Form 485BPOS LINCOLN VARIABLE INSURAN
Tweet
Share
E-mailTable of Contents
1933 Act Registration No. 033-70742
1940 Act Registration No. 811-08090
Washington, D.C. 20549
FORM
POST-EFFECTIVE AMENDMENT NO. 276
AMENDMENT NO. 279
(Exact Name of Registrant as Specified in Charter)
1301 South Harrison Street
Fort Wayne, Indiana 46802
(Address of Principal Executive Offices)
Lincoln Financial
150 N. Radnor-Chester Road
Radnor, PA 19087
(Name and Address of Agent for Service)
Robert A. Robertson, Esquire
Dechert, LLP
US Bank Tower
633 West 5th Street, Suite 4900
Los Angeles, CA 90071-2013
Fort Wayne, Indiana 46802
| |
Standard Class |
Service Class |
| Management Fee |
|
|
| Distribution and/or Service (12b-1) Fees |
|
|
| Other Expenses1 |
|
|
| Total Annual Fund Operating Expenses |
|
|
| Less Fee Waiver and/or Expense Reimbursement2 |
( |
( |
| Total Annual Fund Operating Expenses (After Fee Waiver/Expense Reimbursement) |
|
|
| |
1 year |
3 years |
| Standard Class |
$ |
$ |
| Service Class |
$ |
$ |
| |
|
|
| |
|
- |
| |
1 year |
5 years |
10 years |
| LVIP ClearBridge Appreciation Fund -Class I shares |
% |
% |
% |
| LVIP ClearBridge Appreciation Fund -Class II shares |
% |
% |
% |
| Russell 3000 Index (reflects no deduction for fees, expenses or taxes) |
% |
% |
% |
| S&P 500 Index (reflects no deduction for fees, expenses or taxes) |
% |
% |
% |
| ClearBridge Portfolio Managers |
Company Title |
Experience with Fund* |
| Michael Kagan |
Managing Director, Portfolio Manager |
Since 2009 |
| Stephen Rigo, CFA |
Managing Director, Portfolio Manager |
Since 2022 |
| Adviser |
The aggregate advisory fee paid to the predecessor fund’s investment manager for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2025 was 0.68% of the predecessor fund’s average daily net assets. |
| Sub-Adviser |
ClearBridge Investments, LLC (“ClearBridge”), is located at One Madison Avenue, New York, New York, 10010. ClearBridge is a wholly owned subsidiary of Franklin Resources, Inc., a publicly traded company listed on the New York Stock Exchange (NYSE:BEN). As of December 31, 2025, ClearBridge’s total assets under management were approximately $212 billion, including $45.2 billion for which ClearBridge provides non-discretionary investment models to managed account sponsors. |
| ClearBridge Portfolio Managers |
Michael Kagan and Stephen Rigo are responsible for the day-to-day management of the Fund's assets. |
| |
Michael Kagan is a Managing Director and Portfolio Manager at ClearBridge. Mr. Kagan co-manages the Appreciation strategy. He joined ClearBridge in 1994 and has 41 years of investment industry experience. Mr. Kagan is a member of the ClearBridge Proxy and Brokerage Committees. Mr. Kagan received a B.A. in Economics from Harvard College and attended the Massachusetts Institute of Technology Sloan School of Management. |
| |
Stephen Rigo, CFA, is a Managing Director and Portfolio Manager at ClearBridge. Mr. Rigo co-manages the Appreciation Strategy. He has 26 years of investment industry experience and joined ClearBridge in 2016 as a Sector Analyst covering financials, and in 2019 was named a Senior Portfolio Analyst on the Appreciation Strategy. Mr. Rigo holds a BS in Finance from Boston College and is a member of the CFA Institute. |
| |
ClearBridge Variable Appreciation Portfolio Standard Class | ||||
| |
Year Ended | ||||
| Standard Class Shares1 |
2025 |
2024 |
2023 |
2022 |
2021 |
| Net asset value, beginning of period |
$63.91 |
$58.03 |
$50.29 |
$61.10 |
$51.55 |
| Income (loss) from operations: |
|
|
|
|
|
| Net investment income |
0.35 |
0.46 |
0.54 |
0.56 |
0.42 |
| Net realized and unrealized gain (loss) |
8.92 |
12.88 |
9.30 |
(8.17 ) |
11.72 |
| Total income (loss) from operations |
9.27 |
13.34 |
9.84 |
(7.61 ) |
12.14 |
| Less distributions from: |
|
|
|
|
|
| Net investment income |
(0.37 ) |
(0.51 ) |
(0.54 ) |
(0.58 ) |
(0.37 ) |
| Net realized gain |
(10.50 ) |
(6.95 ) |
(1.56 ) |
(2.62 ) |
(2.22 ) |
| Total distributions |
(10.87 ) |
(7.46 ) |
(2.10 ) |
(3.20 ) |
(2.59 ) |
| Net asset value, end of period |
$62.31 |
$63.91 |
$58.03 |
$50.29 |
$61.10 |
| Total return2 |
14.50% |
22.65% |
19.71% |
(12.44 )% |
23.66% |
| Net assets, end of period (millions) |
$851 |
$828 |
$752 |
$679 |
$829 |
| Ratios to average net assets: |
|
|
|
|
|
| Gross expenses |
0.70% |
0.70% |
0.72% |
0.72% |
0.72% |
| Net expenses3,4 |
0.70 |
0.70 |
0.72 |
0.72 |
0.72 |
| Net investment income |
0.52 |
0.71 |
0.99 |
1.04 |
0.72 |
| Portfolio turnover rate |
30% |
17% |
10% |
9% |
12% |
| |
ClearBridge Variable Appreciation Portfolio Service Class | ||||
| |
Year Ended | ||||
| Service Class Shares1 |
2025 |
2024 |
2023 |
2022 |
2021 |
| Net asset value, beginning of period |
$63.41 |
$57.63 |
$49.97 |
$60.72 |
$51.26 |
| Income (loss) from operations: |
|
|
|
|
|
| Net investment income |
0.18 |
0.30 |
0.40 |
0.39 |
0.27 |
| Net realized and unrealized gain (loss) |
8.83 |
12.70 |
9.22 |
(8.08 ) |
11.64 |
| Total income (loss) from operations |
9.01 |
13.08 |
9.62 |
(7.69 ) |
11.91 |
| Less distributions from: |
|
|
|
|
|
| Net investment income |
(0.19 ) |
(0.35 ) |
(0.40 ) |
(0.44 ) |
(0.23 ) |
| Net realized gain |
(10.50 ) |
(6.95 ) |
(1.56 ) |
(2.62 ) |
(2.22 ) |
| Total distributions |
(10.69 ) |
(7.30 ) |
(1.96 ) |
(3.06 ) |
(2.45 ) |
| Net asset value, end of period |
$61.73 |
$63.41 |
$57.63 |
$49.97 |
$60.72 |
| Total return2 |
14.19% |
22.37% |
19.39% |
(12.64 )% |
23.34% |
| Net assets, end of period (millions) |
$332 |
$323 |
$265 |
$221 |
$256 |
| Ratios to average net assets: |
|
|
|
|
|
| Gross expenses |
0.95% |
0.95% |
0.97% |
0.97% |
0.97% |
| Net expenses3,4 |
0.95 |
0.95 |
0.97 |
0.97 |
0.97 |
| Net investment income |
0.27 |
0.46 |
0.74 |
0.73 |
0.47 |
| Portfolio turnover rate |
30% |
17% |
10% |
9% |
12% |
Fort Wayne, Indiana 46802
| |
Standard Class |
Service Class |
| Management Fee |
|
|
| Distribution and/or Service (12b-1) Fees |
|
|
| Other Expenses1 |
|
|
| Total Annual Fund Operating Expenses |
|
|
| Less Fee Waiver and/or Expense Reimbursement2 |
( |
( |
| Total Annual Fund Operating Expenses (After Fee Waiver/Expense Reimbursement) |
|
|
| |
1 year |
3 years |
| Standard Class |
$ |
$ |
| Service Class |
$ |
$ |
| |
|
|
| |
|
- |
| |
1 year |
5 years |
10 years |
| LVIP ClearBridge Dividend Strategy Fund -Class II shares |
% |
% |
% |
| LVIP ClearBridge Dividend Strategy Fund -Class I shares |
% |
% |
% |
| Russell 3000 Index (reflects no deduction for fees, expenses or taxes) |
% |
% |
% |
| S&P 500 Index (reflects no deduction for fees, expenses or taxes) |
% |
% |
% |
| Russell 3000 Value Index (reflects no deduction for fees, expenses or taxes) |
% |
% |
% |
| ClearBridge Portfolio Managers |
Company Title |
Experience with Fund* |
| John Baldi |
Managing Director and Portfolio Manager |
Since 2019 |
| Michael Clarfeld, CFA |
Managing Director and Portfolio Manager |
Since 2009 |
| Adviser |
The aggregate advisory fee paid to the predecessor fund’s investment manager for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2025 was 0.70% of the predecessor fund’s average daily net assets. |
| Sub-Adviser |
ClearBridge Investments, LLC (“ClearBridge”), is located at One Madison Avenue, New York, New York, 10010. ClearBridge is a wholly owned subsidiary of Franklin Resources, Inc., a publicly traded company listed on the New York Stock Exchange (NYSE:BEN). As of December 31, 2025, ClearBridge’s total assets under management were approximately $212 billion, including $45.2 billion for which ClearBridge provides non-discretionary investment models to managed account sponsors. |
| ClearBridge Portfolio Managers |
John Baldi and Michael Clarfeld are responsible for the day-to-day management of the Fund’s assets. |
| |
John Baldi, is a Managing Director and Portfolio Manager of ClearBridge and has 27 years of industry experience. He joined ClearBridge or its predecessor in 2004. |
| |
Michael Clarfeld, CFA, is a Managing Director and Portfolio Manager of ClearBridge and has 25 years of industry experience. He has been with ClearBridge since 2006. Prior to joining ClearBridge, Mr. Clarfeld was an equity analyst with Hygrove Partners, LLC and a financial analyst with Goldman Sachs. |
| |
ClearBridge Variable Dividend Strategy Portfolio Standard Class | ||||
| |
Year Ended | ||||
| Standard Class Shares1 |
2025 |
2024 |
2023 |
2022 |
2021 |
| Net asset value, beginning of period |
$21.20 |
$20.44 |
$21.18 |
$25.62 |
$22.10 |
| Income (loss) from operations: |
|
|
|
|
|
| Net investment income |
0.33 |
0.32 |
0.38 |
0.44 |
0.30 |
| Net realized and unrealized gain (loss) |
2.27 |
3.17 |
2.44 |
(2.54 ) |
5.57 |
| Total income (loss) from operations |
2.60 |
3.49 |
2.82 |
(2.10 ) |
5.87 |
| Less distributions from: |
|
|
|
|
|
| Net investment income |
(0.48 ) |
(0.29 ) |
(0.46 ) |
(0.33 ) |
(0.39 ) |
| Net realized gain |
(3.07 ) |
(2.44 ) |
(3.10 ) |
(2.01 ) |
(1.96 ) |
| Total distributions |
(3.55 ) |
(2.73 ) |
(3.56 ) |
(2.34 ) |
(2.35 ) |
| Net asset value, end of period |
$20.25 |
$21.20 |
$20.44 |
$21.18 |
$25.62 |
| Total return2 |
12.62% |
16.85% |
14.20% |
(8.10 )% |
26.80% |
| Net assets, end of period (millions) |
$116 |
$116 |
$110 |
$107 |
$122 |
| Ratios to average net assets: |
|
|
|
|
|
| Gross expenses |
0.75% |
0.75% |
0.75% |
0.74% |
0.75% |
| Net expenses3,4 |
0.75 |
0.75 |
0.75 |
0.74 |
0.75 |
| Net investment income |
1.50 |
1.46 |
1.78 |
1.89 |
1.20 |
| Portfolio turnover rate |
27% |
20% |
16% |
15% |
10% |
| |
ClearBridge Variable Dividend Strategy Portfolio Service Class | ||||
| |
Year Ended | ||||
| Service Class Shares1 |
2025 |
2024 |
2023 |
2022 |
2021 |
| Net asset value, beginning of period |
$21.33 |
$20.55 |
$21.28 |
$25.72 |
$22.18 |
| Income (loss) from operations: |
|
|
|
|
|
| Net investment income |
0.30 |
0.29 |
0.35 |
0.40 |
0.26 |
| Net realized and unrealized gain (loss) |
2.29 |
3.19 |
2.45 |
(2.54 ) |
5.59 |
| Total income (loss) from operations |
2.59 |
3.48 |
2.80 |
(2.14 ) |
5.85 |
| Less distributions from: |
|
|
|
|
|
| Net investment income |
(0.43 ) |
(0.26 ) |
(0.43 ) |
(0.29 ) |
(0.35 ) |
| Net realized gain |
(3.07 ) |
(2.44 ) |
(3.10 ) |
(2.01 ) |
(1.96 ) |
| Total distributions |
(3.50 ) |
(2.70 ) |
(3.53 ) |
(2.30 ) |
(2.31 ) |
| Net asset value, end of period |
$20.42 |
$21.33 |
$20.55 |
$21.18 |
$25.72 |
| Total return2 |
12.46% |
16.69% |
14.01% |
(8.23 )% |
26.61% |
| Net assets, end of period (millions) |
$340 |
$332 |
$320 |
$306 |
$437 |
| Ratios to average net assets: |
|
|
|
|
|
| Gross expenses |
1.00% |
1.00% |
1.00% |
0.99% |
0.99% |
| Net expenses3,4 |
0.90 |
0.90 |
0.90 |
0.89 |
0.89 |
| Net investment income |
1.35 |
1.31 |
1.63 |
1.72 |
1.06 |
| Portfolio turnover rate |
27% |
20% |
16% |
15% |
10% |
Fort Wayne, Indiana 46802
| |
Standard Class |
Service Class |
| Management Fee |
|
|
| Distribution and/or Service (12b-1) Fees |
|
|
| Other Expenses1 |
|
|
| Total Annual Fund Operating Expenses |
|
|
| Less Fee Waiver and/or Expense Reimbursement2 |
( |
( |
| Total Annual Fund Operating Expenses (After Fee Waiver/Expense Reimbursement) |
|
|
| |
1 year |
3 years |
| Standard Class |
|
$ |
| Service Class |
$ |
$ |
| |
|
|
| |
|
- |
| |
1 year |
5 years |
10 years |
Since Inception |
Inception Date |
| LVIP ClearBridge Large Cap Growth Fund -Class I shares |
% |
% |
% |
|
|
| LVIP ClearBridge Large Cap Growth Fund -Class II shares |
% |
% |
|
% |
|
| Russell 3000 Index (reflects no deduction for fees, expenses or taxes) 1 |
% |
% |
% |
|
|
| Russell 1000 Growth Index (reflects no deduction for fees, expenses or taxes) 2 |
% |
% |
% |
|
|
| ClearBridge Portfolio Managers |
Company Title |
Experience with Fund* |
| Erica Furfaro |
Director and Portfolio Manager |
Since 2024 |
| Margaret Vitrano |
Managing Director and Portfolio Manager |
Since 2012 |
| Adviser |
The aggregate advisory fee paid to the predecessor fund’s investment manager for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2025 was 0.70% of the predecessor fund’s average daily net assets. |
| Sub-Adviser |
ClearBridge Investments, LLC (“ClearBridge”), is located at One Madison Avenue, New York, New York, 10010. ClearBridge is a wholly owned subsidiary of Franklin Resources, Inc., a publicly traded company listed on the New York Stock Exchange (NYSE:BEN). As of December 31, 2025, ClearBridge’s total assets under management were approximately $212 billion, including $45.2 billion for which ClearBridge provides non-discretionary investment models to managed account sponsors. |
| ClearBridge Portfolio Managers |
Erica Furfaro and Margaret Vitrano are responsible for the day-to-day management of the Fund’s assets. |
| |
Erica Furfaro, is a Director and Portfolio Manager of ClearBridge. Ms. Furfaro joined ClearBridge in 2019. Prior to joining ClearBridge, she worked as a Sector Head at Millennium Partners, an Analyst at York Capital Management, an Analyst at the Carlyle Group, and an Investment Banking Analyst at Merrill Lynch & Co. Ms. Furfaro has 20 years of investment industry experience. |
| |
Margaret Vitrano, is a Managing Director and Portfolio Manager of ClearBridge. Previously, she was a Senior Research Analyst for Information Technology and Communications of ClearBridge from 2007 to 2012. Ms. Vitrano joined the subadviser or its predecessor in 2003. Prior to that, she was a Director of CGMI and a research analyst at Citigroup. Ms. Vitrano has 29 years of investment industry experience. |
| |
ClearBridge Variable Large Cap Growth Portfolio Standard Class | ||||
| |
Year Ended | ||||
| Standard Class Shares1 |
2025 |
2024 |
2023 |
2022 |
2021 |
| Net asset value, beginning of period |
$47.43 |
$38.67 |
$27.07 |
$43.22 |
$37.72 |
| Income (loss) from operations: |
|
|
|
|
|
| Net investment income |
(0.07 ) |
(0.01 ) |
0.02 |
(0.02 ) |
(0.07 ) |
| Net realized and unrealized gain (loss) |
4.16 |
10.88 |
11.88 |
(13.92 ) |
8.31 |
| Total income (loss) from operations |
4.09 |
10.87 |
11.90 |
(13.94 ) |
8.24 |
| Less distributions from: |
|
|
|
|
|
| Net investment income |
— |
— |
— |
— |
— |
| Net realized gain |
(3.42 ) |
(2.11 ) |
(0.30 ) |
(2.21 ) |
(2.74 ) |
| Total distributions |
(3.42 ) |
(2.11 ) |
(0.30 ) |
(2.21 ) |
(2.74 ) |
| Net asset value, end of period |
$48.10 |
$47.43 |
$38.67 |
$27.07 |
$43.22 |
| Total return2 |
8.62% |
27.89% |
44.02% |
(32.24 )% |
21.94% |
| Net assets, end of period (millions) |
$168 |
$174 |
$152 |
$115 |
$189 |
| Ratios to average net assets: |
|
|
|
|
|
| Gross expenses |
0.74% |
0.74% |
0.75% |
0.75% |
0.75% |
| Net expenses3,4 |
0.74 |
0.74 |
0.75 |
0.75 |
0.75 |
| Net investment income |
(0.15 ) |
(0.03 ) |
0.06 |
(0.05 ) |
(0.18 ) |
| Portfolio turnover rate |
23% |
14% |
13% |
21% |
16% |
| |
ClearBridge Variable Large Cap Growth Portfolio Service Class | ||||
| |
Year Ended | ||||
| Service Class Shares1 |
2025 |
2024 |
2023 |
2022 |
2021 |
| Net asset value, beginning of period |
$46.54 |
$38.07 |
$26.72 |
$42.81 |
$37.48 |
| Income (loss) from operations: |
|
|
|
|
|
| Net investment income |
(0.19 ) |
(0.13 ) |
(0.06 ) |
(0.09 ) |
(0.17 ) |
| Net realized and unrealized gain (loss) |
4.08 |
10.71 |
11.71 |
(13.79 ) |
8.24 |
| Total income (loss) from operations |
3.89 |
10.58 |
11.65 |
(13.88 ) |
8.07 |
| Less distributions from: |
|
|
|
|
|
| Net investment income |
— |
— |
— |
— |
— |
| Net realized gain |
(3.42 ) |
(2.11 ) |
(0.30 ) |
(2.21 ) |
(2.74 ) |
| Total distributions |
(3.42 ) |
(2.11 ) |
(0.30 ) |
(2.21 ) |
(2.74 ) |
| Net asset value, end of period |
$47.01 |
$46.54 |
$38.07 |
$26.72 |
$42.81 |
| Total return2 |
8.35% |
27.56% |
43.66% |
(32.42 )% |
21.63% |
| Net assets, end of period (millions) |
$406 |
$379 |
$325 |
$214 |
$296 |
| Ratios to average net assets: |
|
|
|
|
|
| Gross expenses |
0.99% |
0.99% |
1.00% |
1.00% |
0.99% |
| Net expenses3,4 |
0.99 |
0.99 |
1.00 |
1.00 |
0.99 |
| Net investment income |
(0.40 ) |
(0.28 ) |
(0.19 ) |
(0.30 ) |
(0.42 ) |
| Portfolio turnover rate |
23% |
14% |
13% |
21% |
16% |
Fort Wayne, Indiana 46802
| |
Standard Class |
Service Class |
| Management Fee |
|
|
| Distribution and/or Service (12b-1) Fees |
|
|
| Other Expenses1 |
|
|
| Total Annual Fund Operating Expenses |
|
|
| Less Fee Waiver and/or Expense Reimbursement2 |
( |
( |
| Total Annual Fund Operating Expenses (After Fee Waiver/Expense Reimbursement) |
|
|
| |
1 year |
3 years |
| Standard Class |
$ |
$ |
| Service Class |
$ |
$ |
| |
|
|
| |
|
- |
| |
1 year |
5 years |
10 years |
| LVIP ClearBridge Large Cap Value Fund -Class I shares |
% |
% |
% |
| Russell 3000 Index (reflects no deduction for fees, expenses or taxes) |
% |
% |
% |
| Russell 1000 Value Index (reflects no deduction for fees, expenses or taxes) |
% |
% |
% |
| S&P 500 Index (reflects no deduction for fees, expenses or taxes) |
% |
% |
% |
| ClearBridge Portfolio Managers |
Company Title |
Experience with Fund* |
| Dmitry Khaykin |
Managing Director and Portfolio Manager |
Since 2007 |
| Deepon Nag |
Director and Portfolio Manager |
Since 2023 |
| Adviser |
The aggregate advisory fee paid to the predecessor fund’s investment manager for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2025 was 0.65% of the predecessor fund’s average daily net assets. |
| Sub-Adviser |
ClearBridge Investments, LLC (“ClearBridge”), is located at One Madison Avenue, New York, New York, 10010. ClearBridge is a wholly owned subsidiary of Franklin Resources, Inc., a publicly traded company listed on the New York Stock Exchange (NYSE:BEN). As of December 31, 2025, ClearBridge’s total assets under management were approximately $212 billion, including $45.2 billion for which ClearBridge provides non-discretionary investment models to managed account sponsors. |
| ClearBridge Portfolio Managers |
Dmitry Khayki and Deepon Nag are responsible for the day-to-day management of the Fund’s assets. |
| |
Dmitry Khaykin, is a Managing Director and Portfolio Manager of ClearBridge and has 29 years of industry experience. Mr. Khaykin joined the subadviser or its predecessor in 2003 and was previously a research analyst for the telecommunications sector at Gabelli & Company, Inc. and an associate in the risk management division of Morgan Stanley & Co., Inc. |
| |
Deepon Nag, is a Director and Portfolio Manager of ClearBridge with 16 years of industry experience. Mr. Nag joined ClearBridge in 2016 as a Senior Sector Analyst. Prior to joining ClearBridge, he was a Senior Research Analyst at Millennium Partners and a Lead Software Engineer in Design Automation at Intel Corp. |
| |
ClearBridge Variable Large Cap Value Portfolio Standard Class | ||||
| |
Year Ended | ||||
| Standard Class Shares1 |
2025 |
2024 |
2023 |
2022 |
2021 |
| Net asset value, beginning of period |
$19.50 |
$21.21 |
$20.15 |
$22.74 |
$19.84 |
| Income (loss) from operations: |
|
|
|
|
|
| Net investment income |
0.22 |
0.25 |
0.27 |
0.26 |
0.24 |
| Net realized and unrealized gain (loss) |
1.69 |
1.54 |
2.68 |
(1.77 ) |
4.90 |
| Total income (loss) from operations |
1.91 |
1.79 |
2.95 |
(1.51 ) |
5.14 |
| Less distributions from: |
|
|
|
|
|
| Net investment income |
(0.23 ) |
(0.27 ) |
(0.28 ) |
(0.28 ) |
(0.24 ) |
| Net realized gain |
(2.00 ) |
(3.23 ) |
(1.61 ) |
(0.80 ) |
(2.00 ) |
| Total distributions |
(2.23 ) |
(3.50 ) |
(1.89 ) |
(1.08 ) |
(2.24 ) |
| Net asset value, end of period |
$19.18 |
$19.50 |
$21.21 |
$20.15 |
$22.74 |
| Total return2 |
10.20% |
8.08% |
15.09% |
(6.43 )% |
26.21% |
| Net assets, end of period (millions) |
$271 |
$271 |
$285 |
$277 |
$323 |
| Ratios to average net assets: |
|
|
|
|
|
| Gross expenses |
0.73% |
0.72% |
0.72% |
0.71% |
0.71% |
| Net expenses3,4 |
0.73 |
0.72 |
0.72 |
0.71 |
0.71 |
| Net investment income |
1.10 |
1.16 |
1.31 |
1.25 |
1.04 |
| Portfolio turnover rate |
19% |
17% |
23% |
9% |
16% |
Table of Contents
Lincoln Variable Insurance Products Trust
LVIP ClearBridge Appreciation Fund
LVIP ClearBridge Dividend Strategy Fund
LVIP ClearBridge Large Cap Growth Fund
LVIP ClearBridge Large Cap Value Fund
1301 South Harrison Street
Fort Wayne, Indiana 46802
Statement of Additional Information April 24, 2026
This Statement of Additional Information (SAI), which is not a prospectus, provides more information about the series named in the caption — referred to as “Funds”—of Lincoln Variable Insurance Products Trust. Each Fund offers two classes of shares: Standard Class and Service Class.
In reorganization transactions that occurred on April 24, 2026 (each a “Reorganization” and, collectively, the “Reorganizations”), the LVIP ClearBridge Appreciation Fund LVIP ClearBridge Dividend Strategy Fund, LVIP ClearBridge Large Cap Growth Fund, and LVIP ClearBridge Large Cap Value Fund Standard Class (each a “Fund”, together the “Funds”) acquired and assumed the performance, financial and other historical information of the ClearBridge Variable Appreciation Portfolio, ClearBridge Variable Dividend Strategy Portfolio, ClearBridge Variable Large Cap Growth Portfolio, and ClearBridge Variable Large Cap Value Portfolio Class I, each formerly a series of the Legg Mason Partners Variable Equity Trust (each a “Predecessor Fund,” together the “Predecessor Funds”). Accordingly, information provided in this SAI for the Funds that relates to periods prior to April 24, 2026, is that of the Predecessor Funds.
Since the Funds are new, the most recent Form N-CSR, which contains each Fund’s audited financial statements, will not be available until December 31, 2026. Each Predecessor Fund’s audited financial statements for the fiscal year ended, December 31, 2025, are available upon request. This SAI should be read in conjunction with each Fund’s prospectus dated April 24, 2026, as may be amended or supplemented. You may obtain copies of the Funds’ prospectus, annual and semi-annual reports, and other information such as the Funds’ financial statements upon request and without charge. Please write The Lincoln National Life Insurance Company, P.O. Box 2340, Fort Wayne, Indiana 46801 or call 866-436-8717.
Table of Contents
[THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK]
Table of Contents
Table of Contents
| Item | Page | |||
| 4 | ||||
| 4 | ||||
| 5 | ||||
| 5 | ||||
| 50 | ||||
| 52 | ||||
| 53 | ||||
| 61 | ||||
| 63 | ||||
| 67 | ||||
| 67 | ||||
| 67 | ||||
| 67 | ||||
| 68 | ||||
| 68 | ||||
| 69 | ||||
| 69 | ||||
| 70 | ||||
| 70 | ||||
| 71 | ||||
| 73 | ||||
| 73 | ||||
| 73 | ||||
| 73 | ||||
| 73 | ||||
| 77 | ||||
| 79 | ||||
| Appendix C — Compensation Structures and Methodologies of Portfolio Managers |
83 | |||
3
Table of Contents
Description of the Trust and the Funds
Lincoln Variable Insurance Products Trust (the “Trust”), a Delaware statutory trust formed on February 1, 2003, is an open-end management investment company.
Each of the Funds, except the LVIP ClearBridge Appreciation Fund and the LVIP ClearBridge Large Cap Growth Fund (the “Non-Diversified Funds”), is diversified within the meaning of the Investment Company Act of 1940 (“1940 Act”). A “non-diversified” fund can invest a greater percentage of its assets in a limited number of issuers or in any one issuer.
References to “Adviser” in this SAI include both Lincoln Financial Investments Corporation (“LFI”) and the Funds’ sub-adviser (if applicable) unless the context otherwise indicates.
Fundamental Investment Restrictions
Each of the Funds has adopted certain fundamental policies and investment restrictions which may not be changed without a majority vote of a Fund’s outstanding shares. Such majority is defined in the 1940 Act as the vote of the lesser of (1) 67% or more of the outstanding voting securities present at a meeting, if the holders of more than 50% of the outstanding voting securities are present in person or by proxy, or (2) more than 50% of the outstanding voting securities. For purposes of the following restrictions: (a) all percentage limitations apply immediately after the making of an investment; and (b) any subsequent change in any applicable percentage resulting from market fluctuations does not require elimination of any security from the portfolio (except for fundamental investment restriction 2 regarding borrowing).
Each Fund may not:
| 1. | Make investments that will result in the concentration — as that term may be defined in the 1940 Act, any rule or order thereunder, or official interpretation thereof — of its investments in the securities of issuers primarily engaged in the same industry, provided that this restriction does not limit the Fund from investing in obligations issued or guaranteed by the U.S. Government, its agencies or instrumentalities, or in tax-exempt securities or certificates of deposit. |
| 2. | Borrow money or issue senior securities, except as the 1940 Act, any rule or order thereunder, or official interpretation thereof, may permit. |
| 3. | Underwrite the securities of other issuers, except that the Funds may engage in transactions involving the acquisition, disposition or resale of its portfolio securities, under circumstances where it may be considered to be an underwriter under the Securities Act of 1933. |
| 4. | Purchase or sell real estate, unless acquired as a result of ownership of securities or other instruments and provided that this restriction does not prevent the Fund from investing in issuers which invest, deal, or otherwise engage in transactions in real estate or interests therein, or investing in securities that are secured by real estate or interests therein. |
| 5. | Purchase or sell physical commodities, unless acquired as a result of ownership of securities or other instruments and provided that this restriction does not prevent the Fund from investing in securities that are secured by physical commodities or engaging in transactions involving financial commodities, such as financial options, financial futures contracts, options on financial futures contracts, and financial forward contracts. |
| 6. | Make loans of any security or make any other loan if, as a result, more than 331⁄3% of its total assets would be lent to other parties, provided that this limitation does not apply to purchases of debt obligations, to repurchase agreements, and to investments in loans, including assignments and participation interests. |
| 7. | (Except for the Non-Diversified Funds) With respect to 75% of its total assets, invest in a security if, as a result of such investment: (a) more than 5% of its total assets would be invested in the securities of any one issuer or (b) the fund would hold more than 10% of the outstanding voting securities of any one issuer; except that |
4
Table of Contents
| these restrictions do not apply to (i) securities issued or guaranteed by the U.S. Government or its agencies or instrumentalities or (ii) securities of other investment companies. |
The Securities and Exchange Commission’s (“SEC”) staff has taken the position that, for purposes of the concentration disclosure requirement, a fund investing more than 25% of its assets in an industry may be concentrating in that industry. See Registration Form Used by Open-End Management Investment Companies, Investment Company Act Release No. 23064 (Mar. 13, 1998), at note 163. Notwithstanding fundamental investment restriction 1 above, a Fund may concentrate in a particular industry to the extent that such concentration results from the Funds’ tracking or replication of an index.
The 1940 Act generally permits an open-end fund to borrow money in amounts of up to one-third of the Funds’ total assets from banks, and to borrow up to 5% of the Funds’ total assets from banks or other lenders for temporary purposes. To limit the risks attendant to borrowing, the 1940 Act generally requires an open-end fund to maintain at all times an “asset coverage” of at least 300% of the amount of its borrowings. Asset coverage generally means the ratio that the value of a fund’s total assets, minus liabilities other than borrowings, bears to the aggregate amount of all borrowings.
“Senior securities” are generally fund obligations that have a priority over the Funds’ shares with respect to the payment of dividends or the distribution of fund assets. The 1940 Act generally prohibits an open-end fund from issuing senior securities, except that a fund may borrow money in amounts of up to one-third of the Funds’ total assets from banks. A fund also may borrow an amount equal to up to 5% of the Funds’ total assets from banks or other lenders for temporary purposes, and these borrowings would not be considered senior securities.
Manager of Managers
The Funds employ a “manager of managers” structure, which means that the Funds’ investment adviser may delegate the management of some or all of the Funds’ investment portfolio to one or more sub-advisers. To use this structure, the Trust has received an exemptive order from the SEC (“SEC Investment Company Act Rel. Nos. 29170 and 29197) to permit the Funds’ investment adviser – with Board approval – to enter into and amend a sub-advisory agreement for a Fund without shareholder approval, subject to certain conditions. For example, within ninety days of the hiring of a new sub-adviser, a Fund is required to furnish shareholders with information that would be included in a proxy statement regarding the new sub-adviser. In addition, the Funds’ Adviser is not permitted to hire affiliated sub-advisers without shareholder approval.
The Fund has also received an SEC exemptive order (SEC Investment Company Rel. Nos. 34727 and 34749) which permits the Funds’ Board of Trustees to approve new sub-advisory agreements or material amendments to an existing sub-advisory agreement at a meeting that is not in person, provided that the conditions of the order are satisfied. These conditions include, among others, the requirements that: (i) the Trustees will be able to participate in the meeting using a means of communication that allows them to hear each other simultaneously during the meeting; (ii) management will represent that the materials provided to the Board include the same information the Board would have received if approval were sought at an in-person meeting; (iii) the need for considering the proposal at a non-in-person meeting will be explained to the Board; and (iv) the Trustees will have the opportunity to object to considering the proposal at a non-in-person meeting (in which case, the Board will consider the proposal at an in-person meeting unless the objection is rescinded).
Additional Investment Strategies and Risks
The principal investment strategies each Fund uses to pursue its investment objective and the risks of those strategies are discussed in the Funds’ prospectus.
Unless otherwise stated in the prospectus, investment strategies and techniques are generally discretionary. This means a Fund’s Adviser may elect to engage or not engage in various strategies and techniques in its sole discretion. Investors should not assume that any particular discretionary investment technique or strategy will always or ever be employed by the Adviser to the Funds or by other mutual funds in which a Fund invests.
5
Table of Contents
Below describes additional information concerning the investment strategies that the Funds may employ, either principal or discretionary, and the risks of those investment strategies.
The Funds’ Investments
The following additional investment strategy and risk information relates to the Fund.
Bank Obligations
The Fund may invest in all types of bank obligations, including certificates of deposit (“CDs”), time deposits and bankers’ acceptances. CDs are short-term negotiable obligations of commercial banks. Time deposits are non-negotiable deposits maintained in banking institutions for specified periods of time at stated interest rates. Bankers’ acceptances are time drafts drawn on commercial banks by borrowers usually in connection with international transactions.
U.S. commercial banks organized under federal law are supervised and examined by the Comptroller of the Currency and are required to be members of the Federal Reserve System and to be insured by the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (the “FDIC”). U.S. banks organized under state law are supervised and examined by state banking authorities, but are members of the Federal Reserve System only if they elect to join. Most state banks are insured by the FDIC (although such insurance may not be of material benefit to the Fund, depending upon the principal amount of CDs of each bank held by the Fund) and are subject to federal examination and to a substantial body of federal law and regulation. As a result of federal and state laws and regulations, U.S. branches of U.S. banks are, among other things, generally required to maintain specified levels of reserves, and are subject to other supervision and regulation designed to promote financial soundness. Banks may be particularly susceptible to certain economic factors, such as interest rate changes and adverse developments in the market for real estate. Fiscal and monetary policy and general economic cycles can affect the availability and cost of funds, loan demand and asset quality and thereby impact the earnings and financial conditions of banks.
Obligations of foreign branches of U.S. banks, such as CDs and time deposits, may be general obligations of the parent bank in addition to the issuing branch, or may be limited by the terms of a specific obligation and governmental regulation. Such obligations are subject to different risks than are those of U.S. banks or U.S. branches of foreign banks. These risks relate to foreign economic and political developments, foreign governmental restrictions that may adversely affect payment of principal and interest on the obligations, foreign exchange controls and foreign withholding and other taxes on interest income. Foreign branches of U.S. banks and foreign branches of foreign banks are not necessarily subject to the same or similar regulatory requirements that apply to U.S. banks, such as mandatory reserve requirements, loan limitations and accounting, auditing and financial recordkeeping requirements. In addition, less information may be publicly available about a foreign branch of a U.S. bank or about a foreign bank than about a U.S. bank.
Obligations of U.S. branches of foreign banks may be general obligations of the parent bank, in addition to the issuing branch, or may be limited by the terms of a specific obligation and by federal and state regulation as well as governmental action in the country in which the foreign bank has its head office. A U.S. branch of a foreign bank with assets in excess of $1 billion may or may not be subject to reserve requirements imposed by the Federal Reserve System or by the state in which the branch is located if the branch is licensed in that state. In addition, branches licensed by the Comptroller of the Currency and branches licensed by certain states (“State Branches”) may or may not be required to: (a) pledge to the regulator, by depositing assets with a designated bank within the state; and (b) maintain assets within the state in an amount equal to a specified percentage of the aggregate amount of liabilities of the foreign bank payable at or through all of its agencies or branches within the state. The deposits of State Branches may not necessarily be insured by the FDIC. In addition, there may be less publicly available information about a U.S. branch of a foreign bank than about a U.S. bank.
Volatility in the banking system may impact the viability of banking and financial services institutions. In the event of failure of any of the financial institutions where the Fund maintains its cash and cash equivalents, there can be no assurance that the Fund would be able to access uninsured funds in a timely manner or at all and the Fund may incur losses. Any such event could adversely affect the business, liquidity, financial position and performance of the Fund.
6
Table of Contents
Benchmark Reference Rates Risk
Many debt securities, derivatives, and other financial instruments utilize benchmark or reference rates for variable interest rate calculations, including the Euro Interbank Offer Rate, Sterling Overnight Index Average Rate, and the Secured Overnight Financing Rate (each a “Reference Rate”). Instruments in which the Fund invests may pay interest at floating rates based on such Reference Rates or may be subject to interest caps or floors based on such Reference Rates. The Fund and issuers of instruments in which the Fund invests may also obtain financing at floating rates based on such Reference Rates. The elimination of a Reference Rate or any other changes to or reforms of the determination or supervision of Reference Rates could have an adverse impact on the market for, or value of, any instruments or payments linked to those Reference Rates.
For example, some Reference Rates, as well as other types of rates and indices, are described as “benchmarks” and have been the subject of ongoing national and international regulatory reform, including under the European Union regulation on indices used as benchmarks in financial instruments and financial contracts (known as the “Benchmarks Regulation”). The Benchmarks Regulation has been enacted into United Kingdom law by virtue of the European Union (Withdrawal) Act 2018 (as amended), subject to amendments made by the Benchmarks (Amendment and Transitional Provision) (EU Exit) Regulations 2019 (SI 2019/657) and other statutory instruments. Following the implementation of these reforms, the manner of administration of benchmarks has changed and may further change in the future, with the result that relevant benchmarks may perform differently than in the past, the use of benchmarks that are not compliant with the new standards by certain supervised entities may be restricted, and certain benchmarks may be eliminated entirely. Such changes could cause increased market volatility and disruptions in liquidity for instruments that rely on or are impacted by such benchmarks. Additionally, there could be other consequences which cannot be predicted.
Commercial Paper
Commercial paper (including variable amount master demand notes and funding agreements) consists of short-term, unsecured promissory notes issued by corporations, partnerships, trusts and other entities to finance short-term credit needs.
Common Stock
Common stocks are shares of ownership in a corporation or other entity that entitle the holder to a pro rata share of the profits of the corporation, if any, distributed as dividends to holders of common stock, without preference over any other shareholder or class of shareholders, including holders of the entity’s preferred stock and other senior equity securities. Common stock usually carries with it the right to vote and frequently an exclusive right to do so.
Convertible Securities
Convertible securities are fixed income securities (usually debt or preferred stock) that may be converted or exchanged for a prescribed amount of common stock or other equity securities of the same or a different issuer within a particular period of time at a specified price or formula. A convertible security entitles the holder to receive interest paid or accrued on debt or the dividend paid on preferred stock until the convertible security matures or is redeemed, converted or exchanged. Before conversion or exchange, convertible securities ordinarily provide a stream of income with generally higher yields than those of common stocks of the same or similar issuers, but lower than the yield of nonconvertible debt. However, there can be no assurance of current income because the issuers of the convertible securities may default on their obligations. Convertible securities are usually subordinated to comparable nonconvertible debt or preferred stock, but rank senior to common stock in a corporation’s capital structure.
The value of a convertible security is generally related to (1) its yield in comparison with the yields of other securities of comparable maturity and quality that do not have a conversion privilege and/or (2) its worth, at market value, if converted or exchanged into the underlying common stock. A convertible security may be subject to redemption at the option of the issuer at a price established in the convertible security’s governing instrument, which may be less than the ultimate conversion or exchange value.
7
Table of Contents
Convertible securities are subject to stock market and other risks associated with equity securities, as well as credit, interest rate and other risks associated with fixed income securities. As the market price of the equity security underlying a convertible security falls, the convertible security tends to trade on the basis of its yield and other fixed income characteristics. As the market price of such equity security rises, the convertible security tends to trade on the basis of its equity conversion features. Investments in convertible securities generally entail less risk than investments in common stock of the same issuer.
Synthetic Convertible Securities
A synthetic convertible security is comprised of two distinct securities that together resemble convertible securities in certain respects. Synthetic convertible securities are created by combining non-convertible bonds or preferred shares with common stocks, warrants or stock call options. The options that will form elements of synthetic convertible securities will be listed on a securities exchange. The two components of a synthetic convertible security, which will be issued with respect to the same entity, generally are not offered as a unit, and may be purchased and sold by the Fund at different times. Synthetic convertible securities differ from convertible securities in certain respects, including that each component of a synthetic convertible security has a separate market value and responds differently to market fluctuations. Investing in synthetic convertible securities involves the risk normally involved in holding the securities comprising the synthetic convertible security.
Custodial Receipts
The Fund may acquire custodial receipts or certificates underwritten by securities dealers or banks that evidence ownership of future interest payments, principal payments or both on certain municipal obligations. The underwriter of these certificates or receipts typically purchases municipal obligations and deposits the obligations in an irrevocable trust or custodial account with a custodian bank, which then issues receipts or certificates that evidence ownership of the periodic unmatured coupon payments and the final principal payment on the obligations. Although under the terms of a custodial receipt, the Fund would be typically authorized to assert its rights directly against the issuer of the underlying obligation, the Fund could be required to assert through the custodian bank those rights as may exist against the underlying issuer. Thus, in the event the underlying issuer fails to pay principal and/or interest when due, the Fund may be subject to delays, expenses and risks that are greater than those that would have been involved if the Fund had purchased a direct obligation of the issuer. In addition, in the event that the trust or custodial account in which the underlying security has been deposited is determined to be an association taxable as a corporation for U.S. federal income tax purposes, the yield on the underlying security would be reduced by any entity-level corporate taxes paid by the issuer.
Custodial receipts may also evidence ownership of future interest payments, principal payments or both on certain U.S. government obligations. Such obligations are held in custody by a bank on behalf of the owners. Custodial receipts are generally not considered obligations of the U.S. government for purposes of securities laws.
Cybersecurity Risk
Like other funds and business enterprises, the Fund, the Adviser and the Subadviser and their service providers are subject to the risk of cyber incidents occurring from time to time. With the increased use of technologies such as mobile devices and Web-based or “cloud” applications, and the dependence on the Internet and computer systems to conduct business, the Fund, the Adviser, the Subadviser, and other service providers are susceptible to operational, information security and related risks. In general, cybersecurity incidents can result from deliberate attacks or unintentional events (arising from external or internal sources) that may cause the Fund, the Adviser and the Subadviser and/or their service providers to lose proprietary information, suffer data corruption, physical damage to a computer or network system or lose operational capacity. Cybersecurity attacks include, but are not limited to, infection by malicious software, such as malware or computer viruses or gaining unauthorized access to digital systems, networks or devices that are used to service the Fund’s operations (e.g., through “hacking,” “phishing” or malicious software coding) or other means for purposes of misappropriating assets or sensitive information, corrupting data, or causing operational disruption. Cybersecurity attacks may also be carried out in a manner that does not require gaining unauthorized access, such as causing denial-of-service attacks on the Fund’s websites (i.e., efforts to make network services unavailable to intended users). Recently, geopolitical tensions may
8
Table of Contents
have increased the scale and sophistication of deliberate cybersecurity attacks, particularly those from nation-states or from entities with nation-state backing. In addition, authorized persons could inadvertently or intentionally release confidential or proprietary information stored on the Fund’s systems.
Cybersecurity incidents affecting the Fund’s Adviser, the Subadviser, and other service providers to the Fund or its shareholders (including, but not limited to, Fund accountants, custodians, sub-custodians, transfer agents and financial intermediaries) have the ability to cause disruptions and impact business operations, potentially resulting in financial losses to both the Fund and its shareholders, interference with the Fund’s ability to calculate its net asset value, impediments to trading, the inability of Fund shareholders to transact business and the Fund to process transactions (including fulfillment of Fund share purchases and redemptions), violations of applicable privacy and other laws (including the release of private shareholder information) and attendant breach notification and credit monitoring costs, regulatory fines, penalties, litigation costs, reputational damage, reimbursement or other compensation costs, forensic investigation and remediation costs, and/or additional compliance costs. Similar adverse consequences could result from cybersecurity incidents affecting issuers of securities in which the Fund invests, counterparties with which the Fund engages in transactions, governmental and other regulatory authorities, exchange and other financial market operators, banks, brokers, dealers, insurance companies and other financial institutions (including financial intermediaries and other service providers) and other parties. In addition, substantial costs may be incurred in order to safeguard against and reduce the risk of any cybersecurity incidents in the future. In addition to administrative, technological and procedural safeguards, the Fund’s Adviser and the Subadviser have established business continuity plans in the event of, and risk management systems to prevent or reduce the impact of, such cybersecurity incidents. However, there are inherent limitations in such plans and systems, including the possibility that certain risks have not been identified, as well as the rapid development of new threats. Furthermore, the Fund cannot control the cybersecurity plans and systems put in place by its service providers or any other third parties whose operations may affect the Fund and its shareholders. The Fund and its shareholders could be negatively impacted as a result.
New ways to carry out cyber attacks continue to develop. There is a chance that some risks have not been identified or prepared for, or that an attack may not be detected, which puts limitations on the Fund’s, the Adviser’s and the Subadviser’s and/or their service providers’ ability to plan for or respond to a cyber attack.
Debt and Fixed Income Securities
The Fund may invest in a variety of debt and fixed income securities, which may be issued by governmental, corporate or other issuers. Debt securities may pay fixed, floating or variable rates of interest or interest at a rate contingent upon some other factor. Variable rate securities reset at specified intervals, while floating rate securities reset whenever there is a change in a specified index rate. In most cases, these reset provisions reduce the effect of market interest rates on the value of the security. However, some securities do not track the underlying index directly, but reset based on formulas that can produce an effect similar to leveraging; others may provide for interest payments that vary inversely with market rates. The market prices of these securities may fluctuate significantly when interest rates change.
These securities share principal risks. For example, the level of interest income generated by the Fund’s fixed income investments may decline due to a decrease in market interest rates. Thus, when fixed income securities mature or are sold, they may be replaced by lower-yielding investments. Also, their values fluctuate with changes in interest rates. A decrease in interest rates will generally result in an increase in the value of the Fund’s fixed income investments. Conversely, during periods of rising interest rates, the value of the Fund’s fixed income investments will generally decline. However, a change in interest rates will not have the same impact on all fixed rate securities. For example, the magnitude of these fluctuations will generally be greater when the Fund’s duration or average maturity is longer. In addition, certain fixed income securities are subject to credit risk, which is the risk that an issuer of securities will be unable to pay principal and interest when due, or that the value of the security will suffer because investors believe the issuer is unable to pay. Recently, there have been inflationary price movements. As such, fixed income securities markets may experience heightened levels of interest rate volatility and liquidity risk.
Changing Interest Rates. In a low or negative interest rate environment, debt securities may trade at, or be issued with, negative yields, which means the purchaser of the security may receive at maturity less than the total amount
9
Table of Contents
invested. To the extent the Fund holds a negatively-yielding debt security or has a bank deposit with a negative interest rate, the Fund would generate a negative return on that investment. Cash positions may also subject the Fund to increased counterparty risk to the Fund’s bank. Debt market conditions are highly unpredictable and some parts of the market are subject to dislocations. In a low or negative interest rate environment, some investors may seek to reallocate assets to other income-producing assets. This may cause the price of such higher yielding instruments to rise, could further reduce the value of instruments with a negative yield, and may limit the Fund’s ability to locate fixed income instruments containing the desired risk/return profile. Changes in monetary or fiscal policy may exacerbate the risks associated with changing interest rates. In the past, the U.S. government and certain foreign central banks have taken steps to stabilize markets by, among other things, reducing interest rates. In recent years, the U.S. government implemented increases to the federal funds interest rate and there may be further rate increases or other actions which may increase market volatility to the extent inconsistent with general market expectations. As interest rates rise, there is risk that rates across the financial system also may rise. To the extent rates increase substantially and/or rapidly, the Fund may be subject to significant losses. Changing interest rates could have unpredictable effects on the markets and may expose fixed income markets to heightened volatility, increased redemptions, and potential illiquidity.
Fixed Income Securities Ratings. Securities rated in the fourth highest ratings category by a NRSRO, such as those rated BBB by S&P, or Baa by Moody’s, and unrated securities of comparable quality, are generally regarded as having adequate capacity to pay interest and repay principal but may have some speculative characteristics. Securities rated below the fourth highest ratings category by a NRSRO, including those rated below Baa by Moody’s or BBB by S&P, and unrated securities of comparable quality, are generally considered below “investment grade,” and may have speculative characteristics, including a greater possibility of default or bankruptcy of the issuers of such securities, market price volatility based upon interest rate sensitivity, questionable creditworthiness and relative liquidity of the secondary trading market. Changes in economic conditions or other circumstances are more likely to lead to a weakened capacity for lower rated securities to make principal and interest payments, including a greater possibility of default or bankruptcy of the issuer, than is the case for high rated securities.
Appendix B to this SAI contains further information concerning the rating categories of NRSROs and their significance.
Derivatives — Generally
A derivative is a financial instrument that has a value based on, or derived from, the value of one or more underlying reference instruments or measures of value or interest rates (“underlying instruments”), such as a security, a commodity, a currency, an index, an interest rate or a currency exchange rate. A derivative can also have a value based on the likelihood that an event will or will not occur. Derivatives include futures contracts, forward contracts, options and swaps.
The Fund may use derivatives for any purpose, including but not limited to, to attempt to enhance income, yield or return, as a substitute for investing directly in a security or asset, or as a hedging technique in an attempt to manage risk in the Fund’s portfolio. The Fund may choose not to make use of derivatives for a variety of reasons, and no assurance can be given that any derivatives strategy employed will be successful. The Fund’s use of derivative instruments may be limited from time to time by applicable law, availability or by policies adopted by the Board, Adviser or Subadviser (as applicable).
The Fund may utilize multiple derivative instruments and combinations of derivative instruments to seek to adjust the risk and return characteristics of its overall position. Combined positions will typically contain elements of risk that are present in each of its component transactions. It is possible that the combined position will not achieve its intended goal and will instead increase losses or risk to the Fund. Because combined positions involve multiple trades, they result in higher transaction costs and may be more difficult to open and close out.
The Fund may enter into derivatives with standardized terms that have no or few special or unusual components, which are generally traded on an exchange, as well as derivatives with more complex features, singly or in combination. Non- standardized derivatives are generally traded over the counter (“OTC”). OTC derivatives may be standardized or have customized features and may have limited or no liquidity. The Fund’s derivatives contracts
10
Table of Contents
may be centrally cleared or settled bilaterally directly with a counterparty. The Fund’s derivatives contracts may be cash settled or physically settled.
In addition to the instruments and strategies discussed in this section, additional opportunities in connection with derivatives and other similar or related techniques may become available to the Fund as a result of the development of new techniques, the development of new derivative instruments or a regulatory authority broadening the range of permitted transactions. The Fund may utilize these opportunities and techniques to the extent that they are consistent with the Fund’s investment objectives and permitted by its investment limitations and applicable regulatory authorities. These opportunities and techniques may involve risks different from or in addition to those summarized herein.
| • | Risks of Derivatives Generally. The use of derivatives involves special considerations and risks, certain of which are summarized below, and may result in losses to the Fund. In general, derivatives may increase the volatility of the Fund and may involve a small investment of cash relative to the magnitude of the risk or exposure assumed. Even a small investment in derivatives may magnify or otherwise increase investment losses to the Fund. |
| • | Market risk. Derivatives can be complex, and their success depends in part upon the portfolio manager’s ability to forecast correctly future market or other trends or occurrences or other financial or economic factors or the value of the underlying instrument. Even if the portfolio manager’s forecasts are correct, other factors may cause distortions or dislocations in the markets that result in losses or otherwise unsuccessful transactions. Derivatives may behave in unexpected ways, especially in abnormal or volatile market conditions. The market value of the derivative itself or the market value of underlying instruments may change in a way that is adverse to the Fund’s interest. There is no assurance that the use of derivatives will be advantageous to the Fund or that the portfolio manager will use derivatives to hedge at an appropriate time. |
| • | Illiquidity risk. The Fund’s ability to close out or unwind a derivative prior to expiration or maturity depends on the existence of a liquid market or, in the absence of such a market, the ability and willingness of the other party to the transaction (the “counterparty”) to enter into a transaction closing out the position. If there is no market or the Fund is not successful in its negotiations, the Fund may not be able to sell or unwind the derivative position at an advantageous or anticipated time or price. This may also be the case if the counterparty becomes insolvent. The Fund may be required to make delivery of portfolio securities or other underlying instruments in order to settle a position or to sell portfolio securities or assets at a disadvantageous time or price in order to obtain cash to settle the position. While a position remains open, the Fund continues to be subject to investment risk on a derivative. The Fund may or may not be able to take other actions or enter into other transactions, including hedging transactions, to limit or reduce its exposure to the derivative. Illiquidity risk may be enhanced if a derivative transaction is particularly large. Certain derivatives, including certain OTC options and swaps, may be considered illiquid and therefore subject to the Fund’s limitation on illiquid investments. |
| • | Leverage risk. Certain derivative transactions may have a leveraging effect on the Fund, meaning that the Fund can obtain significant investment exposure in return for meeting a relatively small margin or other investment requirement. An adverse change in the value of an underlying instrument can result in losses substantially greater than the amount invested in the derivative itself. When the Fund engages in transactions that have a leveraging effect, the value of the Fund is likely to be more volatile and certain other risks also are likely to be compounded. This is because leverage generally magnifies the effect of any increase or decrease in the value of an investment. Certain derivatives have the potential for unlimited loss, regardless of the size of the initial investment. |
| • | Margin risk. Certain derivatives require the Fund to make initial margin payments, a form of security deposit intended to protect against nonperformance of the derivative contract. The Fund may have to post additional margin (known as “variation margin”) if the value of the derivative position changes in a manner adverse to the Fund. Derivatives may be difficult to value, which may result in increased payment requirements to counterparties or a loss of value to the Fund. If the Fund has insufficient cash to meet additional margin requirements, it might need to sell securities at a disadvantageous time. |
| • | Speculation risk. Derivatives used for non-hedging purposes may result in losses which are not offset by increases in the value of portfolio holdings or declines in the cost of securities or other assets to be acquired. In the event that the Fund uses a derivative as an alternative to purchasing or selling other investments or in |
11
Table of Contents
| order to obtain desired exposure to an index or market, the Fund will be exposed to the same risks as are incurred in purchasing or selling the other investments directly, as well as the risks of the derivative transaction itself, such as counterparty risk. |
| • | Counterparty risk. Derivatives involve the risk of loss resulting from the actual or potential insolvency or bankruptcy of the counterparty or the failure by the counterparty to make required payments or otherwise comply with the terms of the contract. In the event of default by a counterparty (or its affiliates), the Fund may have contractual remedies pursuant to the agreements related to the transaction, which may be limited by applicable law in the case of the counterparty’s (or its affiliates’) bankruptcy. The Fund may not be able to recover amounts owed to it by an insolvent counterparty. |
| • | Operational risk. There may be incomplete or erroneous documentation or inadequate collateral or margin, or transactions may fail to settle. The Fund may have only contractual remedies in the event of a counterparty default, and there may be delays, costs or disagreements as to the meaning of contractual terms and litigation in enforcing those remedies. |
| • | OTC risk. Derivative transactions that are traded OTC, such as options, swaps, forward contracts, and options on foreign currencies, are entered into directly with counterparties or financial institutions acting as market makers, rather than being traded on exchanges or centrally cleared. Because OTC derivatives and other transactions are traded between counterparties based on contractual relationships, the Fund is subject to increased risk that its counterparty will not perform its obligations under the related contracts. Although the Fund intends to enter into transactions only with counterparties which the Fund believes to be creditworthy, there can be no assurance that a counterparty will not default and that the Fund will not sustain a loss on a transaction as a result. Information available on counterparty creditworthiness may be incomplete or outdated, thus reducing the ability to anticipate counterparty defaults. The Fund bears the risk of loss of the amount expected to be received under an OTC derivative in the event of the default or bankruptcy of the counterparty to the OTC derivative. When a counterparty’s obligations are not fully secured by collateral, then the Fund is essentially an unsecured creditor of the counterparty. If the counterparty defaults, the Fund will have contractual remedies, but there is no assurance that a counterparty will be able to meet its obligations pursuant to such contracts or that, in the event of default, the Fund will succeed in enforcing contractual remedies. Credit/counterparty risk still exists even if a counterparty’s obligations are secured by collateral because the Fund’s interest in collateral may not be perfected or additional collateral may not be promptly posted as required. Credit/counterparty risk also may be more pronounced if a counterparty’s obligations exceed the amount of collateral held by the Fund (if any), the Fund is unable to exercise its interest in collateral upon default by the counterparty, or the termination value of the instrument varies significantly from the marked-to-market value of the instrument. |
| • | Non-U.S. derivatives risk. Derivative transactions may be conducted OTC outside of the United States or traded on foreign exchanges. Such transactions may not be regulated as effectively as similar transactions in the United States, may not involve a clearing mechanism and related guarantees and are subject to the risk of governmental actions affecting trading in, or the price of, foreign securities or currencies. The value of such positions also could be adversely affected by (1) other foreign political, legal and economic factors, (2) lesser availability than in the United States of data on which to make trading decisions, (3) delays in the Fund’s ability to act upon economic events occurring in foreign markets during non- business hours in the United States, (4) the imposition of different exercise and settlement terms, procedures, margin requirements, fees, taxes or other charges than in the United States and (5) lesser trading volume. Counterparty risk and many of the risks of OTC derivatives transactions are also applicable to derivative transactions conducted outside the United States. |
| • | Currency derivatives risk. Currency related transactions may be negatively affected by factors such as government exchange controls, blockages, and manipulations. Exchange rates may be influenced by factors extrinsic to a country’s economy. Also, there is no systematic reporting of last sale information with respect to foreign currencies. As a result, the information on which trading in currency derivatives is based may not be as complete as, and may be delayed beyond, comparable data for other types of transactions. |
| • | Turnover risk. Use of derivatives involves transaction costs, which may be significant. The Fund may be required to sell or purchase investments in connection with derivative transactions, potentially increasing the |
12
Table of Contents
| Fund’s portfolio turnover rate and transaction costs. Use of derivatives also may increase the amount of taxable income to shareholders, if applicable. |
Risks Associated with Hedging with Derivatives. If the portfolio manager uses a hedging strategy at the wrong time or judges market conditions incorrectly, hedging strategies may reduce the Fund’s return. Successful use of derivatives to hedge positions depends on the correlation between the price of the derivative and the price of the hedged asset.
The Fund may attempt to protect against declines in the value of the Fund’s portfolio assets by entering into a variety of derivatives transactions, including selling futures contracts, entering into swaps or purchasing puts on indices or futures contracts (short hedging). Short hedging involves the risk that the prices of the futures contracts or the value of the swap or the applicable index will correlate imperfectly with price movements in the Fund’s assets. If the value of the assets held in the Fund’s portfolio declines while the Fund has used derivative instruments in a short hedge, and the prices referenced in the short hedge do not also decline, the value of the Fund’s assets would decline, and the short hedge would not hedge or mitigate the loss in the value of the assets. With respect to a derivative transaction based on an index, the risk of imperfect correlation increases as the composition of the Fund’s portfolio diverges from the assets included in the applicable index. To compensate for the imperfect correlation of movements in the price of the portfolio securities being hedged and movements in the price of the hedging instruments, the Fund may use derivative instruments in a greater dollar amount than the dollar amount of portfolio assets being hedged. It might do so if the historical volatility of the prices of the portfolio assets being hedged is more than the historical volatility of the applicable index.
If the Fund has used derivatives to hedge or otherwise reduce the Fund’s risk exposure to a particular position and then disposes of that position at a time at which it cannot also settle, terminate or close out the corresponding hedge position, this may create short investment exposure. Certain “short” derivative positions involve investment leverage, and the amount of the Fund’s potential loss is theoretically unlimited.
The Fund can use derivative instruments to establish a position in the market as a temporary substitute for the purchase of individual securities or other assets (long hedging) by buying futures contracts and/or calls on such futures contracts, indices or on securities or other assets, or entering into swaps. It is possible that when the Fund does so the market might decline. If the Fund then decides not to invest in the assets because of concerns that the market might decline further or for other reasons, the Fund will realize a loss on the hedge position that is not offset by a reduction in the price of the asset the Fund had intended to purchase.
Risk of Government Regulation of Derivatives. The regulation of derivatives transactions and funds that engage in such transactions is an evolving area of law and is subject to modification by government, self-regulatory organization and judicial action. Registered investment companies are subject to regulatory limitations on their use of derivative investments and certain financing transactions (e.g. reverse repurchase agreements). Among other things, a fund that invests in derivative instruments beyond a specified limited amount must apply a value-at-risk based limit to its use of certain derivative instruments and financing transactions and must adopt and implement a derivatives risk management program. A fund that uses derivative instruments in a limited amount, as specified by applicable rules, is not subject to the same restrictions. Regulatory restrictions may restrict the Fund’s ability to engage in certain derivatives transactions and/or increase the costs of such derivatives transactions, which could adversely affect the value or performance of the Fund.
The Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act (the “Dodd-Frank Act”) has caused broad changes to the OTC derivatives market and granted significant authority to the SEC and the CFTC to regulate OTC derivatives and market participants. Pursuant to such authority, rules have been enacted that currently require clearing of many OTC derivatives transactions and may require clearing of additional OTC derivatives transactions in the future and that impose minimum margin and capital requirements for uncleared OTC derivatives transactions. Similar regulations have been or are being adopted in other jurisdictions around the world. The implementation of the clearing requirement has increased the costs of derivatives transactions since investors have to pay fees to clearing members and are typically required to post more margin for cleared derivatives than had historically been the case. While the new rules and regulations and central clearing of some derivatives transactions are designed to reduce systemic risk (i.e., the risk that the interdependence of large derivatives dealers could cause them to suffer
13
Table of Contents
liquidity, solvency or other challenges simultaneously), there is no assurance that they will achieve that result, and mandatory clearing of derivatives may expose the Fund to new kinds of costs and risks.
Additionally, new regulations may result in increased uncertainty about credit/counterparty risk and may limit the flexibility of the Fund to protect its interests in the event of an insolvency of a derivatives counterparty. In the event of a counterparty’s (or its affiliate’s) insolvency, the Fund’s ability to exercise remedies, such as the termination of transactions, netting of obligations and realization on collateral, could be stayed or eliminated under the rules of the applicable exchange or clearing corporation or under relatively new special resolution regimes adopted in the United States, the United Kingdom, the European Union and various other jurisdictions. Such regimes provide government authorities with broad authority to intervene when a financial institution is experiencing financial difficulty. In particular, with respect to counterparties who are subject to such proceedings in the United Kingdom and the European Union, the liabilities of such counterparties to the Fund could be reduced, eliminated, or converted to equity in such counterparties (sometimes referred to as a “bail in”).
Foreign Currency Instruments and Hedging Strategies
The Fund may use options and futures contracts on foreign currencies and forward currency contracts and currency swap agreements (collectively, “Currency Instruments”), deliverable and non-deliverable, to attempt to hedge against movements in the values of the foreign currencies in which the Fund’s securities are denominated or to attempt to enhance the Fund’s return or yield. The Fund may also use such investments to attempt to establish a short position or to gain exposure to a market that would be more costly or difficult to access with other types of investments, such as bonds or currency. The Fund may also engage in foreign currency transactions on a spot (cash) basis at the rate prevailing in the currency exchange market at the time of the transaction. The Fund may determine not to hedge, and the Fund may be completely unhedged at any point in time. In cases when a particular currency is difficult to hedge or difficult to hedge against the U.S. dollar, the Fund may seek to hedge against price movements in that currency by entering into transactions using Currency Instruments on another currency or a basket of currencies, the value of which the portfolio manager believes will have a high degree of positive correlation to the value of the currency being hedged. The risk that movements in the price of the Currency Instrument will not correlate perfectly with movements in the price of the currency subject to the hedging transaction is magnified when this strategy is used.
Currency Instruments Risks. In addition to the risks found under “Derivatives – Risks of Derivatives Generally,” Currency Instruments are subject to the following risks:
The value of Currency Instruments depends on the value of the underlying foreign currency relative to the U.S. dollar. Because foreign currency transactions occurring in the interbank market might involve substantially larger amounts than those involved in the Fund’s use of such Currency Instruments, the Fund could be disadvantaged by having to deal in the odd lot market (generally consisting of transactions of less than $1 million) for the underlying foreign currencies at prices that are less favorable than for round lots. There is no systematic reporting of last sale information for foreign currencies or any regulatory requirement that quotations available through dealers or other market sources be firm or revised on a timely basis. Quotation information generally is representative of very large transactions in the interbank market and thus might not reflect odd-lot transactions where rates might be less favorable. The interbank market in foreign currencies is a global, round-the-clock market. To the extent the U.S. options or futures markets are closed while the markets for the underlying currencies remain open, significant price and rate movements might take place in the underlying markets that cannot be reflected in the U.S. markets for the Currency Instruments until they reopen.
Settlement of hedging transactions involving foreign currencies might be required to take place within the country issuing the underlying currency. Thus, the Fund might be required to accept or make delivery of the underlying foreign currency in accordance with any U.S. or foreign regulations regarding the maintenance of foreign banking arrangements by U.S. residents and might be required to pay any fees, taxes and charges associated with such delivery assessed in the issuing country.
Forward Currency Contracts
The Fund may enter into forward currency contracts to purchase or sell foreign currencies for a fixed amount of U.S. dollars or another currency at a future date and at a price set by the parties to the forward currency contract.
14
Table of Contents
Forward currency contracts are traded directly between currency traders (usually large commercial banks) and their customers (such as the Fund).
The Fund may purchase a forward currency contract to lock in the U.S. dollar price of a security denominated in a foreign currency that the Fund intends to acquire (a long hedge). The Fund may sell a forward currency contract to lock in the U.S. dollar equivalent of the proceeds from the anticipated sale of a security, dividend or interest payment denominated in a foreign currency (a short hedge). A “position hedge” is when the Fund owns a security denominated in, for example, euros and to protect against a possible decline in the euro’s value, the Fund enters into a forward currency contract to sell euros in return for U.S. dollars. A “position hedge” tends to offset both positive and negative currency fluctuations but would not offset changes in security values caused by other factors. A “proxy hedge” is when the Fund owns a security denominated in, for example, euros and to protect against a possible decline in the euro’s value, the Fund enters into a forward currency contract to sell a currency expected to perform similarly to the euro in return for U.S. dollars. A “proxy hedge” could offer advantages in terms of cost, yield or efficiency, but generally would not hedge currency exposure as effectively as a position hedge to the extent the proxy currency does not perform similarly to the targeted currency. The Fund could, in fact, lose money on both legs of the hedge, i.e., between the euro and proxy currency, and between the proxy currency and the dollar. The Fund also may use forward currency contracts to attempt to enhance return or yield. The Fund could use forward currency contracts to increase its exposure to foreign currencies that the portfolio manager believes might rise in value relative to the U.S. dollar, or shift its exposure to foreign currency fluctuations from one currency to another. For example, if the Fund’s portfolio manager believes that the U.S. dollar will increase in value relative to the euro, the Fund could write a forward contract to buy U.S. dollars in three months at the current price in order to sell those U.S. dollars for a profit if the U.S. dollar does in fact appreciate in value relative to the euro. The cost to the Fund of engaging in forward currency contracts varies with factors such as the currency involved, the length of the contract period and the market conditions then prevailing. Because forward currency contracts are usually entered into on a principal basis, no fees or commissions are involved. When the Fund enters into a forward currency contract, it relies on the counterparty to make or take delivery of the underlying currency at the maturity of the contract or to otherwise fulfill its obligations in connection with settlement. Failure by the counterparty to do so would result in the loss of any expected benefit of the transaction.
The precise matching of forward currency contract amounts, and the value of the securities involved generally will not be possible because the value of such securities, measured in the foreign currency, will change after the forward currency contract has been established. Thus, the Fund may need to purchase or sell foreign currencies in the spot (i.e., cash) market to the extent such foreign currencies are not covered by forward currency contracts. The projection of short-term currency market movements is extremely difficult, and the successful execution of a short-term hedging strategy is highly uncertain.
Successful use of forward currency contracts depends on the portfolio manager’s skill in analyzing and predicting currency values. Forward currency contracts may substantially change the Fund’s exposure to changes in currency exchange rates and could result in losses to the Fund if currencies do not perform as the portfolio manager anticipates. There is no assurance that the portfolio manager’s use of forward currency contracts will be advantageous to the Fund or that the portfolio manager will hedge at an appropriate time.
Non-deliverable Forwards. The consummation of a deliverable foreign exchange forward requires the actual exchange of the principal amounts of the two currencies in the contract (i.e., settlement on a physical basis). Forward currency contracts in which the Fund may engage also include non-deliverable forwards (“NDFs”). NDFs are cash-settled, forward contracts on foreign currencies (each a “Reference Currency”) that are non-convertible and that may be thinly traded or illiquid. NDFs involve an obligation to pay an amount equal to the difference between the prevailing market exchange rate for the Reference Currency and the agreed upon exchange rate, with respect to an agreed notional amount. NDFs are subject to many of the risks associated with derivatives in general and forward currency transactions, including risks associated with fluctuations in foreign currency and the risk that the counterparty will fail to fulfill its obligations.
Under the Dodd-Frank Act, NDFs are classified as “swaps” and are therefore subject to the full panoply of CFTC swap regulations under the Dodd-Frank Act. Although NDFs have historically been traded OTC, in the future,
15
Table of Contents
pursuant to the Dodd- Frank Act, they may be subject to mandatory clearing. Non-centrally-cleared NDFs are subject to mandatory minimum margin requirements for uncleared swaps. Deliverable foreign exchange forwards that solely involve the exchange of two different currencies on a specific future date at a fixed rate agreed upon by the parties are not considered “swaps” and accordingly are not subject to many of the regulations that apply to NDFs. However, as mandated by the Dodd-Frank Act and set forth in CFTC regulations adopted thereunder, foreign exchange forwards must be reported to a swap data repository, and swap dealers and major swap participants who are party to such transactions remain subject to the business conduct standards pertaining to swaps in connection with such deliverable foreign exchange forwards.
Futures Contracts and Options on Futures Contracts
Generally, a futures contract is an exchange-traded, standardized agreement that obligates the seller of the contract to sell a specified quantity of an underlying instrument or asset, such as a security, currency or commodity, to the purchaser of the contract, who has the obligation to buy the underlying instrument or asset, at a specified price and date. In the case of futures on indices, the two parties agree to take or make delivery of an amount of cash equal to the difference between the level of the index calculated for purposes of settlement and the price at which the contract originally was written. Options on futures give the purchaser the right to assume a position in a futures contract at the specified exercise price at any time during the period of the option or at the expiration of the option, depending on the terms of the option.
Futures contracts, by their terms, have stated expirations and, at a specified point in time prior to expiration, trading in a futures contract for the current delivery month will cease. As a result, an investor wishing to maintain exposure to a futures contract with the nearest expiration must close out the position in the expiring contract and establish a new position in the contract for the next delivery month, a process referred to as “rolling.” The process of rolling a futures contract can be profitable or unprofitable depending in large part on whether the futures price for the subsequent delivery month is less than or more than the price of the expiring contract.
Futures contracts and related options may be used for hedging and non-hedging purposes, such as to simulate full investment in the underlying instrument or asset while retaining a cash balance for portfolio management purposes, as a substitute for direct investment in the underlying instrument or asset, to facilitate trading, to reduce transaction costs, or to seek higher investment returns (e.g., when a futures contract or option is priced more attractively than the underlying instrument). In addition, futures strategies can be used to manage the average duration of the Fund’s fixed income portfolio, if applicable. The Fund may sell a debt futures contract or a call option thereon or purchase a put option on that futures contract to attempt to shorten the portfolio’s average duration. Alternatively, the Fund may buy a debt futures contract or a call option thereon or sell a put option thereon to attempt to lengthen the portfolio’s average duration.
At the inception of a futures contract the Fund is required to deposit “initial margin” with a futures commission merchant (“FCM”) in an amount at least equal to the amount designated by the futures exchange. Margin must also be deposited when writing a call or put option on a futures contract, in accordance with applicable exchange rules. Unlike margin in securities transactions, initial margin on futures contracts does not represent a borrowing, but rather is in the nature of a performance bond or good-faith deposit that is required to be returned to the Fund at the termination of the transaction if all contractual obligations have been satisfied. Under certain circumstances, such as periods of high volatility, the Fund may be required by an exchange or by its FCM to increase the level of its initial margin payment, and initial margin requirements might be increased generally in the future by regulatory action.
In addition to initial margin payments, during the life of the transaction “variation margin” payments are made to and from the FCM as the value of the margin and the underlying derivative transaction varies, a process known as “marking-to- market.” Variation margin is intended to represent a daily settlement of the Fund’s obligations to or from an FCM. When the Fund purchases an option on a futures contract, the premium paid plus transaction costs is all that is at risk. However, there may be circumstances when the purchase of an option on a futures contract would result in a loss to the Fund when the use of a futures contract would not, such as when there is no movement in the value of the securities or currencies being hedged. In that case, the Fund would lose the premium it paid for the option plus transaction costs. In contrast, when the Fund purchases or sells a futures contract or writes a call or
16
Table of Contents
put option thereon, it is subject to daily variation margin calls that could be substantial in the event of adverse price movements. If the Fund has insufficient cash to meet daily variation margin requirements, it might need to sell securities at a time when such sales are disadvantageous.
Although some futures and options on futures call for making or taking delivery of the underlying instrument or asset, generally those contracts are closed out prior to delivery by offsetting purchases or sales of matching futures or options (involving the same instrument or asset and delivery month). If an offsetting purchase price is less than the original sale price, the Fund realizes a gain, or if it is more, the Fund realizes a loss. If an offsetting sale price is more than the original purchase price, the Fund realizes a gain, or if it is less, the Fund realizes a loss. The Fund will also bear transaction costs for each contract, which will be included in these calculations. Positions in futures and options on futures may be closed only on an exchange or board of trade that provides a secondary market. However, there can be no assurance that a liquid secondary market will exist for a particular contract at a particular time. In such event, it may not be possible to close a futures contract or options position.
Under certain circumstances, futures exchanges may establish daily limits on the amount that the price of a futures contract or an option on a futures contract can vary from the previous day’s settlement price; once that limit is reached, no trades may be made that day at a price beyond the limit. Daily price limits do not limit potential losses because prices could move to the daily limit for several consecutive days with little or no trading, thereby preventing liquidation of unfavorable positions. If the Fund were unable to liquidate a futures contract or an option on a futures position due to the absence of a liquid secondary market, the imposition of price limits or otherwise, it could incur substantial losses. The Fund would continue to be subject to market risk with respect to the position. In addition, except in the case of purchased options, the Fund would continue to be required to make daily variation margin payments.
Risks of Futures Contracts and Options Thereon. In addition to the risks found under “Derivatives – Risks of Derivatives Generally,” futures contracts and options on futures contracts are subject to the following risks:
Successful use of futures contracts and related options depends upon the ability of the portfolio manager to assess movements in the direction of prices of securities, commodities, measures of value, or interest or exchange rates, which requires different skills and techniques than assessing the value of individual securities. Moreover, futures contracts relate not to the current price level of the underlying instrument or asset, but to the anticipated price level at some point in the future; accordingly trading of stock index futures may not reflect the trading of the securities that are used to formulate the index or even actual fluctuations in the index itself. There is, in addition, the risk that movements in the price of the futures contract will not correlate with the movements in the prices of the securities or other assets being hedged. Price distortions in the marketplace, resulting from increased participation by speculators in the futures market (among other things), may also impair the correlation between movements in the prices of futures contracts and movements in the prices of the hedged assets. If the price of the futures contract moves less than the price of assets that are the subject of the hedge, the hedge will not be fully effective; but if the price of the assets being hedged has moved in an unfavorable direction, the Fund would be in a better position than if it had not hedged at all. If the price of the assets being hedged has moved in a favorable direction, this advantage may be partially offset by losses on the futures position.
Positions in futures contracts and related options may be closed out only on an exchange or board of trade that provides a market for such contracts. Although the Fund intends to purchase and sell futures and related options only on exchanges or boards of trade where there appears to be a liquid market, there is no assurance that such a market will exist for any particular contract at any particular time. In such event, it may not be possible to close a futures position and, in the event of adverse price movements, the Fund would continue to be required to make variation margin payments, where applicable. Options have a limited life and thus can be disposed of only within a specific time period.
Purchasers of options on futures contracts pay a premium in cash at the time of purchase which, in the event of adverse price movements, could be lost. Sellers of options on futures contracts must post initial margin and are subject to additional margin calls that could be substantial in the event of adverse price movements. Because of the low margin deposits required, futures trading involves a high degree of leverage; as a result, a relatively small price movement in a futures contract may result in immediate and substantial loss, or gain, to the Fund. In addition, the
17
Table of Contents
Fund’s activities in the futures markets may result in a higher portfolio turnover rate (see “Portfolio Transactions and Brokerage”) and additional transaction costs in the form of added brokerage commissions.
As noted above, exchanges may impose limits on the amount by which the price of a futures contract or related option is permitted to change in a single day. If the price of a contract moves to the limit for several consecutive days, the Fund may be unable during that time to close its position in that contract and may have to continue making payments of variation margin. The CFTC and domestic exchanges have also established (and continue to evaluate and revise) speculative position limits on the maximum speculative position that any person, or group of persons acting in concert, may hold or control in particular contracts. Under current rules and regulations, other accounts managed by the Adviser or, if applicable, Subadviser are combined with the positions held by the Fund under the Adviser’s or, if applicable, Subadviser’s management for position limit purposes, unless an exemption applies. This aggregation could preclude additional trading by the Fund in such contracts and may require positions held by the Fund to be liquidated, which may adversely affect the performance of the Fund.
When the Fund engages in futures transactions, it will also be exposed to the credit risk of its FCM. If the Fund’s FCM becomes bankrupt or insolvent, or otherwise defaults on its obligations to the Fund, the Fund may not receive all amounts owed to it in respect of its trading, even if the clearinghouse fully discharges all of its obligations. If an FCM were not to appropriately segregate client assets to the full extent required by the CEA, the Fund might not be fully protected in the event of the bankruptcy of an FCM. In the event of an FCM’s bankruptcy, the Fund would be limited to recovering only a pro rata share of all available funds segregated on behalf of an FCM’s combined customer accounts for the relevant account class, even if certain property held by an FCM is specifically traceable to the Fund (for example, U.S. Treasury bills deposited by the Fund). Such situations could arise due to various factors, or a combination of factors, including inadequate FCM capitalization, inadequate controls on customer trading and inadequate customer capital. In addition, in the event of the bankruptcy or insolvency of a clearinghouse, the Fund might experience a loss of funds deposited through its FCM as margin with the clearinghouse, a loss of unrealized profits on its open positions and the loss of funds owed to it as realized profits on closed positions. Such a bankruptcy or insolvency might also cause a substantial delay before the Fund could obtain the return of funds owed to it by an FCM who is a member of such clearinghouse.
Options
A call option gives the purchaser the right to buy, and obligates the writer to sell, an underlying investment (such as a specified security, commodity, currency, interest rate, currency exchange rate or index) at an agreed-upon price (“strike price”). A put option gives the purchaser the right to sell, and obligates the writer to buy, an underlying investment at an agreed-upon price. An American-style option may be exercised at any time during the term of the option, while a European-style option may be exercised only at the expiration of the option. Purchasers of options pay an amount, known as a premium, to the option writer in exchange for the right granted under the option contract.
The value of an option position will reflect, among other things, the current market value of the underlying instrument, the time remaining until expiration, the relationship of the strike price to the market price of the underlying instrument, the historical price volatility of the underlying instrument and general market conditions. If the purchaser does not exercise the option, it will expire and the purchaser will have only lost the premium paid. If a secondary market exists, a purchaser or the writer may terminate a put option position prior to its exercise by selling it in the secondary market at its current price. The Fund will pay a brokerage commission each time it buys or sells an option. Such commissions may be higher than those that would apply to direct purchases or sales of the underlying instrument.
Exchange-traded options in the United States are issued by a clearing organization affiliated with the exchange on which the option is listed and are standardized with respect to the underlying instrument, expiration date, contract size and strike price. In contrast, OTC options (options not traded on exchanges) are contracts between the Fund and a counterparty (usually a securities dealer or a bank) with no clearing organization guarantee. The terms of OTC options generally are established through negotiation with the other party to the option contract (the counterparty). For a discussion on options on futures see “Futures Contracts and Options on Futures Contracts”.
18
Table of Contents
Put Options. In return for receipt of the premium, the writer of a put option assumes the obligation to pay the strike price for the option’s underlying instrument if the buyer exercises the option. A put writer would generally expect to profit, although its gain would be limited to the amount of the premium it received, if the underlying instrument’s price remains greater than or equal to the strike price. If the underlying instrument’s price falls below the strike price, the put writer would expect to suffer a loss. The buyer of a put option can expect to realize a gain if the underlying instrument’s price falls enough to offset the cost of purchasing the option. Any losses suffered by the buyer would be limited to the amount of the premium plus related transaction costs.
Optional delivery standby commitments are a type of put that gives the buyer of an underlying instrument the right to sell the underlying instrument back to the seller on specified terms to induce a purchase of the underlying instrument.
Call Options. In return for the receipt of the premium, the writer of a call option assumes the obligation to sell the underlying instrument at the strike price to the buyer upon exercise of the option. A call writer would generally expect to profit, although its gain would be limited to the amount of the premium it received, if the option goes unexercised, which typically occurs when the underlying instrument’s price remains less than or equal to the strike price. If the underlying instrument’s price were to rise above the strike price, the writer of the call option would generally expect to suffer a loss, which is theoretically unlimited. A call buyer’s maximum loss is the premium paid for the call option, whereas the buyer’s maximum profit is theoretically unlimited.
Straddles. A long straddle is the purchase of a call and a put option with the same expiration date and relating to the same underlying instrument where the strike price of the put is less than or equal to the strike price of the call. The Fund may enter into a long straddle when its portfolio manager believes that the underlying instrument’s price will move significantly during the term of the options. A short straddle is a combination of a call and a put written on the same underlying instrument with the same expiration date where the strike price of the put is less than or equal to the strike price of the call. In a covered short straddle, the underlying instrument is considered cover for both the put and the call that the Fund has written. The Fund may enter into a short straddle when the portfolio manager believes that it is unlikely that the underlying instrument’s prices will experience volatility during the term of the options.
Options on Indices. Puts and calls on indices are similar to puts and calls on other underlying instruments except that all settlements are in cash and gains or losses depend on changes in the level of the index rather than on price movements of individual underlying instruments. The writer of a call on an index receives a premium and the obligation to pay the purchaser an amount of cash equal to the difference between the closing level of the index and the strike price times a specified multiple (“multiplier”), if the closing level of the index is greater than the strike price of the call. The writer of a put on an index receives a premium and the obligation to deliver to the buyer an amount of cash equal to the difference between the closing level of the index and strike price times the multiplier if the closing level is less than the strike price.
Risks of Options – In addition to the risks described under “Derivatives – Risks of Derivatives Generally,” options are also subject to the following risks:
Options on Indices Risk. The risks of investment in options on indices may be greater than options on securities and other instruments. Because index options are settled in cash, when the Fund writes a call on an index it generally cannot provide in advance for other underlying instruments because it may not be practical for the call writer to hedge its potential settlement obligations by acquiring and holding the underlying securities. The Fund can offset some of the risk of writing a call index option by holding a diversified portfolio of securities similar to those on which the underlying index is based. However, the Fund cannot, as a practical matter, acquire and hold a portfolio containing exactly the same securities as underlie the index and, as a result, bears a risk that the value of the securities held will vary from the value of the index.
If the Fund exercises an index option before the closing index value for that day is available, there is the risk that the level of the underlying index may subsequently change. If such a change causes the exercised option to fall out-of-the-money, the Fund will be required to pay the difference between the closing index value and the strike price of the option (times the applicable multiplier) to the assigned writer.
19
Table of Contents
Timing Risk. The hours of trading for options may not conform to the hours during which the underlying instrument are traded. To the extent that the options markets close before the markets for the underlying instrument, significant price and rate movements can take place in the underlying markets that cannot be reflected in the options markets. Options are marked to market daily and their value will be affected by changes in the value of the underlying instrument, changes in the dividend rates of the underlying securities, an increase in interest rates, changes in the actual or perceived volatility of the stock market and the underlying instrument and the remaining time to the options’ expiration. Additionally, the exercise price of an option may be adjusted downward before the option’s expiration as a result of the occurrence of certain corporate or other events affecting the underlying instrument, such as extraordinary dividends, stock splits, merger or other extraordinary distributions or events. A reduction in the exercise price of an option would reduce the Fund’s capital appreciation potential on an underlying instrument.
Yield Curve Options. The Fund may enter into options on the “spread,” or yield differential, between two fixed income securities, in transactions referred to as “yield curve” options. In contrast to other types of options, a yield curve option is based on the difference between the yields of designated securities, rather than the prices of the individual securities, and is settled through cash payments. Accordingly, a yield curve option is profitable to the holder if this differential widens (in the case of a call) or narrows (in the case of a put), regardless of whether the yields of the underlying securities increase or decrease.
Yield curve options may be used for the same purposes as other options on securities. Specifically, the Fund may purchase or write such options for hedging purposes. For example, the Fund may purchase a call option on the yield spread between two securities, if it owns one of the securities, anticipates purchasing the other security and wants to hedge against an adverse change in the yield spread between the two securities. The Fund may also purchase or write yield curve options for other than hedging purposes (e.g., in an effort to increase its current income) if, in the judgment of the portfolio manager the Fund may profit from movements in the spread between the yields of the underlying securities. The trading of yield curve options is subject to all of the risks associated with the trading of other types of options. In addition, however, such options present risk of loss even if the yield of one of the underlying securities remains constant, if the spread moves in a direction or to an extent that was not anticipated.
Swaps
Generally, a swap agreement involves the exchange between two parties of their respective commitments to pay or receive cash flows, e.g., an exchange of floating rate payments for fixed-rate payments. Swaps may be negotiated bilaterally and traded OTC (OTC swaps) or, for certain types of swaps, must be executed through a centralized exchange or regulated facility and be cleared through a regulated clearinghouse (cleared swaps). Swaps include but are not limited to, interest rate swaps, total return swaps, index swaps, inflation indexed swaps, currency swaps, credit default swaps and options on swaps or “swaptions”.
OTC swap agreements can be individually negotiated and structured to include exposure to a variety of different types of investments (such as individual securities, baskets of securities and securities indices) or market factors. The swapped returns are generally calculated with respect to a notional amount, that is, the nominal or face amount used to calculate the payments to be made between the parties to the OTC swap.
The Fund may enter into a swap agreement for hedging or non-hedging purposes, including but not limited to, to enhance returns, increase liquidity, protect against currency and security price fluctuations, manage duration and gain exposure to certain markets or securities in a more cost-efficient manner.
Risks of Swaps Generally. In addition to the risks found under “Derivatives – Risks of Derivatives Generally,” swaps are subject to the following risks:
Depending on their structure, swap agreements may increase or decrease the overall volatility of the Fund’s investments and its share price and yield and may affect the Fund’s exposure to long- or short-term interest rates (in the United States or abroad), foreign currency values, mortgage-backed security values, corporate borrowing rates or other market factors such as security prices or inflation rates.
20
Table of Contents
Swap agreements will tend to shift the Fund’s investment exposure from one type of investment to another. For example, if the Fund agrees to exchange payments in U.S. dollars for payments in foreign currency, the swap agreement would tend to decrease the Fund’s exposure to U.S. interest rates and increase its exposure to foreign currency and interest rates.
The absence of a central exchange or market for OTC swap transactions may lead, in some instances, to difficulties in trading and valuation, especially in the event of market disruptions.
Cleared Swaps. Relatively recent legislation and implementing regulation require certain swaps to be cleared through a regulated clearinghouse. Although this clearing mechanism is generally intended to reduce counterparty credit risk, it may disrupt or limit the swap market and may result in swaps being more difficult to trade or value. As swaps become more standardized, the Fund may not be able to enter into swaps that meet its investment needs. The Fund also may not be able to find a clearing member and clearinghouse willing to accept a swap for clearing. In a cleared swap, a central clearing organization will be the counterparty to the transaction. The Fund will assume the risk that the clearinghouse and the clearing member through which the Fund holds its position may be unable to or may otherwise fail to perform their obligations.
When the Fund enters into a cleared swap transaction, the Fund is subject to the credit and counterparty risk of the clearinghouse and the clearing member through which it holds its cleared position. Credit/counterparty risk of market participants with respect to centrally cleared swaps is concentrated in a few clearinghouses, and it is not clear how an insolvency proceeding of a clearinghouse would be conducted and what impact an insolvency of a clearinghouse would have on the financial system. A clearing member is obligated by contract and by applicable regulation to segregate all funds received from customers with respect to cleared derivatives transactions from the clearing member’s proprietary assets. However, all funds and other property received by a clearing broker from its customers generally are held by the clearing broker on a commingled basis in an omnibus account by account class, and the clearing member may invest those funds in certain instruments permitted under the applicable regulations. The assets of the Fund might not be fully protected in the event of the bankruptcy of the Fund’s clearing member, because the Fund would be limited to recovering only a pro rata share of all available funds segregated on behalf of the clearing broker’s customers for a relevant account class. Also, the clearing member is required to transfer to the clearing organization the amount of margin required by the clearing organization for cleared derivatives, which amounts generally are held in an omnibus account at the clearing organization for all customers of the clearing member. Regulations promulgated by the CFTC require that the clearing member notify the clearinghouse of the amount of initial margin provided by the clearing member to the clearing organization that is attributable to each cleared swaps customer. However, if the clearing member does not provide accurate reporting, the Fund is subject to the risk that a clearing organization will use the Fund’s assets held in an omnibus account at the clearing organization to satisfy payment obligations of a defaulting customer of the clearing member to the clearing organization. In addition, clearing members generally provide to the clearing organization the net amount of variation margin required for cleared swaps for all of its customers in the aggregate, rather than the gross amount of each customer. The Fund is therefore subject to the risk that a clearing organization will not make variation margin payments owed to the Fund if another customer of the clearing member has suffered a loss and is in default, and the risk that the Fund will be required to provide additional variation margin to the clearinghouse before the clearinghouse will move the Fund’s cleared derivatives transactions to another clearing member. In addition, if a clearing member does not comply with the applicable regulations or its agreement with the Fund, or in the event of fraud or misappropriation of customer assets by a clearing member, the Fund could have only an unsecured creditor claim in an insolvency of the clearing member with respect to the margin held by the clearing member.
In some ways, centrally cleared swaps arrangements are less favorable to the Fund than OTC swaps arrangements. For example, the Fund may be required to provide greater amounts of margin for cleared swaps than for OTC swaps. Also, in contrast to OTC swaps, following a period of notice to the Fund, a clearing member generally can require termination of existing cleared swaps at any time or increases in margin requirements above the margin that the clearing member required at the beginning of a transaction. Clearinghouses also have broad rights to increase margin requirements for existing transactions or to terminate transactions at any time. Any increase in margin requirements or termination by the clearing member or the clearinghouse could interfere with the ability of
21
Table of Contents
the Fund to pursue its investment strategy. Further, any increase in margin requirements by a clearing member could also expose the Fund to greater credit risk of its clearing member, because margin for cleared swaps in excess of clearinghouse margin requirements typically is held by the clearing member. While the documentation in place between the Fund and its clearing members generally provides that the clearing members will accept for clearing all transactions submitted for clearing that are within credit limits (specified in advance) for the Fund, the Fund is still subject to the risk that no clearing member will be willing or able to clear a transaction. In those cases, the transaction might have to be terminated, and the Fund could lose some or all of the benefit of the transaction, including loss of an increase in the value of the transaction and/or loss of hedging protection offered by the transaction. In addition, the documentation governing the relationship between the Fund and its clearing members is developed by the clearing members and generally is less favorable to the Fund than typical OTC swap documentation. For example, this documentation generally includes a one-way indemnity by the Fund in favor of the clearing member, indemnifying the clearing member against losses it incurs in connection with acting as the Fund’s clearing member, and the documentation typically does not give the Fund any rights to exercise remedies if the clearing member defaults or becomes insolvent.
Some types of cleared swaps are required to be executed on an exchange or on a swap execution facility (“SEF”). A SEF is a trading platform where multiple market participants can execute swaps by accepting bids and offers made by multiple other participants in the platform. While this execution requirement is designed to increase transparency and liquidity in the cleared swap market, trading on a SEF can create additional costs and risks for the Fund. For example, SEFs typically charge fees, and if the Fund executes swaps on a SEF through a broker intermediary, the intermediary may impose fees as well. Also, the Fund may indemnify a SEF, or a broker intermediary who executes cleared swaps on a SEF on the Fund’s behalf, against any losses or costs that may be incurred as a result of the Fund’s transactions on the SEF.
The Fund may enter into swap transactions with certain counterparties pursuant to master netting agreements. A master netting agreement provides that all swaps entered into between the Fund and that counterparty shall be regarded as parts of an integral agreement. If amounts are payable on a particular date in the same currency in respect of more than one swap transaction, the amount payable shall be the net amount. In addition, the master netting agreement may provide that if one party (or its affiliates) defaults generally or on any swap, the counterparty can terminate all outstanding swaps with that party. As a result, to the extent the Fund enters into master netting agreements with a counterparty, the Fund may be required to terminate a greater number of swap agreements than if it had not entered into such an agreement, which may result in losses to the Fund.
Interest Rate Swaps, Caps and Floors. Interest rate swaps are agreements between two parties to exchange interest rate payment obligations. Typically, one party’s obligation is based on a fixed interest rate while the other party’s obligation is based on an interest rate that fluctuates with changes in a designated benchmark. An interest rate cap transaction entitles the purchaser, to the extent that a specified index exceeds a predetermined value, to receive payments on a notional principal amount from the party selling the cap. An interest rate floor transaction entitles the purchaser, to the extent that a specified index falls below a predetermined value, to receive payments on a notional principal amount from the party selling the floor. A collar combines elements of buying a cap and a floor. Caps and floors have an effect similar to buying or writing options. Caps and floors typically have lower liquidity than swaps.
Options on Swaps (“Swaptions”). A swaption is a contract that gives the counterparty the right, but not the obligation to enter into a new swap agreement or to shorten, extend, cancel or otherwise modify an existing swap agreement, at some designated future time on specified terms. The Fund may write (sell) and purchase put and call swaptions. Swaptions are generally subject to the same risks involved in the use of options and swaps. Depending on the terms of the option agreement, the Fund will generally incur a greater degree of risk when it writes a swaption than it will incur when it purchases a swaption. When the Fund purchases a swaption, only the amount of premium the Fund paid is at risk should the option expire unexercised. However, when the Fund writes a swaption, upon exercise of the option the Fund will become obligated according to the terms of the underlying agreement, which may result in losses to the Fund in excess of the premium it received.
Credit Default Swaps and Related Investments. The Fund may enter into credit default swap contracts for investment purposes and to add leverage to its investment portfolio. As the seller in a credit default swap contract,
22
Table of Contents
the Fund would be required to pay the par (or other agreed-upon) value of a debt-reference obligation to the counterparty in the event of a default by a third party on the debt obligation. In return, the Fund would receive from the counterparty a periodic stream of payments over the term of the contract provided that no event of default has occurred. If no default occurs, the Fund would keep the stream of payments and would have no payment obligations. As the seller, the Fund would effectively add leverage to its portfolio because, in addition to its net assets, the Fund would be subject to investment exposure on the swap. Credit default swap contracts involve special risks and may result in losses to the Fund. Credit default swaps may in some cases be illiquid, and they increase credit risk since the Fund has exposure to both the issuer of the referenced obligation and the counterparty to the credit default swap. As there is no central exchange or market for certain credit default swap transactions, they may be difficult to trade or value, especially in the event of market disruptions. It is possible that developments in the swap market, including new or modified government regulation, could adversely affect the Fund’s ability to terminate existing credit default swap agreements or to realize amounts to be received under such agreements.
The Fund may also purchase credit default swap contracts to attempt to hedge against the risk of default of debt securities held in its portfolio, in which case the Fund would function as the counterparty referenced in the preceding paragraph. This would involve the risk that the investment may expire worthless and would only generate income in the event of an actual default by the issuer of the underlying obligation (or, as applicable, a credit downgrade or other indication of financial instability). It would also involve credit risk—that the seller may fail to satisfy its payment obligations to the Fund in the event of a default.
The Fund may invest in credit default swap index products that provide exposure to obligations of multiple issuers. The Fund can either buy the index (take on credit exposure) or sell the index (pass credit exposure to a counterparty). Such investments are subject to the associated risks with investments in credit default swaps discussed above.
Distressed Debt Securities
Distressed debt securities are debt securities that are purchased in the secondary market and are the subject of bankruptcy proceedings or otherwise in default as to the repayment of principal and/or interest at the time of acquisition by the Fund or are rated in the lower rating categories (Ca or lower by Moody’s and CC or lower by S&P) or, if unrated, are in the judgment of the portfolio manager of equivalent quality. Investment in distressed debt securities is speculative and involves significant risk. The risks associated with high yield securities are heightened when investing in distressed debt securities.
The Fund may make such investments when the portfolio manager believes it is reasonably likely that the issuer of the distressed debt securities will make an exchange offer or will be the subject of a plan of reorganization pursuant to which the Fund will receive new securities (e.g., equity securities) and/or other assets. However, there can be no assurance that such an exchange offer will be made or that such a plan of reorganization will be adopted. In addition, a significant period of time may pass between the time at which the Fund makes its investment in distressed debt securities and the time that any such exchange offer or plan of reorganization is completed. During this period, it is unlikely that the Fund will receive any interest payments on the distressed debt securities, the Fund will be subject to significant uncertainty as to whether the exchange offer or plan will be completed and the Fund may be required to bear extraordinary expenses to protect or recover its investment. Even if an exchange offer is made or a plan of reorganization is adopted with respect to the distressed debt securities held by the Fund, there can be no assurance that the securities or other assets received by the Fund in connection with such exchange offer or plan of reorganization will not have a lower value or income potential than may have been anticipated when the investment was made. Moreover, any securities received by the Fund upon completion of an exchange offer or plan of reorganization may be restricted as to resale. As a result of the Fund’s participation in negotiations with respect to any exchange offer or plan of reorganization with respect to an issuer of distressed debt securities, the Fund may be restricted from disposing of such securities.
Equity Securities
Equity securities include exchange-traded and over-the-counter common and preferred stocks, warrants and rights, and securities convertible into common stocks. Equity securities fluctuate in price based on changes in a
23
Table of Contents
company’s financial condition and overall market and economic conditions. The value of a particular security may decline due to factors that affect a particular industry or industries, such as an increase in production costs, competitive conditions or labor shortages; or due to general market conditions, such as real or perceived adverse economic conditions, changes in the general outlook for corporate earnings, changes in interest or currency rates or generally adverse investor sentiment. The value of an equity security can be more volatile than the market as a whole and can perform differently from the value of the market as a whole. The value of a company’s equity securities may deteriorate because of a variety of factors, including disappointing earnings reports by the issuer, unsuccessful products or services, loss of major customers, major litigation against the issuer or changes in government regulations affecting the issuer or the competitive environment.
Exchange Traded Funds (“ETFs”)
ETFs are ownership interests in investment companies, unit investment trusts, depositary receipts and other pooled investment vehicles that are traded on an exchange and that hold a portfolio of securities or other financial instruments (the “Underlying Assets”). The Underlying Assets are typically selected to correspond to the securities that comprise a particular broad based sector or international index, or to provide exposure to a particular industry sector or asset class, including precious metals or other commodities. “Short ETFs” seek a return similar to the inverse, or a multiple of the inverse, of a reference index. Short ETFs carry additional risks because their Underlying Assets may include a variety of financial instruments, including futures and options on futures, options on securities and securities indexes, swap agreements and forward contracts, and a short ETF may engage in short sales. An ETF’s losses on short sales are potentially unlimited; however, the Fund’s risk would be limited to the amount it invested in the ETF. Certain ETFs are actively managed by a portfolio manager or management team that makes investment decisions on Underlying Assets without seeking to replicate the performance of a reference index or industry sector or asset class.
Unlike shares of typical open-end management investment companies or unit investment trusts, shares of ETFs are designed to be traded throughout the trading day and bought and sold based on market price rather than net asset value. Shares can trade at either a premium or discount to net asset value. The portfolios held by ETFs are typically publicly disclosed on each trading day and an approximation of actual net asset value is disseminated throughout the trading day. An ETF will generally gain or lose value depending on the performance of the Underlying Assets. In the future, as new products become available, the Fund may invest in ETFs that do not have this same level of transparency and, therefore, may be more likely to trade at a larger discount or premium to actual net asset values.
Gains or losses on the Fund’s investment in ETFs will ultimately depend on the purchase and sale price of the ETF. An active trading market for an ETF’s shares may not develop or be maintained and trading of an ETF’s shares may be halted if the listing exchange’s officials deem such action appropriate, the shares are delisted from the exchange or the activation of market- wide “circuit breakers” (which are tied to large decreases in stock prices) halts stock trading generally. The performance of an ETF will be reduced by transaction and other expenses, including fees paid by the ETF to service providers. Investors in ETFs are eligible to receive their portion of income, if any, accumulated on the securities held in the portfolio, less fees and expenses of the ETF.
An investment in an ETF involves risks similar to investing directly in the Underlying Assets, including the risk that the value of the Underlying Assets may fluctuate in accordance with changes in the financial condition of their issuers, the value of securities and other financial instruments generally, and other market factors.
If an ETF is a registered investment company (as defined in the 1940 Act), the limitations applicable to the Fund’s ability to purchase securities issued by other investment companies apply absent certain exemptive rules or other available exemptive relief. However, under Rule 12d1-4, the Fund may invest in other investment companies, including ETFs, in excess of these limits, subject to certain conditions. These restrictions may limit the Fund’s ability to invest in ETFs to the extent desired. Some ETFs are not structured as investment companies and thus are not regulated under the 1940 Act.
Foreign Securities
The risks of investing in securities of non-U.S. issuers or issuers with significant exposure to non-U.S. markets may be related, among other things, to (i) differences in size, liquidity and volatility of, and the degree and manner
24
Table of Contents
of regulation of, the securities markets of certain non-U.S. markets compared to the securities markets in the U.S.; (ii) economic, political and social factors; and (iii) foreign exchange matters, such as restrictions on the repatriation of capital, fluctuations in exchange rates between the U.S. dollar and the currencies in which the Fund’s portfolio securities are quoted or denominated, exchange control regulations and costs associated with currency exchange. The political and economic structures in certain foreign countries, particularly emerging markets, are expected to undergo significant evolution and rapid development, and such countries may lack the social, political and economic stability characteristic of more developed countries.
Unanticipated political or social developments may affect the values of the Fund’s investments in such countries. The economies and securities and currency markets of many emerging markets have experienced significant disruption and declines. There can be no assurances that these economic and market disruptions will not continue.
Legal remedies available to investors in certain foreign countries may be less extensive than those available to investors in the U.S. or other foreign countries. Accounting standards in other countries are also not necessarily the same as in the United States. If the accounting standards in another country do not require as much detail as U.S. accounting standards, it may be harder for the portfolio manager to completely and accurately determine a company’s financial condition. In addition, the U.S. Government has from time to time in the past imposed restrictions, through penalties and otherwise, on foreign investments by U.S. investors such as the Fund. Also, brokerage commissions and other costs of buying or selling securities often are higher in foreign countries than they are in the U.S. This reduces the amount the Fund can earn on its investments.
The Fund generally holds its foreign securities and cash in foreign banks and securities depositories. Some foreign banks and securities depositories may be recently organized or new to the foreign custody business. In addition, there may be limited or no regulatory oversight over their operations. Also, the laws of certain countries may put limits on the Fund’s ability to recover its assets if a foreign bank or depository or issuer of a security or any of their agents goes bankrupt. In addition, it is often more expensive for the Fund to buy, sell and hold securities in certain foreign markets than in the U.S. The increased expense of investing in foreign markets reduces the amount the Fund can earn on its investments and typically results in a higher operating expense ratio for the Fund as compared to investment companies that invest only in the United States.
Securities of some foreign companies have lower liquidity, and their prices are more volatile, than securities of comparable domestic companies. Certain foreign countries are known to experience long delays between the trade and settlement dates of securities purchased or sold resulting in increased exposure of the Fund to market and foreign exchange fluctuations brought about by such delays, and to the corresponding negative impact on Fund liquidity.
Foreign Currency Risks
The U.S. dollar value of securities denominated in a foreign currency will vary with changes in currency exchange rates, which can be volatile. Accordingly, changes in the value of the currency in which the Fund’s investments are denominated relative to the U.S. dollar will affect the Fund’s net asset value. Exchange rates are generally affected by the forces of supply and demand in the international currency markets, the relative merits of investing in different countries and the intervention or failure to intervene of U.S. or foreign governments and central banks. However, currency exchange rates may fluctuate based on factors intrinsic to a country’s economy. Some emerging market countries also may have managed currencies, which are not free floating against the U.S. dollar. In addition, emerging markets are subject to the risk of restrictions upon the free conversion of their currencies into other currencies. Any devaluations relative to the U.S. dollar in the currencies in which the Fund’s securities are quoted would reduce the Fund’s net asset value per share.
Investment in Emerging Markets
Investors are strongly advised to consider carefully the special risks involved in emerging markets, which are in addition to the usual risks of investing in developed foreign markets around the world.
The risks of investing in securities in emerging countries include: (i) less social, political and economic stability; (ii) the smaller size of the markets for such securities and lower volume of trading, which result in a lack of liquidity
25
Table of Contents
and in greater price volatility; (iii) certain national policies that may restrict the Fund’s investment opportunities, including restrictions on investment in issuers or industries deemed sensitive to national interests; (iv) foreign taxation; (v) the absence of developed structures governing private or foreign investment or allowing for judicial redress for injury to private property; and (vi) military unrest, war and terrorism.
Investors should note that upon the accession to power of authoritarian regimes, the governments of a number of emerging market countries previously expropriated large quantities of real and personal property similar to the property which may be represented by the securities purchased by the Fund. The claims of property owners against those governments were never finally settled. There can be no assurance that any property represented by securities purchased by the Fund will not also be expropriated, nationalized, or otherwise confiscated at some time in the future. If such confiscation were to occur, the Fund could lose a substantial portion or all of its investments in such countries. The Fund’s investments would similarly be adversely affected by exchange control regulation in any of those countries.
Certain countries in which the Fund may invest may have vocal groups that advocate radical religious or revolutionary philosophies or support ethnic independence. Any disturbance on the part of such individuals could carry the potential for widespread destruction or confiscation of property owned by individuals and entities foreign to such country and could cause the loss of the Fund’s investment in those countries.
Settlement mechanisms in emerging market securities may be less efficient and reliable than in more developed markets. In such emerging securities markets there may be delays and failures in share registration and delivery. In certain markets there have been times when settlements have been unable to keep pace with the volume of securities transactions, making it difficult to conduct such transactions. The inability of the Fund to make intended securities purchases due to settlement problems could cause the Fund to miss attractive investment opportunities. Inability to dispose of a portfolio security caused by settlement problems could result either in losses to the Fund due to subsequent declines in the value of the portfolio security or, if the Fund has entered into a contract to sell the security, in possible liability to the purchaser. There may also be a danger that, because of uncertainties in the operation of settlement systems in individual markets, competing claims may arise in respect of securities held by or to be transferred to the Fund. Furthermore, compensation schemes may be non-existent, limited or inadequate to meet the Fund’s claims in any of these events.
Inflation and rapid fluctuations in inflation rates have had, and may continue to have, very negative effects on the economies and securities markets of certain emerging markets. While some emerging market countries have sought to develop a number of corrective mechanisms to reduce inflation or mitigate its effects, inflation may continue to have significant effects both on emerging market economies and their securities markets. In addition, many of the currencies of emerging market countries have experienced steady devaluations relative to the U.S. dollar and major devaluations have occurred in certain countries. Economies in emerging markets generally are heavily dependent upon international trade and, accordingly, have been and may continue to be affected adversely by economic conditions, trade barriers, exchange controls, managed adjustments in relative currency values and other protectionist measures imposed or negotiated by the countries with which they trade.
Because of the high levels of foreign-denominated debt owed by many emerging market countries, fluctuating exchange rates can significantly affect the debt service obligations of those countries. This could, in turn, affect local interest rates, profit margins and exports, which are a major source of foreign exchange earnings.
To the extent an emerging market country faces a liquidity crisis with respect to its foreign exchange reserves, it may increase restrictions on the outflow of any foreign exchange. Repatriation is ultimately dependent on the ability of the Fund to liquidate its investments and convert the local currency proceeds obtained from such liquidation into U.S. dollars. Where this conversion must be done through official channels (usually the central bank or certain authorized commercial banks), the ability to obtain U.S. dollars is dependent on the availability of such U.S. dollars through those channels and, if available, upon the willingness of those channels to allocate those U.S. dollars to the Fund. The Fund’s ability to obtain U.S. dollars may be adversely affected by any increased restrictions imposed on the outflow of foreign exchange. If the Fund is unable to repatriate any amounts due to exchange controls, it may be required to accept an obligation payable at some future date by the central bank or other governmental entity of the jurisdiction involved. If such conversion can legally be done outside official channels, either directly or indirectly,
26
Table of Contents
the Fund’s ability to obtain U.S. dollars may not be affected as much by any increased restrictions except to the extent of the price which may be required to be paid in U.S. dollars. Furthermore, repatriation of investment income, capital and the proceeds of sales by foreign investors may require governmental registration and/or approval in some countries.
Many emerging market countries have little experience with the corporate form of business organization and may not have well-developed corporation and business laws or concepts of fiduciary duty in the business context. The Fund may encounter substantial difficulties in obtaining and enforcing judgments against individuals and companies located in certain emerging market countries. It may be difficult or impossible to obtain or enforce legislation or remedies against governments, their agencies and sponsored entities.
Disclosure and regulatory standards in emerging markets in many respects are less stringent than in the United States and other major markets. There also may be a lower level of monitoring and regulation of emerging markets and the activities of investors in such markets; enforcement of existing regulations has been extremely limited. Additionally, accounting, auditing and financial reporting and recordkeeping standards in emerging markets may not provide the same degree of investor protection or information to investors as would generally apply in more developed markets. The Public Company Accounting Oversight Board, which regulates auditors of U.S. public companies, may, from time to time, be unable to inspect audit work papers in certain foreign or emerging market countries.
Trading in the securities of emerging markets presents additional credit and financial risks. The Fund may have limited access to, or there may be a limited number of, potential counterparties that trade in the securities of emerging market issuers. Governmental regulations may restrict potential counterparties to certain financial institutions located or operating in the particular emerging market. Potential counterparties may not possess, adopt or implement creditworthiness standards, financial reporting standards or legal and contractual protections similar to those in developed markets. Currency hedging techniques may not be available or may be limited. The Fund may not be able to reduce or mitigate risks related to trading with emerging market counterparties.
The risk also exists that an emergency situation may arise in one or more emerging markets as a result of which trading of securities may cease or may be substantially curtailed and prices for the Fund’s portfolio securities in such markets may not be readily available. Section 22(e) of the 1940 Act permits a registered investment company to suspend redemption of its shares for any period during which an emergency exists, as determined by the SEC. Accordingly, if the Fund believes that appropriate circumstances warrant, it may apply to the SEC for a determination that an emergency exists within the meaning of Section 22(e) of the 1940 Act. During the period commencing from the Fund’s identification of such conditions until the date of SEC action, the portfolio securities in the affected markets will be valued at fair value as determined by the Adviser in accordance with the Fund’s valuation policy.
Although it might be theoretically possible to hedge for anticipated income and gains, the ongoing and indeterminate nature of the risks associated with emerging market investing (and the costs associated with hedging transactions) makes it very difficult to hedge effectively against such risks.
Europe — Recent Events
A number of countries in Europe have experienced severe economic and financial difficulties. Many non-governmental issuers, and even certain governments, have defaulted on, or been forced to restructure, their debts; many other issuers have faced difficulties obtaining credit or refinancing existing obligations; financial institutions have in many cases required government or central bank support, have needed to raise capital, and/or have been impaired in their ability to extend credit; and financial markets in Europe and elsewhere have experienced extreme volatility and declines in asset values and liquidity. These difficulties may continue, worsen or spread within and outside of Europe. Responses to the financial problems by European governments, central banks and others, including austerity measures and reforms, may not work, may result in social unrest and may limit future growth and economic recovery or have other unintended consequences. Further defaults or restructurings by governments and others of their debt could have additional adverse effects on economies, financial markets and asset valuations around the world.
27
Table of Contents
In addition, the United Kingdom left the European Union on January 31, 2020, commonly referred to as “Brexit.” Following a transition period, the United Kingdom’s post-Brexit trade agreement with the European Union passed into law in December 2020, was provisionally applied effective January 1, 2021, and formally entered into force on May 1, 2021. There is significant market uncertainty regarding Brexit’s ramifications. The range and potential implications of possible political, regulatory, economic, and market outcomes cannot be fully known but could be significant, potentially resulting in increased volatility and illiquidity and lower economic growth for companies that rely significantly on Europe for their business activities and revenues. The United Kingdom has one of the largest economies in Europe and is a major trading partner with the European Union countries and the United States. Brexit may create additional and substantial economic stresses for the United Kingdom, including a contraction of the United Kingdom’s economy, decreased trade, capital outflows, devaluation of the British pound, as well as a decrease in business and consumer spending and investment. The negative impact on not only the United Kingdom and other European economies but also the broader global economy could be significant. Moreover, other countries may seek to withdraw from the European Union and/or abandon the euro, the common currency of the European Union. A number of countries in Europe have suffered terror attacks, and additional attacks may occur in the future. Europe has also been struggling with mass migration from the Middle East and Africa.
The ultimate effects of these events and other socio-political or geopolitical issues are not known but could profoundly affect global economies and markets. Whether or not the Fund invests in securities of issuers located in Europe or with significant exposure to European issuers or countries, these events could negatively affect the value and liquidity of the Fund’s investments.
Risks Related to Russia’s Invasion of Ukraine
Russia’s military invasion of Ukraine in February 2022 resulted in the United States, other countries and certain international organizations levying broad economic sanctions against Russia. These sanctions froze certain Russian assets and prohibited, among other things, trading in certain Russian securities and doing business with specific Russian corporate entities, large financial institutions, officials and oligarchs. The sanctions also included the removal of some Russian banks from the Society for Worldwide Interbank Financial Telecommunications (SWIFT), the electronic network that connects banks globally, and imposed restrictive measures to prevent the Russian Central Bank from undermining the impact of the sanctions. The United States and other countries have also imposed economic sanctions on Belarus and may impose sanctions on other countries that support Russia’s military invasion. A number of large corporations and U.S. states have also announced plans to divest interests or otherwise curtail business dealings with certain Russian businesses. These sanctions and any additional sanctions or other intergovernmental actions that may be undertaken against Russia or other countries that support Russia’s military invasion in the future may result in the devaluation of Russian or other affected currencies, a downgrade in the sanctioned country’s credit rating, and a decline in the value and liquidity of Russian securities and securities of issuers in other countries that support the invasion. The potential for wider conflict may further decrease the value and liquidity of certain Russian securities and securities of issuers in other countries affected by the invasion. In addition, the ability to price, buy, sell, receive, or deliver such securities is also affected due to these measures. For example, the Fund may be prohibited from investing in securities issued by companies subject to such sanctions. In addition, the sanctions may require the Fund to freeze its existing investments in companies operating in or having dealings with Russia or other sanctioned countries, which would prevent the Fund from selling these investments. Any exposure that the Fund may have to Russian counterparties or counterparties in other sanctioned countries also could negatively impact the Fund’s portfolio.
Additionally, Russia has taken retaliatory actions, including preventing repatriation of capital by U.S. and other investors. The ongoing conflict has resulted in significant market disruptions, including in certain markets, industries and sectors, such as the oil and natural gas markets, and has negatively affected global supply chains, food supplies, inflation and global growth. The extent and duration of Russia’s military actions and the repercussions of such actions (including any sanctions, retaliatory actions and countermeasures, including cyber attacks) are impossible to predict. These and any related events could significantly impact the Fund’s performance and the value of an investment in the Fund, even if the Fund does not have direct exposure to Russian issuers or issuers in other countries affected by the invasion.
28
Table of Contents
Eurodollar or Yankee Obligations
Eurodollar bank obligations are U.S. dollar denominated debt obligations issued outside the U.S. capital markets by non-U.S. branches of U.S. banks and by non-U.S. banks. Yankee obligations are U.S. dollar denominated obligations issued in the U.S. capital markets by non-U.S. issuers. Eurodollar (and to a limited extent, Yankee) obligations are subject to certain sovereign risks. One such risk is the possibility that a non-U.S. government might prevent U.S. dollar denominated funds from flowing across its borders. Other risks include: adverse political and economic developments in a non-U.S. country; the extent and quality of government regulation of financial markets and institutions; the imposition of non-U.S. withholding taxes; and expropriation or nationalization of non-U.S. issuers.
Sovereign Government and Supranational Debt Obligations
The Fund may invest in all types of debt securities of governmental issuers in all countries, including emerging markets.
These sovereign debt securities may include: debt securities issued or guaranteed by governments, governmental agencies or instrumentalities and political subdivisions located in emerging market countries; debt securities issued by government owned, controlled or sponsored entities located in emerging market countries; interests issued for the purpose of restructuring the investment characteristics of instruments issued by any of the above issuers; participations in loans between emerging market governments and financial institutions; or debt securities issued by supranational entities such as the World Bank. A supranational entity is a bank, commission or company established or financially supported by the national governments of one or more countries to promote reconstruction or development. Included among these entities are the Asian Development Bank, the European Union, the European Investment Bank, the Inter-American Development Bank, the International Monetary Fund, the United Nations, the World Bank and the European Bank for Reconstruction and Development. Supranational organizations have no taxing authority and are dependent on their members for payments of interest and principal. There is no guarantee that one or more members of a supranational organization will continue to make capital contributions. If such contributions are not made, the organization may be unable to pay interest or repay principal on its debt securities, and the Fund may lose money on such investments. Further, the lending activities of such entities are limited to a percentage of their total capital, reserves and net income.
Sovereign debt is subject to risks in addition to those relating to non-U.S. investments generally. As a sovereign entity, the issuing government may be immune from lawsuits in the event of its failure or refusal to pay the obligations when due. The debtor’s willingness or ability to repay in a timely manner may be affected by, among other factors, its cash flow situation, the extent of its non-U.S. currency reserves, the availability of sufficient foreign currency exchange on the date a payment is due, the relative size of the debt service burden to the economy as a whole, the sovereign debtor’s policy toward principal international lenders and the political constraints to which the sovereign debtor may be subject. Sovereign debtors may also be dependent on disbursements or assistance from non-U.S. governments or multinational agencies, the country’s access to trade and other international credits, and the country’s balance of trade. Assistance may be dependent on a country’s implementation of austerity measures and reforms, economic performance and/or the timely service of such debtor’s obligations. Failure to implement such reforms, achieve such levels of economic performance or repay principal or interest when due may result in the cancellation of such third parties’ commitments to lend funds to the governmental entity, which may further impair such debtor’s ability or willingness to service its debts in a timely manner. Some sovereign debtors have rescheduled their debt payments, declared moratoria on payments or restructured their debt to effectively eliminate portions of it, and similar occurrences may happen in the future. There is no bankruptcy proceeding by which sovereign debt on which governmental entities have defaulted may be collected in whole or in part.
Depositary Receipts
Depositary receipts demonstrate ownership of shares of a foreign issuer and are alternatives to directly purchasing the underlying foreign security. Depositary receipts may be sponsored or unsponsored and include American Depositary Receipts (“ADRs”), Global Depositary Receipts (“GDRs”), European Depositary Receipts (“EDRs”) and
29
Table of Contents
non-voting depositary receipts (“NVDRs”). ADRs in registered form are typically issued by a U.S. bank or trust company, traded in U.S. dollars, and are designed for use in the domestic market. GDRs, EDRs, NVDRs and other similar instruments may be issued by a U.S. or non-U.S. entity and may be traded in other currencies. GDRs are tradable both in the United States and Europe and are designed for use throughout the world. EDRs are issued in bearer form and are designed for use in European securities markets.
Depositary receipts in general are subject to many of the risks associated with foreign investing (e.g., increased market, illiquidity, currency, political, information and other risks), and even where traded in U.S. dollars are subject to currency risk if the underlying security is traded in a foreign currency. Unsponsored depositary receipts are issued without the participation of the issuer of the underlying foreign security and there may be less information available about such issuers than there is with respect to domestic companies and issuers of securities underlying sponsored depositary receipts. Even if there is information available, there may not be a correlation between such information and the market value of the depositary receipts.
High Yield (“Junk”) Bonds
High yield securities are medium or lower rated securities and unrated securities of comparable quality, sometimes referred to as “high yield” or “junk” bonds. Generally, such securities offer a higher current yield than is offered by higher rated securities, but also are predominantly speculative with respect to the issuer’s capacity to pay interest and repay principal in accordance with the terms of the securities. The market values of certain of these securities also tend to be more sensitive to individual corporate developments and changes in economic conditions than higher quality bonds. In addition, medium and lower rated securities and comparable unrated securities generally present a higher degree of credit risk. The risk of loss because of default by issuers of these securities is significantly greater because medium and lower rated securities generally are unsecured and frequently subordinated to senior indebtedness. In addition, the market value of securities in lower rated categories is generally more volatile than that of higher quality securities, and the markets in which medium and lower rated securities are traded are more limited than those in which higher rated securities are traded. The existence of limited markets may make it more difficult for the Fund to obtain accurate market quotations for purposes of valuing its securities and calculating its net asset value. Moreover, the lack of a liquid trading market may restrict the availability of securities for the Fund to purchase and may also limit the ability of the Fund to sell securities at their fair value either to meet redemption requests or to respond to changes in the economy or the financial markets.
Lower rated debt obligations often have redemption features that permit an issuer to repurchase the security from the Fund before it matures. If an issuer exercises that right, the Fund may have to replace the security with a lower yielding security, resulting in a decreased return for investors. If the Fund experiences unexpected net redemptions, it may be forced to sell its higher rated bonds, resulting in a decline in the overall credit quality of the securities held by the Fund and increasing the exposure of the Fund to the risks of lower rated securities. Investments in lower rated zero coupon bonds may be more speculative and subject to greater fluctuations in value because of changes in interest rates than lower rated bonds that pay interest currently.
Subsequent to its purchase by the Fund, an issue of securities may cease to be rated or its rating may be reduced below the minimum required for purchase by the Fund (if applicable). Neither event will require sale of these securities by the Fund, but the portfolio manager will consider the event in determining whether the Fund should continue to hold the security.
Illiquid Investments and Restricted Securities
The Fund may invest up to 15% of its net assets in illiquid investments. An illiquid security is any security which the Fund reasonably expects cannot be sold or disposed of in current market conditions in seven calendar days or less without the sale or disposition significantly changing the market value of the security. To the extent required by applicable law and SEC guidance, the Fund will not acquire an illiquid security if such acquisition would cause the aggregate value of illiquid securities to exceed 15% of the Fund’s net assets. If at any time the portfolio manager determines that the value of illiquid securities held by the Fund exceeds 15% of the Fund’s net assets, the portfolio manager will take such steps as it considers appropriate to reduce the percentage within a reasonable period of
30
Table of Contents
time consistent with applicable regulatory requirements. Because illiquid investments may not be readily marketable, the Fund may not be able to dispose of them in a timely manner. As a result, the Fund may be forced to hold illiquid investments while their price depreciates. Depreciation in the price of illiquid investments may cause the net asset value of the Fund to decline.
Restricted securities are securities subject to legal or contractual restrictions on their resale, such as private placements. Such restrictions might prevent the sale of restricted securities at a time when the sale would otherwise be desirable. Under SEC regulations, certain restricted securities acquired through private placements can be traded freely among qualified purchasers. While restricted securities are generally presumed to be illiquid, it may be determined that a particular restricted security is liquid. Investing in these restricted securities could have the effect of increasing the Fund’s illiquidity if qualified purchasers become, for a time, uninterested in buying these securities.
Restricted securities may be sold only (1) pursuant to SEC Rule 144A or another exemption, (2) in privately negotiated transactions or (3) in public offerings with respect to which a registration statement is in effect under the 1933 Act. Rule 144A securities, although not registered in the U.S., may be sold to qualified institutional buyers in accordance with Rule 144A under the 1933 Act. As noted above, the Fund may determine that some Rule 144A securities are liquid. Where registration is required, the Fund may be obligated to pay all or part of the registration expenses and a considerable period may elapse between the time of the decision to sell and the time the Fund may be permitted to sell a restricted security under an effective registration statement. If, during such a period, adverse market conditions were to develop, the Fund might obtain a less favorable price than prevailed when it decided to sell.
Illiquid securities may be difficult to value, and the Fund may have difficulty disposing of such securities promptly. The Fund does not consider non-U.S. securities to be restricted if they can be freely sold in the principal markets in which they are traded, even if they are not registered for sale in the U.S.
Liquidity Risk Management. Rule 22e-4 under the 1940 Act requires, among other things, that the Fund and other Franklin Templeton ETFs and open-end funds establish a liquidity risk management program (“LRMP”) that is reasonably designed to assess and manage liquidity risk. Rule 22e-4 defines “liquidity risk” as the risk that a fund could not meet requests to redeem shares issued by the fund without significant dilution of the remaining investors’ interests in the fund. The Fund has implemented a LRMP designed to meet the relevant requirements. Additionally, the Board, including a majority of the Independent Trustees, approved the designation of the Fund’s LRMP administrator to administer such program and review no less frequently than annually a written report prepared by the LRMP administrator that addresses the operation of the LRMP and assesses its adequacy and effectiveness of implementation. There is no guarantee the LRMP will be effective in its operations, and complying with Rule 22e-4 or any amendment thereto, including bearing related costs, could impact the Fund’s performance and its ability to achieve its investment objective.
Investments in Other Investment Companies
Subject to applicable statutory and regulatory limitations described below, the Fund may invest in shares of other investment companies, including shares of open-end and closed-end investment companies affiliated or unaffiliated with the Fund, business development companies, exchange-traded funds and unregistered investment companies.
An investment in an investment company is subject to the risks associated with that investment company’s portfolio securities. Investments in closed-end funds may entail the additional risk that the market value of such investments may be substantially less than their net asset value. To the extent the Fund invests in shares of another investment company, the Fund will indirectly bear a proportionate share of that investment company’s advisory fees and other operating expenses. These fees are in addition to the advisory fees and other operational expenses incurred directly by the Fund. In addition, the Fund could incur a sales charge in connection with purchasing an investment company security or a redemption fee upon the redemption of such security.
Section 12(d)(1)(A) of the 1940 Act provides that a fund may not purchase or otherwise acquire the securities of other investment companies if, as a result of such purchase or acquisition, it would own: (i) more than 3% of the total outstanding voting stock of the acquired investment company; (ii) securities issued by any one investment
31
Table of Contents
company having a value in excess of 5% of the fund’s total assets; or (iii) securities issued by all investment companies having an aggregate value in excess of 10% of the fund’s total assets. These limitations are subject to certain statutory and regulatory exemptions including Rule 12d1- 4, which permits the Fund to invest in other investment companies beyond the statutory limits, subject to certain conditions.
Among other conditions, the Rule prohibits a fund from acquiring control of another investment company (other than an investment company in the same group of investment companies), including by acquiring more than 25% of its voting securities. In addition, the Rule imposes certain voting requirements when a fund’s ownership of another investment company exceeds particular thresholds. If shares of a fund are acquired by another investment company, the “acquired” fund may not purchase or otherwise acquire the securities of an investment company or private fund if immediately after such purchase or acquisition, the securities of investment companies and private funds owned by that acquired fund have an aggregate value in excess of 10% of the value of the total assets of the acquired fund, subject to certain exceptions. These restrictions may limit the Fund’s ability to invest in other investment companies to the extent desired. In addition, other unaffiliated investment companies may impose other investment limitations or redemption restrictions which may also limit the Fund’s flexibility with respect to making investments in those unaffiliated investment companies.
Investment in Money Market Funds
The Fund may invest in money market instruments, including money market funds managed by the Adviser or its affiliates and money market funds managed by unaffiliated advisers. Money market funds invest in high-quality, U.S. dollar- denominated short-term debt securities and must follow strict rules as to the credit quality, liquidity, diversification and maturity of their investments. The Fund may lose money on its investment in money market funds. If the Fund invests in money market funds it will indirectly bear its proportionate share of the management fees and other expenses that are charged by the money market fund in addition to the management fees and other expenses paid by the Fund. If the Fund invests in money market funds that are managed by the Adviser or its affiliates, it is possible that a conflict of interest among the Fund and the affiliated funds could affect how the Fund’s Adviser and its affiliates fulfill their fiduciary duty to the Fund and the affiliated funds.
Letters of Credit
The Fund may engage in trades of commercial paper and other short-term obligations that are backed by irrevocable letters of credit issued by banks which assume the obligation for payment of principal and interest in the event of default by an issuer. Only banks the securities of which, in the opinion of the Subadviser, are of investment quality comparable to other permitted investments of the Fund may be used for letters of credit-backed investments.
Leverage
The Fund may employ “leverage” by borrowing money and using it to purchase additional securities. Leverage increases both investment opportunity and investment risk. If the investment gains on the securities purchased with borrowed money exceed the interest and other costs of borrowing, the net asset value of the Fund’s shares will rise faster than would otherwise be the case. On the other hand, if the investment gains fail to cover the cost of borrowings, or if there are losses, the net asset value of the Fund’s shares will decrease faster than would otherwise be the case. To reduce its borrowing, the Fund might be required to sell securities at a disadvantageous time. The Fund will incur interest expense on any money borrowed, and the Fund may therefore have little or no investment income during periods of substantial borrowings. The Fund may leverage its assets when, in the portfolio manager’s judgment, the potential benefits of the borrowing outweigh the risk and expense of the borrowing.
Loans
Loans are negotiated and underwritten by a bank or syndicate of banks and other institutional investors. The Fund may acquire an interest in loans through the primary market by acting as one of a group of lenders of a loan. The primary risk in an investment in loans is that the borrower may be unable to meet its interest and/or principal payment obligations. The occurrence of such a default with regard to a loan in which the Fund had invested would
32
Table of Contents
have an adverse effect on the Fund’s net asset value. In addition, a sudden and significant increase in market interest rates may cause a decline in the value of these investments and in the Fund’s net asset value. Other factors, such as rating downgrades, credit deterioration, or large downward movement in stock prices, a disparity in supply and demand of certain securities or market conditions that reduce liquidity could reduce the value of loans, impairing the Fund’s net asset value. Loans may not be considered “securities” for certain purposes and purchasers, such as the Fund, therefore may not be entitled to rely on the anti-fraud protections of the federal securities laws.
Loans in which the Fund may invest may be collateralized or uncollateralized and senior or subordinate. Investments in uncollateralized and/or subordinate loans entail a greater risk of nonpayment than do investments in loans which hold a more senior position in the borrower’s capital structure or that are secured with collateral. In the case of collateralized senior loans, however, there is no assurance that sale of the collateral would raise enough cash to satisfy the borrower’s payment obligation or that the collateral can or will be liquidated. As a result, the Fund might not receive payments to which it is entitled and thereby may experience a decline in the value of its investment and its net asset value. In the event of bankruptcy, liquidation may not occur and the court may not give lenders the full benefit of their senior positions. If the terms of a senior loan do not require the borrower to pledge additional collateral, the Fund will be exposed to the risk that the value of the collateral will not at all times equal or exceed the amount of the borrower’s obligations under the senior loans. To the extent that a senior loan is collateralized by stock in the borrower or its subsidiaries, such stock may lose all of its value in the event of bankruptcy of the borrower.
The Fund may also acquire an interest in loans by purchasing participations (“Participations”) in and/or assignments (“Assignments”) of portions of loans from third parties. By purchasing a Participation, the Fund acquires some or all of the interest of a bank or other lending institution in a loan to a borrower. Participations typically will result in the Fund’s having a contractual relationship only with the lender and not the borrower. The Fund will have the right to receive payments of principal, interest and any fees to which it is entitled only from the lender selling the Participation and only upon receipt by the lender of the payments from the borrower. In connection with purchasing Participations, the Fund generally will have no right to enforce compliance by the borrower with the terms of the loan agreement relating to the loan, nor any rights of set-off against the borrower, and the Fund may not directly benefit from any collateral supporting the loan in which it has purchased the Participation. As a result, the Fund will assume the credit risk of both the borrower and the lender that is selling the Participation.
When the Fund purchases Assignments from lenders, the Fund will acquire direct rights against the borrower on the loan. However, since Assignments are arranged through private negotiations between potential assignees and assignors, the rights and obligations acquired by the Fund as the purchaser of an Assignment may differ from, and be more limited than, those held by the lender from which the Fund is purchasing the Assignments. Certain of the Participations or Assignments acquired by the Fund may involve unfunded commitments of the lenders or revolving credit facilities under which a borrower may from time to time borrow and repay amounts up to the maximum amount of the facility. In such cases, the Fund would have an obligation to advance its portion of such additional borrowings upon the terms specified in the loan documentation.
The Fund may acquire loans of borrowers that are experiencing, or are more likely to experience, financial difficulty, including loans of borrowers that have filed for bankruptcy protection. Although loans in which the Fund will invest generally will be secured by specific collateral, there can be no assurance that liquidation of such collateral would satisfy the borrower’s obligation in the event of nonpayment of scheduled interest or principal, or that such collateral could be readily liquidated. In the event of bankruptcy of a borrower, the Fund could experience delays or limitations with respect to its ability to realize the benefits of the collateral securing a senior loan.
In addition, the Fund may have difficulty disposing of its investments in loans. The liquidity of such securities is limited and the Fund anticipates that such securities could be sold only to a limited number of institutional investors. The lack of a liquid secondary market could have an adverse impact on the value of such securities and on the Fund’s ability to dispose of particular loans or Assignments or Participations when necessary to meet the Fund’s liquidity needs or in response to a specific economic event, such as a deterioration in the creditworthiness
33
Table of Contents
of the borrower. The lack of a liquid secondary market for loans may also make it more difficult for the Fund to assign a value to those securities for purposes of valuing the Fund’s investments and calculating its net asset value.
The issuer of a loan may offer to provide material, non-public information about the issuer to investors, such as the Fund. The Fund’s portfolio manager may avoid receiving this type of information about the issuer of a loan either held by or considered for investment by the Fund, because of prohibitions on trading in securities of issuers while in possession of such information. The decision not to receive material, non-public information may place the Fund at a disadvantage, relative to other loan investors, in assessing a loan or the loan’s issuer.
Master Limited Partnerships (“MLPs”)
MLPs are limited partnerships or limited liability companies usually taxable as partnerships. MLPs may derive income and gains from, among other things, the exploration, development, mining or production, processing, refining, transportation (including pipelines transporting gas, oil, or products thereof), storage, or the marketing of, or the provision of infrastructure related services relating to, minerals or other natural resources. The value of an investment in some MLPs may be directly affected by the prices of natural resources. The volatility and interrelationships of commodity prices can also indirectly affect certain MLPs due to the potential impact on the volume of commodities transported, processed, stored or distributed. The Fund’s investment in such an MLP may be adversely affected by market perceptions that the performance and distributions or dividends of MLPs are directly tied to commodity prices. In addition, MLPs are generally considered interest-rate sensitive investments, and during periods of interest rate volatility, may not provide attractive returns.
MLPs generally have two classes of owners, the general partner and limited partners. The general partner is typically owned by a major company (often an energy company), an investment fund, the direct management of the MLP or is an entity owned by one or more of such parties. The general partner may be structured as a private or publicly traded corporation or other entity. The general partner typically controls the operations and management of the MLP through an equity interest of up to 2% in the MLP plus, in many cases, ownership of common units and subordinated units. Limited partners own the remainder of the partnership, through ownership of common units, and have a limited role in the partnership’s operations and management.
MLPs are typically structured such that common units and general partner interests have first priority to receive quarterly cash distributions up to an established minimum amount (“minimum quarterly distributions” or “MQD”). Common and general partner interests also accrue arrearages in distributions to the extent the MQD is not paid. Once common and general partner interests have been paid, subordinated units receive distributions of up to the MQD; however, subordinated units do not accrue arrearages. Distributable cash in excess of the MQD paid to both common and subordinated units is distributed to both common and subordinated units generally on a pro rata basis. The general partner is also eligible to receive incentive distributions if the general partner operates the business in a manner which results in distributions paid per common unit surpassing specified target levels. As the general partner increases cash distributions to the limited partners, the general partner receives an increasingly higher percentage of the incremental cash distributions. A common arrangement provides that the general partner can reach a tier where it receives 50% of every incremental dollar paid to common and subordinated unit holders. These incentive distributions encourage the general partner to streamline costs, increase capital expenditures and acquire assets in order to increase the partnership’s cash flow and raise the quarterly cash distribution in order to reach higher tiers. Such results increase costs to the limited partners.
MLP common units represent a limited partnership interest in the MLP. Common units are listed and traded on U.S. securities exchanges, with their value fluctuating predominantly based on prevailing market conditions and the success of the MLP. Unlike owners of common stock of a corporation, owners of common units have limited voting rights and have no ability annually to elect directors. In the event of liquidation, common units have preference over subordinated units, but not over debt or preferred units, to the remaining assets of the MLP.
General partner interests of MLPs are typically retained by the original sponsors of an MLP, such as its founders, corporate partners and entities that sell assets to the MLP. The holder of the general partner interest can be liable in certain circumstances for amounts greater than the amount of the holder’s investment in the general partner.
34
Table of Contents
General partner interests often confer direct board participation rights in, and in many cases control over the operations of, the MLP. General partner interests can be privately held or owned by publicly traded entities.
Market Sector Risk
To the extent the Fund may be significantly overweight or underweight in certain companies, industries or market sectors, the Fund’s performance may be more sensitive to developments affecting those companies, industries or sectors.
Money Market Instruments Generally
Money market instruments are short-term IOUs issued by banks or other non-governmental issuers, the U.S. or non-U.S. governments, or state or local governments. Money market instruments generally have maturity dates of 13 months or less, and may pay interest at fixed, floating or adjustable rates, or may be issued at a discount. Money market instruments may include certificates of deposit, bankers’ acceptances, variable rate demand securities (where the interest rate is reset periodically and the holder may demand payment from the issuer or another obligor at any time), preferred shares, fixed-term obligations, commercial paper (short-term unsecured debt), asset-backed commercial paper, other mortgage-backed and asset- backed securities and repurchase agreements. Asset-backed commercial paper refers to a debt security with an original term to maturity of up to 270 days that may be backed by residential and commercial mortgage loans or mortgage-backed securities or other types of receivables. Payments due on asset-backed commercial paper are supported by cash flows from underlying assets, or one or more liquidity or credit support providers, or both.
Mortgage-Backed and Other Asset-Backed Securities – Generally
An asset-backed security is a fixed income security that derives its value primarily from cash flows relating to a pool of assets. There are a number of different types of asset-backed and related securities, including mortgage-backed securities, securities backed by other pools of collateral (such as automobile loans, student loans, sub-prime mortgages, and credit card receivables), collateralized mortgage obligations, and collateralized debt obligations.
Asset-backed and mortgage-backed securities differ from conventional bonds in that principal is paid over the life of the securities rather than at maturity. As a result, payments of principal of and interest on mortgage-backed securities and asset- backed securities are made more frequently than are payments on conventional debt securities. The average life of asset-backed and mortgage-backed securities is likely to be substantially less than the original maturity of the underlying asset pools as a result of prepayments or foreclosures of mortgages, as applicable. In addition, holders of mortgage-backed securities and of certain asset-backed securities (such as asset-backed securities backed by home equity loans) may receive unscheduled payments of principal at any time representing prepayments on the underlying mortgage loans or financial assets. When the holder of the security attempts to reinvest prepayments or even the scheduled payments of principal and interest, it may receive a rate of interest that is higher or lower than the rate on the mortgage-backed security or asset-backed security originally held. To the extent that mortgage-backed securities or asset-backed securities are purchased by the Fund at a premium, mortgage foreclosures and principal prepayments may result in a loss to the extent of the premium paid. To the extent the loans underlying a security representing an interest in a pool of mortgages or other assets are prepaid, the Fund may experience a loss (if the price at which the respective security was acquired by the Fund was at a premium over par, which represents the price at which the security will be redeemed upon prepayment) or a gain (if the price at which the respective security was acquired by the Fund was at a discount from par). In addition, prepayments of such securities held by the Fund will reduce the share price of the Fund to the extent the market value of the securities at the time of prepayment exceeds their par value, and will increase the share price of the Fund to the extent the par value of the securities exceeds their market value at the time of prepayment. Prepayments may occur with greater frequency in periods of declining interest rates because, among other reasons, it may be possible for borrowers to refinance their outstanding obligation at lower interest rates. When market interest rates increase, the market values of asset-backed and mortgage-backed securities decline. At the same time, however, refinancing slows, which lengthens the effective maturities of these securities. As a result, the negative effect of the rate increase on the market value of asset- backed and mortgage-backed securities is usually more pronounced than it is for other types of fixed income securities.
35
Table of Contents
Changes in the market’s perception of the mortgages or assets backing the security, the creditworthiness of the servicing agent for the loan pool, the originator of the loans, or the financial institution providing any credit enhancement, will all affect the value of an asset-backed or mortgage-backed security, as will the exhaustion of any credit enhancement.
The risks of investing in asset-backed and mortgage-backed securities ultimately depend upon the payment of the underlying loans by the individual borrowers. In its capacity as purchaser of an asset-backed security or mortgage-backed security, the Fund would generally have no recourse to the entity that originated the loans in the event of default by the borrower. The risk of non-payment is greater for asset-backed and mortgage-backed securities that are backed by pools that contain subprime loans, but a level of risk exists for all loans. Market factors adversely affecting loan repayments may include a general economic turndown and high unemployment. Mortgage-backed securities may be adversely affected by a general slowdown in the real estate market, a drop in the market prices of real estate, or an increase in interest rates resulting in higher mortgage payments by holders of adjustable rate mortgages. Developments following the onset of COVID-19 have adversely impacted the commercial real estate markets, causing the deferral of mortgage payments, renegotiated commercial mortgage loans, commercial real estate vacancies or outright mortgage defaults, and potential acceleration of macro trends such as work from home and online shopping which may negatively impact certain industries, such as brick-and-mortar retail.
Additional information regarding different types of asset-backed and mortgage-backed securities is provided below.
Governmental, government-related or private entities may create pools of loan assets offering pass-through investments in addition to those described below. As new types of asset-backed or mortgage-backed securities are developed and offered to investors, the portfolio manager may, consistent with the Fund’s investment objective and policies, consider making investments in such new types of securities.
Mortgage-backed securities. Mortgage-backed securities (“MBS”) represent interests in pools of mortgage loans made by lenders such as savings and loan institutions, mortgage bankers, commercial banks and others, to finance purchases of homes, commercial buildings or other real estate. The individual mortgage loans are assembled for sale to investors (such as the Fund) by various governmental or government-related agencies and private organizations, such as dealers.
Government-sponsored MBS. Some government sponsored mortgage-related securities are backed by the full faith and credit of the United States. The Government National Mortgage Association (“Ginnie Mae”), the principal guarantor of such securities, is a wholly-owned United States government corporation within the Department of Housing and Urban Development. Other government-sponsored mortgage-related securities are not backed by the full faith and credit of the United States government. Issuers of such securities include Fannie Mae (formally known as the Federal National Mortgage Association) and Freddie Mac (formally known as the Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corporation). Fannie Mae is a government-sponsored corporation which is subject to general regulation by the Secretary of Housing and Urban Development. Pass-through securities issued by Fannie Mae are guaranteed as to timely payment of principal and interest by Fannie Mae. Freddie Mac is a stockholder-owned corporation chartered by Congress and subject to general regulation by the Department of Housing and Urban Development. Participation certificates representing interests in mortgages from Freddie Mac’s national portfolio are guaranteed as to the timely payment of interest and ultimate collection of principal by Freddie Mac. The U.S. government has provided financial support to Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac in the past, but there can be no assurances that it will support these or other government-sponsored entities in the future.
Privately issued MBS. Unlike MBS issued or guaranteed by the U.S. government or certain government-sponsored entities, MBS issued by private issuers do not have a government or government-sponsored entity guarantee, but may have credit enhancement provided by external entities such as banks or financial institutions or achieved through the structuring of the transaction itself.
In addition, MBS that are issued by private issuers are not subject to the underwriting requirements for the underlying mortgages that are applicable to those MBS that have a government or government-sponsored entity guarantee. As a result, the mortgage loans underlying private MBS may, and frequently do, have less favorable collateral, credit risk or other underwriting characteristics than government or government-sponsored MBS and
36
Table of Contents
have wider variances in a number of terms including interest rate, term, size, purpose and borrower characteristics. Privately issued pools more frequently include second mortgages, high loan-to-value mortgages and manufactured housing loans. The coupon rates and maturities of the underlying mortgage loans in a private-label MBS pool may vary to a greater extent than those included in a government guaranteed pool, and the pool may include subprime mortgage loans. Subprime loans refer to loans made to borrowers with weakened credit histories or with a lower capacity to make timely payments on their loans. For these reasons, the loans underlying these securities have had in many cases higher default rates than those loans that meet government underwriting requirements.
Privately issued mortgage-backed securities are not traded on an exchange and there may be a limited market for the securities, especially when there is a perceived weakness in the mortgage and real estate market sectors. Without an active trading market, mortgage-backed securities held in the Fund’s portfolio may be particularly difficult to value because of the complexities involved in assessing the value of the underlying mortgage loans.
Adjustable rate mortgage-backed securities. Adjustable rate mortgage-backed securities (“ARMBS”) are pass-through securities collateralized by mortgages with adjustable rather than fixed rates. Adjustable rate mortgages eligible for inclusion in a mortgage pool generally provide for a fixed initial mortgage interest rate for a set number of scheduled monthly payments.
After that schedule of payments has been completed, the interest rates of the adjustable rate mortgages are subject to periodic adjustment based on changes to a designated benchmark index.
Mortgages underlying most ARMBS may contain maximum and minimum rates beyond which the mortgage interest rate may not vary over the lifetime of the mortgage. In addition, certain adjustable rate mortgages provide for additional limitations on the maximum amount by which the mortgage interest rate may adjust for any single adjustment period. In the event that market rates of interest rise more rapidly to levels above that of the maximum rate for the adjustable rate mortgages underlying an ARMBS, the ARMBS’ coupon may represent a below market rate of interest. In these circumstances, the market value of the ARMBS will likely have fallen. During periods of declining interest rates, income to the Fund derived from adjustable rate mortgages that remain in the mortgage pool underlying the ARMBS may decrease in contrast to the income on fixed rate mortgages, which will remain constant. Adjustable rate mortgages also have less potential for appreciation in value as interest rates decline than do fixed rate investments. In addition, the current yields on ARMBS may be different than market yields during interim periods between coupon reset dates.
Stripped mortgage-backed securities. Stripped mortgage-backed securities (“SMBS”) are structured with two or more classes of securities that receive different proportions of the interest and principal distributions on a pool of mortgage assets. A common type of SMBS will have at least one class receiving only a small portion of the principal. In the most extreme case, one class will receive all of the interest (“IO” or interest-only class), while the other class will receive all of the principal (“PO” or principal-only class). The yield to maturity on IOs, POs and other mortgage-backed securities that are purchased at a substantial premium or discount generally are extremely sensitive not only to changes in prevailing interest rates but also to the rate of principal payments (including prepayments) on the related underlying mortgage assets, and a rapid rate of principal payments may have a material adverse effect on such securities’ yield to maturity. If the underlying mortgage assets experience greater than anticipated prepayments of principal, the Fund may fail to fully recoup its initial investment in these securities even if the securities have received the highest rating by a NRSRO.
SMBS have greater volatility than other types of securities. Although SMBS are purchased and sold by institutional investors through several investment banking firms acting as brokers or dealers, the market for such securities has not yet been fully developed. Accordingly, the secondary market for SMBS may be more volatile and have lower liquidity than that for other MBS, potentially limiting the Fund’s ability to buy or sell SMBS at any particular time.
Collateralized mortgage obligations. Another type of security representing an interest in a pool of mortgage loans is known as a collateralized mortgage obligation (“CMO”). CMOs represent interests in a short-term, intermediate-term or long- term portion of a mortgage pool. Each portion of the pool receives monthly interest payments, but the principal repayments pass through to the short-term CMO first and to the long-term CMO last. A CMO permits an investor to more accurately predict the rate of principal repayments. CMOs are issued by private issuers, such as
37
Table of Contents
broker-dealers, and by government agencies, such as Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac. Investments in CMOs are subject to the same risks as direct investments in the underlying mortgage-backed securities. In addition, in the event of a bankruptcy or other default of a broker that issued the CMO held by the Fund, the Fund could experience delays in liquidating both its position and losses. The Fund may invest in CMOs in any rating category of the recognized rating services and may invest in unrated CMOs. The Fund may also invest in “stripped” CMOs, which represent only the income portion or the principal portion of the CMO. The values of stripped CMOs are very sensitive to interest rate changes; accordingly, these instruments present a greater risk of loss than conventional mortgage-backed securities.
Tiered index bonds. Tiered index bonds are relatively new forms of mortgage-related securities. The interest rate on a tiered index bond is tied to a specified index or market rate. So long as this index or market rate is below a predetermined “strike” rate, the interest rate on the tiered index bond remains fixed. If, however, the specified index or market rate rises above the “strike” rate, the interest rate of the tiered index bond will decrease. Thus, under these circumstances, the interest rate on a tiered index bond, like an inverse floater, will move in the opposite direction of prevailing interest rates, with the result that the price of the tiered index bond would decline and may be considerably more volatile than that of a fixed-rate bond.
Other Asset-Backed Securities – Additional Information
Similar to mortgage-backed securities, other types of asset-backed securities may be issued by agencies or instrumentalities of the U.S. government (including those whose securities are neither guaranteed nor insured by the U.S. government), foreign governments (or their agencies or instrumentalities), or non-governmental issuers. These securities include securities backed by pools of automobile loans, educational loans, home equity loans, and credit card receivables. The underlying pools of assets are securitized through the use of trusts and special purpose entities. These securities may be subject to the risks described above under “Mortgage-Backed and Other Asset-Backed Securities — Generally,” including risks associated with changes in interest rates and prepayment of underlying obligations.
Certain types of asset-backed securities present additional risks that are not presented by mortgage-backed securities.
In particular, certain types of asset-backed securities may not have the benefit of a security interest in the related assets. For example, many securities backed by credit card receivables are unsecured. Even when security interests are present, the ability of an issuer of certain types of asset-backed securities to enforce those interests may be more limited than that of an issuer of mortgage-backed securities. For instance, automobile receivables generally are secured by automobiles rather than by real property. Most issuers of automobile receivables permit loan servicers to retain possession of the underlying assets. In addition, because of the large number of underlying vehicles involved in a typical issue of asset-backed securities and technical requirements under state law, the trustee for the holders of the automobile receivables may not have a proper security interest in all of the automobiles. Therefore, recoveries on repossessed automobiles may not be available to support payments on these securities.
In addition, certain types of asset-backed securities may experience losses on the underlying assets as a result of certain rights provided to consumer debtors under federal and state law. In the case of certain consumer debt, such as credit card debt, debtors are entitled to the protection of a number of state and federal consumer credit laws, many of which give such debtors the right to set off certain amounts owed on their credit cards (or other debt), thereby reducing their balances due. For instance, a debtor may be able to offset certain damages for which a court has determined that the creditor is liable to the debtor against amounts owed to the creditor by the debtor on his or her credit card.
Additionally, an asset-backed security is subject to risks associated with the servicing agent’s or originator’s performance. For example, a servicing agent or originator’s mishandling of documentation related to the underlying collateral (e.g., failure to properly document a security interest in the underlying collateral) may affect the rights of the security holders in and to the underlying collateral.
Asset-backed commercial paper. The Fund may purchase commercial paper, including asset-backed commercial paper (“ABCP”) that is issued by structured investment vehicles or other conduits. These conduits may be
38
Table of Contents
sponsored by mortgage companies, investment banking firms, finance companies, hedge funds, private equity firms and special purpose finance entities. ABCP typically refers to a debt security with an original term to maturity of up to 270 days, the payment of which is supported by cash flows from underlying assets, or one or more liquidity or credit support providers, or both. Assets backing ABCP, which may be included in revolving pools of assets with large numbers of obligors, include credit card, car loan and other consumer receivables and home or commercial mortgages, including subprime mortgages. The repayment of ABCP issued by a conduit depends primarily on the cash collections received from the conduit’s underlying asset portfolio and the conduit’s ability to issue new ABCP. Therefore, there could be losses to the Fund investing in ABCP in the event of credit or market value deterioration in the conduit’s underlying portfolio, mismatches in the timing of the cash flows of the underlying asset interests and the repayment obligations of maturing ABCP, or the conduit’s inability to issue new ABCP. To protect investors from these risks, ABCP programs may be structured with various protections, such as credit enhancement, liquidity support, and commercial paper stop-issuance and wind-down triggers. However there can be no guarantee that these protections will be sufficient to prevent losses to investors in ABCP.
Some ABCP programs provide for an extension of the maturity date of the ABCP if, on the related maturity date, the conduit is unable to access sufficient liquidity through the issue of additional ABCP. This may delay the sale of the underlying collateral and the Fund may incur a loss if the value of the collateral deteriorates during the extension period. Alternatively, if collateral for ABCP deteriorates in value, the collateral may be required to be sold at inopportune times or at prices insufficient to repay the principal and interest on the ABCP. ABCP programs may provide for the issuance of subordinated notes as an additional form of credit enhancement. The subordinated notes are typically of a lower credit quality and have a higher risk of default. A fund purchasing these subordinated notes will therefore have a higher likelihood of loss than investors in the senior notes.
Collateralized debt obligations. The Fund may invest in collateralized debt obligations (“CDOs”), which include collateralized bond obligations (“CBOs”), collateralized loan obligations (“CLOs”) and other similarly structured securities. CDOs are types of asset-backed securities. A CBO is a trust or other special purpose entity (“SPE”) which is typically backed by a diversified pool of fixed income securities (which may include high risk, below investment grade securities). A CLO is a trust or other SPE that is typically collateralized by a pool of loans, which may include, among others, domestic and non-U.S. senior secured loans, senior unsecured loans, and subordinate corporate loans, including loans that may be rated below investment grade or equivalent unrated loans. Although certain CDOs may receive credit enhancement in the form of a senior-subordinate structure, over-collateralization or bond insurance, such enhancement may not always be present, and may fail to protect the Fund against the risk of loss on default of the collateral. Certain CDOs may use derivatives contracts to create “synthetic” exposure to assets rather than holding such assets directly, which entails the risks of derivative instruments described elsewhere in this SAI. CDOs may charge management fees and administrative expenses, which are in addition to those of the Fund.
For both CBOs and CLOs, the cashflows from the SPE are split into two or more portions, called tranches, varying in risk and yield. The riskiest portion is the “equity” tranche, which bears the first loss from defaults from the bonds or loans in the SPE and serves to protect the other, more senior tranches from default (though such protection is not complete). Since it is partially protected from defaults, a senior tranche from a CBO or CLO typically has higher ratings and lower yields than its underlying securities, and may be rated investment grade. Despite the protection from the equity tranche, CBO or CLO tranches can experience substantial losses due to actual defaults, increased sensitivity to defaults due to collateral default and disappearance of protecting tranches, market anticipation of defaults, as well as investor aversion to CBO or CLO securities as a class. Interest on certain tranches of a CDO may be paid in kind (paid in the form of obligations of the same type rather than cash), which involves continued exposure to default risk with respect to such payments.
The risks of an investment in a CDO depend largely on the type of the collateral securities and the class of the CDO in which the Fund invests. Normally, CBOs, CLOs and other CDOs are privately offered and sold, and thus, are not registered under the securities laws. As a result, investments in CDOs may be characterized by the Fund as illiquid securities. However, an active dealer market may exist for CDOs, allowing a CDO to qualify for Rule 144A transactions. In addition to the normal risks associated with fixed income securities discussed elsewhere in this SAI and the Prospectus (e.g., interest rate risk and credit risk), CDOs carry additional risks including, but not limited to:
39
Table of Contents
(i) the possibility that distributions from collateral securities will not be adequate to make interest or other payments; (ii) the collateral may decline in value or default or its credit rating may be downgraded, if rated by a nationally recognized statistical rating organization; (iii) the Fund may invest in tranches of CDOs that are subordinate to other tranches; (iv) the complex structure of the security may not be fully understood at the time of investment and may produce disputes with the issuer or unexpected investment results; and (v) the CDO’s manager may perform poorly.
Forward Roll Transactions
In a forward roll transaction, also known as a mortgage dollar roll, the Fund sells MBS for delivery in the current month and simultaneously contracts to repurchase substantially similar (same type, coupon and maturity) MBS on a specified future date. The Fund may enter into a forward roll transaction commitment with the intention of entering into an offsetting transaction whereby, rather than accepting delivery of the security on the specified future date, the Fund sells the security and then agrees to repurchase a similar security at a later time. In this case, the Fund forgoes interest on the security during the roll period and is compensated by the interest earned on the cash proceeds of the initial sale of the security and by the difference between the sale price and the lower repurchase price at the future date.
Forward roll transactions involve the risk that the market value of the securities the Fund is obligated to repurchase under the agreement may decline below the repurchase price. In the event the buyer of securities under a forward roll transaction files for bankruptcy or becomes insolvent, the Fund’s use of proceeds of the forward roll transaction may be restricted pending a determination by the other party, or its trustee or receiver, whether to enforce the Fund’s obligation to repurchase the securities.
Forward roll transactions may have a leveraging effect on the Fund, making the value of an investment in the Fund more volatile and increasing the Fund’s overall investment exposure. Successful use of forward roll transactions may depend on the portfolio manager’s ability to correctly predict interest rates and prepayments. There is no assurance that forward roll transactions can be successfully employed.
Preferred Securities
There are two basic types of preferred securities: traditional and hybrid-preferred securities. Traditional preferred securities consist of preferred stock issued by an entity taxable as a corporation. Preferred stocks, which may offer fixed or floating rate dividends, are perpetual instruments and considered equity securities. Preferred stocks are subordinated to debt instruments in a company’s capital structure, in terms of priority to corporate income and claim to corporate assets, and therefore will be subject to greater credit risk than debt instruments. Alternatively, hybrid-preferred securities may be issued by corporations, generally in the form of interest-bearing notes with preferred securities characteristics, or by an affiliated trust or partnership of the corporation, generally in the form of preferred interests in subordinated debentures or similarly structured securities. The hybrid-preferred securities market consists of both fixed and adjustable coupon rate securities that are either perpetual in nature or have stated maturity dates.
Traditional Preferred Securities. Traditional preferred securities pay fixed or floating dividends to investors and have “preference” over common stock in the payment of dividends and the liquidation of a company’s assets. This means that a company must pay dividends on preferred stock before paying any dividends on its common stock. In order to be payable, distributions on such preferred securities must be declared by the issuer’s board of directors. Income payments on preferred securities may be cumulative, causing dividends and distributions to accumulate even if not declared by the board of directors or otherwise made payable. In such a case, all accumulated dividends must be paid before any dividend on the common stock can be paid. However, many traditional preferred stocks are non-cumulative, in which case dividends do not accumulate and need not ever be paid. There is no assurance that dividends or distributions on the traditional preferred securities in which the Fund invests will be declared or otherwise made payable. Preferred securities may also contain provisions under which payments must be stopped (i.e., stoppage is compulsory, not discretionary). The conditions under which this occurs may relate to, for instance, capitalization levels. Hence, if a company incurs significant losses that deplete retained earnings automatic payment stoppage could occur. In some cases the terms of the preferred securities provide that the
40
Table of Contents
issuer would be obligated to attempt to issue common shares to raise funds for the purpose of making the preferred payments. However, there is no guarantee that the issuer would be successful in placing common shares.
Preferred stockholders usually have no right to vote for corporate directors or on other matters. Shares of traditional preferred securities have a liquidation preference that generally equals the original purchase price at the date of issuance. The market value of preferred securities may be affected by, among other factors, favorable and unfavorable changes impacting the issuer or industries in which they operate, movements in interest rates and inflation, and the broader economic and credit environments, and by actual and anticipated changes in tax laws, such as changes in corporate and individual income tax rates. Because the claim on an issuer’s earnings represented by traditional preferred securities may become onerous when interest rates fall below the rate payable on such securities, the issuer may redeem the securities. Thus, in declining interest rate environments in particular, the Fund’s holdings of higher rate-paying fixed rate preferred securities may be reduced, and the Fund may be unable to acquire securities of comparable credit quality paying comparable rates with the redemption proceeds.
Hybrid-Preferred Securities. Hybrid-preferred securities are typically junior and fully subordinated liabilities of an issuer or the beneficiary of a guarantee that is junior and fully subordinated to the other liabilities of the guarantor. In addition, hybrid- preferred securities typically permit an issuer to defer the payment of income for eighteen months or more without triggering an event of default. Generally, the maximum deferral period is five years. Because of their subordinated position in the capital structure of an issuer, the ability to defer payments for extended periods of time without default consequences to the issuer, and certain other features (such as restrictions on common dividend payments by the issuer or ultimate guarantor when full cumulative payments on the hybrid preferred securities have not been made), these hybrid-preferred securities are often treated as close substitutes for traditional preferred securities, both by issuers and investors. Hybrid-preferred securities have many of the key characteristics of equity due to their subordinated position in an issuer’s capital structure and because their quality and value are heavily dependent on the profitability of the issuer rather than on any legal claims to specific assets or cash flows.
Hybrid-preferred securities include, but are not limited to, trust preferred securities (TRUPS®); enhanced trust preferred securities (Enhanced TRUPS®); trust-originated preferred securities (TOPrS®); monthly-income preferred securities (MIPS®); quarterly- income bond securities (QUIBS®); quarterly-income debt securities (QUIDS®); quarterly-income preferred securities (QUIPSSM); corporate trust securities (CorTS®); public income notes (PINES®); and other hybrid-preferred securities. Hybrid-preferred securities are typically issued with a final maturity date. In certain instances, a final maturity date may be extended and/or the final payment of principal may be deferred at the issuer’s option for a specified time without default. No redemption can typically take place unless all cumulative payment obligations have been met, although issuers may be able to engage in open-market repurchases without regard to whether all payments have been paid.
Many hybrid-preferred securities are issued by trusts or other special purpose entities established by operating companies and are not a direct obligation of an operating company. At the time the trust or special purpose entity sells such preferred securities to investors, it purchases debt of the operating company (with terms comparable to those of the trust or special purpose entity securities), and the operating company deducts for tax purposes the interest paid on the debt held by the trust or special purpose entity. The trust or special purpose entity is generally required to be treated as transparent for U.S. federal income tax purposes such that the holders of the trust preferred securities are treated as owning beneficial interests in the underlying debt of the operating company. Accordingly, payments on the hybrid-preferred securities are generally treated as interest rather than dividends for U.S. federal income tax purposes and, as such, are not eligible for the dividends-received deduction for corporate taxpayers or the reduced rates of tax that apply to qualified dividend income for non-corporate taxpayers. The trust or special purpose entity in turn is a holder of the operating company’s debt and has priority with respect to the operating company’s earnings and profits over the operating company’s common stockholders, but is typically subordinated to other classes of the operating company’s debt. Typically a preferred security has a credit rating that is lower than that of its corresponding operating company’s senior debt securities.
Within the category of hybrid-preferred securities are senior debt instruments that trade in the broader preferred securities market. These debt instruments, which are sources of long-term capital for the issuers, have structural
41
Table of Contents
features similar to other preferred securities such as maturities ranging from 30 years to perpetuity, call features, quarterly payments, exchange listings and the inclusion of accrued interest in the trading price. Preferred securities may be subject to changes in regulations and there can be no assurance that the current regulatory treatment of preferred securities will continue.
Real Estate Investment Trusts (“REITs”)
REITs are pooled investment vehicles which invest primarily in income producing real estate or real estate-related loans or interests. REITs are generally classified as equity REITs, mortgage REITs or a combination of equity and mortgage REITs. Equity REITs invest the majority of their assets directly in real property and derive income primarily from the collection of rents. Equity REITs can also realize capital gains by selling properties that have appreciated in value. Mortgage REITs invest the majority of their assets in real estate mortgages and derive income from the collection of interest payments. REITs are not taxed on income distributed to shareholders provided they comply with the applicable requirements of the Code. Debt securities issued by REITs, for the most part, are general and unsecured obligations and are subject to risks associated with REITs. Like mutual funds, REITs have expenses, including advisory and administration fees paid by certain REITs and, as a result, the Fund is indirectly subject to those fees if the Fund invests in REITs.
Investing in REITs, or in real estate linked derivative instruments linked to the value of REITs, involves certain risks, including declines in the value of the underlying real estate, risks related to general and local economic conditions, possible lack of availability of mortgage funds, overbuilding, extended vacancies of properties, increased competition, increases in property taxes and operating expenses, changes in zoning laws, losses due to costs resulting from the clean-up of environmental problems, liability to third parties for damages resulting from environmental problems, casualty or condemnation losses, limitations on rents, changes in neighborhood values and in the appeal of properties to tenants. Equity REITs may also be subject to property and casualty risks as their insurance policies may not completely recover repair or replacement of assets damaged by fires, floods, earthquakes or other natural disasters. In addition, global climate change may have an adverse effect on property and security values. A rise in sea levels or an increase in flooding could cause certain properties to lose value or become unmarketable altogether. Losses related to climate change could adversely affect the value of REITs. REITs whose underlying assets are concentrated in properties used by a particular industry, such as healthcare, are also subject to industry-related risks. Certain “special purpose” REITs may invest their assets in specific real estate sectors, such as hotels, nursing homes or warehouses, and are therefore subject to the risks associated with adverse developments in any such sectors.
REITs (especially mortgage REITs) are subject to interest rate risks. When interest rates decline, the value of a REIT’s investment in fixed income obligations can be expected to rise. Conversely, when interest rates rise, the value of a REIT’s investment in fixed-rate obligations can be expected to decline. If the REIT invests in adjustable rate debt instruments the interest rates on which are reset periodically, yields on a REIT’s investments in such loans will gradually align themselves to reflect changes in market interest rates. This causes the value of such investments to fluctuate less dramatically in response to interest rate fluctuations than would investments in fixed-rate obligations. However, REIT shares can be more volatile than, and perform differently from, larger company securities since REITs tend to be small- to medium-sized companies in relation to the equity markets as a whole. REITs may have limited financial resources, may trade less frequently and in a limited volume and may be subject to more abrupt or erratic price movements than larger company securities.
REITs are dependent upon the skills of their managers and are generally not diversified. REITs may be highly leveraged, and financial covenants may affect the ability of REITs to operate effectively. REITs are generally dependent upon maintaining cash flows to repay borrowings, to cover operating costs, and to make distributions to shareholders and are subject to the risk of default by lessees and borrowers. In the event of a default by a borrower or lessee, the REIT may experience delays in enforcing its rights as a mortgagee or lessor and may incur substantial costs associated with protecting its investments. If REITs are net sellers of assets or do not reinvest principal, they are also subject to self-liquidation. In addition, REITs could possibly fail to qualify for favorable tax treatment of net income and gains under the Code or to maintain their exemptions from registration as an investment company under the 1940 Act. In the event of any such failure to qualify as a REIT under the Code, the
42
Table of Contents
company would be subject to corporate level taxation, significantly reducing the return to the Fund on its investment in such company.
Redemption Risk
The Fund may experience periods of heavy redemptions that could cause the Fund to liquidate its assets at inopportune times or at a loss or depressed value, particularly during periods of declining or illiquid markets. Redemption risk is greater to the extent that the Fund has investors with large shareholdings, short investment horizons, or unpredictable cash flow needs. In addition, redemption risk is heightened during periods of overall market turmoil. The redemption by one or more large shareholders of their holdings in the Fund could hurt performance and/or cause the remaining shareholders in the Fund to lose money. The Fund’s redemption risk is increased if one decision maker has control of fund shares owned by separate fund shareholders, including clients or affiliates of the Fund’s Adviser. If the Fund is forced to liquidate its assets under unfavorable conditions or at inopportune times, the value of your investment could decline.
Repurchase Agreements
Under the terms of a typical repurchase agreement, the Fund would acquire one or more underlying debt securities from a counterparty (typically a bank or a broker-dealer), subject to the counterparty’s obligation to repurchase, and the Fund to resell, the securities at an agreed-upon time and price. The Fund may enter into repurchase agreements where the underlying collateral consists entirely of cash items and/or securities of the U.S. Government, its agencies, its instrumentalities, or U.S. Government sponsored enterprises. The Fund may also enter into repurchase agreements where the underlying collateral consists of other types of securities, including securities the Fund could not purchase directly. For such repurchase agreements, the underlying securities which serve as collateral may include, but are not limited to, U.S. government securities, municipal securities, corporate debt obligations, asset-backed securities (including collateralized mortgage obligations (“CMOs”)), convertible securities and common and preferred stock and may be of below investment grade quality. The repurchase price is typically greater than the purchase price paid by the Fund, thereby determining the Fund’s yield. A repurchase agreement is similar to, and may be treated as, a secured loan, where the Fund loans cash to the counterparty and the loan is secured by the underlying securities as collateral. All repurchase agreements entered into by the Fund are required to be collateralized so that at all times during the term of a repurchase agreement, the value of the underlying securities is at least equal to the amount of the repurchase price. Also, the Fund or its custodian is required to have control of the collateral, which the portfolio manager believes will give the Fund a valid, perfected security interest in the collateral.
Repurchase agreements could involve certain risks in the event of default or insolvency of the counterparty, including possible delays or restrictions upon the Fund’s ability to dispose of the underlying securities, the risk of a possible decline in the value of the underlying securities during the period in which the Fund seeks to assert its right to them, the risk that there may be a limited market or no market for disposition of such underlying securities, the risk of incurring expenses associated with asserting those rights and the risk of losing all or part of the income from the agreement. The Fund will seek to mitigate these risks but there is no guarantee that such efforts will be successful. If the Fund enters into a repurchase agreement involving securities the Fund could not purchase directly, and the counterparty defaults, the Fund may become the holder of such securities. Repurchase agreements collateralized by securities other than U.S. government securities may be subject to greater risks and are more likely to have a term to maturity of longer than seven days. Repurchase agreements with a maturity of more than seven days are considered to be illiquid.
Repurchase agreements may be entered into or novated with a financial clearinghouse, which would become the Fund’s counterparty. The Fund would then become subject to the rules of the clearinghouse, which may limit the Fund’s rights and remedies (including recourse to collateral) or delay or restrict the rights and remedies, and expose the Fund to the risks of the clearinghouses’ insolvency.
Pursuant to an exemptive order issued by the SEC, the Fund, along with other affiliated entities managed by the Adviser, may transfer uninvested cash balances into one or more joint accounts for the purpose of entering into repurchase agreements secured by cash and U.S. government securities, subject to certain conditions.
43
Table of Contents
Reverse Repurchase Agreements
The Fund may enter into reverse repurchase agreements. A reverse repurchase agreement has the characteristics of a secured borrowing by the Fund and creates leverage in the Fund’s portfolio. In a reverse repurchase transaction, the Fund sells a portfolio instrument to another person, such as a financial institution or broker-dealer, in return for cash. At the same time, the Fund agrees to repurchase the instrument at an agreed-upon time and at a price that is greater than the amount of cash that the Fund received when it sold the instrument, representing the equivalent of an interest payment by the Fund for the use of the cash. During the term of the transaction, the Fund will continue to receive any principal and interest payments (or the equivalent thereof) on the underlying instruments.
The Fund may engage in reverse repurchase agreements as a means of raising cash to satisfy redemption requests or for other temporary or emergency purposes. Unless otherwise limited in the Fund’s Prospectus or this SAI, the Fund may also engage in reverse repurchase agreements to the extent permitted by its fundamental investment policies in order to raise additional cash to be invested by the Fund’s portfolio manager in other securities or instruments in an effort to increase the Fund’s investment returns.
During the term of the transaction, the Fund will remain at risk for any fluctuations in the market value of the instruments subject to the reverse repurchase agreement as if it had not entered into the transaction. When the Fund reinvests the proceeds of a reverse repurchase agreement in other securities, the Fund will also be at risk for any fluctuations in the market value of the securities in which the proceeds are invested. Like other forms of leverage, this makes the value of an investment in the Fund more volatile and increases the Fund’s overall investment exposure. In addition, if the Fund’s return on its investment of the proceeds of the reverse repurchase agreement does not equal or exceed the implied interest that it is obligated to pay under the reverse repurchase agreement, engaging in the transaction will lower the Fund’s return.
When the Fund enters into a reverse repurchase agreement, it is subject to the risk that the buyer under the agreement may file for bankruptcy, become insolvent or otherwise default on its obligations to the Fund. In the event of a default by the counterparty, there may be delays, costs and risks of loss involved in the Fund’s exercising its rights under the agreement, or those rights may be limited by other contractual agreements or obligations or by applicable law.
In addition, the Fund may be unable to sell the instruments subject to the reverse repurchase agreement at a time when it would be advantageous to do so, or may be required to liquidate portfolio securities at a time when it would be disadvantageous to do so in order to make payments with respect to its obligations under a reverse repurchase agreement. This could adversely affect the Fund’s strategy and result in lower fund returns.
The Fund will treat reverse repurchase agreements and similar financing transactions either (i) consistently with Section 18 of the 1940 Act by maintaining asset coverage of at least 300% of the value of such transactions or (ii) as derivatives transactions for purposes of Rule 18f-4, including, as applicable, the value-at-risk based limit on leverage risk.
Securities Lending
The Fund may lend its portfolio securities, provided that cash or equivalent collateral, equal to at least 100% of the market value of such securities, is continuously maintained by the other party with the Fund. During the pendency of the transaction, the other party will pay the Fund an amount equivalent to any dividends or interest paid on such securities, and the Fund may invest the cash collateral and earn additional income, or it may receive an agreed upon amount of interest income from the other party who has delivered equivalent collateral. These transactions are subject to termination at the option of the Fund or the other party. The Fund may pay administrative and custodial fees in connection with these transactions and may pay a negotiated portion of the interest earned on the cash or equivalent collateral to the other party or placing agent or broker.
Although voting rights or rights to consent with respect to the relevant securities generally pass to the other party, the Fund will make arrangements to vote or consent with respect to a material event affecting such securities. The risks in lending portfolio securities include possible delays in recovering or the failure to recover the securities and
44
Table of Contents
possible loss of rights in the collateral should the borrower fail financially. The Fund runs the risk that the counterparty to a loan transaction will default on its obligation and that the value of the collateral received may decline before the Fund can dispose of it. If the Fund receives cash as collateral and invests that cash, the Fund is subject to the risk that the collateral will decline in value before the Fund must return it to the counterparty. Subject to the foregoing, loans of fund securities are effectively borrowings by the Fund and have economic characteristics similar to reverse repurchase agreements. The Fund does not currently intend to engage in securities lending, although it may engage in transactions (such as reverse repurchase agreements) which have similar characteristics.
Short Sales
Short sales are transactions in which the Fund sells a security it does not own in anticipation of a decline in the market value of the security, also known as “naked” short sales. To make delivery to the buyer, the Fund must borrow the security. The Fund is then obligated to replace the borrowed security by purchasing the same security at market price at the time of replacement. The price at such time may be more or less than the price at which the security was sold by the Fund. The lender of the security is entitled to retain the proceeds from the short sale and/or other collateral until the Fund replaces the borrowed security. Until the security is replaced, the Fund is required to pay to the lender the amount of any dividends or interest paid on shares sold short. To borrow the security, the Fund also may be required to pay a premium, which would increase the cost of the security sold.
The Fund will realize a gain if the price of a security declines between the date of the short sale and the date on which the Fund purchases a security to replace the borrowed security. On the other hand, the Fund will incur a loss if the price of the security increases between those dates. The amount of any gain will be decreased and the amount of any loss increased by any premium or interest that the Fund may be required to pay the lender. There is also a risk that a borrowed security will need to be returned to the lender on short notice. If the request for the return of a security occurs at a time when other short sellers of the security are receiving similar requests, a “short squeeze” can occur, meaning that the Fund might be compelled, at the most disadvantageous time, to replace the borrowed security with a security purchased on the open market, possibly at prices significantly in excess of the proceeds received earlier.
Short selling is a technique that may be considered speculative and involves risks beyond the initial capital necessary to secure each transaction. It should be noted that possible losses from short sales differ from those losses that could arise from a cash investment in a security because losses from a short sale may be limitless, while the losses from a cash investment in a security cannot exceed the total amount of the investment in the security.
Short Sales Against the Box. The Fund may also make short sales “against the box,” meaning that at all times when a short position is open, the Fund owns an equal amount of such securities or owns securities convertible into or exchangeable, without payment of further consideration, for securities of the same issues as, and in an amount equal to, the securities sold short. Short sales “against the box” result in a “constructive sale” and may require the Fund to recognize any gain unless an exception to the constructive sale rule applies.
Small and Mid Cap Companies
Investments in securities of companies with small and medium market capitalizations may offer greater opportunity for appreciation than larger companies, but involve special risks. The securities of those companies may be subject to more abrupt fluctuations in market price and may be more sensitive to economic conditions than larger, more established companies. Small and mid cap company stock prices may, to a degree, fluctuate independently of larger company stock prices, i.e., small and mid cap company stocks may decline in price as the prices of large company stocks rise or vice versa.
Small and mid cap companies may have newer or limited product lines, limited markets or financial resources, or they may be dependent upon a limited or inexperienced management group. In addition, securities of these companies are subject to the risk that, during certain periods, the liquidity of particular issuers or industries will shrink or disappear with little forewarning as a result of adverse economic or market conditions, or adverse investor perceptions, whether or not accurate. Securities of small and mid cap companies may not be widely traded and it may be difficult for the Fund to dispose of such securities, or receive an advantageous price.
45
Table of Contents
Small and mid cap companies may require substantial additional capital to support their operations, to finance expansion or to maintain their competitive position; and may have substantial borrowings or may otherwise have a weak financial condition, and may be susceptible to bankruptcy. Transaction costs for these investments are often higher than those of larger capitalization companies. There is typically less publicly available information about small cap companies.
Some small and mid cap companies also may be relatively new issuers, which carries risks in addition to the risks of other small and mid cap companies. New issuers may be more speculative because such companies are relatively unseasoned. These companies will often be involved in the development or marketing of a new product with no established market, which could lead to significant losses.
Structured Notes and Related Instruments
“Structured” notes and other related instruments, including indexed securities, are derivative debt instruments, the interest rate or principal of which is determined by an unrelated underlying instrument (for example, a currency, security, commodity or index thereof). Structured instruments are generally privately negotiated debt obligations issued by corporations, including banks, as well as by governmental agencies and frequently are assembled in the form of medium-term notes, but a variety of forms are available and may be used in particular circumstances. The terms of such structured instruments normally provide that their principal and/or interest payments are to be adjusted upwards or downwards (but ordinarily not below zero) to reflect changes in the underlying instrument while the instruments are outstanding. As a result, the interest and/or principal payments that may be made on a structured product may vary widely. The rate of return on structured notes may be determined by applying a multiplier to the performance or differential performance of the underlying instrument or other asset(s). Application of a multiplier involves leverage that will serve to magnify the potential for gain and the risk of loss. Investment in indexed securities and structured notes involves certain risks, including the credit risk of the issuer and the normal risks of price changes in response to changes in interest rates. Further, in the case of certain indexed securities or structured notes, a decline in the underlying instrument may cause the interest rate to be reduced to zero, and any further declines in the underlying instrument may then reduce the principal amount payable on maturity. Finally, these securities may have lower liquidity than other types of securities and may be more volatile than their underlying instruments. Subordinated “structured” notes, which are subordinated to the right of payment of another class of the structured note, typically have higher yields and present greater risks than unsubordinated “structured” notes.
Subordinated Securities
Subordinated securities include securities which are subordinated or “junior” to more senior securities of the issuer, or which represent interests in pools of such subordinated or junior securities. Such securities may include so-called “high yield” or “junk” bonds (i.e., bonds that are rated below investment grade by a rating agency or that are determined by the Fund’s portfolio manager to be of equivalent quality) and preferred stock. Under the terms of subordinated securities, payments that would otherwise be made to their holders may be required to be made to the holders of more senior securities, and/or the subordinated or junior securities may have junior liens, if they have any rights at all, in any collateral (meaning proceeds of the collateral are required to be paid first to the holders of more senior securities). As a result, subordinated or junior securities will be disproportionately adversely affected by a default or even a perceived decline in creditworthiness of the issuer.
Temporary Defensive Investing
The Fund may depart from its principal investment strategies in response to adverse market, economic or political conditions by taking temporary defensive positions, including by investing in any type of investment grade, government, corporate and money market instruments and short-term debt securities or holding cash without regard to any percentage limitations. If a significant amount of the Fund’s assets is used for defensive investing purposes, the Fund will be less likely to achieve its investment objective. Although the portfolio manager has the ability to take defensive positions, they may choose not to do so for a variety of reasons, even during volatile market conditions.
46
Table of Contents
Trade Policy
The U.S. government has indicated its intent to alter its approach to international trade policy and, in some cases, to renegotiate or potentially terminate certain existing bilateral or multilateral trade agreements and treaties with foreign countries and has made proposals and taken actions related thereto. In addition, the U.S. government has recently imposed tariffs on certain foreign goods and has indicated a willingness to impose tariffs on imports of other products. Some foreign governments, including China, have instituted retaliatory tariffs on certain U.S. goods and have indicated a willingness to impose additional tariffs on U.S. products. Other countries, including Mexico, have threatened retaliatory tariffs on certain U.S. products.
Global trade disruption, significant introductions of trade barriers, and bilateral trade frictions, together with any future downturns in the global economy resulting therefrom, could adversely affect the financial performance of the Fund and its investments. Trade policy may be an ongoing source of instability, potentially resulting in significant currency fluctuations and/or having other adverse effects on international markets, international trade agreements, and/or other existing cross-border cooperation arrangements (whether economic, tax, fiscal, legal, regulatory, or otherwise). To the extent trade disputes escalate globally, there could be additional significant impacts on the sectors or industries in which the Fund invests and other adverse impacts on the Fund’s overall performance.
U.S. Government Securities
U.S. Government securities include (1) U.S. Treasury bills (maturity of one year or less), U.S. Treasury notes (maturity of one to ten years) and U.S. Treasury bonds (maturities generally greater than ten years); (2) obligations issued or guaranteed by U.S. Government agencies or instrumentalities which are supported by any of the following: (a) the full faith and credit of the U.S. Government (such as certificates issued by the Government National Mortgage Association (“Ginnie Mae”)); (b) the right of the issuer to borrow an amount limited to a specific line of credit from the U.S. Government (such as obligations of the Federal Home Loan Banks); (c) the discretionary authority of the U.S. Government to purchase certain obligations of agencies or instrumentalities (such as securities issued by the Federal National Mortgage Association); or (d) only the credit of the agency or instrumentality (such as securities issued by the Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corporation); and (3) obligations issued by non-governmental entities (like financial institutions) that carry direct guarantees from U.S. government agencies as part of government initiatives in response to a market crisis or otherwise. Agencies and instrumentalities of the U.S. Government include but are not limited to: Farmers Home Administration, Export-Import Bank of the United States, Federal Housing Administration, Federal Land Banks, Federal Financing Bank, Central Bank for Cooperatives, Federal Intermediate Credit Banks, Farm Credit Bank System, Federal Home Loan Banks, Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corporation, Federal National Mortgage Association, General Services Administration, Government National Mortgage Association, Student Loan Marketing Association, United States Postal Service, Maritime Administration, Small Business Administration, Tennessee Valley Authority, Washington D.C. Armory Board and any other instrumentality established or sponsored by the U.S. Government.
In the case of obligations not backed by the full faith and credit of the United States, the Fund must look principally to the agency or instrumentality issuing or guaranteeing the obligation for ultimate repayment and may not be able to assert a claim against the United States itself in the event the agency or instrumentality does not meet its commitments. Neither the U.S. Government nor any of its agencies or instrumentalities guarantees the market value of the securities they issue. Therefore, the market value of such securities will fluctuate in response to changes in interest rates and other factors. In addition, any downgrade of the credit rating of the securities issued by the U.S. Government may result in a downgrade of securities issued by its agencies or instrumentalities, including government-sponsored entities. From time to time, uncertainty regarding the status of negotiations in the U.S. government to increase the statutory debt ceiling could increase the risk that the U.S. government may default on payments on certain U.S. government securities, cause the credit rating of the U.S. government to be downgraded, increase volatility in the stock and bond markets, result in higher interest rates, reduce prices of U.S. Treasury securities, and/or increase the costs of various kinds of debt. If a U.S. Government-sponsored entity is negatively impacted by legislative or regulatory action (or lack thereof), is unable to meet its obligations, or its creditworthiness declines, the performance of a fund that holds securities of the entity will be adversely impacted.
47
Table of Contents
U.S. Treasury Obligations
U.S. Treasury obligations are direct debt obligations issued by the U.S. government. Treasury bills, with maturities normally from 4 weeks to 52 weeks, are typically issued at a discount as they pay interest only upon maturity. Treasury bills are non-callable. Treasury notes have a maturity between two and ten years and typically pay interest semi-annually, while Treasury bonds have a maturity of over ten years and pay interest semi- annually. U.S. Treasury obligations also include STRIPS, TIPS, and FRNs. STRIPS are Treasury obligations with separately traded principal and interest component parts of such obligations that are transferable through the federal book-entry system. The principal and interest components of U.S. Treasury bonds with remaining maturities of longer than ten years are eligible to be traded independently under the STRIPS program. Under the STRIPS program, the principal and interest components are separately issued through depository financial institutions, which then trade the component parts separately. Each interest payment and the principal payment becomes a separate zero-coupon security. STRIPS pay interest only at maturity. The interest component of STRIPS may be more volatile than that of U.S. Treasury bills with comparable maturities. TIPS are Treasury Inflation-Protected Securities, the principal of which increases with inflation and decreases with deflation. The inflation adjustment is based on a three month-lagged value of the non-seasonally adjusted Consumer Price Index for Urban Consumers (CPI-U). TIPS entitle the holder, upon maturity, to the adjusted principal or original principal, whichever is greater, thus providing a deflation floor. TIPS pay interest twice a year, at a fixed rate. The rate is applied to the adjusted principal; so, like the principal, interest payments rise with inflation and fall with deflation. However, because the interest rate is fixed, TIPS may lose value when market interest rates increase, particularly during periods of low inflation. FRNs are floating rate notes, the interest on which is indexed to the most recent 13-week Treasury bill auction High Rate, which is the highest accepted discount rate in a Treasury bill auction.
Variable and Floating Rate Securities
Variable and floating rate securities provide for a periodic adjustment in the interest rate paid on the obligations. The terms of such obligations provide that interest rates are adjusted periodically based upon an interest rate adjustment index as provided in the respective obligations. The adjustment intervals may be regular, and range from daily up to annually, or may be event-based, such as based on a change in the prime rate.
The Fund may invest in floating rate debt instruments (“floaters”) and engage in credit spread trades. The interest rate on a floater is a variable rate which is tied to another interest rate, such as a corporate bond index or U.S. Treasury bill rate. The interest rate on a floater resets periodically, typically every six months. While, because of the interest rate reset feature, floaters may provide the Fund with a certain degree of protection against rising interest rates, the Fund will participate in any declines in interest rates as well. A credit spread trade is an investment position relating to a difference in the prices or interest rates of two bonds or other securities or currencies, where the value of the investment position is determined by movements in the difference between the prices or interest rates, as the case may be, of the respective securities or currencies.
The Fund may also invest in inverse floating rate debt instruments (“inverse floaters”). The interest rate on an inverse floater resets in the opposite direction from the market rate of interest to which the inverse floater is indexed. An inverse floating rate security may exhibit greater price volatility than a fixed rate obligation of similar credit quality.
A floater may be considered to be leveraged to the extent that its interest rate varies by a magnitude that exceeds the magnitude of the change in the index rate of interest. The higher degree of leverage inherent in some floaters is associated with greater volatility in their market values.
The Fund may also invest in variable amount master demand notes, which permit the indebtedness thereunder to vary in addition to providing for periodic adjustments in the interest rate. The absence of an active secondary market with respect to particular variable and floating rate instruments could make it difficult for the Fund to dispose of a variable or floating rate note if the issuer were to default on its payment obligation or during periods that the Fund is not entitled to exercise its demand rights, and the Fund could, for these or other reasons, suffer a loss with respect to such instruments. In determining average-weighted portfolio maturity, an instrument will be deemed to have a maturity equal to either the period remaining until the next interest rate adjustment or the time
48
Table of Contents
the Fund can recover payment of principal as specified in the instrument, depending on the type of instrument involved.
Warrants and Rights
Warrants are instruments that give the holder the right to purchase equity securities at a specific price valid for a specified time period. Warrants are typically issued with preferred stock or bonds but can often be traded separately from the securities with which they were initially sold. Warrants may be purchased with values that vary depending on the change in value of one or more specified indexes (“index warrants”). Index warrants are generally issued by banks or other financial institutions and give the holder the right, at any time during the term of the warrant, to receive upon exercise of the warrant a cash payment from the issuer based on the value of the underlying index. Rights are similar to warrants but typically have a shorter duration than warrants and are issued directly by an issuer to existing stockholders and provide those holders the right to purchase additional shares of stock at a later date.
Warrants and rights may be considered speculative in that they have no voting rights, pay no dividends, and have no rights with respect to the assets of the issuer. The prices of warrants and rights do not necessarily move with the prices of the underlying securities. If the market price of the underlying security does not exceed the exercise price of the warrant or right plus the cost thereof before the expiration date, the Fund could sustain losses despite advantageous changes in the market price of the underlying security. Warrants and rights not exercised before their expiration date cease to have value.
Low Exercise Price Call Warrants. Low exercise price call warrants, sometimes also referred to as equity-linked participation certificates, are used to gain exposure to stocks in difficult to access local markets. These warrants typically have a strike price set where the value of the warrants will be identical to the price of the underlying stock. The value of these warrants fluctuates in line with the value of the underlying stock price and therefore, the risk and return profile of the warrants is very similar to owning the underlying securities, but the Fund may also be exposed to the risk of the counterparty that issued the warrant. These warrants have no voting rights. Dividends issued to the warrant issuer by the underlying issuer will be distributed to the warrant holders, net of any taxes or commissions imposed by the local jurisdiction in respect of the receipt of such amount. In addition, these warrants are not exchangeable into the ordinary shares of the underlying stock. These warrants are typically sold in private placement transactions and may be classified as derivative instruments.
When-Issued Securities and Forward Commitments
Securities may be purchased on a “when-issued” or “to be announced” or “forward delivery” basis. The payment obligation and the interest rate that will be received on the “when-issued” securities are fixed at the time the buyer enters into the commitment although settlement, i.e., delivery of and payment for the securities, takes place at a later date. In a “to be announced” transaction, the Fund commits to purchase securities for which all specific information is not known at the time of the trade.
Securities purchased on a “when-issued” or “forward delivery” basis are subject to changes in value based upon the market’s perception of the creditworthiness of the issuer and changes, real or anticipated, in the level of interest rates. The value of these securities experiences appreciation when interest rates decline and depreciation when interest rates rise. Purchasing securities on a “when-issued” or “forward delivery” basis can involve a risk that the yields available in the market on the settlement date may actually be higher or lower than those obtained in the transaction itself.
An increase in the percentage of the Fund’s assets committed to the purchase of securities on a “when-issued” basis may increase the volatility of its net asset value.
Zero Coupon, Pay-In-Kind and Deferred Interest Securities
Zero Coupon Bond. A zero coupon bond is a security that makes no fixed interest payments but instead is sold at a discount from its face value. The bond is redeemed at its face value on the specified maturity date. Zero coupon bonds may be issued as such, or they may be created by a broker who strips the coupons from a bond and
49
Table of Contents
separately sells the rights to receive principal and interest. The prices of zero coupon bonds tend to fluctuate more in response to changes in market interest rates than do the prices of interest-paying debt securities with similar maturities. Zero coupon bonds with a fixed maturity date of more than one year from the date of issuance will be treated as debt obligations that are issued originally at a discount for U.S. federal income tax purposes. Generally, the original issue discount (“OID”) is treated as interest income and is included in the Fund’s income and required to be distributed by the Fund over the term of the bond, even though payment of that amount is not received until a later time, upon partial or full repayment or disposition of the bond. The Fund may thus be required to pay out as an income distribution each year an amount which is greater than the total amount of cash the Fund actually received, and may have to dispose of other securities, including at times when it may be disadvantageous to do so, to generate the cash necessary for the distribution of income attributable to its zero coupon bonds.
Pay-In-Kind Securities. Pay-in-kind securities are bonds which pay interest through the issuance of additional debt or equity securities. Pay-in-kind securities have characteristics similar to those of zero coupon securities, but interest on such securities may be paid in the form of obligations of the same type rather than cash. Similar to zero coupon obligations, pay-in- kind bonds also carry additional risk as holders of these types of securities realize no cash until the cash payment date unless a portion of such securities is sold and, if the issuer defaults, the Fund may obtain no return at all on its investment. The market price of pay-in-kind bonds is affected by interest rate changes to a greater extent, and therefore tends to be more volatile, than that of securities which pay interest in cash. Similar to zero coupon bonds, current U.S. federal income tax law requires the holder of pay-in-kind bonds to accrue income with respect to these securities prior to the receipt of cash payments. To maintain its qualification as a regulated investment company and avoid liability for U.S. federal income and excise taxes, the Fund may be required to distribute income accrued with respect to these securities and may have to dispose of portfolio securities under disadvantageous circumstances in order to generate cash to satisfy these distribution requirements.
Deferred Interest Bonds. Deferred interest bonds are debt obligations that generally provide for a period of delay before the regular payment of interest begins and that are issued at a significant discount from face value. The original discount approximates the total amount of interest the bonds will accrue and compound over the period until the first interest accrual date at a rate of interest reflecting the market rate of the security at the time of issuance. Although this period of delay is different for each deferred interest bond, a typical period is approximately one-third of the bond’s term to maturity. Such investments benefit the issuer by mitigating its initial need for cash to meet debt service, but some also provide a higher rate of return to attract investors who are willing to defer receipt of such cash.
Zero-coupon, pay-in-kind and deferred interest securities may be subject to greater fluctuation in value and lesser liquidity in the event of adverse market conditions than comparably rated securities paying cash interest at regular interest payment periods.
SEC Names Rule Requirement
LVIP ClearBridge Large Cap Growth Fund. The Fund’s policy of normally investing at least 80% of its assets in equity securities, or other instruments with similar economic characteristics, of U.S. companies with large market capitalizations.
LVIP ClearBridge Large Cap Value Fund. The Fund’s policy of normally investing at least 80% of its assets in in equity securities, or other investments with similar economic characteristics, of companies with large market capitalizations.
Portfolio Transactions and Brokerage
The Funds’ Adviser or sub-adviser (as applicable) (collectively referred to as the Adviser) are responsible for decisions to buy and sell securities and other investments for each Fund, and for the selection of brokers and dealers to effect the transactions and the negotiation of brokerage commissions, if any. Purchases and sales of securities on an exchange are effected through brokers who charge a commission for their services. A particular broker may charge different commissions according to such factors as the difficulty and size of the transaction.
50
Table of Contents
Transactions in foreign securities generally involve the payment of fixed brokerage commissions, which are generally higher than those in the United States. There is generally no stated commission in the case of securities traded in the over-the-counter markets, but the price paid by the Fund usually includes an undisclosed dealer commission or mark-up. In the U.S. Government securities market, securities are generally traded on a net basis with dealers acting as principal for their own accounts without a stated commission, although the price of the securities usually includes a profit to the dealer. In underwritten offerings, securities are purchased at a fixed price which includes an amount of compensation to the underwriter, generally referred to as the underwriter’s concession or discount. On occasion, certain money market instruments may be purchased directly from an issuer, in which case no commissions or discounts are paid.
The Adviser currently provides investment advice to a number of other clients. The Adviser will allocate purchase and sale transactions among each of the Funds and other clients whose assets are managed in such manner as is deemed equitable. In making such allocations, among the major factors the Adviser considers are the investment objectives of the relevant Fund, the relative size of portfolio holdings of the same or comparable securities, the availability of cash for investment, the size of investment commitments generally held, and the opinions of the persons responsible for managing the Funds and other client accounts. Securities of the same issuer may be purchased, held, or sold at the same time by a Fund or other accounts or companies for which the Adviser provides investment advice (including affiliates of the Adviser, as the case may be).
On occasions when the Adviser deems the purchase or sale of a security to be in the best interest of a Fund, as well as its other clients, the Adviser, to the extent permitted by applicable laws and regulations, may aggregate such securities to be sold or purchased for a Fund with those to be sold or purchased for its other clients in order to obtain best execution. In such event, allocation of the securities so purchased or sold, as well as the expenses incurred in the transaction, will be made by the Adviser in a manner it considers to be equitable and consistent with its fiduciary obligations to all such clients, including a Fund. In some instances, the procedures may impact the price and size of the position obtainable for a Fund.
In connection with effecting portfolio transactions, consideration will be given to securing the most favorable price and efficient execution. Within the framework of this policy, the reasonableness of commission or other transaction costs is a major factor in the selection of brokers and is considered together with other relevant factors, including financial responsibility, confidentiality (including trade anonymity), research and investment information and other services provided by such brokers. It is expected that, as a result of such factors, transaction costs charged by some brokers may be greater than the amounts other brokers might charge. The Adviser may determine in good faith that the amount of such higher transaction costs is reasonable in relation to the value of the brokerage and research services provided.
The Board of Trustees will review the commissions and other transaction costs incurred from time to time and will receive reports regarding brokerage practices. The nature of the research services provided to the Adviser by brokerage firms varies from time to time but generally includes current and historical financial data concerning particular companies and their securities; information and analysis concerning securities markets and economic and industry matters; and technical and statistical studies and data dealing with various investment opportunities; and risks and trends, all of which the Adviser regards as a useful supplement of its own internal research capabilities.
The Adviser may, from time-to-time, direct trades to brokers which have provided specific brokerage or research services for the benefit of the clients of the Adviser; in addition, the Adviser may allocate trades among brokers that generally provide such services. Research services furnished by brokers are for the benefit of all the clients of the Adviser and not solely or necessarily for the benefit of the Funds. The Adviser believes that the value of research services received is not determinable and does not significantly reduce its expenses. The Fund does not reduce its fee to the Adviser by any amount that might be attributable to the value of such services.
51
Table of Contents
During the last three fiscal years ended December 31, 2025, 2024 and 2023, the Funds did not incur brokerage commissions as they had not commenced operations. During the fiscal years ended December 31, 2025, 2024 and 2024, the Predecessor Funds incurred aggregate brokerage commissions as follows:
Brokerage and Research Services
| 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | ||||||||
| ClearBridge Variable Appreciation Portfolio |
$ | 54,454 | $ | 68,503 | $65,825 | |||||
| ClearBridge Variable Dividend Strategy Portfolio |
$ | 97,990 | $ | 95,837 | $78,457 | |||||
| ClearBridge Variable Large Cap Growth Portfolio |
$ | 36,413 | $ | 34,644 | $20,717 | |||||
| ClearBridge Variable Large Cap Value Portfolio |
$ | 30,399 | $ | 21,183 | $39,733 | |||||
The table below shows, for the Predecessor Funds, the amount of transactions for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2025, that were directed to firms that provided research services and the commissions paid on such transactions.
| Total Amount of Brokerage Transactions Related to Research Services |
Total Commissions Paid on Transactions Related to Research Services |
|||||||
| ClearBridge Variable Appreciation Portfolio |
$ | 316,631,316 | $ | 28,139 | ||||
| ClearBridge Variable Dividend Strategy Portfolio |
$ | 236,263,019 | $ | 60,539 | ||||
| ClearBridge Variable Large Cap Growth Fund |
$ | 177,980,374 | $ | 19,301 | ||||
| ClearBridge Variable Large Cap Value Portfolio |
$ | 95,393,650 | $ | 20,938 | ||||
Purchases of Securities of “Regular” Brokers or Dealers
As of the fiscal year ended December 31, 2025, the Funds held no securities of regular broker-dealers, since the Funds had not commenced operations. As of the fiscal year ended December 31, 2025, each Predecessor Fund held investments in securities of its regular broker dealers as follows:
| Fund Name |
Name of Broker/Dealer | Value of Securities Owned (000’s) |
||||
| ClearBridge Variable Appreciation Portfolio |
JP Morgan Securities LLC | $ | 42,431 | |||
| ClearBridge Variable Dividend Strategy Portfolio |
JP Morgan Securities LLC | $ | 12,570 | |||
| ClearBridge Variable Large Cap Growth Fund |
JP Morgan Securities LLC | $ | 5,532 | |||
| ClearBridge Variable Large Cap Value Fund |
JP Morgan Securities LLC | $ | 15,413 | |||
| BOFA Securities Inc. | $ | 7,208 | ||||
No Commissions to Finance Distribution
The 1940 Act permits a Fund to use its selling brokers to execute transactions in portfolio securities only if the Fund or its adviser has implemented policies and procedures designed to ensure that the selection of brokers for portfolio securities transactions is not influenced by considerations relating to the sale of Fund shares. Accordingly, the Funds maintain, among other policies, a policy that prohibits them from directing to a broker-dealer in consideration for the promotion or sale of Fund shares: (a) Fund portfolio securities transactions; or (b) any commission or other remuneration received or to be received from the Funds’ portfolio transactions effected through any other broker-dealer. The Funds have also established other policies and procedures designed to ensure that a Fund’s brokerage commissions are not used to finance the distribution of Fund shares.
Commission Recapture Program
The Funds do not participate in commission recapture programs.
Portfolio Turnover
A portfolio turnover rate is the percentage computed by dividing the lesser of a Fund’s purchases or sales of securities (excluding short-term securities) by the average market value of the Funds’ portfolio securities. The Adviser intends to manage each Fund’s assets by buying and selling securities to help attain its investment
52
Table of Contents
objective. This may result in increases or decreases in a Fund’s current income available for distribution to its shareholders. While the Funds are not managed with the intent of generating short-term capital gains, each Fund may dispose of investments (including money market instruments) regardless of the holding period if, in the opinion of the Adviser, an issuer’s creditworthiness or perceived changes in a company’s growth prospects or asset value make selling them advisable. Such an investment decision may result in a high portfolio turnover rate during a given period, resulting in increased transaction costs, including brokerage commissions, dealer mark-ups and other transaction costs on the sale of the securities and reinvestment in other securities. These effects of higher than normal portfolio turnover may adversely affect a Fund’s performance.
Portfolio turnover rates are not available for the Funds because the Funds had not yet commenced operations as of December 31, 2025. The table below sets forth each Predecessor Fund’s turnover rate (excluding short sales) for the two most recently completed fiscal years:
| 2025 | 2024 | |||||
| ClearBridge Variable Appreciation Portfolio |
30 | % | 17% | |||
| ClearBridge Variable Dividend Strategy Portfolio |
27 | % | 20% | |||
| ClearBridge Variable Large Cap Growth Fund |
23 | % | 14% | |||
| ClearBridge Variable Large Cap Value Fund |
19 | % | 17% | |||
Trustees and Officers
The Board of Trustees (“Board of Trustees” or the “Board”) oversees the management of the Funds and elects the Trust’s officers. The Trustees of the Trust (“Trustees”) have the power to amend the Trust’s bylaws, to declare and pay dividends, and to exercise all the powers of the Trust except those granted to the shareholders. The Trustees hold their position until their resignation, retirement, or their successors are elected and qualified. The Trust has a mandatory retirement policy for its Board of Trustees. Such policy requires that a Trustee retire from the Board no later than the end of the calendar year (December 31) that occurs after the earliest of (1) the Independent Trustee’s 75th birthday or (2) the 20th anniversary of the Trustee becoming a Board member.
The Trust’s officers are responsible for the Funds’ day-to-day operations. Information pertaining to the Trustees and Executive Officers of the Trust is set forth below. The Trustee that is deemed an “interested person,” as defined in the 1940 Act, is included in the table titled, “Interested Trustee.” Trustees who are not interested persons are referred to as Independent Trustees.
The term Fund Complex includes the 113 series of the Trust.
Interested Trustee
| Name, Address and Year of Birth |
Position(s) Held With the Funds | Term of Office and Length of Time Served |
Principal Occupation(s) during Past Five Years |
Number of Funds in Fund Complex Overseen by Trustee |
Other Board Memberships Held by Trustee during Past Five Years | |||||
| John Morriss* 150 N. Radnor-Chester Road Radnor, PA 19087 YOB: 1967 |
Chairman and Trustee | Since October 2025 | Executive Vice President and Chief Investment Officer for Lincoln Financial since October 2025. Formerly: Senior Vice President, Head of Public and Private Fixed Income at Fortitude Re. | 114 | Lincoln Bain Capital Total Credit Fund since 2025 (1 portfolio); Lincoln Partners Group Royalty Fund since 2025 (1 portfolio); Lincoln Variable Insurance Products Trust since 2025 (114 portfolios) |
| * | Mr. Morriss is an interested person of the Trust because he is a Director and an Officer of Lincoln Financial Investments Corporation, the investment adviser to the Trust, and an officer of The Lincoln National Life Insurance Company, the parent company of the Trust’s investment adviser. |
53
Table of Contents
Independent Trustees
| Name, Address and Year of Birth |
Position(s) Held With the Funds |
Term of Office and Length of Time Served |
Principal Occupation(s) during Past Five Years |
Number of Funds in Fund Complex Overseen by Trustee |
Other Board Memberships Held by Trustee during Past Five Years | |||||
| Steve A. Cobb 1301 S. Harrison Street, Fort Wayne, IN 46802 YOB: 1971 |
Trustee | Since January 2013 | Managing Director, CID Capital (private equity firm) | 114 | None | |||||
| Peter F. Finnerty Brookline, MA 02446 |
Trustee | Since July 2024 | Retired; Formerly: US Mutual Fund Leader, Global Asset, Wealth Management Leader, and Partner of (accounting firm) | 114 | Board of Directors of CBRE Global Real Estate Income Fund | |||||
| Ken C. Joseph 1301 S. Harrison Street, Fort Wayne, IN 46802 YOB: 1962 |
Trustee | Since January 2022 | Chief Compliance Officer, Braidwell L.P; Formerly: Managing Director & Head of Financial Services Compliance and Regulatory Consulting in the Americas, Kroll LLC | 114 | Board of Directors of University Settlement (Executive Committee); Board of Directors of Harvard Kennedy School NY/NJ/CT Alumni Network (former President); Board of Directors of the University of North Carolina, School of Law Alumni Association | |||||
| Barbara L. Lamb 1301 S. Harrison Street, Fort Wayne, IN 46802 YOB: 1954 |
Trustee | Since February 2019 | Retired; Formerly: Managing Director for Finance and Administration, WH Trading, LLC (derivatives trading firm) (2016-2022) | 114 | South Suburban Humane Society | |||||
| Pamela L. Salaway 1301 S. Harrison Street, Fort Wayne, IN 46802 YOB: 1957 |
Trustee | Since December 2013 | Retired | 114 | None | |||||
| Manisha A. Thakor 1301 S. Harrison Street, Fort Wayne, IN 46802 YOB: 1970 |
Trustee | Since January 2022 | Independent Consultant of MoneyZen LLC; Formerly: Vice President, Brighton Jones | 114 | Board Member at The National Endowment for Financial Education since 2017 | |||||
| Brian W. Wixted 1301 S. Harrison Street, Fort Wayne, IN 46802 YOB: 1959 |
Trustee | Since February 2019 | Managing Member, Brian Wixted, LLC; Formerly: Senior Consultant, CKC Consulting and an Advisory Partner, AI Capital; Formerly: Senior Vice President, Finance, and Fund Treasurer, Oppenheimer Funds, Inc. (mutual fund complex) | 114 | Thornburg Income Builder Opportunities Trust since 2020 (1 portfolio) | |||||
54
Table of Contents
| Name, Address and Year of Birth |
Position(s) Held With the Funds |
Term of Office and Length of Time Served |
Principal Occupation(s) during Past Five Years |
Number of Funds in Fund Complex Overseen by Trustee |
Other Board Memberships Held by Trustee during Past Five Years | |||||
| Nancy B. Wolcott 1301 S. Harrison Street, Fort Wayne, IN 46802 YOB: 1954 |
Trustee | Since October 2017 | Retired | 114 | FundVantage Trust since 2011 (32 portfolios); Third Avenue Trust since 2019 (4 portfolios); Third Avenue Variable Series Trust since 2019 (1 portfolio); Polen Credit Opportunities Fund since 2023 (1 portfolio) |
Officers of the Trust
| Name, Address and Year of Birth |
Position(s) Held With the Funds |
Term of Office and Length of Time Served |
Principal Occupation(s) during Past Five Years | |||
| Matthew L. Arnold 150 N. Radnor-Chester Road Radnor, PA 19087 YOB: 1967 |
Vice President | Since December 2023 | Vice President, Lincoln National Corporation | |||
| Matthew T. Berger 150 N. Radnor-Chester Road Radnor, PA 19087 YOB: 1982 |
Vice President | Since June 2022; Formerly: Assistant Vice President since June 2019 | Vice President, The Lincoln National Life Insurance Company; Formerly: Assistant Vice President, The Lincoln National Life Insurance Company. | |||
| Paul T. Chryssikos 150 N. Radnor-Chester Road Radnor, PA 19087 YOB: 1973 |
Senior Vice President, Chief Legal Officer and Assistant Secretary | Since October 2025 | Senior Vice President, Chief Legal Officer, Assistant Secretary, Chief Counsel, Investment Management, Distribution and Risk, Lincoln Financial Investments Corporation. | |||
| Samuel K. Goldstein 150 N. Radnor-Chester Road Radnor, PA 19087 YOB: 1976 |
Vice President and Assistant Secretary | Since June 2019; Formerly: Assistant Vice President and Assistant Secretary since December 2013 | Vice President and Assistant Secretary, Lincoln Financial Investments Corporation; Vice President, The Lincoln National Life Insurance Company; Vice President, Lincoln Life & Annuity Company of New York; Vice President, Lincoln National Corporation. | |||
| Gordon Huellmantel 150 N. Radnor-Chester Road Radnor, PA 19087 YOB: 1976 |
Senior Vice President | Since October 2025 | Director, Senior Vice President, Head of Funds Management for Lincoln Financial and Chief Operating Officer, Lincoln Financial Investments Corporation; Formerly: Senior Vice President, General Account Investment Management Tea. | |||
| James J. Hoffmayer 150 N. Radnor-Chester Road Radnor, PA 19087 YOB: 1973 |
Vice President, Treasurer, and Chief Accounting Officer | Since February 2024; Formerly: Assistant Vice President since November 2021 | Vice President and Treasurer, Lincoln Financial Investments; Vice President and Director of Separate Account Operations and Mutual Fund Administration, The Lincoln National Life Insurance Company; Formerly: Assistant Vice President, Lincoln Financial Investments; Managing Director, SEI; Treasurer and Chief Financial Officer, SEI Family of Mutual Funds. | |||
55
Table of Contents
| Name, Address and Year of Birth |
Position(s) Held With the Funds |
Term of Office and Length of Time Served |
Principal Occupation(s) during Past Five Years | |||
| Michael C. Hoppe 150 N. Radnor-Chester Road Radnor, PA 19087 YOB: 1988 |
Vice President | Since June 2022; Formerly: Assistant Vice President since August 2018 | Vice President, Lincoln Financial Investments Corporation; Formerly: Assistant Vice President, Lincoln Financial Investments Corporation. | |||
| Yun (Maria) Ma 150 N. Radnor-Chester Road Radnor, PA 19087 YOB: 1978 |
Vice President | Since June 2022; Formerly: Assistant Vice President since August 2015 | Vice President, Lincoln Financial Investments Corporation; Formerly: Assistant Vice President, Lincoln Financial Investments Corporation. | |||
| Jennifer M. Matthews 1301 S. Harrison Street Fort Wayne, IN 46802 YOB: 1976 |
Vice President | Since April 2018 | Vice President, Lincoln Financial Investments Corporation; Vice President, The Lincoln National Life Insurance Company. | |||
| John Morriss 150 N. Radnor-Chester Road Radnor, PA 19087 YOB: 1973 |
President | Since October 2025 | Executive Vice President and Chief Investment Officer for Lincoln Financial. Formerly: Senior Vice President, Head of Public and Private Fixed Income at Fortitude Re. | |||
| Colleen E. O’ Leary 1301 S. Harrison Street Fort Wayne, IN 46802 YOB: 1984 |
Vice President | Since June 2022; Formerly: Assistant Vice President since June 2018 | Vice President, The Lincoln National Life Insurance Company; Formerly: Assistant Vice President, The Lincoln National Life Insurance Company. | |||
| Jay T. Shearon 150 N. Radnor-Chester Road Radnor, PA 19087 YOB: 1972 |
Vice President | Since March 2024; Formerly: Assistant Vice President since December 2015 | Assistant Vice President, Lincoln Financial Investments Corporation, Lincoln Life & Annuity Company of New York, The Lincoln National Life Insurance Company; Formerly: Assistant Vice President, Lincoln Variable Insurance Products Trust. | |||
| John (Jack) A. Weston 150 N. Radnor-Chester Road Radnor, PA 19087 YOB: 1959 |
Vice President and Chief Compliance Officer |
Since May 2007 | Vice President and Chief Compliance Officer, Lincoln Financial Investments Corporation; Vice President, The Lincoln National Life Insurance Company. | |||
| Amber Williams 150 N. Radnor-Chester Road Radnor, PA 19087 YOB: 1979 |
Senior Vice President | Since March 2022; Formerly, Vice President since May 2019 | Senior Vice President and Head of Client Investment Strategies, Lincoln Financial Investments Corporation; Senior Vice President, Lincoln Life & Annuity Company of New York; Senior Vice President, Lincoln National Corporation; Senior Vice President, The Lincoln National Life Insurance Company; Formerly, Head of Product Management, Nationwide Investment Management Group. | |||
| Yajun (Alex) Zeng 150 N. Radnor-Chester Road Radnor, PA 19087 YOB: 1982 |
Vice President | Since April 2018 | Vice President and Managing Director, Lincoln Financial Investments Corporation; Vice President, The Lincoln National Life Insurance Company. | |||
56
Table of Contents
Trustee Qualifications
The following is a brief description of the experience and attributes of each Trustee that led the Board to conclude that each Trustee is qualified to serve on the Trust’s Board of Trustees. References to the experience and attributes of Trustees are pursuant to requirements of the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC), and are not holding out the Board of Trustees or any Trustee as having any special expertise and shall not impose any greater responsibility or liability on any Trustee or on the Board of Trustees.
Steve A. Cobb. Mr. Cobb has served as a Trustee of Lincoln Variable Insurance Products Trust since 2013. He is currently a Managing Partner of CID Capital (CID), a private equity firm he joined in 2001. Mr. Cobb often serves as a director of portfolio companies in which CID invests. He has previously served as a director of multiple other companies. Mr. Cobb is a founder and past Director of the Indiana Chapter of the Association for Corporate Growth. He is a past director of several community non-profit organizations. Prior to joining CID, Mr. Cobb was a finance manager with Procter & Gamble where he held a variety of operational and financial roles, including financial analysis, accounting, and internal controls. Through his experience, Mr. Cobb provides the Board with over twenty years of financial, accounting and business management insight.
Peter F. Finnerty. Mr. Finnerty has served as a Trustee of Lincoln Variable Insurance Products Trust since 2024. Prior to July 2024, he was a partner of where he served as US Mutual Fund Leader and Global Asset & Wealth Management Leader. Mr. Finnerty joined (“PwC”) in 1985 and served as a partner since 1996 to the firm’s domestic and international investment management clients. Mr. Finnerty holds a Certified Public Accountant designation and is a member of the American Institute of Certified Public Accountants. Through his experience, Mr. Finnerty provides the Board with accounting, auditing and financial services industry experience.
Ken C. Joseph. Mr. Joseph has served as a Trustee of Lincoln Variable Insurance Products Trust since 2022. He is currently the Chief Compliance Officer of Braidwell LP. Mr. Joseph was previously a Managing Director & Head of Financial Services Compliance and Regulatory Consulting in the Americas for Kroll LLC (formerly Duff & Phelps, LLC). Mr. Joseph served for over 20 years at the U.S. Securities & Exchange Commission, including as Associate Director/Senior Officer in the Division of Examinations (formerly known as the Office of Compliance Inspections and Examinations), and as an Assistant Director in the Division of Enforcement. He also served as an Associate Dean of St. John’s University, NY. Currently, he serves on the Board of Directors of the Harvard Kennedy School NY/NJ/CT Alumni Network (former President), University Settlement (Executive Committee), and the University of North Carolina, School of Law Alumni Association. Mr. Joseph provides the board with compliance, securities law and business experience.
Barbara L. Lamb. Ms. Lamb has served as a Trustee of Lincoln Variable Insurance Products Trust since 2019. She retired from WH Trading LLC in 2022. Ms. Lamb served as a Managing Director of Finance and Administration for WH Trading LLC from 2015-2022. She previously served as a Managing Director of Cheiron Trading LLC from 2012-2015 and a Financial Officer for Valorem Law Group, LLC from 2008-2009. Previously, she served as Chief Development Officer for Market Liquidity, LLC from 1999-2001. Ms. Lamb served as Chief Credit Officer, Senior Vice President, and Director for The Chicago Corporation from 1986-1998 and in several finance and development positions from 1980-1986. Ms. Lamb holds the Chartered Financial Analyst Designation and is a member of the CFA Institute of Chicago. Through her experience, Ms. Lamb provides the board with risk management and investing insight.
John Morriss. Mr. Morriss has served as the Chairman and as a Trustee of Lincoln Variable Insurance Products Trust since October 2025. Mr. Morriss is the Executive Vice President and Chief Investment Officer for Lincoln Financial. In this role, Morriss provides executive leadership, strategic direction, and oversight of the company’s general account, funds management and private markets investment strategies, with more than $300 billion in assets under management. He leads a team of investment professionals focused on portfolio construction, asset allocation, sub-advisor due diligence, and the development of equity, fixed income, and alternative investment strategies. He reports to Ellen Cooper, Chairman, President and CEO, and is a member of the company’s Senior Management Committee.
Morriss has more than 30 years of investment experience. Prior to his current role at Lincoln, he served as Head of Public and Private Fixed Income at Fortitude Re, overseeing the organization’s insurance-focused investment
57
Table of Contents
portfolios. Prior to joining Fortitude Re in 2020, he held the role of Senior Vice President of Fixed Income Investments at Lincoln for four years. Earlier he spent 18 years at TIAA, where he held leadership roles spanning structured finance research, international and high-yield credit, portfolio management, and fixed income research. He began his career as a currency trader at Chase Manhattan Bank.
Morriss holds a Bachelor of Arts in History from the College of the Holy Cross and an MBA in Finance from New York University’s Stern School of Business.
Pamela L. Salaway. Ms. Salaway has served as a Trustee of Lincoln Variable Insurance Products Trust since 2013. Ms. Salaway retired from the Bank of Montreal/Harris Financial Corp in 2010 where she most recently had served as Chief Risk Officer of BMO’s U.S. operations from 2007 to 2009 and as the Harris Financial Corp Personal & Commercial Line of Business Chief Credit Officer/Chief Risk Officer from 2007 to 2010. From 2000 to 2006, she served in a variety of Executive Management positions within the Risk Management Group of BMO Harris Bank. During this time, she participated in audit committee meetings of the board and coordinated risk oversight committee meetings of the board. Through her experience, Ms. Salaway provides the Board with risk management and business experience.
Manisha A. Thakor. Ms. Thakor has served as a Trustee of Lincoln Variable Insurance Products Trust since 2022. Ms. Thakor currently serves at MoneyZen LLC, which she founded in 2009. From 2018-2020, Ms. Thakor served as Vice President at Brighton Jones. From 2015-2017, Ms. Thakor served as Director of Wealth Strategies for Women at Buckingham Financial. She is a Board member of The National Endowment for Financial Education. Ms. Thakor is also a Chartered Financial Analyst (CFA) charterholder and Certified Financial Planner (CFP®). Ms. Thakor provides the Board with investment management experience and financial services industry insight.
Brian W. Wixted. Mr. Wixted has served as a Trustee of Lincoln Variable Insurance Products Trust since 2019. Mr. Wixted formerly served as a consultant for CKC Consulting and since 2019, as an Advisory Partner with AI Capital. Mr. Wixted served as the Senior Vice President of Finance and Fund Treasurer of the Oppenheimer Funds from 1999-2016. He served as the Principal and Chief Operating Officer of Bankers Trust Company’s Mutual Funds Group from 1995-1999 and the Vice President and Chief Financial Officer for CS First Boston Investment Management Corp from 1991-1995. Mr. Wixted served as Vice President and Accounting Manager with Merrill Lynch Asset Management from 1987-1991. From 1981-1987, he held several accounting positions with brokerage and accounting firms. Mr. Wixted holds a Certified Public Accountant designation and is a member of the American Institute of Certified Public Accountants and the New York State Society of Certified Public Accountants. Through his experience, Mr. Wixted provides mutual fund, investment management and financial services industry insight.
Nancy B. Wolcott. Ms. Wolcott has served as a Trustee of Lincoln Variable Insurance Products Trust since 2017. She was Executive Vice President and Head of GFI Client Service Delivery at BNY Mellon Asset Servicing from 2012 to 2014. Ms. Wolcott served as Executive Vice President and Head of U.S. Funds Services at BNY Mellon Asset Servicing from July 2010 to January 2012. She served as the President of BNY Mellon Distributors Holdings Inc. (formerly, PNC Global Investment Servicing Inc.) from December 2008 to July 2010 and served as its Chief Operating Officer from 2007 to 2008. Prior to that, Ms. Wolcott served as Executive Vice President of the predecessor firm, PFPC Worldwide Inc., from 2006 to 2007. She joined PNC in 1996 and served as its Executive Vice President with PNC Advisors before coming to Global Investment Servicing in 2000. Prior to PNC, she served as the Head of Corporate and Institutional Trust at HarrisBank/Bank of Montreal. Through her experience, Ms. Wolcott provides banking and financial services industry insight.
Board Oversight
The primary responsibility of the Board of Trustees is to represent the interests of the Trust’s shareholders and to provide oversight of the management of the Funds. The Trust’s day-to-day operations are managed by the adviser and other service providers who have been approved by the Board. The Board is currently composed of nine trustees, eight of whom are classified under the 1940 Act as “non-interested” persons of the Trust (Independent Trustees) and one of whom is classified as an interested person of the Trust (Trustee). The Interested Trustee serves as the Chairperson of the Board.
58
Table of Contents
The Board has a Lead Independent Trustee that serves as the primary liaison between Trust management and the Independent Trustees. The Lead Independent Trustee is selected by the Independent Trustees and serves until a successor is selected. Ms. Wolcott currently serves as the Lead Independent Trustee.
Generally, the Board acts by majority vote of all the Trustees, including a majority vote of the Independent Trustees if required by applicable law. The Board and its committees meet frequently throughout the year to oversee the Funds’ activities, review contractual arrangements with and performance of service providers, oversee compliance with regulatory requirements and review Fund performance. The Board regularly requests and/or receives reports from the Adviser, the Trust’s other service providers and the Trust’s Chief Compliance Officer. The Board has established three standing committees and has delegated certain responsibilities to those committees. The Board and its committees meet periodically throughout the year to oversee the Trust’s activities, review the Funds’ expenses, oversee compliance with regulatory requirements, and review investment performance. The Independent Trustees are represented by independent legal counsel at Board meetings.
As part of its general oversight of the Trust, the Board is involved in the risk oversight of the Trust. The Board/Investment Committee reviews the Funds’ investment performance with the Adviser at each of its regularly scheduled quarterly Board meetings. In addition, the Board must approve any material changes to a Fund’s investment policies or restrictions. Under the oversight of the Board, the Trust, the Adviser and other service providers have adopted policies, procedures and controls to address risks. With respect to compliance matters, the Trust’s Chief Compliance Officer provides the annual compliance report required by Rule 38a-1 under the 1940 Act and a quarterly report regarding the operation of the Trust’s compliance policies and procedures and any material compliance issues that arose during the quarter, and meets with the Audit Committee a minimum of three times each calendar year.
The Board considered the number of Funds in the Trust, the total assets of the Trust and the general nature of the Funds’ investments and determined that its leadership structure is appropriate given the characteristics of the Trust.
Board Committees
Audit Committee. The Board of Trustees has established an Audit Committee. The Audit Committee oversees the Funds’ financial reporting process on behalf of the Board of Trustees and reports its activities to the Board. The Audit Committee assists and acts as a liaison with the Board of Trustees in fulfilling the Board’s responsibility to shareholders of the Trust and others relating to oversight of Fund accounting, the Trust’s systems of controls, and the quality and integrity of the financial statements, financial reports, and audit of the Trust. In addition, the Audit Committee oversees the Trust’s accounting policies, financial reporting and internal control systems. The members of the Audit Committee include Independent Trustees: Ken C. Joseph, Barbara L. Lamb, Nancy B. Wolcott and Brian W. Wixted (Chair). The Audit Committee met [four] times during the last fiscal year.
Investment Committee. The Board of Trustees has established an Investment Committee, which is responsible for overseeing the performance of the Funds and other tasks as requested by the Board. The members of the Investment Committee include Independent Trustees: Steve A. Cobb (Chair), Peter F. Finnerty, Pamela L. Salaway and Manisha A. Thakor. The Investment Committee met four times during the last fiscal year.
Nominating and Governance Committee. The Board of Trustees has established a Nominating and Governance Committee. The Nominating and Governance Committee is responsible for, among other things, the identification, evaluation and nomination of potential independent trustee candidates to serve on the Board of Trustees. The Board has adopted a charter for the Nominating and Governance Committee setting forth such Committee’s responsibilities. The members of the Nominating and Governance Committee are Independent Trustees: Steve A. Cobb, Peter F. Finnerty, Ken C. Joseph, Barbara L. Lamb, Pamela L. Salaway, Manisha A. Thakor (Chair), Brian W. Wixted, and Nancy B. Wolcott. The Nominating and Governance Committee met four times during the last fiscal year. The Nominating and Governance Committee will accept trustee nominations from shareholders. Any such nominations should be sent to the Trust’s Nominating and Governance Committee, c/o The Lincoln National Life Insurance Company, P.O. Box 2340, Fort Wayne, Indiana 46801.
59
Table of Contents
Ownership of Securities
As of December 31, 2025, the Trustees and officers as a group owned variable contracts that entitled them to give voting instructions with respect to less than 1% of the outstanding shares of each Fund. As of December 31, 2025, the dollar range of equity securities owned beneficially by each Trustee in the Funds and in any registered investment companies overseen by the Trustees within the same family of investment companies as the Funds is as follows:
Interested Trustee
| Name of Trustee | Dollar Range of Equity Securities in the Funds | Aggregate Dollar Range of Equity Securities in All Registered Investment Companies Overseen by Trustee in Family of Investment Companies | ||
| John Morrissi |
None | None |
Independent Trustees
| Name of Trustee |
Dollar Range of Equity Securities in the Funds |
Aggregate Dollar Range of Equity Securities in All Registered Investment Companies Overseen by Trustee in Family of Investment Companies | ||
| Steve A. Cobb |
LVIP Baron Growth Opportunities Fund – $50,001 – $100,000 LVIP Dimensional U.S. Core Equity 2 Fund – $50,001 – $100,000 LVIP Dimensional U.S. Equity Managed Volatility Fund – $10,001 – $50,000 LVIP State Street S&P 500 Index Fund – $50,001 – $100,000 |
Over $100,000 | ||
| Peter Finnerty |
None | Over $100,000 | ||
| Ken C. Joseph |
LVIP Vanguard Domestic Equity ETF Fund – over $100,000 | Over $100,000 | ||
| Barbara L. Lamb |
LVIP Dimensional U.S. Core Equity 1 Fund – $10,001 – $50,000 LVIP Dimensional U.S. Core Equity 2 Fund – $50,001 – $100,000 LVIP Vanguard Bond Allocation Fund – $10,001 – $50,000 LVIP Dimensional International Core Equity Fund – $10,001 – $50,000 |
Over $100,000 | ||
| Pamela L. Salaway |
LVIP State Street S&P 500 Index Fund – Over $100,000 LVIP Baron Growth Opportunities Fund – $50,001 – $100,000 LVIP Mondrian International Value Fund – $10,001 – $50,000 |
Over $100,000 | ||
| Manisha A. Thakor |
LVIP State Street Small Cap Index Fund – $50,001 – $100,000 LVIP State Street Nasdaq-100 Index Fund – $50,001 – $100,000 |
Over $100,000 | ||
| Brian Wixted |
LVIP State Street S&P 500 Fund – $10,001 – $50,000 LVIP State Street Short Term Bond Index Fund – $10,001 – $50,000 LVIP State Street Mid Cap Index Fund – $10,001 – $50,000 LVIP State Street Small-Cap Index. Fund – $10,001 – $50,000 LVIP JPMorgan Retirement Income Fund – $10,001 – $50,000 LVIP American Growth-Income Fund – $10,001 – $50,000 LVIP JPMorgan High Yield Fund – Under $10,000 LVIP State Street International Index Fund – Under $10,000 LVIP Mondrian Global Income Fund – Under $10,000 LVIP Nomura US REIT Fund – Under $10,000 LVIP State Street Emerging Markets Equity Index Fund – Under $10,000 LVIP AllianceBernstein Growth Fund – Under $10,000 LVIP American Growth Fund – Under $10,000 |
Over $100,000 | ||
| Nancy B. Wolcott |
LVIP American Balanced Allocation Fund – $50,001 – $100,000 | $50,001 – $100,000 | ||
As of December 31, 2025, no Trustee owned beneficially any shares of a Predecessor Fund. As of December 31, 2025, the officers and trustees of the Predecessor Funds owned beneficially in the aggregate less than 1% of the outstanding shares of any of the Predecessor Funds.
Brian Wixted served as officer for OppenheimerFunds, Inc. (“Oppenheimer”) from 1999 until his retirement in 2016. He has a deferred compensation plan previously sponsored by Oppenheimer where he receives an annual payout
60
Table of Contents
for a fixed number of years based on the performance of phantom share investments in Oppenheimer funds. In 2019, Invesco acquired Oppenheimer and assumed financial responsibility for payments under the former Oppenheimer deferred compensation plan. Invesco began serving as a sub-adviser to certain LVIP Funds on February 8, 2019. Payments under the plan to Mr. Wixted have exceeded $120,000 during the past two calendar years. The payment amounts are determined by previously established factors (i.e., performance of the relevant funds), and the payment amounts are not impacted by the profits of Oppenheimer or Invesco.
Compensation
The following table sets forth the compensation paid to the Trust’s Independent Trustees and by the Fund Complex for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2025:
| Name of Person, Position |
Aggregate Compensation from the Trust |
Total Compensation from the Trust and Fund Complex |
||||||
| Steve A. Cobb, Trustee |
$ | 387,000 | $ | 387,000 | ||||
| Peter F. Finnerty, Trustee |
$ | 359,000 | $ | 359,000 | ||||
| Ken C. Joseph, Trustee |
$ | 359,000 | $ | 359,000 | ||||
| Barbara L. Lamb, Trustee |
$ | 355,000 | $ | 355,000 | ||||
| Pamela L. Salaway, Trustee |
$ | 359,000 | $ | 359,000 | ||||
| Manisha A. Thakor, Trustee |
$ | 369,000 | $ | 369,000 | ||||
| Brian W. Wixted, Trustee |
$ | 387,000 | $ | 387,000 | ||||
| Nancy B. Wolcott, Trustee |
$ | 434,000 | $ | 434,000 | ||||
Investment Adviser and Sub-Adviser
Investment Adviser. Lincoln Financial Investments Corporation (“LFI” or the “Adviser”) is the investment adviser to the Funds. LFI is a registered investment adviser and wholly-owned subsidiary of The Lincoln National Life Insurance Company (“Lincoln Life”). LFI’s address is 150 N. Radnor-Chester Road, Radnor, Pennsylvania 19087. LFI (or its predecessors) has served as an investment adviser to mutual funds for over 30 years. Lincoln Life is an insurance company organized under Indiana Law and is a wholly-owned subsidiary of Lincoln National Corporation (“LNC”). LNC is a publicly-held insurance holding company organized under Indiana law. Through its subsidiaries, LNC provides insurance and financial services nationwide.
Pursuant to the Investment Management Agreement, LFI manages each Fund’s portfolio investments and reports to the Board of Trustees. Each Fund pays LFI a monthly fee equal to a percentage of the average daily net assets of that Fund. The aggregate annual rates of the fees payable by each Fund to LFI may vary according to the level of assets of that Fund.
Because the Funds are new, they have not yet paid fees to LFI.
Prior to the closing of the Reorganizations, Franklin Templeton Fund Adviser, LLC (“FTFA”) served as investment manager to the Predecessor Funds.
Advisory Fees Paid by Each Fund
For the last three fiscal years ended, December 31, the Predecessor Funds paid the net amounts, as reflected in the table below, to FTFA, the Predecessor Funds’ investment manager, for investment advisory services:
| 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | ||||||||
| ClearBridge Variable Appreciation Portfolio |
$ | 7,844,346 | $ | 7,568,882 | $6,591,160 | |||||
| ClearBridge Variable Dividend Strategy Portfolio |
$ | 3,136,406 | $ | 3,118,208 | $2,914,868 | |||||
| ClearBridge Variable Large Cap Growth Portfolio |
$ | 3,913,490 | $ | 3,659,042 | $2,847,265 | |||||
| ClearBridge Variable Large Cap Value Portfolio |
$ | 1,730,701 | $ | 1,836,491 | $1,770,464 | |||||
61
Table of Contents
Expense Reimbursements
For the last three fiscal years ended December 31, FTFA, the Predecessor Funds’ investment manager, waived fees and/or reimbursed the Predecessor Funds, as reflected in the table below, under the applicable expense reimbursement agreement:
| 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | ||||||||
| ClearBridge Variable Appreciation Portfolio |
$ | 13,009 | $ | 7,211 | $5,357 | |||||
| ClearBridge Variable Dividend Strategy Portfolio |
$ | 3,794 | $ | 1,471 | $1,374 | |||||
| ClearBridge Variable Large Cap Growth Portfolio |
$ | 6,370 | $ | 3,433 | $3,712 | |||||
| ClearBridge Variable Large Cap Value Portfolio |
$ | 2,431 | $ | 1,622 | $1,518 | |||||
The Adviser has contractually agreed to waive fees and/or reimburse each Fund to the extent that Total Annual Fund Operating Expenses (excluding AFFE) exceed the following amounts percentage of the Fund’s average daily net assets:
| Fund |
Standard Class |
Service Class |
||||||
| LVIP ClearBridge Appreciation Fund |
0.70 | % | 0.95 | % | ||||
| LVIP ClearBridge Dividend Strategy Fund |
0.75 | % | 1.00 | % | ||||
| LVIP ClearBridge Large Cap Growth Fund |
0.74 | % | 0.99 | % | ||||
| LVIP ClearBridge Large Cap Value Fund |
0.72 | % | N/A | * | ||||
| * | LVIP ClearBridge Large Cap Value Fund offers Service Class shares; however, because there were no outstanding Class II Shares of ClearBridge Large Cap Value Portfolio outstanding as of the Reorganization Date, only Standard Class shares of the Acquiring Fund will be issued in the Reorganization relating to that Target Fund. |
Any waivers or reimbursements made by the Adviser are subject to recoupment from the Fund within three years after the occurrence of the reimbursement, provided that such recoupment shall not be made if it would cause annual Fund operating expenses of a class of the Fund to exceed the lesser of (a) the expense limitation in effect at the time of the reimbursement, or (b) the current expense limitation in effect, if any. The agreement will continue for a period of at least two years from the closing date of the Reorganization and cannot be terminated before that date without the mutual agreement of the Trust’s Board of Trustees and the Adviser.
There can be no assurance that the above expense limitation will continue beyond the dates indicated.
Sub-Adviser. As adviser, LFI is primarily responsible for investment decisions affecting each of the Funds under its management. LFI has delegated day-to-day portfolio management responsibility to investment management firms that serve as sub-adviser. The sub-adviser makes investment decisions for the Fund in accordance with the Funds’ investment objectives and places orders on behalf of the Fund to effect those decisions. LFI provides ongoing oversight, including review of returns on a relative and absolute basis, a sub-adviser’s use of soft dollars, evaluation of execution quality and brokerage allocation and on-site compliance reviews.
| Fund |
Sub-Adviser | |
| LVIP ClearBridge Appreciation Fund | ClearBridge Investments, LLC (“ClearBridge”) | |
| LVIP ClearBridge Dividend Strategy Fund | 620 Eighth Avenue, 48th Floor, | |
| LVIP ClearBridge Large Cap Growth Fund | New York, NY 10018 | |
| LVIP ClearBridge Large Cap Value Fund |
LFI, not the Funds, pays the sub-adviser a monthly fee equal to a percentage of the average daily net assets of the portion of the Fund for which the sub-adviser provides investment sub-advisory services. The aggregate annual rates of the fees that LFI pays to a sub-adviser may vary according to the level of assets the sub-adviser manages.
Sub-Advisory Fees Paid by Each Fund
Since the Funds are new, there were no fees paid for investment sub-advisory services with respect to the management of each Fund during the fiscal year ended, December 31, 2025. LFI, not the Fund, pays all sub-advisory fees owed.
62
Table of Contents
Prior to the closing of the Reorganizations, ClearBridge served as sub-adviser to the Predecessor Funds. FTFA, and not the Predecessor Funds, paid all sub-advisory fees owed. As compensation for its services, the FTFA paid to ClearBridge a fee equal to 70% of the management fee paid to FTFA by each Predecessor Fund, net of any waivers and expense reimbursements.
ClearBridge Investments, LLC (“ClearBridge”), is located at One Madison Avenue, New York, New York, 10010. ClearBridge is a wholly owned subsidiary of Franklin Resources, Inc., a publicly traded company listed on the New York Stock Exchange (NYSE:BEN). As of December 31, 2025, ClearBridge’s total assets under management were approximately $212 billion, including $45.2 billion for which ClearBridge provides non-discretionary investment models to managed account sponsors.
Service marks. The Funds’ service marks and the name “Lincoln” are used by the Funds with the permission of LNC, and their continued use is subject to LNC’s right to withdraw this permission in the event LFI ceases to be the Funds’ investment adviser.
Fund Expenses. Expenses specifically assumed by each Fund under its Investment Management Agreement include, among others, compensation and expenses of the Trustees who are not interested persons; custodian fees; independent auditor fees; brokerage commissions; legal and accounting fees; registration and other fees in connection with maintaining required Fund and share registration with the SEC and state securities authorities; and the expenses of printing and mailing updated prospectuses, proxy statements and shareholder reports to current contract owners.
Proxy Voting Policies and Procedures. The Board of Trustees has delegated to LFI or each Fund’s sub-adviser (as applicable) responsibility for voting any proxies relating to portfolio securities held by the Fund in accordance with the adviser’s or sub-adviser’s proxy voting policies and procedures. Summaries of the proxy voting policies and procedures to be followed on behalf of the Funds, including procedures to be used when a vote represents a conflict of interest, are attached hereto as Appendix B.
Information regarding how each Fund voted proxies relating to portfolio securities during the most recent 12-month period ended June 30 is available (1) without charge, upon request, by calling 866-436-8717 or on the Funds’ website at https://lincolnfinancial.com/lvip; and (2) on the SEC’s website at http://www.sec.gov.
Portfolio Managers
The following provides information regarding each portfolio manager’s other accounts managed, material conflicts of interest, compensation, and any ownership of securities in the Funds. Each portfolio manager is referred to in this section as a “portfolio manager.” Portfolio managers are the individuals employed by or associated with the Funds or an investment adviser of the Funds who are primarily responsible for the day-to-day management of the Funds’ portfolio.
Other Accounts Managed (To Be Provided)
The following chart lists certain information about types of other accounts for which each portfolio manager was primarily responsible as of December 1, 2025.
| Adviser/Sub-Adviser Portfolio Manager(s) |
Total Number of Other Accounts |
Total Assets (in millions) of Other Accounts |
Number of Other Accounts Paying Performance Fees |
Total Assets (in millions) of Other Accounts Paying Performance Fees |
||||||||||||
| ClearBridge Investments, LLC |
||||||||||||||||
| John Baldi |
||||||||||||||||
| Registered Investment Companies |
4 | $ | 8.88 | 0 | $ | 0 | ||||||||||
| Other Pooled Investment Vehicles |
4 | $ | 0.26 | 0 | $ | 0 | ||||||||||
| Other Accounts |
55,812 | $ | 21.73 | 0 | $ | 0 | ||||||||||
63
Table of Contents
| Adviser/Sub-Adviser Portfolio Manager(s) |
Total Number of Other Accounts |
Total Assets (in millions) of Other Accounts |
Number of Other Accounts Paying Performance Fees |
Total Assets (in millions) of Other Accounts Paying Performance Fees |
||||||||||||
| Michael Clarfeld, CFA |
||||||||||||||||
| Registered Investment Companies |
4 | $ | 8.88 | 0 | $ | 0 | ||||||||||
| Other Pooled Investment Vehicles |
2 | $ | 0.17 | 0 | $ | 0 | ||||||||||
| Other Accounts |
55,800 | $ | 21.50 | 0 | $ | 0 | ||||||||||
| Erica Furfaro |
||||||||||||||||
| Registered Investment Companies |
10 | $ | 16.57 | 0 | $ | 0 | ||||||||||
| Other Pooled Investment Vehicles |
5 | $ | 3.83 | 0 | $ | 0 | ||||||||||
| Other Accounts |
98,130 | $ | 36.54 | 0 | $ | 0 | ||||||||||
| Michael Kagan |
||||||||||||||||
| Registered Investment Companies |
5 | $ | 11.73 | 0 | $ | 0 | ||||||||||
| Other Pooled Investment Vehicles |
2 | $ | 0.22 | 0 | $ | 0 | ||||||||||
| Other Accounts |
8,171 | $ | 3.28 | 0 | $ | 0 | ||||||||||
| Dmitry Khaykin |
||||||||||||||||
| Registered Investment Companies |
4 | $ | 4.73 | 0 | $ | 0 | ||||||||||
| Other Pooled Investment Vehicles |
1 | $ | 0.28 | 0 | $ | 0 | ||||||||||
| Other Accounts |
4,520 | $ | 2.48 | 0 | $ | 0 | ||||||||||
| Deepon Nag |
||||||||||||||||
| Registered Investment Companies |
4 | $ | 4.73 | 0 | $ | 0 | ||||||||||
| Other Pooled Investment Vehicles |
1 | $ | 0.28 | 0 | $ | 0 | ||||||||||
| Other Accounts |
4,520 | $ | 2.48 | 0 | $ | 0 | ||||||||||
| Stephen Rigo, CFA |
||||||||||||||||
| Registered Investment Companies |
5 | $ | 11.73 | 0 | $ | 0 | ||||||||||
| Other Pooled Investment Vehicles |
2 | $ | 0.22 | 0 | $ | 0 | ||||||||||
| Other Accounts |
8,171 | $ | 3.28 | 0 | $ | 0 | ||||||||||
| Margaret Vitrano |
||||||||||||||||
| Registered Investment Companies |
10 | $ | 16.57 | 0 | $ | 0 | ||||||||||
| Other Pooled Investment Vehicles |
5 | $ | 3.83 | 0 | $ | 0 | ||||||||||
| Other Accounts |
98,130 | $ | 36,54 | 0 | $ | 0 | ||||||||||
Material Portfolio Manager Conflicts of Interest
Actual or apparent conflicts of interest may arise when a portfolio manager of a mutual fund has day-to-day management responsibilities with respect to the portfolio assets of more than one investment account, such as other pooled investment vehicles (including mutual funds, private funds, etc.) or separately managed accounts (collectively, “Accounts”).
Potential conflicts of interest may occur in connection with a portfolio manager’s management of a fund named in this SAI (a “Fund”), on one hand, and the investments of another Account, on the other. LFI has policies and procedures that it believes reasonably address the conflicts associated with managing multiple Accounts. The management of multiple Accounts and a Fund may give rise to potential conflicts of interest, as a portfolio manager must allocate time and effort to multiple Accounts and the Fund. Material conflicts may exist between the investment strategy of the Fund and the investment strategy of other Accounts managed by the portfolio manager such as when an Account sells (or buys) a security, while the Fund buys or holds (or sells) the same security. As a result, transactions executed for one Account may adversely affect the value of securities held by the Fund.
Material conflicts may exist in the allocation of investment opportunities between the Fund and other Accounts managed by the portfolio manager. LFI and the Funds’ sub-adviser(s), if any, have adopted policies and procedures designed to allocate investments fairly across a Fund and other Accounts.
No Fund or other LFI managed Account with a strategy similar to any of the Funds charges a performance-based fee.
64
Table of Contents
The information below relates solely to the Fund managed by the particular adviser or sub-adviser.
Lincoln Financial Investments Corporation (“LFI”)
Subadvised Funds. LFI manages certain Fund portfolio investments via a “manager of managers” structure, whereby LFI selects and oversees sub-advisers that, in turn, manage a Fund’s portfolio investments, such as equity (stocks), fixed-income (bonds), and exchange-traded funds (“ETFs”). LFI conducts ongoing reviews of each sub-adviser’s business practices and investment operations. The Funds’ manager of managers structure, as well as Accounts not being charged performance-based fees, greatly reduces the potential for LFI Fund portfolio managers to face conflicts of interest regarding the management of other Accounts.
Funds of Funds. LFI provides direct asset management services for certain Funds known as “funds of funds.” A Lincoln fund of funds invests assets in other mutual funds, including ETFs, funds managed by LFI (typically branded “LVIP” or “Lincoln” funds), and funds managed by unaffiliated investment managers (collectively, underlying funds). LFI Fund portfolio managers maintain an asset allocation strategy for each LVIP fund of funds and make decisions regarding allocations to underlying funds based on the investment objectives, policies, practices and other relevant investment considerations that the portfolio managers deem applicable.
LFI and the Funds generally rely on SEC Rule 12d1-4 to implement the fund of funds structure. LFI, as a fiduciary to each Fund, selects underlying funds that it believes are in a Fund’s best interest based on a variety of factors.
LFI and its affiliates receive advisory and other fees from underlying LVIP Funds for the management and other services that LFI and its affiliates provide to the LVIP Funds. Similarly, unaffiliated investment managers and their affiliates receive advisory and/or other fees from the underlying funds they or their affiliates manage. The affiliated and unaffiliated underlying funds may have advisory fee rates and/or fee structures that are different than those of the Funds. A portfolio manager’s management of Accounts with different advisory fee rates and/or fee structures may raise potential conflicts of interest by creating an incentive to favor higher fee Accounts.
As decision-makers for the LVIP funds of funds, LFI portfolio managers have the authority and discretion to manage fund of funds’ allocations to underlying funds. LFI’s policy is for LFI portfolio managers to make decisions concerning the selection of underlying funds based on the best interests of each Fund and its shareholders, without regard to any revenue that LFI receives or might receive, directly or indirectly, from Funds for services provided by LFI or an LFI affiliate or from any Fund sub-adviser. The Funds have additional policies and procedures in place to comply with SEC rules concerning funds of funds.
Cross Trades. LFI portfolio managers do not manage Fund assets that may be included in cross-trades. Fund sub-advisers effect any such trades, and each sub-adviser has represented to LFI that it has procedures in place to comply with relevant SEC regulations.
Multiple Accounts. A Fund portfolio manager’s management of multiple Accounts may result in the portfolio manager devoting unequal time and attention to the management of each Account. Although LFI does not track the time a portfolio manager spends on a single Fund, it does assess whether a portfolio manager has adequate time and resources to effectively manage all the Accounts for which he or she is responsible. LFI seeks to manage competing interests for the time and attention of portfolio managers and other LFI personnel.
Personal Accounts. Personal accounts of LFI investment personnel may give rise to potential conflicts of interest and must be maintained and conducted in accordance with LFI’s code of ethics.
ClearBridge Investments, LLC (“ClearBridge”)
Potential conflicts of interest may arise when the Funds’ portfolio managers also have day-to-day management responsibilities with respect to one or more other funds or other accounts, as is the case for the Funds’ portfolio managers.
The subadviser and the Funds have adopted compliance policies and procedures that are designed to address various conflicts of interest that may arise for the subadviser and the individuals that each employs. For example, the subadviser seeks to minimize the effects of competing interests for the time and attention of portfolio managers by assigning portfolio managers to manage funds and accounts that share a similar investment style. The
65
Table of Contents
subadviser has also adopted trade allocation procedures that are designed to facilitate the fair allocation of investment opportunities among multiple funds and accounts. There is no guarantee, however, that the policies and procedures adopted by the subadviser and the funds will be able to detect and/or prevent every situation in which an actual or potential conflict may appear. These potential conflicts include:
Allocation of Limited Time and Attention. A portfolio manager who is responsible for managing multiple funds and/or accounts may devote unequal time and attention to the management of those funds and/or accounts. The effects of this potential conflict may be more pronounced where funds and/or accounts overseen by a particular portfolio manager have different investment strategies.
Allocation of Investment Opportunities. If a portfolio manager identifies an investment opportunity that may be suitable for multiple funds and/or accounts, the opportunity may be allocated among these several funds or accounts, which may limit a fund’s ability to take full advantage of the investment opportunity. The subadviser has adopted policies and procedures to ensure that all accounts, including the fund, are treated equitably.
Pursuit of Differing Strategies. At times, a portfolio manager may determine that an investment opportunity may be appropriate for only some of the funds and/or accounts for which he or she exercises investment responsibility or may decide that certain of the funds and/or accounts should take differing positions with respect to a particular security. In these cases, the portfolio manager may place separate transactions for one or more funds or accounts which may affect the market price of the security or the execution of the transaction, or both, to the detriment or benefit of one or more other funds and/or accounts.
Selection of Broker/Dealers. In addition to executing trades, some broker/dealers provide brokerage and research services (as those terms are defined in Section 28(e) of the 1934 Act), which may result in the payment of higher brokerage fees than might have otherwise been available. These services may be more beneficial to certain funds or accounts than to others. For this reason, the subadviser has formed a brokerage committee that reviews, among other things, the allocation of brokerage to broker/dealers, best execution and soft dollar usage.
Variation in Compensation. A conflict of interest may arise where the financial or other benefits available to the portfolio manager differ among the funds and/or accounts that he or she manages. If the structure of the manager’s management fee (and the percentage paid to the subadviser) differs among funds and/or accounts (such as where certain funds or accounts pay higher management fees or performance-based management fees), the portfolio manager might be motivated to help certain funds and/or accounts over others.
The portfolio manager might be motivated to favor funds and/or accounts in which he or she has an interest or in which the manager and/or its affiliates have interests. Similarly, the desire to maintain assets under management or to enhance the portfolio manager’s performance record or to derive other rewards, financial or otherwise, could influence the portfolio manager in affording preferential treatment to those funds and/or accounts that could most significantly benefit the portfolio manager.
Compensation Structures and Methods
Information regarding each portfolio manager’s compensation is attached hereto as Appendix C.
Beneficial Interest of Portfolio Managers
Information regarding securities of each Fund beneficially owned, if any, by portfolio managers is disclosed below. In order to own securities of a fund, a portfolio manager would need to own a Lincoln Life variable life insurance policy or variable annuity contract. Portfolio managers are not required to own Fund shares, but may invest their personal assets in Fund shares in accordance with their individual investment goals. A portfolio manager’s personal investment, or lack of investment, is not an indicator of that portfolio manager’s confidence in, or commitment to, a particular Fund or its investment strategy.
Since the Funds are new, no portfolio manager of any Fund beneficially owns shares of any Fund.
66
Table of Contents
Principal Underwriter
Lincoln Financial Distributors, Inc. (LFD), 130 North Radnor-Chester Road, Radnor, Pennsylvania 19087, serves as the principal underwriter for the Trust pursuant to a Principal Underwriting Agreement with the Trust dated January 1, 2012. LFD is an affiliate of LFI, the Funds’ investment adviser. Under the agreement, the Trust has appointed LFD as the principal underwriter and distributor of the Trust to sell shares of each class of each Fund within the Trust at net asset value in a continuous offering to insurance company separate accounts or employer-sponsored products. LFD will not retain underwriting commissions from the sale of Fund shares. The offering of each such class is continuous.
For fiscal years ended December 31, 2025, 2024 and 2023, LFD received $199,287,590, $194,623,872, and $177,938,119, respectively, in compensation from the Trust.
For the fiscal years ended December 31, 2025, 2024 and 2023, the Predecessor Funds paid $2,645,735, $2,471,504 and $2,051,266, respectively, to Franklin Distributors, LLC, the Predecessor Funds’ distributor.
Administration Agreement
The Trust has entered into an Administration Agreement with Lincoln Life, an affiliate of LFI and LFD, pursuant to which Lincoln Life provides various administrative services necessary for the operation of the Funds. These services include, among others: coordinating all service providers; providing corporate secretary services; providing personnel and office space; providing certain trading operations; maintaining each Fund’s books and records; general accounting monitoring and oversight; preparing of tax returns and reports; preparing and arranging for the distribution of all shareholder materials; preparing and coordinating filings with the SEC and other federal and state regulatory authorities. The Trust reimburses Lincoln Life for the cost of administrative, internal legal and corporate secretary services.
For the fiscal years ended December 31, 2025, 2024 and 2023, the Trust paid Lincoln Life $12,090,608, $11,515,673, and $10,571,726, respectively, in administrative services reimbursement.
FTFA served as the administrator of the Predecessor Funds. FTFA was compensated for administration services under the investment management agreement with the Predecessor Funds and did not receive separate compensation for providing administration services to the Predecessor Funds.
The Trust compensates Lincoln Life for contractholder servicing provided by Lincoln Life with respect to the Funds. These contractholder services include, among others: responding to operational inquiries from contractholders about accounts and the Funds; processing purchase and redemption orders with the Funds’ transfer agent; providing contractholders with automatic investment services; providing periodic account information to contractholders; interfacing between the Funds’ transfer agent and contractholder activity systems; providing subaccounting with respect to Fund shares; and forwarding communications from the Funds to contractholders. In addition, Lincoln Life provides certain corporate-level services to each of the Funds, such as: anti-money laundering and fraud prevention; privacy and data security; disaster recovery; and services related to regulatory duties, such as duties of confidentiality and disclosure.
For the fiscal years ended December 31, 2025 and 2024, the Trust paid Lincoln Life $34,744,937 and $30,947,378, respectively, in contractholder servicing and corporate-level services reimbursement.
Securities Lending
Since the Funds are new, none of the Funds engaged in any securities lending. None of the Predecessor Funds engaged in securities lending for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2025.
Accounting Agreement
The Trust has entered into a fund accounting and financial administration services agreement (“Accounting Agreement”) with State Street Bank and Trust Company (“State Street”), effective October 15, 2018 (November 19,
67
Table of Contents
2018 for the funds of funds and master feeder funds), pursuant to which State Street provides certain accounting services for the Fund. Services provided under the Accounting Agreement include, among others, functions related to calculating the daily net asset values (“NAV”) of the Funds’ shares, providing financial reporting information, regulatory compliance testing and other related accounting services. For these services, the Fund pays State Street either a flat, annual fee or an asset-based fee based on the total value of assets in the Trust, plus certain additional service fees and out-of-pocket expenses.
For fiscal years ended December 31, 2025, 2024 and 2023, the Trust paid $7,662,396, $7,300,929, and $8,785,055, respectively, pursuant to its Accounting Agreement.
For the fiscal years ended December 31, 2025, 2024, and 2023, the Predecessor Funds paid $293,557, $290,028 and $214,465, respectively, to The Bank of New York Mellon, for fund accounting and financial administrative oversight services.
Code of Ethics
The Trust, LFI and LFD have each adopted a Code of Ethics pursuant to Rule 17j-1 under the 1940 Act. The Board of Trustees has reviewed and approved these Codes of Ethics. Subject to certain limitations and procedures, these Codes permit personnel that they cover, including employees of LFI who regularly have access to information about securities purchased for the Funds, to invest in securities for their own accounts. This could include securities that may be purchased by Funds. The Codes are intended to prevent these personnel from taking inappropriate advantage of their positions and to prevent fraud on the Funds. The Trust’s Code of Ethics requires reporting to the Board of Trustees of material compliance violations.
Description of Shares
The Trust was organized as a Delaware statutory trust on February 1, 2003 and is registered with the SEC as an open-end, management investment company. The Trust’s Certificate of Trust is on file with the Secretary of State of Delaware. The Trust’s Agreement and Declaration of Trust authorizes the Board of Trustees to issue an unlimited number of shares, which are shares of beneficial interest, without par value. The Trust currently consists of 113 funds organized as separate series of shares. The Agreement and Declaration of Trust authorizes the Board of Trustees to divide or redivide any unissued shares of the Trust into one or more additional series by setting or changing in any one or more respects their respective preferences, conversion or other rights, voting power, restrictions, limitations as to dividends, qualifications, and terms and conditions of redemption, and to establish separate classes of shares.
Each Fund currently offers two classes of shares: Standard Class and Service Class. The two classes of shares are identical, except that Service Class shares are subject to a distribution and service plan (Plan). The Plan allows each Fund to pay distribution and service fees of up to 0.35% per year to those organizations that sell and distribute Service Class shares and provide services to Service Class shareholders and contract owners. The Plan for the Service Class is discussed in the “Rule 12b-1 Plan” section of this SAI.
The Funds’ shares (all classes) have no subscription or preemptive rights and only such conversion or exchange rights as the Board of Trustees may grant in its discretion. When issued for payment as described in the prospectus and this SAI, the shares will be fully paid and non-assessable, which means that the consideration for the shares has been paid in full and the issuing Fund may not impose levies on shareholders for more money. In the event of a liquidation or dissolution of the Trust, shareholders of each Fund are entitled to receive the assets available for distribution belonging to that Fund, and a proportionate distribution, based upon the relative asset values of the respective Funds, of any general assets not belonging to any particular Fund which are available for distribution, subject to any differential class expenses.
Rule 18f-2 under the 1940 Act provides that any matter required to be submitted to the holders of outstanding voting securities of an investment company such as the Trust shall not be deemed to have been effectively acted upon unless approved by the holders of a majority of the outstanding shares of each Fund affected by the matter.
68
Table of Contents
For purposes of determining whether the approval of a majority of the outstanding shares of a Fund will be required in connection with a matter, a Fund will be deemed to be affected by a matter unless it is clear that the interests of each Fund in the matter are identical, or that the matter does not affect any interest of the Fund. Under Rule 18f-2, the approval of an investment advisory agreement or any change in investment policy would be effectively acted upon with respect to a Fund only if approved by a majority of the outstanding shares of that Fund. However, Rule 18f-2 also provides that the ratification of independent public accountants (for Funds having the same independent accountants), the approval of principal underwriting contracts, and the election of trustees may be effectively acted upon by shareholders of the Trust voting without regard to individual Funds. In such matters, all shares of the Trust have equal voting rights.
Unless otherwise required by the 1940 Act, ordinarily it will not be necessary for the Trust to hold annual meetings of shareholders. As a result, shareholders may not consider each year the election of Trustees or the appointment of auditors. However, the holders of at least 10% of the shares outstanding and entitled to vote may require the Trust to hold a special meeting of shareholders for purposes of removing a trustee from office. Shareholders may remove a Trustee by the affirmative vote of two-thirds of the Trust’s outstanding voting shares. In addition, the Board of Trustees will call a meeting of shareholders for the purpose of electing Trustees if, at any time, less than a majority of the Trustees then holding office have been elected by shareholders.
Control Persons and Principal Holders of Securities
Because the Funds are available as investments for variable annuity contracts and variable life insurance policies (Variable Contracts) offered by certain life insurance companies, the insurance companies could be deemed to control the voting securities of each Fund (i.e., by owning more than 25%). However, an insurance company would exercise voting rights attributable to any shares of each Fund that it owns (directly or indirectly) in accordance with, and in proportion to, voting instructions received by owners of the Variable Contracts. A small number of Contract Holders could therefore determine whether Fund proposals are approved.
For these Funds, the insurance companies include, without limitation, (1) Lincoln Life, an Indiana insurance company, at 1301 S. Harrison Street, Fort Wayne, IN 46802; (2) Lincoln Life & Annuity Company of New York (Lincoln New York), a New York insurance company, at 100 Madison Street, Suite 1860, Syracuse, NY 13202-2802; and (3) other third-party insurance companies.
As of April 1, 2026, there were no shareholders of the Funds that beneficially owned 5% or more (or 25% or more) of a Fund’s outstanding shares.
Rule 12b-1 Plan
Pursuant to Rule 12b-1 under the 1940 Act, the Trust has adopted a distribution and service plan (Plan) for the Service Class of shares of each Fund. As previously noted, the Trust offers shares of beneficial interest to Insurance Companies for allocation to certain of their Variable Contracts. The Trust may pay Insurance Companies or others, out of the assets of Service Class shares of each Fund for activities primarily intended to sell such shares. The Trust would pay each third-party for these services pursuant to a written agreement with that third-party.
Payments made under the Plan may be used for, among other things: the printing of prospectuses and reports used for sales purposes; preparing and distributing sales literature and related expenses; advertisements; education of shareholders and contract owners or dealers and their representatives; and other distribution-related expenses. Payments made under the Plan may also be used to pay insurance companies, dealers or others for, among other things: service fees as defined under FINRA rules; furnishing personal services or such other enhanced services as the Trust or a Variable Contract offering Service Class may require; or maintaining customer accounts and records.
For the noted services, the Plan authorizes each Fund to pay to Insurance Companies or others, a monthly fee (“Plan Fee”) not to exceed 0.25% per annum of the average daily NAV of Service Class shares, respectively, as compensation or reimbursement for services rendered and/or expenses borne. The Plan Fee may be adjusted by the Trust’s Board of Trustees from time to time. The Plan does not limit Plan Fees to amounts actually expended by
69
Table of Contents
third parties for services rendered and/or expenses borne. A third party, therefore, may realize a profit from Plan Fees in any particular year.
No “interested person”, as defined in the 1940 Act, or Independent Trustee had or has a direct or indirect financial interest in the operation of the Plan or any related agreement.
The Board of Trustees, including a majority of the Independent Trustees, has determined that, in the exercise of reasonable business judgment and in light of its fiduciary duties, there is a reasonable likelihood that the Plan will benefit each Fund and Service Class contract owners thereof. Each year, the Trustees must make this determination for the Plan to be continued.
Since the Funds are new, none of the Funds paid Plan Fees for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2025.
Class II shares of each Predecessor Fund were subject to a distribution (Rule 12b-1) fee which was adopted pursuant to a distribution and service plan (the “Predecessor Fund 12b-1 Plan”). Under the Predecessor Fund 12b-1 Plan, Class II shares paid annual amounts not exceeding 0.25% of the average daily net assets of the Class II shares of each Predecessor Fund. The following service and distribution fees were incurred by each Predecessor Fund pursuant to Predecessor Fund 12b-1 Plan during the fiscal year ended December 31, 2025:
| Fund/Class |
Service and Distribution Fees Incurred ($) |
Service and Distribution Fees Waived/Reimbursed ($) | ||
| ClearBridge Variable Appreciation Portfolio Class II |
835,207 | 0 | ||
| ClearBridge Variable Dividend Strategy Portfolio Class II |
835,393 | 334,157 | ||
| ClearBridge Variable Large Cap Growth Portfolio Class II |
975,135 | 0 | ||
| ClearBridge Variable Large Cap Value Portfolio Class II | N/A* | N/A* |
| * | No information is presented for Class II shares of ClearBridge Variable Large Cap Value Portfolio, as no class II shares were outstanding as of December 31, 2025. |
Revenue Sharing
LFI and its affiliates, including LFD, and/or each Fund’s sub-adviser may pay compensation at their own expense, including the profits from the advisory fees LFI receives from the Funds or the sub-advisory fees the sub-advisers receive from LFI, to affiliated or unaffiliated brokers, dealers or other financial intermediaries (financial intermediaries) in connection with the sale or retention of Fund shares or the sales of insurance products that are funded by the Funds and/or shareholder servicing (distribution assistance). For example, LFD may pay additional compensation to financial intermediaries for various purposes, including, but not limited to, promoting the sale of Fund shares and the products that are funded by the Fund shares; access to their registered representatives; sub-accounting, administrative or shareholder processing services; and marketing and education support. Such payments are in addition to any distribution fees, service fees and/or transfer agency fees that may be payable by the Funds. The additional payments may be based on factors, including level of sales, the Funds’ advisory fees, some other agreed upon amount, or other measures as determined from time to time.
A significant purpose of these payments is to increase sales of the Funds’ shares and the products that contain the Funds. LFI and/or its affiliates may benefit from these payments of compensation to financial intermediaries through increased fees resulting from additional assets acquired through the sale of insurance products through such intermediaries.
Valuation of Portfolio Securities
Offering Price/NAV. The offering price of a Fund’s shares is based on the Funds’ net asset value (“NAV”) per share. The Fund determines its NAV per share by subtracting its liabilities (including accrued expenses and dividends payable) from its total assets (the value of the securities the Fund holds plus cash and other assets, including income accrued but not yet received) and dividing the result by the total number of Fund shares outstanding. The Fund determines its NAV per share as of close of regular trading on the New York Stock Exchange (“NYSE”) –
70
Table of Contents
normally 4:00 p.m. New York time, each business day. In addition to the disclosure in each Fund’s prospectus under the “Pricing of Fund Shares” section, the value of each Fund’s investments is determined as follows:
Foreign Equity Securities. Foreign equity securities are generally valued based on their closing price on the principal foreign exchange for those securities, which may occur earlier than the NYSE close. The Fund then may adjust for market events, occurring between the close of the foreign exchange and the NYSE close. An independent statistical service has been retained to assist in determining the value of certain foreign equity securities. This service utilizes proprietary computer models to determine adjustments for market events. Quotations of foreign securities in foreign currencies and those valued using forward currency rates are converted into U.S. dollar equivalents.
Over-the-Counter (“OTC”) Investments. OTC investments (including swaps and options) are generally valued by pricing services that use evaluated prices from various observable market and other factors. Certain forward foreign currency contracts are generally valued using the mean between broker-dealer bid and ask quotations, and foreign currency exchange rates.
Exchange-Traded Futures, Options and Swaps. Exchange-traded futures, options and swaps are normally valued at the reported settlement price determined by the relevant exchange. Exchange-traded futures, options and swaps for which no settlement prices are reported are generally valued at the mean between the most recent bid and ask prices obtained from pricing services, established market makers, or from broker-dealers.
Portfolio Holdings Disclosure
The Trust’s Board of Trustees has adopted policies and procedures designed to ensure that disclosure of information regarding a Fund’s portfolio securities is in the best interests of Fund shareholders. In accordance with these policies and procedures, Fund management will make shareholders reports or other regulatory filings containing the Funds’ portfolio holdings available free of charge to individual investors, institutional investors, intermediaries that distribute the Funds’ shares, and affiliated persons of the Fund that make requests for such holdings information. Shareholder reports are available 60 days after the end of each semi-annual reporting period.
Each Fund posts its top-ten holdings shortly after each quarter-end to Lincoln Life and other insurance companies who include the Funds in their products (Insurance Companies). All Insurance Companies that receive nonpublic portfolio holdings information must sign a confidentiality agreement agreeing to keep this nonpublic portfolio information strictly confidential and not to engage in trading on the basis of the information. The Insurance Companies may include this information in marketing and other public materials (including via website posting) 15 days after the end of the quarter.
each Fund will post all of its holdings to a publicly available website no earlier than 25 calendar days after quarter end. In addition, each Fund may post all of its holdings no earlier than 25 calendar days after inception, rebalance, or after any material changes are made to the holdings. At the time of the disclosure on the website, the portfolio holdings of these Funds will be deemed public.
Each Fund also may provide holdings information following the end of the quarterly reporting period under a confidentiality agreement to third-party service providers, including independent rating and ranking organizations, which conduct market analyses of the Funds’ portfolio holdings against benchmarks or securities market indices. All such third parties must sign a confidentiality agreement agreeing to keep the non-public portfolio information strictly confidential and not to engage in trading on the basis of the information. These parties may disseminate the portfolio holdings information when the portfolio holdings are deemed to be public.
Certain Funds provide daily holdings information to affiliated persons of the Funds to better facilitate Fund and related insurance product operations. In addition, certain Funds provide monthly portfolio holdings on a post-trade basis to Lincoln Life approximately 20 days after the end of each month. The pricing group uses Fund information to support the group’s oversight of risk management functions for the Managed Volatility Funds and Lincoln Life, but does not engage in any trading activities. The risk management group uses the information to hedge portfolio risks for Lincoln Life and for Lincoln insurance products and annuities. Lincoln’s internal risk management
71
Table of Contents
functions are integral to supporting the relevant Funds and their associated insurance products. Each of these information sharing arrangements is subject to: (1) a non-disclosure agreement; and (2) protections against (a) inappropriate trading based on the information and (b) conflicts of interest between the Funds and their affiliated persons.
Fund sub-advisers have an ongoing arrangement with the following third parties to make available information about a Fund’s portfolio holdings: (1) ratings organizations, such as Moodys, Refinitiv and S&P, provided generally on a monthly basis for the purpose of reviewing the particular fund; (2) portfolio analysis companies, such as The Bank of New York Mellon (BNY Mellon), Commicise, BBH Infomediary, IDS GmBH, Commcise, Confluence Technologies Inc., IEX Data Analytics LLC, Institutional Shareholder Services Inc., TS Imagine, Qontigo, OMGEO, LLC, RIMES, Morningstar, Lipper, Factset Research Systems, Inc., Factset Workstation, Factset Raptor, Eagle PACE, Eagle Star, Solutions Atlantic, ION (Minerva and Sentinel), Financial Recovery Technologies, Intex, Performance Attribution System, Linedata Services, Inc., CRIMS, Everest Alpha Beta, Investment Technology Group Inc., Wilshire Associates, Inc., Bloomberg L.P., Bloomberg PORT, BarraOne/MSCI Barra, Inc., Barclays Capital, BlackRock Aladdin, Trade Informatics, Investor Tools Perform, BARRA Aegis Systems, Global Trading Analytics, LLC, Citigroup, Hedgemark, ICE Data Pricing and Reference Data, LLC, MoneyMate, Omgeo, Barclays Capital Point, Acuity Knowledge Partners, Virtu Americas LLC, Virtu Financial, Virtu ITG LLC, Markit/Wall Street Office and Axioma provided generally on a daily, monthly or quarterly basis for the purpose of compiling reports, preparing comparative analysis data and trade execution evaluation; (3) proxy voting or class action services, such as Broadridge Financial Solutions, Inc., Glass, Lewis & Co., or Institutional Shareholder Services (ISS) - ISS/RiskMetrics provided generally on a daily basis or bi-monthly basis for the purpose of voting proxies relating to portfolio holdings or providing corporate actions services and trade confirmation; Securities Class Action Services; (4) computer systems, products, services and software vendors, such as BestX, Electra Securities, TriOptima, FIS XSPrisa (XSP) SaaS, FX Connect, OMEGO LLC, Infinit Outsourcing, Inc., Limited, Cogent Consulting, Abel Noser, Charles River Communications, StarCompliance, Amazon Web Services (hosted applications), Microsoft, SS&C, SmartStream TLM, DTCC, Confluence, Tradeweb, provided generally on a daily basis for the purpose of providing computer products, services, software and accounting systems to the sub-advisers; MetroProof Inc., and (5) operational services such as Accenture LLP, Bank of New York Mellon, Brown Brothers Harriman & Co., Fidelity Corporate Action Solutions, StarCompliance, State Street Bank and Trust Company, State Street Global Services, State Street Investment Manager Solutions, ION and Northern Trust, provided generally on a daily basis for the purpose of providing operational functions including, but not limited to, Fund pricing and OTC derivative swap products to the sub-advisers. Each of the above unaffiliated third parties must agree to keep the Fund’s holdings information confidential and not engage in trading on the basis of the information. The sub-advisers do not receive compensation in connection with these arrangements.
Each Fund may provide, at any time, portfolio holdings information to: (a) Fund service providers and affiliates, such as the Funds’ investment adviser, or sub-advisers, trading services providers, class action service provider (Kessler Topaz Meltzer & Check, LLP), custodian and independent registered public accounting firm, to the extent necessary to perform services for the Funds; and (b) state and federal regulators and government agencies as required by law or judicial process. These entities are subject to duties of confidentiality imposed by law, contract, or fiduciary obligations.
The Funds will disclose their portfolio holdings in public SEC filings. The Trust’s Board of Trustees also may, on a case-by-case basis, authorize disclosure of the Funds’ portfolio holdings, provided that, in its judgment, such disclosure is not inconsistent with the best interests of shareholders, or may impose additional restrictions on the dissemination of portfolio information.
Neither the Funds, the Adviser, nor any affiliate receive any compensation or consideration in connection with the disclosure of the Funds’ portfolio holdings information.
The Funds are responsible for ensuring appropriate disclosure is made regarding these procedures in the Funds’ prospectuses and/or SAI.
The Trust’s Board of Trustees exercises oversight of these policies and procedures. Management for the Funds will inform the Trustees if any substantial changes to the procedures become necessary to ensure that the procedures
72
Table of Contents
are in the best interest of Fund shareholders. The officers will consider any possible conflicts between the interest of Fund shareholders, on the one hand, and those of the Funds’ investment adviser and other Fund affiliates, on the other. Moreover, the Funds’ Chief Compliance Officer will address the operation of the Funds’ procedures in the annual compliance review and will recommend any remedial changes to the procedures.
Purchase and Redemption Information
Shares of a Fund may not be purchased or redeemed by individual investors directly but may be purchased or redeemed only through variable annuity contracts or variable life contracts offered by Lincoln Life, LNY and other insurance companies. Shares of the Funds may also be purchased by the Trust’s funds of funds, which invest their assets in other mutual funds. The offering price of a Fund’s shares is equal to its net asset value per share.
If conditions exist which make payment of redemption proceeds wholly in cash unwise or undesirable, a Fund may make payment wholly or partly in securities or other investment instruments which may not constitute securities as such term is defined in the applicable securities laws. If a redemption is paid wholly or partly in securities or other property, a shareholder would incur transaction costs in disposing of the redemption proceeds.
Custodian and Transfer Agent
All securities, cash and other similar assets of the Funds are currently held in custody by State Street Bank and Trust Company, One Lincoln Street, Boston, Massachusetts 02111.
The custodian shall: receive and disburse money; receive and hold securities; transfer, exchange, or deliver securities; present for payment coupons and other income items, collect interest and cash dividends received, hold stock dividends, etc.; cause escrow and deposit receipts to be executed; register securities; and deliver to the Funds proxies, proxy statements, etc.
Lincoln Life performs the Funds’ dividend and transfer agent functions.
Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm
The Board of Trustees has engaged Ernst & Young LLP, One Commerce Square, Suite 700, 2005 Market Street, Philadelphia, PA 19103, to serve as the Acquiring Funds’ Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm. In addition to the audits of the Funds’ financial statements, Ernst & Young LLP also reviews certain regulatory reports and performs other tax services when engaged to do so by the Trust.
Financial Statements
Since the Funds are new, the recent Form N-CSR to shareholders, which contains the Funds’ audited financial statements, will not be available until December 31, 2026. We will provide a copy of the Funds’ annual report and financial statements, once available, on request and without charge. Either write: The Lincoln National Life Insurance Company, P.O. Box 2340, Fort Wayne, Indiana 46801, or call: 866-436-8717. The audited financial statements of the Predecessor Funds for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2025, and the semi-annual financial statements of the Target Predecessor Funds for the fiscal period ended June 30, 2025, are incorporated by reference herein.
Taxes
Regulated Investment Company. The Fund intends to qualify, and has elected to be taxed as, a regulated investment company under the Internal Revenue Code (the “Code”). A regulated investment company’s ordinary income and net realized capital gains, if distributed to shareholders, will not be subject to corporate income tax. The Fund, as a regulated investment company, must, among other things, annually derive at least 90% of its gross income from dividends, interest, payments with respect to securities loans and gains from the sale of stock or
73
Table of Contents
securities or foreign currencies, or other income, such as income derived from interests in “qualified publicly traded partnerships,” gains from options, futures, or forward contracts, derived with respect to the Funds’ other investments (the Income Requirement).
The Fund also intends to comply with diversification requirements that apply to mutual funds investing in variable contracts. Generally, a Fund will be required to diversify its investments so that on the end of each calendar quarter: no more than 55% of total assets is represented by any one investment; no more than 70% is represented by any two; no more than 80% is represented by any three; and no more than 90% is represented by any four.
For this purpose, securities of a given issuer are treated as one investment, but each U.S. government agency or instrumentality is treated as a separate issuer. Any security issued, guaranteed, or insured by the U.S. government or an agency or instrumentality of the U.S. government is treated as a security issued by such. The Funds may satisfy an alternative asset diversification test under certain circumstances.
The Funds may sell its shares directly to certain qualified pension and retirement plans, and to separate accounts established and maintained by insurance companies for the purpose of funding variable annuity and variable life insurance contracts. If a Fund were to sell its shares to other categories of shareholders, the Funds may fail to comply with applicable Treasury requirements regarding investor control. If a Fund should fail to comply with the investor control requirements, the Contract owners would be treated as the Funds’ shareholders, and the contracts invested in the Fund would not be treated as annuity, endowment, or life insurance contracts under the Code. All income and gain earned from those contracts both in past years and currently would be taxed currently to the Contract owners, and income and gain would remain subject to taxation as ordinary income thereafter.
If a Fund fails to qualify as a regulated investment company, the Fund would be subject to tax as an ordinary corporation on all of its taxable income and gain, whether or not distributed to shareholders. Moreover, if a Fund were to fail to qualify as a regulated investment company, the Funds’ distributions would be characterized as ordinary dividend income to its shareholders, and Contract owners would be required to include in ordinary income any income earned under the contracts for the current and all prior taxable years. A Fund’s failure to satisfy the diversification requirements may also result in adverse tax consequences for the insurance company issuing the contracts. Under certain circumstances inadvertent failures to satisfy the diversification requirements may be corrected.
The Funds may invest in exchange traded vehicles that track commodity returns. Under the Code, these investments are not considered “securities” for purposes of the Income Requirement. As a result, any income generated by such investments is not included in determining compliance with the Income Requirement’s 90% test. The Fund intends to manage its commodities exposure to ensure that the Income Requirement is met at the end of the Funds’ tax year. To the extent that a Fund’s income from commodities exceeds 10% of the Funds’ gross income, the Funds may be subject to taxation on that portion of commodities income that exceeds 10% of the Funds’ gross income.
Medicare Tax. A 3.8% Medicare tax is imposed on the net investment income (which includes, but is not limited to, taxable dividends, taxable annuity payments, and net gain from investments) of certain individuals, trusts and estates.
Fund Distributions. Dividends that a Fund pays from its ordinary income and distributions of a Fund’s net realized capital gains are includable in the respective Insurance Company’s gross income. Distributions of a Fund’s net realized long-term capital gains retain their character as long-term capital gains in the hands of the Insurance Companies if certain requirements are met. The tax treatment of such dividends and distributions depends on the respective Insurance Company’s tax status. To the extent that income of a Fund represents dividends on common or preferred stock, rather than interest income, its distributions to the Insurance Companies will be eligible for the present 70% dividends received deduction applicable to life insurance companies under the Code. See the Contracts Prospectus for a description of the respective Insurance Company’s tax status and the charges that may be made to cover any taxes attributable to the Separate Account. Not later than 60 days after the end of each calendar year, each Fund will send to the Insurance Companies a written notice reporting the amount and character of any distributions made during such year. Any benefits reported will inure to the benefit of the Insurance Companies and will not be shared with Contract owners.
74
Table of Contents
Foreign Investments. Dividends or other income received by a Fund from investments in foreign securities may be subject to withholding and other taxes imposed by foreign jurisdictions. Tax conventions, such as treaties, between certain countries and the United States may reduce or eliminate such taxes in some cases. If more than 50% of a Fund’s total assets at the close of its taxable year consists of stock or securities in foreign corporations or in other regulated investment companies, the Funds may elect to treat its foreign income tax payments as paid by the Insurance Companies for U.S. income tax purposes. The Funds may qualify for and make this election in some, but not necessarily all, of its taxable years. If a Fund were to make this election, the Insurance Companies would be required to take into account an amount equal to their pro rata portions of such foreign taxes in computing their taxable income. Not later than 60 days after any year for which it makes such an election, a Fund will report to the Insurance Companies the amount per share of such foreign income tax that must be included in gross income and the amount that will be available for the deduction or credit. Certain limitations apply to the credit (but not the deduction) for foreign taxes that an Insurance Company may claim. Foreign taxes each Fund pays will reduce the return on the Funds’ investments. Any benefits of a foreign tax credit or deduction as a result of this election will inure to the benefit of the Insurance Companies and will not be shared with Contract owners.
The Fund or Underlying Fund that invests in non-U.S. securities may be subject to non-U.S. income taxes and non-U.S. financial transactions taxes. The Fund and underlying fund that is eligible to do so may elect to “pass through” to its investors the amount of non-U.S. income taxes paid by the Fund or underlying fund, depending on the circumstances.
Contract Owner Taxes. Since individual Contract owners are generally not treated as shareholders of the Funds, no discussion is included regarding the federal income tax consequences at the Contract owner level. The discussion of federal income tax considerations in the prospectus, in conjunction with the foregoing, is a general and abbreviated summary of the applicable provisions of the Code and Treasury Regulations currently in effect. These interpretations can be changed at any time. The above discussion covers only federal tax considerations with respect to the Funds. State and local taxes vary.
The Fund also intends to comply with diversification regulations under Section 817(h) of the Code that apply to mutual funds underlying variable contracts. Generally, a Fund will be required to diversify its investments so that on the last day of each quarter of a calendar year, no more than 55% of the value of its total assets is represented by any one investment, no more than 70% is represented by any two investments, no more than 80% is represented by any three investments, and no more than 90% is represented by any four investments. For this purpose, securities of a given issuer are treated as one investment, but each U.S. government agency or instrumentality is treated as a separate issuer. Any security issued, guaranteed, or insured (to the extent so guaranteed or insured) by the U.S. government or an agency or instrumentality of the U.S. government is treated as a security issued by the U.S. government or its agency or instrumentality, whichever is applicable. An alternative asset diversification test may be satisfied under certain circumstances.
The Funds may sell its shares directly to separate accounts established and maintained by insurance companies for the purpose of funding variable annuity and variable life insurance contracts and to certain qualified pension and retirement plans; if a Fund were to sell its shares to other categories of shareholders, the Funds may fail to comply with applicable Treasury requirements regarding investor control. If a Fund should fail to comply with the investor control requirements, the Contract holders would be treated as the owners of the shares and the contracts invested in the Fund would not be treated as annuity, endowment or life insurance contracts under the Code and all income and gain earned in past years and currently inside the contracts would be taxed currently to the Contract holders, and income and gain would remain subject to taxation as ordinary income thereafter.
Failure by a Fund to both qualify as a regulated investment company and satisfy the Section 817(h) diversification requirements would generally cause Variable Contracts that include the Fund as an underlying investment to lose their favorable tax status and require contract holders to include in ordinary income any income under the contracts for the current and all prior taxable years. Under certain circumstances described in the applicable Treasury regulations, inadvertent failure to satisfy the applicable diversification requirements may be corrected, but such a correction would require a payment to the Internal Revenue Service (IRS) based on the tax contract holders would have incurred if they were treated as receiving the income on the contract for the period during which the
75
Table of Contents
diversification requirements were not satisfied. Any such failure may also result in adverse tax consequences for the insurance company issuing the contracts. Failure by a Fund to qualify as a regulated investment company would also subject a Fund to federal and state income taxation on all of its taxable income and gain, whether or not distributed to shareholders.
The Fund or an underlying fund, if invested in non-U.S. securities, may be subject to non-U.S. income taxes and non-U.S. financial transactions taxes. The Fund and underlying fund that is permitted to do so may elect to “pass through” to its investors, including a Fund, the amount of non-U.S. income taxes paid by the Fund or underlying fund. The Fund itself will be eligible to elect to “pass through” such amounts to its stockholders and may do so, depending upon circumstances.
A 3.8% Medicare tax is imposed on the net investment income (which includes, but is not limited to, taxable dividends, taxable annuity payments and net gain from investments) of certain individuals, trusts and estates.
Dividends paid by the Company from its ordinary income and distributions of the Company’s net realized capital gains are includable in the respective Insurance Company’s gross income. Distributions of the Company’s net realized long-term capital gains retain their character as long-term capital gains in the hands of the Insurance Companies if certain requirements are met. The tax treatment of such dividends and distributions depends on the respective Insurance Company’s tax status. To the extent that income of the Company represents dividends on common or preferred stock, rather than interest income, its distributions to the Insurance Companies will be eligible for the present 70% dividends received deduction applicable in the case of a life insurance company as provided in the Code. See the Prospectus for the Contracts for a description of the respective Insurance Company’s tax status and the charges which may be made to cover any taxes attributable to the Separate Account. Not later than 60 days after the end of each calendar year, the Company will send to the Insurance Companies a written notice required by the Code reporting the amount and character of any distributions made during such year. Any benefits of such designation will inure to the benefit of the Insurance Companies and will not be shared with Contract holders.
Dividends or other income (including, in some cases, capital gains) received by a Fund from investments in foreign securities may be subject to withholding and other taxes imposed by foreign countries. Tax conventions between certain countries and the United States may reduce or eliminate such taxes in some cases. If more than 50% of a Fund’s total assets at the close of its taxable year consists of stock or securities of foreign corporations or in other regulated investment companies, the Funds may elect for U.S. income tax purposes to treat foreign income taxes paid by it as paid by the Insurance Companies. The Funds may qualify for and make this election in some, but not necessarily all, of its taxable years. If a Fund were to make an election, the Insurance Companies would be required to take into account an amount equal to their pro rata portions of such foreign taxes in computing their taxable income and then treat an amount equal to those foreign taxes as a U.S. Federal income tax deduction or as a foreign tax credit against their U.S. Federal income taxes. Not later than 60 days after any year for which it makes such an election, a Fund will report to the Insurance Companies the amount per share of such foreign income tax that must be included in gross income and the amount which will be available for the deduction or credit. Certain limitations will be imposed on the extent to which the credit (but not the deduction) for foreign taxes may be claimed. Foreign taxes paid by each Fund will reduce the return from the Funds’ s investments. Any benefits of such reporting will inure to the benefit of the Insurance Companies and will not be shared with Contract holders.
Since individual contract owners are generally not treated as shareholders of the Funds, no discussion is included regarding the federal income tax consequences at the shareholder level.
The discussion of federal income tax considerations in the prospectus, in conjunction with the foregoing, is a general and abbreviated summary of the applicable provisions of the Code and Treasury Regulations currently in effect as interpreted by the Courts and the IRS. These interpretations can be changed at any time. The above discussion covers only federal tax considerations with respect to the Funds. State and local taxes vary.
76
Table of Contents
Appendix A — Long and Short-Term Credit Ratings
Certain of the Fund’s investment policies and restrictions include reference to bond (long-term) and commercial paper (short-term) ratings. The following is a discussion of the rating categories of Moody’s Investor Service, Inc. and Standard & Poor’s Financial Services LLC.
Background
Moody’s
Ratings assigned on Moody’s global long-term and short-term rating scales are forward-looking opinions of the relative credit risks of financial obligations issued by non-financial corporates, financial institutions, structured finance vehicles, project finance vehicles, and public sector entities.
S&P Global Ratings
A Standard & Poor’s issue credit rating is a forward-looking opinion about the creditworthiness of an obligor with respect to a specific financial obligation, a specific class of financial obligations, or a specific financial program. The opinion reflects Standard & Poor’s view of the obligor’s capacity and willingness to meet its financial commitments as they come due.
Long-Term Credit Ratings
Long-term ratings are generally the credit risk of fixed-income obligation with an original maturity of one year or more.
Moody’s
Aaa - Obligations rated Aaa are judged to be of the highest quality, subject to the lowest level of credit risk.
Aa - Obligations rated Aa are judged to be of high quality and are subject to very low credit risk.
A - Obligations rated A are judged to be upper-medium grade and are subject to low credit risk.
Baa - Obligations rated Baa are judged to be medium-grade and subject to moderate credit risk and as such may possess certain speculative characteristics.
Ba - Obligations rated Ba are judged to be speculative and are subject to substantial credit risk.
B - Obligations rated B are considered speculative and are subject to high credit risk.
Caa - Obligations rated Caa are judged to be speculative of poor standing and are subject to very high credit risk.
Ca - Obligations rated Ca are highly speculative and are likely in, or very near, default, with some prospect of recovery of principal and interest.
C - Obligations rated C are the lowest rated and are typically in default, with little prospect for recovery of principal or interest.
S&P Global Ratings
AAA - An obligation rated ‘AAA’ has the highest rating assigned by S&P Global Ratings. The obligor’s capacity to meet its financial commitment on the obligation is extremely strong.
AA - An obligation rated ‘AA’ differs from the highest-rated obligations only to a small degree. The obligor’s capacity to meet its financial commitment on the obligation is very strong.
A - An obligation rated ‘A’ is somewhat more susceptible to the adverse effects of changes in circumstances and economic conditions than obligations in higher-rated categories. However, the obligor’s capacity to meet its financial commitment on the obligation is still strong.
BBB – An obligation rated ‘BBB’ exhibits adequate protection parameters. However, adverse economic conditions or changing circumstances are more likely to weaken the obligor’s capacity to meet its financial commitment on the obligation.
77
Table of Contents
BB; B; CCC; CC; and C – Obligations rated ‘BB’, ‘B’, ‘CCC’, ‘CC’, and ‘C’ are regarded as having significant speculative characteristics. ‘BB’ indicates the least degree of speculation and ‘C’ the highest. While such obligations will likely have some quality and protective characteristics, these may be outweighed by large uncertainties or major exposures to adverse conditions.
D - An obligation rated ‘D’ is in default or in breach of an imputed promise. For non-hybrid capital instruments, the ‘D’ rating category is used when payments on an obligation are not made on the date due, unless S&P Global Ratings believes that such payments will be made within five business days in the absence of a stated grace period or within the earlier of the stated grace period or 30 calendar days. The ‘D’ rating also will be used upon the filing of a bankruptcy petition or the taking of similar action and where default on an obligation is a virtual certainty, for example due to automatic stay provisions. A rating on an obligation is lowered to ‘D’ if it is subject to a distressed exchange offer. *Ratings from ‘AA’ to ‘CCC’ may be modified by the addition of a plus (+) or minus (-) sign to show relative standing within the rating categories.
Short-Term Credit Ratings
Short-term ratings are generally assigned to those obligations considered short-term in the relevant market. In the U.S., for example, that means obligations with an original maturity of no more than 365 days — including commercial paper.
Moody’s
P1 - Issuers (or supporting institutions) rated Prime-1 have a superior ability to repay short-term debt obligations. P2 - Issuers (or supporting institutions) rated Prime-2 have a strong ability to repay short-term debt obligations. P3 - Issuers (or supporting institutions) rated Prime-3 have an acceptable ability to repay short-term obligations. NP - Issuers (or supporting institutions) rated Not Prime do not fall within any of the Prime rating categories.
S&P Global Ratings
A-1 - A short-term obligation rated ‘A-1’ is rated in the highest category by S&P Global Ratings. The obligor’s capacity to meet its financial commitment on the obligation is strong. Within this category, certain obligations are designated with a plus sign (+). This indicates that the obligor’s capacity to meet its financial commitment on these obligations is extremely strong.
A-2 - A short-term obligation rated ‘A-2’ is somewhat more susceptible to the adverse effects of changes in circumstances and economic conditions than obligations in higher rating categories. However, the obligor’s capacity to meet its financial commitment on the obligation is satisfactory.
A-3 - A short-term obligation rated ‘A-3’ exhibits adequate protection parameters. However, adverse economic conditions or changing circumstances are more likely to weaken an obligor’s capacity to meet its financial commitment on the obligation.
B - A short-term obligation rated ‘B’ is regarded as vulnerable and has significant speculative characteristics. The obligor currently has the capacity to meet its financial commitments; however, it faces major ongoing uncertainties that could lead to the obligor’s inadequate capacity to meet its financial commitments.
C - A short-term obligation rated ‘C’ is currently vulnerable to nonpayment and is dependent upon favorable business, financial, and economic conditions for the obligor to meet its financial commitments on the obligation.
D - A short-term obligation rated ‘D’ is in default or in breach of an imputed promise. For non-hybrid capital instruments, the ‘D’ rating category is used when payments on an obligation are not made on the date due, unless S&P Global Ratings believes that such payments will be made within any stated grace period. However, any stated grace period longer than five business days will be treated as five business days. The ‘D’ rating also will be used upon the filing of a bankruptcy petition or the taking of a similar action and where default on an obligation is a virtual certainty, for example due to automatic stay provisions. A rating on an obligation is lowered to ‘D’ if it is subject to a distressed exchange offer.
78
Table of Contents
Appendix B — Proxy Voting Policies and Procedures
Lincoln Financial Investments Corporation (“LFI”)
I. Introduction
The Board of Trustees (the “Board”) of each series of Lincoln Variable Insurance Products Trust (collectively, the “Lincoln Funds”) has adopted these Proxy Voting Policies and Procedures (the “Policies and Procedures”) to govern each Lincoln Fund’s proxy voting. The Board has delegated implementation of these Policies and Procedures, and the responsibility for all proxy voting, or further delegation of proxy voting, to the Lincoln Funds’ investment adviser, LFI.
LFI has adopted these Policies and Procedures to govern LFI’s implementation of proxy voting for LFI’s clients, which include the Lincoln Funds.
II. Policies
LFI shall vote proxies for which it has discretionary authority in the best interests of its clients. Such clients may include the Lincoln Funds, non-Lincoln mutual funds, private funds, and separate accounts (collectively, “Clients”).
Proxy voting decisions with respect to a Client’s holdings shall be made in the manner LFI believes will most likely protect and promote such Client’s long-term economic value. Absent unusual circumstances or specific instructions, LFI votes proxies on a particular matter with this fundamental premise on behalf of each Client, regardless of a Client’s individual investment style or strategies.
In exercise voting authority LFI will comply with Rule 206(4)-6 under the Investment Advisers Act of 1940. The Rule requires an investment adviser to:
| • | Adopt and implement written policies and procedures that are reasonably designed to ensure that the adviser votes client securities in the best interest of clients, which procedures must include how material conflicts are addressed; |
| • | Disclose to clients how they may obtain information about how the adviser voted with respect to their securities; and |
| • | Describe to clients the adviser’s proxy voting policies and procedures and, upon request, furnish a copy of the policies and procedures to the requesting client. |
III. Procedures
A. Direct Investments
LFI may invest directly in equity and fixed income securities, and other types of investments. LFI will cast votes for proxies in accordance with the Client’s proxy voting procedures or other direction. If the Client does not direct proxy voting in the Client’s account, LFI will vote proxies in the Client’s best interests, as determined by LFI. In making such determination, LFI may rely on analysis from proxy voting consultants or third-party proxy voting services. LFI will consider each proxy that it votes and evaluate it based on the particular facts and circumstances of that proxy. LFI may determine not to vote all or some shares eligible to vote if that course of action would be in the Client’s best interests under the circumstances. Such circumstances could include, but are not limited to, cases where the cost of voting exceeds any expected benefits (e.g., foreign proxies), or where voting results in restrictions on trading.
B. Sub-Advised Funds
LFI advises mutual funds and separate accounts that are offered through variable contracts and which are sub-advised by unaffiliated third-party sub-advisers (“sub-advised funds”). Each sub-advised fund delegates responsibility for voting proxies relating to the sub-advised fund’s securities to the sub-adviser, subject to the Board’s continued oversight. The sub-adviser votes all proxies relating to the sub-advised funds’ portfolio securities
79
Table of Contents
and uses the sub-adviser’s own proxy voting policies and procedures adopted in conformance with Rule 206(4)-6. LFI shall review each sub-adviser’s proxy voting policies and procedures as follows:
| • | Before a sub-adviser is retained, LFI’s compliance staff will review the proposed sub-adviser’s proxy voting policies and procedures and confirm that the sub-adviser will vote the proxies in the best interests of its clients. |
| • | Each quarter, LFI’s compliance staff surveys each sub-adviser, via a compliance questionnaire, and reviews any reported changes or exceptions to their compliance policies and procedures, including proxy voting. LFI’s compliance staff reviews these reported changes or exceptions and, if material, summarizes them and reports such event’s to the sub-advised fund’s board. |
| • | During contract renewal of sub-advisory agreements for Clients that are registered mutual funds, LFI reviews the sub-adviser’s responses to the Section 15(c) information request sent by Funds Management, which includes pertinent questions relating to the sub-adviser’s proxy voting policies and procedures. |
C. Funds of Funds
LFI advises certain funds of funds that invest substantially all of their assets in shares of other affiliated and/or unaffiliated mutual funds (each an “underlying fund”). A fund of funds may also invest directly in equity and fixed income securities and other types of investments.
When an underlying fund, whose shares are held by a fund of funds, solicits a shareholder vote on any matter, LFI shall vote such shares of the underlying fund in the same proportion as the vote of all other holders of shares of such underlying fund. This type of voting structure is commonly referred to as “mirror voting.”
When a fund of funds invests directly in securities other than mutual funds, LFI shall follow the procedures outlined in “Direct Investments” above.
D. Master-Feeder Funds
LFI advises certain master-feeder funds. A feeder fund does not buy investment securities directly. Instead, it invests in a master fund which in turn purchases investment securities. Each feeder fund has the same investment objective and strategies as its master fund.
If a master fund in a master-feeder structure calls a shareholder meeting and solicits proxies, the feeder fund (that owns shares of the master fund) shall seek voting instructions from the feeder fund’s shareholders and will vote proxies as directed. Proxies for which no instructions are received shall be voted in accordance with mirror voting, in the same proportion as the proxies for which instructions were timely received from the feeder fund’s shareholders.
Proxies for the portfolio securities owned by the master fund will be voted pursuant to the master fund’s own proxy voting policies and procedures.
E. Material Conflicts
In the event that LFI identifies a potential material conflict of interest between a Client and LFI, or any LFI-affiliated entity, LFI will advise the chief compliance officer (“CCO”) of the potential conflict. The CCO then will convene an ad hoc committee which will include, without limitation, the CCO, legal counsel, and the president of LFI. The ad hoc committee will determine if an actual conflict exists, and if so, it will vote the proxy in accordance with the Client’s best interests. If the conflict relates specifically to a Client that is a registered mutual fund, the CCO shall report to the fund’s board, at its next regularly scheduled meeting, the nature of the conflict, how the proxy vote was cast, and the rationale for the vote.
IV. Disclosure
A. Form ADV
LFI shall disclose information regarding these Policies and Procedures as required in Item 17 of Form ADV, Part 2A. Among other things, LFI will disclose how Clients may obtain information about how LFI voted their portfolio securities and how Clients may obtain a copy of these Policies and Procedures.
80
Table of Contents
B. Statement of Additional Information (SAI)
Each of the Lincoln Funds shall include in its SAI a copy or a summary of these Policies and Procedures, and, if applicable, any sub-advisers’ policies and procedures (or a summary of such policies and procedures).
C. Annual Reports
Each of the Lincoln Funds shall disclose in its annual and semi-annual shareholder reports that a description of these Policies and Procedures, including any sub-adviser policies and procedures, and the Lincoln Fund’s proxy voting record for the most recent 12 months ended June 30 are available on the Securities and Exchange Commission’s (SEC) website by calling a specified toll-free telephone number.
D. Proxy Voting Record on Form N-PX
The Lincoln Funds annually will file their complete proxy voting record with the SEC on Form N-PX. Form N-PX shall be filed for the twelve months ended June 30 no later than August 31 of that year.
V. Recordkeeping
LFI shall retain the following documents for not less than seven (7) years from the end of the year in which the proxies were voted, the first two (2) years at an on-site location:
| (a) | Proxy Voting Policies and Procedures; |
| (b) | Proxy voting records (this requirement may be satisfied by a third party who has agreed in writing to do so); |
| (c) | A copy of any document that LFI, or an ad hoc committee convened for purposes of voting proxies, creates that was material in making its voting decision, or that memorializes the basis for such decision; and |
| (d) | A copy of each written request from a Client, and any response to the Client, for information on how LFI voted the Client’s proxies. |
ClearBridge Investments, LLC (“ClearBridge”)
ClearBridge is subject to the Proxy Voting Policies and Procedures that it has adopted to seek to ensure that it votes proxies relating to equity securities in the best interest of client accounts. The following is a brief overview of the policies.
ClearBridge votes proxies for each client account with respect to which it has been authorized or is required by law to vote proxies. In voting proxies, ClearBridge is guided by general fiduciary principles and seeks to act prudently and solely in the best interest of the beneficial owners of the accounts it manages. ClearBridge attempts to consider all factors that could affect the value of the investment and will vote proxies in the manner that it believes will be consistent with efforts to maximize shareholder values. ClearBridge may utilize an external service provider to provide it with information and/or a recommendation with regard to proxy votes. However, such recommendations do not relieve ClearBridge of its responsibility for the proxy vote.
In the case of a proxy issue for which there is a stated position in the policies, ClearBridge generally votes in accordance with such stated position. In the case of a proxy issue for which there is a list of factors set forth in the policies that ClearBridge considers in voting on such issue, ClearBridge considers those factors and votes on a case-by-case basis in accordance with the general principles set forth above. In the case of a proxy issue for which there is no stated position or list of factors that ClearBridge considers in voting on such issue, ClearBridge votes on a case-by-case basis in accordance with the general principles set forth above. Issues for which there is a stated position set forth in the policies or for which there is a list of factors set forth in the policies that ClearBridge considers in voting on such issues fall into a variety of categories, including election of directors, ratification of auditors, proxy and tender offer defenses, capital structure issues, executive and director compensation, mergers and corporate restructuring, and social and environmental issues. The stated position on an issue set forth in the policies can always be superseded, subject to the duty to act solely in the best interest of the beneficial owners of accounts, by the investment management professionals responsible for the account whose shares are being voted. There may be occasions when different investment teams vote differently on the same issue. In addition, in the case of Taft-Hartley clients, ClearBridge will comply with a client direction to vote proxies in accordance with Institutional
81
Table of Contents
Shareholder Services’ (ISS) PVS Voting guidelines, which ISS represents to be fully consistent with AFL-CIO guidelines.
In furtherance of ClearBridge’s goal to vote proxies in the best interest of clients, ClearBridge follows procedures designed to identify and address material conflicts that may arise between ClearBridge’s interests and those of its clients before voting proxies on behalf of such clients. To seek to identify conflicts of interest, ClearBridge periodically notifies ClearBridge employees in writing that they are under an obligation (i) to be aware of the potential for conflicts of interest on the part of ClearBridge with respect to voting proxies on behalf of client accounts both as a result of their personal relationships or ClearBridge’s business relationships, and (ii) to bring conflicts of interest of which they become aware to the attention of ClearBridge’s Chief Compliance Officer. ClearBridge also maintains and considers a list of significant ClearBridge relationships that could present a conflict of interest for ClearBridge in voting proxies.
ClearBridge generally takes the position that non-ClearBridge relationships between a Franklin affiliate and an issuer do not present a conflict of interest for ClearBridge in voting proxies with respect to such issuer. Such position is based on the fact that ClearBridge is operated as an independent business unit from other Franklin business units as well as on the existence of information barriers between ClearBridge and certain other Franklin business units.
ClearBridge’s Proxy Committee reviews and addresses conflicts of interest. A proxy issue that will be voted in accordance with a stated ClearBridge position on such issue or in accordance with the recommendation of an independent third party is not brought to the attention of the Proxy Committee for a conflict of interest review because ClearBridge’s position is that to the extent a conflict of interest issue exists, it is resolved by voting in accordance with a pre-determined policy or in accordance with the recommendation of an independent third party. With respect to a conflict of interest brought to its attention, the Proxy Committee first determines whether such conflict of interest is material. A conflict of interest is considered material to the extent that it is determined that such conflict is likely to influence, or appear to influence, ClearBridge’s decision-making in voting proxies. If it is determined by the Proxy Committee that a conflict of interest is not material, ClearBridge may vote proxies notwithstanding the existence of the conflict.
If it is determined by the Proxy Committee that a conflict of interest is material, the Proxy Committee is responsible for determining an appropriate method to resolve such conflict of interest before the proxy affected by the conflict of interest is voted. Such determination is based on the particular facts and circumstances, including the importance of the proxy issue and the nature of the conflict of interest.
82
Table of Contents
Appendix C — Compensation Structures and Methodologies of Portfolio Managers
The following describes the structure of, and the method(s) used to determine the different types of compensation (e.g., salary, bonus, deferred compensation, retirement plans and arrangements) for each Fund’s portfolio manager as of each Fund’s fiscal year ended December 31, 2025:
ClearBridge Investments, LLC (“ClearBridge”)
ClearBridge’s portfolio managers participate in a competitive compensation program that is designed to attract and retain outstanding investment professionals and closely align the interests of its investment professionals with those of its clients and overall firm results. The total compensation program includes a significant incentive component that rewards high performance standards, integrity, and collaboration consistent with the firm’s values. Portfolio manager compensation is reviewed and modified each year as appropriate to reflect changes in the market and to ensure the continued alignment with the goals stated above. ClearBridge’s portfolio managers and other investment professionals receive a combination of base compensation and discretionary compensation, comprising a cash incentive award and deferred incentive plans described below.
Base salary compensation. Base salary is fixed and primarily determined based on market factors and the experience and responsibilities of the investment professional within the firm.
Discretionary compensation. In addition to base compensation managers may receive discretionary compensation.
Discretionary compensation can include:
| • | Cash Incentive Award |
| • | Deferred Compensation - mandatory programs that typically defer a portion of discretionary year-end compensation into company managed funds. Portfolio Managers generally have required allocations in their main product, with the option to invest in additional managed funds. As a result, Portfolio Managers may have up to 100% of this award allocated to their primary managed product or its performance. For research analysts, 100% of the deferred amount is allocated among our managed funds. For U.S.-based employees, these investments are company assets held on the balance sheet and distributed to employees as shares, subject to applicable vesting requirements. Outside the United States, a third-party administrator tracks the performance as a notional investment, which is then paid out to employees in cash following vesting requirements. |
| • | Restricted Stock Deferral – a mandatory program that typically defers a portion of discretionary year-end compensation into Franklin Templeton restricted stock. The award is paid out to employees in shares subject to vesting requirements |
Several factors are considered by ClearBridge Senior Management when determining discretionary compensation for portfolio managers.
These include but are not limited to:
| • | Investment performance. A portfolio manager’s compensation is linked to the investment performance of the fund/accounts managed by the portfolio manager. Investment performance is calculated for 1-, 3-, and 5-year periods measured against the applicable product benchmark (e.g., a securities index and, with respect to a fund, the benchmark set forth in the fund’s Prospectus) and relative to applicable industry peer groups. The greatest weight is generally placed on 3- and 5-year performance; |
| • | Appropriate risk positioning that is consistent with the strategy’s investment philosophy and approach to generation of alpha. |
| • | Overall firm profitability and performance; |
| • | Amount and nature of assets managed by the portfolio manager; |
| • | Contributions for asset retention, gathering and client satisfaction; |
83
Table of Contents
| • | Contribution to mentoring, coaching and/or supervising; |
| • | Contribution and communication of investment ideas in ClearBridge’s Investment Committee meetings and on a day to day basis; and |
| • | Market compensation survey research by independent third parties Lincoln Financial Investments Corporation (“LFI”) |
The equity programs are designed to position LFI to attract and retain the most talented individuals in the financial services industry by offering competitive programs that reward exceptional individual and company performance. Compensation of portfolio managers is not directly based on the performance of the funds or the value of assets held in the funds. Each portfolio manager’s compensation consists of the following:
BASE SALARY: Each named portfolio manager receives a fixed base salary. The base salary is a combination of factors including experience, responsibilities, skills, expectations, and market considerations. Salary increases are awarded in recognition of the portfolio manager’s individual performance and an increase or change in duties and responsibilities. Job expectations are reviewed annually to ensure that they are reflected in the performance objects of the portfolio manager.
ANNUAL INCENTIVE PLAN (AIP): Portfolio managers are eligible to receive annual variable incentive bonus. The AIP is a component of overall compensation based on company, division, and individual employee performance designed to link performance to pay.
LONG-TERM INCENTIVE PLAN PROGRAM: From time to time long-term incentive equity awards are granted to certain key employees. Equity awards are generally granted in the form of Lincoln National Corporation restricted stock units that, once vested, settle in Lincoln National Corporation common stock.
DEFERRED COMPENSATION PROGRAM: A portion of the cash compensation paid to eligible LFI employees may be voluntarily deferred at their election for defined periods of time into an account that may be invested in mutual funds. The mutual fund investment options available in such accounts do not currently include LFI-advised funds.
84
Table of Contents
| (a) |
Declaration of Trust. | |||
| |
(1) |
|||
| |
(2) |
|||
| (b) |
By-laws. | |||
| |
(1) |
|||
| (c) |
Instruments Defining Rights of Security Holders. | |||
| |
(1) |
Articles II, VII, and VIII of the Agreement and Declaration of Trust and Articles III, V and VI of the Amended Bylaws, incorporated by reference into Exhibits (a) and (b) hereto, define the rights of holders of shares. | ||
| (d) |
Investment Advisory Contracts. | |||
| |
(1) |
|||
| |
|
(a) |
||
| |
|
(b) |
||
| |
(2) |
|||
| |
(3) |
Reserved. | ||
| |
(4) |
Sub-Advisory Contracts. | ||
| |
|
(a) |
||
| |
|
|
(i) |
|
| |
|
(b) |
||
| |
|
|
(i) |
|
| |
|
|
(ii) |
|
| |
|
(c) |
||
| |
|
|
(i) |
|
| |
|
(d) |
||
| |
|
|
(i) |
|
| |
|
(e) |
||
| |
|
(f) |
||
| |
|
|
(i) |
|
| |
|
|
(ii) |
|
| |
|
|
(iii) |
|
| |
|
(g) |
||
| |
|
|
(i) |
|
| |
|
(h) |
Reserved. | |
| |
|
(i) |
||
| |
|
|
(i) |
|
| |
|
(j) |
||
| |
|
|
(i) |
|
| |
|
|
(ii) |
|
| |
|
(k) |
||
| |
|
(l) |
Reserved. | |
| |
|
(m) |
||
| |
|
|
(i) |
|
| |
|
(n) |
||
| |
|
(o) |
||
| |
|
|
(i) |
|
| |
|
|
(ii) |
|
| |
|
(p) |
||
| |
|
|
(i) |
|
| |
|
(q) |
||
| |
|
|
(i) |
|
| |
|
(r) |
||
| |
|
|
(i) |
|
| |
|
(s) |
||
| |
|
(t) |
||
| |
|
(u) |
||
| |
|
|
(i) |
|
| |
|
|
(ii) |
|
| |
|
|
(iii) |
|
| |
|
|
(iv) |
|
| |
|
|
(v) |
|
| |
|
|
(vi) |
|
| |
|
|
(vii) |
|
| |
|
(v) |
||
| |
|
|
(i) |
|
| |
|
|
(ii) |
|
| |
|
(w) |
||
| |
|
|
(i) |
|
| |
|
(x) |
||
| |
|
(y) |
||
| |
|
|
(i) |
|
| |
|
|
(ii) |
|
| |
|
(z) |
||
| |
|
|
(i) |
|
| |
|
(aa) |
||
| |
|
|
(i) |
|
| |
|
|
(ii) |
|
| |
|
(bb) |
||
| |
|
|
(i) |
|
| |
|
|
(ii) |
|
| |
|
|
(iii) |
|
| |
|
(cc) |
||
| |
|
|
(i) |
|
| |
|
(dd) |
||
| |
|
|
(i) |
|
| |
|
(ee) |
||
| |
|
(ff) |
||
| |
|
(gg) |
||
| |
|
|
(i) |
|
| |
|
(hh) |
Reserved. | |
| |
|
(ii) |
||
| |
|
(jj) |
||
| |
|
|
(i) |
|
| |
|
|
(ii) |
|
| |
|
(kk) |
||
| |
|
|
(i) |
|
| |
|
|
(ii) |
|
| |
|
(ll) |
||
| |
|
|
(i) |
|
| |
|
(mm) |
||
| |
|
|
(i) |
|
| |
|
|
(ii) |
|
| |
|
(nn) |
||
| |
|
|
(i) |
|
| |
|
|
(ii) |
|
| |
|
|
(iii) |
|
| |
|
(oo) |
||
| |
|
|
(i) |
|
| |
|
(pp) |
||
| |
|
|
(i) |
|
| |
|
(qq) |
||
| |
|
|
(i) |
|
| |
|
|
(ii) |
|
| |
|
(rr) |
||
| |
(5) |
Sub-Sub-Advisory Contracts. | ||
| |
|
(a) |
||
| |
|
(b) |
||
| |
|
(c) |
||
| |
|
(d) |
||
| |
|
(e) |
||
| |
|
(f) |
||
| |
|
(g) |
||
| |
|
(h) |
||
| |
|
(i) |
||
| |
(6) |
Other Sub-Advisory Contracts. | ||
| |
|
(a) |
||
| |
|
(b) |
||
| (e) |
Underwriting Contracts. | |||
| |
(1) |
|||
| |
|
(a) |
||
| |
|
(b) |
||
| (f) |
N/A | |||
| (g) |
Custodian Agreements. | |||
| |
(1) |
|||
| |
|
(a) |
||
| |
|
(b) |
||
| |
|
(c) |
||
| (h) |
Other Material Contracts. | |||
| |
(1) |
|||
| |
|
(a) |
||
| |
(2) |
|||
| |
|
(a) |
||
| |
|
(b) |
||
| |
|
(c) |
||
| |
(3) |
|||
| |
|
(a) |
||
| |
|
(b) |
||
| |
(4) |
|||
| |
|
(a) |
||
| |
|
(b) |
||
| |
(28) |
Consulting Agreements | ||
| |
|
(a) |
||
| |
(29) |
|||
| |
(30) |
|||
| (i) |
Legal Opinion. | |||
| |
(1) |
|||
| |
(2) |
|||
| (j) |
Other Opinions. | |||
| |
(1) |
|||
| |
(2) |
|||
| |
(3) |
|||
| |
(4) |
|||
| (k) |
N/A | |||
| (l) |
N/A | |||
| (m) |
Rule 12b-1 Plan. | |||
| |
(1) |
|||
| |
|
(a) |
||
| |
(2) |
|||
| |
|
(a) |
||
| |
|
(b) |
||
| (n) |
Rule 18f-3 Plan. | |||
| |
(1) |
|||
| (o) |
Reserved | |||
| (p) |
Codes of Ethics. | |||
| |
(1) |
|||
| |
(2) |
|||
| |
(3) |
|||
| |
(4) |
|||
| |
(5) |
|||
| |
(6) |
|||
| |
(7) |
|||
| |
(8) |
|||
| |
(9) |
|||
| |
(10) |
|||
| |
(11) |
|||
| |
(12) |
|||
| |
(13) |
|||
| |
(14) |
|||
| |
(15) |
|||
| |
(16) |
|||
| |
(17) |
|||
| |
(18) |
|||
| |
(19) |
|||
| |
(20) |
|||
| |
(21) |
|||
| |
(22) |
|||
| |
(23) |
|||
| |
(24) |
|||
| |
(25) |
|||
| |
(26) |
|||
| |
(27) |
|||
| |
(28) |
|||
| |
(26) |
|||
| EX-101.INS |
XBRL Instance Document — the instance document does not appear on the Interactive Data File because its XBRL tags are embedded within the Inline XBRL document. |
| EX-101.SCH |
XBRL Taxonomy Extension Schema Document. |
| EX-101.CAL |
XBRL Taxonomy Extension Calculation Linkbase Document. |
| EX-101.DEF |
XBRL Taxonomy Extension Definition Linkbase Document. |
| EX-101.LAB |
XBRL Taxonomy Extension Labels Linkbase Document. |
| EX-101.PRE |
XBRL Taxonomy Extension Presentation Linkbase Document. |
| Name |
Positions and Offices with Underwriter |
Positions and Offices with Trust |
| John C. Kennedy |
Director, Chief Executive Officer, and President |
N/A |
| William A. Nash |
Director and Senior Vice President |
N/A |
| Timothy J. Seifert, Sr. |
Director and Senior Vice President |
N/A |
| Andrew J. Bucklee |
Director and Senior Vice President |
N/A |
| Thomas O'Neill |
Senior Vice President, Chief Operating Officer, and Head of Financial Institutions Group |
N/A |
| Shantanu Mishra |
Senior Vice President, Treasurer |
N/A |
| Paul T. Chryssikos |
Senior Vice President |
N/A |
| Ellen J. Duffy |
Senior Vice President |
N/A |
| Daniel P. Herr |
Senior Vice President |
N/A |
| Kathleen B. Kavanaugh |
Senior Vice President |
N/A |
| Patrick J. Lefemine |
Senior Vice President |
N/A |
| Aadil T. Lokhandwala |
Senior Vice President |
N/A |
| Richard D. Spenner |
Senior Vice President |
N/A |
| Daniel P. Wellock |
Senior Vice President |
N/A |
| Claire H. Hanna |
Secretary |
N/A |
Table of Contents
| LINCOLN VARIABLE INSURANCE PRODUCTS TRUST |
| By: /s/Gordon Huellmantel Gordon Huellmantel Senior Vice President |
| Signature |
Title | |
| By: |
/s/John Morriss* John Morriss |
Chairman of the Board, Trustee and President (Principal Executive Officer) |
| By: |
/s/James Hoffmayer James Hoffmayer |
Chief Accounting Officer (Principal Accounting Officer and Principal Financial Officer) |
| /s/Steve A. Cobb* Steve A. Cobb |
Trustee | |
| /s/Peter F. Finnerty* Peter F. Finnerty |
Trustee | |
| /s/Ken C. Joseph* Ken C. Joseph |
Trustee | |
| /s/Barbara L. Lamb* Barbara L. Lamb |
Trustee | |
| /s/Pamela L. Salaway* Pamela L. Salaway |
Trustee | |
| /s/Manisha A. Thakor* Manisha A. Thakor |
Trustee | |
| /s/Brian W. Wixted* Brian W. Wixted |
Trustee | |
| /s/Nancy B. Wolcott* Nancy B. Wolcott |
Trustee | |
| By: |
/s/Gordon Huellmantel Gordon Huellmantel |
Attorney-in-Fact |
ATTACHMENTS / EXHIBITS
AMENDMENT TO ADMINISTRATION AGREEMENT, LVIP & LFI
AMENDMENT TO AMENDED AND RESTATED EXPENSE LIMITATION AGREEMENT, LVIP & LFI
AMENDMENT TO SCHEDULE A TO THE ADVISORY FEE WAIVER AGREEMENT, LVIP & LFI
CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM
CODE OF ETHICS, AMERICAN CENTURY INVESTMENTS
CODE OF ETHICS, CLEARBRIDGE INVESTMENTS
CODE OF ETHICS, MONDRIAN INVESMENTS PARTNERS
CODE OF ETHICS, NOMURA INVESTMENT
CODE OF ETHICS, T. ROWE PRICE GROUP
CODE OF ETHICS, WELLINGTON MANAGEMENT
Serious News for Serious Traders! Try StreetInsider.com Premium Free!
You May Also Be Interested In
- New Crypto Pepeto Raises $10.2 Million While BlackRock and Fidelity Dominate ETF Exits
- New England’s Top Security Executives Named at the 2026 BostonCISO ORBIE Awards
- WallachBeth Capital Announces Closing of Healthcare Triangle, Inc. Private Placement Offering of Original Issue Discount Senior Convertible Promissory Notes for Gross Proceeds of Approximately $3.6 Mi
Create E-mail Alert Related Categories
SEC FilingsSign up for StreetInsider Free!
Receive full access to all new and archived articles, unlimited portfolio tracking, e-mail alerts, custom newswires and RSS feeds - and more!
