Form 424B3 PARKERVISION INC
Filed pursuant to Rule 424(b)(3)
Registration No. 333-237762
PROSPECTUS SUPPLEMENT No. 22
(to Prospectus dated April 28, 2020)
PARKERVISION, INC.
16,809,295 Shares of Common Stock
This
Prospectus Supplement relates to the prospectus dated April 28,
2020, as amended and supplemented from time to time (the
“Prospectus”), which permits the resale by the selling
stockholders listed in the Prospectus of up to 16,809,295 shares of
our common stock, par value $0.01 per share (“Common
Stock”) consisting of (i) up to 4,961,538 shares of Common
Stock issuable upon conversion of, and for the payment of interest
from time to time at our option, for a convertible promissory note
dated September 13, 2019 which has a fixed conversion price of
$0.10 per share and convertible promissory notes dated January 8,
2020 which have a fixed conversion price of $0.13 per share (the
“Notes”), (ii) an aggregate of 3,907,331 shares of
Common Stock issued pursuant to securities purchase agreements
dated January 9, 2020, January 15, 2020, March 5, 2020 and March
19, 2020, (iii) an aggregate of 2,740,426 shares of Common Stock
issued as payment for services and repayment of short-term loans
and other accounts payable, including interest, (iv) up to
5,000,000 shares of Common Stock issuable upon exercise of a
five-year warrant with an exercise price of $0.74 per share,
subject to adjustment and issued pursuant to a warrant agreement
with Aspire Capital Fund LLC (“Aspire”) and (v) up to
200,000 shares of Common stock issuable upon exercise of a
three-year warrant with an exercise price of $1.00 per share,
subject to adjustment and issued pursuant to a warrant agreement
with Tailwinds Research Group LLC
(“Tailwinds”).
We will
not receive proceeds from the sale of the shares of Common Stock by
the selling stockholders. To the extent the Aspire and Tailwinds
warrants are exercised for cash, we will receive up to an aggregate
of $3,900,000 in gross proceeds. We expect to use proceeds received
from the exercise of the Aspire and Tailwinds warrants, if any, for
general working capital and corporate purposes.
This
Prospectus Supplement is being filed to update and supplement the
information previously included in the Prospectus with the
information contained in our Annual Report on Form 10-K filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “SEC”) on
March 29, 2022. Accordingly, we have attached the 10-K to this
prospectus supplement. You should read this prospectus supplement
together with the prospectus, which is to be delivered with this
prospectus supplement.
Any
statement contained in the Prospectus shall be deemed to be
modified or superseded to the extent that information in this
Prospectus Supplement modifies or supersedes such statement. Any
statement that is modified or superseded shall not be deemed to
constitute a part of the Prospectus except as modified or
superseded by this Prospectus Supplement.
This
Prospectus Supplement should be read in conjunction with, and may
not be delivered or utilized without, the Prospectus.
Our
Common Stock is listed on the OTCQB Venture Capital Market under
the ticker symbol “PRKR.”
Investing in our securities involves a high degree of risk. See
“Risk Factors”
beginning on page 6 of this prospectus for a discussion of
information that should be considered in connection with an
investment in our securities.
Neither the SEC nor any such authority has approved or disapproved
these securities or determined whether this prospectus is truthful
or complete. Any representation to the contrary is a criminal
offense.
The
date of this Prospectus Supplement is March 30, 2022.
UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
WASHINGTON, D.C. 20549
FORM 10-K
(Mark One)
|
|
|
(X)
ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES
EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
|
For the fiscal year ended December 31, 2021
or
|
|
|
( )
TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES
ACT OF 1934
|
|
For the
transition period from ________to__________
|
Commission
file number 000-22904
PARKERVISION, INC.
(Exact
Name of Registrant as Specified in its Charter)
|
|
|
|
|
Florida
|
|
59-2971472
|
|
(State
of Incorporation)
|
|
(I.R.S.
Employer ID No.)
|
4446-1A Hendricks Avenue, Suite 354,
Jacksonville, Florida 32207
(Address
of Principal Executive Offices)
Registrant’s
telephone number, including area code: (904) 732-6100
Securities
registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act:
|
|
|
|
|
Title
of Each Class
|
Trading
Symbol(s)
|
Name of
Each Exchange on Which Registered
|
|
Common Stock, $.01 par value
|
PRKR
|
OTCQB
|
|
Common Stock Rights
|
|
OTCQB
|
Securities
registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act:
None
Indicate
by check mark if the registrant is a well-known seasoned issuer, as
defined in Rule 405 of the Securities Act. Yes ( ) No
(X)
Indicate
by check mark if the registrant is not required to file reports
pursuant to Section 13 or Section 15(d) of the Securities Exchange
Act. Yes ( ) No (X)
Indicate
by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports
required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act
during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the
registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been
subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.
Yes (X) No ( )
Indicate
by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically
every Interactive Data File required to be submitted pursuant to
Rule 405 of Regulation S-T during the preceding 12 months (or for
such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit such
files). Yes (X) No ( )
Indicate
by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer,
an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, smaller reporting
company, or an emerging growth company. See the definitions of
“large accelerated filer,” “accelerated
filer,” “smaller reporting company,” and
“emerging growth company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange
Act.
|
|
|
|
Large
accelerated filer ( )
|
Accelerated
filer ( )
|
|
Non-accelerated
filer (X)
|
Smaller
reporting company (X)
|
|
|
Emerging
growth company ( )
|
If an
emerging growth company, indicate by check mark if the registrant
has elected not to use the extended transition period for complying
with any new or revised financial accounting standards provided
pursuant to Section 13(a) of the Exchange Act. ( )
Indicate
by check mark whether the registrant has filed a report on and
attestation to its management’s assessment of the
effectiveness of its internal control over financial reporting
under Section 404(b) of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act (15 U.S.C. 7262(b))
by the registered public accounting firm that prepared or issued
its audit reports. ( )
Indicate
by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined
in Rule 12b-2 of the Act).
Yes ( ) No (X)
As of
June 30, 2021, the aggregate market value of the
registrant’s common stock, $.01 par value, held by
non-affiliates of the registrant was approximately $101,605,881
(based upon $1.42 share last sale price on that date, as reported
by OTCQB).
As of
March 15, 2022, 77,766,448 shares of the Issuer's Common Stock
were outstanding.
TABLE
OF CONTENTS
|
|
|
|
|
INTRODUCTORY NOTE
|
|
|
|
PART I
|
|
|
|
Item
1.
|
Business
|
|
|
Item
1A.
|
Risk Factors
|
|
|
Item
1B.
|
Unresolved Staff Comments
|
|
|
Item
2.
|
Properties
|
|
|
Item
3.
|
Legal Proceedings
|
|
|
Item
4.
|
Mine Safety Disclosures
|
|
|
PART II
|
|
|
|
Item
5.
|
Market for the Registrant’s Common Equity, Related
Stockholder Matters and Issuer Purchases of Equity
Securities
|
|
|
Item
6.
|
[Reserved]
|
|
|
Item
7.
|
Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition
and Results of Operations
|
|
|
Item
7A.
|
Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market
Risk
|
|
|
Item
8.
|
Financial Statements and Supplementary Data
|
|
|
Item
9.
|
Changes in and Disagreements with Accountants on Accounting and
Financial Disclosure
|
|
|
Item
9A.
|
Controls and Procedures
|
|
|
Item
9B.
|
Other Information
|
|
|
Item
9C.
|
Disclosure Regarding Foreign Jurisdiction that Prevents
Inspections
|
|
|
PART III
|
|
|
|
Item
10.
|
Directors, Executive Officers and Corporate Governance
|
|
|
Item
11.
|
Executive Compensation
|
|
|
Item
12.
|
Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management and
Related Stockholder Matters
|
|
|
Item
13.
|
Certain Relationships and Related Transactions and Director
Independence
|
|
|
Item
14.
|
Principal Accountant Fees and Services
|
|
|
PART IV
|
|
|
|
Item
15.
|
Exhibits and Financial Statement Schedules
|
|
|
Item
16.
|
Form 10-K Summary
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
SIGNATURES
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
INTRODUCTORY NOTE
Unless
the context otherwise requires, in this Annual Report on Form 10-K
(“Annual
Report”), “we”, “us”,
“our” and the “Company” mean ParkerVision,
Inc. and its wholly-owned German subsidiary, ParkerVision
GmbH.
Forward-Looking Statements
We
believe that it is important to communicate our future expectations
to our shareholders and to the public. This Annual Report contains
forward-looking statements within the meaning of the Private
Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995, including, without
limitation, statements about our future plans, objectives, and
expectations under the headings “Item 1. Business” and
“Item 7. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of
Financial Condition and Results of Operations.”
Forward-looking statements include any statement that does not
directly relate to any historical or current fact. When used in
this Annual Report and in future filings by the Company with the
Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”), the words or
phrases “will likely result”, “management
expects”, “we expect”, “will
continue”, “is anticipated”,
“estimated” or similar expressions are intended to
identify such “forward-looking statements.” Readers are
cautioned not to place undue reliance on such forward-looking
statements, each of which speaks only as of the date made. Such
statements are subject to certain risks and uncertainties that
could cause actual results to differ materially from historical
results and those presently anticipated or projected, including the
risks and uncertainties set forth in this Annual Report under the
heading “Item 1A. Risk Factors” and in our other
periodic reports. Examples of such risks and uncertainties include
general economic and business conditions, the outcome of
litigation, unexpected changes in technologies and technological
advances, reliance on our intellectual property, and the ability to
obtain adequate financing in the future. We have no obligation to
publicly release the results of any revisions that may be made to
any forward-looking statements to reflect anticipated events or
circumstances occurring after the date of such
statements.
PART I
Item 1. Business.
We are
in the business of innovating fundamental wireless technologies and
products. We have designed and developed proprietary radio
frequency (“RF”) technologies and
integrated circuits for use in wireless communication
products.
We have
expended significant financial and other resources to research and
develop our RF technologies and to obtain patent protection for
those technologies in the United States of America
(“U.S.”) and certain
foreign jurisdictions. We believe certain patents protecting our
proprietary technologies have been broadly infringed by others and
therefore the primary focus of our business plan is the enforcement
of our intellectual property rights through patent infringement
litigation and licensing efforts.
We
currently have patent enforcement actions ongoing in various U.S.
district courts against mobile handset providers and providers of
smart televisions and other WiFi products and, in certain cases,
their chip suppliers for the infringement of several of our RF
patents. We have made significant investments in developing and
protecting our technologies, the returns on which are dependent
upon the generation of future revenues for
realization.
We
spent the majority of 2021 supporting our current patent
enforcement actions. We have two patent enforcement cases pending
against Qualcomm in the Middle District of Florida. Both cases
experienced trial delays in 2020 and 2021 as a result of the
COVID-19 pandemic. We are currently awaiting a trial date in the
first of these cases, which is expected to be scheduled in 2022
pending the court’s rulings on a few outstanding pre-trial
motions. The second case which is pending against Qualcomm and
Apple has been stayed pending the outcome of the first
case.
In
2021, we entered into two patent settlement and licensing
agreements as a result of patent enforcement actions initiated in
the Western District of Texas in 2020. We have additional
enforcement actions ongoing in Texas including against Intel
Corporation (“Intel”) which is
scheduled for trial in 2022. See “Legal Proceedings” in
Note 12 to our consolidated financial statements included in Item 8
for a detailed description of our various patent enforcement
actions.
A
significant portion of our litigation costs have been funded under
a secured contingent payment arrangement with Brickell Key
Investments, LP (“Brickell”), contingent
arrangements with legal counsel, and various debt and equity
financings. See “Liquidity and Capital Resources”
included in Item 7 for a full discussion of our litigation funding
arrangements and our equity and debt financings.
Products and Licenses
During 2021, we did not offer any products for sale, but rather
focused exclusively on our patent enforcement and licensing
efforts. This resulted in two licensees of our technologies in 2021
including Buffalo, Inc. (“Buffalo”)
and Zyxel Communications Corporation (“Zyxel”).
Each of these licenses resulted from a settlement and patent
license agreement following initiation of patent enforcement
actions by us. See “Revenue” in Note 3 to our
consolidated financial statements included in Item 8 for additional
details.
RF Technologies
Our RF
technologies enable highly accurate transmission and reception of
RF carriers at low power, thereby enabling extended battery life,
and certain size, cost, performance, and packaging
advantages.
We
believe the most significant hurdle to the licensing and/or sale of
our technologies and related products is the widespread use of
certain of our technologies in infringing products produced by
companies with significantly greater financial, technical, sales,
and marketing resources. We believe we can secure licensing
agreements with unauthorized current users of one or more of our
technologies, and therefore compete, based on a solid and
defensible patent portfolio and the advantages enabled by our
unique patent-protected technologies.
Patents and Trademarks
We
consider our intellectual property, including patents, patent
applications, trademarks, and trade secrets to be significant to
our business plan. We have a program to file applications for and
obtain patents, copyrights, and trademarks in the U.S. and in
selected foreign countries where we believe filing for such
protection is appropriate to establish and maintain our proprietary
rights in our technology and products. As of December 31,
2021, we had approximately 81 active U.S. and foreign patents
related to our RF technologies. In addition, we have a number of
recently expired patents that we believe continue to have
significant economic value as a result of our ability to assert
past damages in our patent enforcement actions. We estimate the
economic lives of our patents to be the shorter of fifteen years
from issuance or twenty years from the earliest application date.
Our current portfolio of issued patents have expirations ranging
from 2022 to 2036.
Employees
As of
December 31, 2021, we had seven full-time employees and one
part-time employee. We also outsource certain specialty services,
such as information technology, and utilize contract staff and
third-party consultants from time to time to supplement our
workforce. Our employees are not represented by any collective
bargaining agreements and we consider our employee relations to be
satisfactory.
We have
taken measures to protect our workforce in response to the COVID-19
pandemic, including optional remote worksites for all of our
employees beginning in April 2020. Our management, with the
oversight of our board of directors, monitors the hiring, retention
and management of our employees.
Available Information and Access to Reports
We file
annual reports on Forms 10-K, quarterly reports on Forms 10-Q,
proxy statements and other reports, including any amendments
thereto, electronically with the SEC. The SEC maintains an Internet
site (http://www.sec.gov) where these reports may be obtained at no
charge. We also make copies of these reports available, free of
charge through our website (http://www.parkervision.com) via the
link “SEC filings” as soon as practicable after filing
or furnishing such materials with the SEC.
Corporate Website
We
announce investor information, including news and commentary about
our business, financial performance and related matters, SEC
filings, notices of investor events, and our press and
earnings releases, in the investor relations section of our website
(http://ir.parkervision.com). Additionally, if applicable, we
webcast our earnings calls and certain events we participate in or
host with members of the investment community in the investor
relations section of our website. Investors and others can receive
notifications of new information posted in the investor relations
section in real time by signing up for email alerts and/or RSS
feeds. Further corporate governance information, including our
governance guidelines, Board committee charters, and code of
conduct, is also available in the investor relations section of our
website under the heading “Corporate Governance.” The
content of our website is not incorporated by reference into
this Annual Report or in any other report or document we
file with the SEC, and any references to our website are intended
to be inactive textual references only.
Item 1A. Risk Factors.
In
addition to other risks and uncertainties described in this Annual
Report, the following risk factors should be carefully considered
in evaluating our business because such factors may have a
significant impact on our business, operating results, liquidity
and financial condition. As a result of the risk factors set forth
below, actual results could differ materially from those projected
in any forward-looking statements.
Financial and Operating Risks
Our financial condition raises substantial doubt as to our ability
to continue as a going concern.
We have
had significant losses and negative cash flows in every year since
inception, and continue to have an accumulated deficit which, at
December 31, 2021, was approximately $433.4 million. Our net losses
for the years ended December 31, 2021 and 2020 were approximately
$12.3 million and $19.6 million, respectively. Our independent
registered public accounting firm has included in their audit
opinion on our consolidated financial statements as of and for the
year ended December 31, 2021, a statement with respect to
substantial doubt about our ability to continue as a going concern.
Note 2 to our consolidated financial statements included in Item 8
includes a discussion regarding our liquidity and our ability to
continue as a going concern. Our consolidated financial statements
have been prepared assuming we will continue to operate as a going
concern, which contemplates the realization of assets and the
satisfaction of liabilities in the normal course of business. If we
become unable to continue as a going concern, we may have to
liquidate our assets and the values we receive for our assets in
liquidation or dissolution could be significantly lower than the
values reflected in our consolidated financial statements. The
substantial doubt as to our ability to continue as a going concern
may adversely affect our ability to negotiate reasonable terms with
our vendors and may adversely affect our ability to raise
additional capital in the future.
We have had a history of losses which may ultimately compromise our
ability to implement our business plan and continue in
operation.
To
date, our technologies and products have not produced revenues
sufficient to cover our operating costs. We will continue to make
expenditures on patent protection and enforcement and general
operations in order to continue our current patent enforcement and
licensing efforts. Those efforts may not produce a successful
financial outcome in 2022, or at all. Without a successful
financial outcome from one or more of our patent enforcement and
licensing efforts, we will not achieve profitability. Furthermore,
our current capital resources are not sufficient to sustain our
operations through 2022. If we are not able to generate sufficient
revenues or obtain sufficient capital resources, we may not be able
to implement our business plan or meet
our current obligations due within the twelve months after the
issuance date of our consolidated financial statements and
investors will suffer a loss in their investment. This may also
result in a change in our business strategies.
We will need to raise substantial additional capital in the future
to fund our operations. Failure to raise such additional capital
may prevent us from implementing our business plan as currently
formulated.
Because
we have had net losses and, to date, have not generated positive
cash flow from operations, we have funded our operating losses
primarily from the sale of debt and equity securities, including
our secured and unsecured contingent debt obligations. Our capital
resources include cash and cash equivalents of $1.0 million at
December 31, 2021. Our business
plan will continue to require expenditures for patent protection
and enforcement and general operations. For the years ended
December 31, 2021 and 2020, we used $7.7 million and
$4.8 million, respectively in cash for operations which was
funded primarily through the sale of convertible debt and equity
securities. Our current capital resources will not be sufficient to
meet our working capital needs for the twelve months after the
issuance of our consolidated financial statements and we will
require additional capital to fund our operations. Additional
capital may be in the form of debt securities, the sale of equity
securities, including common or preferred stock, additional
litigation funding, or a combination thereof. Failure to raise
additional capital may have a material adverse impact on our
ability to achieve our business objectives.
Raising additional capital by issuing debt securities or additional
equity securities may result in dilution and/or impose covenants or
restrictions that create operational limitations or other
obligations.
We will
require additional capital to fund our operations and meet our
current obligations due within the twelve months after the issuance
date of our consolidated financial statements. Financing, if any,
may be in the form of debt or sales of equity securities, including
common or preferred stock. Debt instruments or the sale of
preferred stock may result in the imposition of operational
limitations and other covenants and payment obligations, any of
which may be burdensome to us and may have a material adverse
impact on our ability to implement our business plan as currently
formulated. The sale of equity securities, including common or
preferred stock, may result in dilution to the current
stockholders’ ownership and may be limited by the number of
shares we have authorized and available for issuance.
We may be obligated to repay outstanding notes at a premium upon
the occurrence of an event of default.
We have $2.9 million in outstanding principal under
convertible notes at December 31, 2021. If we fail to comply with
the various covenants set forth in each of the notes, including
failure to pay principal or interest when due or, under certain
notes, consummating a change in control, we could be in default
thereunder. Upon an event of default under each of the notes, the
interest rate of the notes will increase to 12% per annum and the
outstanding principal balance of the notes plus all accrued unpaid
interest may be declared immediately payable by the holders. We may
not have sufficient available funds to repay the notes upon an
event of default, and we cannot provide assurances that we will be
able to obtain other financing at terms acceptable to us, or at
all.
Our ability to utilize our tax benefits could be substantially
limited if we fail to generate sufficient income or if we
experience an “ownership change.”
We have
cumulative net operating loss carryforwards (“NOLs”) totaling
approximately $313.2 million at December 31, 2021, of
which $276.6 million is subject to expiration in varying amounts
from 2022 to 2037. Our ability to fully recognize the benefits from
those NOLs is dependent upon our ability to generate sufficient
income prior to their expiration. In addition, our NOL
carryforwards may be limited if we experience an ownership change
as defined by Section 382 of the Internal Revenue Code
(“Section
382”). In general, an ownership change under Section
382 occurs if 5% shareholders increase their collective ownership
of the aggregate amount of our outstanding shares by more than 50
percentage points over a relevant lookback period. We have sold a
significant number of equity securities over the relevant lookback
period which increases the risk of triggering an ownership change
under Section 382 from the future sale of additional equity
securities. An ownership change under Section 382 will
significantly limit our ability to utilize our tax
benefits.
Our litigation funding arrangements may impair our ability to
obtain future financing and/or generate sufficient cash flows to
support our future operations.
We have
funded much of our cost of litigation through contingent financing
arrangements with Brickell Key Investments LP (“Brickell”) and others and
contingent fee arrangements with legal counsel. The repayment
obligation to Brickell is secured by the majority of our assets
until such time that we have repaid a specified minimum return.
Furthermore, our contingent arrangements will result in reductions
in the amount of net proceeds retained by us from litigation,
licensing and other patent-related activities. The contingent fees
payable to legal counsel, Brickell and others will consume all of
our initial future proceeds up to specified limits and could exceed
half of our proceeds thereafter depending on size and timing of
proceeds, among other factors. The long-term continuation of our
business plan is dependent upon our ability to secure sufficient
financing to support our business, and our ability to generate
revenues and/or patent related proceeds sufficient to offset
expenses and meet our contingent payment obligations. Failure to
generate revenue or other patent-related proceeds sufficient to
repay our contingent obligations may impede our ability to obtain
additional financing which will have a material adverse effect on
our ability to achieve our long-term business
objectives.
Our litigation can be time-consuming, costly and we cannot
anticipate the results.
Since
2011, we have spent a significant amount of our financial and
management resources to pursue patent infringement litigation
against third parties. We believe this litigation, and other
litigation matters that we may in the future determine to pursue,
will continue to consume management and financial resources for
long periods of time. There can be no assurance that our current or
future litigation matters will ultimately result in a favorable
outcome for us or that our financial resources will not be
exhausted before achieving a favorable outcome. In addition, even
if we obtain favorable interim rulings or verdicts in particular
litigation matters, they may not be predictive of the ultimate
resolution of the matter. Unfavorable outcomes could result in
exhaustion of our financial resources and could hinder our ability
to pursue licensing and/or product opportunities for our
technologies in the future. Failure to achieve favorable outcomes
from one or more of our patent enforcement actions will have a
material adverse impact on our financial condition, results of
operations, cash flows, and business prospects.
If our patents and intellectual property rights do not provide us
with the anticipated market protections, our competitive position,
business, and prospects will be impaired.
We rely
on our intellectual property rights, including patents and patent
applications, to provide competitive advantage and protect us from
theft of our intellectual property. We believe that our patents are
for entirely new technologies and that our patents are valid,
enforceable and valuable. However, third parties have made claims
of invalidity with respect to certain of our patents and other
similar claims may be brought in the future. For example, in 2019,
the Federal Patent Court in Munich invalidated one of our patents
that was the subject of infringement cases against LG and Apple in
Germany following a nullity action filed by Qualcomm. If our
patents are shown not to be as broad as currently believed or are
otherwise challenged such that some or all of the protection is
lost, we will suffer adverse effects from the loss of competitive
advantage and our ability to offer unique products and
technologies. As a result, there would be an adverse impact on our
financial condition and business prospects. Furthermore, defending
against challenges to our patents may give rise to material costs
for defense and divert resources away from our other
activities.
Our business, results of operations, and financial condition may be
impacted by the recent coronavirus (COVID-19)
outbreak.
The
global spread of COVID-19 has created significant volatility and
uncertainty in financial markets. If such volatility and
uncertainty persist, we may be unable to raise additional capital
on terms that are acceptable to us, or at all. Additionally, in
response to the pandemic, governments and the private sector have
taken a number of drastic measures to contain the spread of
COVID-19. While our employees currently have the ability and are
encouraged to work remotely, such measures may have a substantial
impact on employee attendance or productivity, which, along with
the possibility of employees’ illness, may adversely affect
our operations.
In
addition, COVID-19 has negatively impacted the timing of our
current patent infringement actions as a result of office closures,
travel restrictions and court closures. For example, our patent
infringement trial in Orlando, Florida has been delayed twice due
to the impact of COVID-19. It is possible that further delays in
our cases could occur.
Although
COVID-19 is currently not material to our results of operations,
there is significant uncertainty relating to the potential impact
of COVID-19 on our business. The extent to which COVID-19 impacts
our ongoing patent enforcement actions and our ability to obtain
financing, as well as our results of operations and financial
condition, generally, will depend on future developments which are
highly uncertain and cannot be predicted, including new information
which may emerge concerning the severity of COVID-19 and the
actions taken by governments and private businesses to contain
COVID-19 or treat its impact, among others. If the disruptions
posed by COVID-19 continue for an extensive period of time, our
business, results of operations, and financial condition may be
materially adversely affected.
We are subject to outside influences beyond our control, including
new legislation that could adversely affect our licensing and
enforcement activities and have an adverse impact on the execution
of our business plan.
Our
licensing and enforcement activities are subject to numerous risks
from outside influences, including new legislation, regulations and
rules related to obtaining or enforcing patents. For instance, the
U.S. has enacted sweeping changes to the U.S. patent system
including changes that transition the U.S. from a
“first-to-invent” to a “first-to-file”
system and that alter the processes for challenging issued patents.
To the extent that we are unable to secure patent protection for
our future technologies and/or our current patents are challenged
such that some or all of our protection is lost, we will suffer
adverse effects to our ability to offer unique products and
technologies. As a result, there would be an adverse impact on our
financial position, results of operations and cash flows and our
ability to execute our business plan.
Our industry is subject to rapid technological changes which if we
are unable to match or surpass, will result in a loss of
competitive advantage and market opportunity.
Because
of the rapid technological development that regularly occurs in the
wireless technology industry, along with shifting user needs and
the introduction of competing products and services, we have
historically devoted substantial resources to developing and
improving our technology and introducing new product offerings. As
a result of our limited financial resources, we have ceased our
research and development activities which could result in a loss of
future market opportunity which could adversely affect our future
revenue potential.
We are highly dependent on Mr. Jeffrey Parker as our chief
executive officer. If his services were lost, it would have an
adverse impact on the execution of our business plan.
Because
of Mr. Parker’s leadership position in the Company, the
relationships he has garnered in both the industry in which we
operate and the investment community and the key role he plays in
our patent litigation strategies, the loss of his services might be
seen as an impediment to the execution of our business plan. If Mr.
Parker was no longer available to the Company, investors might
experience an adverse impact on their investment. We maintain
$5 million in key-employee life insurance for our benefit for
Mr. Parker.
If we are unable to retain key highly skilled employees, we will
not be able to execute our current business plans.
Our
business is dependent on having skilled and specialized key
employees to conduct our business activities. The inability to
retain these key employees would have an adverse impact on the
technical support activities and the financial reporting and
regulatory compliance activities that our business requires. These
activities are instrumental to the successful execution of our
business plan.
Any disruptions to our information technology systems or breaches
of our network security could interrupt our operations, compromise
our reputation, and expose us to litigation, government enforcement
actions, and costly response measures and could have a material
adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of
operations.
We rely
on information technology systems, including third-party hosted
servers and cloud-based servers, to keep business, financial, and
corporate records, communicate internally and externally, and
operate other critical functions. If any of our internal systems or
the systems of our third-party providers are compromised due to
computer virus, unauthorized access, malware, and the like, then
sensitive documents could be exposed or deleted, and our ability to
conduct business could be impaired. Cyber incidents can result from
deliberate attacks or unintentional events. These incidents can
include, but are not limited to, unauthorized access to our
systems, computer viruses or other malicious code, denial of
service attacks, malware, ransomware, phishing, SQL injection
attacks, human error, or other events that result in security
breaches or give rise to the manipulation or loss of sensitive
information or assets. Cyber incidents can be caused by various
persons or groups, including disgruntled employees and vendors,
activists, organized crime groups, and state-sponsored and
individual hackers. Cyber incidents can also be caused or
aggravated by natural events, such as earthquakes, floods, fires,
power loss, and telecommunications failures. The risk of
cybersecurity breach has generally increased as the number,
intensity, and sophistication of attempted attacks from around the
world has increased. While we have cyber security procedures in
place, given the evolving nature of these threats, there can be no
assurance that we will not suffer material losses in the future due
to cyber-attacks.
To
date, we have not experienced any material losses relating to
cyber-attacks, computer viruses or other systems failures. Although
we have taken steps to protect the security of data maintained in
our information systems, it is possible that our security measures
will not be able to prevent the systems’ improper functioning
or the improper disclosure of personally identifiable information,
such as in the event of cyber-attacks. In addition to operational
and business consequences, if our cybersecurity is breached, we
could be held liable to our customers or other parties in
regulatory or other actions, and we may be exposed to reputation
damages and loss of trust and business. This could result in costly
investigations and litigation, civil or criminal penalties, fines
and negative publicity.
Risks Relating to our Common Stock
Our outstanding options and warrants may affect the market price
and liquidity of the common stock.
At
December 31, 2021, we had 77.0 million shares of common
stock outstanding and had outstanding options and warrants for the
purchase of up to 33.6 million additional shares of common
stock, of which approximately 27.0 million were exercisable as of
December 31, 2021. In addition, as described more fully below,
holders of convertible notes may elect to receive a substantial
number of shares of common stock upon conversion of the notes and
we may elect to pay accrued interest on the notes in shares of our
common stock. All of the shares of common stock underlying these
securities are currently registered for sale to the holder or for
public resale by the holder. The amount of common stock reserved
for issuance may have an adverse impact on our ability to raise
capital and may affect the price and liquidity of our common stock
in the public market. In addition, the issuance of these shares of
common stock will have a dilutive effect on current
stockholders’ ownership.
The conversion of outstanding convertible notes into shares of
common stock, and the issuance of common stock by us as payment of
accrued interest upon the convertible notes, could materially
dilute our current stockholders.
We have an aggregate principal amount of $2.9 million in
convertible notes outstanding at December 31, 2021. The notes are
convertible into shares of our common stock at fixed conversion
prices, which may be less than the market price of our common stock
at the time of conversion. If the entire principal were converted
into shares of common stock, we would be required to issue an
aggregate of up to 20.2 million shares of common stock. If we issue
all of these shares, the ownership of our current stockholders will
be diluted.
Further, we may elect to pay interest on the notes, at our option,
in shares of common stock, at a price equal to the then-market
price for our common stock. As of December 31, 2021, we have issued
approximately 2.7 million shares of common stock as in-kind
interest payments on our convertible notes. We currently do not
believe that we will have the financial ability to make payments on
the notes in cash when due. Accordingly, we currently intend to
make such payments in shares of our common stock to the greatest
extent possible. Such interest payments could further dilute our
current stockholders.
The price of our common stock may be subject to substantial
volatility.
The
trading price of our common stock has been and may continue to be
volatile. Between January 1, 2020 and March 15, 2022, the
reported high and low sales prices for our common stock ranged
between $0.15 and $1.91 per share. The price of our common stock
may continue to be volatile as a result of a number of factors,
some of which are beyond our control. These factors include, but
are not limited to, developments in outstanding litigation, our
performance and prospects, general conditions of the markets in
which we compete, economic and financial conditions, and the impact
of COVID-19 on global financial markets. Such volatility could
materially and adversely affect the market price of our common
stock in future periods.
Our common stock is quoted on OTCQB, an over-the-counter market.
There can be no assurance that our common stock will continue to
trade on the OTCQB or on another over-the-counter market or
securities exchange.
Our common stock began trading on the OTCQB, an over-the-counter
market, in August 2018 immediately following delisting from Nasdaq,
under the symbol “PRKR”. The over-the-counter market is
a significantly more limited market than a nationally-recognized
securities exchange such as Nasdaq, and the quotation of our common
stock on the over-the-counter market has resulted in a less liquid
market available for existing and potential stockholders to trade
shares of our common stock. Securities traded in
the over-the-counter market generally have less liquidity due to
factors such as the reduced number of investors that will consider
investing in the securities, the reduced number of market makers in
the securities, and the reduced number of securities analysts that
follow such securities. As a result, holders of shares of our
common stock may find it difficult to resell their shares at prices
quoted in the market or at all. We are also subject to additional
compliance requirements under applicable state laws relating to the
issuance of our securities. This could have a long-term adverse effect on our
ability to raise capital, which ultimately could adversely affect
the market price of our common stock. We cannot provide any
assurances as to if or when we will be in a position to relist our
common stock on a nationally-recognized securities
exchange.
Our common stock is classified as a “penny stock” under
SEC rules, which means broker-dealers who make a market in our
stock will be subject to additional compliance
requirements.
Our common stock is deemed to be a "penny stock" as defined in the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the “Exchange
Act”). Penny stocks
are stocks (i) with a price of less than five dollars per share;
(ii) that are not traded on a recognized national exchange; (iii)
whose prices are not quoted on an automated quotation system
sponsored by a recognized national securities association; or (iv)
whose issuer has net tangible assets less than $2,000,000 (if the
issuer has been in continuous operation for at least three years);
or $5,000,000 (if continuous operations for less than three years);
or with average revenues of less than $6,000,000 for the last three
years. The Exchange Act requires broker-dealers dealing in penny
stocks to provide potential investors with a document disclosing
the risks of penny stocks and to obtain a manually signed and dated
written receipt of the document before effecting any transaction in
a penny stock for the investor’s account. Potential investors
in our common stock are urged to obtain and read such disclosure
carefully before purchasing any shares that are deemed to be
“penny stock.” Further, the Exchange Act requires
broker-dealers dealing in penny stocks to approve the account of
any investor for transactions in such stocks before selling any
penny stock to that investor. These procedures require the
broker-dealer to (i) obtain from the investor information
concerning his, her or its financial situation, investment
experience and investment objectives; (ii) reasonably determine,
based on that information, that transactions in penny stocks are
suitable for the investor, and that the investor has sufficient
knowledge and experience as to be reasonably capable of evaluating
the risks of penny stock transactions; (iii) provide the investor
with a written statement setting forth the basis on which the
broker dealer made the determination in (ii) above; and (iv)
receive a signed and dated copy of such statement from the
investor, confirming that it accurately reflects the
investor’s financial situation, investment experience and
investment objectives. Compliance with these requirements may
affect the ability or willingness of broker-dealers to sell our
securities, and accordingly would affect the ability of
stockholders to sell their securities in the public market. These
additional procedures could also limit our ability to raise
additional capital in the future.
We do not currently pay dividends on our common stock and thus
stockholders must look to appreciation of our common stock to
realize a gain on their investments.
We do
not currently pay dividends on our common stock and intend to
retain our cash and future earnings, if any, to fund our business
plan. Our future dividend policy is within the discretion of our
board of directors and will depend upon various factors, including
our business, financial condition, results of operations and
capital requirements. We therefore cannot offer any assurance that
our board of directors will determine to pay special or regular
dividends in the future. Accordingly, unless our board of directors
determines to pay dividends, stockholders will be required to look
to appreciation of our common stock to realize a gain on their
investment. There can be no assurance that this appreciation will
occur.
Provisions in our certificate of incorporation and by-laws could
have effects that conflict with the interest of
shareholders.
Some
provisions in our certificate of incorporation and by-laws could
make it more difficult for a third party to acquire control of us.
For example, our board of directors is divided into three classes
with directors having staggered terms of office, our board of
directors has the ability to issue preferred stock without
shareholder approval, and there are advance notification provisions
for director nominations and submissions of proposals from
shareholders to a vote by all the shareholders under the by-laws.
Florida law also has anti-takeover provisions in its corporate
statute.
We have a shareholder protection rights plan that may delay or
discourage someone from making an offer to purchase the Company
without prior consultation with the board of directors and
management, which may conflict with the interests of some of the
shareholders.
On
November 17, 2005, as amended on November 20, 2015 and
November 20, 2020, our board of directors adopted a shareholder
protection rights plan which called for the issuance, on
November 29, 2005, as a dividend, of rights to acquire
fractional shares of preferred stock. The rights are attached to
the shares of common stock and transfer with them. In the future,
the rights may become exchangeable for shares of preferred stock
with various provisions that may discourage a takeover bid.
Additionally, the rights have what are known as
“flip-in” and “flip-over” provisions that
could make any acquisition of the Company more costly. The
principal objective of the plan is to cause someone interested in
acquiring the Company to negotiate with the board of directors
rather than launch an unsolicited bid. This plan may limit,
prevent, or discourage a takeover offer that some shareholders may
find more advantageous than a negotiated transaction. A negotiated
transaction may not be in the best interests of the
shareholders.
Item 1B. Unresolved Staff Comments.
Not
applicable.
Item 2. Properties.
Until
the expiration of our lease in October 2020, our headquarters were
located in a 3,000 square foot leased facility in Jacksonville,
Florida. Beginning in November 2020, we reverted to remote
worksites for all of our employees in light of the pandemic. We
believe a remote work environment is currently suitable for the
conduct of our business. We have an additional 7,000 square foot
leased facility in Lake Mary, Florida that was primarily for
engineering design activities. We have ceased use of the Lake Mary
facility and secured a sublease tenant in 2021 for the duration of
the lease term through November 2022. Refer to Note 8 to our
consolidated financial statements included in Item 8 for
information regarding our outstanding lease
obligations.
Item 3. Legal Proceedings.
We are
a party to a number of patent enforcement actions initiated by us
against others for the infringement of our technologies, as well as
proceedings brought by others against us in an attempt to
invalidate certain of our patent claims. These patent-related
proceedings are more fully described in Note 12 to our consolidated
financial statements included in Item 8.
Item 4. Mine Safety Disclosures.
Not
applicable.
PART II
Item 5. Market for the Registrant’s Common Equity, Related
Stockholder Matters and Issuer Purchases of Equity
Securities.
Market Information
Our
Common Stock is listed on the OTCQB, an over-the-counter market,
under the ticker symbol “PRKR”. Over-the-counter market
quotations reflect inter-dealer prices, without retail mark-up,
mark-down, or commission, and may not necessarily represent actual
transactions.
Holders
As of
March 15, 2022, we had approximately 83 holders of record and
we believe there are approximately 7,200 beneficial holders of our
common stock.
Dividends
We do
not currently pay dividends on our common stock and intend to
retain our cash and future earnings, if any, to fund our business
plan. The payment of cash dividends in the future will be dependent
upon our revenue and earnings, if any, capital requirements and
general financial condition. The payment of any dividends will be
within the discretion of our board of directors.
Purchases of Equity Securities by Issuer and Affiliated
Purchasers
No
purchases of our equity securities have been made by us or
affiliated purchasers within the fourth quarter of the fiscal year
ended December 31, 2021.
Item 6. [Reserved].
Item 7. Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition
and Results of Operations.
Executive Overview
We are
in the business of innovating fundamental wireless technologies and
products. We have designed and developed proprietary RF
technologies and integrated circuits based on those technologies,
and we license our technologies to others for use in wireless
communication products. We have expended significant financial and
other resources to research and develop our RF technologies and to
obtain patent protection for those technologies in the U.S. and
certain foreign jurisdictions. We believe certain patents
protecting our proprietary technologies have been broadly infringed
by others and therefore our business plan primarily consists of
enforcement of our intellectual property rights through patent
infringement litigation and licensing efforts. We currently have
patent enforcement actions ongoing in various U.S. district courts
against providers of mobile handsets, smart televisions and other
WiFi products and, in certain cases, their chip suppliers for the
infringement of a number of our RF patents. We have made
significant investments in developing and protecting our
technologies, the returns on which are dependent upon the
generation of future revenues for realization.
We
continue to aggressively pursue licensing opportunities with
wireless communications companies that make, use or sell chipsets
and/or products that incorporate RF. We believe there are a number
of wireless communications companies that can benefit from the use
of the RF technologies we have developed, whether through a license
or, in certain cases, a joint product venture that may include
licensing rights. Our licensing efforts to date have required
litigation in order to enforce and/or defend our intellectual
property rights. Since 2011, we have been involved in patent
infringement litigation against Qualcomm and others for the
unauthorized use of our technology. Refer to Note 12 to our
consolidated financial statements included in Item 8 for a complete
discussion of our legal proceedings. We have expended significant
resources since 2011 and incurred significant debt for the
enforcement and defense of our intellectual property
rights.
Recent Developments
On
March 22, 2022, the United States District Court in the Middle
District of Florida (Orlando Division) issued an order granting
Qualcomm’s motion for summary judgment ruling that Qualcomm
does not infringe the three patents that are the subject of our
infringement case against them. This ruling, which is a final
determination of the district court, follows a March 9, 2022 order
granting a Qualcomm motion to strike and exclude the opinions of
our experts regarding the alleged infringement and validity issues.
We intend to appeal both of these decisions. Refer to ParkerVision v. Qualcomm (Middle District of
Florida) included in Note 12 to our consolidated financial
statements included in Item 8 for a complete discussion of these
legal proceedings.
In
February 2022, our two patent infringement cases against Intel in
the Western District of Texas were reconfigured whereby the first
case would assert an aggregate of six patents against Intel
cellular products and the second case would assert the same six
patents along with a seventh patent against Intel WiFi and
Bluetooth products. As a result of the restructuring of the cases,
the trial date for the first Intel case was moved from June 2022 to
October 24, 2022. In March 2022, as a result of discovery delays,
the trial date was moved to a start date of December 5, 2022. The
second case against Intel is currently scheduled for trial
commencing in May 2023, however that date may change in lieu of the
revised schedule in the first Intel case. Refer to ParkerVision v. Intel (Western District of
Texas) and ParkerVision v.
Intel II (Western District of Texas) included in Note 12 to
our consolidated financial statements included in Item 8 for a
complete discussion of these legal proceedings.
In
January 2022, the Patent Trial and Appeal Board
(“PTAB”) issued its final decisions on two Inter Partes Reviews
(“IPRs”) filed by Intel against two of the patents
asserted in the ParkerVision v. Intel infringement cases. The PTAB
ruled in our favor with respect to the seven challenged claims of
one of the two patents and ruled in Intel’s favor with
respect to the one challenged claim of the second patent. We have
one additional IPR filed by Intel against a patent asserted in our
second case, and the PTAB is expected to issue its final decision
in July 2022. Refer to Intel v.
ParkerVision (PTAB) included in Note 12 to our consolidated
financial statements included in Item 8 for a complete discussion
of these IPR proceedings.
Liquidity and Capital Resources
We have
incurred significant losses from operations and negative cash flows
in every year since inception, largely as a result of our
significant investments in developing and protecting our
intellectual property, and have utilized the proceeds from sales of
debt and equity securities and contingent funding arrangements with
third-parties to fund our operations, including the cost of
litigation.
For the
year ended December 31, 2021, we incurred a net loss of
approximately $12.3 million and negative cash flows from
operations of approximately $7.7 million. At December 31,
2021, we had cash and cash equivalents of approximately $1.0
million and an accumulated deficit of approximately
$433.4 million. Additionally, a significant amount of future
proceeds that we may receive from our patent enforcement and
licensing programs will first be utilized to repay borrowings,
legal fees and litigation expenses under our contingent funding
arrangements. Our independent registered public accounting firm has
included in their audit report an explanatory paragraph expressing
substantial doubt about our ability to continue as a going concern.
See Note 2 to our consolidated financial statements included in
Item 8 for a discussion of our liquidity and our ability to
continue as a going concern.
We used
cash for operations of approximately $7.7 million and $4.8 million
for the years ended December 31, 2021 and 2020, respectively. The
increase in cash used for operations from 2020 to 2021 is primarily
due to the use of approximately $3.9 million in cash for the
reduction of accounts payable and accrued expenses during the year
ended December 31, 2021, as compared to a $1.8 million increase in
accounts payable and accrued expenses during the year ended
December 31, 2020. Our accounts payable decreased $3.6 million from
December 31, 2020 to December 31, 2021 primarily as result of a
$3.0 million payment to a law firm in settlement of our outstanding
fees and expenses and in exchange for an agreed-upon reduction in
potential success fees payable to the firm from future
patent-related proceeds. This increase in use of cash from 2020 to
2021 was somewhat offset by a reduction in cash-based operating
costs from 2020 to 2021, largely as a result of decreased
litigation fees and expenses. As a result of the decrease in our
current liabilities from 2020 to 2021, our working capital improved
by approximately $3.7 million.
For the
year ended December 31, 2021, we received aggregate net proceeds
from the sale of debt and equity securities, including the exercise
of outstanding options and warrants, of approximately $7.2 million
compared to approximately $7.6 million in proceeds received for the
year ended December 31, 2020. We repaid approximately $0.1 million
and $1.3 million, respectively in debt obligations during the years
ended December 31, 2021 and 2020.
Our
ability to meet our short-term liquidity needs, including our debt
repayment obligations, is dependent upon one or more of (i) our
ability to successfully negotiate licensing agreements and/or
settlements relating to the use of our technologies by others in
excess of our contingent payment obligations to Brickell and legal
counsel; and/or (ii) our ability to raise additional capital from
the sale of debt or equity securities or other financing
arrangements.
Significant
portions of our litigation costs to date have been funded by
contingent payment arrangements with legal counsel. Fee discounts
offered by legal counsel in exchange for contingent payments upon
successful outcome in our litigation are not recognized in expense
until such time that the related proceeds on which the contingent
fees are payable are considered probable. Contingent fees vary
based on each firm’s specific fee agreement. We currently
have contingent fee arrangements in place for all of our active
cases. In addition to our contingent fee agreements with legal
counsel, we have secured and unsecured contingent payment
obligations to litigation funders that have priority payments due
from patent-related proceeds as discussed more fully under
“Financial Condition-Contingent Payment Obligations”
below.
Although
current working capital will not be used to repay our contingent
arrangements, based on our current outstanding legal proceedings,
funding arrangements and contingent payment arrangements, we
estimate that up to 100% of our initial future proceeds will be
used to repay contingent payment arrangements until the minimum
return under our secured contingent payment obligation has been
met. After repayment of minimum returns on litigation financing, we
estimate that 45% to 68% of remaining future proceeds from current
actions could be payable to others, depending on the proceeding and
the nature, amount and timing of proceeds, among other
factors.
Patent
enforcement litigation is costly and time-consuming and the outcome
is difficult to predict. We expect to continue to invest in the
support of our patent enforcement and licensing programs. We expect
that revenue generated from patent enforcement actions and/or
technology licenses in 2022, if any, after deduction of contingent
payment obligations, may not be sufficient to cover our operating
expenses. In the event we do not generate revenues, or other
patent-related proceeds, sufficient to cover our operational costs
and contingent repayment obligations, we will be required to raise
additional working capital through the sale of debt or equity
securities or other financing arrangements.
The
long-term continuation of our business plan is dependent upon our
ability to secure sufficient financing to support our business, and
our ability to generate revenues and/or patent-related proceeds
sufficient to offset expenses and meet our contingent payment
obligations and other long-term debt repayment obligations. Failure
to generate sufficient revenues, raise additional capital through
debt or equity financings, and/or reduce operating costs could have
a material adverse effect on our ability to meet our short and
long-term liquidity needs and achieve our intended long-term
business objectives.
Financial Condition
Intangible Assets
We
consider our intellectual property, including patents, patent
applications, trademarks, copyrights and trade secrets to be
significant to our business. Our intangible assets are pledged as
security for our secured contingent payment obligation with
Brickell. The net book value of our intangible assets was
approximately $1.8 million and $2.2 million as of December 31, 2021
and 2020, respectively. These assets are amortized using the
straight-line method over their estimated period of benefit,
generally fifteen to twenty years. The decrease in the carrying
value of our intangible assets is primarily the result of $0.4
million in patent amortization expense recognized in 2021.
Management evaluates the recoverability of intangible assets
periodically and takes into account events or circumstances that
may warrant revised estimates of useful lives or that may indicate
impairment exists. As part of our ongoing patent maintenance
program, we may, from time to time, abandon a particular patent if
we determine fees to maintain the patent exceed its expected
recoverability. For the years ended December 31, 2021 and 2020, we
incurred losses of approximately $0.03 million and $0.3 million,
respectively, for the write-off of specific patent assets. These
losses are included in operating expenses in the accompanying
consolidated statements of comprehensive loss.
Contingent Payment Obligations
We have
secured and unsecured contingent payment obligations recorded at an
aggregate estimated fair value of $43.1 million and $38.3 million
as of December 31, 2021 and 2020, respectively. These repayment
obligations are contingent upon receipt of proceeds from patent
enforcement and other patent monetization actions. As a result, we
have elected to account for these contingent payment obligations at
their estimated fair values which are subject to significant
estimates and assumptions as discussed in “Critical
Accounting Policies” below. Refer to Note 10 to our
consolidated financial statements included in Item 8 for a
discussion of the fair value measurement of our contingent payment
obligation.
Our
secured contingent payment obligation is payable to Brickell as a
result of $18 million in borrowings under a 2016 funding agreement,
as amended from time to time. We have repaid Brickell an aggregate
of $3.3 million to date under this agreement. The contingent
payment obligation to Brickell is recorded at its estimated fair
market value of $37.4 million at December 31, 2021, an increase of
$4.3 million or 13% from the estimated fair market value at
December 31, 2020. Brickell is entitled to a priority, prorated
payment of up to 100% of proceeds received by us from funded
patent-related actions up to a specified minimum return.
Brickell’s minimum return is determined as a multiple of the
outstanding funded amount that increases over time. The estimated
aggregate minimum return due to Brickell if repaid in full at
December 31, 2021 is approximately $48.8 million, an increase of
approximately $6.8 million, or 16%, from the minimum return that
would have been due to Brickell as of December 31,
2020.
In
addition, in 2020 and 2021, we incurred unsecured contingent
payment obligations in connection with various funding
arrangements. These contingent payment obligations are payable from
our share of patent-related proceeds after satisfaction of our
obligation to Brickell and payment of contingent fees to legal
counsel. These unsecured contingent payment obligations are
recorded at an aggregate estimated fair value of $5.7 million at
December 31, 2021, representing an increase of $0.5 million from
the estimated fair market value at December 31, 2020. This increase
is primarily the result of $0.4 million in new unsecured contingent
payment obligations incurred in 2021. The maximum payment
obligation for our unsecured contingent payment obligations is
$10.8 million at December 31, 2021.
See
“Change in Fair Value of Contingent Obligations”
included in “Results of Operations” below for a
discussion of the increase in the estimated fair value of our
secured and unsecured contingent payment obligations.
Note Payable
As of
December 31, 2021, we have a $0.7 million unsecured note payable to
Sterne, Kessler, Goldstein, & Fox, PLLC (“SKGF”), a related party.
We are obligated to make principal and interest payments totaling
$0.12 million in 2022 under this note. The remaining outstanding
balance of the note is subject to payment in full by April 30,
2023. Failure to comply with the payment terms of this note
constitutes an event of default which, if uncured, will result in
the entire unpaid principal balance of the note and any unpaid,
accrued interest to become immediately due and payable. In
addition, an event of default results in an increase in the
interest rate under the notes to a default rate of 12% per annum.
Notes payable are discussed more fully in Note 9 to our
consolidated financial statements included in Item 8.
Convertible Notes
As of
December 31, 2021, we have $2.9 million in notes that are
convertible, at the holders’ option, into shares of our
common stock at fixed conversion prices ranging from $0.08 to $0.57
per share. These notes mature at varying dates from September 2023
to January 2025. The majority of the notes bear interest at a
stated rate of 8%, payable quarterly. We have the option, subject
to certain conditions, to pay the quarterly interest in-kind with
shares of our common stock based on market price at the interest
payment date. To date, all of the interest payments under these
convertible notes have been paid in-kind and we anticipate that
future payments of interest will also be paid in-kind. The notes
provide for events of default that include failure to pay principal
or interest when due, breach of any of the representations made by
us, events of liquidation or bankruptcy, and a change in control.
In the event of default, the interest rate increases to 12% per
annum and the outstanding principal balance of the notes plus all
accrued interest due may be declared immediately payable by the
holders of a majority of the then-outstanding notes. Our
convertible notes payable are more fully discussed in Note 9 to our
consolidated financial statements included in Item 8.
Deferred Tax Assets and Related Valuation Allowance
Deferred
tax assets and liabilities are recognized for the expected future
tax consequences of events that have been included in the financial
statements or tax returns. Deferred tax assets and liabilities are
determined based on differences between the financial statement
carrying amounts and the tax bases of assets and liabilities using
enacted tax rates in effect for the year in which the differences
are expected to reverse. Valuation allowances are established to
reduce deferred tax assets when, based on available objective
evidence, it is more likely than not that the benefit of such
assets will not be realized. As of December 31, 2021, we had net
deferred tax assets of approximately $93 million, primarily related
to our NOL carryforwards, which were fully offset by a valuation
allowance due to the uncertainty related to realization of these
assets through future taxable income. In addition, our ability to
benefit from our NOL and other tax credit carryforwards could be
limited under Section 382 as more fully discussed in “Risk
Factors” and in Note 11 to our consolidated financial
statements included in Item 8.
Results of Operations for Each of the Years Ended December 31,
2021 and 2020
Revenues and Gross Margins
Licensing
revenue was $0.14 million for the year ended December 31, 2021. We
reported no licensing revenue for the year ended December 31, 2020.
We entered into patent licensing and settlement agreements with
Buffalo and Zyxel in May 2021 and September 2021, respectively. We
recognized revenue from these contracts during the year ended
December 31, 2021 when the parties’ performance obligations
were met. Cost of sales related to the licensing revenue consists
of amortization expense related to the patents covered under the
license agreements.
Our
licensing proceeds were fully offset against out-of-pocket expenses
recognized under our contingent fee agreement with counsel and
therefore did not impact our cash flows. These out-of-pocket
expenses are included in selling, general and administrative
expenses.
Although
we do anticipate additional revenue to result from our licensing
and patent enforcement actions, the amount and timing is highly
unpredictable and there can be no assurance that we will achieve
our anticipated results.
We
reported no product revenue during the years ended December 31,
2021 or 2020.
Selling, General, and Administrative Expenses
Selling,
general and administrative expenses consist primarily of executive,
director, technical support, and finance and administrative
personnel costs, including share-based compensation, costs incurred
for insurance, shareholder relations and outside legal and
professional services, including litigation expenses, and
amortization and maintenance expenses related to our patent
assets.
Our
selling, general and administrative expenses were approximately
$8.1 million for the year ended December 31, 2021, as
compared to approximately $10.7 million for the year ended
December 31, 2020, representing a decrease of approximately
$2.6 million or 24%. This decrease results, in part, from a
number of one-time, noncash charges in 2020 including $1.8 million
associated with an amendment to a warrant agreement, $0.4 million
from an amendment to our March 2020 equity transactions, and $0.2
million for impairment of the right-of-use asset associated with
our Lake Mary lease. In addition, our litigation fees and expenses
decreased by approximately $2.3 million as a result of the stay in
the Qualcomm case in Jacksonville, Florida. These decreases were
partially offset by a $2.1 million increase in share-based
compensation attributed to nonqualified stock options awarded to
executives, key employees, and nonemployee directors in January
2021 as more fully discussed in Note 14 to our consolidated
financial statements included in Item 8.
Change in Fair Value of Contingent Payment Obligations
We have elected to measure our secured and unsecured contingent
payment obligations at fair value which is based on significant
unobservable inputs. We estimated the fair value of our
secured contingent payment obligations using a probability-weighted
income approach based on the estimated present value of projected
future cash outflows using a risk-adjusted discount
rate. Increases or decreases in the significant
unobservable inputs could result in significant increases or
decreases in fair value.
For the year ended December 31, 2021, we recorded an increase in
the fair value of our secured and unsecured contingent payment
obligations of approximately $4.4 million. The majority
of the change in fair value is attributable to an increase in the
estimated fair value of the secured contingent obligation with
Brickell as a result of changes in estimated amounts and timing of
projected future cash flows.
Critical Accounting Policies
We
believe that the following are critical accounting policies and
estimates that significantly impact the preparation of our
consolidated financial statements:
Contingent Payment Obligations
We have
accounted for our secured and unsecured contingent payment
obligations as long-term debt. Our repayment obligations are
contingent upon the receipt of proceeds from patent enforcement or
other patent monetization actions. We have elected to measure our
contingent payment obligations at their estimated fair values based
on the variable and contingent nature of the repayment provisions.
We have determined that the fair value of our secured and unsecured
contingent payment obligations falls within Level 3 in the fair
value hierarchy, which involves significant estimates and
assumptions including projected future patent-related proceeds and
the risk-adjusted rate for discounting future cash flows. Actual
results could differ from the estimates made. Changes in fair
value, including the component related to imputed interest, are
included in the consolidated statements of comprehensive loss under
the heading “Change in fair value of contingent payment
obligations.” Refer to Note 10 to our consolidated financial
statements included in Item 8 for a discussion of the significant
estimates and assumptions used in estimated the fair value of our
contingent payment obligations.
Accounting for Share-Based Compensation
We
calculate the fair value of share-based equity awards to employees,
including restricted stock, stock options and restricted stock
units (“RSUs”), on the date of
grant and recognize the calculated fair value as compensation
expense over the requisite service periods of the related awards.
The fair value of stock option awards is determined using the
Black-Scholes option valuation model that requires the use of
highly subjective assumptions and estimates including how long
employees will retain their stock options before exercising them
and the volatility of our common stock price over the expected life
of the equity award. Changes in these subjective assumptions can
materially affect the estimate of fair value of share-based
compensation and consequently, the related amount recognized as
expense in the consolidated statements of comprehensive
loss.
New Accounting Pronouncements
We adopted Accounting Standards Update (“ASU”) 2020-06, "Debt - Debt with Conversion and
Other Options (Subtopic 470-20) and Derivatives and Hedging -
Contracts in Entity's Own Equity (Subtopic 815-40): Accounting for
Convertible Instruments and Contracts in an Entity's Own Equity" as
of January 1, 2021. ASU 2020-06 simplifies accounting for
convertible instruments by removing major separation models
required under current U.S. GAAP. Consequently, more
convertible debt instruments will be reported as a single liability
instrument with no separate accounting for embedded conversion
features. The ASU removes certain settlement conditions that are
required for equity contracts to qualify for the derivative scope
exception, which will permit more equity contracts to qualify for
the exception. The ASU also simplifies the diluted
earnings per share calculation in certain areas. For smaller
reporting companies, the ASU is effective for fiscal years
beginning after December 15, 2023, including interim periods within
those fiscal years, with early adoption permitted for fiscal years
beginning after December 15, 2020. The ASU provides for
a modified retrospective method of adoption whereby the guidance is
applied to transactions outstanding at the beginning of the fiscal
year of adoption with the cumulative effect of the change being
recorded as an adjustment to beginning retained earnings. Adoption
of ASU 2020-06 resulted in an increase to our long-term debt of
approximately $0.8 million, a decrease in additional
paid-in-capital of approximately $1.1 million and an adjustment to
our beginning accumulated deficit of $0.3 million resulting from
the elimination of the previously recognized beneficial conversion
feature as a debt discount.
Off-Balance Sheet Transactions
As of
December 31, 2021, we had outstanding warrants to purchase
10.3 million shares of our common stock. The estimated grant date
fair value of these warrants of approximately $3.2 million is
included in shareholders’ deficit in our consolidated balance
sheet for the year ended December 31, 2021. The outstanding
warrants have an average exercise price of $0.75 per share and a
weighted average remaining life of approximately 3
years.
Item 7A. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market
Risk.
Not
applicable.
Item 8. Financial Statements and Supplementary Data.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Index
to Consolidated Financial Statements
|
||
|
|
|
Page
|
|
REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING
FIRM (for the years ended December 31, 2021 and 2020) (PCAOB
ID: 569)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS:
|
|
|
|
Consolidated
Balance Sheets – December 31, 2021 and 2020
|
|
|
|
Consolidated
Statements of Comprehensive Loss - for the years ended
December 31, 2021 and 2020
|
|
|
|
Consolidated
Statements of Shareholders’ Deficit - for the years ended
December 31, 2021 and 2020
|
|
|
|
Consolidated
Statements of Cash Flows - for the years ended December 31,
2021 and 2020
|
|
|
|
Notes
to Consolidated Financial Statements - December 31, 2021 and
2020
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
SUPPLEMENTARY
DATA:
|
|
|
|
Not
applicable
|
|
|
REPORT OF INDEPENDENT
REGISTERED PUBLIC
ACCOUNTING FIRM
Board
of Directors and Shareholders
ParkerVision,
Inc.
Jacksonville,
Florida
Opinion on the Consolidated Financial Statements
We have
audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of ParkerVision, Inc. (the
“Company”) and its subsidiary as of December 31, 2021
and 2020, and the
related consolidated statements of comprehensive loss,
shareholders’ deficit and cash flows for each of the years in
the two-year period ended December 31, 2021, and the related notes
(collectively referred to as the “consolidated financial
statements”). In our opinion, the consolidated financial
statements present fairly, in all material respects, the financial
position of the Company and its subsidiary as of December 31, 2021
and 2020, and the results of their operations and their cash flows for each of the years
in the two-year period ended December 31, 2021 in conformity with
accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of
America.
Basis for Opinion
These
consolidated financial statements are the responsibility of the
Company’s management. Our responsibility is to express an
opinion on the Company’s consolidated financial statements
based on our audits. We are a public accounting firm registered
with the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States)
(PCAOB) and are required to be independent with respect to the
Company in accordance with U.S. federal securities laws and the
applicable rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange
Commission and the PCAOB.
We
conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the PCAOB.
Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to
obtain reasonable assurance about whether the consolidated
financial statements are free of material misstatement, whether due
to error or fraud. The Company is not required to have, nor were we
engaged to perform, an audit of its internal control over financial
reporting. As a part of our audits, we are required to obtain an
understanding of internal control over financial reporting, but not
for the purpose of expressing an opinion on the effectiveness of
the Company’s internal control over financial reporting.
Accordingly, we express no such opinion.
Our
audits included performing procedures to assess the risks of
material misstatement of the consolidated financial statements,
whether due to error or fraud, and performing procedures that
respond to those risks. Such procedures included examining, on a
test basis, evidence regarding the amounts and disclosures in the
consolidated financial statements. Our audits also included
evaluating the accounting principles used and significant estimates
made by management, as well as evaluating the overall presentation
of the consolidated financial statements. We believe that our
audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.
Emphasis of Matter Regarding Going Concern
The
accompanying consolidated financial statements have been prepared
assuming that the Company will continue as a going concern. As
discussed in Note 2 to the consolidated financial statements, the
Company has suffered recurring losses from operations and has
a net capital deficiency that raise substantial doubt about its
ability to continue as a going concern. Management’s plans in
regard to these matters are also described in Note 2. The
consolidated financial statements do not include any adjustments
that might result from the outcome of this uncertainty. Our opinion
is not modified with respect to this matter.
Critical Audit Matters
The
critical audit matters communicated below are matters arising from
the current period audit of the financial statements that were
communicated or required to be communicated to the audit committee
and that: (1) relate to accounts or disclosures that are material
to the financial statements and (2) involved our especially
challenging, subjective, or complex judgments. The communication of
critical audit matters does not alter in any way our opinion on the
financial statements, taken as a whole, and we are not, by
communicating the critical audit matters below, providing separate
opinions on the critical audit matters or on the accounts or
disclosures to which they relate.
Estimation of Fair Value of Contingent Payment
Obligations
As
disclosed in Note 1 of the Company’s consolidated financial
statements, the Company accounts for their secured and unsecured
contingent payment obligations as long-term debt. Their payment
obligations are contingent upon the receipt of proceeds from patent
enforcement and/or patent monetization actions. The Company has
elected to measure their contingent payment obligations at their
estimated fair values. The Company recorded the fair value of their
contingent payment obligations at approximately $43,063,000 as of
December 31, 2021.
Auditing
management’s estimate of the fair value of their contingent
payment obligations involved subjective evaluation and high degree
of auditor judgement due to significant assumptions involved in
estimating the receipt of proceeds from patent enforcement and/or
patent monetization actions.
Addressing
the matter involved performing procedures and evaluating audit
evidence in connection with forming our overall opinion on the
consolidated financial statements. We obtained an understanding and
evaluated the design of internal controls that address the risks of
material misstatement relating to recording the contingent payment
obligations at fair value. We tested the accuracy and completeness
of the underlying data used in calculating the fair value. We
evaluated management’s ability to accurately estimate the
assumptions used to develop the fair value of the contingent
payment obligations. We also involved an independent legal firm to
assist in evaluating the reasonableness of the assumptions of
future litigation outcomes used by the Company in estimating the
receipt of proceeds from patent enforcement and/or patent
monetization actions.
/s/
MSL, P.A.
We have
served as the Company’s auditor since 2019.
Fort
Lauderdale, Florida
March
29, 2022
PARKERVISION,
INC.
CONSOLIDATED
BALANCE SHEETS
DECEMBER
31, 2021 AND 2020
(in
thousands)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2021
|
|
2020
|
||
|
CURRENT
ASSETS:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash
and cash equivalents
|
$
|
1,030
|
|
$
|
1,627
|
|
Prepaid
expenses
|
|
574
|
|
|
599
|
|
Other
current assets
|
|
25
|
|
|
8
|
|
Total
current assets
|
|
1,629
|
|
|
2,234
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Property and
equipment, net
|
|
7
|
|
|
30
|
|
Intangible assets,
net
|
|
1,785
|
|
|
2,170
|
|
Operating lease
right-of-use assets
|
|
7
|
|
|
10
|
|
Other
assets, net
|
|
12
|
|
|
12
|
|
Total
assets
|
$
|
3,440
|
|
$
|
4,456
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
CURRENT
LIABILITIES:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts
payable
|
$
|
706
|
|
$
|
4,318
|
|
Accrued
expenses:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Salaries and
wages
|
|
27
|
|
|
19
|
|
Professional
fees
|
|
109
|
|
|
128
|
|
Statutory court
costs
|
|
-
|
|
|
251
|
|
Other
accrued expenses
|
|
555
|
|
|
936
|
|
Related
party note payable, current portion
|
|
94
|
|
|
100
|
|
Secured
note payable, current portion
|
|
-
|
|
|
26
|
|
Unsecured notes
payable
|
|
-
|
|
|
65
|
|
Operating lease
liabilities, current portion
|
|
155
|
|
|
146
|
|
Total
current liabilities
|
|
1,646
|
|
|
5,989
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
LONG-TERM
LIABILITIES:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Secured
contingent payment obligation
|
|
37,372
|
|
|
33,057
|
|
Unsecured
contingent payment obligations
|
|
5,691
|
|
|
5,222
|
|
Convertible notes,
net
|
|
2,895
|
|
|
3,018
|
|
Related
party note payable, net of current portion
|
|
609
|
|
|
703
|
|
Operating lease
liabilities, net of current portion
|
|
4
|
|
|
159
|
|
Other
long-term liabilities
|
|
-
|
|
|
129
|
|
Total
long-term liabilities
|
|
46,571
|
|
|
42,288
|
|
Total
liabilities
|
|
48,217
|
|
|
48,277
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
COMMITMENTS
AND CONTINGENCIES
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
SHAREHOLDERS'
DEFICIT:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common
stock, $0.01 par value, 150,000 and 140,000 shares authorized,
76,992 and 58,591 issued and outstanding at December 31, 2021 and
2020, respectively
|
|
770
|
|
|
586
|
|
Additional paid-in
capital
|
|
387,865
|
|
|
376,954
|
|
Accumulated
deficit
|
|
(433,412)
|
|
|
(421,361)
|
|
Total
shareholders' deficit
|
|
(44,777)
|
|
|
(43,821)
|
|
Total
liabilities and shareholders' deficit
|
$
|
3,440
|
|
$
|
4,456
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The
accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated
financial statements.
PARKERVISION,
INC.
CONSOLIDATED
STATEMENTS OF COMPREHENSIVE LOSS
FOR THE
YEARS ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2021 AND 2020
(in
thousands, except per share amounts)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2021
|
|
2020
|
|
||
|
Licensing revenue
|
$
|
144
|
|
$
|
-
|
|
|
Cost of sales
|
|
(5)
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
Gross
margin
|
|
139
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Selling, general, and administrative expenses
|
|
8,088
|
|
|
10,664
|
|
|
Total
operating expenses
|
|
8,088
|
|
|
10,664
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest and other income
|
|
242
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
Interest and other expense
|
|
(251)
|
|
|
(547)
|
|
|
Change in fair value of contingent payment obligations
|
|
(4,372)
|
|
|
(8,367)
|
|
|
Total
interest and other
|
|
(4,381)
|
|
|
(8,914)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net loss before income tax
|
|
(12,330)
|
|
|
(19,578)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income tax expense
|
|
-
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net loss
|
|
(12,330)
|
|
|
(19,578)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other comprehensive income, net of tax
|
|
-
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Comprehensive loss
|
$
|
(12,330)
|
|
$
|
(19,578)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic and diluted net loss per common share
|
$
|
(0.17)
|
|
$
|
(0.42)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted average common shares outstanding
|
|
71,299
|
|
|
47,019
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The
accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated
financial statements.
PARKERVISION,
INC.
CONSOLIDATED
STATEMENTS OF SHAREHOLDERS’ DEFICIT
FOR THE
YEARS ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2021 AND 2020
(in
thousands)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common
Stock, Par Value
|
|
|
Additional
Paid-in Capital
|
|
AccumulatedDeficit
|
|
TotalShareholders'Deficit
|
|||
|
Balance as of December 31, 2019
|
|
$
|
341
|
|
|
368,345
|
|
|
(401,783)
|
|
|
(33,097)
|
|
Issuance
of common stock and warrants in public and private offerings, net
of issuance costs and initial fair value of contingent payment
rights
|
|
|
148
|
|
|
4,618
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,766
|
|
Issuance
of common stock upon exercise of warrants
|
|
|
45
|
|
|
1,530
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
1,575
|
|
Issuance
of common stock and warrants for services
|
|
|
7
|
|
|
297
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
304
|
|
Issuance
of convertible debt with beneficial conversion feature
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
173
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
173
|
|
Issuance
of common stock upon conversion and payment of interest in kind on
convertible debt
|
|
|
15
|
|
|
437
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
452
|
|
Issuance
of common stock upon conversion of short-term loans and
payables
|
|
|
22
|
|
|
318
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
340
|
|
Share-based
compensation, net of shares withheld for taxes
|
|
|
8
|
|
|
1,236
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
1,244
|
|
Net
loss for the year
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
(19,578)
|
|
|
(19,578)
|
|
Balance as of December 31, 2020
|
|
|
586
|
|
|
376,954
|
|
|
(421,361)
|
|
|
(43,821)
|
|
Cumulative
effect of change in accounting principle
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
(1,126)
|
|
|
279
|
|
|
(847)
|
|
Issuance
of common stock and warrants in public and private offerings, net
of issuance costs and initial fair value of contingent payment
rights
|
|
|
73
|
|
|
5,701
|
|
|
|
|
|
5,774
|
|
Issuance
of common stock upon exercise of options and warrants
|
|
|
63
|
|
|
959
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
1,022
|
|
Issuance
of common stock and warrants for services
|
|
|
9
|
|
|
863
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
872
|
|
Issuance
of common stock upon conversion and payment of interest in kind on
convertible debt
|
|
|
37
|
|
|
1,201
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
1,238
|
|
Share-based
compensation, net of shares withheld for taxes
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
3,313
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
3,315
|
|
Net
loss for the year
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
(12,330)
|
|
|
(12,330)
|
|
Balance as of December 31, 2021
|
|
$
|
770
|
|
$
|
387,865
|
|
$
|
(433,412)
|
|
$
|
(44,777)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The
accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated
financial statements.
PARKERVISION,
INC.
CONSOLIDATED
STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
FOR THE
YEARS ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2021 AND 2020
(in
thousands)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2021
|
|
2020
|
||
|
CASH
FLOWS FROM OPERATING ACTIVITIES:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net
loss
|
$
|
(12,330)
|
|
$
|
(19,578)
|
|
Adjustments to
reconcile net loss to net cash used inoperating
activities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Depreciation and
amortization
|
|
368
|
|
|
632
|
|
Share-based
compensation
|
|
3,315
|
|
|
1,244
|
|
Noncash
lease expense
|
|
3
|
|
|
61
|
|
Change
in fair value of contingent payment obligations
|
|
4,372
|
|
|
8,367
|
|
Loss on
disposal/impairment of equipment and other assets
|
|
43
|
|
|
487
|
|
Loan
forgiveness
|
|
(194)
|
|
|
-
|
|
Noncash
expense for amendment of equity-related agreements
|
|
-
|
|
|
2,211
|
|
Changes
in operating assets and liabilities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Prepaid
expenses and other assets
|
|
784
|
|
|
292
|
|
Accounts payable
and accrued expenses
|
|
(3,917)
|
|
|
1,757
|
|
Operating lease
liabilities
|
|
(146)
|
|
|
(250)
|
|
Total
adjustments
|
|
4,628
|
|
|
14,801
|
|
Net
cash used in operating activities
|
|
(7,702)
|
|
|
(4,777)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
CASH
FLOWS FROM INVESTING ACTIVITIES:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Proceeds from sale
of property and equipment
|
|
-
|
|
|
2
|
|
Purchases of
property and equipment
|
|
(3)
|
|
|
(3)
|
|
Net
cash used in investing activities
|
|
(3)
|
|
|
(1)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
CASH
FLOWS FROM FINANCING ACTIVITIES:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net
proceeds from issuance of common stock, including contingent
payment rights, in private offerings
|
|
6,186
|
|
|
4,801
|
|
Net
proceeds from exercise of options and warrants
|
|
1,022
|
|
|
1,575
|
|
Net
proceeds from debt financings
|
|
-
|
|
|
1,244
|
|
Debt
repayments
|
|
(100)
|
|
|
(1,272)
|
|
Net
cash provided by financing activities
|
|
7,108
|
|
|
6,348
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
NET
CHANGE IN CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS
|
|
(597)
|
|
|
1,570
|
|
CASH
AND CASH EQUIVALENTS, beginning of year
|
|
1,627
|
|
|
57
|
|
CASH
AND CASH EQUIVALENTS, end of year
|
$
|
1,030
|
|
$
|
1,627
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
SUPPLEMENTAL
CASH FLOW INFORMATION:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash
paid for interest
|
$
|
17
|
|
$
|
61
|
|
Cash
paid for income taxes
|
$
|
-
|
|
$
|
-
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The
accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated
financial statements.
PARKERVISION,
INC.
NOTES
TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
DECEMBER 31,
2021 AND 2020
1.
SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING
POLICIES
ParkerVision,
Inc. and its wholly-owned German subsidiary, ParkerVision GmbH
(collectively “ParkerVision”, “we” or the
“Company”) is in the business of innovating fundamental
wireless hardware technologies and products. We have determined
that our business currently operates under a single operating and
reportable segment.
We
have designed and developed proprietary radio frequency
(“RF”)
technologies and integrated circuits based on those technologies,
and we license our technologies to others for use in wireless
communication products. We have expended significant financial and
other resources to research and develop our RF technologies and to
obtain patent protection for those technologies in the United
States of America (“U.S.”) and certain
foreign jurisdictions. We believe certain patents protecting our
proprietary technologies have been broadly infringed by others, and
therefore the primary focus of our business plan is the enforcement
of our intellectual property rights through patent infringement
litigation and licensing efforts. We currently have patent
enforcement actions ongoing in various U.S. district courts against
providers of mobile handsets, smart televisions and other WiFi
products and, in certain cases, their chip suppliers for the
infringement of a number of our RF patents. We have made
significant investments in developing and protecting our
technologies, the returns on which are dependent upon the
generation of future revenues for realization.
Basis of Presentation
Our
consolidated financial statements are prepared in accordance with
generally accepted accounting principles in the U.S.
(“GAAP”). The consolidated
financial statements include the accounts of ParkerVision, Inc. and
our wholly-owned German subsidiary, ParkerVision GmbH, after
elimination of all intercompany transactions and
accounts.
Use of Estimates in the Preparation of Financial
Statements
The
preparation of financial statements in conformity with GAAP
requires us to make estimates and assumptions that affect the
reported amounts of assets and liabilities at the date of the
financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and
expenses during the reporting periods. The more significant
estimates made by us include projected future cash flows and
risk-adjusted discount rates for estimating the fair value of our
contingent payment obligations, the volatility and estimated lives
of share-based awards used in the estimate of the fair market value
of share-based compensation, the assessment of recoverability of
long-lived assets, the amortization periods for intangible and
long-lived assets, and the valuation allowance for deferred taxes.
Actual results could differ from the estimates made. We
periodically evaluate estimates used in the preparation of the
financial statements for continued reasonableness. Appropriate
adjustments, if any, to the estimates used are made prospectively
based upon such periodic evaluation.
Cash and Cash Equivalents
We
consider cash and cash equivalents to include cash on hand,
interest-bearing deposits, overnight repurchase agreements and
investments with original maturities of three months or less when
purchased.
Property and Equipment
Property
and equipment are stated at cost, less accumulated depreciation.
Depreciation is determined using the straight-line method over the
following estimated useful lives:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Manufacturing
and office equipment
|
5-7
years
|
|
Leasehold
improvements
|
Shorter
of useful life or remaining life of lease
|
|
Furniture
and fixtures
|
7
years
|
|
Computer
equipment and software
|
3-5
years
|
The
cost and accumulated depreciation of assets sold or retired are
removed from their respective accounts, and any resulting net gain
or loss is recognized in the accompanying consolidated statements
of comprehensive loss. The carrying value of long-lived assets is
reviewed on a regular basis for the existence of facts, both
internally and externally, that may suggest impairment.
Recoverability of assets to be held and used is measured by
comparing the carrying amount of an asset to the estimated
undiscounted future cash flows expected to be generated by the
asset. If the carrying amount of the assets exceeds its estimated
undiscounted future net cash flows, an impairment charge is
recognized in the amount by which the carrying amount of the asset
exceeds the fair value of the assets.
Intangible Assets
We
capitalize outside legal costs and agency filing fees incurred in
connection with securing the rights to our intellectual property.
Patents, copyrights and other intangible assets are amortized using
the straight-line method over their estimated period of benefit. We
estimate the economic lives of our patents and copyrights to be
fifteen to twenty years. Management evaluates the recoverability of
intangible assets periodically and takes into account events or
circumstances that may warrant revised estimates of useful lives or
that may indicate impairment exists. As part of our ongoing patent
maintenance program, we will, from time to time, abandon a
particular patent if we determine fees to maintain the patent
exceed its expected recoverability. The cost and accumulated
amortization of abandoned intangible assets are removed from their
respective accounts, and any resulting net loss is recognized in
selling, general and administrative expenses in the accompanying
consolidated statements of comprehensive loss.
Contingent Payment Obligations
We have
accounted for our secured and unsecured contingent payment
obligations as long-term debt in accordance with Accounting
Standards Codification (“ASC”) 470-10-25,
“Sales of Future Revenues or Various other Measures of
Income.” Our payment obligations are contingent upon the
receipt of proceeds from patent enforcement and/or patent
monetization actions. We have elected to measure our contingent
payment obligations at their estimated fair values in accordance
with ASC 825, “Financial Instruments” based on the
variable and contingent nature of the repayment provisions. We have
determined that the fair value of our secured and unsecured
contingent payment obligations falls within Level 3 in the fair
value hierarchy, which involves significant estimates, and
assumptions including projected future patent-related proceeds and
the risk-adjusted rate for discounting future cash flows (see Note
10). Actual results could differ from the estimates made. Changes
in fair value, including the component related to imputed interest,
are included in the accompanying consolidated statements of
comprehensive loss under the heading “Change in fair value of
contingent payment obligations.”
Leases
We have
accounted for our finance and operating leases in accordance with
ASC 842, “Leases” which requires the recognition of
lease right-of-use (“ROU”) assets and lease
liabilities on our consolidated balance sheets for finance and
operating leases with initial lease terms of more than 12 months.
At inception of a lease, we determine
if an arrangement contains a lease and whether that lease meets the
classification criteria of a finance or operating lease. Some of
our lease arrangements contain lease components (e.g. minimum rent
payments) and non-lease components (e.g. services). For certain
equipment leases, we account for lease and non-lease components
separately based on a relative fair market value basis. For all
other leases, we account for the lease and non-lease components
(e.g. common area maintenance) on a combined
basis.
For operating leases with terms greater than 12 months, we record
the ROU asset and lease obligation at the present value of lease
payments over the term using the implicit interest rate, when
readily available, or our incremental borrowing rate for
collateralized debt based on information available at the lease
commencement date. Certain of our leases include rental escalation
clauses, renewal options and/or termination options that are
factored into our determination of lease payments when it is
reasonably certain that the option will be exercised. We do not
recognize ROU assets and lease liabilities for leases with terms at
inception of twelve months or less.
Finance leases are included in property and equipment and other
accrued expenses on the consolidated balance sheets. Finance leases
are recorded as an asset and an obligation at an amount equal to
the present value of the minimum lease payments during the lease
term. Amortization expense and interest expense associated with
finance leases are included in selling, general, and administrative
expense and interest expense, respectively, on the consolidated
statements of comprehensive loss.
Refer
to Note 8 for additional disclosures related to our
leases.
Convertible Debt
We have
issued debt that is convertible, at the holder’s option, into
shares of our common stock at fixed conversion prices. Certain of
the convertible notes were issued with conversion prices that were
below market value of our common stock on the closing date
resulting in a beneficial conversion feature which we recorded to
equity with a corresponding discount to the debt that was amortized
over the life of the notes as interest expense.
Effective January 1, 2021, we adopted Accounting Standards Update
(“ASU”) 2020-06 "Debt - Debt with Conversion and
Other Options (Subtopic 470-20) and Derivatives and Hedging -
Contracts in Entity's Own Equity (Subtopic 815-40): Accounting for
Convertible Instruments and Contracts in an Entity's Own
Equity." This ASU simplifies accounting for convertible
instruments by removing major separation models required under
current U.S. GAAP. Consequently, more convertible debt
instruments will be reported as a single liability instrument with
no separate accounting for embedded conversion
features. The ASU removes certain settlement conditions
that are required for equity contracts to qualify for the
derivative scope exception, which will permit more equity contracts
to qualify for the exception. The ASU also simplifies
the diluted earnings per share calculation in certain areas.
For smaller reporting companies, the ASU is effective for
fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2023, including interim
periods within those fiscal years, with early adoption permitted
for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2020. The
ASU provides for a modified retrospective method of adoption
whereby the guidance is applied to transactions outstanding at the
beginning of the fiscal year of adoption with the cumulative effect
of the change being recorded as an adjustment to beginning retained
earnings.
Adoption of ASU 2020-06 resulted in an increase to our long-term
debt of approximately $0.8 million, a decrease in additional
paid-in-capital of approximately $1.1 million, and an adjustment to
our beginning accumulated deficit of $0.3 million resulting from
the elimination of the previously recognized beneficial conversion
feature as a debt discount.
Revenue Recognition
We
account for revenue under ASC 606, “Revenue from Contracts
with Customers” which implements a common revenue standard
that clarifies the principles for recognizing revenue. This revenue
recognition model provides a five-step analysis in determining when
and how revenue is recognized. These steps include (1) identifying
the contract with the customer, (2) identifying the performance
obligations, (3) determining the transaction price, (4) allocating
the transaction price to the performance obligations, and (5)
recognizing revenue as the entity satisfies the performance
obligation(s).
Our
revenue is derived from patent licensing and settlement agreements.
We have an active monitoring and enforcement program with respect
to our intellectual property rights that includes seeking
appropriate compensation from third parties that utilize or have
utilized our intellectual property without a license. As a result,
we may receive payments as part of a settlement or in the form of
court-awarded damages for a patent infringement dispute. The timing
and amount of revenue recognized from each licensee depend upon a
variety of factors, including the specific terms of each agreement
and the nature of the deliverables and obligations. Such agreements
are often complex and may include multiple performance obligations.
These agreements can include performance obligations related to the
settlement of past patent infringement liabilities, royalties on
future covered products sold by licensees, access to a portfolio of
technology as it exists at a point in time, and/or promises to
provide technology updates to the portfolio during the term of the
license.
Refer
to Note 3 for additional disclosures related to our
revenue.
Cost of Sales
Cost of
sales includes amortization of intangible assets directly linked
with revenue generating licensing activities. Amortization expense
for intangible assets that are not directly related to revenue
generating licensing activities are included in selling, general,
and administrative expenses in our consolidated statements of
comprehensive loss.
Accounting for Share-Based Compensation
We have
various share-based compensation programs which provide for equity
awards including stock options, restricted stock units
(“RSUs”) and restricted
stock awards (“RSAs”). We calculate the
fair value of share-based equity awards on the date of grant and
recognize the calculated fair value as compensation expense over
the requisite service periods of the related awards. We estimate
the fair value of stock option awards using the Black-Scholes
option valuation model. This valuation model requires the use of
highly subjective assumptions and estimates including how long
employees will retain their stock options before exercising them
and the volatility of our common stock price over the expected life
of the equity award. Such estimates, and the basis for our
conclusions regarding such estimates, are outlined in detail in
Note 14. Estimates of fair value are not intended to predict actual
future events or the value ultimately realized by persons who
receive equity awards. We account for forfeitures of share-based
awards as they occur.
Income Taxes
The
provision for income taxes is based on loss before taxes as
reported in the accompanying consolidated statements of
comprehensive loss. Deferred tax assets and liabilities are
recognized for the expected future tax consequences of events that
have been included in the financial statements or tax returns.
Deferred tax assets and liabilities are determined based on
differences between the financial statement carrying amounts and
the tax basis of assets and liabilities using enacted tax rates in
effect for the year in which the differences are expected to
reverse. Valuation allowances are established to reduce deferred
tax assets when, based on available objective evidence, it is more
likely than not that the benefit of such assets will not be
realized. Our deferred tax assets exclude unrecognized tax benefits
which do not meet a more-likely-than-not threshold for financial
statement recognition for tax positions taken or expected to be
taken in a tax return.
Loss per Common Share
Basic
loss per common share is determined based on the weighted-average
number of common shares outstanding during each year. Diluted loss
per common share is the same as basic loss per common share as all
potential common shares are excluded from the calculation, as their
effect is anti-dilutive.
The
number of shares underlying outstanding options, warrants, unvested
RSUs, and convertible notes at December 31, 2021 and 2020 were as
follows (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2021
|
|
2020
|
||
|
Options
outstanding
|
|
23,215
|
|
|
12,240
|
|
Warrants
outstanding
|
|
10,346
|
|
|
12,850
|
|
Unvested
RSUs
|
|
-
|
|
|
187
|
|
Shares
underlying convertible notes
|
|
20,157
|
|
|
23,557
|
|
|
|
53,718
|
|
|
48,834
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
These
potential shares were excluded from the computation of diluted loss
per share as their effect would have been
anti-dilutive.
2.
LIQUIDITY AND GOING
CONCERN
The
accompanying consolidated financial statements as of and for the
year ended December 31, 2021 were prepared assuming we will
continue as a going concern, which contemplates that we will
continue in operation and will be able to realize our assets and
settle our liabilities and commitments in the normal course of
business for a period of at least one year from the issuance date
of these consolidated financial statements. These consolidated
financial statements do not include any adjustments to reflect the
possible future effects on the recoverability and classification of
assets or the amounts and classification of liabilities that could
result should we be unable to continue as a going
concern.
We have
incurred significant losses from operations and negative cash flows
in every year since inception and have utilized the proceeds from
the sales of our equity and equity-linked securities and our
contingent funding arrangements with third-parties to fund our
operations, including our litigation costs. For the year ended
December 31, 2021, we incurred a net loss of approximately
$12.3 million and negative cash flows from operations of
approximately $7.7 million. At December 31, 2021, we had
an accumulated deficit of approximately $433.4 million. These
circumstances raise substantial doubt about our ability to continue
to operate as a going concern for a period of one year after the
issuance date of these consolidated financial
statements.
We had
cash and cash equivalents of approximately $1.0 million at December
31, 2021. Our remaining capital resources will be used to fund our
current obligations and ongoing operating costs; however these
resources will not be sufficient to meet our liquidity needs for
the next twelve months and we will be required to seek additional
capital.
Our
business plan is currently focused solely on our patent enforcement
and technology licensing objectives. The timing and amount of
proceeds from our patent enforcement actions are difficult to
predict and there can be no assurance we will receive any proceeds
from these enforcement actions. Refer to Note 12 for a complete
discussion of our patent enforcement proceedings.
Our
ability to meet our liquidity needs for the twelve months after the
issuance date of these financial statements is dependent upon one
or more of (i) our ability to successfully negotiate licensing
agreements and/or settlements relating to the use of our
technologies by others in excess of our contingent payment
obligations and (ii) our ability to raise additional capital from
the sale of debt or equity securities or other financing
arrangements. We anticipate that we will continue to invest in
patent protection, licensing, and enforcement of our wireless
technologies. We expect that revenue generated from patent
enforcement actions, and technology licenses over the twelve months
after the issuance date of these financial statements, if any,
after deduction of payment obligations to our third-party
litigation funder and legal counsel, may not be sufficient to cover
our operating expenses. In the event we do not generate revenues,
or other patent-asset proceeds, sufficient to cover our operational
costs and contingent repayment obligation, we will be required to
raise additional working capital through the sale of equity
securities or other financing arrangements.
The
long-term continuation of our business plan is dependent upon our
ability to secure sufficient financing to support our business, and
our ability to generate revenues and/or patent-related proceeds
sufficient to offset expenses and meet our contingent payment
obligation and other long-term debt repayment obligations. Failure
to generate sufficient revenues, raise additional capital through
debt or equity financings, and/or reduce operating costs could have
a material adverse effect on our ability to meet our short and
long-term liquidity needs and achieve our intended long-term
business objectives.
3.
REVENUE
During
the year ended December 31, 2021, we recognized $0.14 million of
revenue derived from contracts with two licensees. The contracts
provide access to specified patented technologies as they exist at
a point in time and we have no obligation to provide any future
updates. The consideration received by us was negotiated as part of
a settlement of patent litigation where no prior license agreement
existed. The performance obligations were satisfied upon our
dismissal of patent enforcement actions with each licensee which
was contingent upon our receipt of the negotiated and agreed-upon
lump-sum payments from the licensees. The contracts included no
variable consideration. All consideration received was recorded to
licensing revenue as there were no other material components of the
contracts. No contract assets or liabilities exist as of December
31, 2021.
We
recognized no revenue during the year ended December 31,
2020.
4.
PREPAID
EXPENSES
Prepaid
expenses consisted of the following at December 31, 2021 and
2020 (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2021
|
|
2020
|
||
|
Prepaid
services
|
$
|
523
|
|
$
|
408
|
|
Prepaid
bonds for German statutory costs
|
|
-
|
|
|
142
|
|
Prepaid
insurance
|
|
23
|
|
|
21
|
|
Prepaid
licenses, software tools and support
|
|
16
|
|
|
11
|
|
Other
prepaid expenses
|
|
12
|
|
|
17
|
|
|
$
|
574
|
|
$
|
599
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Prepaid
services at December 31, 2021 and 2020 include approximately $0.5
million and $0.1 million, respectively, of consulting services paid
in shares of stock or warrants to purchase shares of stock in the
future.
5.
PROPERTY AND EQUIPMENT,
NET
Property
and equipment, at cost, consisted of the following at
December 31, 2021 and 2020 (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2021
|
|
2020
|
||
|
Equipment
and software
|
$
|
221
|
|
$
|
218
|
|
Leasehold
improvements
|
|
19
|
|
|
19
|
|
Furniture
and fixtures
|
|
-
|
|
|
30
|
|
|
|
240
|
|
|
267
|
|
Less
accumulated depreciation
|
|
(233)
|
|
|
(237)
|
|
|
$
|
7
|
|
$
|
30
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Depreciation
expense related to property and equipment was approximately $0.01
million and $0.03 million in 2021 and 2020, respectively. For the
years ended December 31, 2021 and 2020, we recorded a loss on
disposal of fixed assets of approximately $0.01 million and $0.02
million, respectively.
6.
INTANGIBLE
ASSETS
Intangible
assets consisted of the following at December 31, 2021 and 2020 (in
thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2021
|
|
2020
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Patents
and copyrights
|
$
|
14,755
|
|
$
|
14,948
|
|
Less
accumulated amortization
|
|
(12,970)
|
|
|
(12,778)
|
|
|
$
|
1,785
|
|
$
|
2,170
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amortization
expense for the years ended December 31, 2021 and 2020 was
approximately $0.35 million and $0.45 million, respectively.
For the years ended December 31, 2021 and 2020, we recorded losses
on the disposal of intangible assets of approximately $0.03 million
and $0.3 million, respectively.
Future
estimated amortization expense for intangible assets that have
remaining unamortized amounts as of December 31, 2021 is as
follows (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2022
|
$
|
309
|
|
2023
|
|
278
|
|
2024
|
|
265
|
|
2025
|
|
226
|
|
2026
|
|
155
|
|
2027
and thereafter
|
|
552
|
|
Total
|
$
|
1,785
|
|
|
|
|
7.
ACCRUED
LIABILITIES
Other
accrued expenses consisted of the following at December 31, 2021
and 2020 (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2021
|
|
2020
|
||
|
Advances
|
$
|
500
|
|
$
|
882
|
|
Other
accrued expenses
|
|
55
|
|
|
54
|
|
|
$
|
555
|
|
$
|
936
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Advances
include amounts received from litigation counsel as advanced
reimbursement of out-of-pocket expenses expected to be incurred by
us and, at December 31, 2020, includes approximately $0.4 million
received from investors for the purchase of equity securities in a
January 2021 transaction (see Note 13).
8.
LEASES
We lease our office and other facilities and certain office
equipment under long-term, non-cancelable operating leases. No new
finance or operating leases commenced during the years ended
December 31, 2021 or 2020 except with respect to a sublease
agreement for our Lake Mary facility in 2021 as discussed more
fully below.
During the year ended December 31, 2020, we recognized an
impairment loss of approximately $0.2 million on the ROU asset
related to our Lake Mary office lease. We ceased use
of this facility in 2018 as part of a restructuring
of our operations. The original value of our ROU asset
included estimated future sublease income. Due to a
number of factors, including the high vacancy
rate of the building in which the space is located
and the pandemic, we determined securing a sublease for
the space would be unlikely. The impairment loss recognized in 2020 represented
the remaining carrying value of the asset and is included in
selling, general, and administrative expenses in our
consolidated statements of comprehensive loss. During the year
ended December 31, 2021, we entered into a sublease agreement for
this facility for the remaining term of our original lease, through
November 2022. The sublease is accounted for as an operating
lease.
Lease expense for operating leases is generally recognized on a
straight-line basis over the lease term and is included in
operating expenses on the consolidated statement of comprehensive
loss. We recognized operating lease costs of $0.04 million and $0.1
million for the years ended December 31, 2021 and 2020,
respectively. Rental income recognized of $0.05 million for
the year ended December 31, 2021, is included in “Interest
and other income” in the accompanying consolidated statements
of comprehensive loss.
Supplemental Cash Flow Information
The following table summarizes the supplemental cash flow
information related to leases (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year
Ended
|
|
Year
Ended
|
||
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
December 31,
|
||
|
|
|
2021
|
|
2020
|
||
|
Cash
paid for amounts included in the measurement of lease
liabilities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating
cash flows from operating leases
|
|
$
|
181
|
|
$
|
315
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash
received for amounts included in the measurement of sublease
assets:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating
cash flows from operating subleases
|
|
|
44
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other Information
The
table below summarizes other supplemental information related to
leases:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
|
2021
|
|
2020
|
|
Weighted-average
remaining lease term (in years):
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating
leases
|
|
0.9
|
|
1.7
|
|
Operating
subleases
|
|
0.9
|
|
-
|
|
Weighted
average discount rate
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating
leases (1)
|
|
12.2%
|
|
12.1%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1)
Upon
adoption of the new lease standard, discount rates used for
existing leases were established at January 1, 2019.
Undiscounted Cash Flows
The
future maturities of lease liabilities and sublease receivables
consist of the following as of December 31, 2021 (in
thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating
Leases
|
|
Operating
Subleases
|
||
|
2022
|
|
$
|
166
|
|
$
|
(120)
|
|
2023
|
|
|
4
|
|
|
-
|
|
Thereafter
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
-
|
|
Total
undiscounted lease payments (receipts)
|
|
|
170
|
|
|
(120)
|
|
Less:
imputed interest
|
|
|
(11)
|
|
|
-
|
|
Present
value of lease liabilities (receivables)
|
|
|
159
|
|
|
(120)
|
|
Less:
current portion
|
|
|
(155)
|
|
|
120
|
|
Long-term
lease obligations
|
|
$
|
4
|
|
$
|
-
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
9.
LONG-TERM
DEBT
Notes Payable
Note Payable to a Related Party
We have
an unsecured promissory note payable of $0.7 million to Sterne,
Kessler, Goldstein, & Fox, PLLC (“SKGF”), a related party
(see Note 15), for outstanding unpaid fees for legal services. The
note, as amended, accrues interest at 4% per annum and provides for
monthly payments of principal and interest of $10,000 with a final
balloon payment of approximately $0.59 million due at the maturity
date of April 30, 2023. We are currently in compliance with all the
terms of the note, as amended. For each of the years ended December
31, 2021 and 2020, we recognized interest expense of approximately
$0.03 million related to this note.
Unsecured Notes Payable
Unsecured notes payable at December 31, 2020 represents the
current portion of our Paycheck Protection Program loan. In May
2020, we received approximately $0.2 million in proceeds
from an approved loan under the Paycheck Protection
Program. The loan was eligible for forgiveness provided
that (i) we used the loan proceeds exclusively for allowed costs
including payroll, employee group health benefits, rent and
utilities and (ii) employee and compensation levels were maintained
during the coverage period. We applied for loan forgiveness in
April 2021 and the loan was forgiven in June 2021. The forgiveness
of the loan was recognized as income and is included in
“Interest and other income” in the accompanying
consolidated statements of comprehensive loss for the year ended
December 31, 2021.
Secured Note Payable
Our secured note payable as of December 31, 2020 represented
default interest accrued related to a note payable to Mintz, Levin,
Cohn, Ferris, Glovsky and Popeo, P.C. (“Mintz”)
for outstanding fees and expenses. Additionally, as of December 31,
2020, we had approximately $3.1 million in accounts payable to
Mintz for outstanding fees and expenses. We also had approximately
$3.6 million in disputed legal fees and expenses billed by Mintz
that we treated as a loss contingency that was not probable as of
December 31, 2020 and accordingly, for which we recognized no
expense in the consolidated financial statements. On March 29,
2021, we entered into an agreement with Mintz to satisfy our
outstanding obligations to Mintz. Under the terms of the agreement,
(i) Mintz waived all past defaults on the note resulting in a
reversal of previously accrued interest, (ii) we paid Mintz a
lump-sum payment of $3.0 million in satisfaction of all outstanding
obligations including our accounts payable to Mintz and all
disputed and unrecorded billings, and (iii) Mintz agreed to a
significant reduction in future success fees that might be payable
to Mintz from future patent-related proceeds.
At
December 31, 2021, the aggregate maturities of our notes
payable are as follows (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2022
|
$
|
94
|
|
2023
|
|
609
|
|
Total
|
$
|
703
|
|
|
|
|
The
estimated fair value of our notes payable at December 31, 2021 is
approximately $0.63 million based on a risk-adjusted discount
rate.
Convertible Notes
Our
convertible notes represent five-year promissory notes that are
convertible, at the holders’ option, into shares of our
common stock at fixed conversion prices. Interest payments are made
on a quarterly basis and are payable, at our option and subject to
certain equity conditions, in either cash, shares of our common
stock, or a combination thereof. The number of shares issued for
interest is determined by dividing the interest payment amount by
the closing price of our common stock on the trading day
immediately prior to the scheduled interest payment
date.
To
date, all interest payments on the convertible notes have been made
in shares of our common stock. We have recognized the convertible
notes as debt in our consolidated financial statements. The fixed
conversion prices of certain of the notes were below the market
value of our common stock on the closing date resulting in the
recognition of a beneficial conversion feature that was recorded as
a discount on the convertible notes with a corresponding increase
to additional paid in capital. Upon our adoption of ASU 2020-06 on
January 1, 2021, the previously recognized beneficial conversion
feature was eliminated resulting in an increase in convertible
notes of $0.8 million (see Note 1).
Convertible
notes payable at December 31, 2021 and 2020, consist of the
following (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fixed
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Conversion
|
|
Interest
|
|
|
|
December
31,
|
||||
|
Description
|
|
Rate
|
|
Rate
|
|
Maturity
Date
|
|
2021
|
|
2020
|
||
|
Convertible
notes dated September 10, 2018
|
|
$0.40
|
|
8.0%
|
|
September
10, 2023
|
|
$
|
200
|
|
$
|
600
|
|
Convertible
notes dated September 19, 2018
|
|
$0.57
|
|
8.0%
|
|
September
19, 2023
|
|
|
425
|
|
|
425
|
|
Convertible
notes dated February/March 2019
|
|
$0.25
|
|
8.0%
|
|
February
28, 2024 to March 13, 2024
|
|
|
750
|
|
|
1,300
|
|
Convertible
notes dated June/July 2019
|
|
$0.10
|
|
8.0%
|
|
June 7,
2024 to July 15, 2024
|
|
|
320
|
|
|
340
|
|
Convertible
notes dated July 18, 2019
|
|
$0.08
|
|
7.5%
|
|
July
18, 2024
|
|
|
700
|
|
|
700
|
|
Convertible
notes dated September 13, 2019
|
|
$0.10
|
|
8.0%
|
|
September
13, 2024
|
|
|
50
|
|
|
50
|
|
Convertible
notes dated January 8, 2020
|
|
$0.13
|
|
8.0%
|
|
January
8, 2025 1
|
|
|
450
|
|
|
450
|
|
Total
principal balance
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,895
|
|
|
3,865
|
|
Less
unamortized discount
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
847
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
2,895
|
|
$
|
3,018
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1 The maturity date may be extended by one-year increments
for up to an additional five years at the holder’s option at
a reduced interest rate of 2%.
We have
the option to prepay the majority of the notes any time following
the one-year anniversary of the issuance of the notes, subject to a
premium on the outstanding principal prepayment amount of 25% prior
to the two-year anniversary of the note issuance date, 20% prior to
the three-year anniversary of the note issuance date, 15% prior to
the four-year anniversary of the note issuance date, or 10%
thereafter. The notes provide for events of default that include
failure to pay principal or interest when due, breach of any of the
representations, warranties, covenants or agreements made by us,
events of liquidation or bankruptcy, and a change in control. In
the event of default, the interest rate increases to 12% per annum
and the outstanding principal balance of the notes plus all accrued
interest due may be declared immediately payable by the holders of
a majority of the then outstanding principal balance of the
notes.
For the
year ended December 31, 2021, convertible notes with a face value
of $0.97 million were converted by the holders into 3.4 million
shares of our common stock at an average conversion price of $0.29.
For the year ended December 31, 2020, convertible notes with a face
value of $0.15 million were converted by the holders into 0.75
million shares of our common stock at an average conversion price
of $0.20. At the holders’ option, subject to ownership
limitations, the convertible notes outstanding at December 31, 2021
could be converted into an aggregate of approximately 20.2 million
shares of our common stock based on the fixed conversion
prices.
For the
years ended December 31, 2021 and 2020, we recognized interest
expense of approximately $0.26 million and $0.47 million,
respectively. Interest expense for the year ended December 31, 2020
included approximately $0.17 million related to amortization of the
discount that was subsequently eliminated upon our adoption of ASU
2020-06. We have elected to pay contractual interest in shares of
our common stock. For the years ended December 31, 2021 and 2020,
we issued approximately 272,000 and 710,000 shares of our common
stock, respectively, as interest-in-kind payments on our
convertible notes.
All of
the shares underlying our convertible notes, including shares
reserved for future in-kind interest payments on the notes, have
been registered for resale.
At
December 31, 2021, we estimate our convertible notes have an
aggregate fair value of approximately $2.3 million and would be
categorized within Level 2 of the fair value
hierarchy.
Secured Contingent Payment Obligation
The
following table provides a reconciliation of our secured contingent
payment obligation measured at estimated fair market value for the
years ended December 31, 2021 and 2020, respectively (in
thousands).
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||
|
|
|
|
2021
|
|
|
2020
|
|
Secured
contingent payment obligation, beginning of year
|
|
$
|
33,057
|
|
$
|
26,651
|
|
Change
in fair value
|
|
|
4,315
|
|
|
6,406
|
|
Secured
contingent payment obligation, end of year
|
|
$
|
37,372
|
|
$
|
33,057
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Our
secured contingent payment obligation represents the estimated fair
value of our repayment obligation to Brickell Key Investments, LP
(“Brickell”) under a
February 2016 funding agreement, as amended from time to time (the
“CPIA”). To date, we have
received aggregate proceeds of $18 million in exchange for
Brickell’s right to reimbursement and compensation from gross
proceeds resulting from patent enforcement and other patent
monetization actions. No proceeds were received from Brickell in
2020 or 2021. To date, we have repaid an aggregate of $3.3 million
under the CPIA from patent license and settlement
proceeds.
Brickell
is entitled to priority payment of 100% of proceeds received by us,
after reimbursement of out-of-pocket expenses and legal contingent
fees, from all patent-related actions until such time that Brickell
has been paid its minimum return. The minimum return is determined
as a multiple of the funded amount that increases over time. The
estimated minimum return due to Brickell was approximately $48.8
million and $42 million as of December 31, 2021 and 2020,
respectively. In addition, Brickell is entitled to a pro rata
portion of proceeds from specified legal actions to the extent
aggregate proceeds from those actions exceed the minimum
return.
Brickell
holds a senior security interest in the majority of our assets
until such time as the specified minimum return is paid, in which
case, the security interest will be released except with respect to
the patents and proceeds related to specific legal actions. The
security interest is enforceable by Brickell in the event that we
are in default under the agreement which would occur if (i) we
fail, after notice, to pay proceeds to Brickell, (ii) we become
insolvent or insolvency proceedings are commenced (and not
subsequently discharged) with respect to us, (iii) our creditors
commence actions against us (which are not subsequently discharged)
that affect our material assets, (iv) we, without Brickell’s
consent, incur indebtedness other than immaterial ordinary course
indebtedness, or (v) there is an uncured non-compliance of our
obligations or misrepresentations under the agreement. As of
December 31, 2021, we are in compliance with our obligations
under this agreement.
In
addition, in the event of a change in control of the Company,
Brickell has the right to be paid its return as defined under the
CPIA based on the transaction price for the change in control
event.
We have
elected to measure our secured contingent payment obligation at its
estimated fair value based on probability-weighted estimated cash
outflows, discounted back to present value using a discount rate
determined in accordance with accepted valuation methods (see Note
10). The secured contingent payment obligation is remeasured to
fair value at each reporting period with changes recorded in the
consolidated statements of comprehensive loss until the contingency
is resolved.
Unsecured Contingent Payment Obligations
The following table provides a reconciliation of our unsecured
contingent payment obligations, measured at estimated fair market
value, for the years ended December 31, 2021 and 2020,
respectively (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2021
|
|
2020
|
||
|
Unsecured
contingent payment obligations, beginning of period
|
|
$
|
5,222
|
|
$
|
-
|
|
Reclassification
of other liabilities
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
1,003
|
|
Issuance
of contingent payment rights
|
|
|
412
|
|
|
2,258
|
|
Change
in fair value
|
|
|
57
|
|
|
1,961
|
|
Unsecured
contingent payment obligations, end of period
|
|
$
|
5,691
|
|
$
|
5,222
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Our unsecured contingent payment obligations represent amounts
payable to others from future patent-related proceeds including (i)
a termination fee due to a litigation funder
(“Termination
Fee”) and (ii) contingent
payment rights (“CPRs”)
issued to accredited investors primarily in connection with equity
financings. We have elected to measure these unsecured contingent
payment obligations at their estimated fair value based on
probability-weighted estimated cash outflows, discounted back to
present value using a discount rate determined in accordance with
accepted valuation methods. The unsecured contingent
payment obligations will be remeasured to fair value at each
reporting period with changes recorded in the consolidated
statements of comprehensive loss until the contingency is resolved
(see Note 10).
The Termination Fee is a result of advances received under a
letter agreement with a third-party funder of $0.4 million in 2019
and $0.6 million in 2020. Based on the terms of the
letter agreement, if a final funding arrangement was not executed
by March 31, 2020, we would be obligated to pay, from future
patent-related proceeds, an aggregate termination payment equal to
five times the advances received, or approximately
$5.0 million. We did not consummate a funding
agreement and accordingly the advances were recorded as an
unsecured contingent payment obligation at March 31, 2020, when the
Termination Fee obligation was incurred. As
of December 31, 2021, the estimated fair value of unsecured
contingent payment obligations related to the Termination Fee
is $2.6 million.
The CPRs represent the estimated fair value of rights provided to
accredited investors who purchased shares of our common stock in
2020 and 2021 and the fair value of a right issued to a third-party
in connection with a service agreement during the year ended
December 31, 2020 (see Note 13). During the years
ended December 31, 2021 and 2020, we received aggregate
proceeds of $1.1 million and $3.8 million, respectively
from the sale of common stock with contingent payment rights, of
which approximately $0.4 million and $1.8 million,
respectively was allocated to the CPRs. In addition, on
May 1, 2020, we amended certain March 2020 equity purchase
agreements with accredited investors for the purchase of $0.9
million in common stock to add CPRs. This amendment resulted in a
charge to expense of $0.4 million for the initial
estimated fair value of the CPRs. The terms of the CPRs
provide that we will pay each investor an allocated portion of
our net proceeds from patent-related actions, after taking into
account fees and expenses payable to law firms representing us and
amounts payable to Brickell. The investors’
allocated portion of net proceeds will be determined by multiplying
the net proceeds recovered by us (up to $10 million) by
the quotient of such investors’ subscription amount divided
by $10 million, up to an amount equal to each
investor’s subscription amount, or an aggregate
of $5.8 million. As of December 31, 2021,
the estimated fair value of our unsecured contingent
payment obligations related to the CPRs
is $3.1 million.
10.
FAIR VALUE
MEASUREMENTS
ASC
820, “Fair Value Measurements” establishes a fair value
hierarchy that prioritizes the inputs to valuation methods used to
measure fair value. The three levels of the fair value hierarchy
are as follows:
●
Level 1: Quoted
prices for identical assets or liabilities in active markets which
we can access
●
Level 2: Observable
inputs other than those described in Level 1
●
Level 3:
Unobservable inputs
The
following table summarizes financial assets and financial
liabilities carried at fair value and measured on a recurring basis
as of December 31, 2021 and 2020, segregated by classification
within the fair value hierarchy (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fair
Value Measurements
|
|||||||
|
|
Total
|
|
Quoted
Prices inActive Markets(Level 1)
|
|
Significant
OtherObservableInputs (Level 2)
|
|
SignificantUnobservableInputs
(Level 3)
|
||||
|
December 31, 2021:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Liabilities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Secured
contingent payment obligation
|
$
|
37,372
|
|
$
|
-
|
|
$
|
-
|
|
$
|
37,372
|
|
Unsecured
contingent payment obligations
|
|
5,691
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
5,691
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, 2020:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Liabilities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Secured
contingent payment obligation
|
|
33,057
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
33,057
|
|
Unsecured
contingent payment obligations
|
|
5,222
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
5,222
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the
years ended December 31, 2021 and 2020, respectively, we had
no transfers of assets or liabilities between the levels of the
hierarchy.
The fair values of our secured and unsecured contingent payment
obligations were estimated using a probability-weighted income
approach based on various cash flow scenarios as to the outcome of
patent-related actions both in terms of timing and amount,
discounted to present value using a risk-adjusted
rate. We used a risk-adjusted discount rate
of 14.85% at December 31, 2021, based on a risk-free
rate of 0.85% as adjusted by 8% for credit risk
and 6% for litigation inherent risk.
The following table provides quantitative information about the
significant unobservable inputs used in the measurement of fair
value for both the secured and unsecured contingent payment
obligations at December 31, 2021, including the lowest
and highest undiscounted payout scenarios as well as a weighted
average payout scenario based on relative undiscounted fair value
of each cash flow scenario.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Secured
Contingent Payment Obligation
|
|
Unsecured
Contingent Payment Obligations
|
||||||||||||||
|
Unobservable
Inputs
|
|
Low
|
|
Weighted
Average
|
|
High
|
|
Low
|
|
Weighted
Average
|
|
High
|
||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Estimated
undiscounted cash outflows (in millions)
|
|
$
|
0.0
|
|
$
|
51.8
|
|
$
|
79.6
|
|
$
|
0.0
|
|
$
|
8.1
|
|
$
|
10.8
|
|
Duration
(in years)
|
|
|
0.5
|
|
|
2.3
|
|
|
3.5
|
|
|
1.5
|
|
|
2.5
|
|
|
3.5
|
|
Estimated
probabilities
|
|
|
7%
|
|
|
23%
|
|
|
25%
|
|
|
25%
|
|
|
25%
|
|
|
25%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
We evaluate the estimates and assumptions
used in determining the fair value of our contingent
payment obligations each reporting period and make any adjustments
prospectively based on those
evaluations. Changes in any of these Level 3 inputs
could result in a significantly higher or lower fair value
measurement
11.
INCOME TAXES AND TAX
STATUS
Our net
losses before income taxes for the years ended December 31,
2021 and 2020 are from domestic operations as well as losses from
our wholly-owned German subsidiary. We elected to treat our German
subsidiary as a disregarded entity for purposes of income taxes and
accordingly, the losses from our German subsidiary have been
included in our operating results.
No
current or deferred tax provision or benefit was recorded in 2021
or 2020 as a result of current losses and fully deferred tax
valuation allowances for all periods. We have recorded a valuation
allowance to state our deferred tax assets at their estimated net
realizable value due to the uncertainty related to realization of
these assets through future taxable income.
A
reconciliation between the provision for income taxes and the
expected tax benefit using the federal statutory rate of 21% for
each of the years ended December 31, 2021 and 2020,
respectively are as follows (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2021
|
|
2020
|
||
|
Tax
benefit at statutory rate
|
$
|
(2,589)
|
|
$
|
(4,111)
|
|
State
tax benefit
|
|
(530)
|
|
|
(842)
|
|
Increase
in valuation allowance
|
|
3,368
|
|
|
4,307
|
|
Other
|
|
(249)
|
|
|
646
|
|
|
$
|
-
|
|
$
|
-
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Our
deferred tax assets and liabilities relate to the following sources
and differences between financial accounting and the tax bases of
our assets and liabilities at December 31, 2021 and 2020 (in
thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2021
|
|
2020
|
||
|
Gross
deferred tax assets:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net
operating loss carry-forward
|
$
|
78,600
|
|
$
|
80,848
|
|
Research and
development credit carry-forward
|
|
6,028
|
|
|
6,603
|
|
Stock
compensation
|
|
356
|
|
|
122
|
|
Patents
and other
|
|
1,470
|
|
|
1,466
|
|
Contingent payment
obligations
|
|
6,341
|
|
|
5,235
|
|
Fixed
assets
|
|
53
|
|
|
54
|
|
Accrued
liabilities
|
|
-
|
|
|
64
|
|
Lease
liabilities
|
|
38
|
|
|
77
|
|
|
|
92,886
|
|
|
94,469
|
|
Less
valuation allowance
|
|
(92,886)
|
|
|
(94,245)
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
224
|
|
Gross
deferred tax liabilities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Convertible
debt
|
|
-
|
|
|
(224)
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
(224)
|
|
Net
deferred tax asset
|
$
|
-
|
|
$
|
-
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Upon
adoption of ASU 2020-06 on January 1, 2021 (see “Convertible
Notes” in Note 9), the difference between the financial
accounting and tax bases, net of tax effect, of unrecognized tax
benefit related to the beneficial conversion feature of convertible
debt was eliminated.
At
December 31, 2021, we had cumulative net operating loss
(“NOL”)
carry-forwards for income tax purposes of $313.2 million, of
which $276.6 million is subject to expiration in varying amounts
from 2022 to 2037. At December 31, 2021, we also had research and
development tax credit carryforwards of $6.0 million, which
expire in varying amounts from 2022 through 2038.
Our
ability to benefit from the tax credit carry-forwards could be
limited under certain provisions of the Internal Revenue Code if
there are ownership changes of more than 50%, as defined by Section
382 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 (“Section 382”). Under
Section 382, an ownership change may limit the amount of NOL,
capital loss and R&D credit carry-forwards that can be used
annually to offset future taxable income and tax, respectively. In
general, an ownership change, as defined by Section 382, results
from transactions increasing the ownership of certain shareholders
or public groups in the stock of a corporation by more than 50
percentage points over a three-year period. We conduct a
study annually of our ownership changes. Based on the results of
our studies, we have determined that we do not have any ownership
changes on or prior to December 31, 2021 which would result in
limitations of our NOL, capital loss or R&D credit
carry-forwards under Section 382.
Uncertain Tax Positions
We file
income tax returns in the U.S. federal jurisdiction, various state
jurisdictions, and Germany. We have identified our Federal
and Florida tax returns as our only major jurisdictions, as
defined. The periods subject to examination for those returns
are the 2002 through 2021 tax years. The following table
provides a reconciliation of our unrecognized tax benefits due to
uncertain tax positions for the years ended December 31, 2021
and 2020, respectively (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2021
|
|
2020
|
||
|
Unrecognized
tax benefits – beginning of year
|
$
|
927
|
|
$
|
927
|
|
Reduction
as a result of lapse of statute of limitations
|
|
(274)
|
|
|
-
|
|
Unrecognized
tax benefits – end of year
|
$
|
653
|
|
$
|
927
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Future
changes in the unrecognized tax benefit will have no impact on the
effective tax rate so long as we maintain a full valuation
allowance.
Our
policy is that we recognize interest and penalties accrued on any
unrecognized tax benefits as a component of our income tax
expense. We do not have any accrued interest or penalties
associated with any unrecognized tax benefits. For the years
ended December 31, 2021 and 2020, we did not incur any income
tax-related interest income, expense or
penalties.
12.
COMMITMENTS AND
CONTINGENCIES
Legal Proceedings
From
time to time, we are subject to legal proceedings and claims which
arise in the ordinary course of our business. These proceedings
include patent enforcement actions initiated by us against others
for the infringement of our technologies, as well as proceedings
brought by others against us at the Patent Trial and Appeal Board
of the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office (“PTAB”) and in the Federal
Patent Court in Germany in an attempt to invalidate certain of our
patent claims.
The
majority of our litigation, including our PTAB proceedings, is
being paid for through contingency fee arrangements with our
litigation counsel as well as third-party litigation financing. In
general, litigation counsel is entitled to recoup on a priority
basis, from litigation proceeds, any out-of-pocket expenses
incurred. Following reimbursement of out-of-pocket expenses,
litigation counsel is generally entitled to a percentage of
remaining proceeds based on the terms of the specific arrangement
between us, counsel and our third-party litigation
funder.
We were
liable for costs assessed on infringement and validity cases in
Germany in which we did not prevail. A portion of this liability
was covered by bonds posted in Germany. As of December 31, 2021,
our bonds have been fully released and all outstanding statutory
court costs have been satisfied in full. We have no remaining
litigation or related liabilities in Germany.
ParkerVision v. Qualcomm (Middle District of Florida)
We have a patent infringement complaint pending in the Middle
District of Florida against Qualcomm and Qualcomm Atheros, Inc.
(collectively “Qualcomm”) seeking approximately
$1.3 billion in damages for infringement of four of
our patents (the “Qualcomm
Action”). HTC
Corporation and HTC America, Inc. (collectively
“HTC”) were also defendants in this case
but we voluntarily dismissed our claims against HTC
and HTC dismissed their related counter-claims
against us in October 2020. Qualcomm has
pending counterclaims
against us for non-infringement and invalidity for
all patents in the case. The case was filed in May 2014
and stayed in February 2016 pending decisions in other cases,
including the appeal of a PTAB proceeding with regard to U.S.
patent 6,091,940 (“the ‘940
Patent”) asserted in this
case. In March 2017, the PTAB ruled in our favor
on three of the six petitions (the method
claims), ruled in Qualcomm’s favor on two of the
six petitions (the apparatus claims) and issued a split decision on
the claims covered in the sixth petition. In September
2018, the Federal Circuit upheld the
PTAB’s decision with regard to the ‘940 Patent
and, in January 2019, the court lifted the stay in this
case. In July 2019, the court issued an order that
granted our proposed selection of patent claims from four asserted
patents, including the ‘940 Patent, and denied
Qualcomm’s request to limit the claims and patents. The court
also agreed that we may elect to pursue accused products that were
at issue at the time the case was stayed, as well as new products
that were released by Qualcomm during the pendency of the
stay. In September 2019, Qualcomm filed a motion for
partial summary judgement in an attempt to exclude certain patents
from the case, including the ‘940 Patent. The
court denied this motion in January
2020.
In April 2020, the court issued its claim construction
order in which the court adopted our proposed construction
for seven of the ten disputed terms and adopted
slightly modified versions of our proposed construction for the
remaining terms. Due to the impact of COVID-19, a number of
the scheduled deadlines in this case were moved including the trial
commencement date which was rescheduled from December 2020 to May
2021. In October 2020, our damages expert submitted a report
supporting our damages ask of $1.3 billion for Qualcomm’s
unauthorized use of our technology. Such amount
excludes additional amounts requested by us for interest and
enhanced damages for willful infringement. Ultimately,
the amount of damages, if any, will be determined by the
court. Discovery was expected to close in December 2020;
however, the court allowed us to designate a substitute expert due
to medical issues with one of our experts in the case. Accordingly,
the close of discovery was delayed until January
2021. As a result of these delays, the court rescheduled
the trial commencement date from May 3, 2021 to
July 6, 2021.
In March 2021, the court further delayed the trial date citing
backlog due to the pandemic, among other factors. A new
trial date has not yet been set. Fact and expert
discovery in this case are closed, expert reports have been
submitted, and summary judgement and Daubert briefings have been completed by the
parties. Joint pre-trial statements were submitted in
May 2021. In March 2021, the court granted Qualcomm’s motion
to strike certain of our 2020 infringement contentions. We
filed a motion to clarify the court’s order and in July 2021,
based on the court’s response to our motion to clarify, we
filed a joint motion for entry of a judgement of non-infringement
of our Patent No. 7,865,177 (“the ‘177
Patent”), subject to
appeal. A number of outstanding motions are pending decisions
by the court. In January 2022, the court held a hearing to
allow the parties to present their respective positions on three
outstanding motions. The court indicated that upon its ruling on
these motions, a pre-trial conference will be scheduled and a trial
date set. On March 9, 2022, the court ruled with respect to one of
these motions granting Qualcomm’s motion to strike and
exclude opinions regarding the alleged infringement and
validity issues. This court order prevents the presentation of
infringement and validity opinions by both of our experts at trial.
In addition, on March 22, 2022, the court issued an order granting
Qualcomm’s motion for summary judgment ruling that Qualcomm
does not infringe the remaining three patents in this case. This is
a final judgment and the next step is an appeal of both the March
22, 2022 and the March 9, 2022 rulings (see Note 17). We are represented in this case on
a full contingency fee basis.
ParkerVision v. Apple and Qualcomm (Middle District of
Florida)
In December 2015, we filed a patent infringement complaint in the
Middle District of Florida against Apple, LG, Samsung and Qualcomm
alleging infringement of four of our patents. In February
2016, the district court proceedings were stayed pending resolution
of a corresponding case filed at the International Trade Commission
(“ITC”). In July 2016, we entered into a patent
license and settlement agreement with Samsung and, as a result,
Samsung was dismissed from the district court action. In March
2017, we filed a motion to terminate the ITC proceedings and a
corresponding motion to lift the stay in the district court case.
This motion was granted in May 2017. In July 2017, we filed a
motion to dismiss LG from the district court case and re-filed our
claims against LG in the District of New Jersey (see ParkerVision
v. LG below). Also in July 2017, Qualcomm filed a motion
to change venue to the Southern District of California, and
Apple filed a motion to dismiss for improper venue. In March 2018,
the district court ruled against the Qualcomm and Apple motions.
The parties also filed a joint motion in March 2018 to
eliminate three of the four patents in the case
in order to expedite proceedings leaving our U.S. patent 9,118,528
as the only remaining patent in this case. A claim construction
hearing was held on August 31, 2018. In July 2019, the court issued
its claim construction order in which the court adopted our
proposed claim construction for two of
the six disputed terms and the “plain and ordinary
meaning” on the remaining terms. In addition, the court
denied a motion filed by Apple for summary
judgment. Fact discovery has closed in this case
and a jury trial was scheduled to begin in August
2020. In March 2020, as a result of the impact of
COVID-19, the parties filed a motion requesting an extension of
certain deadlines in the case. In April 2020, the court
stayed this proceeding pending the outcome of the
Qualcomm Action.
ParkerVision v. LG (District of New Jersey)
In July
2017, we filed a patent infringement complaint in the District of
New Jersey against LG for the alleged infringement of the same
patents previously asserted against LG in the Middle District of
Florida (see ParkerVision v. Apple
and Qualcomm above). We elected to dismiss the case in the
Middle District of Florida and re-file in New Jersey as a result of
a Supreme Court ruling regarding proper venue. In March 2018, the
court stayed this case pending a final decision in ParkerVision v. Apple and Qualcomm in
the Middle District of Florida. As part of this stay, LG has agreed
to be bound by the final claim construction decision in that
case.
ParkerVision v. Intel (Western District of Texas)
In
February 2020, we filed a patent infringement complaint in the
Western District of Texas against Intel Corporation
(“Intel”) alleging
infringement of eight of our patents. The complaint was amended in
May 2020 to add two additional patents. In June 2020, we requested
that one of the patents be dropped from this case and filed a
second case in the Western District of Texas that included this
dismissed patent (see ParkerVision
v. Intel II below). Intel’s response to our complaint
was filed in June 2020 denying infringement and claiming invalidity
of the patents. Intel also filed a motion to transfer venue which
the court denied. In July 2020 and September 2020, Intel filed IPR
petitions against two of the patents in this case and in January
2021, the PTAB instituted proceedings with regard to these two
petitions (see Intel v.
ParkerVision (PTAB) below).
The
court issued its claim
construction ruling in January 2021 in which the
majority of the disputed claim terms were decided in our
favor. The case was scheduled for trial beginning February
7, 2022. In April 2021, we filed an amended complaint to include
additional Intel chips and products, including WiFi devices, to the
complaint. The court suggested that, given the number of patents at
issue, the case would be separated into two trials and, as a result
of the added products, the first trial date was moved to June
2022.
In
January 2022, the PTAB issued its ruling on the IPRs (see
Intel v. ParkerVision
(PTAB) below). In February 2022, the parties filed a joint
motion with respect to both Intel cases whereby the first case
would be narrowed to six total patents asserted against Intel
cellular products. These same six patents would be also asserted in
the second Intel case, along with one additional patent from the
second case, against Intel WiFi and Bluetooth products. As a result
of the restructuring of the two cases, the trial date was moved to
October 2022. In March 2022, due to discovery delays, the court
agreed to move the trial commencement date to December 5, 2022.
Discovery is ongoing in this case. We
are represented in this case on a full contingency fee
basis.
ParkerVision v. Intel II (Western District of
Texas)
In June 2020, to reduce the number of claims
in ParkerVision v.
Intel, we filed
a second patent infringement complaint in the Western
District of Texas against Intel that included
a single patent that we voluntarily dismissed
from the original case. In July 2020, we amended our
complaint adding two more patents to the case. Intel
responded to the complaint denying infringement and claiming
invalidity of the patents.
In January 2021, Intel filed a petition for IPR against one of the
patents in this case and in July 2021, the PTAB instituted
proceedings with regard to this petition (see Intel v. ParkerVision (PTAB) below).
We filed an amended complaint in 2021
adding Intel WiFi and Bluetooth products to the case. Two claim
construction hearings were held in June 2021 and July 2021 and the
court’s claim construction ruling was largely decided in our
favor. The case was scheduled for trial in October 2022. In
February 2022, the parties filed a joint motion which
provided that the Intel II
case would assert the same six patents from the first Intel case,
provided none of the patents were invalidated in the first case, as
well as one additional patent, depending on the outcome of the
pending IPR proceeding. As a result of the restructuring of the
cases, the trial date for this case is rescheduled for May 2023
although this date may change in lieu of the schedule changes in
the first Intel case. We
are represented in this case on a full contingency fee
basis.
Additional Patent Infringement Cases – Western District of
Texas
ParkerVision filed a number of additional patent cases in the
Western District of Texas in September and October 2020 including
cases against (i) TCL Industries Holdings Co., Ltd, a Chinese
company, TCL Electronics Holdings Ltd., Shenzhen TCL New Technology
Co., Ltd, TCL King Electrical Appliances (Huizhou) Co., Ltd., TCL
Moka Int’l Ltd. and TCL Moka Manufacturing S.A. DE C.V.
(collectively “TCL”), (ii) Hisense Co., Ltd. and
Hisense Visual Technology Co., Ltd (collectively
“Hisense”), a Chinese company, (iii) Buffalo Inc., a
Japanese company (“Buffalo”) and (iv) Zyxel
Communications Corporation, a Chinese multinational electronics
company headquartered in Taiwan,
(“Zyxel”). Each case alleges infringement of
the same ten patents by products
that incorporate modules containing certain WiFi
chips manufactured by Realtek and/or MediaTek. Each
of the defendants have filed responses denying infringement and
claiming invalidity of the patents, among other
defenses.
In May 2021, we filed a patent infringement case against LG
Electronics (“LGE”),
a South Korean company, in the Western District of Texas alleging
infringement of the same ten patents. A second action was filed
against Hisense in June 2021 in the Western District of Texas for
infringement of two additional patents. In September 2021, we
dismissed the cases against Buffalo and Zyxel following
satisfaction of the parties’ obligations under settlement and
license agreements entered into in May 2021 and September 2021,
respectively.
In May 2021, TCL and Hisense filed petitions for IPR against two of
the ten patents asserted against them, including U.S. Patent
7,110,444 (“the ‘444
Patent”) which was
challenged by Intel (see TCL, et. al. v. ParkerVision
(PTAB) below). In December
2021, LGE filed nearly identical petitions for IPR against the same
two patents along with a joinder motion requesting to join the
existing petitions.
The court held a combined Markman hearing on October 27, 2021 for
the cases against Hisense and TCL. The court issued its claim
construction recommendations on October 29, 2021, in which nearly
all of the claim terms were decided in our favor. The Hisense and
TCL cases currently have a trial date scheduled for December 12,
2022. The LGE case currently has a claim construction hearing
scheduled for April 25, 2022 and a trial scheduled to commence on
April 24, 2023. We are represented in each of these cases on a full
contingency fee basis.
Intel v. ParkerVision (PTAB)
Intel filed petitions for Inter
Partes Review (IPR) against U.S.
patent 7,539,474 (“the ‘474
Patent”), and the
‘444 Patent which were both asserted in ParkerVision v.
Intel. Intel also filed a
petition for IPR against U.S. patent 8,190,108
(“the ‘108
patent”) which is
asserted in ParkerVision v. Intel
II. In
January 2021, the PTAB issued its decision to institute IPR
proceedings for the ‘444 Patent and the ‘474 Patent. An
oral hearing was held on November 1, 2021 and final decisions from
the PTAB on the ‘474 Patent and the ‘444 Patent were
issued in January 2022. The PTAB ruled
against us with respect to the single challenged claim of the
‘444 Patent and ruled in our favor with respect to the seven
challenged claims of the ‘474 Patent. The ‘444 Patent
has subsequently been excluded from the narrowed claims asserted
in ParkerVision v.
Intel.
In July 2021, the PTAB issued its decision to
institute IPR proceedings for the ‘108 Patent. We filed our
response to this petition in October 2021 and an oral hearing is
scheduled for April 2022. A final decision from the PTAB with
respect to the ‘108 Patent is expected by July 2022.
Depending on the PTAB’s ruling with respect to the ‘108
Patent, we have the option to include or exclude this patent from
the patents being asserted in the Intel II case.
TCL, et. al. v. ParkerVision (PTAB)
In May
2021, TCL, along with Hisense, filed petitions for Inter Partes Review (“IPR”) against U.S.
patent 7,292,835 (“the ‘835 Patent”) and the
‘444 Patent, both of which are asserted in the infringement
cases against these parties in the Western District of Texas. In
November 2021, the PTAB issued its decision to implement IPR
proceedings for these two patents. In December 2021, LGE filed
nearly identical petitions against the same two patents along with
a joinder motion requesting to join the existing petitions filed by
TCL and Hisense. Oral hearings are scheduled for these IPRs in
September 2022 with a final decision expected in November
2022.
13.
STOCK AUTHORIZATION AND
ISSUANCE
Preferred Stock
We have
15 million shares of preferred stock authorized for issuance
at the direction of our board of directors (the “Board”). On
November 17, 2005, our Board designated 0.1 million
shares of authorized preferred stock as the Series E Preferred
Stock in conjunction with its adoption of a Shareholder Protection
Rights Agreement. As of December 31, 2021, we had no
outstanding preferred stock.
Common Stock
We have 150 million shares of common stock authorized for issuance
as of December 31, 2021. Our shareholders approved amendments to
our articles of incorporation in July 2020 increasing the
number of our authorized shares of common stock from 110 million to
140 million shares and in September 2021 increasing the number of
our authorized shares of common stock from 140 million to 150
million shares.
As of
December 31, 2021, we have 33.6 million shares reserved for
issuance under outstanding warrants and options and 20.2 million
shares reserved for issuance upon conversion of our outstanding
convertible notes. In addition, we have 2.0 million shares reserved
for future issuance under equity compensation plans and 3.2 million
shares reserved for future issuance upon payment of interest
in-kind on our convertible notes.
Stock and Warrant Issuances – Equity Based
Financings
The
following table presents a summary of completed equity-based
financing transactions for the years ended December 31, 2020 and
2021 (in thousands, except for per share amounts):
|
The
following table presents a summary of completed equity-based
financing transactions for the years ended December 31, 2020 and
2021 (in thousands, except for per share amounts):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Date
|
Transaction
|
|
# of
Common Shares/ Units Sold
|
|
Average
Price per Share/ Unit
|
|
# of
Warrants Issued(in 000’s)
|
|
Average
Exercise Price per Warrant
|
|
|
Net
Proceeds (1)
|
|
January
2020
|
Private
placement of common stock
|
|
1,335
|
|
$0.13
|
|
-
|
|
-
|
|
$
|
177
|
|
February
2020
|
Warrant
amendment
|
|
-
|
|
-
|
|
5,000
|
|
$0.74
|
|
$
|
-
|
|
March
2020
|
Private
placement of common stock, amended to add CPR
|
|
2,571
|
|
$0.35
|
|
-
|
|
-
|
|
$
|
900
|
|
April
2020 to December 2020
|
Private
placement of common stock with CPRs
|
|
10,858
|
|
$0.35
|
|
-
|
|
-
|
|
$
|
3,724
|
|
January
2021
|
Private
placement of common stock with CPRs
|
|
2,976
|
|
$0.35
|
|
-
|
|
-
|
|
$
|
1,040
|
|
March
2021
|
Private
placement of common stock with warrants
|
|
3,231
|
|
$1.29
|
|
1,619
|
|
$1.75
|
|
$
|
4,156
|
|
December
2021
|
Private
placement of common stock with warrants
|
|
1,053
|
|
$0.95
|
|
526
|
|
$1.00
|
|
$
|
1,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1)
After deduction of
applicable offering costs. Net proceeds are inclusive of the value
of the CPRs that are classified as long-term debt (see Note
9).
Private Placements
In January 2020, we entered into securities purchase
agreements with accredited investors for an aggregate
of 1,169,232 shares of our common stock at a price
of $0.13 per share and 166,667 shares of our
common stock at $0.15 per share for aggregate proceeds of
approximately $0.2 million.
In March 2020, we entered into securities purchase agreements with
accredited investors for an aggregate of 2,571,432 shares
of our common stock at a price of $0.35 per share for
aggregate proceeds of $0.9 million. The
securities purchase agreements for the March 2020 transactions were
amended on May 1, 2020, in order to add a contingent
payment right whereby we will pay each investor an allocated
portion of our share of proceeds from patent-related
actions, after taking into account fees and expenses payable
to law firms representing us and amounts payable to Brickell,
up to an amount equal to the investors’ aggregate
subscription amount, or $0.9 million (see
“Unsecured Contingent Payment Obligations” in Note
9). The shares were registered for resale on a registration
statement that was declared effective on April 28, 2020 (File No.
333-237762).
From April to December 2020, we entered into securities purchase
agreements with accredited investors for an aggregate
of 10,857,876 shares of our common stock at a price
of $0.35 per share for aggregate proceeds
of $3.8 million. The securities purchase
agreements include contingent payment rights.
Approximately $1.8 million of the proceeds were allocated
to unsecured contingent payment obligations based on the initial
fair value estimate of the CPRs (see “Unsecured Contingent
Payment Obligations” in Note 9). The shares sold
from April to August, totaling 5,871,584 shares, were registered
for resale on a registration statement that was declared effective
on September 2, 2020 (File No. 333-248242). The shares sold from
August to December, totaling 4,986,292 shares, were registered for
resale on a registration statement that was declared effective on
April 26, 2021 (File No. 333-255217).
In January 2021, we entered into securities purchase agreements
with accredited investors for the sale of an aggregate of 2,976,430
shares of our common stock at a price of $0.35 per share for
aggregate proceeds of $1.0 million. The securities purchase
agreements include contingent payment rights. Approximately $0.4
million of the proceeds were allocated to unsecured contingent
payment obligations based on the initial fair value estimate of the
CPRs (see “Unsecured Contingent Payment Obligations” in
Note 9). The shares were registered for resale on a registration
statement that was declared effective on April 26, 2021 (File No.
333-255217).
In March 2021, we entered into securities purchase agreements with
accredited investors for the sale of 3,230,942 shares of our common
stock and 1,619,289 warrants at a price of $1.29 per common share
for aggregate proceeds of approximately $4.2 million. The warrants
have an exercise price of $1.75 per share and expire in March 2026.
The shares, including the shares underlying the warrants, were
registered for resale on a registration statement that was declared
effective on April 26, 2021 (File No. 333-255217). We used $3.0
million of the proceeds from this transaction to satisfy our
obligations to Mintz (see “Secured Note Payable” in
Note 9).
In December 2021, we entered into a securities purchase agreement
with an accredited investor for the sale of 1,052,631 shares of our
common stock and 526,315 warrants at a price of $0.95 per common
share for aggregate proceeds of $1.0 million. The warrants have an
exercise price of $1.00 per share and expire in December 2026. The
shares, including the shares underlying the warrants, were
registered for resale on a registration statement that was declared
effective on January 24, 2022 (File No. 333-262147).
Warrant Amendment
On February 28, 2020, we entered into a warrant amendment
agreement (the “Warrant Amendment
Agreement”) with Aspire
Capital Fund, LLC (“Aspire”),
with respect to warrants issued in July and September 2018 (the
“2018
Warrants”) that are
exercisable, collectively, into 5,000,000 shares of
our common stock. The Warrant Amendment Agreement
provided for a reduction in the exercise price for the 2018
Warrants from $0.74 to $0.35 per share and the
issuance of a new warrant for the purchase
of 5,000,000 shares of our common stock at an
exercise price of $0.74 per share
(“New Aspire
Warrant”). The
New Aspire Warrant expires February 28, 2025 and is subject to
adjustment in the event of certain stock dividends and
distributions, stock splits, stock combinations, reclassifications
or similar events affecting our common stock and upon any
distributions of assets to our stockholders. The New
Aspire Warrant contains provisions that prohibit exercise if the
holder, together with its affiliates, would beneficially own in
excess of 9.99% of the number of shares of common
stock outstanding immediately after giving effect to such
exercise. The holder of the New Aspire Warrant may increase (up
to 19.99%) or decrease this percentage by providing at least
61 days’ prior notice to the Company. In the event of certain
corporate transactions, the holder of the New Aspire Warrant will
be entitled to receive, upon exercise of such New Aspire Warrant,
the kind and amount of securities, cash or other property that the
holder would have received had they exercised the New Aspire
Warrant immediately prior to such transaction. The New Aspire
Warrant does not contain voting rights or any of the other rights
or privileges as a holder of our common
stock.
We recognized $1.78 million of non-cash warrant expense in
connection with the Warrant Amendment Agreement based on the
difference between the Black-Scholes value of the warrants
immediately before and after the amendment. The Warrant
Amendment Agreement added a call provision to the 2018 Warrants
whereby we could, after December 31, 2020, call for cancellation of
all or any portion of the 2018 Warrants for which an exercise
notice has not yet been received, in exchange for consideration
equal to $0.001 per warrant share and subject to certain
conditions. All other terms of the 2018 Warrants
remained unchanged, including the original expiration dates of July
and September 2023. The shares underlying the New
Aspire Warrant were registered for resale on a
registration statement that was declared effective on April
28, 2020 (File No. 333-237762). The shares
underlying the 2018 Warrants are currently registered for
resale pursuant to a registration statement on Form S-1 (File
No. 333-226738).
Upon execution of the Warrant Amendment Agreement, Aspire
exercised 1,430,000 shares of the 2018 Warrants for
aggregate proceeds to us of $0.5 million. For the
years ended December 31, 2021 and 2020, Aspire exercised 500,000
and 3,070,000 shares of the 2018 Warrants for aggregate
additional proceeds to us of approximately $0.2 and $1.1
million, respectively.
Stock and Warrant Issuances – Payment for
Services
On February 10, 2020, we entered into a business consulting and
retention agreement with Chelsea Investor Relations
(“Chelsea”)
to provide business advisory services to us. As
consideration for services to be provided under the 24-month
term of the consulting agreement, we
issued 500,000 shares of unregistered common
stock in exchange for a nonrefundable retainer for services
valued at approximately $0.15 million. The
value of the stock issued is being recognized as consulting expense
over the term of the agreement. The shares were
registered for resale on a registration statement that
was declared effective on April 28, 2020 (File No.
333-237762). In January 2021, we amended the agreement with Chelsea
to increase the compensation for services over the remaining term
and to extend the term of the agreement through February
2024. As consideration for the amended agreement, we
issued 500,000 shares of unregistered common stock in
exchange for a nonrefundable retainer for services valued at
approximately $0.33 million. The value of the stock
issued is being recognized as consulting expense over the term of
the agreement. The shares were registered for resale on a
registration statement that was declared effective on April 26,
2021 (File No. 333-255217).
On March 16, 2020, we entered into an agreement with Tailwinds
Research Group LLC (“Tailwinds”)
to provide digital marketing services to us. As
consideration for services to be provided under
the twelve-month term of the agreement, we issued warrants for
the purchase up to 200,000 shares of our common
stock with an exercise price of $1.00 per
share in exchange for a nonrefundable retainer for services,
valued using the Black-Scholes method, at
approximately $0.06 million. The value of the
warrants was recognized as expense over the twelve-month term of
the agreement. The Tailwinds warrants are exercisable
immediately after issuance, expire March 16, 2023, and are subject
to adjustment in the event of certain stock dividends and
distributions, stock splits, stock combinations, reclassifications
or similar events affecting our common stock. The
shares underlying the warrant were registered for
resale on a registration statement that was declared effective
on April 28, 2020 (File No.
333-237762).
On May 22, 2020, we entered into an agreement with Intro-Act to
provide research and shareholder relations services. As
consideration for services under the agreement, we issued 50,000
shares of unregistered common stock on each of July 14, 2020,
October 30, 2020, January 12, 2021 and April 6, 2021 with an
aggregate value of approximately $0.05 million for the year ended
December 31, 2020 and $0.1 million for the year ended December 31,
2021. In June 2021, we extended our agreement with Intro-Act and
issued 100,000 shares of unregistered common stock valued at
approximately $0.12 million as consideration for services to be
provided over the twelve-month extended term of the agreement. The
value of the shares will be recognized as consulting expense over
the term of the agreement. We are not obligated to register the
shares for resale.
On June 8, 2020, we entered into an agreement with a third party to
provide media advisory services. As consideration for
services provided under the term of the agreement, which extended
through December 31, 2020, we issued 30,000 shares of
unregistered common stock for a nonrefundable retainer for services
valued at approximately $0.01 million. The
value of the stock issued was recognized as a consulting expense
over the term of the agreement. The shares were
registered for resale on a registration statement that was declared
effective on April 26, 2021 (File No. 333-255217).
On October 30, 2020, we entered into a consulting services
agreement with a third-party to provide shareholder relations
services. As consideration for services provided under the
twelve-month term of the agreement, we issued 70,000 shares of
unregistered common stock for a non-refundable retainer for
services valued at approximately $0.02 million. The agreement
included a CPR to receive up to $0.02 million from patent-related
proceeds. The CPR was recorded as debt at its estimated fair value
of approximately $0.1 million (see “Unsecured Contingent
Payment Obligations” in Note 9). In April 2021, we amended
the consulting services agreement and extended the term through
December 31, 2021. We issued 35,000 shares of our unregistered
common stock valued at approximately $0.04 million as
compensation over the remaining term of the agreement. The
value of the shares issued were recognized as consulting expense
over the term of the agreement.
In
addition, from time to time, we issue restricted stock awards under
our approved equity plans to third party consultants as share-based
compensation. During the year ended December 31, 2021, we issued
217,143 RSAs valued at $0.3 million under our 2019 long-term
incentive equity plan to nonemployees as compensation under
consulting agreements (see Note 14).
Common Stock Warrants
As of
December 31, 2021 and 2020, we had outstanding warrants for
the purchase of up to 10.3 million shares and 12.9 million
shares of our common stock, respectively. The estimated grant date
fair value of these warrants of $3.2 million and $1.7 million
at December 31, 2021 and 2020, respectively, is included in
shareholders’ deficit in our consolidated balance sheets. As
of December 31, 2021, our outstanding warrants have an average
exercise price of $0.75 per share and a weighted average remaining
life of approximately three years.
Shareholder Protection Rights Agreement
On
November 20, 2020, we adopted a second amendment to our Shareholder
Protection Rights Agreement (“Rights Agreement”) dated
November 21, 2005, as amended. The amendment extends the
expiration date of the Rights Agreement from November 20, 2020
to November 20, 2023 and decreases the exercise price of the
rights from $14.50 to $8.54.
The
Rights Agreement provided for the issuance, on November 29,
2005, as a dividend, rights to acquire fractional shares of Series
E Preferred Stock. We did not assign any value to the dividend, as
the value of these rights is not believed to be objectively
determinable. The principal objective of the Rights Agreement is to
cause someone interested in acquiring us to negotiate with our
Board rather than launch an unsolicited or hostile bid. The Rights
Agreement subjects a potential acquirer to substantial voting and
economic dilution. Each share of common stock issued by
ParkerVision will include an attached right.
The
rights initially are not exercisable and trade with the common
stock of ParkerVision. In the future, the rights may become
exchangeable for shares of Series E Preferred Stock with various
provisions that may discourage a takeover bid. Additionally, the
rights have what are known as “flip-in” and
“flip-over” provisions that could make any acquisition
of us more costly to the potential acquirer. The rights may
separate from the common stock following the acquisition of 15% or
more of the outstanding shares of common stock by an acquiring
person. Upon separation, the holder of the rights may exercise
their right at an exercise price of $8.54 per right (the
“Exercise
Price”), subject to adjustment and payable in cash.
Upon payment of the Exercise Price, the holder of the right will
receive from us that number of shares of common stock having an
aggregate market price equal to twice the Exercise Price, as
adjusted. The Rights Agreement also has a flip over provision
allowing the holder to purchase that number of shares of
common/voting equity of a successor entity, if we are not the
surviving corporation in a business combination, at an aggregate
market price equal to twice the Exercise Price. We have the right
to substitute for any of our shares of common stock that we are
obligated to issue, shares of Series E Preferred Stock at a ratio
of one ten-thousandth of a share of Series E Preferred Stock for
each share of common stock. The Series E Preferred Stock, if and
when issued, will have quarterly cumulative dividend rights payable
when and as declared by the Board, liquidation, dissolution and
winding up preferences, voting rights and will rank junior to other
securities of ParkerVision unless otherwise determined by the
Board. The rights may be redeemed upon approval of the Board at a
redemption price of $0.01. As of December 31, 2021, there are no
Series E preferred shares outstanding.
14.
SHARE-BASED
COMPENSATION
For the
years ended December 31, 2021 and 2020 we recognized share-based
compensation expense of approximately $3.3 million and $1.2
million, respectively. Share-based compensation is included in
selling, general, and administrative expenses in our consolidated
statements of comprehensive loss. From time to time, we issue fully
vested share-based compensation awards to third parties as prepaid
retainers for services over a specified period. The cost of these
awards is recorded as a prepaid asset and expensed to selling,
general and administrative expense over the service period (see
Note 4).
As of
December 31, 2021, there was $3.0 million of total
unrecognized compensation cost related to all non-vested
share-based compensation awards. That cost is expected to be
recognized over a weighted-average period of approximately
1.0 year.
Stock Incentive Plans
2019 Long-Term Incentive Equity Plan
We
adopted a long-term incentive equity plan in August 2019 that
provides for the grant of stock-based awards to employees,
officers, directors and consultants, not to exceed 12.0 million
shares of common stock (the “2019 Plan”). The 2019
Plan provides for benefits in the form of nonqualified stock
options, stock appreciation rights, restricted stock awards, and
other stock based awards. Forfeited and expired options under the
2019 Plan become available for reissuance. The plan provides that
non-employee directors may not be granted awards that exceed the
lesser of 1.0 million shares or $175,000 in value, calculated based
on grant-date fair value. In January 2021, the Board amended the
2019 Plan to increase the number of shares of common stock reserved
for issuance under the 2019 Plan from 12 million to 27 million
shares. At December 31, 2021, 1,897,857 shares of common stock were
available for future grants under the 2019 Plan.
2011 Long-Term Incentive Equity Plan
We
adopted a long-term incentive equity plan in September 2011 that,
as amended in 2014, 2016 and 2017, provides for the grant of
stock-based awards to employees, officers, directors and
consultants, not to exceed 3.0 million shares of common stock
(the “2011
Plan”). The 2011 Plan provides for benefits in the
form of incentive stock options, nonqualified stock options, stock
appreciation rights, restricted stock awards, and other stock based
awards. Forfeited and expired options under the 2011 Plan become
available for reissuance. The plan provides that no participant may
be granted awards in excess of 150,000 shares in any calendar year.
At December 31, 2021, 61,302 shares of common stock were
available for future grants under the 2011 Plan.
2008 Equity Incentive Plan
We
adopted an equity incentive plan in August 2008 (the
“2008
Plan”). The 2008 Plan provides for the grant of
stock-based awards to employees (excluding named executives),
directors and consultants, not to exceed 50,000 shares of common
stock. The 2008 Plan provides for benefits in the form of incentive
stock options, nonqualified stock options, stock appreciation
rights, restricted stock awards, and other stock based awards.
Forfeited and expired options under the 2008 Plan become available
for reissuance. The plan provides that no participant may be
granted awards in excess of 5,000 shares in any calendar year. At
December 31, 2021, 20,473 shares of common stock were
available for future grants under the 2008 Plan.
Restricted Stock Awards
RSAs
are issued as executive and employee incentive compensation and as
payment for services to others. The value of the award is based on
the closing price of our common stock on the date of grant. RSAs
are generally immediately vested.
Restricted Stock Units
RSUs
are issued as incentive compensation to executives, employees, and
non-employee directors. Each RSU represents a right to one share of
our common stock, upon vesting. The RSUs are not entitled to voting
rights or dividends, if any, until vested. RSUs generally vest over
a one to three year period for employee awards and a one year
period for non-employee director awards. The fair value of RSUs is
generally based on the closing price of our common stock on the
date of grant and is amortized to share-based compensation expense
over the estimated life of the award, generally the vesting
period.
RSAs and RSUs
The
following table presents a summary of RSA and RSU activity under
the 2008, 2011, and 2019 Plans (collectively, the
“Stock
Plans”) as of December 31, 2021 (shares in
thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-vested
Shares
|
|||
|
|
Shares
|
|
Weighted-AverageGrant
Date Fair Value
|
|
|
Non-vested
at beginning of year
|
187
|
|
$
|
0.33
|
|
Granted
|
217
|
|
|
1.34
|
|
Vested
|
(404)
|
|
|
0.87
|
|
Forfeited
|
-
|
|
|
-
|
|
Non-vested
at end of year
|
-
|
|
$
|
-
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The awards granted under the Stock Plans in 2021 were all RSAs
awarded to non-employees as compensation in connection with
consulting agreements.
The total fair value of RSAs and RSUs vested under the Stock Plans
for the year ended December 31, 2021 was approximately $0.6
million.
Stock Options
Stock
options are issued as incentive compensation to executives,
employees and non-employee directors. Stock options are generally
granted with exercise prices at or above fair market value of the
underlying shares at the date of grant. The fair value of options
granted is estimated using the Black-Scholes option pricing model.
Generally, fair value is determined as of the grant date. Options
for employees, including executives and non-employee directors, are
generally granted under the Stock Plans.
The
following table presents a summary of option activity under the
Stock Plans for the year ended December 31, 2021 (shares in
thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shares
|
|
Weighted-AverageExercise
Price
|
|
Weighted-AverageRemainingContractual
Term
|
|
AggregateIntrinsicValue
($)
|
|||
|
Outstanding
at beginning of year
|
12,240
|
|
$
|
0.28
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Granted
|
13,040
|
|
|
0.54
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exercised
|
(2,029)
|
|
|
0.17
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Forfeited/Expired
|
(36)
|
|
|
11.18
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Outstanding
at end of year
|
23,215
|
|
|
0.42
|
|
4.2
|
years
|
|
$
|
11,988
|
|
Vested
at end of year
|
16,676
|
|
$
|
0.37
|
|
4.3
|
years
|
|
$
|
9,503
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
In
January 2021, the Board awarded 11.9 million nonqualified stock
options to executives and other key employees and an aggregate of
1.1 million nonqualified stock options to non-employee directors
under the 2019 Plan. The options are exercisable at $0.54 per
share, vest in eight equal quarterly installments commencing March
31, 2021, and expire on January 11, 2026.
The
weighted average per share fair value of options granted during the
years ended December 31, 2021 and 2020 was $0.46 and $0.27,
respectively. The total fair value of option shares vested was $3.4
million and $0.9 million for the year ended December 31, 2021
and 2020, respectively.
The
fair value of option grants under the Stock Plans for the years
ended December 31, 2021 and 2020, respectively, was estimated
using the Black-Scholes option-pricing model with the following
assumptions:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year
ended December 31,
|
||
|
|
2021
|
|
2020
|
|
Expected
option term 1
|
4
years
|
|
5
years
|
|
Expected
volatility factor 2
|
141.1%
|
|
127.4%
to 135.3%
|
|
Risk-free
interest rate 3
|
0.36%
|
|
0.33%
to 1.63%
|
|
Expected
annual dividend yield
|
0%
|
|
0%
|
|
|
|
|
|
1 The expected term was generally determined based
on historical activity for grants with similar terms and for
similar groups of employees and represents the period of time that
options are expected to be outstanding. For employee options,
groups of employees with similar historical exercise behavior are
considered separately for valuation purposes.
2 The stock volatility for each grant is measured
using the weighted average of historical daily price changes of our
common stock over the most recent period equal to the expected
option life of the grant.
3 The risk-free interest rate for periods equal to
the expected term of the share option is based on the U.S. Treasury
yield curve in effect at the measurement date.
Options by Price Range
The
options outstanding at December 31, 2021 under all plans have
exercise price ranges, weighted average contractual lives, and
weighted average exercise prices as follows (weighted average lives
in years and shares in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Options
Outstanding
|
|
Options
Vested
|
||||||||||
|
Range
of Exercise Prices
|
|
Number
Outstanding at December 31, 2021
|
|
Wtd.
Avg. Exercise Price
|
|
Wtd.
Avg. Remaining Contractual Life
|
|
Number
Exercisable at December 31, 2021
|
|
Wtd.
Avg. Exercise Price
|
|
Wtd.
Avg. Remaining Contractual Life
|
||
|
$0.171
- $0.33
|
|
9,289
|
|
$
|
0.18
|
|
4.6
|
|
9,289
|
|
$
|
0.18
|
|
4.6
|
|
$0.50 -
$0.75
|
|
13,553
|
|
|
0.54
|
|
4.0
|
|
7,014
|
|
|
0.54
|
|
4.0
|
|
$1.98 -
$2.97
|
|
373
|
|
|
2.02
|
|
2.5
|
|
373
|
|
|
2.02
|
|
2.5
|
|
|
|
23,215
|
|
$
|
0.42
|
|
4.2
|
|
16,676
|
|
$
|
0.37
|
|
4.3
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
We
issue new shares of our common stock upon exercise of options or
vesting of RSUs or RSAs under the Stock Plans. The shares
underlying the Stock Plans are registered. Cash received from
option exercises for the year ended December 31, 2021, was $0.3
million. We had no option exercises for the year ended
December 31, 2020.
15.
RELATED PARTY
TRANSACTIONS
We paid
approximately $0.1 million and $0.01 million in 2021 and
2020, respectively, for patent-related legal services to SKGF, of
which Robert Sterne, one of our directors since September 2006, is
a partner. In addition, we paid approximately $0.1 million in
both 2021 and 2020 for principal and interest on the SKGF Note
(refer to “Note Payable to a Related Party” included in
Note 9). The SKGF Note has an outstanding balance, including
accrued interest, of approximately $0.7 million at December 31,
2021.
In
January 2020, we issued 500,000 in unregistered shares of our
common stock as an in-kind payment of approximately $0.08 million
in outstanding amounts payable to Stacie Wilf, sister to Jeffrey
Parker.
16.
CONCENTRATIONS OF CREDIT
RISK
Financial
instruments that potentially subject us to a concentration of
credit risk principally consist of cash and cash equivalents. Cash
and cash equivalents are primarily held in bank accounts and
overnight investments. At times our cash balances on deposit with
banks may exceed the balance insured by the F.D.I.C.
17.
SUBSEQUENT
EVENTS
On
March 22, 2022, the United States District Court in the Middle
District of Florida (Orlando Division) issued an order granting
Qualcomm’s motion for summary judgment ruling that Qualcomm
does not infringe the three patents that are the subject of our
infringement case against them. This ruling, which is a final
determination of the district court, follows a March 9, 2022 order
granting a Qualcomm motion to strike and exclude the opinions of
our experts regarding the alleged infringement and validity issues.
We intend to appeal both of these decisions. See ParkerVision v. Qualcomm (Middle District of
Florida) included in Note 12 for a complete discussion of
these legal proceedings.
In
February 2022, our two patent infringement cases against Intel in
the Western District of Texas were reconfigured whereby the first
case would assert an aggregate of six patents against Intel
cellular products and the second case would assert the same six
patents along with a seventh patent against Intel WiFi and
Bluetooth products. As a result of the restructuring of the cases,
the trial date for the first Intel case was moved from June 2022 to
October 24, 2022. In March 2022, as a result of discovery delays,
the trial date was moved to a start date of December 5, 2022. The
second case against Intel is currently scheduled for trial
commencing in May 2023, however that date may change in lieu of the
revised schedule in the first Intel case. See ParkerVision v. Intel (Western District of
Texas) and ParkerVision v.
Intel II (Western District of Texas) included in Note 12 for
a complete discussion of these legal proceedings.
In
January 2022, the Patent Trial and Appeal Board
(“PTAB”) issued its final decisions on two Inter Partes Reviews
(“IPRs”) filed by Intel against two of the patents
asserted in the ParkerVision v. Intel infringement cases. The PTAB
ruled in our favor with respect to the seven challenged claims of
one of the two patents and ruled in Intel’s favor with
respect to the one challenged claim of the second patent. We have
one additional IPR filed by Intel against a patent asserted in our
second case, and the PTAB is expected to issue its final decision
in July 2022. Refer to Intel v.
ParkerVision (PTAB) included in Note 12 for a complete
discussion of these IPR proceedings.
Item 9. Changes in and Disagreements with Accountants on Accounting
and Financial Disclosure.
None.
Item 9A. Controls and Procedures.
Evaluation of Disclosure Controls and Procedures
Under
Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) of the Exchange Act,
“disclosure controls and procedures” are controls and
other procedures that are designed to
ensure that the information we are required to disclose in reports
that we file or submit under the Exchange Act is recorded,
processed, summarized and reported within the time periods
specified under the rules and forms of the SEC. Disclosure controls
and procedures include, without limitation, controls and procedures
designed to ensure that such information is accumulated and
communicated to our management, including our chief executive
officer and our chief financial officer, as appropriate to allow
timely decisions regarding required disclosures. Our
management, with the participation of our chief executive officer
and our chief financial officer, has evaluated the effectiveness of
our disclosure controls and procedures as of December 31,
2021. Based on such evaluation, our chief executive officer and our
chief financial officer have concluded that as of December 31,
2021, our disclosure controls and procedures were
effective.
Management’s Report on Internal Control over Financial
Reporting
Our
management is responsible for establishing and maintaining adequate
internal control over financial reporting and for the assessment of
the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting.
Under Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f) of the Exchange Act,
“internal control over financial reporting’’ is
defined as a process designed by, or under the supervision of, our
chief executive officer and our chief financial officer, and
effected by our board of directors, management and other personnel,
to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of our
financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for
external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting
principles.
Internal
control over financial reporting includes policies and procedures
that pertain to the maintenance of records, that in reasonable
detail, accurately and fairly reflect our transactions and our
dispositions of assets; provide reasonable assurance that
transactions are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of our
financial statements in accordance with generally accepted
accounting; provide reasonable assurance that receipts and
expenditures of the Company are made only in accordance with
authorizations of management and directors; and provide reasonable
assurance regarding the prevention or the timely detection of the
unauthorized acquisition, use or disposition of the Company’s
assets that could have a material effect on our financial
statements. Because of its inherent limitations, internal control
over financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements.
Also, projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future
periods are subject to the risk that controls may become inadequate
because of changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance
with the policies and procedures may deteriorate.
Management,
with the participation of our chief executive officer and our chief
financial officer, conducted an evaluation of the effectiveness of
our internal control over financial reporting as of
December 31, 2021 using the criteria established in
Internal Control—Integrated
Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring
Organizations of the Treadway Commission in 2013. Based on this
evaluation, management concluded that our internal control over
financial reporting was effective as of December 31,
2021.
Changes in Internal Control over Financial Reporting
There
were no changes in our internal control over financial reporting
during the fiscal quarter ended December 31, 2021 that
materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect,
our internal control over financial reporting.
Item 9B. Other Information.
In accordance with and satisfaction of the requirements of Form
8-K, we include the following disclosure:
On March 29, 2022, we issued a press release announcing our results
of operations and financial condition for the year ended
December 31, 2021. The press release is attached
hereto as Exhibit 99.1.
The foregoing information, including
the exhibit related thereto, is furnished in response to Item 2.02
of Form 8-K and shall not be deemed “filed” for
purposes of Section 18 of the Exchange Act, nor shall it be deemed
incorporated by reference in any disclosure document of the
Registrant, except as shall be expressly set forth by specific
reference in such document.
Item 9C. Disclosure Regarding
Foreign Jurisdiction that Prevents Inspections.
Not
applicable.
PART III
Item 10. Directors, Executive Officers and Corporate
Governance.
Directors
Our
Board is divided into three classes with only one class of
directors typically being elected in each year and each class
serving a three-year term. Our current directors, including their
backgrounds and qualifications are as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Name
|
|
Age
|
|
Position
with the Company
|
|
Frank
N. Newman
|
|
79
|
|
Class
II Director, Audit Committee Member
|
|
Jeffrey
L. Parker
|
|
65
|
|
Class I
Director, Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive
Officer
|
|
Paul A.
Rosenbaum
|
|
79
|
|
Class
III Director, Audit Committee Chair
|
|
Robert
G. Sterne
|
|
70
|
|
Class
III Director
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Frank N. Newman
Frank
Newman has been a director of ours since December 2016 and a member
of our audit committee since April 2020. Mr. Newman has been the
chief executive officer and co-founder of PathGuard, Inc. (or its
predecessors), a company offering hardware-based cybersecurity,
since 2015. From 2011 until December 2018, Mr. Newman served as
chairman of Promontory Financial Group China Ltd., an advisory
group for financial institutions and corporations in China. From
2005 to 2010, he served as chairman and chief executive officer of
Shenzhen Development Bank, a national bank in China. Prior to 2005,
Mr. Newman served as chairman, president, and chief executive
officer of Bankers Trust and chief financial officer of Bank of
America and Wells Fargo Bank. Mr. Newman served as Deputy Secretary
of the U.S. Treasury from 1994 to 1995 and as Under Secretary of
Domestic Finance from 1993 to 1994. He has authored two books and
several articles on economic matters, published in the U.S.,
mainland China, and Hong Kong. Mr. Newman has served as director of
Aspirational Consumer Lifestyle Corp (NYSE: ASPL), a special
purpose acquisition company, since September 2020. He also serves
as audit committee chair and a member of the compensation committee
for ASPL. Mr. Newman has previously served as a director for major
public companies in the U.S., United Kingdom, and China, and as a
member of the Board of Trustees of Carnegie Hall. He earned his BA,
magna cum laude, in economics at Harvard. Mr. Newman brings a
substantial knowledge of international banking and business
relationships to the Board. His financial background adds an
important expertise to the Board with regard to financing future
business opportunities.
Jeffrey L. Parker
Jeffrey
Parker has been the Chairman of our Board and our Chief Executive
Officer since our inception in August 1989 and was our president
from April 1993 to June 1998. From March 1983 to August 1989, Mr.
Parker served as executive vice president for Parker Electronics,
Inc., a joint venture partner with Carrier Corporation performing
research, development, manufacturing, and sales and marketing for
the heating, ventilation and air conditioning industry. Mr. Parker
is a named inventor on 31 U.S. patents. Among other qualifications,
as Chief Executive Officer, Mr. Parker has relevant insight into
our operations, our industry, and related risks as well as
experience bringing disruptive technologies to market.
Paul A. Rosenbaum
Paul A.
Rosenbaum has been a director of ours since December 2016 and a
member of our audit committee since September 2018. Mr. Rosenbaum
has extensive experience as a director and executive officer for
both public and private companies in a number of industries. Since
1994, Mr. Rosenbaum has served as chief executive of SWR
Corporation, a privately-held corporation that designs, sells, and
markets specialty industrial chemicals. In September 2017, Mr.
Rosenbaum was appointed to the Board of Commissioners for the
Oregon Liquor Control Commission and has served as chairman since
March 2018. Since 2009, Mr. Rosenbaum has been a member of the
Providence St. Vincent Medical Foundation Council of Trustees, and
previously served as president of the Council. In addition, from
September 2000 until June 2009, Mr. Rosenbaum served as chairman
and chief executive officer of Rentrak Corporation
(“Rentrak”), a Nasdaq
publicly traded company that provides transactional media
measurement and analytical services to the entertainment and media
industry. From June 2009 until July 2011, Mr. Rosenbaum served in a
non-executive capacity as chairman of Rentrack. From 2007 until
2016, Mr. Rosenbaum served on the Board of Commissioners for the
Port of Portland, including as vice chairman from 2012 to 2016. Mr.
Rosenbaum was chief partner in the Rosenbaum Law Center from 1978
to 2000 and served in the Michigan Legislature from 1972 to 1978,
during which time he chaired the Michigan House Judiciary
Committee, was legal counsel to the Speaker of the House of the
state of Michigan and wrote and sponsored the Michigan
Administrative Procedures Act. Additionally, Mr. Rosenbaum served
on the National Conference of Commissioners on Uniform State Laws,
as vice chairman of the Criminal Justice and Consumer Affairs
Committee of the National Conference of State Legislatures, and on
a committee of the Michigan Supreme Court responsible for reviewing
local court rules. Among other
qualifications, Mr. Rosenbaum has extensive experience as a
director and executive officer of a publicly held corporation and
has relevant insights into operations and our litigation
strategies.
Robert G. Sterne
Robert
Sterne has been a director of ours since September 2006 and also
served as a director of ours from February 2000 to June 2003. Since
1978, Mr. Sterne has been a partner of the law firm of Sterne,
Kessler, Goldstein & Fox PLLC, specializing in patent and other
intellectual property law. Mr. Sterne provides legal services to us
as one of our patent and intellectual property attorneys. Mr.
Sterne has co-authored numerous publications related to patent
litigation strategies. He has received multiple awards for
contributions to intellectual property law including Law
360’s 2016 Top 25 Icons of IP and the Financial Times 2015
Top 10 Legal Innovators in North America. Among other
qualifications, Mr. Sterne has an in-depth knowledge of our
intellectual property portfolio and patent strategies and is
considered a leader in best practices and board responsibilities
concerning intellectual property.
Information About Our Executive Officers
Our
current executive officers are as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Name
|
|
Age
|
|
Position
with the Company
|
|
Jeffrey
Parker
|
|
65
|
|
Chairman
of the Board and Chief Executive Officer
(“CEO”)
|
|
Cynthia
French
|
|
55
|
|
Chief
Financial Officer and Corporate Secretary
(“CFO”)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The
background for Mr. Jeffrey Parker is included above under the
heading “Directors”.
Cynthia French (formerly Poehlman)
Cynthia
French has been our chief financial officer since June 2004 and our
corporate secretary since August 2007. From March 1994 to June
2004, Ms. French was our controller and our chief accounting
officer. Ms. French has been a certified public accountant in the
state of Florida since 1989.
Former Executive Officers
Messrs.
David Sorrells and Gregory Rawlins both served as our Chief
Technology Officers (“CTO”) through March 2020,
at which time, given our reduced scope of operations, in particular
our research and development activities, our Board determined to
eliminate the Chief Technology Officer role. Both Mr. Sorrells and
Mr. Rawlins remain employed by us in technical support
roles.
Family Relationships
There
are no family relationships among our officers or
directors.
Delinquent Section 16(a) Reports
Section
16(a) of the Exchange Act requires our officers, directors and
persons who beneficially own more than ten percent of our common
stock to file reports of ownership and changes in ownership with
the SEC. Based solely upon a review of such forms and written
representations received by the Company from certain reporting
persons, we believe that during the year ended December 31, 2021
all Section 16(a) filing requirements were complied with in a
timely manner.
Code of Ethics
The
Board has adopted a code of ethics applicable to all of our
directors, officers and employees, including our chief executive
officer and our chief financial and accounting officer, that is
designed to deter wrongdoing and to promote honest and ethical
conduct, full, fair, accurate, timely and understandable disclosure
in reports that we file or submit to the SEC and in our other
public communications, compliance with applicable government laws,
rules and regulations, prompt internal reporting of violations of
the code to an appropriate person designated in the code and
accountability for adherence to the code. A copy of the code of
ethics may be found on our website at
www.parkervision.com.
Shareholder Nominations
There
have been no material changes to the procedures by which security
holders may recommend nominees to our Board.
Audit Committee and Financial Expert
Messrs. Paul Rosenbaum and Frank Newman serve as the members of our
audit committee. Our audit committee is governed by a
Board-approved charter which, among other things, establishes the
audit committee’s membership requirements and its powers and
responsibilities. Our Board has determined that Mr. Rosenbaum and
Mr. Newman are audit committee financial experts within the meaning
of the rules and regulations of the SEC.
Item 11. Executive Compensation.
Summary Compensation Table
The
following table summarizes the total compensation of each of our
“named executive officers” as defined in Item 402(m) of
Regulation S-K (the “Executives”) for the
fiscal years ended December 31, 2021 and 2020. Given the complexity
of disclosure requirements concerning executive compensation, and
in particular with respect to the standards of financial accounting
and reporting related to equity compensation, there is a difference
between the compensation that is reported in this table versus that
which is actually paid to and received by the Executives. The
amounts in the Summary Compensation Table that reflect the full
grant date fair value of an equity award, do not necessarily
correspond to the actual value that has been realized or will be
realized in the future with respect to these awards.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(a)
|
(b)
|
|
(c)
|
|
(d)
|
|
(e)
|
|
(f)
|
|
(g)
|
|
(h)
|
||||||
|
Name
and Principal Position
|
Year
|
|
Salary($)
|
|
Bonus
($)
|
|
Stock
Awards($)(2)
|
|
Option
Awards($)(2)
|
|
All
Other($)
|
|
Total($)
|
||||||
|
Jeffrey
Parker, CEO
|
2021
|
|
$
|
260,000
|
|
$
|
-
|
|
$
|
-
|
|
$
|
3,640,000
|
|
$
|
24,000
|
3
|
$
|
3,924,000
|
|
|
2020
|
|
|
270,000
|
1
|
|
-
|
|
|
99,000
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
24,923
|
3
|
|
393,923
|
|
Cynthia
French, CFO
|
2021
|
|
|
180,000
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
455,000
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
635,000
|
|
|
2020
|
|
|
186,923
|
1
|
|
-
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
42,750
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
229,673
|
|
David
Sorrells, Former CTO 4
|
2020
|
|
|
176,150
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
49,500
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
225,650
|
|
Gregory
Rawlins, Former CTO Heathrow 4
|
2020
|
|
|
207,692
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
49,500
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
257,192
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1.
There were 27
biweekly pay periods in 2020 compared to 26 in 2021 resulting in an
decrease in reported base salaries.
2.
The amounts
represented in columns (e) and (f) represents the full grant date
fair value of equity awards in accordance with ASC 718. Refer to
Note 14 to the consolidated financial statements for the year ended
December 31, 2021 included in Item 8 for the assumptions made in
the valuation of equity awards.
3.
Represents an
automobile allowance in the amount of $24,000, paid biweekly. The
additional amount in 2020 is the result of 27 pay periods in 2020
compared to 26 in 2021.
4.
The CTO roles were
eliminated in March 2020 by our Board.
In
February 2020, our Board approved equity awards under our 2019 Long
Term Incentive Plan (the “2019 Plan”) including
300,000 RSUs to Mr. Parker, 150,000 RSUs to each of Messrs. Rawlins
and Sorrells and 150,000 share options at an exercise price of
$0.33 per share to Ms. French. These awards vest over five quarters
through May 2021. These awards were, in part, in consideration of
continuing voluntary salary reductions by our
Executives.
In
January 2021, the Board approved equity awards under the 2019 Plan
including nonqualified stock options for the purchase of up to
8,000,000 shares at an exercise price of $0.54 per share to Mr.
Parker and nonqualified stock options for the purchase of up to
1,000,000 shares at an exercise price of $0.54 to Ms. French. These
options vest over eight equal quarterly increments commencing March
31, 2021 and expiring on January 11, 2026. These awards were
awarded as long-term incentive to our executives and took into
consideration the longevity of their tenure with us, the
continuation of their base compensation at a 20% reduced pay rate
since 2018 and in recognition of the key role each holds in the
organization.
We do
not have employment agreements with any of our Executives. We have
non-compete arrangements in place with all of our employees,
including our Executives, that impose post-termination restrictions
on (i) employment or consultation with competing companies or
customers, (ii) recruiting or hiring employees for a competing
company, and (iii) soliciting or accepting business from our
customers. We also have a tax-qualified defined contribution 401(k)
plan for all of our employees, including our Executives. We did not
make any employer contributions to the 401(k) plan in 2021 or
2020.
Outstanding Equity Awards at Fiscal Year End
The
following table summarizes information concerning the outstanding
equity awards, including unexercised options, unvested stock and
equity incentive awards, as of December 31, 2021 for each of our
Executives:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Option
Awards
|
|||||||
|
|
|
Number ofsecuritiesunderlyingunexercisedoptions(#)exercisable
|
|
Number ofsecuritiesunderlyingunexercisedoptions(#)unexercisable
|
OptionExercisePrice($)
|
|
OptionExpirationDate
|
|
|
|
Name
|
|
(a)
|
|
(b)
|
(c)
|
|
(d)
|
|
|
|
Jeffrey
Parker
|
|
20,000
|
1
|
-
|
|
1.98
|
|
8/15/2024
|
|
|
|
|
2,680,000
|
2, 5
|
-
|
|
0.17
|
|
8/7/2026
|
|
|
|
|
4,000,000
|
3
|
4,000,000
|
3
|
0.54
|
|
1/11/2026
|
|
|
Cynthia
French
|
|
20,000
|
1
|
-
|
|
1.98
|
|
8/15/2024
|
|
|
|
|
877,150
|
2
|
-
|
|
0.17
|
|
8/7/2026
|
|
|
|
|
150,000
|
4
|
-
|
|
0.33
|
|
2/9/2027
|
|
|
|
|
500,000
|
3
|
500,000
|
3
|
0.54
|
|
1/11/2026
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1
Options vested over
four equal quarterly periods from August 31, 2017 to May 31,
2018.
2
Options vested over
eight equal quarterly periods from September 1, 2019 to June 1,
2021.
3
Options vest over
eight equal quarterly periods beginning March 31, 2021
4
Options vested 50%
on grant date and the remaining 50% over four equal quarterly
periods from May 9, 2020 to May 9, 2021
5
Number of
securities underlying exercisable options is net of 3.3 million
share options gifted for no consideration by Mr. Parker in January
2021.
Director Compensation
Since
September 2018, the Board compensation program has consisted
exclusively of equity-based compensation, generally awarded
annually, in the form of nonqualified stock options, RSUs, or a
combination thereof. Unvested director equity compensation awards
are forfeited if the director resigns or is removed from the Board
for cause prior to the vesting date. Nonqualified stock options
generally expire seven year from grant date.
In
February 2020, our non-employee directors were awarded, at their
option, either 150,000 nonqualified stock options at an exercise
price of $0.33 per share or an RSU for 150,000 shares. Messrs.
Rosenbaum and Sterne opted to receive options, each with a
grant-date fair value of approximately $43,000. Mr. Newman opted to
receive a RSU with a grant date fair value of approximately
$50,000. Each of the awards vest 50% upon grant with the remaining
portion vesting in four equal quarterly installments from May 2020
through February 2021.
In
addition, in February 2020, Mr. Sterne was awarded an immediately
vested nonqualified stock option for the purchase of 100,000 shares
at $0.33 per share, with an estimated grant-date fair value of
approximately $29,000, as partial payment of accrued and unpaid
fees for board and committee service prior to 2019. Mr. Sterne
waived approximately $70,000 in additional accrued and unpaid
fees.
In
January 2021, each of our non-employee directors were awarded
380,000 nonqualified stock options at an exercise price of $0.54
per share. These options vest over eight equal quarterly increments
commencing March 31, 2021 and expiring on January 11,
2026.
We
reimburse our non-employee directors for their reasonable expenses
incurred in attending meetings where applicable and we encourage
participation in relevant educational programs for which we
reimburse all or a portion of the costs incurred for these
purposes.
Directors
who are also our employees are not compensated for serving on our
Board. Information regarding compensation otherwise received by our
directors who are also named executive officers is provided under
“Executive Compensation.”
The
following table summarizes the compensation of our non-employee
directors for the year ended December 31, 2021.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Name
|
|
Stock
Awards($)
|
|
Option
Awards($)
1
|
|
Total($)
|
|||
|
(a)
|
|
(b)
|
|
(c)
|
|
(d)
|
|||
|
Frank
Newman 2
|
|
$
|
-
|
|
$
|
172,900
|
|
$
|
172,900
|
|
Paul
Rosenbaum 3
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
172,900
|
|
|
172,900
|
|
Robert
Sterne 4
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
172,900
|
|
|
172,900
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1.
The amounts
represented in columns (b) and (c) represent the full grant date
fair value of share-based awards in accordance with ASC
718. Refer to Note 14 of the consolidated financial
statements included in Item 8 for the assumptions made in the
valuation of stock awards.
2.
At December 31,
2021, Mr. Newman has an aggregate of 1,355,000 nonqualified stock
options outstanding, of which 1,165,000 are
exercisable.
3.
At December 31,
2021, Mr. Rosenbaum has an aggregate of 1,505,000 nonqualified
stock options outstanding, of which 1,315,000 are
exercisable.
4.
At December 31,
2021, Mr. Sterne has 1,651,735 nonqualified stock options
outstanding, of which 1,461,735 are exercisable.
Item 12. Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and
Management and Related Stockholder Matters.
Equity Compensation Plan Information
The
following table gives information as of December 31, 2021 about
shares of our common stock authorized for issuance under all of our
equity compensation plans (in thousands, except for per share
amounts):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Plan
Category
|
Number of securities tobe issued upon exerciseof outstanding options,warrants and rights
|
Weighted-averageexercise price ofoutstanding options,warrants and rights
|
Number of securitiesremaining available forfuture issuance underequity compensation plans(excluding securitiesreflected in column (a))
|
|
|
(a)
|
(b)
|
(c)
|
|
Equity
compensation plans approved by security holders 1,3
|
1,204
|
$0.94
|
82
|
|
Equity
compensation plans not approved by security holders 2,3
|
22,011
|
0.39
|
1,898
|
|
Total
|
23,215
|
|
1,980
|
|
|
|
|
|
1.
Includes the 2008
Plan and the 2011 Plan.
2.
Includes the 2019
Plan.
3.
The types of awards
that may be issued under each of these plans is discussed more
fully in Note 14 to our consolidated financial statements included
in Item 8.
Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Holders
The
following table sets forth certain information as of March 15, 2022
with respect to the stock ownership of (i) those persons or groups
who beneficially own more than 5% of our common stock, (ii) each of
our directors, (iii) each of our executive officers, and (iv) all
of our directors and executive officers as a group (based upon
information furnished by those persons).
As of
March 15, 2022, 77,766,448 shares of our common stock were issued
and outstanding.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Name of
Beneficial Owner
|
|
Amount andNature ofBeneficialOwnership
|
|
Percentof Class1
|
|
>5% HOLDERS (EXCLUDING EXECUTIVE OFFICERS AND
DIRECTORS)
|
|
|
|
|
|
GEM
Partners, LP
|
|
8,156,616
|
2
|
9.99%
|
|
Thomas
Staz Revocable Trust
|
|
4,017,169
|
3
|
5.17%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
EXECUTIVE OFFICERS AND DIRECTORS
|
|
|
|
|
|
Jeffrey
Parker 10
|
|
7,990,583
|
4
|
9.35%
|
|
Cynthia
French 10
|
|
1,690,743
|
5
|
2.13%
|
|
Frank
Newman 10
|
|
1,395,600
|
6
|
1.77%
|
|
Paul
Rosenbaum 10
|
|
2,039,884
|
7
|
2.57%
|
|
Robert
Sterne 10
|
|
1,557,500
|
8
|
1.96%
|
|
All
directors and executive officers as a group (5
persons)
|
|
14,674,310
|
9
|
16.05%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1
Percentage is
calculated based on all outstanding shares of common stock plus,
for each person or group, any shares of common stock that the
person or the group has the right to acquire within 60 days
pursuant to options, warrants, conversion privileges or other
rights. Unless otherwise indicated, each person or group has sole
voting and dispositive power over all such shares of common
stock.
2
GEM
Investment Advisors, LLC (“GEM Advisors”) is the
general partner of GEM Partners LP (“GEM”) and Flat
Rock Partners LP (“FlatRock”). Mr. Daniel Lewis is the
controlling person of GEM Advisors. GEM Advisors and Mr. Lewis have
shared voting and dispositive power. Beneficial ownership includes
(i) 4,899 shares held by FlatRock, (ii) 6,600 shares held by Mr.
Lewis, (iii) 4,272,796 shares held by GEM, and (iv)
3,886,923 shares underlying convertible notes held by GEM.
Excludes 5,440,000 shares underlying convertible notes held by
GEM that are not convertible within 60 days due to exercise
limitations. The principal business address of GEM Advisors,
FlatRock, and Mr. Lewis is 100 State Street, Suite 2B, Teaneck, NJ
07666. Information derived from a Schedule 13G/A filed by GEM
Advisors on March 9, 2021.
3
Thomas Staz is the
trustee of the Thomas Staz Revocable Trust. The principal business
address of the Thomas Staz Revocable Trust is 1221 Brickell Avenue,
Suite 2660, Miami, Florida 33131. Information derived from a
Schedule 13D filed by Thomas Staz Revocable Trust on April 7,
2021.
4
Includes 7,680,000
shares of common stock issuable upon currently exercisable options,
193,324 shares held by Mr. Parker directly, and 117,259 shares held
by Jeffrey Parker and Deborah Parker Joint Tenants in Common, over
which Mr. Parker has shared voting and dispositive power. Excludes
3,000,000 shares of common stock
issuable upon options that may become exercisable in the
future.
5
Includes 1,665,550
shares of common stock issuable upon currently exercisable options
and excludes 375,000 shares of common
stock issuable upon options that may become exercisable in
the future.
6
Includes 1,212,500
shares of common stock issuable upon currently exercisable options
and excludes 142,500 shares of common
stock issuable upon options that may become exercisable in
the future.
7
Includes 1,362,500
shares of common stock issuable upon currently exercisable options
and 250,000 shares of common stock issuable upon conversion of
convertible notes. Excludes 142,500 shares of common stock issuable
upon options that may become exercisable in the
future.
8
Includes 1,509,235
shares of common stock issuable upon currently exercisable options
and excludes 142,500 shares of common stock issuable upon options
that may become exercisable in the future.
9
Includes 13,429,785
shares of common stock issuable upon currently exercisable options
and 250,000 shares of common stock issuable upon conversion of
convertible notes held by directors and officers and excludes
3,802,500 shares of common stock issuable upon options that may
become exercisable in the future (see notes 4, 5, 6, 7 and 8
above).
10
The person’s
address is 4446-1A Hendricks Avenue, Suite 354, Jacksonville,
Florida 32207.
Item 13. Certain Relationships and Related Transactions and
Director Independence.
Related Party Transactions
We paid
approximately $97,000 and $11,000 in 2021 and 2020, respectively
for patent-related legal services to SKGF, of which Robert Sterne
is a partner. In addition, we paid approximately $130,000 and
$110,000 in 2021 and 2020, respectively, for principal and interest
on an unsecured note payable to SKGF. The note was issued in 2016
to convert outstanding unpaid legal fees to an unsecured promissory
note. The note has been amended multiple times to defer principal
payments. The note, as amended, allows for interest at 4% per
annum, monthly installments of $10,000 per month beginning January
2020, with a final balloon payment due on April 30, 2023. At
December 31, 2021, the outstanding balance of the note, including
unpaid interest is approximately $703,000.
In
January 2020, we issued 500,000 in unregistered shares of our
common stock as an in-kind payment of approximately $0.08 million
in outstanding amounts payable to Stacie Wilf, sister to Jeffrey
Parker.
Director Independence
We
follow the rules of Nasdaq in determining if a director is
independent. The Board also consults with our counsel to ensure
that the Board’s determination is consistent with those rules
and all relevant securities and other laws and regulations
regarding the independence of directors. The Board has
affirmatively determined that Messrs. Newman, Rosenbaum, and Sterne
are independent directors.
Item 14. Principal Accountant Fees and Services.
The
firm of MSL, P.A. acts as our principal accountants. From April
2018 to September 2019, the firm of BDO USA, LLP acted as our
principal accountants (“Prior Accountants”). The
following is a summary of fees paid to the principal accountants
and Prior Accountants for services rendered.
Audit Fees. For the years ended December 31, 2021 and 2020,
the aggregate fees billed by our principal accountants for
professional services rendered for the audit of our annual
financial statements, the review of our financial statements
included in our quarterly reports, and services provided in
connection with regulatory filings were approximately $120,000 and
$148,300, respectively. In addition, for the year ended December
31, 2020, the aggregate fees billed by our Prior Accountants for
professional services rendered in connection with services provided
in connection with regulatory filings were approximately
$70,000.
Audit Related Fees. For the years ended December 31, 2021
and 2020, there were no fees billed for professional services by
our principal accountants or Prior Accountants for assurance and
related services.
Tax Fees. For the years ended December 31, 2021 and 2020,
there were no fees billed for professional services rendered by our
principal accountants for tax compliance, tax advice or tax
planning.
All Other Fees. For the years ended December 31, 2021 and
2020, there were no fees billed for other professional services by
our principal accountants.
All the
services discussed above were approved by our audit committee. The
audit committee pre-approves the services to be provided by our
principal accountants, including the scope of the annual audit and
non-audit services to be performed by the principal accountants and
the principal accountants’ audit and non-audit
fees.
PART IV
Item 15. Exhibits and Financial Statement Schedules.
(a)
Documents filed as part of this report:
(1)
Financial statements:
Consolidated
Balance Sheets as of December 31, 2021 and 2020
Consolidated
Statements of Comprehensive Loss for the years ended
December 31, 2021 and 2020
Consolidated
Statements of Shareholders’ Deficit for the years ended
December 31, 2021 and 2020
Consolidated
Statements of Cash Flows for the years ended December 31, 2021
and 2020
Notes
to Consolidated Financial Statements for the years ended
December 31, 2021 and 2020
(2)
Financial statement schedules:
Not
applicable.
(3)
Exhibits.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
ExhibitNumber
|
|
Description
|
|
|
|
|
|
3.1
|
|
|
|
3.2
|
|
|
|
3.3
|
|
|
|
3.4
|
|
|
|
3.5
|
|
|
|
3.6
|
|
|
|
3.7
|
|
|
|
3.8
|
|
|
|
3.9
|
|
Articles of Amendment to the Amended and Restated Articles of
Incorporation (incorporated by reference from Exhibit 3.1 of
Current Report on Form 8-K filed September 30, 2021)
|
|
3.10
|
|
|
|
4.1
|
|
|
|
4.2
|
|
|
|
4.3
|
|
|
|
4.5
|
|
|
|
4.6
|
|
|
|
4.7
|
|
Description of Registered Securities *
|
|
10.1
|
|
|
|
10.2
|
|
|
|
10.3
|
|
|
|
10.4
|
|
|
|
10.5
|
|
|
|
10.6
|
|
|
|
10.7
|
|
|
|
10.8
|
|
|
|
10.9
|
|
|
|
10.10
|
|
|
|
10.11
|
|
|
|
10.12
|
|
|
|
10.13
|
|
|
|
10.14
|
|
|
|
10.15
|
|
|
|
10.16
|
|
|
|
10.17
|
|
|
|
10.18
|
|
|
|
10.19
|
|
|
|
10.20
|
|
|
|
10.21
|
|
|
|
10.22
|
|
|
|
10.23
|
|
|
|
10.24
|
|
|
|
10.25
|
|
|
|
10.26
|
|
|
|
10.27
|
|
|
|
10.28
|
|
|
|
10.29
|
|
|
|
10.30
|
|
2019 Long-term Incentive Plan dated August 9, 2019, as
amended (incorporated by
reference from Exhibit 10.39 of Annual Report on Form 10-K filed
March 31, 2021) **
|
|
10.31
|
|
|
|
10.32
|
|
|
|
10.33
|
|
|
|
10.34
|
|
|
|
10.35
|
|
|
|
10.36
|
|
|
|
10.37
|
|
|
|
10.38
|
|
|
|
10.39
|
|
|
|
10.40
|
|
|
|
10.41
|
|
|
|
10.42
|
|
|
|
10.43
|
|
|
|
10.44
|
|
|
|
10.45
|
|
|
|
10.46
|
|
|
|
10.47
|
|
|
|
10.48
|
|
|
|
10.49
|
|
|
|
10.50
|
|
|
|
10.51
|
|
|
|
10.52
|
|
|
|
10.53
|
|
|
|
10.54
|
|
|
|
10.55
|
|
|
|
10.56
|
|
|
|
10.57
|
|
|
|
10.58
|
|
Form of Subscription Agreement between Registrant and Accredited
Investors dated March 29, 2021 (incorporated by reference from Exhibit 10.84 of
Annual Report on Form 10-K filed March 31,
2021)
|
|
10.59
|
|
Form of Registration Rights Agreement between Registrant and
Accredited Investors dated March 29, 2021 (incorporated by reference from Exhibit 10.85 of
Annual Report on Form 10-K filed March 31,
2021)
|
|
10.60
|
|
Form of Warrant Agreement between Registrant and Accredited
Investors dated March 29, 2021 (incorporated by reference from Exhibit 10.86 of
Annual Report on Form 10-K filed March 31,
2021)
|
|
10.61
|
|
List of Accredited Investors to March 29, 2021 Subscription
Agreement (incorporated by
reference from Exhibit 10.87 of Annual Report on Form 10-K filed
March 31, 2021)*
|
|
10.62
|
|
Form of Securities Purchase Agreement between Registrant and
Accredited Investor dated December 14, 2021 (incorporated by
reference from Exhibit 10.1 of Current Report on Form 8-K filed
December 16, 2021)
|
|
10.63
|
|
Form of Registration Rights Agreement between Registrant and
Accredited Investor dated December 14, 2021 (incorporated by
reference from Exhibit 10.2 of Current Report on Form 8-K filed
December 16, 2021)
|
|
10.64
|
|
Form of Warrant Agreement between Registrant and Accredited
Investor dated December 14, 2021 (incorporated by reference from
Exhibit 10.3 of Current Report on Form 8-K filed December 16,
2021)
|
|
21.1
|
|
|
|
23.1
|
|
Consent of MSL, P.A. *
|
|
31.1
|
|
Rule 13a-14 and 15d-14 Certification of Jeffrey L. Parker
*
|
|
31.2
|
|
Rule 13a-14 and 15d-14 Certification of Cynthia L. French
*
|
|
32.1
|
|
Section 1350 Certification of Jeffrey L. Parker and Cynthia L.
French *
|
|
99.1
|
|
Earnings Press Release *
|
|
|
|
|
|
101.INS
|
|
XBRL Instance Document*
|
|
101.SCH
|
|
XBRL Taxonomy Extension Schema*
|
|
101.CAL
|
|
XBRL Taxonomy Extension Calculation Linkbase*
|
|
101.DEF
|
|
XBRL Taxonomy Extension Definition Linkbase*
|
|
101.LAB
|
|
XBRL Taxonomy Extension Label Linkbase*
|
|
101.PRE
|
|
XBRL Taxonomy Extension Presentation Linkbase*
|
* Filed
herewith
**
Management contract or compensatory plan or
arrangement.
Item 16. Form 10-K Summary
None.
SIGNATURES
Pursuant
to the requirements of Section 13 of the Exchange Act, the
registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf
by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.
|
|
|
|
|
Date:
March 29, 2022
|
|
|
|
|
PARKERVISION, INC.
|
|
|
|
By: /s/
Jeffrey L. Parker
|
|
|
|
Jeffrey
L. Parker
|
|
|
|
Chief
Executive Officer
|
|
Pursuant
to the requirements of the Exchange Act, this report has been
signed below by the following persons on behalf of the registrant
and in the capacities and on the dates indicated.
|
|
|
|
|
Signature
|
Title
|
Date
|
|
|
|
|
|
By: /s/
Jeffrey L. Parker
|
Chief
Executive Officer and
|
March
29, 2022
|
|
Jeffrey
L. Parker
|
Chairman
of the Board (Principal
|
|
|
|
Executive
Officer)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
By: /s/
Cynthia L. French
|
Chief
Financial Officer (Principal
|
March
29, 2022
|
|
Cynthia
L. French
|
Financial
Officer and Principal
|
|
|
|
Accounting
Officer) and Corporate Secretary
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
By: /s/
Frank N. Newman
|
Director
|
March
29, 2022
|
|
Frank
N. Newman
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
By: /s/
Paul A. Rosenbaum
|
Director
|
March
29, 2022
|
|
Paul A.
Rosenbaum
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
By: /s/
Robert G. Sterne
|
Director
|
March
29, 2022
|
|
Robert
G. Sterne
|
|
|
Serious News for Serious Traders! Try StreetInsider.com Premium Free!
You May Also Be Interested In
- Global Nexa Initiative Launches to Support Climate and Health Innovations
- Growing Interest in Liver Wellness Leads Consumers to Explore PureHealth Research Liver Health Supplements
- Beyond the IGV Swing Lies the Rise of AI Application Leaders Like Tec-Do
Create E-mail Alert Related Categories
SEC FilingsSign up for StreetInsider Free!
Receive full access to all new and archived articles, unlimited portfolio tracking, e-mail alerts, custom newswires and RSS feeds - and more!



Tweet
Share