Form 485BPOS MANNING & NAPIER FUND,

 

5 

 

 

 

6 

 

 

 

 

More Information About the Series’
Principal Investment Strategies
and Principal Risks

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Choosing a Share Class

 

The Series offers four classes of shares: Class I, Class S, Class W shares, and Class Z shares. Each share class has its own investment eligibility criteria, cost structure and other features. The following summarizes the primary features of the Class I, Class S, Class W and Class Z shares. Contact your financial intermediary or the Fund for more information about the Series’ share classes and how to choose among them.

 

CLASS NAME	ELIGIBLE INVESTORS	INVESTMENT MINIMUMS	DISTRIBUTION AND SERVICES (12B-1) FEE
Class S	Individual or institutional investors; employee benefit plans, such as defined benefit plans, defined contribution plans, and 401(k) plans; and certain financial intermediaries.	Initial – $2,000 Minimum Balance Requirement $1,000	0.25%
Class I	Institutions, such as investment companies, foundations, endowments, banks, trusts and corporate capital and cash management accounts; employee benefit plans; individual investors; and certain financial intermediaries.	Initial – $1,000,000 Minimum Balance Requirement $1,000,000	None
Class W	Manning & Napier’s discretionary investment account clients and other funds managed by Manning & Napier.	Initial – None Minimum Balance Requirement None	None
Class Z	Institutions, such as investment companies, foundations, endowments, banks, trusts and corporate capital and cash management accounts; employee benefit plans; individual investors; and certain financial intermediaries.	Initial – $1,000,000 Minimum Balance Requirement $1,000,000	None

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Manning & Napier Fund, Inc.   Systematic High Yield Bond Series – Class I, S, W and Z Shares   Shareholder Reports, Financial Statements and the Statement of Additional Information (SAI) Additional information about the Series' investments is available in the Fund's annual and semi-annual reports to shareholders and in Form N-CSR filed with the SEC. Once available, in the Series' annual report, you will find a discussion of the market conditions and investment strategies that significantly affected the Series' performance during its last fiscal year. Once available, in Form N-CSR, you will find the Series’ annual and semi-annual financial statements. The SAI provides more detailed information about the Series. It is incorporated by reference into this prospectus, making it legally part of the prospectus.   How to Obtain the Shareholder Reports, Financial Statements, SAI, and Additional Information • You may obtain shareholder reports and the SAI or other information about the Series, including its financial statements, without charge, by calling 1-800-466-3863 or sending written requests to Manning & Napier Fund, Inc., P.O. Box 805, Fairport, New York 14450. Note that this address should not be used for transaction requests. These documents are also available at www.manning-napier.com. • Shareholder reports, the prospectus, the SAI and other information about the Series, including its financial statements, are available on the EDGAR Database on the Commission's Internet site at http:// www.sec.gov. You may obtain copies of this information, after paying a duplicating fee, by sending an email request to [email protected].   Shareholder Mailings The Fund may send only one copy of the Series’ prospectus and annual and semi-annual reports to certain shareholders residing at the same “household” for shareholders who have elected this option. This reduces Fund expenses, which benefits you and other shareholders. If you wish to change your “householding” option, please call 1-800-466-3863 or contact your financial intermediary.

The Fund also offers electronic delivery of certain documents. Direct shareholders can elect to receive shareholder reports, prospectus updates, and statements via e-delivery. For more information or to sign up for e-delivery, please visit the Fund’s website at www.manning-napier.com.

 

If someone makes a statement about the Series that is not in this prospectus, you should not rely upon that information. Neither the Fund nor its distributor is offering to sell shares of any Series to any person to whom the Series may not lawfully sell its shares.

 

Investment Company Act File No. 811-04087

MSHIX 06/05/2025

 

 

Manning & Napier Fund, Inc.

Statement of Additional Information dated June 5, 2025

 

This Statement of Additional Information (“SAI”) is not a prospectus, but expands upon and supplements the information contained in the current Prospectus for the Series and Class listed below of Manning & Napier Fund, Inc. (the “Fund”), dated June 5, 2025, and should be read in conjunction with the Prospectus. You may obtain copies of the Fund’s current Prospectus from Manning & Napier Advisors, LLC, 290 Woodcliff Drive, Fairport, NY 14450 or by calling 1-800-466-3863. The Prospectus is also available online at www.manning-napier.com.

 

Because the Series (as defined below) was not active as of the date of this SAI, no financial statements for the Series are incorporated by reference into this SAI.

 

SERIES	CLASS I	CLASS S	CLASS W	CLASS Z
Systematic High Yield Bond Series	MSHIX	MSYSX	MSHWX	MSYZX

TABLE OF CONTENTS

 

		Page
The Fund		3
Investment Goals		3
Investment Policies and Risks		3
Investment Restrictions		31
Portfolio Turnover		33
Disclosure of Portfolio Holdings		33
Management		34
Code of Ethics		43
Proxy Voting Policy		43
Principal Owners and Control Persons		43
The Advisor		43
The Distributor		44
Payments to Broker-Dealers and Other Financial Intermediaries		44
Transfer Agent, Dividend Disbursing Agent, Custodian, Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm, and Counsel		46
Purchases and Redemptions		46
Portfolio Managers		47
Portfolio Transactions and Brokerage		49
Net Asset Value		50
Information About Fund Operations		50
Federal Taxes		51
Performance Reporting		59
Financial Statements		59
Appendix A – Description of Bond Ratings		A-1
Appendix B – Procedures for the Nominating Committee’s Consideration of Potential Nominees Submitted by Stockholders		B-1
Appendix C –Proxy Voting Policies		C-1

 The Fund

 

The Fund is an open-end management investment company incorporated under the laws of the State of Maryland on July 26, 1984. This SAI relates to the following series of the Fund: Systematic High Yield Bond Series (Class I, Class S, Class W and Class Z) (the “Series”). The Fund’s Board of Directors (“Board” or “Board of Directors”) may, at its own discretion, create additional series of shares (and classes of such series), each of which would have separate assets and liabilities. Other series of the Fund are offered in a separate SAI.

 

Currently, the Fund has issued the following classes of shares of the Series: Class I, S, W and Z.

 

Each share of the Series represents an identical interest in the investment portfolio of the Series and has the same rights, except that (i) each class of shares bears those distribution fees, shareholder service fees and administrative expenses applicable to the respective class of shares as a result of its distribution and shareholder services arrangements, which will cause the different classes of shares to have different expense ratios and to pay different rates of dividends, and (ii) each class has exclusive voting rights with respect to any distribution and/or shareholder service fees which relate only to such class. As a result of each class’s differing amount of distribution and/or shareholder services fees, shares of different classes of the Series may have different NAVs per share.

 

Shares of the Fund may not be available for purchase in every state. If the Series’ shares are not registered in a state, investments will not be accepted for the Series from shareholders in that state, and requests to exchange from another series into the Series also will not be accepted. Please contact the Fund at 1-800-466-3863 for information about state availability.

 

Investment Goals

 

The Series’ investment goal is described in its prospectus.

 

The investment goal of the Series is non-fundamental and may be changed by the Board of Directors without shareholder approval. If there is a material change in the investment objective of the Series, shareholders will be notified thirty (30) days prior to any such change and will be advised to consider whether the Series remains an appropriate investment in light of their then current financial position and needs.

 

The investment strategy of the Series is to invest, under normal circumstances, at least 80% of its assets in high yield (i.e., non-investment grade securities) fixed income securities of any maturity and duration and other financial instruments, principally derivative instruments and exchange-traded funds (ETFs), with economic characteristics similar to high yield fixed income securities. The Series will notify its shareholders at least sixty (60) days prior to any change in its 80% investment strategy.

 

The Series is diversified. This means that with respect to 75% of its total assets, the Series may not purchase securities of any issuer (other than obligations of, or guaranteed by, the U.S. government or its agencies, or instrumentalities or securities of other investment companies) if, as a result, more than 5% of the Series’ total assets would be invested in the securities of such issuer, or more than 10% of the issuer’s voting securities would be held by the Series. Under applicable federal securities laws, the diversification of a mutual fund’s holdings is measured at the time a fund purchases a security. However, if a fund purchases a security and holds it for a period of time, the security may become a larger percentage of the fund’s total assets due to movements in the financial markets. If the market affects several securities held by the Series, the Series may have a greater percentage of its assets invested in securities of fewer issuers. Accordingly, the Series would be subject to the risk that its performance may be hurt disproportionately by the poor performance of relatively few securities despite the fund qualifying as a diversified fund under applicable federal securities laws.

 

Investment Policies and Risks

 

Except as explicitly stated otherwise, all investment policies of the Series are non-fundamental and may be changed by the Board of Directors without shareholder approval.

 

The Series’ principal investment strategies and risks are described in its prospectus. The following discussion provides additional information about those principal investment strategies and related risks, as well as information about non-principal investment strategies (and related risks) that the Series may utilize. Accordingly, an investment strategy (and related risk) that is described below, but which is not described in the Series’ prospectus, is considered by the Series to be a non-principal strategy (or related risk).

 

 

The different types of investments in which the Series typically may invest, the investment techniques each may use, and the risks normally associated with these investments are discussed below. The Series may purchase any of these instruments and/or engage in any of these investment practices unless such investment activity or practice is directly inconsistent with, or not permitted by, a specific Series investment policy as stated below or in the Series’ prospectus. The Series is free to reduce or eliminate its activity in any of these areas.

 

EQUITY INVESTMENTS

 

Common Stocks. The Series may purchase exchange-traded and over the counter (“OTC”) common stocks.

 

Common stocks are shares of a corporation or other entity that entitle the holder to a pro rata share of the profits of the corporation, if any, without preference over any other shareholder or class of shareholders, including holders of the entity’s preferred stock and other senior equity. Common stock usually carries with it the right to vote and, frequently, an exclusive right to do so. In the event an issuer is liquidated or declares bankruptcy, the claims of owners of bonds and preferred stock take precedence over the claims of those who own common stock.

 

Securities traded on OTC markets are not listed and traded on an organized exchange such as the New York Stock Exchange (“NYSE”). Generally, the volume of trading in an unlisted or OTC common stock is less than the volume of trading in an exchange-listed stock. As a result, the market liquidity of some stocks in which the Series invest may not be as great as that of exchange-listed stocks and, if the Series were to dispose of such stocks, the Series may have to offer the shares at a discount from recent prices, or sell the shares in small lots over an extended period of time.

 

Small- and mid-size company securities. The Series may invest in small- and mid-size companies. Securities of small companies often have only a small proportion of their outstanding securities held by the general public. They may have limited trading markets that may be subject to wide price fluctuations. Small- and mid-size companies may have relatively small revenues and lack depth of management. Investments in such companies tend to be volatile and are therefore speculative. Small- and mid-size companies may have a small share of the market for their products or services and they may provide goods or services to a regional or limited market. They may be unable to internally generate funds necessary for growth or potential development or to generate such funds through external financing on favorable terms. In addition, they may be developing or marketing new products or services for which markets are not yet established and may never become established. Such companies may have or may develop only a regional market for products or services and thus be affected by local or regional market conditions. Moreover, small- and mid-size companies may have insignificant market share in their industries and may have difficulty maintaining or increasing their market share in competition with larger companies. Due to these and other factors, small- and mid-size companies may suffer significant losses.

 

Depositary Receipts. The Series may purchase Depositary Receipts. Depositary Receipts represent an ownership interest in securities of foreign companies (an “underlying issuer”) that are deposited with a depositary. Depositary Receipts are not necessarily denominated in the same currency as the underlying securities. American Depositary Receipts (“ADRs”) are dollar-denominated Depositary Receipts typically issued by a U.S. financial institution which evidence an ownership interest in a security or pool of securities issued by a foreign issuer. Generally, ADRs are issued in registered form and are designed for use in the U.S. securities markets. Other Depositary Receipts, such as Global Depositary Receipts (“GDRs”) and International Depositary Receipts (“IDRs”), may be issued in bearer form and denominated in foreign currencies, and are generally designed for use in securities markets outside the United States. Depositary Receipts are subject to many of the risks associated with investing directly in foreign securities, which are described below.

 

The Depositary Receipts in which the Series invest may be “sponsored” or “unsponsored.” Sponsored Depositary Receipts are established jointly by a depositary and the underlying issuer, whereas unsponsored Depositary Receipts may be established by a depositary without participation by the underlying issuer. Holders of unsponsored Depositary Receipts generally bear all the costs associated with establishing unsponsored Depositary Receipts. In addition, the issuers of the securities underlying unsponsored Depositary Receipts are not obligated to disclose material information in the United States and, therefore, there may be less information available regarding such issuers and there may not be a correlation between such information and the market value of the Depositary Receipts.

 

 

Initial Public Offerings (“IPOs”). The Series may purchase shares issued as part of, or a short period after, a company’s IPO, and may at times dispose of those shares shortly after their acquisition. The Series’ purchase of shares issued in IPOs exposes it to the risks associated with companies that have little operating history as public companies, as well as to the risks inherent in those sectors of the market where these new issuers operate. The market for IPO issuers tends to be volatile, and share prices of newly-public companies tend to fluctuate significantly over short periods of time.

 

Preferred Stocks. The Series may invest in preferred stocks. Preferred stocks represent an equity or ownership interest in an issuer but do not ordinarily carry voting rights, although they may carry limited voting rights. Preferred stocks also normally have preference over the corporation’s assets and earnings. For example, preferred stocks have preference over common stock in the payment of dividends. Preferred stocks normally pay dividends at a specified rate and may entitle the holder to acquire the issuer’s stock by exchange or purchase for a predetermined rate. However, preferred stock may be purchased where the issuer has omitted, or is in danger of omitting, payment of its dividend. Such investments would be made primarily for their capital appreciation potential. In the event an issuer is liquidated or declares bankruptcy, the claims of bond owners take precedence over the claims of preferred and common stock owners. Certain classes of preferred stock are convertible into shares of common stock of the issuer. By holding convertible preferred stock, the Series can receive a steady stream of dividends and still have the option to convert the preferred stock to common stock. Preferred stock is subject to many of the same risks as common stock and debt securities.

 

Convertible Securities. The Series may invest in securities that are convertible at either a stated price or a stated rate into underlying shares of common stock, thus enabling the investor to benefit from increases in the market price of the common stock.

 

Convertible securities are typically preferred stocks or bonds that are exchangeable for a specific number of another form of security (usually the issuer’s common stock) at a specified price or ratio. A convertible security generally entitles the holder to receive interest paid or accrued on bonds or the dividend paid on preferred stock until the convertible security matures or is redeemed, converted or exchanged. A corporation may issue a convertible security that is subject to redemption after a specified date, and usually under certain circumstances. A holder of a convertible security that is called for redemption would be required to tender it for redemption to the issuer, convert it to the underlying common stock or sell it to a third party. The convertible structure allows the holder of the convertible bond to participate in share price movements in the company’s common stock. The actual return on a convertible bond may exceed its stated yield if the company’s common stock appreciates in value and the option to convert to common stocks becomes more valuable.

 

Convertible securities typically pay a lower interest rate than nonconvertible bonds of the same quality and maturity because of the convertible feature. Convertible securities may be rated below investment grade (“high yield”) or not rated, and are subject to credit risk.

 

Prior to conversion, convertible securities have characteristics and risks similar to nonconvertible debt and equity securities. In addition, convertible securities are often concentrated in economic sectors, which, like the stock market in general, may experience unpredictable declines in value, as well as periods of poor performance, which may last for several years. There may be a small trading market for a particular convertible security at any given time, which may adversely impact market price and the Series’ ability to liquidate a particular security or respond to an economic event, including deterioration of an issuer’s creditworthiness.

 

Convertible preferred stocks are nonvoting equity securities that pay a fixed dividend. These securities have a convertible feature similar to convertible bonds, but do not have a maturity date. Due to their fixed income features, convertible securities provide higher income potential than the issuer’s common stock, but typically are more sensitive to interest rate changes than the underlying common stock. In the event of a company’s liquidation, bondholders have claims on company assets senior to those of shareholders; preferred shareholders have claims senior to those of common shareholders.

 

Convertible securities typically trade at prices above their conversion value, which is the current market value of the common stock received upon conversion, because of their higher yield potential than the underlying common stock. The difference between the conversion value and the price of a convertible security will vary depending on the value of the underlying common stock and interest rates. When the underlying value of the common stock declines, the price of the issuer’s convertible securities will tend not to fall as much because the convertible security’s income potential will act as a price support. While the value of a convertible security also tends to rise when the underlying common stock value rises, it will not rise as much because its conversion value is more narrow. The value of convertible securities also is affected by changes in interest rates. For example, when interest rates fall, the value of convertible securities may rise because of their fixed income component.

 

 

Contingent Convertible Securities. A contingent convertible security, or “CoCo”, is a type of convertible security typically issued by a non-U.S. bank that, upon the occurrence of a specified trigger event, may be (i) convertible into equity securities of the issuer at a predetermined share price; or (ii) written down in liquidation value. Trigger events are identified in the documents that govern the CoCo and may include a decline in the issuer’s capital below a specified threshold level, an increase in the issuer’s risk weighted assets, the share price of the issuer falling to a particular level for a certain period of time and certain regulatory events, such as a change in regulatory capital requirements. CoCos are designed to behave like bonds in times of economic health yet absorb losses when the trigger event occurs. CoCos are generally considered speculative and the prices of CoCos may be volatile.

 

With respect to CoCos that provide for conversion of the CoCo into common shares of the issuer in the event of a trigger event, the conversion would deepen the subordination of the investor, creating a greater risk of loss in the event of bankruptcy. In addition, because the common stock of the issuer may not pay a dividend, investors in such instruments could experience reduced yields (or no yields at all). With respect to CoCos that provide for the write down in liquidation value of the CoCo in the event of a trigger event, it is possible that the liquidation value of the CoCo may be adjusted downward to below the original par value or written off entirely under certain circumstances. For instance, if losses have eroded the issuer’s capital levels below a specified threshold, the liquidation value of the CoCo may be reduced in whole or in part. The write-down of the CoCo’s par value may occur automatically and would not entitle holders to institute bankruptcy proceedings against the issuer. In addition, an automatic write-down could result in a reduced income rate if the dividend or interest payment associated with the CoCo is based on par value. Coupon payments on CoCos may be discretionary and may be cancelled by the issuer for any reason or may be subject to approval by the issuer’s regulator and may be suspended in the event there are insufficient distributable reserves.

 

Rights and Warrants. The Series may purchase rights and warrants. A right is a privilege granted to existing shareholders of a corporation to subscribe to shares of a new issue of common stock before it is issued. Rights normally have a short life, usually two to four weeks, are freely transferable and entitle the holder to buy the new common stock at a lower price than the public offering price. Warrants are securities that are usually issued together with a debt security or preferred stock and that give the holder the right to buy a proportionate amount of common stock at a specified price. Warrants are freely transferable and are often traded on major exchanges. Unlike rights, warrants normally have a life that is measured in years and entitle the holder to buy common stock of a company at a price that is usually higher than the market price at the time the warrant is issued. Corporations often issue warrants to make the accompanying debt security more attractive.

 

Rights and warrants may be considered more speculative than certain other types of investments because they (1) do not carry rights to dividends or voting rights with respect to the underlying securities, and (2) do not represent any rights in the assets of the issuer. Warrants purchased by the Series may or may not be listed on a national securities exchange.

 

Real Estate Investment Trusts (“REITs”). The Series may invest in shares of REITs, which are pooled investment vehicles that invest in real estate or real estate loans or interests. Investing in REITs involves certain unique risks in addition to those risks associated with investing in the real estate industry in general. These risks may include, but are not limited to, the following: declines in the value of real estate; risks related to general and local economic conditions; possible lack of availability of mortgage funds; lack of ability to access the credit or capital markets; overbuilding; extended vacancies of properties; defaults by borrowers or tenants, particularly during an economic downturn; increasing competition; increases in property taxes and operating expenses; changes in zoning laws; losses due to costs resulting from the clean-up of environmental problems; liability to third parties for damages resulting from environmental problems; casualty or condemnation losses; limitations on rents; changes in market and sub-market values and the appeal of properties to tenants; and changes in interest rates. Furthermore, REITs are dependent on specialized management skills. Some REITs may have limited diversification and may be subject to risks inherent in financing a limited number of properties. REITs depend generally on their ability to generate cash flow to make distributions to shareholders or unitholders, and may be subject to defaults by borrowers and to self-liquidations. In addition, a U.S. REIT may be affected by its failure to qualify for tax-free pass-through of income under the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended (the “Code”) or its failure to maintain exemption from registration under the 1940 Act. By investing in REITs indirectly through a fund, shareholders will bear not only the proportionate share of the expenses of the fund, but also, indirectly, similar expenses of underlying REITs.

 

 

Generally, REITs can be classified as Equity REITs, Mortgage REITs and Hybrid REITs. Equity REITs invest the majority of their assets directly in real property and derive their income primarily from rents and capital gains from appreciation realized through property sales. Mortgage REITs invest the majority of their assets in real estate mortgages and derive their income primarily from interest payments. Hybrid REITs combine the characteristics of both Equity and Mortgage REITs.

 

Mortgage REITs receive principal and interest payments from the owners of the mortgaged properties. Accordingly, mortgage REITs are subject to the credit risk of the borrowers to whom they extend credit. Credit risk refers to the possibility that the borrower will be unable and/or unwilling to make timely interest payments and/or repay the principal on the loan to a mortgage REIT when due. Mortgage REITs are subject to significant interest rate risk. When the general level of interest rates goes up, the value of a mortgage REIT’s investment in fixed rate obligations goes down. When the general level of interest rates goes down, the value of a mortgage REIT’s investment in fixed rate obligations goes up. Mortgage REITs typically use leverage and many are highly leveraged, which exposes them to leverage risk. Leverage risk refers to the risk that leverage created from borrowing may impair a mortgage REIT’s liquidity, cause it to liquidate positions at an unfavorable time and increase the volatility of the values of securities issued by the mortgage REIT. Mortgage REITs are subject to prepayment risk, which is the risk that borrowers may prepay their mortgage loans at faster than expected rates. Prepayment rates generally increase when interest rates fall and decrease when interest rates rise. These faster than expected payments may adversely affect a mortgage REIT’s profitability because the mortgage REIT may be forced to replace investments that have been redeemed or repaid early with other investments having a lower yield. Additionally, rising interest rates may cause the duration of a mortgage REIT’s investments to be longer than anticipated and increase such investments’ interest rate sensitivity.

 

Ultimately, a REIT’s performance depends on the types of properties it owns and how well the REIT manages its properties. Investing in REITs involves risks similar to those associated with investing in equity securities of small capitalization companies.

 

Trust Certificates, Partnership Interests and Equity Participations. The Series may invest in equity securities that are interests in non-corporate entities. These securities, which include trust certificates, partnership interests and equity participations, have different liability and tax characteristics than equity securities issued by a corporation, and thus may present additional risks to the Series. However, the investment characteristics of these securities are similar to those of traditional corporate equity securities.

 

Business Development Companies (“BDCs”). BDCs are a type of closed-end investment company regulated under the 1940 Act. BDCs generally invest in less mature private companies or thinly traded U.S. public companies which involve greater risk than well-established publicly-traded companies. While BDCs are expected to generate income in the form of dividends, certain BDCs during certain periods of time may not generate such income. If the Series invests in BDCs, it will indirectly bear its proportionate share of any management and other operating expenses and of any performance-based or incentive fees charged by the BDCs in which it invests, in addition to the expenses paid by the Series. The 1940 Act imposes certain constraints upon the operations of a BDC. For example, BDCs are required to invest at least 70% of their total assets primarily in securities of private companies or thinly traded U.S. public companies, cash, cash equivalents, U.S. government securities and high quality debt investments that mature in one year or less. Generally, little public information exists for private and thinly traded companies and there is a risk that investors may not be able to make a fully informed evaluation of a BDC and its portfolio of investments. With respect to investments in debt instruments, there is a risk that the issuers of such instruments may default on their payments or declare bankruptcy. Additionally, a BDC may only incur indebtedness in amounts such that the BDC’s coverage ratio of total assets to total senior securities equals at least 200% after such incurrence. These limitations on asset mix and leverage may affect the way that the BDC raises capital. BDCs compete with other entities for the types of investments they make, and such entities are not necessarily subject to the same investment constraints as BDCs.

 

Investments made by BDCs are generally subject to legal and other restrictions on resale and are otherwise less liquid than publicly-traded securities. The illiquidity of these investments may make it difficult to sell such investments if the need arises, and if there is a need for a BDC in which the Series invests to liquidate its portfolio quickly, it may realize a loss on its investments. BDCs may have relatively concentrated investment portfolios, consisting of a relatively small number of holdings. A consequence of this limited number of investments is that the aggregate returns realized may be disproportionately impacted by the poor performance of a small number of investments, or even a single investment, particularly if a company experiences the need to write down the value of an investment. Since BDCs rely on access to short-term money markets, longer-term capital markets and the bank markets as significant sources of liquidity, if BDCs are not able to access capital at competitive rates, their ability to implement certain financial strategies will be negatively impacted. Market disruptions, including a downturn in capital markets in general or a downgrade of the credit rating of a BDC held by the Series, may increase the cost of borrowing to that company, thereby increasing its cost of borrowing and adversely impacting the Series’ returns. Credit downgrades may also result in requirements for a BDC to provide additional support in the form of letters of credit or cash or other collateral to various counterparties.

 

 

Since many of the assets of BDCs do not have readily ascertainable market values, such assets are most often recorded at fair value, in good faith, in accordance with valuation procedures adopted by such companies. A fair value determination requires that judgment be applied to the specific facts and circumstances. Due to the absence of a readily ascertainable market value, and because of the inherent uncertainty of fair valuation, the fair value assigned to a BDC’s investments may differ significantly from the values that would be reflected if the assets were traded in an established market, potentially resulting in material differences between a BDC’s net asset value (“NAV”) per share and its market value.

 

Many BDCs invest in mezzanine and other debt securities of privately held companies, including senior secured loans. Mezzanine investments typically are structured as subordinated loans (with or without warrants) that carry a fixed rate of interest. Many debt investments in which a BDC may invest will not be rated by a credit rating agency and will be below investment grade quality. These investments are commonly referred to as “junk bonds” and have predominantly speculative characteristics with respect to an issuer’s capacity to make payments of interest and principal. Although lower grade securities are higher yielding, they are also characterized by high risk. In addition, the secondary market for lower grade securities may be less liquid than that of higher rated securities. Issuers of lower rated securities have a currently identifiable vulnerability to default or may currently be in default. Lower-rated securities may react more strongly to real or perceived adverse economic and competitive industry conditions than higher grade securities. If the issuer of lower-rated securities defaults, a BDC may incur additional expenses to seek recovery.

 

Section 12(d)(1)(A) of the 1940 Act limits the extent to which the Series may invest in securities of BDCs, but the 1940 Act provides certain exceptions to these limitations that the Series may rely on from time to time.

 

Master Limited Partnerships (“MLPs”). MLPs are limited partnerships or limited liability companies whose partnership units or limited liability interests are listed and traded on a U.S. securities exchange, and which are treated as publicly traded partnerships for federal income tax purposes. To qualify to be treated as a partnership for tax purposes, an MLP must receive at least 90% of its income from qualifying sources as set forth in Section 7704(d) of the Code. These qualifying sources include activities such as the exploration, development, mining, production, processing, refining, transportation, storage and marketing of mineral or natural resources. MLPs generally have two classes of owners, the general partner and limited partners. MLPs that are formed as limited liability companies generally have two analogous classes of owners, the managing member and the members. For purposes of this section, references to general partners also apply to managing members and references to limited partners also apply to members. The general partner is typically owned by a major energy company, an investment fund, the direct management of the MLP or is an entity owned by one or more of such parties. The general partner may be structured as a private or publicly traded corporation or other entity. The general partner typically controls the operations and management of the MLP through an equity interest of as much as 2% in the MLP plus, in many cases, ownership of common units and subordinated units. Limited partners own the remainder of the MLP through ownership of common units and have a limited role in the MLP’s operations and management.

 

MLPs are typically structured such that common units and general partner interests have first priority to receive quarterly cash distributions up to an established minimum amount (“minimum quarterly distributions” or “MQD”). Common and general partner interests also accrue arrearages in distributions to the extent the MQD is not paid. Once common and general partner interests have been paid, subordinated units receive distributions of up to the MQD; however, subordinated units do not accrue arrearages. Distributable cash in excess of the MQD paid to both common and subordinated units is distributed to both common and subordinated units generally on a pro rata basis. The general partner is also eligible to receive incentive distributions if the general partner operates the business in a manner which results in distributions paid per common unit surpassing specified target levels. As the general partner increases cash distributions to the limited partners, the general partner receives an increasingly higher percentage of the incremental cash distributions. A common arrangement provides that the general partner can reach a tier where it receives 50% of every incremental dollar paid to common and subordinated unit holders. These incentive distributions encourage the general partner to streamline costs, increase capital expenditures and acquire assets in order to increase the partnership’s cash flow and raise the quarterly cash distribution in order to reach higher tiers. Such results benefit all security holders of the MLP.

 

 

General partner interests of MLPs are typically retained by an MLP’s original sponsors, such as its founders, corporate partners, entities that sell assets to the MLP and investors such as the Series. A holder of general partner interests can be liable under certain circumstances for amounts greater than the amount of the holder’s investment in the general partner interest. General partner interests often confer direct board participation rights, and in many cases, operating control, over the MLP. These interests themselves are not publicly traded, although they may be owned by publicly traded entities. General partner interests receive cash distributions, typically 2% of the MLP’s aggregate cash distributions, which are contractually defined in the partnership agreement. In addition, holders of general partner interests typically hold incentive distribution rights, which provide them with a larger share of the aggregate MLP cash distributions as the distributions to limited partner unit holders are increased to prescribed levels. General partner interests generally cannot be converted into common units. The general partner interest can be redeemed by the MLP if the MLP unitholders choose to remove the general partner, typically with a supermajority vote by limited partner unitholders.

 

Tracking Stocks. A tracking stock is a separate class of common stock whose value is linked to a specific business unit or operating division within a larger company and which is designed to “track” the performance of such business unit or division. The tracking stock may pay dividends to shareholders independent of the parent company. The parent company, rather than the business unit or division, generally is the issuer of tracking stock. However, holders of the tracking stock may not have the same rights as holders of the company’s common stock.

 

YieldCos. A YieldCo is a dividend growth-oriented company, created by a parent company (the “YieldCo Sponsor”), that bundles operating assets in order to generate systematic cash flows. YieldCos are not limited by asset or income composition, but they are generally tied to the energy industry, including, for example, renewable energy projects, that offer predictable cash flows. YieldCos generally serve a similar purpose as MLPs and REITs, which most energy companies cannot establish due to regulatory reasons.

 

The risks of investing in YieldCos involve risks that differ from investments in traditional operating companies, including risks related to the relationship between the YieldCo and the YieldCo Sponsor. A YieldCo is usually dependent on the management of the YieldCo Sponsor and may be impacted by the development capabilities and financial health of its YieldCo Sponsor. Additionally, a YieldCo Sponsor may have interests of its YieldCo and may retain control of the YieldCo through classes of stock held by the YieldCo Sponsor.

 

A YieldCo’s share price is typically a multiple of its distributable cash flow. Therefore, any event that limits a YieldCo’s ability to maintain or grow its distributable cash flow would likely have a negative impact on the YieldCo’s share price. The share price of a YieldCo can be affected by fundamentals unique to the YieldCo, including the robustness and consistency of its earnings and its ability to meet debt obligations including the payment of interest and principle to creditors. A YieldCo may distribute all or substantially all of the cash available for distribution, which may limit new acquisitions and future growth. A YieldCo may finance its growth strategy with debt, which may increase the YieldCo’s leverage and the risk associated with the YieldCo. The ability of a YieldCo to maintain or grow its dividend distributions may depend on the YieldCo’s ability to minimize its tax liabilities through the use of accelerated depreciation schedule, tax loss carryforwards, and tax incentives. Changes to the current tax code could result in greater tax liabilities, which would reduce a YieldCo’s distributable cash flow.

 

FIXED INCOME INVESTMENTS

 

Corporate Debt Obligations. The Series may invest in corporate debt obligations issued by financial institutions and corporations. Corporate debt obligations are subject to the risk of an issuer’s inability to meet principal and interest payments on the obligations and may also be subject to price volatility due to such factors as market interest rates, market perception of the creditworthiness of the issuer and general market liquidity.

 

U.S. Government Securities. The Series may invest in debt obligations of varying maturities issued or guaranteed by the U.S. Government, its agencies or instrumentalities. Direct obligations of the U.S. Treasury, which are backed by the full faith and credit of the U.S. Government, include a variety of Treasury securities that differ only in their interest rates, maturities and dates of issuance. U.S. Government agencies or instrumentalities which issue or guarantee securities include, but are not limited to, the Federal Housing Administration, Federal National Mortgage Association (“Fannie Mae”), Farmers Home Administration, Export-Import Bank of the United States, Small Business Administration, Government National Mortgage Association (“GNMA”), General Services Administration, Central Bank for Cooperatives, Federal Home Loan Banks (“FHLB”), Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corporation (“FHLMC” or “Freddie Mac”), Federal Intermediate Credit Banks, Federal Land Banks, Maritime Administration, the Tennessee Valley Authority, District of Columbia Armory Board and the Student Loan Marketing Association (“Sallie Mae”).

 

 

Obligations of U.S. Government agencies and instrumentalities such as Fannie Mae, FHLB, FHLMC and Sallie Mae are not supported by the full faith and credit of the United States. Some are backed by the right of the issuer to borrow from the U.S. Treasury; others by discretionary authority of the U.S. Government to purchase the agencies’ obligations; while still others, such as Sallie Mae, are supported only by the credit of the instrumentality. In the case of securities not backed by the full faith and credit of the United States, the investor must look principally to the agency or instrumentality issuing or guaranteeing the obligation for ultimate repayment, and may not be able to assert a claim against the United States itself in the event the agency or instrumentality does not meet its commitment.

 

The Series will invest in securities of such instrumentalities only when the Fund’s investment advisor, Manning & Napier Advisors, LLC (“MNA” or the “Advisor”), is satisfied that the credit risk with respect to any instrumentality is consistent with the Series’ goal and strategies.

 

On September 7, 2008, the U.S. Treasury announced a federal takeover of Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac, placing the two federal instrumentalities in conservatorship. Under the takeover, the U.S. Treasury agreed to acquire $1 billion of senior preferred stock of each instrumentality and obtained warrants for the purchase of common stock of each instrumentality (the “Senior Preferred Stock Purchase Agreements” or “SPAs”). Under the SPAs, the U.S. Treasury pledged to provide up to $200 billion per instrumentality as needed, including the contribution of cash capital to the instrumentalities in the event their liabilities exceed their assets. This was intended to ensure that the instrumentalities maintain a positive net worth and meet their financial obligations, preventing mandatory triggering of receivership. On December 24, 2009, the U.S. Treasury announced that it was amending the SPAs to allow the $200 billion cap on the U.S. Treasury’s funding commitment to increase as necessary to accommodate any cumulative reduction in net worth through the end of 2012. The unlimited support the U.S. Treasury extended to the two companies expired at the beginning of 2013 – Fannie Mae’s support is now capped at $125 billion and Freddie Mac has a limit of $149 billion.

 

On August 17, 2012, the U.S. Treasury announced that it was again amending the SPAs to terminate the requirement that Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac each pay a 10% annual dividend. Instead, the companies will transfer to the U.S. Treasury on a quarterly basis all profits earned during a quarter that exceed a capital reserve amount. The capital reserve amount was $3 billion in 2013, and decreased by $600 million in each subsequent year through 2017. It is believed that this amendment put Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac in a better position to service their debt because it eliminated the need for the companies to have to borrow from the U.S. Treasury to make fixed dividend payments. As part of the new terms, Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac also will be required to reduce their investment portfolios over time. On December 21, 2017, the U.S. Treasury announced that it was again amending the Agreement to reinstate the $3 billion capital reserve amount. On September 30, 2019, the U.S. Treasury announced that it was further amending the Agreement, now permitting Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac to retain earnings beyond the $3 billion capital reserves previously allowed through the 2017 amendment. Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac are now permitted to maintain capital reserves of $25 billion and $20 billion, respectively.

 

Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac are the subject of several continuing class action lawsuits and investigations by federal regulators over certain accounting, disclosure or corporate governance matters, which (along with any resulting financial restatements) may adversely affect the guaranteeing entities. Importantly, the future of the entities is in serious question as the U.S. Government reportedly is considering multiple options, ranging from nationalization, privatization, consolidation, or abolishment of the entities.

 

Mortgage-Backed Securities. The Series may invest in mortgage-backed securities, which represent an interest in a pool of mortgage loans. Some of these securities are issued or guaranteed by U.S. Government agencies or instrumentalities such as GNMA, Fannie Mae, and FHLMC. Obligations of GNMA are backed by the full faith and credit of the U.S. Government. Obligations of Fannie Mae and FHLMC are not backed by the full faith and credit of the U.S. Government, but are supported by the U.S. Treasury’s authority to purchase the obligations and lend to the companies. The market value and interest yield of these mortgage-backed securities can vary due to market interest rate fluctuations and early prepayments of underlying mortgages. These securities represent ownership in a pool of federally insured mortgage loans with a maximum maturity of 30 years. However, due to scheduled and unscheduled principal payments on the underlying loans, these securities have a shorter average maturity and, therefore, less principal volatility than a comparable 30-year bond. Since prepayment rates vary widely, it is not possible to accurately predict the average maturity of a particular mortgage-backed security. The scheduled monthly interest and principal payments relating to mortgages in the pool will be “passed through” to investors. Government mortgage-backed securities differ from conventional bonds in that principal is paid back to the certificate holders over the life of the loan rather than at maturity. As a result, there will be monthly scheduled payments of principal and interest. In addition, there may be unscheduled principal payments representing prepayments on the underlying mortgages. Although these securities may offer yields higher than those available from other types of U.S. Government securities, mortgage-backed securities may be less effective than other types of securities as a means of “locking in” attractive long-term rates because of the prepayment feature. For instance, when interest rates decline, the value of these securities likely will not rise as much as comparable debt securities due to the prepayment feature. In addition, these prepayments can cause the price of a mortgage-backed security originally purchased at a premium to decline in price to its par value, which may result in a loss.

 

 

The Series may also invest in private pass-through securities issued by a non-governmental entity, such as a trust. These securities include collateralized mortgage obligations (“CMOs”) and real estate mortgage investment conduits (“REMICs”). The Series may invest in CMOs and REMICs without restriction as to any specific ratings agency security rating. CMOs are securities collateralized by mortgages, mortgage pass-throughs, mortgage pay-through bonds (bonds representing an interest in a pool of mortgages where the cash flow generated from the mortgage collateral pool is dedicated to bond repayment), and mortgage-backed bonds (general obligations of the issuers payable out of the issuer’s general funds and additionally secured by a first lien on a pool of single family detached properties). Many CMOs are issued with a number of classes or series which have different maturities and are retired in sequence. Investors purchasing such CMOs in the shortest maturities receive or are credited with their pro rata portion of the scheduled payments of interest and principal on the underlying mortgages plus all unscheduled prepayments of principal up to a predetermined portion of the total CMO obligation. Until that portion of such CMO obligation is repaid, investors in the longer maturities receive interest only. Accordingly, CMOs in the longer maturity series are less likely than other mortgage pass-throughs to be prepaid prior to their stated maturity. Although some of the mortgages underlying CMOs may be supported by various types of insurance, and some CMOs may be backed by GNMA certificates of other mortgage pass-throughs issued or guaranteed by U.S. Government agencies or instrumentalities, the CMOs themselves are not generally guaranteed.

 

REMICs, which were authorized under the Tax Reform Act of 1986, are private entities formed for the purpose of holding a fixed pool of mortgages secured by an interest in real property. REMICs are similar to CMOs in that they issue multiple classes of securities.

 

The privately issued mortgage-backed securities in which the Series invests are not issued or guaranteed by the U.S. Government or its agencies or instrumentalities and may bear a greater risk of nonpayment than securities that are backed by the U.S. Treasury.

 

Commercial Mortgage-Backed Securities. Commercial mortgage-backed securities include securities that reflect an interest in, and are secured by, mortgage loans on commercial real property. Many of the risks of investing in commercial mortgage-backed securities reflect the risks of investing in the real estate securing the underlying mortgage loans. These risks reflect the effects of local and other economic conditions on real estate markets, the ability of tenants to make loan payments, and the ability of a property to attract and retain tenants. Commercial mortgage-backed securities may be less liquid and exhibit greater price volatility than other types of mortgage- or asset-backed securities.

 

Mortgage Dollar Rolls. The Series may invest in mortgage dollar rolls. Mortgage dollar rolls are transactions in which the Series sells securities (usually mortgage-backed securities) and simultaneously contracts to repurchase substantially similar, but not identical, securities on a specified future date. A mortgage dollar roll program may be structured to simulate an investment in mortgage-backed securities at a potentially lower cost, or with potential reduced administrative burdens, than directly holding mortgage-backed securities. A mortgage dollar roll can be viewed as a collateralized borrowing in which the Series pledges a mortgage-backed security to a counterparty to obtain cash. The counterparty with which the Series enters into a mortgage dollar roll transaction is not required to return the same securities as those originally sold by the Series, but rather only securities which are “substantially identical.” To be considered substantially identical, the securities returned to the Series generally must be of the same type, coupon, and maturity and meet the “good delivery guidelines” established by the Bond Market Association, which is a private trade association of dealers in debt securities. Notwithstanding a dealer’s compliance with the “good delivery guidelines,” the Series may assume some risk because the characteristics of the mortgage-backed securities delivered to the Series may be less favorable than the mortgage-backed securities the Series delivered to the dealer. If the broker-dealer to whom the Series sells the securities becomes insolvent, the Series’ right to repurchase the securities may be restricted. Other risks involved in entering into mortgage dollar rolls include the risk that the value of the securities may change adversely over the term of the mortgage dollar roll and that the securities the Series is required to repurchase may be worth less than the securities that the Series originally held.

 

 

Asset-Backed Securities. The Series may invest in asset-backed securities. These securities, issued by trusts and special purpose corporations, are backed by a pool of assets, such as credit card and automobile loan receivables, representing the obligations of a number of different parties.

 

Asset-backed securities present certain risks. For instance, in the case of credit card receivables, these securities may not have the benefit of any security interest in the related collateral. Credit card receivables are generally unsecured and the debtors are entitled to the protection of a number of state and federal consumer credit laws, many of which give such debtors the right to set off certain amounts owed on the credit cards, thereby reducing the balance due. Most issuers of automobile receivables permit the servicers to retain possession of the underlying obligations. If the servicer were to sell these obligations to another party, there is a risk that the purchaser would acquire an interest superior to that of the holders of the related automobile receivables. In addition, because of the large number of vehicles involved in a typical issuance and technical requirements under state laws, the trustee for the holders of the automobile receivables may not have a proper security interest in all of the obligations backing such receivables. Therefore, there is the possibility that recoveries on repossessed collateral may not, in some cases, be available to support payments on these securities.

 

Asset-backed securities are often backed by a pool of assets representing the obligations of a number of different parties. To lessen the effect of failures by obligors to make payments on underlying assets, the securities may contain elements of credit support which fall into two categories: (i) liquidity protection and (ii) protection against losses resulting from ultimate default by an obligor on the underlying assets. Liquidity protection refers to the provision of advances, generally by the entity administering the pool of assets, to ensure that the receipt of payments on the underlying pool occurs in a timely fashion. Protection against losses resulting from ultimate default ensures payment through insurance policies or letters of credit obtained by the issuer or sponsor from third parties. The degree of credit support provided for each issue is generally based on historical information respecting the level of credit risk associated with the underlying assets. Delinquency or loss in excess of that anticipated or failure of the credit support could adversely affect the return on an instrument in such a security.

 

The estimated life of an asset-backed security varies with the prepayment experience with respect to the underlying debt instruments. The rate of such prepayments, and hence the life of an asset-backed security, will be primarily a function of current market interest rates, although other economic and demographic factors may be involved. For example, falling interest rates generally result in an increase in the rate of prepayments of mortgage loans while rising interest rates generally decrease the rate of prepayments. Consequently, asset-backed securities are subject to call risk and extension risk (described below).

 

Collateralized Debt Obligations (“CDOs”). The Series may invest in CDOs, which include collateralized bond obligations (“CBOs”), collateralized loan obligations (“CLOs”) and other similarly structured securities. CBOs and CLOs are types of asset-backed securities. A CBO is a trust which is backed by a diversified pool of high risk, below investment grade fixed income securities. A CLO is a trust typically collateralized by a pool of loans, which may include, among others, domestic and foreign senior secured loans, senior unsecured loans, and subordinate corporate loans, including loans that may be rated below investment grade or equivalent unrated loans.

 

For both CBOs and CLOs, the cashflows from the trust are split into two or more portions, called tranches, varying in risk and yield. The riskiest portion is the “equity” tranche which bears the bulk of defaults from the bonds or loans in the trust and serves to protect the other, more senior tranches from default in all but the most severe circumstances. Since it is partially protected from defaults, a senior tranche from a CBO trust or CLO trust typically has higher ratings and lower yields than its underlying securities, and can be rated investment grade. Despite the protection from the equity tranche, CBO or CLO tranches can experience substantial losses due to actual defaults, increased sensitivity to defaults due to collateral default and disappearance of protecting tranches, market anticipation of defaults, as well as aversion to CBO or CLO securities as a class.

 

The risks of an investment in a CDO depend largely on the type of the collateral securities and the class of the CDO in which the Series invests. Normally, CBOs, CLOs and other CDOs are privately offered and sold, and thus, are not registered under the securities laws. As a result, investments in CDOs may be characterized by the Series as illiquid securities; however, an active dealer market may exist for CDOs allowing a CDO to qualify for Rule 144A transactions. In addition to the normal risks associated with fixed income securities discussed elsewhere in this SAI (e.g., interest rate risk and default risk), CDOs carry additional risks including, but not limited to: (i) the possibility that distributions from collateral securities will not be adequate to make interest or other payments; (ii) the quality of the collateral may decline in value or default; (iii) the Series may invest in CDOs that are subordinate to other classes; and (iv) the complex structure of the security may not be fully understood at the time of investment and may produce disputes with the issuer or unexpected investment results.

 

 

Below Investment Grade Debt Securities. The Series may invest up to 100% of its assets in fixed income securities rated below investment grade. The Series may invest in securities with any rating, including those that have defaulted, are not rated, or have had their rating withdrawn. High risk, high yield securities rated below BBB- by S&P or Baa by Moody’s are “below investment grade” and are considered to have speculative characteristics and involve greater risk of default or price changes due to changes in the issuer’s creditworthiness. Market prices of these securities may fluctuate more than higher rated securities and they are difficult to price at times because they are more thinly traded and less liquid securities. Market prices may decline significantly in periods of general economic difficulty which may follow periods of rising interest rates. Securities in the lowest rating category may be in default. For these reasons, it is the Series’ policy not to rely primarily on ratings issued by established credit rating agencies, but to utilize such ratings in conjunction with the Advisor’s own independent and ongoing review of credit quality. In the event a security is downgraded below these ratings after purchase, the Advisor will review and take appropriate action, including no action, with regard to the security. For a description of the above ratings, see Appendix A.

 

Bank Loans. Bank loans are generally non-investment grade floating rate instruments. Usually, they are freely callable at the issuer’s option. The Series may invest in fixed and floating rate loans (“Loans”) arranged through private negotiations between a corporate borrower or a foreign sovereign entity and one or more financial institutions (“Lenders”). The Series may invest in such Loans in the form of participations in Loans (“Participations”) and assignments of all or a portion of Loans from third parties (“Assignments”). The Series considers these investments to be investments in debt securities for purposes of its investment policies. Participations typically will result in the Series having a contractual relationship only with the Lender, not with the borrower. The Series will have the right to receive payments of principal, interest and any fees to which it is entitled only from the Lender selling the Participation and only upon receipt by the Lender of the payments from the borrower. In connection with purchasing Participations, the Series generally will have no right to enforce compliance by the borrower with the terms of the loan agreement relating to the Loans, nor any rights of set-off against the borrower, and the Series may not benefit directly from any collateral supporting the Loan in which it has purchased the Participation. As a result, the Series will assume the credit risk of both the borrower and the Lender that is selling the Participation. In the event of the insolvency of the Lender selling the Participation, the Series may be treated as a general creditor of the Lender and may not benefit from any set-off between the Lender and the borrower. The Series will acquire Participations only if the Lender interpositioned between the Series and the borrower is determined by the Advisor to be creditworthy. When the Series purchases Assignments from Lenders, the Series will acquire direct rights against the borrower on the Loan, and will not have exposure to the Lender’s credit risk. The Series may enter into Participations and Assignments on a forward commitment or “when-issued” basis, whereby the Series would agree to purchase a Participation or Assignment at set terms in the future. The Series may have difficulty disposing of Assignments and Participations. In certain cases, the market for such instruments is not highly liquid, and therefore the Series anticipate that in such cases such instruments could be sold only to a limited number of institutional investors. The lack of a highly liquid secondary market may make Assignments and Participations difficult to value and have an adverse impact on the value of such instruments and on the Series’ ability to dispose of particular Assignments or Participations in response to a specific economic event, such as deterioration in the creditworthiness of the borrower. Assignments and Participations will not be considered illiquid so long as it is determined by the Advisor that an adequate trading market exists for these securities. To the extent that liquid Assignments and Participations that the Series holds become illiquid, due to the lack of sufficient buyers or market or other conditions, the percentage of the Series’ assets invested in illiquid assets would increase.

 

 

Leading financial institutions often act as agent for a broader group of lenders, generally referred to as a syndicate. The syndicate’s agent arranges the loans, holds collateral and accepts payments of principal and interest. If the agent develops financial problems, the Series may not recover its investment or recovery may be delayed.

 

The Loans in which the Series may invest are subject to the risk of loss of principal and income. Although borrowers frequently provide collateral to secure repayment of these obligations they do not always do so. If they do provide collateral, the value of the collateral may not completely cover the borrower’s obligations at the time of a default. If a borrower files for protection from its creditors under the U.S. bankruptcy laws, these laws may limit the Series’ rights to its collateral. In addition, the value of collateral may erode during a bankruptcy case. In the event of a bankruptcy, the holder of a Loan may not recover its principal, may experience a long delay in recovering its investment and may not receive interest during the delay.

 

The Advisor may from time to time have the opportunity to receive material non-public information ("Confidential Information") about the borrower, including financial information and related documentation regarding the borrower that is not publicly available. Pursuant to applicable policies and procedures, the Advisor may (but is not required to) seek to avoid receipt of Confidential Information from the borrower so as to avoid possible restrictions on its ability to purchase and sell investments on behalf of the Series and other clients to which such Confidential Information relates (e.g., publicly traded securities issued by the borrower). In such circumstances, the Series (and other clients of the Advisor) may be disadvantaged in comparison to other investors, including with respect to the price the Series pays or receives when it buys or sells a bank loan. Further, the Advisor's abilities to assess the desirability of proposed consents, waivers or amendments with respect to certain bank loans may be compromised if it is not privy to available Confidential Information. The Advisor may also determine to receive such Confidential Information in certain circumstances under its applicable policies and procedures. If the Advisor intentionally or unintentionally comes into possession of Confidential Information, it may be unable, potentially for a substantial period of time, to purchase or sell publicly traded securities to which such Confidential Information relates.

 

Yankee Bonds. The Series may invest in U.S. dollar-denominated instruments of foreign issuers who either register with the SEC or issue securities under Rule 144A of the 1933 Act (“Yankee bonds”). These consist of debt securities (including preferred or preference stock of non-governmental issuers), certificates of deposit, fixed time deposits and banker’s acceptances issued by foreign banks, and debt obligations of foreign governments or their subdivisions, agencies and instrumentalities, international agencies and supranational entities. Some securities issued by foreign governments or their subdivisions, agencies and instrumentalities may not be backed by the full faith and credit of the foreign government. Yankee bonds, as obligations of foreign issuers, are subject to the same types of risks discussed in “Risks of Foreign Securities” below. The Yankee bonds selected for the Series will adhere to the same quality standards as those utilized for the selection of domestic debt obligations.

 

As compared with bonds issued in the United States, such bond issues normally carry a higher interest rate but are less actively traded.

 

Obligations of Supranational Agencies. The Series may purchase securities issued or guaranteed by supranational agencies including, but not limited to, the following: Asian Development Bank, Inter-American Development Bank, International Bank for Reconstruction and Development (World Bank), African Development Bank, European Coal and Steel Community, European Union, and the European Investment Bank. For concentration purposes, supranational entities are considered an industry. Investment in these entities is subject to the Series’ other restrictions on investments in foreign securities, described below.

 

Municipal Bonds and Other Municipal Obligations. The Series may invest in municipal bonds and other municipal obligations. These bonds and other obligations are issued by the states and by their local and special-purpose political subdivisions. The term “municipal bond” includes short-term municipal notes issued by the states and their political subdivisions, including, but not limited to, tax anticipation notes (“TANs”), bond anticipation notes (“BANs”), revenue anticipation notes (“RANs”), construction loan notes, tax free commercial paper, and tax free participation certificates. In general, municipal obligations include debt obligations issued by states, cities and local authorities to obtain funds for various public purposes, including construction of a wide range of public facilities such as airports, bridges, highways, hospitals, housing, mass transportation, schools, streets and water and sewer works.

 

General obligation bonds are backed by the issuer’s pledge of its faith, credit, and taxing power for the payment of principal and interest. The taxes that can be levied for the payment of debt service may be limited or unlimited as to rate and amount. For a limited obligation or revenue bond, the only security is typically the net revenue derived from payments by a particular facility or class of facilities financed by the proceeds of the bonds or, in some cases, from the proceeds of a special tax or other special revenues. Although the security behind these bonds varies widely, many lower rated bonds provide additional security in the form of a debt service reserve fund that may also be used to make principal and interest payments on the issuer’s obligations. In addition, some revenue obligations(as well as general obligations) are insured by a bond insurance company or backed by a letter of credit issued by a banking institution. The credit quality of revenue bonds is usually directly related to the credit standing of the user of the facility being financed or of an institution which provides a guarantee, letter of credit or other credit enhancement for the bond issue. Revenue bonds do not generally constitute the pledge of the credit of the issuer of such bonds and are generally not secured by the taxing power of the municipality. Revenue bonds are included in the term municipal obligations if the interest paid thereon is exempt from federal income tax. Revenue bonds may include, but are not limited to, pollution control, health care, housing, education-related and industrial development bonds.

 

 

Generally, the creditworthiness of a local municipal obligation is unrelated to that of the municipal obligations of the state itself if the state has no responsibility to guarantee or otherwise make payments on those local municipal obligations.

 

Generally, interest received on municipal obligations is exempt from federal income tax. The tax-exempt nature of the interest on a municipal obligation is generally the subject of a bond counsel opinion delivered in connection with the issuance of the instrument. Tax opinions are generally provided at the time the municipal security is initially issued and neither the Series or its portfolio manager(s) will independently review the bases for those tax opinions or guarantee that the tax opinions are correct. There is no assurance that the Internal Revenue Service (the “IRS”) will agree with bond counsel’s opinion that such interest is tax-exempt or that the interest payments on such municipal obligations will continue to be tax exempt for the life of the municipal obligation. Issuers or other parties generally enter into covenants requiring continuing compliance with federal tax requirements to preserve the tax-free status of interest payments over the life of the municipal obligation. If at any time the covenants are not complied with, or if the IRS otherwise determines that the issuer did not comply with relevant tax requirements, interest payments from a municipal obligation could become federally taxable, possibly retroactively to the date the municipal obligation was issued, and an investor may need to file an amended income tax return.

 

Obligations of issuers of municipal obligations are subject to the provisions of bankruptcy, insolvency and other laws affecting the rights and remedies of creditors. The application of state law to municipal obligation issuers could produce varying results among the states or among municipal obligation issuers within a state. These uncertainties could have a significant impact on the prices of the municipal obligations in which the Series invests. In addition, issuers of municipal obligations may become subject to the laws enacted in the future by Congress, state legislatures or referenda extending the time for payment of principal and/or interest, or imposing other constraints upon enforcement of such obligations or upon municipalities to levy taxes. There is also the possibility that, as a result of legislation or other conditions, the power or ability of any issuer to pay, when due, the principal of and interest on its municipal obligations may be materially affected.

 

The two general classifications of municipal bonds are “general obligation” bonds and “revenue” bonds. General obligation bonds are secured by the governmental issuer’s pledge of its faith, credit and taxing power for the payment of principal and interest upon a default by the issuer of its principal and interest payment obligations. They are usually paid from general revenues of the issuing governmental entity. Revenue bonds, on the other hand, are usually payable only out of a specific revenue source rather than from general revenues. Revenue bonds ordinarily are not backed by the faith, credit or general taxing power of the issuing governmental entity. The principal and interest on revenue bonds for private facilities are typically paid out of rents or other specified payments made to the issuing governmental entity by a private company which uses or operates the facilities. Examples of these types of obligations are industrial revenue bond and pollution control revenue bonds. Industrial revenue bonds are issued by governmental entities to provide financing aid to community facilities such as hospitals, hotels, business or residential complexes, convention halls and sport complexes. Pollution control revenue bonds are issued to finance air, water and solids pollution control systems for privately operated industrial or commercial facilities.

 

Revenue bonds for private facilities usually do not represent a pledge of the credit, general revenues or taxing powers of issuing governmental entity. Instead, the private company operating the facility is the sole source of payment of the obligation. Sometimes, the funds for payment of revenue bonds come solely from revenue generated by operation of the facility. Federal income tax laws place substantial limitations on industrial revenue bonds, and particularly certain specified private activity bonds issued after August 7, 1986. In the future, legislation could be introduced in Congress which could further restrict or eliminate the income tax exemption for interest on debt obligations in which the Series may invest.

 

 

The Series may invest in refunded bonds. Refunded bonds may have originally been issued as general obligation or revenue bonds, but become refunded when they are secured by an escrow fund, usually consisting entirely of direct U.S. government obligations and/or U.S. government agency obligations sufficient for paying the bondholders. There are two types of refunded bonds: pre-refunded bonds and escrowed-to-maturity (“ETM”) bonds. The escrow fund for a pre-refunded municipal bond may be structured so that the refunded bonds are to be called at the first possible date or a subsequent call date established in the original bond debenture. The call price usually includes a premium from 1% to 3% above par. This type of structure usually is used for those refundings that either reduce the issuer’s interest payment expenses or change the debt maturity schedule. In escrow funds for ETM refunded municipal bonds, the maturity schedules of the securities in the escrow funds match the regular debt-service requirements on the bonds as originally stated in the bond indentures.

 

The Series also may purchase municipal lease obligations, primarily through certificates of participation. Certificates of participation in municipal leases are undivided interests in a lease, installment purchase contract or conditional sale contract entered into by a state or local governmental unit to acquire equipment or facilities. Municipal leases frequently have special risks which generally are not associated with general obligation bonds or revenue bonds. Municipal leases and installment purchase or conditional sales contracts (which usually provide for title to the leased asset to pass to the governmental issuer upon payment of all amounts due under the contract) have evolved as a means for governmental issuers to acquire property and equipment without meeting the constitutional and statutory requirements for the issuance of municipal debt.

 

Although lease obligations do not constitute general obligations of the municipality for which the municipality’s taxing power is pledged, a lease obligation is ordinarily backed by the municipality’s covenant to budget for, appropriate and make the payments due under the lease obligation. However, certain lease obligations contain “non-appropriation” clauses, which provide that the municipality has no obligation to make lease or installment purchase payments in future years unless money is appropriated for such purpose on a yearly basis. In evaluating securities for purchase, a Fund will take into account the incentive of the issuer to appropriate under the lease, among other factors. Some lease obligations may be illiquid under certain circumstances. Although non-appropriation lease obligations are secured by the leased equipment or facilities, disposition of the property in the event of foreclosure might prove difficult and time consuming. In addition, disposition upon non-appropriation or foreclosure might not result in recovery by a Fund of the full principal amount represented by an obligation.

 

The Series may also acquire derivative municipal securities, which are custodial receipts of certificates underwritten by securities dealers or banks that evidence ownership of future interest payments, principal payments or both on certain municipal securities. The underwriter of these certificates or receipts typically purchases municipal securities and deposits them in an irrevocable trust or custodial account with a custodian bank, which then issues receipts or certificates that evidence ownership of the periodic unmatured coupon payments and the final principal payment on the obligation.

 

The principal and interest payments on the municipal securities underlying custodial receipts may be allocated in a number of ways. For example, payments may be allocated such that certain custodial receipts may have variable or floating interest rates and others may be stripped securities which pay only the principal or interest due on the underlying municipal securities. The Series may invest in custodial receipts which have inverse floating interest rates and other inverse floating rate municipal obligations, as described below.

 

Variable Rate Demand Notes (“VRDNs”) are long-term municipal obligations that have variable or floating interest rates and provide a Fund with the right to tender the security for repurchase at its stated principal amount plus accrued interest. Such securities typically bear interest at a rate that is intended to cause the securities to trade at par. The interest rate may float or be adjusted at regular intervals (ranging from daily to annually), and is normally based on an applicable interest index or another published interest rate or interest rate index. Most VRDNs allow a Fund to demand the repurchase of the security on not more than seven days prior notice. Other notes only permit a Fund to tender the security at the time of each interest rate adjustment or at other fixed intervals. Variable interest rates generally reduce changes in the market value of municipal obligations from their original purchase prices. Accordingly, as interest rates decrease, the potential for capital appreciation is less for variable rate municipal obligations than for fixed income obligations.

 

 

The Series may invest in inverse floating rate municipal securities or “inverse floaters,” whose rates vary inversely to interest rates on a specified short-term municipal bond index or on another instrument. Such securities involve special risks as compared to conventional fixed-rate bonds. Should short-term interest rates rise, the Series’ investment in inverse floaters likely would adversely affect the Series’ earnings and distributions to shareholders. Also, because changes in the interest rate on the other index or other instrument inversely affect the rate of interest received on an inverse floater, and because inverse floaters essentially represent a leveraged investment in a long-term bond, the value of an inverse floater is generally more volatile than that of a conventional fixed-rate bond having similar credit quality, redemption provisions and maturity. Although volatile in value, inverse floaters typically offer the potential for yields substantially exceeding the yields available on conventional fixed-rate bonds with comparable credit quality, coupon, call provisions and maturity. The markets for inverse floating rate securities may be less developed and have less liquidity than the markets for conventional securities. .

 

Zero-Coupon Bonds. The Series may invest in so-called “zero-coupon” bonds. Zero-coupon bonds are issued at a significant discount from face value and generally pay interest only at maturity rather than at intervals during the life of the security. The Series is required to accrue and distribute income from zero-coupon bonds on a current basis, even though it does not receive that income currently in cash. Thus, the Series may have to sell investments to obtain cash needed to make income distributions. The discount, in the absence of financial difficulties of the issuer, decreases as the final maturity of the security approaches. Zero-coupon bonds can be sold prior to their maturity date in the secondary market at the then prevailing market value, which depends primarily on the time remaining to maturity, prevailing level of interest rates and the perceived credit quality of the issues. The market prices of zero-coupon securities are subject to greater fluctuations in response to changes in market interest rates than bonds which pay interest currently.

 

Inflation Protected Securities. The Series may invest in inflation protected securities, which are fixed income securities for which the principal and/or interest income paid is linked to inflation rates. They may be issued by the U.S. Treasury, foreign governments, or U.S. or foreign companies. The relationship between an inflation protected security and its associated inflation index affects both the sum the Series is paid when the security matures and the amount of interest that the security pays the Series. With inflation (a rise in the index), the principal of the security increases. With deflation (a drop in the index), the principal of the security decreases. Inflation protected securities pay interest at a fixed rate. Because the rate is applied to the adjusted principal, however, interest payments can vary in amount from one period to the next. If inflation occurs, the interest payment increases. In the event of deflation, the interest payment decreases. At the maturity of a security, the Series receives the adjusted principal or the original principal, whichever is greater.

 

Variable and Floating Rate Instruments. Certain of the obligations that may be purchased by the Series may carry variable or floating rates of interest. These obligations may involve a conditional or unconditional demand feature and may include variable amount master demand notes. Such instruments bear interest at rates which are not fixed, but which vary with changes in specified market rates or indices. The interest rate on these securities may be reset daily, weekly, quarterly, or at some other reset period. There is a risk that the current interest rate on such obligations may not accurately reflect existing market interest rates. A demand instrument with a demand notice exceeding seven days may be considered illiquid if there is no secondary market for such security.

 

Some variable rate securities may be combined with a put or demand feature (variable rate demand securities) that entitles the holder to the right to demand repayment in full or to resell at a specific price and/or time. While the demand feature is intended to reduce credit risks, it is not always unconditional and may be subject to termination if the issuer’s credit rating falls below investment grade or if the issuer fails to make payments on other debt. While most variable-rate demand securities allow a fund to exercise its demand rights at any time, some such securities may only allow a fund to exercise its demand rights at certain times, which reduces the liquidity usually associated with this type of security. The Series could suffer losses in the event that the demand feature provider, usually a bank, fails to meet its obligation to pay the demand.

 

Short-Term Investments/Temporary Defensive Positions. For temporary defensive purposes during periods when the Advisor determines that market conditions warrant, the Series may depart from its investment goals and invest up to 100% of its assets in all types of money market instruments (including securities guaranteed by the U.S. Government, its agencies or instrumentalities, certificates of deposit, time or other interest-bearing deposits, and bankers’ acceptances issued by banks or savings and loan institutions deemed creditworthy by the Advisor, commercial paper or short-term notes rated A-1 by S&P or Prime-1 by Moody’s, repurchase agreements involving such securities and shares of other investment companies as permitted by applicable law) and may hold a portion of its assets in cash. For a description of the above ratings, see Appendix A.

 

 

Risks of Fixed Income Securities. Investments in fixed income securities may subject the Series to risks, including the following:

 

Interest Rate Risk. When interest rates decline, the market value of fixed income securities tends to increase. Conversely, when interest rates increase, the market value of fixed income securities tends to decline. The volatility of a security’s market value will differ depending upon the security’s maturity and duration, the issuer and the type of instrument.

 

Default Risk/Credit Risk. Investments in fixed income securities are subject to the risk that the issuer of the security could default on its obligations, causing the Series to sustain losses on such investments. A default could impact both interest and principal payments.

 

Call Risk and Extension Risk. Fixed income securities may be subject to both call risk and extension risk. Call risk exists when the issuer may exercise its right to pay principal on an obligation earlier than scheduled, which would cause cash flows to be returned earlier than expected. This typically results when interest rates have declined and the Series will suffer from having to reinvest in lower yielding securities. Extension risk exists when the issuer may exercise its right to pay principal on an obligation later than scheduled, which would cause cash flows to be returned later than expected. This typically results when interest rates have increased, and the Series will suffer from the inability to invest in higher yield securities.

 

DERIVATIVE TRANSACTIONS

 

Foreign Currency Transactions. The Series may enter into forward foreign currency exchange contracts and use currency futures contracts, options on such futures contracts, and options on foreign currencies. The Series may engage in foreign currency transactions for hedging purposes, as well as to enhance the Series’ returns.

 

A forward foreign currency contract involves a negotiated obligation to purchase or sell a specific currency at a future date (with or without delivery required), which may be any fixed number of days from the date of the contract agreed upon by the parties, at a price set at the time of the contract. These contracts are traded in the interbank market conducted directly between currency traders (usually large, commercial banks) and their customers.

 

Forward contracts generally may not be liquidated prior to the stated maturity date, although the parties to a contract may agree to enter into a second offsetting transaction with the same maturity, thereby fixing each party’s profit or loss on the two transactions. Nevertheless, each position must still be maintained to maturity unless the parties separately agree on an earlier settlement date. As a result, a party to a forward contract must be prepared to perform its obligations under each such contract in full. Parties to a forward contract may also separately agree to extend the contract by “rolling” it over prior to the originally scheduled settlement date. The Series may use forward contracts for cash equitization purposes, which allows the Series to invest consistent with its benchmark while managing daily cash flows, including significant client inflows and outflows.

 

The Series may use foreign currency transactions as part of a hedging strategy, as described below:

 

Transaction Hedging. Transaction Hedging is entering into a currency transaction with respect to specific assets or liabilities of the Series, which will generally arise in connection with the purchase or sale of its portfolio securities or the receipt of income therefrom. The Series may enter into Transaction Hedging out of a desire to preserve the U.S. dollar price of a security when it enters into a contract for the purchase or sale of a security denominated in a foreign currency. The Series may be able to protect itself against possible losses resulting from changes in the relationship between the U.S. dollar and foreign currencies during the period between the date the security is purchased or sold and the date on which payment is made or received by entering into a forward contract for the purchase or sale, for a fixed amount of U.S. dollars, of the amount of the foreign currency involved in the underlying security transactions.

 

Position Hedging. The Series may sell a non-U.S. currency and purchase U.S. currency to reduce exposure to the non-U.S. currency (“Position Hedging”). The Series may use Position Hedging when the Advisor reasonably believes that the currency of a particular foreign country may suffer a substantial decline against the U.S. dollar. The Series may enter into a forward foreign currency contract to sell, for a fixed amount of U.S. dollars, the amount of foreign currency approximating the value of some or all of its portfolio securities denominated in such foreign currency. The precise matching of the forward foreign currency contract amount and the value of the portfolio securities involved may not have a perfect correlation since the future value of the securities hedged will change as a consequence of the market between the date the forward contract is entered into and the date it matures. The projection of short-term currency market movement is difficult, and the successful execution of this short-term hedging strategy is uncertain.

 

 

Cross Hedges. The Series may also cross-hedge currencies by entering into transactions to purchase or sell one or more currencies that are expected to decline in value relative to other currencies to which the Series has or in which the Series expects to have portfolio exposure.

 

Proxy Hedges. The Series may also engage in proxy hedging. Proxy hedging is often used when the currency to which the Series’ portfolio is exposed is difficult to hedge or to hedge against the U.S. dollar.

 

Proxy hedging entails entering into a forward contract to sell a currency whose changes in value are generally considered to be linked to a currency or currencies in which some or all of the Series’ portfolio securities are or are expected to be denominated, and to buy U.S. dollars. The amount of the contract would not exceed the value of the Series’ securities denominated in linked currencies.

 

In addition to the hedging transactions described above, the Series may also engage in foreign currency transactions in an attempt to take advantage of certain inefficiencies in the currency exchange market, to increase their exposure to a foreign currency or to shift exposure to foreign currency fluctuations from one currency to another. Active investment in currencies may subject the Series to additional risks.

 

The Series may engage in non-deliverable forward transactions. A non-deliverable forward transaction is a transaction that represents an agreement between the Series and a counterparty (usually a commercial bank) to buy or sell a specified (notional) amount of a particular currency at an agreed upon foreign exchange rate on an agreed upon future date. The nondeliverable forward transaction position is closed using a fixing rate, as defined by the central bank in the country of the currency being traded, that is generally publicly stated within one or two days prior to the settlement date. Unlike other currency transactions, there is no physical delivery of the currency on the settlement of a non-deliverable forward transaction. Rather, the Series and the counterparty agree to net the settlement by making a payment in U.S. dollars or another fully convertible currency that represents any differential between the foreign exchange rate agreed upon at the inception of the non-deliverable forward agreement and the actual exchange rate on the agreed upon future date. Thus, the actual gain or loss of a given non-deliverable forward transaction is calculated by multiplying the transaction’s notional amount by the difference between the agreed upon forward exchange rate and the actual exchange rate when the transaction is completed.

 

The Series may invest in foreign currency futures contracts. Buyers and sellers of currency futures are subject to the same risks that apply to the use of futures generally, which are described elsewhere in this SAI. Further, settlement of a currency futures contract for the purchase of most currencies must occur at a bank based in the issuing nation, which may subject the Series to additional risk.

 

The Series may invest in options on foreign currencies and futures. Trading options on currency futures contracts is relatively new, and the ability to establish and close out positions on such options is subject to the maintenance of a liquid market, which may not always be available. An option on a currency provides the purchaser, or “holder,” with the right, but not the obligation, to purchase, in the case of a “call” option, or sell, in the case of a “put” option, a stated quantity of the underlying currency at a fixed exchange rate up to a stated expiration date (or, in the case of certain options, on such date). The holder generally pays a nonrefundable fee for the option, referred to as the “premium,” but cannot lose more than this amount, plus related transaction costs. Thus, where the Series is a holder of option contracts, such losses will be limited in absolute amount. In contrast to a forward contract, an option imposes a binding obligation only on the seller, or “writer.” If the holder exercises the option, the writer is obligated to complete the transaction in the underlying currency. An option generally becomes worthless to the holder when it expires. In addition, in the context of an exchange-traded option, the writer is often required to deposit initial margin and may be required to increase the margin on deposit if the market moves against the writer’s position. Options on currencies may be purchased in the OTC market between commercial entities dealing directly with each other as principals. In purchasing an OTC currency option, the holder is subject to the risk of default by the writer and, for this reason, purchasers of options on currencies may require writers to post collateral or other forms of performance assurance.

 

 

Currency hedging involves some of the same risks and considerations as other transactions with similar instruments. Currency transactions can result in losses to the Series if the currency being hedged fluctuates in value to a degree or in a direction that is not anticipated. Furthermore, there is risk that the perceived linkage between various currencies may not be present or may not be present during the particular time that the Series is engaging in proxy hedging. Suitable hedging transactions may not be available in all circumstances. Hedging transactions may also eliminate any chance for the Series to benefit from favorable fluctuations in relevant foreign currencies.

 

Currency transactions are subject to risks different from those of other portfolio transactions. Because currency control is of great importance to the issuing governments and influences economic planning and policy, purchase and sales of currency and related instruments can be negatively affected by government exchange controls, blockages, and manipulations or exchange restrictions imposed by governments. These can result in losses to the Series if it is unable to deliver or receive currency or funds in settlement of obligations and could also cause hedges it has entered into to be rendered useless, resulting in full currency exposure as well as incurring transaction costs.

 

Although forward foreign currency contracts and currency futures tend to minimize the risk of loss due to a decline in the value of the hedged currency, at the same time they tend to limit any potential gain which might result should the value of such currency increase.

 

Futures and Options on Futures. Futures contracts provide for the future sale by one party and purchase by another party of a specified amount of a specific security, interest rate, index, currency or commodity at a specified future time and at a specified price. An option on a futures contract gives the purchaser the right, in exchange for a premium, to assume a position in a futures contract at a specified exercise price during the term of the option. An index futures contract is a bilateral agreement pursuant to which two parties agree to take or make delivery of an amount of cash equal to a specified dollar amount times the difference between the index value at the close of trading of the contract and the price at which the futures contract is originally struck. No physical delivery of the securities comprising the index is made; generally contracts are closed out prior to the expiration date of the contract.

 

The Series may also invest in Treasury futures, interest rate futures, interest rate swaps, and interest rate swap futures. A Treasury futures contract involves an obligation to purchase or sell Treasury securities at a future date at a price set at the time of the contract. The sale of a Treasury futures contract creates an obligation by the Series to deliver the amount of certain types of Treasury securities called for in the contract at a specified future time for a specified price. A purchase of a Treasury futures contract creates an obligation by the Series to take delivery of an amount of securities at a specified future time at a specific price. Interest rate futures can be sold as an offset against the effect of expected interest rate increases and purchased as an offset against the effect of expected interest rate declines. Interest rate swaps are an agreement between two parties where one stream of future interest rate payments is exchanged for another based on a specified principal amount. Interest rate swaps often exchange a fixed payment for a floating payment that is linked to a particular interest rate. Interest rate swap futures are instruments that provide a way to gain swap exposure and the structure features of a futures contract in a single instrument. Interest rate swap futures are futures contracts on interest rate swaps that enable purchasers to cash settle at a future date at the price determined by the benchmark rate at the end of a fixed period.

 

The Series may use futures contracts and related options for either hedging purposes or risk management purposes as well as to enhance the Series’ returns. Instances in which the Series may use futures contracts and related options for risk management or return enhancement purposes include: attempting to offset changes in the value of securities held or expected to be acquired or be disposed of; attempting to minimize fluctuations in foreign currencies; attempting to gain exposure to a particular market, index or instrument; attempting to take advantage of expected price changes of various futures; or other risk management or return enhancement purposes. The Series may use futures for cash equitization purposes, which allows the Series to invest consistent with its benchmark while managing daily cash flows, including significant client inflows and outflows.

 

There are significant risks associated with the Series’ use of futures contracts and options on futures, including the following: (i) the success of a hedging or trading strategy may depend on the Advisor’s ability to predict movements in the prices of individual securities, fluctuations in markets and movements in interest rates; (ii) there may be an imperfect or no correlation between the changes in market value of the securities held by the Series and the prices of futures and options on futures; (iii) there may not be a liquid secondary market for a futures contract or option; (iv) trading restrictions or limitations may be imposed by an exchange; and (v) government regulations may restrict trading in futures contracts and options on futures. In addition, some strategies reduce the Series’ exposure to price fluctuations, while others tend to increase its market exposure.

 

 

Options. The Series may purchase and write (i.e., sell) put and call options on securities and indices. A put option on a security gives the purchaser of the option the right to sell, and the writer of the option the obligation to buy, the underlying security at any time during the option period. A call option on a security gives the purchaser of the option the right to buy, and the writer of the option the obligation to sell, the underlying security at any time during the option period. The premium paid to the writer is the consideration for undertaking the obligations under the option contract.

 

Put and call options on indices are similar to options on securities except that options on an index give the holder the right to receive, upon exercise of the option, an amount of cash if the closing level of the underlying index is greater than (or less than, in the case of puts) the exercise price of the option. This amount of cash is equal to the difference between the closing price of the index and the exercise price of the option, expressed in dollars multiplied by a specified number. Thus, unlike options on individual securities, all settlements are in cash, and gain or loss depends on price movements in the particular market represented by the index generally, rather than the price movements in individual securities.

 

The Series may purchase put and call options on securities for any purpose, including to protect against a decline in the market value of the securities in its portfolio or to anticipate an increase in the market value of securities that the Series may seek to purchase in the future. The Series purchasing put and call options pays a premium for such options. If price movements in the underlying securities are such that exercise of the options would not be profitable for the Series, loss of the premium paid may be offset by an increase in the value of the Series’ securities or by a decrease in the cost of acquisition of securities by the Series.

 

When the Series writes an option, if the underlying securities do not increase or decrease, as applicable, to a price level that would make the exercise of the option profitable to the holder thereof, the option generally will expire without being exercised and the Series will realize as profit the premium received for such option. When a call option of which the Series is the writer is exercised, the Series will be required to sell the underlying securities to the option holder at the strike price, and will not participate in any increase in the price of such securities above the strike price. When a put option of which the Series is the writer is exercised, the Series will be required to purchase the underlying securities at a price in excess of the market value of such securities.

 

When the Series wishes to sell a security at a specified price, it may seek to generate additional income by writing “covered” call options on the security. A call option is “covered” if the Series either owns the underlying instrument or has an absolute and immediate right (such as a call with the same or a later expiration date) to acquire that instrument. The underlying instruments of such covered call options may consist of individual equity securities, pools of equity securities, ETFs or indices.

 

The writing of covered call options is a more conservative investment technique than writing of naked or uncovered options, but capable of enhancing the Series’ total return. When the Series writes a covered call option, it profits from the premium paid by the buyer but gives up the opportunity to profit from an increase in the value of the underlying security above the exercise price. At the same time, the Series retains the risk of loss from a decline in the value of the underlying security during the option period.

 

Although the Series may terminate its obligation by executing a closing purchase transaction, which is the purchase of an option contract on the same security with the same exercise price and expiration date as the option contract originally sold, the cost of effecting such a transaction may be greater than the premium received upon its sale, resulting in a loss to the Series. If such an option expires unexercised, the Series realizes a gain equal to the premium received. Such a gain may be offset or exceeded by a decline in the market value of the underlying security during the option period. If an option is exercised, the exercise price, the premium received and the market value of the underlying security determine the gain or loss realized by the Series.

 

The Series may seek to hedge against an increase in the value of a security that it would like to acquire, or otherwise profit from an expected increase in the value of a security by writing a “naked” put option on the security. The writer of a naked put option has no position in the underlying security. If the security price rises, the option would expire worthless and the Series would profit by the amount of the premium it received, which may offset the increase in the market price of the security the Series would like to acquire. If the security price falls, however, the Series may lose an amount up to the difference between the value of the security and the premium it received, and the Series may be deprived of the opportunity to benefit from the full decrease in the market price of the security it would like to acquire. The Series may seek to terminate its position in a put option it writes before exercise by executing a closing purchase transaction. If the market is not liquid for a put option the Series has written, however, the Series must continue to be prepared to pay the exercise price while the option is outstanding, regardless of price changes.

 

 

The Series may purchase and write options on an exchange or over-the-counter (“OTC”). OTC options differ from exchange-traded options in several respects. They are transacted directly with dealers and not with a clearing corporation, and therefore entail the risk of non-performance by the dealer. OTC options are available for a greater variety of securities and for a wider range of expiration dates and exercise prices than are available for exchange-traded options. Because OTC options are not traded on an exchange, pricing is normally done by reference to information from a market maker. It is the SEC’s position that OTC options are generally illiquid.

 

The market value of an option generally reflects the market price of an underlying security. Other principal factors affecting market value include supply and demand, interest rates, the pricing volatility of the underlying security and the time remaining until the expiration date.

 

Risks associated with options transactions include: (i) the success of a hedging or trading strategy may depend on an ability to predict movements in the prices of individual securities, fluctuations in markets and movements in interest rates; (ii) there may be an imperfect or no correlation between the movement in prices of options and the securities underlying them; (iii) there may not be a liquid secondary market for options; (iv) the buyer of an option assumes the risk of losing the entire premium invested in the option; (v) while the Series will receive a premium when it writes covered call options, it may not participate fully in a rise in the market value of the underlying security; and (vi) while the Series will receive a premium when it writes naked put options, it may lose money if it must purchase the underlying security at a price above market value.

 

Swaps, Caps, Floors, Collars and Swaptions. Swaps are privately negotiated OTC derivative products in which two parties agree to exchange payment streams calculated in relation to a rate, index, instrument or certain securities (referred to as the “underlying”) and a predetermined amount (referred to as the “notional amount”). The underlying for a swap may be an interest rate (fixed or floating), a currency exchange rate, a commodity price index, a security, group of securities or a securities index, a combination of any of these, or various other rates, securities, instruments, assets or indices. Swap agreements generally do not involve the delivery of the underlying or principal, and a party’s obligations generally are equal to only the net amount to be paid or received under the agreement based on the relative values of the positions held by each party to the swap agreement.

 

A great deal of flexibility is possible in the way swaps may be structured. For example, in a simple fixed-to-floating interest rate swap, one party makes payments equivalent to a fixed interest rate, and the other party makes payments calculated with reference to a specified floating interest rate. An equity swap is an agreement between counterparties to exchange a set of payments, determined by a stock or index return, with another set of payments (usually an interest-bearing (fixed or floating rate) instrument, but they can also be the return on another stock or index). In a total return swap, one party agrees to make periodic payments to another party based on the change in market value of the assets underlying the contract, which may include a specific security, basket of securities or securities indices, during a specified period. In a currency swap, the parties generally enter into an agreement to pay interest streams in one currency based on a specified rate in exchange for receiving interest streams denominated in another currency. Currency swaps may involve initial and final exchanges of the currency that correspond to the agreed upon notional amount.

 

The Series may engage in simple or more complex swap transactions involving a wide variety of underlyings for various reasons. For example, the Series may enter into a swap to gain exposure to investments (such as an index of securities in a market) or currencies without actually purchasing those stocks or currencies; to make an investment without owning or taking physical custody of securities or currencies in circumstances in which direct investment is restricted for legal reasons or is otherwise impracticable; to hedge an existing position; to obtain a particular desired return at a lower cost to the Series than if it had invested directly in an instrument that yielded the desired return; or for various other reasons.

 

The Series may enter into credit default swaps, as a buyer or a seller. The buyer in a credit default contract is obligated to pay the seller a periodic stream of payments over the term of the contract provided no event of default has occurred. If an event of default occurs, the seller must pay the buyer the full notional value (“par value”) of the underlying in exchange for the underlying. If the Series is a buyer and no event of default occurs, the Series will have made a stream of payments to the seller without having benefited from the default protection it purchased. However, if an event of default occurs, the Series, as buyer, will receive the full notional value of the underlying that may have little or no value following default. As a seller, the Series receives a fixed rate of income throughout the term of the contract, provided there is no default. If an event of default occurs, the Series would be obligated to pay the notional value of the underlying in return for the receipt of the underlying. The value of the underlying received by the Series, coupled with the periodic payments previously received may be less than the full notional value it pays to the buyer, resulting in a loss of value to the Series. Credit default swaps involve different risks than if the Series invests in the underlying directly.

 

 

Caps, floors, collars and swaptions are privately-negotiated option-based derivative products. Like a put or call option, the buyer of a cap or floor pays a premium to the writer. In exchange for that premium, the buyer receives the right to a payment equal to the differential if the specified index or rate rises above (in the case of a cap) or falls below (in the case of a floor) a pre-determined strike level. Like swaps, obligations under caps and floors are calculated based upon an agreed notional amount, and, like most swaps (other than foreign currency swaps), the entire notional amount is not exchanged. A collar is a combination product in which one party buys a cap from and sells a floor to another party, or vice versa. Swaptions give the holder the right to enter into a swap. The Series may use one or more of these derivative products in addition to or in lieu of a swap involving a similar rate or index.

 

Under current market practice, swaps, caps, collars and floors between the same two parties are generally documented under a “master agreement.” In some cases, options and forwards between the parties may also be governed by the same master agreement. In the event of a default, amounts owed under all transactions entered into under, or covered by, the same master agreement would be netted, and only a single payment would be made.

 

Generally, the Series will calculate the obligations of the swap agreements’ counterparties on a “net basis.” Consequently, the Series’ current obligation (or rights) under a swap agreement will generally be equal only to the net amount to be paid or received under the agreement based on the relative values of the positions held by each counterparty to the swap agreement (the “net amount”).

 

The swap market has grown substantially in recent years with a large number of banks and investment banking firms acting both as principals and as agents using standardized swap agreements. As a result, the use of swaps has become more prevalent in comparison with the markets for other similar instruments that are also traded in over-the-counter markets.

 

Swaps and other derivatives involve risks. One significant risk in a swap, cap, floor, collar or swaption is the volatility of the specific interest rate, currency or other underlying that determines the amount of payments due to and from the Series. This is true whether these derivative products are used to create additional risk exposure for the Series or to hedge, or manage, existing risk exposure. If under a swap, cap, floor, collar or swaption agreement the Series is obligated to make a payment to the counterparty, the Series must be prepared to make the payment when due. The Series could suffer losses with respect to such an agreement if the Series is unable to terminate the agreement or reduce its exposure through offsetting transactions. Further, the risks of caps, floors and collars, like put and call options, may be unlimited for the seller if the cap or floor is not hedged or covered, but is limited for the buyer.

 

Because under swap, cap, floor, collar and swaption agreements a counterparty may be obligated to make payments to the Series, these derivative products are subject to risks related to the counterparty’s creditworthiness. If a counterparty defaults, the Series’ risk of loss will consist of any payments that the Series is entitled to receive from the counterparty under the agreement (this may not be true for currency swaps that require the delivery of the entire notional amount of one designated currency in exchange for the other). Upon default by a counterparty, however, the Series may have contractual remedies under the swap agreement.

 

The Series will enter into swaps only with counterparties that the Advisor believes to be creditworthy.

 

Participatory Notes (“P-notes”). P-notes are participation interest notes that are issued by banks or broker-dealers and are designed to offer a return linked to a particular underlying equity, debt, currency or market. If the P-note were held to maturity, the issuer would pay to, or receive from, the purchaser the difference between the nominal value of the underlying instrument at the time of purchase and that instrument’s value at maturity. The holder of a P-note that is linked to a particular underlying security or instrument may be entitled to receive any dividends paid in connection with that underlying security or instrument, but typically does not receive voting rights as it would if it directly owned the underlying security or instrument. P-notes involve transaction costs. Investments in P-notes involve the same risks associated with a direct investment in the underlying securities, instruments or markets that they seek to replicate. In addition, there can be no assurance that there will be a trading market for a P-note or that the trading price of a P-note will equal the underlying value of the security, instrument or market that it seeks to replicate. Due to liquidity and transfer restrictions, the secondary markets on which a P-note is traded may be less liquid than the market for other securities, or may be completely illiquid, which may also affect the ability of the Series to accurately value a P-note. P-notes typically constitute general unsecured contractual obligations of the banks or broker-dealers that issue them, which subjects the Series to counterparty risk (and this risk may be amplified if the Series purchases P-notes from only a small number of issuers).

 

 

Government Regulation of Derivatives. The Commodity Futures Trading Commission (“CFTC”) regulates the trading of commodity interests, including commodity futures contracts, options on commodity futures, and swaps (which includes cash-settled currency forwards and swaps). Pursuant to rules adopted under the Commodity Exchange Act (“CEA”) by the CFTC, the Series must either operate within certain guidelines and restrictions with respect to the Series’ use of commodity interests, or the Advisor will be subject to registration and regulation under the CEA.

 

Consistent with the CFTC’s regulations, the Advisor has claimed an exclusion from the definition of the term “commodity pool operator” (“CPO”) under the CEA with respect to the Series and, therefore, the Series are not subject to registration or regulation under the CEA. As a result, the Series will operate within certain guidelines and restrictions with respect to their use of commodity interests. If the Series determines to no longer operate within such guidelines and restrictions, the Advisor would be subject to registration and regulation as a CPO under the CEA with respect to the Series. If the Series is subject to CFTC regulation, it may incur additional expenses.

 

The regulation of futures, options and swaps transactions in the U.S. is a rapidly changing area of law and is subject to modification by government and judicial action. For example, the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act (the “Dodd-Frank Act”), which was signed into law in July 2010, granted significant new authority to the SEC and the CFTC to regulate OTC derivatives and market participants, and requires clearing of many OTC derivatives transactions.

 

In addition, the SEC adopted Rule 18f-4 under the 1940 Act (the “Derivatives Rule”) on October 28, 2020. Since its compliance date of August 19, 2022, the Derivatives Rule has replaced prior SEC and staff guidance with an updated, comprehensive framework for registered funds’ use of derivatives.

 

The Derivatives Rule provides a comprehensive framework for the use of derivatives by registered investment companies. The Derivatives Rule permits a registered investment company, subject to various conditions described below, to enter into derivatives transactions and certain other transactions notwithstanding the restrictions on the issuance of “senior securities” under Section 18 of the 1940 Act. Section 18 of the 1940 Act, among other things, prohibits open-end funds, including the Series, from issuing or selling any “senior security,” other than borrowing from a bank (subject to a requirement to maintain 300% “asset coverage”).

 

Registered investment companies that do not qualify as “limited derivatives users” as defined below, are required by the Derivatives Rule to, among other things, (i) adopt and implement a derivatives risk management program (“DRMP”) and new testing requirements; (ii) comply with a relative or absolute limit on fund leverage risk calculated based on value-at-risk (“VaR”); and (iii) comply with new requirements related to Board and SEC reporting. The DRMP is administered by a “derivatives risk manager,” who is appointed by the Board and periodically reviews the DRMP and reports to the Board.

 

The Derivatives Rule provides an exception from the DRMP, VaR limit and certain other requirements for a registered investment company that limits its “derivatives exposure” to no more than 10% of its net assets (as calculated in accordance with the Derivatives Rule) (a “limited derivatives user”), provided that the registered investment company establishes appropriate policies and procedures reasonably designed to manage derivatives risks, including the risk of exceeding the 10% “derivatives exposure” threshold.

 

The requirements of the Derivatives Rule may limit the Series’ ability to engage in derivatives transactions as part of its investment strategies. These requirements may also increase the cost of the Series’ investments and cost of doing business, which could adversely affect the value of the Series’ investments and/or the performance of the Series. The rule also may not be effective to limit the Series’ risk of loss. In particular, measurements of VaR rely on historical data and may not accurately measure the degree of risk reflected in the Series’ derivatives or other investments. There may be additional regulation of the use of derivatives transactions by registered investment companies, which could significantly affect their use. The ultimate impact of the regulations remains unclear. Additional regulation of derivatives transactions may make them more costly, limit their availability or utility, otherwise adversely affect their performance or disrupt markets. Other potentially adverse regulatory obligations can develop suddenly and without notice.

 

 

OTHER INVESTMENT POLICIES

 

Foreign Securities.

 

The Series may invest in equity securities of non-U.S. companies, including those that are not publicly traded in the United States. There are no prescribed limits on the geographic distribution of the Series’ investments, and the Series may focus its investments in only a few countries. Foreign securities may be denominated either in U.S. dollars or foreign currencies.

 

Risks of Foreign Securities. There are risks in investing in foreign securities not typically involved in domestic investing. An investment in foreign securities may be affected by changes in currency rates and in exchange control regulations. Foreign companies are frequently not subject to the accounting and financial reporting standards applicable to domestic companies, and there may be less information available about foreign issuers. There is frequently less government regulation of foreign issuers than in the United States.

 

In addition, investments in foreign countries are subject to the possibility of expropriation or confiscatory taxation, political or social instability or diplomatic developments that could adversely affect the value of those investments. There may also be imposition of withholding taxes. Foreign financial markets may have less volume and longer settlement periods than U.S. markets, which may cause liquidity problems for the Series. In addition, costs associated with transactions on foreign markets are generally higher than for transactions in the U.S. These risks generally are greater for investments in securities of companies in emerging markets, which are usually in the initial stages of their industrialization cycle.

 

Obligations of foreign governmental entities are subject to various types of governmental support and may or may not be supported by the full faith and credit of a foreign government. The Series’ investments in emerging markets can be considered speculative, and therefore may offer greater potential for gains and losses than investments in developed markets of the world. Investing in emerging market countries may entail purchasing securities issued by or on behalf of entities that are insolvent, bankrupt, in default or otherwise engaged in an attempt to reorganize or reschedule their obligations, and in entities that have little or no proven credit rating or credit history. With respect to any emerging country, there may be a greater potential for nationalization, expropriation or confiscatory taxation, political changes, government regulation, social instability or diplomatic developments (including war) which could affect adversely the economies of such countries or investments in such countries. Foreign ownership limitations also may be imposed by the charters of individual companies in emerging market countries to prevent, among other concerns, violation of foreign investment limitations. The economies of developing countries generally are heavily dependent upon international trade and, accordingly, have been and may continue to be adversely affected by trade barriers, exchange or currency controls, managed adjustments in relative currency values and other protectionist measures imposed or negotiated by the countries with which they trade. These economies also may have been, and may continue to be, adversely affected by economic conditions in the countries with which they trade.

 

The Series may invest in relatively few countries and may experience increased volatility and risk as a result. As a result of investing in relatively few countries, the Series will be more susceptible to country-specific economic or market factors; social or political factors; legal, custody, accounting, legislative and regulatory changes; and currency fluctuations.

 

The occurrence of events similar to those in recent years, such as the aftermath of the war in Iraq; instability in Afghanistan, Pakistan, Egypt, Libya, Syria and the Middle East; epidemics such as those caused by the Ebola or Zika viruses; political and military actions undertaken by Russia and the resulting sanctions imposed by the United States and European Union (“EU”); terrorist attacks in the U.S. and around the world; social and political discord; debt crises (such as the recent Greek crisis); sovereign debt downgrades; or the exit or potential exit of one or more countries (such as the United Kingdom) from the EU, among others, may result in market volatility, may have long term effects on the U.S. and worldwide financial markets, and may cause further economic uncertainties in the U.S. and worldwide. Any such event(s) could have a significant adverse impact on the value and risk profile of the Series’ portfolio. The Series does not know how long the securities markets may be affected by similar events and cannot predict the effects of similar events in the future on the U.S. and global economies and securities markets. There can be no assurance that similar events and other market disruptions will not have other material and adverse implications.

 

 

Given the increasing interdependence among global economies and markets, conditions in one country, region or market might adversely affect financial conditions or issuers in other countries, regions or markets. For example, on January 31, 2020, the United Kingdom (the “UK”) formally withdrew from the European Union (the “EU”) (commonly referred to as “Brexit”). Following a transition period, the UK and the EU signed a post-Brexit trade agreement governing their future economic relationship on December 30, 2020. This agreement became effective on a provisional basis on January 1, 2021 and formally entered into force on May 1, 2021. While the full impact of Brexit is unknown, Brexit has already resulted in volatility in European and global markets. The effects of Brexit on the UK and EU economies and the broader global economy could be significant, resulting in negative impacts, such as business and trade disruptions, increased volatility and illiquidity, and potentially lower economic growth of markets in the UK, EU and globally, which could negatively impact the value of the Series' investments. Brexit could also lead to legal uncertainty and politically divergent national laws and regulations while the new relationship between the UK and EU is further defined and the UK determines which EU laws to replace or replicate. Additionally, depreciation of the British pound sterling and/or the euro in relation to the U.S. dollar following Brexit could adversely affect Fund investments denominated in the British pound sterling and/or the euro, regardless of the performance of the investment.

 

In addition, on February 24, 2022, Russian military forces invaded Ukraine, significantly amplifying already existing geopolitical tensions among Russia, Ukraine, Europe, NATO, and the West. Following Russia's actions, various countries, including the U.S., Canada, the UK, Germany, and France, as well as the EU, issued broad-ranging economic sanctions against Russia. The sanctions consist of the prohibition of trading in certain Russian securities and engaging in certain private transactions, the prohibition of doing business with certain Russian corporate entities, large financial institutions, officials and oligarchs, and the freezing of Russian assets. The extent and duration of the war in Ukraine and the longevity and severity of sanctions remain unknown, but they could have a significant adverse impact on the European economy as well as the price and availability of certain commodities, including oil and natural gas, throughout the world. These sanctions, and the resulting disruption of the Russian economy, may cause volatility in other regional and global markets and may negatively impact the performance of various sectors and industries, as well as companies in other countries, which could have a negative effect on the performance of the Series, even if the Series does not have direct exposure to securities of Russian issuers.

 

Whether or not the Series invests in securities of issuers located in Europe or with significant exposure to European issuers or countries, these events could negatively affect the value and liquidity of the Fund's investments due to the interconnected nature of the global economy and capital markets.

 

Similarly, armed conflict between Israel and Hamas and other militant groups in the Middle East and related events could cause significant market disruptions and volatility. This conflict could disrupt regional trade and supply chains, potentially affecting U.S. businesses with exposure to the region. Additionally, the Middle East plays a pivotal role in the global energy sector, and prolonged instability could impact oil prices, leading to increased costs for businesses and consumers. These and any related events could significantly impact the Series’ performance and the value of an investment in the Series, even if the Series does not have direct exposure to affected issuers.

 

Currency Risks. The U.S. dollar value of securities denominated in a foreign currency will vary with changes in currency exchange rates, which can be volatile. Accordingly, changes in the value of the currency in which the Series’ investments are denominated relative to the U.S. dollar will affect the Series’ NAV. Exchange rates are generally affected by the forces of supply and demand in the international currency markets, the relative merits of investing in different countries and the intervention or failure to intervene of U.S. or foreign governments and central banks. However, currency exchange rates may fluctuate based on factors intrinsic to a country’s economy. Some emerging market countries also may have managed currencies, which are not free floating against the U.S. dollar. In addition, emerging markets are subject to the risk of restrictions upon the free conversion of their currencies into other currencies. Any devaluations relative to the U.S. dollar in the currencies in which the Series’ securities are quoted would reduce the Series’ NAV per share.

 

 

Real estate securities. The Series may invest in the securities of companies in the real estate industry. Examples of companies in which the Series may invest include those in the following areas: REITs, real estate operating companies (“REOCs”), real estate developers and brokers, building suppliers, and mortgage lenders.

 

REOCs are corporations that engage in the development, management or financing of real estate. REOCs are publicly traded real estate companies that are taxed at the corporate level, unlike REITs. Because REOCs reinvest earnings rather than distribute dividends to unit holders, they do not get the same benefits of lower corporate taxation that are a common characteristic of REITs. The value of the Series’ REOC securities generally will be affected by the same factors that adversely affect a REIT. For more information about REITs, see “Real Estate Investment Trusts.”

 

Although the Series may not invest directly in real estate, concentration in securities of companies that are primarily engaged in the United States real estate industry exposes the Series to special risks associated with the direct ownership of real estate, and an investment in the Series will be closely linked to the performance of the real estate markets. These risks may include, but are not limited to, the following: declines in the value of real estate; risks related to general and local economic conditions; possible lack of availability of mortgage funds; lack of ability to access the credit or capital markets; overbuilding; extended vacancies of properties; defaults by borrowers or tenants, particularly during an economic downturn; increasing competition; increases in property taxes and operating expenses; changes in zoning laws; losses due to costs resulting from the clean-up of environmental problems; liability to third parties for damages resulting from environmental problems; casualty or condemnation losses; limitations on rents; changes in market and sub-market values and the appeal of properties to tenants; and changes in interest rates.

 

Repurchase Agreements. The Series may enter into repurchase agreements with respect to portfolio securities. Under the terms of a repurchase agreement, the Series purchases securities (“collateral”) from various financial institutions such as a bank or broker-dealer (a “seller”) which the Advisor deems to be creditworthy, subject to the seller’s agreement to repurchase them at a mutually agreed-upon date and price. The repurchase price generally equals the price paid by the Series plus interest negotiated on the basis of current short-term rates (which may be more or less than the rate on the underlying portfolio securities).

 

The seller under a repurchase agreement is required to maintain the value of the collateral held pursuant to the agreement at not less than 100% of the repurchase price, and securities subject to repurchase agreements are held by the Series’ custodian either directly or through a securities depositary. Default by the seller would, however, expose the Series to possible loss because of adverse market action or delay in connection with the disposition of the underlying securities.

 

Investment Companies. Investment company securities are securities of other open-end or closed-end investment companies or unit investment trusts (“UITs”). The Series may invest in securities issued by other investment companies to the extent permitted by the 1940 Act, the rules or regulations thereunder, as such statute, rules or regulations may be amended from time to time.

 

The 1940 Act generally prohibits, subject to certain exceptions, an investment company from acquiring more than 3% of the outstanding voting shares of an investment company and limits such investments to no more than 5% of the Series’ total assets in any one investment company and no more than 10% in any combination of investment companies. These limitations do not apply to the Series’ investments in money market funds. The Series may invest in an investment company in excess of these limitations, provided the Series otherwise complies with the conditions of any exception provided by the 1940 Act or any rule or regulation of the SEC thereunder. The Series may invest in investment companies managed by the Advisor or its affiliates to the extent permitted under the 1940 Act or as otherwise authorized by rule, regulation or order of the SEC.

 

The Series may rely on Section 12(d)(1)(F) of the 1940 Act, which provides an exemption from Section 12(d)(1) that allows the Series to invest all of its assets in other registered funds, including exchange-traded funds (“ETFs”), if, among other conditions, the Series, together with its affiliates, acquires no more than 3% of the outstanding voting stock of any acquired fund. The Series may also rely on Rule 12d1-4 under the 1940 Act to invest in other registered funds, including ETFs and BDCs. Rule 12d1-4 permits the Series to invest in other investment companies beyond the statutory limits, subject to certain conditions specified in the Rule, including, among other conditions, that the Series and its advisory group will not control (individually or in the aggregate) a non-affiliated acquired fund (e.g., hold more than 25% of the outstanding voting securities of an acquired fund that is a registered open-end management investment company or 10% of the outstanding voting securities of an acquired fund that is a registered closed-end management investment company or BDC). In addition, the Series may be able to rely on certain other rules under the 1940 Act to invest in shares of money market funds or other investment companies beyond the statutory limits noted above, but subject to certain conditions.

 

 

To the extent the Series invests a portion of its assets in investment companies, those assets will be subject to the risks of the purchased investment company’s portfolio securities. The Series also will bear its proportionate share of the expenses of the purchased investment company in addition to its own expenses. Because of restrictions on direct investment by U.S. entities in certain countries, investment in other investment companies may be the most practical or the only manner in which an international, emerging markets, or global fund can invest in the securities markets of those countries. With the exception of the Series’ investments in money market funds, the Series do not intend to invest in other investment companies, unless, in the judgment of the Advisor, the potential benefits of such investments exceed the associated costs (which include any investment advisory fees charged by the investment companies) relative to the benefits and costs associated with direct investments in the underlying securities.

 

The Series may invest in securities of open-end investment companies, including ETFs organized as open-end investment companies, closed-end investment companies or unit investment trusts, including ETFs organized as unit investment trusts.

 

Investments in closed-end investment companies may involve the payment of substantial premiums above the NAV of such issuer’s portfolio securities and are subject to limitations under the 1940 Act. The Series also may incur tax liability to the extent it invests in the stock of a foreign issuer that constitutes a “passive foreign investment company.”

 

ETFs are investment companies that are registered under the 1940 Act as open-end funds or UITs. ETFs are actively traded on national securities exchanges and are generally based on specific domestic and foreign market indices. An “index-based ETF” seeks to track the performance of an index by holding in its portfolio either the contents of the index or a representative sample of the securities in the index. Because ETFs are based on an underlying basket of stocks or an index, they are subject to the same market fluctuations as these types of securities in volatile market swings.

 

Exchange-Traded Products (“ETPs”). The Series may purchase shares of or interests in ETPs, which may or may not be investment companies registered under the 1940 Act. The risks of owning interests of an ETP, such as an exchange-traded note (“ETN”) or exchange-traded commodity pool, generally reflect the same risks as owning the underlying securities or other instruments that the ETP is designed to track. The shares of certain ETPs may trade at a premium or discount to their intrinsic value (i.e., the market value may differ from the NAV of an ETP’s shares). For example, supply and demand for shares of an ETP or market disruptions may cause the market price of the ETP to deviate from the value of the ETP’s investments, which may be emphasized in less liquid markets. The value of an ETN may also differ from the valuation of its reference market or instrument due to changes in the issuer’s credit rating. By investing in an ETP, the Series indirectly bears the proportionate share of any fees and expenses of the ETP in addition to the fees and expenses that the Series and its shareholders directly bear in connection with the Series’ operations. Because certain ETPs may have a significant portion of their assets exposed directly or indirectly to commodities or commodity-linked securities, developments affecting commodities may have a disproportionate impact on such ETPs and may subject the ETPs to greater volatility than investments in traditional securities.

 

Generally, ETNs are structured as senior, unsecured notes in which an issuer, such as a bank, agrees to pay a return based on the target commodity index less any fees. ETNs allow individual investors to have access to derivatives linked to commodities and assets such as oil, currencies and foreign stock indexes. ETNs combine certain aspects of bonds and ETFs. Similar to ETFs, ETNs are traded on a major exchange (e.g., the NYSE) during normal trading hours. However, investors can also hold an ETN until maturity. At maturity, the issuer pays to the investor a cash amount equal to principal amount, subject to the day’s index factor. ETN returns are based upon the performance of a market index minus applicable fees. The value of an ETN may be influenced by time to maturity, level of supply and demand for the ETN, volatility and lack of liquidity in underlying commodities markets, changes in the applicable interest rates, changes in the issuer’s credit rating, and economic, legal, political or geographic events that affect the referenced commodity. The value of an ETN may drop due to a downgrade in the issuer’s credit rating, even if the underlying index remains unchanged. Investments in ETNs are subject to the risks facing fixed income securities in general, including the risk that a counterparty will fail to make payments when due or default.

 

Securities Lending. The Series may lend portfolio securities to brokers, dealers and other financial organizations that meet capital and other credit requirements or other criteria established by the Fund’s Board of Directors. These loans, if and when made, may not exceed 33 ¹/₃% of the Series’ total assets taken at value (including the loan collateral). The Series will not lend portfolio securities to its investment advisor, or its affiliates unless it has applied for and received specific authority to do so from the SEC. Loans of portfolio securities will be fully collateralized by cash, letters of credit or U.S. Government Securities, and the collateral will be maintained in an amount equal to at least 100% of the current market value of the loaned securities by marking to market daily. Any gain or loss in the market price of the securities loaned that might occur during the term of the loan would be for the account of the Series.

 

 

The Series may pay a part of the income earned to a third party (such as the Fund’s custodian) for acting as the Series’ securities lending agent, but will bear all of any losses from the investment of collateral.

 

By lending its securities, the Series may increase its income by either investing cash collateral received from the borrower in short-term instruments or obtaining a fee from the borrower when U.S. Government Securities or letters of credit are used as collateral. Investing the cash collateral subjects the Series to market risk. The Series remains obligated to return all collateral to the borrower under the terms of its securities lending arrangements, even if the value of the investments made with the collateral has declined. Accordingly, if the value of a security in which the cash collateral has been invested declines, the loss would be borne by the Series, and the Series may be required to liquidate other investments in order to return collateral to the borrower at the end of a loan. The Series will adhere to the following conditions whenever its portfolio securities are loaned: (i) the Series must receive at least 100% cash collateral or equivalent securities of the type discussed in the preceding paragraph from the borrower; (ii) the borrower must increase such collateral whenever the market value of the securities rises above the level of such collateral; (iii) the Series must be able to terminate the loan on demand; (iv) the Series must receive reasonable interest on the loan, in addition to payments reflecting the amount of any dividends, interest or other distributions on the loaned securities; (v) the Series may pay only reasonable fees in connection with the loan; and, (vi) voting rights on the loaned securities may pass to the borrower, provided, however, that if a material event adversely affecting the investment occurs, the Series must terminate the loan and regain the right to vote the securities. Loans may involve certain risks in the event of default or insolvency of the borrower, including possible delays or restrictions upon the Series’ ability to recover the loaned securities or dispose of the collateral for the loan, which could give rise to loss because of adverse market action, expenses and/or delays.

 

Short Sales. Short sales may be used by the Series as part of its overall portfolio management strategies or to offset (hedge) a potential decline in the value of a security. The Series may engage in short sales that are either “against the box” or “uncovered.” A short sale is “against the box” if, at all times during which the short position is open, the Series owns at least an equal amount of the securities or securities convertible into, or exchangeable without further consideration for, securities of the same issue as the securities that are sold short. A short sale against the box is a taxable transaction to the Series with respect to the securities that are sold short. “Uncovered” short sales are transactions under which the Series sells a security it does not own. To complete such a transaction, the Series must borrow the security to make delivery to the buyer. The Series is then obligated to replace the security borrowed by purchasing the security at the market price at the time of the replacement. The price at such time may be more or less than the price at which the security was sold by the Series. Until the security is replaced, the Series is required to pay the lender amounts equal to any dividends or interest that accrue during the period of the loan. To borrow the security, the Series also may be required to pay a premium, which would increase the cost of the security sold. The proceeds of the short sale may be retained by the broker, to the extent necessary to meet margin requirements, until the short position is closed out.

 

The Series may engage in short sales in an attempt to capitalize on equity securities that it believes will underperform the market or their peers. When the Series sells securities short, it may use the proceeds from the sales to purchase long positions in additional securities that it believes will outperform the market or their peers. This strategy may effectively result in the Series having a leveraged investment portfolio, which results in greater potential for loss. Leverage can amplify the effects of market volatility on the Series’ share price and make the Series’ returns more volatile. This is because leverage tends to exaggerate the effect of any increase or decrease in the value of the Series’ portfolio securities. The use of leverage may also cause the Series to liquidate portfolio positions when it would not be advantageous to do so or in order to satisfy its obligations.

 

Forward Commitments or Purchases on a When-Issued Basis. The Series may enter into forward commitments or purchase securities on a when-issued basis. These securities normally are subject to settlement within 45 days of the purchase date. The interest rate realized on these securities is fixed as of the purchase date and no interest accrues to the Series before settlement. These securities are subject to market fluctuation due to changes in market interest rates. The Series will enter into these arrangements with the intention of acquiring the securities in question and not for speculative purposes.

 

 

Investment in Illiquid and Restricted Securities. The Series may not purchase any illiquid investment, i.e., an investment that the Advisor reasonably expects cannot be sold or disposed of in current market conditions in seven calendar days or less without the sale or disposition significantly changing the market value of the investment (which term includes repurchase agreements and time deposits maturing in more than seven days) if, immediately after the acquisition, the Series would have invested more than 15% of its net assets in illiquid investments that are assets.

 

Restricted securities are securities which were originally sold in private placements and which have not been registered under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended (the “1933 Act”). Such securities generally have been considered illiquid because they may be resold only subject to statutory restrictions and delays or if registered under the 1933 Act. The SEC adopted Rule 144A to provide for a safe harbor exemption from the registration requirements of the 1933 Act for resales of restricted securities to “qualified institutional buyers.” The result has been the development of a more liquid and efficient institutional resale market for restricted securities. As discussed below, the liquidity of the Series’ investments in Rule 144A securities is determined based on relevant market, trading and investment-specific considerations under the Liquidity Program (as defined below). The Series’ ability to invest in restricted securities includes investments in unregistered equity securities offered at a discount in a private placement that are issued by companies that have outstanding publicly traded equity securities of the same class (a “private investment in public equity,” or a “PIPE”).

 

Liquidity Risk Management. In October 2016, the SEC adopted Rule 22e-4 under the 1940 Act (the “Liquidity Rule”), which requires the Fund to establish a liquidity risk management program. Prior to June 1, 2019, the final effective date, the Board of Directors of the Fund, including a majority of the Independent Directors, approved the Fund’s Liquidity Risk Management Program (the “Liquidity Program”) and the appointment of the Liquidity Risk Committee to administer the Liquidity Program (the “Liquidity Program Administrator”). Under the Liquidity Program, the Liquidity Program Administrator assesses, manages, and periodically reviews the Series’ liquidity risk and classifies each investment as “Highly Liquid,” “Moderately Liquid,” “Less Liquid” or “Illiquid” based on the time it will take to convert the investment to cash. The Liquidity Rule defines “liquidity risk” as the risk that the Series could not meet requests to redeem shares issued by the Series without significant dilution of the remaining investors’ interests in the Series. The liquidity of the Series’ portfolio investments is determined based on relevant market, trading and investment-specific considerations under the Liquidity Program. The adoption of the Liquidity Program is not a guarantee that the Series will have sufficient liquidity to satisfy its redemption requests in all market conditions or that redemptions can be effected without diluting remaining investors in the Series. The Liquidity Rule may impact the Series’ performance and its ability to achieve its investment objective. 

 

Borrowings. The Series may borrow money subject to its fundamental and non-fundamental investment policies. Borrowing money will subject the Series to interest costs. The Series generally borrows at times to meet redemption requests rather than sell portfolio securities to raise the necessary cash. The Series may borrow money from banks and make other investments or engage in other transactions permissible under the 1940 Act which may be considered a borrowing (such as mortgage dollar rolls and reverse repurchase agreements).

 

The Fund renewed its 364-day, $50 million credit agreement with Bank of New York Mellon (the “Credit Agreement”) in September 2024, which will terminate in September 2025, unless extended or renewed. Each series of the Fund may borrow under the Credit Agreement for temporary or emergency purposes, including funding shareholder redemptions and other short-term liquidity purposes. A series may borrow up to the maximum amount allowable under its current Prospectus and SAI, subject to various other legal, regulatory or contractual limits. Borrowing results in interest expense and other fees and expenses for a series that may impact the series’ net expenses and return. Each series of the Fund is charged its pro rata share of upfront fees and commitment fees on the aggregate commitment amount based on its net assets. If a series borrows pursuant to the Credit Agreement, the series is charged interest at a variable rate. The availability of assets under the Credit Agreement can be affected by other series’ borrowings under the agreement. As such, a series may be unable to borrow (or borrow further) under the Credit Agreement if the commitment limit has been reached.

 

Diversification. The Series is diversified under the 1940 Act. Further, the Series intends to satisfy the diversification requirements necessary to qualify as a regulated investment company (“RIC”) under the Code. For more information, see “Taxes” below. Diversification does not guarantee against a loss.

 

 

Special Risks of Cyber Attacks. As with any entity that conducts business through electronic means in the modern marketplace, the Fund, and its service providers, may be susceptible to operational and information security risks resulting from cyber attacks. Cyber attacks include, among other behaviors, stealing or corrupting data maintained online or digitally, denial of service attacks on websites, the unauthorized monitoring, release, misuse, loss, destruction or corruption of confidential information, unauthorized access to relevant systems, compromises to networks or devices that the Fund and its service providers use to service the Fund’s operations, ransomware, operational disruption or failures in the physical infrastructure or operating systems that support the Fund and its service providers, or various other forms of cyber security breaches. Cyber attacks affecting the Fund, the Advisor, or the Fund’s distributor, custodian, or any other of the Fund’s intermediaries or service providers may adversely impact the Fund and its shareholders, potentially resulting in, among other things, financial losses or the inability of Fund shareholders to transact business. For instance, cyber attacks may interfere with the processing of shareholder transactions, impact the Series’ ability to calculate their NAVs, cause the release of private shareholder information or confidential business information, impede trading, subject the Fund to regulatory fines or financial losses and/or cause reputational damage. The Fund may also incur additional costs for cyber security risk management purposes designed to mitigate or prevent the risk of cyber attacks. Such costs may be ongoing because threats of cyber attacks are constantly evolving as cyber attackers become more sophisticated and their techniques become more complex. Similar types of cyber security risks are also present for issuers of securities in which the Series may invest, which could result in material adverse consequences for such issuers and may cause the Series’ investments in such companies to lose value. There can be no assurance that the Fund, the Fund’s service providers, or the issuers of the securities in which the Series invest will not suffer losses relating to cyber attacks or other information security breaches in the future.

 

Recent Market Events. An outbreak of respiratory disease caused by a novel coronavirus designated as COVID-19 was first detected in China in December 2019 and subsequently spread internationally. The transmission of COVID-19 and efforts to contain its spread have resulted in international, national and local border closings and other significant travel restrictions and disruptions, significant disruptions to business operations, supply chains and customer activity, event cancellations and restrictions, service cancellations, reductions and other changes, significant challenges in healthcare service preparation and delivery, and quarantines, as well as general concern and uncertainty that has negatively affected the economic environment. These impacts also have caused significant volatility and declines in global financial markets, which have caused losses for investors. Liquidity for many instruments has been greatly reduced, and some interest rates are very low and in some cases yields are negative.

 

In addition, inflation has increased to highs that markets have not seen in decades. The U.S. Federal Reserve has increased interest rates in an effort to control rising inflation, however uncertainty regarding the speed and magnitude of the interest rate increases, as well as the U.S. Federal Reserve’s general ability to successfully control inflation without causing a recession, may negatively impact asset prices and increase market volatility.

 

Investment Restrictions

 

The Series has adopted certain restrictions set forth below as fundamental policies, which may not be changed without the favorable vote of the holders of a “majority” of the Series’ outstanding voting securities, which means a vote of the holders of the lesser of (i) 67% of the shares represented at a meeting at which more than 50% of the outstanding shares are represented or (ii) more than 50% of the outstanding shares, whichever is less.

 

The following fundamental restrictions apply to the Series:

 

1.

The Series may purchase securities of an issuer, except if such purchase is inconsistent with the maintenance of its status as an open-end diversified company under the 1940 Act, the rules or regulations thereunder or any exemption therefrom, as such statute, rules or regulations may be amended or interpreted from time to time.

 

2.

The Series may not concentrate investments in a particular industry or group of industries, as concentration is defined under the 1940 Act, the rules and regulations thereunder or any exemption therefrom, as such statute, rules or regulations may be amended or interpreted from time to time, except that the Series may invest without limitation in securities issued or guaranteed by the U.S. government, its agencies or instrumentalities and repurchase agreements involving such securities or tax-exempt obligations of state or municipal governments and their political subdivisions.

 

 

3.

The Series may borrow money or issue senior securities (as defined under the 1940 Act), except as prohibited under the 1940 Act, the rules and regulations thereunder or any exemption therefrom, as such statute, rules or regulations may be amended or interpreted from time to time.

 

4.

The Series may make loans, except as prohibited under the 1940 Act, the rules and regulations thereunder or any exemption therefrom, as such statute, rules or regulations may be amended or interpreted from time to time.

 

5.

The Series may purchase or sell commodities or real estate, except as prohibited under the 1940 Act, the rules and regulations thereunder or any exemption therefrom, as such statute, rules or regulations may be amended or interpreted from time to time.

 

6.

The Series may underwrite securities issued by other persons, except as prohibited under the 1940 Act, the rules and regulations thereunder or any exemption therefrom, as such statute, rules or regulations may be amended or interpreted from time to time.

 

The following descriptions of the 1940 Act may assist investors in understanding the above policies and restrictions.

 

Borrowing. The 1940 Act restricts an investment company from borrowing in excess of 33 1/3% of its total assets (including the amount borrowed, but excluding temporary borrowings not in excess of 5% of its total assets).

 

Concentration. The SEC has defined concentration as investing 25% or more of an investment company’s total assets in any particular industry or group of industries, with certain exceptions such as with respect to investments in obligations issued or guaranteed by the U.S. Government or its agencies and instrumentalities, or tax-exempt obligations of state or municipal governments and their political subdivisions. For purposes of a Fund’s concentration policy, the Fund may classify and re-classify companies in a particular industry and define and re-define industries in any reasonable manner, consistent with SEC guidance.

 

Diversification. Under the 1940 Act and the rules, regulations and interpretations thereunder, a “diversified company,” as to 75% of its total assets, may not purchase securities of any issuer (other than obligations of, or guaranteed by, the U.S. government or its agencies, or instrumentalities or securities of other investment companies) if, as a result, more than 5% of its total assets would be invested in the securities of such issuer, or more than 10% of the issuer’s voting securities would be held by a Series. For purposes of the diversification policy, the identification of the issuer of a security may be determined in any reasonable manner, consistent with SEC guidance.

 

Lending. Under the 1940 Act, an investment company may only make loans if expressly permitted by its investment policies.

 

Commodities and Real Estate. The 1940 Act does not directly restrict an investment company’s ability to invest in commodities or real estate, but does require that every investment company have the fundamental investment policy governing such investments. The Series has adopted a fundamental policy that would permit direct investment in commodities and real estate. However, the Series has a non-fundamental investment limitation that prohibits it from investing directly in real estate. This non-fundamental policy may be changed by vote of the Board.

 

Senior Securities. Senior securities may include any obligation or instrument issued by an investment company evidencing indebtedness. The 1940 Act generally prohibits a fund from issuing senior securities, although it provides allowances for certain borrowings. In addition, Rule 18f-4 under the 1940 Act permits a fund to enter into derivatives transactions, notwithstanding the prohibitions and restrictions on the issuance of senior securities under the 1940 Act, provided that the fund complies with the conditions of Rule 18f-4.

 

Underwriting. Under the 1940 Act, underwriting securities involves an investment company purchasing securities directly from an issuer for the purpose of selling (distributing) them or participating in any such activity either directly or indirectly. Under the 1940 Act, a diversified fund may not make any commitment as underwriter, if immediately thereafter the amount of its outstanding underwriting commitments, plus the value of its investments in securities of issuers (other than investment companies) of which it owns more than 10% of the outstanding voting securities, exceeds 25% of the value of its total assets.

 

 

Illiquid Investments. Rule 22e-4 defines an “illiquid investment” to mean any investment that the Series reasonably expects cannot be sold or disposed of in current market conditions in seven calendar days or less without the sale or disposition significantly changing the market value of the investment, as determined pursuant to the Rule. The Series may not purchase an investment if, as a result, more than 15% of the value of its net assets would be invested in illiquid investments (as such term is defined in Rule 22e-4 of the 1940 Act).

 

Except for the limitations on borrowings, or as may be specifically provided to the contrary, each of the above percentage limitations are applicable at the time of a purchase. With respect to warrants, rights, and convertible securities, a determination of compliance with the above limitations shall be made as though such warrant, right, or conversion privilege had been exercised. With respect to the limitation on illiquid securities, in the event that a subsequent change in net assets or other circumstances cause the Series to exceed its limitation, the Series will take steps to bring the aggregate amount of illiquid instruments back within the limitations as soon as reasonably practicable. With respect to the limitation on borrowing, in the event that a subsequent change in net assets or other circumstances causes the Series to exceed its limitation, the Series will take steps to bring the aggregate amount of borrowing back within the limitation within three days thereafter (not including Sundays and holidays).

 

Portfolio Turnover

 

An annual portfolio turnover rate is, in general, the percentage computed by taking the lesser of purchases or sales of portfolio securities (excluding securities with a maturity of one year or less at the time of acquisition) for a year and dividing that amount by the monthly average of the market value of such securities during the year. Higher portfolio turnover (e.g., over 100%) necessarily will cause the Series to pay correspondingly increased brokerage and trading costs. In addition to the transaction costs, higher portfolio turnover may result in the realization of capital gains. As discussed under Federal Tax Treatment of Dividends and Distributions, to the extent net short-term gains are realized, any distributions resulting from such gains are considered ordinary income for federal income tax purposes.

 

Disclosure of Portfolio Holdings

 

The Fund’s Board of Directors has approved a portfolio holdings disclosure policy that governs the timing and circumstances of disclosure to shareholders and third parties of information regarding the portfolio investments held by the Series.

 

Disclosure of the Series’ complete portfolio holdings is required to be made quarterly within 60 days of the end of each fiscal quarter (currently, each March 31, June 30, September 30, and December 31), in the Fund’s Form N-CSR filings and in the quarterly holdings reports filed with the SEC as exhibits to Form N-PORT. The Series’ Form N-CSR filings and quarterly holdings reports filed with the SEC are not distributed to Series shareholders, but are available, free of charge, on the EDGAR Database on the SEC’s website, www.sec.gov, and on the Fund’s website at www.manning-napier.com. In addition, the Series’ month-end and quarter-end complete portfolio holdings are available on the Fund’s website at www.manning-napier.com. This information is provided with a lag of at least eight days. The information provided will include the following for each security in the portfolio: security name, ticker (for equities only), country, number of shares or units held (for equities), par value (for bonds), and market value as of the date of the portfolio. For futures contracts, the information provided will include the underlying instrument, the notional value of the contracts, and the amount of unrealized appreciation or depreciation. Portfolio holdings information will be available on the website at least until it is superseded by the next quarterly portfolio holdings report on Form N-CSR or N-PORT, as applicable. This information is publicly available to all categories of persons.

 

The Fund provides portfolio holdings and information derived from the portfolio holdings to rating and ranking organizations such as Lipper and Morningstar, Inc. in connection with rating the Series and mutual fund database services such as Thomson Financial Research in connection with their collection of fund data for their subscribers. The Fund will only disclose such information as of the end of the most recent quarter-end, and this information will be provided to these organizations no sooner than the next day after it is posted on the Fund’s website, unless the conditions described below relating to the disclosure of “non-public” portfolio holdings information are satisfied. The Fund believes that these organizations have legitimate objectives in requesting such portfolio holdings information.

 

The Fund’s policies and procedures provide that the Fund’s Chief Compliance Officer (or her designee) (“CCO”) may authorize disclosure of non-public portfolio holdings to rating and ranking organizations, mutual fund databases, consultants, and other organizations that will use the data for due diligence, rating, or ranking the Series, or similar uses at differing times and/or with different lag times than those described above. Prior to making any disclosure of non-public portfolio holdings to a third party, the CCO must determine that such disclosure serves a reasonable business purpose, is in the best interests of the Fund’s shareholders and that conflicts between the interests of the Fund’s shareholders and those of the Fund’s Advisor, principal underwriter, or any affiliated person of the Fund are addressed.

 

 

The Fund’s policies and procedures also permit the Fund to disclose certain commentary and analytical, statistical, performance or similar information relating to the Series of the Fund or its portfolio holdings if certain conditions are met. The information must be for legitimate business purposes and must be deemed to be non-material non-public information based on a good faith review of the particular facts and circumstances. Examples of such non-material non-public information may include, but are not limited to, the following types of information: allocation of the Series’ portfolio securities and other investments among various asset classes, sectors, industries, market capitalizations, countries and regions; the characteristics of the stock components and other investments of the Series; the attribution of the Series’ returns by asset class, sector, industry, market capitalization, country and region; certain volatility characteristics of the Series; certain valuation metrics of the Series (such as average price to earnings ratio and average earnings growth); and maturity and credit quality statistics for the Series’ fixed income holdings.

 

The Fund requires any third party receiving non-public portfolio holdings or information which is derived from portfolio holdings that is deemed material (together, “portfolio holdings data”) to enter into a confidentiality agreement with the Fund which provides, among other things, that non-public portfolio holdings data will be kept confidential and that the recipient has a duty not to trade on the portfolio holdings data and will use such information solely to analyze and rank the Series, or to perform due diligence and asset allocation, depending on the recipient of the information. The agreement will require that the recipient provide, upon request, evidence reasonably satisfactory to the Fund to demonstrate its adherence to the provisions of the agreement.

 

The Fund does not receive any compensation or other consideration for disclosure of portfolio holdings information.

 

In addition, the Fund’s service providers, such as the Advisor, Custodian, Morgan, Lewis & Bockius LLP, PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP (“PwC”), Distributor, and BNY Mellon Investment Servicing (US) Inc. (“BNY Mellon”), all as defined herein, and any pricing service used by the Advisor may possess or receive daily portfolio holdings information with no lag time in connection with their services to the Fund. In addition, Broadridge Financial Solutions, Inc. may receive portfolio holdings information with no lag time, as necessary, in connection with the proxy voting support services it provides to the Fund (see “Proxy Voting Policy”). Service providers will be subject to a duty of confidentiality with respect to any portfolio holdings information, whether imposed by the provisions of the service provider’s contract with the Fund or by the nature of its relationship with the Fund.

 

The Board exercises ongoing oversight of the portfolio holdings disclosure policy by overseeing the implementation and enforcement of the Fund’s policies and procedures by the CCO and by considering reports and recommendations by the CCO concerning any material compliance matters. The Board will be informed of any disclosures of non-public portfolio holdings data pursuant to a confidentiality agreement at its next regularly scheduled meeting or as soon as is reasonably practicable, and will periodically review agreements that the Fund has entered into to selectively disclose portfolio holdings data.

 

Management

 

The overall business and affairs of the Fund are managed by the Fund’s Board of Directors. The Board approves all significant agreements between the Fund and persons or companies furnishing services to the Fund, including the Fund’s agreements with its investment advisor, custodian and distributor. The day-to-day operations of the Fund are delegated to the Fund’s officers and to the Advisor and other service providers.

 

The following chart shows certain information about the Fund’s officers and directors, including their principal occupations during the last five years. Unless specific dates are provided, the individuals have held the listed positions for longer than five years. Manning & Napier Advisors, LLC is the successor entity to Manning & Napier Advisors, Inc. Accordingly, for purposes of the charts below, an individual’s employment history at Manning & Napier Advisors, LLC includes his/her employment history at Manning & Napier Advisors, Inc., except as otherwise stated.

 

 

Interested Director and Officer1
Name:	Paul Battaglia*
Address:	290 Woodcliff Drive  Fairport, NY 14450
Born:	1978
Current Position(s) Held with Fund:	Principal Executive Officer, President, Chairman and Director
Term of Office2 & Length of Time Served:	Indefinite – Chairman and Director since November 2018
Principal Occupation(s) During Past 5 Years:	Chief Financial Officer since 2018; Vice President of Finance (2016-2018); Director of Finance (2011-2016); Financial Analyst/Internal Auditor (2004-2006) – Manning & Napier Advisors, LLC and affiliates
	Holds one or more of the following titles for various subsidiaries and affiliates: Chief Financial Officer
Number of Portfolios Overseen within Fund Complex:	15
Other Directorships Held Outside Fund Complex During Past 5 Years:	N/A
Independent Directors
Name:	Paul A. Brooke
Address:	290 Woodcliff Drive  Fairport, NY 14450
Born:	1945
Current Position(s) Held with Fund:	Lead Independent Director, Audit Committee Member, Governance & Nominating Committee Member
Term of Office & Length of Time Served:	Indefinite –Director, Audit Committee Member, Governance & Nominating Committee Member since 2007; Lead Independent Director since 2017
Principal Occupation(s) During Past 5 Years:	Managing Member since 1991 - PMSV Holdings LLC (investments)
Number of Portfolios Overseen within Fund Complex:	15
Other Directorships Held Outside Fund Complex During Past 5 Years:	PureEarth (non-profit) since 2012; Sonorous NV (healthcare technology) since 2023; Single Pass (healthcare technology) since 2023; Brown Trading (restaurant wholesaler) since 2024; Incyte Corp. (biotech) (2000-2020); Cerus (biomedical) (2016 – 2023); Caelum BioSciences (biomedical) (2018 – 2022)
Name:	Eunice K. Chapon
Address:	290 Woodcliff Drive Fairport, NY 14450
Born:	1969
Current Position(s) Held with Fund:	Director, Audit Committee Member, Governance & Nominating Committee Member
Term of Office & Length of Time Served:	Indefinite – Director, Audit Committee Member, Governance & Nominating Committee Member since May 2023
Principal Occupation(s) During Past 5 Years:	Director, Impact – since 2024; Director of Operations and Business Development (2022-2024) – BrightEdge/American Cancer Society (impact investment/non-profit); General Counsel and Chief Operating Officer (2021-2022) – Decency Global Inc. (ESG start-up); Senior Vice President and Counsel, Head of Legal – Global Distribution (2018-2021)
Number of Portfolios Overseen within Fund Complex:	15
Other Directorships Held Outside Fund Complex During Past 5 Years:	N/A

 

 

Name:	John Glazer
Address:	290 Woodcliff Drive  Fairport, NY 14450
Born:	1965
Current Position(s) Held with Fund:	Director, Audit Committee Member, Governance & Nominating Committee Member
Term of Office & Length of Time Served:	Indefinite – Director, Audit Committee Member, Governance & Nominating Committee Member since February 2021
Principal Occupation(s) During Past 5 Years:	Chief Executive Officer since 2025 – Ford Estates LLC (Single-Family Office); Chief Executive Officer (2020 – 2025) – Oikos Holdings LLC (Single-Family Office); Head of Corporate Development (2019-2020) – Caelum Biosciences (pharmaceutical development)
Number of Portfolios Overseen within Fund Complex:	15
Other Directorships Held Outside Fund Complex During Past 5 Years:	N/A
Name:	Russell O. Vernon
Address:	290 Woodcliff Drive  Fairport, NY 14450
Born:	1957
Current Position(s) Held with Fund:	Director, Audit Committee Member, Governance & Nominating Committee Chairman
Term of Office & Length of Time Served:	Indefinite – Director, Audit Committee Member, Governance & Nominating Committee Member since April 2020; Governance & Nominating Committee Chairman since November 2020
Principal Occupation(s) During Past 5 Years:	Founder and General Partner (2009-2019) – BVM Capital Management (economic development)
Number of Portfolios Overseen within Fund Complex:	15
Other Directorships Held Outside Fund Complex During Past 5 Years:	Board Member, Vice Chairman and President since 2010 – Newburgh Armory Unity Center (education); Board Member and Executive Director since 2020 – National Purple Heart Honor Mission, Inc. (military); Board Member, Vice Chairman (2015-2020) – National Purple Heart Hall of Honor, Inc. (military)

 

 

Name:	Chester N. Watson
Address:	290 Woodcliff Drive  Fairport, NY 14450
Born:	1950
Current Position(s) Held with Fund:	Director, Audit Committee Chairman, Governance & Nominating Committee Member
Term of Office & Length of Time Served:	Indefinite – Director, Audit Committee Member, Governance & Nominating Committee Member Since 2012; Audit Committee Chairman since 2013
Principal Occupation(s) During Past 5 Years:	General Auditor (2003-2011) - General Motors Company (auto manufacturer)
Number of Portfolios Overseen within Fund Complex:	15
Other Directorships Held Outside Fund Complex During Past 5 Years:	Rochester Institute of Technology (University) since 2005; Hudson Valley Center for Innovation, Inc. (New Business and Economic Development) (2019 – 2024); Town of Greenburgh, NY Planning Board (Municipal Government) (2015-2019)
Officers:
Name:	Elizabeth Craig
Address:	290 Woodcliff Drive  Fairport, NY 14450
Born:	1987
Current Position(s) Held with Fund:	Corporate Secretary
Term of Office2 & Length of Time Served:	Since 2016
Principal Occupation(s) During Past 5 Years:	Director of Fund Administration since 2021; Fund Regulatory Administration Manager (2018-2021); Fund Administration Manager (2015-2018) – Manning & Napier Advisors, LLC; Corporate Secretary, Director since 2019 – Manning & Napier Investor Services, Inc.
Name:	Samantha Larew
Address:	290 Woodcliff Drive  Fairport, NY 14450
Born:	1980
Current Position(s) Held with Fund:	Chief Compliance Officer and Anti-Money Laundering Compliance Officer
Term of Office2 & Length of Time Served:	Chief Compliance Officer since 2019; Anti-Money Laundering Compliance Officer since 2018
Principal Occupation(s) During Past 5 Years:	Co-Director of Compliance since 2018; Compliance Communications Supervisor (2014-2018) - Manning & Napier Advisors, LLC& Affiliates; Broker-Dealer Chief Compliance Officer since 2013; Broker-Dealer Assistant Corporate Secretary since 2011 – Manning & Napier Investor Services, Inc.

 

 

Name:	Scott Morabito
Address:	290 Woodcliff Drive  Fairport, NY 14450
Born:	1987
Current Position(s) Held with Fund:	Vice President
Term of Office2 & Length of Time Served:	Vice President since 2019; Assistant Vice President (2017-2019)
Principal Occupation(s) During Past 5 Years:	Managing Director, Client Service and Business Operations since 2021; Managing Director of Operations (2019-2021); Director of Funds Group (2017-2019) - Manning & Napier Advisors, LLC; President, Director since 2018 – Manning & Napier Investor Services, Inc.; President, Exeter Trust Company since 2021.
Name:	Jill Peeper
Address:	290 Woodcliff Drive Fairport, NY 14450
Born:	1982
Current Position(s) Held with Fund:	Principal Financial Officer and Treasurer
Term of Office2 & Length of Time Served:	Principal Financial Officer and Treasurer since 2024; Assistant Treasurer, 2023-2024
Principal Occupation(s) During Past 5 Years:	Mutual Fund Financial Reporting Manager since 2022 - Manning & Napier Advisors, LLC; Fund Accounting Manager (2007 – 2022) – State Street Bank.
Name:	Sarah Turner
Address:	290 Woodcliff Drive  Fairport, NY 14450
Born:	1982
Current Position(s) Held with Fund:	Chief Legal Officer; Assistant Corporate Secretary
Term of Office2 & Length of Time Served:	Since 2018
Principal Occupation(s) During Past 5 Years:	General Counsel since 2018 - Manning & Napier Advisors, LLC and affiliates; Counsel (2017-2018) – Harter Secrest and Emery LLP
	Holds one or more of the following titles for various affiliates: General Counsel

1

Interested Director, within the meaning of the 1940 Act by reason of his positions with the Fund’s Advisor, Manning & Napier Advisors, LLC, and Distributor, Manning & Napier Investor Services, Inc.

 

2

The term of office of all officers shall be one year and until their respective successors are chosen and qualified, or his or her earlier resignation or removal as provided in the Fund’s By-Laws.

 

Equity Ownership of Directors

 

The following table provides information, as of December 31, 2024, regarding the dollar range of beneficial ownership by each Director (i) in the Series and (ii) on an aggregate basis, in the Manning & Napier family of investment companies, which includes all series of the Fund. Dollar amount ranges disclosed are established by the SEC. “Beneficial ownership” is determined in accordance with Rule 16a-1(a)(2) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “1934 Act”).

 

Name of Directors		Dollar Ranges of Equity Securities in the Series		Aggregate Dollar Range of Equity Securities in All Registered Investment Companies Overseen by Director in Family of Investment Companies
Independent Directors
Paul A. Brooke		None		Between $100,001 and $500,000
Eunice K. Chapon		None		Between $50,001 and $100,000
John M. Glazer		None		Between $100,001 and $500,000
Russell O. Vernon		None		Between $100,001 and $500,000
Chester N. Watson		None		Between $10,001 and $50,000
Interested Director
Paul J. Battaglia		None		Between $100,001 and $500,000

 

 

None of the Independent Directors have any beneficial ownership interest in the Fund’s Advisor, Manning & Napier Advisors, LLC or its Distributor, Manning & Napier Investor Services, Inc.

 

Board Responsibilities

 

The management and affairs of the Fund and the Series are supervised by the Directors under the laws of the State of Maryland. The Board of Directors is responsible for overseeing the Series and each of the Fund’s additional other series, which are not described in this SAI. The Board has approved contracts, as described herein, under which certain companies provide essential management services to the Fund.

 

As with most mutual funds, the day-to-day business of the Fund, including the management of risk, is performed by third party service providers, such as the Advisor and Distributor. The Directors are responsible for overseeing the Fund’s service providers and, thus, have oversight responsibility with respect to risk management performed by those service providers. Each service provider is responsible for one or more discrete aspects of the Fund’s business (e.g., the Advisor is responsible for the day-to-day management of the Fund’s portfolio investments) and, consequently, for managing the risks associated with that business.

 

The Directors’ role in risk oversight begins before the inception of the Series, at which time the Advisor presents the Board with information concerning the investment objectives, strategies and risks of the Series as well as proposed investment limitations for the Series. Additionally, the Advisor provides the Board with an overview of, among other things, its investment philosophy, brokerage practices and compliance infrastructure. Thereafter, the Board continues its oversight function with respect to the Fund by monitoring risks identified during regular and special reports made to the Board, as well as regular and special reports made to the Audit Committee. In addition to monitoring such risks, the Board and the Audit Committee oversee efforts by management and service providers to manage risks to which the Fund may be exposed.

 

The Board is responsible for overseeing the nature, extent and quality of the services provided to the Fund by the Advisor and receives information about those services at its regular meetings. In addition, on an annual basis, in connection with its consideration of whether to renew the Advisory Agreement with the Advisor, the Board meets with the Advisor to review such services. Among other things, the Board regularly considers the Advisor’s adherence to the Series’ investment restrictions and compliance with various Fund policies and procedures and with applicable securities regulations. The Board also reviews information about the Series’ investments, including, for example, portfolio holdings schedules and reports on the Advisor’s use of derivatives and illiquid securities in managing the Series.

 

The Board meets regularly with the Fund’s CCO to review and discuss compliance issues and Fund and Advisor risk assessments. At least annually, the Fund’s CCO provides the Board with an assessment of the Fund’s Compliance Program reviewing the adequacy and effectiveness of the Fund’s policies and procedures and those of its service providers, including the Advisor. The assessment addresses the operation of the policies and procedures of the Fund and each service provider since the date of the last report; any material changes to the policies and procedures since the date of the last report; any recommendations for material changes to the policies and procedures; and any material compliance matters since the date of the last report.

 

 

The Board directly, or through one or more of its Committees, receives reports from the Fund’s service providers that assist the Board in identifying and understanding operational risks and risks related to the valuation and liquidity of portfolio securities. The Advisor makes regular reports to the Board concerning investments for which market quotations are not readily available. Annually, the independent registered public accounting firm reviews with the Audit Committee its audit of the Fund’s financial statements, focusing on major areas of risk encountered by the Fund and noting any significant deficiencies or material weaknesses in the Fund’s internal controls. Additionally, in connection with its oversight function, the Board (through its Audit Committee) oversees Fund management’s implementation of disclosure controls and procedures, which are designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed by the Fund in its periodic reports with the SEC is recorded, processed, summarized, and reported within the required time periods, and the Fund’s internal controls over financial reporting, which comprise policies and procedures designed to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of the Fund’s financial reporting and the preparation of the Fund’s financial statements.

 

From their review of these reports and discussions with the Advisor, the CCO, the independent registered public accounting firm and other service providers, the Board and the Audit Committee learn in detail about the material risks of the Fund and the Series, thereby facilitating a dialogue about how management and service providers identify and mitigate those risks.

 

The Chair of the Board, Paul J. Battaglia, is an interested person of the Fund as that term is defined in the 1940 Act. Paul A. Brooke serves as the Lead Independent Director. In his role as Lead Independent Director, Mr. Brooke, among other things: (i) presides over Board meetings in the absence of the Chair of the Board; (ii) presides over executive sessions of the Independent Directors; (iii) along with the Chair of the Board, oversees the development of agendas for Board meetings; (iv) facilitates communication between the Independent Directors and Fund management, and among the Independent Directors; (v) serves as a key point person for dealings between the Independent Directors and Fund management; and (vi) has such other responsibilities as the Board or Independent Directors determine from time to time.

 

The Fund has determined its leadership structure is appropriate given the specific characteristics and circumstances of the Fund. The Fund made this determination in consideration of, among other things, the fact that the Directors who are not interested persons of the Fund (i.e., “Independent Directors”) constitute a super-majority (at least 75%) of the Board, the fact that the members of each Committee of the Board are Independent Directors, the amount of assets under management in the Fund, the number of Series (and classes of shares) overseen by the Board, and the total number of Directors on the Board. The Board also believes that its leadership structure facilitates the orderly and efficient flow of information to the Independent Directors from Fund management.

 

However, a Director must retire from the Board by the end of the calendar year in which the Director turns 82 provided that the Board may, if it deems doing so to be consistent with the best interest of the Fund, and with the consent of any Director that is eligible for retirement, by unanimous vote of the Governance Committee and majority vote of the full Board, extend the term of such Director for successive periods of one year.

 

Individual Director Qualifications

 

The Fund has concluded that each of the Directors should serve on the Board because of their ability to review and understand information about the Series provided to them by management, to identify and request other information they may deem relevant to the performance of their duties, to question management and other service providers regarding material factors bearing on the management and administration of the Series, and to exercise their business judgment in a manner that serves the best interests of the Fund’s shareholders. The Fund has concluded that each of the Directors should serve as a Director based on their own experience, qualifications, attributes and skills as described below.

 

The Fund has concluded that Paul J. Battaglia should serve as Director because of his knowledge of and experience in the financial services industry, and the knowledge and experience he has gained from serving in various executive and management positions with the Advisor since 2004. Mr. Battaglia has over 20 years of experience in strategic and fiscal planning and budgeting, financial reporting, and investor relations.

 

The Fund has concluded that Paul A. Brooke should serve as Director because of the business experience he has gained in a variety of roles with different financial and health care related businesses. Mr. Brooke has served as Chairman and CEO of Ithaka Acquisition Corp., and following its merger with a medical device company, the Alsius Corporation, Mr. Brooke served as Chairman. As a Partner of Morgan Stanley, Mr. Brooke was responsible for global research and health care strategy. Mr. Brooke was also responsible for health care investments at Tiger Management, LLC and serves as the Managing Member for a private investment firm, PMSV Holdings, LLC. In addition, Mr. Brooke was a Founder and Managing Partner of VenBio, an investment firm focused on biotechnology. The Fund has also concluded that Mr. Brooke should serve as a Director because of his knowledge of the financial services industry, and the experience he has gained serving as Director of the Fund since 2007.

 

 

The Fund has concluded that Eunice K. Chapon should serve as Director because of the financial services, investment management and governance experience she has gained working with start-up, private and public companies, and fund boards. Ms. Chapon currently serves as the Director of Impact, at BrightEdge, LLC of the American Cancer Society, after previously serving as the Director of Operations and Business Development. Prior to this, Ms. Chapon served as Chief Operating Officer and General Counsel for an ESG start-up venture. She also held senior legal roles at various prominent financial institutions, including Natixis, Bank of America/Merrill Lynch and State Street, working with domestic and offshore mutual funds and ETFs. Ms. Chapon has significant international business experience from working in Europe and advising on cross-border transactions and business arrangements. Beginning her legal career at Choate, Hall & Stewart LLP, Ms. Chapon became a partner while representing clients in a wide range of securities and financing transactions as well as corporate and governance matters. She has successfully guided companies and boards through expansion and growth opportunities as well as market crises and disruptions.

 

The Fund has concluded that John M. Glazer should serve as Director because of the experience he has gained in his more than 30 years of professional experience with asset allocation, investment strategy, financial strategy and corporate transactions. Mr. Glazer currently serves as the Chief Executive Officer of Ford Estates, a Detroit-based single-family office. He is responsible for oversight of functions that range from investment management to estate planning and other services. Prior to this, Mr. Glazer served as the CEO of another single-family office in New York, Head of Private Investments for an international family office in Dubai, and as Chief Financial Officer and Executive Vice President of Corporate Development for a digital marketing firm. Earlier in his career, he spent 15 years as an investment principal for two private equity firms. Mr. Glazer has served on many Boards of Directors and has extensive experience working closely with management teams on strategy, acquisitions and financing.

 

The Fund has concluded that Russell O. Vernon should serve as Director because of the experience he has gained in his forty years of helping financial companies grow and adjust to changing conditions. Mr. Vernon formerly served as the founder and General Partner of BVM Capital and President of Commerce Capital Markets, Inc. Mr. Vernon also previously served as the Chief Operating Officer at Barrett Associates, Inc., a money management firm, and as the Director of Investment Operations at Warburg Pincus Asset Management and Chancellor Capital Management. In those roles, Mr. Vernon was directly responsible for building a state-of-the-art infrastructure to support all client, business, product development and growth needs. He also served on numerous management and operating committees. Additionally, Mr. Vernon served as a Senior Manager at Deloitte & Touche, where his consulting practice focused on management, M&A, financial service and due diligence engagements and issues.

 

The Fund has concluded that Chester N. Watson should serve as Director because of the business experience he has gained as the Chief Audit Executive of General Motors Company, Lucent Technologies, and Verizon Communications (formerly Bell Atlantic Corporation) and as an Audit Partner in two major accounting firms, as well as his experience as a member of the Board of Trustees of Rochester Institute of Technology, where he serves on the Audit Committee. The Fund has also concluded that Mr. Watson should serve as a Director because of his knowledge of the financial services industry, and the experience he has gained serving as Director of the Fund since 2012.

 

In its periodic assessment of the effectiveness of the Board, the Board considers the complementary individual skills and experience of the individual Directors primarily in the broader context of the Board’s overall composition so that the Board, as a body, possesses the appropriate (and appropriately diverse) skills and experience to oversee the business of the Fund. Moreover, references to the qualifications, attributes and skills of Directors are pursuant to requirements of the SEC, do not constitute holding out of the Board or any Director as having any special expertise or experience, and shall not be deemed to impose any greater responsibility or liability on any such person or on the Board by reason thereof.

 

Board Committees

 

There are two Committees of the Fund’s Board of Directors: the Audit Committee and the Governance and Nominating Committee.

 

 

The Audit Committee is comprised of the following Independent Directors: Paul A. Brooke, Eunice K. Chapon, John M. Glazer, Russell O. Vernon and Chester N. Watson (Chairman). The Audit Committee meets twice annually, and, if necessary, more frequently. The Audit Committee met twice during the last fiscal year. The Audit Committee reviews the financial reporting process, the system of internal control, the audit process, and the Fund’s process for monitoring compliance with investment restrictions and applicable laws and regulations. All of the members of the Audit Committee have been determined by the Board to be audit committee financial experts, as defined by the SEC. The designation of a person as an audit committee financial expert does not impose on such person any duties, obligations, or liability that are greater than the duties, obligations, and liability imposed on such person as a member of the Audit Committee and Board in the absence of such designation.

 

The Governance and Nominating Committee is comprised of the following Independent Directors: Paul A. Brooke, Eunice K. Chapon, John M. Glazer, Russell O. Vernon (Chairman) and Chester N. Watson. The Governance and Nominating Committee meets on an annual basis, and, if necessary, more frequently. The Governance and Nominating Committee met twice during the last fiscal year. The Governance and Nominating Committee evaluates candidates’ qualifications for Board membership and the independence of such candidates from the Advisor and other principal service providers for the Fund; makes recommendations to the full Board for nomination for membership on any committees of the Board; reviews as necessary the responsibilities of any committees of the Board and whether there is a continuing need for each committee; evaluates whether there is a need for additional committees of the Board; evaluates whether committees should be combined or reorganized; and reviews the performance of all Board members. The Governance and Nominating Committee’s procedures for the consideration of candidates for Board membership submitted by shareholders are attached as Appendix B.

 

The Interested Director and the officers of the Fund do not receive compensation from the Fund, except that a portion of the Fund’s CCO’s salary is paid by the Fund. Each Independent Director receives an annual fee of $80,000. Annual fees will be calculated quarterly. Each Independent Director receives $10,000 per regular Board meeting attended, and $3,000 per special or other Board meeting attended. In addition, the Independent Directors who are members of the Audit Committee receive $5,000 per Committee meeting attended, and the Independent Directors who are members of the Governance and Nominating Committee receive $5,000 per Committee meeting attended. Mr. Watson receives an additional fee of $5,000 per Audit Committee meeting for serving as Audit Committee Chairman. Mr. Vernon receives an additional fee of $3,000 per Governance and Nominating Committee meeting for serving as Governance and Nominating Committee Chairman. Mr. Brooke receives an additional fee of $30,000 for serving as Lead Independent Director.

 

Compensation Table for Fiscal Year Ended December 31, 2024

 

The following table sets forth information regarding the anticipated total compensation payable by the Fund during the Series’ fiscal year ending December 31, 2024 to the following persons.

 

Name		Position with Registrant		Aggregate Compensation from Fund		Pension		Estimated Benefits upon Retirement		Total Compensation from Fund and Fund Complex*
Samantha Larew		CCO		$124,300		N/A		N/A		$124,300
Eunice K. Chapon		Director		$160,000		N/A		N/A		$160,000
John M. Glazer		Director		$160,000		N/A		N/A		$160,000
Paul A. Brooke		Director		$190,000		N/A		N/A		$190,000
Russell O. Vernon		Director, Governance and Nominating Committee Chair		$166,000		N/A		N/A		$166,000
Chester N. Watson		Director, Audit Committee Chair		$175,000		N/A		N/A		$175,000

 

^* As of December 31, 2024, the Fund Complex consisted of 14 Series.

 

As of June 1, 2025, the directors and officers of the Fund, as a group, owned less than 1% of the Fund.

 

 

Code of Ethics

 

The Fund, the Advisor and the Fund’s principal underwriter have adopted a Code of Ethics (the “Code of Ethics”) pursuant to Rule 17j-1 under the 1940 Act. The Code of Ethics is designed to detect and prevent improper personal trading. The Code of Ethics permits personnel subject to the Code of Ethics to invest in securities, including securities that may be purchased or held by the Fund, subject to a number of restrictions and controls. A copy of the Code of Ethics is on file with the SEC, and is available to the public.

 

Proxy Voting Policy

 

The Board of Directors has delegated proxy voting responsibilities with respect to securities held by the Series to the Advisor, subject to the Board’s general oversight. Proxies will be voted in accordance with the proxy voting policies and procedures attached to this SAI as Appendix C. The proxy voting policies and procedures may be changed as necessary to remain current with regulatory requirements and internal policies and procedures. 

 

The Fund is required to disclose annually the Fund’s complete proxy voting record on Form N-PX. The Fund’s proxy voting record for the most recent 12-month period ended June 30 will be available upon request by calling 1-800-466-3863, by writing to the Fund at Manning & Napier Fund, Inc., P.O. Box 805, Fairport, NY 14450, or on the Fund’s website at www.manning-napier.com. The Fund’s Form N-PX is also available on the SEC’s website at www.sec.gov.

 

Principal Owners and Control Persons

 

As of the date of this SAI, no persons or entities owned, of record or beneficially, more than 5% of the Series’ shares.

 

The Advisor

 

Manning & Napier Advisors, LLC (“MNA” or the “Advisor”), acts as the Fund’s investment advisor. MNA is indirectly owned and controlled by Callodine MN Holdings, Inc., which, in turn, is controlled by Callodine Group, LLC (“Callodine Group”) and its founder James Morrow. East Asset Management, LLC, and its owners Terrence and Kim Pegula, also indirectly hold a substantial interest in Callodine MN Holdings, Inc. Under the Investment Advisory Agreement (the “Advisory Agreement”) between the Fund, on behalf of the Series, and the Advisor, the Advisor is generally responsible for supervision of the overall business affairs of the Fund including supervision of service providers to the Fund and direction of the Advisor’s directors, officers or employees who may be elected as officers of the Fund to serve as such.

 

The Fund pays the Advisor for the services performed a fee at the annual rate of: 0.35% of the Series’ average daily net assets. As described below, the Advisor is separately compensated for acting as the Fund’s accounting services agent and providing administration services to the Series.

 

After its initial two year term, the continuance of the Advisory Agreement must be specifically approved at least annually: (i) by the vote of a majority of the outstanding shares of the Series or by the Directors; and (ii) by the vote of a majority of the Directors who are not parties to such Agreement or “interested persons” (as defined under the 1940 Act) of any party thereto, at a meeting called for the purpose of voting on such approval. The Advisory Agreement will terminate automatically in the event of its “assignment” (as defined under the 1940 Act) and is terminable at any time without penalty by the Directors or by a majority of the outstanding shares of the Series on 60 days’ written notice to the Advisor, or by the Advisor on 60 days’ written notice to the Series.

 

Pursuant to a separate management fee waiver agreement, the Advisor has contractually agreed to waive the Series’ management fee with respect to Class W shares. In addition, pursuant to a separate expense limitation agreement, the Advisor has contractually agreed to limit each class’s total direct annual operating expenses (exclusive of Distribution and Service (Rule 12b-1 Fees) and Class W management fees (collectively, “excluded expenses”)), as shown below. These contractual waivers will continue indefinitely, and may only be amended or terminated with the approval of the Series’ Board of Directors. The Advisor’s agreement to limit the Series’ operating expenses is limited to direct operating expenses and, therefore, does not apply to the indirect expenses incurred by the Series through its investments in underlying funds or other investment companies. 

 

 

The Advisor may receive from a class the difference between the class’s total direct annual operating expenses (not including excluded expenses) and the class’s contractual expense limit to recoup all or a portion of its prior fee waivers or expense reimbursements made during the rolling three-year period preceding the recoupment if at any point the total direct annual operating expenses (not including excluded expenses), are below the contractual expense limit (i) at the time of the fee waiver and/or expense reimbursement and (ii) at the time of the recoupment.

 

Series		Contractual Expense Limitation
Class I		0.60%
Class S		0.60%
Class Z		0.45%
Class W		0.10%

 

The Advisor serves as the Fund’s accounting services agent and provides administration services to the Fund and its series. The Advisor has contracted with BNY Mellon Investment Servicing (US) Inc. (“BNY Mellon”), 118 Flanders Road, Westborough, MA 01581, to provide sub-accounting and sub-administration services to the Series.

 

Pursuant to a Master Services Agreement, the Fund pays the Advisor an annual fee related to fund accounting and administration services in the following amounts: 0.0085% on the first $25 billion of average daily net assets; 0.0075% on the next $15 billion of average daily net assets; and 0.0065% of average daily net assets in excess of $40 billion; plus a base fee of $18,400 per Series. Additionally, certain transaction and out-of-pocket expenses, including charges for reporting relating to the Fund’s compliance program, are charged to the Fund.

 

The Advisor and its affiliates may use the Series within discretionary investment accounts. From time to time, these discretionary accounts may hold a substantial portion of the outstanding shares of the Series, and transactions in shares of the Series for such accounts may have an impact upon the size and operations of the Series. For instance, transactions in shares of the Series for these accounts may cause the Series’ portfolio turnover rate and transaction costs to rise, which may negatively affect fund performance and increase the likelihood of capital gain distributions. In addition, the Series’ assets may be significantly less during times when these discretionary accounts are not invested in the Series, which would cause the Series’ remaining shareholders to bear greater portions of the Series’ fixed operating expenses, subject to any fee waiver then in effect.

 

The Distributor

 

Manning & Napier Investor Services, Inc. (the “Distributor”), an affiliate of the Advisor, acts as Distributor of Fund shares and is located at the same address as the Advisor and the Fund. The Distributor and the Fund are parties to a distribution agreement (the “Distribution Agreement”) which applies to each class of shares of the Fund.

 

The Distribution Agreement is renewable annually. The continuation of the Distribution Agreement must be specifically approved by the Board of Directors and separately by the Directors who are not parties to the Distribution Agreement or “interested persons” (as defined under the 1940 Act) of any party to the Distribution Agreement.

 

The Distributor will not receive compensation for distribution of Class I, Class W or Z shares of the Series.

 

Payments to Broker-Dealers and Other Financial Intermediaries

 

Rule 12b-1 Plan

 

The Fund’s Board of Directors has adopted a Distribution and Shareholder Services Plan pursuant to Rule 12b-1 under the 1940 Act (the “Rule 12b-1 Plan”) whereby Class S shares of the Series (a “Rule 12b-1 Plan Class”) are subject to an annual distribution and shareholder services fee (a “Rule 12b-1 Fee”) as shown below.

 

The Rule 12b-1 Fee is calculated on the average daily net assets of the applicable Rule 12b-1 Plan Class. The Rule 12b-1 Fee is intended to compensate the Distributor for services and expenses primarily intended to result in the sale of a Rule 12b-1 Plan Class and/or in connection with the provision of direct client service, personal services, maintenance of shareholder accounts and reporting services to holders of a Rule 12b-1 Plan Class.

 

Class		Rule 12b-1 Fee
Class S			0.25	%

 

The Rule 12b-1 Plan has been adopted in accordance with the provisions of Rule 12b-1 under the 1940 Act, which regulates circumstances under which an investment company may directly or indirectly bear expenses relating to the distribution of its shares. The Rule 12b-1 Plan shall continue in effect for a Rule 12b-1 Plan Class for so long as its continuance is specifically approved at least annually by votes of the majority of both (i) the Directors of the Fund and (ii) those Directors of the Fund who are not “interested persons” (as defined under the 1940 Act) of the Fund, and have no direct or indirect financial interest in the operation of the Rule 12b-1 Plan or any agreements related to it (referred to as the “Qualified Directors”) at a Board of Directors meeting called for the purpose of voting on the Rule 12b-1 Plan. The Rule 12b-1 Plan requires that quarterly written reports of amounts spent under the Rule 12b-1 Plan and the purposes of such expenditures be furnished to and reviewed by the Directors. With respect to a Rule 12b-1 Plan Class, the Rule 12b-1 Plan may not be amended to increase materially the amount of distribution expenses permitted to be paid under the Rule 12b-1 Plan for the Rule 12b-1 Plan Class without the approval of shareholders holding a majority of the outstanding voting securities of the Rule 12b-1 Plan Class. All material amendments to a Rule 12b-1 Plan must be approved by votes of the majority of both (i) the Directors of the Fund and (ii) the Qualified Directors.

 

 

Pursuant to the Rule 12b-1 Plan, the Rule 12b-1 Plan Class is subject to an annual Rule 12b-1 Fee as shown in the chart above.

 

With respect to amounts paid under the Rule 12b-1 Plan for distribution services, the Distributor may use this fee on any activities or expenses primarily intended to result in the sale of shares of the Rule 12b-1 Plan Class, including, but not limited to, (i) as compensation for the Distributor’s services in connection with distribution assistance; or (ii) as a source of payments to financial institutions and intermediaries such as banks, savings and loan associations, insurance companies and investment counselors, broker-dealers, mutual fund supermarkets and the Distributor’s affiliates and subsidiaries as compensation for services or reimbursement of expenses incurred in connection with distribution assistance.

 

With respect to shareholder services, the Distributor may use payments under this aspect of the Rule 12b-1 Plan to provide or enter into agreements with organizations, including affiliates of the Distributor (referred to as “Service Organizations”), who will provide certain shareholder, administrative and non-distribution services for shareholders of the Rule 12b-1 Plan Class, including, but not limited to: (i) maintaining accounts relating to shareholders that invest in shares of a Rule 12b-1 Plan Class; (ii)  responding to shareholder inquiries relating to the services performed by Distributor and/or Service Organizations; (iii) responding to inquiries from shareholders concerning their investment in shares of the Rule 12b-1 Plan Class; (iv) assisting shareholders in changing dividend options, account designations and addresses; (v) providing information periodically to shareholders showing their position in shares of the Rule 12b-1 Plan Class; (vi) forwarding shareholder communications from the Fund such as proxies, shareholder reports, annual reports, and dividend distribution and tax notices to shareholders; (vii) processing purchase, exchange and redemption requests from shareholders and placing orders with the Fund or its service providers; (viii) arranging for bank wires; (ix) processing dividend payments from the Fund on behalf of shareholders; (x) preparing tax reports; (xi) providing sub-accounting services; and (xii) providing such other similar non-distribution services as the Fund or Distributor may reasonably request to the extent that the Service Organization is permitted to do so under applicable laws or regulations. The Distributor may also use this fee for payments to financial institutions and intermediaries such as banks, savings and loan associations, insurance companies and investment counselors, broker-dealers, mutual fund supermarkets and the Distributor and/or Service Organizations’ affiliates and subsidiaries as compensation for such services.

 

Generally, the Rule 12b-1 Fee paid under the Rule 12b-1 Plan will not be retained by the Distributor but will instead be reallowed to various financial intermediaries and Service Organizations that enter into distribution and/or shareholder servicing agreements with the Distributor. The Rule 12b-1 Plan and class structure of the Fund permit the Fund to allocate an amount of fees to a financial intermediary or Service Organization based on the level of distribution and/or shareholder services it agrees to provide. The Distributor is free to make additional payments out of its own assets to promote the sale of Fund shares.

 

Payments under the Rule 12b-1 Plan are made as described above regardless of the Distributor’s actual cost of providing the services and may be used to pay the Distributor’s overhead expenses. If the cost of providing the services under the Rule 12b-1 Plan is less than the payments received, the unexpended portion of the fees may be retained as profit by the Distributor.  

 

Other Payments by the Fund

 

The Fund may enter into agreements with financial intermediaries pursuant to which the Fund may pay financial intermediaries for non-distribution related sub-transfer agency, administrative, sub-accounting, and other shareholder services in an annual amount not to exceed 0.15% of the average daily net assets of the Class I and Class S shares of the Series. Payments made pursuant to such agreements are generally based on the current assets and/or number of accounts of the Series attributable to the financial intermediary. Any payments made pursuant to such agreements may be in addition to, rather than in lieu of, any Rule 12b-1 Fee payable under the Rule 12b-1 Plan of the Fund.

 

 

Payments by the Advisor and/or its Affiliates

 

The Advisor may use its own resources to engage in activities that may promote the sale of the Series’ shares, including payments, or other forms of incentives such as discounted fees for products or services of affiliates, to third parties who provide services such as shareholder servicing, marketing support, and distribution assistance to the Series. These fees or other incentives are in addition to any payments made to financial intermediaries by the Fund. The level of payments made to financial intermediaries may be a fixed fee or based upon one or more of the following factors: gross sales, current assets and/or number of accounts of the Series attributable to the financial intermediary, the particular type of Series, or other measures as agreed to in writing by the Advisor, the Distributor and/or their affiliates and the financial intermediaries or any combination thereof. The amount of these payments is determined at the discretion of the Advisor, the Distributor and/or their affiliates from time to time and may be different for different financial intermediaries based on, for example, the nature of the services provided by the financial intermediary.

 

The Distributor may from time to time and from its own resources pay or allow additional discounts or promotional incentives in the form of cash or other compensation (including merchandise or travel) to financial intermediaries and it is free to make additional payments out of its own assets to promote the sale of Fund shares. The Advisor may also, from its own resources, defray or absorb costs relating to distribution, including compensation of employees who are involved in distribution. These payments or discounts may be substantial but are paid or discounted by the Advisor or its affiliates, not by the Series or their shareholders. Such payments may provide an incentive for the financial intermediary to make shares of the Series available to its customers and may allow the Series greater access to the financial intermediary’s customers, and may create a conflict of interest by influencing the financial intermediary to recommend the Series over another investment.

 

Transfer Agent, Dividend Disbursing Agent, Custodian, Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm, and Counsel

 

The transfer agent and dividend disbursing agent for the Fund is BNY Mellon. Transfer agent fees are charged to the Fund on a per account basis.

 

The custodian for the Fund is The Bank of New York Mellon (the “Custodian”), 135 Santilli Highway, Everett, MA 02149. The Custodian holds cash, securities, and other assets of the Fund as required by the 1940 Act. The Custodian may, at its own expense, employ one or more sub-custodians on behalf of the Fund, provided that it shall remain liable for all its duties as custodian. The foreign sub-custodians will act as custodian for the foreign securities held by the Fund.

 

PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP (“PwC”), with offices at 300 Madison Avenue, New York, NY 10017, serves as the independent registered public accounting firm for the Series. In addition to providing audit services, PwC assists in the preparation and review of, and signs as paid preparer, the Series’ federal and New York State tax returns and provides assistance on certain non-audit matters.

 

Morgan, Lewis & Bockius LLP, 2222 Market Street, Philadelphia, PA 19103, serves as legal counsel to the Fund.

 

Paul Hastings LLP, 101 California Street, 48^th Floor, San Francisco, CA 94111, serves as legal counsel to the Independent Directors.

 

Purchases and Redemptions

 

Check Acceptance Policy. The Fund reserves the right to reject certain forms of payment for share purchases. The Fund maintains a check acceptance policy for share purchases. Checks must be made payable to the Manning & Napier Fund, Inc. and must be in U.S. dollars. The Fund will not accept cash, third party checks, starter checks, travelers checks, credit card checks, or money orders. Investments that are received in an unacceptable form will be returned.

 

 

Investors Outside the U.S. The Fund does not generally accept investments by non-U.S. persons or U.S. persons living outside the U.S. Investments from U.S. persons living outside the U.S. may be accepted if the U.S. person maintains a physical address within the U.S. or utilizes an APO or similar address. Non-U.S. persons may be permitted to invest under certain limited circumstances.

 

Payment for shares redeemed. Payment for shares presented for redemption may be delayed more than seven days only for (1) any period (a) during which the NYSE is closed other than customary weekend and holiday closings or (b) during which the SEC determines that trading on the NYSE is restricted; (2) for any period during which the SEC determines that an emergency exists as a result of which (a) disposal by the Fund of securities owned by it is not reasonably practicable or (b) it is not reasonably practicable for the Fund to determine the value of its net assets; or (3) for such other periods as the SEC may by order permit.

 

The Fund may make payment for shares redeemed in part by giving you portfolio securities. As a redeeming shareholder, you will pay transaction costs to dispose of these securities. In addition, you will continue to be subject to the risks of any market fluctuation in the value of the securities until they are sold. An in-kind distribution of portfolio securities could include illiquid securities. Illiquid securities may not be able to be sold quickly or at a price that reflects full value, or there may not be a market for such securities, which could cause you to realize losses on the security if the security is sold at a price lower than that at which it had been valued.

 

The Fund has made an election pursuant to Rule 18f-1 under the 1940 Act committing itself to pay in cash all requests for redemption by any shareholder of record of the Series, limited in amount with respect to each shareholder during any 90-day period to the lesser of (1) $250,000 or (2) 1% of the net asset value of the Series at the beginning of such period.

 

Other Information about Purchases and Redemptions. The Fund has authorized a number of brokers to accept purchase and redemption orders on its behalf, and these brokers are authorized to designate other intermediaries to accept purchase and redemption orders on the Fund’s behalf. Orders placed with an authorized financial intermediary will be processed at the share price of the Series next computed after they are received in good order by the financial intermediary or its designee. Accordingly, for you to receive the current business day’s share price, your order must be received by an authorized financial intermediary or its designee in good order before the close of regular trading on the NYSE. Your financial intermediary is responsible for transmitting requests and delivering funds to the Series on a timely basis.

 

Portfolio Manager

 

This section includes information about the Series’ Portfolio Management Team, including information about how each member is compensated, and other accounts they manage. The share ownership information is current as of March 31, 2025.

 

Name and Title				Dollar Range of Equity Securities Beneficially Owned by the Portfolio Manager in the Series covered by this SAI*		Aggregate Dollar Range of Equity Securities  Beneficially Owned By the Portfolio Manager in All  Manning & Napier Fund Series*
Marc Bushallow, CFA, Managing Director of Fixed Income				None		Over $1,000,001
Scott Friedman, CFA, Senior Analyst				None		Between $50,001 and $100,000

 

 

^* Dollar ranges do not reflect interests owned by a Portfolio Manager in collective investment trust funds managed by the Advisor, which may have investment objectives, policies and strategies substantially similar to those of a series of the Fund.

 

Compensation

 

The portfolio managers of the Series are compensated by the Advisor. The Advisor’s portfolio manager compensation system includes a base salary and a bonus. The bonus system has been established to provide a strong incentive for portfolio managers to make investment decisions in the best interest of clients. Bonuses may be several times the level of base salary for successful portfolio managers.

 

Portfolio managers are assigned a competitive target bonus, which has both qualitative and quantitative components. The quantitative portion of the bonus calculation increases or decreases based on the relative performance of the portfolio manager’s overall portfolio over 12-, 36- and 60- month time periods. The aggregate bonus calculation could result in a zero or positive bonus.

 

Portfolio managers may also receive awards under the Manning & Napier P-Share Plan. Recipients who receive an award under this plan will receive P-Shares, which are notional interests, that will entitle the recipient, upon vesting of the award, to have an opportunity to receive a cash bonus that is determined based on the profits of Callodine MN Holdings, Inc., Manning & Napier’s parent company, over the course of the applicable performance period for such award.

 

Management of Other Portfolios. The following table provides information about other portfolios managed by members of the Series’ Portfolio Management Team. The information provided is current as of March 31, 2025. The information below excludes the Series.

 

	Registered Investment Companies			Other Pooled Investment Vehicles			Other Accounts
Name	Number  of Accts		Total Assets*	Number  of Accts		Total Assets	Number  of Accts		Total Assets
Marc Bushallow	4	$	1,731,852,801	4	$	862,766,329	3,585 **	$	9,635,567,180
Scott Friedman	1	$	1,419,326,929	0		0	5**	$	564,387,324

 

* At times assets of the Other Accounts in column 3 may be invested in series of the Fund.
^** Includes 2 accounts with total assets under management of $589,465,546 that are subject to a performance-based advisory fee.

 

Management of Conflicts of Interest

 

The Advisor's management of other accounts may give rise to potential conflicts of interest in connection with its management of the Series' investments, on the one hand, and the investments of the other accounts, on the other. The Advisor may, for example, have an incentive to favor accounts with higher fees or performance-based fees in the allocation of investment opportunities. However, the Advisor has established policies and procedures to ensure that the purchase and sale of securities among all accounts it manages are fairly and equitably allocated.

 

For the Fund, other pooled investment vehicles, and Other Accounts that have authorized it to do so, the Advisor trades equities, futures and most fixed income investments on an aggregate basis to improve execution efficiency and minimize associated costs. Order management systems automatically allocate aggregated orders according to pre-trade determinations using a random or pro-rata based methodology. Each account that participates in an aggregated order will participate at the average security price with all transaction costs shared on a pro-rata basis.

 

 

The Advisor’s trading function for equities and certain fixed income investments is separate from its research function. The individuals who recommend and approve trades are not the same individuals who execute trades. For equities and most fixed income securities, traders exercise individual discretion in order to get the best possible execution on trades, but guidelines as to security, position size, and price are set by the analysts recommending the security. Proprietary and third-party reporting systems monitor implementation of trading programs across the account base. For certain fixed income trades, however, the trading and research functions overlap. This means that Fixed Income Analysts select and execute trades in certain bonds, primarily securitized debt, within these portfolios.

 

To remove the incentive for unauthorized trading and speculation in client accounts, members of the Trading Department are not compensated for profits generated, since the Research Department issues the investment directives and members of the Trading Department merely implement them. In addition, the compensation program for Research and Fixed Income Analysts, including those analysts that execute trades, is based on the returns of the particular security recommended or overall investment approach, rather than on the performance of any individual account.

 

For certain fixed income investments, the Series’ Portfolio Management Team identifies the securities to be purchased and a member of the team executes the trades. The team members do not execute trades in the types of securities held in the Series’ portfolios for other accounts managed by the Advisor. Rather, when similar fixed income securities are to be purchased for such other accounts, traders exercise individual discretion in order to get the Advisor’s clients the best possible execution on trades, but strict guidelines as to security, position size, and price are set by the analysts recommending the security. With respect to any account of the Advisor not receiving a full allocation of a primary market issuance, the Advisor may purchase more bonds on behalf of such account in the secondary market. In such case, the purchase price of such bonds will likely be different than that of the initial issue.

 

Portfolio Transactions and Brokerage

 

In connection with the Advisor’s duty to arrange for the purchase and sale of securities held in the Series’ portfolios, the Advisor shall select the broker-dealers that, in the Advisor’s judgement, implement the Fund’s policy to achieve best execution. The Fund defines best execution as the prompt and efficient execution of securities trades at the most favorable price under the circumstances.

 

In directing trades to a given broker, the Advisor will consider the reliability, integrity and financial condition of the broker, the size and difficulty of executing the order and the value of the expected contribution of the broker to the investment performance of the Series on a continuing basis.

 

The Advisor also considers whether a broker provides brokerage and/or research services to the Fund and/or other accounts of the Advisor and may allocate orders for the Series to those brokers that provide such benefits. Such allocations shall be in such amounts and proportions as the Advisor shall determine, and the Advisor shall report on such allocations regularly to the Fund.

 

Examples of research services for which the Advisor deploys the Fund’s commission dollars include research reports and other information on the economy, industries, sectors, groups of securities, individual companies, statistical information, political developments, technical market action, pricing and appraisal services, credit analysis, risk measurement analysis, performance and other analysis. The research which the Advisor receives for the Series’ brokerage commissions, whether or not useful to the Fund, may be useful to the Advisor in managing the accounts of the Advisor’s other advisory clients. Similarly, the research received for the commissions of such accounts may be useful to the Fund.

 

Commissions paid to such brokers may be higher than another broker would have charged if a good faith determination is made by the Advisor that the commission is reasonable in relation to the services provided, viewed in terms of either that particular transaction or the Advisor’s holistic experience with that broker for transactions executed across the Advisor’s client base.

 

A portion of the Fund’s portfolio transactions may be transacted with primary market makers acting as principal on a net basis, with no brokerage commissions being paid by the Series. Such principal transactions may, however, result in a profit to market makers. In certain instances the Advisor may make purchases of underwritten issues for the Series at prices which include underwriting fees.

 

The Fund will direct futures trades to one or more Futures Commissions Merchants (“FCMs”), as selected by the Advisor.

 

 

Brokerage Commissions Paid

 

The Series was not active as of the date of this SAI. Accordingly, the Series has not paid any brokerage commissions.

 

Directed Brokerage. The Series was not active as of the date of this SAI. Accordingly, the Series has not paid any commissions to brokers because of research services provided.

 

Regular Broker-Dealers. The Series’ regular broker-dealers are (i) the ten broker-dealers that received the greatest dollar amount of brokerage commissions from the Series; (ii) the ten broker-dealers that engaged as principal in the largest dollar amount of portfolio transactions of the Series; and (iii) the ten broker-dealers that sold the largest dollar amount of Series shares. The Series was not active as of the date of this SAI. Accordingly, the Series has not purchased securities issued by its regular broker-dealers.

 

Net Asset Value

 

The NAV is determined on each day that the NYSE is open for trading. In determining the NAV of the Series’ shares, common stocks that are traded OTC or listed on national securities exchanges other than the NASDAQ National Market System are valued at the last sale price on the exchange on which each stock is principally traded as of the close of the NYSE (generally 4:00 p.m., Eastern time), or, in the absence of recorded sales, at the closing bid prices on such exchanges. Securities listed on the NASDAQ National Market System are valued in accordance with the NASDAQ Official Closing Price. Unlisted securities that are not included in such NASDAQ National Market System are valued at the quoted bid prices in the OTC market. Short-term investments that mature in sixty days or less may be valued at amortized cost, which approximates market value. Futures, and related options on futures, traded on U.S. and foreign exchanges are valued at the exchange settlement price, or if no settlement price is available, at the last sale price as of the close of the exchange on the valuation date. Investments in registered investment companies are valued at their NAV per share on valuation date. All securities initially expressed in foreign currencies will be converted to U.S. dollars using current exchange rates. Short securities positions are accounted for at value, using the same method of valuation described above. Securities and other assets for which market quotations are not readily available or are unreliable, such as in the case of a security value that has been materially affected by events occurring after the relevant market closes, are valued at fair value. The Board has designated the Advisor as the Series’ valuation designee to make all fair value determinations with respected to the Series’ portfolio investments, subject to the Board’s oversight. The Advisor has adopted and implemented policies and procedures to be followed when making fair value determinations, and it has established a Valuation Committee through which the Advisor makes fair value determinations. The Advisor’s determination of a security’s fair value price often involves the consideration of a number of subjective factors, and is therefore subject to the unavoidable risk that the value that is assigned to a security may be higher or lower than the security’s value would be if a reliable market quotation for the security was readily available. The Advisor may use a pricing service to obtain the value of the Fund’s portfolio securities where the prices provided by such pricing service are believed to reflect the fair market value of such securities. The methods used by the pricing service and the valuations so established will be reviewed by the Advisor. Several pricing services are available, one or more of which may be used by the Advisor. A change in a pricing service or a material change in a pricing methodology for investments with no readily available market quotations will be reported to the Fund’s Board by the Advisor in accordance with certain requirements.

 

The foreign securities held by the Series may be listed on foreign exchanges that trade on days when the NYSE is not open and the Series do not price their shares. As a result, the NAV of the Series may change at a time when shareholders are not able to purchase or redeem shares.

 

If trading or events occurring in other markets after the close of the principal market in which securities are traded are expected to materially affect the value of those securities, then they may be valued at their fair value taking this trading or these events into account.

 

Information About Fund Operations

 

The Fund does not expect to hold annual meetings of shareholders, but special meetings of shareholders may be held under certain circumstances. Shareholders of the Fund retain the right, under certain circumstances, to request that a meeting of shareholders be held for the purpose of considering the removal of a Director from office, and if such a request is made, the Fund will assist with shareholder communications in connection with the meeting. The shares of the Fund have equal rights with regard to voting, redemption and liquidations. The Fund’s shareholders will vote in the aggregate and not by Series or class except as otherwise expressly required by law or when the Board of Directors determines that the matter to be voted upon affects only the interests of the shareholders of the Series or a Class. Income, direct liabilities and direct operating expenses of the Series will be allocated directly to the Series, and general liabilities and expenses of the Fund will be allocated among the Series, along with other series of the Fund, in proportion to the total net assets of the Series by the Board of Directors. The holders of shares have no preemptive or conversion rights. Shares when issued are fully paid and non-assessable and do not have cumulative voting rights.

 

 

The Series may participate in class action lawsuits relating to its portfolio securities. The proceeds from the settlements of such lawsuits will generally be recorded as assets of the Series in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles. If the Series is liquidated prior to its recognition of the proceeds of a settlement, however, the proceeds may be donated to charity in the event that the officers of the Series reasonably determine that, after taking into account all fees, costs and expenses reasonably related to the administration and distribution of such proceeds, including, but not limited to, administrative fees, mailing fees, and personnel costs, the amount to be distributed to each applicable shareholder is either zero or a de minimis amount. As part of the Board’s considerations when approving the liquidation and dissolution of a Series of the Fund, the Board may approve the establishment of a liquidating trust for the completion of the liquidation and distribution of a Series’ assets to shareholders. This may be the case when, for example, the Series has assets and liabilities which are contingent in nature that remain on the liquidation date. If the Board establishes a liquidating trust for a Series, the Fund would grant, assign and deliver to the liquidating trust all of the Series’ rights and interests in any assets it currently owns and the liquidating trust would assume all of such Series’ current liabilities and obligations, thereby allowing the Series to fully liquidate and dissolve. The Board would also appoint one or more trustees of the liquidation trust, which may be a Fund officer and/or an employee of the Advisor or an affiliate of the Advisor, to oversee the operations and administration of the trust. The Series’ former shareholders on the liquidation date will be the beneficiaries of the liquidating trust.

 

The liquidating trust will exist solely for the purposes of holding, liquidating and disposing of any assets received by it and paying or settling the liabilities and obligations of the Series. All claims, expenses, charges, liabilities, and obligations of the liquidating trust will be paid out of the trust’s assets. On an interim or annual basis and only to the extent the liquidating trust receives assets that are in excess of its costs, fees and expenses, the trust will distribute those assets on a pro rata basis to the beneficiaries of the trust, provided however, that the liquidating trustee may determine, in the exercise of its reasonable judgment and in good faith, that the pro-rata amount of the assets due to each beneficiary would not be practicable to distribute to the beneficiaries because such amount is either zero or de minimis after taking into account the fees, costs and expenses reasonably related to the administration and distribution of such proceeds, including, but not limited to, administrative fees, mailing fees, and personnel costs. In such instance, such amounts will be distributed to a reputable non-profit charitable organization unaffiliated with the Fund or Adviser.

 

Although the Fund’s use of a liquidating trust for a Series is unique to the facts and circumstances relating to the reasons for which it was created, a liquidating trust would generally have a term of three years from the date upon which it was established. At the conclusion of the liquidating trust’s term, the trust will distribute any remaining assets to the beneficiaries of the trust, subject to the cost considerations discussed above, and the trust would then liquidate. If a Series (or its corresponding liquidating trust) were to receive any assets after the liquidation of the liquidating trust, such assets will be considered to be assets of the Fund generally and will be distributed by the Fund among all currently active series of the Fund on a pro rata basis.

 

Federal Taxes

 

The following is only a summary of certain U.S. federal income tax considerations generally affecting the Series and its shareholders, and is not intended as a substitute for careful tax planning. The summary is very general, and does not address investors subject to special rules, such as investors who hold shares through an individual retirement account (“IRA”), 401(k) or other tax-advantaged account. Shareholders are urged to consult their tax advisers with specific reference to their own tax situations, including their state, local and foreign tax liabilities.

 

The following discussion of certain U.S. federal income tax consequences is based on the Code, and the regulations issued thereunder as in effect on the date of this SAI. New legislation, certain administrative changes, or court decisions may significantly change the conclusions expressed herein, and may have a retroactive effect with respect to the transactions contemplated herein.

 

 

Qualification as a Regulated Investment Company. The Series has elected or intends to elect and to qualify each year to be treated as a RIC under Subchapter M of the Code. As such, the Series expects to be relieved of federal income tax on investment company taxable income and net capital gain (the excess of net long-term capital gain over net short-term capital loss) timely distributed to shareholders.

 

In order to qualify as a RIC the Series must, among other things, (1) derive at least 90% of its gross income each taxable year from dividends, interest, payments with respect to certain securities loans, and gains from the sale or other disposition of stock, securities or foreign currencies, or other income (including, but not limited to, gains from options, futures or forward contracts) derived with respect to its business of investing in such stock, securities or currencies and net income derived from an interest in a qualified publicly traded partnership (the “Qualifying Income Test”); and (2) diversify its holdings so that at the close of each quarter of each taxable year (i) at least 50% of the value of the Series’ total assets is represented by cash and cash items, U.S. Government securities, securities of other RICs, and other securities limited, in respect of any one issuer, to a value not greater than 5% of the value of the Series’ total assets and 10% of the outstanding voting securities of such issuer, including the equity securities of a qualified publicly traded partnership and (ii) not more than 25% of the value of its assets is invested, including through corporations in which the Series owns a 20% or more voting stock interest, in the securities of any one issuer (other than U.S. Government securities or securities of any other RIC) or the securities (other than the securities of other RICs) of two or more issuers that are engaged in the same or similar trades or businesses or related trades or businesses if the Series owns at least 20% of the voting power of each such issuer, or the securities of one or more qualified publicly traded partnerships (the “Asset Test”). These requirements may restrict the degree to which the Series may engage in certain hedging transactions and may limit the range of the Series’ investments. If the Series qualifies as a RIC, it will not be subject to federal income tax on the part of its net investment income and net realized capital gains, if any, which it timely distributes each year to the shareholders, provided the Series distributes at least the sum of (a) 90% of its investment company taxable income (generally, net investment income plus the excess, if any, of net short-term capital gain over net long-term capital loss) and (b) 90% of its net exempt interest income (the excess of (i) its tax-exempt interest income over (ii) certain deductions attributable to that income), if any (the “Distribution Requirement”).

 

If the Series fails to satisfy the Qualifying Income or Asset Test in any taxable year, it may be eligible for relief provisions if the failures are due to reasonable cause and not willful neglect and if a penalty tax is paid with respect to each failure to satisfy the applicable requirements. If these relief provisions are not available to the Series for any year in which it fails to qualify as a RIC, all of its taxable income will be subject to tax at the regular corporate rate (currently 21%) without any deduction for distributions to shareholders, and its distributions (including capital gains distributions) generally will be taxable as ordinary income dividends to its shareholders to the extent of the Series’ current and accumulated earnings and profits, subject to the dividends received deduction for corporate shareholders and lower tax rates on qualified dividend income for individual shareholders. In addition, the Series could be required to recognize unrealized gains, pay substantial taxes and interest, and make substantial distributions before requalifying as a RIC. If the Series determines that it will not qualify for treatment as a RIC, the Fund will establish procedures to reflect the anticipated tax liability in the NAV of the Series. To requalify for treatment as a RIC in a subsequent taxable year, the Series would be required to satisfy the RIC qualification requirements for that year and to distribute any earnings and profits from any year in which the Series failed to qualify for tax treatment as a RIC. If the Series failed to qualify as a RIC for a period greater than two taxable years, it would generally be required to pay the Series-level tax on certain net built-in gains recognized with respect to certain of its assets upon a disposition of such assets within five years of qualifying as a RIC in a subsequent year. The Board reserves the right not to maintain the qualification of the Series for treatment as a RIC if it determines such course of action to be beneficial to shareholders.

 

The Series may elect to treat part or all of any “qualified late year loss” as if it had been incurred in the succeeding taxable year in determining the Series’ taxable income, net capital gain, net short-term capital gain, and earnings and profits. A “qualified late year loss” generally includes net capital loss, net long-term capital loss, or net short-term capital loss incurred after October 31 of the current taxable year (commonly referred to as “post-October losses”) and certain other late-year losses.  

 

The treatment of capital loss carryovers for RICs is similar to the rules that apply to individuals which provide that such losses are carried over by the Series indefinitely. Thus, if the Series has a “net capital loss” (that is, capital losses in excess of capital gains), the excess of the Series’ net short-term capital losses over its net long-term capital gains is treated as a short-term capital loss arising on the first day of the Series’ next taxable year, and the excess (if any) of the Series’ net long-term capital losses over its net short-term capital gains is treated as a long-term capital loss arising on the first day of the Series’ next taxable year. In addition, the carryover of capital losses may be limited under the general loss limitation rules if the Series experiences an ownership change as defined in the Code.

 

 

The Series is treated as a corporation for federal income tax purposes. The Series therefore is considered to be a separate entity in determining its treatment under the rules for RICs described herein. The requirements (other than certain organizational requirements) for qualifying RIC status are determined at the Series level rather than at the Fund level.

 

Excise Tax. If the Series fails to distribute in a calendar year at least 98% of its ordinary income for the year and 98.2% of its capital gain net income (the excess of short- and long-term capital gains over short- and long-term capital losses) for the one-year period ending October 31 of that year (and any retained amount from the prior year), the Series will be subject to a nondeductible 4% federal excise tax on the undistributed amounts. For this purpose, any ordinary income or capital gain net income retained by the Series and subject to corporate income tax will be considered to have been distributed. The Series generally intend to make sufficient distributions to avoid imposition of this tax but can make no assurances that such tax liability will be entirely eliminated. For example, the Series may receive delayed or corrected tax reporting statements from its investments that cause the Series to accrue additional income and gains after the Series has already made its excise tax distributions for the year. In such a situation, the Series may incur an excise tax liability resulting from such delayed receipt of such tax information statements. In addition, the Series may in certain circumstances be required to liquidate investments in order to make sufficient distributions to avoid federal excise tax liability at a time when the investment advisor might not otherwise have chosen to do so, and liquidation of investments in such circumstances may affect the ability of the Series to satisfy the requirements for qualification as a RIC.

 

Distributions and Dividends. The Series receives income generally in the form of dividends and interest on its investments. This income, plus net short-term capital gains, if any, less expenses incurred in the operation of the Series, constitutes its net investment income from which dividends may be paid to you. All or a portion of the net investment income distributions may be treated as qualified dividend income (currently eligible for the reduced maximum capital gains rate to individuals of up to 20% (lower rates apply to individuals in lower tax brackets)) to the extent that the Series receives and reports its dividends as qualified dividend income. Qualified dividend income is, in general, dividend income from taxable domestic corporations and certain foreign corporations (e.g., foreign corporations incorporated in a possession of the United States or in certain countries with a comprehensive tax treaty with the United States, or the stock of which is readily tradable on an established securities market in the United States, in each case subject to certain limitations). A dividend will not be treated as qualified dividend income to the extent that: (i) the shareholder has not held the shares on which the dividend was paid for more than 60 days during the 121-day period that begins on the date that is 60 days before the date on which the shares become “ex-dividend” (which is the day on which declared distributions (dividends or capital gains) are deducted from the Series’ assets before it calculates the NAV) with respect to such dividend, (ii) the Series has not satisfied similar holding period requirements with respect to the securities it holds that paid the dividends distributed to the shareholder, (iii) the shareholder is under an obligation (whether pursuant to a short sale or otherwise) to make related payments with respect to substantially similar or related property, or (iv) the shareholder elects to treat such dividend as investment income under section 163(d)(4)(B) of the Code.  Therefore, if you lend your shares in the Series, such as pursuant to securities lending arrangement, you may lose the ability to treat dividends (paid while the shares are held by the borrower) as qualified dividend income.  Distributions that the Series receives from an underlying fund taxable as a RIC or from a REIT will be treated as qualified dividend income only to the extent so reported by such underlying fund or REIT. It is expected that dividends received by the Series from a REIT and distributed from that Series to a shareholder generally will be taxable to the shareholder as ordinary income. The Series is expected to principally earn interest income such that the Series is generally not expected to make distributions eligible for the reduced tax rates applicable to qualified dividend income.

 

The Series’ participation in the lending of securities may affect the amount, timing, and character of distributions to its shareholders. If the Series participates in a securities lending transaction and receives a payment in lieu of dividends (a “substitute payment”) with respect to securities on loan in a securities lending transaction, such income generally will not constitute qualified dividend income and thus dividends attributable to such income will not be eligible for taxation at the rates applicable to qualified dividend income for individual shareholders and will not be eligible for the dividends received deduction for corporate shareholders.

 

Any distribution by the Series may be taxable to shareholders regardless of whether it is received in cash or in additional shares. The Series may derive capital gains and losses in connection with sales or other dispositions of the portfolio securities. Distributions from net short-term capital gains will generally be taxable to shareholders as ordinary income. Distributions from net long-term capital gains will be taxable to shareholders as long-term capital gains regardless of how long the shares have been held. The current maximum tax rate on long-term capital gains for non-corporate shareholders is 20% (lower rates apply to individuals in lower tax brackets). Distributions from capital gains are generally made after applying any available capital loss carryforwards.

 

 

Certain distributions may qualify for a dividends received deduction for corporate shareholders, subject to holding period requirements and other limitations under the Code, if they are attributable to the qualifying dividend income the Series receives from a domestic corporation and are properly reported by that Series. The Series is expected to principally earn interest income such that the Series is generally not expected to make distributions eligible for dividends received deduction for corporate shareholders.

 

A RIC that receives business interest income may pass through its net business interest income for purposes of the tax rules applicable to the interest expense limitations under Section 163(j) of the Code. A RIC’s total “Section 163(j) Interest Dividend” for a tax year is limited to the excess of the RIC’s business interest income over the sum of its business interest expense and its other deductions properly allocable to its business interest income. A RIC may, in its discretion, designate all or a portion of ordinary dividends as Section 163(j) Interest Dividends, which would allow the recipient shareholder to treat the designated portion of such dividends as interest income for purposes of determining such shareholder’s interest expense deduction limitation under Section 163(j) of the Code. This can potentially increase the amount of a shareholder’s interest expense deductible under Section 163(j) of the Code. In general, to be eligible to treat a Section 163(j) Interest Dividend as interest income, you must have held your shares in the Series for more than 180 days during the 361-day period beginning on the date that is 180 days before the date on which the share becomes ex-dividend with respect to such dividend. Section 163(j) Interest Dividends, if so designated by the Series, will be reported to your financial intermediary or otherwise in accordance with the requirements specified by the IRS.

 

The Series (or its administrative agent) will inform you of the amount of your ordinary income dividends, qualified dividend income, and capital gain distributions shortly after the close of each calendar year. Shareholders who have not held the Series’ shares for a full year should be aware that the Series may designate and distribute, as ordinary income or capital gain, a percentage of income that is not equal to the actual amount of such income earned during the period of investment in the Series. A distribution will reduce the Series’ NAV per share and may be taxable to you as ordinary income or capital gain even though, from an investment standpoint, the distribution may constitute a return of capital. Therefore, an investor should consider the tax consequences of purchasing shares immediately before a distribution record date.

 

If the Series’ distributions exceed its earnings and profits (as calculated for federal income tax purposes) for a taxable year, all or a portion of the distributions made in the same taxable year may be re-characterized as a return of capital to shareholders. A return of capital distribution will generally not be taxable, but will reduce each shareholder’s cost basis in the Series’ shares and result in higher reported capital gain or lower reported capital loss when those shares on which a distribution was received are sold.

 

Distributions declared in October, November, or December to shareholders of record during those months and paid during the following January are treated as if they were received by each shareholder on December 31 of the year in which they are declared for tax purposes.

 

U.S. individuals with income exceeding $200,000 ($250,000 if married and filing jointly) are subject to a 3.8% tax on their “net investment income,” including interest, dividends, and capital gains (including capital gains realized on the sale, exchange, or redemption of shares of the Series).

 

 

Sale, Exchange, or Redemption of Shares. Any gain or loss recognized on a sale, exchange or redemption of shares of the Series by a shareholder that owns shares as a capital asset will generally be treated as a long-term capital gain or loss if the shares have been held for more than one year and otherwise generally will be treated as short-term capital gain or loss. However, if shares on which a shareholder has received a net capital gain distribution are subsequently sold, exchanged or redeemed and such shares have been held for six months or less, any loss recognized will be treated as long-term capital loss to the extent of the net capital gain distribution. In addition, the loss realized on a sale or other disposition of shares will be disallowed to the extent a shareholder repurchases (or enters into a contract or option to repurchase) shares within a period of 61 days (beginning 30 days before and ending 30 days after the disposition of the shares). This loss disallowance rule will apply to shares received through the reinvestment of dividends during the 61-day period. If disallowed, the loss will be reflected in an upward adjustment to the basis of the shares acquired. For tax purposes, an exchange of shares of the Series for shares of a different Series is the same as a sale.

 

The Series (or its administrative agent) is required to report to the IRS and furnish its shareholders the cost basis information for purchases of Series shares. In addition to the requirement to report the gross proceeds from the sale of shares, the Series is also required to report the cost basis information for such shares and indicate whether the shares had a short-term or long-term holding period. Each time a shareholder sells shares, the Series will permit the shareholder to elect from among several IRS accepted cost basis methods, including the average cost basis method. In the absence of an election, the Series will use the average cost basis method. The cost basis method elected by the shareholder (or the cost basis method applied by default) for each sale of shares may not be changed after the settlement date of each such sale of shares. Shareholders should consult with their tax advisors to determine the best IRS accepted cost basis method for their tax situation and to obtain more information about how cost basis reporting applies to them. Shareholders also should carefully review any cost basis information provided to them by the Series and make any additional basis, holding period or other adjustments that are required when reporting these amounts on their federal income tax returns.

 

Tax-Exempt Shareholders. Tax-exempt entities are not permitted to offset losses from one trade or business against the income or gain of another trade or business. Certain net losses incurred prior to January 1, 2018 are permitted to offset gain and income created by an unrelated trade or business, if otherwise available. Under current law, the Series serve to block unrelated business taxable income (“UBTI”) from being realized by their tax-exempt shareholders. Notwithstanding the foregoing, a tax-exempt shareholder could realize UBTI by virtue of its investment in the Series if shares in the Series constitute debt-financed property in the hands of the tax-exempt shareholder within the meaning of section 514(b) of the Code. Certain types of income received by the Series from REITs, REMICs, taxable mortgage pools or other investments may cause the Series to designate some or all of its distributions as “excess inclusion income.” To Series shareholders such excess inclusion income may (i) constitute taxable income, as UBTI for those shareholders who would otherwise be tax-exempt such as IRAs, 401(k) accounts, Keogh plans, pension plans and certain charitable entities; (ii) not be offset by otherwise allowable deductions for tax purposes; (iii) not be eligible for reduced U.S. withholding for non-U.S. shareholders even from tax treaty countries; and (iv) cause the Series to be subject to tax if certain “disqualified organizations” as defined by the Code are Series shareholders.

 

Tax-exempt investors sensitive to UBTI, especially charitable remainder trusts, are strongly encouraged to consult their tax advisers prior to investment in the Series regarding this issue and IRS pronouncements regarding the treatment of such income in the hands of such investors.

 

The Series’ shares held in a tax-qualified retirement account will generally not be subject to federal taxation on income and capital gains distribution from the Series until a shareholder begins receiving payments from its retirement account. Because each shareholder’s tax situation is different, shareholders should consult their tax advisor about the tax implications of an investment in the shares of the Series.

 

Taxation of Series Investments. The Series’ transactions in certain futures contracts, options, forward contracts, foreign currencies, foreign debt securities, foreign entities treated as investment companies, derivative securities, and certain other investment and hedging activities will be subject to special tax rules. In a given case, these rules may affect the Series’ ability to qualify as a RIC, accelerate income to the Series, defer losses to the Series, require adjustments in the holding periods of the Series’ assets, convert short-term capital losses into long-term capital losses, or otherwise affect the character of the Series’ income. These rules could therefore affect the amount, timing, and character of distributions to shareholders. The Series will endeavor to make any available elections pertaining to such transactions in a manner believed to be in the best interest of the Series.

 

 

With respect to investments in zero coupon securities which are sold at original issue discount (“OID”) and thus do not make periodic cash interest payments, the Series will be required to include as part of its current income the imputed interest on such obligations even though the Series has not received any interest payments on such obligations during that period. Because the Series intends to distribute all of its net investment income to its shareholders, the Series may have to sell securities to distribute such imputed income which may occur at a time when the Advisor would not have chosen to sell such securities and which may result in a taxable gain or loss. Special rules apply if the Series holds inflation-indexed bonds. Generally, all stated interest on such bonds is recorded as income by the Series under its regular method of accounting for interest income. The amount of positive inflation adjustment, which results in an increase in the inflation-adjusted principal amount of the bond, is treated as OID. The OID is included in the Series’ gross income ratably during the period ending with the maturity of the bond, under the general OID inclusion rules. The amount of the Series’ OID in a taxable year with respect to a bond will increase the Series’ taxable income for such year without a corresponding receipt of cash, until the bond matures. As a result, the Series may need to use other sources of cash to satisfy its distributions for such year. The amount of negative inflation adjustments, which results in a decrease in the inflation-adjusted principal amount of the bond, reduces the amount of interest (including stated interest, OID, and market discount, if any) otherwise includible in the Series’ income with respect to the bond for the taxable year.

 

Any market discount recognized on a bond is taxable as ordinary income. A market discount bond is a bond acquired in the secondary market at a price below redemption value or adjusted issue price if issued with original issue discount. Absent an election by the Series to include the market discount in income as it accrues, gain on its disposition of such an obligation will be treated as ordinary income rather than capital gain to the extent of the accrued market discount.

 

The Series may invest in inflation-linked debt securities. Any increase in the principal amount of an inflation-linked debt security will be OID, which is taxable as ordinary income and is required to be distributed, even though the Series will not receive the principal, including any increase thereto, until maturity. As noted above, if the Series invests in such securities it may be required to liquidate other investments, including at times when it is not advantageous to do so, in order to satisfy its distribution requirements and to eliminate any possible taxation at the Series level.

 

 

Foreign Investments. Transactions by the Series in foreign currencies and forward foreign currency contracts will be subject to special provisions of the Code that, among other things, may affect the character of gains and losses realized by the Series (i.e., may affect whether gains or losses are ordinary or capital), accelerate recognition of income to the Series and defer losses. These rules could therefore affect the character, amount and timing of distributions to shareholders. These provisions also may require the Series to mark-to-market certain types of positions in its portfolio (i.e., treat them as if they were closed out) which may cause the Series to recognize income without receiving cash with which to make distributions in amounts necessary to satisfy the RIC distribution requirements for avoiding income and excise taxes. The Series intends to monitor its transactions, intends to make the appropriate tax elections, and intends to make the appropriate entries in its books and records when it acquires any foreign currency or forward foreign currency contract in order to mitigate the effect of these rules so as to prevent disqualification of the Series as a RIC and minimize the imposition of income and excise taxes.

 

The U.S. Treasury Department has authority to issue regulations that would exclude foreign currency gains from the Qualifying Income Test described above if such gains are not directly related to the Series’ business of investing in stock or securities (or options and futures with respect to stock or securities). Accordingly, regulations may be issued in the future that could treat some or all of the Series’ non-U.S. currency gains as non-qualifying income, thereby potentially jeopardizing the Series’ status as a RIC for all years to which the regulations are applicable.

 

If the Series owns shares in certain foreign investment entities, referred to as “passive foreign investment companies” or “PFICs,” the Series will be subject to one of the following special tax regimes: (i) the Series is liable for U.S. federal income tax, and an additional interest charge, on a portion of any “excess distribution” from such foreign entity or any gain from the disposition of such shares, even if the entire distribution or gain is paid out by the Series as a dividend to its shareholders; (ii) if the Series were able and elected to treat a PFIC as a “qualified electing fund” or “QEF,” the Series would be required each year to include in income, and distribute to shareholders in accordance with the distribution requirements set forth above, the Series’ pro rata share of the ordinary earnings and net capital gains of the PFIC, whether or not such earnings or gains are distributed to the Series; or (iii) the Series may be entitled to mark-to-market annually shares of the PFIC, and in such event would be required to distribute to shareholders any such mark-to-market gains in accordance with the distribution requirements set forth above. The Series may have to distribute to its shareholders certain “phantom” income and gain the Series accrues with respect to its investment in a PFIC in order to satisfy its distribution requirement and to avoid imposition of the 4% excise tax described above. The Series will make the appropriate tax elections, if possible, and take any additional steps that are necessary to mitigate the effect of these rules. Amounts included in income each year by the Series arising from a QEF election will be “qualifying income” under the Qualifying Income Test (as described above) even if not distributed to the Series, if the Series derives such income from its business of investing in stock, securities or currencies.

 

Foreign Taxes. Dividends and interest received by the Series may be subject to income, withholding or other taxes imposed by foreign countries and U.S. possessions that would reduce the yield on its securities. Tax conventions between certain countries and the U.S. may reduce or eliminate these taxes. Foreign countries generally do not impose taxes on capital gains with respect to investments by foreign investors. If more than 50% of the value of the Series’ total assets at the close of its taxable year consists of stock or securities of foreign corporations, the Series will be eligible to, and may, file an election with the IRS that will enable shareholders, in effect, to receive the benefit of the foreign tax credit with respect to any foreign and U.S. possessions’ income taxes paid by the Series. If the Series were to make such an election, the Series would treat those taxes as dividends paid to its shareholders. Each shareholder would be required to include a proportionate share of those taxes in gross income as income received from a foreign source and to treat the amount so included as if the shareholder had paid the foreign tax directly. The shareholder may then either deduct the taxes deemed paid by him or her in computing his or her taxable income or, alternatively, use the foregoing information in calculating the foreign tax credit (subject to significant limitations) against the shareholder’s federal income tax. If the Series makes the election, it will report annually to its shareholders the respective amounts per share of the Series’ income from sources within, and taxes paid to, foreign countries and U.S. possessions.

 

 

Foreign tax credits, if any, received by the Series as a result of an investment in another RIC (including an ETF which is taxable as a RIC) will not be passed through to you unless the Series qualifies as a “qualified fund-of-funds” under the Code. If the Series is a “qualified-fund-of-funds” it will be eligible to file an election with the IRS that will enable it to pass along these foreign tax credits to its shareholders. The Series will be treated as a “qualified fund-of-funds” if at least 50% of the value of the Series’ total assets (at the close of each quarter of the Series’ taxable year) is represented by interests in other RICs.

 

To the extent the Series invests in an underlying fund (including an ETF) that indicates that such underlying fund intends to satisfy the tax requirements to be treated as a RIC under the Code, the Series may be able to receive the benefits of a “qualified fund-of-funds” as described above. If, however, an underlying fund loses its status as a RIC under the Code, the Series would no longer be permitted to count its investment in such underlying fund for purposes of satisfying the requirements to be a “qualified fund-of-funds.” In addition, an underlying fund that loses its status as a RIC would be treated as a regular corporation subject to entity level taxation prior to making any distributions to the Series which would affect the amount, timing and character of such income distributed by an underlying fund to the Series.

 

Backup Withholding. In certain cases, the Series will be required to withhold and remit to the U.S. Treasury 24% of any taxable dividends, capital gain distributions and redemption proceeds paid to a shareholder (1) who has failed to provide a correct and properly certified taxpayer identification number, (2) who is subject to backup withholding by the IRS, (3) who has not certified to the Series that such shareholder is not subject to backup withholding, or (4) who has failed to certify that he or she is a U.S. person (including a U.S. resident alien). This backup withholding is not an additional tax, and any amounts withheld may be credited against the shareholder’s U.S. federal income tax liability (provided the appropriate information is furnished to the IRS).

 

Foreign Shareholders. Foreign shareholders (i.e., nonresident alien individuals and foreign corporations, partnerships, trusts and estates) are generally subject to U.S. withholding tax at the rate of 30% (or a lower tax treaty rate) on distributions derived from net investment income. The Series may, under certain circumstances, report all or a portion of a dividend as an “interest-related dividend” or a “short-term capital gain dividend,” which would generally be exempt from this 30% U.S. withholding tax, provided certain other requirements are met. Short-term capital gain dividends received by a nonresident alien individual who is present in the U.S. for a period or periods aggregating 183 days or more during the taxable year are not exempt from this 30% withholding tax.  Gains realized by foreign shareholders from the sale or other disposition of shares of the Series generally are not subject to U.S. taxation, unless the recipient is an individual who is physically present in the U.S. for 183 days or more per year. Foreign shareholders who fail to provide an applicable IRS form may be subject to backup withholding on certain payments from the Series. Backup withholding will not be applied to payments that are subject to the 30% (or lower applicable treaty rate) withholding tax described in this paragraph. Different tax consequences may result if the foreign shareholder is engaged in a trade or business within the United States. In addition, the tax consequences to a foreign shareholder entitled to claim the benefits of a tax treaty may be different than those described above.

 

Under legislation generally known as “FATCA” (the Foreign Account Tax Compliance Act), the Series is required to withhold 30% of certain ordinary dividends it pays to shareholders that fail to meet prescribed information reporting or certification requirements. In general, no such withholding will be required with respect to a U.S. person or non-U.S. person that timely provides the certifications required by the Series or its agent on a valid IRS Form W-9 or applicable series of IRS Form W-8, respectively. Shareholders potentially subject to withholding include foreign financial institutions (“FFIs”), such as non-U.S. investment funds, and non-financial foreign entities (“NFFEs”). To avoid withholding under FATCA, an FFI generally must enter into an information sharing agreement with the IRS in which it agrees to report certain identifying information (including name, address, and taxpayer identification number) with respect to its U.S. account holders (which, in the case of an entity shareholder, may include its direct and indirect U.S. owners), and an NFFE generally must identify and provide other required information to the Series or other withholding agent regarding its U.S. owners, if any. Such non-U.S. shareholders also may fall into certain exempt, excepted or deemed compliant categories as established by regulations and other guidance. A non-U.S. shareholder resident or doing business in a country that has entered into an intergovernmental agreement with the U.S. to implement FATCA will be exempt from FATCA withholding provided that the shareholder and the applicable foreign government comply with the terms of the agreement.

 

 

A non-U.S. entity that invests in the Series will need to provide the Series with documentation properly certifying the entity’s status under FATCA in order to avoid FATCA withholding.

 

Foreign shareholders are urged to consult their own tax advisors concerning the applicability of the U.S. withholding tax and the proper withholding form(s) to be submitted to the Series.

 

Potential Reporting Requirements. Under U.S. Treasury regulations, generally, if a shareholder recognizes a loss of $2 million or more for an individual shareholder or $10 million or more for a corporate shareholder, the shareholder must file with the IRS a disclosure statement on Form 8886. Direct shareholders of portfolio securities are in many cases excepted from this reporting requirement, but under current guidance, shareholders of a RIC such as the Series are not excepted. Future guidance may extend the current exception from this reporting requirement to shareholders of most or all RICs. The fact that a loss is reportable under these regulations does not affect the legal determination of whether the taxpayer’s treatment of the loss is proper. Shareholders should consult their tax advisors to determine the applicability of these regulations in light of their individual circumstances.

 

State and Local Taxes. Distributions by the Series to shareholders and the ownership of shares may be subject to state and local taxes. Therefore, shareholders are urged to consult their tax advisors concerning the application of state and local taxes to investments in the Series, which may differ from the federal income tax consequences.

 

Many states grant tax-free status to dividends paid to you from interest earned on direct obligations of the U.S. Government, subject in some states to minimum investment requirements that must be met by the Series. Investments in Ginnie Mae or Fannie Mae securities, bankers acceptances, commercial paper, and repurchase agreements collateralized by U.S. Government securities do not generally qualify for such tax-fee treatment. The rules on exclusion of this income are different for corporate shareholders. Shareholders are urged to consult their tax advisors regarding whether, and under what conditions, such exemption is available.

 

Shareholders should consult their own tax advisors regarding the effect of federal, state, local, and foreign taxes affecting an investment in shares of the Series.

 

Performance Reporting

 

The performance of the Series may be compared in publications to the performance of various indices and investments for which reliable performance data is available. It may also be compared to averages, performance rankings, or other information prepared by recognized mutual fund statistical services. The Series’ annual reports contain additional performance information. These reports will be available without charge at the Fund’s website, www.manning-napier.com, or by calling 1-800-466-3863.

 

Financial Statements

 

Because the Series was not active as of the date of this SAI, no financial statements for the Series are incorporated by reference into this SAI.

 

Appendix A — Description of Bond Ratings¹

 

Moody’s Investors Service, Inc. (“Moody’s”) Short-Term Prime Rating System — Taxable Debt and Deposits Globally

 

Moody’s short-term debt ratings are opinions of the ability of issuers to repay punctually senior debt obligations. These obligations have an original maturity not exceeding one year, unless explicitly noted.

 

Moody’s employs the following three designations, all judged to be investment grade, to indicate the relative repayment ability of rated issuers:

 

Prime-1: Issuers rated Prime-1 (or supporting institutions) have a superior ability for repayment of senior short-term debt obligations. Prime-1 repayment ability will often be evidenced by many of the following characteristics:

 

Leading market positions in well-established industries.

 

High rates of return on funds employed.

 

Conservative capitalization structure with moderate reliance on debt and ample asset protection.

 

Broad margins in earnings coverage of fixed financial charges and high internal cash generation.

 

Well-established access to a range of financial markets and assured sources of alternate liquidity.

 

Prime-2: Issuers rated Prime-2 (or supporting institutions) have a strong ability for repayment of senior short-term debt obligations. This will normally be evidenced by many of the characteristics cited above but to a lesser degree. Earnings trends and coverage ratios, while sound, may be more subject to variation. Capitalization characteristics, while still appropriate, may be more affected by external conditions. Ample alternate liquidity is maintained.

 

Prime-3: Issuers rated Prime-3 (or supporting institutions) have an acceptable ability for repayment of senior short-term obligations. The effect of industry characteristics and market compositions may be more pronounced. Variability in earnings and profitability may result in changes in the level of debt protection measurements and may require relatively high financial leverage. Adequate alternate liquidity is maintained.

 

Not Prime: Issuers rated Not Prime do not fall within any of the Prime rating categories.

 

Obligations of a branch of a bank are considered to be domiciled in the country in which the branch is located. Unless noted as an exception, Moody’s rating on a bank’s ability to repay senior obligations extends only to branches located in countries which carry a Moody’s Sovereign Rating for Bank Deposits. Such branch obligations are rated at the lower of the bank’s rating or Moody’s Sovereign Rating for Bank Deposits for the country in which the branch is located.

 

When the currency in which an obligation is denominated is not the same as the currency of the country in which the obligation is domiciled, Moody’s ratings do not incorporate an opinion as to whether payment of the obligation will be affected by actions of the government controlling the currency of denomination. In addition, risks associated with bilateral conflicts between an investor’s home country and either the issuer’s home country or the country where an issuer’s branch is located are not incorporated into Moody’s short-term debt ratings.

 

If an issuer represents to Moody’s that its short-term debt obligations are supported by the credit of another entity or entities, then the name or names of such supporting entity or entities are listed within the parenthesis beneath the name of the issuer, or there is a footnote referring the reader to another page for the name or names of the supporting entity or entities. In assigning ratings to such issuers, Moody’s evaluates the financial strength of the affiliated corporations, commercial banks, insurance companies, foreign governments or other entities, but only as one factor in the total rating assessment.

 

¹  The ratings indicated herein are believed to be the most recent ratings available at the date of this SAI for the securities listed. Ratings are generally given to securities at the time of issuance. While the rating agencies may from time to time revise such ratings, they undertake no obligation to do so, and the ratings indicated do not necessarily represent ratings which will be given to these securities on the date of the fund’s fiscal year-end.

 

 

Moody’s Municipal and Corporate Bond Ratings

 

Aaa: Bonds which are rated Aaa are judged to be of the best quality. They carry the smallest degree of investment risk and are generally referred to as “gilt edge.” Interest payments are protected by a large or by an exceptionally stable margin and principal is secure. While the various protective elements are likely to change, such changes as can be visualized are most unlikely to impair the fundamentally strong position of such issues.

 

Aa: Bonds which are rated Aa are judged to be of high quality by all standards. Together with the Aaa group they comprise what are generally known as high grade bonds. They are rated lower than the best bonds because margins of protection may not be as large as in Aaa securities or fluctuation of protective elements may be of greater amplitude or there may be other elements present which make the long term risks appear somewhat larger than in Aaa securities.

 

A: Bonds which are rated A possess many favorable investment attributes and are to be considered as upper-medium-grade obligations. Factors giving security to principal and interest are considered adequate, but elements may be present which suggest a susceptibility to impairment sometime in the future.

 

Baa: Bonds which are rated Baa are considered as medium-grade obligations (i.e., they are neither highly protected nor poorly secured). Interest payments and principal security appear adequate for the present but certain protective elements may be lacking or may be characteristically unreliable over any great length of time. Such bonds lack outstanding investment characteristics and in fact have speculative characteristics as well.

 

Ba: Bonds which are rated Ba are judged to have speculative elements; their future cannot be considered as well assured. Often the protection of interest and principal payments may be very moderate and thereby not well safeguarded during both good and bad times over the future. Uncertainty of position characterizes bonds in this class.

 

B: Bonds which are rated B generally lack characteristics of the desirable investment. Assurance of interest and principal payments or of maintenance of other terms of the contract over any long period of time may be small.

 

Caa: Bonds which are rated Caa are of poor standing. Such issues may be in default or there may be present elements of danger with respect to principal or interest.

 

Ca: Bonds which are rated Ca represent obligations which are speculative in a high degree. Such issues are often in default or have other marked shortcomings.

 

C: Bonds which are rated C are the lowest rated class of bonds, and issues so rated can be regarded as having extremely poor prospects of ever attaining any real investment standing.

 

Note: Moody’s applies numerical modifiers 1, 2 and 3 in each generic rating classification from Aa through Caa. The modifier 1 indicated that the obligation ranks in the higher end of its generic rating category; the modifier 2 indicated a mid-range ranking; and the modifier 3 indicates a ranking in the lower end of that generic rating category.

 

Moody’s may also assign conditional ratings to municipal bonds. Bonds for which the security depends upon the completion of some act or the fulfillment of some condition are rated conditionally. These are bonds secured by (a) earnings of projects under constructions, (b) earnings of projects unseasoned in operating experience, (c) rentals which begin when facilities are completed, or (d) payments to which some other limiting condition attaches. Parenthetical rating denotes probable credit stature upon completion of construction or elimination of basis of condition.

 

Standard & Poor’s Short-Term Issue Credit Ratings

 

A-1: A short-term obligation rated ‘A-1’ is rated in the highest category by Standard & Poor’s. The obligor’s capacity to meet its financial commitment on the obligation is strong. Within this category, certain obligations are designated with a plus sign (+). This indicates that the obligor’s capacity to meet its financial commitment on these obligations is extremely strong.

 

A-2: A short-term obligation rated ‘A-2’ is somewhat more susceptible to the adverse effects of changes in circumstances and economic conditions than obligations in higher rating categories. However, the obligor’s capacity to meet its financial commitment on the obligation is satisfactory.

 

A-3: A short-term obligation rated ‘A-3’ exhibits adequate protection parameters. However, adverse economic conditions or changing circumstances are more likely to lead to a weakened capacity of the obligor to meet its financial commitment on the obligation.

 

B: A short-term obligation rated ‘B’ is regarded as vulnerable and has significant speculative characteristics. The obligor currently has the capacity to meet its financial commitments; however, it faces major ongoing uncertainties which could lead to the obligor’s inadequate capacity to meet its financial commitments.

 

C: A short-term obligation rated ‘C’ is currently vulnerable to nonpayment and is dependent upon favorable business, financial, and economic conditions for the obligor to meet its financial commitment on the obligation.

 

D: A short-term obligation rated ‘D’ is in default or in breach of an imputed promise. For non-hybrid capital instruments, the ‘D’ rating category is used when payments on an obligation are not made on the date due, unless Standard & Poor’s believes that such payments will be made within any stated grace period. However, any stated grace period longer than five business days will be treated as five business days. The ‘D’ rating also will be used upon the filing of a bankruptcy petition or the taking of a similar action and where default on an obligation is a virtual certainty, for example due to automatic stay provisions. An obligation’s rating is lowered to ‘D’ if it is subject to a distressed exchange offer.

 

Standard & Poor’s Municipal and Corporate Bond Ratings

 

AAA: An obligation rated ‘AAA’ has the highest rating assigned by Standard & Poor’s. The obligor’s capacity to meet its financial commitment on the obligation is extremely strong.

 

AA: An obligation rated ‘AA’ differs from the highest-rated obligations only to a small degree. The obligor’s capacity to meet its financial commitment on the obligation is very strong.

 

A: An obligation rated ‘A’ is somewhat more susceptible to the adverse effects of changes in circumstances and economic conditions than obligations in higher-rated categories. However, the obligor’s capacity to meet its financial commitment on the obligation is still strong.

 

BBB: An obligation rated ‘BBB’ exhibits adequate protection parameters. However, adverse economic conditions or changing circumstances are more likely to lead to a weakened capacity of the obligor to meet its financial commitment on the obligation.

 

Obligations rated ‘BB’, ‘B’, ‘CCC’, ‘CC’, and ‘C’ are regarded as having significant speculative characteristics. ‘BB’ indicates the least degree of speculation and ‘C’ the highest. While such obligations will likely have some quality and protective characteristics, these may be outweighed by large uncertainties or major exposures to adverse conditions.

 

BB: An obligation rated ‘BB’ is less vulnerable to nonpayment than other speculative issues. However, it faces major ongoing uncertainties or exposure to adverse business, financial, or economic conditions which could lead to the obligor’s inadequate capacity to meet its financial commitment on the obligation.

 

B: An obligation rated ‘B’ is more vulnerable to nonpayment than obligations rated ‘BB’, but the obligor currently has the capacity to meet its financial commitment on the obligation. Adverse business, financial, or economic conditions will likely impair the obligor’s capacity or willingness to meet its financial commitment on the obligation.

 

CCC: An obligation rated ‘CCC’ is currently vulnerable to nonpayment, and is dependent upon favorable business, financial, and economic conditions for the obligor to meet its financial commitment on the obligation. In the event of adverse business, financial, or economic conditions, the obligor is not likely to have the capacity to meet its financial commitment on the obligation.

 

CC: An obligation rated ‘CC’ is currently highly vulnerable to nonpayment. The ‘CC’ rating is used when a default has not yet occurred, but Standard & Poor’s expects default to be a virtual certainty, regardless of the anticipated time to default.

 

C: An obligation rated ‘C’ is currently highly vulnerable to nonpayment, and the obligation is expected to have lower relative seniority or lower ultimate recovery compared to obligations that are rated higher.

 

D: An obligation rated ‘D’ is in default or in breach of an imputed promise. For non-hybrid capital instruments, the ‘D’ rating category is used when payments on an obligation are not made on the date due, unless Standard & Poor’s believes that such payments will be made within five business days in the absence of a stated grace period or within the earlier of the stated grace period or 30 calendar days. The ‘D’ rating also will be used upon the filing of a bankruptcy petition or the taking of similar action and where default on an obligation is a virtual certainty, for example due to automatic stay provisions. An obligation’s rating is lowered to ‘D’ if it is subject to a distressed exchange offer.

 

NR: This indicates that no rating has been requested, or that there is insufficient information on which to base a rating, or that Standard & Poor’s does not rate a particular obligation as a matter of policy.

 

The ratings from ‘AA’ to ‘CCC’ may be modified by the addition of a plus (+) or minus (-) sign to show relative standing within the major rating categories.

 

The letters ‘pr’ indicate that the rating was provisional. A provisional rating assumed the successful completion of a project financed by the debt being rated and indicates that payment of debt service requirements was largely or entirely dependent upon the successful, timely completion of the project. This rating, however, while addressing credit quality subsequent to completion of the project, made no comment on the likelihood of or the risk of default upon failure of such completion.

 

 

The ‘r’ modifier was assigned to securities containing extraordinary risks, particularly market risks, which are not covered in the credit rating. The absence of an ‘r’ modifier should not be taken as an indication that an obligation would not exhibit extraordinary non-credit related risks. Standard & Poor’s discontinued the use of the ‘r’ modifier for most obligations in June 2000 and for the balance of obligations (mainly structured finance transactions) in November 2002.

 

Appendix B — Procedures for the Nominating Committee’s Consideration of Potential Nominees Submitted by Stockholders

 

A nominee for nomination as a Director submitted by a stockholder will not be deemed to be properly submitted to the Committee for the Committee’s consideration unless the following qualifications have been met and procedures followed:

 

1.

A stockholder or group of stockholders (referred to in either case as a “Nominating Stockholder”) that, individually or as a group, has beneficially owned at least 5% of the Fund’s common stock for at least two years prior to the date the Nominating Stockholder submits a candidate for nomination as a Director may submit one candidate to the Committee for consideration at an annual meeting of stockholders.

 

2.

The Nominating Stockholder must submit any such recommendation (a “Stockholder Recommendation”) in writing to the Fund, to the attention of the Secretary, at the address of the principal executive offices of the Fund.

 

3.

The Stockholder Recommendation must be delivered to or mailed and received at the principal executive offices of the Fund not less than the date specified in a public notice by the Fund. Such public notice shall be made at least 30 calendar days prior to the deadline for submission of Stockholder Recommendations. Such public notice may be given in a stockholder report or other mailing to stockholders or by any other means deemed by the Committee or the Board of Directors to be reasonably calculated to inform stockholders.

 

4.

The Stockholder Recommendation must include: (i) a statement in writing setting forth (A) the name, date of birth, business address and residence address of the person recommended by the Nominating Stockholder (the “candidate”); (B) any position or business relationship of the candidate, currently or within the preceding five years, with the Nominating Stockholder or an Associated Person of the Nominating Stockholder (as defined below); (C) the class or Series and number of all shares of the Fund owned of record or beneficially by the candidate, as reported to such Nominating Stockholder by the candidate; (D) any other information regarding the candidate that is required to be disclosed about a nominee in a proxy statement or other filing required to be made in connection with the solicitation of proxies for election of Directors pursuant to Section 20 of the Investment Company Act of 1940, as amended (the “1940 Act”) and the rules and regulations promulgated thereunder; (E) whether the Nominating Stockholder believes that the candidate is or will be an “interested person” of the Fund (as defined in the 1940 Act) and, if believed not to be an “interested person,” information regarding the candidate that will be sufficient for the Fund to make such determination; and (F) information as to the candidate’s knowledge of the investment company industry, experience as a director or senior officer of public companies, directorships on the boards of other registered investment companies and educational background ; (ii) the written and signed consent of the candidate to be named as a nominee and to serve as a Director if elected; (iii) the written and signed agreement of the candidate to complete a directors’ and officers’ questionnaire if elected; (iv) the Nominating Stockholder’s consent to be named as such by the Fund; (v) the class or Series and number of all shares of the Fund owned beneficially and of record by the Nominating Stockholder and any Associated Person of the Nominating Stockholder and the dates on which such shares were acquired, specifying the number of shares owned beneficially but not of record by each, and stating the names of each as they appear on the Fund’s record books and the names of any nominee holders for each; and (vi) a description of all arrangements or understandings between the Nominating Stockholder, the candidate and/or any other person or persons (including their names) pursuant to which the recommendation is being made by the Nominating Stockholder. “Associated Person of the Nominating Stockholder” as used in this paragraph 4 means any person required to be identified pursuant to clause (vi) and any other person controlling, controlled by or under common control with, directly or indirectly, (a) the Nominating Stockholder or (b) any person required to be identified pursuant to clause (vi).

 

5.

The Committee may require the Nominating Stockholder to furnish such other information as it may reasonably require or deem necessary to verify any information furnished pursuant to paragraph 4 above or to determine the qualifications and eligibility of the candidate proposed by the Nominating Stockholder to serve on the Board. If the Nominating Stockholder fails to provide such other information in writing within seven days of receipt of written request from the Committee, the recommendation of such candidate as a nominee will be deemed not properly submitted for consideration, and will not be considered, by the Committee.

 

Appendix C –Proxy Voting Policy and Procedures

 

MANNING & NAPIER PROXY VOTING POLICIES AND PROCEDURES

 

January 15, 2025

 

GENERAL POLICY

 

This policy applies to Manning & Napier Advisors, LLC (“MNA”) and Rainier Investment Management, LLC (“Rainier”), collectively “Manning & Napier”, in their capacity as affiliated discretionary advisors to separate account clients, collective investment trust funds, and advisor and sub-advisor, respectively, to the Manning & Napier Fund, Inc. Manning & Napier is a fiduciary that owes duties of care and loyalty to each client with respect to its exercise of proxy voting authority. Manning & Napier is committed to effective stewardship of client assets and will engage with the companies in which we invest to vote proxies in a manner that we believe will maximize the long-term value of the investment. Manning & Napier has adopted and implemented the following policies and procedures, which it believes are reasonably designed to ensure that proxies are voted in the best interest of clients, in accordance with its fiduciary duties and applicable rules and regulations.

 

Proxy votes are the property of Manning & Napier’s clients. It is presumed, however, that Manning & Napier, pursuant to its discretionary authority, will vote proxies on each client’s behalf. Clients typically delegate the authority and responsibility for proxy voting to Manning & Napier’s through their written investment management agreement. Manning & Napier uses Broadridge Financial Solutions, Inc. (“Broadridge”) to execute proxy votes in accordance with this policy and Glass Lewis & Co. (“Glass Lewis”) guidelines for those ballot issues that this policy does not address. Manning & Napier’s analysts may override these guidelines or Glass Lewis recommendations in accordance with and adherence to the procedure mandates set forth below. All conflicts or potential conflicts will be resolved by Manning & Napier’s Proxy Conflicts and Oversight Committee (the “Committee”).

 

It is Manning & Napier’s overarching policy regarding proxies to:

 

1.

Discharge our duties prudently, in the interest of plans, plan fiduciaries, plan participants, beneficiaries, clients and shareholders (together “clients”).

2.

Act prudently in voting of proxies by considering those factors, which would affect the value of client assets.

3.

Maintain accurate records as to voting of such proxies that will enable clients to periodically review voting procedures employed and actions taken in individual situations.

4.

Provide, upon request, a report of proxy activity for clients reflecting the activity of the portfolio requested.

5.

By following our procedures for reconciling proxies, take reasonable steps under the particular circumstances to ensure that proxies for which we are responsible are received by us.

6.

Make available, upon request, this policy to all plan fiduciaries, client, and shareholders.

7.

Comply with all current and future applicable laws, rules, and regulation governing proxy voting.

POLICY LIMITATIONS

 

Voting proxies with respect to shares of foreign companies may involve significantly greater effort and corresponding cost due to the variety of regulatory schemes and corporate practices in foreign countries. Each country has its own rules and practices regarding shareholder notification, voting restrictions, registration conditions and share blocking. These conditions present challenges such as but not limited to:

 

•

The shares in some countries may be “blocked” by the custodian or depository for a specified number of days before or after the shareholder meeting. When blocked, shares typically may not be traded until the day after the blocking period. Manning & Napier may refrain from voting shares of foreign stocks subject to blocking restrictions where, in its judgment, the benefit from voting the shares is outweighed by the interest of maintaining client liquidity in the shares;

•

Often it is difficult to ascertain the date of a shareholder meeting and time frames between notification and the actual meeting date may be too short to allow timely action;

•

Language barriers will generally mean that an English translation of proxy information must be obtained or commissioned before the relevant shareholder meeting; and

•

The lack of “proxy voting service” or the imposition of voting fees may limit our ability to lodge votes in such countries.

Manning & Napier will make best efforts to vote foreign proxies in accordance with the guidelines set forth herein. There may be times, however, when Manning & Napier is unable to vote foreign proxies due to the practical limitations stipulated above. Manning & Napier might also refrain from voting a foreign proxy when doing so is in the clients’ best interests, such as when the explicit (e.g., travel) or imputed (e.g., trading limitations) cost of voting the proxy exceeds the expected benefit to the client.

 

PROCEDURES

 

Manning & Napier’s proxy voting policies and procedures are designed to align with each investment strategy. Accordingly, Manning & Napier’s proxy voting practices differ across strategies, which means that Manning & Napier can vote “FOR” a ballot issue on a security held in one portfolio and “AGAINST” a ballot issue on that same security held in another portfolio. Proxies for companies held in MNA’s qualitative, bottom-up investment strategies follow the parameters set forth in this policy and certain custom decisions provided to Broadridge. At times, MNA’s analysts may wish to override pre-determined voting protocols. The analyst who recommended the security for client portfolios is most familiar with the company and is in the best position to determine how to vote the proxy ballot. Therefore, MNA will defer to its analysts to vote the proxy ballot in the best economic interest of the client even if they vote contrary to these Guidelines. When voting contrary to the pre-determined voting Guidelines an analyst will be required to document their rationale and complete a conflicts questionnaire to ensure that the analyst is singularly focused on the client’s best interests.

 

MNA votes proxies in the Disciplined Value (“DV”) strategy in accordance with Glass Lewis recommendations. However, when a security is held in DV and in one of MNA’s qualitatively driven strategies, an analyst’s decision to vote contrary to Glass Lewis in the qualitatively driven strategy will extend to the vote in DV. Rainier votes proxies in the in the Rainier International Small Cap strategy in accordance with Glass Lewis ESG recommendations. With regards to Custom Solution portfolios that contain a mix of Manning & Napier’s investment strategies, voting will occur pursuant to the strategy-level procedures set forth above. Callodine Capital Management (“Callodine”) votes proxies on securities held in the Callodine Equity Income Series of the Fund.

 

 

GUIDELINES

 

These guidelines reflect Manning & Napier’s general views and serve to help Manning & Napier’s customers understand how we tend to vote typical ballot issues. Fundamentally, these guidelines are shaped by Manning & Napier’s desire and responsibility to preserve and enhance the value of securities for clients and to protect the long-term interests of our clients.

 

This list is not exhaustive and is subject to revision as new issues arise. Actual proxy votes may differ from these guidelines because Manning & Napier may determine that voting in contravention of these guidelines on a particular issue(s) is in the best interest of our clients. In all circumstances, however, Manning & Napier will discharge its proxy duties prudently, solely in the best interest of our clients, and for the exclusive purpose of providing benefits to those clients.

 

A.

BOARDS AND DIRECTORS

 

1.

Election of Directors

 

Generally, if not contested, we will vote “FOR” the nominated directors. For each director, care must be taken to determine from the proxy statement each director’s: attendance at meetings, investment in the company, status inside and outside company, governance profile, compensation, independence from management, and related/relevant parameters. If the director’s actions are questionable on any of these items, the analyst may vote “AGAINST” the election of the director.

 

In a contested race, voting decisions are based on the track record of both slates of candidates, an analysis of what each side is offering to shareholders, assessment of the likelihood of each slate to fulfill promises, and evaluation of the economic benefits that a new board verses old board could generate for shareholders. Candidate backgrounds and qualifications should be considered, along with benefit to shareholders of diversity on the board. If the proposed election of directors would change the number of directors, the change should not diminish the overall quality and independence of the board.

 

Because of the complexity and specific circumstances of issues concerning a contested race, Manning & Napier’s analysts will evaluate and decide these issues on a case-by-case basis.

 

2.

Appointment of Auditors:

 

We will vote “AGAINST” a change of auditors that compromises the integrity of the independent audit process or a change of auditors due to the auditors’ refusal to approve a company’s financial statement. We also will vote “AGAINST” the re-appointment of an auditor if we believe their independence has been compromised.

 

3.

Re-election of Directors

 

In order to hold directors accountable, they should be subject to frequent reelection – ideally, on an annual basis. Therefore, we recommend a vote “AGAINST” any proposal to extend the terms of directors beyond one year and a vote “FOR” annual election of directors.

 

4.

Classified Boards

 

A classified board is one in which directors are divided into two (sometimes more) classes, with each serving two-year (sometimes more) terms, with each class re-election occurring in a different year. A non-staggered Board serves a one-year term and Directors stand for re-election each year.

 

We will vote “FOR” proposals to declassify currently staggered boards and “AGAINST” proposals to retain or institute classified boards. Likewise, we will vote “FOR” proposals to re-elect directors annually. In our view, staggered boards are less accountable to shareholders than boards that are elected annually because directors who are elected annually are more focused on shareholder interests.

 

 

5.

Majority Vote in Director Elections

 

We would generally vote “FOR” binding resolutions requesting that the board change the company’s bylaws to stipulate that directors need to be elected with an affirmative majority of votes cast, provided it does not conflict with the state law where the company is incorporated. Binding resolutions need to allow for a carve-out for a plurality vote standard when there are more nominees than board seats. Companies should also adopt a post-election policy (also known as a director resignation policy) that will provide guidelines so that the company will promptly address the situation of a holdover director.

 

6.

Cumulative Voting

 

Cumulative voting permits proportional representation on the board of directors. Without it, a group with a simple majority could elect all directors. Cumulative voting is meant to enhance minority shareholder decision making power but may not always be beneficial depending on the he independence of the existing board and the operations of the majority voting structure. Accordingly, we will vote in accordance with Glass Lewis recommendations on a given company’s ballot.

 

7.

Director/Management Liability

 

Directors must be accountable to shareholders and liable for misdeeds. Therefore, we will vote “AGAINST” proposals that limit director liability or unreasonably indemnify directors. We recognize, however, that directors must be afforded certain protections in order to perform their duties and, therefore support a company taking certain measures, such as enrolling in liability insurance, to encourage directors to take measured risks designed to benefit shareholders.

 

8.

Independent Chair

 

We believe that a separation of roles between a CEO and a chairman create a better governance structure than a combined CEO/chairman position. A separation of roles enables the chairman and other board members to oversee the CEO, evaluate CEO performance and hold the CEO accountable. As such, we will vote “FOR” proposals to separate the roles of CEO and chairman. However, we will not automatically vote against the election of a CEO as chairman because we recognize the inevitability and necessity of this structure in smaller companies.

 

9.

Committee Independence

 

Where practical, we believe that chairpersons of nominating, compensation, or audit committees should be independent of management. Therefore, we recommend a vote “FOR” requirements that these committees have a majority of independent directors and “AGAINST” interested directors seeking appointment to one of these positions.

 

B.

COMPENSATION and BENEFITS

 

1.

General

 

Executive compensation and benefit packages can vary significantly across companies and the details of company plans can be quite nuanced and difficult to comprehend. We generally believe that companies are in the best position to determine the compensation and benefits that align with the company’s size, maturity, financial condition, and industry peers and that will attract and retain the talent required to execute company strategy and grow its value for shareholders. However, we also believe that companies must adopt policies and practices to link compensation and benefits with well-defined and clearly disclosed performance measures.

 

 

2.

Incentive Compensation

 

Incentive compensation plans reward an executive’s performance through a combination of cash compensation and stock awards. Typically, Manning & Napier will vote “FOR” incentive compensation plans that are reasonable relative to peer groups, derive from comprehensive and measurable performance metrics, are designed to attract and retained skilled executives, are sufficiently linked to an executive’s tenure and value-add, and are adequately disclosed to shareholders. We generally will vote “AGAINST” incentive compensation plans that dilute shareholder value, are disconnected from management performance, or offer management an opportunity to purchase stock below market value.

 

3.

Say on Pay

 

“Say on Pay” proposals give shareholders a non-binding vote on executive compensation. Manning & Napier will vote in accordance with Glass Lewis recommendations. Glass Lewis evaluates Say on Pay ballot measures on a case-by-case basis, considering an analysis of a company’s current executive compensation model, adequacy of the company’s disclosures around compensation and the specific terms of the say on pay proposal

 

4.

Pay for Performance

 

Pay for performance refers to the link between an executive’s performance and their pay. Glass Lewis evaluates shareholder-initiated pay for performance proposals on a case-by-case basis, factoring in the alignment between the company’s long-term interests and its executives’ financial incentives and the methodology for setting executive compensation. Manning & Napier will defer to Glass Lewis voting recommendations on a given ballot.

 

5.

Golden Parachute

 

Golden parachutes are severance payments made to departing executives after a termination or change in control. We will typically vote “AGAINST” such payments because these payments are often made despite an executive’s or company’s poor performance. We will vote “FOR” proposals that require shareholder ratification of company severance agreements and executive death benefits. While we generally recommend voting “AGAINST” golden parachutes, an analyst might vote FOR such an award if the analyst believes that it ultimately benefits shareholders.

 

6.

Clawback Provisions

 

A clawback provision allows a company to recoup or “claw back” incentive compensation paid to an executive under certain circumstances such as when a company later determines that the executive failed to meet applicable performance goals, or the company must restate financials. Glass Lewis assesses each company’s clawback policies and we will vote in accordance with the Glass Lewis recommendations.

 

7.

Anti-gross-up Provisions

 

We will vote “FOR” anti-gross-up policies that prohibit companies from paying executives an additional sum of money intended to reimburse them for tax liabilities. Likewise, we will vote “AGAINST” ballot measures that seek to instate a tax gross-up payment. In our view, gross-up payments often are not transparent, making it difficult for shareholders to discern total compensation paid to executives.

 

 

C.

SHAREHOLDER RIGHTS and ANTI-TAKEOVER MEASURES

 

1.

Supermajority Voting Provisions

 

Supermajority voting provisions require more than a simple shareholder majority in order to ratify a proposal. We believe that supermajority provisions impede shareholder action on critical ballot items and limit the voice of shareholders in making crucial decisions. As such, we will vote “AGAINST” proposals to add a supermajority vote requirement and “FOR” proposals to remove supermajority provisions at non-controlled companies. At controlled companies we may vote “AGAINST” removing supermajority vote requirements in order to preserve our shareholder rights.

 

2.

Special Meetings of Shareholders

 

We oppose unreasonable limitations on shareholder rights but recognize management’s authority to limit shareholder proposals under certain circumstances. As such, we will vote these ballots in accordance with Glass Lewis recommendations.

 

3.

Shareholder recovery of proxy contest costs

 

We will vote in accordance with Glass Lewis case-by-case determinations on shareholder proposals that seek to require companies to reimburse shareholders for expenses they incurred by initiating proxy contents.

 

4.

Confidential Voting

 

Confidential voting is the best way to guarantee an independent vote. Shareholders must be able to vote all proxies on the merits of each proposal. Open voting alters the concept of free choice in corporate elections and proxy proposal by providing management the opportunity to influence the vote outcome – they can see who has voted for or against proposals before the final vote is taken and therefore management can pressure institutional shareholders, suppliers, customers, and other shareholders with which it maintains a business relationship. This process, which would give management the opportunity to coerce votes from its shareholders, destroys the concept of management accountability. Therefore, we recommend a vote “FOR” confidential voting.

 

5.

Multiple Classes of Stocks

 

Multiple classes of stock, which would give more voting rights to one class of shareholders at the expense of another, would clearly affect the rights of all shareholders. We recommend a vote “AGAINST” any proposal which divides common equity into more than one class of stock, or which limits the voting rights of certain shareholders of a single class of stock. The exception would only occur if a subsidiary of a company issued its own class of common stock, such as General Motor’s class E (for EDS) and H (for Hughes) stock.

 

Similarly, we recommend a vote “AGAINST” any proposal to give the board of director’s broad powers with respect to establishing new classes of stock and determining voting, dividend, and other rights without shareholder review. An example would be requests to authorize “blank check” preferred stock.

 

6.

Shareholder Rights Plans

 

Shareholder Rights Plans (“Poison Pills”) give shareholders the ability to purchase shares from or sell shares back to the company or, in the case of a hostile acquisition, to the potential acquirer at a price far out of line with their fair market value, effectively making the company more expensive and less attractive to potential acquirers. Typically, we will vote “AGAINST” poison pill proposals and “FOR” proposals to eliminate existing poison pills and proposals that require companies to submit poison pills for shareholder ratification. However, there may be circumstances in which Glass Lewis recommends a vote FOR a poison pill and we will vote in accordance with Glass Lewis’ recommendation.

 

 

7.

Greenmail

 

We will vote “FOR” anti-greenmail proposals that prevent company management from buying back company stock from a greenmailer at a significant premium without shareholder approval. However, anti-greenmail measures cannot be bundled with other proposals designed to entrench existing management or discourage attractive takeovers.

 

D.

CHANGES IN CAPITAL STRUCTURE

 

1.

Increased Authorized Common Stock

 

Requests to authorize increases in common stock can be expected from time-to-time, and when handled in a disciplined manner such requests can be for beneficial purposes such as stock splits, cost-effective means of raising capital, or reasonable incentive programs. However, increases in common stock can easily become dilutive, so by no means are they always in the best interest of shareholders. Purpose and scale are the determining factors with respect to increases in common stock. We will vote in accordance with Glass Lewis’ case-by-case evaluation of these factors.

 

2.

Reincorporation

 

We believe that corporate jurisdiction is an issue better suited to board determinations than shareholder determinations. Companies seek reincorporation to obtain more favorable tax treatment or reap other benefits that a new corporate jurisdiction affords. Reincorporation can, however, negatively affect shareholder rights. Accordingly, Manning & Napier’s analysts will vote on such matters on a case-by-case basis.

 

3.

Approving Other Business

 

Management may, on occasion, seek broad authorization to approve business resolution without shareholder consent. Management typically already has the authority needed to make routine business decisions, so shareholders should avoid granting blanket authority to management, which may reduce management accountability and/or shareholders rights. Manning & Napier’s analysts will evaluate these proposals on a case-by-case basis.

 

E.

ENVIRONMENTAL, SOCIAL, GOVERNANCE MATTERS

 

Material environmental and social issues can have an impact on the value of a company’s stock. Manning & Napier believes that companies must adequately disclose policies and any data related to such issues in a consistent manner so that they may be appropriately analyzed. To this end Manning & Napier will generally support proposals seeking company disclosures in line with those proposed by The Task Force on Climate-related Financial Disclosure (TCFD) and the Sustainability Accounting Standards Board (SASB). As not all proposals seek such broad disclosures Manning & Napier would also support reasonable proposals seeking the disclosure of policies related to other Environmental and Social issues including but not limited to:

 

•

Climate Change

•

Bribery/Corruption

•

Human Rights

•

Diversity

 

As well as data points including those related to:

 

•

Greenhouse Gas emissions

•

Worker Safety

•

Diversity

•

Political Spending

 

 

Shareholder proposals on Environmental and Social issues may also seek to implement changes at the company which seek to lower the potential for boycotts, lawsuits, regulatory penalties, or other financially adverse outcomes. When we believe the impact on the overall shareholders would be neutral or positive, we recommend a vote FOR such proposals.

 

Examples may include:

 

•

Resolution to establish shareholder advisory committees

•

Corporate conduct and human rights policies

•

Adoption of the “MacBride Principles” of equal employment

•

Adoption of “CERES Principles” of environmental responsibility

•

Legal and regulatory compliance policies

•

Supplier standards

•

Fair lending

 

F.

FOREIGN SECURITIES

 

While the international proxies generally follow the same guidelines listed above, there are several issues which are not normally a part of the domestic proxies and as such are addressed separately below.

 

1.

Receiving Financials

 

We recommend voting “FOR” such routine, non-controversial items. Most companies around the world submit their financials to shareholders for approval, and this is one of the first items on most agendas. When evaluating a company’s financial statements, unless there are major concerns about the accuracy of the financial statements, we would vote “FOR” this item.

 

2.

Accepting the acts or performance of the managing board or supervisory board

 

We recommend voting “FOR” such items. The annual formal discharge of board and management represents shareholder approval of actions taken during the year. Discharge is a vote of confidence in the company’s management and policies. It does not necessarily eliminate the possibility of future shareholder action, but it does make such action more difficult to pursue. Meeting agendas normally list proposals to discharge both the board and management as one agenda item.

 

Discharge is generally granted unless a shareholder states a specific reason for withholding discharge and plans to undertake legal action. Withholding discharge is a serious matter and is advisable only when a shareholder has concrete evidence of negligence or abuse on the part of the board or management, has plans to take legal action, or has knowledge of other shareholders’ plans to take legal action.

 

3.

Capital Increase per the following

 

1. with rights, 2. without rights, 3. bonds with rights, or 4. bond without rights. In the majority of cases, we would vote “FOR” capital increases. There may be cases where the analyst deems the capital increase inappropriate and would then vote “AGAINST” such an item.

 

Companies can have one of two types of capital systems. The authorized capital system sets a limit in a company’s articles on the total number of shares that can be issued by the company’s board. The system allows companies to issue shares from this pre-approved limit, although in many markets shareholder approval must be obtained prior to an issuance. Companies also request shareholder approval for increases in authorization when the number of shares contained in the articles is inadequate for issuance authorities. When looking at such issues, we need to review the following: the history of issuance requests; the size of the request; and the purpose of the issuance associated with the increase in authorization.

 

 

Under the conditional capital system, companies seek authorizations for pools of capital with fixed periods of availability. If a company seeks to establish a pool of capital for general issuance purposes, it requests the creation of a certain number of shares with or without preemptive rights, issuable piecemeal at the discretion of the board for a fixed period of time. Unissued shares lapse after the fixed time period expires. This type of authority would be used to carry out general rights issue or small issuances without preemptive rights.

 

Requests for a specific issuance authority are tied to a specific transaction or purpose, such as an acquisition or the servicing of convertible securities. Such authorities cannot be used for any purpose other than that specified in the authorization. This pool of conditional capital also carries a fixed expiration date.

 

In reviewing these proposals, we need to look at the existence of pools of capital from previous years. Because most capital authorizations are for several years, new requests may be made on top of the existing pool of capital. While most requests contain a provision to eliminate earlier pools and replace them with the current request, this is not always the case. Thus, if existing pools of capital are being left in place, the total potential dilution amount from all capital should be considered.

 

G.

CONFLICTS OF INTEREST

 

There are potential conflicts of interest that may arise in connection with the Firm or the Analyst responsible for voting a company’s proxy. Examples of potential conflicts may include the following: (1) the voting Analyst is aware that a client of the advisor or its affiliates is a public company whose shares are held in client portfolios; (2) the voting Analyst (or a member of their immediate family) of the advisor or its affiliates also has a personal interest in the outcome of a matter before shareholders of a particular security that they cover as an Analyst; (3) an employee (or a member of their immediate family) of the advisor or its affiliates is a Director or Officer of such security; (4) an employee (or a member of their immediate family) is a Director candidate on the proxy; or (5) the voting Analyst (or a member of their immediate family), the advisor or its affiliates have a business relationship with a participant in a proxy contest, corporate director or director candidates.

 

In recognizing the above potential conflicts, the following controls have been put in place: (1) analysts provide written confirmation that no conflict of interest exists with respect to each proxy vote on which the analyst opines. If an Analyst indicates a conflict of interest, then the analyst will not be permitted to vote the proxy; instead (2) the Committee will resolve any apparent or potential conflicts of interest. The Committee may utilize the following to assist in seeking resolution (including, without limitation, those instances when the Advisor potentially has an institutional conflict): (1) voting in accordance with the guidance of an independent consultant or outside counsel; (2) designation of a senior employee or committee member to vote that has neither a relationship with the company nor knowledge of any relationship between the advisor or its affiliates with such company; (3) voting in proportion to other shareholders of the issuer; (4) voting in other ways that are consistent with the advisor’s and its affiliates’ obligation to vote in clients’ collective best interest.

 

With respect to proxies solicited by a Series of the Manning & Napier Fund, Inc. held by separate account clients of Manning & Napier that have delegated proxy voting responsibility to Manning & Napier pursuant to the terms of their investment advisory agreements with Manning & Napier, the Committee will determine if any material conflicts of interest arise with respect to Manning & Napier voting the proxy. If the Committee determines that a material conflict of interest arises with respect to Manning & Napier voting the proxy, Manning & Napier will vote the proxy in accordance with Glass Lewis & Co.’s proxy voting policies and procedures. If the Committee determines that no material conflicts of interest arise with respect to Manning & Napier voting the proxy, then the Committee will determine how to vote the proxy and document its rationale for making the conflict of interest and voting determinations.

 

When required by law or SEC exemptive order (if applicable), Manning & Napier will also “echo vote” proxies of an unaffiliated mutual fund or exchange traded fund (“ETF”). When not required to “echo vote,” Manning & Napier will defer to Glass Lewis procedures and recommendations for voting proxies of an unaffiliated mutual fund or ETF, subject to any custom policies of Manning & Napier set forth herein. If Manning & Napier and/or its affiliates own greater than a 5% position in an iShares Exchange Traded Fund, we will vote the shares in the same proportion as the vote of all other holders of shares of such iShares fund.

 

 

OVERSIGHT

 

Manning & Napier has a responsibility to oversee its proxy voting processes including those functions delegated to its service providers. Accordingly, Manning & Napier has adopted the following processes:

 

•

The Committee or persons that the Committee so designates will review these Guidelines annually

 

•

In conjunction with the annual Guideline review, the Committee will review the Glass Lewis guidelines and re-assess the prudence of relying on Glass Lewis research and voting recommendations

 

•

The Committee or persons that the Committee so designates will conduct due diligence on Glass Lewis to assess conflicts, review current voting methodology and research development processes, among other variables

 

•

Manning & Napier’s Vendor Oversight Committee will review Broadridge as a service provider, evaluating such factors as contract fulfillment, error occurrences, financial stability, control infrastructure, among other variables. This review will be conducted in accordance with the Vendor Oversight Committee’s risk-based review cycle.

 

ISSUER and LOBBYIST COMMUNICATION

 

Periodically, analysts may receive calls from lobbyists or solicitors trying to persuade them to vote a certain way on a proxy issue, or from other large stockholders trying to persuade Manning & Napier to join a voting conglomerate in order to exercise control of a company. We will take their opinions into consideration, but our policy is simply to vote in accordance with what we feel is in the best interest of our clients and shareholders and which maximizes the value of the investment.

 

RECORDKEEPING

 

Manning & Napier retains records of the following: (i) these and other related Policies and procedures; (ii) copies of each proxy statement received regarding client securities (except that Manning & Napier may rely on the SEC’s Electronic Data Gathering, Analysis, and Retrieval (EDGAR) system; (iii) a record of every vote cast on behalf of a client, which may be maintained by a third-party provider under certain conditions; (iv) documents, if any, that Manning & Napier prepared that were material to its proxy voting decisions; (v) all requests for proxy voting records and Manning & Napier’s reply to such requests; and (vi) documentation of conflicts of interests and resolutions thereto. These records will be maintained in accordance with applicable rules and regulations to which Manning & Napier is subject.

 

INQUIRIES

 

Information regarding these policies and procedures or voting records specific to your account may be obtained through your Financial Consultant or Relationship Manager.

 

 

PART C – OTHER INFORMATION

 

Item 28. Exhibits
(a)	(1)	Articles of Incorporation as filed with the State of Maryland on July 26, 1984 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit (1)(a) to Post-Effective Amendment No. 30 to the Registration Statement on Form N-1A filed on October 23, 1998 with Accession Number 0000751173-98-00050).
	(2)	Articles of Amendment and Restatement as filed with the State of Maryland dated February 27, 2024 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 99.a(2) to Post-Effective Amendment No. 226 to the Registration Statement on Form N-1A filed on February 28, 2024 with Accession Number 0001999371-24-002806).
	(3)	Articles Supplementary to the Charter as filed with the State of Maryland dated June 4, 2024 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 99.a(3) to Post-Effective Amendment No. 227 to the Registration Statement on Form N-1A filed on June 18, 2024 with Accession Number 0001999371-24-007569).
	(4)	Articles of Amendment as filed with the State of Maryland dated August 14, 2024 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 99.a(4) to Post-Effective Amendment No. 232 to the Registration Statement on Form N-1A filed on February 27, 2025 with Accession Number 0001839882-25-011877).
	(5)	Articles of Amendment as filed with the State of Maryland dated February 13, 2025 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 99.a(5) to Post-Effective Amendment No. 232 to the Registration Statement on Form N-1A filed on February 27, 2025 with Accession Number 0001839882-25-011877).
	(6)	Articles Supplementary to the Charter (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 99.a(6) to Post-Effective Amendment No. 233 to the Registration Statement on Form N-1A filed on March 14, 2025 with Accession Number 0001387131-25-000050).
(b)
	(1)	Amended and Restated By-Laws dated May 5, 2020 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit (2)(a)(1) to the Registration Statement on Form N-14 filed on May 21, 2020 with Accession Number 0001387131-20-005062).
(c)
	(1)	Specimen Stock Certificate (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 1(a) (Articles of Incorporation) and Exhibit (2) (By-Laws) to Post-Effective Amendment No. 30 to the Registration Statement on Form N-1A filed on October 23, 1998 with Accession Number 0000751173-98-00050).
(d)
	(1)	Investment Advisory Agreement dated October 21, 2022 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 99.d(1) to Post Effective Amendment No. 219 to the Registration Statement on Form N-1A filed on February 27, 2023 with Accession Number 0001387131-23-002455).
	(1)(a)	Amended and Restated Schedule A to the Investment Advisory Agreement dated May 20, 2025 as filed herewith.
	(2)	Expense Limitation Agreement between Manning & Napier Advisors, LLC and Manning & Napier Fund, Inc., dated October 21, 2022 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 99.d(2)(a) to Post Effective Amendment No. 219 to the Registration Statement on Form N-1A filed on February 27, 2023 with Accession Number 0001387131-23-002455).
	(2)(a)	Amended and Restated Schedule A to the Expense Limitation Agreement between Manning & Napier Advisors, LLC and Manning & Napier Fund, Inc., dated May 20, 2025 as filed herewith.
	(3)	Advisory Fee Waiver Agreement between Manning & Napier Advisors, LLC and Manning & Napier Fund, Inc. dated October 21, 2022 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 99.d(2)(b) to Post Effective Amendment No. 219 to the Registration Statement on Form N-1A filed on February 27, 2023 with Accession Number 0001387131-23-002455).
	(3)(a)	Amended and Restated Schedule A to the Advisory Fee Waiver Agreement between Manning & Napier Advisors, LLC and Manning & Napier Fund, Inc. dated May 20, 2025 as filed herewith.
	(4)	Investment Advisory Agreement between Manning & Napier Fund, Inc. and Manning & Napier Advisors, LLC, dated October 21, 2022 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 99.d(3)(a) to Post Effective Amendment No. 219 to the Registration Statement on Form N-1A filed on February 27, 2023 with Accession Number 0001387131-23-002455).
	(4)(a)	Amended and Restated Schedule A to the Investment Advisory Agreement between Manning & Napier Advisors, LLC and Manning & Napier Fund, Inc. dated October 11, 2023 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 99.d(3)(a)(i) to Post Effective Amendment No. 225 to the Registration Statement on Form N-1A filed on October 13, 2023 with Accession Number 0001387131-23-012240).

 

 

	(5)	Investment Sub-Advisory Agreement between Rainier Investment Management, LLC and Manning & Napier Advisors, LLC, on behalf of the Rainier International Discovery Series dated October 21, 2022 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 99.d(4)(a) to Post Effective Amendment No. 219 to the Registration Statement on Form N-1A filed on February 27, 2023 with Accession Number 0001387131-23-002455).
	(6)	Investment Sub-Advisory Agreement between Callodine Capital Management, LP and Manning & Napier Advisors, LLC, on behalf of the Callodine Equity Income Series dated October 11, 2023 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 99.d(5)(a) to Post Effective Amendment No. 225 to the Registration Statement on Form N-1A filed on October 13, 2023 with Accession Number 0001387131-23-012240).
(e)
	(1)	Amended and Restated Distribution Agreement dated October 21, 2022 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 99.e(1) to Post Effective Amendment No. 219 to the Registration Statement on Form N-1A filed on February 27, 2023 with Accession Number 0001387131-23-002455).
	(1)(a)	Amended and Restated Schedule A to the Distribution Agreement dated May 20, 2025 as filed herewith.
	(2)	Manning & Napier Fund, Inc. form of dealer agreement between Manning & Napier Investor Services, Inc. and financial intermediaries (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 99.e(2) to Post-Effective Amendment 201 to the Registration Statement on Form N-1A filed on April 26, 2018 with Accession Number 0001193125-18-134595).
(f)		Not Applicable.
(g)
	(1)	Mutual Fund Custody and Service Agreement between Manning & Napier Fund, Inc. and The Bank of New York Mellon beginning February 1, 2015 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 99.g(1) to Post-Effective Amendment No. 163 to the Registration Statement on Form N-1A filed on April 29, 2015 with Accession Number 0001193125-15-155932).
	(1)(a)	Amendment to the Custody Agreement dated January 1, 2018 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 99.g(1)a to Post-Effective Amendment No. 199 to the Registration Statement on Form N-1A filed on February 26, 2018 with Accession Number 0001193125-18-058157).
	(1)(b)	Amendment to the Custody Agreement dated March 22, 2021 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 99.g(1)(b) to Post-Effective Amendment No. 218 to the Registration Statement on Form N-1A filed on February 25, 2022 with Accession Number 0001387131-22-002466).
	(1)(c)	Amendment to the Custody Agreement dated August 26, 2021 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 99.g(1)(c) to Post-Effective Amendment No. 218 to the Registration Statement on Form N-1A filed on February 25, 2022 with Accession Number 0001387131-22-002466).
	(1)(d)	Amendment to the Custody Agreement dated June 15, 2023 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 99.g(1)d to Post-Effective Amendment No. 226 to the Registration Statement on Form N-1A filed on February 28, 2024 with Accession Number 0001999371-24-002806).
	(1)(e)	Amendment to the Custody Agreement dated December 1, 2024 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 99.g(1)(e) to Post-Effective Amendment No. 232 to the Registration Statement on Form N-1A filed on February 27, 2025 with Accession Number 0001839882-25-011877).
(h)
	(1)	Amended and Restated Master Services Agreement dated February 13, 2020 between Manning & Napier Advisors, LLC and Manning & Napier Fund, Inc. (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 99.h(1) to Post-Effective Amendment No. 215 to the Registration Statement on Form N-1A filed on February 27, 2020 with Accession Number 0001193125-20-052712).
	(1)(a)	Amended and Restated Fund Administration Appendix and Schedule A to the Master Services Agreement between Manning & Napier Advisors, LLC and Manning & Napier Fund, Inc. dated August 17, 2022 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 99.h(1)(a) to Post Effective Amendment No. 219 to the Registration Statement on Form N-1A filed on February 27, 2023 with Accession Number 0001387131-23-002455).
	(2)	Transfer Agency and Shareholder Services Agreement between BNY Mellon Investment Servicing (US) Inc., Manning & Napier Fund, Inc. and Manning & Napier Advisors, LLC dated March 1, 2017 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 99.h(2) to Post-Effective Amendment No. 185 to the Registration Statement on Form N-1A filed on April 18, 2017 with Accession Number 0001193125-17-127042).
	(2)(a)	Amendment No. 1 to the Transfer Agency and Shareholder Services Agreement dated March 10, 2017 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 99.h(2)a to Post-Effective Amendment No. 199 to the Registration Statement on Form N-1A filed on February 26, 2018 with Accession Number 0001193125-18-058157).
	(2)(b)	Amendment No. 8 to the Transfer Agency and Shareholder Services Agreement dated July 17, 2023 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 99.h(2)(h) to Post-Effective Amendment No. 226 to the Registration Statement on Form N-1A filed on February 28, 2024 with Accession Number 0001999371-24-002806).

 

 

	(2)(c)	Amendment No. 9 to the Transfer Agency and Shareholder Services Agreement dated December 1, 2024 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 99.h(2)(c) to Post-Effective Amendment No. 232 to the Registration Statement on Form N-1A filed on February 27, 2025 with Accession Number 0001839882-25-011877).
	(3)	Rule 12d1-4 Fund of Funds Investment Agreement between Manning & Napier Fund, Inc. and Managed Portfolio Series, on behalf of the High Yield Bond Series, dated December 28, 2023, as filed herewith.
(i)		Opinion of Morgan, Lewis & Bockius LLP (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 99.i to Post-Effective Amendment No. 233 to the Registration Statement on Form N-1A filed on March 14, 2025 with Accession Number 0001387131-25-000050).
(j)		Not Applicable
(k)		Not Applicable.
(l)		Investment letters (incorporated by reference to Exhibit (13) to Post-Effective Amendment No. 30 to the Registration Statement on Form N-1A filed on October 23, 1998 with Accession Number 0000751173-98-00050).
(m)
	(1)	Shareholder Services Plan (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 99.m(5) to Post-Effective Amendment No. 60 to the Registration Statement on Form N-1A filed on December 17, 2007 with Accession Number 0001193125-07-266584).
	(1)(a)	Amended and Restated Shareholder Services Plan Exhibit A dated May 21, 2020 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 99.m(1)(a) to Post Effective Amendment No. 217 to the Registration Statement of Form N-1A filed on February 25, 2021 with Accession Number 0001193125-21-057155).
	(2)	Shareholder Services Agreement between Manning & Napier Fund, Inc. and Manning & Napier Advisors, Inc. (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 99.m(6) to Post-Effective Amendment No. 60 to the Registration Statement on Form N-1A filed on December 17, 2007 with Accession Number 0001193125-07-266584).
	(2)(a)	Assignment and Assumption Agreement among Manning & Napier Fund, Inc., Manning & Napier Advisors, Inc., and Manning & Napier Advisors, LLC dated October 1, 2011 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 99.d(2)e to Post Effective Amendment No. 93 to the Registration Statement on Form N-1A filed on November 1, 2011 with Accession Number 0001193125-11-289850).
	(2)(b)	Amended and Restated Shareholder Services Agreement Exhibit A dated May 21, 2020 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 99.m(2)(b) to Post Effective Amendment No. 217 to the Registration Statement of Form N-1A filed on February 25, 2021 with Accession Number 0001193125-21-057155).
	(3)	Amended and Restated Distribution and Shareholder Services Plan (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 99.m(3) to Post-Effective Amendment No. 213 to the Registration Statement on Form N-1A filed on February 27, 2019 with Accession Number 0001193125-19-054181).
	(3)(a)	Amended and Restated Distribution and Shareholder Services Plan Exhibit A dated May 20, 2025 as filed herewith.
(n)
	(1)	Amended and Restated Rule 18f-3 Plan dated May 23, 2019 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 99.n(1) to Post-Effective Amendment No. 215 to the Registration Statement on Form N-1A filed on February 27, 2020 with Accession Number 0001193125-20-052712).
	(1)(a)	Amended and Restated Rule 18f-3 Plan Schedule A dated May 20, 2025 as filed herewith.
(o)		Not Applicable.
(p)
	(1)	Amended Code of Ethics adopted by Manning & Napier Fund, Inc., Manning & Napier Advisors, LLC, Manning & Napier Investor Services, Inc. and Rainier Investment Management, LLC dated February 13, 2025 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 99.p(1) to Post-Effective Amendment No. 232 to the Registration Statement on Form N-1A filed on February 27, 2025 with Accession Number 0001839882-25-011877).
	(2)	Amended Code of Ethics adopted by Callodine Capital Management, LP, dated December 2024 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 99.p(2) to Post-Effective Amendment No. 232 to the Registration Statement on Form N-1A filed on February 27, 2025 with Accession Number 0001839882-25-011877).

 

(q)
	(1)	Powers of Attorney dated February 13, 2020 for Chester N. Watson and Paul A. Brooke (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 99.q to Post-Effective Amendment No. 215 to the Registration Statement on Form N-1A filed on February 27, 2020 with Accession Number 0001193125-20-052712).
	(2)	Power of Attorney dated April 17, 2020 for Russell O. Vernon (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 99.q(2) to Post Effective Amendment No. 217 to the Registration Statement of Form N-1A filed on February 25, 2021 with Accession Number 0001193125-21-057155).
	(3)	Power of Attorney dated February 11, 2020 for John M. Glazer (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 99.q(3) to Post Effective Amendment No. 217 to the Registration Statement of Form N-1A filed on February 25, 2021 with Accession Number 0001193125-21-057155).
	(4)	Power of Attorney dated July 13, 2023 for Eunice Chapon (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 99.q(4) to Post Effective Amendment No. 225 to the Registration Statement on Form N-1A filed on October 13, 2023 with Accession Number 0001387131-23-012240).

 

Item 29.  Persons Controlled by or under Common Control with Registrant.

 

Not Applicable

 

Item 30.  Indemnification.

 

Reference is made to subparagraph (b) of paragraph (7) of Article SEVENTH of Registrant's Articles of Incorporation, which reflects the positions taken in Investment Company Act Release 11330.

 

Insofar as indemnification for liabilities arising under the Securities Act of 1933 may be permitted to trustees, officers and controlling persons of Registrant pursuant to the foregoing provisions, or otherwise, Registrant has been advised that in the opinion of the Securities and Exchange Commission such indemnification is against public policy as expressed in that Act and is, therefore, unenforceable. In the event that a claim for indemnification against such liabilities (other than the payment by Registrant of expenses incurred or paid by a trustee, officer or controlling persons of Registrant in the successful defense of any action, suit or proceeding) is asserted by such trustee, officer or controlling person in connection with the securities being registered, Registrant will, unless in the opinion of its counsel the matter has been settled by controlling precedent, submit to a court of appropriate jurisdiction the question whether such indemnification by it is against public policy as expressed in the Act and will be governed by the final adjudication of such issue.

 

The Directors and Officers of the Registrant are covered parties under a Directors & Officers/Errors & Omissions insurance policy issued by Continental Casualty Company, Endurance American Insurance Company, ACE American Insurance Company, and Ironshore Indemnity Inc and Zurich American Insurance Company. The effect of such insurance is to insure against liability for any act, error, omission, misstatement, misleading statement, neglect or breach of duty by the insureds as directors and/or officers of the Registrant.

 

Item 31.  Business and Other Connections of Investment Advisor.

 

Manning & Napier Advisors, LLC is the investment advisor of the High Yield Bond Series, Pro-Blend Moderate Term Series, Pro-Blend Extended Term Series, Pro-Blend Conservative Series, Pro-Blend Maximum Term Series, Equity Series, Overseas Series, Diversified Tax Exempt Series, Core Bond Series, Unconstrained Bond Series, Disciplined Value Series, Rainier International Discovery Series, Credit Series, Callodine Equity Income Series and the Systematic High Yield Bond Series. Manning & Napier Advisors, LLC was the investment advisor to the Emerging Markets Series prior to its liquidation on November 10, 2017, the Quality Equity Series prior to its liquidation on March 9, 2018, the World Opportunities Series prior to its reorganization into the Overseas Series on September 24, 2018, the Strategic Income Conservative Series prior to its liquidation on September 27, 2018, the Ohio Tax Exempt Series and Global Fixed Income Series prior to their liquidations on November 30, 2018, the Income Series, Equity Income Series and International Series prior to their liquidations on November 20, 2019, the Blended Asset Moderate Series, Blended Asset Conservative Series, Blended Asset Extended Series and Blended Asset Maximum Series prior to their liquidation on September 18, 2020, the Target Income Series, Target 2015 Series, Target 2020 Series, Target 2025 Series, Target 2030 Series, Target 2035 Series, Target 2040 Series, Target 2045 Series, Target 2050 Series, Target 2055 Series, Target 2060 Series prior to their reorganization on September 28, 2020, the New York Tax Exempt Series on January 20, 2023 and the Real Estate Series on October 15, 2024. For information as to the business, profession, vocation or employment of a substantial nature of Manning & Napier Advisors, LLC and its officers, reference is made to Part B of this Registration Statement and to Form ADV as filed under the Investment Advisers Act of 1940 by Manning & Napier Advisors, LLC.

 

Rainier Investment Management, LLC is the investment sub-advisor of the Rainier International Discovery Series. For information as to the business, profession, vocation or employment of a substantial nature of Rainier Investment Management, LLC and its officers, reference is made to Part B of this Registration Statement and to Form ADV as filed under the Investment Advisers Act of 1940 by Rainier Investment Management, LLC.

 

 

Callodine Capital Management, LP is the investment sub-advisor of the Callodine Equity Income Series. For information as to the business, profession, vocation or employment of a substantial nature of Callodine Capital Management, LP and its officers, reference is made to Part B of this Registration Statement and to Form ADV as filed under the Investment Advisers Act of 1940 by Callodine Capital Management, LP.

 

Item 32.  Principal Underwriters.

 

(a) Not Applicable

 

(b) Manning & Napier Investor Services, Inc. is the Distributor for the Registrant's shares.

 

Name & Principal Business Address	Positions & Offices With Distributor	Positions & Offices With Registrant
Scott Morabito  290 Woodcliff Drive  Fairport, NY 14450	President & Director	Vice President
Valerie Lindenmuth  290 Woodcliff Drive  Fairport, NY 14450	Director	N/A
Carl Serra  290 Woodcliff Drive  Fairport, NY 14450	Principal Financial Officer	N/A
Elizabeth Craig  290 Woodcliff Drive  Fairport, NY 14450	Corporate Secretary & Director	Corporate Secretary
Samantha Larew  290 Woodcliff Drive  Fairport, NY 14450	Chief Compliance Officer	Chief Compliance Officer

 

(c) Not Applicable

 

Item 33.  Location of Accounts and Records.

 

With respect to the Registrant:

 

Manning & Napier Fund, Inc. 

290 Woodcliff Drive 

Fairport, NY 14450

 

With respect to the Registrant’s Investment Advisors:

 

Manning & Napier Advisors, LLC 

290 Woodcliff Drive 

Fairport, NY 14450

 

Rainier Investment Management, LLC 

600 University Street, Suite 2412 

Seattle, WA 98101

 

Callodine Capital Management, LP, 

Two International Place, Suite 1830 

Boston, MA 02110

 

With respect to the Registrant’s Transfer Agent: 

 

BNY Mellon Investment Servicing (US) Inc. 

118 Flanders Road 

Westborough, MA 01581

 

 

With respect to the Registrant’s Custodian:

 

The Bank of New York Mellon Corporation 

135 Santilli Highway 

Everett, MA 02149

 

Item 34.  Management Services.

 

Not Applicable.

 

Item 35.  Undertakings.

 

Not Applicable.

 

 

SIGNATURES

 

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Act of 1933 and the Investment Company Act of 1940, the Registrant duly certifies that it meets all of the requirements for effectiveness of this Registration Statement pursuant to Rule 485(b) under the Securities Act of 1933 and has duly caused this Post-Effective Amendment to the Registration Statement to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized, in the Village of Fairport and State of New York on the 5^th day of June 2025.

 

	Manning & Napier Fund, Inc.
	(Registrant)
	By	/s/ Paul J. Battaglia
	Paul J. Battaglia
	President

  

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Act of 1933, this Post-Effective Amendment to the Registration Statement has been signed below by the following persons in the capacities and on the date indicated.

 

Signature		Title	Date
/s/ Paul J. Battaglia		President, Principal Executive Officer, Director	June 5, 2025
Paul J. Battaglia
/s/     *		Director	June 5, 2025
John M. Glazer
/s/     *		Director	June 5, 2025
Eunice K. Chapon
/s/     *		Director	June 5, 2025
Paul A. Brooke
/s/     *		Director	June 5, 2025
Russell O. Vernon
/s/     *		Director	June 5, 2025
Chester N. Watson
/s/ Jill Peeper		Principal Financial Officer, Chief Financial Officer, Treasurer	June 5, 2025
Jill Peeper

 

* By:	/s/ Paul J. Battaglia
	Paul J. Battaglia

 

* Pursuant to powers of attorney dated February 13, 2020, April 17, 2020, February 11, 2021 and July 13, 2023. See Item 28(q) of this Registration Statement.

 

 

EXHIBIT INDEX

 

Exhibit 99.d(1)(a) - Amended and Restated Schedule A to the Investment Advisory Agreement dated May 20, 2025.

 

Exhibit 99.d(2)(a) - Amended and Restated Schedule A to the Expense Limitation Agreement between Manning & Napier Advisors, LLC and Manning & Napier Fund, Inc., dated May 20, 2025.

 

Exhibit 99.d(3)(a) - Amended and Restated Schedule A to the Advisory Fee Waiver Agreement between Manning & Napier Advisors, LLC and Manning & Napier Fund, Inc. dated May 20, 2025.

 

Exhibit 99.e(1)(a) - Amended and Restated Schedule A to the Distribution Agreement dated May 20, 2025.

  

Exhibit 99.h(3) - Rule 12d1-4 Fund of Funds Investment Agreement between Manning & Napier Fund, Inc. and Managed Portfolio Series, on behalf of the High Yield Bond Series, dated December 28, 2023.

 

Exhibit 99.m(3)(a) - Amended and Restated Distribution and Shareholder Services Plan Exhibit A dated May 20, 2025.

 

Exhibit 99.n(1)(a) - Amended and Restated Rule 18f-3 Plan Schedule A dated May 20, 2025.

 

ATTACHMENTS / EXHIBITS

AMENDED AND RESTATED SCHEDULE A

AMENDED AND RESTATED SCHEDULE A TO THE EXPENSE LIMITATION AGREEMENT

AMENDED AND RESTATED SCHEDULE A TO THE ADVISORY FEE WAIVER AGREEMENT

AMENDED AND RESTATED SCHEDULE A TO THE DISTRIBUTION AGREEMENT

RULE 12D1-4 FUND OF FUNDS INVESTMENT AGREEMENT

AMENDED AND RESTATED DISTRIBUTION AND SHAREHOLDER SERVICES PLAN EXHIBIT A

AMENDED AND RESTATED RULE 18F-3 PLAN SCHEDULE A

XBRL SCHEMA FILE

XBRL DEFINITION FILE

XBRL LABEL FILE

XBRL PRESENTATION FILE

IDEA: mn_485bpos-060525_htm.xml

IDEA: R1.htm

IDEA: R2.htm

IDEA: R3.htm

IDEA: R4.htm

IDEA: R5.htm

IDEA: R6.htm

IDEA: R7.htm

IDEA: R8.htm

IDEA: R9.htm

IDEA: FilingSummary.xml

IDEA: MetaLinks.json