Form POS AMI KINETICS PORTFOLIOS TRUS

Article

FREE Breaking News Alerts from StreetInsider.com!

StreetInsider.com Top Tickers, 6/24/2026

1. CBRS
2. FDX
3. KBH
4. HON
5. HTZ

6. INFY
7. HONA
8. TTWO
9. QCOM
10. HELP

Top News Most Read Special Reports

May 6, 2026 6:04 AM EDT

E-mail

Filed with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission on May 5, 2026

1940 Act File No. 811-09923

UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, DC 20549

FORM N‑1A


REGISTRATION STATEMENT UNDER THE INVESTMENT COMPANY ACT OF 1940			x
Amendment No. 46			x

KINETICS PORTFOLIOS TRUST

(Exact Name of Registrant as Specified in Charter)

470 Park Avenue South

New York, New York 10016

(Address and Zip Code of Principal Executive Offices)

1-800-930-3828

Registrant's Telephone Number, including Area Code

Jay Kesslen

470 Park Avenue South

New York, New York 10016

(Name and Address of Agent for Service)

Copies of Communications to:


Paul M. Miller
Seward & Kissel LLP
901 K Street, N.W.
Suite 800
Washington, D.C. 20001

It is proposed that this filing will become effective immediately upon filing in accordance with Section 8 of the Investment Company Act of 1940 and the rules thereunder.

EXPLANATORY NOTE

This Amendment No. 46 to the Registration Statement of Kinetics Portfolios Trust (the “Trust” or the “Registrant”) on Form N-1A (File No. 811-09923) (the “Registration Statement”) is being filed as a part of the Registration Statement filed by the Trust pursuant to Section 8(b) of the Investment Company Act of 1940, as amended (“1940 Act”). Beneficial interests of each series of the Trust are not being registered under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended (the “1933 Act”), because such interests are issued solely to eligible investors in private placement transactions that do not involve any “public offering” within the meaning of Section 4(2) of the 1933 Act. Accordingly, investments in any of the series of the Registrant may currently be made only by regulated investment companies, unregulated foreign investment companies, U.S. and non-U.S. institutional investors, S corporations, segregated asset accounts, and certain qualified pension and retirement plans. The Amendment does not constitute an offer to sell, or the solicitation of an offer to buy, any beneficial interests of any of the series of the Registrant.

This Amendment No. 46 to the Registration Statement of the Trust is being filed to amend disclosure in the Registration Statement.


Name of Portfolio			Ticker Symbol
The Internet Portfolio			Not Applicable
The Global Portfolio			Not Applicable
The Paradigm Portfolio			Not Applicable
The Small Cap Opportunities Portfolio			Not Applicable
The Market Opportunities Portfolio			Not Applicable
The Multi-Disciplinary Income Portfolio			Not Applicable

each a series of Kinetics Portfolios Trust

a Delaware statutory trust

Prospectus

May 5, 2026

The U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission has not approved or disapproved these securities or passed upon the adequacy of the Prospectus. Any representation to the contrary is a criminal offense.

Table of Contents


Summary Section			1
Summary Information About Purchases, Sales, And Taxation			3
Overview			3
Investment Objective, Principal Investment Strategies and Principal Risks of the Internet Portfolio			3
Investment Objective, Principal Investment Strategies and Principal Risks of the Global Portfolio			14
Investment Objective, Principal Investment Strategies and Principal Risks of the Paradigm Portfolio			25
Investment Objective, Principal Investment Strategies and Principal Risks of the Small Cap Portfolio			35
Investment Objective, Principal Investment Strategies and Principal Risks of the Market Opportunities Portfolio			45
Investment Objective, Principal Investment Strategies and Principal Risks of the Multi-Disciplinary Income Portfolio			56
Additional Strategies and Risks of the Portfolios			62
Portfolio Holdings Information			77
Management of the Portfolios			77
Valuation of the Portfolios			80
Purchase of Beneficial Interests in the Portfolios			82
Redemption of Beneficial Interests in the Portfolios			82
Exchange Privilege			82
Restrictions on Excessive Trading Practices			83
Taxes			83
Distribution of Shares			85
Counsel and Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm			86


Summary Section

Internet Portfolio

Management

Investment Adviser. The Internet Portfolio’s investment adviser is Horizon Kinetics Asset Management LLC.

Portfolio Managers. The Internet Portfolio is managed by an investment team with Mr. Doyle, Mr. Davolos and Mr. Colavita as the Co-Portfolio Managers. Each investment team member serves as a research analyst.


Investment team member	Primary Title	Years of Service with the Portfolio
Peter B. Doyle	Co-Portfolio Manager	27
James Davolos	Co-Portfolio Manager	20
Brandon Colavita	Co-Portfolio Manager	1
Steven Tuen	Investment Team Member	27
Steven Bregman	Investment Team Member	10

Global Portfolio

Management

Investment Adviser. The Global Portfolio’s investment adviser is Horizon Kinetics Asset Management LLC.

Portfolio Managers. The Global Portfolio is managed by an investment team with Mr. Doyle, Mr. Davalos and Mr. Tuen as the Co-Portfolio Managers. Each investment team member serves as a research analyst.


Investment team member	Primary Title	Years of Service with the Portfolio
Steven Tuen	Co-Portfolio Manager	23
Peter B. Doyle	Co-Portfolio Manager	27
James Davolos	Co-Portfolio Manager	20
Steven Bregman	Investment Team Member	10

Paradigm Portfolio

Management

Investment Adviser. The Paradigm Portfolio’s investment adviser is Horizon Kinetics Asset Management LLC.

Portfolio Managers. The Paradigm Portfolio is managed by an investment team with Mr. Doyle, Mr. Bregman, and Mr. Davolos as the Co-Portfolio Managers.


Investment team member	Primary Title	Years of Service with the Portfolio
Peter B. Doyle	Co-Portfolio Manager	27
Steven Bregman	Co-Portfolio Manager	10
James Davolos	Co-Portfolio Manager	20

Small Cap Opportunities Portfolio (the “Small Cap Portfolio”)

Management

Investment Adviser. The Small Cap Portfolio’s investment adviser is Horizon Kinetics Asset Management LLC.

Portfolio Managers. The Small Cap Portfolio is managed by an investment team with Mr. Doyle, Mr. Davolos and Mr. Houk as the Co-Portfolio Managers. Each investment team member serves as a research analyst.


Investment team member	Primary Title	Years of Service with the Portfolio
Peter B. Doyle	Co-Portfolio Manager	26
Matthew Houk	Co-Portfolio Manager	15
James Davolos	Co-Portfolio Manager	20
Steven Bregman	Investment Team Member	10

Market Opportunities Portfolio

Management

Investment Adviser. The Market Opportunities Portfolio’s investment adviser is Horizon Kinetics Asset Management LLC.

Portfolio Managers. The Market Opportunities Portfolio is managed by an investment team with Mr. Doyle, Mr. Davolos and Mr. Colavita as the Co-Portfolio Managers. Each investment team member serves as a research analyst.


Investment team member	Primary Title	Years of Service with the Portfolio
Peter B. Doyle	Co-Portfolio Manager	20
James Davolos	Co-Portfolio Manager	20
Brandon Colavita	Co-Portfolio Manager	1
Steven Bregman	Investment Team Member	10

Multi-Disciplinary Income Portfolio

Management

Investment Adviser. The Multi-Disciplinary Income Portfolio’s investment adviser is Horizon Kinetics Asset Management LLC.

Portfolio Managers. The Multi-Disciplinary Income Portfolio is managed by an investment team with Mr. Monasebian and Mr. Doyle as the Co-Portfolio Managers.


Investment team member	Primary Title	Years of Service with the Portfolio
Darryl Monasebian	Co-Portfolio Manager	4
Peter Doyle	Co-Portfolio Manager	1


Summary Information About Purchases, Sales, And Taxation

Purchase and Sale of Portfolio Shares

Investments in a Portfolio are sold solely in private placement transactions that do not involve any “public offering” within the meaning of Section 4(a)(2) of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended (the “1933 Act”).

Tax Information

Each Portfolio is treated as a partnership for U.S. federal income tax purposes. Each year, you will be taxable on a flow-through basis on your share of net income and gain of the Portfolio and the Portfolio will provide you with an IRS Schedule K-1 that sets forth those tax items. Additional information on tax aspects of an investment in a Portfolio is set forth below under the heading “Taxes.”


Overview

EXPLANATORY NOTE

This Prospectus is being filed as a part of the Registration Statement filed by the Kinetics Portfolios Trust (the “Trust”) pursuant to Section 8(b) of the Investment Company Act of 1940, as amended (“1940 Act”). Beneficial interests of each series (each a “Portfolio” and collectively, the “Portfolios”) of the Trust are not being registered under the 1933 Act, because such interests are issued solely to eligible investors in private placement transactions that do not involve any “public offering” within the meaning of Section 4(a)(2) of the 1933 Act. Accordingly, investments in any of the series of the Trust described herein may currently be made only by regulated investment companies, unregulated foreign investment companies, U.S. and non-U.S. institutional investors, S corporations, segregated asset accounts, and certain qualified pension and retirement plans. No part of this Prospectus or of the Trust’s Registration Statement constitutes an offer to sell, or the solicitation of an offer to buy, any beneficial interests of any of the series described herein or any other series of the Trust.

Responses to Items 1, 2, 3, 4 and 13 of Part A and Items 28(e) and (i)-(k) of Part C have been omitted pursuant to paragraph B.2.(b) of the General Instructions to Form N-1A.

The Trust is comprised of six series of mutual funds, all of which are non-diversified, open-end management investment companies, except the Global Portfolio and the Multi-Disciplinary Income Portfolio, which are diversified. Kinetics Mutual Funds, Inc. is comprised of seven series of mutual funds, all of which are open-end management investment companies (the “Funds”). The Funds (other than the Kinetics Spin-Off and Corporate Restructuring Fund) and Portfolios are set up in a master/feeder fund structure whereby each Fund is a feeder fund that invests all of its investable assets in a “master” Portfolio.


Investment Objective, Principal Investment Strategies and Principal Risks of the Internet Portfolio

Investment Objective

The investment objective of the Internet Portfolio is long-term growth of capital. The Internet Portfolio seeks to obtain current income as a secondary objective.

Principal Investment Strategies

The Internet Portfolio is a non-diversified mutual fund that invests, under normal circumstances, at least 80% of its net assets plus any borrowings for investment purposes in common stocks, convertible securities, warrants and other equity securities having the characteristics of common stocks (such as American Depositary Receipts (“ADRs”), Global Depositary Receipts (“GDRs”) and International Depositary Receipts (“IDRs”)), of U.S. and foreign companies engaged in the Internet and Internet-related activities and whose businesses are vastly improved through the distribution of content and reduction of costs with the use of the Internet. Internet and internet-related companies include companies (i) involved in software, hardware, information technology services, or infrastructure (including energy and real estate) relating to the internet and (ii) companies involved in enhancement or improvement via the internet. The Internet Portfolio may also invest in exchange-traded funds (“ETFs”) and purchase and write options for hedging purposes and/or direct investment and invest in participatory notes (commonly known as “P-notes”) to take positions in certain foreign securities.

The Internet Portfolio may invest up to 20% of its total assets in convertible and non-convertible debt securities rated below investment grade, also known as junk bonds, or unrated securities that the Investment Adviser has determined to be of comparable quality.

The Investment Adviser believes that the global economy will continue to be impacted by increased and enhanced connectivity enabled by the sustained development of the Internet. Established businesses will continue to be disrupted by this development, while some may also stand to benefit, realizing gains in efficiency, scale and speed. Newly developed companies that leverage the global Internet infrastructure are continuously emerging. Identifying the advantaged business models that are sustainable and supported by strong financial metrics warrant the Investment Adviser’s investment consideration.

Internet Portfolio securities will be selected by the Investment Adviser from companies that are engaged in the development of hardware, software, infrastructure and telecommunications solutions that enable the transaction of business on the Internet by individuals and companies engaged in private and commercial use of the Internet as well as companies that offer products and services primarily via the Internet. Accordingly, the Internet Portfolio seeks to invest in the equity securities of companies whose research and development efforts may result in higher stock values. These companies may be large, medium or small in size if, in the Investment Adviser’s opinion, they meet the Internet Portfolio’s investment criteria. Also, such companies’ core business may not be primarily Internet-related. Such companies include, but are not limited to, the following:

ª Content Developers: Companies that supply proprietary information and entertainment content, such as games, music, video, graphics and news, on the Internet.

ª Computer Hardware: Companies that develop and produce computer and network hardware such as modems, switchers and routers, and those that develop and manufacture workstations and personal communications systems used to access the Internet and provide Internet services.

ª Computer Software: Companies that produce, manufacture and develop tools to access the Internet, enable Internet users to enhance the speed, integrity and storage of data on the Internet, facilitate information distribution and gathering on the Internet, and secure Internet-based transactions.

ª Venture Capital: Companies that invest in pre-initial public offering and start-up stage companies with business models related to the Internet.

ª Internet Service Providers: Companies that provide users with access to the Internet.

ª Internet Portals: Companies that provide users with search-engine services to access various sites by category on the Internet.

ª Wireless/Broadband Access: Companies that provide the infrastructure to enable high-speed and wireless communication of data via the Internet. Companies that concentrate on and are positioned to benefit from the shift in technology infrastructure from traditional hardware and software to cloud-based systems, including, among other companies, businesses that enable or that depend on or gain from the growing use of shared technology, artificial intelligence, infrastructure, and related services.

ª E-Commerce: Companies that derive a substantial portion of their revenue from sales of products and services conducted via the Internet.

ª Telecommunications: Companies that are primarily engaged in the development of the telecommunications transmission lines and software technologies that enhance the reach and bandwidth of Internet users.

ª Other Companies: Companies whose core business may not be primarily Internet-related include, but are not limited to, publishing and media companies.

The Investment Adviser selects portfolio securities by evaluating a company’s positioning and business model as well as its ability to grow and expand its activities via the Internet or achieve a competitive advantage in cost/profitability and brand image leveraging via use of the Internet. The Investment Adviser also considers a company’s fundamentals by reviewing its balance sheets, corporate revenues, earnings and dividends. Furthermore, the Investment Adviser looks at the amount of capital a company currently expends on research and development. The Internet Portfolio may invest in companies of any size, including small and medium-sized companies.

The Internet Portfolio invests indirectly in bitcoin through a Delaware statutory trust, Grayscale Bitcoin Trust ETF (“Grayscale Bitcoin Trust”) and through other pooled investment vehicles that provide exposure to crypto assets. Certain of these investment vehicles, including the Grayscale Bitcoin Trust, are not registered under the 1940 Act and do not receive the protections of the 1940 Act. The Internet Portfolio will not invest directly in bitcoin or other crypto assets. The Grayscale Bitcoin Trust is a Bitcoin ETF and enables investors to gain exposure to bitcoin in the form of a security while avoiding the challenges of buying, storing, and safekeeping bitcoin, directly. Bitcoin is a type of crypto asset and is not issued by a government, bank or central organization. Bitcoin exists on an online, peer-to-peer computer network (the “Bitcoin Network”) that hosts a public transaction ledger where bitcoin transfers are recorded (the “Bitcoin Blockchain”). Bitcoin has no physical existence and exists solely through the record of bitcoin transactions on the Bitcoin Blockchain. The Grayscale Bitcoin Trust invests principally in bitcoin. The Internet Portfolio held 45.98% of its net assets in the Grayscale Bitcoin Trust ETF as of March 31, 2026.

The Internet Portfolio contributed a portion of its holdings in the Grayscale Bitcoin Trust to a wholly-owned and controlled subsidiary of the Internet Portfolio organized under the laws of the Cayman Islands (the “Cayman Subsidiary”).

The Internet Portfolio is also the sole shareholder of a wholly owned subsidiary organized under Delaware law (the “Delaware Subsidiary”). The Internet Portfolio contributed a portion of its holdings in the Grayscale Bitcoin Trust to the Delaware Subsidiary. Any net gains that the Delaware Subsidiary recognizes on future sales of the contributed Grayscale Bitcoin Trust shares will be subject to federal and state corporate income tax, but the dividends that the Delaware Subsidiary pays to the Internet Portfolio (i.e., those gains, net of the tax paid and any other expenses of the Delaware Subsidiary, such as its

management and advisory fees) will be eligible to be treated as “qualified dividend income” under the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended (the “Internal Revenue Code”). The Delaware Subsidiary and the Cayman Subsidiary are each referred to herein as a “Subsidiary” and collectively as “Subsidiaries.” Additional information regarding the tax treatment of the Portfolio is provided in the “Taxes” section of the SAI.

The Grayscale Bitcoin Trust invests principally in bitcoin. The Grayscale Bitcoin Trust issues creation units in exchange for bitcoins and distributes bitcoins in exchange for redemption units upon demand by its “authorized participants.” The performance of the Grayscale Bitcoin Trust is intended to reflect changes in the value of the Grayscale Bitcoin Trust’s bitcoin investments. The Grayscale Bitcoin Trust is subject to the informational requirements of the Exchange Act and files or furnishes reports and other information with the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”). The SEC maintains an Internet site that contains reports, proxy and information statements and other information filed electronically by the Grayscale Bitcoin Trust with the SEC which are available on the SEC’s website at https://www.sec.gov.

In the future, the Internet Portfolio may seek to gain additional exposure to the Grayscale Bitcoin Trust that may not produce qualifying income for the Internet Fund under the Internal Revenue Code if held directly. The Internet Portfolio will not make any additional investments in the Grayscale Bitcoin Trust if as a result of such investment, its aggregate investment in the Grayscale Bitcoin Trust, either directly or through a Subsidiary, would be more than 15% of its assets at the time of the investment. However, the Portfolio’s investment in the Grayscale Bitcoin Trust may, at times, exceed 15% of its net assets, due to appreciation.

Each Subsidiary invests primarily in the Grayscale Bitcoin Trust. The Internet Portfolio will invest in its Subsidiaries in a manner that is consistent with certain limitations of the federal tax laws, rules and regulations that apply to its investors, which are expected to be “regulated investment companies” (“RICs”) under Subchapter M of Subtitle A, Chapter 1, of the Internal Revenue Code (“Subchapter M”). However, the Internet Portfolio and each Subsidiary comply with the same fundamental investment restrictions on an aggregate basis, to the extent those restrictions are applicable to the investment activities of each Subsidiary. Each Subsidiary also complies with Section 17 of the 1940 Act, relating to affiliated transactions and custody, and the Investment Adviser complies with Section 15 of the 1940 Act, relating to investment advisory contracts with respect to the Subsidiaries. Each Subsidiary is taxed as a corporation and neither Subsidiary qualifies, or will seek to qualify as a RIC. The Internet Portfolio is the sole shareholder of each Subsidiary and does not expect shares of its Subsidiaries to be offered or sold to other investors. Subsidiaries include entities that engage in investment activities in securities or other assets that are primarily controlled by the Internet Portfolio. The Internet Portfolio does not intend to create or acquire primary control of any entity which primarily engages in investment activities in securities or other assets other than entities wholly-owned by the Internet Portfolio.

Sell decisions are generally triggered by either adequate value being achieved, as determined by the Investment Adviser, or by an adverse change in a company’s operating performance or a deterioration of the company’s business model. A sell trigger may also occur if the Investment Adviser discovers a new investment opportunity that it believes is more compelling and represents a greater risk reward profile than other investment(s) held by the Internet Portfolio.

The Internet Portfolio may invest up to 20% of its assets in high quality, U.S. short-term debt securities and money market instruments to maintain liquidity. Some of these short-term instruments include commercial paper, certificates of deposit, demand and time deposits and banker’s acceptances, U.S. government securities (i.e., U.S. Treasury obligations) and repurchase agreements.

The Internet Portfolio held 32.81% of its net assets in the Texas Pacific Land Corporation (the “Land Corporation”) as of March 31, 2026. The Land Corporation is a corporation organized under the laws of the state of New York. One of the largest land owners in Texas, the Land Corporation derives most of its income from oil and gas royalty revenue, land easements and water royalties and sales. The Land Corporation has historically operated with minimal operating expenses, little to no debt and utilized cash flow to return capital to unitholders through share repurchases and dividends. While the Land Corporation has held the majority of its assets since its formation in 1888, the development of energy resources subject to its royalty interests and related land use have experienced rapid growth in recent years due to advances in energy exploration and extraction technologies.

Temporary and Defensive Cash and Cash Equivalent Holdings

The Internet Portfolio may maintain during a temporary period, which could be for a short period or a longer period lasting several years or more, of abnormal conditions, a significant portion of its total assets in cash and securities, generally considered to be cash and cash equivalents, including, but not limited to: high quality, U.S. short-term debt securities and money market instruments, as described above. The Investment Adviser will invest in such short-term cash positions to the extent that the Investment Adviser is unable to find sufficient investments meeting its criteria and when the Investment Adviser believes the purchase of additional equity securities would not further the investment objective of the Internet Portfolio during such periods of time. Additionally, to respond to adverse market, economic, political or other conditions, which may persist for short or long periods of time, the Internet Portfolio may invest up to 100% of its assets in the types of high quality, U.S. short-term debt securities and money market instruments described above.

If the market advances during periods when the Internet Portfolio is holding a large cash position, the Internet Portfolio may not participate as much as it would have if it had been more fully invested in securities. In the aforementioned temporary defensive periods, the Investment Adviser believes that an additional amount of liquidity in the Internet Portfolio is desirable both to meet operating requirements and to take advantage of new investment opportunities. When the Internet Portfolio holds a significant portion of assets in cash and cash equivalents, it may not meet its investment objective.

Principal Risks of Investment

Investing in common stocks has inherent risks that could cause you to lose money. The principal risks of investing in the Internet Portfolio are listed below and could adversely affect the net asset value (“NAV”), total return and value of the Internet Portfolio and your investment. The risks are prioritized by order of importance. Each risk summarized below is considered a principal risk of investing in the Internet Portfolio, regardless of the order in which it appears. Different risks may be more significant at different times depending on market conditions or other factors.

ª Crypto Asset Exposure Risk: Crypto assets (also referred to as “virtual currencies” and “digital currencies”) are digital assets designed to act as a medium of exchange. Although crypto assets are an emerging asset class, they are not presently widely accepted as a medium of exchange. There are thousands of crypto assets, the most well-known of which is bitcoin.

known as a Blockchain. The Internet Portfolio may invest indirectly in bitcoin through the Grayscale Bitcoin Trust and through other pooled investment vehicles that provide exposure to crypto assets. Certain of these investment vehicles, including the Grayscale Bitcoin Trust, are not registered under the 1940 Act and do not receive the protections of the 1940 Act. The Grayscale Bitcoin Trust is a Bitcoin ETF that enables investors to gain exposure to bitcoin in the form of a security while avoiding the challenges of buying, storing, and safekeeping bitcoin, directly. Blockchain technology is a relatively new and untested technology which operates as a distributed ledger. The risks associated with blockchain technology may not fully emerge until the technology is widely used. Blockchain systems could be vulnerable to fraud, particularly if a significant minority of participants colluded to defraud the rest. Access to a given blockchain requires an individualized key, which, if compromised, could result in loss due to theft, destruction or inaccessibility. There is little regulation of blockchain technology other than the intrinsic public nature of the blockchain system. Any future regulatory developments could affect the viability and expansion of the use of blockchain technology.

The adoption of blockchain and the development of competing platforms or technologies could affect its usage. There are currently a number of competing blockchain platforms with competing intellectual property claims. The uncertainty inherent in these competing technologies could cause companies to use alternatives to blockchain. In addition, blockchain networks may undergo technological developments or upgrades. Certain upgrade proposals to a blockchain may not be accepted by all the participants in an ecosystem. If one significant group adopts a proposed upgrade and another does not – or if groups adopt different upgrades – this can result in a “fork” of the blockchain, wherein two distinct sets of users and validators or users and miners run two different versions of a protocol. If the versions are sufficiently different such that the two versions of the protocol cannot simultaneously maintain and update a shared record of the blockchain database, it is called a “hard fork.” A hard fork can result in the creation of two competing blockchains, each with its own native crypto assets.

Technological developments may lead to technical or other flaws (including undiscovered flaws) in the underlying blockchain technology, including in the process by which transactions are recorded to a blockchain, or by which the validity of a copy of such blockchain can be proven, or the development of new or existing hardware or software tools or mechanisms that could negatively impact the functionality of the blockchain systems, all of which could negatively impact Portfolio shares.

Individuals or organizations holding a large amount of crypto assets in which the Internet Portfolio may invest indirectly (also known as “whales”) may have the ability to manipulate the prices of those crypto assets.

Certain other crypto-focused, pooled investment vehicles, including the Grayscale Ethereum Classic Trust, in which the Internet Portfolio may invest, could be determined to be operating out of compliance with the 1940 Act. As a result, the prices of the impacted crypto assets may be subject to large and sudden declines.

In addition to the general risks of investing in other investment vehicles, the value of the Internet Portfolio’s indirect investments in crypto assets are subject to fluctuations in the value of the crypto asset, which can be highly volatile. The value of crypto assets is determined by the supply and demand for crypto assets in the global market for the trading of crypto assets, which consists primarily of transactions on crypto asset trading platforms. The value of crypto assets has been, and may continue to be, substantially dependent on speculation, such that trading and investing in crypto assets generally may not be based on fundamental analysis.

Crypto assets facilitate decentralized, peer-to-peer financial exchange and value storage, without the oversight of a central authority or banks. The value of crypto assets are not backed by any government, corporation, or other identified body. Crypto assets are also susceptible to theft, loss and destruction.

Currently, there is relatively limited use of crypto assets in the retail and commercial marketplace, which contributes to price volatility. A lack of expansion by crypto assets into retail and commercial markets, or a contraction of such use, may result in increased volatility or a reduction in the value of crypto assets, either of which could adversely impact the value of the Internet Portfolio’s investment. In addition, to the extent market participants develop a preference for one crypto asset over another, the value of the less preferred crypto assets would likely be adversely affected. Crypto assets are a new technological innovation with a limited history; it is a highly speculative asset and future regulatory actions or policies may limit, perhaps to a materially adverse extent, the value of the Internet Portfolio’s indirect investment in crypto assets and the ability to exchange a crypto asset or utilize it for payments.

ª Crypto Asset Industry Risk: The crypto asset industry is a newer, speculative, and still-developing industry that faces many risks. The crypto asset industry may still be experiencing a bubble or may experience a bubble again in the future. For example, in the first half of 2022, each of Celsius Network, Voyager Digital Ltd., and Three Arrows Capital declared bankruptcy, resulting in a loss of confidence in participants of the digital asset ecosystem and negative publicity surrounding digital assets more broadly. In November 2022, FTX Trading Ltd. (“FTX”), one of the largest digital asset platforms by volume at the time, halted customer withdrawals amid rumors of the company’s liquidity issues and likely insolvency, which were subsequently corroborated by its CEO. Shortly thereafter, FTX’s CEO resigned and FTX and many of its affiliates filed for bankruptcy in the United States, while other affiliates have entered insolvency, liquidation, or similar proceedings around the globe, following which the U.S. Department of Justice brought criminal fraud and other charges, and the SEC and Commodity Futures Trading Commission (“CFTC”) brought civil securities and commodities fraud charges, against certain of FTX’s and its affiliates’ senior executives, including its former CEO. In addition, several other entities in the crypto asset industry filed for bankruptcy following FTX’s bankruptcy filing, such as BlockFi Inc. and Genesis Global Capital, LLC. In response to these events, the prices of crypto assets experienced extreme volatility and other entities in the crypto asset industry have been negatively affected. It is possible that similar events could occur in the future, which would undermine confidence in the crypto asset industry and negatively affect the value of crypto assets. It is not possible to predict at this time all of the risks that they may pose to the Internet Portfolio, its service providers or to the crypto asset industry as a whole.

Factors affecting the further development of crypto assets include, but are not limited to, continued worldwide growth or possible cessation or reversal in the adoption and use of crypto assets and other digital assets; government and quasi-government regulation or restrictions on or regulation of access to and operation of digital asset networks; changes in consumer demographics and public preferences; maintenance and development of open-source software protocol; availability and popularity of other forms or methods of buying and selling goods and services; the use of the networks supporting digital assets, such as those for developing smart contracts and distributed applications; general economic conditions and the regulatory environment relating to digital assets; negative consumer or public perception; and general risks tied to the use of information technologies, including cyber risks. A hack or failure of one crypto asset may lead to a loss in confidence in, and thus decreased usage and/or value of, other crypto assets.

ª Crypto Asset Regulatory Risk: Crypto asset markets in the United States exist in a state of regulatory uncertainty. Regulatory changes or actions by Congress as well as U.S. federal or state agencies may adversely affect the value of the Internet Portfolio’s indirect investments in crypto assets. As digital assets have grown in both popularity and market size, a number of state and federal agencies have issued consumer advisories regarding the risks posed by digital assets to investors. In addition, the SEC, U.S. state securities regulators and several foreign governments have issued warnings and instituted legal proceedings in which they argue that certain digital assets may be classified as securities or may be offered and sold as securities, and that both those digital assets and any related initial coin offerings are subject to securities regulations. Additionally, U.S. state and federal, and foreign regulators and legislatures have taken action against virtual currency businesses or enacted restrictive regimes in response to adverse publicity arising from hacks, consumer harm, or criminal activity stemming from virtual currency activity.

The Internet Portfolio’s exposure to crypto assets may change over time and, accordingly, such exposure may not be represented in the Internet Portfolio at any given time. Many significant aspects of the tax treatment of investments in crypto assets are uncertain, and a direct or indirect investment in crypto assets may produce non-qualifying income.

ª Non-Diversification Risks: Holding a large portion of its net assets in a small number of issuers exposes the Portfolio to various risks relating to those issuers. A change in the value of any one investment may affect the overall value of the Internet Portfolio’s shares, more than shares of a diversified mutual fund that holds more investments.

ª Single Security Concentration Risk: Holding a large portion of its net assets in a single security or issuer exposes the Portfolio to various risks relating to that security or issuer and to the market volatility of that specific security or issuer if the security or issuer performs worse than the market as a whole, which could adversely affect the Portfolio’s performance.

ª Internet Industry Concentration Risks: Investing a substantial portion of the Internet Portfolio’s assets in the Internet industry carries the risk that Internet-related securities will decline in price due to market and technological developments. Internet and internet-related companies, including companies (i) involved in software, hardware, information technology services, or infrastructure (including energy and real estate) relating to the internet and (ii) companies involved in enhancement or improvement via the internet are subject to a rate of change in technology and competition which is generally higher than that of other industries. As artificial intelligence is used more widely, the profitability and growth of Portfolio holdings may be impacted, which could significantly impact the overall performance of the Portfolio. To the extent the Portfolio invests in companies that are involved in various aspects of artificial intelligence technologies, it is particularly sensitive to the risks of those types of companies. These risks include, but are not limited to, small or limited markets for such securities, changes in business cycles, world economic growth, technological progress, rapid obsolescence, and government regulation.

ª Petroleum and Gas Sector Risk: The profitability of companies in the oil and gas industry is related to worldwide energy prices, exploration costs and production spending. Companies in the oil and gas industry may be at risk for environmental damage claims and other types of litigation. Companies in the oil and gas industry may be adversely affected by: natural disasters or other catastrophes; changes in exchange rates or interest rates; prices for competitive energy services; economic conditions; tax treatment or government regulation; government intervention; negative public perception; or unfavorable events in the regions where companies operate (e.g., expropriation, nationalization, confiscation of assets and property, imposition of restrictions on foreign investments or repatriation of capital, military coups, social or political unrest, violence or

labor unrest). Companies in the oil and gas industry may have significant capital investments in, or engage in transactions involving, emerging market countries, which may heighten these risks.

ª Tax Risks: The Internet Portfolio has not requested a ruling from the Internal Revenue Service (the “IRS”) or an opinion of legal counsel as to any tax matters, including whether the Internet Portfolio will be treated as a partnership (and not as an association taxable as a corporation) for U.S. federal income tax purposes. If the Internet Portfolio were to be treated as a corporation rather than as a partnership for U.S. federal income tax purposes, the Internet Portfolio itself would be taxed on its taxable income at corporate tax rates, there would be no flow-through of items of Internet Portfolio income, gain, loss or deductions to the Partners, and Internet Portfolio distributions generally would be taxable as dividends. Assuming that the Internet Portfolio is treated as a partnership, each Partner of the Internet Portfolio must include in its own income its allocable share of Portfolio taxable income, whether or not any cash is distributed and, as a result of various limitations imposed by the tax laws, may be unable to currently deduct its allocable share of Portfolio expenses and capital losses, if any. Additionally, the Grayscale Bitcoin Trust (in which the Internet Portfolio indirectly invests) takes the position that it is treated as a grantor trust for U.S. federal income tax purposes. However, the tax treatment of digital assets such as those held by the Grayscale Bitcoin Trust is uncertain and could cause the Grayscale Bitcoin Trust to be treated as a corporation for U.S. federal income tax purposes. The imposition of an entity-level tax could affect the value of that investment and, indirectly, your total return.

In order to qualify as a RIC, a fund must meet certain requirements regarding the source of its income, the diversification of its assets and the distribution of its income. Under the test regarding the source of a RIC’s income, at least 90% of the gross income of the RIC each year must be qualifying income, which consists of dividends, interest, gains on investments in securities and certain other categories of investment income. It appears to be the position of the IRS that gain realized on bitcoin investments such as investments in the Grayscale Bitcoin Trust will not be qualifying income. The Internet Portfolio’s investment in each Subsidiary is expected to provide RIC investors with exposure to such bitcoin investments within the limitations of the Internal Revenue Code for qualification as a RIC because, under applicable tax rules, the earnings of each Subsidiary will be qualifying income for the RIC when distributed by the Subsidiary even though the income would not be qualifying income if earned directly by the RIC or indirectly by an entity classified as a partnership for U.S. federal income tax purposes, such as the Internet Portfolio. There is a risk, however, that the IRS might assert that the income derived from the Internet Portfolio’s investment in a Subsidiary will not be considered qualifying income. If a RIC investor were to fail to qualify as a RIC it would become subject to U.S. federal income tax.

ª Sector Concentration Risk: The Internet Portfolio will not invest more than 25% of its total assets in any one industry at the time of investment. However, the value of securities in a particular sector or industry may appreciate or depreciate significantly over time, causing the Portfolio’s investments in that sector or industry to exceed the 25% threshold. If the Portfolio’s investments in a particular industry exceed 25% of its total assets due to market appreciation, the Portfolio may be subject to greater risk than a fund that does not concentrate in a particular industry. Industries are often subject to specific risks, including, but not limited to, legislative or regulatory changes, adverse market conditions, or increased competition. As a result, the Portfolio’s performance may be more volatile than that of a more broadly diversified fund. As of March 31, 2026, the Portfolio had 53.8% invested in the Finance and Insurance sector and 34.6% invested in the Mining, Quarrying and Oil & Gas Extraction sector. In the Finance and Insurance sector, cryptocurrency investment represents 45.9% of total net assets as of March 31, 2026.

ª Volatility Risk: The Portfolio may have investments, including but not limited to bitcoin, that appreciate or depreciate significantly in value over short periods of time. This may cause the Portfolio’s net asset value per share to experience significant increases or declines in value over short periods of time.

ª Management Risks: There is no guarantee that the Internet Portfolio will meet its investment objective. The Investment Adviser does not guarantee the performance of the Internet Portfolio, nor can it assure you that the market value of your investment will not decline.

ª Small and Medium-Size Company Risks: Investing in small and medium-size companies often involve more risks than investing in larger companies as small and medium size companies have narrower markets and more limited managerial and financial resources than do larger, more established companies. As a result, their performance can be more volatile and they face a greater risk of business failure, which could increase the volatility of the Internet Portfolio’s assets and have an adverse effect on the Portfolio’s performance.

ª Stock Selection Risks: The portfolio securities selected by the Investment Adviser may decline in value or not increase in value when the stock market in general is rising and may fail to meet the Internet Portfolio’s investment objective.

ª Market Risks: Mutual funds are subject to market risks and significant fluctuations in value. If the market declines in value, the Internet Portfolio is likely to decline in value and you could lose money on your investment. Natural disasters, public health emergencies (including epidemics and pandemics), geopolitical events, tariffs and trading disruptions, terrorism and other global unforeseeable events may lead to instability in world economies and markets, market volatility and may have adverse long-term effects. Advancements in technology may adversely impact markets and the overall performance the Portfolio. For example, as artificial intelligence is used more widely, the profitability and growth of Portfolio holdings may be impacted, which could significantly impact the overall performance of the Portfolio.

ª Valuation Risk: The sales price the Portfolio could receive for any particular portfolio investment may differ from the Portfolio’s valuation of the investment, particularly for securities or other investments, such as bitcoin, that trade in thin or volatile markets or that are valued using a fair value methodology. Valuation may be more difficult in times of market turmoil since many investors and market makers may be reluctant to purchase complex instruments or quote prices for them. Fair valuation of the Portfolio's investments involves subjective judgment. The Portfolio’s ability to value its investments may be impacted by technological issues and/or errors by pricing services or other third party service providers. Shares of the Grayscale Bitcoin Trust are intended to reflect the price of bitcoin assets, less fees and expenses, and shares of the Grayscale Bitcoin Trust have historically traded, and may continue to trade, at a significant discount or premium to net asset value. As such, the price of the Grayscale Bitcoin Trust may go down even if the price of the underlying asset, bitcoin, remains unchanged. Additionally, shares that trade at a premium mean that an investor who purchases $1 of a Portfolio will actually own less than $1 in assets.

ª Subsidiary Risks: By investing in its Subsidiaries, the Internet Portfolio is indirectly exposed to the risks associated with each Subsidiary’s investments. Those investments held by the Subsidiaries are generally similar to the investments that are permitted to be held by the Internet Portfolio and are subject to the same risks that would apply to similar investments if held directly by the Internet

Portfolio. Each Subsidiary is not registered under the 1940 Act and, unless otherwise noted in this Prospectus, is not subject to all the investor protections of the 1940 Act. In addition, changes in the laws of the United States, Delaware and/or the Cayman Islands could result in the inability of the Internet Portfolio and/or its Subsidiaries to continue to operate and could adversely affect the Internet Portfolio’s performance.

ª Leveraging Risks: Investments in derivative instruments may give rise to a form of leverage. The Investment Adviser may engage in speculative transactions, which involve substantial risk and leverage. The use of leverage by the Investment Adviser may increase the volatility of the Internet Portfolio. These leveraged instruments may result in losses to the Internet Portfolio or may adversely affect the Internet Portfolio’s NAV or total return, because instruments that contain leverage are more sensitive to changes in interest rates. The Internet Portfolio may also have to sell assets at inopportune times to satisfy its obligations in connection with such transactions.

ª Interest Rate Risk: The risk that when interest rates increase, fixed-income securities held by the Internet Portfolio will decline in value. Long-term fixed-income securities will normally have more price volatility because of this risk than short-term fixed-income securities. A low or negative interest rate environment could cause the Internet Portfolio’s earnings to fall below the Portfolio’s expense ratio, resulting in a decline in the Portfolio’s share price. A general rise in interest rates may cause investors to move out of fixed income securities on a large scale, which could adversely affect the price and liquidity of fixed income securities. The risks associated with changing interest rates may have unpredictable effects on the markets and the Internet Portfolio's investments.

ª Foreign Securities Risks: Investing in foreign securities directly or indirectly (e.g., through ADRs, GDRs, and IDRs) can carry higher returns but involve more risks than those associated with U.S. investments. Additional risks associated with investment in foreign securities include currency fluctuations, political and economic instability, tariffs and trading disruptions, less publicly available information differences in financial reporting standards and less stringent regulation of securities markets. Foreign securities in which the Portfolio invests may be traded in markets that close before the time that the Portfolio calculates its NAV. Furthermore, certain foreign securities in which the Portfolio invests may be listed on foreign exchanges that trade on weekends or other days when the Portfolio does not calculate its NAV. As a result, the value of the Portfolio’s holdings may change on days when shareholders are not able to purchase or redeem the Internet Portfolio’s shares.

ª Exchange-Traded Funds (ETFs) Risks: ETFs are registered investment companies whose shares are listed and traded on U.S. stock exchanges or otherwise traded in the over-the-counter market. In general, passively-managed ETFs seek to track a specified securities index or a basket of securities that an “index provider,” such as S&P Global, selects as representative of a market, market segment or industry sector. A passively-managed ETF is designed so that its performance will correspond closely with that of the index it tracks. Actively-managed ETFs may not meet their investment objective based on an ETF’s investment adviser’s success or failure to implement strategies for the ETF and/or the investment adviser’s ability to control the ETF’s level of risk. A leveraged ETF will engage in transactions and purchase instruments that give rise to forms of leverage, including, among others, the use of reverse repurchase agreements and other borrowings, the investment of collateral from loans of portfolio securities, the use of when issued, delayed-delivery or forward commitment transactions or short sales. To the extent a fund invests in ETFs that achieve leveraged exposure to their underlying indexes through the use of derivative instruments, the fund will indirectly be subject to leveraging risk. As a shareholder in an ETF, the Internet Portfolio will bear its pro rata portion of an ETF’s expenses, including advisory fees, in addition to its own expenses. The existence of extreme market volatility or potential lack of an active trading market for an ETF’s shares could result in such shares trading at a significant premium or discount to their NAV.

ª Convertible Securities Risks: Convertible securities are subject to the risks affecting both equity and fixed income securities, including market, credit, liquidity, and interest rate risk.

ª Below Investment Grade Debt Securities Risks: Generally, below investment grade debt securities, i.e., junk bonds, are subject to greater credit risk, price volatility and risk of loss than investment grade securities. Junk bonds are considered to be speculative in nature.

ª IPO Risk: IPO share prices can be volatile and fluctuate considerably due to factors such as the absence of a prior public market, unseasoned trading, a limited number of shares available for trading, and limited operating history and/or information about the issuer. The purchase of IPO shares may involve high transaction costs. IPO shares are subject to market risk and liquidity risk.

ª Cybersecurity Risk: Cybersecurity incidents may allow an unauthorized party to gain access to Internet Fund assets or proprietary information, or cause the fund, the Investment Adviser, and/or other service providers (including custodians and financial intermediaries) to suffer data breaches or data corruption. Additionally, cybersecurity failures or breaches of the electronic systems of the Internet Fund, the Investment Adviser, or the Internet Fund’s other service providers, or the issuers of securities in which the Internet Portfolio invests have the ability to disrupt and negatively affect the Fund’s business operations, including the ability to purchase and sell fund shares, potentially resulting in financial losses to the Internet Fund and its shareholders.

ª Temporary Defensive Position Risk: If the Internet Portfolio takes a temporary defensive position, it may invest all or a large portion of its assets in cash and/or cash equivalents. If the Internet Portfolio takes a temporary defensive position, the Internet Fund may not achieve its investment objective.


Investment Objective, Principal Investment Strategies and Principal Risks of the Global Portfolio

Investment Objective

The investment objective of the Global Portfolio is long-term growth of capital.

Principal Investment Strategies

The Global Portfolio is a diversified mutual fund that invests, under normal circumstances, at least 65% of its net assets plus any borrowings for investment purposes in common stocks, ETFs, convertible securities, warrants and other equity securities having the characteristics of common stocks (such as ADRs, GDRs and IDRs) of foreign and U.S. companies listed on publicly traded exchanges. At least 40% of the Global Portfolio’s net assets will be invested in companies located outside the United States. The Global Portfolio will at all times have exposure to at least three (3) countries, which may include the United States. The Global Portfolio may also purchase and write options for hedging purposes and/or direct investment and invest in participatory notes (commonly known as “P-notes”) to take positions in certain foreign securities. The Global Portfolio may invest up to 100% of its assets in companies located in emerging markets.

The Global Portfolio may invest up to 20% of its total assets in convertible and non-convertible debt securities rated below investment grade, also known as junk bonds, or unrated securities that the Investment Adviser has determined to be of comparable quality.

The Global Portfolio securities selected by the Investment Adviser generally will be those of foreign companies that have the ability to facilitate an increase in the growth of their traditional business lines and those of U.S. companies that benefit from international economic growth. An increase in growth may occur by entry into new distribution channels, through an ability to leverage brand identity, and by

improvement in the underlying cost/profitability dynamics of the business. Accordingly, the Global Portfolio seeks to invest in the equity securities of companies whose research and development efforts may result in higher stock values. These companies may be large, medium or small in size if, in the Investment Adviser’s opinion, the companies meet the Global Portfolio’s investment criteria. Such companies include, but are not limited to, the following:

ª Infrastructure: Companies that hold equity stakes in or are involved in building, owning or operating infrastructure assets including electric generation and transmission, airports, toll roads, railways, ports, etc.

ª Energy: Companies that explore for, finance, produce, market or distribute energy-oriented products and services, including oil and natural gas, coal and alternate energy sources.

ª Utilities: Companies and industries such as gas, electric and telephone.

ª Financial Services: Companies that engage in financial service transactions such as banking, credit cards and investment services.

ª Real Estate Development: Companies that provide commercial real estate property and services.

ª Business Services: Companies that provide business-to-business products and services.

ª Healthcare: Companies and industries such as pharmaceuticals, healthcare services, contracting services, hospitals, medical devices, medical equipment, etc.

ª Media: Companies that provide print, broadcast, cable, satellite and web-based information and entertainment content.

ª Travel & Leisure: Companies that provide transportation and recreational services.

ª Retailers: Companies that sell retail products and services through traditional stores, catalogues, telemarketing, and web-sites.

The Investment Adviser selects portfolio securities by evaluating a company’s positioning and business model as well as its ability to grow and expand its activities or achieve a greater competitive advantage in cost/profitability and brand image leveraging. This evaluation by the Investment Adviser includes consideration of a company’s potential to maintain and grow long lived assets, while generating high returns on capital with operating predictability and transparency. The Investment Adviser also considers a company’s fundamentals by reviewing its balance sheets, corporate revenues, earnings and dividends.

The Global Portfolio invests indirectly in bitcoin through the Grayscale Bitcoin Trust and through other pooled investment vehicles that provide exposure to crypto assets. Certain of these investment vehicles, including the Grayscale Bitcoin Trust, are not registered under the 1940 Act and do not receive the protections of the 1940 Act. The Global Portfolio will not invest directly in bitcoin or other crypto assets. The Grayscale Bitcoin Trust is a Bitcoin ETF and enables investors to gain exposure to bitcoin in the form of a security while avoiding the challenges of buying, storing, and safekeeping bitcoin, directly. Bitcoin is a type of crypto asset and is not issued by a government, bank or central organization. Bitcoin exists on the Bitcoin Network that hosts the Bitcoin Blockchain. Bitcoin has no physical existence and exists solely through the record of bitcoin transactions on the Bitcoin Blockchain. The Grayscale Bitcoin Trust invests principally in bitcoin. The Global Portfolio held 15.85% of its net assets in the Grayscale Bitcoin Trust ETF as of March 31, 2026. The Global Portfolio may also invest in other pooled investment vehicles that provide exposure to the spot price of crypto assets. For example, the Global Portfolio may invest in the Grayscale Bitcoin Mini Trust ETF and the Grayscale Ethereum Classic Trust.

The Global Portfolio contributed a portion of its holdings in the Grayscale Bitcoin Trust to a wholly-owned and controlled subsidiary organized under the laws of the Cayman Islands (the “Cayman Subsidiary”).

The Global Portfolio is also the sole shareholder of a wholly owned subsidiary organized under Delaware law (the “Delaware Subsidiary”). The Global Portfolio contributed a portion of its holdings in the Grayscale Bitcoin Trust to the Delaware Subsidiary. Any net gains that the Delaware Subsidiary recognizes on future sales of the contributed Grayscale Bitcoin Trust shares will be subject to federal and state corporate income tax, but the dividends that the Delaware Subsidiary pays to the Global Portfolio (i.e., those gains, net of the tax paid and any other expenses of the Delaware Subsidiary, such as its management and advisory fees) will be eligible to be treated as “qualified dividend income” under the Internal Revenue Code. The Delaware Subsidiary and the Cayman Subsidiary are each referred to herein as a “Subsidiary” and collectively as “Subsidiaries.” Additional information regarding the tax treatment of the Portfolio is provided in the “Taxes” section of the SAI.

In the future, the Global Portfolio may seek to gain additional exposure to the Grayscale Bitcoin Trust that may not produce qualifying income for the Global Fund under the Internal Revenue Code if held directly. The Global Portfolio will not make any additional investments in the Grayscale Bitcoin Trust if as a result of such investment, its aggregate investment in the Grayscale Bitcoin Trust, either directly or through a Subsidiary, would be more than 15% of its assets at the time of the investment. However, the Portfolio’s investment in the Grayscale Bitcoin Trust may, at times, exceed 15% of its net assets, due to appreciation.

Each Subsidiary invests primarily in the Grayscale Bitcoin Trust. The Global Portfolio will invest in its Subsidiaries in a manner that is consistent with the limitations of the federal tax laws, rules and regulations that apply to its investors, which are expected to be RICs under Subchapter M. However, the Global Portfolio and each Subsidiary comply with the same fundamental investment restrictions on an aggregate basis, to the extent those restrictions are applicable to the investment activities of each Subsidiary. Each Subsidiary also complies with Section 17 of the 1940 Act relating to affiliated transactions and custody, and the Investment Adviser complies with Section 15 of the 1940 Act relating to investment advisory contracts with respect to the Subsidiaries. Each Subsidiary is taxed as a corporation and neither Subsidiary qualifies or will seek to qualify as a RIC. The Global Portfolio is the sole shareholder of each Subsidiary and does not expect shares of the Subsidiaries to be offered or sold to other investors. The Subsidiaries include entities that engage in investment activities in securities or other assets that are primarily controlled by the Global Portfolio. The Global Portfolio does not intend to create or acquire primary control of any entity which primarily engages in investment activities in securities or other assets other than entities wholly-owned by the Global Portfolio.

the company’s business model. A sell trigger may also occur if the Investment Adviser discovers a new investment opportunity that it believes is more compelling and represents a greater risk reward profile than other investment(s) held by the Global Portfolio.

The Global Portfolio may also invest in participatory notes. Participatory notes (commonly known as “P-notes”) are derivative instruments used by investors to take positions in certain foreign securities. P-notes are generally issued by the associates of foreign-based foreign brokerages and domestic institutional brokerages. P-notes represent interests in securities listed on certain foreign exchanges, and thus present similar risks to investing directly in such securities. P-notes also expose investors to counterparty risk, which is the risk that the entity issuing the note may not be able to honor its financial commitments.

The Global Portfolio held 21.60% of its assets in the Texas Pacific Land Corporation (the “Land Corporation”) as of March 31, 2026. The Land Corporation is a corporation organized under the laws of the state of New York. One of the largest land owners in Texas, the Land Corporation derives most of its income from oil and gas royalty revenue, land easements and water royalties and sales. The Land Corporation has historically operated with minimal operating expenses, little to no debt and utilized cash flow to return capital to unitholders through share repurchases and dividends. While the Land Corporation has held the majority of its assets since its formation in 1888, the development of energy resources subject to its royalty interests and related land use have experienced rapid growth in recent years due to advances in energy exploration and extraction technologies.

Temporary and Defensive Cash and Cash Equivalent Holdings

The Global Portfolio may maintain during a temporary period, which could be for a short period or a longer period lasting several years or more, of abnormal conditions, a significant portion of its total assets in cash and securities, generally considered to be cash and cash equivalents, including, but not limited to: high quality, U.S. short-term debt securities and money market instruments, as described above. The Investment Adviser will invest in such short-term cash positions to the extent that the Investment Adviser is unable to find sufficient investments meeting its criteria and when the Investment Adviser believes the purchase of additional equity securities would not further the investment objective of the Global Portfolio during such periods of time. Additionally, to respond to adverse market, economic, political or other conditions, which may persist for short or long periods of time, the Global Portfolio may invest up to 100% of its assets in the types of high quality, U.S. short-term debt securities and money market instruments described above.

If the market advances during periods when the Global Portfolio is holding a large cash position, the Portfolio may not participate as much as it would have if it had been more fully invested in securities. In the aforementioned temporary defensive periods, the Investment Adviser believes that an additional amount of liquidity in the Global Portfolio is desirable both to meet operating requirements and to take advantage of new investment opportunities. When the Global Portfolio holds a significant portion of assets in cash and cash equivalents, it may not meet its investment objective.

Principal Risks of Investment

The Global Portfolio’s investments, including common stocks, have inherent risks that could cause you to lose money. The principal risks of investing in the Global Portfolio are listed below and could adversely affect the NAV, total return and value of the Global Portfolio and your investment. The risks are prioritized by order of importance. Each risk summarized below is considered a principal risk of investing in the Global Portfolio, regardless of the order in which it appears. Different risks may be more significant at different times depending on market conditions or other factors.

Bitcoin or BTC was the first decentralized crypto asset. Bitcoin is a type of crypto asset that is not issued by a government, bank or central organization. Bitcoin exists on an online, peer-to-peer computer network that hosts the Bitcoin Blockchain. Bitcoin has no physical existence and exists solely through the record of bitcoin transactions on the Bitcoin Blockchain. The Bitcoin Network allows people to exchange tokens of value, bitcoins, which are recorded on a public transaction ledger known as a Blockchain. The Global Portfolio may invest indirectly in bitcoin through the Grayscale Bitcoin Trust and through other pooled investment vehicles that provide exposure to crypto assets. Certain of these investment vehicles, including the Grayscale Bitcoin Trust, are not registered under the 1940 Act and do not receive the protections of the 1940 Act. The Grayscale Bitcoin Trust is a Bitcoin ETF that enables investors to gain exposure to bitcoin in the form of a security while avoiding the challenges of buying, storing, and safekeeping bitcoin, directly. Blockchain technology is a relatively new and untested technology which operates as a distributed ledger. The risks associated with blockchain technology may not fully emerge until the technology is widely used. Blockchain systems could be vulnerable to fraud, particularly if a significant minority of participants colluded to defraud the rest. Access to a given blockchain requires an individualized key, which, if compromised, could result in loss due to theft, destruction or inaccessibility. There is little regulation of blockchain technology other than the intrinsic public nature of the blockchain system. Any future regulatory developments could affect the viability and expansion of the use of blockchain technology.

Individuals or organizations holding a large amount of crypto assets in which the Global Portfolio may invest indirectly (also know as “whales”) may have the ability to manipulate the prices of those crypto assets.

Certain other crypto-focused, pooled investment vehicles, including the Grayscale Ethereum Classic Trust, in which the Global Portfolio invests, could be determined to be operating out of compliance with the 1940 Act. As a result, the prices of the impacted crypto assets may be subject to large and sudden declines.

In addition to the general risks of investing in other investment vehicles, the value of the Global Portfolio’s indirect investments in crypto assets are subject to fluctuations in the value of the crypto asset, which can be highly volatile. The value of crypto assets is determined by the supply and demand for crypto assets in the global market for the trading of crypto assets, which consists primarily of transactions on crypto asset trading platforms. The value of crypto assets has been, and may continue to be, substantially dependent on speculation, such that trading and investing in crypto assets generally may not be based on fundamental analysis.

Currently, there is relatively limited use of crypto assets in the retail and commercial marketplace, which contributes to price volatility. A lack of expansion by crypto assets into retail and commercial markets, or a contraction of such use, may result in increased volatility or a reduction in the value of crypto assets, either of which could adversely impact the value of the Global Portfolio’s investment. In addition, to the extent market participants develop a preference for one crypto asset over another, the value of the less preferred crypto assets would likely be adversely affected. Crypto assets are a new technological innovation with a limited history; it is a highly speculative asset and future regulatory actions or policies may limit, perhaps to a materially adverse extent, the value of the Global Portfolio’s indirect investment in crypto assets and the ability to exchange a crypto asset or utilize it for payments.

ª Crypto Asset Industry Risk: The crypto asset industry is a newer, speculative, and still-developing industry that faces many risks. The crypto asset industry may still be experiencing a bubble or may experience a bubble again in the future. For example, in the first half of 2022, each of Celsius Network, Voyager Digital Ltd., and Three Arrows Capital declared bankruptcy, resulting in a loss of confidence in participants of the digital asset ecosystem and negative publicity surrounding digital assets more broadly. In November 2022, FTX Trading Ltd. (“FTX”), one of the largest digital asset platforms by volume at the time, halted customer withdrawals amid rumors of the company’s liquidity issues and likely insolvency, which were subsequently corroborated by its CEO. Shortly thereafter, FTX’s CEO resigned and FTX and many of its affiliates filed for bankruptcy in the United States, while other affiliates have entered insolvency, liquidation, or similar proceedings around the globe, following which the U.S. Department of Justice brought criminal fraud and other charges, and the SEC and Commodity Futures Trading Commission (“CFTC”) brought civil securities and commodities fraud charges, against certain of FTX’s and its affiliates’ senior executives, including its former CEO. In addition, several other entities in the crypto asset industry filed for bankruptcy following FTX’s bankruptcy filing, such as BlockFi Inc. and Genesis Global Capital, LLC. In response to these events, the prices of crypto assets experienced extreme volatility and other entities in the crypto asset industry have been negatively affected. It is possible that similar events could occur in the future, which would undermine confidence in the crypto asset industry and negatively affect the value of crypto assets. It is not possible to predict at this time all of the risks that they may pose to the Global Portfolio and its service providers or to the crypto asset industry as a whole.

ª Crypto Asset Regulatory Risk: Crypto asset markets in the United States exist in a state of regulatory uncertainty. Regulatory changes or actions by Congress as well as U.S. federal or state agencies may adversely affect the value of the Global Portfolio’s indirect investments in crypto assets. As digital assets have grown in both popularity and market size, a number of state and federal agencies have issued consumer advisories regarding the risks posed by digital assets to investors. In addition, the Securities and Exchange Commission, U.S. state securities regulators and several foreign governments have issued warnings and instituted legal proceedings in which they argue that certain digital assets may be classified as securities or may be offered and sold as securities, and that both those digital assets and any related initial coin offerings are subject to securities regulations. Additionally, U.S. state and federal, and foreign regulators and legislatures have taken action against virtual currency businesses or enacted restrictive regimes in response to adverse publicity arising from hacks, consumer harm, or criminal activity stemming from virtual currency activity.

The Global Portfolio’s exposure to crypto assets may change over time and, accordingly, such exposure may not be represented in the Global Portfolio’s portfolio at any given time. Many significant aspects of the tax treatment of investments in crypto assets are uncertain, and a direct or indirect investment in crypto assets may produce non-qualifying income.

ª Foreign Securities Risks: Investing in foreign securities directly or indirectly (e.g., through ADRs, GDRs, and IDRs) can carry higher returns but involve more risks than those associated with U.S. investments. Additional risks associated with investment in foreign securities include currency fluctuations, political and economic instability, tariffs and trading disruptions, less publicly available information, differences in financial reporting standards and less stringent regulation of securities markets. Foreign securities in which the Portfolio invests may be traded in markets that close before the time that the Portfolio calculates its NAV. Furthermore, certain foreign securities in which the Portfolio invests may be listed on foreign exchanges that trade on weekends or other days when the Portfolio does not calculate its NAV. As a result, the value of the Portfolio’s holdings may change on days when shareholders are not able to purchase or redeem the Global Portfolio’s shares.

ª Single Security Concentration Risk: Holding a large portion of its assets in a single security or issuer exposes the Portfolio to various risks relating to that security or issuer and to the market volatility of that specific security or issuer if the security or issuer performs worse than the market as a whole, which could adversely affect the Portfolio’s performance.

catastrophes; changes in exchange rates or interest rates; prices for competitive energy services; economic conditions; tax treatment or government regulation; government intervention; negative public perception; or unfavorable events in the regions where companies operate (e.g., expropriation, nationalization, confiscation of assets and property, imposition of restrictions on foreign investments or repatriation of capital, military coups, social or political unrest, violence or labor unrest). Companies in the oil and gas industry may have significant capital investments in, or engage in transactions involving, emerging market countries, which may heighten these risks.

ª Sector Concentration Risk: The Global Portfolio will not invest more than 25% of its total assets in any one industry at the time of investment. However, the value securities in a particular sector or industry may appreciate or depreciate significantly over time, causing the Portfolio’s investments in that sector or industry to exceed the 25% threshold. If the Portfolio’s investments in a particular industry exceed 25% of its total assets due to market appreciation, the Portfolio may be subject to greater risk than a fund that does not concentrate in a particular industry. Industries are often subject to specific risks, including, but not limited to, legislative or regulatory changes, adverse market conditions, or increased competition. As a result, the Portfolio’s performance may be more volatile than that of a more broadly diversified fund. As of March 31, 2026, the Portfolio had 36.8% invested in the Finance and Insurance sector and 31.5% invested in the Mining, Quarrying and Oil & Gas Extraction sector. In the Finance and Insurance sector, cryptocurrency investment represents 15.8% of total net assets as of March 31, 2026.

ª Small and Medium-Size Company Risks: Investing in small and medium-size companies often involve more risks than investing in larger companies in larger companies as small and medium-size companies have narrower markets and more limited managerial and financial resources than do larger, more established companies. As a result, their performance can be more volatile and they face a greater risk of business failure, which could increase the volatility of the Global Portfolio’s assets and have an adverse effect on the Portfolio’s performance.

ª Market Risks: Mutual funds are subject to market risks and significant fluctuations in value. If the market declines in value, the Global Portfolio is likely to decline in value and you could lose money on your investment. Natural disasters, public health emergencies (including epidemics and pandemics), geopolitical events, tariffs and trading disruptions, terrorism and other global unforeseeable events may lead to instability in world economies and markets, market volatility and may have adverse long-term effects. Advancements in technology may adversely impact markets and the overall performance of the Portfolio. For example, as artificial intelligence is used more widely, the profitability and growth of Portfolio holdings may be impacted, which could significantly impact the overall performance of the Portfolio.

ª Management Risks: There is no guarantee that the Global Portfolio will meet its investment objective. The Investment Adviser does not guarantee the performance of the Global Portfolio, nor can it assure you that the market value of your investment will not decline.

ª Emerging Markets Risks: The risk that the securities markets of emerging countries are less liquid, are especially subject to greater price volatility, have smaller market capitalizations, have less government regulation and are not subject to as extensive and frequent accounting, financial and other reporting requirements as the securities markets of more developed countries as have historically been the case. The information available about an emerging market issuer may be less reliable than for comparable issuers in more developed capital markets. In addition, investments in certain emerging markets are subject to an elevated risk of loss resulting from market manipulation and the imposition of exchange controls (including repatriation restrictions). The legal rights and remedies available for investors in emerging markets may be more limited than the rights and remedies available in the United States, and the ability of U.S. authorities (e.g., SEC and the U.S. Department of Justice) to bring actions against bad actors in emerging markets may be limited.

ª Tax Risks: The Global Portfolio has not requested a ruling from the IRS or an opinion of legal counsel as to any tax matters, including whether the Global Portfolio will be treated as a partnership (and not as an association taxable as a corporation) for U.S. federal income tax purposes. If the Global Portfolio were to be treated as a corporation rather than as a partnership for U.S. federal income tax purposes, the Global Portfolio itself would be taxed on its taxable income at corporate tax rates, there would be no flow-through of items of Global Portfolio income, gain, loss or deductions to the Partners, and Global Portfolio distributions generally would be taxable as dividends. Assuming that the Global Portfolio is treated as a partnership, each Partner of the Global Portfolio must include in its own income its allocable share of Portfolio taxable income, whether or not any cash is distributed and, as a result of various limitations imposed by the tax laws, may be unable to currently deduct its allocable share of Portfolio expenses and capital losses, if any. Additionally, the Grayscale Bitcoin Trust (in which the Global Portfolio indirectly invests) takes the position that it is treated as a grantor trust for U.S. federal income tax purposes. However, the tax treatment of digital assets such as those held by the Grayscale Bitcoin Trust is uncertain and could cause the Grayscale Bitcoin Trust to be treated as a corporation for U.S. federal income tax purposes. The imposition of an entity-level tax could affect the value of that investment and, indirectly, your total return.

In order to qualify as a RIC, a fund must meet certain requirements regarding the source of its income, the diversification of its assets and the distribution of its income. Under the test regarding the source of a RIC’s income, at least 90% of the gross income of the RIC each year must be qualifying income, which consists of dividends, interest, gains on investments in securities and certain other categories of investment income. It appears to be the position of the IRS that gain realized on bitcoin investments such as investments in the Grayscale Bitcoin Trust will not be qualifying income. The Global Portfolio’s investment in each Subsidiary is expected to provide RIC investors with exposure to such bitcoin investments within the limitations of the Internal Revenue Code for qualification as a RIC because, under applicable tax rules, the earnings of each Subsidiary will be qualifying income for the RIC when distributed by the Subsidiary even though the income would not be qualifying income if earned directly by the RIC or indirectly by an entity classified as a partnership for U.S. federal income tax purposes, such as the Global Portfolio. There is a risk, however, that the IRS might assert that the income derived from the Global Portfolio’s investment in a Subsidiary will not be considered qualifying income. If a RIC investor were to fail to qualify as a RIC it would become subject to U.S. federal income tax.

ª Subsidiary Risks: By investing in its Subsidiaries, the Global Portfolio is indirectly exposed to the risks associated with each Subsidiary’s investments. Those investments held by the Subsidiaries are generally similar to the investments that are permitted to be held by the Global Portfolio and are subject to the same risks that would apply to similar investments if held directly by the Global Portfolio. Each Subsidiary is not registered under the 1940 Act and, unless otherwise noted in this Prospectus, is not subject to all the investor protections of the 1940 Act. In addition, changes in the laws of the United States, Delaware and/or the Cayman Islands could result in the inability of the

Global Portfolio and/or its Subsidiaries to continue to operate and could adversely affect the Global Portfolio’s performance.

ª Valuation Risk: The sales price the Portfolio could receive for any particular portfolio investment may differ from the Portfolio’s valuation of the investment, particularly for securities or other investments, such as bitcoin, that trade in thin or volatile markets or that are valued using a fair value methodology. Valuation may be more difficult in times of market turmoil since many investors and market makers may be reluctant to purchase complex instruments or quote prices for them. Fair valuation of the Portfolio’s investments involves subjective judgment. The Portfolio’s ability to value its investments may be impacted by technological issues and/or errors by pricing services or other third-party service providers. Shares of the Grayscale Bitcoin Trust are intended to reflect the price of bitcoin assets, less fees and expenses, and the shares of the Grayscale Bitcoin Trust have historically traded, and may continue to trade, at a significant discount or premium to net asset value. As such, the price of the Grayscale Bitcoin Trust may go down even if the price of the underlying asset, bitcoin, remains unchanged. Additionally, shares that trade at a premium mean that an investor who purchases $1 of a portfolio will actually own less than $1 in assets.

ª Interest Rate Risk: The risk that when interest rates increase, fixed-income securities held by the Global Portfolio will decline in value. Long-term fixed-income securities will normally have more price volatility because of this risk than short-term fixed-income securities. A low or negative interest rate environment could cause the Global Portfolio’s earnings to fall below the Portfolio’s expense ratio, resulting in a decline in the Portfolio’s share price. A general rise in interest rates may cause investors to move out of fixed income securities on a large scale, which could adversely affect the price and liquidity of fixed income securities. The risks associated with changing interest rates may have unpredictable effects on the markets and the Global Portfolio's investments.

ª Exchange-Traded Funds (ETFs) Risks: ETFs are registered investment companies whose shares are listed and traded on U.S. stock exchanges or otherwise traded in the over-the-counter market. In general, passively-managed ETFs seek to track a specified securities index or a basket of securities that an “index provider,” such as S&P Global, selects as representative of a market, market segment or industry sector. A passively-managed ETF is designed so that its performance will correspond closely with that of the index it tracks. Actively-managed ETFs may not meet their investment objective based on an ETF’s investment adviser’s success or failure to implement strategies for the ETF and/or the investment adviser’s ability to control the ETF’s level of risk. A leveraged ETF will engage in transactions and purchase instruments that give rise to forms of leverage, including, among others, the use of reverse repurchase agreements and other borrowings, the investment of collateral from loans of portfolio securities, the use of when issued, delayed-delivery or forward commitment transactions or short sales. To the extent a fund invests in ETFs that achieve leveraged exposure to their underlying indexes through the use of derivative instruments, the fund will indirectly be subject to leveraging risk. As a shareholder in an ETF, the Global Portfolio will bear its pro rata portion of an ETF’s expenses, including advisory fees, in addition to its own expenses. The existence of extreme market volatility or potential lack of an active trading market for an ETF’s shares could result in such shares trading at a significant premium or discount to their NAV.

ª Counterparty Risks: Transactions involving a counterparty are subject to the credit risk of the counterparty. A Portfolio that enters into contracts with counterparties, such as repurchase or reverse repurchase agreements or over-the-counter (“OTC”) derivatives contracts, or that lends its securities run the risk that the counterparty will be unable or unwilling to make timely settlement payments or otherwise honor its obligations. If a counterparty fails to meet its contractual obligations, goes bankrupt, or otherwise experiences a business interruption, the Portfolio could suffer losses, including monetary losses, miss investment opportunities or be forced to hold investments it would prefer to sell. Counterparty risk is heightened during unusually adverse market conditions.

ª Convertible Securities Risks: Convertible securities are subject to the risks affecting both equity and fixed income securities, including market, credit, liquidity, and interest rate risk.

ª Leveraging Risks: Investments in derivative instruments may give rise to a form of leverage. The Investment Adviser may engage in speculative transactions, which involve substantial risk and leverage. The use of leverage by the Investment Adviser may increase the volatility of the Global Portfolio. These leveraged instruments may result in losses to the Global Portfolio or may adversely affect the Global Portfolio’s NAV or total return, because instruments that contain leverage are more sensitive to changes in interest rates. The Global Portfolio may also have to sell assets at inopportune times to satisfy its obligations in connection with such transactions.

ª Cybersecurity Risk: Cybersecurity incidents may allow an unauthorized party to gain access to Global Fund assets or proprietary information, or cause the fund, the Investment Adviser, and/or other service providers (including custodians and financial intermediaries) to suffer data breaches or data corruption. Additionally, cybersecurity failures or breaches of the electronic systems of the Global Fund, the Investment Adviser, or the Internet Fund’s other service providers, or the issuers of securities in which the Global Portfolio invests have the ability to disrupt and negatively affect the Fund’s business operations, including the ability to purchase and sell fund shares, potentially resulting in financial losses to the Global Fund and its shareholders.

ª Temporary Defensive Position Risk: If the Global Portfolio takes a temporary defensive position, it may invest all or a large portion of its assets in cash and/or cash equivalents. If the Global Portfolio takes a temporary defensive position, the Global Fund may not achieve its investment objective.


Investment Objective, Principal Investment Strategies and Principal Risks of the Paradigm Portfolio

Investment Objective

The investment objective of the Paradigm Portfolio is long-term growth of capital.

Principal Investment Strategies

The Paradigm Portfolio is a non-diversified mutual fund that invests, under normal circumstances, at least 65% of its net assets in common stocks, ETFs, convertible securities, warrants and other equity securities having the characteristics of common stocks (such as ADRs, GDRs and IDRs) of U.S. and foreign companies that the Investment Adviser believes are undervalued, that have, or are expected to soon have, high returns on equity and that are well positioned to reduce their costs, extend the reach of their distribution channels and experience significant growth in their assets or revenues. The Paradigm Portfolio will carry out its investment strategy by regarding investments as representing fractional ownership in the underlying companies’ assets. This will allow the Paradigm Portfolio to attempt to achieve its investment objective by acting as a classic value investor seeking high returns on equity, an intrinsic characteristic of the investment, not a reappraisal of a company’s stock value by the market, an external factor. The Paradigm Portfolio may also purchase and write options for hedging purposes and/or direct investment.

The Paradigm Portfolio may invest up to 20% of its total assets in convertible and non-convertible debt securities rated below investment grade, also known as junk bonds, or unrated securities that the Investment Adviser has determined to be of comparable quality. The Paradigm Portfolio may invest up to 100% of its total assets in companies located in emerging markets.

Paradigm Portfolio securities will be selected by the Investment Adviser from companies that are engaged in various industries that will facilitate an increase in the growth of traditional business lines, entry into new distribution channels, an ability to leverage brand identity, and an improvement in the underlying cost/profitability dynamics of the business. These companies may be large, medium or small in size if, in the Investment Adviser’s opinion, these companies meet the Paradigm Portfolio’s investment criteria. Accordingly, the Paradigm Portfolio seeks to invest in the equity securities of companies whose research and development efforts may result in higher stock values. Such companies include, but are not limited to, the following:

ª Retailers: Companies that sell retail products and services through traditional stores, catalogues, telemarketing, and web-sites.

ª Media: Companies that provide print, broadcast, cable, satellite and web-based information and entertainment content.

ª Financial Services: Companies that engage in financial service transactions such as banking, credit cards and investment services.

ª Real Estate Development: Companies that provide commercial real estate property and services.

ª Business Services: Companies that provide business-to-business products and services.

ª Travel & Leisure: Companies that provide transportation and recreational services.

ª Utilities: Companies and industries such as gas, electric and telephone.

The Investment Adviser selects portfolio securities by evaluating a company’s positioning and traditional business lines as well as its ability to expand its activities or achieve competitive advantage in cost/

profitability and brand image leveraging. The Investment Adviser also considers a company’s fundamentals by reviewing its balance sheets, corporate revenues, earnings and dividends. The Paradigm Portfolio may invest in companies of any size, including small and medium-sized companies.

The Paradigm Portfolio invests indirectly in bitcoin through the Grayscale Bitcoin Trust and through other pooled investment vehicles that provide exposure to crypto assets. Certain of these investment vehicles, including the Grayscale Bitcoin Trust, are not registered under the 1940 Act and do not receive the protections of the 1940 Act. The Paradigm Portfolio will not invest directly in bitcoin or other crypto assets. The Grayscale Bitcoin Trust is a Bitcoin ETF and enables investors to gain exposure to bitcoin in the form of a security while avoiding the challenges of buying, storing, and safekeeping bitcoin, directly. Bitcoin is a type of crypto asset that is not issued by a government, bank or central organization. Bitcoin exists on the Bitcoin Network that hosts the Bitcoin Blockchain. Bitcoin has no physical existence and exists solely through the record of bitcoin transactions on the Blockchain. The Grayscale Bitcoin Trust invests principally in bitcoin. The Paradigm Portfolio held 8.25% of its net assets in the Grayscale Bitcoin Trust ETF as of March 31, 2026. The Paradigm Portfolio may also invest in other pooled investment vehicles that provide exposure to the spot price of crypto assets. For example, the Paradigm Portfolio may invest in the Grayscale Bitcoin Mini Trust ETF, the Grayscale Litecoin Trust and the Grayscale Ethereum Classic Trust.

The Paradigm Portfolio contributed a portion of its holdings in the Grayscale Bitcoin Trust to a wholly-owned and controlled subsidiary organized under the laws of the Cayman Islands (the “Subsidiary” or the “Cayman Subsidiary”). Additional information regarding the tax treatment of the Portfolio is provided in the “Taxes” section of the SAI.

In the future, the Paradigm Portfolio may seek to gain additional exposure to the Grayscale Bitcoin Trust that may not produce qualifying income for the Paradigm Fund under the Internal Revenue Code if held directly. The Paradigm Portfolio will not make any additional investments in the Grayscale Bitcoin Trust if as a result of such investment, its aggregate investment in the Grayscale Bitcoin Trust, either directly or through the Subsidiary, would be more than 15% of its assets at the time of the investment. However, the Portfolio’s investment in the Grayscale Bitcoin Trust may, at times, exceed 15% of its net assets, due to appreciation.

The Subsidiary invests primarily in the Grayscale Bitcoin Trust. The Paradigm Portfolio will invest in its Subsidiary in a manner that is consistent with the limitations of the federal tax laws, rules and regulations that apply to its investors, which are expected to be RICs under Subchapter M. However, the Paradigm Portfolio and the Subsidiary comply with the same fundamental investment restrictions on an aggregate basis, to the extent those restrictions are applicable to the investment activities of the Subsidiary. The Subsidiary also complies with Section 17 of the 1940 Act relating to affiliated transactions and custody, and the Investment Adviser complies with Section 15 of the 1940 Act, relating to investment advisory contracts with respect to the Subsidiary. The Subsidiary is taxed as a corporation and does not, and will not, seek to qualify as a RIC. The Paradigm Portfolio is the sole shareholder of the Subsidiary and does not expect shares of the Subsidiary to be offered or sold to other investors. The Subsidiary includes entities that engage in investment activities in securities or other assets that are primarily controlled by the Paradigm Portfolio. The Paradigm Portfolio does not intend to create or acquire primary control of any entity which primarily engages in investment activities in securities or other assets other than entities wholly-owned by the Paradigm Portfolio.

The Paradigm Portfolio may invest up to 35% of its assets in high quality, U.S. short-term debt securities and money market instruments to maintain liquidity. Some of these short-term instruments include commercial paper, certificates of deposit, demand and time deposits and banker’s acceptances, U.S. government securities (i.e., U.S. Treasury obligations) and repurchase agreements.

The Paradigm Portfolio held 69.11% of its net assets in the Texas Pacific Land Corporation (the “Land Corporation”) as of March 31, 2026. The Land Corporation is a corporation organized under the laws of the state of New York. One of the largest land owners in Texas, the Land Corporation derives most of its income from oil and gas royalty revenue, land easements and water royalties and sales. The Land Corporation has historically operated with minimal operating expenses, little to no debt and utilized cash flow to return capital to unitholders through share repurchases and dividends. While the Land Corporation has held the majority of its assets since its formation in 1888, the development of energy resources subject to its royalty interests and related land use have experienced rapid growth in recent years due to advances in energy exploration and extraction technologies.

Temporary and Defensive Cash and Cash Equivalent Holdings

The Paradigm Portfolio may maintain during a temporary period, which could be for a short period or a longer period lasting several years or more, of abnormal conditions, a significant portion of its total assets in cash and securities, generally considered to be cash and cash equivalents, including, but not limited to: high quality, U.S. short-term debt securities and money market instruments, as described above. The Investment Adviser will invest in such short-term cash positions to the extent that the Investment Adviser is unable to find sufficient investments meeting its criteria and when the Investment Adviser believes the purchase of additional equity securities would not further the investment objective of the Paradigm Portfolio during such periods of time. Additionally, to respond to adverse market, economic, political or other conditions, which may persist for short or long periods of time, the Paradigm Portfolio may invest up to 100% of its assets in the types of high quality, U.S. short-term debt securities and money market instruments described above.

If the market advances during periods when the Paradigm Portfolio is holding a large cash position, the Paradigm Portfolio may not participate as much as it would have if it had been more fully invested in securities. In the aforementioned temporary defensive periods, the Investment Adviser believes that an additional amount of liquidity in the Paradigm Portfolio is desirable both to meet operating requirements and to take advantage of new investment opportunities. When the Paradigm Portfolio holds a significant portion of assets in cash and cash equivalents, it may not meet its investment objective.

Principal Risks of Investment

Investing in common stocks has inherent risks that could cause you to lose money. The principal risks of investing in the Paradigm Portfolio are listed below and could adversely affect the NAV, total return and value of the Paradigm Portfolio and your investment. The risks are prioritized by order of importance. Each risk summarized below is considered a principal risk of investing in the Paradigm Portfolio, regardless of the order in which it appears. Different risks may be more significant at different times depending on market conditions or other factors.

ª Non-Diversification Risks: Holding a large portion of its net assets in a small number of issuers exposes the Portfolio to various risks relating to those issuers. A change in the value of any one investment may affect the overall value of the Paradigm Portfolio’s shares more than shares of a diversified mutual fund that holds more investments.

ª Petroleum and Gas Sector Risk: The profitability of companies in the oil and gas industry is related to worldwide energy prices, exploration costs and production spending. Companies in the oil and gas industry may be at risk for environmental damage claims and other types of litigation. Companies in the oil and gas industry may be adversely affected by: natural disasters or other catastrophes; changes in exchange rates or interest rates; prices for competitive energy services, economic conditions, tax treatment, or government regulation; government intervention; negative public perception; or unfavorable events in the regions where companies operate (e.g., expropriation, nationalization, confiscation of assets and property, imposition of restrictions on foreign investments or repatriation of capital, military coups, social or political unrest, violence or labor unrest). Companies in the oil and gas industry may have significant capital investments in, or engage in transactions involving, emerging market countries, which may heighten these risks.

Bitcoin or BTC was the first decentralized crypto asset. Bitcoin is a type of crypto asset that is not issued by a government, bank or central organization. Bitcoin exists on an online, peer-to-peer computer network that hosts the Bitcoin Blockchain. Bitcoin has no physical existence and exists solely through the record of bitcoin transactions on the Bitcoin Blockchain. The Bitcoin Network allows people to exchange tokens of value, bitcoins, which are recorded on a public transaction ledger known as a Blockchain. The Paradigm Portfolio may invest indirectly in bitcoin through the Grayscale Bitcoin Trust and through other pooled investment vehicles that provide exposure to crypto assets. Certain of these investment vehicles, including the Grayscale Bitcoin Trust, are not registered under the 1940 Act and do not receive the protections of the 1940 Act. The Grayscale Bitcoin Trust is a Bitcoin ETF that enables investors to gain exposure to bitcoin in the form of a security while avoiding the challenges of buying, storing, and safekeeping bitcoin, directly. Blockchain technology is a relatively new and untested technology which operates as a distributed ledger. The risks associated with blockchain technology may not fully emerge until the technology is widely used. Blockchain systems could be vulnerable to fraud, particularly if a significant minority of participants colluded to defraud the rest. Access to a given blockchain requires an individualized key, which, if compromised, could result in loss due to theft, destruction or inaccessibility. There is little regulation of blockchain technology other than the intrinsic public nature of the blockchain system. Any future regulatory developments could affect the viability and expansion of the use of blockchain technology.

and another does not – or if groups adopt different upgrades – this can result in a “fork” of the blockchain, wherein two distinct sets of users and validators or users and miners run two different versions of a protocol. If the versions are sufficiently different such that the two versions of the protocol cannot simultaneously maintain and update a shared record of the blockchain database, it is called a “hard fork.” A hard fork can result in the creation of two competing blockchains, each with its own native crypto assets.

Individuals or organizations holding a large amount of crypto assets in which the Paradigm Portfolio may invest indirectly (also known as “whales”) may have the ability to manipulate the prices of those crypto assets.

Certain other crypto-focused, pooled investment vehicles, including the Grayscale Ethereum Classic Trust, in which the Paradigm Portfolio invests, could be determined to be operating out of compliance with the 1940 Act. As a result, the prices of the impacted crypto assets may be subject to large and sudden declines.

In addition to the general risks of investing in other investment vehicles, the value of the Paradigm Portfolio’s indirect investments in crypto assets are subject to fluctuations in the value of the crypto asset, which can be highly volatile. The value of crypto assets is determined by the supply and demand for crypto assets in the global market for the trading of crypto assets, which consists primarily of transactions on crypto asset trading platforms. The value of crypto assets has been, and may continue to be, substantially dependent on speculation, such that trading and investing in crypto assets generally may not be based on fundamental analysis.

Currently, there is relatively limited use of crypto assets in the retail and commercial marketplace, which contributes to price volatility. A lack of expansion by crypto assets into retail and commercial markets, or a contraction of such use, may result in increased volatility or a reduction in the value of crypto assets, either of which could adversely impact the value of the Paradigm Portfolio’s investment. In addition, to the extent market participants develop a preference for one crypto asset over another, the value of the less preferred crypto assets would likely be adversely affected. Crypto assets are a new technological innovation with a limited history; it is a highly speculative asset and future regulatory actions or policies may limit, perhaps to a materially adverse extent, the value of the Paradigm Portfolio’s indirect investment in crypto assets and the ability to exchange a crypto asset or utilize it for payments.

platforms by volume at the time, halted customer withdrawals amid rumors of the company’s liquidity issues and likely insolvency, which were subsequently corroborated by its CEO. Shortly thereafter, FTX’s CEO resigned and FTX and many of its affiliates filed for bankruptcy in the United States, while other affiliates have entered insolvency, liquidation, or similar proceedings around the globe, following which the U.S. Department of Justice brought criminal fraud and other charges, and the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”) and Commodity Futures Trading Commission (“CFTC”) brought civil securities and commodities fraud charges, against certain of FTX’s and its affiliates’ senior executives, including its former CEO. In addition, several other entities in the crypto asset industry filed for bankruptcy following FTX’s bankruptcy filing, such as BlockFi Inc. and Genesis Global Capital, LLC. In response to these events, the prices of crypto assets experienced extreme volatility and other entities in the crypto asset industry have been negatively affected. It is possible that similar events could occur in the future, which would undermine confidence in the crypto asset industry and negatively affect the value of crypto assets. It is not possible to predict at this time all of the risks that they may pose to the Paradigm Portfolio and its service providers or to the crypto asset industry as a whole.

ª Crypto Asset Regulatory Risk: Crypto asset markets in the United States exist in a state of regulatory uncertainty. Regulatory changes or actions by Congress as well as U.S. federal or state agencies may adversely affect the value of the Paradigm Portfolio’s indirect investments in crypto assets. As digital assets have grown in both popularity and market size, a number of state and federal agencies have issued consumer advisories regarding the risks posed by digital assets to investors. In addition, the SEC, U.S. state securities regulators and several foreign governments have issued warnings and instituted legal proceedings in which they argue that certain digital assets may be classified as securities or may be offered and sold as securities, and that both those digital assets and any related initial coin offerings are subject to securities regulations. Additionally, U.S. state and federal, and foreign regulators and legislatures have taken action against virtual currency businesses or enacted restrictive regimes in response to adverse publicity arising from hacks, consumer harm, or criminal activity stemming from virtual currency activity.

The Paradigm Portfolio’s exposure to crypto assets may change over time and, accordingly, such exposure may not be represented in the Paradigm Portfolio at any given time. Many significant aspects of the tax treatment of investments in crypto assets are uncertain, and a direct or indirect investment in crypto assets may produce non-qualifying income.

ª Sector Concentration Risk: Although the Paradigm Portfolio will not concentrate its investments in any industries, the Paradigm Portfolio may, at certain times, have concentrations in one or more sectors which may cause the Portfolio to be more sensitive to economic changes or events occurring in those sectors, and the Portfolio’s investments may be more volatile. As of March 31, 2026, the Portfolio had 74.2% invested in the Mining, Quarrying, and Oil and Gas Extraction sector.

ª Market Risks: Mutual funds are subject to market risks and significant fluctuations in value. If the market declines in value, the Paradigm Portfolio is likely to decline in value and you could lose money on your investment. Natural disasters, public health emergencies (including epidemics and pandemics), geopolitical events, tariffs and trading disruptions, terrorism and other global unforeseeable events may lead to instability in world economies and markets, market volatility and may have adverse long-term effects. Advancements in technology may adversely impact markets and the overall performance of the Portfolio. For example, as artificial intelligence is used more widely, the profitability and growth of Portfolio holdings may be impacted, which could significantly impact the overall performance of the Portfolio.

ª Tax Risks: The Paradigm Portfolio has not requested a ruling from the IRS or an opinion of legal counsel as to any tax matters, including whether the Paradigm Portfolio will be treated as a partnership (and not as an association taxable as a corporation) for U.S. federal income tax purposes. If the Paradigm Portfolio were to be treated as a corporation rather than as a partnership for U.S. federal income tax purposes, the Paradigm Portfolio itself would be taxed on its taxable income at corporate tax rates, there would be no flow-through of items of Paradigm Portfolio income, gain, loss or deductions to the Partners, and Paradigm Portfolio distributions generally would be taxable as dividends. Assuming that the Paradigm Portfolio is treated as a partnership, each Partner of the Paradigm Portfolio must include in its own income its allocable share of Portfolio taxable income, whether or not any cash is distributed and, as a result of various limitations imposed by the tax laws, may be unable to currently deduct its allocable share of Portfolio expenses and capital losses, if any. Additionally, the Grayscale Bitcoin Trust (in which the Paradigm Portfolio indirectly invests) takes the position that it is treated as a grantor trust for U.S. federal income tax purposes. However, the tax treatment of digital assets such as those held by the Grayscale Bitcoin Trust is uncertain and could cause the Grayscale Bitcoin Trust to be treated as a corporation for U.S. federal income tax purposes. The imposition of an entity-level tax could affect the value of that investment and, indirectly, your total return.

ª Subsidiary Risks: By investing in the Subsidiary, the Paradigm Portfolio is indirectly exposed to the risks associated with the Subsidiary’s investments. Those investments held by the Subsidiary are generally similar to the investments that are permitted to be held by the Paradigm Portfolio and are subject to the same risks that would apply to similar investments if held directly by the Paradigm Portfolio. The Subsidiary is not registered under the 1940 Act and, unless otherwise noted in this Prospectus, is not subject to all the investor protections of the 1940 Act. In addition, changes in the laws of the United States and/or the Cayman Islands could result in the inability of the Paradigm Portfolio and/or its Subsidiary to continue to operate and could adversely affect the Paradigm Portfolio’s performance.

ª Small and Medium-Size Company Risks: Investing in small and medium-size companies often involve more risks than investing in larger companies as small and medium-size companies have narrower markets and more limited managerial and financial resources than do larger, more established companies. As a result, their performance can be more volatile and they face a greater risk of business

failure, which could increase the volatility of the Paradigm Portfolio’s assets and have an adverse effect on the Portfolio’s performance.

ª Management Risks: There is no guarantee that the Paradigm Portfolio will meet its investment objective. The Investment Adviser does not guarantee the performance of the Paradigm Portfolio, nor can it assure you that the market value of your investment will not decline.

ª Valuation Risk: The sales price the Portfolio could receive for any particular portfolio investment may differ from the Portfolio’s valuation of the investment, particularly for securities or other investments, such as bitcoin, that trade in thin or volatile markets or that are valued using a fair value methodology. Valuation may be more difficult in times of market turmoil since many investors and market makers may be reluctant to purchase complex instruments or quote prices for them. Fair valuation of the Portfolio’s investments involves subjective judgment. The Portfolio’s ability to value its investments may be impacted by technological issues and/or errors by pricing services or other third-party service providers. Shares of Grayscale Bitcoin Trust are intended to reflect the price of bitcoin assets, less fees and expenses, and shares of the Grayscale Bitcoin Trust have historically traded, and may continue to trade, at a significant discount or premium to net asset value. As such, the price of Grayscale Bitcoin Trust may go down even if the price of the underlying asset, bitcoin, remains unchanged. Additionally, shares that trade at a premium mean that an investor who purchases $1 of a portfolio will actually own less than $1 in assets.

ª Foreign Securities Risks: Investing in foreign securities directly or indirectly (e.g., through ADRs, GDRs, and IDRs) can carry higher returns but involve more risks than those associated with U.S. investments. Additional risks associated with investment in foreign securities include currency fluctuations, political and economic instability, tariffs and trading disruptions, less publicly available information, differences in financial reporting standards and less stringent regulation of securities markets. Foreign securities in which the Portfolio invests may be traded in markets that close before the time that the Portfolio calculates its NAV. Furthermore, certain foreign securities in which the Portfolio invests may be listed on foreign exchanges that trade on weekends or other days when the Portfolio does not calculate its NAV. As a result, the value of the Portfolio’s holdings may change on days when shareholders are not able to purchase or redeem the Paradigm Portfolio’s shares.

ª Emerging Markets Risks: The risks of foreign investments are usually much greater for the emerging markets. Investments in emerging markets may be considered speculative. The information available about an emerging market issuer may be less reliable than for comparable issuers in more developed capital markets. In addition, investments in certain emerging markets are subject to an elevated risk of loss resulting from market manipulation and the imposition of exchange controls (including repatriation restrictions). The legal rights and remedies available for investors in emerging markets may be more limited than the rights and remedies available in the United States, and the ability of U.S. authorities (e.g., SEC and the U.S. Department of Justice) to bring actions against bad actors in emerging markets may be limited.

or industry sector. A passively-managed ETF is designed so that its performance will correspond closely with that of the index it tracks. Actively-managed ETFs may not meet their investment objective based on an ETF’s investment adviser’s success or failure to implement strategies for the ETF and/or the investment adviser’s ability to control the ETF’s level of risk. A leveraged ETF will engage in transactions and purchase instruments that give rise to forms of leverage, including, among others, the use of reverse repurchase agreements and other borrowings, the investment of collateral from loans of portfolio securities, the use of when issued, delayed-delivery or forward commitment transactions or short sales. To the extent a fund invests in ETFs that achieve leveraged exposure to their underlying indexes through the use of derivative instruments, the fund will indirectly be subject to leveraging risk. As a shareholder in an ETF, the Paradigm Portfolio will bear its pro rata portion of an ETF’s expenses, including advisory fees, in addition to its own expenses. The existence of extreme market volatility or potential lack of an active trading market for an ETF’s shares could result in such shares trading at a significant premium or discount to their NAV.

ª Convertible Securities Risks: Convertible securities are subject to the risks affecting both equity and fixed income securities, including market, credit, liquidity, and interest rate risk.

ª Interest Rate Risk: The risk that when interest rates increase, fixed-income securities held by the Paradigm Portfolio will decline in value. Long-term fixed-income securities will normally have more price volatility because of this risk than short-term fixed-income securities. A low or negative interest rate environment could cause the Paradigm Portfolio’s earnings to fall below the Portfolio’s expense ratio, resulting in a decline in the Portfolio’s share price. A general rise in interest rates may cause investors to move out of fixed income securities on a large scale, which could adversely affect the price and liquidity of fixed income securities. The risks associated with changing interest rates may have unpredictable effects on the markets and the Paradigm Portfolio's investments.

ª Leveraging Risks: Investments in derivative instruments may give rise to a form of leverage. The Investment Adviser may engage in speculative transactions, which involve substantial risk and leverage. The use of leverage by the Investment Adviser may increase the volatility of the Paradigm Portfolio. These leveraged instruments may result in losses to the Paradigm Portfolio or may adversely affect the Paradigm Portfolio’s NAV or total return, because instruments that contain leverage are more sensitive to changes in interest rates. The Paradigm Portfolio may also have to sell assets at inopportune times to satisfy its obligations in connection with such transactions.

ª Cybersecurity Risk: Cybersecurity incidents may allow an unauthorized party to gain access to Paradigm Fund assets or proprietary information, or cause the fund, the Investment Adviser, and/or other service providers (including custodians and financial intermediaries) to suffer data breaches or data corruption. Additionally, cybersecurity failures or breaches of the electronic systems of the Paradigm Fund, the Investment Adviser, or the Paradigm Fund’s other service providers, or the issuers of securities in which the Paradigm Portfolio invests have the ability to disrupt and negatively affect the Fund’s business operations, including the ability to purchase and sell fund shares, potentially resulting in financial losses to the Paradigm Fund and its shareholders.

ª Temporary Defensive Position Risk: If the Paradigm Portfolio takes a temporary defensive position, it may invest all or a large portion of its assets in cash and/or cash equivalents. If the Paradigm Portfolio takes a temporary defensive position, the Paradigm Fund may not achieve its investment objective.


Investment Objective, Principal Investment Strategies and Principal Risks of the Small Cap Portfolio

Investment Objective

The investment objective of the Small Cap Portfolio is long-term growth of capital.

Principal Investment Strategies

The Small Cap Portfolio is a non-diversified mutual fund that invests, under normal circumstances, at least 80% of its net assets plus any borrowings for investment purposes in common stocks, convertible securities, warrants and other equity securities having the characteristics of common stocks (such as ADRs, GDRs and IDRs) of U.S. and foreign small capitalization companies that provide attractive valuation opportunities. The Investment Adviser considers small cap companies to be those with market capitalizations at or below the highest market capitalization of a component security within the MSCI USA Small Cap Index. The highest market capitalization of a company within the MSCI USA Small Cap Index was approximately $80 billion as of March 31, 2026. The Small Cap Portfolio may also invest in ETFs and purchase and write options for hedging purposes and/or direct investment.

The Small Cap Portfolio may invest up to 20% of its total assets in convertible and non-convertible debt securities rated below investment grade, also known as junk bonds, or unrated securities that the Investment Adviser has determined to be of comparable quality.

The Investment Adviser believes that favorable investment opportunities are available through companies that exhibit a number of the following characteristics: have little or no institutional ownership, have had short-term earnings shortfalls, have had a recent initial public offering (“IPO”) but have not attracted significant analyst coverage, are selling at or below book or replacement value, and have price to earnings ratios that are less than one half of their projected growth rate.

The Small Cap Portfolio focuses on undervalued and special situation small capitalization equities that the Investment Adviser believes have the potential for rewarding long-term investment results. Small Cap Portfolio securities will generally be selected from companies that are engaged in a number of industries if, in the Investment Adviser’s opinion, they are selling below their perceived intrinsic value, have limited or no institutional ownership, have had short-term earnings shortfalls, have had a recent IPO but have not attracted significant analyst coverage, are selling at or below book or replacement value, or have modest price to earnings ratios. Such companies include, but are not limited to, the following:

ª Media: Companies that provide print, broadcast, cable, satellite and web-based information and entertainment content.

ª Financial Services: Companies that engage in financial service transactions such as banking, credit cards and investment services.

ª Retailers: Companies that sell retail products and services through traditional stores, catalogues, telemarketing, and web-sites.

ª Manufacturing and Consumer Products: Companies that manufacture and distribute products to retail outlets.

ª Utilities: Companies and industries such as gas, electric and telephone.

The Investment Adviser considers a company’s fundamentals by reviewing its balance sheets, corporate revenues, earnings and dividends. The Investment Adviser also looks at the amount of capital a company spends on research and development.

The Small Cap Portfolio invests indirectly in bitcoin through the Grayscale Bitcoin Trust and through other pooled investment vehicles that provide exposure to crypto assets. Certain of these investment vehicles, including the Grayscale Bitcoin Trust, are not registered under the 1940 Act and do not receive the protections of the 1940 Act. The Small Cap Portfolio will not invest directly in bitcoin or other crypto assets. The Grayscale Bitcoin Trust is a Bitcoin ETF and enables investors to gain exposure to bitcoin in the form of a security while avoiding the challenges of buying, storing, and safekeeping bitcoin, directly. Bitcoin is a type of crypto asset that is not issued by a government, bank or central organization. Bitcoin exists on the Bitcoin Network that hosts the Bitcoin Blockchain. Bitcoin has no physical existence and exists solely through the record of bitcoin transactions on the Bitcoin Blockchain. The Grayscale Bitcoin Trust invests principally in bitcoin. The Small Cap Portfolio held 3.11% of its net assets in the Grayscale Bitcoin Trust ETF as of March 31, 2026. The Small Cap Portfolio may also invest in other pooled investment vehicles that provide exposure to the spot price of crypto assets. For example, the Small Cap Portfolio may invest in the Grayscale Bitcoin Mini Trust ETF, the Grayscale Litecoin Trust and the Grayscale Ethereum Classic Trust.

The Small Cap Portfolio contributed a portion of its holdings in the Grayscale Bitcoin Trust to a wholly-owned and controlled subsidiary organized under the laws of the Cayman Islands (the “Subsidiary”).

In the future, the Small Cap Portfolio may seek to gain additional exposure to the Grayscale Bitcoin Trust that may not produce qualifying income for the Small Cap Fund under the Internal Revenue Code if held directly. The Small Cap Portfolio will not make any additional investments in the Grayscale Bitcoin Trust if as a result of such investment, its aggregate investment in the Grayscale Bitcoin Trust, either directly or through a Subsidiary, would be more than 15% of its assets at the time of the investment. However, the Portfolio’s investment in the Grayscale Bitcoin Trust may, at times, exceed 15% of its net assets, due to appreciation.

The Subsidiary invests primarily in the Grayscale Bitcoin Trust. The Small Cap Portfolio will invest in its Subsidiary in a manner that is consistent with the limitations of the federal tax laws, rules and regulations that apply to its investors, which are expected to be RICs under Subchapter M. However, the Small Cap Portfolio and its Subsidiary comply with the same fundamental investment restrictions on an aggregate basis, to the extent those restrictions are applicable to the investment activities of the Subsidiary. The Subsidiary also complies with Section 17 of the 1940 Act relating to affiliated transactions and custody, and the Investment Adviser complies with Section 15 of the 1940 Act, relating to investment advisory contracts with respect to the Subsidiary. The Subsidiary is taxed as a corporation and does not, and will not, seek to qualify as a RIC. The Small Cap Portfolio is the sole shareholder of its Subsidiary and does not expect shares of its Subsidiary to be offered or sold to other investors. The Subsidiary includes entities that engage in investment activities in securities or other assets that are primarily controlled by the Small Cap Portfolio. The Small Cap Portfolio does not intend to create or acquire primary control of any entity which primarily engages in investment activities in securities or other assets other than entities wholly-owned by the Small Cap Portfolio.

investment opportunity that it believes is more compelling and represents a greater risk reward profile than other investment(s) held by the Small Cap Portfolio.

The Small Cap Portfolio may invest up to 20% of its assets in high quality, U.S. short-term debt securities and money market instruments to maintain liquidity. Some of these short-term instruments include commercial paper, certificates of deposit, demand and time deposits and banker’s acceptances, U.S. government securities (i.e., U.S. Treasury obligations) and repurchase agreements.

The Small Cap Portfolio held 56.40% of its net assets in the Texas Pacific Land Corporation (the “Land Corporation”) as of March 31, 2026. The Land Corporation is a corporation organized under the laws of the state of New York. One of the largest land owners in Texas, the Land Corporation derives most of its income from oil and gas royalty revenue, land easements and water royalties and sales. The Land Corporation has historically operated with minimal operating expenses, little to no debt and utilized cash flow to return capital to unitholders through share repurchases and dividends. While the Land Corporation has held the majority of its assets since its formation in 1888, the development of energy resources subject to its royalty interests and related land use have experienced rapid growth in recent years due to advances in energy exploration and extraction technologies.

Temporary and Defensive Cash and Cash Equivalent Holdings

The Small Cap Portfolio may maintain during a temporary period, which could be for a short period or a longer period lasting several years or more, of abnormal conditions, a significant portion of its total assets in cash and securities, generally considered to be cash and cash equivalents, including, but not limited to: high quality, U.S. short-term debt securities and money market instruments, as described above. The Investment Adviser will invest in such short-term cash positions to the extent that the Investment Adviser is unable to find sufficient investments meeting its criteria and when the Investment Adviser believes the purchase of additional equity securities would not further the investment objective of the Small Cap Portfolio during such periods of time. Additionally, to respond to adverse market, economic, political or other conditions, which may persist for short or long periods of time, the Small Cap Portfolio may invest up to 100% of its assets in the types of high quality, U.S. short-term debt securities and money market instruments described above.

If the market advances during periods when the Small Cap Portfolio is holding a large cash position, the Small Cap Portfolio may not participate as much as it would have if it had been more fully invested in securities. In the aforementioned temporary defensive periods, the Investment Adviser believes that an additional amount of liquidity in the Small Cap Portfolio is desirable both to meet operating requirements and to take advantage of new investment opportunities. When the Small Cap Portfolio holds a significant portion of assets in cash and cash equivalents, it may not meet its investment objective.

Principal Risks of Investment

Investing in common stocks has inherent risks that could cause you to lose money. The principal risks of investing in the Small Cap Portfolio are listed below and could adversely affect the NAV, total return and value of the Small Cap Portfolio and your investment. The risks are prioritized by order of importance. Each risk summarized below is considered a principal risk of investing in the Small Cap Portfolio, regardless of the order in which it appears. Different risks may be more significant at different times depending on market conditions or other factors.

volatility of that specific security or issuer if the security or issuer performs worse than the market as a whole, which could adversely affect the Small Cap Portfolio’s performance.

ª Non-Diversification Risks: Holding a large portion of its net assets in a small number of issuers exposes the Portfolio to various risks relating to those issuers. A change in the value of any one investment may affect the overall value of the Small Cap Portfolio’s shares more than shares of a more diversified mutual fund that holds more investments.

ª Petroleum and Gas Sector Risk: The profitability of companies in the oil and gas industry is related to worldwide energy prices, exploration costs and production spending. Companies in the oil and gas industry may be at risk for environmental damage claims and other types of litigation. Companies in the oil and gas industry may be adversely affected by: natural disasters or other catastrophes; changes in exchange rates or interest rates; prices for competitive energy services, economic conditions, tax treatment, or government regulation; government intervention; negative public perception; or unfavorable events in the regions where companies operate (e.g., expropriation, nationalization, confiscation of assets and property, imposition of restrictions on foreign investments or repatriation of capital, military coups, social or political unrest, violence or labor unrest). Companies in the oil and gas industry may have significant capital investments in, or engage in transactions involving, emerging market countries, which may heighten these risks.

ª Sector Concentration Risk: Although the Small Cap Portfolio will not concentrate its investments in any industries, the Small Cap Portfolio may, at certain times, have concentrations in one or more sectors which may cause the Portfolio to be more sensitive to economic changes or events occurring in those sectors, and the Portfolio's investments may be more volatile. As of March 31, 2026, the Portfolio had 65.4% invested in the Mining, Quarrying and Oil and Gas Extraction sector.

ª Small-Capitalization Company Risks: Investing in small-capitalization companies often involve more risks than investing in larger companies as small-capitalization companies have narrower markets and more limited managerial and financial resources than larger, more established companies. As a result, their performance can be more volatile and they face a greater risk of business failure, which could increase the volatility of the Small Cap Portfolio’s assets and have an adverse effect on the Portfolio’s performance.

Bitcoin or BTC was the first decentralized crypto asset. Bitcoin is a type of crypto asset that is not issued by a government, bank or central organization. Bitcoin exists on an online, peer-to-peer computer network that hosts the Bitcoin Blockchain. Bitcoin has no physical existence and exists solely through the record of bitcoin transactions on the Bitcoin Blockchain. The Bitcoin Network allows people to exchange tokens of value, bitcoins, which are recorded on a public transaction ledger known as a Blockchain. The Small Cap Portfolio may invest indirectly in bitcoin through the Grayscale Bitcoin Trust and through other pooled investment vehicles that provide exposure to crypto assets. Certain of these investment vehicles, including the Grayscale Bitcoin Trust, are not registered under the 1940 Act and do not receive the protections of the 1940 Act. The Grayscale Bitcoin Trust is a Bitcoin ETF that enables investors to gain exposure to bitcoin in the form of a security while avoiding the challenges of buying, storing, and safekeeping bitcoin, directly. Blockchain technology is a relatively new and untested technology which operates as a distributed ledger. The risks associated with blockchain technology may not fully emerge until the technology is widely used. Blockchain systems could be vulnerable to fraud, particularly if a significant minority of participants

colluded to defraud the rest. Access to a given blockchain requires an individualized key, which, if compromised, could result in loss due to theft, destruction or inaccessibility. There is little regulation of blockchain technology other than the intrinsic public nature of the blockchain system. Any future regulatory developments could affect the viability and expansion of the use of blockchain technology.

Individuals or organizations holding a large amount of crypto assets in which the Small Cap Portfolio may invest indirectly (also known as “whales”) may have the ability to manipulate the prices of those crypto assets.

Certain other crypto-focused, pooled investment vehicles, including the Grayscale Ethereum Classic Trust, in which the Small Cap Portfolio invests, could be determined to be operating out of compliance with the 1940 Act. As a result, the prices of the impacted crypto assets may be subject to large and sudden declines.

In addition to the general risks of investing in other investment vehicles, the value of the Small Cap Portfolio’s indirect investments in crypto assets are subject to fluctuations in the value of the crypto asset, which can be highly volatile. The value of crypto assets is determined by the supply and demand for crypto assets in the global market for the trading of crypto assets, which consists primarily of transactions on crypto asset trading platforms. The value of crypto assets has been, and may continue to be, substantially dependent on speculation, such that trading and investing in crypto assets generally may not be based on fundamental analysis.

assets are a new technological innovation with a limited history; it is a highly speculative asset and future regulatory actions or policies may limit, perhaps to a materially adverse extent, the value of the Small Cap Portfolio’s indirect investment in crypto assets and the ability to exchange a crypto asset or utilize it for payments.

ª Crypto Asset Industry Risk: The crypto asset industry is a newer, speculative, and still-developing industry that faces many risks. The crypto asset industry may still be experiencing a bubble or may experience a bubble again in the future. For example, in the first half of 2022, each of Celsius Network, Voyager Digital Ltd., and Three Arrows Capital declared bankruptcy, resulting in a loss of confidence in participants of the digital asset ecosystem and negative publicity surrounding digital assets more broadly. In November 2022, FTX Trading Ltd. (“FTX”), one of the largest digital asset platforms by volume at the time, halted customer withdrawals amid rumors of the company’s liquidity issues and likely insolvency, which were subsequently corroborated by its CEO. Shortly thereafter, FTX’s CEO resigned and FTX and many of its affiliates filed for bankruptcy in the United States, while other affiliates have entered insolvency, liquidation, or similar proceedings around the globe, following which the U.S. Department of Justice brought criminal fraud and other charges, and the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”) and Commodity Futures Trading Commission (“CFTC”) brought civil securities and commodities fraud charges, against certain of FTX’s and its affiliates’ senior executives, including its former CEO. In addition, several other entities in the crypto asset industry filed for bankruptcy following FTX’s bankruptcy filing, such as BlockFi Inc. and Genesis Global Capital, LLC. In response to these events, the prices of crypto assets experienced extreme volatility and other entities in the crypto asset industry have been negatively affected. It is possible that similar events could occur in the future, which would undermine confidence in the crypto asset industry and negatively affect the value of crypto assets. It is not possible to predict at this time all of the risks that they may pose to the Small Cap Portfolio and its service providers or to the crypto asset industry as a whole.

ª Crypto Asset Regulatory Risk: Crypto asset markets in the United States exist in a state of regulatory uncertainty. Regulatory changes or actions by Congress as well as U.S. federal or state agencies may adversely affect the value of the Small Cap Portfolio’s indirect investments in crypto assets. As digital assets have grown in both popularity and market size, a number of state and federal agencies have issued consumer advisories regarding the risks posed by digital assets to investors. In addition, the Securities and Exchange Commission, U.S. state securities regulators and several foreign governments have issued warnings and instituted legal proceedings in which they argue that certain digital assets may be classified as securities or may be offered and sold as securities, and that both those digital assets and any related initial coin offerings are subject to securities regulations. Additionally, U.S. state and federal, and foreign regulators and legislatures have taken action against

virtual currency businesses or enacted restrictive regimes in response to adverse publicity arising from hacks, consumer harm, or criminal activity stemming from virtual currency activity.

The Small Cap Portfolio’s exposure to crypto assets may change over time and, accordingly, such exposure may not be represented in the Small Cap Portfolio at any given time. Many significant aspects of the tax treatment of investments in crypto assets are uncertain, and a direct or indirect investment in crypto assets may produce non-qualifying income.

ª Market Risks: Mutual funds are subject to market risks and significant fluctuations in value. If the market declines in value, the Small Cap Portfolio is likely to decline in value and you could lose money on your investment. Natural disasters, public health emergencies (including epidemics and pandemics), geopolitical events, tariffs and trading disruptions, terrorism and other global unforeseeable events may lead to instability in world economies and markets, market volatility and may have adverse long-term effects. Advancements in technology may adversely impact markets and the overall performance of the Portfolio. For example, as artificial intelligence is used more widely, the profitability and growth of Portfolio holdings may be impacted, which could significantly impact the overall performance of the Portfolio.

ª Management Risks: There is no guarantee that the Small Cap Portfolio will meet its investment objective. The Investment Adviser does not guarantee the performance of the Small Cap Portfolio, nor can it assure you that the market value of your investment will not decline.

ª Tax Risks: The Small Cap Portfolio has not requested a ruling from the IRS or an opinion of legal counsel as to any tax matters, including whether the Small Cap Portfolio will be treated as a partnership (and not as an association taxable as a corporation) for U.S. federal income tax purposes. If the Small Cap Portfolio were to be treated as a corporation rather than as a partnership for U.S. federal income tax purposes, the Small Cap Portfolio itself would be taxed on its taxable income at corporate tax rates, there would be no flow-through of items of Small Cap Portfolio income, gain, loss or deductions to the Partners, and Small Cap Portfolio distributions generally would be taxable as dividends. Assuming that the Small Cap Portfolio is treated as a partnership, each Partner of the Small Cap Portfolio must include in its own income its allocable share of Portfolio taxable income, whether or not any cash is distributed and, as a result of various limitations imposed by the tax laws, may be unable to currently deduct its allocable share of Portfolio expenses and capital losses, if any. Additionally, the Grayscale Bitcoin Trust (in which the Small Cap Portfolio indirectly invests) takes the position that it is treated as a grantor trust for U.S. federal income tax purposes. However, the tax treatment of digital assets such as those held by the Grayscale Bitcoin Trust is uncertain and could cause the Grayscale Bitcoin Trust to be treated as a corporation for U.S. federal income tax purposes. The imposition of an entity-level tax could affect the value of that investment and, indirectly, your total return.

ª Subsidiary Risks: By investing in its Subsidiary, the Small Cap Portfolio is indirectly exposed to the risks associated with the Subsidiary’s investments. Those investments held by the Subsidiary are generally similar to the investments that are permitted to be held by the Small Cap Portfolio and are subject to the same risks that would apply to similar investments if held directly by the Small Cap Portfolio. The Subsidiary is not registered under the 1940 Act and, unless otherwise noted in this Prospectus, is not subject to all the investor protections of the 1940 Act. In addition, changes in the laws of the United States and/or the Cayman Islands could result in the inability of the Small Cap

Portfolio and/or its Subsidiary to continue to operate and could adversely affect the Small Cap Portfolio’s performance.

ª Valuation Risk: The sales price the Portfolio could receive for any particular portfolio investment may differ from the Portfolio’s valuation of the investment, particularly for securities or other investments, such as bitcoin, that trade in thin or volatile markets or that are valued using a fair value methodology. Valuation may be more difficult in times of market turmoil since many investors and market makers may be reluctant to purchase complex instruments or quote prices for them. Fair valuation of the Portfolio’s investments involves subjective judgment. The Portfolio’s ability to value its investments may be impacted by technological issues and/or errors by pricing services or other third-party service providers. Shares of the Grayscale Bitcoin Trust are intended to reflect the price of bitcoin assets, less fees and expenses, and shares of the Grayscale Bitcoin Trust have historically traded, and may continue to trade, at a significant discount or premium to net asset value. As such, the price of the Grayscale Bitcoin Trust may go down even if the price of the underlying asset, bitcoin, remains unchanged. Additionally, shares that trade at a premium mean that an investor who purchases $1 of a portfolio will actually own less than $1 in assets.

ª Foreign Securities Risks: Investing in foreign securities directly or indirectly (e.g., through ADRs, GDRs, and IDRs) can carry higher returns but involve more risks than those associated with U.S. investments. Additional risks associated with investment in foreign securities include currency fluctuations, political and economic instability, tariffs and trading disruptions, less publicly available information, differences in financial reporting standards and less stringent regulation of securities markets. Foreign securities in which the Portfolio invests may be traded in markets that close before the time that the Portfolio calculates its NAV. Furthermore, certain foreign securities in which the Portfolio invests may be listed on foreign exchanges that trade on weekends or other days when the Portfolio does not calculate its NAV. As a result, the value of the Portfolio’s holdings may change on days when shareholders are not able to purchase or redeem the Small Cap Portfolio’s shares.

engage in transactions and purchase instruments that give rise to forms of leverage, including, among others, the use of reverse repurchase agreements and other borrowings, the investment of collateral from loans of portfolio securities, the use of when issued, delayed-delivery or forward commitment transactions or short sales. To the extent a fund invests in ETFs that achieve leveraged exposure to their underlying indexes through the use of derivative instruments, the fund will indirectly be subject to leveraging risk. As a shareholder in an ETF, the Small Cap Portfolio will bear its pro rata portion of an ETF’s expenses, including advisory fees, in addition to its own expenses. The existence of extreme market volatility or potential lack of an active trading market for an ETF’s shares could result in such shares trading at a significant premium or discount to their NAV.

ª Special Situations Risks: The Small Cap Portfolio may use aggressive investment techniques, including seeking to benefit from “special situations,” such as mergers, reorganizations, or other unusual events expected to affect a particular issuer. There is a risk that the “special situation” might not occur or involve longer time frames than originally expected, which could have a negative impact on the price of the issuer’s securities and fail to produce gains or produce a loss for the Small Cap Portfolio.

ª Leveraging Risks: Investments in derivative instruments may give rise to a form of leverage. The Investment Adviser may engage in speculative transactions, which involve substantial risk and leverage. The use of leverage by the Investment Adviser may increase the volatility of the Small Cap Portfolio. These leveraged instruments may result in losses to the Small Cap Portfolio or may adversely affect the Small Cap Portfolio’s NAV or total return, because instruments that contain leverage are more sensitive to changes in interest rates. The Small Cap Portfolio may also have to sell assets at inopportune times to satisfy its obligations in connection with such transactions.

ª Interest Rate Risk: The risk that when interest rates increase, fixed-income securities held by the Small Cap Portfolio will decline in value. Long-term fixed-income securities will normally have more price volatility because of this risk than short-term fixed-income securities. A low or negative interest rate environment could cause the Small Cap Portfolio’s earnings to fall below the Portfolio’s expense ratio, resulting in a decline in the Portfolio’s share price. A general rise in interest rates may cause investors to move out of fixed income securities on a large scale, which could adversely affect the price and liquidity of fixed income securities. The risks associated with changing interest rates may have unpredictable effects on the markets and the Small Cap Portfolio's investments.

ª Convertible Securities Risks: Convertible securities are subject to the risks affecting both equity and fixed income securities, including market, credit, liquidity and interest rate risk.

ª Cybersecurity Risk: Cybersecurity incidents may allow an unauthorized party to gain access to Small Cap Fund assets or proprietary information, or cause the fund, the Investment Adviser, and/or other service providers (including custodians and financial intermediaries) to suffer data breaches or data corruption. Additionally, cybersecurity failures or breaches of the electronic systems of the Small Cap Fund, the Investment Adviser, or the Small Cap Fund’s other service providers, or the issuers of securities in which the Small Cap Portfolio invests have the ability to disrupt and negatively affect the Fund’s business operations, including the ability to purchase and sell fund shares, potentially resulting in financial losses to the Small Cap Fund and its shareholders.

ª Temporary Defensive Position Risk: If the Small Cap Portfolio takes a temporary defensive position, it may invest all or a large portion of its assets in cash and/or cash equivalents. If the Small Cap

Portfolio takes a temporary defensive position, the Small Cap Fund may not achieve its investment objective.


Investment Objective, Principal Investment Strategies and Principal Risks of the Market Opportunities Portfolio

Investment Objective

The investment objective of the Market Opportunities Portfolio is long-term growth of capital.

Principal Investment Strategies

The Market Opportunities Portfolio is a non-diversified mutual fund that invests, under normal circumstances, at least 65% of its net assets in common stocks, convertible securities, warrants and other equity securities having the characteristics of common stocks (such as ADRs, GDRs and IDRs) of U.S. and foreign companies involved in capital markets or related to capital markets, as well as companies involved in the gaming industry. Capital market companies include companies that are engaged in or derive a substantial portion of their revenue from activities with a publicly traded securities exchange, such as equity exchanges and commodity exchanges, including but not limited to clearing firms and brokerage houses, and in ETFs that invest significantly in such securities. The Market Opportunities Portfolio may also purchase and write options for hedging purposes and/or direct investment.

The Market Opportunities Portfolio may invest up to 20% of its total assets in convertible and non-convertible debt securities rated below investment grade, also known as junk bonds, or unrated securities that the Investment Adviser has determined to be of comparable quality.

The Market Opportunities Portfolio securities will be selected by the Investment Adviser from companies that are engaged in public exchanges, derivative exchanges, and capital markets, companies that experience operational scale from increased volume such as investment banks, credit card processing companies, electronic payment companies, and companies in the gaming industry; and from companies that act as facilitators such as publicly traded expressways, airports, roads and railways. Companies that experience operational scale from increased volume are similar to capital markets companies because they have greater fixed costs than variable costs, operating margins that rise once fixed costs are covered, and an ability to generate higher operating margins once fixed costs are covered (referred to as operating leverage). High operating leverage describes a company’s ability to experience rising profit margins as revenues increase. These companies may be large, medium or small in size if, in the Investment Adviser’s opinion, these companies meet the Market Opportunities Portfolio’s investment criteria. The Investment Adviser seeks to invest in companies with high operating leverage that can expand capacity with negligible or limited associated costs. Generally, high returns on equity, long product life cycles, high barriers to entry and certain degrees of financial gearing are necessary for this. Financial gearing occurs with the use of loans and debt in companies where it is necessary to build capacity and infrastructure before operations can begin. The Investment Adviser selects portfolio securities by, among other things, evaluating a company’s balance sheets, corporate revenues, earnings and dividends. Such companies include, but are not limited to, the following:

ª Exchanges: Companies that are organized as public exchanges where debt and equity securities are traded, including derivative exchanges.

ª Financial Services: Companies that engage in financial service transactions relating to capital markets such as banking, credit cards and investment services.

ª Business Services: Companies that provide business-to-business products and services involving capital markets or the gaming industry.

ª Gaming: Companies engaged in casino entertainment, including casino resorts and other leisure activities.

Other leisure activities are defined as those activities that individuals engage in for entertainment, enjoyment and pleasure, which may take place at casinos. Additionally, a substantial aspect of the operations of gaming companies is the operation of casino resorts, which includes, but is not limited to lodging, amenities and recreational activities.

Although the Market Opportunities Portfolio intends to focus its investments in the capital markets and gaming sectors, the Market Opportunities Portfolio may also purchase the securities of companies such as auction houses and payroll and other processing companies that, due to the fixed costs of their operations, benefit from an increase in the volume of sales/transactions.

The Market Opportunities Portfolio invests indirectly in bitcoin through the Grayscale Bitcoin Trust and through other pooled investment vehicles that provide exposure to crypto assets. Certain of these investment vehicles, including the Grayscale Bitcoin Trust, are not registered under the 1940 Act and do not receive the protections of the 1940 Act. The Market Opportunities Portfolio will not invest directly in bitcoin or other crypto assets. The Grayscale Bitcoin Trust is a Bitcoin ETF and enables investors to gain exposure to bitcoin in the form of a security while avoiding the challenges of buying, storing, and safekeeping bitcoin, directly. Bitcoin is a type of crypto asset that is not issued by a government, bank or central organization. Bitcoin exists on the Bitcoin Network that hosts the Bitcoin Blockchain. Bitcoin has no physical existence and exists solely through the record of bitcoin transactions on the Bitcoin Blockchain. The Grayscale Bitcoin Trust invests principally in bitcoin. The Market Opportunities Portfolio held 10.83% of its net assets in the Grayscale Bitcoin Trust ETF as of March 31, 2026. The Market Opportunities Portfolio may also invest in other pooled investment vehicles that provide exposure to the spot price of crypto assets. For example, the Market Opportunities Portfolio may invest in the Grayscale Bitcoin Mini Trust ETF, the Grayscale Litecoin Trust and the Grayscale Ethereum Classic Trust.

The Market Opportunities Portfolio contributed a portion of its holdings in the Grayscale Bitcoin Trust to a wholly-owned and controlled subsidiary organized under the laws of the Cayman Islands (the “Cayman Subsidiary”).

The Market Opportunities Portfolio is also the sole shareholder of a wholly owned subsidiary organized under Delaware law (the “Delaware Subsidiary”). The Market Opportunities Portfolio contributed a portion of its holdings in the Grayscale Bitcoin Trust to the Delaware Subsidiary. Any net gains that the Delaware Subsidiary recognizes on future sales of the contributed Grayscale Bitcoin Trust shares will be subject to federal and state corporate income tax, but the dividends that the Delaware Subsidiary pays to the Market Opportunities Portfolio (i.e., those gains, net of the tax paid and any other expenses of the Delaware Subsidiary, such as its management and advisory fees) will be eligible to be treated as “qualified dividend income” under the Internal Revenue Code. The Delaware Subsidiary and the Cayman Subsidiary are each referred to herein as a “Subsidiary” and collectively as “Subsidiaries.” Additional information regarding the tax treatment of the Portfolio is provided in the “Taxes” section of the SAI.

information with the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”). The SEC maintains an Internet site that contains reports, proxy and information statements and other information filed electronically by the Grayscale Bitcoin Trust with the SEC which are available on the SEC’s website at http://www.sec.gov.

In the future, the Market Opportunities Portfolio may seek to gain additional exposure to the Grayscale Bitcoin Trust that may not produce qualifying income for the Market Opportunities Fund under the Internal Revenue Code if held directly. The Market Opportunities Portfolio will not make any additional investments in the Grayscale Bitcoin Trust if as a result of such investment, its aggregate investment in the Grayscale Bitcoin Trust, either directly or through a Subsidiary, would be more than 15% of its assets at the time of the investment. However, the Portfolio’s investment in the Grayscale Bitcoin Trust may, at times, exceed 15% of its net assets, due to appreciation.

Each Subsidiary invests primarily in the Grayscale Bitcoin Trust. The Market Opportunities Portfolio will invest in its Subsidiaries in a manner that is consistent with the limitations of the federal tax laws, rules and regulations that apply to its investors, which are expected to be RICs under Subchapter M. However, the Market Opportunities Portfolio and each Subsidiary comply with the same fundamental investment restrictions on an aggregate basis, to the extent those restrictions are applicable to the investment activities of each Subsidiary. Each Subsidiary also complies with Section 17 of the 1940 Act relating to affiliated transactions and custody, and the Investment Adviser complies with Section 15 of the 1940 Act, relating to investment advisory contracts with respect to the Subsidiaries. Neither Subsidiary qualifies or will seek to qualify as a RIC. The Market Opportunities Portfolio is the sole shareholder of each Subsidiary and does not expect shares of the Subsidiaries to be offered or sold to other investors. The Subsidiaries include entities that engage in investment activities in securities or other assets that are primarily controlled by the Market Opportunities Portfolio. The Market Opportunities Portfolio does not intend to create or acquire primary control of any entity which primarily engages in investment activities in securities or other assets other than entities wholly-owned by the Market Opportunities Portfolio.

The Market Opportunities Portfolio may invest up to 35% of its assets in high quality, U.S. short-term debt securities and money market instruments to maintain liquidity. Some of these short-term instruments include commercial paper, certificates of deposit, demand and time deposits and banker’s acceptances, U.S. government securities (i.e., U.S. Treasury obligations) and repurchase agreements.

The Market Opportunities Portfolio held 47.77% of its net assets in the Texas Pacific Land Corporation (the “Land Corporation”) as of March 31, 2026. The Land Corporation is a corporation organized under the laws of the state of New York. One of the largest land owners in Texas, the Land Corporation derives most of its income from oil and gas royalty revenue, land easements and water royalties and sales. The Land Corporation has historically operated with minimal operating expenses, little to no debt and utilized cash flow to return capital to unitholders through share repurchases and dividends. While the Land Corporation has held the majority of its assets since its formation in 1888, the development of energy resources subject to its royalty interests and related land use have experienced rapid growth in recent years due to advances in energy exploration and extraction technologies.

Temporary and Defensive Cash and Cash Equivalent Holdings

The Market Opportunities Portfolio may maintain during a temporary period, which could be for a short period or a longer period lasting several years or more, of abnormal conditions, a significant portion of its total assets in cash and securities, generally considered to be cash and cash equivalents, including, but not limited to: high quality, U.S. short-term debt securities and money market instruments, as described above. The Investment Adviser will invest in such short-term cash positions to the extent that the Investment Adviser is unable to find sufficient investments meeting its criteria and when the Investment Adviser believes the purchase of additional equity securities would not further the investment objective of the Market Opportunities Portfolio during such periods of time. Additionally, to respond to adverse market, economic, political or other conditions, which may persist for short or long periods of time, the Market Opportunities Portfolio may invest up to 100% of its assets in the types of high quality, U.S. short-term debt securities and money market instruments described above.

If the market advances during periods when the Market Opportunities Portfolio is holding a large cash position, the Market Opportunities Portfolio may not participate as much as it would have if it had been more fully invested in securities. In the aforementioned temporary defensive periods, the Investment Adviser believes that an additional amount of liquidity in the Market Opportunities Portfolio is desirable both to meet operating requirements and to take advantage of new investment opportunities. When the Market Opportunities Portfolio holds a significant portion of assets in cash and cash equivalents, it may not meet its investment objective.

Principal Risks of Investment

Investing in common stocks has inherent risks that could cause you to lose money. The principal risks of investing in the Market Opportunities Portfolio are listed below and could adversely affect the NAV, total return and the value of the Market Opportunities Portfolio and your investment. The risks are prioritized by order of importance. Each risk summarized below is considered a principal risk of investing in the Market Opportunities Portfolio, regardless of the order in which it appears. Different risks may be more significant at different times depending on market conditions or other factors.

ª Non-Diversification Risks: Holding a large portion of its net assets in a small number of issuers exposes the Portfolio to various risks relating to those issuers. A change in the value of any one investment may affect the overall value of the Market Opportunities Portfolio’s shares more than shares of a diversified mutual fund that holds more investments.

Bitcoin or BTC was the first decentralized crypto asset. Bitcoin is a type of crypto asset that is not issued by a government, bank or central organization. Bitcoin exists on an online, peer-to-peer computer network that hosts the Bitcoin Blockchain. Bitcoin has no physical existence and exists solely through the record of bitcoin transactions on the Bitcoin Blockchain. The Bitcoin Network allows people to exchange tokens of value, bitcoins, which are recorded on a public transaction ledger known as a Blockchain. The Market Opportunities Portfolio may invest indirectly in bitcoin through the Grayscale Bitcoin Trust and through other pooled investment vehicles that provide exposure to crypto assets. Certain of these investment vehicles, including the Grayscale Bitcoin Trust, are not registered under the 1940 Act and do not receive the protections of the 1940 Act. The Grayscale Bitcoin Trust is a Bitcoin ETF that enables investors to gain exposure to bitcoin in the form of a security while avoiding the challenges of buying, storing, and safekeeping bitcoin, directly. Blockchain technology is a relatively new and untested technology which operates as a distributed ledger. The risks associated with blockchain technology may not fully emerge until the technology is widely used. Blockchain systems could be vulnerable to fraud, particularly if a significant minority of participants colluded to defraud the rest. Access to a given blockchain requires an individualized key, which, if compromised, could result in loss due to theft, destruction or inaccessibility. There is little regulation of blockchain technology other than the intrinsic public nature of the blockchain system. Any future regulatory developments could affect the viability and expansion of the use of blockchain technology.

Individuals or organizations holding a large amount of crypto assets in which the Market Opportunities Portfolio may invest indirectly (also known as “whales”) may have the ability to manipulate the prices of those crypto assets.

Certain other crypto-focused, pooled investment vehicles, including the Grayscale Ethereum Classic Trust, in which the Market Opportunities Portfolio invests could be determined to be operating out of

compliance with the 1940 Act. As a result, the prices of the impacted crypto assets may be subject to large and sudden declines.

In addition to the general risks of investing in other investment vehicles, the value of the Market Opportunities Portfolio’s indirect investments in crypto assets are subject to fluctuations in the value of the crypto asset, which can be highly volatile. The value of crypto assets is determined by the supply and demand for crypto assets in the global market for the trading of crypto assets, which consists primarily of transactions on crypto asset trading platforms. The value of crypto assets has been, and may continue to be, substantially dependent on speculation, such that trading and investing in crypto assets generally may not be based on fundamental analysis.

Currently, there is relatively limited use of crypto assets in the retail and commercial marketplace, which contributes to price volatility. A lack of expansion by crypto assets into retail and commercial markets, or a contraction of such use, may result in increased volatility or a reduction in the value of crypto assets, either of which could adversely impact the value of the Market Opportunities Portfolio’s investment. In addition, to the extent market participants develop a preference for one crypto asset over another, the value of the less preferred crypto assets would likely be adversely affected. Crypto assets are a new technological innovation with a limited history; it is a highly speculative asset and future regulatory actions or policies may limit, perhaps to a materially adverse extent, the value of the Market Opportunities Portfolio’s indirect investment in crypto assets and the ability to exchange a crypto asset or utilize it for payments.

ª Crypto Asset Industry Risk: The crypto asset industry is a newer, speculative, and still-developing industry that faces many risks. The crypto asset industry may still be experiencing a bubble or may experience a bubble again in the future. For example, in the first half of 2022, each of Celsius Network, Voyager Digital Ltd., and Three Arrows Capital declared bankruptcy, resulting in a loss of confidence in participants of the digital asset ecosystem and negative publicity surrounding digital assets more broadly. In November 2022, FTX Trading Ltd. (“FTX”), one of the largest digital asset platforms by volume at the time, halted customer withdrawals amid rumors of the company’s liquidity issues and likely insolvency, which were subsequently corroborated by its CEO. Shortly thereafter, FTX’s CEO resigned and FTX and many of its affiliates filed for bankruptcy in the United States, while other affiliates have entered insolvency, liquidation, or similar proceedings around the globe, following which the U.S. Department of Justice brought criminal fraud and other charges, and the SEC and Commodity Futures Trading Commission (“CFTC”) brought civil securities and commodities fraud charges, against certain of FTX’s and its affiliates’ senior executives, including its former CEO. In addition, several other entities in the crypto asset industry filed for bankruptcy following FTX’s bankruptcy filing, such as BlockFi Inc. and Genesis Global Capital, LLC. In response to these events, the prices of crypto assets experienced extreme volatility and other entities in the crypto asset industry have been negatively affected. It is possible that similar events could occur in the future, which would undermine confidence in the crypto asset industry and negatively affect the value of crypto assets. It is not possible to predict at this time all of the risks that they may pose to the Market Opportunities Portfolio and its service providers or to the crypto asset industry as a whole.

to and operation of digital asset networks; changes in consumer demographics and public preferences; maintenance and development of open-source software protocol; availability and popularity of other forms or methods of buying and selling goods and services; the use of the networks supporting digital assets, such as those for developing smart contracts and distributed applications; general economic conditions and the regulatory environment relating to digital assets; negative consumer or public perception; and general risks tied to the use of information technologies, including cyber risks. A hack or failure of one crypto asset may lead to a loss in confidence in, and thus decreased usage and/or value of, other crypto assets.

ª Crypto Asset Regulatory Risk: Crypto asset markets in the United States exist in a state of regulatory uncertainty. Regulatory changes or actions by Congress as well as U.S. federal or state agencies may adversely affect the value of the Market Opportunities Portfolio’s indirect investments in crypto assets. As digital assets have grown in both popularity and market size, a number of state and federal agencies have issued consumer advisories regarding the risks posed by digital assets to investors. In addition, the SEC, U.S. state securities regulators and several foreign governments have issued warnings and instituted legal proceedings in which they argue that certain digital assets may be classified as securities or may be offered and sold as securities, and that both those digital assets and any related initial coin offerings are subject to securities regulations. Additionally, U.S. state and federal, and foreign regulators and legislatures have taken action against virtual currency businesses or enacted restrictive regimes in response to adverse publicity arising from hacks, consumer harm, or criminal activity stemming from virtual currency activity.

The Market Opportunities Portfolio’s exposure to crypto assets may change over time and, accordingly, such exposure may not be represented in the Market Opportunities Portfolio at any given time. Many significant aspects of the tax treatment of investments in crypto assets are uncertain, and a direct or indirect investment in crypto assets may produce non-qualifying income.

ª Sector Concentration Risk: Although the Market Opportunities Portfolio will not concentrate its investments in any industries, the Market Opportunities Portfolio may, at certain times, have concentrations in one or more sectors which may cause the Portfolio to be more sensitive to economic changes or events occurring in those sectors, and the Portfolio's investments may be more volatile. As of March 31, 2026, the Portfolio had 56.7% invested in the Mining, Quarrying, and Oil and Gas Extraction sector and 21.1% invested in the Finance and Insurance sector.

ª Sector Emphasis Risks: The Market Opportunities Portfolio’s investments in the capital markets sector subjects it to the risks affecting that sector more than would a fund that invests in a wide variety of market sectors. For instance, companies in the capital markets sector may be adversely affected by changes in economic conditions as well as legislative initiatives, all of which may impact the profitability of companies in this sector. The Market Opportunities Portfolio’s investments in the gaming sector may be adversely affected by changes in economic conditions. The casino industry is particularly susceptible to economic conditions that negatively affect tourism. Casino and gaming companies are highly competitive, and new products, casino concepts and venues are competitive challenges to existing companies. In addition, gaming and related companies are highly regulated, and state and federal legislative changes can significantly impact profitability in those sectors.

ª Market Risks: Mutual funds are subject to market risks and significant fluctuations in value. If the market declines in value, the Market Opportunities Portfolio is likely to decline in value and you could lose money on your investment. Natural disasters, public health emergencies (including epidemics and pandemics), geopolitical events, tariffs and trading disruptions, terrorism and other global unforeseeable events may lead to instability in world economies and markets, market volatility and may have adverse long-term effects. Advancements in technology may adversely impact markets and the overall performance of the Portfolio. For example, as artificial intelligence is used more

widely, the profitability and growth of Portfolio holdings may be impacted, which could significantly impact the overall performance of the Portfolio.

ª Management Risks: There is no guarantee that the Market Opportunities Portfolio will meet its investment objective. The Investment Adviser does not guarantee the performance of the Market Opportunities Portfolio, nor can it assure you that the market value of your investment will not decline.

ª Tax Risks: The Market Opportunities Portfolio has not requested a ruling from the IRS or an opinion of legal counsel as to any tax matters, including whether the Market Opportunities Portfolio will be treated as a partnership (and not as an association taxable as a corporation) for U.S. federal income tax purposes. If the Market Opportunities Portfolio were to be treated as a corporation rather than as a partnership for U.S. federal income tax purposes, the Market Opportunities Portfolio itself would be taxed on its taxable income at corporate tax rates, there would be no flow-through of items of Market Opportunities Portfolio income, gain, loss or deductions to the Partners, and Market Opportunities Portfolio distributions generally would be taxable as dividends. Assuming that the Market Opportunities Portfolio is treated as a partnership, each Partner of the Market Opportunities Portfolio must include in its own income its allocable share of Portfolio taxable income, whether or not any cash is distributed and, as a result of various limitations imposed by the tax laws, may be unable to currently deduct its allocable share of Portfolio expenses and capital losses, if any. Additionally, the Grayscale Bitcoin Trust (in which the Market Opportunities Portfolio indirectly invests) takes the position that it is treated as a grantor trust for U.S. federal income tax purposes. However, the tax treatment of digital assets such as those held by the Grayscale Bitcoin Trust is uncertain and could cause the Grayscale Bitcoin Trust to be treated as a corporation for U.S. federal income tax purposes. The imposition of an entity-level tax could affect the value of that investment and, indirectly, your total return.

In order to qualify as a RIC, a fund must meet certain requirements regarding the source of its income, the diversification of its assets and the distribution of its income. Under the test regarding the source of a RIC’s income, at least 90% of the gross income of the RIC each year must be qualifying income, which consists of dividends, interest, gains on investments in securities and certain other categories of investment income. It appears to be the position of the IRS that gain realized on bitcoin investments such as investments in the Grayscale Bitcoin Trust will not be qualifying income. The Market Opportunities Portfolio’s investment in each Subsidiary is expected to provide RIC investors with exposure to such bitcoin investments within the limitations of the Internal Revenue Code for qualification as a RIC because, under applicable tax rules, the earnings of each Subsidiary will be qualifying income for the RIC when distributed by the Subsidiary even though the income would not be qualifying income if earned directly by the RIC or indirectly by an entity classified as a partnership for U.S. federal income tax purposes, such as the Market Opportunities Portfolio. There is a risk, however, that the IRS might assert that the income derived from the Market Opportunities Portfolio’s investment in a Subsidiary will not be considered qualifying income. If a RIC investor were to fail to qualify as a RIC it would become subject to U.S. federal income tax.

ª Subsidiary Risks: By investing in its Subsidiaries, the Market Opportunities Portfolio is indirectly exposed to the risks associated with each Subsidiary’s investments. Those investments held by the Subsidiaries are generally similar to the investments that are permitted to be held by the Market Opportunities Portfolio and are subject to the same risks that would apply to similar investments if held directly by the Market Opportunities Portfolio. Each Subsidiary is not registered under the 1940

Act and, unless otherwise noted in this Prospectus, is not subject to all the investor protections of the 1940 Act. In addition, changes in the laws of the United States, Delaware and/or the Cayman Islands could result in the inability of the Market Opportunities Portfolio and/or its Subsidiaries to continue to operate and could adversely affect the Market Opportunities Portfolio’s performance.

ª Foreign Securities Risks: Investing in foreign securities directly or indirectly (e.g., through ADRs, GDRs, and IDRs) can carry higher returns but involve more risks than those associated with U.S. investments. Additional risks associated with investment in foreign securities include currency fluctuations, political and economic instability, tariffs and trading disruptions, less publicly available information, differences in financial reporting standards and less stringent regulation of securities markets. Foreign securities in which the Portfolio invests may be traded in markets that close before the time that the Portfolio calculates its NAV. Furthermore, certain foreign securities in which the Portfolio invests may be listed on foreign exchanges that trade on weekends or other days when the Portfolio does not calculate its NAV. As a result, the value of the Portfolio’s holdings may change on days when shareholders are not able to purchase or redeem the Market Opportunities Portfolio’s shares.

ª Liquidity Risks: The Investment Adviser may not be able to sell portfolio securities at an optimal time or price. The Portfolio’s significant investment in a single position, makes the Portfolio especially susceptible to the risk that during certain periods the liquidity of the single position will decrease or disappear suddenly and without warning as a result of adverse market or political events, or adverse investor perceptions. The Portfolio’s significant investment in a single position, makes the Portfolio especially susceptible to the risk that during certain periods the liquidity of the single position will decrease or disappear suddenly and without warning as a result of adverse market or political events, or adverse investor perceptions. The Portfolio’s significant investment in a single position, makes the Portfolio especially susceptible to the risk that during certain periods the liquidity of the single position will decrease or disappear suddenly and without warning as a result of adverse market or political events, or adverse investor perceptions.

ª Exchange-Traded Funds (ETFs) Risks: ETFs are registered investment companies whose shares are listed and traded on U.S. stock exchanges or otherwise traded in the over-the-counter market. In general, passively-managed ETFs seek to track a specified securities index or a basket of securities that an “index provider,” such as S&P Global, selects as representative of a market, market segment or industry sector. A passively-managed ETF is designed so that its performance will correspond closely with that of the index it tracks. Actively-managed ETFs may not meet their investment objective based on an ETF’s investment adviser’s success or failure to implement strategies for the ETF and/or the investment adviser’s ability to control the ETF’s level of risk. A leveraged ETF will engage in transactions and purchase instruments that give rise to forms of leverage, including, among others, the use of reverse repurchase agreements and other borrowings, the investment of collateral from loans of portfolio securities, the use of when issued, delayed-delivery or forward commitment transactions or short sales. To the extent a fund invests in ETFs that achieve leveraged exposure to their underlying indexes through the use of derivative instruments, the fund will indirectly be subject to leveraging risk. As a shareholder in an ETF, the Market Opportunities Portfolio will bear its pro rata portion of an ETF’s expenses, including advisory fees, in addition to its own expenses. The existence of extreme market volatility or potential lack of an active trading market for an ETF’s shares could result in such shares trading at a significant premium or discount to their NAV.

ª Valuation Risk: The sales price the Portfolio could receive for any particular portfolio investment may differ from the Portfolio’s valuation of the investment, particularly for securities or other investments, such as bitcoin, that trade in thin or volatile markets or that are valued using a fair value methodology. Valuation may be more difficult in times of market turmoil since many investors and market makers may be reluctant to purchase complex instruments or quote prices for them. Fair valuation of the Portfolio's investments involves subjective judgment. The Portfolio’s ability to value its investments may be impacted by technological issues and/or errors by pricing services or other third-party service providers. Shares of the Grayscale Bitcoin Trust are intended to reflect the price of bitcoin assets, less fees and expenses, and shares of the Grayscale Bitcoin Trust have historically traded, and may continue to trade, at a significant discount or premium to net asset value. As such, the price of the Grayscale Bitcoin Trust may go down even if the price of the underlying asset, bitcoin, remains unchanged. Additionally, shares that trade at a premium mean that an investor who purchases $1 of a portfolio will actually own less than $1 in assets.

ª Interest Rate Risk: The risk that when interest rates increase, fixed-income securities held by the Market Opportunities Portfolio will decline in value. Long-term fixed-income securities will normally have more price volatility because of this risk than short-term fixed-income securities. A low or negative interest rate environment could cause the Market Opportunities Portfolio’s earnings to fall below the Portfolio’s expense ratio, resulting in a decline in the Portfolio’s share price. A general rise in interest rates may cause investors to move out of fixed income securities on a large scale, which could adversely affect the price and liquidity of fixed income securities. The risks associated with changing interest rates may have unpredictable effects on the markets and the Market Opportunities Portfolio's investments.

ª Leveraging Risks: Investments in derivative instruments may give rise to a form of leverage. The Investment Adviser may engage in speculative transactions, which involve substantial risk and leverage. The use of leverage by the Investment Adviser may increase the volatility of the Market Opportunities Portfolio. These leveraged instruments may result in losses to the Market Opportunities Portfolio or may adversely affect the Market Opportunities Portfolio’s NAV or total return, because instruments that contain leverage are more sensitive to changes in interest rates. The Market Opportunities Portfolio may also have to sell assets at inopportune times to satisfy its obligations in connection with such transactions.

ª Convertible Securities Risks: Convertible securities are subject to the risks affecting both equity and fixed income securities, including market, credit, liquidity and interest rate risk.

ª Cybersecurity Risk: Cybersecurity incidents may allow an unauthorized party to gain access to Market Opportunities Fund assets or proprietary information, or cause the fund, the Investment Adviser, and/or other service providers (including custodians and financial intermediaries) to suffer data breaches or data corruption. Additionally, cybersecurity failures or breaches of the electronic systems of the Market Opportunities Fund, the Investment Adviser, or the Market Opportunities Fund’s other service providers, or the issuers of securities in which the Market Opportunities Portfolio invests have the ability to disrupt and negatively affect the Fund’s business operations, including the ability to purchase and sell fund shares, potentially resulting in financial losses to the Market Opportunities Fund and its shareholders.

ª Temporary Defensive Position Risk: If the Market Opportunities Portfolio takes a temporary defensive position, it may invest all or a large portion of its assets in cash and/or cash equivalents. If the Market Opportunities Portfolio takes a temporary defensive position, the Market Opportunities Fund may not achieve its investment objective.


Investment Objective, Principal Investment Strategies and Principal Risks of the Multi-Disciplinary Income Portfolio

Investment Objective

The investment objective of the Multi-Disciplinary Income Portfolio is total return. This investment objective is non-fundamental, which means that the Board of Trustees may change the investment objective without shareholder approval.

Principal Investment Strategies

The Multi-Disciplinary Income Portfolio is a diversified mutual fund. “Total Return” sought by the Multi-Disciplinary Income Portfolio consists of income earned on the Multi-Disciplinary Income Portfolio’s investments, plus capital appreciation. The Multi-Disciplinary Income Portfolio utilizes a two-part investment strategy, which includes fixed-income components, including fixed-income ETFs, collateralized loan obligations (“CLOs”) and senior secured corporate loans, and derivatives components. Under normal circumstances, the Multi-Disciplinary Income Portfolio will invest at least 65% of its net assets in fixed-income securities (which includes CLOs and corporate loans), derivatives and cash or cash equivalents committed as collateral for written option contracts.

There is no limit on the amount of assets the Multi-Disciplinary Income Portfolio may invest in fixed-income securities. The Multi-Disciplinary Income Portfolio may invest in the debt tranches of CLOs. The CLO debt tranches may have any stated maturity and may be rated (at time of issuance), from “AAA” to and including “B-”(or equivalent by a nationally recognized statistical rating organization (“NRSRO”)), or if unrated, determined to be of comparable credit quality by the Investment Adviser. An NRSRO is a credit rating agency that is registered with the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”) that issues credit ratings that the SEC permits other financial firms to use for certain regulatory purposes.

The Multi-Disciplinary Income Portfolio may invest up to 35% of its net assets in senior secured corporate loans, issued by either public or privately owned companies. Senior secured corporate loans will be first lien or second lien loans, have maturities of up to 8 years, and may be 100% rated below investment grade (junk bonds) by an NRSRO.

CLO structures are securitization vehicles collateralized by a pool of investments, which are primarily below investment grade (or unrated equivalent), first lien senior secured corporate loans (generally at least 90% of the CLO portfolio). CLOs are typically permitted to also invest up to 10% of their portfolio in below investment grade (or unrated equivalent) second lien senior secured corporate loans, unsecured corporate loans, and senior secured and senior unsecured corporate bonds. CLOs are generally required to hold a portfolio of investments that are highly diversified by the underlying borrower and industry and that are subject to a variety of asset concentration limitations. The covenants of a typical CLO structure are, with certain exceptions, based primarily on the cash flow generated by, and the par value (as opposed to the market price) of, the collateral. These covenants include collateral coverage tests, interest coverage tests and collateral quality tests. The CLOs are generally structured with several debt tranches (typically rated “AAA” and “AA” (or its equivalent), which are the senior notes of the CLO, down to “BB-” or “B-” rated (or its equivalent), which is below investment grade, at the most junior debt level), and an equity or “first loss” tranche. CLOs have two priority-of-payment schedules (“waterfalls”), which are documented in a CLO’s indenture, and which govern how cash generated from a CLO’s underlying collateral is distributed to the CLO’s debt and equity tranches. The interest waterfall applies to interest payments received on a CLO’s underlying collateral. The principal waterfall applies to cash generated from principal on the underlying collateral, primarily through loan repayments and the proceeds from

loan sales. Debt tranches (starting with the AAA rated, then AA rated and then lower rated debt tranches in that order) are paid sequentially under the waterfall, with the equity or “first loss” tranche paid last. Losses are first borne by the equity tranche, followed by the junior debt tranches, and finally by the senior debt tranches. The equity has the highest potential return but is subject to the greatest risk of loss if some collateral assets held by the CLO default and the cash received by the CLO is insufficient to meet all its debt service obligations under the waterfall. Since the debt tranches of CLOs are over-collateralized, they are partially protected from defaults of collateral assets held by the CLO. The debt tranches generally have a higher rating and lower yield than the underlying collateral assets held in the CLO. Despite the protection afforded through subordination, the debt tranches can still experience losses due to actual defaults of the collateral assets, market anticipation of defaults and aversion to CLO investments as a class.

The Investment Adviser uses a bottom-up approach in managing the Multi-Disciplinary Income Portfolio, which means that the focus is on the analysis of individual securities. By engaging in quantitative and qualitative analysis of individual securities, the Investment Adviser examines an investment’s current valuation, income potential, risk adjusted return and credit profile.

The Multi-Disciplinary Income Portfolio will invest in CLOs and senior secured corporate loans with a minimum initial total offering size of $250 million, that are floating rate and are U.S. dollar denominated. The Multi-Disciplinary Income Portfolio may purchase CLOs and senior secured corporate loans, in both the primary and secondary markets.

The Multi-Disciplinary Income Portfolio will generally not invest more than 5% of its portfolio in any single investment measured at the time of purchase. It is intended that the Multi-Disciplinary Income Portfolio will hold between 20 to 75 investments with a position weighing between 1% to 5% per security. The Multi-Disciplinary Income Portfolio may temporarily deviate from this diversification weighting due to, among other reasons, market conditions and the initial size of the fund as determined by the Investment Adviser, in its sole discretion.

Temporary and Defensive Cash and Cash Equivalent Holdings

The Multi-Disciplinary Income Portfolio may maintain during a temporary period, which could be for a short period or a longer period lasting several years or more, of abnormal conditions, a significant portion of its total assets in cash and securities, generally considered to be cash and cash equivalents, including, but not limited to: high quality, U.S. short-term debt securities and money market instruments, as described above. The Investment Adviser will invest in such short-term cash positions to the extent that the Investment Adviser is unable to find sufficient investments meeting its criteria and when the Investment Adviser believes the purchase of additional investments would not further the investment objective of the Multi-Disciplinary Income Portfolio during such periods of time. Additionally, to respond to adverse market, economic, political or other conditions, which may persist for short or long periods of time, the Multi-Disciplinary Income Portfolio may invest up to 100% of its assets in the types of high quality, U.S. short-term debt securities and money market instruments described above.

If the market advances during periods when the Multi-Disciplinary Income Portfolio is holding a large cash position, the Portfolio may not participate as much as it would have if it had been more fully invested in securities. In the aforementioned temporary defensive periods, the Investment Adviser believes that an additional amount of liquidity in the Multi-Disciplinary Income Portfolio is desirable both to meet operating requirements and to take advantage of new investment opportunities. When the Multi-

Disciplinary Income Portfolio holds a significant portion of assets in cash and cash equivalents, it may not meet its investment objective.

Principal Risks of Investment

The Multi-Disciplinary Income Portfolio’s investments have inherent risks that could cause you to lose money. The principal risks of investing in the Multi-Disciplinary Income Portfolio are listed below and could adversely affect the net asset value (“NAV”), total return and the value of the Multi-Disciplinary Income Portfolio and your investment. The risks are prioritized by order of importance. Each risk summarized below is considered a principal risk of investing in the Multi-Disciplinary Income Portfolio, regardless of the order in which it appears. Different risks may be more significant at different times depending on market conditions or other factors.

ª Collateralized Loan Obligations Risk. A CLO is a securitization vehicle collateralized by a pool of credit-related assets. Generally, these assets are below investment grade and are subject to greater credit risk, price volatility and risk of loss than investment grade securities. CLO securities present risks similar to those of other types of credit investments, including default (credit), interest rate and prepayment risks. The extent of these risks depends largely on the type of securities used as collateral and the debt tranche of the CLOs in which the Multi-Disciplinary Income Portfolio invests. In addition, CLOs are often governed by a complex series of legal documents and contracts, which increases the risk of dispute over the interpretation and enforceability of such documents relative to other types of investments. There is also a risk that the trustee of a CLO does not properly carry out its duties to the CLO, potentially resulting in loss to the CLO.

ª Collateralized Loan Obligations Leveraging Risk. CLOs are typically leveraged, and such leverage will magnify the loss on CLO investments, which may in turn magnify the loss experienced by the Multi-Disciplinary Income Portfolio. The cumulative effect of the use of leverage with respect to any investments in a market that moves adversely to such investments could result in a substantial loss that would be greater than if the Multi-Disciplinary Income Portfolio’s investments were not leveraged.

ª Collateralized Loan Obligations Manager Risk. CLO managers are responsible for selecting, managing, and replacing the underlying collateral assets within a CLO. CLO managers may have limited operating histories, may be subject to conflicts of interests, including managing the assets of other clients or other investment vehicles, or receiving fees that incentivize maximizing the yield, and indirectly the risk, of a CLO. Adverse developments with respect to a CLO manager, such as personnel and resource constraints, regulatory issues or other developments that may impact the ability and/or performance of the CLO manager, may adversely impact the performance of the CLO debt tranches in which the Multi-Disciplinary Income Portfolio invests.

ª Below Investment Grade Securities Risks. Securities rated “BB+” or below by S&P or “Ba1” or below by Moody’s are known as high yield securities and are commonly referred to as “junk debt.” Such securities entail greater price volatility and credit and interest rate risk than investment-grade securities. Analysis of the creditworthiness of high yield issuers is more complex than for higher-rated securities, making it more difficult for the Investment Adviser to accurately predict risk. There is a greater risk with high yield securities that an issuer will not be able to make principal and interest payments when due. If the Multi-Disciplinary Income Portfolio pursues missed payments, there is a risk that fund expenses could increase. In addition, lower-rated securities may not trade as often and may be less liquid than higher-rated securities, especially during periods of economic uncertainty or change. As a result of all these factors, these securities are generally considered to be speculative.

ª Credit/Default Risk. The Multi-Disciplinary Income Portfolio is subject to the risks associated with the credit quality of CLO debt tranches and corporate loans. Credit quality measures the likelihood that the obligor will be able to meet its debt service obligations. Credit risk is the risk that an obligor will be unable to make principal and interest payments when due, or default on its obligations. Most CLO debt tranches and corporate loans which would be considered for investment by the Multi-Disciplinary Income Portfolio, will have credit ratings issued from NRSROs such as S&P Global, Fitch, and Moody’s. These NRSROs assign ratings to the obligor by assessing the likelihood of issuer default.

ª Cybersecurity Risk. Cybersecurity incidents may allow an unauthorized party to gain access to Multi-Disciplinary Income Portfolio assets or proprietary information, or cause the fund, the Investment Adviser, and/or other service providers (including custodians and financial intermediaries) to suffer data breaches or data corruption. Additionally, cybersecurity failures or breaches of the electronic systems of the Multi-Disciplinary Income Portfolio, the Investment Adviser, or the Multi-Disciplinary Income Portfolio’s other service providers, or the issuers of securities in which the Multi-Disciplinary Income Portfolio invests have the ability to disrupt and negatively affect the Portfolio’s business operations, including the ability to purchase and sell fund shares, potentially resulting in financial losses to the Multi-Disciplinary Income Portfolio and its shareholders.

ª Derivatives Risk. The Multi-Disciplinary Income Portfolio’s investments in futures, options and other derivative instruments may result in loss. Derivative instruments may be illiquid, difficult to price and leveraged so that small changes may produce disproportionate losses to the Multi-Disciplinary Income Portfolio. The use of derivatives is a highly specialized activity that involves investment techniques and risks different from those associated with investments in more traditional securities and instruments.

ª Exchange-Traded Funds (ETFs) Risk. ETFs are registered investment companies whose shares are listed and traded on U.S. stock exchanges or otherwise traded in the over-the-counter market. In general, passively-managed ETFs seek to track a specified securities index or a basket of securities that an “index provider,” such as S&P Global, selects as representative of a market, market segment or industry sector. A passively-managed ETF is designed so that its performance will correspond closely with that of the index it tracks. Actively-managed ETFs may not meet their investment objective based on an ETF’s investment adviser’s success or failure to implement strategies for the ETF and/or the investment adviser’s ability to control the ETF’s level or risk. A leveraged ETF will engage in transactions and purchase instruments that give rise to forms of leverage, including, among others, the use of reverse repurchase agreements and other borrowings, the investment of collateral from loans of portfolio securities, the use of when issued, delayed-delivery or forward commitment transactions or short sales. To the extent a fund invests in ETFs that achieve leveraged exposure to their underlying indexes through the use of derivative instruments, the fund will indirectly be subject to leveraging risk. As a shareholder in an ETF, the Multi-Disciplinary Income Portfolio will bear its pro rata portion of an ETF’s expenses, including advisory fees, in addition to its own expenses. The existence of extreme market volatility or potential lack of an active trading market for an ETF’s shares could result in such shares trading at a significant premium or discount to their NAV.

ª Fixed Income Risk. Fixed income securities are subject to credit risk and interest rate risk. Credit risk, as described more fully herein, refers to the possibility that the issuer of a debt security will be unable to make interest payments or repay principal when it becomes due. Interest rate risk refers to fluctuations in the value of a debt security resulting from changes in the general level of interest rates. Prices of fixed income securities tend to move inversely with changes in interest rates. Additionally, investments in fixed income securities are subject to the following risks:

◦Prepayment Risk. CLO debt tranches and corporate loans are subject to prepayment risk. During periods when credit spreads are contracting, a callable CLO debt tranche or corporate loan held by the Multi-Disciplinary Income Portfolio may be “called” and repaid before its stated maturity, and the Multi-Disciplinary Income Portfolio may have to reinvest the proceeds at a lower interest rate, resulting in a decline in the Multi-Disciplinary Income Portfolio’s income. CLOs are also typically structured such that, after a specified time period (i.e., the non-call period), the majority investor(s) in the equity tranche can call (i.e., require the CLO issuer to redeem) the CLO debt tranches issued by the CLO in full, plus accrued interest. The Multi-Disciplinary Income Portfolio may not be able to accurately predict when or which of its CLO investments may be called, resulting in the Multi-Disciplinary Income Portfolio having to reinvest the proceeds in unfavorable market conditions, which in turn could cause a decline in the Multi-Disciplinary Income Portfolio’s income.

◦Credit Risk of Underlying CLO Collateral. The ability of the underlying collateral assets held by the CLOs to generate sufficient cash flow to meet the debt service requirements of the CLO debt tranches on a full and timely basis when principal and/or interest payments are due, may be adversely affected by payment defaults of certain collateral assets held by the CLO.

◦Extension Risk. During periods when credit spreads are increasing, certain CLO debt tranches may be paid off substantially more slowly than originally anticipated and the value of those securities may fall sharply, resulting in a decline in the Multi-Disciplinary Income Portfolio’s income and potentially in the value of the Multi-Disciplinary Income Portfolio’s investments.

◦Interest Rate Risk: The risk that when interest rates increase, fixed-income securities held by the Multi-Disciplinary Income Portfolio may decline in value. Floating interest rate securities may increase or decrease in value in response to changes in interest rates, although generally to a lesser degree than fixed-income securities.

◦Floating Interest Rate Risk. CLO tranches and corporate loans have floating interest rates, and therefore their market price may be less sensitive to interest rate changes than securities with fixed interest rates but may still decline in value if their interest rates do not rise as much, or as quickly, as interest rates in general. Conversely, floating rate securities will not generally increase in value if interest rates decline. Since the Multi-Disciplinary Income Portfolio invests primarily in floating rate CLO debt tranches and corporate loans, a decline in interest rates may result in a reduction of income and may adversely affect the value of the Multi-Disciplinary Income Portfolio’s shares. The interest rate for a CLO tranche resets quarterly and for corporate loans usually resets either monthly or quarterly, by reference to a benchmark interest rate index. The impact of interest rate changes on floating rate CLO investments and corporate loans is typically mitigated by the periodic interest rate reset of the investments. Securities with longer durations tend to be more sensitive to interest rate changes, usually making them more volatile than securities with shorter durations.

◦Income Risk. The Multi-Disciplinary Income Portfolio’s income may decline if interest rates fall. This decline in income can occur because investments held by the Multi-Disciplinary Income Portfolio will have floating or variable interest rates.

◦Privately Issued Securities Risk. The Multi-Disciplinary Income Portfolio may invest in privately issued securities, including those that are normally purchased pursuant to Rule 144A or

Regulation S under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended. Privately issued securities typically may be resold only to qualified institutional buyers, in a privately negotiated transaction, to a limited number of purchasers, or in limited quantities after they have been held for a specified period of time and other conditions are met for an exemption from registration. Because there may be relatively few potential purchasers for such securities, especially under adverse market or economic conditions or in the event of adverse changes in the financial condition of the issuer, the Multi-Disciplinary Income Portfolio may find it more difficult to sell such securities when it may be advisable to do so or it may be able to sell such securities only at lesser prices than if such securities were more widely held and traded. At times, it also may be more difficult to determine the fair value of such securities for the purposes of computing the fund’s NAV due to the absence of an active trading market. The determinations of the fair value of the Multi-Disciplinary Income Portfolio’s investments may cause its NAV on a given date to understate or overstate, possibly materially, the value that the Multi-Disciplinary Income Portfolio may ultimately realize on one or more of its investments. There can also be no assurance that a privately issued security previously deemed to be liquid when purchased will continue to be liquid for as long as it is held by the Multi-Disciplinary Income Portfolio, and its value may decline as a result.

ª Liquidity Risk. Liquidity risk refers to the possibility that the Multi-Disciplinary Income Portfolio may not be able to buy or sell a security at a favorable price or time. Consequently, the Multi-Disciplinary Income Portfolio may have to accept a lower price to sell a security, sell other securities to raise cash, or decline an investment opportunity, any of which could have a negative effect on the Multi-Disciplinary Income Portfolio’s performance. Infrequent trading of securities also may lead to an increase in their price volatility. While CLO debt tranches and corporate loans in which the Multi-Disciplinary Income Portfolio seeks to invest are expected to be supported by a secondary market, it is possible that they may be characterized as illiquid investments under adverse market conditions resulting in a limited market for the resale for such securities or affected by the liquidity in the fixed income market, generally.

ª Management Risk. The Investment Adviser continuously evaluates the Multi-Disciplinary Income Portfolio’s holdings, purchases, and sales with a view to achieving the Multi-Disciplinary Income Portfolio’s investment objective. However, achievement of the stated investment objective cannot be guaranteed. The Investment Adviser’s judgment about the markets, the economy, CLOs and corporate loans may not anticipate actual market movements, economic conditions, CLOs or corporate loans securities performance, and these factors may affect the return on your investment.

ª Market Risk. Mutual funds are subject to market risks and significant fluctuations in value. If the market declines in value, the Multi-Disciplinary Income Portfolio is likely to decline in value and you could lose money on your investment. Natural disasters, public health emergencies (including epidemics and pandemics), geopolitical events, tariffs and trading disruptions, terrorism and other global unforeseeable events may lead to instability in world economies and markets, market volatility and may have adverse long-term effects. Advancements in technology may adversely impact markets and overall performance of the Portfolio. For example, as artificial intelligence is used more widely, the profitability and growth of Portfolio holdings may be impacted, which could significantly impact the overall performance of the Portfolio.

ª Option Transaction Risk. Purchasing and writing put and call options are highly specialized activities and entail greater than ordinary investment risks. The successful use of options depends in part on the ability of the Investment Adviser to manage future price fluctuations and the degree of correlation between the options and securities (or currency) markets. By writing put options on equity securities,

the Multi-Disciplinary Income Portfolio gives up the opportunity to benefit from potential increases in the value of the common stocks above the strike prices of the written put options, but continues to bear the risk of declines in the value of its common stock portfolio. The Multi-Disciplinary Income Portfolio will receive a premium from writing a covered call option that it retains whether or not the option is exercised. The premium received from the written options may not be sufficient to offset any losses sustained from the volatility of the underlying equity securities over time.

ª Redemption Risk. Paying redemption proceeds may require the Multi-Disciplinary Income Portfolio to dispose of or sell portfolio investments at an inopportune time to obtain the cash needed to pay redemption proceeds. This may cause the Multi-Disciplinary Income Portfolio to incur certain costs and to recognize gains or losses.

ª Temporary Defensive Position Risk. If the Multi-Disciplinary Income Portfolio takes a temporary defensive position, it may invest all or a large portion of its assets in cash and/or cash equivalents. If the Multi-Disciplinary Income Portfolio takes a temporary defensive position, the Multi-Disciplinary Income Portfolio may not achieve its investment objective.

ª Valuation Risk. There is a risk that one or more of the securities in which the Multi-Disciplinary Income Portfolio invests are valued differently than the price realized upon such security’s sale. In times of market instability, valuation may be more difficult. The tiered capital structure of CLOs may also subject them to price volatility and valuation risk in times of market stress.

ª Covenant Lite Corporate Loans Risk. Certain underlying corporate loans in which the Multi-Disciplinary Income Portfolio may invest on a direct basis and/or indirectly through an investment in a CLO debt tranche, may be “covenant lite”, which have few or no financial maintenance covenants that would require a borrower to maintain. As a result, there may be delays in enforcing our interests in such covenant lite securities, which may result in losses and adversely affect the Multi-Disciplinary Income Portfolio


Additional Strategies and Risks of the Portfolios

The principal risks of investing in each Portfolio are described previously in this Prospectus. Each of these risks is considered a “principal” risk of investing in a Portfolio, regardless of the order in which it appears. The following section provides more detail about some of those risks, along with information on additional types of risks that may apply to the Portfolios.

Collateralized Loan Obligations Leveraging Risk - Multi-Disciplinary Income Portfolio

CLOs are typically leveraged, and such leverage will magnify the loss on CLO investments, which may in turn magnify the loss experienced by the Multi-Disciplinary Income Portfolio. The cumulative effect of the use of leverage with respect to any investments in a market that moves adversely to such investments could result in a substantial loss that would be greater than if the Multi-Disciplinary Income Portfolio’s investments were not leveraged.

Collateralized Loan Obligations Manager Risk - Multi-Disciplinary Income Portfolio.

CLO managers are responsible for selecting, managing, and replacing the underlying collateral assets within a CLO. CLO managers may have limited operating histories, may be subject to conflicts of interests, including managing the assets of other clients or other investment vehicles, or receiving fees that incentivize maximizing the yield, and indirectly the risk, of a CLO. Adverse developments with respect to a CLO manager, such as personnel and resource constraints, regulatory issues or other developments that may impact the ability and/or performance of the CLO manager, may adversely impact the performance of the CLO debt tranches in which the Multi-Disciplinary Income Portfolio invests.

Collateralized Loan Obligations Risk - Multi-Disciplinary Income Portfolio.

A CLO is a securitization vehicle collateralized by a pool of credit-related assets. Generally, these assets are below investment grade and are subject to greater credit risk, price volatility and risk of loss than investment grade securities. CLO securities present risks similar to those of other types of credit investments, including default (credit), interest rate and prepayment risks. The extent of these risks depends largely on the type of securities used as collateral and the tranche of the CLOs in which the Multi-Disciplinary Income Portfolio invests. In addition, CLOs are often governed by a complex series of legal documents and contracts, which increases the risk of dispute over the interpretation and enforceability of such documents relative to other types of investments. There is also a risk that the trustee of a CLO does not properly carry out its duties to the CLO, potentially resulting in loss to the CLO.

Covenant Lite Corporate Loans Risk - Multi-Disciplinary Income Portfolio.

Certain underlying corporate loans in which the Multi-Disciplinary Income Portfolio may invest on a direct basis and/or indirectly through an investment in a CLO debt tranche, may be “covenant lite”, which have few or no financial maintenance covenants that would require a borrower to maintain. As a result, there may be delays in enforcing our interests in such covenant lite securities, which may result in losses and adversely affect the Multi-Disciplinary Income Portfolio.

Credit/Default Risk - Multi-Disciplinary Income Portfolio

The Multi-Disciplinary Income Portfolio is subject to the risks associated with the credit quality of CLO debt tranches and corporate loans. Credit quality measures the likelihood that the obligor will be able to meet its debt service obligations. Credit risk is the risk that an obligor will be unable to make principal and interest payments when due, or default on its obligations. Most CLO debt tranches and corporate loans which would be considered for investment by the Multi-Disciplinary Income Portfolio, will have credit ratings issued from NRSROs such as S&P Global, Fitch, and Moody’s. These NRSROs assign ratings to the obligor by assessing the likelihood of issuer default.

Currency Risk - All Portfolios except the Multi-Disciplinary Income Portfolio

Fluctuations in the exchange rates between the U.S. dollar and foreign currencies may negatively impact an investment. A decline in the value of a foreign currency versus the U.S. dollar reduces the dollar value of securities denominated in that currency. Exchange rate movements can be large and unpredictable and can last for extended periods. Absent other events that could otherwise affect the value of a foreign security (such as a change in the political climate or an issuer’s credit quality), appreciation in value of a foreign currency generally can be expected to increase the value of a foreign-currency denominated security in terms of U.S. dollars. An increase in foreign interest rates or a decline in the value of the foreign currency relative to the U.S. dollar generally can be expected to depress the value of a foreign currency-denominated security. Although a Portfolio may invest in securities denominated in foreign currencies, its portfolio securities and other assets are valued in U.S. dollars.

Currency exchange rates may fluctuate significantly over short periods of time causing, together with other factors, a Portfolio’s net asset value to fluctuate as well. Currency exchange rates generally are determined by the forces of supply and demand in the foreign exchange markets and the relative merits of investments in different countries, actual or anticipated changes in interest rates and other complex factors, as seen from an international perspective. Currency exchange rates also may be affected unpredictably by the intervention or the failure to intervene by U.S. or foreign governments or central banks, or by currency controls or political developments in the United States or abroad. To the extent that a Portfolio’s total assets, adjusted to reflect the Portfolio’s net position after giving effect to currency transactions, are denominated in the currencies of foreign countries, the Portfolio will be more susceptible to the risk of adverse economic and political developments within those countries. The Portfolios investing in foreign securities are all subject to the possible imposition of exchange control regulations or freezes on convertibility of currency. Currency risk may be particularly high to the extent that a Portfolio invests in foreign currencies or engages in foreign currency transactions that are economically tied to emerging markets countries. These currency transactions may present market, credit, currency, liquidity, legal, political and other risks different from, or greater than, the risks of investing in developed foreign currencies or engaging in foreign currency transactions that are economically tied to developed foreign countries.

Cybersecurity Risk – All Portfolios.

With the increased use of technologies such as the Internet and the dependence on computer systems to perform business and operational functions, the Portfolios and their service providers may be prone to operational and information security risks resulting from cyber-attacks and/or technological malfunctions. In general, cyber-attacks are deliberate, but unintentional events may have similar effects. Cyber-attacks include, among others, stealing or corrupting data maintained online or digitally, preventing legitimate users from accessing information or services on a website, releasing confidential information without authorization, and causing operational disruption. Cybersecurity incidents may allow an unauthorized party to gain access to Portfolio assets or proprietary information, or cause a Portfolio, the Investment Adviser and/or other service providers (including custodians and financial intermediaries) to suffer data breaches or data corruption. Additionally, cybersecurity failures or breaches of the electronic systems of a Portfolio, the Investment Adviser or a Portfolio’s other service providers, have the ability to cause disruptions and negatively impact the fund’s business operations, including the ability to purchase and sell Portfolio shares, potentially resulting in financial losses to the Portfolio and its shareholders. For instance, cyber-attacks or technical malfunctions may interfere with the processing of shareholder or other transactions, affect a Portfolio’s ability to calculate its NAV, cause the release of private shareholder information or confidential Portfolio information, impede trading, cause reputational damage, and subject a Portfolio to regulatory fines, penalties or financial losses, reimbursement or other compensation costs, and additional compliance costs. Cyber-attacks or technical malfunctions may render records of Portfolio assets and transactions, shareholder ownership of fund shares, and other data integral to the functioning of a Portfolio inaccessible or inaccurate or incomplete. A Portfolio may also incur substantial costs for cybersecurity risk management in order to prevent cyber incidents in the future. A Portfolio and its respective shareholders could be negatively impacted as a result.

Derivatives Risk — All Portfolios

Each Portfolio may invest in derivatives such as options. The successful use of these investment practices depends on the Investment Adviser’s ability to forecast stock price movements correctly. Should stock prices move unexpectedly, a Portfolio may not achieve the anticipated benefits of the transactions, or may realize losses, and thus be in a worse position than if such strategies had not been used. Unlike many exchange-traded options, there are no daily price fluctuation limits for certain options, and adverse market movements could therefore continue for an unlimited extent over a period

of time. In addition, the correlation between movements in the prices of options and movements in the prices of the securities hedged or used for cover will not be perfect and could produce unanticipated losses.

A Portfolio’s ability to dispose of its positions in options depends on the availability of liquid markets in such instruments. Markets in options with respect to a number of types of securities are relatively new and still developing. It is impossible to predict the amount of trading interest that may exist in various types of options. If a secondary market does not exist for an option purchased or written by a Portfolio, it might not be possible to effect a closing transaction in the option (i.e., dispose of the option), with the result that (1) an option purchased by a Portfolio would have to be exercised in order for the Portfolio to realize any profit and (2) a Portfolio may not be able to sell portfolio securities covering an option written by the Portfolio until the option expires or it delivers the underlying security, upon exercise. Therefore, no assurance can be given that a Portfolio will be able to utilize these instruments effectively. In addition, the ability to engage in options transactions may be limited by tax considerations and the use of certain hedging activities may adversely impact the characterization of income to the Portfolio for U.S. federal income tax purposes.

The Paradigm Portfolio may enter into futures contracts in U.S. domestic markets or on exchanges located outside of the United States. Foreign markets may offer advantages such as trading opportunities or arbitrage possibilities not available in the United States. Foreign markets, however, may have greater risk potential than domestic markets. For example, some foreign exchanges are principal markets, so that no common clearing facility exists and that an investor may look only to the broker or counter-party for the performance of the contract. Unlike trading on domestic commodity exchanges, trading on foreign commodity exchanges is not regulated by the Commodity Futures Trading Commission. The use of derivatives is subject to operational and legal risks. Operational risks generally refer to risks related to potential operational issues, including documentation issues, settlement issues, system failures, inadequate controls, and human error. Legal risks generally refer to risks of loss resulting from insufficient documentation, insufficient capacity or authority of counterparty, or legality or enforceability of a contract.

Rule 18f-4 imposes limits on the amount of derivatives a fund can enter into, eliminates the asset segregation framework previously used by funds to comply with Section 18 of the 1940 Act, treats derivatives as senior securities so that a failure to comply with the limits would result in a statutory violation, and requires certain funds to establish and maintain a comprehensive derivatives risk management program and appoint a derivatives risk manager. The Portfolios are required to comply with Rule 18f-4 and have adopted procedures for investing in derivatives and other transactions in compliance with Rule 18f-4.

Fixed Income Risk – Multi-Disciplinary Income Portfolio

Fixed income securities are subject to credit risk and interest rate risk. Credit risk, as described more fully herein, refers to the possibility that the issuer of a debt security will be unable to make interest payments or repay principal when it becomes due. Interest rate risk refers to fluctuations in the value of a debt security resulting from changes in the general level of interest rates. Prices of fixed income securities tend to move inversely with changes in interest rates. Additionally, investments in fixed income securities are subject to the following risks:

◦Prepayment Risk. CLO debt tranches and corporate loans are subject to prepayment risk. During periods when credit spreads are contracting a callable CLO debt tranche or corporate loan held by the Multi-Disciplinary Income Portfolio may be “called” and repaid before its stated maturity,

and the Multi-Disciplinary Income Portfolio may have to reinvest the proceeds at a lower interest rate, resulting in a decline in the Multi-Disciplinary Income Portfolio’s income. CLOs are also typically structured such that, after a specified time period (i.e., the non-call period), the majority investor(s) in the equity tranche can call (i.e., require the CLO issuer to redeem) the CLO debt tranches issued by the CLO in full, plus accrued interest. The Multi-Disciplinary Income Portfolio may not be able to accurately predict when or which of its CLO investments may be called, resulting in the Multi-Disciplinary Income Portfolio having to reinvest the proceeds in unfavorable market conditions, which in turn could cause a decline in the Multi-Disciplinary Income Portfolio’s income.

◦Floating Interest Rate Risk. CLO tranches and corporate loans have floating interest rates, and therefore their market price may be less sensitive to interest rate changes than securities with fixed interest rates but may still decline in value if their interest rates do not rise as much, or as quickly, as interest rates in general. Conversely, floating rate securities will not generally increase in value if interest rates decline. Since the Multi-Disciplinary Income Portfolio invests in floating rate CLO debt tranches and corporate loans, a decline in interest rates may result in a reduction of income and may adversely affect the value of the Multi-Disciplinary Income Portfolio’s shares. The interest rate for a CLO tranche resets quarterly and for corporate loans usually reset either monthly or quarterly, by reference to a benchmark interest rate index. The impact of interest rate changes on floating rate CLO investments and corporate loans is typically mitigated by the periodic interest rate reset of the investments. Securities with longer durations tend to be more sensitive to interest rate changes, usually making them more volatile than securities with shorter durations.

◦Privately Issued Securities Risk. The Multi-Disciplinary Income Portfolio may invest in privately issued securities, including those that are normally purchased pursuant to Rule 144A or Regulation S under the Securities Act of 1933. Privately issued securities typically may be resold only to qualified institutional buyers, in a privately negotiated transaction, to a limited number of purchasers, or in limited quantities after they have been held for a specified period of time and other conditions are met for an exemption from registration. Because there may be relatively few

potential purchasers for such securities, especially under adverse market or economic conditions or in the event of adverse changes in the financial condition of the issuer, the Multi-Disciplinary Income Portfolio may find it more difficult to sell such securities when it may be advisable to do so or it may be able to sell such securities only at lesser prices than if such securities were more widely held and traded. At times, it also may be more difficult to determine the fair value of such securities for the purposes of computing the Multi-Disciplinary Income Portfolio’s NAV due to the absence of an active trading market. The determinations of the fair value of the Multi-Disciplinary Income Portfolio investments may cause the Multi-Disciplinary Income Portfolio’s NAV on a given date to understate or overstate, possibly materially, the value that the Multi-Disciplinary Income Portfolio may ultimately realize on one or more of its investments. There can also be no assurance that a privately issued security previously deemed to be liquid when purchased will continue to be liquid for as long as it is held by the Multi-Disciplinary Income Portfolio, and its value may decline as a result.

Foreign Securities — All Portfolios except the Multi-Disciplinary Income Portfolio

Investing in foreign securities can carry higher returns than those generally associated with U.S. investments. However, foreign securities may be substantially riskier than U.S. investments. The economies of foreign countries may differ from the U.S. economy in such respects as growth of gross domestic product, rate of inflation, currency depreciation, capital reinvestment, resource self-sufficiency, and balance of payments position. Furthermore, the economies of developing countries generally are heavily dependent on international trade and, accordingly, have been, and may continue to be, adversely affected by trade barriers, exchange controls, managed adjustments in relative currency values and other protective measures imposed or negotiated by the countries with which they trade. These economies also have been, and may continue to be, adversely affected by economic conditions in the countries with which they trade. A Portfolio may be required to obtain prior governmental approval for foreign investments in some countries under certain circumstances. Governments may require approval to invest in certain issuers or industries deemed sensitive to national interests, and the extent of foreign investment in certain debt securities and companies may be subject to limitation. Individual companies may also limit foreign ownership to prevent, among other things, violation of foreign investment limitations.

Some foreign investments may risk being subject to repatriation controls that could render such securities illiquid. Other countries might undergo nationalization, expropriation, political changes, governmental regulation, social instability or diplomatic developments (including war) that could adversely affect the economies of such countries or the value of the investments in those countries. Certain foreign markets may rely heavily on particular industries or foreign capital and are more vulnerable to diplomatic developments, the imposition of economic sanctions against a particular country or countries, organizations, entities and/or individuals, changes in international trading patterns, trade barriers, tariffs and trading disruptions, and other protectionist or retaliatory measures. International trade barriers or economic sanctions against foreign countries, organizations, entities and/or individuals may adversely affect a Portfolio's holdings or exposures. The imposition of, or an increase in, tariffs or trade restrictions between the U.S. and foreign countries, or even the threat of such developments, could lead to a significant reduction in international trade, which could have a negative impact on the economies of the U.S. and foreign countries. Additional risks include more or less government regulation, less public information, currency fluctuations, political and economic instability, differences in financial reporting standards and less stringent regulation of securities markets.

Exchange-Traded Funds (ETFs) — All Portfolios

ETFs are registered investment companies whose shares are listed and traded on U.S. stock exchanges or otherwise traded in the over-the-counter market. In general, passively-managed ETFs seek to track a specified securities index or a basket of securities that an “index provider,” such as S&P Global, selects as representative of a market, market segment or industry sector. A passively-managed ETF generally holds the same stocks or bonds as the index it tracks or it may hold a representative sample of such securities. Thus, a passively-managed ETF is designed so that its performance will correspond closely with that of the index it tracks. Actively-managed ETFs may not meet their investment objective based on an ETF’s investment adviser’s success or failure to implement strategies for the ETF and/or the investment adviser’s ability to control the ETF’s level or risk. Conversely, actively-managed ETFs seek an investment objective by investing in a basket of securities based on the investment strategy and discretion of the ETF’s adviser. A leveraged ETF will engage in transactions and purchase instruments that give rise to forms of leverage, including, among others, the use of reverse repurchase agreements and other borrowings, the investment of collateral from loans of portfolio securities, the use of when issued, delayed-delivery or forward commitment transactions or short sales. To the extent a fund invests in ETFs that achieve leveraged exposure to their underlying indexes through the use of derivative instruments, the fund will indirectly be subject to leveraging risk. As a shareholder in an ETF, a Portfolio will bear its pro rata portion of an ETF’s expenses, including advisory fees, in addition to its own expenses. Certain ETFs may be thinly traded and experience large spreads between the "ask" price quoted by a seller and the "bid" price offered by a buyer. The existence of extreme market volatility or potential lack of an active trading market for an ETF’s shares could result in such shares trading at a significant premium or discount to their NAV.

Other Investment Companies — All Portfolios

The Portfolios may invest in securities issued by other investment companies to the extent permitted by the 1940 Act. Under the 1940 Act, a Portfolio’s investments in such securities currently are limited to, subject to certain exceptions, (i) 3% of the total voting stock of any one investment company, (ii) 5% of the Portfolio’s total assets with respect to any one investment company and (iii) 10% of the Portfolio’s total assets with respect to investment companies in the aggregate. Because other investment companies employ an investment adviser, such investments by each Portfolio may cause shareholders to bear duplicate fees.

Among other things, each Portfolio may invest in money market mutual funds for cash management purposes by “sweeping” excess cash balances into such funds until the cash is invested or otherwise utilized. A Portfolio will indirectly bear its proportionate share of any management fees and other expenses paid by investment companies in which it invests in addition to the advisory and administration fees paid by the Portfolio.

The SEC has adopted revisions to the rules permitting funds to invest in other investment companies to streamline and enhance the regulatory framework applicable to fund of funds arrangements. While Rule 12d1-4 permits more types of fund-of-fund arrangements without reliance on an exemptive order or no-action letters, it imposes new conditions, including limits on control and voting of acquired funds’ shares, evaluations and findings by investment advisers, fund investment agreements, and limits on most three-tier fund structures.

Leveraging Risk — All Portfolios

A Portfolio’s use of derivative instruments will have the economic effect of financial leverage. The use of leverage by the Investment Adviser may increase the volatility of a Portfolio. These leveraged instruments may result in losses to a Portfolio or may adversely affect a Portfolio’s NAV or total return,

because instruments that contain leverage are more sensitive to changes in interest rates. A Portfolio may also use borrowed funds to create leverage. Although the use of leverage by a Portfolio may create an opportunity for increased return, it also results in additional risks and can magnify the effect of any losses. If the income and gains earned on the securities and instruments purchased with leverage proceeds are greater than the cost of the leverage, a Portfolio’s return will be greater than if leverage had not been used. Conversely, if the income and gains from the securities and instruments purchased with such proceeds does not cover the cost of leverage, a Portfolio’s return will be less than if leverage had not been used. In the event of a sudden, precipitous drop in value of a Portfolio’s assets, the Portfolio may not be able to liquidate assets quickly enough to pay off its borrowing. Using this investment technique may adversely affect a Portfolio’s NAV or total return.

Liquidity Risk – All Portfolios.

Liquidity risk refers to the possibility that a Portfolio may not be able to sell or buy a security or close out an investment contract at a favorable price or time. Consequently, a Portfolio may have to accept a lesser price to sell a security, sell other securities to raise cash, or give up an investment opportunity, any of which could have a negative effect on a Portfolio’s performance. Infrequent trading of securities also may lead to an increase in their price volatility.

In addition, during periods of reduced market liquidity or in the absence of readily available market quotations for particular investments in a Portfolio’s portfolio, the ability of a Portfolio to assign an accurate daily value to these investments may be difficult and the Investment Adviser may be required to fair value the investments. Fair value determinations are inherently subjective and reflect good faith judgments based on available information. Accordingly, there can be no assurance that the determination of a security’s fair value in accordance with a Portfolio’s valuation procedures will in fact approximate the price at which such Portfolio could sell that security at that time (i.e., the sale price could differ, sometimes significantly, from the Portfolio’s last valuation for the security). Investors who purchase or redeem shares of a Portfolio on days when such Portfolio is holding fair valued securities may receive fewer or more shares or lower or higher redemption proceeds than they would have received if the Portfolio had not fair valued the securities or had used a different valuation methodology. These risks may be magnified if a Portfolio holds a significant percentage of fair valued or otherwise difficult to value securities, such Portfolio may be particularly susceptible to the risks associated with valuation.

Liquidity risk also refers to the risk of unusually high redemption requests, redemption requests by certain large shareholders such as institutional investors or asset allocators, or other unusual market conditions that may make it difficult for a Portfolio to sell investments within the allowable time period to meet redemptions. Meeting such redemption requests could require a Portfolio to sell securities at reduced prices or under unfavorable conditions or access additional means of liquidity, which would reduce the value of such Portfolio.

Risks of Investing in Mutual Funds — All Portfolios

All mutual funds carry risks that may cause you to lose money on your investment in one or more of the Portfolios. The following describes the primary risks to each Portfolio due to each Portfolio’s specific investment objective and strategies. As all investment securities are subject to inherent market risks and fluctuations in value due to earnings, economic and political conditions and other factors, no Portfolio can give any assurance that its investment objective will be achieved.

Market Risks — All Portfolios

The NAV of each Portfolio will fluctuate based on changes in the value of its underlying portfolio. The securities markets are generally susceptible to volatile fluctuations. Market prices of securities in which

each Portfolio invests may be adversely affected by an issuer’s having experienced losses or lack of earnings, or by the issuer’s failure to meet the market’s expectations with respect to new products or services, or even by factors wholly unrelated to the value or condition of the issuer. The value of the securities held by each Portfolio is also subject to the risk that a specific segment of the stock market may not perform as well as the overall market. Under any of these circumstances, the value of a Portfolio’s shares and total return will fluctuate, and your investment may be worth more or less than your original cost when you redeem your shares. Advancements in technology may adversely impact markets and the overall performance of a Portfolio. For example, as artificial intelligence is used more widely, the profitability and growth of Portfolio holdings may be impacted, which could significantly impact the overall performance of a Portfolio.

Recently, various countries have seen significant internal conflicts and in some cases, civil wars may have had an adverse impact on the securities markets of the countries concerned. In addition, the occurrence of new disturbances due to acts of war or terrorism or other political developments cannot be excluded. Nationalization, expropriation or confiscatory taxation, currency blockage, political changes, government regulation, political, regulatory or social instability or uncertainty or diplomatic developments, including tariffs and trading disruptions, the imposition of sanctions or other similar measures, could adversely affect a Portfolio's investments. Recent examples of the above include conflict, loss of life and disaster connected to ongoing armed conflict between Russia and Ukraine in Europe and Israel and other countries in the Middle East. The extent, duration and impact of these conflicts, related sanctions and retaliatory actions are difficult to ascertain, but could be significant and have severe adverse effects on the region, including significant adverse effects on the regional or global economies and the markets for certain securities and commodities. These impacts could negatively affect a Portfolio's investments in securities and instruments that are economically tied to the applicable region, and include (but are not limited to) declines in value and reductions in liquidity. In addition, to the extent new sanctions are imposed or previously relaxed sanctions are reimposed (including with respect to countries undergoing transformation), complying with such restrictions may prevent the Portfolios from pursuing certain investments, cause delays or other impediments with respect to consummating such investments or divestments, require divestment or freezing of investments on unfavorable terms, render divestment of underperforming investments impracticable, negatively impact the Portfolios' ability to achieve their investment objectives, prevent the Portfolios from receiving payments otherwise due, increase diligence and other similar costs to the Portfolios, render valuation of affected investments challenging, or require the Portfolios to consummate an investment on terms that are less advantageous than would be the case absent such restrictions. Any of these outcomes could adversely affect the Portfolios' performance.

Portfolio Turnover Risks — All Portfolios

Under certain circumstances a Portfolio may take advantage of short-term trading opportunities without regard to the length of time its securities have been held. This strategy often calls for frequent trading of a Portfolio’s securities in order to take advantage of anticipated changes in market conditions. Frequent trading by the Portfolio could increase the rate of its portfolio turnover, which would involve correspondingly greater expenses. Such expenses may include brokerage commissions or dealer mark-ups/mark-downs, as well as other transaction costs on the sale of securities and reinvestments in other securities. Such sales also may result in adverse tax consequences to shareholders. If a Portfolio realizes capital gains when it sells its portfolio investments, the capital gains will flow through to the Portfolio. For more information see the heading “Taxes.” The trading costs and tax effects associated with such portfolio turnover may adversely affect performance under these circumstances, and large movements of assets into and out of a Portfolio may negatively impact such Portfolio’s ability to achieve its investment objective or maintain its current level of operating expenses.

Single Security Concentration Risk—All Portfolios, except the Multi-Disciplinary Income Portfolio

Holding a large portion of its net assets in a single security or issuer exposes a Portfolio to various risks relating to that security or issuer and to the market volatility of that specific security or issuer if the security or issuer performs worse than the market as a whole, which could adversely affect the Portfolio’s performance. As of March 31, 2026, the Internet Portfolio, Global Portfolio, the Paradigm Portfolio, the Small Cap Opportunities Portfolio and the Market Opportunities Portfolio each held a large concentration of its net assets in the Texas Pacific Land Corporation. Because a large portion of the Land Corporation’s revenue is derived from oil and gas royalties, the performance of the Portfolios could be adversely affected if the underlying markets for oil or gas were to decline, thereby having a more significant impact on the Portfolios given the concentration in this holding.

Internet Industry Concentration Risks — The Internet Portfolio

The value of the Internet Portfolio’s shares will be susceptible to factors affecting the Internet and Internet-related companies, such as heightened regulatory scrutiny and impending changes in government policies, which may have a material effect on the products and services of this industry. Furthermore, securities of companies in this industry tend to be more volatile than securities of companies in other industries. Competitive pressures and changing demand may have a significant effect on the financial condition of Internet and Internet-related companies. These companies spend heavily on research and development and are especially sensitive to the risk of product obsolescence. The occurrence of any of these factors, individually or collectively, may adversely affect the value of the Internet Portfolio’s shares. As artificial intelligence is used more widely, the profitability and growth of Portfolio holdings may be impacted, which could significantly impact the overall performance of the Portfolio. To the extent the Portfolio invests in companies that are involved in various aspects of artificial intelligence technologies, it is particularly sensitive to the risks of those types of companies. These risks include, but are not limited to, small or limited markets for such securities, changes in business cycles, world economic growth, technological progress, rapid obsolescence, and government regulation.

Securities Lending Risks — All Portfolios except the Multi-Disciplinary Income Portfolio

Each Portfolio (other than the Multi-Disciplinary Income Portfolio) lends its portfolio securities to broker-dealers by entering directly into lending arrangements with such broker-dealers or indirectly through repurchase agreements, amounting to no more than 33 1/3% of the total assets of each Portfolio (including any collateral posted) or 50% of the total assets of each Portfolio (excluding any collateral posted). Cash collateral may be invested by a Portfolio in short-term investments, including repurchase agreements and money market funds that meet the requirements of Rule 2a-7 of the 1940 Act. Repurchase transactions will be fully collateralized at all times with cash and/or short-term debt obligations. These transactions involve some risk to a Portfolio if the other party should default on its obligation and the Portfolio is delayed or prevented from recovering the collateral. In the event that the original seller defaults on its obligation to repurchase, a Portfolio will seek to sell the collateral, which could involve costs or delays. To the extent proceeds from the sale of collateral are less than the repurchase price, each Portfolio would suffer a loss if forced to sell such collateral in this manner. In addition, invested collateral will be subject to market depreciation or appreciation, and a Portfolio will be responsible for any loss that might result from its investment of the collateral.

Regulations that took effect in 2019 require certain bank-regulated counterparties and certain of their affiliates to include in certain financial contracts, including many securities lending agreements, terms that delay or restrict the rights of counterparties, such as a Portfolio, to terminate such agreements, foreclose upon collateral, exercise other default rights or restrict transfers of credit support in the event that the counterparty and/or its affiliates are subject to certain types of resolution or insolvency proceedings. It is possible that these new requirements, as well as potential additional government

regulation and other developments in the market, could adversely affect a Portfolio’s ability to terminate existing securities lending agreements or to realize amounts to be received under such agreements.

Non-Diversification Risks — All Portfolios other than The Global Portfolio and The Multi-Disciplinary Income Portfolio

Each Portfolio, except the Global Portfolio and the Multi-Disciplinary Income Portfolio, is a non-diversified fund and therefore may be more susceptible to adverse financial, economic or other developments affecting any single issuer, and more susceptible to greater losses because of these developments. In certain instances, the non-diversified funds may hold relatively substantial portions of their assets in the securities of a single issuer.

Risks of Investment in Small and Medium-Size Companies — All Portfolios other than The Multi-Disciplinary Income Portfolio

Investing in companies with small or medium-size capital structures (generally a market capitalization of $5 billion or less) often involve more risks than investing in larger companies as small and medium-size companies have narrower markets and more limited managerial and financial resources than do larger, more established companies. The market prices of the securities of such companies tend to be more volatile than those of larger companies. Further, these securities tend to trade at a lower volume than those of larger, more established companies. If a Portfolio is heavily invested in these securities and the value of these securities suddenly declines, the NAV of that Portfolio will be more susceptible to significant losses.

Portfolio Borrowing Risks — All Portfolios

Each Portfolio may leverage its assets, subject to the provisions of the 1940 Act, to fund investment activities or to achieve higher returns. Each Portfolio may borrow money from banks for temporary or emergency purposes in order to meet redemption requests. To reduce its indebtedness, a Portfolio may have to sell a portion of its investments at a time when it may be disadvantageous to do so. In addition, interest paid by a Portfolio on borrowed funds would decrease the net earnings of the Portfolio.

Futures Risks — All Portfolios except the Multi-Disciplinary Income Portfolio

There are risks associated with these activities, including the following: (1) the success of a hedging strategy may depend on an ability to predict movements in the prices of individual securities, fluctuations in markets and movements in interest rates; (2) there may be an imperfect or no correlation between the changes in market value of the securities held by a Portfolio and the prices of futures; (3) there may not be a liquid secondary market for a futures contract; (4) trading restrictions or limitations may be imposed by an exchange; and (5) government regulations may restrict trading in futures contracts.

Risks of Investing in Investment Grade Debt Securities and Below Investment Grade Debt Securities — All Portfolios

Investments in debt securities pose different risks than investments in equity securities. The value of fixed income securities generally will fall if interest rates rise and generally will rise if interest rates fall. The value of these securities may also fall as a result of other factors such as the performance of the issuer, the market perception of the issuer or general economic conditions. These investments also involve a risk that the issuer may not be able to meet its principal and interest payment obligations. Fixed-income securities having longer maturities involve greater risk of fluctuations in value. The longer the duration of a bond, the more a change in interest rates affects the bond’s price. Short-term and long-term interest rates may not move the same amount and may not move in the same direction. The risks associated with changes in interest rates may have unpredictable effects on the markets and the Portfolios' investments. A general rise in interest rates may cause investors to move out of fixed income securities on a large scale, which

could adversely affect the price and liquidity of fixed income securities. Fluctuations in interest rates may also affect the liquidity of fixed income securities and instruments held by a Portfolio. Other types of securities also may be adversely affected from changes in interest rates. During periods of declining interest rates, a bond issuer may “call,” or repay, its high yielding bonds before their maturity dates. A Portfolio would then be forced to invest the unanticipated proceeds at lower interest rates, resulting in a decline in its income.

Investments in debt securities rated below investment grade, i.e., junk bonds, and unrated securities of comparable quality are subject to the increased risk of an issuer’s inability to meet principal and interest payment obligations. These securities may be subject to greater price volatility due to such factors as specific corporate or municipal developments, interest rate sensitivity, negative perceptions of the junk bond markets generally and less secondary market liquidity.

IPO Risk—All Portfolios, except the Multi-Disciplinary Income Portfolio

IPO share prices can be volatile and fluctuate considerably due to factors such as the absence of a prior public market, unseasoned trading, a limited number of shares available for trading and limited operating history and/or information about the issuer. The purchase of IPO shares may involve high transaction costs. IPO shares are subject to market risk and liquidity risk. In addition, the limited number of shares available for trading in some IPOs may also make it more difficult for the Portfolio to buy or sell significant amounts of those shares without an unfavorable impact on the prevailing prices. In addition, some companies initially offering their shares publicly are involved in relatively new industries or lines of business, which may not be widely understood by investors. Some of the companies involved in new industries may be regarded as developmental stage companies, without revenues or operating income or the near-term prospects of them. Many IPOs are by small- or micro-cap companies that are undercapitalized.

Crypto Asset Exposure Risk- All Portfolios, except the Multi-Disciplinary Income Portfolio

Crypto assets (also referred to as “virtual currencies” and “digital currencies”) are digital assets designed to act as a medium of exchange. Although crypto assets are an emerging asset class, they are not presently widely accepted as a medium of exchange. There are thousands of crypto assets, the most well-known of which is bitcoin.

Bitcoin or BTC was the first decentralized crypto asset. Bitcoin is a type of crypto asset that is not issued by a government, bank or central organization. Bitcoin exists on an online, peer-to-peer computer network that hosts the Bitcoin Blockchain. Bitcoin has no physical existence and exists solely through the record of bitcoin transactions on the Bitcoin Blockchain. The Bitcoin Network allows people to exchange tokens of value, bitcoins, which are recorded on a public transaction ledger known as a blockchain. The Portfolios, except the Multi-Disciplinary Income Portfolio, may invest indirectly in bitcoin through the Grayscale Bitcoin Trust and through other pooled investment vehicles that provide exposure to crypto assets. The Grayscale Bitcoin Trust is a Bitcoin ETF that enables investors to gain exposure to bitcoin in the form of a security while avoiding the challenges of buying, storing, and safekeeping bitcoin, directly. Blockchain technology is a relatively new and untested technology which operates as a distributed ledger. The risks associated with blockchain technology may not fully emerge until the technology is widely used. Blockchain systems could be vulnerable to fraud, particularly if a significant minority of participants colluded to defraud the rest. Access to a given blockchain requires an individualized key, which, if compromised, could result in loss due to theft, destruction or inaccessibility. There is little regulation of blockchain technology other than the intrinsic public nature of the blockchain system. Any future regulatory developments could affect the viability and expansion of the use of blockchain technology.

Individuals or organizations holding a large amount of crypto assets in which a Portfolio may invest indirectly (also known as “whales”) may have the ability to manipulate the prices of those crypto assets.

In addition to the general risks of investing in other investment vehicles, the value of a Portfolio’s indirect investments in crypto assets are subject to fluctuations in the value of the crypto asset, which can be highly volatile. Certain of these investment vehicles, including the Grayscale Bitcoin Trust, are not registered under the 1940 Act and do not receive the protections of the 1940 Act. Certain other crypto-focused, pooled investment vehicles, including the Grayscale Ethereum Classic Trust, in which the Portfolios invest or may invest, could be determined to be operating out of compliance with the 1940 Act. As a result, the prices of the impacted crypto assets may be subject to large and sudden declines. The value of crypto assets is determined by the supply and demand for crypto assets in the global market for the trading of crypto assets, which consists primarily of transactions on crypto asset trading platforms. The value of crypto assets has been, and may continue to be, substantially dependent on speculation, such that trading and investing in crypto assets generally may not be based on fundamental analysis.

Crypto Asset Industry Risk - All Portfolios, except the Multi-Disciplinary Income Portfolio

other charges, and the SEC and CFTC brought civil securities and commodities fraud charges, against certain of FTX’s and its affiliates’ senior executives, including its former CEO. In addition, several other entities in the crypto asset industry filed for bankruptcy following FTX’s bankruptcy filing, such as BlockFi Inc. and Genesis Global Capital, LLC. In response to these events, the prices of crypto assets experienced extreme volatility and other entities in the crypto asset industry have been negatively affected. It is possible that similar events could occur in the future, which would undermine confidence in the crypto asset industry and negatively affect the value of crypto assets. It is not possible to predict at this time all of the risks that they may pose to a Portfolio, its service providers or to the crypto asset industry as a whole.

Crypto Asset Regulatory Risk - All Portfolios, except the Multi-Disciplinary Income Portfolio

In particular, Crypto asset markets in the United States exist in a state of regulatory uncertainty. Regulatory changes or actions by Congress as well as U.S. federal or state agencies may adversely affect the value of a Portfolio’s indirect investments in crypto assets. As digital assets have grown in both popularity and market size, a number of state and federal agencies have issued consumer advisories regarding the risks posed by digital assets to investors. In addition, the Securities and Exchange Commission, U.S. state securities regulators and several foreign governments have issued warnings and instituted legal proceedings in which they argue that certain digital assets may be classified as securities or may be offered and sold as securities, and that both those digital assets and any related initial coin offerings are subject to securities regulations. Additionally, U.S. state and federal, and foreign regulators and legislatures have taken action against virtual currency businesses or enacted restrictive regimes in response to adverse publicity arising from hacks, consumer harm, or criminal activity stemming from virtual currency activity.

A Portfolio’s exposure to crypto assets may change over time and, accordingly, such exposure may not be represented in a Portfolio at any given time. Many significant aspects of the tax treatment of investments in crypto assets are uncertain, and a direct or indirect investment in crypto assets may produce non-qualifying income.

Subsidiary Risk—All Portfolios, except the Multi-Disciplinary Income Portfolio

Each Portfolio makes investments through a wholly-owned Subsidiary organized under the laws of Delaware and/or the Cayman Islands. By investing in a Subsidiary, the Portfolio is indirectly exposed to the risks associated with the Subsidiary’s investments. The investments held by a Subsidiary are generally similar to those that are permitted to be held by the Portfolio and are subject to the same risks that apply to similar investments if held directly by the Portfolio. These risks are described elsewhere in this Prospectus. There can be no assurance that the investment objective of a Subsidiary will be achieved.

Each Subsidiary is not registered under the 1940 Act, and, unless otherwise noted in this Prospectus, is not subject to all the investor protections of the 1940 Act. However, each Portfolio wholly-owns and controls its Subsidiaries, making it unlikely that a Subsidiary will take action contrary to the interests of the investors in the Portfolios. The Board has oversight responsibility for the investment activities of each Portfolio, including its investment in each Subsidiary, and each Portfolio’s role as sole shareholder of its Subsidiaries. Each Portfolio and its corresponding Subsidiaries will be subject to the same investment restrictions and limitations on a consolidated basis, and to the extent applicable to the investment activities of the Subsidiary, each Subsidiary will follow the same compliance policies and procedures, as its Portfolio.

Changes in the laws of the United States, Delaware and/or the Cayman Islands could result in the inability of a Portfolio and/or its Subsidiaries to operate as described in this Prospectus and could adversely affect the investors in the Portfolios. For example, the Cayman Islands does not currently impose any income, corporate or capital gains tax or withholding tax on the Cayman Subsidiaries. If Cayman Islands law changes such that the Cayman Subsidiaries must pay Cayman Islands taxes, investors in the Portfolios would likely suffer decreased investment returns.

Tax Risk—All Portfolios, except the Multi-Disciplinary Income Portfolio

The Portfolios have not requested a ruling from the IRS or an opinion of legal counsel as to any tax matters, including whether a Portfolio will be treated as a partnership (and not as an association taxable as a corporation) for U.S. federal income tax purposes. If a Portfolio were to be treated as a corporation rather than as a partnership for U.S. federal income tax purposes, the Portfolio itself would be taxed on its taxable income at corporate tax rates, there would be no flow-through of items of Portfolio income, gain, loss or deductions to the Partners, and Portfolio distributions generally would be taxable as dividends. Assuming that a Portfolio is treated as a partnership, each Partner of the Portfolio must include in its own income its allocable share of Portfolio taxable income, whether or not any cash is distributed and, as a result of various limitations imposed by the tax laws, may be unable to currently deduct its allocable share of Portfolio expenses and capital losses, if any.

Petroleum and Gas Sector Risk – All Portfolios, except the Multi-Disciplinary Income Portfolio

The profitability of companies in the oil and gas industry is related to worldwide energy prices, exploration costs and production spending. Companies in the oil and gas industry may be at risk for environmental damage claims and other types of litigation. Companies in the oil and gas industry may be adversely affected by: natural disasters or other catastrophes; changes in exchange rates or interest rates; prices for competitive energy services, economic conditions, tax treatment, or government regulation; government intervention; negative public perception; or unfavorable events in the regions where companies operate (e.g., expropriation, nationalization, confiscation of assets and property, imposition of restrictions on foreign investments or repatriation of capital, military coups, social or political unrest, violence or labor unrest). Companies in the oil and gas industry may have significant capital investments in, or engage in transactions involving, emerging market countries, which may heighten these risks.

Sector Concentration Risk – All Portfolios, except the Multi-Disciplinary Income Portfolio

Although the Portfolios will not concentrate their investments in any industries, the Portfolios may, at certain times, have concentrations in one or more sectors which may cause the Portfolios to be more sensitive to economic changes or events occurring in those sectors. As of March 31, 2026, the Internet Portfolio, Global Portfolio, Paradigm Portfolio, Small Cap Portfolio and Market Opportunities Portfolio had 34.6%, 31.5%, 74.2%, 65.4% and 56.7% invested in the Mining, Quarrying, and Oil and Gas Extraction sector, respectively. Additionally, as of March 31, 2026, the Internet Portfolio, Global Portfolio, Paradigm Portfolio, Small Cap Portfolio and the Market Opportunities Portfolio had 53.8%,

36.8%, 11.8%, 7.1% and 21.1% invested in the Finance and Insurance sector, respectively.

Volatility Risk – All Portfolios

The Portfolios may have investments, including but not limited to bitcoin, that appreciate or depreciate significantly in value over short periods of time. This may cause the Portfolios’ net asset value per share to experience significant increases or declines in value over short periods of time.

Valuation Risk – All Portfolios

The sales price the Portfolios could receive for any particular portfolio investment may differ from a Portfolios’ valuation of the investment, particularly for securities or other investments, such as bitcoin, that trade in thin or volatile markets or that are valued using a fair value methodology. Valuation may be more difficult in times of market turmoil since many investors and market makers may be reluctant to purchase complex instruments or quote prices for them. Fair valuation of the Portfolios' investments involves subjective judgment. A Portfolio’s ability to value its investments may be impacted by technological issues and/or errors by pricing services or other third party service providers. Shares of the Grayscale Bitcoin Trust are intended to reflect the price of bitcoin assets, less fees and expenses, and shares of the Grayscale Bitcoin Trust have historically traded, and may continue to trade, at a significant discount or premium to net asset value. As such, the price of the Grayscale Bitcoin Trust may go down even if the price of the underlying asset, bitcoin, remains unchanged. Additionally, shares that trade at a premium mean that an investor who purchases $1 of a Portfolio will actually own less than $1 in assets.


Portfolio Holdings Information

A description of the Portfolios’ policies and procedures with respect to the disclosure of their portfolio securities is available in the Portfolios’ SAI. Each Portfolio files its portfolio holdings with the SEC and the holdings are publicly available twice each fiscal year on Form N-CSR (with respect to each annual and semi-annual period) and twice each fiscal year on Form N-PORT (with respect to the first and third quarters of the Portfolios' fiscal year). The annual and semi-annual reports are available by contacting Kinetics Mutual Funds, Inc. (the “Company”), c/o U.S. Bank Global Fund Services, P.O. Box 219252, Kansas City, MO 64121-9252, or calling 1-800-930-3828. In addition, the Company may publish on its webpage (www.kineticsfunds.com) month-end (a) top twenty portfolio holdings of each Portfolio and the percentage that each holding represents of the Portfolio’s net assets, (b) top five performing and bottom five performing portfolio holdings of each Portfolio, and (c) for Portfolios that primarily invest in derivatives, cash and fixed income instruments, the top ten (10) derivative and top ten (10) fixed income holdings, along with their respective percentage of net assets in each Portfolio, in all cases no earlier than twenty calendar days after the end of each calendar quarter. This information will be available on the website until the date on which a Portfolio files its next quarterly portfolio holdings report on Form N-CSR or Part F of Form N-PORT with the SEC or until the next month in which portfolio holdings are posted in accordance with the above policy.


Management of the Portfolios

Investment Adviser

Each Portfolio’s investment adviser is Horizon Kinetics Asset Management LLC, 470 Park Avenue South, New York, New York 10016. The Investment Adviser provides investment advisory services to a family of seven mutual funds with discretionary management authority over approximately $2.13 billion

in assets as of December 31, 2025. The Investment Adviser is a wholly-owned subsidiary of Horizon Kinetics Holding Corporation, a publicly traded company.

The Investment Adviser conducts investment research and supervision for each Portfolio and is responsible for the purchase and sale of securities for each Portfolio.

For each Portfolio except the Multi-Disciplinary Income Portfolio, the Investment Adviser is entitled to receive an annual fee from each Portfolio for its services of 1.25% of each Portfolio’s average daily net assets. Effective as of April 30, 2023, the Investment Adviser has agreed to reduce the management fee for the Multi-Disciplinary Income Portfolio from 1.25% to 1.00%. Additionally, effective as of April 30, 2023, the Investment Adviser has agreed to waive 0.75% of the 1.00% management fee for the Multi-Disciplinary Income Portfolio through April 30, 2027. The advisory fees paid to the Investment Adviser for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2025, were as follows:


			Advisory Fees (as a percentage of average net assets)
Internet Portfolio			1.25%
Global Portfolio			0.81%
Paradigm Portfolio			1.25%
Small Cap Opportunities Portfolio			1.23%
Market Opportunities Portfolio			0.98%
Multi-Disciplinary Income Portfolio			0.01%

A discussion regarding the basis of the Board of Trustees’ approval of the investment advisory agreement for each Portfolio is available in the Trust’s Form N-CSR for the period ended June 30, 2025.

Horizon Kinetics, as the Investment Adviser to each Portfolio, is engaged in a broad range of portfolio management, portfolio advisory and other business activities. Its services are not exclusive to the Portfolios and nothing prevents it, or any affiliates, from providing similar services to other investment funds and other clients (whether or not their investment objectives, strategies, or criteria are similar to those of a Portfolio) or from engaging in other activities.

Members of the Investment Team

Steven Bregman and Peter Doyle, as the Co-Chief Executive Officers for Horizon Kinetics Holding Corporation, the parent company to the Investment Adviser generally oversee the management of each Portfolio’s investment team. The following persons are members of an investment team: Peter B. Doyle, Steven Bregman, Steven Tuen, James Davolos, Brandon Colavita, Matthew Houk, and Darryl Monasebian. Each person’s role varies from Portfolio to Portfolio as indicated in the table below. Each member of the investment team is an employee of the Investment Adviser.

The Internet Portfolio

The Global Portfolio

The Paradigm Portfolio

The Small Cap Opportunities Portfolio

The Market Opportunities Portfolio

The Multi-Disciplinary Income Portfolio

Peter B. Doyle

Co-Portfolio Manager

Steven Tuen

Investment Team Member

Co-Portfolio Manager

N/A

Steven Bregman

Investment Team Member

Co-Portfolio Manager

Investment Team Member

N/A

James Davolos

Co-Portfolio Manager

N/A

Brandon Colavita

Co-Portfolio Manager

N/A

Co-Portfolio Manager

N/A

Matthew Houk

N/A

Co-Portfolio Manager

N/A

Darryl Monasebian

N/A

Co-Portfolio
Manager

Peter B. Doyle is the Chairman of the Board of the Company and is the Co-Chief Executive Officer of the Investment Adviser with over 40 years of investing experience. In 1994, he co-founded Horizon Asset Management Inc. (“Horizon”), and in 1996 he co-founded Kinetics Asset Management Inc., the predecessor company to the Investment Adviser (“Kinetics”). In May 2011, Horizon and Kinetics merged, thereby resulting in the formation of Horizon Kinetics Asset Management LLC (the “Investment Adviser”). Mr. Doyle is also a Portfolio Manager to ETFs, a closed-end fund, private funds, and separately managed accounts managed by the Investment Adviser. Mr. Doyle is a member of the firm’s Investment Committee, which is responsible for general oversight of all portfolio management decisions across the Investment Adviser. In addition to other outside business activities, Mr. Doyle is a Vice President of FRMO Corp., a publicly traded affiliate of the Investment Adviser.

Steven Bregman is the Co-Chief Executive Officer for the Investment Adviser with over 40 years of investing experience. In 1994, he co-founded Horizon, which merged with Kinetics in May 2011, resulting in the formation of the Investment Adviser. Mr. Bregman is a member of the firm’s Investment Committee, which is responsible for general oversight of all portfolio management decisions across the Investment Adviser. In addition to other outside business activities, Mr. Bregman is also the President and CFO of FRMO Corp., a publicly traded affiliate of the Investment Adviser, and is a member of the Board of Directors of Winland Holdings Corporation, a publicly traded holding company to several subsidiary companies.

Brandon Colavita joined the Firm in 2014 and currently serves as Co-Portfolio Manager of the Horizon Kinetics Blockchain Development ETF, along with several other registered investment companies. Mr. Colavita is involved in developing research, generating investment ideas and performing portfolio analytics for many of the Firm's investment products. He previously held positions within the Firm’s Client Service & Business Development and Wholesaling teams. Mr. Colavita received a B.S. in Economics from The Wharton School of the University of Pennsylvania where he was also a member of the football team. Mr. Colavita is a CFA® charterholder.

James Davolos joined the Investment Adviser as an analyst in 2005, and is a Portfolio Manager for the Inflation Beneficiaries ETF (“INFL”), along with several mutual funds, ETFs, private funds and separately managed accounts managed by the Investment Adviser.

Steven Tuen joined the Investment Adviser in 1999 as a research analyst. He is a Portfolio Manager for several mutual funds and ETFs managed by the Investment Adviser. In addition to his portfolio manager responsibilities, Mr. Tuen is responsible for conducting and authoring research on behalf of the Investment Adviser.

Matthew Houk joined the Investment Adviser as a research analyst in 2008 and began serving as a Portfolio Manager in 2012. Mr. Houk is also the Chairman, Chief Executive Officer, and Chief Financial Officer of Winland Holdings Corporation, a publicly traded holding company to several subsidiary companies. He is also a member of the Board of Directors of Lamington Road DAC and Bonterra Resources Inc. Prior to joining the Investment Adviser, Mr. Houk held various positions at Goldman, Sachs & Co.

Darryl Monasebian has been a Portfolio Manager of the Investment Adviser since June 2022 with deep experience managing portfolios of collateralized loan obligations. Before joining the Investment Adviser, Mr. Monasebian served as an Executive Vice President at Oxford Funds, LLC from 2005 to June 2022. Prior to that, he held several positions including a Director in the Merchant Banking Group at BNP Paribas, a Director at Swiss Bank Corporation, a Senior Account Officer at Citibank, and an Investment Analyst in the Corporate Investments Department at Metropolitan Life Insurance Company. Mr. Monasebian has over 30 years of professional experience.

The SAI provides additional information about the portfolio managers’ compensation, other accounts managed by the portfolio managers, and the portfolio managers’ ownership of securities in the Portfolios.


Valuation of the Portfolios

Each Portfolio calculates its NAV as of the close of regular trading (generally 4:00 p.m. Eastern Time), on each day that the New York Stock Exchange (the “Exchange”) is open for unrestricted business (“Business Day”). The Exchange is closed on the following holidays: New Year’s Day, Martin Luther King, Jr.’s Day, Washington’s Birthday/President’s Day, Good Friday, Memorial Day, Juneteenth National Independence Day, Independence Day, Labor Day, Thanksgiving Day and Christmas Day. The NAV per share of each Portfolio is determined by dividing the value of the Portfolio’s securities, cash and other assets, minus all expenses and liabilities of the Portfolio, by the number of shares outstanding of that Portfolio.

A Portfolio’s equity securities are valued each day at the last quoted market sale price on the securities’ principal exchange. If there is no sale price, a security is valued at the last reported bid price. Securities listed on the Nasdaq Stock Market, Inc., however, are valued using the Nasdaq Official Closing Price (“NOCP”), and if no NOCP is available, then at the last reported bid price. If market quotations are not readily available or if events occur that may significantly affect the value of a particular security between the time trading ends on a particular security and the close of regular trading on the Exchange, securities will be valued at their fair value as determined in good faith in accordance with procedures adopted by the Investment Adviser and approved by the Trust’s Board of Trustees. The Board has designated the Investment Adviser as its “valuation designee” under Rule 2a-5 of the 1940 Act, subject to its oversight. Situations involving significant events may include those where: a security’s trading has been halted or

suspended; the security has been de-listed from a national exchange; or the security has not been traded for an extended period of time. In addition, the prices of foreign securities may be affected by events that occur after the close of a foreign market but before a Portfolio prices its shares. See “Trading in Foreign Securities.” Each Portfolio may use independent pricing services to assist in calculating the NAV per share of such Portfolio.

Futures, options on futures and swap contracts that are listed or traded on a national securities exchange, commodities exchange, contract market or over-the-counter markets and that are freely transferable will be valued at their closing settlement price on the exchange on which they are primarily traded or based upon the current settlement price for a like instrument acquired on the day on which the option is being valued. Exchange traded options are valued at the last reported sale price on an exchange on which the option is traded. If no sales are reported on a particular day, the mean between the highest bid and lowest asked quotations at the close of the exchanges will be used. Non-exchange traded options also will be valued at the mean between the last bid and asked quotations. Securities that have no public market and all other assets of a Portfolio are considered at such value as the Investment Adviser, as valuation designee, may determine in good faith, in accordance with a Portfolio’s valuation procedures as approved by the Trust’s Board of Trustees.

A Portfolio’s debt obligations (including convertible securities) that are either investment grade or non-investment grade and irrespective of days to maturity are valued at evaluated mean by one of the authorized third party pricing agents which rely on various valuation methodologies such as matrix pricing and other analytical pricing models as well as market transactions and dealer quotations. Certain instruments such as repurchase agreements, demand notes, and money market mutual funds are traded at cost and there are no market values available for those instruments from third parties. Those instruments are priced at cost. Debt securities that are not priced by an independent third party pricing agent shall be valued (a) at the last sale price if such last sale occurred within the previous five business days, and (b) if there was no sale price during the previous five business days, at the average of the bids, or the sole bid if there is only one. Debt securities and other securities which, in the judgment of the Investment Adviser, do not properly represent the value of a security will be valued at their fair value as determined in good faith by the Investment Adviser, as valuation designee, in accordance with procedures adopted by the Investment Adviser and approved by the Trust’s Board of Trustees.

Fair valuation of securities introduces an element of subjectivity to the pricing of securities. As a result, the price of a security determined through fair valuation techniques may differ from the price quoted or published by other sources and may not accurately reflect the market value of the security when trading resumes. If a reliable market quotation becomes available for a security formerly valued through fair valuation techniques, the Investment Adviser compares the new market quotation to the fair value price to evaluate the effectiveness of the Portfolios’ fair valuation procedures.

Trading in Foreign Securities

Trading in foreign securities may be completed at times when the Exchange is closed. In computing the NAV per share of each Portfolio, the value of a foreign security is determined as of the close of trading on the foreign exchange on which it is principally traded or as of the scheduled close of trading on the Exchange, whichever is earlier, at the closing sales prices provided by approved pricing services or other alternate sources. In the absence of sales, the last available closing bid will be used. Securities and assets for which market quotations are not readily available are valued at fair value as determined in good faith by the Investment Adviser, as valuation designee. Values of foreign securities are translated from the local currency into U.S. dollars on the basis of the foreign currency exchange rates, as provided by an independent pricing service or reporting agency, generally prior to the close of the Exchange.

Occasionally, events affecting the value of foreign securities and such exchange rates occur between the time at which they are determined and the close of the Exchange, which events would not be reflected in the computation of a Portfolio’s NAV. If events materially affecting the value of such securities or currency exchange rates occur during such time period, the securities will be valued at their fair value as determined in good faith by the Investment Adviser, as valuation designee.


Purchase of Beneficial Interests in the Portfolios

Beneficial interests in each of the Portfolios are sold without a sales load, at the NAV per share next determined after an order is received by a Portfolio. Investments in a Portfolio are sold solely in private placement transactions that do not involve any “public offering” within the meaning of Section 4(a)(2) of the 1933 Act. Investments a Portfolio may be made only by regulated investment companies, unregulated foreign investment companies, U.S. and non-U.S. institutional investors, S corporations, segregated asset accounts, insurance company separate accounts, and certain qualified pension and retirement plans. This Prospectus does not constitute an offer to sell, or the solicitation of an offer to buy, any “security” within the meaning of the 1933 Act.

There is no minimum initial or subsequent investment in the Portfolios. Each Portfolio reserves the right to cease accepting investments at any time or to reject any investment order.


Redemption of Beneficial Interests in the Portfolios

An investor in a Portfolio may redeem all or any portion of its investment at the NAV per share next determined after a redemption request in good order is received by such Portfolio. The proceeds of a redemption will be paid by the Portfolio in federal funds normally on the Business Day that the redemption is effected, but in any event within three Business Days, except as extensions may be permitted by law.

The Portfolios typically expect that a Portfolio will hold cash or cash equivalents to meet redemption requests. The Portfolios may also use the proceeds from the sale of portfolio securities to meet redemption requests if consistent with the management of the Portfolio. These redemption methods will be used regularly and may also be used in stressed market conditions. The Portfolios reserve the right to redeem in-kind as described under “Additional Information.” Redemptions in-kind are typically used to meet redemption requests that represent a large percentage of a Portfolio’s net assets in order to minimize the effect of large redemptions on a Portfolio and its remaining shareholders. Redemptions in-kind may be used regularly in circumstances as described above, and may also be used in stressed market conditions.

Each Portfolio reserves the right to pay the redemption price of a beneficial interest in kind, i.e., in readily marketable securities. Unless requested by an investor or deemed by the Investment Adviser to be in the best interests of the investors in a Portfolio as a group, the Portfolio will not pay a redemption in kind to an investor, except in situations where that investor may pay redemptions in kind.

The right of any investor to receive payment with respect to any redemption may be suspended, or the payment of the redemption proceeds postponed, during any period in which the Exchange is closed or trading on the Exchange is restricted or to the extent otherwise permitted by the 1940 Act.


Exchange Privilege

You can exchange your interest in a Portfolio for an interest in any other Portfolio offered by the Trust at no charge. If you elect to make such an exchange, the Portfolio that you are exchanging an interest of will transfer cash to the Portfolio into which you are exchanging, and an interest in the latter Portfolio will be issued to you in redemption of your interest in the former Portfolio. You should request your exchange prior to market close to obtain that day’s closing NAV. Exchange requests received after the close of the Exchange will be treated as though received on the next business day.


Restrictions on Excessive Trading Practices

The Portfolios are designed for long-term investors willing to accept the risks associated with a long-term investment. In accordance with policies and procedures adopted by the Board of Trustees of the Trust, frequent purchases and redemptions of Portfolio shares are not encouraged but are generally permitted by the Portfolios. Such purchases and redemptions may have an adverse affect on other Portfolio shareholders, including, without limitation, the possibility of disrupting portfolio management strategies, increasing brokerage and administrative costs, harming Portfolio performance and possible dilution in the value of Portfolio shares held by long-term shareholders. The Trust may, in its sole discretion, reject purchase orders when, in the judgment of management, such rejection is in the best interest of the Portfolio and its shareholders.


Taxes

As noted above, each Portfolio will be treated as a partnership for U.S. federal income tax purposes, and its items of Portfolio income, gain loss or deductions will therefore be reportable by the owners of the Portfolio on a flow-through basis. The Portfolio will provide you with a Schedule K-1 each year that reflects your allocable share of the Portfolio’s items of income, gain, loss, deduction and credit, if any. In the event of any audit of the Portfolio’s U.S. federal income tax return by the IRS, adjustments to those items, if any, will be made and adjudicated at the Portfolio level. Depending on elections made at the Portfolio level with respect to such an audit, you may have liabilities relating to the year(s) audited.

Partners in a partnership are taxable on their allocable share of a partnership’s net income and gain each year even if the partnership does not distribute those amounts to the partners. In the case of the Portfolios, however, they generally intend to make distributions to their owners of the net income and gain that is earned each year. This is because most of the owners of the interests in each Portfolio are regulated investment companies that need, in turn, to make distributions of their taxable income to their shareholders each year in order to avoid incurring entity-level tax.

The tax consequences of distributions by a partnership to a partner, and of a partner’s disposition of an interest in a partnership, generally depend on the partner’s adjusted tax basis in the partnership. Your adjusted tax basis in your interest in a Portfolio will generally equal the cash you invest in the Portfolio, increased by Portfolio income and gain that is allocated to you, and decreased by Portfolio losses and deductions that are allocable to you and by distributions of cash that you receive from the Portfolio. Basis is also increased to the extent your allocable share of Portfolio liabilities is increased and decreased to the extent your allocable share of Portfolio liabilities is decreased.

A distribution of cash by a Portfolio to you will generally not be taxable to you unless it exceeds your adjusted tax basis in your interest in the Portfolio. Accordingly, distributions you receive that are attributable to Portfolio net income and gain each year will generally not be taxable to you – although, as noted above, you will be taxable on the net income and gain itself on a flow-through basis. Distributions that exceed your adjusted tax basis will generally be taxable to you as capital gain. Thus, if, for example,

you redeem part of your interest in a Portfolio in exchange for cash, you will generally be taxable on the exchange only to the extent the cash exceeds your adjusted tax basis in your entire interest in the Portfolio.

If you elect to exchange all or part of your interest in one Portfolio (the “Old Portfolio”) for an interest in another Portfolio (the “New Portfolio”), the transaction will be treated for U.S. federal income tax purposes as a transfer of cash from the Old Portfolio to the New Portfolio in exchange for an interest in the New Portfolio, followed by a distribution by the Old Portfolio of that interest in the New Portfolio in full or partial redemption of your interest in the Old Portfolio. Because a distribution of property by a partnership to a partner is generally a nontaxable event, you will generally not recognize gain or loss on such an exchange. In the case of a partial redemption of your interest in the Old Portfolio, your basis in the interest in the New Portfolio that you receive will equal the lesser of the value of the interest and your adjusted basis in your entire interest in the Old Portfolio immediately before the exchange, and that amount will reduce your adjusted basis in your remaining interest in the Old Portfolio. In the case of a full redemption of your interest in the Old Portfolio, your basis in the interest in the New Portfolio that you receive will equal your adjusted basis in your entire interest in the Old Portfolio immediately before the exchange.

One exception to the preceding tax principles is that distributions by a partnership to a partner in redemption of all or part of the partner’s interest are taxable to the partner to the extent there is a reduction in the partner’s share of certain “unrealized receivables” of the partnership as a result of the redemption. Accordingly, in the case of any redemption or exchange of a Portfolio interest, it is possible that you may recognize some amount of ordinary income.

If you redeem your entire interest in a Portfolio for cash, you will generally recognize gain or loss for U.S. federal income tax purposes based on the difference between your proceeds of such a redemption and your basis in the interest redeemed. Here, again, a portion of the gain may constitute ordinary income for you to the extent it represents the share of Portfolio “unrealized receivables” that are allocable to the interest redeemed.

Generally, any gain that you recognize on a distribution or gain or loss that you recognize on a disposition will constitute capital gain or loss for you. Whether the gain or loss is long-term or short-term capital gain or loss will depend on whether your holding period for the interest with respect to which the gain or loss is recognized exceeds 12 months. For this purpose, if you invest in a Portfolio at different times, you will have a separate holding period for each portion of your investment. If you receive an interest in a Portfolio as a result of an exchange of your entire interest in another Portfolio (or in any other exchange in which your basis in one Portfolio carries over to the other), your holding period in the interest exchanged will carry over to the interest received. In all other cases in which your interest is exchanged, a new holding period will start for the interest received in the exchange.

In the event that the income tax returns of a Portfolio are audited by the IRS, the tax treatment of Portfolio items of taxable income, gain, loss, deduction and credits generally will be determined at the Portfolio level in a single proceeding rather than by individual audits of the Partners. The “partnership representative” of a Portfolio, as such term is defined in Section 6223(a) of the Internal Revenue Code (the “Partnership Representative”), will be the only person with the authority to act on behalf of the applicable Portfolio with respect to audits and certain other tax matters. The Partnership Representative has considerable authority to make decisions affecting the tax treatment and procedural rights of all Partners. In addition, the Partnership Representative has the authority on behalf of all Partners to extend the statute of limitations relating to the Partners' taxable liabilities with respect to Portfolio items.

Under the partnership audit rules, any adjustments to the amount of tax due (including interest and penalties) for any taxable year will be payable by the partnership unless the partnership elects to pass through the partnership adjustments under one of two special regimes (both, “pass through elections”).

If audited a Portfolio would have two options. First, the Portfolio may pay any resulting tax (and any interest and penalties) at the Portfolio level. In that event, (i) the Partners at the time the adjustments become final could bear income tax liabilities in excess of the aggregate amount of taxes that would have been due had the Portfolio elected out as described below, and (ii) a given Partner may bear taxes attributable to income allocable to other Partners or former Partners, including taxes (as well as interest and penalties) with respect to periods prior to such Partner's admission to the Portfolio. Amounts available for distribution to the Partners may be reduced as a result of the Portfolio's obligations to pay any taxes, interests and penalties associated with an adjustment.

Second, the Portfolio may elect to pass through the adjustments to the persons who were Partners in the year under audit. In that case, each Partner would be responsible for paying any resulting tax, as well as an additional interest charge. To the extent a given Partner files an amended return which includes the year under audit and directly pays any tax due on all adjustments properly allocable to such Partner, the Portfolio will not be liable for such amount.

The Partnership Representative of a Portfolio will be the only person with the authority to act on behalf of the Portfolio with respect to audits and certain other tax matters and will decide whether or not to pass through an adjustment to the Partners. In addition, the applicable Portfolio and each Partner will be bound by the actions taken by the Partnership Representative on behalf of the Portfolio during any audit or litigation proceeding concerning U.S. federal income taxes.

This discussion of tax matters relates only to U.S. federal income tax law. Gain and income from a Portfolio may be subject to foreign, state and local taxes, and the treatment under foreign, state and local income tax laws may differ from the U.S. federal income tax treatment. You should consult your tax advisor with respect to particular questions of federal, foreign, state and local taxation in light of your individual circumstances.


Distribution of Shares

Private Placement Agent

Kinetics Funds Distributor LLC (“KFD”), an affiliate of the Investment Adviser, 470 Park Avenue South, New York, New York 10016, serves as the private placement agent for the shares of beneficial interest of the Portfolios on a best efforts basis. KFD is a registered broker-dealer and member of the Financial Industry Regulatory Authority, Inc. Beneficial interests in the Portfolios are issued continuously.

Portfolio Administrator

U.S. Bank Global Fund Services (“Fund Services”) serves as administrator to the Portfolios.

Custodian, Transfer Agent, Dividend Disbursing Agent and Portfolio Accountant

U.S. Bank N.A. serves as Custodian for each Portfolio’s cash and securities. U.S. Bank N.A. does not assist in, and is not responsible for, investment decisions involving assets of the Portfolios. Fund Services acts as each Portfolio’s transfer agent, dividend disbursing agent, and portfolio accountant.


Counsel and Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

Legal matters in connection with the issuance of shares of beneficial interests of the Trust are passed upon by Seward & Kissel LLP, 901 K Street N.W., Suite 800 Washington, DC 20001. Tait, Weller & Baker LLP, Two Liberty Place, 50 South 16th Street, Suite 2900, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19102 is the independent registered public accounting firm for the Trust.

KINETICS PORTFOLIOS TRUST

STATEMENT OF ADDITIONAL INFORMATION

May 5, 2026


Name of Portfolio			Ticker Symbol
The Internet Portfolio			Not Applicable
The Global Portfolio			Not Applicable
The Paradigm Portfolio			Not Applicable
The Small Cap Opportunities Portfolio			Not Applicable
The Market Opportunities Portfolio			Not Applicable
The Multi-Disciplinary Income Portfolio			Not Applicable

Each a series (individually, a “Portfolio” and collectively, the “Portfolios”)

of Kinetics Portfolios Trust (the “Trust”)

This Statement of Additional Information (“SAI”) provides general information about each of the Portfolios. This SAI is not a Prospectus and should be read in conjunction with the Portfolios’ current Prospectus dated May 5, 2026, as supplemented and amended from time to time, which is incorporated herein by reference. To obtain a copy of the Portfolios’ Prospectus, please write or call the Portfolios at the address or telephone number shown below.

Kinetics Portfolios Trust

c/o U.S. Bank Global Fund Services

P.O. Box 219252

Kansas City, MO 64121-9252

Phone: 1-800-930-3828

This SAI is being filed as a part of the Registration Statement filed by the Trust pursuant to Section 8(b) of the Investment Company Act of 1940, as amended (“1940 Act”). Beneficial interests of each series of the Trust are not being registered under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended (“1933 Act”), because such interests are issued solely in private placement transactions to eligible investors that do not involve any “public offering” within the meaning of Section 4(a)(2) of the 1933 Act. Accordingly, investments in the Portfolios may currently be made only by regulated investment companies, unregulated foreign investment companies, U.S. and non-U.S. institutional investors, S corporations, segregated asset accounts and certain qualified pension and retirement plans. Neither this SAI nor the Registration Statement as a whole constitutes an offer to sell or the solicitation of an offer to buy any beneficial interests in the Portfolios.

Table of Contents


General Information about Kinetics Portfolio Trust			1
Description of the Portfolios			1
Investment Restrictions			2
Investment Policies and Associated Risks			4
Temporary Investments			22
Portfolio Turnover			22
Management of the Portfolios			23
Control Persons and Principal Holders of Securities			33
Proxy Voting Policies			33
Investment Adviser			34
Administrative Services			39
Custodian			40
Codes of Ethics			41
Valuation of the Portfolios			42
Portfolio Holdings Information			43
Purchasing Shares of Beneficial Interest in the Portfolios			44
Redemption of Shares of Beneficial Interest in the Portfolios			45
Brokerage			45
Taxes			47
Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm			47
Financial Statements			47
Appendix A			A-1

General Information about Kinetics Portfolio Trust

The Trust is a statutory trust organized pursuant to a Declaration of Trust under the laws of the State of Delaware on March 14, 2000. The Trust’s principal business office is located at 470 Park Avenue South, New York, New York 10016. The Trust is comprised of six series of mutual funds, all of which are non-diversified, open-end management investment companies, except the Global Portfolio and the Multi-Disciplinary Income Portfolio, which are diversified. Kinetics Mutual Funds, Inc. (the “Company”) is a Maryland corporation, established on March 26, 1999. The Company is comprised of seven series of mutual funds, all of which are open-end management investment companies (the “Funds”). The Funds (other than the Kinetics Spin-Off and Corporate Restructuring Fund, which is not described in this SAI) and Portfolios are set up in a master/feeder fund structure whereby each Fund is a feeder fund that invests all of its investable assets in a “master” Portfolio. Horizon Kinetics Asset Management LLC (“Kinetics” or “Adviser” or “Investment Adviser”) is a Delaware limited liability corporation that serves as the investment adviser to the Portfolios. The Investment Adviser is a wholly-owned subsidiary of Horizon Kinetics LLC.

Capitalization

The authorized capitalization of the Trust consists of an unlimited number of shares of beneficial interests. Each investor in a Portfolio is entitled to participate equally in the Portfolio’s earnings and assets.

Each investor in a Portfolio is entitled to vote in proportion to the amount of its investment in the Portfolio. Portfolio investors will vote together in certain circumstances (e.g., election of the Trustees and ratification of auditors, as required by the 1940 Act and the rules thereunder). One or more Portfolios could control the outcome of these votes. Investors do not have cumulative voting rights, and investors holding more than 50% of the aggregate beneficial interests in the Trust or in a Portfolio, as the case may be, may control the outcome of votes. The Trust is not required and has no current intention to hold annual meetings of investors, but the Trust will hold special meetings of investors when (1) a majority of the Trustees determines to do so or (2) investors holding at least 10% of the interests in a Portfolio (if the meeting relates solely to that Portfolio), or investors holding at least 10% of the aggregate interests in the Trust (if the meeting relates to the Trust and not specifically to a Portfolio) requests in writing a meeting of investors. Changes in fundamental policies or limitations will be submitted to investors for approval.

The Trust is organized as a business trust under the laws of the State of Delaware. Investors in a Portfolio will be held personally liable for its obligations and liabilities, subject, however, to indemnification by the Trust in the event that there is imposed upon an investor a greater portion of the liabilities and obligations than its proportionate beneficial interest in the Portfolio. The Declaration of Trust also provides that, subject to the provisions of the 1940 Act, the Trust may maintain insurance (for example, fidelity bonding and errors and omissions insurance) for the protection of the Portfolios, investors, Trustees, officers, employees, and agents covering possible tort and other liabilities. Thus, the risk of an investor incurring financial loss on account of such liability would be limited to circumstances in which a Portfolio had inadequate insurance and was unable to meet its obligation out of its assets.

Description of the Portfolios

With the exception of the Multi-Disciplinary Income Portfolio, the investment objectives listed below are fundamental objectives and therefore cannot be changed without the approval of shareholders.

The Internet Portfolio

The Internet Portfolio is a non‑diversified portfolio with an investment objective of long-term growth of capital. The Internet Portfolio seeks to obtain current income as a secondary objective.

The Global Portfolio

The Global Portfolio is a diversified portfolio with an investment objective of long-term growth of capital.

The Paradigm Portfolio

The Paradigm Portfolio is a non‑diversified portfolio with an investment objective of long-term growth of capital.

The Small Cap Opportunities Portfolio

The Small Cap Opportunities Portfolio is a non‑diversified portfolio with an investment objective of long-term growth of capital.

The Market Opportunities Portfolio

The Market Opportunities Portfolio is a non-diversified portfolio with an investment objective of long-term growth of capital.

The Multi-Disciplinary Income Portfolio

The Multi-Disciplinary Income Portfolio is a diversified portfolio with an investment objective of total return. This investment objective is non-fundamental and can be changed without the approval of shareholders upon 60 days’ notice to shareholders.

Investment Restrictions

Fundamental Investment Limitations

The fundamental investment restrictions of a Portfolio may be changed only with the approval of the holders of a majority of a Portfolio’s outstanding voting securities. As used in this SAI, “a majority of a Portfolio’s outstanding voting securities” means the lesser of (1) 67% of the beneficial interests of a Portfolio represented at a meeting at which more than 50% of the outstanding shares are present in person or by proxy, or (2) more than 50% of the outstanding beneficial interests of a Portfolio.

1.Each Portfolio will not act as underwriter for securities of other issuers.

2.Each Portfolio will not make loans amounting to more than 33 1/3% of its total assets (including any collateral posted) or 50% of its total assets (excluding any collateral posted).

3.With respect to 50% of its total assets, each Portfolio will not invest in the securities of any issuer if as a result the Portfolio holds more than 10% of the outstanding securities or more than 10% of the outstanding voting securities of such issuer.

4.Each Portfolio will not borrow money or pledge, mortgage, or hypothecate its assets except to facilitate redemption requests that might otherwise require the untimely disposition of portfolio securities and then only from banks and in amounts not exceeding the lesser of 10% of its total assets valued at cost or 5% of its total assets valued at market at the time of such borrowing, pledge, mortgage, or hypothecation and except that (a) with respect to each Portfolio other than the Multi-Disciplinary Income Portfolio, each Portfolio may enter into futures contracts and related options and (b) with respect to the Multi-Disciplinary Income Portfolio, to the extent permitted by the 1940 Act.

5.Each Portfolio (other than the Multi-Disciplinary Income Portfolio), will not invest more than 10% of the value of its net assets in illiquid securities, restricted securities, and other securities for which market quotations are not readily available.

6.The Internet Portfolio will not invest in the securities of any one industry except the Internet and Internet-related industries, with the exception of securities issued or guaranteed by the U.S. Government, its agencies, and instrumentalities, if as a result, more than 20% of the Portfolio’s total net assets would be invested in the securities of such industries. Except during temporary defensive periods, at least 80% of the Portfolio’s total net assets plus any borrowings for investment purposes will be invested in the securities of domestic and foreign companies that are engaged in the Internet and Internet-related activities.

7.The Paradigm Portfolio will not invest in the securities of any one industry, with the exception of securities issued or guaranteed by the U.S. Government, its agencies, and instrumentalities, if as a result, more than 20% of the Portfolio’s total net assets would be invested in the securities of such industries.

8.The Small Cap Opportunities Portfolio will not invest in the securities of any one industry, with the exception of securities issued or guaranteed by the U.S. Government, its agencies, and instrumentalities, if as a result, more than 20% of the Portfolio’s total net assets would be invested in the securities of such industry. Except during temporary defensive periods, at least 80% of the Portfolio’s net assets plus any borrowings for investment purposes will be invested in the securities of domestic and foreign small capitalization companies that provide attractive valuation opportunities due to lack of institutional ownership, lack of significant analyst coverage, or short-term earnings disappointments.

9.The Market Opportunities Portfolio will not invest in the securities of any one industry, except in the securities of U.S. and foreign companies engaged in capital markets or related to capital markets and in the gaming industry, with the exception of securities issued or guaranteed by the U.S. Government, its agencies, and instrumentalities, if, as a result, more than 20% of the Portfolio’s total net assets would be invested in the securities of such industry.

10.The Global Portfolio and the Multi-Disciplinary Income Portfolio will not invest in the securities of any one industry with the exception of securities issued or guaranteed by the U.S. Government, its agencies, and instrumentalities, if as a result, more than 25% of the Portfolio’s total net assets would be invested in the securities of such industry.

11.Each Portfolio will not purchase or sell commodities or commodity contracts, or invest in oil, gas or mineral exploration or development programs or real estate except that each Portfolio may purchase and sell securities of companies that deal in oil, gas, or mineral exploration or development programs or interests therein.

12.Each Portfolio will not issue senior securities.

Non-Fundamental Investment Limitations

The following are non-fundamental operating policies that may be changed by the Board of Trustees of the Trust, without shareholder approval.

1.The Multi-Disciplinary Income Portfolio will not invest more than 15% of the value of its total assets in illiquid investments, restricted securities, and other securities for which market quotations are not readily available.

Investment Policies and Associated Risks

The following paragraphs provide a more detailed description of the Portfolios’ investment policies and risks identified in the Prospectus. Unless otherwise noted, the policies described in this SAI pertain to all of the Portfolios. Furthermore, unless otherwise noted, the policies described in this SAI are not fundamental and may be changed by the Board of Trustees of the Trust without shareholder approval.

Common and Preferred Stock; Convertible Securities

Common stocks are units of ownership of a corporation. Preferred stocks are stocks that often pay dividends at a specific rate and have a preference over common stocks in dividend payments and liquidation of assets. Some preferred stocks may be convertible into common stock. Convertible securities are securities that may be converted into or exchanged for a specified amount of common stock of the same or different issuer within a particular period of time at a specified price or formula.

Short Sales

The Multi-Disciplinary Income Portfolio may enter into short sales. Short sales are transactions in which a fund sells a security it does not own in anticipation of a decline in the market value of that security. To complete such a transaction, the Portfolio must borrow the security to make delivery to the buyer. The Portfolio then is obligated to replace the security borrowed by purchasing it at the market price at the time of replacement. The price at such time may be more or less than the price at which the security was sold by the Portfolio. Until the security is replaced, the Portfolio is required to pay to the lender amounts equal to any dividend that accrues during the period of the loan. To borrow the security, the Portfolio also may be required to pay a premium or a negative rebate (short rebate), which would increase the cost of the security sold. The proceeds of the short sale will be retained by the broker, to the extent necessary to meet margin requirements, until the short position is closed out.

The Portfolio will comply with Rule 18f-4 under the 1940 Act with respect to its use of derivatives and related instruments. Rule 18f-4 treats short sale borrowings as derivatives transactions. Rule 18f-4 prescribes specific value-at-risk leverage limits for certain derivatives users and requires certain derivatives users to adopt and implement a derivatives risk management program (including the appointment of a derivatives risk manager and the implementation of certain testing requirements), and

prescribes reporting requirements in respect of derivatives. Subject to certain conditions, if a Portfolio qualifies as a “limited derivatives user,” as defined in Rule 18f-4, it is not subject to the full requirements of Rule 18f-4. In connection with the adoption of Rule 18f-4, the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “SEC”) rescinded certain of its prior guidance regarding asset segregation and coverage requirements in respect of derivatives transactions and related instruments. With respect to reverse repurchase agreements or other similar financing transactions in particular, Rule 18f-4 permits a fund to enter into such transactions if the fund either (i) complies with the asset coverage requirements of Section 18 of the 1940 Act, and combines the aggregate amount of indebtedness associated with all reverse repurchase agreements or similar financing transactions with the aggregate amount of any other senior securities representing indebtedness when calculating the relevant asset coverage ratio, or (ii) treats all reverse repurchase agreements or similar financing transactions as derivatives transactions for all purposes under Rule 18f-4. The Portfolios have adopted procedures for investing in derivatives and other transactions in compliance with Rule 18f-4. Rule 18f-4 under the 1940 Act may require a Portfolio to observe more stringent asset coverage and related requirements than were previously imposed by the 1940 Act, which could adversely affect the value or performance of the Portfolio. Limits or restrictions applicable to the counterparties or issuers, as applicable, with which the Portfolios may engage in derivative transactions could also limit or prevent a Portfolio from using certain instruments.

The Portfolio will incur a loss as a result of the short sale if the price of the security increases between the date of the short sale and the date on which the Portfolio replaces the borrowed security. The Portfolio will realize a gain if the security declines in price between those dates. This result is the opposite of what one would expect from a cash purchase of a long position in a security. The amount of any gain will be decreased, and the amount of any loss will be increased, by the amount of any premium, negative rebate (short rebate) or amounts in lieu of interest the Portfolio may be required to pay in connection with a short sale.

The use of derivatives is subject to operational and legal risks. Operational risks generally refer to risks related to potential operational issues, including documentation issues, settlement issues, system failures, inadequate controls, and human error. Legal risks generally refer to risks of loss resulting from insufficient documentation, insufficient capacity or authority of counterparty, or legality or enforceability of a contract.

Warrants

Each Portfolio may purchase, and the Multi-Disciplinary Income Portfolio may also sell short, warrants and similar rights, which are privileges issued by corporations enabling the owners to subscribe to and purchase a specified number of shares of the corporation at a specified price during a specified period of time. The prices of warrants do not necessarily correlate with the prices of the underlying shares. The purchase of warrants involves the risk that a Portfolio could lose the purchase value of a warrant if the right to subscribe to additional shares is not exercised prior to the warrant’s expiration. Also, the purchase of warrants involves the risk that the effective price paid for the warrant added to the subscription price of the related security may exceed the value of the subscribed security’s market price such as when there is no movement in the level of the underlying security.

Debt Securities

The Portfolios may invest in (and the Multi-Disciplinary Income Portfolio may invest all of its assets in) convertible and non-convertible debt obligations without regard to rating, and as a result, may purchase or hold securities in the lowest rating categories. Debt securities in these lowest investment grade categories are considered to be below investment grade securities that may not have adequate capacity to pay principal or that otherwise generally lack the characteristics of desirable investments. As

compared to debt securities with higher ratings, these “high risk” securities are vulnerable to nonpayment and depend to a larger degree upon favorable business, financial and economic conditions for the obligor to meet its financial commitment on the obligation. With the exception of the Multi-Disciplinary Income Portfolio, at no time will the Portfolios have more than 20% of their respective total assets invested in any debt securities that are rated below investment grade or if the security is unrated, of comparable quality as determined by the Adviser, either at the time of purchase or as a result of a reduction in rating after purchase. Please see “Appendix A” to this SAI for a description of debt security ratings.

The fixed-income securities in which the Portfolios may invest are generally subject to credit risk, extension risk, income risk, inflation risk, interest rate risk, market risk, and prepayment risk.

Credit Risk. Fixed-income securities are subject to the risk of an issuer’s (or other party’s) failure or inability to meet its obligations under the security. Multiple parties may have obligations under a fixed income security. An issuer or borrower may fail to pay principal and interest when due. A guarantor, insurer or credit support provider may fail to provide the agreed upon protection. A counterparty to a transaction may fail to perform its side of the bargain. An intermediary or agent interposed between the investor and other parties may fail to perform the terms of its service. Also, performance under a fixed income security may be linked to the obligations of other people who may fail to meet their obligations. The credit risk associated with a fixed income security could increase to the extent that a fund’s ability to benefit fully from its investment in the security depends on the performance by multiple parties of their respective contractual or other obligations. The market value of a fixed income security is also affected by the market’s perception of the creditworthiness of the issuer.

A fund may incur substantial losses on fixed income securities that are inaccurately perceived to present a different amount of credit risk than they actually do by the market, the Adviser or the rating agencies. Credit risk is generally greater where less information is publicly available, where fewer covenants safeguard the investors’ interests, where collateral may be impaired or inadequate, where little legal redress or regulatory protection is available, or where a party’s ability to meet obligations is speculative. Additionally, any inaccuracy in the information used by the fund to evaluate credit risk may affect the value of securities held by a fund. Obligations under debt securities held by a fund may never be satisfied or, if satisfied, only satisfied in part.

Some securities are subject to risks as a result of a credit downgrade or default by a government, or its agencies or, instrumentalities. Credit risk is a greater concern for high-yield debt securities and debt securities of issuers whose ability to pay interest and principal may be considered speculative. Debt securities are typically classified as investment grade-quality (medium to highest credit quality) or below investment grade-quality (commonly referred to as high-yield or junk bonds). Many individual debt securities are rated by a third-party source, such as Moody’s Ratings (“Moody’s”), Standard & Poor’s Global Ratings (“S&P®”), or Fitch Ratings (“Fitch”) to help describe the creditworthiness of the issuer. Generally, a lower rating indicates higher credit risk. Higher yields are ordinarily available from debt securities in the lower rating categories. These ratings are described at the end of this SAI under “Description of Securities Ratings.”

Extension Risk. A fund subject to extension risk, which is the risk that the market value of some fixed income securities, particularly mortgage securities and certain asset-backed securities, may be adversely affected when bond calls or prepayments on underlying mortgages or other assets are less or slower than anticipated. Extension risk may result from, for example, rising interest rates or unexpected developments in the markets for the underlying assets or mortgages. Consequently, the security’s effective maturity will be extended, resulting in an increase in interest rate sensitivity to that of a longer-term instrument. Extension risk generally increases as interest rates rise. This is because, in a rising interest rate environment, the rate of prepayment and exercise of call or buy-back rights generally falls and the rate of default and delayed payment generally rises. When the maturity of an investment is extended in a rising

interest rate environment, a below-market interest rate is usually locked-in, and the value of the security reduced. This risk is greater for fixed-rate than variable-rate debt securities.

Income Risk. A fund is subject to income risk, which is the risk that a fund’s income will decline during periods of falling interest rates or when the fund experiences defaults on fixed income securities it holds. A fund’s income declines when interest rates fall because, as the fund’s higher-yielding fixed income securities mature or are prepaid, a fund must re-invest the proceeds in fixed income securities that have lower, prevailing interest rates. The amount and rate of distribution that a fund’s shareholders receive are affected by the income that the fund receives from its portfolio holdings. If the income is reduced, distributions by a fund to shareholders may be less.

Fluctuations in income paid to a fund are generally greater for variable rate fixed income securities. A fund will be deemed to receive taxable income on certain securities which pay no cash payments until maturity, such as zero-coupon securities. A fund may be required to sell portfolio securities that it would otherwise continue to hold in order to obtain sufficient cash to make the distribution to shareholders required for U.S. tax purposes.

Inflation Risk. The market price of fixed income securities generally falls as inflation increases because the purchasing power of the future income and repaid principal is expected to be worth less when received by a fund. Fixed income securities that pay a fixed rather than variable interest rate are especially vulnerable to inflation risk because variable-rate debt securities may be able to participate, over the long term, in rising interest rates which have historically corresponded with long-term inflationary trends.

Interest Rate Risk. The market value of fixed income securities generally varies in response to changes in prevailing interest rates. Interest rate changes can be sudden and unpredictable. In addition, short-term and long-term rates are not necessarily correlated to each other as short-term rates tend to be influenced by government monetary policy while long-term rates are market driven and may be influenced by macroeconomic events (such as economic expansion or contraction), inflation expectations, as well as supply and demand. During periods of declining interest rates, the market value of debt securities generally increases. Conversely, during periods of rising interest rates, the market value of debt securities generally declines. This occurs because new fixed income securities are likely to be issued with higher interest rates as interest rates increase, making the old or outstanding fixed income securities less attractive. In general, the market prices of long-term fixed income securities or securities that make little (or no) interest payments are more sensitive to interest rate fluctuations than shorter-term fixed income securities. The longer a fund’s average weighted portfolio duration, the greater the potential impact a change in interest rates will have on its share price. Also, certain segments of the fixed income markets, such as high-quality bonds, tend to be more sensitive to interest rate changes than other segments, such as lower-quality bonds.

Market Risk. All mutual funds are affected by changes in the economy and swings in investment markets. These can occur within or outside the U.S. or worldwide and may affect only particular companies or industries.

Prepayment risk. Fixed income securities, especially bonds that are subject to “calls,” such as asset-backed or mortgage-backed securities, are subject to prepayment risk if their terms allow the payment of principal and other amounts due before their stated maturity. Amounts invested in a fixed income security that has been “called” or “prepaid” will be returned to an investor holding that security before expected by the investor. In such circumstances, the investor, such as a fund, may be required to re-invest the proceeds it receives from the called or prepaid security in a new security which, in periods of declining interest rates, will typically have a lower interest rate. Prepayment risk is especially prevalent in periods of declining interest rates and will result for other reasons, including unexpected developments in the markets for the underlying assets or mortgages. For example, a decline in mortgage interest rates typically initiates a period of mortgage refinancing. When homeowners refinance their mortgages, the investor in the underlying pool of mortgage-backed securities (such as a fund) receives its principal back sooner than

expected, and must reinvest at lower, prevailing rates. Securities subject to prepayment risk are often called during a declining interest rate environment and generally offer less potential for gains and greater price volatility than other income-bearing securities of comparable maturity.

When-Issued and Delayed Delivery Transactions

Each Portfolio may purchase short-term obligations on a when-issued or delayed delivery basis. These transactions are arrangements in which the Portfolios purchase securities with payment and delivery scheduled for a future time. The seller’s failure to complete these transactions may cause the Portfolios to miss a price or yield considered advantageous. Settlement dates may be a month or more after entering into these transactions and the market values of the securities purchased may vary from the purchase prices.

The Portfolios may dispose of a commitment prior to settlement if the Adviser deems it appropriate to do so. In addition, each Portfolio may enter into transactions to sell its purchase commitments to third parties at current market values and simultaneously acquire other commitments to purchase similar securities at later dates. A Portfolio may realize short-term profits or losses upon the sale of such commitments.

These transactions are made to secure what is considered to be an advantageous price or yield for a Portfolio. No fees or other expenses, other than normal transaction costs, are incurred. The Portfolios will comply with Rule 18f-4 under the 1940 Act with respect to these transactions. See the sections entitled “Investment Policies and Associated Risks-Short Sales” above and “Recent Regulatory Developments” below for additional information.

In addition, Financial Industry Regulatory Authority (“FINRA”) rules include mandatory margin requirements that require a Portfolio to post collateral in connection with its to be announced (“TBA”) transactions. There is no similar requirement applicable to a Portfolio’s TBA counterparties. The required collateralization of TBA trades could increase the cost of TBA transactions to a Portfolio and impose added operational complexity.

Exchange-Traded Funds

ETF shares typically trade like shares of common stock and provide investment results that generally correspond to the price and yield performance of the component stocks of a widely recognized index such as the S&P 500® Index. There can be no assurance, however, that this can be accomplished as it may not be possible for an ETF to replicate the composition and relative weightings of the securities of its corresponding index. ETFs are subject to risks of an investment in a broadly based portfolio of common stocks, including the risk that the general level of stock prices may decline, thereby adversely affecting the value of such investment. Individual shares of an ETF are generally not redeemable at their net asset value (“NAV”), but trade on an exchange during the day at prices that are normally close to, but not the same as, their NAV. There is no assurance that an active trading market will be maintained for the shares of an ETF or that market prices of the shares of an ETF will be close to their NAV. The existence of extreme market volatility or potential lack of an active trading market for an ETF's shares could result in such shares trading at a significant premium or discount to NAV.

Leveraged ETFs contain all of the risks that non-leveraged ETFs present. Additionally, to the extent a Portfolio invests in ETFs that achieve leveraged exposure to their underlying indexes through the use of derivative instruments, the Portfolio will indirectly be subject to leveraging risk. The more these ETFs invest in derivative instruments that give rise to leverage, the more this leverage will magnify any losses on those investments. Because leverage tends to exaggerate the effect of any increase or decrease in the value of an ETF’s portfolio securities or other investments, leverage will cause the value of an ETF’s

shares to be more volatile than if the ETF did not use leverage. A leveraged ETF will engage in transactions and purchase instruments that give rise to forms of leverage, including, among others, the use of reverse repurchase agreements and other borrowings, the investment of collateral from loans of portfolio securities, the use of when issued, delayed-delivery or forward commitment transactions or short sales. The use of leverage may also cause a leveraged ETF to liquidate portfolio positions when it would not be advantageous to do so in order to satisfy its obligations or to meet segregation requirements. Certain types of leveraging transactions, such as short sales that are not “against the box,” could theoretically be subject to unlimited losses in cases where a leveraged ETF, for any reason, is unable to close out the transaction. In addition, to the extent a leveraged ETF borrows money, interest costs on such borrowed money may not be recovered by any appreciation of the securities purchased with the borrowed funds and could exceed the ETF’s investment income, resulting in greater losses. Such ETFs often “reset” daily, meaning that they are designed to achieve their stated objectives on a daily basis. Due to the effect of compounding, their performance over longer periods of time can differ significantly from the performance (or inverse of the performance) of their underlying index or benchmark during the same period of time, which may be enhanced during the periods of increased market volatility. These investment vehicles may be extremely volatile and can potentially expose an investing Portfolio to theoretically unlimited losses. Please see “Investment Company Securities” below for additional information.

Investment Company Securities

Each Portfolio may invest in securities issued by other investment companies to the extent permitted by the 1940 Act. Under the 1940 Act, a Portfolio's investments in such securities currently are limited to, subject to certain exceptions, (i) 3% of the total voting stock of any one investment company, (ii) 5% of the Portfolio's total assets with respect to any one investment company and (iii) 10% of the Portfolio's total assets with respect to investment companies in the aggregate. Rule 12d1-1 under the 1940 Act permits a Portfolio to invest an unlimited amount of its uninvested cash in a money market fund so long as, among other things, said investment is consistent with the Portfolio's investment objectives and policies.

The SEC has adopted revisions to the rules permitting funds to invest in other investment companies in excess of the limits described above. While new Rule 12d1-4 permits more types of fund of fund arrangements without reliance on an exemptive order or no-action letters, it imposes new conditions, including limits on control and voting of acquired funds' shares, evaluations and findings by investment advisers, fund investment agreements, and limits on most three-tier fund structures. Each Portfolio may also acquire investment company shares received or acquired as dividends, through offers of exchange or as a result of reorganization, consolidation or merger. As a shareholder in an investment company, a Portfolio would bear its pro rata portion of the investment company’s expenses, including advisory fees, in addition to its own expenses.

Restricted and Illiquid Investments

Pursuant to Rule 22e-4 under the 1940 Act, the Portfolios may invest up to 15% of their net assets in illiquid investments. An illiquid investment is an investment that a Portfolio reasonably expects cannot be sold or disposed of in current market conditions within seven calendar days or less without the sale or disposition significantly changing the market value of the investment. Restricted securities are any securities that are not registered under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended (“1933 Act”) and are illiquid. For purposes of each Portfolio’s limitation on purchases of illiquid investments described in “Investment Restrictions” above, securities that are not registered under the 1933 Act and are determined to be liquid based upon a review of the trading markets for the specific restricted security will not be

included. This practice could increase the level of illiquidity during any period that qualified institutional buyers become uninterested in purchasing these securities.

The Trust has implemented a liquidity risk management program and related procedures to identify illiquid investments pursuant to Rule 22e-4. If the limitation on illiquid investments is exceeded, the condition will be reported to the Board of Trustees of the Trust, and when required, to the SEC.

Depositary Receipts

The Portfolios may invest in ADRs and in other forms of depositary receipts, such as IDRs and GDRs. Depositary receipts are typically issued in connection with a U.S. or foreign bank or trust company and evidence ownership of underlying securities issued by a foreign corporation. In particular, ADRs represent the right to receive securities of foreign issuers deposited in a bank or other depositary. ADRs are traded in the United States and the prices of ADRs are quoted in U.S. dollars. Investments in depositary receipts involve certain inherent risks generally associated with investments in foreign securities, including the following:

Political and Economic Factors. Individual foreign economies of certain countries may differ favorably or unfavorably from the United States economy in such respects as growth of gross national product, rate of inflation, capital reinvestment, resource self‑sufficiency, diversification and balance of payments position. The internal politics of certain foreign countries may not be as stable as those of the United States. Governments in certain foreign countries also continue to participate to a significant degree, through ownership interest or regulation, in their respective economies. Action by these governments could include restrictions on foreign investment, nationalization, expropriation of goods or imposition of taxes, and could have a significant effect on market prices of securities and payment of interest. The economies of many foreign countries are heavily dependent upon international trade and are accordingly affected by the trade policies and economic conditions of their trading partners. Enactment by these trading partners of protectionist trade legislation could have a significant adverse effect upon the securities markets of such countries.

Currency Fluctuations. A change in the value of any foreign currency against the U.S. dollar will result in a corresponding change in the U.S. dollar value of an ADR’s underlying portfolio securities denominated in that currency. Such changes will affect a Portfolio to the extent that the Portfolio is invested in ADRs comprised of foreign securities.

Taxes. The interest and dividends payable on certain foreign securities comprising an ADR may be subject to foreign withholding taxes, thus reducing the net amount of income to be paid to the Portfolios and that may ultimately be available for distribution to the Portfolio’s shareholders.

Derivatives

Buying Call and Put Options. The Portfolios may purchase call options. Such transactions may be entered into in order to limit the risk of a substantial increase in the market price of the security that each Portfolio intends to purchase. Prior to its expiration, a call option may be sold in a closing sale transaction. Any profit or loss from the sale will depend on whether the amount received is more or less than the premium paid for the call option plus the related transaction cost.

The Portfolios may purchase put options. By buying a put, each Portfolio has the right to sell the security at the exercise price, thus limiting its risk of loss through a decline in the market value of the security until the put expires. The amount of any appreciation in the value of the underlying security will be partially offset by the amount of the premium paid for the put option and any related transaction cost.

Prior to its expiration, a put option may be sold in a closing sale transaction and any profit or loss from the sale will depend on whether the amount received is more or less than the premium paid for the put option plus the related transaction costs.

Writing (Selling) Call and Put Options. Each Portfolio may write covered options on equity and debt securities and indices. The Multi-Disciplinary Income Portfolio may write up to 20% of its assets in put options on equity and, to a limited extent, debt securities and indices, for hedging or non-hedging purposes. The Multi-Disciplinary Income Portfolio may also write more than 5% of its net assets on covered call options on equity and debt securities and indices. In the case of call options, so long as a Portfolio is obligated as the writer of a call option, it will own the underlying security subject to the option, however, index options and sector/industry based ETF options will be considered covered if the Portfolio holds a portion of securities substantially correlated with the movement of the index (or, to the extent it does not hold such a portfolio, segregates liquid assets in an amount equal to the value of the option on a daily, marked-to-market basis). In the case of put options, it will, through its custodian, deposit and maintain either cash or securities with a market value equal to or greater than the exercise price of the option.

Covered call options written by a Portfolio give the holder the right to buy the underlying securities from the Portfolio at a stated exercise price. A call option written by a Portfolio is “covered” if the Portfolio owns the underlying security that is subject to the call or has an absolute and immediate right to acquire that security without additional cash consideration (or for additional cash consideration held in a segregated account by its custodian bank) upon conversion or exchange of other securities held in its portfolio or, in the case of index options and sector/industry based ETF options, will be considered covered if the Portfolio holds a portion of securities substantially correlated with the movement of the index. A call option is also covered if a Portfolio holds a call on the same security and in the same principal amount as the call written where the exercise price of the call held (a) is equal to or less than the exercise price of the call written or (b) is greater than the exercise price of the call written if the difference is maintained by the Portfolio in cash and high grade debt securities in a segregated account with its custodian bank. The Portfolios may purchase securities, which may be covered with call options solely on the basis of considerations consistent with the investment objectives and policies of the Portfolios. A Portfolio’s turnover may increase through the exercise of a call option; this will generally occur if the market value of a “covered” security increases and the Portfolio has not entered into a closing purchase transaction.

As a writer of an option, each Portfolio receives a premium less a commission, and in exchange foregoes the opportunity to profit from any increase in the market value of the security exceeding the call option price. The premium serves to mitigate the effect of any depreciation in the market value of the security. The premium paid by the buyer of an option will reflect, among other things, the relationship of the exercise price to the market price, the volatility of the underlying security, the remaining term of the option, the existing supply and demand, and the interest rates.

The writer of a call option may have no control over when the underlying securities must be sold because the writer may be assigned an exercise notice at any time prior to the termination of the obligation. Exercise of a call option by the purchaser will cause a Portfolio to forego future appreciation of the securities covered by the option. Whether or not an option expires unexercised, the writer retains the amount of the premium. This amount may, in the case of a covered call option, be offset by a decline in the market value of the underlying security during the option period. If a call option is exercised, the writer experiences a profit or loss from the sale of the underlying security. Thus during the option period, the writer of a call option gives up the opportunity for appreciation in the market value of the underlying security or currency above the exercise price. It retains the risk of the loss should the price of the

underlying security or foreign currency decline. Writing call options also involves risks relating to a Portfolio’s ability to close out the option it has written.

Each Portfolio may write exchange-traded call options on its securities. Call options may be written on portfolio securities indices, or foreign currencies. With respect to securities and foreign currencies, the Portfolio may write call and put options on an exchange or over-the-counter. Call options on portfolio securities will be covered since the Portfolio will own the underlying securities. Call options on securities indices will be written only to hedge in an economically appropriate way portfolio securities that are not otherwise hedged with options or financial futures contracts and will be “covered” by identifying the specific portfolio securities being hedged. Options on foreign currencies will be covered by securities denominated in that currency. Options on securities indices will be covered by securities that substantially replicate the movement of the index.

A put option on a security, security index, or foreign currency gives the purchaser of the option, in return for the premium paid to the writer (seller), the right to sell the underlying security, index, or foreign currency at the exercise price at any time during the option period. When a Portfolio writes a secured put option, it will gain a profit in the amount of the premium, less a commission, so long as the price of the underlying security remains above the exercise price. However, a Portfolio remains obligated to purchase the underlying security from the buyer of the put option (usually in the event the price of the security falls bellows the exercise price) at any time during the option period. If the price of the underlying security falls below the exercise price, the Portfolios may realize a loss in the amount of the difference between the exercise price and the sale price of the security, less the premium received. Upon exercise by the purchaser, the writer of a put option has the obligation to purchase the underlying security or foreign currency at the exercise price. A put option on a securities index is similar to a put option on an individual security, except that the value of the option depends on the weighted value of the group of securities comprising the index and all settlements are made in cash.

During the option period, the writer of a put option has assumed the risk that the price of the underlying security or foreign currency will decline below the exercise price. However, the writer of the put option has retained the opportunity for appreciation above the exercise price should the market price of the underlying security or foreign currency increase. Writing put options also involves risks relating to a Portfolio’s ability to close out the option that it has written.

The writer of an option who wishes to terminate its obligation may effect a “closing purchase transaction” by buying an option of the same series as the option previously written. The effect of the purchase is that the clearing corporation will cancel the writer’s position. However, a writer may not effect a closing purchase transaction after being notified of the exercise of an option. There is also no guarantee that a Portfolio will be able to effect a closing purchase transaction for the options it has written.

Effecting a closing purchase transaction in the case of a written call option will permit a Portfolio to write another call option on the underlying security with a different exercise price, expiration date, or both. Effecting a closing purchase transaction will also permit a Portfolio to use cash or proceeds from the investments. If a Portfolio desires to sell a particular security from its portfolio on which it has written a call option, it will effect a closing purchase transaction before or at the same time as the sale of the security.

A Portfolio will realize a profit from a closing purchase transaction if the price of the transaction is less than the premium received from writing the option. Likewise, a Portfolio will realize a loss from a closing purchase transaction if the price of the transaction is more than the premium received from writing the option. Because increases in the market price of a call option will generally reflect increases in the market

price of the underlying security, any loss resulting from the repurchase of a call option is likely to be offset in whole or in part by appreciation of the underlying security owned by the Portfolio.

Writing Over-The-Counter (“OTC”) Options. Each Portfolio, except the Multi-Disciplinary Income Portfolio, may engage in options transactions that trade on the OTC market to the same extent that it intends to engage in exchange-traded options. The Multi-Disciplinary Income Portfolio may invest to a limited extent in OTC options. Just as with exchange-traded options, OTC options give the holder the right to buy an underlying security from, or sell an underlying security to, an option writer at a stated exercise price. However, OTC options differ from exchange-traded options in certain material respects.

OTC options are arranged directly with dealers and not, as is the case with exchange-traded options, through a clearing corporation. Thus, there is a risk of non-performance by the dealer. Because there is no exchange, pricing is typically done by reference to information obtained from market makers. Since OTC options are available for a greater variety of securities and in a wider range of expiration dates and exercise prices, the writer of an OTC option is paid the premium in advance by the dealer.

A writer or purchaser of a put or call option can terminate it voluntarily only by entering into a closing transaction. There can be no assurance that a continuously liquid secondary market will exist for any particular option at any specific time. Consequently, a Portfolio may be able to realize the value of an OTC option it has purchased only by exercising it or entering into a closing sale transaction with the dealer that issued it. Similarly, when a Portfolio writes an OTC option, it generally can close out that option prior to its expiration only by entering into a closing purchase transaction with the dealer to which it originally wrote the option. If a covered call option writer cannot effect a closing transaction, it cannot sell the underlying security or foreign currency until the option expires or the option is exercised. Therefore, the writer of a covered OTC call option may not be able to sell an underlying security even though it might otherwise be advantageous to do so. Likewise, the writer of a secured OTC put option may be unable to sell the securities pledged to secure the put for other investment purposes while it is obligated as a put writer. Similarly, a purchaser of an OTC put or call option might also find it difficult to terminate its position on a timely basis in the absence of a secondary market.

The staff of the SEC has often taken the position that purchased OTC options and the assets used to “cover” written OTC options are illiquid investments.

Futures Contracts. Each Portfolio may buy and sell stock index futures contracts traded on domestic stock exchanges to hedge the value of its portfolio against changes in market conditions. A stock index futures contract is an agreement between two parties to take or make delivery of an amount of cash equal to a specified dollar amount, times the difference between the stock index value at the close of the last trading day of the contract and the price at which the futures contract is originally struck. A stock index futures contract does not involve the physical delivery of the underlying stocks in the index. Although stock index futures contracts call for the actual taking or delivery of cash, in most cases each Portfolio expects to liquidate its stock index futures positions through offsetting transactions, which may result in a gain or a loss, before cash settlement is required.

Each Portfolio will incur brokerage fees when it purchases and sells stock index futures contracts, and at the time a Portfolio purchases or sells a stock index futures contract, it must make a good faith deposit known as the “initial margin.” Thereafter, a Portfolio may need to make subsequent deposits, known as “variation margin,” to reflect changes in the level of the stock index. Each Portfolio may buy or sell a stock index futures contract so long as the sum of the amount of margin deposits on open positions with respect to all stock index futures contracts does not exceed 5% of each other Portfolio’s net assets.

To the extent a Portfolio enters into a stock index futures contract, it will comply with Rule 18f-4 under the 1940 Act. See the sections entitled “Investment Policies and Associated Risks- Short Sales” above and “-Recent Regulatory Developments” below for additional information.

Risks Associated With Options and Futures. Although each Portfolio may write covered call options and purchase and sell stock index futures contracts to hedge against declines in market value of their portfolio securities, the use of these instruments involves certain risks. As the writer of covered call options, a Portfolio receives a premium but loses any opportunity to profit from an increase in the market price of the underlying securities, though the premium received may partially offset such loss.

Although stock index futures contracts may be useful in hedging against adverse changes in the value of a Portfolio’s investment securities, they are derivative instruments that are subject to a number of risks. During certain market conditions, purchases and sales of stock index futures contracts may not completely offset a decline or rise in the value of a Portfolio’s investments. In the futures markets, it may not always be possible to execute a buy or sell order at the desired price, or to close out an open position due to market conditions, limits on open positions and/or daily price fluctuations. Changes in the market value of each Portfolio’s investment securities may differ substantially from the changes anticipated by the Portfolio when it established its hedged positions, and unanticipated price movements in a futures contract may result in a loss substantially greater than the Portfolio’s initial investment in such a contract.

Successful use of futures contracts depends upon the Adviser’s ability to correctly predict movements in the securities markets generally or of a particular segment of a securities market. No assurance can be given that the Adviser’s judgment in this respect will be correct.

The Commodity Futures Trading Commission and the various exchanges have established limits referred to as “speculative position limits” on the maximum net long or net short position that any person may hold or control in a particular futures contract. Federal position limits apply to swaps that are economically equivalent to futures contracts that are subject to CFTC set speculative position limits. All positions owned or controlled by the same person or entity, even if in different accounts, must be aggregated for purposes of determining whether the applicable position limits have been exceeded, unless an exemption applies. Trading limits are imposed on the number of contracts that any person may trade on a particular trading day. An exchange may order the liquidation of positions found to be in violation of these limits and it may impose sanctions or restrictions. These trading and positions limits will not have an adverse impact on a Portfolio’s strategies for hedging its securities.

Participatory Notes. The Global Portfolio may invest in participatory notes issued by banks or broker-dealers that are designed to replicate the performance of certain issuers and markets. Participatory notes are a type of equity-linked derivative, which generally are traded over-the-counter. The performance results of participatory notes will not replicate exactly the performance of the issuers or markets that the notes seek to replicate due to transaction costs and other expenses. Investments in participatory notes involve the same risks associated with a direct investment in the shares of the companies the notes seek to replicate. In addition, participatory notes are subject to counterparty risk, which is the risk that the broker-dealer or bank that issues the notes will not fulfill its contractual obligation to complete the transaction with the Portfolio. Participatory notes constitute general unsecured contractual obligations of the banks or broker-dealers that issue them, and the Portfolio is relying on the creditworthiness of such banks or broker-dealers and has no rights under a participatory note against the issuers of the securities underlying such participatory notes. Participatory notes involve transaction costs. Participatory notes may be considered illiquid and, therefore, participatory notes considered illiquid will be subject to the Portfolio’s percentage limitation for investments in illiquid investments.

Regulatory Derivative Rule. Rule 18f-4 requires that the Portfolios trade derivatives and other transactions that create future payment or delivery obligations (except reverse repurchase agreements and similar financing transactions) subject to a value-at-risk (“VaR”) leverage limit and certain derivatives risk management program and reporting requirements. Generally, these requirements apply unless a fund qualifies as a “limited derivatives user,” as defined in Rule 18f-4. Under Rule 18f-4, when a Portfolio trades reverse repurchase agreements or similar financing transactions, it needs to aggregate the amount of indebtedness associated with the reverse repurchase agreements or similar financing transactions with the aggregate amount of any other senior securities representing indebtedness when calculating the Portfolio's asset coverage ratio or treat all such transactions as derivatives transactions. Reverse repurchase agreements or similar financing transactions aggregated with other indebtedness do not need to be included in the calculation of whether a fund is a limited derivatives user, but for funds subject to the VaR testing, reverse repurchase agreements and similar financing transactions must be included for purposes of such testing whether treated as derivatives transactions or not. These requirements may limit the ability of a fund to use derivatives and reverse repurchase agreements and similar financing transactions as part of its investment strategies. These requirements may increase the cost of a Portfolio's investments and cost of doing business, which could adversely affect investors in the Portfolios.

Distressed Investments

Each Portfolio, other than the Multi-Disciplinary Income Portfolio, may invest up to 5% of its assets in securities of companies that are in financial distress (i.e., involved in bankruptcy or reorganization proceedings). The Multi-Disciplinary Income Portfolio may invest up to 15% of its total assets in securities of companies that are in financial distress. These securities may include, among other things, senior or subordinated fixed income securities, common stock, preferred stock, warrants and other kinds of indebtedness. There can be no assurance that the Adviser will correctly evaluate all the factors that could affect the outcome of an investment in these types of securities. Financially distressed securities involve considerable risk that can result in substantial or even total loss on a Portfolio’s investment.

It is often difficult to obtain information as to the true condition of financially distressed securities. These securities are often subject to litigation among the participants in the bankruptcy or reorganization proceedings. Such investments may also be adversely affected by federal and state laws relating to, among other things, fraudulent transfers and other voidable transfers or payments, lender liability and a bankruptcy court’s power to disallow, reduce, subordinate or disenfranchise particular claims. These and other factors contribute to above-average price volatility and abrupt and erratic movements of the market prices of these securities. In addition, the spread between the bid and asked prices of such securities may be greater than normally expected and it may take a number of years for the market price of such securities to reflect their intrinsic value.

Securities of financially troubled companies require active monitoring and may, at times, require participation in bankruptcy or reorganization proceedings by the Adviser. To the extent that the Adviser becomes involved in such proceedings, the Adviser may have a more active participation in the affairs of the issuer than that assumed generally by a shareholder, and such participation may generate higher legal fees and other transaction costs relating to the investment than would normally be the case.

In bankruptcy and other forms of corporate reorganization, there exists the risk that the reorganization will: (1) be unsuccessful (due to, for example, failure to obtain the necessary approvals); (2) be delayed (for example, until various liabilities, actual or contingent, have been satisfied); or (3) result in a distribution of cash or a new security the value of which will be less than the purchase price of the security in respect to which such distribution was made.

Real Estate Investment Trusts (“REITs”)(All Portfolios). The Portfolios may invest in REITs. A REIT is a corporation or trust that pools the capital of many investors to purchase income property and/or mortgage loans.

A REIT is not taxed on income distributed to its shareholders or unitholders if it complies with regulatory requirements relating to its organization, ownership, assets and income, and with a regulatory requirement that it distribute to its shareholders or unitholders at least 90% of its taxable income for each taxable year. Generally, REITs can be classified as Equity REITs, Mortgage REITs and Hybrid REITs. Equity REITs invest the majority of their assets directly in real property and derive their income primarily from rents and capital gains from appreciation realized through property sales. Mortgage REITs invest the majority of their assets in real estate mortgages and derive their income primarily from interest payments. Hybrid REITs combine the characteristics of both Equity and Mortgage REITs. By investing in REITs indirectly through the Portfolio, shareholders of the Fund will bear not only their proportionate share of the expenses of the Portfolio, but also indirectly, similar expenses of underlying REITs.

REITs may be affected by changes in their underlying properties and by defaults by borrowers or tenants. Mortgage REITs may be affected by the quality of the credit extended. Furthermore, REITs are dependent on specialized management skills. Some REITs may have limited diversification and may be subject to risks inherent in financing a limited number of properties. REITs depend generally on their ability to generate cash flow to make distributions to shareholders or unitholders, and may be subject to defaults by borrowers and to self-liquidations.

In addition, the performance of a REIT may be affected by its failure to qualify for tax-free pass-through of income under the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended (the “Code”) or its failure to maintain exemption from registration under the 1940 Act.

Cyber Security Risk (All Portfolios). The Portfolios and their service providers may be prone to operational and information security risks resulting from breaches in cyber security. A breach in cyber security refers to both intentional and unintentional events that may cause a Portfolio to lose proprietary information, suffer data corruption, or lose operational capacity. Breaches in cyber security include, among other behaviors, stealing or corrupting data maintained online or digitally, denial of service attacks on websites, the unauthorized release of confidential information or various other forms of cyber-attacks. Cyber security breaches affecting the Portfolios or their Adviser, custodian, transfer agent, intermediaries and other third-party service providers may adversely impact the Portfolios. For instance, cyber security breaches may interfere with the processing of shareholder transactions, impact a Portfolio’s ability to calculate its NAV, cause the release of private shareholder information or confidential business information, impede trading, subject a Portfolio to regulatory fines or financial losses and/or cause reputational damage. In addition to administrative, technological and procedural safeguards, the Adviser has established business continuity plans in the event of, and risk management systems to prevent or reduce the impact of, such cyber security incidents. However, there are inherent limitations in such plans and systems, including the possibility that certain risks have not been identified, as well as the rapid development of new threats. Furthermore, the Portfolios have limited ability to prevent or mitigate cyber security incidents involving third-party service providers, and such third-party service providers may have limited indemnification obligations to the Portfolios and the Adviser, and the Portfolios cannot control the cyber security plans and systems put in place by their service providers or any other third-parties whose operations may affect the Portfolios or their shareholders. A Portfolio may also incur additional costs for cyber security risk management purposes. Similar types of cyber security risks are also present for issuers of securities in which a Portfolio may invest, which could result in material adverse consequences for such issuers and may cause a Portfolio’s investment in such companies to lose value and therefore negatively impact a Portfolio’s NAV.

Operational Risk (All Portfolios). The Adviser and other service providers may experience disruptions or operating errors that could negatively impact the Portfolios. While service providers are required to have appropriate operational risk management policies and procedures, their methods of operational risk management may differ from the Portfolios’ in the setting of priorities, the personnel and resources available or the effectiveness of relevant controls. The Adviser, through its monitoring and oversight of service providers, seeks to ensure that service providers take appropriate precautions to avoid and mitigate risks that could lead to disruptions and operating errors. However, it is not possible for the Adviser or the other service providers to identify all of the operational risks that may affect a Portfolio or to develop processes and controls to completely eliminate or mitigate their occurrence or effects.

Qualified Financial Contracts (All Portfolios). Regulations adopted by federal banking regulators under the Dodd-Frank Act require that certain qualified financial contracts (“QFCs”) with counterparties that are part of U.S. or foreign global systemically important banking organizations be amended to include contractual restrictions on close-out and cross-default rights. QFCs include, but are not limited to, securities contracts, commodities contracts, forward contracts, repurchase agreements, securities lending agreements and swaps agreements, as well as related master agreements, security agreements, credit enhancements, and reimbursement obligations. If a covered counterparty of a Portfolio or certain of the covered counterparty's affiliates were to become subject to certain insolvency proceedings, the Portfolio may be temporarily unable to exercise certain default rights, and the QFC may be transferred to another entity. These requirements may impact a Portfolio's credit and counterparty risks.

Foreign Securities (All Portfolios except the Multi-Disciplinary Income Portfolio). Each Portfolio (with the exception of the Multi-Disciplinary Income Portfolio) may invest in securities of foreign issuers that are denominated or traded in foreign currencies. Investments in foreign securities involve higher costs than investments in U.S. securities, including higher transaction costs as well as the imposition of additional taxes by foreign governments, and potential imposition of tariffs or other trading disruptions. In addition, foreign investments may include additional risks associated with more or less foreign government regulation; less public information; less stringent investor protections; less stringent accounting, corporate governance, financial reporting and disclosure standards; and less economic, political and social stability in the countries in which a Portfolio invests. Volume and liquidity in most foreign bond markets are less than in the United States and, at times, volatility or price can be greater than in the United States. Future political and economic information, the possible imposition of withholding taxes on interest income, the possible seizure or nationalization of foreign holdings, the possible establishment of exchange controls, or the adoption of other governmental restrictions, might adversely affect the payment of principal and interest on foreign obligations. Inability to dispose of Portfolio securities due to settlement problems could result either in losses to a Portfolio due to subsequent declines in value of the securities, or, if the Portfolio has entered into a contract to sell the securities, could result in possible liability to the purchaser. Individual foreign economies may differ favorably or unfavorably from the U.S. economy in such respects as growth or gross national product, rate of inflation, capital reinvestment, resource self-sufficiency and balance of payments position. Fixed commissions on foreign securities exchanges are generally higher than negotiated commissions on U.S. exchanges, although the Portfolios endeavor to achieve the most favorable net results on their portfolio transactions. There is generally less government supervision and regulation of securities exchanges, brokers, dealers and listed companies than in the United States.

Settlement mechanics (e.g., mail service between the United States and foreign countries) may be slower or less reliable than within the United States, thus increasing the risk of delayed settlements of portfolio transactions or loss of certificates for portfolio securities. Foreign markets also have different clearance and settlement procedures, and in certain markets there have been times when settlements have been unable to keep pace with the volume of securities transactions, making it difficult to conduct such transactions. Such delays in settlement could result in temporary periods when a portion of the assets of a

Portfolio is uninvested and no return is earned thereon. The inability of a Portfolio to make intended security purchases due to settlement problems could cause the Portfolio to miss attractive investment opportunities.

Although the Portfolios may invest in securities denominated in foreign currencies, the Portfolios value their securities and other assets in U.S. dollars. As a result, the NAV of a Portfolio’s shares may fluctuate with U.S. dollar exchange rates as well as the price changes of the Portfolio’s securities in the various local markets and currencies. Thus, an increase in the value of the U.S. dollar compared to the currencies in which a Portfolio makes its investments could reduce the effect of increases and magnify the effect of decreases in the price of the Portfolio’s securities in their local markets. Conversely, a decrease in the value of the U.S. dollar may have the opposite effect of magnifying the effect of increases and reducing the effect of decreases in the prices of a Portfolio’s securities in its foreign markets. In addition to favorable and unfavorable currency exchange rate developments, a Portfolio is subject to the possible imposition of exchange control regulations or freezes on convertibility of currency. To the extent consistent with their investment objectives and strategies, the Portfolios may invest in obligations of foreign branches of U.S. banks (Eurodollars) and U.S. branches of foreign banks (Yankee dollars) as well as foreign branches of foreign banks. These investments involve risks that are different from investments in securities of U.S. banks, including potential unfavorable political and economic developments, different tax provisions, seizure of foreign deposits, currency controls, interest limitations or other governmental restrictions which might affect payment of principal or interest. To the extent consistent with their investment objectives and strategies, the Portfolios may also invest in Yankee bonds, which are issued by foreign governments and their agencies and foreign corporations but pay interest in U.S. dollars and are typically issued in the United States.

European countries can be significantly affected by the tight fiscal and monetary controls that the European Economic and Monetary Union (“EMU”) imposes for membership. Europe’s economies are diverse, its governments are decentralized, and its cultures vary widely. Several EMU countries have faced budget issues, some of which may have negative long-term effects for the economies of those countries and other EMU countries. There is continued concern about national-level support for the euro and the accompanying coordination of fiscal and wage policy among EMU member countries. Member countries are required to maintain tight control over inflation, public debt, and budget deficit to qualify for membership in the EMU. These requirements can severely limit the ability of EMU member countries to implement monetary policy to address regional economic conditions.

Recent examples of the above include conflict, loss of life and disaster connected to ongoing armed conflict between Russia and Ukraine in Europe and Israel and other countries in the Middle East. The extent, duration and impact of these conflicts, related sanctions and retaliatory actions are difficult to ascertain, but could be significant and have severe adverse effects on the region, including significant adverse effects on the regional or global economies and the markets for certain securities and commodities. These impacts could negatively affect the Portfolios' investments in securities and

instruments that are economically tied to the applicable region, and include (but are not limited to) declines in value and reductions in liquidity. In addition, to the extent new sanctions are imposed or previously relaxed sanctions are reimposed (including with respect to countries undergoing transformation), complying with such restrictions may prevent the Portfolios from pursuing certain investments, cause delays or other impediments with respect to consummating such investments or divestments, require divestment or freezing of investments on unfavorable terms, render divestment of underperforming investments impracticable, negatively impact the Portfolios' ability to achieve their investment objectives, prevent the Portfolios from receiving payments otherwise due, increase diligence and other similar costs to the Portfolios, render valuation of affected investments challenging, or require the Portfolios to consummate an investment on terms that are less advantageous than would be the case absent such restrictions. Any of these outcomes could adversely affect the Portfolios' performance with respect to such investments, and thus the Portfolios' performance as a whole.

Crypto Asset Investments (All Portfolios, except the Multi-Disciplinary Income Portfolio)

The Internet Portfolio, Global Portfolio, Paradigm Portfolio, Small Cap Opportunities Portfolio and the Market Opportunities Portfolio invest indirectly in crypto assets.

Bitcoin or BTC was the first decentralized crypto asset. It is created and transmitted through the operations of the peer-to-peer bitcoin network (“Bitcoin Network”), a decentralized network of computers that operates on cryptographic protocols. The Bitcoin Network allows people to transfer bitcoin through recordation of such transfers on a public transaction ledger known as a blockchain. The Portfolios may invest indirectly in bitcoin through a Delaware statutory trust, the Grayscale Bitcoin Trust ETF (“Grayscale Bitcoin Trust”) and through other pooled investment vehicles that provide exposure to crypto assets. The Grayscale Bitcoin Trust is a Bitcoin ETF and enables investors to gain exposure to bitcoin in the form of a security while avoiding the challenges of buying, storing, and safekeeping bitcoin, directly.

In addition to the general risks of investing in other investment vehicles, the value of the Portfolios’ indirect investments in crypto assets are subject to fluctuations in the value of the crypto asset, which can be highly volatile. The value of crypto assets is determined by the supply and demand for crypto assets in the global market for the trading of crypto assets, which consists primarily of transactions on crypto asset trading platforms. The price of a crypto asset could drop precipitously (including to zero) for a variety of reasons including but not limited to regulatory changes, a crisis of confidence in the crypto asset network or a change in user preference to competing crypto assets. The Portfolios’ exposure to crypto assets can result in substantial losses to the Portfolios.

Crypto assets facilitate decentralized, peer-to-peer financial exchange and value storage, without the oversight of a central authority or banks. The value of crypto assets is not backed by any government, corporation, or other identified body. Crypto assets are also susceptible to theft, loss and destruction.

Crypto assets trade on crypto asset trading platforms. The regulatory environment for crypto asset trading platforms continues to evolve and is less stringent than that for trading platforms for traditional assets. As a result, crypto asset trading platforms may be more exposed to fraud and failure than established, regulated exchanges for securities, derivatives and other currencies. These crypto asset trading platforms can cease operating temporarily or even permanently, resulting in the potential loss of users’ crypto assets or other market disruptions. Crypto asset trading platforms may be more exposed to the risk of market

manipulation than exchanges for more traditional assets. Crypto asset trading platforms that are regulated typically must comply with minimum net worth, cybersecurity, and anti-money laundering requirements, but are not typically required to protect customers or their markets to the same extent that regulated securities exchanges or futures exchanges are required to do so. Furthermore, crypto asset trading platforms may be operating out of compliance with regulations, and many crypto asset trading platforms lack certain safeguards established by more traditional exchanges to enhance the stability of trading on the exchange, such as measures designed to prevent sudden drops in value of items traded on the exchange (i.e., “flash crashes”). As a result, the prices of crypto assets on crypto asset trading platforms may be subject to larger and more frequent sudden declines than assets traded on more traditional exchanges.

Currently, there is relatively limited use of crypto assets in the retail and commercial marketplace, which contributes to price volatility. A lack of expansion by crypto assets into retail and commercial markets, or a contraction of such use, may result in increased volatility or a reduction in the value of crypto assets, either of which could adversely impact the value of the Portfolios’ investments. In addition, to the extent market participants develop a preference for one crypto asset over another, the value of the less preferred crypto assets would likely be adversely affected. Crypto assets are a new technological innovation with a limited history; it is a highly speculative asset and future regulatory actions or policies may limit, perhaps to a materially adverse extent, the value of the Portfolios’ indirect investment in crypto assets and the ability to exchange a crypto asset or utilize it for payments.

The crypto asset industry is a newer, speculative, and still-developing industry that faces many risks. The crypto asset industry may still be experiencing a bubble or may experience a bubble again in the future. For example, in the first half of 2022, each of Celsius Network, Voyager Digital Ltd., and Three Arrows Capital declared bankruptcy, resulting in a loss of confidence in participants of the digital asset ecosystem and negative publicity surrounding digital assets more broadly. In November 2022, FTX Trading Ltd. (“FTX”), one of the largest digital asset platforms by volume at the time, halted customer withdrawals amid rumors of the company’s liquidity issues and likely insolvency, which were subsequently corroborated by its CEO. Shortly thereafter, FTX’s CEO resigned and FTX and many of its affiliates filed for bankruptcy in the United States, while other affiliates have entered insolvency, liquidation, or similar proceedings around the globe, following which the U.S. Department of Justice brought criminal fraud and other charges, and the SEC and CFTC brought civil securities and commodities fraud charges, against certain of FTX’s and its affiliates’ senior executives, including its former CEO. In addition, several other entities in the crypto asset industry filed for bankruptcy following FTX’s bankruptcy filing, such as BlockFi Inc. and Genesis Global Capital, LLC. In response to these events, the prices of crypto assets experienced extreme volatility and other entities in the crypto asset industry been negatively affected. It is possible that similar events could occur in the future, which would undermine confidence in the crypto asset industry and negatively affect the value of crypto assets. It is not possible to predict at this time all of the risks that they may pose to the Portfolios, its service providers or to the crypto asset industry as a whole.

failure of one crypto asset may lead to a loss in confidence in, and thus decreased usage and/or value of, other crypto assets.

Crypto asset markets in the U.S. exist in a state of regulatory uncertainty. Regulatory changes or actions by Congress as well as U.S. federal or state agencies may adversely affect the value of the Portfolios’ indirect investments in crypto assets. As digital assets have grown in both popularity and market size, a number of state and federal agencies have issued consumer advisories regarding the risks posed by digital assets to investors. In addition, the Securities and Exchange Commission, U.S. state securities regulators and several foreign governments have issued warnings and instituted legal proceedings in which they argue that certain digital assets may be classified as securities and that both those digital assets and any related initial coin offerings are subject to securities regulations. Additionally, U.S. state and federal, and foreign regulators and legislatures have taken action against virtual currency businesses or enacted restrictive regimes in response to adverse publicity arising from hacks, consumer harm, or criminal activity stemming from virtual currency activity.

The Portfolios’ exposure to crypto assets may change over time and, accordingly, such exposure may not be represented in a Portfolio at any given time. Many significant aspects of the tax treatment of investments in crypto assets are uncertain, and a direct or indirect investment in crypto assets may produce non-qualifying income.

Blockchain technology is a relatively new and untested technology which operates as a distributed ledger. The risks associated with blockchain technology may not fully emerge until the technology is widely used. Blockchain systems could be vulnerable to fraud, particularly if a significant minority of participants colluded to defraud the rest. Access to a given blockchain requires an individualized key, which, if compromised, could result in loss due to theft, destruction or inaccessibility. There is little regulation of blockchain technology other than the intrinsic public nature of the blockchain system. Any future regulatory developments could affect the viability and expansion of the use of blockchain technology.

Most of the Portfolios contributed all or a portion of their holdings in crypto assets to a wholly-owned and controlled subsidiary of each Portfolio organized under the laws of the Cayman Islands (individually, a “Cayman Subsidiary” and collectively, the “Cayman Subsidiaries.” Each of the Internet, Global, and

Market Opportunities Portfolios is also the sole shareholder of its respective wholly owned subsidiary organized under Delaware law (collectively, the “Delaware Subsidiaries,” and together with the Cayman Subsidiaries, the “Subsidiaries”) and contributed a portion of its holdings in crypto assets to its Delaware Subsidiary. Any net gains that a Delaware Subsidiary recognizes on future sales of the contributed shares of crypto assets will be subject to federal and state corporate income tax, but the dividends that a Delaware Subsidiary pays to each Portfolio (i.e., those gains, net of the tax paid and any other expenses of the Delaware Subsidiary, such as its management and advisory fees) will be eligible to be treated as “qualified dividend income” under the Code. In the future, each Portfolio may seek to gain additional exposure to the crypto assets that may not produce qualifying income for the corresponding feeder fund under the Code, if held directly, including, potentially, other pooled investment vehicles that provide exposure to crypto assets, by investing up to 25% of the value of its total assets at the time of investment in its Subsidiaries.

Generally, a Subsidiary invests primarily in the Grayscale Bitcoin Trust, but may, potentially, invest in other pooled investment vehicles that provide exposure to crypto assets. The Subsidiaries are corporations for U.S. federal income tax purposes and do not, and will not, seek to qualify as RICs.

Temporary Investments

Due to the changing nature of the Internet and related companies, the national economy and market conditions, the Internet Portfolio may, as a temporary defensive measure, invest without limitation, in short‑term debt securities and money market securities with a rating of A2-P2 or higher. These ratings are described at the end of the SAI under “Description of Securities Ratings.”

To respond to adverse market, economic, political or other conditions, the Global Portfolio, the Paradigm Portfolio, the Small Cap Opportunities Portfolio, the Market Opportunities Portfolio and the Multi-Disciplinary Income Portfolio may invest up to 100% of their assets in high quality U.S. short-term debt securities and money market instruments.

In order to have funds available for redemption and investment opportunities, each Portfolio may also hold a portion of its assets in cash or U.S. short-term money market instruments. Certificates of deposit purchased by the Portfolios will be those of U.S. banks having total assets at the time of purchase in excess of $1 billion, and bankers’ acceptances purchased by the Portfolios will be guaranteed by U.S. or foreign banks having total assets at the time of purchase in excess of $1 billion. Each Portfolio anticipates that not more than 15% of its total assets will be so invested or held in cash at any given time, except when the Portfolio is in a temporary defensive posture.

Portfolio Turnover

Most of the direct investors in the Portfolios are entities that have elected to be treated as RICs for federal tax purposes. For these entities to qualify for the beneficial tax treatment afforded RICs, and to be relieved of federal tax liabilities, the RICs must distribute substantially all of their net income to shareholders generally on an annual basis and the Portfolios will have to provide those funds. Thus, the Portfolios may have to dispose of portfolio securities under disadvantageous circumstances to generate cash or borrow cash in order for the Funds to satisfy the distribution requirement. The Portfolios do not trade in securities for short-term profits but, when circumstances warrant, securities may be sold without regard to the length of time they have been held. Portfolio turnover rates may vary depending on the

volume of buying and selling activities. Rates over 100% annually are considered high. The table below shows the portfolio turnover rates for the past two fiscal years.


Portfolio turnover rate for:	Fiscal Year Ended December 31, 2025	Fiscal Year Ended December 31, 2024
The Internet Portfolio	45%	43%
The Global Portfolio	5%	34%
The Paradigm Portfolio	3%	2%
The Small Cap Opportunities Portfolio	0%	6%
The Market Opportunities Portfolio	4%	7%
The Multi-Disciplinary Income Portfolio	74%	37%

Management of the Portfolios

Board of Trustees

The management and affairs of the Portfolios are overseen by the Board of Trustees of the Trust. The Board consists of six individuals, five of whom are not “interested persons” of the Trust as that term is defined in the 1940 Act (“Independent Trustees”). The Board establishes policies for the operation of the Portfolios and appoints the officers who conduct the daily business of the Portfolios. The Board has appointed Mr. Jay Kesslen as its Anti-Money Laundering Officer.

The Board believes that each of the Trustee’s experience, qualifications, attributes and skills on an individual basis and in combination with those of the other Trustees lead to the conclusion that each Trustee should serve in such capacity. Among the attributes common to all Trustees is the ability to review critically, evaluate, question and discuss information provided to them, to interact effectively with the other Trustees, the Adviser, other service providers, counsel and the independent registered public accounting firm, and to exercise effective business judgment in the performance of their duties as Trustees. A Trustee’s ability to perform his duties effectively may have been attained through the Trustee’s business, consulting, public service and/or academic positions; experience as a board member of the Trust, other investment funds, or non-profit entities or other organizations; education or professional training; and/or other life experiences. In addition to these shared characteristics, specific details regarding each Trustee’s principal occupations during the past five years are included in the table below.

Officers and Trustees of the Trust are listed below with their ages, addresses, present positions with the Trust and principal occupations over at least the last five years. Each Trustee may be contacted by writing to the Trustee at c/o Kinetics Mutual Funds, Inc., 470 Park Avenue South, New York, New York 10016. Each Trustee of the Trust also serves as a Director of the Company and each Officer of the Trust also serves in the same capacity for the Company.

Independent Trustees

Name, Address and Age

Position(s) Held with Company/ Trust

Term of Office and Length of Time Served

Principal

Occupation(s) During Past Five Years

# of Portfolios in Fund Complex(1) Overseen by Director/ Trustee

Other Directorships Held by Director/ Trustee(2)

Steven T. Russell (62)

c/o Horizon Kinetics Asset Management LLC

470 Park Avenue South

New York, New York 10016

Independent Director/ Independent Trustee

Indefinite/

24 years

Professor of Business Law, Suffolk County Community College (1997 to present); Lawyer, Private Practice (2010 to present).

N/A

Douglas Cohen, CPA (64)

c/o Horizon Kinetics Asset Management LLC

470 Park Avenue South

New York, New York 10016

Independent Director/ Independent Trustee

Indefinite/

24 years

Chief Financial Officer, Sunrise Credit Services, Inc. (2005 to 2021).

N/A

William J. Graham (64)

c/o Horizon Kinetics Asset Management LLC

470 Park Avenue South

New York, New York 10016

Independent Director/ Independent Trustee

Indefinite/

24 years

Attorney, William J. Graham, PC (2001 to present); Assistant Town Attorney, Town of Islip (2016 to 2021).

N/A

Name, Address and Age

Position(s) Held with Company/ Trust

Term of Office and Length of Time Served

Principal

Occupation(s) During Past Five Years

# of Portfolios in Fund Complex(1) Overseen by Director/ Trustee

Other Directorships Held by Director/ Trustee(2)

Joseph E. Breslin (72)

c/o Horizon Kinetics Asset Management LLC

470 Park Avenue South

New York, New York 10016

Independent Director/ Independent Trustee

Indefinite/

24 years

Counsel, White Oak Global Advisors, LLC (2016 to present).

Trustee, Forethought Variable Insurance Trust (23 portfolios); Trustee, BluArc Multi-Strategy Fund (2014 to 2017); Chairman and Trustee, Northern Lights Fund Trust IV (21 portfolios); Trustee, Hatteras Alternative Mutual Funds Trust (5 portfolios) (2004 to 2016); Trustee, Underlying Funds Trust (5 portfolios) (2004 to 2016); Trustee, Director, Hatteras Master Fund, L.P. (2013 to 2016); Director, Hatteras Core Alternatives TEI Fund, L.P. (2013 to 2016); Director, Hatteras Core Alternatives Fund, L.P. (2013 to 2016); Director, Hatteras Core Alternatives Institutional Fund, L.P. (2013 to 2016); and Director, Hatteras Core Alternatives TEI Institutional Fund, L.P. (2013 to 2016).

Name, Address and Age

Position(s) Held with Company/ Trust

Term of Office and Length of Time Served

Principal

Occupation(s) During Past Five Years

# of Portfolios in Fund Complex(1) Overseen by Director/ Trustee

Other Directorships Held by Director/ Trustee(2)

James M. Breen (67)

c/o Horizon Kinetics Asset Management LLC

470 Park Avenue South

New York, New York 10016

Independent Director/ Independent Trustee

Indefinite/ 16 years

Security Consultant and Licensed Florida Private Investigator (2019 to present); Special Agent, Florida Department of Law Enforcement (FDLE) (2015 to 2019); Vice President, HBES Consulting, Inc. (2014 to present).

N/A

Interested Trustee

Name, Address and Age

Position(s) Held with the Company/
Trust

Term of Office and Length of Time Served

Principal Occupation(s) During Past Five Years

# of Portfolios in Fund Complex(1) Overseen by Director/

Trustee

Other Directorships

Held by Director/Trustee(2)

Peter B. Doyle(3) (63)

c/o Horizon Kinetics Asset Management LLC

470 Park Avenue South

New York, New York 10016

Director/Trustee, President & Chairman of the Board

Indefinite/

22 years

Co-Chief Executive Officer, Horizon Kinetics Asset Management LLC (2026 to present); Managing Director, Horizon Kinetics Holding Corporation (Parent Company of Horizon Kinetics Asset Management LLC (investment adviser) (1994 to present); Vice President, FRMO Corp. (2001 to present) (provides consulting services to private investment funds and research services with respect to marketable securities).

Director and Officer, FRMO Corp. (since 2001).

(1)The term “fund complex” refers to the Company and the Trust, which hold themselves out as related for investment purposes.

(2)“Other Directorships Held” includes only directorships of companies required to register or file reports with the SEC under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, (that is, “public companies”) or investment companies registered under the 1940 Act.

(3)Directors/Trustees who are considered “interested persons” as defined in Section 2(a)(19) of the 1940 Act because of their association with the Adviser and its affiliates.

Officers


Name, Address and Age	Position(s) Held with the Company/Trust	Term of Office and Length of Time Served	Principal Occupation(s) During Past Five Years
Russell W. Grimaldi (46) c/o Horizon Kinetics Asset Management LLC 470 Park Avenue South New York, New York 10016	Chief Compliance Officer	Indefinite/1 month	Chief Compliance Officer, Horizon Kinetics Holding Corporation (including Horizon Kinetics Asset Management) (2005 to present); KBD Securities, LLC (2005 to present); Kinetics Funds Distributor LLC (2005 to present); Consensus Mining and Seigniorage Corporation (2022 to present); Chief Compliance Officer, Renn Fund, Inc. (2024 to present).
Jay H. Kesslen (53) c/o Horizon Kinetics Asset Management LLC 470 Park Avenue South New York, New York 10016	Vice President and Assistant Secretary	Indefinite/20 years	General Counsel, Horizon Kinetics LLC (including Horizon Kinetics Asset Management LLC (an SEC-registered investment adviser) (2000 to present), Chief Compliance Officer, Horizon Kinetics Asset Management LLC (2015 to 2017); Kinetics Funds Distributor LLC (2000 to present); KBD Securities LLC (2000 to present); FRMO Corp. (2014 to present); RENN Fund, Inc. (2017 to present); Vice-President and General Counsel, Consensus Mining and Seigniorage Corporation (2022 to present).

Leadership Structure and Oversight Responsibilities

Overall responsibility for oversight of the Portfolios rests with the Board of Trustees of the Trust. The Trust, on behalf of each Portfolio, has engaged the Adviser to manage the Portfolios on a day-to-day basis. The Board is responsible for overseeing the Adviser and other service providers in the operations of the Portfolios in accordance with the provisions of the 1940 Act, applicable provisions of state and other laws and the Trust’s Declaration of Trust and By-laws. The Board meets in-person at regularly scheduled meetings four times each year. In addition, the Board may hold special in-person or telephonic meetings or informal conference calls to discuss specific matters that may arise or require action between regular meetings. The Independent Trustees have also engaged independent legal counsel to assist them in performing their oversight responsibility. The Independent Trustees meet with their independent legal counsel in-person during each quarterly in-person board meeting. As described below, the Board has established an Audit Committee and a Pricing Committee, and may establish ad hoc committees or working groups from time to time to assist them in fulfilling their oversight responsibilities.

The Board has appointed Peter B. Doyle, an interested Trustee, to serve in the role of Chairman. The Chairman’s role is to preside at all meetings of the Board and to act as liaison with the Trust’s service providers, counsel and other Trustees generally between meetings. The Chairman may also perform such other functions as may be delegated by the Board from time to time. The Board does not have a lead independent Trustee. The Board has determined that the Board’s leadership structure is appropriate

because it allows the Board to exercise informed and independent judgment over matters under its purview and it allocates areas of responsibility among committees of Trustees and the full Board in a manner that enhances effective oversight.

The Portfolios are subject to a number of risks, including investment, compliance, operational and valuation risks, among others. Risk oversight forms part of the Board’s general oversight of the Portfolios and is addressed as part of various Board and committee activities. Day-to-day risk management functions are subsumed within the responsibilities of the Adviser and other service providers (depending on the nature of the risk), which carry out the Portfolios’ investment management and business affairs. The Adviser and other service providers employ a variety of processes, procedures and controls to identify various events or circumstances that give rise to risks, to lessen the probability of their occurrence and/or to mitigate the effects of such events or circumstances if they do occur. The Adviser and other service providers have their own independent interests in risk management, and their policies and methods of risk management will depend on their functions and business models. The Board recognizes that it is not possible to identify all of the risks that may affect the Portfolios or to develop processes and controls to eliminate or mitigate their occurrence or effects. The Board requires senior officers of the Trust, including the President, Treasurer and Chief Compliance Officer, and the Adviser, to report to the full Board on a variety of matters at regular and special meetings of the Board, including matters relating to risk management. The Board and the Audit Committee also receive regular reports from the Trust’s independent registered public accounting firm on internal control and financial reporting matters. The Board also receives reports from certain of the Trust’s other primary service providers on a periodic or regular basis, including the Trust’s custodian, distributor and administrator. The Board may, at any time and in its discretion, change the manner in which it conducts risk oversight.

Board Committees

The Board has two standing committees as described below:


Audit Committee
Members	Description	# of Meetings during Past Fiscal Year
James M. Breen Joseph E. Breslin Douglas Cohen, CPA* William J. Graham Steven T. Russell	Responsible for advising the full Board with respect to accounting, auditing and financial matters affecting the Portfolios.	The Committee met two times during the year ended December 31, 2025.
Pricing Committee
Members	Description	# of Meetings during Past Fiscal Year
James M. Breen Joseph E. Breslin* Douglas Cohen, CPA William J. Graham Steven T. Russell	Responsible for (1) monitoring the valuation of the Portfolios’ securities and other investments; and (2) as required by the Portfolios’ valuation policies, when the full Board is not in session, overseeing the fair value determination of illiquid and other holdings by the Portfolios’ valuation designee, which determinations shall be reported to the full Board.	The Committee met two times during the year ended December 31, 2025.

* Designates the Chairperson of the respective Committee.

Board Interest in the Portfolios

As of December 31, 2025, no Trustee held any interest in the Portfolios. However, as of December 31, 2025, the Trustees owned the following amounts of each series of the Company (other than the Kinetics Spin-off and Corporate Restructuring Fund):


Name of Director/Trustee	Dollar Range of Equity Securities in the Funds		Aggregate Dollar Range of Equity Securities in All Funds/Portfolios Overseen by Director/Trustee

INDEPENDENT TRUSTEES

Steven T. Russell	Internet Fund	None	None
	Global Fund	None
	Paradigm Fund	None
	Small Cap Opportunities Fund	None
	Market Opportunities Fund	None
	Multi-Disciplinary Income Fund	None
Douglas Cohen, CPA	Internet Fund	None	Over $100,000
	Global Fund	None
	Paradigm Fund	$10,001-$50,000
	Small Cap Opportunities Fund	Over $100,000
	Market Opportunities Fund	None
	Multi-Disciplinary Income Fund	None
William J. Graham	Internet Fund	None	Over $100,000
	Global Fund	None
	Paradigm Fund	Over $100,000
	Small Cap Opportunities Fund	$50,001 - $100,000
	Market Opportunities Fund	None
	Multi-Disciplinary Income Fund	None
Joseph E. Breslin	Internet Fund	None	Over $100,000
	Global Fund	None
	Paradigm Fund	Over $100,000
	Small Cap Opportunities Fund	None
	Market Opportunities Fund	$50,001 - $100,000
	Multi-Disciplinary Income Fund	None
James M. Breen	Internet Fund	None	None
	Global Fund	None
	Paradigm Fund	None
	Small Cap Opportunities Fund	None
	Market Opportunities Fund	None
	Multi-Disciplinary Income Fund	None


Name of Director/Trustee	Dollar Range of Equity Securities in the Funds		Aggregate Dollar Range of Equity Securities in All Funds/Portfolios Overseen by Director/Trustee

INTERESTED TRUSTEE







Peter B. Doyle	Internet Fund	Over $100,000	Over $100,000
	Global Fund	Over $100,000
	Paradigm Fund	Over $100,000
	Small Cap Opportunities Fund	Over $100,000
	Market Opportunities Fund	Over $100,000
	Multi-Disciplinary Income Fund	Over $100,000

Compensation

Effective January 1, 2024, for their service as Directors of the Company and Trustees of the Trust, the Independent Directors/Independent Trustees receive an aggregate fee of $60,000 per year and $3,750 per Board meeting attended, with an additional $2,000 for each Pricing and/or Audit Committee meeting attended, as well as reimbursement for expenses incurred in connection with attendance at such meetings. In addition, each Committee Chairman of the Company and the Trust (such as the Audit Committee or Pricing Committee) receives an additional fee of $5,000 per year for his service as chairman.

The “interested persons” who serve as Directors of the Company or Trustees of the Trust receive no compensation for their service as Directors or Trustees. None of the executive officers receive compensation from the Funds or the Portfolios except the Company’s/Trust’s Chief Compliance Officer. The following table provides compensation information for the Directors/Trustees for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2025.

Kinetics Portfolios Trust

Compensation Table

Name and Position

Aggregate Compensation From Portfolios

Pension or Retirement Benefits Accrued as Part of Fund/Portfolio Expenses

Estimated Annual Benefits Upon Retirement

Total Compensation from Portfolios and Fund Complex Paid to Directors/Trustees(2)

Interested Trustee

Peter B. Doyle(1)

None

Independent Trustees

Steven T. Russell

$31,553

None

$65,000

Douglas Cohen, CPA

$34,018

None

$60,000

William J. Graham

$31,553

None

$65,000

Joseph E. Breslin

$36,484

None

$60,000

James M. Breen

$31,553

None

$65,000

(1)“Interested person” as defined under the 1940 Act.

(2)Includes compensation paid by the Company

Control Persons and Principal Holders of Securities

Each Portfolio is a master fund in a master/feeder structure in which feeder funds invest the majority of their investable assets in a Portfolio of the Trust. A control person is one who owns beneficially either directly or through controlled companies more than 25% of the voting securities of a company or who acknowledges or asserts the existence of control. Therefore, each feeder fund is a control person because it owns the majority of the beneficial interests of a Portfolio. Set forth in the table below are the feeder funds that invest in a Portfolio.


Name of Record Holder (Feeder Fund)	Portfolio	Beneficial Interest as of March 31, 2026
The Internet Fund	The Internet Portfolio	99.97%
The Global Fund	The Global Portfolio	99.96%
The Paradigm Fund	The Paradigm Portfolio	95.88%
The Small Cap Opportunities Fund	The Small Cap Opportunities Portfolio	99.96%
The Market Opportunities Fund	The Market Opportunities Portfolio	99.97%
The Multi-Disciplinary Income Fund	The Multi-Disciplinary Income Portfolio	98.55%

Management Ownership

The percentage of each Portfolio’s interests owned or controlled by the executive officers and/or Trustees of the Portfolios is less than 1% of the interest of each Portfolio as of March 31, 2026.

Proxy Voting Policies

The Trust, on behalf of the Portfolios, has delegated the voting of portfolio securities to the Adviser. The Adviser has adopted policies and procedures for the voting of proxies on behalf of client accounts, including the Portfolios, for which the Adviser has voting discretion. Pursuant to these policies and procedures, the Adviser’s guiding principles in voting proxies is to ensure that the manner in which proxies are voted is in the best interest of its clients and the value of the investment. To this end, an independent third party proxy service, Institutional Shareholder Services Inc. (“ISS”), has been retained by the Adviser for their fundamental research on the proxy question and subsequent recommendations. Proxies are voted by ISS in accordance with their proxy voting guidelines with the intent of serving the best interests of the Adviser’s clients.

ISS will inform the Adviser’s proxy administrator of any proxies that do not fall within the adopted guidelines. The Adviser’s proxy administrator will send the proxies in question to the relevant Portfolio’s portfolio manager for review, documentation of vote rationale, and signature. In the event the designated portfolio manager is unavailable, the proxy will be forwarded to the Chief Investment Strategist for execution.

ISS also updates and revises the Guidelines on a periodic basis, and the revisions are reviewed by the Adviser to determine whether they are consistent with the Adviser’s guiding principles. ISS also assists the Adviser in the proxy voting process by providing operational, recordkeeping and reporting services.

The Adviser is responsible for reviewing its relationship with ISS and for evaluating the quality and effectiveness of the various services provided by ISS. The Adviser may hire other service providers to replace or supplement ISS with respect to any of the services the Adviser currently receives from ISS.

The Adviser has implemented procedures that are intended to prevent conflicts of interest from influencing proxy voting decisions. These procedures include the Adviser’s use of ISS as an independent third party and a review and approval process for individual decisions that do not follow ISS recommendations.

More Information

The Portfolios’ actual voting records relating to portfolio securities during the most recent 12-month period ended June 30 is available without charge, upon request by calling toll-free at 1-800-930-3828 or by accessing the SEC’s website at www.sec.gov. In addition, a copy of the Trust’s proxy voting policies and procedures are also available by calling toll-free at 1-800-930-3828 and will be sent within three business days of receipt of a request.

Investment Adviser

The Board of the Trustees of the Trust, on behalf of the Portfolios, approved advisory contracts (collectively, the “Advisory Agreement”) with Kinetics. This Advisory Agreement continues on a year-to-year basis provided that specific approval is voted at least annually by the Board of Trustees of the Trust or by the vote of the holders of a majority of the outstanding voting securities of the Portfolios, as applicable. In either event, it must also be approved by a majority of the Trustees of the Portfolios who are neither parties to the Advisory Agreement nor “interested persons” of the Trust as defined in the 1940 Act at a meeting called for the purpose of voting on such approval. The Adviser’s investment decisions are made subject to the direction and supervision of the Board of Trustees. The Advisory Agreement may be terminated at any time, without the payment of any penalty, by the Board of Trustees or by vote of a majority of the outstanding voting securities of the Portfolios. Ultimate decisions as to a Portfolio’s investment policies are made by the Portfolio’s officers and the Board of Trustees.

Under the Advisory Agreement, Kinetics furnishes investment advice to the Portfolios by continuously reviewing the securities portfolios and recommending to the Portfolios to what extent securities should be purchased or sold. Pursuant to the Advisory Agreement, the Adviser:

(1)renders research, statistical and advisory services to the Portfolios;

(2)makes specific recommendations based on the Portfolios’ investment requirements;

(3)pays the salaries of those of the Portfolios’ employees who may be officers or directors or employees of the Adviser.

A discussion regarding the basis for the Board of Trustees’ approval of the Advisory Agreement for each Portfolio is available in the Portfolios’ Form N-CSR for the period ended June 30, 2025.

Advisory Fees

The Investment Adviser conducts investment research and supervision for each Portfolio and is responsible for the purchase and sale of securities for each Portfolio. Horizon provides certain research services to the Portfolios and does not receive a fee for such services. For the above advisory services,

except with respect to the Multi-Disciplinary Income Portfolio, each Portfolio has agreed to pay to Kinetics an annual fee of 1.25% of each Portfolio’s average daily net assets. All fees are computed on the average daily closing net asset value (“NAV”) of the Portfolios and are payable monthly. Effective as of April 30, 2023, the Investment Adviser has agreed to reduce the management fee for the Multi-Disciplinary Income Portfolio from 1.25% to 1.00%. Additionally, effective as of April 30, 2023, the Investment Adviser has agreed to waive 0.75% of the 1.00% management fee for the Multi-Disciplinary Income Portfolio through April 30, 2027.

During the fiscal years ended December 31, 2025, 2024, and 2023, the advisory fees expensed to the Adviser were as follows:


Advisory Fees	2025	2024	2023
The Internet Portfolio	$4,229,249	$3,259,047	$2,024,221
The Global Portfolio	$795,857	$379,531	$302,272
The Paradigm Portfolio	$16,999,547	$13,022,350	$10,675,542
The Small Cap Opportunities Portfolio	$6,421,711	$4,337,380	$4,330,935
The Market Opportunities Portfolio	$3,861,598	$2,121,973	$1,582,609
The Multi-Disciplinary Income Portfolio	$39,162	$33,081	$149,673

The Adviser has voluntarily agreed to waive advisory fees allocated to the Funds and to reimburse expenses of the Funds in order to keep total annual Fund operating expenses at a certain percentage for each Fund, as described in the Funds’ Prospectuses. During the fiscal years ended December 31, 2025, 2024, and 2023, Kinetics waived advisory fees and reimbursed other Fund expenses in the following amounts:


	2025				2024				2023
Waiver and Reimbursements	Advisory Fee Waiver		Expense Reimbursements		Advisory Fee Waiver		Expense Reimbursements		Advisory Fee Waiver		Expense Reimbursements
The Internet Fund	$	0	$	0	$	0	$	0	$	0	$	0
The Global Fund	$	280,410	$	0	$	198,353	$	0	$	178,171	$	0
The Paradigm Fund	$	(8,020)	$	0	$	174,303	$	0	$	355,617	$	0
The Small Cap Opportunities Fund	$	100,143	$	0	$	164,624	$	0	$	261,281	$	0
The Market Opportunities Fund	$	849,511	$	0	$	549,141	$	0	$	457,854	$	0
The Multi-Disciplinary Income Fund	$	37,540	$	0	$	52,698	$	0	$	81,659	$	0

Fees of the custodian, administrator, fund accountant and transfer agent are paid by the Funds or by the Portfolios or by the Funds and the Portfolios jointly, as more fully described below. The Funds pay all other expenses, including:

•fees and expenses of directors not affiliated with the Adviser;

•legal and accounting fees;

•interest, taxes, and brokerage commissions; and

•record keeping and the expense of operating its offices.

Portfolio Managers

Investment Professionals for the Adviser

Mr. Peter B. Doyle

Mr. Doyle serves as a Co-Portfolio Manager of the Internet Portfolio, Global Portfolio, Paradigm Portfolio, Small Cap Opportunities Portfolio, Market Opportunities Portfolio and Multi-Disciplinary Income Portfolio. The following provides information regarding other accounts managed by Mr. Doyle as of December 31, 2025:


Category of Account	Total Number of Accounts Managed	Total Assets in Accounts Managed (in Millions)	Number of Accounts for which Advisory Fee is Based on Performance	Assets in Accounts for which Advisory Fee is Based on Performance (in Millions)
Other Registered Investment Companies	6	$1,422.05	0	$0
Other Pooled Investment Vehicles	0	$0	11	$1576.36
Other Accounts	126	$170.17	0	$0

Mr. Steven Tuen

Mr. Tuen is a Co-Portfolio Manager for the Global Portfolio and a member of the investment team for the Internet Portfolio. The following provides information regarding other accounts managed by Mr. Tuen as of December 31, 2025:


Category of Account	Total Number of Accounts Managed	Total Assets in Accounts Managed (in Millions)	Number of Accounts for which Advisory Fee is Based on Performance	Assets in Accounts for which Advisory Fee is Based on Performance (in Millions)
Other Registered Investment Companies	1	$4.07	0	$0
Other Pooled Investment Vehicles	0	$0	0	$0
Other Accounts	0	$0	0	$0

Mr. Steven Bregman

Mr. Bregman serves as the Co-Portfolio Manager for the Paradigm Portfolio and as a member of the investment teams of the Internet Portfolio, Global Portfolio, Small Cap Opportunities Portfolio and Market Opportunities Portfolio. The following provides information regarding other accounts managed by Mr. Bregman as of December 31, 2025:


Category of Account	Total Number of Accounts Managed	Total Assets in Accounts Managed (in Millions)	Number of Accounts for which Advisory Fee is Based on Performance	Assets in Accounts for which Advisory Fee is Based on Performance (in Millions)
Other Registered Investment Companies	4	$1399	0	$0
Other Pooled Investment Vehicles	0	$0	11	$1103.62
Other Accounts	1,084	$1,242.53	2	$0.67

Mr. James Davolos

Mr. Davolos is the Co-Portfolio Manager for the Internet Portfolio, Global Portfolio, Paradigm Portfolio, Small Cap Opportunities Portfolio and Market Opportunities Portfolio. The following provides information regarding other accounts managed by Mr. Davolos as of December 31, 2025:


Category of Account	Total Number of Accounts Managed	Total Assets in Accounts Managed (in Millions)	Number of Accounts for which Advisory Fee is Based on Performance	Assets in Accounts for which Advisory Fee is Based on Performance (in Millions)
Other Registered Investment Companies	3	$1379.32	0	$0
Other Pooled Investment Vehicles	0	$0	1	$48.71
Other Accounts	0	$0	0	$0

Mr. Matthew Houk

Mr. Houk serves as a Co-Portfolio Manager for the Small Cap Opportunities Portfolio. The following provides information regarding other accounts managed by Mr. Houk as of December 31, 2025:


Category of Account	Total Number of Accounts Managed	Total Assets in Accounts Managed (in Millions)	Number of Accounts for which Advisory Fee is Based on Performance	Assets in Accounts for which Advisory Fee is Based on Performance (in Millions)
Other Registered Investment Companies	1	$193.86	0	$0
Other Pooled Investment Vehicles	0	$0	0	$0
Other Accounts	5	$1.02	2	$4.64

Mr. Brandon Colavita

Mr. Colavita serves as a Co-Portfolio Manager for the Internet Portfolio and Market Opportunities Portfolio. The following provides information regarding other accounts managed by Mr. Colavita as of December 31, 2025:


Category of Account	Total Number of Accounts Managed	Total Assets in Accounts Managed (in Millions)	Number of Accounts for which Advisory Fee is Based on Performance	Assets in Accounts for which Advisory Fee is Based on Performance (in Millions)
Other Registered Investment Companies	1	$18.77	0	$0
Other Pooled Investment Vehicles	0	$0	0	$0
Other Accounts	0	$0	0	$0

Mr. Darryl Monasebian

Mr. Monasebian serves as a Co-Portfolio Manager for the Multi-Disciplinary Income Portfolio. The following provides information regarding other accounts managed by Mr. Monasebian as of December 31, 2025:


Category of Account	Total Number of Accounts Managed	Total Assets in Accounts Managed (in Millions)	Number of Accounts for which Advisory Fee is Based on Performance	Assets in Accounts for which Advisory Fee is Based on Performance (in Millions)
Other Registered Investment Companies	0	0	0	0
Other Pooled Investment Vehicles	0	0	0	0
Other Accounts	0	0	0	0

As of December 31, 2025, no Portfolio Manager held any interest in the Portfolios. However, as of December 31, 2025, the Portfolio Managers that are responsible for the day-to-day management of each of the Portfolios beneficially owned shares of the Funds (other than the Kinetics Spin-off and Corporate Restructuring Fund) as shown below.


Dollar Range of Equity Securities in the Funds Beneficially Owned A. None B. $1-$10,000 C. $10,001-$50,000 D. $50,001-$100,000 E. $100,001-$500,000 F. $500,001-$1,000,000 G. Over $1,000,000

Name of Fund

Peter B. Doyle

Steven Tuen

James Davolos

Matthew Houk

Steven Bregman

Darryl
Monasebian

Brandon

Colavita

Internet Fund

Global Fund

Paradigm Fund

Small Cap Opportunities Fund

Market Opportunities Fund

Multi-Disciplinary Income Fund

Compensation

Portfolio Managers are compensated with a base salary and bonus. The base salary is a fixed amount. Bonuses are subjective and are not tied to performance of the Funds, but instead are based on the overall

contribution to the Adviser. The Portfolio Managers also have access to a 401(k) retirement plan. Additionally, certain Portfolio Managers are also equity owners of the Adviser.

Material Conflicts of Interest

The Adviser’s portfolio managers are responsible for managing one or more of the Portfolios, as well as other accounts. A portfolio manager may manage a separate account or other pooled investment vehicle that may have a materially higher or lower fee arrangement than the Portfolio or that may have a performance fee arrangement. The side-by-side management of these accounts may raise potential conflicts of interest relating to cross trading, the allocation of investment opportunities and the aggregation and allocation of trades. In addition, while portfolio managers generally only manage accounts with similar investment strategies, it is possible that due to varying investment restrictions among accounts and for other reasons that certain investments could be made for some accounts and not others or conflicting investment positions could be taken among accounts. The Adviser has a fiduciary responsibility to manage all client accounts in a fair and equitable manner. The Adviser seeks to provide best execution of all securities transactions and aggregates and then allocates securities to client accounts in a fair and timely manner. To this end, the Adviser has developed compliance policies and procedures that seek to mitigate and manage the potential conflicts of interest that may arise from side-by-side management of accounts, which include allocation and aggregation policies.

The Adviser and certain of its management personnel have relationships or arrangements that may be material to the advisory business of the Adviser or to investors in the products and accounts managed by the Adviser and that present potential or actual conflicts of interest. The Adviser seeks to address these potential conflicts of interest through the adoption of various policies and procedures, which include both electronic and physical safeguards. Texas Pacific Land Corporation (“TPL”) and Miami International Holdings Inc. (“MIAX”), both of which are public companies whose shares trade on the New York Stock Exchange, are significant portfolio holdings in many of the advisory accounts managed by the Adviser, including the Funds. To the extent the Adviser’s policies and procedures prevent the Adviser from trading in certain securities (e.g., TPL or MIAX stock or the stock of a company that has a material business relationship with TPL or MIAX) for a client account during certain periods of time, the account and its performance could be negatively impacted. Furthermore, Adviser personnel, including personnel who are or may be involved in the management of the Funds and other advisory accounts managed by the Adviser, have personal investments in TPL and/or MIAX stock or the stock of a company that has a material business relationship with TPL and/or MIAX. These personal investments may also present potential or actual conflicts of interest. The Adviser has adopted a Code of Ethics governing the manner in which employees may engage in personal securities transactions. The Code requires employees to periodically report their personal holdings and to preclear personal securities transactions. The personal holding information and preclearance requests are reviewed by the Adviser’s compliance personnel.

Administrative Services

U.S. Bank Global Fund Services (“Fund Services”), located at 615 East Michigan Street, Milwaukee, Wisconsin 53202, serves as Administrator of the Funds and the Portfolios. The Administrator is entitled to receive annual fees, payable monthly, based on each Portfolio’s average net assets. For the fiscal years

ended December 31, 2025, 2024, and 2023, the Portfolios paid Fund Services the following aggregate amounts for administrative services:


Administrative Services Fees	2025	2024	2023
The Internet Portfolio	$130,160	$93,943	$65,749
The Global Portfolio	$35,034	$22,121	$21,374
The Paradigm Portfolio	$485,780	$320,288	$311,894
The Small Cap Opportunities Portfolio	$188,408	$115,656	$135,864
The Market Opportunities Portfolio	$117,635	$63,974	$56,540
The Multi-Disciplinary Income Portfolio	$17,567	$17,096	$16,937

Fund Services also serves as the Portfolios’ accountant and transfer agent. As such, Fund Services provides certain shareholder services and record management services and acts as the Portfolios’ dividend disbursement agent.

Administrative services include, but are not limited to, providing office space, equipment, telephone facilities, various personnel, including clerical and supervisory, and computers, as is necessary or beneficial to:

•establish and maintain shareholders’ accounts and records,

•process purchase and redemption transactions,

•process automatic investments of client account cash balances,

•answer routine client inquiries regarding the Portfolios,

•assist clients in changing dividend options,

•account designations, and addresses, and

•providing such other services as the Portfolios may reasonably request.

Private Placement Agent

Kinetics Funds Distributor LLC (“KFD”), 470 Park Avenue South, New York, New York 10016, serves as the private placement agent for the beneficial interests of the Portfolio on a best efforts basis. KFD is a registered broker-dealer and member of the Financial Industry Regulatory Authority, Inc., and an affiliate of the Adviser. Beneficial interests in the Portfolio are issued continuously.

Custodian

U.S. Bank N.A. (“U.S. Bank”), with principal offices at 1555 North RiverCenter Drive, Suite 302, Milwaukee, WI 53212, is custodian for the securities and cash of the Portfolios. Under a Custody Agreement, U.S. Bank holds the Portfolios’ assets in safekeeping and keeps all necessary records and documents relating to its duties. U.S. Bank receives annual fees based on each Portfolio’s average net assets.

Securities Lending

U.S. Bank. serves as securities lending agent for the Portfolios and in that role administers the Portfolios’ securities lending program pursuant to the terms of a Securities Lending Agreement entered into between the Portfolios and U.S. Bank.

The Portfolios may lend their portfolio securities to broker-dealers by entering directly into lending arrangements with such broker-dealers or indirectly through repurchase agreements with respect to no

more than 33 1/3% of the total assets of a Portfolio (including any collateral posted) or 50% of the total assets of a Portfolio (excluding any collateral posted). Securities lending and repurchase transactions will be fully collateralized at all times with cash and/or short-term debt obligations. The Portfolios receive interest on the collateral received as well as a fee for the securities loaned.

The table below sets forth, for the Portfolios’ most recently completed fiscal year, the Portfolios’ income from securities lending activities, as well as the fees and/or compensation earned.


	The Internet Portfolio(1)		The Global Portfolio(1)		The Paradigm Portfolio(1)		The Small Cap Opportunities Portfolio(1)		The Market Opportunities Portfolio(1)
Gross income from securities lending activities:	$262,763		$30,535		$1,171,109		$594,526		$227,170
Fees paid to securities lending agent from a revenue split:	$(31,383)		$3,136		$57,461		$19,876		$17,974
Fees paid for any cash collateral management service that are not included in the revenue split:	$0		$0		$0		$0		$0
Administrative fees not included in revenue split:	$0		$0		$0		$0		$0
Indemnification fee not included in revenue split:	$0		$0		$0		$0		$0
Rebates (paid to borrower):	$	(105,849)	$	(14,857)	$	(883,807)	$	(495,144)	$	(137,307)
Other fees not included in revenue split:	$0		$0		$0		$0		$0
Aggregate fees/compensation for securities lending activities:	$(137,231)		$(14,857)		$(883,807)		$(495,144)		$(137,307)
Net income from securities lending activities:	$125,531		$12,543		$229,841		$79,506		$71,889

(1) This table reflects securities lending activity at the Portfolios and the corresponding Cayman Subsidiaries.

Codes of Ethics

The Trust, Kinetics, and KFD have adopted Codes of Ethics pursuant to Rule 17j-1 under the 1940 Act that permits investment personnel subject to the particular Code of Ethics to invest in securities, including securities that may be purchased or held by the Portfolios, for their own accounts.

Valuation of the Portfolios

Shares of beneficial interest in the Portfolios are sold on a continual basis at the NAV per share next computed following acceptance of an order by the Portfolios. The Portfolios’ NAV is determined at the close of normal trading (currently 4:00 p.m. Eastern Time) on each day the New York Stock Exchange (“NYSE”) is open for trading. The NYSE is closed on the following holidays; New Year’s Day, Martin Luther King, Jr.’s Day, Washington’s Birthday/President’s Day, Good Friday, Memorial Day, Juneteenth National Independence Day, Independence Day, Labor Day, Thanksgiving Day and Christmas Day.

Equity securities are valued each day at the last quoted sales price on the securities principal exchange. If there is no sales price, a security is valued at the last reported bid price. The Portfolios’ securities that are listed on the Nasdaq Stock Market Inc. are valued using the NASDAQ Official Closing Price (“NOCP”), and if no NOCP is available, then at the last reported bid price. In the event market quotations are not readily available, or if events occur that may materially affect the value of a particular security between the time trading ends on a particular security and the close of regular trading on the NYSE, “fair value” will be as determined in good faith in accordance with procedures approved by the Board of Trustees. The Portfolios may use independent pricing services to assist in calculating the NAV of the Portfolios’ shares.

Futures, options on futures and swap contracts that are listed or traded on a national securities exchange, commodities exchange, contract market or over-the-counter markets and that are freely transferable will be valued at the composite price, using the National Best Bid and Offer quotes (“NBBO”). NBBO consists of the highest bid price and lowest ask price across any of the exchanges on which an option is quoted thus providing a view across the entire U.S. options marketplace. Composite option pricing calculates the mean of the highest bid price and lowest ask price across the exchanges where the option is traded. If a composite price is not available, the mean of the highest bid price and lowest ask priced on the exchange where the option or future is traded will be used. If neither a composite price or a mean of the highest bid price and lowest ask price is available, the security will be valued at the last quoted sales price. Non-exchange traded options also will be valued at the mean between the last bid and asked quotations. Securities that have no public market and all other assets of the Portfolios are considered at such value as the Investment Adviser, as valuation designee, may determine in good faith, in accordance with the Portfolio’s valuation procedures as approved by the Trust’s Board of Trustees.

Debt obligations (including convertible securities) that are either investment grade or below investment grade and irrespective of days to maturity are valued at evaluated mean by an independent third party pricing agent, which relies on various valuation methodologies such as matrix pricing and other analytical pricing models as well as market transactions and dealer quotations. Certain instruments such as repurchase agreements, demand notes, and money market mutual funds are traded at cost and there are no market values available for those instruments from third parties. Those instruments are priced at cost. Debt securities that are not priced by an independent third party pricing agent shall be valued (a) at the last sale price if such last sale occurred within the previous five business days, and (b) if there was no sale price during the previous five business days, at the average of the bids, or the sole bid if there is only one. Debt securities and other securities which, in the judgment of the Investment Adviser, do not properly represent the value of a security will be valued at their fair value as determined in good faith by the Investment Adviser, as valuation designee, in accordance with procedures adopted by the Investment Adviser and approved by the Trust’s Board of Trustees.

Trading in foreign securities may be completed at times when the NYSE is closed. In computing the NAV of each Portfolio that trades foreign securities, the value of a foreign security is determined as of the close of trading on the foreign exchange on which it is principally traded or as of the scheduled close of trading on the NYSE, whichever is earlier, at the closing sales price as provided by the approved pricing services or other alternate sources. In the absence of sales, the last available mean price between the closing bid and asked prices will be used. Securities and assets for which market quotations are not readily available are valued at fair value as determined in good faith by the Investment Adviser, as valuation designee. Values of foreign securities are translated from the local currency into U.S. dollars on the basis of the foreign currency exchange rates, as provided by an independent pricing service or reporting agency, generally prior to the close of the NYSE. Occasionally, events affecting the value of foreign securities and such exchange rates occur between the time at which they are determined and the close of the NYSE, which events would not be reflected in the computation of a Portfolio’s NAV. If events materially affecting the value of such securities or currency exchange rates occur during such time period, the securities will be valued at their fair value as determined in good faith by the Investment Adviser, as valuation designee, under the oversight of the Trust’s Board of Trustees.

The NAV per share of a Portfolio is computed by dividing the value of the securities held by the Portfolio plus any cash or other assets attributable to that Portfolio (including interest and dividends accrued but not yet received) minus all liabilities (including accrued expenses attributable to that Portfolio) by the total number of shares of that Portfolio outstanding at such time, as shown below:


(Value of Assets of the Portfolio) - (Liabilities of the Portfolio)	=	NAV per share
Shares Outstanding of the Portfolio

Portfolio Holdings Information

The Trust, on behalf of the Portfolios, maintains policies and procedures relating to selective disclosure of portfolio holdings (“Portfolio Holdings Policies”) that govern the timing and circumstances of disclosure to shareholders and third parties of information regarding the portfolio investments held by the Portfolios. These Portfolio Holdings Policies have been approved by the Board of Trustees of the Trust on behalf of the Portfolios. Disclosure of the Portfolios’ complete holdings is required to be made twice each fiscal year on Form N-CSR (with respect to each annual and semi-annual period) and twice each fiscal year on Form N-PORT (with respect to the first and third quarters of the Portfolios' fiscal year). These reports are available, free of charge, on the EDGAR database on the SEC’s website at www.sec.gov. Under the Portfolio Holdings Policies, neither the Trust nor any of its representatives may solicit or accept any compensation or other consideration in connection with Portfolio Holdings.

The Adviser only discloses information concerning securities held by the Portfolios under the following circumstances:

•twenty calendar days after the end of each calendar month, the Adviser may post (a) top twenty (20) securities held by each Portfolio and their respective percentage of the Portfolio on the Company’s website, (b) top five (5) performing and the bottom five (5) performing securities held by each of the Trust’s Portfolios, and (c) for Portfolios that primarily invest in derivatives, cash and fixed income instruments, the top ten (10) derivative and top ten (10) fixed income holdings, along with their respective percentage of net assets in each Portfolio; and

•as required by the federal securities laws, the Portfolios will disclose portfolio holdings in their applicable regulatory filings, including shareholder reports, reports on Forms N-CSR and N-PORT or such other filings, reports or disclosure documents as the applicable regulatory authorities may require.

Portfolio holdings information that is not filed with the SEC or posted on the Company’s website may be provided to third parties only if the third party recipients are required to keep all portfolio holdings information confidential and are prohibited from trading on the information they receive. Disclosure to such third parties must be approved in advance by the Trust’s or Adviser’s President. The Administrator is responsible for portfolio holdings disclosure to third party service providers of auditing, custody, proxy voting and other similar services for the Portfolios, as well as rating and ranking organizations, which will generally be permitted; however, information may be disclosed to other third parties (including, without limitation, individuals, institutional investors, and intermediaries that sell shares of the Funds) only upon approval by the Trust’s or Adviser’s President, who must first determine that the Portfolio has a legitimate business purpose for doing so. In general, each recipient of non-public portfolio holdings information must sign a confidentiality and non-trading agreement, although this requirement will not apply when the recipient is otherwise subject to a duty of confidentiality. In accordance with the policy, the identity of those recipients who receive non-public portfolio holdings information on an ongoing basis is as follows: the Trust’s Adviser, the Trust’s transfer agent and Administrator – U.S. Bank Global Fund Services, the Trust’s independent registered public accounting firm, the Trust’s custodian, the Trust’s legal counsel and the Trust’s proxy voting service. Such holdings are released on conditions of confidentiality, which include appropriate trading prohibitions. “Conditions of confidentiality” include confidentiality terms included in written agreements, implied by the nature of the relationship (e.g., attorney-client relationship), or required by fiduciary or regulatory principles (e.g., custody services provided by financial institutions). Portfolio holdings may also be provided earlier to shareholders and their agents who receive redemptions in kind that reflect a pro rata allocation of all securities held in the portfolio. Third party providers of custodial or accounting services to the Portfolios may release non-public portfolio holdings information of the Portfolios only with the permission of the Administrator. From time to time portfolio holdings information may be provided to broker-dealers solely in connection with a Portfolio seeking portfolio securities trading suggestions. In providing this information, reasonable precautions, including limitations on the scope of the portfolio holdings information disclosed, are taken to avoid any potential misuse of the disclosed information.

The Company’s/Trust’s Portfolio Holdings Policies set forth the third parties who receive portfolio holdings information pursuant to ongoing arrangements. Furthermore, the Portfolio Holdings Policies can only be revised by Board approval. The Board will be notified by the Adviser and the Administrator if disclosures are made concerning the Company’s/Trust’s portfolio holdings in contravention of the Company’s/Trust’s Portfolio Holdings Policies.

In determining the existence of a legitimate business purpose, and in order to ensure that the disclosure of the Company’s/Trust’s portfolio holdings is in the best interests of the Company’s/Trust’s shareholders, the following factors, and any additional relevant factors, shall be considered by the Company/Trust or its service providers when disclosing non-public portfolio holdings information to selected third parties; (1) whether the disclosure is consistent with the anti-fraud provisions of the federal securities laws; and (2) avoidance of any conflicts of interest between the interests of the Company’s/Trust’s shareholders and the service providers.

Purchasing Shares of Beneficial Interest in the Portfolios

Shares of beneficial interest in the Portfolios are sold without a sales load, at the NAV next determined after an order is received by the Portfolios. Investments in the Portfolios are sold solely in private placement transactions that do not involve any “public offering” within the meaning of Section 4(a)(2) of the 1933 Act. Investments in the Portfolios may be made only by regulated investment companies (“RICs”), unregulated foreign investment companies, U.S. and non-U.S. institutional investors, S corporations, insurance company separate accounts, and certain qualified pension and retirement plans. The Registration Statement of which this SAI is a part does not constitute an offer to sell, or the solicitation of any offer to buy, any “security” within the meaning of the 1933 Act.

There is no minimum initial or subsequent investment in the Portfolios. The Portfolios reserve the right to cease accepting investments at any time or to reject any investment order.

Redemption of Shares of Beneficial Interest in the Portfolios

An investor in the Portfolios may withdraw all or any portion of its investment at the NAV next determined after a redemption request in good order is received by a Portfolio. The proceeds of a redemption will be paid by the Portfolios in federal funds normally on the business day that the redemption is effected, but in any event within three business days, except as extensions may be permitted by law.

The Portfolios reserve the right to pay the redemption price of shares of beneficial interest in kind, i.e., in readily marketable securities. Unless requested by an investor or deemed by the Adviser to be in the best interests of the investors in a Portfolio as a group, the Portfolios will not pay a redemption in kind to an investor, except in situations where that investor may pay redemptions in kind.

The right of any investor to receive payment with respect to any redemption may be suspended, or the payment of the redemption proceeds postponed, during any period in which the NYSE is closed or trading on the NYSE is restricted or to the extent otherwise permitted by the 1940 Act.

Brokerage

Each Portfolio’s assets are invested by the Adviser in a manner consistent with the Portfolio’s investment objective, strategies, policies and restrictions and with any instructions the Board of Trustees may issue from time to time. Within this framework, the Adviser is responsible for making all determinations as to the purchase and sale of portfolio securities and for taking all steps necessary to implement securities transactions on behalf of each Portfolio.

Transactions on U.S. stock exchanges, commodities markets and futures markets and other agency transactions may involve the payment by the Adviser, on behalf of the Portfolios, of negotiated brokerage commissions. Such commissions vary among different brokers. A particular broker may charge different commissions according to such factors as the difficulty and size of the transaction. Transactions in foreign investments often involve the payment of fixed brokerage commissions, which may be higher than those in the United States. There is generally no stated commission in the case of securities traded in the over‑the‑counter markets, but the price paid by the Adviser usually includes an undisclosed dealer commission or mark-up. In underwritten offerings, the price paid by the Adviser on behalf of the Portfolios includes a disclosed, fixed commission or discount retained by the underwriter or dealer.

U.S. government securities generally are traded in the over-the-counter market through broker-dealers. A broker-dealer is a securities firm or bank that makes a market for securities by offering to buy at one price and sell at a slightly higher price. The difference between the prices is known as a spread.

In placing orders for the purchase and sale of portfolio securities for the Portfolios, the Adviser seeks to obtain the best price and execution, taking into account such factors as price, size of order, difficulty and risk of execution and operational facilities of the firm involved. For securities traded in the over-the-counter markets, the Adviser deals directly with the dealers who make markets in these securities unless better prices and execution are available elsewhere. The Adviser negotiates commission rates with brokers based on the quality and quantity of services provided in light of generally prevailing rates, and while the Adviser generally seeks reasonably competitive commission rates, the Portfolios do not necessarily pay the lowest commissions available. The Trust’s Board of Trustees periodically reviews the commission rates and allocation of orders.

When consistent with the objectives of best price and execution, business may be placed with broker-dealers who furnish investment research or services to the Adviser. Such research or services include advice, both orally and in writing, as to the value of securities; the advisability of investing in, purchasing or selling securities; and the availability of securities, or purchasers or sellers of securities; as well as analyses and reports concerning issues, industries, securities, economic factors and trends, portfolio strategy and the performance of accounts. To the extent portfolio transactions are effected with broker-dealers who furnish research services to the Adviser, the Adviser receives a benefit, without providing any direct monetary benefit to the Portfolios from these transactions. The Adviser believes that most research services obtained by it generally benefit several or all of the investment companies and private accounts that it manages, as opposed to solely benefiting one specific managed fund or account.

The Portfolios may direct certain portfolio trades to unaffiliated brokers who pay a portion of the commissions for those trades in cash to the applicable Portfolio that generated the commission.

From time to time, the Adviser may effect transactions in portfolio securities with executing brokers that may also promote or sell shares of the Funds/Portfolios (“selling brokers”) pursuant to policies adopted by the Company’s/Trust’s Board of Directors/Trustees. These policies provide that the Adviser shall not (i) take into consideration the promotion or sale of the Funds’/Portfolios’ shares as a factor in selecting executing brokers for the Funds/Portfolios, (ii) enter into an arrangement or understanding (whether oral or written) pursuant to which the Adviser directs, or is expected to direct, portfolio securities transactions or any other remuneration (as described below) to any broker or dealer in consideration for the promotion or sale of the Funds/Portfolios, and (iii) enter into a “step out” or any other type of arrangement under which a portion of the Funds’/Portfolios’ commission is directed to the selling brokers for the purpose of compensating such brokers for promoting or selling shares of the Funds/Portfolios. This prohibition applies to all transactions whether such transaction involves a commission, mark-up, mark down, other fee or portion of another fee paid or to be paid from a transaction effected through an executing broker.

The same security may be suitable for a Portfolio, another Portfolio of the Trust or other private accounts managed by the Adviser. If and when a Portfolio and two or more accounts simultaneously purchase or sell the same security, the transactions will be allocated as to price and amount in accordance with arrangements equitable to the Portfolio and the accounts. The simultaneous purchase or sale of the same securities by the Portfolio and other accounts may have a detrimental effect on the Portfolio, as this may affect the price paid or received by the Portfolio or the size of the position obtainable or able to be sold by the Portfolio.

The following table represents the total brokerage commissions paid by the Portfolios for the three fiscal years ended December 31, 2025, 2024, and 2023:


Total Brokerage Commissions Paid	2025	2024	2023
The Internet Portfolio	$54,359	$123,910	$8,973
The Global Portfolio	$14,005	$18,770	$3,429
The Paradigm Portfolio	$45,799	$17,205	$20,869
The Market Opportunities Portfolio	$29,088	$20,473	$6,793
The Small Cap Opportunities Portfolio	$26,692	$11,836	$19,475
The Multi-Disciplinary Income Portfolio	$0	$0	$0

Taxes

The Portfolios expect to, and the following discussion assumes that they will, be classified for U.S. federal income tax purposes as partnerships that are not “publicly traded partnerships.” As partnerships, the Portfolios are not subject to U.S. federal income tax; instead, each holder of shares of beneficial interest in a Portfolio (an “Interestholder”) is required to take into account in determining its U.S. federal income tax liability its share of the particular Portfolio’s income, gains, losses, deductions, and credits, without regard to whether it has received any cash distributions from a Portfolio.

An Interestholder is deemed to own a proportionate share of that Portfolio’s assets and to earn a proportionate share of that Portfolio’s income, for, among other things, purposes of determining whether the Interestholder satisfies the requirements to qualify as a RIC. Accordingly, the Portfolios intend to conduct their operations so that their Interestholders that invest substantially all of their assets in a Portfolio and intend to qualify as RICs should be able to satisfy all those requirements.

The foregoing discussion relates only to U.S. federal income tax law. Income from the Portfolios also may be subject to foreign, state and local taxes, and their treatment under foreign, state and local income tax laws may differ from the U.S. federal income tax treatment. You should consult your tax advisors with respect to particular questions of U.S. federal, foreign, state and local taxation.

Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

Tait, Weller & Baker LLP, Two Liberty Place, 50 South 16th Street, Suite 2900, Philadelphia, PA 19102, serves as the Portfolios’ independent registered public accounting firm. Its services include an audit of the Portfolios’ financial statements and the performance of other related audit and tax services.

Financial Statements

The audited financial statements for the Portfolios for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2025 are incorporated herein by reference to the Funds’ Form N-CSR dated December 31, 2025, as filed with the SEC on March 6, 2026.

Financial statements certified by the Portfolios’ independent registered public accounting firm will be submitted to shareholders at least annually.

APPENDIX A

DESCRIPTION OF SECURITIES RATINGS

Short-Term Credit Ratings

An S&P Global Ratings short-term issue credit rating is generally assigned to those obligations considered short-term in the relevant market. The following summarizes the rating categories used by S&P Global Ratings for short-term issues:

“A-1” – A short-term obligation rated “A-1” is rated in the highest category by S&P Global Ratings. The obligor’s capacity to meet its financial commitments on the obligation is strong. Within this category, certain obligations are designated with a plus sign (+). This indicates that the obligor’s capacity to meet its financial commitment on these obligations is extremely strong.

“A-2” – A short-term obligation rated “A-2” is somewhat more susceptible to the adverse effects of changes in circumstances and economic conditions than obligations in higher rating categories. However, the obligor’s capacity to meet its financial commitments on the obligation is satisfactory.

“A-3” – A short-term obligation rated “A-3” exhibits adequate protection parameters. However, adverse economic conditions or changing circumstances are more likely to weaken an obligor’s capacity to meet its financial commitments on the obligation.

“B” – A short-term obligation rated “B” is regarded as vulnerable and has significant speculative characteristics. The obligor currently has the capacity to meet its financial commitments; however, it faces major ongoing uncertainties that could lead to the obligor’s inadequate capacity to meet its financial commitments.

“C” – A short-term obligation rated “C” is currently vulnerable to nonpayment and is dependent upon favorable business, financial, and economic conditions for the obligor to meet its financial commitments on the obligation.

“D” – A short-term obligation rated “D” is in default or in breach of an imputed promise. For non-hybrid capital instruments, the “D” rating category is used when payments on an obligation are not made on the date due, unless S&P Global Ratings believes that such payments will be made within any stated grace period. However, any stated grace period longer than five business days will be treated as five business days. The “D” rating also will be used upon the filing of a bankruptcy petition or the taking of a similar action and where default on an obligation is a virtual certainty, for example due to automatic stay provisions. A rating on an obligation is lowered to “D” if it is subject to a distressed debt restructuring.

Local Currency and Foreign Currency Ratings – S&P Global Ratings’ issuer credit ratings make a distinction between foreign currency ratings and local currency ratings. A foreign currency rating on an issuer can differ from the local currency rating on it when the obligor has a different capacity to meet its obligations denominated in its local currency, versus obligations denominated in a foreign currency.

“NR” – This indicates that a rating has not been assigned or is no longer assigned.

Moody’s Ratings (“Moody’s”) short-term ratings are forward-looking opinions of the relative credit risks of financial obligations with an original maturity of thirteen months or less and reflect both on

the likelihood of a default or impairment on contractual financial obligations and the expected financial loss suffered in the event of default or impairment.

Moody’s employs the following designations to indicate the relative repayment ability of rated issuers:

“P-1” – Issuers (or supporting institutions) rated Prime-1 reflect a superior ability to repay short-term obligations.

“P-2” – Issuers (or supporting institutions) rated Prime-2 reflect a strong ability to repay short-term obligations.

“P-3” – Issuers (or supporting institutions) rated Prime-3 reflect an acceptable ability to repay short-term obligations.

“NP” – Issuers (or supporting institutions) rated Not Prime do not fall within any of the Prime rating categories.

“NR” – Is assigned to an unrated issuer, obligation and/or program.

Fitch, Inc. / Fitch Ratings Ltd. (“Fitch”) short-term issuer or obligation rating is based in all cases on the short-term vulnerability to default of the rated entity and relates to the capacity to meet financial obligations in accordance with the documentation governing the relevant obligation. Short-term deposit ratings may be adjusted for loss severity. Short-term ratings are assigned to obligations whose initial maturity is viewed as “short-term” based on market convention.1 Typically, this means up to 13 months for corporate, sovereign, and structured obligations and up to 36 months for obligations in U.S. public finance markets. The following summarizes the rating categories used by Fitch for short-term obligations:

“F1” – Securities possess the highest short-term credit quality. This designation indicates the strongest intrinsic capacity for timely payment of financial commitments; may have an added “+” to denote any exceptionally strong credit feature.

“F2” – Securities possess good short-term credit quality. This designation indicates good intrinsic capacity for timely payment of financial commitments.

“F3” – Securities possess fair short-term credit quality. This designation indicates that the intrinsic capacity for timely payment of financial commitments is adequate.

“B” – Securities possess speculative short-term credit quality. This designation indicates minimal capacity for timely payment of financial commitments, plus heightened vulnerability to near term adverse changes in financial and economic conditions.

“C” – Securities possess high short-term default risk. Default is a real possibility.

“RD” – Restricted default. Indicates an entity that has defaulted on one or more of its financial commitments, although it continues to meet other financial obligations. Typically applicable to entity ratings only.

———————

1 A long-term rating can also be used to rate an issue with short maturity.

“D” – Default. Indicates a broad-based default event for an entity, or the default of a short-term obligation.

“NR” – Is assigned to an issue of a rated issuer that are not and have not been rated.

The Morningstar DBRS® Ratings Limited (“Morningstar DBRS”) short-term obligation ratings provide Morningstar DBRS’s opinion on the risk that an issuer will not meet its short-term financial obligations in a timely manner. The obligations rated in this category typically have a term of shorter than one year. The R-1 and R-2 rating categories are further denoted by the subcategories “(high)”, “(middle)”, and “(low)”.

The following summarizes the ratings used by Morningstar DBRS for commercial paper and short-term debt:

“R-1 (high)” - Short-term debt rated “R-1 (high)” is of the highest credit quality. The capacity for the payment of short-term financial obligations as they fall due is exceptionally high. Unlikely to be adversely affected by future events.

“R-1 (middle)” – Short-term debt rated “R-1 (middle)” is of superior credit quality. The capacity for the payment of short-term financial obligations as they fall due is very high. Differs from “R-1 (high)” by a relatively modest degree. Unlikely to be significantly vulnerable to future events.

“R-1 (low)” – Short-term debt rated “R-1 (low)” is of good credit quality. The capacity for the payment of short-term financial obligations as they fall due is substantial. Overall strength is not as favorable as higher rating categories. May be vulnerable to future events, but qualifying negative factors are considered manageable.

“R-2 (high)” – Short-term debt rated “R-2 (high)” is considered to be at the upper end of adequate credit quality. The capacity for the payment of short-term financial obligations as they fall due is acceptable. May be vulnerable to future events.

“R-2 (middle)” – Short-term debt rated “R-2 (middle)” is considered to be of adequate credit quality. The capacity for the payment of short-term financial obligations as they fall due is acceptable. May be vulnerable to future events or may be exposed to other factors that could reduce credit quality.

“R-2 (low)” – Short-term debt rated “R-2 (low)” is considered to be at the lower end of adequate credit quality. The capacity for the payment of short-term financial obligations as they fall due is acceptable. May be vulnerable to future events. A number of challenges are present that could affect the issuer’s ability to meet such obligations.

“R-3” – Short-term debt rated “R-3” is considered to be at the lowest end of adequate credit quality. There is a capacity for the payment of short-term financial obligations as they fall due. May be vulnerable to future events and the certainty of meeting such obligations could be impacted by a variety of developments.

“R-4” – Short-term debt rated “R-4” is considered to be of speculative credit quality. The capacity for the payment of short-term financial obligations as they fall due is uncertain.

“R-5” – Short-term debt rated “R-5” is considered to be of highly speculative credit quality. There is a high level of uncertainty as to the capacity to meet short-term financial obligations as they fall due.

“D” – A downgrade to “D” may occur when the issuer has filed under any applicable bankruptcy, insolvency or winding-up statute or there is a failure to satisfy an obligation after the exhaustion of grace periods. Morningstar DBRS may also use “SD” (Selective Default) in cases where only some securities are impacted, such as the case of a “distressed exchange”.

Long-Term Issue Credit Ratings

The following summarizes the ratings used by S&P Global Ratings for long-term issues:

“AAA” – An obligation rated “AAA” has the highest rating assigned by S&P Global Ratings. The obligor’s capacity to meet its financial commitments on the obligation is extremely strong.

“AA” – An obligation rated “AA” differs from the highest-rated obligations only to a small degree. The obligor’s capacity to meet its financial commitments on the obligation is very strong.

“A” – An obligation rated “A” is somewhat more susceptible to the adverse effects of changes in circumstances and economic conditions than obligations in higher-rated categories. However, the obligor’s capacity to meet its financial commitments on the obligation is still strong.

“BBB” – An obligation rated “BBB” exhibits adequate protection parameters. However, adverse economic conditions or changing circumstances are more likely to weaken the obligor’s capacity to meet its financial commitments on the obligation.

“BB,” “B,” “CCC,” “CC” and “C” – Obligations rated “BB,” “B,” “CCC,” “CC” and “C” are regarded as having significant speculative characteristics. “BB” indicates the least degree of speculation and “C” the highest. While such obligations will likely have some quality and protective characteristics, these may be outweighed by large uncertainties or major exposure to adverse conditions.

“BB” – An obligation rated “BB” is less vulnerable to nonpayment than other speculative issues. However, it faces major ongoing uncertainties or exposure to adverse business, financial, or economic conditions that could lead to the obligor’s inadequate capacity to meet its financial commitments on the obligation.

“B” – An obligation rated “B” is more vulnerable to nonpayment than obligations rated “BB”, but the obligor currently has the capacity to meet its financial commitments on the obligation. Adverse business, financial, or economic conditions will likely impair the obligor’s capacity or willingness to meet its financial commitments on the obligation.

“CCC” – An obligation rated “CCC” is currently vulnerable to nonpayment and is dependent upon favorable business, financial, and economic conditions for the obligor to meet its financial commitments on the obligation. In the event of adverse business, financial, or economic conditions, the obligor is not likely to have the capacity to meet its financial commitments on the obligation.

“CC” – An obligation rated “CC” is currently highly vulnerable to nonpayment. The “CC” rating is used when a default has not yet occurred but S&P Global Ratings expects default to be a virtual certainty, regardless of the anticipated time to default.

“C” – An obligation rated “C” is currently highly vulnerable to nonpayment, and the obligation is expected to have lower relative seniority or lower ultimate recovery compared with obligations that are rated higher.

“D” – An obligation rated “D” is in default or in breach of an imputed promise. For non-hybrid capital instruments, the “D” rating category is used when payments on an obligation are not made on the date due, unless S&P Global Ratings believes that such payments will be made within the next five business days in the absence of a stated grace period or within the earlier of the stated grace period or the next 30 calendar days. The “D” rating also will be used upon the filing of a bankruptcy petition or the taking of similar action and where default on an obligation is a virtual certainty, for example due to automatic stay provisions. A rating on an obligation is lowered to “D” if it is subject to a distressed debt restructuring

Plus (+) or minus (-) – Ratings from “AA” to “CCC” may be modified by the addition of a plus (+) or minus (-) sign to show relative standing within the rating categories.

“NR” – This indicates that a rating has not been assigned, or is no longer assigned.

Local Currency and Foreign Currency Ratings - S&P Global Ratings’ issuer credit ratings make a distinction between foreign currency ratings and local currency ratings. A foreign currency rating on an issuer can differ from the local currency rating on it when the obligor has a different capacity to meet its obligations denominated in its local currency, versus obligations denominated in a foreign currency.

Moody’s long-term ratings are forward-looking opinions of the relative credit risks of financial obligations with an original maturity of eleven months or more. Such ratings reflect both on the likelihood of default or impairment on contractual financial obligations and the expected financial loss suffered in the event of default or impairment. The following summarizes the ratings used by Moody’s for long-term debt:

“Aaa” – Obligations rated “Aaa” are judged to be of the highest quality, subject to the lowest level of credit risk.

“Aa” – Obligations rated “Aa” are judged to be of high quality and are subject to very low credit risk.

“A” – Obligations rated “A” are judged to be upper-medium grade and are subject to low credit risk.

“Baa” – Obligations rated “Baa” are judged to be medium-grade and subject to moderate credit risk and as such may possess certain speculative characteristics.

“Ba” – Obligations rated “Ba” are judged to be speculative and are subject to substantial credit risk.

“B” – Obligations rated “B” are considered speculative and are subject to high credit risk.

“Caa” – Obligations rated “Caa” are judged to be speculative of poor standing and are subject to very high credit risk.

“Ca” – Obligations rated “Ca” are highly speculative and are likely in, or very near, default, with some prospect of recovery of principal and interest.

“C” – Obligations rated “C” are the lowest rated and are typically in default, with little prospect for recovery of principal or interest.

Note: Moody’s appends numerical modifiers 1, 2, and 3 to each generic rating classification from “Aa” through “Caa.” The modifier 1 indicates that the obligation ranks in the higher end of its generic rating category; the modifier 2 indicates a mid-range ranking; and the modifier 3 indicates a ranking in the lower end of that generic rating category.

“NR” – Is assigned to unrated obligations, obligation and/or program.

The following summarizes long-term ratings used by Fitch:

“AAA” – Securities considered to be of the highest credit quality. “AAA” ratings denote the lowest expectation of credit risk. They are assigned only in cases of exceptionally strong capacity for payment of financial commitments. This capacity is highly unlikely to be adversely affected by foreseeable events.

“AA” – Securities considered to be of very high credit quality. “AA” ratings denote expectations of very low credit risk. They indicate very strong capacity for payment of financial commitments. This capacity is not significantly vulnerable to foreseeable events.

“A” – Securities considered to be of high credit quality. “A” ratings denote expectations of low credit risk. The capacity for payment of financial commitments is considered strong. This capacity may, nevertheless, be more vulnerable to adverse business or economic conditions than is the case for higher ratings.

“BBB” – Securities considered to be of good credit quality. “BBB” ratings indicate that expectations of credit risk are currently low. The capacity for payment of financial commitments is considered adequate, but adverse business or economic conditions are more likely to impair this capacity.

“BB” – Securities considered to be speculative. “BB” ratings indicates an elevated vulnerability to credit risk, particularly in the event of adverse changes in business or economic conditions over time; however, business or financial alternatives may be available to allow financial commitments to be met.

“B” – Securities considered to be highly speculative. “B” ratings indicate that material credit risk is present

“CCC” – A “CCC” rating indicates that substantial credit risk is present.

“CC” – A “CC” rating indicates very high levels of credit risk.

“C” – A “C” rating indicates exceptionally high levels of credit risk.

Defaulted obligations typically are not assigned “RD” or “D” ratings but are instead rated in the “CCC” to “C” rating categories, depending on their recovery prospects and other relevant characteristics. Fitch believes that this approach better aligns obligations that have comparable overall expected loss but varying vulnerability to default and loss.

Plus (+) or minus (-) may be appended to a rating to denote relative status within major rating categories. Such suffixes are not added to the “AAA” obligation rating category, or to corporate finance obligation ratings in the categories below “CCC”.

“NR” – Is assigned to an unrated issue of a rated issuer.

The Morningstar DBRS long-term obligation ratings provide Morningstar DBRS’s opinion on the risk that investors may not be repaid in accordance with the terms under which the long-term obligation was issued. The obligations rated in this category typically have a term of one year or longer. All rating categories from AA to CCC contain subcategories “(high)” and “(low)”. The absence of either a “(high)” or “(low)” designation indicates the rating is in the middle of the category. The following summarizes the ratings used by Morningstar DBRS for long-term debt:

“AAA” – Long-term debt rated “AAA” is of the highest credit quality. The capacity for the payment of financial obligations is exceptionally high and unlikely to be adversely affected by future events.

“AA” – Long-term debt rated “AA” is of superior credit quality. The capacity for the payment of financial obligations is considered high. Credit quality differs from “AAA” only to a small degree. Unlikely to be significantly vulnerable to future events.

“A” – Long-term debt rated “A” is of good credit quality. The capacity for the payment of financial obligations is substantial, but of lesser credit quality than “AA.” May be vulnerable to future events, but qualifying negative factors are considered manageable.

“BBB” – Long-term debt rated “BBB” is of adequate credit quality. The capacity for the payment of financial obligations is considered acceptable. May be vulnerable to future events.

“BB” – Long-term debt rated “BB” is of speculative, non-investment grade credit quality. The capacity for the payment of financial obligations is uncertain. Vulnerable to future events.

“B” – Long-term debt rated “B” is of highly speculative credit quality. There is a high level of uncertainty as to the capacity to meet financial obligations.

“CCC”, “CC” and “C” – Long-term debt rated in any of these categories is of very highly speculative credit quality. In danger of defaulting on financial obligations. There is little difference between these three categories, although “CC” and “C” ratings are normally applied to obligations that are seen as highly likely to default or subordinated to obligations rated in the “CCC” to “B” range. Obligations in respect of which default has not technically taken place but is considered inevitable may be rated in the “C” category.

“D” – A downgrade to “D” may occur when the issuer has filed under any applicable bankruptcy, insolvency or winding up statute or there is a failure to satisfy an obligation after the exhaustion of grace periods. Morningstar DBRS may also use “SD” (Selective Default) in cases where only some securities are impacted, such as the case of a “distressed exchange”.

Municipal Note Ratings

An S&P Global Ratings U.S. municipal note rating reflects S&P Global Ratings’ opinion about the liquidity factors and market access risks unique to the notes. Notes due in three years or less will likely receive a note rating. Notes with an original maturity of more than three years will most likely receive a long-term debt rating. In determining which type of rating, if any, to assign, S&P Global Ratings’ analysis will review the following considerations:

•Amortization schedule - the larger the final maturity relative to other maturities, the more likely it will be treated as a note; and

•Source of payment - the more dependent the issue is on the market for its refinancing, the more likely it will be treated as a note.

Municipal Short-Term Note rating symbols are as follows:

“SP-1” – A municipal note rated “SP-1” exhibits a strong capacity to pay principal and interest. An issue determined to possess a very strong capacity to pay debt service is given a plus (+) designation.

“SP-2” – A municipal note rated “SP-2” exhibits a satisfactory capacity to pay principal and interest, with some vulnerability to adverse financial and economic changes over the term of the notes.

“SP-3” – A municipal note rated “SP-3” exhibits a speculative capacity to pay principal and interest.

“D” – This rating is assigned upon failure to pay the note when due, completion of a distressed debt restructuring, or the filing of a bankruptcy petition or the taking of similar action and where default on an obligation is a virtual certainty, for example due to automatic stay provisions.

Moody’s uses the global short-term Prime rating scale (listed above under Short-Term Credit Ratings) for commercial paper issued by U.S. municipalities and nonprofits. These commercial paper programs may be backed by external letters of credit or liquidity facilities, or by an issuer’s self-liquidity.

For other short-term municipal obligations, Moody’s uses one of two other short-term rating scales, the Municipal Investment Grade (“MIG”) and Variable Municipal Investment Grade (“VMIG”) scales provided below.

Moody’s uses the MIG scale for U.S. municipal cash flow notes, bond anticipation notes and certain other short-term obligations, which typically mature in three years or less.

MIG Scale

“MIG-1” – This designation denotes superior credit quality. Excellent protection is afforded by established cash flows, highly reliable liquidity support, or demonstrated broad-based access to the market for refinancing.

“MIG-2” – This designation denotes strong credit quality. Margins of protection are ample, although not as large as in the preceding group.

“MIG-3” – This designation denotes acceptable credit quality. Liquidity and cash-flow protection may be narrow, and market access for refinancing is likely to be less well-established.

“SG” – This designation denotes speculative-grade credit quality. Debt instruments in this category may lack sufficient margins of protection.

“NR” – Is assigned to an unrated obligation, obligation and/or program.

In the case of variable rate demand obligations (“VRDOs”), Moody’s assigns both a long-term rating and a short-term payment obligation rating. The long-term rating addresses the issuer’s ability to meet scheduled principal and interest payments. The short-term payment obligation rating addresses the ability of the issuer or the liquidity provider to meet any purchase price payment obligation resulting from optional tenders (“on demand”) and/or mandatory tenders of the VRDO. The short-term payment obligation rating uses the VMIG scale. Transitions of VMIG ratings with conditional liquidity support differ from transitions of Prime ratings reflecting the risk that external liquidity support will terminate if the issuer’s long-term rating drops below investment grade.

Moody’s typically assigns the VMIG rating if the frequency of the payment obligation is less than every three years. If the frequency of the payment obligation is less than three years but the obligation is payable only with remarketing proceeds, the VMIG short-term rating is not assigned and it is denoted as “NR”.

“VMIG-1” – This designation denotes superior credit quality. Excellent protection is afforded by the superior short-term credit strength of the liquidity provider and structural and legal protections.

“VMIG-2” – This designation denotes strong credit quality. Good protection is afforded by the strong short-term credit strength of the liquidity provider and structural and legal protections.

“VMIG-3” – This designation denotes acceptable credit quality. Adequate protection is afforded by the satisfactory short-term credit strength of the liquidity provider and structural and legal protections.

“SG” – This designation denotes speculative-grade credit quality. Demand features rated in this category may be supported by a liquidity provider that does not have a sufficiently strong short-term rating or may lack the structural and/or legal protections.

“NR” – Is assigned to an unrated obligation, obligation and/or program.

About Credit Ratings

An S&P Global Ratings issue credit rating is a forward-looking opinion about the creditworthiness of an obligor with respect to a specific financial obligation, a specific class of financial obligations, or a specific financial program (including ratings on medium-term note programs and commercial paper programs). It takes into consideration the creditworthiness of guarantors, insurers, or other forms of credit enhancement on the obligation and takes into account the currency in which the obligation is denominated. The opinion reflects S&P Global Ratings’ view of the obligor’s capacity and willingness to meet its financial commitments as they come due, and this opinion may assess terms, such as collateral security and subordination, which could affect ultimate payment in the event of default.

Ratings assigned on Moody’s global long-term and short-term rating scales are forward-looking opinions of the relative credit risks of financial obligations issued by non-financial corporates, financial institutions, structured finance vehicles, project finance vehicles, and public sector entities.

Fitch’s credit ratings are forward-looking opinions on the relative ability of an entity or obligation to meet financial commitments. Issuer Default Ratings (IDRs) are assigned to corporations, sovereign entities, financial institutions such as banks, leasing companies and insurers, and public finance entities (local and regional governments). Issue-level ratings are also assigned and often include an expectation of recovery, which may be notched above or below the issuer-level rating. Issue ratings are assigned to secured and unsecured debt securities, loans, preferred stock and other instruments. Credit ratings are indications of the likelihood of repayment in accordance with the terms of the issuance. In limited cases, Fitch may include additional considerations (i.e., rate to a higher or lower standard than that implied in the obligation’s documentation).

Morningstar DBRS offers independent, transparent, and innovative credit analysis to the market.

Credit ratings are forward-looking opinions about credit risk that reflect the creditworthiness of an issuer, rated entity, security and/or obligation based on Morningstar DBRS’s quantitative and qualitative analysis in accordance with applicable methodologies and criteria. They are meant to provide opinions on relative measures of risk and are not based on expectations of, or meant to predict, any specific default probability. Credit ratings are not statements of fact. Morningstar DBRS issues credit ratings using one or more categories, such as public, private, provisional, final(ized), solicited, or unsolicited. From time to time, credit ratings may also be subject to trends, placed under review, or discontinued. Morningstar DBRS credit ratings are determined by credit rating committees.

KINETICS PORTFOLIOS TRUST

PART C

OTHER INFORMATION

ITEM 28. EXHIBITS


(a)	Articles of Incorporation
	(1)	Certificate of Trust and Declaration of Trust, filed May 1, 2000 with N-1A.
	(2)	Amendment No. 1 to Declaration of Trust dated January 31, 2006, filed January 31, 2006 with the Amendment No. 11.
	(3)	Amendment No. 2 to Declaration of Trust dated June 29, 2007, filed June 29, 2007 with the Amendment No. 16.
	(4)	Amendment No. 3 to Declaration of Trust dated February 7, 2008, filed February 8, 2008 with the Amendment No. 17.
	(5)	Amendment No. 4 to Declaration of Trust dated March 3, 2008, filed May 1, 2008 with the Amendment No. 18.
(b)	By-Laws, filed May 1, 2000 with N-1A.
(c)	Instruments Defining Rights of Security Holders. Incorporated by reference to the Declaration of Trust and the By-Laws.
(d)	Investment Advisory Agreements between Registrant, on behalf of each series, and Horizon Kinetics Asset Management LLC (formerly known as Kinetics Asset Management, Inc.), filed May 1, 2000 with N-1A.
	(1)	Investment Advisory Agreement between Registrant, on behalf of its series the Global Portfolio (formerly known as the Internet Emerging Growth Portfolio), and Horizon Kinetics Asset Management LLC (formerly known as Kinetics Asset Management, Inc.), filed May 1, 2002 with the Amendment No. 5.
	(1)(i)	Addendum to Investment Advisory Agreement between Registrant, on behalf of its series the Global Portfolio (formerly known as the Internet Emerging Growth Portfolio), and Horizon Kinetics Asset Management LLC (formerly known as Kinetics Asset Management, Inc.), filed May 1, 2002 with the Amendment No. 5.


	(2)	Investment Advisory Agreement between Registrant, on behalf of its series the Small Cap Opportunities Portfolio, and Horizon Kinetics Asset Management LLC (formerly known as Kinetics Asset Management, Inc.), filed May 1, 2002 with the Amendment No. 5.
	(2)(i)	Addendum to Investment Advisory Agreement between Registrant, on behalf of its series the Small Cap Opportunities Portfolio, and Horizon Kinetics Asset Management LLC (formerly known as Kinetics Asset Management, Inc.), filed May 1, 2002 with the Amendment No. 5.
	(3)	Addendum to Investment Advisory Agreement between Registrant, on behalf of its series the Internet Portfolio, and Horizon Kinetics Asset Management LLC (formerly known as Kinetics Asset Management, Inc.), filed May 1, 2002 with the Amendment No. 5.
	(4)	Addendum to Investment Advisory Agreement between Registrant, on behalf of its series the Paradigm Portfolio (formerly known as the New Paradigm Portfolio), and Horizon Kinetics Asset Management LLC (formerly known as Kinetics Asset Management, Inc.), filed May 1, 2002 with the Amendment No. 5.


	(5)	Investment Advisory Agreement between Registrant, on behalf of its series the Market Opportunities Portfolio, and Horizon Kinetics Asset Management LLC (formerly known as Kinetics Asset Management, Inc.), filed March 16, 2007 with the Amendment No. 13.

	(6)	Investment Advisory Agreement between Registrant, on behalf of its series the Multi-Disciplinary Portfolio, and Horizon Kinetics Asset Management LLC (formerly known as Kinetics Asset Management, Inc.), filed February 8, 2008 with the Amendment No. 17.
	(6)(i)	Management Fee Reduction Commitment (Multi-Disciplinary Portfolio) by Horizon Kinetics Asset Management LLC dated April 30, 2023, filed April 29, 2024 with Amendment No. 41.
	(7)	Investment Advisory Agreement between Kinetics Internet Fund (Cayman) and Horizon Kinetics Asset Management LLC, filed April 30, 2018 with the Amendment No. 31.
	(8)	Investment Advisory Agreement between Kinetics Global Fund (Cayman) and Horizon Kinetics Asset Management LLC, filed April 30, 2018 with the Amendment No. 31.
	(9)	Investment Advisory Agreement between Kinetics Paradigm Fund (Cayman) and Horizon Kinetics Asset Management LLC, filed April 30, 2018 with the Amendment No. 31.
	(10)	Investment Advisory Agreement between Kinetics Small Cap Opportunities Fund (Cayman) and Horizon Kinetics Asset Management LLC, filed April 30, 2018 with the Amendment No. 31.
	(11)	Investment Advisory Agreement between Kinetics Market Opportunities Fund (Cayman) and Horizon Kinetics Asset Management LLC, filed April 30, 2018 with the Amendment No. 31.
	(12)	Investment Advisory Agreement between Kinetics Internet Corporation and Horizon Kinetics Asset Management LLC, filed May 11, 2020 with the Amendment No. 35 .
	(13)	Investment Advisory Agreement between Kinetics Global Corporation and Horizon Kinetics Asset Management LLC, filed May 11, 2020 with the Amendment No. 35.
	(14)	Investment Advisory Agreement between Kinetics Market Opportunity Corporation and Horizon Kinetics Asset Management LLC, filed May 11, 2020 with the Amendment No. 35 .
(e)	Underwriting Contracts. Omitted pursuant to paragraph 2(b) of Instruction B to the General instruction to Form N-1A.
(f)	Bonus or Profit Sharing Contracts. Not applicable.
(g)	Custodian Agreements
	(1)	Custody Agreement among Registrant, Kinetics Portfolios Trust and U.S. Bank N.A. dated June 26, 2006. filed June 29, 2007 with the Amendment No. 16.
	(1)(i)	Fourth Amendment dated December 18, 2009 to Custody Agreement among Registrant, Kinetics Portfolios Trust and U.S. Bank N.A. dated June 26, 2006 incorporated by reference to Amendment No. 35 to Registration Statement for Kinetics Mutual Funds, Inc. (File No. 811-09303) filed on December 30, 2009.
	(1)(ii)	Amended and Restated Custody Agreement dated October 15, 2013 among Registrant, Kinetics Mutual Funds, Inc. and U.S. Bank N.A., incorporated by reference to Amendment No. 70 to Registration Statement for Kinetics Mutual Funds, Inc. (File No. 811-09303) filed on April 30, 2018.


	(1)(iii)	First Amendment to Amended and Restated Custody Agreement dated August 1, 2017 among Registrant, Kinetics Mutual Funds, Inc. and U.S. Bank N.A., incorporated by reference to Amendment No. 70 to Registration Statement for Kinetics Mutual Funds, Inc. (File No. 811-09303) filed on April 30, 2018.
	(1)(iv)	Second Amendment to Amended and Restated Custody Agreement dated June 9, 2017 among Registrant, Kinetics Mutual Funds, Inc. and U.S. Bank N.A., incorporated by reference to Amendment No. 70 to Registration Statement for Kinetics Mutual Funds, Inc. (File No. 811-09303) filed on April 30, 2018.
	(1)(v)	Fourth Amendment to Amended and Restated Custody Agreement dated September 1, 2019 among Registrant, Kinetics Mutual Funds, Inc. and U.S. Bank N.A., filed May 11, 2020 with Amendment No. 35.
	(1)(vi)	Form of Amendment to Amended and Restated Custody Agreement among Registrant, Kinetics Mutual Funds, Inc. and U.S. Bank N.A., filed on April 28, 2023 with Amendment No. 39.
(h)	Other Material Contracts
	(1)	Fund Administration Servicing Agreement among Registrant and U.S. Bancorp Fund Services, LLC dated January 1, 2002, filed April 29, 2004 with the Amendment No. 8.
	(1)(i)	Seventh Amendment dated June 30, 2009 to Fund Administration Servicing Agreement between Registrant and U.S. Bancorp Fund Services, LLC, filed April 30, 2010 with the Amendment No. 21.
	(2)	Fund Accounting Servicing Agreement among Registrant, Kinetics Mutual Funds, Inc. and U.S. Bancorp Fund Services, LLC dated December 15, 2005, filed January 31, 2006 with the Amendment No. 11.
	(2)(i)	Fifth Amendment dated December 18, 2009 to Fund Accounting Servicing Agreement among Registrant, Kinetics Mutual Funds, Inc. and U.S. Bancorp Fund Services, LLC dated December 15, 2006 incorporated by reference to Amendment No. 35 to Registration Statement for Kinetics Mutual Funds, Inc. (File No. 811-09303) filed on December 30, 2009.
	(2)(ii)	Sixth Amendment to Fund Accounting Servicing Agreement among Registrant, Kinetics Mutual Funds, Inc. and U.S. Bancorp Fund Services, LLC dated June 9, 2017 incorporated by reference to Amendment No. 70 to Registration Statement for Kinetics Mutual Funds, Inc. (File No. 811-09303) filed on April 30, 2018.
	(2)(iii)	Seventh Amendment to Fund Accounting Servicing Agreement among Registrant, Kinetics Mutual Funds, Inc. and U.S. Bancorp Fund Services, LLC dated September 1, 2019, filed May 11, 2020 with Post-Effective Amendment No. 35 .
	(2)(iv)	Form of Amendment to Fund Administration Servicing Agreement between Registrant and U.S. Bancorp Fund Services, LLC, filed on April 28, 2023 with Amendment No. 39.
	(2)(v)	Form of Amendment to Fund Accounting Servicing Agreement among Registrant, Kinetics Mutual Funds, Inc. and U.S. Bancorp Fund Services, LLC, filed on May 16, 2023 with Amendment No. 40.
	(3)	Placement Agency Agreement between Registrant and Kinetics Funds Distributors, LLC (formerly known as Kinetics Funds Distributors, Inc.), filed May 1, 2000 with N-1A.
	(3)(i)	Schedule A dated December 6, 2007 to Placement Agency Agreement between Registrant and Kinetics Funds Distributors, LLC (formerly known as Kinetics Funds Distributors, Inc.), dated May 1, 2000. filed February 8, 2008 with the Amendment No. 17.


	(4)	Power of Attorney, filed April 30, 2013 with the Amendment No. 25.
	(5)	Securities Lending Agreement between Registrant and U.S. Bank N.A, filed April 30, 2009 with the Amendment No. 19.
(i)	Legal Opinion. Omitted pursuant to paragraph 2(b) of Instruction B of the General Instruction to Form N-1A.
(j)	Other Opinions.
	(1)	Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Fir m, filed April 30, 2026 with Amendment N o. 45.
(k)	Omitted Financial Statements. Not applicable.
(l)	Initial Capital Agreements. Not applicable.
(m)	Rule 12b-1 Plan. Not applicable.
(n)	Rule 18f-3 Plan. Not applicable.
(o)	Reserved.
(p)	Code of Ethics
	(1)	Code of Ethics for Kinetics Portfolio Trust, and Kinetics Mutual Funds, Inc., filed April 30, 2021 with Amendment No. 36.
	(2)	Code of Ethics for Kinetics Funds Distributor, LLC, KBD Securities, LLC, Horizon Kinetics Asset Management LLC and Kinetics Advisers, LLC, filed April 29, 2024 with Amendment No. 41.

ITEM 29. PERSONS CONTROLLED BY OR UNDER COMMON CONTROL WITH REGISTRANT

Registrant is controlled by its Board of Trustees.

ITEM 30. INDEMNIFICATION

Reference is made to Article VIII, Section 8.3 of Registrant’s Declaration of Trust and Article IX, Section 9.2 of Registrant’s By-Laws. The general effect of these provisions is to indemnify any person (trustee, director, officer, employee or agent, among others) who was or is a party to any proceeding by reason of their actions performed in their official or duly authorized capacity on behalf of the Trust.

Insofar as indemnification for liability arising under the Securities Act of 1933 may be permitted to trustees, officers and controlling persons of the Registrant, the Registrant has been advised that, in the opinion of the Securities and Exchange Commission, such indemnification is against public policy as expressed in the Act and is, therefore, unenforceable. In the event that a claim for indemnification against such liabilities (other than the payment by the Registrant of expenses incurred or paid by a trustee, officer or controlling person of the Registrant in the successful defense of any action, suit or proceeding) is asserted by such trustee, officer or controlling person in connection with the securities being registered, the Registrant will, unless in the opinion of its counsel the matter has been settled by controlling precedent, submit to a court of appropriate jurisdiction the question whether such indemnification by it is against public policy as expressed in the Act and will be governed by the final adjudication of such issue.

ITEM 31. BUSINESS AND OTHER CONNECTIONS OF INVESTMENT ADVISER:

Horizon Kinetics Asset Management LLC is an investment adviser registered under the Investment Advisers Act of 1940, as amended. Information regarding the business, vocation or employment of a substantial nature of the Adviser and its officers is incorporated by reference to the information contained in Statement of Additional Information of this Registration Statement.

ITEM 32. PRINCIPAL UNDERWRITERS:

(a) As of the date of this filing, Kinetics Funds Distributor, LLC (“KFD”), the private placement agent for shares of the Registrant, also serves as the Distributor for shares of Kinetics Mutual Funds, Inc.

(b) To the best of Registrant’s knowledge, the directors and executive officers of KFD are as follows:


Name and Principal Business Address	Position and Offices with Kinetics Funds Distributor, LLC	Positions and Offices with Registrant
Alun Williams 470 Park Avenue South New York, NY 10016	Chief Executive Officer	N/A
Jay Kesslen 470 Park Avenue South New York, NY 10016	General Counsel, Senior Vice President, AML Officer	Vice President, Assistant Secretary and AML Officer
Francine Pollack 470 Park Avenue South New York, NY 10016	Chief Compliance Officer and Designated Principal	N/A
Leonid Polyakov 470 Park Avenue South New York, NY 10016	Designated Principal	N/A

ITEM 33. LOCATION OF ACCOUNTS AND RECORDS:

All accounts and records required to be maintained by Section 31(a) of the Investment Company Act of 1940 as amended (the “Investment Company Act”), and Rules 31a‑1 through 31a-3 promulgated thereunder are maintained at the following locations:


Records Relating to:			Are located at:
Registrant’s fund accountant, administrator and transfer agent			U.S. Bancorp Fund Services, LLC 615 East Michigan Street Milwaukee, WI 53202
Registrant’s investment adviser			Horizon Kinetics Asset Management LLC 470 Park Avenue South New York, NY 10016
Registrant’s custodian			U.S. Bank N.A. 1555 N. River Center Drive, Suite 302 Milwaukee, WI 53212

ITEM 34. MANAGEMENT SERVICES:

Not applicable.

ITEM 35. UNDERTAKINGS:

Not applicable.

SIGNATURES

Pursuant to the requirements of the Investment Company Act, the Registrant, Kinetics Portfolios Trust, has duly caused this Registration Statement to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, duly authorized, in the City of New York and State of New York, on the 5th day of May 2026.

KINETICS PORTFOLIO TRUST

/s/ Peter B. Doyle*

Peter B. Doyle, President

*By:/s/ Jay Kesslen

Attorney-In-Fact pursuant to the Power of Attorney.

Resolution of the Board of Trustees of Kinetics Portfolios Trust (the “Trust”) and the Board of Directors of Kinetics Mutual Funds, Inc. (the “Company”)

RESOLVED, that the officers of the Trust/Company who may be required to execute any amendments to the Trust’s/Company’s Registration Statement be, and each hereby is, authorized to execute a power of attorney appointing Jay Kesslen, their true and lawful attorney, to execute in their name, place and stead, in their capacity as Director/Trustee or officer of the Trust/Company, any and all amendments to the Trust’s/Company’s Registration Statements, and all instruments necessary or incidental in connection therewith, and to file the same with the Securities and Exchange Commission; and said attorney shall have the power to act thereunder and shall have full power of substitution and resubstitution; and to do and perform in their name and on their behalf, in any and all capacities, every act whatsoever requisite or necessary to be done in the premises, as fully and to all intents and purposes as they might or could do in person, said acts of said attorney, being hereby ratified and approved.

The foregoing is certified as the true and correct resolution of the Board of Trustees of the Trust and the Board of Directors of the Company, duly adopted on March 6, 2020 and reapproved on March 13, 2026.

/s/ Jay Kesslen

Jay Kesslen

Assistant Secretary and Vice President of the Trust and the Company

Dated: March 13, 2026

Serious News for Serious Traders! Try StreetInsider.com Premium Free!

Create E-mail Alert Related Categories

SEC Filings

Sign up for StreetInsider Free!

Receive full access to all new and archived articles, unlimited portfolio tracking, e-mail alerts, custom newswires and RSS feeds - and more!

Form POS AMI KINETICS PORTFOLIOS TRUS

You May Also Be Interested In

Create E-mail Alert Related Categories

Sign up for StreetInsider Free!

Free News Feed