Form 40-APP/A TCW Steel City Perpetual
No. 812-15661
U.S. SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
In the Matter of the Application of:
TCW STEEL CITY PERPETUAL LEVERED FUND LP; TCW STEEL CITY UNLEVERED PRIVATE FUND LP; TCW PT MANAGEMENT COMPANY LLC
515 South Flower Street
Los Angeles, California 90071
PNC STEEL CITY ADVISORS, LLC
1 N. Franklin St. – Suite 2500
Chicago, Illinois 60606
AMENDMENT NO. 1 TO THE APPLICATION FOR AN ORDER PURSUANT TO SECTIONS 17(d) AND 57(i) OF THE INVESTMENT COMPANY ACT OF 1940 AND RULE 17d-1
UNDER THE ACT TO PERMIT CERTAIN JOINT TRANSACTIONS OTHERWISE PROHIBITED BY SECTIONS 17(d) AND 57(a)(4) OF THE ACT AND RULE 17d-1 UNDER THE ACT
All Communications, Notices and Orders to:
|
Laura Long
General Counsel The PNC Financial Services Group, Inc. The Tower at PNC, 300 Fifth Avenue
Pittsburgh, PA 15222
(412) 762-4283
Kevin Finch
Senior Vice President
The TCW Group, Inc.
515 South Flower Street
Los Angeles, California 90071
(213) 244-0000
|
Copies to:
Richard Horowitz, Esq.
Cynthia Beyea, Esq.
Dechert LLP
1095 Avenue of the Americas
New York, NY, 10036
(212) 698-3500
Vadim Avdeychik, Esq.
Clifford Chance US LLP
Two Manhattan West
375 9th Avenue
New York, New York 10001
(212) 878-8000
Page 1 of 30 sequentially numbered pages (including exhibits).
As filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on March 26, 2025
|
I.
|
Introduction
|
|
A.
|
Requested Relief and Applicants Seeking Relief
|
The following entities hereby request an order (the “Order”)
of the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (the “Commission”) pursuant to Sections 17(d) and 57(i) of the Investment Company Act of 1940, as amended (the “Act”)1, and Rule 17d-l thereunder2, authorizing certain joint transactions that otherwise would be prohibited by either or both of Sections 17(d) and 57(a)(4) of the Act as modified by the exemptive
rules adopted by the Commission under the Act:
|
•
|
TCW Steel City Perpetual Levered Fund LP (“SCPLF”), a Delaware limited partnership that
intends to convert to a closed-end management investment company that intends to elect to be regulated as a business development company (a “BDC”) under the Act;3
|
|
•
|
TCW PT Management Company LLC (“TCW”), the investment adviser to SCPLF, on behalf of
itself and its successors;4
|
|
•
|
PNC Steel City Advisors, LLC (“PNC”), the sub-adviser to SCPLF, on behalf of itself and
its successors; and
|
|
•
|
TCW Steel City Unlevered Private Fund LP, which is an entity whose investment adviser is TCW and sub-adviser is PNC and that would be an investment
company but for Section 3(c)(1) or 3(c)(7) of the Act (collectively, the “Existing Affiliated Fund” and collectively with SCPLF, TCW, and PNC, the “Applicants”).
|
In particular, the relief requested in this application (the “Application”)
would allow one or more Regulated Funds (including one or more BDC Downstream Funds) and/or one or more Affiliated Funds (each as defined below) to participate in the same investment opportunities where such participation would otherwise be
prohibited under Section 17(d) or 57(a)(4) and the rules under the Act. All existing entities that currently intend to rely on the Order have been named as Applicants and any existing or future entities that may rely on the Order in the future will
comply with the terms and conditions set forth in this Application (the “Conditions”). No Regulated Fund or Affiliated Fund that relies on this Order will rely on any other order of the
Commission authorizing co-investment transactions pursuant to Sections 17(d) and 57(i) of the Act and no entity that relies on another such order of the Commission will rely on this Order.
|
B.
|
Defined Terms
|
“Adviser” means any TCW Adviser or any PNC Adviser
(defined below).
“Affiliated Fund” means (i) the Existing
Affiliated Fund; (ii) any PNC Proprietary Account (as defined below); and (iii) any entity (x) either (A) whose investment adviser (and sub-adviser(s), if any) is a PNC Adviser or (B) whose investment adviser is a TCW Adviser and whose sub-adviser is
a PNC Adviser (y) that either (A) would be an investment company but for Section 3(c)(1), 3(c)(5)(C) or 3(c)(7) of the Act or (B) relies on Rule 3a-7 under
| 1 |
Unless otherwise indicated, all section references herein are to the Act.
|
| 2 |
Unless otherwise indicated, all rule references herein are to rules under the Act.
|
| 3 |
Section 2(a)(48) defines a BDC to be any closed-end investment company that operates for the purpose of making investments in securities described in Sections 55(a)(1) through 55(a)(3) of the
Act and makes available significant managerial assistance with respect to the issuers of such securities.
|
| 4 |
The term “successor,” as applied to each Adviser, means an entity that results from a reorganization into another jurisdiction or
change in the type of business organization.
|
2
the Act and (iii) that is not a BDC Downstream Fund, and (iv) that intends to participate in the Co-Investment Program.5
The Existing Affiliated Fund is not a BDC Downstream Fund.
“BDC” means a business development company under the
Act.6
“BDC Downstream Fund” means, with
respect to any Regulated Fund that is a BDC, an entity (i) that the BDC directly or indirectly controls, (ii) that is not controlled by any person other than the BDC (except a person that indirectly controls the entity solely because it controls
the BDC), (iii) that would be an investment company but for Section 3(c)(1) or 3(c)(7) of the Act, (iv) (x) whose investment adviser (and sub-adviser(s), if any) is a PNC Adviser or (y) whose investment adviser is a TCW Adviser and whose
sub-adviser is a PNC Adviser, (v) that is not a Wholly-Owned Investment Sub and (vi) that intends to participate in the Co-Investment Program.
“Board” means (i) with respect to a
Regulated Fund other than a BDC Downstream Fund, the board of directors (or the equivalent) of the applicable Regulated Fund and (ii) with respect to a BDC Downstream Fund, the Independent Party of the BDC Downstream Fund.
“Board-Established Criteria” means criteria that the
Board of a Regulated Fund may establish from time to time to describe the characteristics of Potential Co-Investment Transactions regarding which the Adviser to the Regulated Fund should be notified under Condition 1. The Board-Established Criteria
will be consistent with the Regulated Fund’s Objectives and Strategies (defined below). If no Board-Established Criteria are in effect, then the Regulated Fund’s Adviser will be notified of all Potential Co-Investment Transactions that fall within
the Regulated Fund’s then-current Objectives and Strategies. Board-Established Criteria will be objective and testable, meaning that they will be based on observable information, such as industry/sector of the issuer, minimum EBITDA of the issuer,
asset class of the investment opportunity or required commitment size, and not on characteristics that involve a discretionary assessment. The Adviser to the Regulated Fund may from time to time recommend criteria for the Board’s consideration, but
Board-Established Criteria will only become effective if approved by a majority of the Independent Directors (defined below). The Independent Directors of a Regulated Fund may at any time rescind, suspend or qualify their approval of any
Board-Established Criteria, though Applicants anticipate that, under normal circumstances, the Board would not modify these criteria more often than quarterly.
“Close Affiliate” means the Advisers, the Regulated Funds, the Affiliated Funds and any other
person described in Section 57(b) (after giving effect to Rule 57b-1) in respect of any Regulated Fund (treating any registered investment company or series thereof as a BDC for this purpose) except for limited partners included solely by reason of
the reference in Section 57(b) to Section 2(a)(3)(D).
| 5 |
Affiliated Funds may include funds that are ultimately structured as collateralized loan obligation funds (“CLOs”). Such CLOs
would be investment companies but for the exception provided in Section 3(c)(7) of the Act or their ability to rely on Rule 3a-7 of the Act. During the investment period of a CLO, the CLO may engage in certain transactions customary in CLO
formations with another Affiliated Fund on a secondary basis at fair market value. For purposes of the Order, any securities that were acquired by an Affiliated Fund in a particular Co-Investment Transaction that are then transferred in
such customary transactions to an Affiliated Fund that is or will become a CLO (an “Affiliated Fund CLO”) will be treated as if the Affiliated Fund CLO acquired such securities in
the Co-Investment Transaction. For the avoidance of doubt, any such transfer from an Affiliated Fund to an Affiliated Fund CLO will be treated as a Disposition and completed pursuant to terms and conditions of the Application, though
Applicants note that the Regulated Funds would be prohibited from participating in such Disposition by Section 17(a)(2) or Section 57(a)(2) of the Act, as applicable. The participation by any Affiliated Fund CLO in any such Co-Investment
Transaction will remain subject to the Order.
|
| 6 |
Section 2(a)(48) defines a BDC to be any closed-end investment company that operates for the purpose of making investments in securities described in Section 55(a)(1) through 55(a)(3) and
makes available significant managerial assistance with respect to the issuers of such securities.
|
3
“Co-Investment Program” means the proposed
co-investment program that would permit one or more Regulated Funds and/or one or more Affiliated Funds to participate in the same investment opportunities where such participation would otherwise be prohibited under Section 57(a)(4) and Rule
17d–1 by (i) co-investing with each other in securities issued by issuers in private placement transactions in which an Adviser negotiates terms in addition to price;7 and (ii) making Follow-On Investments (as defined below).
“Co-Investment Transaction” means any transaction in
which a Regulated Fund (or its Wholly-Owned Investment Sub) participated together with one or more Affiliated Funds and/or one or more other Regulated Funds in reliance on the Order.
“Disposition” means the sale, exchange or other
disposition of an interest in a security of an issuer.
“Eligible Directors” means, with respect to a
Regulated Fund and a Potential Co-Investment Transaction, the members of the Regulated Fund’s Board eligible to vote on that Potential Co-Investment Transaction under Section 57(o) of the Act (treating any registered investment company or series
thereof as a BDC for this purpose).
“Follow-On Investment” means (i) with
respect to a Regulated Fund, an additional investment in the same issuer in which the Regulated Fund is currently invested; or (ii) with respect to an Affiliated Fund, (x) an additional investment in the same issuer in which the Affiliated Fund
and at least one Regulated Fund are currently invested; or (y) an investment in an issuer in which at least one Regulated Fund is currently invested but in which the Affiliated Fund does not currently have an investment. An investment in an
issuer includes, but is not limited to, the exercise of warrants, conversion privileges or other rights to purchase securities of the issuer.
“Future Regulated Fund” means a closed-end management
investment company (i) that is registered under the Act or has elected to be regulated as a BDC, (ii) (x) whose investment adviser (and sub-adviser(s), if any) is a PNC Adviser or (y) whose investment adviser is a TCW Adviser and whose
sub-adviser is a PNC Adviser, and (iii) that intends to participate in the Co-Investment Program.
“Independent Director” means a member of the Board of
any relevant entity who is not an “interested person” as defined in Section 2(a)(19) of the Act. No Independent Director of a Regulated Fund (including any non-interested member of an Independent Party) will have a financial interest in any
Co-Investment Transaction, other than indirectly through share ownership in one or more of the Regulated Funds.
“Independent Party” means, with
respect to a BDC Downstream Fund, (i) if the BDC Downstream Fund has a board of directors (or the equivalent), the board or (ii) if the BDC Downstream Fund does not have a board of directors (or the equivalent), a transaction committee or
advisory committee of the BDC Downstream Fund.
“JT No-Action Letters” means SMC Capital, Inc.,
SEC Staff No-Action Letter (pub. avail. Sept. 5, 1995) and Massachusetts Mutual Life Insurance Company, SEC Staff No-Action Letter (pub. avail. June 7, 2000).
“Objectives and Strategies” means (i)
with respect to any Regulated Fund other than a BDC Downstream Fund, its investment objectives and strategies, as described in its most current registration statement on Form 10 or N-2, other current filings with the Commission under the
Securities Act or under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and its most current report to stockholders, and (ii) with respect to any BDC Downstream Fund, those investment objectives and strategies described in its disclosure
documents (including private placement memoranda and reports to equity holders) and organizational documents (including operating agreements).
“PNC Adviser” means PNC and any future investment adviser that
(i) controls, is controlled by, or is under common control with PNC, (ii) is registered as an investment adviser under the Investment Advisers Act of 1940, as amended (the “Advisers Act”), and (iii) is not a Regulated Fund or a subsidiary of a Regulated Fund.
| 7 |
The term “private placement transactions” means transactions in which the offer and sale of securities by the issuer are exempt from registration under the Securities Act
of 1933 (the “Securities Act”).
|
4
“PNC Proprietary
Account” means any account of a PNC Adviser or its affiliates or any company that is a direct or indirect, wholly- or majority-owned subsidiary of a PNC Adviser or its affiliates that, from time to time, will hold various financial
assets in a principal capacity and intends to participate in the proposed co-investment program.
“Potential Co-Investment Transaction” means any
investment opportunity in which a Regulated Fund (or its Wholly-Owned Investment Sub) could not participate together with one or more Affiliated Funds and/or one or more other Regulated Funds without obtaining and relying on the Order.
“Pre-Boarding Investments” are investments in an
issuer held by a Regulated Fund as well as one or more Affiliated Funds and/or one or more other Regulated Funds that were acquired prior to participating in any Co-Investment Transaction:
|
i)
|
in transactions in which the only term negotiated by or on behalf of such funds was price in reliance on one of the JT
No-Action Letters; or
|
|
ii)
|
in transactions occurring at least 90 days apart and without coordination between the Regulated Fund and any Affiliated Fund
or other Regulated Fund.
|
“Regulated Funds” means SCPLF, the Future Regulated
Funds and the BDC Downstream Funds.
“Related Party” means (i) any Close Affiliate and
(ii) in respect of matters as to which any Adviser has knowledge, any Remote Affiliate.
“Remote Affiliate” means any person described in
Section 57(e) in respect of any Regulated Fund (treating any registered investment company or series thereof as a BDC for this purpose) and any limited partner holding 5% or more of the relevant limited partner interests that would be a Close
Affiliate but for the exclusion in that definition.
“Required Majority” means a required majority, as
defined in Section 57(o) of the Act.8
“SBIC Subsidiary” means a
Wholly-Owned Investment Sub that is licensed by the Small Business Administration (the “SBA”) to operate under the Small Business Investment Act of 1958, as amended, (the “SBA Act”) as a small business investment company (an “SBIC”).
“TCW Adviser” means TCW and any future investment adviser that (i) controls, is controlled by, or is under common control with TCW, (ii) is registered as an investment adviser under the Advisers Act, and (iii) is not a
Regulated Fund or a subsidiary of a Regulated Fund.
“Tradable Security” means a security that meets the
following criteria at the time of Disposition:
|
i)
|
it trades on a national securities exchange or designated offshore securities market as defined in rule 902(b) under the
Securities Act;
|
|
ii)
|
it is not subject to restrictive agreements with the issuer or other security holders; and
|
|
iii)
|
it trades with sufficient volume and liquidity (findings as to which are documented by the Advisers to any Regulated Funds
holding investments in the issuer and retained for the life of the Regulated Fund) to allow each Regulated Fund to dispose of its entire position remaining after the proposed
|
| 8 |
In the case of a Regulated Fund that is a registered closed-end fund, the Board members that make up the Required Majority will be determined as if the Regulated Fund were a BDC subject
to Section 57(o). In the case of a BDC Downstream Fund with a board of directors (or the equivalent), the members that make up the Required Majority will be determined as if the BDC Downstream Fund were a BDC subject to Section 57(o).
In the case of a BDC Downstream Fund with a transaction committee or advisory committee, the committee members that make up the Required Majority will be determined as if the BDC Downstream Fund were a BDC subject to Section 57(o) and
as if the committee members were directors of the fund.
|
5
|
|
Disposition within a short period of time not exceeding 30 days at approximately the value (as defined by Section 2(a)(41)
of the Act) at which the Regulated Fund has valued the investment.
|
“Wholly-Owned Investment Sub”
means an entity (i) that is a wholly-owned subsidiary9 of a Regulated Fund (with such Regulated Fund at all times holding, beneficially and of record, directly or indirectly, 95% or more of the voting and economic interests); (ii)
whose sole business purpose is to hold one or more investments on behalf of such Regulated Fund (and, in the case of an SBIC Subsidiary, maintain a license under the SBA Act and issue debentures guaranteed by the SBA); (iii) with respect to
which such Regulated Fund’s Board has the sole authority to make all determinations with respect to the entity’s participation under the Conditions to this Application; and (iv) (x) that would be an investment company but for Section 3(c)(1),
3(c)(5)(C), or 3(c)(7) of the Act, or (y) that qualifies as a real estate investment trust (“REIT”) within the meaning of Section 856 of the Internal Revenue Code (“Code”) because substantially all of its assets would consist of real properties. There are currently no existing Wholly-Owned Investment Subs.
|
II.
|
Background
|
SCPLF is a Delaware limited partnership that was organized on October 14, 2024. SCPLF was formed for the
purpose of operating as a closed-end management investment company and intends to elect to be regulated as a BDC under Section 54(a) of the Act. SCPLF also intends to qualify and elect to be treated as a regulated investment company (“RIC”) under Subchapter M of the Code and intends to continue to qualify as a RIC in the future. SCPLF’s Objectives and
Strategies are to seek to generate current income while preserving capital. SCPLF will be managed by TCW pursuant to an investment advisory agreement and by PNC pursuant to a sub-advisory agreement, and the business and affairs of SCPLF will
be managed under the direction of a Board, which will consist of a majority of Independent Directors. SCPLF has not commenced operations and it will not rely on the requested Order until it has filed its election on Form N-54A to be regulated
as a BDC under Section 54(a) of the Act.
TCW is an investment adviser that is registered with the Commission under the Advisers Act. TCW is a
wholly-owned subsidiary of The TCW Group, Inc. TCW serves as investment adviser to SCPLF and manages SCPLF’s portfolio in accordance with SCPLF’s Objectives and Strategies. TCW is responsible for reviewing and approving investment
opportunities for SCPLF and retains ultimate responsibility for all investment decisions made on behalf of SCPLF.
PNC is an investment adviser that is registered with the Commission under the Advisers Act. PNC is a
wholly-owned subsidiary of PNC Bank, National Association (“PNC Bank”).10 PNC serves as the sub-adviser to SCPLF and is solely responsible for originating investment opportunities sourced through PNC Bank’s network and conducting
due diligence and analysis for SCPLF on potential investments, while TCW separately retains ultimate responsibility for reviewing and approving each investment to ensure alignment with SCPLF’s Objectives and Strategies. A PNC Adviser may
serve as the investment adviser or sub-adviser to Future Affiliated Funds or Future Regulated Funds.
TCW serves as the adviser, and PNC serves as the sub-adviser, to the Existing Affiliated Fund. A TCW Adviser
will serve as the investment adviser to certain Regulated Funds or Future Affiliated Funds with a PNC Adviser as sub-adviser. TCW’s and PNC’s respective roles with respect to any Affiliated Fund or Regulated Fund with a TCW Adviser as its
investment adviser and a PNC Adviser as its sub-adviser will be the same as they are with respect to SCPLF.
TCW Advisers and the PNC Advisers are not affiliated persons, or affiliated persons of affiliated persons (as defined in the Act), except for the
affiliation that arises as a result of serving as the advisers of any Regulated Fund or
| 9 |
A “wholly-owned subsidiary” of a person is as defined in Section 2(a)(43) of the Act and means a company 95% or more of the outstanding voting securities of which are owned by such
person.
|
| 10 |
PNC Bank does not currently offer investment advisory services to any person and is not expected to do so in the future, and will not be the source of any Potential Co-Investment
Transactions under the requested Order. As a result, PNC Bank has not been included as an Applicant.
|
6
Affiliated Fund that is advised by a TCW Adviser and sub-advised by a PNC Adviser. The relationship between the TCW Advisers and the PNC Advisers will be arm’s length, and any PNC Adviser serving as a sub-adviser to a
Regulated Fund or Affiliated Fund will be able to withdraw from the sub-advisory agreement on 120 days’ written notice.11
The PNC Proprietary Accounts, if any, will hold various financial assets in a principal capacity. A PNC
Adviser and its affiliates may have various business lines that it may operate through wholly- or majority-owned subsidiaries. Currently, there are no PNC Proprietary Accounts. Each PNC Proprietary Account will be subject to oversight by a
PNC Adviser. As a result, a PNC Adviser will ensure compliance by each PNC Proprietary Account with the conditions of the Application in the same manner in which the PNC Adviser will ensure compliance by each Affiliated Fund.
As previously described, TCW serves as SCPLF’s investment adviser and PNC serves as SCPLF’s sub-adviser. In
these respective roles, PNC will bear sole responsibility for originating investment opportunities sourced through PNC Bank’s network for SCPLF, and TCW will separately evaluate and approve each investment originated by PNC to ensure
alignment with SCPLF’s Objectives and Strategies, in each case consistent with their fiduciary duties.
In the case of a Regulated Fund, the PNC Adviser will identify and recommend Potential Co-Investment
Transactions for the Regulated Fund, and, if such Regulated Fund has a TCW Adviser as its investment adviser, the sub-advisory agreement will require the PNC Adviser to present each Potential Co-Investment Transaction to the TCW Adviser,
which will have the authority to approve or reject it for the Regulated Fund. Through this authority to approve or reject any investment proposed by the PNC Adviser, the TCW Adviser will have ultimate authority with respect to each
applicable Regulated Fund’s investments, subject in each case to the oversight of the relevant Board.
It is anticipated that a PNC Adviser will periodically determine that certain investments recommended for a
Regulated Fund by the PNC Adviser would also be appropriate investments for one or more other Regulated Funds and/or one or more Affiliated Funds. Such a determination may result in a Regulated Fund, one or more other Regulated Funds and/or
one or more Affiliated Funds co-investing in certain investment opportunities.
|
III.
|
Order Requested
|
Applicants request the Order of the Commission under Sections 17(d) and 57(i) under the Act, and Rule 17d-1
under the Act to permit, subject to the terms and Conditions set forth below in this Application, a Regulated Fund and one or more other Regulated Funds and/or one or more Affiliated Funds to enter into Co-Investment Transactions with each
other.
The Regulated Funds and the Affiliated Funds seek relief to enter into Co-Investment Transactions because
such Co-Investment Transactions would otherwise be prohibited by either or both of Section 17(d) or Section 57(a)(4) and the Rules under the Act without an exemptive order from the Commission. This Application seeks relief in order to (i)
enable the Regulated Funds and Affiliated Funds to avoid, among other things, the practical commercial and/or economic difficulties of trying to structure, negotiate and persuade counterparties to enter into transactions while awaiting the
granting of the relief requested in individual applications with respect to each Co-Investment Transaction that arises in the future and (ii) enable the Regulated Funds and the Affiliated Funds to avoid the significant legal and other
expenses that would be incurred in preparing such individual applications.
|
A.
|
Overview
|
The Advisers manage the assets entrusted to each of them by their clients in accordance with their fiduciary duties to those clients and, in the case
of a BDC and registered fund, the Act.
| 11 |
Each sub-advisory agreement may also be terminated by the Regulated Fund through its Board or a vote of its shareholders in accordance with Section 15(a) of the Act.
|
7
The Advisers have established rigorous processes for allocating initial investment opportunities,
opportunities for subsequent investments in an issuer and dispositions of securities holdings reasonably designed to treat all clients fairly and equitably. As discussed below, these processes will be extended and modified in a manner
reasonably designed to ensure that the additional transactions permitted under the Order will both (i) be fair and equitable to the Regulated Funds and the Affiliated Funds and (ii) comply with the Conditions contained in the Order.
|
1.
|
The Investment Process
|
The investment process consists of three stages: (i) the identification and consideration of investment
opportunities (including Follow-On Investment opportunities); (ii) order placement and allocation; and (iii) consideration by each applicable Regulated Fund’s Board when a Potential Co-Investment Transaction is being considered by one or
more Regulated Funds, as provided by the Order.
|
a.
|
Identification and Consideration of Investment Opportunities
|
Opportunities for Potential Co-Investment Transactions may arise when investment advisory personnel of a
PNC Adviser become aware of investment opportunities that may be appropriate for a Regulated Fund and one or more other Regulated Funds and/or one or more Affiliated Funds. In the case of a Regulated Fund
with a TCW Adviser as its investment adviser, if a PNC Adviser deems the Regulated Fund’s participation in any Potential Co-Investment Transaction to be appropriate, the PNC Adviser would notify the TCW Adviser of the PNC Adviser’s
recommended participation. The TCW Adviser would consider the Potential Co-Investment Transaction. The TCW Adviser would review the PNC Adviser’s recommendation for the Potential Co-Investment Transaction and would have the ability to
ask questions of the PNC Adviser and request additional information from the PNC Adviser.
If the requested Order is granted, the Advisers will each establish, maintain and implement policies and
procedures reasonably designed to ensure that, when opportunities for Potential Co-Investment Transactions arise, the Advisers to the relevant Regulated Funds are promptly notified and receive the same information about the opportunity as
any other Advisers considering the opportunity for their clients. In particular, consistent with Condition 1, if a Potential Co-Investment Transaction falls within the then-current Objectives and Strategies and any Board-Established
Criteria of a Regulated Fund, the policies and procedures will require that the Adviser to such Regulated Fund receive sufficient information to allow such Adviser’s investment committee to make its independent determination and
recommendations under Conditions 1, 2(a), 6, 7, 8 and 9 (as applicable).12 In addition, the policies and procedures will specify the individuals or roles responsible for carrying out the policies and procedures, including
ensuring that the Advisers receive such information. After receiving notification of a Potential Co-Investment Transaction under Condition 1(a), each Adviser to each applicable Regulated Fund will then make an independent determination of
the appropriateness of the investment for the Regulated Fund in light of the Regulated Fund’s then-current circumstances.
Applicants represent that, if the requested Order is granted, the investment advisory personnel of the Advisers to the
Regulated Funds will be charged with making sure they identify, and participate in this process with respect to, each investment opportunity that falls within the Objectives and Strategies and Board-Established Criteria of each Regulated
Fund. Applicants assert that the Advisers’ allocation policies and procedures are structured so that the relevant investment advisory personnel for each Regulated Fund will be promptly notified of all Potential Co-Investment Transactions
that fall within the then-current Objectives and Strategies and Board-Established Criteria of such Regulated Fund and that the Advisers will undertake to perform these duties regardless of whether the Advisers serve as investment adviser
or sub-adviser to the Regulated Fund or Affiliated Funds.
| 12 |
Representatives from each Adviser to a Regulated Fund are members of each investment committee or otherwise entitled to participate in each meeting of any investment committee that
is expected to approve or reject recommended investment opportunities falling within its Regulated Funds’ Objectives and Strategies and Board-Established Criteria. Accordingly, the policies and procedures may provide, for example,
that an Adviser will receive the information required under Condition 1 in conjunction with its representatives’ participation in the relevant investment committee’s meetings. The allocation memorandum for each Potential
Co-Investment Transaction will document the recommendations by the investment committee.
|
8
|
b.
|
Order Placement and Allocation
|
General. In the case of a Regulated Fund with a TCW Adviser as its
investment adviser, if a PNC Adviser deems the Regulated Fund’s participation in any Potential Co-Investment Transaction to be appropriate, at the time the PNC Adviser notifies the TCW Adviser of the Potential Co-Investment
Transaction, the PNC Adviser would notify the TCW Adviser of the PNC Adviser’s recommended allocation for each such Regulated Fund. At the time the TCW Adviser considers the Potential Co-Investment Transaction, it would consider the
PNC Adviser’s proposed allocation. The TCW Adviser would review the PNC Adviser’s recommendation for each such Regulated Fund and would have the ability to ask questions of the PNC Adviser and request additional information from the
PNC Adviser. If the Adviser to a Regulated Fund deems the Regulated Fund’s participation in any Potential Co-Investment Transaction to be appropriate, it will formulate a recommendation regarding the proposed order amount for the
Regulated Fund.
Allocation Procedure. For each Regulated Fund and Affiliated Fund
whose Adviser recommends participating in a Potential Co-Investment Transaction, such Adviser will approve an investment and the amount to be allocated to each Regulated Fund and/or Affiliated Fund participating in the Potential
Co-Investment Transaction. For each Regulated Fund and Affiliated Fund with a TCW Adviser as its investment adviser, a PNC Adviser will recommend to a TCW Adviser participation in a Potential Co-Investment Transaction, and the
TCW Adviser will review and approve an investment and the amount to be allocated to each Regulated Fund and/or Affiliated Fund participating in the Potential Co-Investment Transaction. Prior to the External Submission (as defined
below), each proposed order amount may be reviewed and adjusted, in accordance with the applicable Adviser’s written allocation policies and procedures, by the applicable Adviser.13 The order of a Regulated Fund or Affiliated
Fund resulting from this process is referred to as its “Internal Order”. The Internal Order will be submitted for approval by the Required Majority of any participating
Regulated Funds in accordance with the Conditions and as discussed in Section III.A.1.c. below.
If the aggregate Internal Orders for a Potential Co-Investment Transaction do not exceed the size of the
investment opportunity immediately prior to the submission of the orders to the underwriter, broker, dealer, borrower and/or issuer, as applicable (the “External Submission”),
then each Internal Order will be fulfilled as placed. If, on the other hand, the aggregate Internal Orders for a Potential Co-Investment Transaction exceed the size of the investment opportunity immediately prior to the External
Submission, then the allocation of the opportunity will be made pro rata on the basis of the size of the Internal Orders.14 If, subsequent to such External Submission, the size of the opportunity is increased or decreased, or
if the terms of such opportunity, or the facts and circumstances applicable to the Regulated Funds’ or the Affiliated Funds’ consideration of the opportunity, change, the participants will be permitted to submit revised Internal Orders
in accordance with written allocation policies and procedures that the Advisers will establish, implement and maintain; provided that, if the size of the opportunity is decreased such that the aggregate of the original Internal Orders
would exceed the amount of the remaining investment opportunity, then upon submitting any revised order amount to the Board of a Regulated Fund for approval, the Adviser to the Regulated Fund will also notify the Board promptly of the
amount that the Regulated Fund would receive if the remaining investment opportunity were allocated pro rata on the basis of the size of the original Internal Orders. The Board of the Regulated Fund will then either approve or
disapprove of the investment opportunity in accordance with Condition 2, 6, 7, 8 or 9, as applicable.
The Applicants believe the investment process between a PNC Adviser and a TCW Adviser, prior to seeking approval from such
Regulated Fund’s Board, is significant and provides for additional procedures and processes to ensure that each such Regulated Fund is being treated fairly in respect of Potential Co-Investment Transactions. These
| 13 |
The reason for any such adjustment to a proposed order amount will be documented in writing and preserved in the records of the Advisers.
|
| 14 |
The Advisers will maintain records of all proposed order amounts, Internal Orders and External Submissions in conjunction with Potential Co-Investment Transactions. Each
applicable Adviser will provide the Eligible Directors with information concerning the Affiliated Funds’ and Regulated Funds’ order sizes to assist the Eligible Directors with their review of the applicable Regulated Fund’s
investments for compliance with the Conditions.
|
9
procedures are in addition to, and not instead of, the procedures required under the conditions of the
Application and will not deprive a Regulated Fund of an opportunity to participate in a Potential Co-Investment Transaction.
Compliance. Applicants represent that each Adviser’s allocation review process is a robust
process designed as part of its overall compliance policies and procedures to ensure that every client is treated fairly and that the Advisers are following their allocation policies. The entire allocation process is monitored and
reviewed by members of the compliance team, led by the chief compliance officer, and approved by the Board of each Regulated Fund as it applies to such Regulated Fund.
|
c.
|
Approval of Potential Co-Investment Transactions
|
A Regulated Fund will enter into a Potential Co-Investment Transaction with one or more other
Regulated Funds and/or Affiliated Funds only if, prior to the Regulated Fund’s participation in the Potential Co-Investment Transaction, the Required Majority approves it in accordance with the Conditions of this Order.
In the case of a BDC Downstream Fund with an Independent Party consisting of a
transaction committee or advisory committee, the individuals on the committee would possess experience and training comparable to that of the directors of the parent Regulated Fund and sufficient to permit them to make informed
decisions on behalf of the applicable BDC Downstream Fund. Applicants represent that the Independent Parties of the BDC Downstream Funds would be bound (by law or by contract) by fiduciary duties comparable to those applicable to the
directors of the parent Regulated Fund, including a duty to act in the best interests of their respective funds when approving transactions. These duties would apply in the case of all Potential Co-Investment Transactions, including
transactions that could present a conflict of interest.
Further, Applicants believe that the existence of differing routes of approval between the BDC
Downstream Funds and other Regulated Funds would not result in Applicants investing through the BDC Downstream Funds in order to avoid obtaining the approval of a Regulated Fund’s Board. Each Regulated Fund and BDC Downstream Fund has
its own Objectives and Strategies and may have its own Board-Established Criteria, the implementation of which depends on the specific circumstances of the entity’s portfolio at the time an investment opportunity is presented. As
noted above, consistent with its duty to its BDC Downstream Funds, the Independent Party must reach a conclusion on whether or not an investment is in the best interest of its relevant BDC Downstream Funds. An investment made solely
to avoid an approval requirement at the Regulated Fund level should not be viewed as in the best interest of the entity in question and, thus, would not be approved by the Independent Party.
A Regulated Fund may participate in Pro Rata Dispositions (defined below) and Pro Rata Follow-On
Investments (defined below) without obtaining prior approval of the Required Majority in accordance with Conditions 6(c)(i) and 8(b)(i).
|
2.
|
Delayed Settlement
|
All Regulated Funds and Affiliated Funds participating in a Co-Investment Transaction will invest at
the same time, for the same price and with the same terms, conditions, class, registration rights and any other rights, so that none of them receives terms more favorable than any other. However, the settlement date for an Affiliated
Fund in a Co-Investment Transaction may occur up to ten business days after the settlement date for the Regulated Fund, and vice versa. Nevertheless, in all cases, (i) the date on which the commitment of the Affiliated Funds and
Regulated Funds is made will be the same even where the settlement date is not and (ii) the earliest settlement date and the latest settlement date of any Affiliated Fund or Regulated Fund participating in the transaction will occur
within ten business days of each other.
|
3.
|
Permitted Follow-On Investments and Approval of Follow-On Investments
|
From time to time the Regulated Funds and Affiliated Funds may have opportunities to make Follow-On Investments in an issuer in which a
Regulated Fund and one or more other Regulated Funds and/or Affiliated Funds previously have invested and continue to hold an investment. If the Order is granted, Follow-On Investments will be made in a manner that, over time, is fair
and equitable to all of the Regulated Funds and Affiliated Funds and in
10
accordance with the proposed procedures discussed above and with the Conditions of the Order. The Order, if granted,
would permit Affiliated Funds to participate in Follow-On Investments in issuers in which at least one Regulated Fund is invested but such Affiliated Funds are not invested. The relief would not permit Follow-On Investments by
Regulated Funds that are not invested in the issuer.
The Order would divide Follow-On Investments into two categories depending on whether the Regulated
Funds and Affiliated Funds holding investments in the issuer previously participated in a Co-Investment Transaction with respect to the issuer and continue to hold any securities acquired in a Co-Investment Transaction for that
issuer. If such Regulated Funds and Affiliated Funds have previously participated in a Co-Investment Transaction with respect to the issuer, then the terms and approval of the Follow-On Investment would be subject to the process
discussed in Section III.A.3.a. below and governed by Condition 8. These Follow-On Investments are referred to as “Standard Review Follow-Ons.” If such Regulated Funds and
Affiliated Funds hold Pre-Boarding Investments and have not previously participated in a Co-Investment Transaction with respect to the issuer, then the terms and approval of the Follow-On Investment would be subject to the
“onboarding process” discussed in Section III.A.3.b. below and governed by Condition 9. These Follow-On Investments are referred to as “Enhanced Review Follow-Ons.”
|
a.
|
Standard Review Follow-Ons
|
A Regulated Fund may invest in Standard Review Follow-Ons either with the approval of the Required
Majority using the procedures required under Condition 8(c) or, where certain additional requirements are met, without Board approval under Condition 8(b).
A Regulated Fund may participate in a Standard Review Follow-On without obtaining the prior approval
of the Required Majority if it is (i) a Pro Rata Follow-On Investment or (ii) a Non-Negotiated Follow-On Investment.
A “Pro Rata Follow-On Investment” is a
Follow-On Investment (i) in which the participation of each Affiliated Fund and each Regulated Fund is proportionate to its outstanding investments in the issuer or security, as appropriate,15 immediately preceding the
Follow-On Investment, and (ii) in the case of a Regulated Fund, a majority of the Board has approved the Regulated Fund’s participation in the pro rata Follow-On Investments as being in the best interests of the Regulated Fund. The
Regulated Fund’s Board may refuse to approve, or at any time rescind, suspend or qualify, their approval of Pro Rata Follow-On Investments, in which case all subsequent Follow-On Investments will be submitted to the Regulated Fund’s
Eligible Directors in accordance with Condition 8(c).
A “Non-Negotiated Follow-On Investment”
is a Follow-On Investment in which a Regulated Fund participates together with one or more Affiliated Funds and/or one or more other Regulated Funds (i) in which the only term negotiated by or on behalf of the funds is price and
(ii) with respect to which, if the transaction were considered on its own, the funds would be entitled to rely on one of the JT No-Action Letters.
Applicants believe that these Pro Rata Follow-On Investments and Non-Negotiated Follow-On
Investments do not present a significant opportunity for overreaching on the part of any Adviser and thus do not warrant the time or the attention of the Board. Pro Rata Follow-On Investments and Non-Negotiated Follow-On Investments
remain subject to the Board’s periodic review in accordance with Condition 10.
|
b.
|
Enhanced Review Follow-Ons
|
One or more Regulated Funds and/or one or more Affiliated Funds holding Pre-Boarding Investments may have the
opportunity to make a Follow-On Investment that is a Potential Co-Investment Transaction in an issuer with respect to which they have not previously participated in a Co-Investment Transaction. In these cases, the Regulated Funds
and Affiliated Funds may rely on the Order to make such Follow-On Investment subject to the requirements of Condition 9. These enhanced review requirements constitute an “onboarding process” whereby Regulated Funds and Affiliated
Funds may utilize the Order to participate in Co-Investment Transactions even though they already hold Pre-Boarding Investments. For a given issuer, the participating Regulated Funds and Affiliated Funds need to comply
| 15 |
See note 29, below.
|
11
with these requirements only for the first Co-Investment Transaction. Subsequent Co-Investment Transactions with
respect to the issuer will be governed by Condition 8 under the standard review process.
|
4.
|
Dispositions
|
The Regulated Funds and Affiliated Funds may be presented with opportunities to sell, exchange or
otherwise dispose of securities in a transaction that would be prohibited by Rule 17d-1 or Section 57(a)(4), as applicable. If the Order is granted, such Dispositions will be made in a manner that, over time, is fair and equitable
to all of the Regulated Funds and Affiliated Funds and in accordance with procedures set forth in the proposed Conditions to the Order and discussed below.
The Order would divide these Dispositions into two categories: (i) if the Regulated Funds and
Affiliated Funds holding investments in the issuer have previously participated in a Co-Investment Transaction with respect to the issuer and continue to hold any securities acquired in a Co-Investment Transaction for such issuer,
then the terms and approval of the Disposition (hereinafter referred to as “Standard Review Dispositions”) would be subject to the process discussed in Section III.A.4.a.
below and governed by Condition 6; and (ii) if the Regulated Funds and Affiliated Funds have not previously participated in a Co-Investment Transaction with respect to the issuer, then the terms and approval of the Disposition
(hereinafter referred to as “Enhanced Review Dispositions”) would be subject to the same “onboarding process” discussed in Section III.A.4.b. below, and governed by
Condition 7.
|
a.
|
Standard Review Dispositions
|
A Regulated Fund may participate in a Standard Review Disposition either with the approval of the
Required Majority using the standard procedures required under Condition 6(d) or, where certain additional requirements are met, without Board approval under Condition 6(c).
A Regulated Fund may participate in a Standard Review Disposition without obtaining the prior
approval of the Required Majority if (i) the Disposition is a Pro Rata Disposition or (ii) the securities are Tradable Securities and the Disposition meets the other requirements of Condition 6(c)(ii).
A “Pro Rata Disposition” is a
Disposition (i) in which the participation of each Affiliated Fund and each Regulated Fund is proportionate to its outstanding investment in the security subject to Disposition immediately preceding the Disposition;16
and (ii) in the case of a Regulated Fund, a majority of the Board has approved the Regulated Fund’s participation in pro rata Dispositions as being in the best interests of the Regulated Fund. The Regulated Fund’s Board may refuse
to approve, or at any time rescind, suspend or qualify, their approval of Pro Rata Dispositions, in which case all subsequent Dispositions will be submitted to the Regulated Fund’s Eligible Directors.
In the case of a Tradable Security, approval of the Required Majority is not required for the
Disposition if: (i) the Disposition is not to the issuer or any affiliated person of the issuer17 and (ii) the security is sold for cash in a transaction in which the only term negotiated by or on behalf of the
participating Regulated Funds and Affiliated Funds is price. Pro Rata Dispositions and Dispositions of a Tradable Security remain subject to the Board’s periodic review in accordance with Condition 10.
|
b.
|
Enhanced Review Dispositions
|
One or more Regulated Funds and one or more Affiliated Funds that have not previously participated in a Co-Investment Transaction with
respect to an issuer may have the opportunity to make a Disposition of Pre-Boarding
| 16 |
See note 27, below.
|
| 17 |
In the case of a Tradable Security, Dispositions to the issuer or an affiliated person of the issuer are not permitted so that funds participating in the Disposition do not
benefit to the detriment of Regulated Funds that remain invested in the issuer. For example, if a Disposition of a Tradable Security were permitted to be made to the issuer, the issuer may be reducing its short term assets
(i.e., cash) to pay down long term liabilities.
|
12
Investments in a Potential Co-Investment Transaction. In these cases, the Regulated Funds and Affiliated Funds may
rely on the Order to make such Disposition subject to the requirements of Condition 7. As discussed above, with respect to investment in a given issuer, the participating Regulated Funds and Affiliated Funds need only complete
the onboarding process for the first Co-Investment Transaction, which may be an Enhanced Review Follow-On or an Enhanced Review Disposition.18 Subsequent Co-Investment Transactions with respect to the issuer will be
governed by Condition 6 or 8 under the standard review process.
|
5.
|
Use of Wholly-Owned Investment Subs
|
A Regulated Fund may, from time to time, form one or more Wholly-Owned Investment Subs. Such a
subsidiary would be prohibited from investing in a Co-Investment Transaction with a Regulated Fund (other than its parent) or any Affiliated Fund because it would be a company controlled by its parent Regulated Fund for purposes
of Section 57(a)(4) and Rule 17d-1. Applicants request that each Wholly-Owned Investment Sub be permitted to participate in Co-Investment Transactions in lieu of the applicable parent Regulated Fund that owns it and that the
Wholly-Owned Investment Sub’s participation in any such transaction be treated, for purposes of the Order, as though the parent Regulated Fund were participating directly.
Applicants note that an entity could not be both a Wholly-Owned Investment Sub
and a BDC Downstream Fund because, in the former case, the Board of the parent Regulated Fund makes any determinations regarding the subsidiary’s investments while, in the latter case, the Independent Party makes such
determinations.
|
B.
|
Applicable Law
|
|
1.
|
Section 17(d) and Section 57(a)(4)
|
Section 17(d) of the Act generally prohibits an affiliated person (as defined in
Section 2(a)(3) of the Act), or an affiliated person of such affiliated person, of a registered investment company acting as principal, from effecting any transaction in which the registered investment company is a joint or a
joint and several participant, in contravention of such rules as the Commission may prescribe for the purpose of limiting or preventing participation by the registered investment company on a basis different from or less
advantageous than that of such other participant.
Similarly, with regard to BDCs, Section 57(a)(4) prohibits certain persons specified in
Section 57(b) from participating in a joint transaction with the BDC, or a company controlled by the BDC, in contravention of rules as prescribed by the Commission. In particular, Section 57(a)(4) applies to:
|
•
|
Any director, officer, employee, or member of an advisory board of a BDC or any person (other than the BDC itself) who is an
affiliated person of the forgoing pursuant to Section 2(a)(3)(C); or
|
|
•
|
Any investment adviser or promoter of, general partner in, principal underwriter for, or person
directly or indirectly either controlling, controlled by, or under common control with, a BDC (except the BDC itself and any person who, if it were not directly or indirectly controlled by the BDC, would not be
|
| 18 |
However, with respect to an issuer, if a Regulated Fund’s first Co-Investment Transaction is an Enhanced Review Disposition, and the Regulated Fund does not dispose of
its entire position in the Enhanced Review Disposition, then before such Regulated Fund may complete its first Standard Review Follow-On in such issuer, the Eligible Directors must review the proposed Follow-On
Investment not only on a stand-alone basis but also in relation to the total economic exposure in such issuer (i.e., in combination with the portion of the Pre-Boarding Investment not disposed of in the Enhanced Review
Disposition), and the other terms of the investments. This additional review is required because such findings were not required in connection with the prior Enhanced Review Disposition, but they would have been required
had the first Co-Investment Transaction been an Enhanced Review Follow-On.
|
13
|
|
directly or indirectly under the control of a person who controls the BDC);19 or any person who is an affiliated
person of any of the forgoing within the meaning of Section 2(a)(3)(C) or (D).
|
Pursuant to the foregoing application of Section 57(a)(4), BDC Downstream Funds on the one
hand and other Regulated Funds and Affiliated Funds on the other, may not co-invest absent an exemptive order because the BDC Downstream Funds are controlled by a BDC and the Affiliated
Funds and other Regulated Funds are included in Section 57(b).
Section 2(a)(3)(C) defines an “affiliated person” of another person to
include any person directly or indirectly controlling, controlled by, or under common control with, such other person. Section 2(a)(3)(D) defines “any officer, director, partner, copartner, or employee” of an affiliated
person as an affiliated person. Section 2(a)(9) defines “control” as the power to exercise a controlling influence over the management or policies of a company, unless such power is solely the result of an official position
with that company. Under Section 2(a)(9) a person who beneficially owns, either directly or through one or more controlled companies, more than 25% of the voting securities of a company is presumed to control such company.
The Commission and its staff have indicated on a number of occasions their belief that an investment adviser that provides discretionary investment management services to a fund and that sponsored, selected the initial
directors, and provides administrative or other non-advisory services to the fund, controls such fund, absent compelling evidence to the contrary.20
|
2.
|
Rule 17d-1
|
Rule 17d-1 generally prohibits an affiliated person (as defined in
Section 2(a)(3)), or an affiliated person of such affiliated person, of a registered investment company acting as principal, from effecting any transaction in which the registered investment company, or a company controlled
by such registered company, is a joint or a joint and several participant, in contravention of such rules as the Commission may prescribe for the purpose of limiting or preventing participation by the registered investment
company on a basis different from or less advantageous than that of such first or second tier affiliate. Rule 17d-1 generally prohibits participation by a registered investment company and an affiliated person (as defined in
Section 2(a)(3)) or principal underwriter for that investment company, or an affiliated person of such affiliated person or principal underwriter, in any “joint enterprise or other joint arrangement or profit-sharing plan,”
as defined in the rule, without prior approval by the Commission by order upon application.
Rule 17d-1 was promulgated by the Commission pursuant to Section 17(d) and
made applicable to persons subject to Sections 57(a) and (d) by Section 57(i) to the extent specified therein. Section 57(i) provides that, until the Commission prescribes rules under Sections 57(a) and (d), the Commission’s
rules under Section 17(d) applicable to registered closed-end investment companies will be deemed to apply to persons subject to the prohibitions of Section 57(a) or (d). Because the Commission has not adopted any rules
under Section 57(a) or (d), Rule 17d-1 applies to persons subject to the prohibitions of Section 57(a) or (d).
Applicants seek relief pursuant to Rule 17d-1, which permits the Commission to authorize joint transactions upon
application. In passing upon applications filed pursuant to Rule 17d-1, the Commission is directed by Rule 17d-1(b) to consider whether the participation of a registered investment company or controlled company thereof in the
| 19 |
Also excluded from this category by Rule 57b-1 is any person who would otherwise be included (a) solely because that person is directly or indirectly controlled by a
business development company, or (b) solely because that person is, within the meaning of Section 2(a)(3)(C) or (D), an affiliated person of a person described in (a) above.
|
| 20 |
See, e.g., SEC Rel. No. IC-4697 (Sept. 8, 1966) (“For purposes of Section 2(a)(3)(C), affiliation based upon control would
depend on the facts of the given situation, including such factors as extensive interlocks of officers, directors or key personnel, common investment advisers or underwriters, etc.”); Lazard Freres Asset Management,
SEC Staff No-Action Letter (pub. avail. Jan. 10, 1997) (“While, in some circumstances, the nature of an advisory relationship may give an adviser control over its client’s management or policies, whether an investment
company and another entity are under common control is a factual question.”).
|
14
joint enterprise or joint arrangement under scrutiny is consistent with provisions, policies
and purposes of the Act and the extent to which such participation is on a basis different from or less advantageous than that of other participants.
The Commission has stated that Section 17(d), upon which Rule 17d-1 is
based, and upon which Section 57(a)(4) was modeled, was designed to protect investment companies from self-dealing and overreaching by insiders. The Commission has also taken notice that there may be transactions subject
to these prohibitions that do not present the dangers of overreaching.21 The Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit has enunciated a like rationale for the purpose behind Section 17(d): “The objective of
[Section] 17(d) . . . is to prevent . . . injuring the interest of stockholders of registered investment companies by causing the company to participate on a basis different from or less advantageous than that of such
other participants.”22 Furthermore, Congress acknowledged that the protective system established by the enactment of Section 57 is “similar to that applicable to registered investment companies under Section 17,
and rules thereunder, but is modified to address concerns relating to unique characteristics presented by business development companies.”23
Applicants believe that the Conditions would ensure that the conflicts
of interest that Section 17(d) and Section 57(a)(4) were designed to prevent would be addressed and the standards for an order under Rule 17d-1 and Section 57(i) would be met.
|
C.
|
Need for Relief
|
Co-Investment Transactions are prohibited by Rule 17d-1 and either or
both of Sections 17(d) and 57(a)(4) without a prior exemptive order of the Commission, to the extent that the Affiliated Funds and the Regulated Funds participating in such transactions fall within the category of persons
described by Rule 17d-1, Section 17(d) and/or Section 57(b), as modified by Rule 57b-1 thereunder, as applicable, vis-à-vis each participating Regulated Fund.
TCW serves as the investment adviser, and PNC serves as the sub-adviser, to SCPLF and the
Existing Affiliated Fund. A PNC Adviser may serve as the investment adviser to certain Future Regulated Funds and Future Affiliated Funds, and a TCW Adviser may serve as the investment adviser to certain Future Regulated
Funds or Future Affiliated Funds with a PNC Adviser as its sub-adviser. Each BDC Downstream Fund will be deemed to be controlled by its BDC parent and/or its BDC parent’s Adviser.
The Regulated Funds may be deemed to be under common control because a PNC Adviser will be
either the investment adviser or the sub-adviser to each Regulated Fund, and thus each Regulated Fund may be deemed to be affiliated persons of each other Regulated Fund under Section 2(a)(3)(C) of the Act. Section 57(b) of
the Act applies to any investment adviser to a Regulated Fund that is a BDC and to any Section 2(a)(3)(C) affiliates of the investment adviser, including SCPLF and the Affiliated Funds. In addition, the Affiliated Funds may
be deemed to be under common control with the Regulated Funds, and thus affiliated persons of each Regulated Fund under Section 2(a)(3)(C) of the Act. As a result, these relationships might cause a Regulated Fund and one or
more other Regulated Funds and/or one or more Affiliated Funds participating in Co-Investment Transactions to be subject to Section 17(d) or 57(a)(4) of the Act, and thus subject to the provisions of Rule 17d-1 of the Act.
Further, because the BDC Downstream Funds and Wholly-Owned Investment Subs are controlled by the Regulated Funds, the BDC Downstream
Funds and Wholly-Owned Investment Subs are subject to Section 57(a)(4) (or Section 17(d) in the case of Wholly-Owned Investment Subs controlled by Regulated Funds that are registered under the Act), and thus also subject to
the provisions of Rule 17d-1, and therefore would be prohibited from participating in Co-Investment Transactions without the Order.
| 21 |
See Protecting Investors: A Half-Century of Investment Company Regulation, 1504 Fed. Sec. L. Rep., Extra Edition (May
29, 1992) at 488 et seq.
|
| 22 |
Securities and Exchange Commission v. Talley Industries, Inc., 399 F.2d 396, 405 (2d Cir. 1968), cert. denied, 393 U.S. 1015 (1969).
|
| 23 |
H.Rep. No. 96-1341, 96th Cong., 2d Sess. 45 (1980) reprinted in 1980 U.S.C.C.A.N. 4827.
|
15
In addition, because the PNC Proprietary Accounts will be controlled by a
PNC Adviser or its affiliates and, therefore, may be under common control with SCPLF and any Future Regulated Funds, the PNC Proprietary Accounts could be deemed to be persons related to the Regulated Funds (or a company
controlled by the Regulated Funds) in a manner described by Section 17(d) or 57(b) and also prohibited from participating in the Co-Investment Program.
|
D.
|
Precedents
|
The Commission has issued numerous exemptive orders under the Act permitting registered investment companies and BDCs to co-invest with affiliated
persons,24 including precedents involving proprietary accounts,25 a
| 24 |
See, e.g., MidCap Financial Investment Corporation, et al.,
(File No. 812-15538) Release No. IC-35423 (December 18, 2024) (notice), Release No. IC-35448 (January 14, 2025) (order); 5C Lending Partners Corp., et al., (File No. 812-15518) Release No. IC-35359 (October
15, 2024) (notice), Release No. IC-35391 (November 18, 2024) (order); AGL Private Credit Income Fund, et al., (File No. 812-15550) Release No. IC-35363 (October 21, 2024) (notice), Release No. IC-35389
(November 18, 2024) (order); Overland Advantage, et al., (File No. 812-15515) Release No. IC-35286 (July 25, 2024) (notice), Release No. IC-35298 (August 20, 2024) (order); Fidus
Investment Corporation, et al., (File No. 812-15496) Release No. 35289 (August 2, 2024) (notice), Release No. IC-35309 (August 29, 2024) (order); Overland Advantage,
et al., (File No. 812-15515) Release No. IC-35286 (July 25, 2024) (notice), Release No. IC-35298 (August 20, 2024) (order); Carlyle Secured Lending, Inc., et al. (File No. 812-15275), Release
No. IC-35213 (June 5, 2024) (notice), Release No. IC-35275 (July 2, 2024) (order); Crescent Capital BDC, Inc., et al. (File No. 812-15450), Release No. IC-35185 (May
2, 2024) (notice), Release No. IC-35209 (May 29, 2024) (order); Antares Private Credit Fund, et al. (File No. 812-15464),
Release No. IC-35152 (Mar. 5, 2024) (notice), Release No. IC-35166 (Apr. 2, 2024) (order); Barings Corporate Investors, et al. (File No. 812-15488), Release No.
IC-35131 (Feb. 14, 2024) (notice), Release No. IC-35158 (Mar. 20, 2024) (order); BIP Ventures Evergreen BDC, et al. (File No.
812-15502), Release No. IC-35127 (Feb. 8, 2024) (notice), Release No. IC-35151 (Mar. 5, 2024) (order); Diameter Credit Company, et al. (File No.812-15490) Release No.
IC-35122 (Feb. 1, 2024) (notice), Release No. IC-35149 (Feb. 27, 2024); Golub Capital BDC Inc., et al. (File No. 812-15431), Release No. IC-35114 (Jan. 25,
2024) (notice), Release No. IC-35149 (Feb. 21, 2024) (order); CAZ Strategic Opportunities Fund, et al. (File No. 812-15493), Release No. IC-35094 (Jan. 19, 2024) (notice),
Release No. IC-35130 (Feb. 14, 2024) (order); AB CarVal Opportunistic Credit Fund, et al. (File No. 812-15429), Release No. IC-35083 (Dec. 27, 2023) (notice), Release No. IC-35093 (Jan. 19, 2024) (order); Saratoga
Investment Advisors, LLC, et al. (File No. 812-15459), Release No. IC-35047 (November 15, 2023) (notice), Release No. IC-35065 (December 12, 2023) (order); Nomura Alternative Income Fund, et al. (File
No. 812-15439), Release No. IC-35045 (November 3, 2023) (notice), Release No. IC-35062 (November 29, 2023) (order); 26North BDC, Inc., et al. (File No. 812-15398), Release No. IC-35036 (October 24, 2023)
(notice), Release No. IC-35049 (November 15, 2023) (order); T. Rowe Price OHA Select Private Credit Fund, et al. (File No. 812-15461) Release No. IC-34963 (July 24, 2023) (notice), Release No. IC-34987
(August 21, 2023) (order); KKR Real Estate Select Trust Inc., et al., (File No. 812-15181) Release No. IC-34962 (July 18, 2023) (notice), Release No.
IC-34985 (Aug. 15, 2023) (order); JPM Private Markets Fund, et al., (File No. 812-15396) Release No. IC-34914 (May 10, 2023) (notice), Release No. IC-34939 (June 6,
2023) (order); Goldman Sachs BDC, Inc., et al., (File No. 812-15237) Release No. IC-34533 (Mar. 15, 2022) (notice), Release No. IC-34753 (Nov. 16, 2022) (order); Sixth
Street Specialty Lending, Inc. et al., (File No. 812-15090) Release No. IC-34644 (July 8, 2022) (notice), Release No. IC-34660 (Aug. 3, 2022) (order); Jefferies Private Credit BDC Inc., et al., (File
No. 812-15136) Release No. IC-34522 (Mar. 2, 2022) (notice), Release No. IC-34511 (Mar. 30, 2022) (order); Apollo Investment Corporation, et al., (File No. 812-15015)
Release No. IC-34432 (Dec. 3, 2021) (notice), Release No. IC-34458 (Dec. 29, 2021) (order); Blackstone/GSO Floating Rate Enhanced Income Fund, et al., (File No.
812-15135) Release No. IC-34412 (Nov. 1, 2021) (notice), Release No. IC-34427 (Nov. 29, 2021) (order), as amended in File No. 812-15317, Release No. IC-34581 (May 11, 2022) (notice), Release No. IC-34612 (June 7,
2022) (order).
|
| 25 |
See., e.g., Commonwealth Credit Partners BDC I, Inc., et al., (File No.812 15195) Release No. IC 34325 (July 7, 2021)
(notice), Release No. IC 34347 (August 2, 2021) (order); Kayne Anderson MLP/Midstream Investment Company, et al., (File No. 812 14940) Release No. IC 33742 (January 8, 2020) (notice), Release No. IC 33798 (February
4, 2020) (order); Prospect Capital Corporation, et al., (File No. 812 14977) Release
|
16
non-discretionary sub-adviser where the adviser needed to approve co-investment decisions made by the
sub-adviser.26 However, the relief requested in this Application extends the adviser/sub-adviser structure to all Regulated Funds and Affiliated Funds relying on the Order. The Applicants believe with this
structure that protective measures contemplated by this Application are responsive to the same concerns considered by the Commission in other contexts, in that both TCW and PNC will have the same distinct and
well-defined roles with respect to each Regulated Fund and Affiliated Fund with a TCW Adviser as its investment adviser. The relief requested in this Application with respect to Follow-On Investments is consistent with
the temporary relief granted by the Commission on April 8, 2020 and subsequent exemptive relief.27 Applicants submit that the allocation procedures set forth in the Conditions for relief are consistent with
and expand the range of investor protections found in the cited orders.
|
E.
|
Statement in Support of Relief Requested
|
In accordance with Rule 17d-1 (made applicable to transactions subject to Section 57(a)
by Section 57(i)), the Commission may grant the requested relief as to any particular joint transaction if it finds that the participation of the Regulated Funds in the joint transaction is consistent with the
provisions, policies and purposes of the Act and is not on a basis different from or less advantageous than that of other participants. Applicants submit that allowing the Co-Investment Transactions described in this
Application is justified on the basis of (i) the potential benefits to the Regulated Funds and the shareholders thereof and (ii) the protections found in the Conditions.
As required by Rule 17d-1(b), the Conditions ensure that the terms on which
Co-Investment Transactions may be made will be consistent with the participation of the Regulated Funds being on a basis that it is neither different from nor less advantageous than other participants, thus protecting
the equity holders of any participant from being disadvantaged. The Conditions ensure that all Co-Investment Transactions are reasonable and fair to the Regulated Funds and their shareholders and do not involve
overreaching by any person concerned, including the Advisers.
|
F.
|
Potential Benefits
|
In the absence of the relief sought hereby, in many circumstances the Regulated Funds
would be limited in their ability to participate in attractive and appropriate investment opportunities. Section 17(d), Section 57(a)(4), and Rule 17d-1 should not prevent BDCs and registered closed-end investment
companies from making investments that are in the best interests of their shareholders.
Each Regulated Fund and its shareholders will benefit from the ability to participate in Co-Investment Transactions. The Board,
including the Required Majority, of each Regulated Fund will determine that it is in the best interests of the Regulated Fund to participate in Co-Investment Transactions because, among other matters, (i) the Regulated
Fund should be able to participate in a larger number and greater variety of transactions; (ii) the Regulated Fund should be able to participate in larger transactions; (iii) the Regulated Fund should be able to
participate in all opportunities approved by a Required Majority or otherwise permissible under the Order rather than risk
| No. IC 33716 (December 16, 2019) (notice), Release No. IC 33745 (January 13, 2020) (order); New Mountain Finance Corporation, et al., (File No. 812 15030) Release No. IC 33624 (September 12, 2019) (notice), Release No. IC 33656 (October 8, 2019) (order); John Hancock GA Mortgage Trust, et al. (File No. 812 14917) Release No. IC 33493 (May 28, 2019) (notice), Release No. IC 33518 (June 25, 2019) (order); BlackRock Capital Investment Corporation, et al. (File No. 812 14955) Release No. IC 33480 (May 21, 2019) (notice), Release No. IC 33515 (June 20, 2019) (order); Nuveen Churchill BDC LLC, et al. (File No. 812 14898) Release No. IC 33475 (May 15, 2019) (notice), Release No. IC 33503 (June 7, 2019) (order). |
| 26 |
See, e.g., Bain Capital Specialty Finance, Inc., et al., (File No.
812-15222) Release No. IC-34422 (November 22, 2021) (notice), Release No. IC-34445 (December 20, 2021) (order); Altegris KKR Commitments Master Fund, et al., (File No. 812-14410) Release No. IC-32265
(September 19, 2016) (notice), Release No. IC-32319 (October 17, 2016) (order); and Corporate Capital Trust, Inc., (File No. 812-13844) Release No. IC-30494 (May 21, 2013) (notice), Release No. IC-30526
(May 21, 2013) (order).
|
| 27 |
BDC Temporary Exemptive Order, Investment Company Act Rel. Nos. 33837 (April 8, 2020) (order) (extension granted January 5, 2021, and further
extension granted April 22, 2021).
|
17
underperformance through rotational allocation of opportunities among the Regulated Funds; (iv) the
Regulated Fund and any other Regulated Funds participating in the proposed investment should have greater bargaining power, more control over the investment and less need to bring in other external investors or
structure investments to satisfy the different needs of external investors; (v) the Regulated Fund should be able to obtain greater attention and better deal flow from investment bankers and others who act as sources
of investments; and (vi) the Conditions are fair to the Regulated Funds and their shareholders.
|
G.
|
Protective Representations and Conditions
|
The Conditions ensure that the proposed Co-Investment Transactions are consistent with
the protection of each Regulated Fund’s shareholders and with the purposes intended by the policies and provisions of the Act. Specifically, the Conditions incorporate the following critical protections: (i) all
Regulated Funds participating in the Co-Investment Transactions will invest at the same time (except that, subject to the limitations in the Conditions, the settlement date for an Affiliated Fund in a Co-Investment
Transaction may occur up to ten business days after the settlement date for the Regulated Fund, and vice versa), for the same price and with the same terms, conditions, class, registration rights and any other rights,
so that none of them receives terms more favorable than any other; (ii) a Required Majority of each Regulated Fund must approve various investment decisions (not including transactions completed on a pro rata basis
pursuant to Conditions 6(c)(i) and 8(b)(i) or otherwise not requiring Board approval) with respect to such Regulated Fund in accordance with the Conditions; and (iii) the Regulated Funds are required to retain and
maintain certain records.
Applicants believe that participation by the Regulated Funds in Pro Rata Follow-On
Investments and Pro Rata Dispositions, as provided in Conditions 6(c)(i) and 8(b)(i), is consistent with the provisions, policies, and purposes of the Act and will not be made on a basis different from or less
advantageous than that of other participants. A formulaic approach, such as pro rata investment or disposition, eliminates the possibility for overreaching and unnecessary prior review by the Board. Applicants note
that the Commission has adopted a similar pro rata approach in the context of Rule 23c-2, which relates to the redemption by a closed-end investment company of less than all of a class of its securities, indicating the
general fairness and lack of overreaching that such approach provides.
Applicants also believe that the participation by the Regulated Funds in
Non-Negotiated Follow-On Investments and in Dispositions of Tradable Securities without the approval of a Required Majority is consistent with the provisions, policies and purposes of the Act as there is no opportunity
for overreaching by affiliates.
If an Adviser, its principals, or any person controlling, controlled by, or under
common control with the Adviser or its principals, and the Affiliated Funds (collectively, the “Holders”) own in the aggregate more than 25 percent of the
outstanding voting shares of a Regulated Fund (the “Shares”), then the Holders will vote such Shares as required under Condition 15.
In sum, Applicants believe that the Conditions would ensure that each Regulated Fund that participates in
any type of Co-Investment Transaction does not participate on a basis different from, or less advantageous than, that of such other participants for purposes of Section 17(d) or Section 57(a)(4) and the Rules under the
Act. As a result, Applicants believe that the participation of the Regulated Funds in Co-Investment Transactions in accordance with the Conditions would be consistent with the provisions, policies, and purposes of the
Act, and would be done in a manner that was not different from, or less advantageous than, the other participants.
18
|
IV.
|
Conditions
|
Applicants agree that any Order granting the requested relief shall be subject to
the following Conditions:
1. Identification and Referral of Potential Co-Investment
Transactions
(a) The Advisers28 will establish, maintain and implement policies and procedures reasonably designed to ensure that each Adviser is promptly notified of all Potential Co-Investment Transactions that
fall within the then-current Objectives and Strategies and Board-Established Criteria of any Regulated Fund the Adviser manages.
(b) When a PNC Adviser to a Regulated Fund is notified of a Potential Co-Investment Transaction under Condition 1(a), the Advisers will make an independent determination of the appropriateness of the investment
for the Regulated Fund in light of the Regulated Fund’s then-current circumstances.
|
2.
|
Board Approvals of Co-Investment Transactions
|
(a) If an Adviser deems a Regulated Fund’s participation in any Potential Co-Investment Transaction to be appropriate for the Regulated Fund, the Adviser will then determine an appropriate level of investment
for the Regulated Fund.
(b) If the aggregate amount recommended by the Advisers to be invested in the Potential Co-Investment Transaction by the participating Regulated Funds and any participating Affiliated Funds, collectively,
exceeds the amount of the investment opportunity, the investment opportunity will be allocated among them pro rata based on the size of the Internal Orders, as described in Section III.A.1.b. above. Each Adviser to
a participating Regulated Fund will promptly notify and provide the Eligible Directors with information concerning the Affiliated Funds’ and Regulated Funds’ order sizes to assist the Eligible Directors with their
review of the applicable Regulated Fund’s investments for compliance with these Conditions.
(c) After making the determinations required in Condition 1(b) above, each Adviser to a participating Regulated Fund will distribute written information concerning the Potential Co-Investment Transaction
(including the amount proposed to be invested by each participating Regulated Fund and each participating Affiliated Fund) to the Eligible Directors of its participating Regulated Fund(s) for their consideration. A
Regulated Fund will enter into a Co-Investment Transaction with one or more other Regulated Funds or Affiliated Funds only if, prior to the Regulated Fund’s participation in the Potential Co-Investment Transaction,
a Required Majority concludes that:
|
(i)
|
the terms of the transaction, including the consideration to be paid, are reasonable and fair
to the Regulated Fund and its equity holders and do not involve overreaching in respect of the Regulated Fund or its equity holders on the part of any person concerned;
|
|
(ii)
|
the transaction is consistent with:
|
|
(A).
|
the interests of the Regulated Fund’s equity holders; and
|
|
(B).
|
the Regulated Fund’s then-current Objectives and Strategies;
|
|
(iii)
|
the investment by any other Regulated Fund(s) or Affiliated Fund(s) would not disadvantage the Regulated Fund, and participation by the Regulated Fund would not be on a
basis different from, or less advantageous than, that of any other Regulated Fund(s) or Affiliated Fund(s) participating in the transaction; provided that the Required Majority shall not be
prohibited from reaching the conclusions required by this Condition 2(c)(iii) if:
|
| 28 |
Any Affiliated Fund that is not advised by an Adviser is itself deemed to be an Adviser for the purposes of Condition 1(a).
|
19
|
(A).
|
the settlement date for another Regulated Fund or an Affiliated Fund in a Co-Investment
Transaction is later than the settlement date for the Regulated Fund by no more than ten business days or earlier than the settlement date for the Regulated Fund by no more than ten business days, in
either case, so long as: (x) the date on which the commitment of the Affiliated Funds and Regulated Funds is made is the same; and (y) the earliest settlement date and the latest settlement date of any
Affiliated Fund or Regulated Fund participating in the transaction will occur within ten business days of each other; or
|
|
(B).
|
any other Regulated Fund or Affiliated Fund, but not the Regulated Fund itself, gains the
right to nominate a director for election to a portfolio company’s board of directors, the right to have a board observer or any similar right to participate in the governance or management of the
portfolio company so long as: (x) the Eligible Directors will have the right to ratify the selection of such director or board observer, if any; (y) the Advisers agree to, and do, provide periodic reports
to the Regulated Fund’s Board with respect to the actions of such director or the information received by such board observer or obtained through the exercise of any similar right to participate in the
governance or management of the portfolio company; and (z) any fees or other compensation that any other Regulated Fund or Affiliated Fund or any affiliated person of any other Regulated Fund or
Affiliated Fund receives in connection with the right of one or more Regulated Funds or Affiliated Funds to nominate a director or appoint a board observer or otherwise to participate in the governance or
management of the portfolio company will be shared proportionately among any participating Affiliated Funds (who may, in turn, share their portion with their affiliated persons) and any participating
Regulated Fund(s) in accordance with the amount of each such party’s investment; and
|
|
(iv)
|
the proposed investment by the Regulated Fund will not involve compensation, remuneration or
a direct or indirect29 financial benefit to the Advisers, any other Regulated Fund, the Affiliated Funds or any affiliated person of any of them (other than the parties to the Co-Investment
Transaction), except (A) to the extent permitted by Condition 14, (B) to the extent permitted by Section 17(e) or 57(k), as applicable, (C) indirectly, as a result of an interest in the securities issued
by one of the parties to the Co-Investment Transaction, or (D) in the case of fees or other compensation described in Condition 2(c)(iii)(B)(z).
|
|
3.
|
Right to Decline.
|
Each Regulated Fund has the right to decline to participate in any Potential
Co-Investment Transaction or to invest less than the amount proposed.
|
4.
|
General Limitation.
|
Except for Follow-On Investments made in accordance with Conditions 8 and 9 below,30
a Regulated Fund will not invest in reliance on the Order in any issuer in which a Related Party has an investment.
|
5.
|
Same Terms and Conditions.
|
A Regulated Fund will not participate in any Potential Co-Investment Transaction unless (i) the terms, conditions, price,
class of securities to be purchased, date on which the commitment is entered into and registration rights (if any) will be the same for each participating Regulated Fund and Affiliated Fund and (ii) the earliest
settlement date and the latest settlement date of any participating Regulated Fund or Affiliated Fund will occur as close in time
| 29 |
For example, procuring the Regulated Fund’s investment in a Potential Co-Investment Transaction to permit an affiliate to complete or obtain better terms in
a separate transaction would constitute an indirect financial benefit.
|
| 30 |
This exception applies only to Follow-On Investments by a Regulated Fund in issuers in which that Regulated Fund already holds investments.
|
20
as practicable and in no event more than ten business days apart. The grant to one or more
Regulated Funds or Affiliated Funds, but not the respective Regulated Fund, of the right to nominate a director for election to a portfolio company’s board of directors, the right to have an observer on the board
of directors or similar rights to participate in the governance or management of the portfolio company will not be interpreted so as to violate this Condition 5, if Condition 2(c)(iii)(B) is met.
|
6.
|
Standard Review Dispositions.
|
(a) General. If any Regulated Fund or Affiliated Fund elects to sell, exchange or otherwise dispose of an interest in a security and one or more Regulated Funds and
Affiliated Funds have previously participated in a Co-Investment Transaction with respect to the issuer, then:
|
(i)
|
the Advisers to such Regulated Fund or Affiliated Fund31 will notify each Regulated Fund that holds
an investment in the issuer of the proposed Disposition at the earliest practical time; and
|
|
(ii)
|
the Advisers to each Regulated Fund that holds an investment in the issuer will formulate a
recommendation as to participation by such Regulated Fund in the Disposition.
|
(b) Same Terms and Conditions. Each Regulated Fund will have the right to participate in such Disposition on a proportionate basis, at the same price and on the same
terms and conditions as those applicable to the Affiliated Funds and any other Regulated Fund.
(c) No Board Approval Required. A Regulated Fund may participate in such Disposition without obtaining prior approval of the Required Majority if:
|
(i)
|
(A) the participation of each Regulated Fund and Affiliated Fund in
such Disposition is proportionate to its then-current holding of the security (or securities) of the issuer that is (or are) the subject of the Disposition;32 (B) the Board of the Regulated
Fund has approved as being in the best interests of the Regulated Fund the ability to participate in such Dispositions on a pro rata basis (as described in greater detail in the Application ); and (C)
the Board of the Regulated Fund is provided on a quarterly basis with a list of all Dispositions made in accordance with this Condition; or
|
|
(ii)
|
each security is a Tradable Security and (A) the Disposition is not to the issuer or any
affiliated person of the issuer; and (B) the security is sold for cash in a transaction in which the only term negotiated by or on behalf of the participating Regulated Funds and Affiliated Funds is
price.
|
(d) Standard Board Approval. In all other cases, the Advisers will provide its written recommendation as to the Regulated Fund’s participation to the Eligible
Directors and the Regulated Fund will participate in such Disposition solely to the extent that a Required Majority determines that it is in the Regulated Fund’s best interests.
|
7.
|
Enhanced Review Dispositions.
|
(a) General. If any Regulated Fund or Affiliated Fund elects to sell, exchange or otherwise dispose of a Pre-Boarding Investment in a Potential Co-Investment
Transaction and the Regulated Funds and Affiliated Funds have not previously participated in a Co-Investment Transaction with respect to the issuer:
|
(i)
|
the Advisers to such Regulated Fund or Affiliated Fund will notify each Regulated Fund that
holds an investment in the issuer of the proposed Disposition at the earliest practical time;
|
| 31 |
Any PNC Proprietary Account that is not advised by a PNC Adviser is itself deemed to be an Adviser for purposes of Conditions 6(a)(i), 7(a)(i), 8(a)(i)
and 9(a)(i).
|
| 32 |
In the case of any Disposition, proportionality will be measured by each participating Regulated Fund’s and Affiliated Fund’s outstanding investment in
the security in question immediately preceding the Disposition.
|
21
|
(ii)
|
the Advisers to each Regulated Fund that holds an investment in the issuer will formulate
a recommendation as to participation by such Regulated Fund in the Disposition; and
|
|
(iii)
|
the Advisers will provide to the Board of each Regulated Fund that holds an investment in
the issuer all information relating to the existing investments in the issuer of the Regulated Funds and Affiliated Funds, including the terms of such investments and how they were made, that is
necessary for the Required Majority to make the findings required by this Condition.
|
(b) Enhanced Board Approval. The Advisers will provide their written recommendation as to the Regulated Fund’s participation to the Eligible Directors, and the
Regulated Fund will participate in such Disposition solely to the extent that a Required Majority determines that:
|
(i)
|
the Disposition complies with Condition 2(c)(i), (ii), (iii)(A), and (iv); and
|
|
(ii)
|
the making and holding of the Pre-Boarding Investments were not prohibited by Section 57
or Rule 17d-1, as applicable, and records the basis for the finding in the Board minutes.
|
(c) Additional Requirements: The Disposition may only be completed in reliance on the Order if:
|
(i)
|
Same Terms and Conditions. Each Regulated Fund
has the right to participate in such Disposition on a proportionate basis, at the same price and on the same terms and Conditions as those applicable to the Affiliated Funds and any other Regulated
Fund;
|
|
(ii)
|
Original Investments. All of the Affiliated
Funds’ and Regulated Funds’ investments in the issuer are Pre-Boarding Investments;
|
|
(iii)
|
Advice of counsel. Independent counsel to the
Board advises that the making and holding of the investments in the Pre-Boarding Investments were not prohibited by Section 57 (as modified by Rule 57b-1) or Rule 17d-1, as applicable;
|
|
(iv)
|
Multiple Classes of Securities. All Regulated
Funds and Affiliated Funds that hold Pre-Boarding Investments in the issuer immediately before the time of completion of the Co-Investment Transaction hold the same security or securities of the
issuer. For the purpose of determining whether the Regulated Funds and Affiliated Funds hold the same security or securities, they may disregard any security held by some but not all of them if, prior
to relying on the Order, the Required Majority is presented with all information necessary to make a finding, and finds, that: (x) any Regulated Fund’s or Affiliated Fund’s holding of a different
class of securities (including for this purpose a security with a different maturity date) is immaterial33 in amount, including immaterial relative to the size of the issuer; and (y) the
Board records the basis for any such finding in its minutes. In addition, securities that differ only in respect of issuance date, currency, or denominations may be treated as the same security; and
|
|
(v)
|
No control. The Affiliated Funds, the other Regulated Funds and their affiliated persons (within the
meaning of Section 2(a)(3)(C) of the Act), individually or in the aggregate, do not control the issuer of the securities (within the meaning of Section 2(a)(9) of the Act).
|
| 33 |
In determining whether a holding is “immaterial” for purposes of the Order, the Required Majority will consider whether the nature and extent of the
interest in the transaction or arrangement is sufficiently small that a reasonable person would not believe that the interest affected the determination of whether to enter into the transaction or
arrangement or the terms of the transaction or arrangement.
|
22
|
8.
|
Standard Review Follow-Ons.
|
(a) General. If any Regulated Fund or Affiliated Fund desires to make a Follow-On Investment in an issuer and the Regulated Funds and Affiliated Funds
holding investments in the issuer previously participated in a Co-Investment Transaction with respect to the issuer:
|
(i)
|
the Advisers to each such Regulated Fund or Affiliated Fund will notify each Regulated
Fund that holds securities of the portfolio company of the proposed transaction at the earliest practical time; and
|
|
(ii)
|
the Advisers to each Regulated Fund that holds an investment in the issuer will
formulate a recommendation as to the proposed participation, including the amount of the proposed investment, by such Regulated Fund.
|
(b) No Board Approval Required. A Regulated Fund may participate in the Follow-On Investment without obtaining prior approval of the Required Majority
if:
|
(i)
|
(A) the proposed participation of each Regulated Fund and each Affiliated Fund in such
investment is proportionate to its outstanding investments in the issuer or the security at issue, as appropriate,34 immediately preceding the Follow-On Investment; and (B) the Board of
the Regulated Fund has approved as being in the best interests of the Regulated Fund the ability to participate in Follow-On Investments on a pro rata basis (as described in greater detail in this
Application ); or
|
|
(ii)
|
it is a Non-Negotiated Follow-On Investment.
|
(c) Standard Board Approval. In all other cases, the Advisers will provide their written recommendation as to the Regulated Fund’s participation to the
Eligible Directors and the Regulated Fund will participate in such Follow-On Investment solely to the extent that a Required Majority makes the determinations set forth in Condition 2(c). If the only
previous Co-Investment Transaction with respect to the issuer was an Enhanced Review Disposition the Eligible Directors must complete this review of the proposed Follow-On Investment both on a stand-alone
basis and together with the Pre-Boarding Investments in relation to the total economic exposure and other terms of the investment.
(d) Allocation. If, with respect to any such Follow-On Investment:
|
(i)
|
the amount of the opportunity proposed to be made available to any Regulated Fund is
not based on the Regulated Funds’ and the Affiliated Funds’ outstanding investments in the issuer or the security at issue, as appropriate, immediately preceding the Follow-On Investment; and
|
|
(ii)
|
the aggregate amount recommended by the Advisers to be invested in the Follow-On
Investment by the participating Regulated Funds and any participating Affiliated Funds, collectively, exceeds the amount of the investment opportunity, then the Follow-On Investment opportunity will
be allocated among them pro rata based on the size of the Internal Orders, as described in Section III.A.1.b. above.
|
| 34 |
To the extent that a Follow-On Investment opportunity is in a security or arises in respect of a security held by the participating Regulated Funds
and Affiliated Funds, proportionality will be measured by each participating Regulated Fund’s and Affiliated Fund’s outstanding investment in the security in question immediately preceding the
Follow-On Investment using the most recent available valuation thereof. To the extent that a Follow-On Investment opportunity relates to an opportunity to invest in a security that is not in respect
of any security held by any of the participating Regulated Funds or Affiliated Funds, proportionality will be measured by each participating Regulated Fund’s and Affiliated Fund’s outstanding
investment in the issuer immediately preceding the Follow-On Investment using the most recent available valuation thereof.
|
23
(e) Other Conditions. The acquisition of Follow-On Investments as permitted by this Condition will be
considered a Co-Investment Transaction for all purposes and subject to the other Conditions set forth in this Application.
|
9.
|
Enhanced Review Follow-Ons.
|
(a) General. If any Regulated Fund or Affiliated Fund desires to make a Follow-On Investment in an issuer that is a Potential Co-Investment Transaction
and the Regulated Funds and Affiliated Funds holding investments in the issuer have not previously participated in a Co-Investment Transaction with respect to the issuer:
|
(i)
|
the Advisers to each such Regulated Fund or Affiliated Fund will notify each
Regulated Fund that holds securities of the portfolio company of the proposed transaction at the earliest practical time;
|
|
(ii)
|
the Advisers to each Regulated Fund that holds an investment in the issuer will
formulate a recommendation as to the proposed participation, including the amount of the proposed investment, by such Regulated Fund; and
|
|
(iii)
|
the Advisers will provide to the Board of each Regulated Fund that holds an
investment in the issuer all information relating to the existing investments in the issuer of the Regulated Funds and Affiliated Funds, including the terms of such investments and how they were
made, that is necessary for the Required Majority to make the findings required by this Condition.
|
(b) Enhanced Board Approval. The Advisers will provide their written recommendation as to the Regulated Fund’s participation to the Eligible Directors,
and the Regulated Fund will participate in such Follow-On Investment solely to the extent that a Required Majority reviews the proposed Follow-On Investment both on a stand-alone basis and together with
the Pre-Boarding Investments in relation to the total economic exposure and other terms and makes the determinations set forth in Condition 2(c). In addition, the Follow-On Investment may only be
completed in reliance on the Order if the Required Majority of each participating Regulated Fund determines that the making and holding of the Pre-Boarding Investments were not prohibited by Section 57
(as modified by Rule 57b-1) or Rule 17d-1, as applicable. The basis for the Board’s findings will be recorded in its minutes.
(c) Additional Requirements. The Follow-On Investment may only be completed in reliance on the Order if:
|
(i)
|
Original Investments. All of the Affiliated
Funds’ and Regulated Funds’ investments in the issuer are Pre-Boarding Investments;
|
|
(ii)
|
Advice of counsel. Independent counsel to
the Board advises that the making and holding of the investments in the Pre-Boarding Investments were not prohibited by Section 57 (as modified by Rule 57b-1) or Rule 17d-1, as applicable;
|
|
(iii)
|
Multiple Classes of Securities. All
Regulated Funds and Affiliated Funds that hold Pre-Boarding Investments in the issuer immediately before the time of completion of the Co-Investment Transaction hold the same security or
securities of the issuer. For the purpose of determining whether the Regulated Funds and Affiliated Funds hold the same security or securities, they may disregard any security held by some but not
all of them if, prior to relying on the Order, the Required Majority is presented with all information necessary to make a finding, and finds, that: (x) any Regulated Fund’s or Affiliated Fund’s
holding of a different class of securities (including for this purpose a security with a different maturity date) is immaterial in amount, including immaterial relative to the size of the issuer;
and (y) the Board records the basis for any such finding in its minutes. In addition, securities that differ only in respect of issuance date, currency, or denominations may be treated as the same
security; and
|
|
(iv)
|
No control. The Affiliated Funds, the other
Regulated Funds and their affiliated persons (within the meaning of Section 2(a)(3)(C) of the Act), individually or in the aggregate, do not control the issuer of the securities (within the
meaning of Section 2(a)(9) of the Act).
|
24
(d) Allocation. If, with respect to any such Follow-On Investment:
|
(i)
|
the amount of the opportunity proposed to be made available to any Regulated Fund
is not based on the Regulated Funds’ and the Affiliated Funds’ outstanding investments in the issuer or the security at issue, as appropriate, immediately preceding the Follow-On Investment; and
|
|
(ii)
|
the aggregate amount recommended by the Advisers to be invested in the Follow-On
Investment by the participating Regulated Funds and any participating Affiliated Funds, collectively, exceeds the amount of the investment opportunity,
|
then the Follow-On Investment opportunity will be allocated among them
pro rata based on the size of the Internal Orders, as described in Section III.A.1.b. above.
(e) Other Conditions. The acquisition of Follow-On Investments as permitted by this Condition will be considered a Co-Investment Transaction for all
purposes and subject to the other Conditions set forth in this Application.
|
10.
|
Board Reporting, Compliance and Annual Re-Approval
|
(a) Each Adviser to a Regulated Fund will present to the Board of each Regulated Fund, on a quarterly basis, and at such other times as the Board may request, (i) a record of all investments
in Potential Co-Investment Transactions made by any of the other Regulated Funds or any of the Affiliated Funds during the preceding quarter that fell within the Regulated Fund’s then-current Objectives
and Strategies and Board-Established Criteria that were not made available to the Regulated Fund, and an explanation of why such investment opportunities were not made available to the Regulated Fund;
(ii) a record of all Follow-On Investments in and Dispositions of investments in any issuer in which the Regulated Fund holds any investments by any Affiliated Fund or other Regulated Fund during the
prior quarter; and (iii) all information concerning Potential Co-Investment Transactions and Co-Investment Transactions, including investments made by other Regulated Funds or Affiliated Funds that the
Regulated Fund considered but declined to participate in, so that the Independent Directors, may determine whether all Potential Co-Investment Transactions and Co-Investment Transactions during the
preceding quarter, including those investments that the Regulated Fund considered but declined to participate in, comply with the Conditions.
(b) All information presented to the Regulated Fund’s Board pursuant to this Condition will be kept for the life of the Regulated Fund and at least two years thereafter, and will be subject
to examination by the Commission and its staff.
(c) Each Regulated Fund’s chief compliance officer, as defined in rule 38a-1(a)(4), will prepare an annual report for its Board each year that evaluates (and documents the basis of that
evaluation) the Regulated Fund’s compliance with the terms and Conditions of the application and the procedures established to achieve such compliance. In the case of a BDC Downstream Fund that does
not have a chief compliance officer, the chief compliance officer of the BDC that controls the BDC Downstream Fund will prepare the report for the relevant Independent Party.
(d) The Independent Directors (including the non-interested members of each Independent Party) will consider at least annually whether continued participation in new and existing
Co-Investment Transactions is in the Regulated Fund’s best interests.
|
11.
|
Record Keeping.
|
Each Regulated Fund will maintain the records required by Section 57(f)(3) of the Act as if each of the Regulated
Funds were a BDC and each of the investments permitted under these Conditions were approved by the Required Majority under Section 57(f).
25
|
12.
|
Director Independence.
|
No Independent Director (including the non-interested members of any
Independent Party) of a Regulated Fund will also be a director, general partner, managing member or principal, or otherwise be an “affiliated person” (as defined in the Act) of any Affiliated Fund.
|
13.
|
Expenses.
|
The expenses, if any, associated with acquiring, holding or disposing
of any securities acquired in a Co-Investment Transaction (including, without limitation, the expenses of the distribution of any such securities registered for sale under the Securities Act) will, to
the extent not payable by the Advisers under their respective advisory agreements with the Regulated Funds and the Affiliated Funds, be shared by the Regulated Funds and the participating Affiliated
Funds in proportion to the relative amounts of the securities held or being acquired or disposed of, as the case may be.
|
14.
|
Transaction Fees.35
|
Any transaction fee (including break-up, structuring, monitoring or
commitment fees but excluding brokerage or underwriting compensation permitted by Section 17(e) or 57(k)) received in connection with any Co-Investment Transaction will be distributed to the
participants on a pro rata basis based on the amounts they invested or committed, as the case may be, in such Co-Investment Transaction. If any transaction fee is to be held by an Adviser pending
consummation of the transaction, the fee will be deposited into an account maintained by the Adviser at a bank or banks having the qualifications prescribed in Section 26(a)(1) of the Act, and the
account will earn a competitive rate of interest that will also be divided pro rata among the participants. None of the Advisers, the Affiliated Funds, the other Regulated Funds or any affiliated person
of the Affiliated Funds or the Regulated Funds will receive any additional compensation or remuneration of any kind as a result of or in connection with a Co-Investment Transaction other than (i) in the
case of the Regulated Funds and the Affiliated Funds, the pro rata transaction fees described above and fees or other compensation described in Condition 2(c)(iii)(B)(z), (ii) brokerage or underwriting
compensation permitted by Section 17(e) or 57(k) of the Act or (iii) in the case of the Advisers, investment advisory compensation paid in accordance with investment advisory agreements between the
applicable Regulated Fund(s) or Affiliated Fund(s) and its Advisers.
|
15.
|
Independence.
|
If the Holders own in the aggregate more than 25 percent of the Shares
of a Regulated Fund, then the Holders will vote such Shares in the same percentages as the Regulated Fund’s other shareholders (not including the Holders) when voting on (1) the election of directors;
(2) the removal of one or more directors; or (3) any other matter under either the Act or applicable State law affecting the Board’s composition, size or manner of election.
|
V.
|
Procedural Matters
|
|
A.
|
Communications
|
Please address all communications concerning this Application and the Notice and Order to:
|
c/o The PNC Financial Services Group, Inc.
The Tower at PNC, 300 Fifth Avenue Pittsburgh, PA 15222 Attention: Laura Long (412) 762-4283 (Tel.) |
| 35 |
Applicants are not requesting and the Commission is not providing any relief for transaction fees received in connection with any Co-Investment
Transaction.
|
26
c/o The TCW Group, Inc.
515 South Flower Street
Los Angeles, California 90071
Attention: Kevin Finch
(213) 244-0000 (Tel.)
Please address any questions, and a copy of any communications, concerning this Application, the Notice
and Order to:
Richard Horowitz, Esq.
Cynthia Beyea, Esq.
Dechert LLP
1095 Avenue of the Americas
New York, NY, 10036
(212) 698-3525
and
Vadim Avdeychik, Esq.
Clifford Chance US LLP
Two Manhattan West
375 9th Avenue
New York, New York 10001
(212) 878-8000
|
B.
|
Authorization
|
The verifications required by Rule 0-2(d) and the authorizations required by Rule 0-2(c) under the Act
are attached hereto as Exhibit A and B.
Pursuant to Rule 0-2 under the Act, each Applicant declares that this Application for a Commission
order is signed by an authorized person of each Applicant pursuant to the general authority vested in him or her as such by the operating agreement, management agreement, certificate of
incorporation and by-laws or certificate of formation, limited liability company agreement or otherwise of each Applicant; and that all actions by members, directors or other bodies necessary to
authorize each such person to execute and file the Application have been taken.
|
VI.
|
Request for Order of Exemption
|
For the foregoing reasons, Applicants request that the Commission enter an Order under Sections 17(d) and 57(i) of the Act and
Rule 17d-1 under the Act granting Applicants the relief sought by the Application. Applicants submit that the requested exemption is consistent with the protection of investors.
27
| Dated: March 26, 2025 |
|
|
|
TCW STEEL CITY PERPETUAL LEVERED FUND LP
|
|
|
By: TCW Steel City GP LLC, its general partner
|
|
|
By: TCW PT MANAGEMENT COMPANY LLC, its managing member
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
By: /s/ Andrew Kim
Name: Andrew Kim
Title: Managing Director
|
|
|
|
|
|
By: /s/ Kevin Finch
Name: Kevin Finch
Title: Senior Vice President
|
|
|
TCW STEEL CITY UNLEVERED PRIVATE FUND LP
|
|
|
By: TCW Steel City GP LLC, its general partner
|
|
|
By: TCW PT MANAGEMENT COMPANY LLC, its managing member
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
By: /s/ Andrew Kim
Name: Andrew Kim
Title: Managing Director
|
|
|
|
|
|
By: /s/ Kevin Finch
Name: Kevin Finch
Title: Senior Vice President
|
|
|
PNC STEEL CITY ADVISORS, LLC
|
|
|
|
|
|
By: /s/ Peter Mardaga
Name: Peter Mardaga
Title: Executive Vice President
|
|
|
|
|
|
TCW PT MANAGEMENT COMPANY LLC
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
By: /s/ Andrew Kim
Name: Andrew Kim
Title: Managing Director
|
|
|
|
|
|
By: /s/ Kevin Finch
Name: Kevin Finch
Title: Senior Vice President
|
28
Exhibit A
Verification of Statement of Facts and Application pursuant to Rule 17d-1 under the
Investment Company Act of 1940 for an Order of the Commission
Investment Company Act of 1940 for an Order of the Commission
Each undersigned states that he or she has duly executed the attached Application for an order under Sections 17(d) and 57(i) of the
Investment Company Act of 1940 and Rule 17d-1 under the Investment Company Act of 1940, dated March 26, 2025, for and on behalf of, as applicable, TCW Steel City Perpetual Levered Fund
LP; TCW Steel City Unlevered Private Fund LP; and TCW PT Management Company LLC, and that all actions by stockholders, directors, members, and
other bodies necessary to authorize the undersigned to execute and file such Application have been taken. Each undersigned further says that he or she is familiar with the instrument
and the contents thereof, and that the facts set forth therein are true to the best of his or her knowledge, information, and belief.
|
|
TCW STEEL CITY PERPETUAL LEVERED FUND LP
|
|
|
By: TCW Steel City GP LLC, its general partner
|
|
|
By: TCW PT MANAGEMENT COMPANY LLC, its managing member
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
By: /s/ Andrew Kim
Name: Andrew Kim
Title: Managing Director
|
|
|
|
|
|
By: /s/ Kevin Finch
Name: Kevin Finch
Title: Senior Vice President
|
|
|
TCW STEEL CITY UNLEVERED PRIVATE FUND LP
|
|
|
By: TCW Steel City GP LLC, its general partner
|
|
|
By: TCW PT MANAGEMENT COMPANY LLC, its managing member
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
By: /s/ Andrew Kim
Name: Andrew Kim
Title: Managing Director
|
|
|
|
|
|
By: /s/ Kevin Finch
Name: Kevin Finch
Title: Senior Vice President
|
|
|
TCW PT MANAGEMENT COMPANY LLC
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
By: /s/ Andrew Kim
Name: Andrew Kim
Title: Managing Director
|
|
|
|
|
|
By: /s/ Kevin Finch
Name: Kevin Finch
Title: Senior Vice President
|
29
Exhibit B
Verification of Statement of Facts and Application pursuant to Rule 17d-1 under the
Investment Company Act of 1940 for an Order of the Commission
Investment Company Act of 1940 for an Order of the Commission
The undersigned states that he or she has duly executed the attached Application for an order under Sections 17(d) and 57(i) of the Investment
Company Act of 1940 and Rule 17d-1 under the Investment Company Act of 1940, dated March 26, 2025, for and on behalf of, as applicable, PNC Steel City Advisors, LLC, and that all actions by stockholders, directors, members, and other bodies necessary to authorize the undersigned to execute and file such
Application have been taken. The undersigned further says that he or she is familiar with the instrument and the contents thereof, and that the facts set forth therein are true
to the best of his or her knowledge, information, and belief.
|
|
PNC STEEL CITY ADVISORS, LLC
|
|
|
|
|
|
By: /s/ Peter Mardaga
Name: Peter Mardaga
Title: Executive Vice President
|
30
Serious News for Serious Traders! Try StreetInsider.com Premium Free!
You May Also Be Interested In
- Orbis International's Flying Eye Hospital Arrives in Peru to Expand Access to Essential Eye Care
- Tradr to Ring Opening Bell at Cboe to Celebrate SpaceX ETF Launches
- Over 100 Organizations Thank America’s Blood Donors on World Blood Donor Day
Create E-mail Alert Related Categories
SEC FilingsSign up for StreetInsider Free!
Receive full access to all new and archived articles, unlimited portfolio tracking, e-mail alerts, custom newswires and RSS feeds - and more!



Tweet
Share