Form 40-APP RoboStrategy, Inc.
File No. 812-
U.S. SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
In the Matter of the Application of:
FP STRATEGIES LLC
ROBOSTRATEGY, INC.
151 Calle de San Francisco, Suite 200
San Juan, Puerto Rico 00901
SATYA ROBO HOLDINGS LLC
1250 Ave Ponce de Leon, Suite 301 PMB 1902
San Juan, Puerto Rico 00907
EXPEDITED REVIEW REQUESTED UNDER 17 CFR 270.0-5(d)
APPLICATION FOR AN ORDER PURSUANT TO
SECTIONS 17(d) AND 57(i) OF THE INVESTMENT COMPANY ACT OF 1940 AND RULE 17d-1
UNDER THE INVESTMENT COMPANY ACT OF 1940 PERMITTING CERTAIN JOINT
TRANSACTIONS OTHERWISE PROHIBITED BY SECTIONS 17(d) AND 57(a)(4) OF AND RULE
17d-1 UNDER THE INVESTMENT COMPANY ACT OF 1940
All Communications, Notices and Orders to:
Marc Weinstein
FP Strategies LLC
151 Calle de San Francisco, Suite 200
San Juan, Puerto Rico 00901
Telephone 787-722-6881
Copies to:
Owen J. Pinkerton, Esq.
Anne G. Oberndorf, Esq.
Krisztina Nadasdy, Esq.
Eversheds Sutherland (US) LLP
700 Sixth Street, NW, Suite 700
Washington, DC 20001
Telephone (202) 383-0100
February 6, 2026
This Application (including Exhibits) contains 57 pages.
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
BEFORE THE
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
|
IN THE MATTER OF
FP STRATEGIES LLC ROBOSTRATEGY, INC.
151 CALLE DE SAN FRANCISCO, SUITE 200 SAN JUAN, PUERTO RICO 00901
SATYA ROBO HOLDINGS LLC
1250 AVE PONCE DE LEON, SUITE 301 PMB 1902 SAN JUAN, PUERTO RICO 00907
File No. 812- |
: : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : |
APPLICATION FOR AN ORDER PURSUANT TO SECTIONS 17(d) AND 57(i) OF THE INVESTMENT COMPANY ACT OF 1940 AND RULE 17d-1 UNDER THE INVESTMENT COMPANY ACT OF 1940 PERMITTING CERTAIN JOINT TRANSACTIONS OTHERWISE PROHIBITED BY SECTIONS 17(d) AND 57(a)(4) OF AND RULE 17d-1 UNDER THE INVESTMENT COMPANY ACT OF 1940 |
| I. | SUMMARY OF APPLICATION |
The following entities hereby request an order (the “Order”) of the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (the “SEC” or “Commission”) pursuant to Sections 17(d) and 57(i) of the Investment Company Act of 1940, as amended (the “1940 Act”),1 and Rule 17d-1, permitting certain joint transactions otherwise prohibited by Sections 17(d) and 57(a)(4) of the 1940 Act and Rule 17d-1 thereunder.
| · | RoboStrategy, Inc. (the “Existing Regulated Fund”), an externally-managed, non-diversified, closed-end management investment company registered under the 1940 Act; |
| · | FP Strategies LLC (the “Existing Adviser”), a Puerto Rico limited liability company that is registered as an investment adviser under the Investment Advisers Act of 1940, as amended (the “Advisers Act”) and serves as the investment adviser to the Existing Regulated Fund, on behalf of itself and its successors2; and |
| 1 | Unless otherwise indicated, all section and rule references herein are to the 1940 Act and rules promulgated thereunder. |
| 2 | The term “successor” means an entity that results from a reorganization into another jurisdiction or change in the type of business organization. |
2
| · | Satya Robo Holdings LLC, an entity wholly owned by an affiliate of the Existing Adviser that, from time to time, will hold various financial assets in a principal capacity and that currently intends to participate in Co-Investment Transactions (in such capacity, the “Existing Proprietary Account,” and collectively with the Existing Regulated Fund and Existing Adviser, the “Applicants”).3 |
The relief requested in this application for the Order (the “Application”) would allow a Regulated Fund4 and one or more Affiliated Entities5 to engage in Co-Investment Transactions6 subject to the terms and conditions described herein. The Regulated Funds and Affiliated Entities that participate in a Co-Investment Transaction are collectively referred to herein as “Participants.”7 The Applicants do not seek relief for transactions effected consistent with Commission staff no-action positions.8
| 3 | All existing entities that currently intend to rely upon the requested Order have been named as Applicants. Any other existing or future entity that subsequently relies on the Order will comply with the terms and conditions of the Application. |
| 4 | “Regulated Fund” means the Existing Regulated Fund and any Future Regulated Funds. “Future Regulated Fund” means an entity (a) that is a closed-end management investment company registered under the 1940 Act, or a closed-end management investment company that has elected to be regulated as a business development company under the 1940 Act, (b) whose (1) primary investment adviser or (2) sub-adviser is an Adviser (as defined below) and (c) that intends to engage in Co-Investment Transactions. If an Adviser serves as sub-adviser to a Regulated Fund whose primary adviser is not also an Adviser, such primary adviser shall be deemed to be an Adviser with respect to conditions 3 and 4 only. |
The term Regulated Fund also includes (a) any Wholly-Owned Investment Sub (as defined below) of a Regulated Fund, (b) any Joint Venture (as defined below) of a Regulated Fund, and (c) any BDC Downstream Fund (as defined below) of a Regulated Fund that is a business development company. “Wholly-Owned Investment Sub” means an entity: (a) that is a “wholly-owned subsidiary” (as defined in Section 2(a)(43) of the 1940 Act) of a Regulated Fund; (b) whose sole business purpose is to hold one or more investments and which may issue debt on behalf or in lieu of such Regulated Fund; and (c) is not a registered investment company or a business development company. “Joint Venture” means an unconsolidated joint venture subsidiary of a Regulated Fund, in which all portfolio decisions, and generally all other decisions in respect of such joint venture, must be approved by an investment committee consisting of representatives of the Regulated Fund and the unaffiliated joint venture partner (with approval from a representative of each required). “BDC Downstream Fund” means an entity (a) directly or indirectly controlled by a Regulated Fund that is a business development company, (b) that is not controlled by any person other than the Regulated Fund (except a person that indirectly controls the entity solely because it controls the Regulated Fund), (c) that would be an investment company but for Section 3(c)(1) or 3(c)(7) of the 1940 Act, (d) whose investment adviser is an Adviser and (e) that is not a Wholly-Owned Investment Sub.
In the case of a Wholly-Owned Investment Sub that does not have a chief compliance officer or a Board, the chief compliance officer and Board of the Regulated Fund that controls the Wholly-Owned Investment Sub will be deemed to serve those roles for the Wholly-Owned Investment Sub. In the case of a Joint Venture or a BDC Downstream Fund (as applicable) that does not have a chief compliance officer or a Board, the chief compliance officer of the Regulated Fund will be deemed to be the Joint Venture’s or BDC Downstream Fund’s chief compliance officer, and the Joint Venture’s or BDC Downstream Fund’s investment committee will be deemed to be the Joint Venture’s or BDC Downstream Fund’s Board.
| 5 | “Affiliated Entity” means an entity not controlled by a Regulated Fund that intends to engage in Co-Investment Transactions and that is (a) with respect to a Regulated Fund, another Regulated Fund; (b) an Adviser or its affiliates (other than an open-end investment company registered under the 1940 Act), and any direct or indirect, wholly- or majority-owned subsidiary of an Adviser or its affiliates (other than of an open-end investment company registered under the 1940 Act), that is participating in a Co-Investment Transaction in a principal capacity; or (c) any entity that would be an investment company but for Section 3(c) of the 1940 Act or Rule 3a-7 thereunder and whose investment adviser is an Adviser. |
To the extent that an entity described in clause (b) is not advised by an Adviser, such entity shall be deemed to be an Adviser for purposes of the conditions.
| 6 | “Co-Investment Transaction” means the acquisition or Disposition of securities of an issuer in a transaction effected in reliance on the Order or previously granted relief. |
| 7 | “Adviser” means the Existing Adviser, and any other investment adviser controlling, controlled by, or under common control with the Existing Adviser. The term “Adviser” also includes any internally-managed Regulated Fund. |
| 8 | See, e.g., Massachusetts Mutual Life Insurance Co. (pub. avail. June 7, 2000), Massachusetts Mutual Life Insurance Co. (pub. avail. July 28, 2000) and SMC Capital, Inc. (pub. avail. Sept. 5, 1995). |
3
| II. | GENERAL DESCRIPTION OF THE APPLICANTS |
| A. | The Existing Regulated Fund |
The Existing Regulated Fund was formed as a Maryland corporation under the Maryland General Corporation Law on May 23, 2025, and operates as an externally-managed, non-diversified, closed-end management investment company registered under the 1940 Act. The Existing Regulated Fund’s principal place of business is 151 Calle de San Francisco, Suite 200, San Juan, Puerto Rico 00901.
The Existing Regulated Fund’s investment objective is to seek long-term capital appreciation, principally through capital gains on equity and equity-linked investments in robotics and artificial intelligence companies. The Existing Regulated Fund focuses primarily on private, venture-capital-backed private companies with significant growth potential, many of which are not yet publicly listed or widely accessible to individual investors. The Existing Regulated Fund has a five-member board (the “Existing Fund Board,” and together with any Future Regulated Fund’s board, the “Board”), of which three members are not “interested” persons of the Existing Regulated Fund within the meaning of Section 2(a)(19) of the 1940 Act.9
| B. | The Existing Proprietary Account |
The Existing Proprietary Account will, from time to time, hold various financial assets in a principal capacity. The Existing Adviser and its affiliates operate various business lines directly or through their wholly- or majority-owned subsidiaries, and the affiliate that exists and currently intends to participate in Co-Investment Transactions has been included as an Applicant herein.
| C. | Existing Adviser |
The Existing Adviser serves as the investment adviser of the Existing Regulated Fund, and either it or another Adviser will serve as the investment adviser to any Future Regulated Fund. The Existing Adviser is a Puerto Rico limited liability company and is a registered investment adviser with the Commission under the Advisers Act. On the date of this Application, the Existing Adviser’s sole client that intends to rely on this application is the Existing Regulated Fund.
Under the terms of an investment advisory agreement with the Existing Regulated Fund, the Existing Adviser will, among other things, manage the investment portfolio, direct purchases and sales of portfolio securities and report thereon to the Existing Regulated Fund’s officers and Board regularly.
| III. | ORDER REQUESTED |
The Applicants request an Order of the Commission pursuant to Sections 17(d) and 57(i) of the 1940 Act and Rule 17d-1 thereunder to permit, subject to the terms and conditions set forth below in this Application (the “Conditions”), each Regulated Fund to be able to participate with one or more Affiliated Entities in Co-Investment Transactions otherwise prohibited by Sections 17(d) and 57(a)(4) of the 1940 Act and Rule 17d-1 thereunder.
| A. | Applicable Law |
Section 17(d), in relevant part, prohibits an affiliated person, or an affiliated person of such affiliated person, of a registered investment company, acting as principal, from effecting any transaction in which the registered investment company is “a joint or a joint and several participant with such person” in contravention of such rules as the SEC may prescribe “for the purpose of limiting or preventing participation by such [fund] on a basis different from or less advantageous than that of such other participant.”
| 9 | The Board of each Future Regulated Fund will consist of a majority of members who are not “interested persons” of such Future Regulated Fund within the meaning of Section 2(a)(19) of the 1940 Act. |
4
Rule 17d-1 prohibits an affiliated person, or an affiliated person of such affiliated person, of a registered investment company, acting as principal, from participating in, or effecting any transaction in connection with, any “joint enterprise or other joint arrangement or profit-sharing plan”10 in which the fund is a participant without first obtaining an order from the SEC.
Section 57(a)(4), in relevant part, prohibits any person related to a business development company in the manner described in Section 57(b), acting as principal, from knowingly effecting any transaction in which the business development company is a joint or a joint and several participant with such persons in contravention of such rules as the Commission may prescribe for the purpose of limiting or preventing participation by the business development company on a basis less advantageous than that of such person. Section 57(i) provides that, until the SEC prescribes rules under Section 57(a), the SEC’s rules under Section 17(d) applicable to registered closed-end investment companies will be deemed to apply to persons subject to the prohibitions of Section 57(a). Because the SEC has not adopted any rules under Section 57(a), Rule 17d-1 applies to persons subject to the prohibitions of Section 57(a).
Rule 17d-1(b) provides, in relevant part, that in passing upon applications under the rule, the Commission will consider whether the participation of a registered investment company in a joint enterprise, joint arrangement or profit-sharing plan on the basis proposed is consistent with the provisions, policies and purposes of the 1940 Act and the extent to which such participation is on a basis different from or less advantageous than that of other participants.
| B. | Need for Relief |
Each Regulated Fund may be deemed to be an affiliated person of each other Regulated Fund within the meaning of Section 2(a)(3) if it is deemed to be under common control because an Adviser is or will be either the investment adviser or sub-adviser to each Regulated Fund. Section 17(d) and Section 57(b) apply to any investment adviser to a closed-end fund or a business development company, respectively, including a sub-adviser. Thus, an Adviser and any Affiliated Entities that it advises could be deemed to be persons related to Regulated Funds in a manner described by Sections 17(d) and 57(b). With respect to the Existing Adviser and any other Advisers that are deemed to be affiliated persons of the Existing Adviser, Affiliated Entities advised by any of them could be deemed to be persons related to Regulated Funds (or a company controlled by a Regulated Fund) in a manner described by Sections 17(d) and 57(b). In addition, any entities or accounts controlled by or under common control with the Existing Adviser, and/or any other Advisers that are deemed to be affiliated persons of each other that may, from time to time, hold various financial assets in a principal capacity, could be deemed to be persons related to Regulated Funds (or a company controlled by a Regulated Fund) in a manner described by Sections 17(d) and 57(b). Finally, with respect to any Wholly-Owned Investment Sub, Joint Venture, or BDC Downstream Fund of a Regulated Fund, such entity would be a company controlled by its parent Regulated Fund for purposes of Section 57(a)(4) of the 1940 Act and Rule 17d-l under the 1940 Act.
| C. | Conditions |
Applicants agree that any Order granting the requested relief will be subject to the following Conditions.
1. Same Terms. With respect to any Co-Investment Transaction, each Regulated Fund and Affiliated Entity participating in such transaction will acquire, or dispose of, as the case may be, the same class of securities, at the same time, for the same price and with the same conversion, financial reporting and registration rights, and with substantially the same other terms (provided that the settlement date for an Affiliated Entity may occur up to ten business days after the settlement date for the Regulated Fund, and vice versa). If a Participant, but not all of the Regulated Funds, has the right to nominate a director for election to a portfolio company’s board of directors, the right to appoint a board observer or any similar right to participate in the governance or management of a portfolio company, the Board of each Regulated Fund that does not hold this right must be given the opportunity to veto the selection of such person.11
| 10 | Rule 17d-1(c) defines a “[j]oint enterprise or other joint arrangement or profit-sharing plan” to include, in relevant part, “any written or oral plan, contract, authorization or arrangement or any practice or understanding concerning an enterprise or undertaking whereby a registered investment company … and any affiliated person of or principal underwriter for such registered company, or any affiliated person of such a person or principal underwriter, have a joint or a joint and several participation, or share in the profits of such enterprise or undertaking ….” |
| 11 | Such a Board can also, consistent with applicable fund documents, facilitate this opportunity by delegating the authority to veto the selection of such person to a committee of the Board. |
5
2. Existing Investments in the Issuer. Prior to a Regulated Fund acquiring in a Co-Investment Transaction a security of an issuer in which an Affiliated Entity has an existing interest in such issuer, the “required majority,” as defined in Section 57(o) of the 1940 Act,12 of the Regulated Fund (“Required Majority”) will take the steps set forth in Section 57(f) of the 1940 Act,13 unless: (i) the Regulated Fund already holds the same security as each such Affiliated Entity; and (ii) the Regulated Fund and each other Affiliated Entity holding the security is participating in the acquisition in approximate proportion to its then-current holdings.
3. Related Expenses. Any expenses associated with acquiring, holding or disposing of any securities acquired in a Co-Investment Transaction, to the extent not borne by the Adviser(s), will be shared among the Participants in proportion to the relative amounts of the securities being acquired, held or disposed of, as the case may be.14
4. No Remuneration. Any transaction fee15 (including break-up, structuring, monitoring or commitment fees but excluding broker’s fees contemplated by section 17(e) or 57(k) of the 1940 Act, as applicable), received by an Adviser and/or a Participant in connection with a Co-Investment Transaction will be distributed to the Participants on a pro rata basis based on the amounts they invested or committed, as the case may be, in such Co-Investment Transaction. If any transaction fee is to be held by an Adviser pending consummation of the transaction, the fee will be deposited into an account maintained by the Adviser at a bank or banks having the qualifications prescribed in section 26(a)(1) of the 1940 Act, and the account will earn a competitive rate of interest that will also be divided pro rata among the Participants based on the amount they invest in such Co-Investment Transaction. No Affiliated Entity, Regulated Fund, or any of their affiliated persons will accept any compensation, remuneration or financial benefit in connection with a Regulated Fund’s participation in a Co-Investment Transaction, except: (i) to the extent permitted by Section 17(e) or 57(k) of the 1940 Act; (ii) as a result of either being a Participant in the Co-Investment Transaction or holding an interest in the securities issued by one of the Participants; or (iii) in the case of an Adviser, investment advisory compensation paid in accordance with investment advisory agreement(s) with the Regulated Fund(s) or Affiliated Entity(ies).
5. Co-Investment Policies. Each Adviser (and each Affiliated Entity that is not advised by an Adviser) will adopt and implement policies and procedures reasonably designed to ensure that: (i) opportunities to participate in Co-Investment Transactions are allocated in a manner that is fair and equitable to every Regulated Fund; and (ii) the Adviser negotiating the Co-Investment Transaction considers the interest in the Transaction of any participating Regulated Fund (the “Co-Investment Policies”). Each Adviser (and each Affiliated Entity that is not advised by an Adviser) will provide its Co-Investment Policies to the Regulated Funds and will notify the Regulated Funds of any material changes thereto.16
| 12 | Section 57(o) defines the term “required majority,” in relevant part, with respect to the approval of a proposed transaction, as both a majority of a BDC’s directors who have no financial interest in the transaction and a majority of such directors who are not interested persons of the BDC. In the case of a Regulated Fund that is not a BDC, the Board members that constitute the Required Majority will be determined as if such Regulated Fund were a BDC subject to Section 57(o) of the 1940 Act. |
| 13 | Section 57(f) provides for the approval by a Required Majority of certain transactions on the basis that, in relevant part: (i) the terms of the transaction, including the consideration to be paid or received, are reasonable and fair to the shareholders of the BDC and do not involve overreaching of the BDC or its shareholders on the part of any person concerned; (ii) the proposed transaction is consistent with the interests of the BDC’s shareholders and the BDC’s policy as recited in filings made by the BDC with the Commission and the BDC’s reports to shareholders; and (iii) the BDC’s directors record in their minutes and preserve in their records a description of the transaction, their findings, the information or materials upon which their findings were based, and the basis for their findings. |
| 14 | Expenses of an individual Participant that are incurred solely by the Participant due to its unique circumstances (such as legal and compliance expenses) will be borne by such Participant. |
| 15 | Applicants are not requesting and the Commission is not providing any relief for transaction fees received in connection with any Co-Investment Transaction. |
| 16 | The Affiliated Entities may adopt shared Co-Investment Policies. |
6
6. Dispositions:
(a) Prior to any Disposition17 by an Affiliated Entity of a security acquired in a Co-Investment Transaction, the Adviser to each Regulated Fund that participated in the Co-Investment Transaction will be notified and each such Regulated Fund given the opportunity to participate pro rata based on the proportion of its holdings relative to the other Affiliated Entities participating in such Disposition.
(b) Prior to any Disposition by a Regulated Fund of a security acquired in a Co-Investment Transaction, the Required Majority will take the steps set forth in Section 57(f) of the 1940 Act, unless: (i) each Affiliated Entity holding the security participates in the Disposition in approximate proportion to its then-current holding of the security; or (ii) the Disposition is a sale of a Tradable Security.18
7. Board Oversight
(a) Each Regulated Fund’s directors will oversee the Regulated Fund’s participation in the co-investment program in the exercise of their reasonable business judgment.
(b) Prior to a Regulated Fund’s participation in Co-Investment Transactions, the Regulated Fund’s Board, including a Required Majority, will: (i) review the Co-Investment Policies, to ensure that they are reasonably designed to prevent the Regulated Fund from being disadvantaged by participation in the co-investment program; and (ii) approve policies and procedures of the Regulated Fund that are reasonably designed to ensure compliance with the terms of the Order.
(c) At least quarterly, each Regulated Fund’s Adviser and chief compliance officer (as defined in Rule 38a-1(a)(4)) will provide the Regulated Fund Boards with reports or other information requested by the Board related to a Regulated Fund’s participation in Co-Investment Transactions and a summary of matters, if any, deemed significant that may have arisen during the period related to the implementation of the Co-Investment Policies and the Regulated Fund’s policies and procedures approved pursuant to (b) above.
(d) Every year, each Regulated Fund’s Adviser and chief compliance officer will provide the Regulated Fund’s Board with reports or other information requested by the Board related to the Regulated Fund’s participation in the co-investment program and any material changes in the Affiliated Entities’ participation in the co-investment program, including changes to the Affiliated Entities’ Co-Investment Policies.
(e) The Adviser and the chief compliance officer will also notify the Regulated Fund’s Board of a compliance matter related to the Regulated Fund’s participation in the co-investment program and related Co-Investment Policies or the Regulated Fund’s policies and procedures approved pursuant to (b) above that a Regulated Fund’s chief compliance officer considers to be material.
| 17 | “Disposition” means the sale, exchange, transfer or other disposition of an interest in a security of an issuer. |
| 18 | “Tradable Security” means a security which trades: (i) on a national securities exchange (or designated offshore securities market as defined in Rule 902(b) under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended) and (ii) with sufficient volume and liquidity (findings which are to be made in good faith and documented by the Advisers to any Regulated Funds) to allow each Regulated Fund to dispose of its entire remaining position within 30 days at approximately the price at which the Regulated Fund has valued the investment. |
7
8. Recordkeeping. All information presented to the Board pursuant to the order will be kept for the life of the Regulated Fund and at least two years thereafter, and will be subject to examination by the Commission and its Staff. Each Regulated Fund will maintain the records required by Section 57(f)(3) as if it were a business development company and each of the Co-Investment Transactions were approved by the Required Majority under Section 57(f).19
9. In the event that the Commission adopts a rule under the 1940 Act allowing co-investments of the type described in this Application, any relief granted by the Order will expire on the effective date of that rule.
| IV. | STATEMENT IN SUPPORT OF RELIEF REQUESTED |
Applicants submit that allowing the Co-Investment Transactions described by this Application is justified on the basis of (i) the potential benefits to the Regulated Funds and their respective shareholders and (ii) the protections found in the terms and conditions set forth in this Application.
| A. | Potential Benefits to the Regulated Funds and their Shareholders |
Section 57(a)(4) and Rule 17d-1 (as applicable) limit the ability of the Regulated Funds to participate in attractive co-investment opportunities under certain circumstances. If the relief is granted, the Regulated Funds should: (i) be able to participate in a larger number and greater variety of investments, thereby diversifying their portfolios and providing related risk-limiting benefits; (ii) be able to participate in larger financing opportunities, including those involving issuers with better credit quality, which otherwise might not be available to investors of a Regulated Fund’s size; (iii) have greater bargaining power (notably with regard to creditor protection terms and other similar investor rights), more control over the investment and less need to bring in other external investors or structure investments to satisfy the different needs of external investors; (iv) benefit from economies of scale by sharing fixed expenses associated with an investment with the other Participants; and (v) be able to obtain better deal flow from investment bankers and other sources of investments.
| B. | Shareholder Protections |
Each Co-Investment Transaction would be subject to the terms and conditions of this Application. The Conditions are designed to address the concerns underlying Sections 17(d) and 57(a)(4) and Rule 17d-l by ensuring that participation by a Regulated Fund in any Co-Investment Transaction would not be on a basis different from or less advantageous than that of other Participants. Under Condition 5, each Adviser (and each Affiliated Entity that is not advised by an Adviser) will adopt and implement Co-Investment Policies that are reasonably designed to ensure that (i) opportunities to participate in Co-Investment Transactions are allocated in a manner that is fair and equitable to every Regulated Fund; and (ii) the Adviser negotiating the Co Investment Transaction considers the interest in the Transaction of any participating Regulated Fund. The Co-Investment Policies will require an Adviser to make an independent determination of the appropriateness of a Co-Investment Transaction and the proposed allocation size based on each Participant’s specific investment profile and other relevant characteristics.
| V. | PRECEDENTS |
The Commission has previously issued orders permitting certain investment companies subject to regulation under the 1940 Act and their affiliated persons to be able to participate in Co-Investment Transactions, including substantially identical relief20 recently granted by the Commission, which applications have been identified by Applicants as substantially identical to the Application pursuant to Rule 0-5(e)(3) under the 1940 Act, (together, the “Existing Orders”).21 Similar to the Existing Orders, the Conditions described herein are designed to mitigate the possibility for overreaching and to promote fair and equitable treatment of the Regulated Funds. Accordingly, the Applicants submit that the scope of investor protections contemplated by the Conditions are consistent with those found in the Existing Orders.
| 19 | If a Regulated Fund enters into a transaction that would be a Co-Investment Transaction pursuant to this Order in reliance on another exemptive order instead of this Order, the information presented to the Board and records maintained by the Regulated Fund will expressly indicate the order relied upon by the Regulated Fund to enter into such transaction. |
| 20 | Oxford Square Capital Corp., et al. (File No. 812-15840), Release No. IC-35820 (December 11, 2025) (notice), Release No. IC-35860 (January 6, 2026) (order); Prospect Capital Corporation, et al. (File No. 812-15849), Release No. IC-35819 (December 9, 2025) (notice), Release No. IC-35859 (January 6, 2026) (order). |
| 21 | See, e.g., FS Credit Opportunities Corp., et al. (File No. 812-15706), Release No. IC-35520 (April 3, 2025) (notice), Release No. IC-35561 (April 29, 2025) (order); Sixth Street Specialty Lending, Inc. et al. (File No. 812-15729), Release No. IC-35531 (April 10, 2025) (notice), Release No. IC-35570 (May 6, 2025) (order); Blue Owl Capital Corporation, et al. (File No. 812-15715), Release No. IC-35530 (April 9, 2025) (notice), Release No. IC-35573 (May 6, 2025) (order); BlackRock Growth Equity Fund LP, et al. (File No. 812-15712), Release No. IC-35525 (April 8, 2025) (notice), Release No. IC-35572 (May 6, 2025) (order). |
8
| VI. | PROCEDURAL MATTERS |
| A. | Communications |
Please address all communications concerning this Application, the Notice and the Order to:
Marc Weinstein
FP Strategies LLC
151 Calle de San Francisco, Suite 200
San Juan, Puerto Rico 00901
Telephone 787-722-6881
Please address any questions, and a copy of any communications, concerning this Application, the Notice, and the Order to:
Owen J. Pinkerton, Esq.
Anne G. Oberndorf, Esq.
Krisztina Nadasdy, Esq.
Eversheds Sutherland (US) LLP
700 Sixth Street, NW, Suite 700
Washington, DC 20001
Telephone (202) 383-0100
| B. | Authorizations |
The filing of this Application for the Order sought hereby and the taking of all acts reasonably necessary to obtain the relief requested herein was authorized by the Board of the Existing Regulated Fund pursuant to resolutions duly adopted by the Board. A copy of the resolutions are attached hereto as Exhibit B.
Pursuant to Rule 0-2(c), Applicants hereby state that each Applicant has authorized to cause to be prepared and to execute and file with the Commission this Application and any amendment thereto for an order pursuant to Sections 17(d) and 57(i) and Rule 17d-1 permitting certain joint transactions otherwise prohibited by Sections 17(d) and 57(a)(4) and Rule 17d-1. The person executing the Application on behalf of the Applicants being duly sworn deposes and says that he has duly executed the Application for and on behalf of the applicable entity listed; that he is authorized to execute the Application pursuant to the terms of an operating agreement, management agreement or otherwise; and that all actions by members, directors or other bodies necessary to authorize each such deponent to execute and file the Application have been taken.
In accordance with Rule 0-5(d) under the 1940 Act, Applicants request expedited review of the Application by the Commission. In accordance with Rule 0-5(e)(2) under the 1940 Act, included as Exhibit C to this Application are two marked copies of the Application showing changes from the final versions of two recent applications identified by Applicants as substantially identical to the Application pursuant to Rule 0-5(e)(3) under the 1940 Act.
[Signature Page Follows]
9
The Applicants have caused this Application to be duly signed on their behalf on the 6th day of February, 2026.
| FP STRATEGIES LLC | |||
| By: | /s/ Marc Weinstein | ||
| Name: | Marc Weinstein | ||
| Title: | Member | ||
| ROBOSTRATEGY, INC. | |||
| By: | /s/ Andrew Kang | ||
| Name: | Andrew Kang | ||
| Title: | President and Chief Executive Officer | ||
| SATYA ROBO HOLDINGS LLC | |||
| By: | /s/ Marc Weinstein | ||
| Name: | Marc Weinstein | ||
| Title: | Authorized Signatory | ||
10
Exhibit A
Verification
The undersigned states that he or she has duly executed the attached Application dated February 6, 2026 for and on behalf of the Applicants, as the case may be, that he or she holds the office with each such entity as indicated below, and that all actions by stockholders, officers, directors, and other bodies necessary to authorize the undersigned to execute and file such Application have been taken. The undersigned further states that he or she is familiar with the instrument and the contents thereof, and that the facts set forth therein are true to the best of his or her knowledge, information, and belief.
| FP STRATEGIES LLC | |||
| By: | /s/ Marc Weinstein | ||
| Name: | Marc Weinstein | ||
| Title: | Member | ||
| ROBOSTRATEGY, INC. | |||
| By: | /s/ Andrew Kang | ||
| Name: | Andrew Kang | ||
| Title: | President and Chief Executive Officer | ||
| SATYA ROBO HOLDINGS LLC | |||
| By: | /s/ Marc Weinstein | ||
| Name: | Marc Weinstein | ||
| Title: | Authorized Signatory | ||
11
Exhibit B
RESOLUTIONS OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF ROBOSTRATEGY, INC. (THE “COMPANY”)*
WHEREAS, the Board of Directors has reviewed the Company’s Co-Investment Exemptive Application (the “Exemptive Application”) involving the Company and certain affiliates thereof as specified in the Exemptive Application, a copy of which is attached hereto as Appendix D, for an order of the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (the “Commission”) pursuant to Section 57(i) of the Investment Company Act of 1940, as amended (the “1940 Act”), and Rule 17d-1 promulgated under the 1940 Act, permitting certain joint transactions that otherwise may be prohibited by Section 17(d) and Section 57(a)(4) of the 1940 Act.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that each of the Chief Executive Officer, Chief Financial Officer, Chief Compliance Officer and the Secretary of the Company (the “Authorized Officers”) shall be, and each of them individually hereby is, authorized, empowered and directed, in the name and on behalf of the Company, to cause to be executed, delivered and filed with the Commission the Exemptive Application, in substantially the form attached hereto as Appendix D; and
FURTHER RESOLVED, that the Authorized Officers shall be, and each of them individually hereby is, authorized, empowered and directed, in the name and on behalf of the Company, to cause to be made, executed, delivered and filed with the Commission any amendments to the Exemptive Application and any additional applications for exemptive relief as are determined necessary, advisable or appropriate by any such officers in order to effectuate the foregoing, such determination to be conclusively evidenced by the taking of any such action.
| * | Appendix D in this resolution refers to the Appendix included in the Board consent that was executed by the Board and contained this resolution. |
12
EXHIBIT C
File No. 812-15840
File No. 812-
U.S. SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
In the Matter of the First
Amended and Restated Application of:
OXFORD SQUARE CAPITAL CORP.
AND OXFORD LANE CAPITAL CORP. AND OXFORD PARK INCOME FUND, INC. AND OXFORD SQUARE MANAGEMENT, LLC AND OXFORD LANE MANAGEMENT, LLC AND
OXFORD PARK MANAGEMENT, LLC AND OXFORD GATE MANAGEMENT, LLC AND OXFORD GATE MASTER FUND, LLC AND OXFORD GATE, LLC AND OXFORD GATE (BERMUDA),
LLC AND OXFORD BRIDGE II, LLC.
FP STRATEGIES LLC
ROBOSTRATEGY, INC.
8
Sound Shore Drive, Suite 255
Greenwich, CT 06830
(203) 983-5275
151 Calle de San Francisco, Suite 200
San Juan, Puerto Rico 00901
SATYA ROBO HOLDINGS LLC
1250 Ave Ponce de Leon, Suite 301 PMB 1902
San Juan, Puerto Rico 00907
EXPEDITED REVIEW REQUESTED UNDER 17 CFR 270.0-5(d)
FIRST AMENDED
AND RESTATED APPLICATION FOR AN ORDER PURSUANT TO
SECTIONS 17(d) AND 57(i) OF THE INVESTMENT COMPANY
ACT OF 1940 AND RULE 17d-l 17d-1
UNDER THE INVESTMENT COMPANY ACT OF 1940 PERMITTING CERTAIN JOINT
TRANSACTIONS OTHERWISE PROHIBITED BY SECTIONS
17(d) AND 57(a)(4) OF AND RULE 17d-l
17d-1 UNDER THE INVESTMENT COMPANY ACT OF 1940
All Communications, Notices and Orders to:
Marc Weinstein
FP Strategies LLC
151 Calle de San Francisco, Suite 200
San Juan, Puerto Rico 00901
Telephone 787-722-6881
Jonathan
H. Cohen
Chief Executive Officer
8 Sound Shore Drive, Suite 255
Greenwich, CT 06830
(203) 983-5275
[email protected]
Copies to:
Harry S. Pangas
Philip T. Hinkle
Dechert LLP
1900 K Street, NW
Washington, DC 20006
(202) 261-3466
October 14,2025
Owen J. Pinkerton, Esq.
Anne G. Oberndorf, Esq.
Krisztina Nadasdy, Esq.
Eversheds Sutherland (US) LLP
700 Sixth Street, NW, Suite 700
Washington, DC 20001
Telephone (202) 383-0100
February 6, 2026
This Application (including Exhibits) contains 57 pages.
2
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
BEFORE THE
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
|
FP STRATEGIES LLC ROBOSTRATEGY, INC.
SAN JUAN, PUERTO RICO 00901
SATYA ROBO HOLDINGS LLC
1250 AVE PONCE DE LEON, SUITE 301 PMB 1902 SAN JUAN, PUERTO RICO 00907
File No.
|
: : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : :
|
APPLICATION FOR AN ORDER
|
3
| SUMMARY OF APPLICATION |
The following entities hereby request an order
(the “Order”) of the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (the “SEC” or “Commission”)
under Section pursuant
to Sections 17(d) and 57(i) of the Investment Company Act of 1940, as amended (the “1940 Act”),1
and Rule 17d-l17d-1,
permitting certain joint transactions otherwise prohibited by Sections 17(d) and 57(a)(4) of the 1940 Act and Rule 17d-l17d-1
thereunder. The Order would supersede the exemptive order issued by the Commission on June 14, 2017 (the
“Prior Order”)2that was granted pursuant to Sections 17(d), 57(a)(4), 57(i) and Rule 17d-l, with the result that
no person will continue to rely on the Prior Order if the Order is granted.
| · |
·
Oxford Square Management, LLC, the investment adviser to OXSQ (“OXSQ Adviser”);
·
Oxford Lane Capital Corp., a closed-end management
investment company registered under the 1940 Act (“OXLC”);
| · | FP Strategies LLC (the “Existing Adviser”), a Puerto Rico limited liability company that is registered as an investment adviser under the Investment Advisers Act of 1940, as amended (the “Advisers Act”) and serves as the investment adviser to the Existing Regulated Fund, on behalf of itself and its successors2; and |
·
Oxford Lane Management, LLC, the investment adviser to OXLC (“OXLC Adviser”);
·
Oxford Park Income Fund, Inc., a closed-end management investment company registered under the 1940 Act that operates
as a tender offer fund (“OXPK” and together with OXSQ and OXLC, the “Existing Regulated Funds”);
| · | Satya Robo Holdings LLC, an entity wholly owned by an affiliate of the Existing Adviser that, from time to time, will hold various financial assets in a principal capacity and that currently intends to participate in Co-Investment Transactions (in such capacity, the “Existing Proprietary Account,” and collectively with the Existing Regulated Fund and Existing Adviser, the “Applicants”).3 |
·
Oxford Park Management, LLC, the investment adviser to OXPK (“OXPK Adviser”);
·
Certain existing investment vehicles (as identified on Schedule A hereto),
each of which is a separate and distinct legal entity and each of which would be an investment company but for Section 3(c)(1) or 3(c)(7)
of the 1940 Act (the “Existing Affiliated Funds”);
·
Oxford Gate Management, LLC, the investment adviser
to the Existing Affiliated Funds (“Oxford Gate Management” and, together with
OXSQ Adviser, OXLC Adviser and OXPK Adviser, the “Existing Advisers”) and together with the Existing Regulated
Funds and the Existing Affiliated Funds, the “Applicants”).3
| 1 | Unless otherwise indicated, all section and rule references herein are to the 1940 Act and rules promulgated thereunder. |
| 2 | The term “successor” means an entity that results from a reorganization into another jurisdiction or change in the type of business organization. |
| 3 | All existing entities that currently intend to rely upon the requested Order have been named as Applicants. Any other existing or future entity that subsequently relies on the Order will comply with the terms and conditions of the Application. |
4
The relief requested in this application for the Order (the “Application”) would allow a Regulated Fund4 and one or more Affiliated Entities5 to engage in Co-Investment Transactions6 subject to the terms and conditions described herein. The Regulated Funds and Affiliated Entities that participate in a Co-Investment Transaction are collectively referred to herein as “Participants.”7 The Applicants do not seek relief for transactions effected consistent with Commission staff no-action positions.8
| 4 | “Regulated Fund” means the Existing
Regulated |
The term Regulated Fund also includes (a) any Wholly-Owned Investment Sub (as defined below) of a Regulated Fund, (b) any Joint Venture (as defined below) of a Regulated Fund, and (c) any BDC Downstream Fund (as defined below) of a Regulated Fund that is a business development company. “Wholly-Owned Investment Sub” means an entity: (a) that is a “wholly-owned subsidiary” (as defined in Section 2(a)(43) of the 1940 Act) of a Regulated Fund; (b) whose sole business purpose is to hold one or more investments and which may issue debt on behalf or in lieu of such Regulated Fund; and (c) is not a registered investment company or a business development company. “Joint Venture” means an unconsolidated joint venture subsidiary of a Regulated Fund, in which all portfolio decisions, and generally all other decisions in respect of such joint venture, must be approved by an investment committee consisting of representatives of the Regulated Fund and the unaffiliated joint venture partner (with approval from a representative of each required). “BDC Downstream Fund” means an entity (a) directly or indirectly controlled by a Regulated Fund that is a business development company, (b) that is not controlled by any person other than the Regulated Fund (except a person that indirectly controls the entity solely because it controls the Regulated Fund), (c) that would be an investment company but for Section 3(c)(1) or 3(c)(7) of the 1940 Act, (d) whose investment adviser is an Adviser and (e) that is not a Wholly-Owned Investment Sub.
In the case of a Wholly-Owned Investment Sub that does not have a chief compliance officer or a Board, the chief compliance officer and Board of the Regulated Fund that controls the Wholly-Owned Investment Sub will be deemed to serve those roles for the Wholly-Owned Investment Sub. In the case of a Joint Venture or a BDC Downstream Fund (as applicable) that does not have a chief compliance officer or a Board, the chief compliance officer of the Regulated Fund will be deemed to be the Joint Venture’s or BDC Downstream Fund’s chief compliance officer, and the Joint Venture’s or BDC Downstream Fund’s investment committee will be deemed to be the Joint Venture’s or BDC Downstream Fund’s Board.
| 5 | “Affiliated Entity” means an entity not controlled by a Regulated Fund that intends to engage in Co-Investment Transactions and that is (a) with respect to a Regulated Fund, another Regulated Fund; (b) an Adviser or its affiliates (other than an open-end investment company registered under the 1940 Act), and any direct or indirect, wholly- or majority-owned subsidiary of an Adviser or its affiliates (other than of an open-end investment company registered under the 1940 Act), that is participating in a Co-Investment Transaction in a principal capacity; or (c) any entity that would be an investment company but for Section 3(c) of the 1940 Act or Rule 3a-7 thereunder and whose investment adviser is an Adviser. |
To the extent that an entity described in clause (b) is not advised by an Adviser, such entity shall be deemed to be an Adviser for purposes of the conditions.
| 6 | “Co-Investment Transaction” means the acquisition or Disposition of securities of an issuer in a transaction effected in reliance on the Order or previously granted relief. |
| 7 | “Adviser” means |
| 8 | See, e.g., Massachusetts Mutual Life Insurance Co. (pub. avail. June 7, 2000), Massachusetts Mutual Life Insurance Co. (pub. avail. July 28, 2000) and SMC Capital, Inc. (pub. avail. Sept. 5, 1995). |
5
| GENERAL DESCRIPTION OF THE APPLICANTS |
| A. |
OXSQ is a Maryland corporation
structured as an externally managed closed-end management investment company that has elected to be regulated as a business development
company under the 1940 Act. OXSQ was originally formed as Technology Investment Capital Corporation (“TICC’)
on July 21, 2003 and commenced operations on July 21, 2003. TICC changed its name to Oxford Square Capital Corp, on March 19, 2018. OXSQ
has elected to be treated as a regulated investment company (“RIC’) under Sub-Chapter M of the Internal Revenue
Code of 1986, as amended (the “Code”), and intends to comply with the requirements to qualify for tax treatment
applicable to RICs. OXSQ’s principal place of business is 8 Sound Shore Drive, Greenwich, CT 06830.
The Existing Regulated Fund was formed as a Maryland corporation under the Maryland General Corporation Law on May 23, 2025, and operates as an externally-managed, non-diversified, closed-end management investment company registered under the 1940 Act. The Existing Regulated Fund’s principal place of business is 151 Calle de San Francisco, Suite 200, San Juan, Puerto Rico 00901.
OXSQ’sThe
Existing Regulated Fund’s investment objective is to maximize its portfolio’s total
return. OXSQ’s primary focus is to seek an attractive risk-adjusted total return by investing primarily in corporate debt securities
and, to a lesser extent, collateralized loan obligations (“CLO”), which are structured finance investments
that own corporate debt securities. OXSQseek long-term capital
appreciation, principally through capital gains on equity and equity-linked investments in robotics and artificial intelligence companies.
The Existing Regulated Fund focuses primarily on private, venture-capital-backed private companies with significant growth potential,
many of which are not yet publicly listed or widely accessible to individual investors. The Existing Regulated Fund has a five-member
board (the “Existing Fund Board,” and together
with any Future Regulated Fund’s board, the “OXSQ Board”),
of which three members are not “interested” persons of OXSQthe
Existing Regulated Fund within the meaning of Section 2(a)(19) of the 1940 Act.9
B. OXLC
OXLC is
a Maryland corporation formed on June 10, 2010 and structured as an externally managed registered closed-end management investment company
under the 1940 Act. OXLC commenced operations on January 25, 2011. OXLC has elected to be treated as a RIC under Sub-Chapter M of the
Code, and intends to comply with the requirements to qualify for tax treatment applicable to RICs. OXLC’s principal place of business
is 8 Sound Shore Drive, Greenwich, CT 06830.
OXLC’s
investment objective is to maximize its portfolio’s risk-adjusted total return by investing in equity and junior debt tranches of
CLO vehicles. OXLC has a five-member board (the “OXLC Board”), of which three are not “interested”
persons of OXLC within the meaning of Section 2(a)(19) of the 1940 Act.
C.
OXPK
OXPK
is a Maryland corporation formed on December 19, 2022 and structured as an externally managed registered closed-end management investment
company under the 1940 Act that operates as a tender offer fund. OXPK commenced operations on April 3, 2023. OXPK has elected to be treated
as a RIC under Sub-Chapter M of the Code, and intends to comply with the requirements to qualify for tax treatment applicable to RICs.
OXPK’s principal place of business is 8 Sound
Shore Drive, Greenwich, CT 06830.
OXPK’s
investment objective is to maximize its portfolio’s risk-adjusted total return by investing in equity and junior debt tranches of
CLO vehicles. OXPK has a five-member board (the “OXPK Board” and, together with the OXSQ Board, OXLC Board,
and any future Regulated Fund’s board, the “Board”), of which three members are not “interested”
persons of OXPK within the meaning of Section 2(a)(19) of the 1940 Act.
| 9 | The Board of each Future Regulated Fund will consist of a majority of members who are not “interested persons” of such Future Regulated Fund within the meaning of Section 2(a)(19) of the 1940 Act. |
6
D.
The Existing Affiliated Funds
The Existing
Affiliated Funds are investment funds, each of whose investment adviser is Oxford Gate Management and each of which would be an investment
company but for Section 3(c)(1) or Section 3(c)(7) of the 1940 Act.10A complete list of the Existing Affiliated Funds is included
on Schedule A hereto.
| B. |
Each of the Existing Advisers
are controlled by Oxford Funds, LLC (“Oxford Funds”). Oxford Funds serves as administrator to OXSQ, OXLC, OXPK,
pursuant to respective administration agreements with each. Oxford Funds does not currently offer investment advisory services to any
person and is not expected to do so in the future. Accordingly, Oxford Funds has not been included as an Applicant.
The Existing Proprietary Account will, from time to time, hold various financial assets in a principal capacity. The Existing Adviser and its affiliates operate various business lines directly or through their wholly- or majority-owned subsidiaries, and the affiliate that exists and currently intends to participate in Co-Investment Transactions has been included as an Applicant herein.
| C. | Existing Adviser |
OXSQ
Adviser is a Delaware limited liability company and is registered as an investment
adviser with the Commission under the Investment Advisers Act of 1940,
as amended (the “Advisers Act”).
OXSQThe Existing Adviser serves as the investment
adviser to OXSQ and manages its portfolio in accordance with OXSQ’s objectives and strategies.
of
the Existing Regulated Fund, and either it or another Adviser will serve as the investment adviser to any Future Regulated Fund. The Existing
OXLC Adviser is a ConnecticutPuerto
Rico limited liability company and is a registered as
an investment adviser with the Commission under the Advisers Act. OXLC Adviser serves
as the investment adviser to OXLC and manages its portfolio in accordance with OXLC’s objectives and strategies.On
the date of this Application, the Existing Adviser’s sole client that intends to rely on this application is the Existing Regulated
Fund.
OXPK Adviser is a Connecticut
limited liability company and is registered as an investment adviser with the Commission under the Advisers Act. OXPK Adviser serves as
the investment adviser to OXPK and manages its portfolio in accordance with OXPK’s objectives and strategies.
Under the terms of an investment advisory agreement with the Existing Regulated Fund, the Existing Adviser will, among other things, manage the investment portfolio, direct purchases and sales of portfolio securities and report thereon to the Existing Regulated Fund’s officers and Board regularly.
Oxford Gate Management is
a Delaware limited liability company and is an investment adviser registered with the Commission under the Advisers Act. Oxford Gate Management
serves as the investment adviser to the Existing Affiliated Funds and manages their portfolios in accordance with each Existing Affiliated
Fund’s investment objectives and strategies.
| ORDER REQUESTED |
The Applicants request an Order of the Commission
underpursuant to
Sections 17(d) and 57(i) of the 1940 Act and Rule 17d-1 thereunder to permit, subject to the terms and conditions set forth below in this
Application (the “Conditions”), each Regulated Fund to be able to participate with one or more Affiliated Entities
in Co-Investment Transactions otherwise prohibited by Sections 17(d) and 57(a)(4) of the 1940 Act and Rule 17d-1 thereunder.
| A. |
Section 17(d), in relevant part, prohibits an affiliated person, or an affiliated person of such affiliated person, of a registered investment company, acting as principal, from effecting any transaction in which the registered investment company is “a joint or a joint and several participant with such person” in contravention of such rules as the SEC may prescribe “for the purpose of limiting or preventing participation by such [fund] on a basis different from or less advantageous than that of such other participant.”
Rule 17d-1 prohibits an affiliated person, or
an affiliated person of such affiliated person, of a registered investment company, acting as principal, from participating in, or effecting
any transaction in connection with, any “joint enterprise or other joint arrangement or profit-sharing plan”1110
in which the fund is a participant without first obtaining an order from the SEC.
| Rule |
7
Section 57(a)(4), in relevant part, prohibits any person related to a business development company in the manner described in Section 57(b), acting as principal, from knowingly effecting any transaction in which the business development company is a joint or a joint and several participant with such persons in contravention of such rules as the Commission may prescribe for the purpose of limiting or preventing participation by the business development company on a basis less advantageous than that of such person. Section 57(i) provides that, until the SEC prescribes rules under Section 57(a), the SEC’s rules under Section 17(d) applicable to registered closed-end investment companies will be deemed to apply to persons subject to the prohibitions of Section 57(a). Because the SEC has not adopted any rules under Section 57(a), Rule 17d-1 applies to persons subject to the prohibitions of Section 57(a).
Rule 17d-1(b) provides, in relevant part, that in passing upon applications under the rule, the Commission will consider whether the participation of a registered investment company in a joint enterprise, joint arrangement or profit-sharing plan on the basis proposed is consistent with the provisions, policies and purposes of the 1940 Act and the extent to which such participation is on a basis different from or less advantageous than that of other participants.
| B. | Need for Relief |
Each Regulated Fund may be deemed to be an affiliated
person of each other Regulated Fund within the meaning of Section 2(a)(3) if it is deemed to be under common control because an Adviser
is or will be either the investment adviser or sub-adviser to each Regulated Fund. Section 17(d) and Section 57(b) apply to any investment
adviser to a closed-end fund or a business development company, respectively, including a sub-adviser. Thus, an Adviser and any Affiliated
Entities that it advises could be deemed to be persons related to Regulated Funds in a manner described by Sections 17(d) and 57(b). The
Existing Advisers are each controlled by Oxford Funds, and are thus affiliated persons of each other. Accordingly, withWith
respect to the Existing AdvisersAdviser
and any other Advisers that are deemed to be affiliated persons of each otherthe
Existing Adviser, Affiliated Entities advised by any of them could be deemed to be persons related to Regulated Funds (or a company
controlled by a Regulated Fund) in a manner described by Sections 17(d) and 57(b). In addition, any entities or accounts controlled by
or under common control with anthe
Existing Adviser, and/or any other Advisers that are deemed to be
affiliated persons of each other that may, from time to time, hold various financial assets in a principal capacity, could be deemed to
be persons related to Regulated Funds (or a company controlled by a Regulated Fund) in a manner described by Sections 17(d) and 57(b).
Finally, with respect to any Wholly-Owned Investment Sub, Joint Venture, or BDC Downstream Fund of a Regulated Fund, such entity would
be a company controlled by its parent Regulated Fund for purposes of Section 57(a)(4) of the 1940 Act and Rule 17d-117d-l
under the 1940 Act.
| C. | Conditions |
Applicants agree that any Order granting the requested relief will be subject to the following Conditions.
1.
1. Same
Terms. With respect to any Co-Investment Transaction, each Regulated Fund, and Affiliated
Entity participating in such transaction will acquire, or dispose of, as the case may be, the same class of securities, at the same time,
for the same price and with the same conversion, financial reporting and registration rights, and with substantially the same other terms
(provided that the settlement date for an Affiliated Entity may occur up to ten business days after the settlement date for the Regulated
Fund, and vice versa). If a Participant, but not all of the Regulated Funds, has the right to nominate a director for election to a portfolio
company’s board of directors, the right to appoint a board observer or any similar right to participate in the governance or management
of a portfolio company, the Board of each Regulated Fund that does not hold this right must be given the opportunity to veto the selection
of such person.1211
| Such a Board can also, consistent with applicable fund documents, facilitate this opportunity by delegating the authority to veto the selection of such person to a committee of the Board. |
8
2.
2. Existing
Investments in the Issuer. Prior to a Regulated Fund acquiring in a Co-Investment Transaction a security of an issuer in which an
Affiliated Entity has an existing interest in such issuer, the “required majority,” as defined in Section 57(o) of the 1940
Act,1312
of the Regulated Fund (“Required Majority”) will take the steps set forth in Section 57(f) of the 1940 Act,1413
unless: (i) the Regulated Fund already holds the same security as each such Affiliated Entity; and (ii) the Regulated Fund and each other
Affiliated Entity holding the security is participating in the acquisition in approximate proportion to its then-current holdings.
3.
3. Related
Expenses. Any expenses associated with acquiring, holding or disposing of any securities acquired in a Co-Investment Transaction,
to the extent not borne by the Adviser(s), will be shared among the Participants in proportion to the relative amounts of the securities
being acquired, held or disposed of, as the case may be.1514
4.
4. No
Remuneration. Any transaction fee1615
(including break-up, structuring, monitoring or commitment fees but excluding broker’s fees contemplated by section 17(e) or 57(k)
of the 1940 Act, as applicable), received by an Adviser and/or a Participant in connection with a Co-Investment Transaction will be distributed
to the Participants on a pro rata basis based on the amounts they invested or committed, as the case may be, in such Co-Investment Transaction.
If any transaction fee is to be held by an Adviser pending consummation of the transaction, the fee will be deposited into an account
maintained by the Adviser at a bank or banks having the qualifications prescribed in section 26(a)(1) of the 1940 Act, and the account
will earn a competitive rate of interest that will also be divided pro rata among the Participants based on the amount they invest in
such Co-Investment Transaction. No Affiliated Entity, Regulated Fund, or any of their affiliated persons will accept any compensation,
remuneration or financial benefit in connection with a Regulated Fund’s participation in a Co-Investment Transaction, except: (i)
to the extent permitted by Section 17(e) or 57(k) of the 1940 Act; (ii) as a result of either being a Participant in the Co-Investment
Transaction or holding an interest in the securities issued by one of the Participants; or (iii) in the case of an Adviser, investment
advisory compensation paid in accordance with investment advisory agreement(s) with the Regulated Fund(s) or Affiliated Entity(ies).
5.
5. Co-Investment
Policies. Each Adviser (and each Affiliated Entity that is not advised by an Adviser) will adopt and implement policies and procedures
reasonably designed to ensure that: (i) opportunities to participate in Co-Investment Transactions are allocated in a manner that is
fair and equitable to every Regulated Fund; and (ii) the Adviser negotiating the Co-Investment Transaction considers the interest in
the Transaction of any participating Regulated Fund (the “Co-Investment Policies”). Each Adviser (and each
Affiliated Entity that is not advised by an Adviser) will provide its Co-Investment Policies to the Regulated Funds and will notify the
Regulated Funds of any material changes thereto.1716
| Section 57(o) defines the term “required majority,” in relevant part, with respect to the approval of a proposed transaction, as both a majority of a BDC’s directors who have no financial interest in the transaction and a majority of such directors who are not interested persons of the BDC. In the case of a Regulated Fund that is not a BDC, the Board members that constitute the Required Majority will be determined as if such Regulated Fund were a BDC subject to Section 57(o) of the 1940 Act. |
| Section 57(f) provides for the approval by a Required Majority of certain transactions on the basis that, in relevant part: (i) the terms of the transaction, including the consideration to be paid or received, are reasonable and fair to the shareholders of the BDC and do not involve overreaching of the BDC or its shareholders on the part of any person concerned; (ii) the proposed transaction is consistent with the interests of the BDC’s shareholders and the BDC’s policy as recited in filings made by the BDC with the Commission and the BDC’s reports to shareholders; and (iii) the BDC’s directors record in their minutes and preserve in their records a description of the transaction, their findings, the information or materials upon which their findings were based, and the basis for their findings. |
| Expenses of an individual Participant that are incurred solely by the Participant due to its unique circumstances (such as legal and compliance expenses) will be borne by such Participant. |
| Applicants are not requesting and the Commission is not providing any relief for transaction fees received in connection with any Co-Investment Transaction. |
| The Affiliated Entities may adopt shared Co-Investment Policies. |
9
6.
6. Dispositions:
(a)
(a) Prior
to any Disposition1817
by an Affiliated Entity of a security acquired in a Co-Investment Transaction, the Adviser to each Regulated Fund that participated in
the Co-Investment Transaction will be notified and each such Regulated Fund given the opportunity to participate pro rata based on the
proportion of its holdings relative to the other Affiliated Entities participating in such Disposition.
(b)
(b) Prior
to any Disposition by a Regulated Fund of a security acquired in a Co-Investment Transaction, the Required Majority will take the steps
set forth in Section 57(f) of the 1940 Act, unless: (i) each Affiliated Entity holding the security participates in the Disposition in
approximate proportion to its then-current holding of the security; or (ii) the Disposition is a sale of a Tradable Security.1918
7.
7. Board
Oversight
(a)
(a) Each
Regulated Fund’s directors will oversee the Regulated Fund’s participation in the co-investment program in the exercise of
their reasonable business judgment.
(b)
(b) Prior
to a Regulated Fund’s participation in Co-Investment Transactions, the Regulated Fund’s Board, including a Required Majority,
will: (i) review the Co-investmentCo-Investment
Policies, to ensure that they are reasonably designed to prevent the Regulated Fund from being disadvantaged by participation in the co-investment
program; and (ii) approve policies and procedures of the Regulated Fund that are reasonably designed to ensure compliance with the terms
of the Order.
(c)
(c) At
least quarterly, each Regulated Fund’s Adviser and chief compliance officer (as defined in Rule 38a-1(a)(4)) will provide the Regulated
Fund Boards with reports or other information requested by the Board related to a Regulated Fund’s participation in Co-investmentCo-Investment
Transactions and a summary of matters, if any, deemed significant that may have arisen during the period related to the implementation
of the Co-investmentCo-Investment
Policies and the Regulated Fund’s policies and procedures approved pursuant to (b) above.
(d)
(d) Every
year, each Regulated Fund’s Adviser and chief compliance officer will provide the Regulated Fund’s Board with reports or other
information requested by the Board related to the Regulated Fund’s participation in the co-investment program and any material changes
in the Affiliated Entities’ participation in the co-investment program, including changes to the Affiliated Entities’ Co-investmentCo-Investment
Policies.
(e)
(e) The
Adviser and the chief compliance officer will also notify the Regulated Fund’s Board of a compliance matter related to the Regulated
Fund’s participation in the co-investment program and related Co-investmentCo-Investment
Policies or the Regulated Fund’s policies and procedures approved pursuant to (b) above that a Regulated Fund’s chief compliance
officer considers to be material.
8.
8. Recordkeeping.
All information presented to the Board pursuant to the order will be kept for the life of the Regulated Fund and at least two years thereafter,
and will be subject to examination by the Commission and its Staff. Each Regulated Fund will maintain the records required by Section
57(f)(3) as if it were a business development company and each of the Co-investmentCo-Investment
Transactions were approved by the Required Majority under Section 57(f).2019
| “Disposition” means the sale, exchange, transfer or other disposition of an interest in a security of an issuer. |
| “Tradable Security” means a security which trades: (i) on a national securities exchange (or designated offshore securities market as defined in Rule 902(b) under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended) and (ii) with sufficient volume and liquidity (findings which are to be made in good faith and documented by the Advisers to any Regulated Funds) to allow each Regulated Fund to dispose of its entire remaining position within 30 days at approximately the price at which the Regulated Fund has valued the investment. |
| If a Regulated Fund enters into a transaction that would
be a |
10
9.
9. In
the event that the Commission adopts a rule under the 1940 Act allowing co-investments of the type described in this Application, any
relief granted by the Order will expire on the effective date of that rule.
| STATEMENT IN SUPPORT OF RELIEF REQUESTED |
Applicants submit that allowing the Co-Investment Transactions described by this Application is justified on the basis of (i) the potential benefits to the Regulated Funds and their respective shareholders and (ii) the protections found in the terms and conditions set forth in this Application.
| A. | Potential Benefits to the Regulated Funds and their Shareholders |
Section 57(a)(4) and Rule 17d-l17d-1
(as applicable) limit the ability of the Regulated Funds to participate in attractive co-investment opportunities under certain circumstances.
If the relief is granted, the Regulated Funds should: (i) be able to participate in a larger number and greater variety of investments,
thereby diversifying their portfolios and providing related risk-limiting benefits; (ii) be able to participate in larger financing opportunities,
including those involving issuers with better credit quality, which otherwise might not be available to investors of a Regulated Fund’s
size; (iii) have greater bargaining power (notably with regard to creditor protection terms and other similar investor rights), more control
over the investment and less need to bring in other external investors or structure investments to satisfy the different needs of external
investors; (iv) benefit from economies of scale by sharing fixed expenses associated with an investment with the other Participants; and
(v) be able to obtain better deal flow from investment bankers and other sources of investments.
| B. | Shareholder Protections |
Each Co-investmentCo-Investment
Transaction would be subject to the terms and conditions of this Application. The Conditions are designed to address the concerns underlying
Sections 17(d) and 57(a)(4) and Rule 17d-117d-l
by ensuring that participation by a Regulated Fund in any Co-Investment Transaction would not be on a basis different from or less advantageous
than that of other Participants. Under Condition 5, each Adviser (and each Affiliated Entity that is not advised by an Adviser) will adopt
and implement Co-investmentCo-Investment
Policies that are reasonably designed to ensure that (i) opportunities to participate in Co-investmentCo-Investment
Transactions are allocated in a manner that is fair and equitable to every Regulated Fund; and (ii) the Adviser negotiating the Co Investment
Transaction considers the interest in the Transaction of any participating Regulated Fund. The Co-investmentCo-Investment
Policies will require an Adviser to make an independent determination of the appropriateness of a Co-investmentCo-Investment
Transaction and the proposed allocation size based on each Participant’s specific investment profile and other relevant characteristics.
| PRECEDENTS |
The Commission has previously issued orders permitting
certain investment companies subject to regulation under the 1940 Act and their affiliated persons to be able to participate in Co-investment
Transactions (the Co-Investment Transactions, including substantially
identical relief20 recently granted by the Commission, which
applications have been identified by Applicants as substantially identical to the Application pursuant to Rule 0-5(e)(3) under the 1940
Act, (together, the “Existing Orders”).21
Similar to the Existing Orders, the Conditions described herein are designed to mitigate the possibility for overreaching and to promote
fair and equitable treatment of the Regulated Funds. Accordingly, the Applicants submit that the scope of investor protections contemplated
by the Conditions are consistent with those found in the Existing Orders.
| 20 | Oxford Square Capital Corp., et al. (File No. 812-15840), Release No. IC-35820 (December 11, 2025) (notice), Release No. IC-35860 (January 6, 2026) (order); Prospect Capital Corporation, et al. (File No. 812-15849), Release No. IC-35819 (December 9, 2025) (notice), Release No. IC-35859 (January 6, 2026) (order). |
| 21 | See, e.g., |
11
| PROCEDURAL MATTERS |
| A. | Communications |
Please address all communications concerning this Application, the Notice and the Order to:
Jonathan H. Cohen
Chief Executive Officer
8 Sound Shore Drive, Suite 255
Greenwich, CT 06830
(203) 983-5275
j[email protected]
Marc Weinstein
FP Strategies LLC
151 Calle de San Francisco, Suite 200
San Juan, Puerto Rico 00901
Telephone 787-722-6881
12
Please address any questions, and a copy of any communications, concerning this Application, the Notice, and the Order to:
Harry S. Pangas
Philip T. Hinkle
Dechert LLP
1900 K Street, NW
Washington, DC 20006
(202) 261-3466
Owen J. Pinkerton, Esq.
Anne G. Oberndorf, Esq.
Krisztina Nadasdy, Esq.
Eversheds Sutherland (US) LLP
700 Sixth Street, NW, Suite 700
Washington, DC 20001
Telephone (202) 383-0100
| B. | Authorizations |
The filing of this Application for the Order sought
hereby and the taking of all acts reasonably necessary to obtain the relief requested herein was authorized by the Board of eachthe
Existing Regulated Fund pursuant to resolutions duly adopted by the Board. CopiesA
copy of the resolutions are provided belowattached
hereto as Exhibit B.
Pursuant to Rule 0-2(c), Applicants hereby state
that each Existing Regulated Fund and Existing Affiliated Fund haveApplicant
has authorized to cause to be prepared and to execute and file with the Commission this Application and any amendment thereto for
an order pursuant to SectionSections
17(d) and 57(i) and Rule 17d-1 permitting certain joint transactions otherwise prohibited by Sections 17(d) and 57(a)(4) and Rule
17d-1. The person executing the Application on behalf of the Applicants being duly sworn deposes and says that he has duly executed the
Application for and on behalf of the applicable entity listed; that he is authorized to execute the Application pursuant to the terms
of an operating agreement, management agreement or otherwise; and that all actions by members, directors or other bodies necessary to
authorize each such deponent to execute and file the Application have been taken.
In accordance with Rule 0-5(d) under the 1940 Act, Applicants request expedited review of the Application by the Commission. In accordance with Rule 0-5(e)(2) under the 1940 Act, included as Exhibit C to this Application are two marked copies of the Application showing changes from the final versions of two recent applications identified by Applicants as substantially identical to the Application pursuant to Rule 0-5(e)(3) under the 1940 Act.
[Signature Page Follows]
13
The Applicants have caused this Amended
Application to be duly signed on their behalf on the 14th6th
day of OctoberFebruary,
20252026.
|
|
14
| FP STRATEGIES LLC | ||
| By: | /s/ Marc Weinstein | |
| Name: Marc Weinstein | ||
| Title: Member | ||
| ROBOSTRATEGY, INC. | ||
| By: | /s/ Andrew Kang | |
| Name: Andrew Kang | ||
| Title: President and Chief Executive Officer | ||
| SATYA ROBO HOLDINGS LLC | ||
| By: | /s/ Marc Weinstein | |
| Name: Marc Weinstein | ||
| Title: Authorized Signatory | ||
15
VERIFICATIONExhibit A
The undersigned states that
he has duly executed the foregoing Application for and on behalf of Oxford Square Capital Corp., that he is the Chief Executive Officer
of such entity and that all action by officers, directors, and other bodies necessary to authorize deponent to execute and file such instrument
has been taken. The undersigned further states that he is familiar with such instrument, and the contents thereof, and that the facts
therein set forth are true to the best of his knowledge, information and belief.
|
|
|
VERIFICATIONVerification
The undersigned states that
he has duly executed the foregoing Application for and on behalf of Oxford Square Management, LLC, that he is the Chief Executive Officer
of such entity and that all action by officers, directors, and other bodies necessary to authorize deponent to execute and file such instrument
has been taken. The undersigned further states that he is familiar with such instrument, and the contents thereof, and that the facts
therein set forth are true to the best of his knowledge, information and belief.
|
|
|
VERIFICATION
The undersigned states that
he has duly executed the foregoing Application for and on behalf of Oxford Lane Capital Corp., that he is the Chief Executive Officer
of such entity and that all action by officers, directors, and other bodies necessary to authorize deponent to execute and file such instrument
has been taken. The undersigned further states that he is familiar with such instrument, and the contents thereof, and that the facts
therein set forth are true to the best of his knowledge, information and belief.
|
|
|
VERIFICATION
The undersigned states that
he has duly executed the foregoing Application for and on behalf of Oxford Lane Management, LLC, that he is the Chief Executive Officer
of such entity and that all action by officers, directors, and other bodies necessary to authorize deponent to execute and file such instrument
has been taken. The undersigned further states that he is familiar with such instrument, and the contents thereof, and that the facts
therein set forth are true to the best of his knowledge, information and belief.
|
|
|
16
VERIFICATION
The undersigned states that
he has duly executed the foregoing Application for and on behalf of Oxford Park Income Fund, Inc., that he is Chief Executive Officer
of such entity and that all action by officers, directors, and other bodies necessary to authorize deponent to execute and file such instrument
has been taken. The undersigned further states that he is familiar with such instrument, and the contents thereof, and that the facts
therein set forth are true to the best of his knowledge, information and belief.
|
|
|
VERIFICATION
The undersigned states that
he has duly executed the foregoing Application for and on behalf of Oxford Park Management, LLC, that he is the Chief Executive Officer
of such entity and that all action by officers, directors, and other bodies necessary to authorize deponent to execute and file such instrument
has been taken. The undersigned further states that he is familiar with such instrument, and the contents thereof, and that the facts
therein set forth are true to the best of his knowledge, information and belief.
|
|
|
VERIFICATION
The undersigned states that
it has duly executed the foregoing Application for and on behalf of Oxford Gate Master Fund, LLC, and that all action by officers, directors,
and other bodies necessary to authorize deponent to execute and file such instrument has been taken. The undersigned further states that
it is familiar with such instrument, and the contents thereof, and that the facts therein set forth are true to the best of its knowledge,
information and belief.
|
|
|
17
VERIFICATION
The undersigned states that
it has duly executed the foregoing Application for and on behalf of Oxford Gate, LLC, and that all action by officers, directors, and
other bodies necessary to authorize deponent to execute and file such instrument has been taken. The undersigned further states that it
is familiar with such instrument, and the contents thereof, and that the facts therein set forth are true to the best of its knowledge,
information and belief.
|
|
|
VERIFICATION
The undersigned states that
it has duly executed the foregoing Application for and on behalf of Oxford Gate (Bermuda), LLC, and that all action by officers, directors,
and other bodies necessary to authorize deponent to execute and file such instrument has been taken. The undersigned further states that
it is familiar with such instalment, and the contents thereof, and that the facts therein set forth are true to the best of its knowledge,
information and belief.
|
|
|
VERIFICATION
The undersigned states that
it has duly executed the foregoing Application for and on behalf of Oxford Bridge II, LLC, and that all action by officers, directors,
and other bodies necessary to authorize deponent to execute and file such instrument has been taken. The undersigned further states that
it is familiar with such instrument, and the contents thereof, and that the facts therein set forth are true to the best of its knowledge,
information and belief.
|
|
|
18
VERIFICATION
The undersigned states that he or
she has duly executed the foregoingattached
Application dated February 6, 2026 for and on behalf of Oxford
Gate Management, LLCthe Applicants, as the case may be,
that he is an Authorized Person ofor
she holds the office with each such entity as indicated below, and
that all action byactions
by stockholders, officers, directors, and other bodies necessary to authorize deponentthe
undersigned to execute and file such instrument hasApplication
have been taken. The undersigned further states that he or she is
familiar with suchthe
instrument, and the contents thereof, and that the facts therein
set forth therein are true to the best of his or
her knowledge, information, and belief.
|
|
| FP STRATEGIES LLC | ||
| By: | /s/ Marc Weinstein | |
| Name: Marc Weinstein | ||
| Title: Member | ||
19
| ROBOSTRATEGY, INC. | ||
| By: | /s/ Andrew Kang | |
| Name: Andrew Kang | ||
| Title: President and Chief Executive Officer | ||
| SATYA ROBO HOLDINGS LLC | ||
| By: | /s/ Marc Weinstein | |
| Name: Marc Weinstein | ||
| Title: Authorized Signatory | ||
Approval
of Filing Section 17(d) Application for Co-Investment Relief
20
Exhibit B
RESOLUTIONS OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF ROBOSTRATEGY, INC. (THE “COMPANY”)*
WHEREAS, the Board
deems it is advisable and in the best interest of the Fund to file withof
Directors has reviewed the Company’s Co-Investment Exemptive Application (the “Exemptive Application”)
involving the Company and certain affiliates thereof as specified in the Exemptive Application, a copy of which is attached hereto as
Appendix D, for an order of the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (the “Commission”) an
application for an order pursuant to Sections 17(d) andSection 57(i) of
the Investment Company Act of 1940, as amended (the “1940 Act”), and Rule 17d-1 promulgated thereunder
(the “Application”), to authorize the entering into ofunder
the 1940 Act, permitting certain joint transactions that otherwise may be prohibited by SectionsSection 17(d) and
Section 57(a)(4) of the 1940 Act and
Rule 17d-1 promulgated thereunder.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED,
that the officers of Oxford Square Management, LLC and the Fundeach
of the Chief Executive Officer, Chief Financial Officer, Chief Compliance Officer and the Secretary of the Company (the “Authorized
Officers”) shall be, and each of them individually hereby
is, authorized, empowered and directed on
behalf of, in the Fund
and in its name and on behalf of the FundCompany,
to prepare, execute, and cause to be executed,
delivered and filed with the Commission anthe
Exemptive Application for an Order of Exemption and any amendments thereto, pursuant to Section
17(d) of the 1940 Act, and Rule 17d-1 promulgated under the 1940 Act, authorizing certain joint transactions that otherwise may be prohibited
by Section 17(d) of the 1940 Act; and it is further, in substantially
the form attached hereto as Appendix D; and
RESOLVED,
that the officers of the Fund be, and each of them hereby is, authorized and directed to take such further action
and execute such other documents as such officer or officers shall deem necessary or advisable in
order to effectuate the intent of the foregoing resolution; and it is further
RESOLVED, that
any and all actions previously taken by the Fund or any of its directors or officers in connection with the actions contemplated by the
foregoing resolutions be, and each of them hereby is, ratified, confirmed, approved and adopted in all respects as and for the acts and
deeds of the Fund.
Resolutions
of the Board of Directors of Oxford Lane Capital Corp.
Approval of Filing Section 17(d) Application
for Co-Investment Relief
WHEREAS, the
Board deems it is advisable and in the best interest of the Fund to file with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (the “Commission”)
an application for an order pursuant to Sections 17(d) and 57(i)
of the Investment Company Act of 1940, as amended (the “1940 Act”), and Rule 17d-1 promulgated thereunder (the “Application”),
to authorize the entering into of certain joint transactions that otherwise may be prohibited by Sections 17(d) and 57(a)(4) of the 1940
Act and Rule 17d-1 promulgated thereunder.
NOW,
THEREFORE, BE ITFURTHER RESOLVED, that
the officers of Oxford Lane Management, LLC and the FundAuthorized
Officers shall be, and each of them individually hereby is,
authorized, empowered and directed on
behalf of, in the Fund
and in its name and on behalf of the FundCompany,
to prepare, execute, and cause to be made,
executed, delivered and filed with the Commission an Application for an Order of Exemption and
any amendments thereto, pursuant to Section 17(d) of the 1940 Act, and Rule 17d-1 promulgated under the 1940 Act, authorizing certain
joint transactions that otherwise may be prohibited by Section 17(d) of the 1940 Act; and it is furtherany
amendments to the Exemptive Application and any additional applications for exemptive relief as are determined necessary, advisable or
appropriate by any such officers in order to effectuate the foregoing,
such determination to be conclusively evidenced by the taking of any such action.
| * | Appendix D in this resolution refers to the Appendix included in the Board consent that was executed by the Board and contained this resolution. |
21
EXHIBIT C
RESOLVED, that
the officers of the Fund be, and each of them hereby is, authorized and directed to take such further action and execute such other documents
as such officer or officers shall deem necessary or advisable in order to effectuate the intent of the foregoing resolution; and it is
further
RESOLVED, that
any and all actions previously taken by the Fund or any of its directors or officers in connection with the actions contemplated by the
foregoing resolutions be, and each of them hereby is, ratified, confirmed, approved and adopted in all respects as and for the acts and
deeds of the Fund.
Resolutions of the
Board of Directors of Oxford Park Income Fund. Inc.
Approval of Filing Section 17(d) Application
for Co-Investment Relief
WHEREAS,
the Board deems it is advisable and in the best interest of the Fund to file with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (the “Commission”)
an application for an order pursuant to Sections 17(d) and 57(i) of the Investment Company Act of 1940, as amended (the “1940 Act”),
and Rule 17d-1 promulgated thereunder (the “Application”), to authorize the entering into of certain joint transactions that
otherwise may be prohibited by Sections 17(d) and 57(a)(4) of the 1940 Act and Rule 17d-1 promulgated thereunder.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED,
that the officers of Oxford Park Management, LLC and the Fund be, and each of them hereby is, authorized and directed on behalf of the
Fund and in its name and on behalf of the Fund, to prepare, execute, and cause to be filed with the Commission an Application for an Order
of Exemption and any amendments thereto, pursuant to Section 17(d) of the 1940 Act, and Rule 17d-1 promulgated under the 1940 Act, authorizing
certain joint transactions that otherwise may be prohibited by Section 17(d) of the 1940 Act; and it is further
RESOLVED,
that the officers of the Fund be, and each of them hereby is, authorized and directed to take such further action and execute such other
documents as such officer or officers shall deem necessary or advisable in order to effectuate the intent of the foregoing resolution;
and it is further
RESOLVED,
that any and all actions previously taken by the Fund or any of its directors or officers in connection with the actions contemplated
by the foregoing resolutions be, and each of them hereby is, ratified, confirmed, approved and adopted in all respects as and for the
acts and deeds of the Fund.
Two Marked Copies of the Application Pursuant to Rule 0-5(e)
22
[Different first page setting changed from off in original to on in modified.].
[Different first page link-to-previous setting changed from on in original to off in modified.].
File No. 812-15840
Schedule
A
Existing Affiliated
Funds
1.
Oxford Gate Master Fund, LLC
2.
Oxford Gate, LLC
3.
Oxford Gate (Bermuda), LLC
4.
Oxford Bridge II, LLC
[Different first page setting changed from off in original to on in modified.].
File No. 812-15849812-
U.S. SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
In the Matter of the Application of:
FP STRATEGIES LLC
ROBOSTRATEGY, INC.
151 Calle de San Francisco, Suite 200
San Juan, Puerto Rico 00901
SATYA ROBO HOLDINGS LLC
1250 Ave Ponce de Leon, Suite 301 PMB 1902
San Juan, Puerto Rico 00907
EXPEDITED REVIEW REQUESTED UNDER 17 CFR 270.0-5(d)
FIRST AMENDED
AND RESTATED APPLICATION FOR AN ORDER PURSUANT TO
SECTIONS 17(d) AND 57(i) OF THE INVESTMENT COMPANY ACT OF 1940 AND RULE 17d-1
UNDER THE INVESTMENT COMPANY ACT OF 1940 PERMITTING CERTAIN JOINT
TRANSACTIONS OTHERWISE PROHIBITED BY SECTIONS 17(d) AND 57(a)(4) OF AND RULE
17d-1 UNDER THE INVESTMENT COMPANY ACT OF 1940
In
the Matter of the Application of:
PROSPECT CAPITAL CORPORATION,
PRIORITY INCOME FUND, INC.,
PROSPECT FLOATING RATE AND ALTERNATIVE INCOME FUND, INC.,
PROSPECT CAPITAL FUNDING LLC,
NATIONAL PROPERTY REIT CORP.,
PROSPECT CAPITAL MANAGEMENT L.P.,
PRIORITY SENIOR SECURED INCOME MANAGEMENT, LLC,
PROSPECT ENHANCED YIELD FUND,
PROSPECT ENHANCED YIELD MANAGEMENT, LLC
All Communications, Notices and Orders to:
Marc Weinstein
FP Strategies LLC
151 Calle de San Francisco, Suite 200
San Juan, Puerto Rico 00901
Telephone 787-722-6881
Prospect
Capital Corporation
10 East 40th Street, 42nd Floor
New York, NY 10016
Attention: Russell Wininger
(646) 536-3992
[email protected]
Copies to:
Kenneth E. Burdon
Simpson Thacher & Bartlett LLP
855 Boylston Street, 9th Floor
Boston, MA 02116
(617) 778-9001
[email protected]
November 26,2025
Owen J. Pinkerton, Esq.
Anne G. Oberndorf, Esq.
Krisztina Nadasdy, Esq.
Eversheds Sutherland (US) LLP
700 Sixth Street, NW, Suite 700
Washington, DC 20001
Telephone (202) 383-0100
February 6, 2026
This Application (including Exhibits) contains 57 pages.
2
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
BEFORE THE
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
|
IN THE MATTER OF
FP STRATEGIES LLC ROBOSTRATEGY, INC.
151 CALLE DE SAN FRANCISCO, SUITE 200 SAN JUAN, PUERTO RICO 00901
SATYA ROBO HOLDINGS LLC
1250 AVE PONCE DE LEON, SUITE 301 PMB 1902 SAN JUAN, PUERTO RICO 00907
File No. |
: : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : |
PURSUANT TO SECTIONS 17(d) AND 57(i) OF THE INVESTMENT COMPANY ACT OF 1940 AND RULE 17d-1 UNDER THE INVESTMENT COMPANY ACT OF 1940 PERMITTING CERTAIN JOINT TRANSACTIONS OTHERWISE PROHIBITED BY SECTIONS 17(d) AND 57(a)(4) OF AND RULE 17d-1 UNDER THE INVESTMENT COMPANY ACT OF 1940 |
I. I. SUMMARY
OF APPLICATION
The following entities hereby request an order
(the “Order”) of the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (the “SEC” or “Commission”)
under Section pursuant to
Sections 17(d) and 57(i) of the Investment Company Act of 1940, as amended (the “1940 Act”),1
and Rule 17d-1, permitting certain joint transactions otherwise prohibited by Sections 17(d) and 57(a)(4) of the 1940 Act and Rule 17d-1
thereunder. The Order would supersede the exemptive order issued by the Commission on January 13, 2020
(as amended, the “Prior Order”)2that was granted pursuant to Sections 17(d), 57(i) and Rule 17d-1,
with the result that no person will continue to rely on the Prior Order if the Order is granted.
| 1 | Unless otherwise indicated, all section and rule references herein are to the 1940 Act and rules promulgated thereunder. |
3
·
Prospect Capital Corporation (“PSEC”’). a closed-end
management investment company that has elected to be regulated as a BDC (as defined below) under the 1940 Act. The investment adviser
to PSEC is PCM (as defined below).
| · |
·
Prospect Floating Rate and Alternative Income Fund. Inc. (“PFLOAT”) (f/k/a Prospect
Sustainable Income Fund. Inc.), a closed-end management investment company that has elected to be regulated as a BDC under the 1940 Act.
The investment adviser to PFLOAT is PCM.
·
Prospect Enhanced Yield Fund (“PEYF” and together with
PSEC, PRIS and PFLOAT. the “Existing Regulated Funds”), a closed-end management investment company registered
under the 1940 Act. The investment adviser to PEYF is PEYM (as defined below).
| · |
·
Priority Senior Secured Income Management, LLC (“PRISM”),
a Delaware limited liability company that serves as the investment adviser for PRIS. PRISM is an investment adviser registered under the
Advisers Act.
| · | Satya Robo Holdings LLC, an entity wholly owned by an affiliate of the Existing Adviser that, from time to time, will hold various financial assets in a principal capacity and that currently intends to participate in Co-Investment Transactions (in such capacity, the “Existing Proprietary Account,” and collectively with the Existing Regulated Fund and Existing Adviser, the “Applicants”).[3] |
·
Prospect Enhanced Yield Management, LLC (“PEYM” and together
with PCM and PRISM, the “Existing Advisers”), a Delaware limited liability company that serves as the investment
adviser for PEYF. PEYM is an investment adviser registered under the Advisers Act. All of the Existing Advisers are under common control.
·
Prospect Capital Funding LLC (“PSEC SPY Sub”) and National Property REIT Corp., (“NPRC”
and together with PSEC SPV Sub, the Existing Regulated Funds and the Existing Advisers, the “Applicants”),3each
of which is a separate and distinct legal entity and each of which is a Wholly-Owned Investment Sub (as defined below) of PSEC.
| 2 | The term “successor” means an entity that results from a reorganization into another jurisdiction or change in the type of business organization. |
| 3 | All existing entities that currently intend to rely upon the requested Order have been named as Applicants. Any other existing or future entity that subsequently relies on the Order will comply with the terms and conditions of the Application. |
4
The relief requested in this application for the Order (the “Application”) would allow a Regulated Fund4 and one or more Affiliated Entities5 to engage in Co-Investment Transactions6 subject to the terms and conditions described herein. The Regulated Funds and Affiliated Entities that participate in a Co-Investment Transaction are collectively referred to herein as “Participants.”7 The Applicants do not seek relief for transactions effected consistent with Commission staff no-action positions.8
II. II. GENERAL
DESCRIPTION OF THE APPLICANTS
| A. |
PSEC is a Maryland corporation
organized as a closed-end management investment company that has elected to be regulated as a business development company (“BDC”)
under the 1940 Act. PSEC was organized on April 13, 2004 and commenced operations on July 27, 2004. PSEC’s principal place of business
is 10 East 40th Street, 42nd Floor, New York, New York 10016.
| 4 |
“Regulated Fund” means the Existing Regulated |
The term Regulated Fund also includes (a) any Wholly-Owned Investment Sub (as defined below) of a Regulated Fund, (b) any Joint Venture (as defined below) of a Regulated Fund, and (c) any BDC Downstream Fund (as defined below) of a Regulated Fund that is a business development company. “Wholly-Owned Investment Sub” means an entity: (a) that is a “wholly-owned subsidiary” (as defined in Section 2(a)(43) of the 1940 Act) of a Regulated Fund; (b) whose sole business purpose is to hold one or more investments and which may issue debt on behalf or in lieu of such Regulated Fund; and (c) is not a registered investment company or a business development company. “Joint Venture” means an unconsolidated joint venture subsidiary of a Regulated Fund, in which all portfolio decisions, and generally all other decisions in respect of such joint venture, must be approved by an investment committee consisting of representatives of the Regulated Fund and the unaffiliated joint venture partner (with approval from a representative of each required). “BDC Downstream Fund” means an entity (a) directly or indirectly controlled by a Regulated Fund that is a business development company, (b) that is not controlled by any person other than the Regulated Fund (except a person that indirectly controls the entity solely because it controls the Regulated Fund), (c) that would be an investment company but for Section 3(c)(1) or 3(c)(7) of the 1940 Act, (d) whose investment adviser is an Adviser and (e) that is not a Wholly-Owned Investment Sub.
In the case of a Wholly-Owned Investment Sub that does not have a chief compliance officer or a Board, the chief compliance officer and Board of the Regulated Fund that controls the Wholly-Owned Investment Sub will be deemed to serve those roles for the Wholly-Owned Investment Sub. In the case of a Joint Venture or a BDC Downstream Fund (as applicable) that does not have a chief compliance officer or a Board, the chief compliance officer of the Regulated Fund will be deemed to be the Joint Venture’s or BDC Downstream Fund’s chief compliance officer, and the Joint Venture’s or BDC Downstream Fund’s investment committee will be deemed to be the Joint Venture’s or BDC Downstream Fund’s Board.
| 5 | “Affiliated Entity” means an entity not controlled by a Regulated Fund that intends to engage in Co-Investment Transactions and that is (a) with respect to a Regulated Fund, another Regulated Fund; (b) an Adviser or its affiliates (other than an open-end investment company registered under the 1940 Act), and any direct or indirect, wholly- or majority-owned subsidiary of an Adviser or its affiliates (other than of an open-end investment company registered under the 1940 Act), that is participating in a Co-Investment Transaction in a principal capacity; or (c) any entity that would be an investment company but for Section 3(c) of the 1940 Act or Rule 3a-7 thereunder and whose investment adviser is an Adviser.To the extent that an entity described in clause (b) is not advised by an Adviser, such entity shall be deemed to be an Adviser for purposes of the conditions. |
| 6 | “Co-Investment Transaction” means the acquisition or Disposition of securities of an issuer in a transaction effected in reliance on the Order or previously granted relief. |
| 7 | “Adviser” means |
| 8 | See, e.g., Massachusetts Mutual Life Insurance Co. (pub. avail. June 7, 2000), Massachusetts Mutual Life Insurance Co. (pub. avail. July 28, 2000) and SMC Capital, Inc. (pub. avail. Sept. 5, 1995). |
5
The Existing Regulated Fund was formed as a Maryland corporation under the Maryland General Corporation Law on May 23, 2025, and operates as an externally-managed, non-diversified, closed-end management investment company registered under the 1940 Act. The Existing Regulated Fund’s principal place of business is 151 Calle de San Francisco, Suite 200, San Juan, Puerto Rico 00901.
PSEC’sThe
Existing Regulated Fund’s investment objective is to generate both current income andseek
long-term capital appreciation, principally through debt
andcapital gains on equity and
equity-linked investments. PSEC invests primarily in first and second lien secured loans and
unsecured debt, which in some cases includes an equity component. PSEC in
robotics and artificial intelligence companies. The Existing Regulated Fund focuses primarily on private, venture-capital-backed private
companies with significant growth potential, many of which are not yet publicly listed or widely accessible to individuals investors.
The Existing Regulated Fund has a five-member board (the “Existing
Fund Board,” and together with any Future Regulated Fund’s board, the “Board,
three”), of which three
members are not “interested” persons of PSECthe
Existing Regulated Fund within the meaning of Section 2(a)(19) of the 1940 Act.9
PSEC is externally
managed by PCM, its investment adviser.
| B. |
PRIS is a Maryland
corporation organized as a closed-end management investment company registered under
the 1940 Act. PRIS was organized on July 19, 2012. PRIS’s principal
place of business is 10 East 40th Street, 42nd Floor, New York, New York 10016.
PRIS’s investment objective
is to generate current income and, as a secondary objective, long-term capital appreciation. PRIS expects to seek to achieve its investment
objective by investing, under normal circumstances, at least 80% of its total assets, or net assets plus borrowings, in senior secured
loans made to companies whose debt is rated below investment grade or, in limited circumstances, unrated, with an emphasis on current
income. PRIS has a four-member Board, three of which are not “interested” persons of the Fund within the meaning of Section
2(a)(19) of the 1940 Act.
PRIS is externally managed
by PRISM, its investment adviser.
The Existing Proprietary Account will, from time to time, hold various financial assets in a principal capacity. The Existing Adviser and its affiliates operate various business lines directly or through their wholly- or majority-owned subsidiaries, and the affiliate that exists and currently intends to participate in Co-Investment Transactions has been included as an Applicant herein.
| C. |
PFLOAT is a Maryland corporation
organized as a closed-end management investment company that has elected to be regulated as a business development company under the 1940
Act. PFLOAT was organized on April 29, 2011. PFLOAT’s principal place of business is 10 East 40th Street, 42nd
Floor, New York, New York 10016.
PFLOAT’s investment
objective and strategy is to generate current income and, as a secondary objective, capital appreciation by targeting investment opportunities
with favorable risk-adjusted returns. PFLOAT has a four-member Board, three of which are not “interested” persons of the Fund
within the meaning of Section 2(a)(19) of the 1940 Act.
PFLOAT is externally managed
by PCM, its investment adviser.
D. PEYF
The Existing Adviser serves as the investment adviser of the Existing Regulated Fund, and either it or another Adviser will serve as the investment adviser to any Future Regulated Fund. The Existing Adviser is a Puerto Rico limited liability company and is a registered investment adviser with the Commission under the Advisers Act. On the date of this Application, the Existing Adviser’s sole client that intends to rely on this application is the Existing Regulated Fund.
| 9 | The
|
6
PEYF is a Delaware statutory
trust organized as a closed-end management investment company registered under the 1940 Act that operates as an interval fund pursuant
to Rule 23c-3 under the 1940 Act. PEYF was organized on June 27, 2024. PEYF’s principal place of business is 10 East 40th
Street, 42nd Floor, New York, New York 10016.
PEYF’s investment objective
is to generate current income and, as a secondary objective, long-term capital appreciation. PEYF has a four-member Board, three of which
are not “interested” persons of the Fund within the meaning of Section 2(a)(19) of the 1940 Act.
PEYF is externally managed
by PEYM, its investment adviser.
E. PCM
Under the terms of an investment advisory agreement with the Existing Regulated Fund, the Existing Adviser will, among other things, manage the investment portfolio, direct purchases and sales of portfolio securities and report thereon to the Existing Regulated Fund’s officers and Board regularly.
PCM is a Delaware
limited partnership and an investment adviser registered with the Commission under
the Advisers Act. PCM serves as investment adviser to PSEC and PFLOAT (together the “PCM Funds”)
and manages their respective portfolios in accordance with their respective investment objectives. Subject to the oversight of the Board
for the relevant PCM Fund, PCM manages the day-to-day operations of, provides investment advisory services to such PCM Fund, including
by determining the composition of the investment portfolio, negotiating investments, and monitoring investments.
PCM is led by John F. Barry
III and M. Grier Eliasek, two senior executives with significant investment advisory and business experience. Mr. Barry controls PCM.
PCM’s principal place of business is 700 S. Rosemary Ave., Suite 204, West Palm Beach, Florida 33401.
F. PRISM
PRISM is a Delaware limited
liability company and an investment adviser registered with the Commission under the Advisers Act. PRISM serves as investment adviser
to PRIS and manages PRIS’s portfolio in accordance with PRIS’s investment objective. PRISM makes investment decisions for
PRIS, places purchase and sale orders for portfolio transactions for PRIS and otherwise manage the day-to-day operations of PRIS, subject
to the oversight of the PRIS Board. PRISM is owned 50% by PCM and 50% by Stratera Holdings, LLC, a national sponsor of alternative investment
products designed for the individual and institutional investor. PCM controls PRISM. PRISM’s principal place of business is 700
S. Rosemary Ave., Suite 204, West Palm Beach, Florida 33401.
PRISM is led by the same team
of investment professionals from the investment and operations team of PCM that manages PSEC, which is responsible for PRIS’s day-to-day
operations on behalf of PRISM and is responsible for developing, recommending and implementing PRIS’s investment objective.
G.
PEYM
PEYM is a Delaware limited
liability company and an investment adviser registered with the Commission under the Advisers Act. PEYM serves as investment adviser to
PEYF and manages PEYF’s portfolio in accordance with PEYF’s investment objective. PEYM makes investment decisions for PEYF,
including placing purchase and sale orders for portfolio transactions and otherwise managing the day-to-day operations of PEYF, subject
to the oversight of the PEYF Board.
PEYM is led by John F. Barry
III, M. Grier Eliasek, Colin McGinnis, and Ga’ash “Josh” Soffer, senior executives with significant investment advisory
and business experience. PCM controls PEYM. PEYM’s principal place of business is 700 S. Rosemary Ave., Suite 204, West Palm Beach,
Florida 33401.
H.
PSEC SPV Sub
PSEC SPV Sub
is a Delaware limited liability company and is a Wholly-Owned
Investment Sub of PSEC. PSEC SPV Sub holds certain of PSEC’s portfolio loan investments that are used as collateral for the revolving
credit facility at PSEC SPV Sub.
7
I.
NPRC
NPRC is a Maryland corporation,
a qualified REIT for U.S. federal income tax purposes, and is a Wholly-Owned Investment Sub of PSEC. NPRC is held for purposes of investing,
operating, financing, leasing, managing, and selling a portfolio of real estate assets.
III. III. ORDER
REQUESTED
The Applicants request an Order of the Commission
underpursuant to
Sections 17(d) and 57(i) of the 1940 Act and Rule 17d-1 thereunder to permit, subject to the terms and conditions set forth below in this
Application (the “Conditions”), each Regulated Fund to be able to participate with one or more Affiliated Entities
in Co-Investment Transactions otherwise prohibited by Sections 17(d) and 57(a)(4) of the 1940 Act and Rule 17d-1 thereunder.
| A. | Applicable Law |
Section 17(d), in relevant part, prohibits an affiliated person, or an affiliated person of such affiliated person, of a registered investment company, acting as principal, from effecting any transaction in which the registered investment company is “a joint or a joint and several participant with such person” in contravention of such rules as the SEC may prescribe “for the purpose of limiting or preventing participation by such [fund] on a basis different from or less advantageous than that of such other participant.”
Rule 17d-1 prohibits an affiliated person, or an affiliated person of such affiliated person, of a registered investment company, acting as principal, from participating in, or effecting any transaction in connection with, any “joint enterprise or other joint arrangement or profit-sharing plan”10 in which the fund is a participant without first obtaining an order from the SEC.
Section 57(a)(4), in relevant part, prohibits any person related to a business development company in the manner described in Section 57(b), acting as principal, from knowingly effecting any transaction in which the business development company is a joint or a joint and several participant with such persons in contravention of such rules as the Commission may prescribe for the purpose of limiting or preventing participation by the business development company on a basis less advantageous than that of such person. Section 57(i) provides that, until the SEC prescribes rules under Section 57(a), the SEC’s rules under Section 17(d) applicable to registered closed-end investment companies will be deemed to apply to persons subject to the prohibitions of Section 57(a). Because the SEC has not adopted any rules under Section 57(a), Rule 17d-1 applies to persons subject to the prohibitions of Section 57(a).
Rule 17d-1(b) provides, in relevant part, that in passing upon applications under the rule, the Commission will consider whether the participation of a registered investment company in a joint enterprise, joint arrangement or profit-sharing plan on the basis proposed is consistent with the provisions, policies and purposes of the 1940 Act and the extent to which such participation is on a basis different from or less advantageous than that of other participants.
| B. | Need for Relief |
Each Regulated Fund may be deemed to be an affiliated
person of each other Regulated Fund within the meaning of Section 2(a)(3) if it is deemed to be under common control because an Adviser
is or will be either the investment adviser or sub-adviser to each Regulated Fund. Section 17(d) and Section 57(b) apply to any investment
adviser to a closed-end fund or a business development company, respectively, including a sub-adviser. Thus, an Adviser and any Affiliated
Entities that it advises could be deemed to be persons related to Regulated Funds in a manner described by Sections 17(d) and 57(b). PEYM
and PRISM are controlled by PCM, and so the Existing Advisers are thus affiliated persons of each other.
| 10 | Rule |
8
With
Accordingly, with respect to the Existing Advisers,Adviser
and any other Advisers that are deemed to be affiliated persons of each otherthe
Existing Adviser, Affiliated Entities advised by any of them could be deemed to be persons related to Regulated Funds (or a company
controlled by a Regulated Fund) in a manner described by Sections 17(d) and 57(b). In addition, any entities or accounts controlled by
or under common control with the Existing AdvisersAdviser,
and/or any other Advisers that are deemed to be affiliated persons of each other that may, from time to time, hold various financial assets
in a principal capacity, could be deemed to be persons related to Regulated Funds (or a company controlled by a Regulated Fund) in a manner
described by Sections 17(d) and 57(b). Finally, with respect to any Wholly-Owned Investment Sub, Joint Venture, or BDC Downstream Fund
of a Regulated Fund, such entity would be a company controlled by its parent Regulated Fund for purposes of Section 57(a)(4) of the 1940
Act and Rule 17d-117d-l
under the 1940 Act.
| C. | Conditions |
Applicants agree that any Order granting the requested relief will be subject to the following Conditions.
1.
1. Same Terms. With respect to any Co-Investment
Transaction, each Regulated Fund, and Affiliated Entity participating in such transaction
will acquire, or dispose of, as the case may be, the same class of securities, at the same time, for the same price and with the same
conversion, financial reporting and registration rights, and with substantially the same other terms (provided that the settlement date
for an Affiliated Entity may occur up to ten business days after the settlement date for the Regulated Fund, and vice versa). If a Participant,
but not all of the Regulated Funds, has the right to nominate a director for election to a portfolio company’s board of directors,
the right to appoint a board observer or any similar right to participate in the governance or management of a portfolio company, the
Board of each Regulated Fund that does not hold this right must be given the opportunity to veto the selection of such person.11
2.
2. Existing Investments in the Issuer. Prior
to a Regulated Fund acquiring in a Co-Investment Transaction a security of an issuer in which an Affiliated Entity has an existing interest
in such issuer, the “required majority,” as defined in Section 57(o) of the 1940 Act,12
of the Regulated Fund (“Required Majority”) will take the steps set forth in Section 57(f) of the 1940 Act,[13]
unless: (i) the Regulated Fund already holds the same security as each such Affiliated Entity; and (ii) the Regulated Fund and each other
Affiliated Entity holding the security is participating in the acquisition in approximate proportion to its then-current holdings.
3.
3. Related Expenses. Any expenses associated
with acquiring, holding or disposing of any securities acquired in a Co-Investment Transaction, to the extent not borne by the Adviser(s),
will be shared among the Participants in proportion to the relative amounts of the securities being acquired, held or disposed of, as
the case may be.14
| 11 | Such a Board can also, consistent with applicable fund documents, facilitate this opportunity by delegating the authority to veto the selection of such person to a committee of the Board. |
| 12 | Section 57(o) defines the term “required majority,” in relevant part, with respect to the approval of a proposed transaction, as both a majority of a BDC’s directors who have no financial interest in the transaction and a majority of such directors who are not interested persons of the BDC. In the case of a Regulated Fund that is not a BDC, the Board members that constitute the Required Majority will be determined as if such Regulated Fund were a BDC subject to Section 57(o) of the 1940 Act. |
| 13 | Section 57(f) provides for the approval by a Required Majority of certain transactions on the basis that, in relevant part: (i) the terms of the transaction, including the consideration to be paid or received, are reasonable and fair to the shareholders of the BDC and do not involve overreaching of the BDC or its shareholders on the part of any person concerned; (ii) the proposed transaction is consistent with the interests of the BDC’s shareholders and the BDC’s policy as recited in filings made by the BDC with the Commission and the BDC’s reports to shareholders; and (iii) the BDC’s directors record in their minutes and preserve in their records a description of the transaction, their findings, the information or materials upon which their findings were based, and the basis for their findings. |
| 14 | Expenses of an individual Participant that are incurred solely by the Participant due to its unique circumstances (such as legal and compliance expenses) will be borne by such Participant. |
9
4.
4. No Remuneration. Any transaction fee15
(including break-up, structuring, monitoring or commitment fees but excluding broker’s fees contemplated by section 17(e) or 57(k)
of the 1940 Act, as applicable), received by an Adviser and/or a Participant in connection with a Co-Investment Transaction will be distributed
to the Participants on a pro rata basis based on the amounts they invested or committed, as the case may be, in such Co-Investment Transaction.
If any transaction fee is to be held by an Adviser pending consummation of the transaction, the fee will be deposited into an account
maintained by the Adviser at a bank or banks having the qualifications prescribed in section 26(a)(1) of the 1940 Act, and the account
will earn a competitive rate of interest that will also be divided pro rata among the Participants based on the amount they invest in
such Co-Investment Transaction. No Affiliated Entity, Regulated Fund,
or any of their affiliated persons will accept any compensation, remuneration or financial benefit in connection with a Regulated Fund’s
participation in a Co-Investment Transaction, except: (i) to the extent permitted by Section 17(e) or 57(k) of the 1940 Act; (ii) as a
result of either being a Participant in the Co-investmentCo-Investment
Transaction or holding an interest in the securities issued by one of the Participants; or (iii) in the case of an Adviser, investment
advisory compensation paid in accordance with investment advisory agreement)(s)
with the Regulated Fund(s) or Affiliated Entity(ies).
5.
5. Co-Investment Policies. Each Adviser (and
each Affiliated Entity that is not advised by an Adviser) will adopt and implement policies and procedures reasonably designed to ensure
that: (i) opportunities to participate in Co-Investment Transactions are allocated in a manner that is fair and equitable to every Regulated
Fund; and (ii) the Adviser negotiating the Co-Investment Transaction considers the interest in the Transaction of any participating Regulated
Fund (the “Co-Investment Policies”). Each Adviser (and each Affiliated Entity that is not advised by an Adviser)
will provide its Co-Investment Policies to the Regulated Funds and will notify the Regulated Funds of any material changes thereto.16
6.
6. Dispositions:
(a)
(a) Prior to any Disposition17
by an Affiliated Entity of a security acquired in a Co-Investment Transaction, the Adviser to each Regulated Fund that participated in
the Co-Investment Transaction will be notified and each such Regulated Fund given the opportunity to participate pro rata based on the
proportion of its holdings relative to the other Affiliated Entities participating in such Disposition.
(b)
(b) Prior to any Disposition by a Regulated Fund of
a security acquired in a Co-Investment Transaction, the Required Majority will take the steps set forth in Section 57(f) of the 1940 Act,
unless: (i) each Affiliated Entity holding the security participates in the Disposition in approximate proportion to its then-current
holding of the security; or (ii) the Disposition is a sale of a Tradable Security.18
7.
7. Board Oversight
(a)
(a) Each Regulated Fund’s directors will oversee
the Regulated Fund’s participation in the co-investment program in the exercise of their reasonable business judgment.
(b)
(b) Prior to a Regulated Fund’s participation
in Co-investmentCo-Investment
Transactions, the Regulated Fund’s Board, including a Required Majority, will: (i) review the Co-investmentCo-Investment
Policies, to ensure that they are reasonably designed to prevent the Regulated Fund from being disadvantaged by participation in the co-investment
program; and (ii) approve policies and procedures of the Regulated Fund that are reasonably designed to ensure compliance with the terms
of the Order.
| 15 | Applicants are not requesting and the Commission is not providing any relief for transaction fees received in connection with any Co-Investment Transaction. |
| 16 | The Affiliated Entities may adopt shared |
| 17 | “Disposition” means the sale, exchange, transfer or other disposition of an interest in a security of an issuer. |
| 18 | “Tradable Security” means a security which trades: (i) on a national securities exchange (or designated offshore securities market as defined in Rule 902(b) under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended) and (ii) with sufficient volume and liquidity (findings which are to be made in good faith and documented by the Advisers to any Regulated Funds) to allow each Regulated Fund to dispose of its entire remaining position within 30 days at approximately the price at which the Regulated Fund has valued the investment. |
10
(c)
(c) At least quarterly, each Regulated Fund’s
Adviser and chief compliance officer (as defined in Rule 38a-1(a)(4)) will provide the Regulated Fund Boards with reports or other information
requested by the Board related to a Regulated Fund’s participation in Co-Investment Transactions and a summary of matters, if any,
deemed significant that may have arisen during the period related to the implementation of the Co-Investment Policies and the Regulated
Fund’s policies and procedures approved pursuant to (b) above.
(d)
(d) Every year, each Regulated Fund’s Adviser
and chief compliance officer will provide the Regulated Fund’s Board with reports or other information requested by the Board related
to the Regulated Fund’s participation in the co-investment program and any material changes in the Affiliated Entities’ participation
in the co-investment program, including changes to the Affiliated Entities’ Co-investmentCo-Investment
Policies.
(e)
(e) The Adviser and the chief compliance officer will
also notify the Regulated Fund’s Board of a compliance matter related to the Regulated Fund’s participation in the co-investment
program and related Co-investmentCo-Investment
Policies or the Regulated Fund’s policies and procedures approved pursuant to (b) above that a Regulated Fund’s chief compliance
officer considers to be material.
8.
8. Recordkeeping. All information presented
to the Board pursuant to the order will be kept for the life of the Regulated Fund and at least two years thereafter, and will be subject
to examination by the Commission and its Staff. Each Regulated Fund will maintain the records required by Section 57(f)(3) as if it were
a business development company and each of the Co-investmentCo-Investment
Transactions were approved by the Required Majority under Section 57(f).19
9.
9. In the event that the Commission adopts a rule
under the 1940 Act allowing co-investments of the type described in this Application, any relief granted by the Order will expire on the
effective date of that rule.
IV. IV. STATEMENT
IN SUPPORT OF RELIEF REQUESTED
Applicants submit that allowing the Co-Investment Transactions described by this Application is justified on the basis of (i) the potential benefits to the Regulated Funds and their respective shareholders and (ii) the protections found in the terms and conditions set forth in this Application.
| A. | Potential Benefits to the Regulated Funds and their Shareholders |
Section 57(a)(4) and Rule 17d-1 (as applicable) limit the ability of the Regulated Funds to participate in attractive co-investment opportunities under certain circumstances. If the relief is granted, the Regulated Funds should: (i) be able to participate in a larger number and greater variety of investments, thereby diversifying their portfolios and providing related risk-limiting benefits; (ii) be able to participate in larger financing opportunities, including those involving issuers with better credit quality, which otherwise might not be available to investors of a Regulated Fund’s size; (iii) have greater bargaining power (notably with regard to creditor protection terms and other similar investor rights), more control over the investment and less need to bring in other external investors or structure investments to satisfy the different needs of external investors; (iv) benefit from economies of scale by sharing fixed expenses associated with an investment with the other Participants; and (v) be able to obtain better deal flow from investment bankers and other sources of investments.
| B. | Shareholder Protections |
Each Co-investmentCo-Investment
Transaction would be subject to the terms and conditions of this Application. The Conditions are designed to address the concerns underlying
Sections 17(d) and 57(a)(4) and Rule 17d-117d-l
by ensuring that participation by a Regulated Fund in any Co-Investment Transaction would not be on a basis different from or less advantageous
than that of other Participants. Under Condition 5, each Adviser (and each Affiliated Entity that is not advised by an Adviser) will adopt
and implement Co-Investment Policies that are reasonably designed to ensure that (i) opportunities to participate in Co-Investment Transactions
are allocated in a manner that is fair and equitable to every Regulated Fund; and (ii) the Adviser negotiating the Co Investment Transaction
considers the interest in the Transaction of any participating Regulated Fund. The Co-Investment Policies will require an Adviser to make
an independent determination of the appropriateness of a Co-Investment Transaction and the proposed allocation size based on each Participant’s
specific investment profile and other relevant characteristics.
| 19 | If a Regulated Fund enters into a transaction that would be
a |
11
V. V. PRECEDENTS
The Commission has previously issued orders permitting
certain investment companies subject to regulation under the 1940 Act and their affiliated persons to be able to participate in Co-Investment
Transactions (, including
substantially identical relief[20] recently granted by the
Commission, which applications have been identified by Applicants as substantially identical to the Application pursuant to Rule 0-5(e)(3)
under the 1940 Act, (together, the “Existing Orders”).20[21]
Similar to the Existing Orders, the Conditions described herein are designed to mitigate the possibility for overreaching and to promote
fair and equitable treatment of the Regulated Funds. Accordingly, the Applicants submit that the scope of investor protections contemplated
by the Conditions are consistent with those found in the Existing Orders.
| 20 | Oxford Square Capital Corp., et al. (File No. 812-15840), Release No. IC-35820 (December 11, 2025) (notice), Release No. IC-35860 (January 6, 2026) (order); Prospect Capital Corporation, et al. (File No. 812-15849), Release No. IC-35819 (December 9, 2025) (notice), Release No. IC-35859 (January 6, 2026) (order). |
| See, e.g., |
12
VI. VI. PROCEDURAL
MATTERS
| A. | Communications |
Please address all communications concerning this Application, the Notice and the Order to:
Russell
Wininger
Prospect
Capital
Corporation
10 East 40th Street, 42nd Floor
New York, NY 10016
(646) 536-3992
[email protected]
Marc Weinstein
FP Strategies LLC
151 Calle de San Francisco, Suite 200
San Juan, Puerto Rico 00901
Telephone 787-722-6881
Please address any questions, and a copy of any communications, concerning this Application, the Notice, and the Order to:
Kenneth
E. Burdon
Simpson Thacher & Bartlett LLP
855 Boylston Street, 9th Floor
Boston, MA 02116
(617) 778-9001
[email protected]
Owen J. Pinkerton, Esq.
Anne G. Oberndorf, Esq.
Krisztina Nadasdy, Esq.
Eversheds Sutherland (US) LLP
700 Sixth Street, NW, Suite 700
Washington, DC 20001
Telephone (202) 383-0100
| B. | Authorizations |
The filing of this Application for the Order sought
hereby and the taking of all acts reasonably necessary to obtain the relief requested herein was authorized by the Board of eachthe
Existing Regulated Fund pursuant to resolutions duly adopted by the Board. CopiesA
copy of the resolutions are provided belowattached
hereto as Exhibit B.
Pursuant to Rule 0-2(c), Applicants hereby state
that each Applicant has authorized to cause to be prepared and to execute and file with the Commission this Application and any amendment
thereto for an order pursuant to SectionSections
17(d) and 57(i) and Rule 17d-1 permitting certain joint transactions otherwise prohibited by Sections 17(d) and 57(a)(4) and Rule
17d-1. The person executing the Application on behalf of the Applicants being duly sworn deposes and says that he has duly executed the
Application for and on behalf of the applicable entity listed; that he is authorized to execute the Application pursuant to the terms
of an operating agreement, management agreement or otherwise; and that all actions by members, directors or other bodies necessary to
authorize each such deponent to execute and file the Application have been taken.
13
In accordance with Rule 0-5(d) under the 1940 Act, Applicants request expedited review of the Application by the Commission. In accordance with Rule 0-5(e)(2) under the 1940 Act, included as Exhibit C to this Application are two marked copies of the Application showing changes from the final versions of two recent applications identified by Applicants as substantially identical to the Application pursuant to Rule 0-5(e)(3) under the 1940 Act.
[Signature Page Follows]
14
The Applicants have caused this Application to
be duly signed on their behalf on the November 26, 20256th
day of February, 2026.
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
15
|
| |
|
|
VERIFICATION
| FP STRATEGIES LLC | ||
| By: | /s/ Marc Weinstein | |
| Name: Marc Weinstein | ||
| Title: Member | ||
| ROBOSTRATEGY, INC. | ||
| By: | /s/ Andrew Kang | |
| Name: Andrew Kang | ||
| Title: President and Chief Executive Officer | ||
| SATYA ROBO HOLDINGS LLC | ||
| By: | /s/ Marc Weinstein | |
| Name: Marc Weinstein | ||
| Title: Authorized Signatory | ||
16
Exhibit A
Verification
Each of theThe
undersigned states that he or she has duly executed the attached application dated as of November 26,
2025Application dated February 6, 2026 for and on
behalf of the entities listed below;Applicants,
as the case may be, that he or she holds the office with each
such entity as indicated below, and that all action
byactions by stockholders, officers, directors, officers,
stockholders, general partners, trustees or members of each entity and any other bodyand
other bodies necessary to authorize the undersigned to execute and file such instrument hasApplication
have been taken. Each of theThe
undersigned further states that he or she is familiar with suchthe
instrument, and the contents thereof, and that the facts therein
set forth therein are true to the best of his or
her knowledge, information, and belief.
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
17
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
18
[Different first page setting changed from off in original to on in modified.].
[Different first page link-to-previous setting changed from on in original to off in modified.].
| FP STRATEGIES LLC | ||
| By: | /s/ Marc Weinstein | |
| Name: Marc Weinstein | ||
| Title: Member | ||
| ROBOSTRATEGY, INC. | ||
| By: | /s/ Andrew Kang | |
| Name: Andrew Kang | ||
| Title: President and Chief Executive Officer | ||
| SATYA ROBO HOLDINGS LLC | ||
| By: | /s/ Marc Weinstein | |
| Name:Marc Weinstein | ||
| Title: Authorized Signatory | ||
Approval of Filing
Section 17(d) Application for Co-Investment Relief
[Different first page setting changed from off in original to on in modified.].
19
[Different first page setting changed from off in original to on in modified.].
[Link-to-previous setting changed from on in original to off in modified.].
Exhibit B
RESOLUTIONS OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF ROBOSTRATEGY, INC. (THE “COMPANY”)*
WHEREAS, the Board
of Directors (the “Board”) believes it is in the best interests of Prospect
Capital Corporation (the “Company”) to file an application for an order to replace a prior order under Sections
17(d) andhas reviewed the Company’s Co-Investment Exemptive
Application (the “Exemptive Application”) involving the Company and certain affiliates thereof as specified
in the Exemptive Application, a copy of which is attached hereto as Appendix D, for an order of the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission
(the “Commission”) pursuant to Section 57(i) of the Investment Company Act of 1940,
as amended (the “1940 Act”), and Rule 17d-1 promulgated
under the Investment Company Act of 1940 to permit1940
Act, permitting certain joint transactions that otherwise may
be prohibited by Section 17(d) and Section 57(a)(4) of
the Investment Company Act of 1940 and Rule 17d-1 under the Investment Company Act of 1940 (the “Application”)1940
Act.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED,
that the officers of the Company (the “Officers”) be, and they hereby are, authorized,
empowered and directed, in the name and on behalf of the Company, to cause to be prepared, executed, delivered and filed with the SEC
the Application, and to do such other acts or things and execute such other documents, including amendments to the Application, as they
deem necessary or desirable to cause the Application to conform to comments received from the Staff of the SEC and otherwise to comply
with the Investment Company Act of 1940 and the rides and regulations promulgated thereunder, in such form and accompanied by such exhibits
and other documents, as the Officers preparing the same shall approve, such approval to be conclusively evidenced by the filing of the
Application; and it is further
RESOLVED, that
the Officers be, and each of them hereby is, authorized, empowered and directed, in the name and on behalf of Company, to perform all
of the agreements and obligations of the Company in connection with the foregoing resolutions, to take or cause to be taken any and all
further actions, to execute and deliver, or cause to be executed and delivered, all other documents, instalments, agreements, undertakings,
and certificates of any kind and nature whatsoever, to incur and pay all fees and expenses and to engage such persons as the Officers
may determine to be necessary, advisable or appropriate to effectuate or carry out the purposes and intent of the foregoing resolutions,
and the execution by the Officers of any such documents, instruments, agreements, undertakings and certificates, the payment of any fees
and expenses or the engagement of such persons or the taking by them of any action in connection with the foregoing matters shall conclusively
establish the Officers’ authority therefore and the authorization, acceptance, adoption, ratification, approval and confirmation
by the Company thereof.
Resolutions of the Board
of Directors of Priority Income Fund, Inc.
Approval of
Filing Section 17(d) Application for Co-Investment Relief
WHEREAS, the
Board of Directors (the “Board”) believes it is in the best interests of Priority Income Fund, Inc. (the “Company”)
to file an application for an order to replace a prior order under Sections 17(d) and 57(i) of the Investment Company Act of 1940 and
Rule 17d-1 under the Investment Company Act of 1940 to permit certain joint transactions otherwise prohibited by Section 17(d) and 57(a)
(4) of the Investment Company Act of 1940 and Rule 17d-1 under the Investment Company Act of 1940 (the “Application”).
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED,
that the officerseach of
the Chief Executive Officer, Chief Financial Officer, Chief Compliance Officer and the Secretary of the Company (the “Authorized
Officers”) shall be, and theyeach
of them individually hereby areis,
authorized, empowered and directed, in the name and on behalf of the Company, to cause to be prepared,
executed, delivered and filed with the SECCommission
the Exemptive Application, and to
do such other acts or things and execute such other documents, including amendments to the Application, as they deem necessary or desirable
to cause the Application to conform to comments received from the Staff of the SEC and otherwise to comply with the Investment Company
Act of 1940 and the rales and regulations promulgated thereunder, in such form and accompanied by such exhibits and other documents, as
the Officers preparing the same shall approve, such approval to be conclusively evidenced by the filing of the Application; and it is
furtherin substantially the form attached hereto as Appendix
D; and
RESOLVED, that
the Officers be, and each of them hereby is, authorized, empowered and directed, in the name and on behalf of Company, to perform all
of the agreements and obligations of the Company in connection with the foregoing resolutions, to take or cause to be taken any and all
further actions, to execute and deliver, or cause to be executed and delivered, all other documents, instruments, agreements, undertakings,
and certificates of any kind and nature whatsoever, to incur and pay all fees and expenses and to engage such persons as the Officers
may determine to be necessary, advisable or appropriate to effectuate or carry out the purposes and intent of the foregoing resolutions,
and the execution by the Officers of any such documents, instruments, agreements, undertakings and certificates, the payment of any fees
and expenses or the engagement of such persons or the taking by them of any action in connection with the foregoing matters shall conclusively
establish the Officers’ authority therefore and the authorization, acceptance, adoption, ratification, approval and confirmation
by the Company thereof.
[Different first page setting changed from off in original to on in modified.].
20
[Different first page setting changed from off in original to on in modified.].
[Link-to-previous setting changed from on in original to off in modified.].
Resolutions of the Board
of Directors of Prospect Floating Rate and Alternative Income Fund, Inc.
Approval of
Filing Section 17(d) Application for Co-Investment Relief
WHEREAS, the
Board of Directors (the “Board”) believes it is in the best interests of Prospect Floating Rate and Alternative
Income Fund, Inc. (the “Company”) to file an application for an order to replace a prior order under Sections
17(d) and 57(i) of the Investment Company Act of 1940 and Rule 17d-1 under the Investment Company Act of 1940 to permit certain joint
transactions otherwise prohibited by Section 17(d) and 57(a)(4) of the Investment Company Act of 1940 and Rule 17d-1 under the Investment
Company Act of 1940 (the “Application”).
NOW,
THEREFORE, BE ITFURTHER RESOLVED, that
the officers of the Company (the “Authorized
Officers”) shall
be, and theyeach of them
individually hereby areis,
authorized, empowered and directed, in the name and on behalf of the Company, to cause to be preparedmade,
executed, delivered and filed with the SEC the Application, and to do such other acts or things and execute
such other documents, includingCommission any amendments
to the Exemptive Application, as
they deem necessary or desirable to cause the Application to conform to comments received from the Staff of the SEC and otherwise to comply
with the Investment Company Act of 1940 and the rules and regulations promulgated thereunder, in such form and accompanied by such exhibits
and other documents, as the Officers preparing the same shall approve, such approval and
any additional applications for exemptive relief as are determined necessary, advisable or appropriate by any such officers in order to
effectuate the foregoing, such determination to be conclusively evidenced by the filing of the
Application; and it is furthertaking of any such action.
[Different first page setting changed from off in original to on in modified.].
| * | Appendix D in this resolution refers to the Appendix included in the Board consent that was executed by the Board and contained this resolution. |
21
[Different first page setting changed from off in original to on in modified.].
[Link-to-previous setting changed from on in original to off in modified.].
EXHIBIT C
RESOLVED, that
the Officers be, and each of them hereby is, authorized, empowered and directed, in the name and on behalf of Company, to perform all
of the agreements and obligations of the Company in connection with the foregoing resolutions, to take or cause to be taken any and all
further actions, to execute and deliver, or cause to be executed and delivered, all other documents, instalments, agreements, undertakings,
and certificates of any kind and nature whatsoever, to incur and pay all fees and expenses and to engage such persons as the Officers
may determine to be necessary, advisable or appropriate to effectuate or carry out the purposes and intent of the foregoing resolutions,
and the execution by the Officers of any such documents, instruments, agreements, undertakings and certificates, the payment of any fees
and expenses or the engagement of such persons or the taking by them of any action in connection with the foregoing matters shall conclusively
establish the Officers’ authority therefore and the authorization, acceptance, adoption, ratification, approval and confirmation
by the Company thereof.
Resolutions of the Board of Trustees of Prospect Enhanced Yield Fund
Approval of Filing Section
17(d) Application for Co-Investment Relief
WHEREAS, the
Board of Trustees (the “Board”) believes it is in the best interests of Prospect Enhanced Yield Fund (the “Company”)
to file an application for an order to replace a prior order under Sections 17(d) and 57(i) of the Investment Company Act of 1940 and
Rule 17d-1 under the Investment Company Act of 1940 to permit certain joint transactions otherwise prohibited by Section 17(d) and 57(a)(4)
of the Investment Company Act of 1940 and Rule 17d-1 under the Investment Company Act of 1940 (the “Application”).
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED,
that the officers of the Company (the “Officers”) be, and they hereby are, authorized,
empowered and directed, in the name and on behalf of the Company, to cause to be prepared, executed, delivered and filed with the SEC
the Application, and to do such other acts or things and execute such other documents, including amendments to the Application, as they
deem necessary or desirable to cause the Application to conform to comments received from the Staff of the SEC and otherwise to comply
with the Investment Company Act of 1940 and the rules and regulations promulgated thereunder, in such form and accompanied by such exhibits
and other documents, as the Officers preparing the same shall approve, such approval to be conclusively evidenced by the filing of the
Application; and it is further
RESOLVED, that
the Officers be, and each of them hereby is, authorized, empowered and directed, in the name and on behalf of Company, to perform all
of the agreements and obligations of the Company in connection with the foregoing resolutions, to take or cause to be taken any and all
further actions, to execute and deliver, or cause to be executed and delivered, all other documents, instruments, agreements, undertakings,
and certificates of any kind and nature whatsoever, to incur and pay all fees and expenses and to engage such persons as the Officers
may determine to be necessary, advisable or appropriate to effectuate or carry out the purposes and intent of the foregoing resolutions,
and the execution by the Officers of any such documents, instruments, agreements, undertakings and certificates, the payment of any fees
and expenses or the engagement of such persons or the taking by them of any action in connection with the foregoing matters shall conclusively
establish the Officers’ authority therefore and the authorization, acceptance, adoption, ratification, approval and confirmation
by the Company thereof.
Two Marked Copies of the Application Pursuant to Rule 0-5(e)
[Different first page setting changed from off in original to on in modified.].
22
Serious News for Serious Traders! Try StreetInsider.com Premium Free!
You May Also Be Interested In
- Avonetiq Launches AVO to Measure Brand Visibility in the AI Search Era
- Dr. Leyla Arvas Clinic Launches AI Aesthetic Assistant for International Patient Inquiries
- Relocated villagers scaling new heights
Create E-mail Alert Related Categories
SEC FilingsSign up for StreetInsider Free!
Receive full access to all new and archived articles, unlimited portfolio tracking, e-mail alerts, custom newswires and RSS feeds - and more!



Tweet
Share