Form N-CSR Salient Midstream & MLP For: Nov 30
UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
FORM N-CSR
CERTIFIED SHAREHOLDER REPORT OF REGISTERED
MANAGEMENT INVESTMENT COMPANY
Investment Company Act file number: 811-22626
Salient Midstream & MLP Fund
(Exact name of registrant as specified in charter)
4265 San Felipe, 8th Floor
Houston, TX 77027
(Address of principal executive offices) (Zip code)
|
Gregory A. Reid, Principal Executive Officer Salient Midstream & MLP Fund 4265 San Felipe, 8th Floor Houston, TX 77027 (Name and address of agent for service) |
With a Copy To: George J. Zornada K&L Gates LLP State Street Financial Center One Lincoln St. Boston, MA 02111-2950 (617) 261-3231 |
Registrants telephone number, including area code: (713) 993-4001
Date of fiscal year end: November 30
Date of reporting period: November 30, 2020
Form N-CSR is to be used by management investment companies to file reports with the Commission, not later than 10 days after the transmission to stockholders of any report that is required to be transmitted to stockholders under Rule 30e-1 under the Investment Company Act of 1940 (17 CFR 270.30e-1). The Commission may use the information provided on Form N-CSR in its regulatory, disclosure review, inspection, and policymaking roles.
A registrant is required to disclose the information specified by Form N-CSR, and the Commission will make this information public. A registrant is not required to respond to the collection of information contained in Form N-CSR unless the Form displays a currently valid Office of Management and Budget (OMB) control number. Please direct comments concerning the accuracy of the information collection burden estimate and any suggestions for reducing the burden to the Secretary, Securities and Exchange Commission, 100 F Street, NE, Washington, DC 20549. The OMB has reviewed this collection of information under the clearance requirements of 44 U.S.C. § 3507.
| Item 1. | Report to Stockholders. |
The following is a copy of the report transmitted to shareholders of the Salient Midstream & MLP Fund (the Fund), pursuant to Rule 30e-1 under the Investment Company Act of 1940, as amended (the Act) (17 CFR 270.30e-1).
|
Midstream & MLP Fund |
Shareholder Letter (Unaudited)
Dear Fellow Shareholders:1
We are pleased to provide the annual report of the Salient Midstream & MLP Fund (the Fund or SMM) (NYSE: SMM) which contains updated data as of November 30, 2020.
As of November 30, 2020, the Fund had total assets of $121.4 million, net asset value of $5.64 per share and 17.7 million common shares outstanding. The Funds price per share was $4.22, which represents a 25.2% discount to its net asset value (NAV).2
The Funds investment allocation is shown in the pie chart below:
Source: Salient Capital Advisors, LLC (Adviser), November 30, 2020.
For illustrative purposes only. Figures are based on the Funds gross assets.
1 Certain statements in this letter are forward-looking statements. The forward-looking statements and other views expressed herein are those of the portfolio managers and the Fund as of the date of this letter. Actual future results or occurrences may differ significantly from those anticipated in any forward-looking statements, and there is no guarantee that any predictions will come to pass. The views expressed herein are subject to change at any time, due to numerous market and other factors. The Fund disclaims any obligation to update publicly or revise any forward-looking statements or views expressed herein. There can be no assurance that the Fund will achieve its investment objectives. The value of the Fund will fluctuate with the value of the underlying securities. Historically, closed-end funds often trade at a discount to their net asset value.
2 Past performance is not indicative of future results. Current performance may be higher or lower than the data shown. The data shown are unaudited. Returns do not reflect the deduction of taxes that shareholders may have to pay on Fund distributions or upon the sale of Fund shares.
| 1 |
The Funds Top 10 holdings are shown below, as of November 30, 2020:1
| No. | Symbol | Name | Country | Asset Type | % of Gross Assets |
|||||||
| 1 | | EMG Utica I Offshore Co-Investment LP |
United States | Midstream Company | 12.7 | % | ||||||
| 2 | ENB | Enbridge, Inc. |
Canada | Midstream Company | 5.4 | % | ||||||
| 3 | WMB | The Williams Companies, Inc. |
United States | Midstream Company | 5.3 | % | ||||||
| 4 | EPD | Enterprise Products Partners LP |
United States | MLP | 4.7 | % | ||||||
| 5 | KEY CN | Keyera Corp. |
Canada | Midstream Company | 4.4 | % | ||||||
| 6 | PAGP | Plains GP Holdings LP |
United States | MLP Affiliate | 4.2 | % | ||||||
| 7 | NEP | NextEra Energy Partners LP |
United States | Renewable Energy Infrastructure | 4.2 | % | ||||||
| 8 | TRP | TC Energy Corp. |
Canada | Midstream Company | 4.1 | % | ||||||
| 9 | ETRN | Equitrans Midstream Corp. |
United States | Midstream Company | 3.9 | % | ||||||
| 10 | MPLX | MPLX LP |
United States | MLP | 3.9 | % | ||||||
|
|
|
|||||||||||
| 52.8 | % | |||||||||||
|
|
|
|||||||||||
Source: Salient Capital Advisors, LLC (Adviser), November 30, 2020.
For illustrative purposes only. Current and future holdings are subject to change and risk. Figures are based on the Funds gross assets.
During the fiscal year (December 1, 2019 November 30, 2020), the Funds NAV and market price total returns were -27.9% and -36.2%, respectively, compared to -17.9% for the Alerian Midstream Energy Select Index (AMEI), during the same period.2,3
Performance Snapshot
as of November 30, 2020 (Unaudited)
| Price Per Share | Fiscal YTD Total Return* |
Since Inception* (Annualized) | ||||||||
| $5.64 (NAV) |
-27.93 | % | -6.81 | % | ||||||
| $4.22 (Market Price) |
-36.19 | % | -9.93 | % | ||||||
Source: Salient Capital Advisors, LLC (Adviser), November 30, 2020.
For illustrative purposes only. All figures represent past performance and are not indicative of future results. No investment strategy can guarantee performance results.
* Total returns are based on changes in NAV or market price, respectively. Returns reflect the deduction of all Fund expenses, including management fees, operating expenses and other Fund expenses. Returns do not reflect the deduction of brokerage commissions or taxes that investors may pay on distributions or the sale of shares. Total return assumes the reinvestment of all distributions. Inception date of the Fund was May 25, 2012.
1 Fund shares do not represent a deposit or obligation of, and are not guaranteed or endorsed by, any bank or other insured depository institution, and are not federally insured by the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation, the Federal Reserve Board or any other government agency. Data are based on total market value of Fund investments unless otherwise indicated. The data provided are for informational purposes only and are not intended for trading purposes.
2 Source: Alerian, November 30, 2020. Alerian Midstream Energy Select Index, Alerian Midstream Energy Select Total Return Index, AMEI and AMEIX are trademarks of Alerian and their use is granted under a license from Alerian. Past performance is not indicative of how the index will perform in the future. The index reflects the reinvestment of dividends and income and does not reflect deductions for fees, expenses or taxes. The index is unmanaged and is not available for direct investment. Alerian Midstream Energy Select Index (AMEI) is a composite of North American midstream energy infrastructure companies that are engaged in activities involving energy commodities. The capped, float-adjusted, capitalization-weighted index is disseminated in real time on a price-return basis. Inception date of the AMEI is April 1, 2013.
3 Past performance is not indicative of future results.
| 2 |
Market Review
Almost from the very beginning of the fiscal year (December 1, 2019), the coronavirus (COVID-19) and the various governmental preventive measures taken to contain the spread of the virus dominated all facets of life. It is impossible to review the last 12 months and not eventually come back to COVID-19.1
Looking back now, it seems like it was a lot longer ago than just 12 months when the first whispers started leaking out of China that something was amiss. By the middle of January, China sealed off the city of Wuhan and several other cities and it wasnt long before an aggregate population of over 50 million in the worlds second largest economy was offline. Even worse, the spread of the virus was showing no sign of slowing down. At the Fund level, we began to worry that we may have an energy demand issue arising. By the end of the month, flights from China to the U.S. were grounded and our worries were rapidly coming to fruition.
West Texas Intermediate crude oil began the year above $61 per barrel (bbl) largely on a robust global economy and the December 2019 announcement from the Organization of the Petroleum Exporting Countries (OPEC) that it would deepen existing production cuts by an additional 500,000 barrels per day (bpd) through March 2020.2,3,4 Crude oil had only rarely traded above $60/bbl throughout 2019 so it ended the year on a high note and received a further boost after the killing of Iranian Quds Force leader Qassam Soleimani on January 2, 2020, which heightened Middle East tensions.5 The Iranian response was not as aggressive as feared and tensions cooled and soon so did the price of crude oil. After peaking at over $63/bbl on January 6, 2020, the price fell to $51/bbl by the end of the month and the race to the bottom was on.2
Midstream followed a similar path, gaining nearly 2.5% over the first half of January before plummeting over the back half of the month as Chinese lockdowns went into effect.6 The Alerian Midstream Energy Select Index (AMEI) finished the month down over 4%.7
The decline in the energy markets quickened in February as COVID-19 spread around the globe, increasing fears that an unprecedented decrease in energy demand was possible. Investors abandoned energy with aplomb and the AMEI fell a further 10.3% in the month.7 The fear wasnt limited to energy. Reports out of China showed that its economic activity had fallen 60% year-over-year (y/y) indicating the sharpest decline ever measured.8 The broader market, as represented by the S&P 500 Total Return Index (S&P 500), set an all-time high close on February 19, 2020, of 3,386.2,9 By the end of the month, the S&P 500 finished down 8.2%, falling 13% over the last seven trading days.2
The bottom fell out in March when full-blown panic took hold as the global economy came to a screeching halt. International flights were grounded, states didnt allow residents of certain other states entry without quarantining first and the New York City area was hardest hit as cases and casualties spiked. In short order, the NBA, NHL and MLB all suspended their seasons and the NCAA cancelled its wildly popular basketball tournament. More importantly, many school systems shut down and switched to online instruction. Many employers shut their offices and allowed their employees to work from home in order to attempt to limit the spread of the coronavirus. All these measures had a devastating impact on energy demand. Analysts estimated that crude oil demand was on pace to fall by an unthinkable 30% y/y. Making matters worse, the OPEC+ meeting on March 6, 2020, ended in disaster with Saudi Arabia and Russia not only not agreeing to extend the production cuts agreed to three months prior, but actually promising to increase production in the face of collapsing crude oil demand.10
1 COVID-19 is an infectious disease caused by a new strain of coronavirus. The virus was first identified in late 2019 in Wuhan, the capital of Chinas Hubei province, and has since spread globally, resulting in the ongoing 20192021 coronavirus pandemic.
2 Source: Bloomberg, December 2020.
3 West Texas Intermediate (WTI) is a grade of crude oil used as a benchmark in oil pricing. This grade is described as medium crude oil because of its relatively low density and sweet because of its low sulfur content. It is the underlying commodity of the New York Mercantile Exchanges oil futures contracts. The Organization of the Petroleum Exporting Countries (OPEC) is a group consisting of 14 of the worlds major oil-exporting nations. OPEC was founded in 1960 to coordinate the petroleum policies of its members and to provide member states with technical and economic aid.
4 Source: CNBC, December 2019.
5 Source: New York Times, January 2020.
6 Midstream is a term used to describe one of the three major stages of oil and gas industry operations. Midstream activities include the processing, storing, transporting and marketing of oil, natural gas and natural gas liquids.
7 Source: Alerian, December 2020. Past performance is not indicative of future results. One cannot invest directly in an index.
8 Source: CNBC, February 2020.
9 S&P 500 Total Return (TR) Index (SPX) is a stock market index based on the common stock prices of 500 top publicly traded American companies. RISKS: Can be affected by general market or economic conditions.
10 Source: OPEC, March 2020. OPEC+ is a group of 24 oil-producing nations, made up of the 14 members of OPEC and 10 other non-OPEC members, including Russia and Mexico. The expanded group arose from a desire to coordinate oil production in a bid to stabilize global oil prices.
| 3 |
When the dust settled, crude oil closed March at $20.48, the lowest price since January 2002.2 Midstream suffered the worst month in its history with the AMEI declining 41.5% and ending the month down just shy of 50% for the year.7
As bad as everything looked at the end of March, there was a glimmer of hope. The AMEI bottomed on March 18, 2020, and then rallied 30% over the last nine trading days of the month.7 The positive momentum carried over into April and the worst month in the history of the index was followed by the best. The AMEI index soared 32.8% in April as bottom-fishing investors began to enter the space.7 Part of the optimism was due to the tone of many midstream first quarter 2020 earnings reports and guidance. In anticipation of lower cash flows from reduced activity and throughput, we saw many midstream companies reduce their dividends/distributions with first quarter earnings reports but that was expected by investors and a prudent move.11 We were in unprecedented times in which giving guidance with any degree of certainty could easily be dismissed as a fools errand, but many midstream companies stated that they only expected to see EBITDA (earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation and amortization) down roughly 10%-15% y/y for 2020.12 Many of the stocks in the midstream space were down greater than 70% at this point so with operations only being guided down in the 15% range there was a disconnect that had risk-tolerant investors easing back in and driving the sector strongly off the bottom.
The recovery in midstream continued through the summer as the global economy gradually reopened. By the first week of June, midstream, as represented by the AMEI, had rallied 115% off the bottom and was down only 16.4% for 2020.7 The broader market also recovered quite nicely and had erased its entire decline and turned positive for the year on June 8, 2020. Energy demand outside of jet fuel had already returned to within roughly 10% of 2019 levels while U.S. crude oil production had bottomed at about 11 million barrels per day (mmbpd), down roughly 15% from the 13 mmbpd peak set in early 2020.13
Midstream was dealt a further blow on July 6, 2020, when a federal judge ordered Energy Transfers (NYSE: ET) Dakota Access Pipeline (DAPL) to shut down in 30 days due to a dispute over its environmental impact.14 An appeals court stayed the ruling a few weeks later, but once again it reminded investors that at times the federal government intervenes into the space and it is detrimental to how the space is perceived. This episode reminded us of the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission ruling disallowing income tax provisions in cost of service tolling back in March 2018.15 The space sold off on the news but by the time the ruling went into effect, its impact had been largely muted. Unfortunately, the damage was done in the eyes of many investors.
The midstream space continued to struggle through the fall as all eyes turned toward the U.S. presidential election. President Trump trailed in the polls and since his administration was considered to be friendlier toward traditional energy than a Biden administration would be, midstream slumped into the election with the AMEI declining 8.6% from the end of July through October.7 Crude oil, which had stabilized around $40/bbl since June, slumped to $37.66/bbl on Election Day.2
Election Day came and went and while energy may have rallied more with a Trump victory, a divided Congress means that the industry-friendly policies of the Trump Administration will not be able to be legislated away and any potentially punitive action would need to be achieved through an executive order, which would likely be met with court challenges. It has often been stated that the thing the market hates most is uncertainty. With the election results, the market got some clarity and investors reacted favorably. November is traditionally the worst month of the year for midstream, as investors engage in tax-loss selling.16 During November, the AMEI spiked 19.5% higher as investors viewed energy, and more specifically, midstream, as a value proposition rather than a value trap.7
The strong November performance allowed the AMEI to end the fiscal year down 17.9%, which, while obviously not optimal, is somewhat of a victory given that it was down nearly 58% at the bottom. Crude oil also rallied and traded at a level above where it was the day before the OPEC+ meeting blew up back in March. If crude oil remains in the high $40s to low $50s range per barrel, we believe U.S. producers will continue to practice capital discipline and be in no hurry to bring new production online absent a significant price incentive.
11 Cash flow refers to the total amount of money being transferred into and out of a business, especially as affecting liquidity.
12 Earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation and amortization (EBITDA) is a measure of a companys overall financial performance and is used as an alternative to simple earnings or net income in some cases.
13 Source: Energy Information Administration, December 2020.
14 Source: New York Times, July 2020. Dakota Access Pipeline (DAPL) or Bakken pipeline is a 1,172-mile-long underground oil pipeline in the United States. It begins in the shale oil fields of the Bakken formation in northwest North Dakota and continues through South Dakota and Iowa to an oil terminal near Patoka, Illinois.
15 The Federal Energy Regulatory Commission is the United States federal agency that regulates the transmission and wholesale sale of electricity and natural gas in interstate commerce and regulates the transportation of oil by pipeline in interstate commerce.
16 Tax-loss selling is the process of selling stocks at a loss in order to reduce the capital gains earned on an investment.
| 4 |
We stated in last years letter that there is a degree of irony to recognize that a slowdown in production growth could have a positive impact on free cash flow for midstream companies.17 This is even more true today as the growth in production over the next 12 months or so will just represent a return to prior production levels and will require even less capital spend from midstream than before. We believe midstream appears to screen favorably, and with the continued gradual reopening of the global economy, it represents a potential opportunity as we thankfully put 2020 in our rearview mirror.
Please note that this letter, including the financial information herein, is made available to shareholders of the Fund for their information. It is not a prospectus, circular or representation intended for use in the purchase or sale of shares of the Fund or of any securities mentioned in this letter.
Sincerely,
Gregory A. Reid
President
MLP Business, Salient Capital Advisors, LLC
17 Free cash flow (FCF) is a way of looking at a businesss cash flow to see what is available for distribution among all the securities holders of a corporate entity.
| 5 |
Key Financial Data (Unaudited)
We supplement the reporting of our financial information determined under United States generally accepted accounting principles (GAAP) with certain non-GAAP financial measures: distributable cash flow and distributable cash flow coverage ratio. We believe these non-GAAP measures provide meaningful information to assist shareholders in understanding our financial results and assessing our performance. We pay distributions to our shareholders, funded in part by distributable cash flow generated from our portfolio investments. Distributable cash flow is the amount of income received by us from our portfolio investments less operating expenses, subject to certain adjustments as described below. Other companies with similar measures may calculate these measures differently, and as a result, it may not be possible to compare these financial measures with other companies non-GAAP financial measures having the same or similar names. These adjusted financial measures should not be considered in isolation or as a substitute for reported net investment income. These non-GAAP financial measures reflect an additional way of viewing an aspect of our operations that, when viewed with our GAAP results and the below reconciliation to the corresponding GAAP financial measures, provide a more complete understanding of our Fund. We strongly encourage shareholders to review our financial statements in their entirety and not rely on any single financial measure.
The table below reconciles the non-GAAP financial measures, distributable cash flow and distributable cash flow coverage ratio, by starting with the most directly comparable GAAP financial measure, net investment income.
| Year Ended November 30, 2020 | |||||
| Net investment Income |
$ | 2,041,845 | |||
| Reconciling items: |
|||||
| Return of capital of distributions(a) |
6,819,549 | ||||
| Net realized gain on written options(b) |
252,132 | ||||
| Distributable cash flow (non-GAAP) |
$ | 9,113,526 | |||
| Distributions paid on common stock |
$ | 6,220,579 | |||
| Distributable cash flow coverage ratio (non-GAAP) |
1.47x | ||||
Reconciliation of distributable cash flow to GAAP
(a) GAAP recognizes that a significant portion of the cash distributions received from MLPs is characterized as a return of capital and therefore excluded from net investment income, whereas the distributable cash flow calculation includes the return of capital portion of such distributions.
(b) We may sell covered call option contracts to generate income or to reduce our ownership of certain securities that we hold. In some cases, we are able to repurchase these call option contracts at a price less than the fee that we received, thereby generating a profit. The amount we received from selling call options, less the amount that we pay to repurchase such call option contracts is included in distributable cash flow. For GAAP purposes, income from call option contracts sold is not included in net investment income. See Note 2Summary of Significant Accounting Policies and Practices for a full discussion of the GAAP treatment of option contracts.
| 6 |
Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm
To the Shareholders and Board of Trustees
Salient Midstream & MLP Fund:
Opinion on the Financial Statements
We have audited the accompanying statement of assets, liabilities, and shareholders equity of Salient Midstream & MLP Fund (the Fund), including the schedule of investments, as of November 30, 2020, the related statements of operations and cash flows for the year then ended, the statements of changes in net assets for each of the years in the two-year period then ended, and the related notes (collectively, the financial statements) and the financial highlights for each of the years in the five-year period then ended. In our opinion, the financial statements and financial highlights present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of the Fund as of November 30, 2020, the results of its operations and cash flows for the year then ended, the changes in its net assets for each of the years in the two-year period then ended, and the financial highlights for each of the years in the five-year period then ended, in conformity with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles.
Basis for Opinion
These financial statements and financial highlights are the responsibility of the Funds management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements and financial highlights based on our audits. We are a public accounting firm registered with the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States) (PCAOB) and are required to be independent with respect to the Fund in accordance with the U.S. federal securities laws and the applicable rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission and the PCAOB.
We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the PCAOB. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements and financial highlights are free of material misstatement, whether due to error or fraud. Our audits included performing procedures to assess the risks of material misstatement of the financial statements and financial highlights, whether due to error or fraud, and performing procedures that respond to those risks. Such procedures included examining, on a test basis, evidence regarding the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements and financial highlights. Such procedures also included confirmation of securities owned as of November 30, 2020, by correspondence with the custodian, investee, and broker. Our audits also included evaluating the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall presentation of the financial statements and financial highlights. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.
/s/ KPMG LLP
We have served as the auditor of one or more Salient investment companies since 2003.
Columbus, Ohio
January 28, 2021
| 7 |
Salient Midstream & MLP Fund
November 30, 2020
| Shares/Units | Fair Value | |||||||||
| Master Limited Partnerships43.9% |
||||||||||
| Gathering & Processing19.1% |
||||||||||
| United States19.1% |
||||||||||
| Crestwood Equity Partners LP(a) |
53,639 | $ | 874,852 | |||||||
| EMG Utica I Offshore Co-Investment LP(a)(b)(d) |
16,000,000 | 15,361,838 | ||||||||
| Enable Midstream Partners LP(a) |
55,426 | 282,118 | ||||||||
| Noble Midstream Partners LP(a) |
143,771 | 1,370,138 | ||||||||
| Western Midstream Partners LP(a) |
90,874 | 1,172,275 | ||||||||
|
|
|
|||||||||
| 19,061,221 | ||||||||||
|
|
|
|||||||||
| Liquids Transportation & Storage9.1% |
||||||||||
| United States9.1% |
||||||||||
| BP Midstream Partners LP(a) |
25,837 | 292,992 | ||||||||
| Genesis Energy LP(a) |
200,037 | 1,286,238 | ||||||||
| Holly Energy Partners LP(a) |
46,187 | 625,372 | ||||||||
| MPLX LP(a)(c) |
222,780 | 4,687,291 | ||||||||
| NuStar Energy LP(a)(c) |
71,391 | 948,786 | ||||||||
| PBF Logistics LP(a) |
24,357 | 227,251 | ||||||||
| Phillips 66 Partners LP(a)(c) |
29,504 | 793,067 | ||||||||
| Shell Midstream Partners LP(a)(c) |
23,707 | 243,234 | ||||||||
|
|
|
|||||||||
| 9,104,231 | ||||||||||
|
|
|
|||||||||
| Natural Gas Pipelines & Storage10.1% |
||||||||||
| United States10.1% |
||||||||||
| Cheniere Energy Partners LP(a)(c) |
54,560 | 2,078,736 | ||||||||
| Energy Transfer LP(a)(c) |
384,118 | 2,373,850 | ||||||||
| Enterprise Products Partners LP(a)(c) |
292,223 | 5,669,126 | ||||||||
|
|
|
|||||||||
| 10,121,712 | ||||||||||
|
|
|
|||||||||
| Refined Products4.1% |
||||||||||
| United States4.1% |
||||||||||
| Magellan Midstream Partners LP(a)(c) |
100,068 | 4,117,798 | ||||||||
|
|
|
|||||||||
| Renewable Energy Infrastructure1.5% |
||||||||||
| United States1.5% |
||||||||||
| Enviva Partners LP(a)(c) |
33,724 | 1,505,439 | ||||||||
|
|
|
|||||||||
| Total Master Limited Partnerships |
43,910,401 | |||||||||
|
|
|
|||||||||
| MLP Related Companies77.0% |
|
|||||||||
| Gathering & Processing7.9% |
||||||||||
| United States7.9% |
||||||||||
| Altus Midstream Co., Class A(a) |
15,441 | 604,052 | ||||||||
| Antero Midstream Corp.(c) |
291,132 | 1,962,230 | ||||||||
| Hess Midstream LP, Class A(c) |
113,589 | 2,048,010 | ||||||||
| Rattler Midstream LP(c) |
215,839 | 1,789,305 | ||||||||
| Targa Resources Corp.(c) |
65,502 | 1,539,297 | ||||||||
|
|
|
|||||||||
| 7,942,894 | ||||||||||
|
|
|
|||||||||
| Integrated Oil & Gas0.6% |
||||||||||
| United States0.6% |
||||||||||
| Exxon Mobil Corp. |
15,312 | 583,846 | ||||||||
|
|
|
|||||||||
| See accompanying Notes to Financial Statements. | 8 |
Schedule of Investments
Salient Midstream & MLP Fund
November 30, 2020
| Shares/Units | Fair Value | |||||||||
| Liquids Transportation & Storage20.0% |
||||||||||
| Canada14.9% |
||||||||||
| Enbridge, Inc.(c) |
209,914 | $ | 6,551,416 | |||||||
| Gibson Energy, Inc. |
208,334 | 3,346,306 | ||||||||
| TC Energy Corp.(c) |
113,143 | 4,970,372 | ||||||||
|
|
|
|||||||||
| 14,868,094 | ||||||||||
|
|
|
|||||||||
| United States5.1% |
||||||||||
| Plains GP Holdings LP, Class A(a)(c) |
640,214 | 5,076,897 | ||||||||
|
|
|
|||||||||
| Natural Gas Pipelines & Storage33.1% |
||||||||||
| Canada13.9% |
||||||||||
| Keyera Corp.(c) |
307,452 | 5,305,305 | ||||||||
| Pembina Pipeline Corp. |
155,047 | 3,952,148 | ||||||||
| Pembina Pipeline Corp. (CAD)(c) |
180,464 | 4,602,270 | ||||||||
|
|
|
|||||||||
| 13,859,723 | ||||||||||
|
|
|
|||||||||
| United States19.2% |
||||||||||
| Equitrans Midstream Corp.(c) |
577,533 | 4,712,669 | ||||||||
| Kinder Morgan, Inc.(c) |
250,217 | 3,598,120 | ||||||||
| ONEOK, Inc.(c) |
124,462 | 4,464,452 | ||||||||
| The Williams Companies, Inc.(c) |
306,769 | 6,436,014 | ||||||||
|
|
|
|||||||||
| 19,211,255 | ||||||||||
|
|
|
|||||||||
| Renewable Energy Infrastructure14.4% |
||||||||||
| Canada2.2% |
||||||||||
| Brookfield Infrastructure Corp., Class A |
33,172 | 2,210,914 | ||||||||
|
|
|
|||||||||
| Great Britain1.6% |
||||||||||
| Atlantica Sustainable Infrastructure PLC(a) |
46,966 | 1,615,161 | ||||||||
|
|
|
|||||||||
| Israel0.9% |
||||||||||
| SolarEdge Technologies, Inc.(a) |
3,245 | 902,045 | ||||||||
|
|
|
|||||||||
| United States9.7% |
||||||||||
| Brookfield Renewable Corp., Class A |
42,834 | 3,390,311 | ||||||||
| Enphase Energy, Inc.(a) |
8,931 | 1,219,706 | ||||||||
| NextEra Energy Partners LP(a)(c) |
79,559 | 5,049,610 | ||||||||
|
|
|
|||||||||
| 9,659,627 | ||||||||||
|
|
|
|||||||||
| Utilities1.0% |
||||||||||
| United States1.0% |
||||||||||
| NextEra Energy, Inc. |
13,524 | 995,231 | ||||||||
|
|
|
|||||||||
| Total MLP Related Companies |
76,925,687 | |||||||||
|
|
|
|||||||||
| Total Investments120.9% (Cost $100,182,292) |
120,836,088 | |||||||||
| Credit Facility(21.0%) |
(21,000,000 | ) | ||||||||
| Other Assets and Liabilities0.1% |
123,966 | |||||||||
|
|
|
|||||||||
| Total Net Assets Applicable to Common Shareholders100.0% |
$ | 99,960,054 | ||||||||
|
|
|
|||||||||
All percentages disclosed are calculated by dividing the indicated amounts by net assets applicable to common shareholders.
(a) The security is considered a non-income producing security as the dividends received during the period are treated as return of capital per the Generally Accepted Accounting Principles.
| See accompanying Notes to Financial Statements. | 9 |
Schedule of Investments
Salient Midstream & MLP Fund
November 30, 2020
(b) EMG Utica I Offshore Co-Investment LP is a restricted security exempt from registration under the Securities Act of 1933. This security may be resold in transactions exempt from registration, normally to qualified institutional buyers. See footnote 2(g) in the Notes to Schedule of Investments for further information.
(c) All or a portion of these securities are held as collateral for the line of credit agreement. As of November 30, 2020, the total fair value of securities held as collateral for the line of credit agreement is $55,114,106.
(d) This investment is classified as a Level 3 asset and such classification was a result of the unavailability of other significant observable inputs. At period end, the aggregate value of the security was $15,361,838, representing 15.37% of net assets. See Note 3 in the Notes Financial Statements for further information.
Salient Midstream & MLP Fund invested in the following industries as of November 30, 2020:
| Value | % of Total Investments | |||||||||
| Gathering & Processing |
$ | 27,004,115 | 22.4 | % | ||||||
| Integrated Oil & Gas |
583,846 | 0.5 | % | |||||||
| Liquids Transportation & Storage |
29,049,222 | 24.0 | % | |||||||
| Natural Gas Pipelines & Storage |
43,192,690 | 35.8 | % | |||||||
| Refined Products |
4,117,798 | 3.4 | % | |||||||
| Renewable Energy Infrastructure |
15,893,186 | 13.1 | % | |||||||
| Utilities |
995,231 | 0.8 | % | |||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||
| Total |
$ | 120,836,088 | 100.0 | % | ||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||
Salient Midstream & MLP Fund invested in securities with exposure to the following countries as of November 30, 2020:
| Value | % of Total Investments | |||||||||
| Canada |
$ | 30,938,731 | 25.6 | % | ||||||
| Great Britain |
1,615,161 | 1.3 | % | |||||||
| Israel |
902,045 | 0.8 | % | |||||||
| United States |
87,380,151 | 72.3 | % | |||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||
| Total |
$ | 120,836,088 | 100.0 | % | ||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||
Currency Abbreviations:
CADCanadian Dollar
| See accompanying Notes to Financial Statements. | 10 |
Statement of Assets, Liabilities and Shareholders Equity
Salient Midstream & MLP Fund
November 30, 2020
| Assets: |
|||||
| Investments, at value (cost $100,182,292) |
$ | 120,836,088 | |||
| Cash and cash equivalents |
310,662 | ||||
| Dividends receivable |
240,164 | ||||
| Prepaids and other assets |
1,579 | ||||
|
|
|
||||
| Total Assets |
121,388,493 | ||||
|
|
|
||||
| Liabilities: |
|||||
| Credit Facility |
21,000,000 | ||||
| Payable to advisor |
111,376 | ||||
| Interest payable |
15,798 | ||||
| Line of credit commitment fees payable |
2,411 | ||||
| Accounts payable and accrued expenses |
298,854 | ||||
|
|
|
||||
| Total Liabilities |
21,428,439 | ||||
|
|
|
||||
| Net Assets applicable to common shareholders |
$ | 99,960,054 | |||
|
|
|
||||
| Net Assets Applicable to Common Shareholders: |
|||||
| Capital Stock, $0.01 par value; 17,722,448 shares issued and outstanding (unlimited shares authorized) |
$ | 177,224 | |||
| Paid-in capital |
347,109,336 | ||||
| Total distributable earnings |
(247,326,506 | ) | |||
|
|
|
||||
| Net assets applicable to common shareholders |
$ | 99,960,054 | |||
|
|
|
||||
| Net Asset Value: |
|||||
| Net assets applicable to common shareholders |
$ | 99,960,054 | |||
| Common shares outstanding |
17,722,448 | ||||
| Net asset value per common share outstanding |
$ | 5.64 |
| See accompanying Notes to Financial Statements. | 11 |
Salient Midstream & MLP Fund
Year Ended November 30, 2020
| Investment Income: |
||||
| Distributions from master limited partnerships |
$ | 4,634,305 | ||
| Less return of capital on distributions |
(4,634,305 | ) | ||
|
|
|
|||
| Net investment income from master limited partnerships |
| |||
| Dividends from master limited partnership related companies |
7,854,117 | |||
| Less return of capital on dividends |
(2,185,244 | ) | ||
|
|
|
|||
| Net investment income from master limited partnership related companies |
5,668,873 | |||
| Foreign taxes withheld |
(378,105 | ) | ||
|
|
|
|||
| Total Investment Income |
5,290,768 | |||
|
|
|
|||
| Operating Expenses: |
||||
| Investment advisory fee |
1,699,948 | |||
| Management fee |
160,000 | |||
| Administration fees |
146,015 | |||
| Custodian fees |
20,484 | |||
| Interest expense |
607,742 | |||
| Commitment fees |
24,035 | |||
| Professional fees |
335,173 | |||
| Transfer agent fees |
23,838 | |||
| Compliance fees |
75,076 | |||
| Other expenses |
156,612 | |||
|
|
|
|||
| Total Expenses |
3,248,923 | |||
|
|
|
|||
| Net Investment Income |
2,041,845 | |||
|
|
|
|||
| Realized and Unrealized Gain (Loss): |
||||
| Net realized loss on investments |
(32,546,049 | ) | ||
| Net realized gain on written options |
252,132 | |||
| Net realized loss on foreign currency |
(27,809 | ) | ||
|
|
|
|||
| Net realized loss |
(32,321,726 | ) | ||
|
|
|
|||
| Change in unrealized appreciation/depreciation on: |
||||
| Investments |
(12,147,934 | ) | ||
| Written options |
(84,719 | ) | ||
|
|
|
|||
| Change in unrealized appreciation/depreciation from investments and written options |
(12,232,653 | ) | ||
|
|
|
|||
| Net Realized and Unrealized Loss from Investments and Written options |
(44,554,379 | ) | ||
|
|
|
|||
| Net Decrease in Net Assets Applicable to Common Shareholders Resulting from Operations |
$ | (42,512,534 | ) | |
|
|
|
| See accompanying Notes to Financial Statements. | 12 |
Statements of Changes in Net Assets
Salient Midstream & MLP Fund
| Year Ended November 30, 2020 |
Year Ended November 30, 2019 | |||||||||
| Operations: |
||||||||||
| Net investment income/(loss) |
$ | 2,041,845 | $ | (855,509 | ) | |||||
| Net realized loss |
(32,321,726 | ) | (24,020,091 | ) | ||||||
| Change in unrealized appreciation/depreciation |
(12,232,653 | ) | 7,814,261 | |||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||
| Net decrease in net assets applicable to common shareholders resulting from operations |
(42,512,534 | ) | (17,061,339 | ) | ||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||
| Distributions: |
||||||||||
| From distributable earnings |
| (2,120,677 | ) | |||||||
| From return of capital |
(6,220,579 | ) | (10,001,477 | ) | ||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||
| Total distributions to common shareholders |
(6,220,579 | ) | (12,122,154 | ) | ||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||
| Net decrease in net assets applicable to common shareholders |
$ | (48,733,113 | ) | $ | (29,183,493 | ) | ||||
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||
| Net Assets: |
||||||||||
| Beginning of period |
148,693,167 | 177,876,660 | ||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||
| End of period |
$ | 99,960,054 | $ | 148,693,167 | ||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||
| See accompanying Notes to Financial Statements. | 13 |
Salient Midstream & MLP Fund
For the Year Ended November 30, 2020
| Cash Flows from Operating Activities: |
|||||
| Net decrease in net assets resulting from operations |
$ | (42,512,534 | ) | ||
| Adjustments to reconcile net decrease in net assets resulting from operations to net cash provided by operating activities |
|||||
| Purchase of investments |
(213,570,152 | ) | |||
| Proceeds from disposition of investments |
234,836,525 | ||||
| Premiums from written options |
688,086 | ||||
| Proceeds paid to cover written options |
(347,163 | ) | |||
| Premiums paid on exercised written options |
(268,872 | ) | |||
| Net realized loss on investments |
32,546,049 | ||||
| Net realized gain on written options |
(252,132 | ) | |||
| Change in unrealized appreciation/depreciation from investments |
12,147,934 | ||||
| Change in unrealized appreciation/depreciation from written options |
84,719 | ||||
| Change in operating assets and liabilities: |
|||||
| Dividends receivable |
76,568 | ||||
| Receivable for investments sold |
227,439 | ||||
| Prepaids and other assets |
24,286 | ||||
| Interest payable |
(75,546 | ) | |||
| Payable to Advisor |
(81,135 | ) | |||
| Line of credit commitment fees payable |
(7,665 | ) | |||
| Accounts payable and accrued expenses |
(39,404 | ) | |||
|
|
|
||||
| Net cash provided by operating activities |
23,477,003 | ||||
|
|
|
||||
| Cash Flows from Financing Activities: |
|||||
| Advances from credit facility |
84,250,000 | ||||
| Repayments on credit facility |
(102,339,219 | ) | |||
| Distributions paid to common shareholders |
(6,220,579 | ) | |||
|
|
|
||||
| Net cash used in financing activities |
(24,309,798 | ) | |||
|
|
|
||||
| Net decrease in cash and cash equivalents |
(832,795 | ) | |||
| Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of year |
1,143,457 | ||||
|
|
|
||||
| Cash and cash equivalents at end of period |
$ | 310,662 | |||
|
|
|
||||
| Supplemental Schedule of Cash Activity: |
|||||
| Cash paid for interest during the period |
$ | 683,288 | |||
| Cash paid for line of credit commitment fees during the period |
31,700 |
| See accompanying Notes to Financial Statements. | 14 |
Salient Midstream & MLP Fund
| Year Ended November 30, 2020 |
Year Ended November 30, 2019 |
Year Ended November 30, 2018 |
Year Ended November 30, 2017 |
Year Ended November 30, 2016(a) | |||||||||||||||||||||
| Per Common Share Data:(b) |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Net Asset Value, beginning of period |
$ | 8.39 | $ | 10.04 | $ | 11.23 | $ | 14.37 | $ | 14.23 | |||||||||||||||
| Income/(loss) from operations: |
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Net investment income/(loss)(c) |
0.12 | (0.05 | ) | (0.12 | ) | 0.00 | (d) | 0.11 | |||||||||||||||||
| Net realized and unrealized gain/(loss) from investments |
(2.52 | ) | (0.91 | ) | (0.31 | ) | (2.16 | ) | 1.17 | ||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||||||||||
| Net increase (decrease) resulting from operations |
(2.40 | ) | (0.96 | ) | (0.43 | ) | (2.16 | ) | 1.28 | ||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||||||||||
| Distributions paid from: |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Net investment income |
| | | | (0.11 | ) | |||||||||||||||||||
| In excess of net investment income |
| (0.12 | ) | (0.06 | ) | | (1.00 | ) | |||||||||||||||||
| Return of capital |
(0.35 | ) | (0.57 | ) | (0.70 | ) | (0.98 | ) | (0.03 | ) | |||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||||||||||
| Net Asset Value, end of period |
$ | 5.64 | $ | 8.39 | $ | 10.04 | $ | 11.23 | $ | 14.37 | |||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||||||||||
| Per common share market value, end of period |
$ | 4.22 | $ | 7.09 | $ | 8.41 | $ | 10.22 | $ | 13.40 | |||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||||||||||
| Total investment return based on market value(e) |
(36.19 | )% | (8.23 | )% | (11.05 | )% | (17.08 | )% | 16.97 | % | |||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||||||||||
| Ratios to Average Net Assets: |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Net investment income/(loss) |
1.87 | % | (0.49 | )% | (1.09 | )% | 0.01 | % | 1.01 | % | |||||||||||||||
| Net operating expenses (including tax expense/benefit) |
2.97 | % | 3.49 | % | 3.26 | % | 2.40 | % | 2.34 | % | |||||||||||||||
| Net operating expenses (excluding tax benefit/expense) |
2.97 | % | 3.49 | % | 3.26 | % | 2.87 | % | 3.09 | % | |||||||||||||||
| Supplemental Data: |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Net assets applicable to common shareholders, end of period (in 000s) |
$ | 99,960 | $ | 148,693 | $ | 177,877 | $ | 199,045 | $ | 254,618 | |||||||||||||||
| Average net assets (000s) |
$ | 109,424 | $ | 173,820 | $ | 200,269 | $ | 236,834 | $ | 201,307 | |||||||||||||||
| Portfolio turnover |
155.52 | % | 44.75 | % | 45.27 | % | 23.72 | % | 93.44 | % | |||||||||||||||
| Asset coverage per $1,000 unit of senior indebtedness(f) |
$ | 5,760 | $ | 4,804 | $ | 3,402 | $ | 3,585 | $ | 3,817 | |||||||||||||||
| Short-term borrowings, end of period (000s) |
$ | 21,000 | $ | 39,089 | $ | 74,039 | $ | 76,989 | $ | 90,389 | |||||||||||||||
(a) At and prior to November 30, 2016, Salient Midstream & MLP Fund presented information on a consolidated basis. See Note 1 for additional information.
(b) Information presented relates to a common share outstanding for periods indicated.
(c) Per share net investment income/(loss) has been calculated using the average daily shares method.
(d) Amount represents less than $0.01 per share.
(e) Total investment return is calculated assuming a purchase of common shares at the current market price on the first day of the period and a sale at the closing market price on the last day of the period reported (excluding brokerage commissions). Dividends and distributions are assumed for the purpose of this calculation to be reinvested at prices obtained under the Dividend Reinvestment Plan (DRIP).
(f) Calculated by subtracting the Funds total liabilities (not including borrowings) from the Funds total assets and dividing by the total number of senior indebtedness units, where one unit equals $1,000 of senior indebtedness.
| See accompanying Notes to Financial Statements. | 15 |
November 30, 2020
| 16 |
Notes to Financial Statements, continued
November 30, 2020
| 17 |
Notes to Financial Statements, continued
November 30, 2020
| 18 |
Notes to Financial Statements, continued
November 30, 2020
The restricted securities held at November 30, 2020 are identified below and are also presented in the Funds Schedule of Investments.
| Security |
% of Net |
Acquisition |
Shares/Units |
Cost |
Fair Value | ||||||||||||||||||||
| EMG Utica I Offshore Co-Investment, LP |
15.4 | % | 2/22/2013 | 16,000,000 | $ | 12,831,116 | $ | 15,361,838 | |||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||
| Total Restricted Securities |
15.4 | % | $ | 12,831,116 | $ | 15,361,838 | |||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||
| 19 |
Notes to Financial Statements, continued
November 30, 2020
| 20 |
Notes to Financial Statements, continued
November 30, 2020
| 21 |
Notes to Financial Statements, continued
November 30, 2020
The following is a summary categorization of the Funds investments based upon the three levels defined above as of November 30, 2020. The breakdown by category of equity securities is disclosed in the Schedule of Investments.
| Level 1 | Level 2 | Level 3 | Total | |||||||||||||||||
| Master Limited Partnerships |
$ | 28,548,563 | $ | | $ | 15,361,838 | (a) | $ | 43,910,401 | |||||||||||
| MLP Related Companies |
76,925,687 | | | 76,925,687 | ||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||
| Total |
$ | 105,474,250 | $ | | $ | 15,361,838 | $ | 120,836,088 | ||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||
(a) During the year ended November 30, 2020, the Fund changed its valuation technique used to value EMG Utica I Offshore Co-Investment LP from valuing using the partners capital or net asset value as a practical expedient, as reported by the Investment Fund manager, to an income approach using a discounted cash flow model. The Fund believes the change in valuation technique and its application results in a measurement that is equally or more representative of the fair value in the circumstances because of an increase in market volatility and uncertainty that may not be captured in the reported partners capital, as partners capital statements are not issued as of the measurement date of the Fund.
The following is a reconciliation of Level 3 investments based on the inputs used to determine fair value:
| Asset Type |
Balance
as |
Purchases |
Sales |
Realized |
Change
in |
Transfer
into |
Transfer |
Balance
as |
Net change
in | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Master Limited Partnerships |
$ | | $ | | $ | | $ | | $ | | $ | 15,361,838 | $ | | $ | 15,361,838 | $ | (7,460,898 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Total |
$ | | $ | | $ | | $ | | $ | | $ | 15,361,838 | $ | | $ | 15,361,838 | $ | (7,460,898 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
The table below provides additional information about the Level 3 Fair Value Measurements as of November 30, 2020:
| Qualitative Information about Level 3 Fair Value Measurements |
| |||||||||||||||
| Asset Class |
Fair Value | Valuation |
Unobservable |
Input Value/ Range | ||||||||||||
| Master Limited Partnerships |
$ | 15,361,838 | Discounted Cash Flow | Discount Rate | 14.0 | % | ||||||||||
| Terminal Cash Flow Exit Multiple | 12.0 | x | ||||||||||||||
(a) A change to the unobservable input may result in a significant change to the value of the investment as follows:
| Unobservable Inputs |
Impact to Value if Input Increases |
Impact to Value if Input Decreases | ||
| Discount Rate |
Decrease | Increase | ||
| Terminal Cash Flow Exit Multiple |
Increase | Decrease |
| 22 |
Notes to Financial Statements, continued
November 30, 2020
| 23 |
Notes to Financial Statements, continued
November 30, 2020
The tax character of dividends paid to shareholders during the tax year ended in 2020 was as follows:
| Ordinary |
Net Long Term |
Total Taxable |
Tax Return of |
Total | ||||
| $ | $ | $ | $6,220,579 | $6,220,579 |
The tax character of dividends paid to shareholders during the tax year ended in 2019 was as follows:
| Ordinary |
Net Long Term |
Total Taxable |
Tax Return of |
Total | ||||
| $2,120,677 | $ | $2,120,677 | $10,001,477 | $12,122,154 |
| 24 |
Notes to Financial Statements, continued
November 30, 2020
| 25 |
Notes to Financial Statements, continued
November 30, 2020
| 26 |
Supplemental Information (Unaudited)
November 30, 2020
The table below shows each Trustee and executive officers full name, year of birth, the position held with the Fund, the length of time served in that position, his/her principal occupation during the past five years, and other directorships held by such Trustee. The address of each Trustee and officer is c/o Salient Midstream & MLP Fund, 4265 San Felipe, 8th Floor, Houston, Texas 77027.
Interested Trustees*
| Name and Year of Birth | Position(s) Held with the Fund |
Principal Occupation(s) During the Past 5 Years |
Number of Portfolios in Fund Complex Overseen by Trustee(1) |
Other Directorships During Past 5 Years** | ||||||
| Gregory A. Reid* Year of Birth: 1965 |
Trustee (since 2020); President and Chief Executive Officer (since inception) |
President and Chief Executive Officer, Salient Midstream & MLP Fund (since inception); President, MLP Complex, Salient, (since 2011). | 6 | Forward Funds (investment company) (three funds) (since 2020); Salient MF Trust (investment company) (two funds) (since 2020); Salient Midstream & MLP Fund (investment company) (2012-2018) | ||||||
Independent Trustees
| Name and Year of Birth | Position(s) Held with the Fund |
Principal Occupation(s) During the Past 5 Years |
Number of Portfolios in Fund Complex Overseen by Trustee(1) |
Other Directorships During Past 5 Years** | ||||||
| Julie Allecta Year of Birth: 1946 |
Trustee (since 2018) |
Retired Partner, Paul Hastings, Janofsky & Walker LLP (1999-2009); Trustee, Litman Gregory Masters Funds Trust (since 2013); Member of Executive Committee and Governing Council, Independent Directors Council (since 2014); Director, WildCare Bay Area (2007-2017). | 6 | Litman Gregory Funds Trust (since 2013); Salient MF Trust (investment company) (two funds) (since 2015); Forward Funds (investment company) (three funds) (since 2012). | ||||||
| Jonathan P. Carroll Year of Birth: 1961 |
Trustee (since inception) |
President, Lazarus Capital LLC (since 2006); President, Lazarus Energy Holdings, LLC (since 2006); President and CEO, Blue Dolphin Energy Company (since 2012); President and Director, Starlight Relativity Acquisition Company, LLC (since 2019); President and Director, The San Antonio Refinery LLC (since 2019); President and Director, Lazarus San Antonio Refinery LLC (since 2019); private investor (since 1988). | 6 | Salient Private Access Funds (investment companies) (four funds) (since 2004); Endowment PMF Funds (investment companies) (three funds) (since 2014); Salient MF Trust (investment company) (two funds) (since 2012); Forward Funds (investment company) (three funds) (since 2015); LRR Energy, L.P. (LRE) (energy company) (2014-2015); Blue Dolphin Energy Company (BDCO) (energy company) (since 2014); Starlight Relativity Acquisition Company, LLC (Investment Company) (since 2019); The San Antonio Refinery LLC (energy company) (since 2019); Lazarus San Antonio Refinery LLC (energy company) (since 2019). | ||||||
| 27 |
Supplemental Information, continued (Unaudited)
November 30, 2020
| Name and Year of Birth | Position(s) Held with the Fund |
Principal Occupation(s) During the Past 5 Years |
Number of Portfolios in Fund Complex Overseen by Trustee(1) |
Other Directorships During Past 5 Years** | ||||||
| A. John Gambs Year of Birth: 1945 |
Trustee (since 2018); Audit Committee Chairperson (since 2018) |
Director and Compensation Committee Chair, NMI Holdings, Inc. (2011-2012); Trustee and Audit Committee Chair, Barclays Global Investors Funds (2006-2010); Trustee and Audit Committee Chair, Master Investment Portfolio (2006-2010); Advisory Board Member, Fairview Capital Management (since 2009); Director, San Francisco Classical Voice (2011-2016); Member, Board of Governors San Francisco Symphony (since 2001) and Vice President (2018-2020); Director, The New Century Chamber Orchestra (since 2010); Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer, The Charles Schwab Corporation (1988-1996); President and Director, Gambs Family Foundation (1997-2010). | 6 | Salient MF Trust (investment company) (two funds) (since 2015); Forward Funds (investment company) (three funds) (since 2012). | ||||||
|
Dr. Bernard A. Harris, Jr. Year of Birth: 1956 |
Trustee (since inception) |
Chief Executive Officer and Managing Partner, Vesalius Ventures, Inc. (venture investing) (since 2002); CEO, National Math and Science Initiative (non-profit) (since 2018); President and Founder, The Harris Foundation (non-profit) (since 1998); clinical scientist, flight surgeon and astronaut for NASA (1986-1996). | 6 | Salient Private Access Funds (investment companies) (four funds) (since 2009); Babson Funds (eleven funds) (since 2011); Monebo Technologies Inc. (since 2009); The National Math and Science Initiative (since 2008); Communities in Schools (since 2007); American Telemedicine Association (2007-2014); U.S. Physical Therapy, Inc. (since 2005); Houston Technology Center (2004-2016); The Harris Foundation, Inc. (since 1998); Salient MF Trust (investment company) (two funds) (since 2012); Forward Funds (investment company) (three funds) (since 2015). | ||||||
| 28 |
Supplemental Information, continued (Unaudited)
November 30, 2020
| Name and Year of Birth | Position(s) Held with the Fund |
Principal Occupation(s) During the Past 5 Years |
Number of Portfolios in Fund Complex Overseen by Trustee(1) |
Other Directorships During Past 5 Years** | ||||||
| Haig G. Mardikian Year of Birth: 1947 |
Trustee (since 2018) |
Owner of Haig G. Mardikian Enterprises, a real estate investment business (since 1971); General Partner of M&B Development, a real estate investment business (since 1983); General Partner of George M. Mardikian Enterprises, a real estate investment business (1983-2002); President and Director of Adiuvana-Invest, Inc., a real estate investment business (since 1989); President of the William Saroyan Foundation (since 1992); Managing Director of the United Broadcasting Company, radio broadcasting (1983-2001); Trustee of the International House of UC Berkeley (2001-2007); Director of the Downtown Association of San Francisco (1982-2006); Director of the Market Street Association (1982-2006); Trustee of Trinity College (1998-2007); Trustee of the Herbert Hoover Presidential Library (since 1997); Trustee of the Herbert Hoover Foundation (since 2002); Trustee of the Advisor California Civil Liberties Public Education Fund (1997-2006); Director of The Walnut Management Co., a privately held family investment company (since 2008); President of the Foundation of City College (2006-2010); Director of Near East Foundation (since 2007). | 6 | Salient MF Trust (investment company) (two funds) (since 2015); Forward Funds (investment company) (three funds) (since 1998); Chairman and Director of SIFE Trust Fund (1978-2001). | ||||||
* This persons status as an interested Trustee arises from his affiliation with the Advisor.
** This column includes only directorships of companies required to report to the SEC under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (i.e., public companies) or other investment companies registered under the 1940 Act.
(1) The Fund Complex for the purposes of this table consists of five (5) open-end funds in the Salient MF Trust and the Forward Funds (each, a Trust), with the series of each Trust being advised by either the Advisor or an affiliate of the Advisor; and one (1) public closed-end fund advised by either the Advisor or an affiliate of the Advisor.
| 29 |
Supplemental Information, continued (Unaudited)
November 30, 2020
Officers of the Fund Who Are Not Trustees***
| Name and Year of Birth(1) | Position(s) with the Fund | Principal Occupation(s) During Past 5 Years | ||
| Thomas Dusenberry Year of Birth: 1977 |
Treasurer and Principal Financial Officer (since 2020) | Treasurer and Principal Financial Officer (since 2020), Assistant Treasurer (April 2019-December 2019), Salient MF Trust; Treasurer and Principal Financial Officer (since 2020), Assistant Treasurer (April 2019-December 2019), Salient Midstream and MLP Fund; Treasurer and Principal Financial Officer (since 2020), Assistant Treasurer (April 2019-December 2019), Forward Funds; Principal Financial Officer (since 2018) and Treasurer (since 2020), Salient Private Access Funds (four funds); Principal Financial Officer (since 2018) and Treasurer (since 2020), Endowment PMF Funds (three funds); Director of Fund Operations, Salient (2016-2019); Senior Vice President of Fund Accounting and Administration, Salient (since 2020); Vice President of Fund Accounting and Administration, Citi Fund Services Ohio, Inc. (2001- 2016). | ||
|
Paul A. Bachtold Year of Birth: 1973 |
Chief Compliance Officer (since inception) | Chief Compliance Officer and Secretary, Forward Securities (since 2016); Chief Compliance Officer, Forward Funds (since 2016); Chief Compliance Officer, Forward Management, LLC (since 2015); Chief Compliance Officer, Salient Private Access Funds (since 2010); Chief Compliance Officer, Endowment PMF Funds (since 2014); Chief Compliance Officer, Salient (since 2010); Chief Compliance Officer, Salient Midstream & MLP Fund (since 2012); Chief Compliance Officer, Salient MF Trust (since 2012). | ||
| Kristen Bayazitoglu Year of Birth: 1981 |
Secretary (Since 2018) | Secretary, Forward Funds (since 2018); Secretary, Salient MF Trust (since 2018); Secretary, Salient Midstream & MLP Fund (since 2018); Vice President, Forward Funds (2017-2018); Vice President, Salient MF Trust (2017-2018); Vice President, Salient Midstream & MLP Fund (2017-2018); Chief Operating Officer, Salient Partners, L.P. (since 2017); Vice President, Salient Private Access Funds (since 2017); Vice President, Endowment PMF Funds (since 2017); Vice President of Operations, Salient Partners, L.P. (March 2012-June 2017). |
(1) The business address of each officer is c/o Salient Midstream & MLP Fund, 4265 San Felipe, 8th Floor, Houston, Texas 77027.
| 30 |
Supplemental Information, continued (Unaudited)
November 30, 2020
At a meeting of the Board held on October 27, 2020, the Board, including the Trustees who are not interested persons as that term is defined in the Investment Company Act of 1940, as amended (the Independent Trustees), considered and approved the continuation of the Investment Management Agreement (the Advisory Agreement) between the Fund and the Advisor. In preparation for review of this agreement, the Board requested the Advisor to provide detailed information that the Board determined to be reasonably necessary to evaluate the agreement. The Independent Trustees held a meeting of the Board on October 2, 2020 (the Pre-15(c) Meeting) to review and discuss materials from the Advisor, and also met among themselves prior to the October 27, 2019 meeting to review and discuss the response materials of the Advisor in support of the consideration of the Advisory Agreement. At the request of the Independent Trustees, the Advisor made presentations regarding the materials and responded to questions from the Independent Trustees relating to, among other things, portfolio management, the Funds investment program, Fund and Advisor compliance programs, Fund performance including benchmarks and comparisons to other funds, Fund fee levels, other portfolios (including fees) managed by the Advisor and its affiliates and the Advisors profitability (including revenue of the Advisor across all its advised funds). The Board, including the Independent Trustees, also took into consideration information furnished for the Boards review and consideration throughout the year at regular Board meetings. The Independent Trustees were assisted at all times by independent counsel.
The Independent Trustees met with counsel in executive session without the presence of Advisor personnel, along with independent counsel. After the executive session, the Independent Trustees reported that the extensive prior discussions among themselves and with independent counsel, including during the Pre-15(c) call, and their reviews of the Advisors response materials, left them satisfied that the Advisor had responded to requests. The Independent Trustees further reported that they had concluded that the Advisory Agreement enables the Funds shareholders to obtain high quality services at a cost that is appropriate, reasonable, and in the interests of investors. The Independent Trustees also reported that they took into account many factors, including volatility and conditions in the markets, overall down energy and MLP markets and the Funds leverage and fee structure, and believed management has taken reasonable steps in managing the Fund related to the energy markets. They stated that in light of the Advisors efforts, the prudent exercise of judgment warranted renewal of the advisory fee. It also was noted that the Boards decision to renew the Advisory Agreement was not based on any single factor, but rather was based on a comprehensive consideration of all the information provided to the Board at its meetings throughout the year. Upon consideration of these and other factors, the Board also determined:
The nature, extent and quality of the advisory services provided. With respect to the Advisory Agreement, the Board considered: the specialized expertise required to manage the Funds strategy, personnel and staffing at the Advisor, the background and experience of key investment personnel; the Advisors focus on analysis of complex asset categories; the Advisors disciplined investment approach and commitment to investment principles; the Advisors significant investment in and commitment to personnel, including hiring and extensive training; the Advisors significant compliance, risk oversight and tax reporting efforts; and, the Advisors oversight of and interaction with service providers.
The Board concluded that the nature, extent and quality of the management and advisory service provided were appropriate and thus supported a decision to renew the Advisory Agreement. The Board also concluded that the Advisor would be able to provide during the coming year quality of investment management and related services, and that these services are appropriate in scope and extent in light of the Funds operations, the competitive landscape and investor needs.
The investment performance of the Fund. The Board evaluated the comparative information provided by the Advisor regarding the Funds investment performance, distributions and information on the performance of other investment funds and indices, including the relevance of various indices. The Board also considered the various performance reports received throughout the year. The Board noted the drawdown in the MLP and energy markets and nearly unprecedented oil price declines early in the year. On the basis of the Trustees assessment, the Trustees concluded that the Advisor, although faced with declines in the Funds area of investment focus during the year, was capable of generating a level of investment performance that is appropriate in light of the Funds investment objective, policies and strategies and competitive with comparable funds.
The cost of advisory service provided and the level of profitability. In analyzing the cost of services and profitability of the Advisor, the Board considered the revenues earned and expenses incurred by the Advisor. The Board took into account the significant investment by and cost to the Advisor in appropriate personnel and service infrastructure to support the operations and management of the Fund. On the basis of the Boards review of the fees charged by the Advisor for investment advisory and related services, the specialized nature of the Funds investment program, the Funds use of leverage, the Advisors financial information and the costs associated with managing the Fund, the Board concluded that the level of investment management fees, and the Advisors profitability, are reasonable in light of the services provided, the management fees and overall expense ratios of comparable investment companies, and the anticipated profitability of the relationship between the Fund and the Advisor.
The extent to which economies of scale would be realized as the Fund grows and whether fee levels reflect these economies of scale for the benefit of fund investors. While noting that the management fees will not decrease as the level of Trust assets increase, the Board concluded that as a closed-end fund of a relatively fixed-scale the management fees reflect the Funds complex operations, the current energy markets, the economic environment for the Advisor, including
| 31 |
Supplemental Information, continued (Unaudited)
November 30, 2020
its continued investment relating to support and monitoring of the Trust, and the competitive nature of the investment company market as relevant to the Fund. The Board noted that it would have the opportunity to periodically re-examine the matter of economies of scale, as well as the appropriateness of management fees payable to the Advisor.
Benefits (such as soft dollars) to the Advisor from its relationship with the Fund. The Board concluded that other benefits derived by the Advisor from its relationship with the Fund, to the extent such benefits are identifiable or determinable, are reasonable and fair, result from the provision of appropriate services to the Fund and investors therein, and are consistent with industry practice and the best interests of the Fund and its partners. In this regard, the Board noted that although the Advisor may use soft dollars, it has not done so to date with respect to the Fund.
Other considerations. The Board determined that the Advisor has made a continuing and substantial commitment both to the recruitment of high quality personnel, monitoring and investment decision-making, and maintained and expanded the financial, compliance and operational resources reasonably necessary to manage the Fund in a professional manner that is consistent with the best interests of the Fund and its investors. The Trustees also concluded that the Advisor continues to make a significant entrepreneurial commitment to the management and success of the Fund.
In light of the continuing COVID-19 pandemic, the meetings of the Board referred to above were held electronically by means of video, based on continuing relief provided by the staff of the Securities and Exchange Commission from the otherwise applicable in-person meeting requirements.
| 32 |
Supplemental Information, continued (Unaudited)
November 30, 2020
N-PORT Filings
The Fund files its complete schedule of portfolio holdings with the SEC for the first and third quarters of each fiscal year as an exhibit to its reports on Form N-PORT. The Funds Form N-PORT reports are available on the SECs web site at http://www.sec.gov.
Forward-Looking Statements
This report contains forward-looking statements within the meaning of the 1933 Act and the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. By their nature, all forward-looking statements involve risks and uncertainties, and actual results could differ materially from those contemplated by the forward-looking statements. Several factors that could materially affect the Funds actual results are the performance of the portfolio of investments held by it, the conditions in the U.S. and international financial, petroleum and other markets, the price at which shares of the Fund will trade in the public markets and other factors discussed in filings with the SEC.
Proxy Voting Policies
The Fund is required to file Form N-PX, with its complete proxy voting record for the twelve months ended June 30, no later than August 31 of each year. A description of the policies and procedures that the Fund uses to determine how to vote proxies relating to portfolio securities and information regarding how the Fund voted proxies for the period ended June 30 of each year will be available: (i) without charge, upon request, by calling (800) 809-0525, or (ii) by visiting the SECs website at http://www.sec.gov.
Statement of Additional Information
The Statement of Additional Information (SAI) includes additional information about the Funds Trustees and is available upon request without charge by calling (800) 809-0525 or by visiting the SEC website at http://www.sec.gov.
Certifications
The Funds Chief Executive Officer has submitted to the NYSE the annual CEO certification as required by Section 303A.12(a) of the NYSE Listed Fund Manual.
| 33 |
Additional Tax Information (Unaudited)
November 30, 2020
The following Funds designate the percentages listed below of the income dividends distributed between January 1, 2020 and December 31, 2020, as qualified dividend income (QDI) as defined in Section 1(h)(11) of the Internal Revenue Code:
| Salient Midstream & MLP Fund |
0.00 | % |
The following Funds designate the percentages listed below of the income dividends distributed between January 1, 2020 and December 31, 2020, as qualifying for the corporate dividends received deduction (DRD) as defined in Section 854(b)(2) of the Internal Revenue Code:
| Salient Midstream & MLP Fund |
0.00 | % |
| 34 |
The Funds Investment Objectives, Strategies and Principal Risks (Unaudited)
There have been no material changes to the Funds investment objective, strategies and principal risks during the reporting period.
Investment Objective
The Funds investment objective is to provide a high level of total return with an emphasis on making quarterly cash distributions to its common shareholders.
Investment Strategies
The Fund seeks to achieve its investment objective by investing at least 80% of its total assets in securities of Midstream Companies and MLPs. The Fund invests in equity securities such as common units, preferred units, subordinated units, general partner interests, common shares, preferred shares and convertible securities in Midstream Companies, MLPs and other energy companies. The Fund may invest in companies of any market capitalization ranges. The Fund may also invest up to but not more than 25% of its total assets in debt securities of energy companies. All or a portion of the Funds debt securities may be rated below investment grade (commonly referred to as junk bonds) by a nationally recognized statistical ratings organization (NRSRO). No more than 10% of the Funds total assets may be invested in debt securities rated CCC+/Caa1 or lower. For the purposes of determining if an investment satisfies this test, the Advisor will look to the highest credit rating from a NRSRO on such debt investment.
Midstream Companies are companies, including affiliates of MLPs, that own or operate assets used in energy logistics, including, but not limited to, assets used in transporting (including marine), storing, gathering, processing, distributing or marketing of natural gas, natural gas liquids, crude oil or refined products.
MLPs are entities structured as master limited partnerships. Master limited partnerships are limited partnerships and limited liability companies that are publicly traded and are treated as partnerships for federal income tax purposes.
The Fund may directly invest up to but not more than 25% (or such higher amount as permitted by any applicable tax diversification rules) of its total assets in equity or debt securities of MLPs. Other energy companies may include alternative energy providers and utilities, including renewable energy. The Fund will invest primarily in companies located in North America, but may invest in companies located anywhere in the world. The Fund is non-diversified, which means that it may invest in a limited number of issuers.
The Fund may invest up to but not more than 30% of its total assets in unregistered, or otherwise restricted securities of MLPs and Midstream Companies and in interests in private investments in public equities (PIPEs). For purposes of this limitation, restricted securities include (i) registered securities of public companies subject to a lock-up period, (ii) unregistered securities of public companies with registration rights, (iii) unregistered securities of public companies that become freely tradable with the passage of time, or (iv) securities of privately held companies. However, no more than 10% of total assets may be invested in equity securities of privately held companies.
The Fund may engage in covered call writing on up to 30% of the value of total assets. The Fund currently expects to write call options for the purpose of generating realized gains or reducing the Funds ownership of certain securities. The Fund will only write call options on securities that are held in the portfolio (i.e., covered calls). The Fund may borrow to purchase securities, which would have the effect of adding financial leverage to the portfolio. In the future, financial leverage could be in the form of the issuance of preferred shares. Under normal market conditions, the Fund utilizes financial leverage in an amount that represents no more than 25% of total assets, including proceeds from such financial leverage. However, as market conditions develop, the Fund may use financial leverage in amounts that represent greater than 25% leverage as permitted by the 1940 Act. The Fund also may utilize derivatives and other portfolio techniques (such as short selling and uncovered call writing) that have the economic effect of leverage by creating additional investment exposure.
Principal Risks
Discount from or Premium to Net Asset Value: The shares of closed-end management investment companies often trade at a discount from or premium to their NAV, and the common shares of the Fund may likewise trade at a discount from or premium to NAV. This risk is separate and distinct from the risk that the Funds NAV could decrease or increase as a result of its investment activities. The trading price of the common shares may be less than the initial public offering price, creating a risk of loss for investors purchasing in the initial public offering of the common shares. This market price risk may be greater for investors who sell their common shares within a relatively short period after completion of an offering.
| 35 |
The Funds Investment Objectives, Strategies and Principal Risks, continued (Unaudited)
Industry Specific Risk: The Midstream Companies, MLPs and other energy companies in which the Fund invests are subject to risks specific to the industry they serve, including the following:
| | Fluctuations in commodity prices may impact the volume of commodities transported, processed, stored or distributed. |
| | Reduced volumes of natural gas or other energy commodities available for transporting, processing, storing or distributing may affect the profitability of a company or MLP. |
| | Slowdowns in new construction and acquisitions can limit growth potential. |
| | A sustained reduced demand for crude oil, natural gas and refined petroleum products that could adversely affect revenues and cash flows. |
| | Depletion of the natural gas reserves or other commodities if not replaced, which could impact the ability of a Midstream Companies, MLPs or other energy company to make distributions. |
| | Changes in the regulatory environment could adversely affect the profitability of Midstream Companies, MLPs and other energy companies. |
| | Extreme weather or other natural disasters could impact the value of securities of Midstream Companies, MLPs and other energy companies. |
| | Rising interest rates which could result in a higher cost of capital and divert investors into other investment opportunities. |
| | Threats of attack by terrorists on energy assets could impact the market for securities of Midstream Companies, MLPs and other energy companies. |
| | Global events, including particularly in the Middle East and including government stability specifically, could have significant adverse effects on the U.S. economy, and financial and commodities markets. |
Master Limited Partnerships (MLPs) Risk: Investments in the debt and equity securities of MLPs involve risks that differ from investments in the debt and equity securities of corporate issuers, including risks related to limited control and limited rights to vote on matters affecting the partnership, risks related to potential conflicts of interest between the partnership and its general partner, cash flow risks, dilution risks and risks related to the general partners right to require unitholders to sell their common units at an undesirable time or price. The Fund and its shareholders are not eligible for a tax deduction based on income received from MLPs that is available to individuals who invest directly in MLPs.
Equity Securities Risk: The risks associated with investing in equity securities of companies include the financial and operational risks faced by individual companies, the risk that the stock markets, sectors and industries in which the Fund invests may experience periods of turbulence and instability, and the general risk that domestic and global economies may go through periods of decline and cyclical change.
Leverage Risk: If the Fund makes investments in futures contracts, forward currency contracts and other derivative instruments, the futures contracts and certain other derivatives provide the economic effect of financial leverage by creating additional investment exposure, as well as the potential for greater loss. If the Fund uses leverage through activities such as borrowing, entering into short sales, purchasing securities on margin or on a when-issued basis or purchasing derivative instruments in an effort to increase its returns, the Fund has the risk of magnified capital losses that occur when losses affect an asset base, enlarged by borrowings or the creation of liabilities, that exceeds the net assets of the Fund. The Funds NAV when employing leverage will be more volatile and sensitive to market movements. Leverage may involve the creation of a liability that requires the Fund to pay interest.
Concentration Risk: The Fund concentrates its investments in issuers of one or more particular industries to the extent permitted by applicable regulatory guidance. There is a risk that those issuers (or industry sector) will perform poorly and negatively impact the Fund. Concentration risk results from maintaining exposure (long or short) to issuers conducting business in a specific industry. The risk of concentrating investments in a limited number of issuers in a particular industry is that the Fund will be more susceptible to the risks associated with that industry than a fund that does not concentrate its investments.
Privately Held Company Risk: Privately held companies are not subject to SEC reporting requirements, are not required to maintain their accounting records in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles, and are not required to maintain effective internal controls over financial
| 36 |
The Funds Investment Objectives, Strategies and Principal Risks, continued (Unaudited)
reporting. As a result, the Advisor may not have timely or accurate information about the business, financial condition and results of operations of the privately held companies in which the Fund invests. In addition, the securities of privately held companies are generally illiquid.
Non-Diversification Risk: The Fund is a non-diversified fund. Because the Fund may invest in securities of a smaller number of issuers, the Fund may be more exposed to the risks associated with and developments affecting an individual issuer than a fund that invests more widely, which may, therefore, have a greater impact on the Funds performance.
Small and Medium Capitalization Stocks Risk: Investment in securities of smaller companies presents greater investment risks than investing in the securities of larger companies. These risks include greater price volatility, greater sensitivity to changing economic conditions, and less liquidity than the securities of larger, more mature companies.
Market Events Risk: Events in the U.S. and global financial markets, including actions taken by the U.S. Federal Reserve or foreign central banks to stimulate or stabilize economic growth, may at times, and for varying periods of time, result in unusually high market volatility, which could negatively impact the Funds performance and cause the Fund to experience illiquidity, shareholder redemptions, or other potentially adverse effects. Reduced liquidity in credit and fixed-income markets could negatively affect issuers worldwide. Banks and financial services companies could suffer losses if interest rates rise or economic conditions deteriorate.
Tax Risk: The Funds ability to meet its objective will depend, in part, on the level of taxable income and distributions received from the equity securities in which the Fund invests. If an MLP were treated as a corporation for federal income tax purposes, such MLP would be obligated to pay federal income tax on its income at the corporate tax rate and the amount of cash available for distribution would be reduced and distributions received by the Fund would be taxed under federal income tax laws applicable to corporate dividends (as dividend income, return of capital, or capital gain). MLPs restructuring their debts as a result of a decline in oil prices and a decline in value of energy-related properties could result in the receipt of cancellation of debt income by MLP partners, including the Fund. The receipt of this taxable income by the Fund will result in increased investment company taxable income required to be distributed by the Fund, without corresponding cash distributions from the MLPs. The Fund might need to sell assets that it might not otherwise wish to sell in order to pay the required distributions. In addition, the Fund faces the risk that it could fail to qualify as a regulated invested company (RIC) under Subchapter M of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended, and the risk of changes in tax laws or regulations, or interpretations thereof, which could adversely affect any or all of the Fund, the MLPs and other portfolio companies in which the Fund invests. Effective for taxable years beginning after December 31, 2017 and before January 1, 2026, the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act of 2017 generally allows individuals and certain other non-corporate entities, such as partnerships, a deduction for 20% of qualified publicly traded partnership income such as income from MLPs. However, the new law does not include any provision for a RIC to pass the character of its qualified publicly traded partnership income through to its shareholders. As a result, an investor who invests directly in MLPs will be able to receive the benefit of that deduction, while a shareholder in the Fund will not. The federal, state, local and foreign tax consequences of an investment in Fund shares will depend on the facts of each investors situation. Investors are encouraged to consult their own tax advisors regarding the specific tax consequences that may affect such investors.
Manager Risk: If the Funds portfolio managers make poor investment decisions, it will negatively affect the Funds investment performance.
Tax Law Change Risk: Changes in tax laws or regulations, or interpretations thereof in the future, could adversely affect the Fund or the Midstream Companies, MLPs and other energy companies in which the Fund invests. Any such changes could negatively impact the Funds common shareholders. Legislation could also negatively impact the amount and tax characterization of distributions received by the Funds common shareholders.
Liquidity Risk: Although common units of MLPs trade on the exchanges, certain securities may trade less frequently than those of larger companies due to their smaller capitalizations. In the event certain securities experience limited trading volumes, the prices may display abrupt or erratic movements at times. Additionally, it may be more difficult for the Fund to buy and sell significant amounts of such securities without an unfavorable impact on prevailing market prices. As a result, these securities may be difficult to dispose of at a fair price at the times when the Advisor believes it is desirable to do so. The Funds investment in securities that are less actively traded or over time experience decreased trading volume may restrict its ability to take advantage of other market opportunities or to dispose of securities.
Short Sales Risk: The Fund may take a short position in a derivative instrument, such as a future, forward or swap. A short position on a derivative instrument involves the risk of a theoretically unlimited increase in the value of the underlying instrument. The Fund may also from time to time sell securities short, which involves borrowing and selling a security and covering such borrowed security through a later purchase. A short sale creates
| 37 |
The Funds Investment Objectives, Strategies and Principal Risks, continued (Unaudited)
the risk of an unlimited loss, in that the price of the underlying security could theoretically increase without limit, thus increasing the cost of buying those securities to cover the short position. There can be no assurance that the securities necessary to cover a short position will be available for purchase. Until 2022, when new short sales rules will apply which are not expected to impact materially the Funds ability to conduct short sales, the Fund must set aside cover for short sales to comply with applicable SEC provisions under the 1940 Act.
Counterparty Risk: In general, a derivative contract typically involves leverage, i.e., it provides exposure to potential gain or loss from a change in the level of the market price of a security, currency or commodity (or a basket or index) in a notional amount that exceeds the amount of cash or assets required to establish or maintain the derivative contract. Many of these derivative contracts will be privately negotiated in the over-the-counter market. These contracts also involve exposure to credit risk, since contract performance depends in part on the financial condition of the counterparty. If a privately negotiated over-the-counter contract calls for payments by the Fund, the Fund must be prepared to make such payments when due. In addition, if a counterpartys creditworthiness declines, a Fund may not receive payments owed under the contract, or such payments may be delayed under such circumstances and the value of agreements with such counterparty can be expected to decline, potentially resulting in losses by the Fund.
Lower-Rated Debt Securities (Junk Bonds) Risk: Securities rated below investment grade and comparable unrated securities are often referred to as junk bonds. Junk bonds involve greater risks of default or downgrade and are more volatile than investment grade securities. In addition, issuers of junk bonds may be more susceptible than other issuers to economic downturns. Junk bonds are subject to the risk that the issuer may not be able to pay interest or dividends or ultimately repay principal upon maturity. Analysis of the creditworthiness of issuers of lower-rated debt securities may be more complex than for issuers of higher-rated securities, and the use of credit ratings to evaluate lower-rated securities can involve certain risks.
Debt Instruments Risk: Debt instruments are generally subject to credit risk and interest rate risk. Credit risk refers to the possibility that the issuer of a security will be unable to make interest payments and/or repay the principal on its debt. Interest rate risk refers to fluctuations in the value of a fixed-income security resulting from changes in the general level of interest rates. When the general level of interest rates goes up, the prices of most fixed-income securities go down. When the general level of interest rates goes down, the prices of most fixed-income securities go up. Derivatives related to debt instruments may be exposed to similar risks for individual securities, groups of securities or indices tracking multiple securities or markets. Both debt securities and debt-related derivative instruments may be exposed to one or more of the following risks:
| | Credit Risk. Credit risk refers to the possibility that the issuer of the security will not be able to make principal and interest payments when due. Changes in an issuers credit rating or the markets perception of an issuers creditworthiness may also affect the value of the Funds investment in that issuer. The degree of credit risk depends on both the financial condition of the issuer and the terms of the obligation. Securities rated by the rating agencies in the four highest categories (Standard & Poors Ratings Services (S&P) (AAA, AA, A and BBB), Fitch, Inc. (Fitch) (AAA, AA, A and BBB) or Moodys Investors Service, Inc. (Moodys) (Aaa, Aa, A and Baa)) are considered investment grade, but they may also have some speculative characteristics, meaning that they carry more risk than higher rated securities and may have problems making principal and interest payments in difficult economic climates. Investment grade ratings do not guarantee that bonds will not lose value. |
| | Extension Risk. Extension risk is the risk that, when interest rates rise, certain obligations will be paid off by the issuer (or obligor) more slowly than anticipated, causing the value of these securities to fall. Rising interest rates tend to extend the duration of securities, making them more sensitive to changes in interest rates. The value of longer-term securities generally changes more in response to changes in interest rates than shorter-term securities. As a result, in a period of rising interest rates, securities may exhibit additional volatility and may lose value. |
| | Interest Rate Risk. The yields for certain securities (including for equity securities of MLPs and certain energy companies) are susceptible in the short-term to fluctuations in interest rates, and the prices of such securities may decline when interest rates rise. Interest rate risk in general is the risk that prices of fixed income securities generally increase when interest rates decline and decrease when interest rates increase. The Fund may decline in value or suffer losses if short term or long term interest rates rise sharply or otherwise change in a manner not anticipated by the Advisor. |
| | Prepayment Risk. Prepayment risk is the risk that certain debt securities with high interest rates will be prepaid by the issuer before they mature. When interest rates fall, certain obligations will be paid off by the obligor more quickly than originally anticipated, and an investor may have to invest the proceeds in securities with lower yields. In periods of falling interest rates, the rate of prepayments tends to increase (as does price fluctuation) as borrowers are motivated to pay off debt and refinance at new lower rates. During such periods, reinvestment of the prepayment proceeds by the management team will generally be at lower rates of return than the return on the assets that were prepaid. Prepayment reduces the yield to maturity and the average life of the security. |
| 38 |
The Funds Investment Objectives, Strategies and Principal Risks, continued (Unaudited)
Restricted and Illiquid Securities: Certain securities generally trade in lower volume and may be less liquid than securities of large established companies. If a security is illiquid, the Fund may not be able to sell the security at a time when the Advisor might wish to sell, which means that the Fund could lose money. In addition, the security could have the effect of decreasing the overall level of the Funds liquidity. Certain restricted securities, i.e., securities subject to legal or contractual restrictions on resale, may be treated as liquid even though they may be less liquid than registered securities traded on established secondary markets.
Derivatives Risk: The market value of the derivative instruments in which the Fund may invest, including options, futures contracts, forward currency contracts, swap agreements and other similar instruments, may be more volatile than that of other instruments. A Funds use of derivative instruments involves risks different from, and possibly greater than, the risks associated with investing directly in securities and other more traditional investments, and certain derivatives may create a risk of loss greater than the amount invested. There can be no assurance given that each derivative position will perform as expected, or that a particular derivative position will be available when sought by the portfolio manager. A Funds use of derivative instruments to obtain short exposures may result in greater volatility because losses are potentially unlimited. In addition, there can be no assurance given that any derivatives strategy will succeed and the Fund may lose money as a result of its use of derivative instruments. Changes in regulation relating to a funds use of derivatives and related instruments could potentially limit or impact the Funds ability to invest in derivatives, limit the Funds ability to employ certain strategies that use derivatives and adversely affect the value or performance of derivatives and the Fund.
| 39 |
The Fund recognizes the importance of securing personal financial information. It is our policy to safeguard any personal and financial information that may be entrusted to us. The following is a description of the Funds policy regarding disclosure of nonpublic personal information.
We collect nonpublic personal information as follows:
We collect information about our investors, including, but not limited to, the investors name, address, telephone number, e-mail address, social security number and date of birth. We collect that information from subscription agreements, other forms of correspondence that we receive from investors, from personal conversations and from affiliated entities as permitted by law.
We receive information about investor transactions with us, including, but not limited to, account number, account balance, investment amounts, withdrawal amounts and other financial information.
We are permitted by law to disclose nonpublic information we collect, as described above, to the Funds service providers, including the Funds investment advisor, sub-advisors, servicing agent, independent administrator, custodian, legal counsel, accountant and auditor. We do not disclose any nonpublic information about our current or former investors to nonaffiliated third parties, except as required or permitted by law.
You may contact us at any time to manage the information we have about you.
You may request from us information about the categories of information we have collected about you, the categories of sources from which your information was collected, the business or commercial purpose for collecting your information, the categories of third parties with whom we share your information, and the specific pieces of information we have about you. You may email us at [email protected] with Request for Information in the subject line and in the body of your message to request this information.
You may also request that we delete any information about you that we collected from you. You may email us at [email protected] with Request to Delete Information in the subject line and in the body of your message. There are circumstances where we may not be able to fulfil your request and we will let you know if one of those situations arises.
We reserve the right to verify your identity before we process any request relating to your information.
We restrict access to investor nonpublic personal information to those persons who require such information to provide products or services to investors. We maintain physical, electronic and procedural safeguards that comply with federal standards to guard investors nonpublic personal information.
If an investors investment relationship with the Fund involves a financial intermediary, including, but not limited to, a broker-dealer, bank or trust company, the privacy policy of such investors financial intermediary would govern how any nonpublic personal information would be shared by them with nonaffiliated third parties.
| 40 |
4265 San Felipe
8th Floor
Houston, Texas 77027
800-809-0525
www.salientpartners.com
Salient Midstream & MLP Fund
NYSE: SMM
11/21
| Item 2. | Code of Ethics. |
(a) The registrant has adopted a code of ethics that applies to the registrants principal executive officer, principal financial officer, principal accounting officer or controller, or persons performing similar functions. This code of ethics is included as Exhibit 13(a)(1).
(b) During the period covered by the report, with respect to the registrants code of ethics that applies to its principal executive officer, principal financial officer, principal accounting officer or controller, or persons performing similar functions; there have been no amendments to, nor any waivers granted from, a provision that relates to any element of the code of ethics definition enumerated in paragraph (b) of this Item 2.
| Item 3. | Audit Committee Financial Expert. |
The registrants board of trustees has determined that there is at least one audit committee financial expert serving on its audit committee. John Gambs is the audit committee financial expert and is considered to be independent as each term is defined in Item 3 of Form N-CSR.
| Item 4. | Principal Accountant Fees and Services. |
| 2020 | 2019 | |||||||
| Audit Fees |
$ | 76,500 | $ | 76,500 | ||||
| Audit-Related Fees |
0 | 0 | ||||||
| Tax Fees |
0 | 0 | ||||||
| All Other Fees |
0 | 0 | ||||||
(e)(1) Disclose the audit committees pre-approval policies and procedures described in paragraph (c)(7) of Rule 2-01 of Regulation S-X.
The audit committee may delegate its authority to pre-approve audit and permissible non-audit services to one or more members of the committee. Any decision of such members to pre-approve services shall be presented to the full audit committee at its next regularly scheduled meeting.
(2) Disclose the percentage of services described in each of paragraphs (b) through (d) of this item that were approved by the audit committee pursuant to paragraph (c) (7)(i)(c) of Rule 2-01 of Regulation S-X.
| 2020 |
2019 | |||
| 0% |
0 | % | ||
(f) Not applicable.
(g) Disclose the aggregate non-audit fees billed by the registrants accountant for services rendered to registrant, and rendered to the registrants investment adviser (not including any sub-adviser whose role is primarily portfolio management and is subcontracted with or overseen by another investment adviser), and any entity controlling, controlled by, or under common control with the adviser that provides ongoing services to the registrant for each of the last two fiscal years of the registrant.
| 2020 |
2019 | |
| $0 |
$0 |
(h) Not applicable.
| Item 5. | Audit Committee of Listed Registrants. |
(a) The registrant has a separately-designated standing audit committee established in accordance with Section 3(a)(58)(A) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C 78c(a)(58)(A)), and is comprised of Julie Allecta, Jonathan P. Carroll, A. John Gambs, Dr. Bernard A. Harris, Jr., and Haig G. Mardikian.
| Item 6. | Investments. |
(a) The registrants Schedule of Investments as of the close of the reporting period is included in the Report to Stockholders filed under Item 1 of Form N-CSR.
(b) Not applicable.
| Item 7. | Disclosure of Proxy Voting Policies and Procedures for Closed-End Management Investment Companies. |
A closed-end management investment company that is filing an annual report on this Form N-CSR must, unless it invests exclusively in non-voting securities, describe the policies and procedures that it uses to determine how to vote proxies relating to portfolio securities, including the procedures that the company uses when a vote presents a conflict between the interests of its shareholders, on the one hand, and those of the companys investment adviser; principal underwriter; or any affiliated person (as defined in section 2(a)(3) of the Investment Company Act of 1940 (15 U.S.C. 80a-2(a)(3)) and the rules thereunder) of the company, its investment adviser, or its principal underwriter, on the other. Include any policies and procedures of the companys investment adviser, or any other third party, that the company uses, or that are used on the companys behalf, to determine how to vote proxies relating to portfolio securities.
These policies are included as Exhibit 13(c).
| Item 8. | Portfolio Managers of Closed-End Management Investment Companies. |
Greg A. Reid and Frank T. Gardner III (the portfolio managers) are primarily responsible for the day-to-day management of the registrants portfolio.
(a)(1) The following table provides biographical information about the registrants portfolio managers as of the date of this filing:
| Name |
Position(s) Held With Registrant and Length of Time Served |
Principal Occupation During Past 5 Years | ||
| Greg A. Reid |
Trustee (since 2020); President and Chief Executive Officer (since inception). |
President and Chief Executive Officer, Salient Midstream & MLP Fund (since inception); President, MLP Complex, Salient (since 2011). | ||
| Frank T. Gardner III |
Managing Director and Portfolio Manager since 2010. |
Portfolio Manager of Salient Capital Advisors, LLC since 2010. | ||
(a)(2) The following table provides information about the other accounts managed on a day-to-day basis by the portfolio managers as of November 30, 2020:
| Name |
Number of Accounts |
Total Assets of Accounts |
Number of Accounts Subject to a Performance Fee |
Total Assets of Accounts Subject to a Performance Fee |
||||||||||||
| Greg A. Reid |
||||||||||||||||
| Registered investment companies |
1 | $ | 479M | 0 | $ | 0M | ||||||||||
| Other pooled investment companies |
2 | $ | 259M | 0 | $ | 0M | ||||||||||
| Other accounts |
120 | $ | 1,044M | 10 | $ | 16M | ||||||||||
| Frank T. Gardner III |
||||||||||||||||
| Registered investment companies |
1 | $ | 479M | 0 | $ | 0 | ||||||||||
| Other pooled investment companies |
2 | $ | 259M | 0 | $ | 0M | ||||||||||
| Other accounts |
120 | $ | 1,044M | 10 | $ | 16M | ||||||||||
Conflicts of Interest with the Investment Adviser
Conflicts of interest may arise because Salient Partners, LP (Salient) and its affiliates generally carry on substantial investment activities for other clients in which we will have no interest. Salient or its affiliates may have financial incentives to favor certain of such accounts over us. Any of their proprietary accounts and other customer accounts may compete with us for specific trades. Salient or its affiliates may buy or sell securities for us which differ from securities bought or sold for other accounts and customers, although their investment objectives and policies may be similar to ours. Situations may occur when we could be disadvantaged because of the investment activities conducted by Salient or its affiliates for their other accounts. Such situations may be based on, among other things, legal or internal restrictions on the combined size of positions that may be taken for us and the other accounts, thereby limiting the size of our position, or the difficulty of liquidating an investment for us and the other accounts where the market cannot absorb the sale of the combined position.
Our investment opportunities may be limited by affiliations of Salient or its affiliates with MLPs and Energy Infrastructure Companies. In addition, to the extent that Salient sources and structures private investments in MLPs and Energy Infrastructure Companies, certain employees of Salient may become aware of actions planned by these companies, such as acquisitions, that may not be announced to the public. Although Salient maintains procedures to ensure that any material non-public information available to certain Salient employees not be shared with those employees responsible for the purchase and sale of publicly traded securities, it is possible that we could be precluded from investing in a company about which Salient has material non-public information.
The Advisor also manages other funds that invest primarily in MLPs (collectively Affiliated Funds) and some of the Affiliated Funds have investment objectives that are similar to or overlap with ours. In particular, certain Affiliated Funds invest in MLPs and Midstream Energy Infrastructure Companies. Furthermore, the Advisor may at some time in the future, manage other investment funds with the same investment objective as ours.
Investment decisions for us are made independently from those of Salients other clients; however, from time to time, the same investment decision may be made for more than one fund or account. When two or more clients advised by Salient or its affiliates seek to purchase or sell the same publicly traded securities, the securities actually purchased or sold are allocated among the clients on a good faith equitable basis by Salient in its discretion in accordance with the clients various investment objectives and procedures adopted by Salient and approved by our Board of Trustees. In some cases, this system may adversely affect the price or size of the position that we may obtain. In other cases, however, our ability to participate in volume transactions may produce better execution for us.
We and our affiliates, including Affiliated Funds, may be precluded from co-investing in private placements of securities, including in any portfolio companies that we control. Except as permitted by law, Salient will not co-invest its other clients assets in the private transactions in which we invest. Salient will allocate private investment opportunities among its clients, including us, based on allocation policies that take into account several suitability factors, including the size of the investment opportunity, the amount of funds that each client has available for investment and the clients investment objectives. These allocation policies may result in the allocation of investment opportunities to an Affiliated Fund rather than to us. The policies contemplate that Salient will exercise discretion, based on several factors relevant to the determination, in allocating the entirety, or a portion, of such investment opportunities to an Affiliated Fund, in priority to other prospectively interested advisory clients, including us. In this regard, when applied to specified investment opportunities that would normally be suitable for us, the allocation policies may result in certain Affiliated Funds having greater priority than us to participate in such opportunities depending on the totality of the considerations, including, among other things, our available capital for investment, our existing holdings, applicable tax and diversification standards to which we may then be subject and the ability to efficiently liquidate a portion of our existing portfolio in a timely and prudent fashion in the time period required to fund the transaction.
The investment management fee paid to our Adviser is based on the value of our assets, as periodically determined. A significant percentage of our assets may be illiquid securities acquired in private transactions for which market quotations will not be readily available. Although we will adopt valuation procedures designed to determine valuations of illiquid securities in a manner that reflects their fair value, there typically is a range of prices that may be established for each individual security. Senior management of our Adviser, our Board of Trustees and its Valuation Committee, and a third-party valuation firm might participate in the valuation of our securities.
(a)(3) As of November 30, 2020:
Compensation
Messrs. Gardner and Reid are compensated by the Adviser through partnership distributions from Salient based on the amount of assets they manage, and they receive a portion of the advisory fees applicable to those accounts, which, with respect to certain amounts, as noted above, are based in part on the performance of those accounts. Some of the other accounts managed by Messrs. Gardner and Reid have investment strategies that are similar to ours. However, Salient manages potential conflicts of interest by allocating investment opportunities in accordance with its allocation policies and procedures. Messrs. Gardner and Reid did not own any of the Funds equity securities prior to this offering; however, through their limited partner interests in the parent company of the adviser, which owned all the Funds outstanding shares as of April 23, 2012 (with a value of approximately $100,000), Messrs. Gardner and Reid could be deemed to indirectly own a portion of the Funds securities.
(a)(4) As of November 30, 2020:
Securities Beneficially Owned in the Registrant by Portfolio Managers
The following table provides information about the dollar range of equity securities in the registrant beneficially owned by the portfolio managers:
| Portfolio Manager |
Aggregate Dollar Range of Beneficial Ownership in the Registrant | |
| Greg A. Reid |
$10,001 $50,000 | |
| Frank T. Gardner III |
None |
| Item. 9. | Purchase of Equity Securities by Closed-End Management Investment Company and Affiliated Purchasers. |
| Periodf |
(a) Total Number of Shares (or Units) Purchased |
(b) Average Price Paid per Share (or Unit) |
(c) Total Number of Shares (or Units) Purchased as Part of Publicly Announced Plans or Programs |
(d) Maximum Number (or Approximate Dollar Value) of Shares (or Units) that May Yet Be Purchased Under the Plans or Programs |
||||||||||||
| December 1, 2019 through December 31, 2019 |
N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | ||||||||||||
| January 1, 2020 through January 31, 2020 |
N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | ||||||||||||
| February 1, 2020 through February 28, 2020 |
N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | ||||||||||||
| March 1, 2020 through March 31, 2020 |
N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | ||||||||||||
| April 1, 2020 through April 30, 2020 |
N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | ||||||||||||
| May 1, 2020 through May 31, 2020 |
N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | ||||||||||||
| June 1, 2020 through June 30, 2020 |
N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | ||||||||||||
| July 1, 2020 through July 31, 2020 |
N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | ||||||||||||
| August 1, 2020 through August 31, 2020 |
N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | ||||||||||||
| September 1, 2020 through September 30, 2020 |
N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | ||||||||||||
| October 1, 2020 through October 31, 2020 |
N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | ||||||||||||
| November 1, 2020 through November 30, 2020 |
N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | ||||||||||||
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||
| Total |
| |||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||
| Item 10. | Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders. |
No material changes to the procedures by which the shareholders may recommend nominees to the registrants Board of Trustees have been implemented after the registrants last provided disclosure in response to the requirements of Item 407(c)(2)(iv) of Regulation S-K (17 CFR 229.407) (as required by Item 22(b)(15) of Schedule 14A (17 CFR 240.14a-101)), or this Item.
| Item 11. | Controls and Procedures. |
| (a) | The registrants principal executive officer and principal financial officer, or persons performing similar functions, have concluded, based on their evaluation of the registrants disclosure controls and procedures as conducted within 90 days of the filing date of this report, that these disclosure controls and procedures are adequately designed and are operating effectively to ensure that information required to be disclosed by the registrant on Form N-CSR is (i) accumulated and communicated to the investment companys management, including its certifying officers, to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure; and (ii) recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in the Securities and Exchange Commissions rules and forms. |
| (b) | There were no changes in the registrants internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Rule 30a-3(d) under the Act (17 CFR 270.30a-3(d)) that occurred during the period covered by this report that have materially affected or are reasonably likely to materially affect the registrants internal control over financial reporting. |
| Item 12. | Disclosure of Securities Lending Activities for Closed-End Management Investment Companies. |
Not applicable
| Item 13. | Exhibits. |
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and the Investment Company Act of 1940, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.
| Salient Midstream & MLP Fund | ||
| By: | /s/ Gregory A. Reid | |
| Gregory A. Reid Principal Executive Officer | ||
| Date: | February 5, 2021 | |
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and the Investment Company Act of 1940, this report has been signed below by the following persons on behalf of the registrant and in the capacities and on the dates indicated.
| By: | /s/ Gregory A. Reid | |
| Gregory A. Reid Principal Executive Officer | ||
| Date: | February 5, 2021 | |
| By: | /s/ Thomas Dusenberry | |
| Thomas Dusenberry Principal Financial Officer | ||
| Date: | February 5, 2021 | |
Salient Midstream & MLP Fund
Code of Ethics for Principal Executive and Senior Financial Officers
In accordance with the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (the Act) and the rules promulgated thereunder by the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC), the Salient Midstream & MLP Fund (the Fund) is required to file, on a semi-annual basis, a report on Form N-CSR in which the Fund must disclose whether it has adopted, for the purposes set forth below, a code of ethics applicable to certain of its officers. The Funds Board of Trustees (the Board), including a majority of the Trustees that are not interested persons of the Fund, as defined in Section 2(a)(19) of the Investment Company Act of 1940 (Investment Company Act), has approved this Code of Ethics (Code) as compliant with the requirements of the Act and related SEC rules.
| I. | Covered Officers/Purpose of the Code |
This Code applies to the Funds Principal Executive Officer, Chief Financial Officer and Chief Accounting Officer (the Covered Officers, each of whom are set forth in Exhibit A) for the purpose of promoting:
| | honest and ethical conduct, including the ethical handling of actual or apparent conflicts of interest between personal and professional relationships; |
| | full, fair, accurate, timely and understandable disclosure in reports and documents that the Fund files with, or submits to, the SEC and in other public communications made by the Fund; |
| | compliance with applicable laws and governmental rules and regulations; |
| | the prompt internal reporting of violations of the Code to an appropriate person or persons identified in the Code; and |
| | accountability for adherence to the Code. |
Each Covered Officer should adhere to a high standard of business ethics and should be sensitive to situations that may give rise to actual as well as apparent conflicts of interest.
| II. | Covered Officers Should Handle Ethically Actual and Apparent Conflicts of Interest |
A conflict of interest occurs when a Covered Officers private interest interferes with the interests of, or his or her service to, the Fund. For example, a conflict of interest would arise if a Covered Officer receives improper personal benefits as a result of his or her position with the Fund.
Certain conflicts of interest may arise out of the relationships between Covered Officers and the Fund and already are subject to conflict of interest provisions in the Investment Company Act and the Investment Advisers Act of 1940, as amended (Investment Advisers Act). For example, Covered Officers may not individually engage in certain transactions (such as the purchase or sale of securities or other property) with the Fund because of their status as affiliated persons of the Fund. The Fund and certain of its service providers compliance programs and procedures are designed to prevent, or identify and correct, violations of these provisions. This Code does not, and is not intended to, repeat or replace these programs and procedures, and such conflicts fall outside the parameters of this Code.
Although typically not presenting an opportunity for improper personal benefit, conflicts may arise from, or as a result of, the contractual relationship between the Fund and its investment adviser, placement agent, or administrator (each an Employer) of which the Covered Officers may be officers or employees. As a result, this Code recognizes that the Covered Officers will, in the normal course of their duties (whether for the Fund or an Employer), be involved in establishing policies and implementing decisions that will have different effects on the Employer and the Fund. The participation of the Covered Officers in such activities is inherent in the contractual relationships between the Fund and the Employers and is consistent with the performance by the Covered Officers of their duties as officers of the Fund. Thus, if performed in conformity with the provisions of the Investment Company Act and the Investment Advisers Act, such activities normally will be deemed to have been handled ethically. In addition, it is recognized by the Board that the Covered Officers may also be officers or employees of one or more other investment companies covered by this Code or other codes of ethics.
Other conflicts of interest are covered by the Code, even if such conflicts of interest are not subject to provisions in the Investment Company Act and the Investment Advisers Act. The following list provides examples of conflicts of interest under the Code, but Covered Officers should keep in mind that these examples are not exhaustive. The overarching principle is that the personal interest of a Covered Officer should not be placed improperly before the interest of the Fund.
Each Covered Officer must:
| | not use his or her personal influence or personal relationships improperly to influence investment decisions or financial reporting by the Fund whereby the Covered Officer would benefit personally to the detriment of the Fund; |
| | not cause the Fund to take action, or fail to take action, for the individual personal benefit of the Covered Officer rather than the benefit of the Fund; |
| | not use material non-public knowledge of portfolio transactions made or contemplated for the Fund to trade personally or cause others to trade personally in contemplation of the market effect of such transactions; and |
| | report at least annually the information elicited in the Funds Trustee and officer questionnaire relating to potential conflicts of interest. |
There are some conflict of interest situations that must be discussed with the Funds Audit Committee if material. Some examples of such situations include:
| | service as a Trustee on the board of any company (public or private), other than a management investment company; |
| | the receipt of any non-nominal gifts; |
| | the receipt of any entertainment from any company with which the Fund has current or prospective business dealings unless such entertainment is business related, reasonable in cost, appropriate as to time and place, and not so frequent as to raise any question of impropriety; |
| | any ownership interest in, or any consulting or employment relationship with, any of the Funds service providers, other than an Employer or any affiliated person thereof; and |
| | a direct or indirect financial interest in commissions, transaction charges or spreads paid by the Fund for effecting portfolio transactions or for selling or redeeming shares other than an interest arising from the Covered Officers employment, such as compensation or equity ownership. |
2
| III. | Disclosure and Compliance |
Each Covered Officer:
| | should familiarize himself or herself with the disclosure requirements generally applicable to the Fund; |
| | should not knowingly misrepresent, or cause others to misrepresent, facts about the Fund to others, whether within or outside the Fund, including to the Trustees and auditors, governmental regulators or self-regulatory organizations; |
| | should, to the extent appropriate within his or her area of responsibility, consult with other officers and employees of the Fund, the Employers, and other Fund service providers, with the goal of promoting full, fair, accurate, timely and understandable disclosure in the reports and documents the Fund files with, or submits to, the SEC and in other public communications made by the Fund; and |
| | has the responsibility to promote compliance with the standards and restrictions imposed by applicable laws, rules and regulations. |
| IV. | Reporting and Accountability by Covered Officers |
Each Covered Officer must:
| | upon adoption of the Code (or thereafter as applicable, upon becoming a Covered Officer), affirm in writing (in the form attached hereto as Exhibit B) to the Board that he or she has received, read, and understands the Code; |
| | annually thereafter affirm (in the form attached hereto as Exhibit B) to the Board that he or she has complied with the requirements of the Code; |
| | not retaliate against any other Covered Officer or any employee or agent of an affiliated person of the Fund for good faith reports of potential violations; and |
| | notify the Funds Audit Committee promptly if he or she knows of any violation of this Code. Failure to do so is itself a violation of this Code. |
| V. | Enforcement |
The Audit Committee is responsible for applying this Code to specific situations in which questions are presented under it and has the authority to interpret this Code in any particular situation. Any approvals or waivers sought by a Covered Officer will be considered by the Audit Committee. The Audit Committee is authorized to consult, as appropriate, with counsel to the Fund.
The Fund will follow these procedures in investigating and enforcing this Code:
| | The Audit Committee will take all appropriate action to investigate any potential violations reported to the Audit Committee; |
| | if, after such investigation, the Audit Committee believes that no violation has occurred, the Audit Committee is not required to take any further action; |
3
| | any matter that the Audit Committee believes is a material violation will be promptly reported to the Board of Trustees of the Fund. The Trustees, with the exception of any person whose matter is under consideration for a waiver, shall take such actions as they consider appropriate, including imposition of any sanctions that they consider appropriate; |
| | no person shall participate in a determination of whether he or she has committed a violation of this Code or in the imposition of any sanction against himself or herself. |
| | the Audit Committee will be responsible for granting waivers, as appropriate; and |
| | any amendments to or waivers of this Code will, to the extent required, be disclosed as provided by SEC rules. |
| VI. | Other Policies and Procedures |
This Code shall be the sole code of ethics adopted by the Fund for purposes of Section 406 of the Act and the rules and forms applicable to registered investment companies thereunder. Insofar as other policies or procedures of the Fund, the Employers or other service providers govern or purport to govern the behavior or activities of the Covered Officers who are subject to this Code, they are superseded by this Code to the extent that they overlap or conflict with the provisions of this Code. The Fund and any Employer code of ethics under Rule 17j-1 under the Investment Company Act are separate requirements applying to the Covered Officers and others, and are not part of this Code.
| V. | Amendment; Interpretation of Provisions |
The Trustees may from time to time amend this Code of Ethics or adopt such interpretations of this Code of Ethics as they deem appropriate.
| VI. | Confidentiality |
All reports and records prepared or maintained pursuant to this Code shall be treated as confidential and shall not be disclosed to any one other than the Board of Trustees, the Covered Officers and Fund counsel, except as otherwise requested in accordance with applicable law.
| VII. | Internal Use |
The Code is intended solely for the internal use by the Fund and does not constitute an admission, by or on behalf of the Fund, as to any fact, circumstance, or legal conclusion.
Dated: April 12, 2012
4
Exhibit A
Persons Covered by this Code of Ethics (Covered Officers)
Principal Executive Officer: [Name]
Chief Financial Officer and Chief Accounting Officer: [Name]
5
EXHIBIT B
Salient Midstream & MLP Fund
Code of Ethics for Principal Executive and Senior Financial Officers
INITIAL AND ANNUAL CERTIFICATION OF
COMPLIANCE WITH THE
CODE OF ETHICS FOR PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE AND SENIOR FINANCIAL OFFICERS
| To: | The Board of Trustees |
[Initial] I hereby certify that I have received the Code of Ethics for Principal Executive and Senior Financial Officers adopted pursuant to the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (the Code) and that I have read and understood the Code. I further certify that I am subject to the Code and will comply with each of the Codes provisions to which I am subject.
[Annual] I hereby certify that I have received the Code of Ethics for Principal Executive and Senior Financial Officers adopted pursuant to the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (the Code) and that I have read and understood the Code. I further certify that I have complied with and will continue to comply with each of the provisions of the Code to which I am subject.
|
| ||
| (Signature) | ||
| Name: |
| |
| Date: |
| |
6
EX-99.CERT
CERTIFICATIONS
I, Gregory A. Reid certify that:
| 1. | I have reviewed this report on Form N-CSR of Salient Midstream & MLP Fund (the registrant); |
| 2. | Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report; |
| 3. | Based on my knowledge, the schedules of investments included in this report fairly present in all material respects the investments of the registrant as of the end of the fiscal quarter for which the report is filed; |
| 4. | The registrants other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Rule 30a-3(c) under the Investment Company Act of 1940) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Rule 30a-3(d) under the Investment Company Act of 1940) for the registrant and have: |
| (a) | Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared; |
| (b) | Designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internal control over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles; |
| (c) | Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of a date within 90 days prior to the filing date of this report, based on such evaluation; and |
| (d) | Disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the period covered by this report that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants internal control over financial reporting; and |
| 5. | The registrants other certifying officer and I have disclosed to the registrants auditors and the audit committee of the registrants board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions): |
| (a) | All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrants ability to record, process, summarize, and report financial information; and |
| (b) | Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrants internal control over financial reporting. |
| Date: February 5, 2021 |
By: |
/s/ Gregory A. Reid | ||||
| Gregory A. Reid Principal Executive Officer |
EX-99.CERT
CERTIFICATIONS
I, Thomas Dusenberry, certify that:
| 1. | I have reviewed this report on Form N-CSR of Salient Midstream & MLP Fund (the registrant); |
| 2. | Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report; |
| 3. | Based on my knowledge, the schedules of investments included in this report fairly present in all material respects the investments of the registrant as of the end of the fiscal quarter for which the report is filed; |
| 4. | The registrants other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Rule 30a-3(c) under the Investment Company Act of 1940) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Rule 30a-3(d) under the Investment Company Act of 1940) for the registrant and have: |
| (a) | Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared; |
| (b) | Designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internal control over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles; |
| (c) | Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of a date within 90 days prior to the filing date of this report, based on such evaluation; and |
| (d) | Disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the period covered by this report that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants internal control over financial reporting; and |
| 5. | The registrants other certifying officer and I have disclosed to the registrants auditors and the audit committee of the registrants board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions): |
| (a) | All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrants ability to record, process, summarize, and report financial information; and |
| (b) | Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrants internal control over financial reporting. |
| Date: February 5, 2021 |
By: |
/s/ Thomas Dusenberry | ||||
| Thomas Dusenberry Principal Financial Officer |
EX-99.906 CERT
CERTIFICATIONS
This certification is provided pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. § 1350, and accompanies the report on Form N-CSR for the period ended November 30, 2020 of Salient Midstream & MLP Fund (the Registrant).
I, Gregory A. Reid, the Principal Executive Officer of the Registrant, certify that, to the best of my knowledge:
| 1. | The Form N-CSR fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m(a) or 78o(d)); and |
| 2. | The information contained in the Form N-CSR fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Registrant. |
| February 5, 2021 |
| Date |
| /s/ Gregory A. Reid |
| Gregory A. Reid |
| Principal Executive Officer |
This certification is being furnished solely pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and is not being filed as part of Form N-CSR or as a separate disclosure document. A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Registrant and will be retained by the Registrant and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
This certification is provided pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. § 1350, and accompanies the report on Form N-CSR for the period ended November 30, 2020 of Salient Midstream & MLP Fund (the Registrant).
I, Thomas Dusenberry, the Principal Financial Officer of the Registrant, certify that, to the best of my knowledge:
| 1. | The Form N-CSR fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m(a) or 78o(d)); and |
| 2. | The information contained in the Form N-CSR fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Registrant. |
| February 5, 2021 |
| Date |
| /s/ Thomas Dusenberry |
| Thomas Dusenberry |
| Principal Financial Officer |
This certification is being furnished solely pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and is not being filed as part of Form N-CSR or as a separate disclosure document. A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Registrant and will be retained by the Registrant and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
SALIENT MIDSTREAM & MLP FUND
(the Fund)
PROXY VOTING POLICIES AND PROCEDURES
| I. | Statement of Principle |
The Fund seeks to assure that proxies received by the Fund are voted in the best interest of the Funds stockholders and have accordingly adopted these procedures.
| II. | Delegation of Proxy Voting/Adoption of Advisor and Sub-Advisor Policies |
Except as provided in Section III below, the Fund delegates the authority to vote proxies related to portfolio securities to Salient Capital Advisors, LLC, (the Advisor), as investment advisor to the Fund. For each portion of the Funds portfolio managed by a sub-advisor retained to provide day-to-day portfolio management for that portion of the Funds portfolio (each, a Sub-Advisor), the Advisor in turn may delegate its proxy voting authority to the Sub-Advisor responsible for that portion of the Funds portfolio. The Board of Trustees of the Fund adopts the proxy voting policies and procedures of the Advisor and Sub-Advisors as the proxy voting policies and procedures that will be used by the respective entity when exercising voting authority on behalf of the Fund. These policies and procedures are attached hereto.
| III. | Consent in the Event of a Conflict of Interest |
If for a particular proxy vote the Advisor or Sub-Advisor seeks the Funds consent to vote because of a conflict of interest or for other reasons, any two independent Trustees of the Fund may provide the Funds consent to vote.
| IV. | Annual Review of Proxy Voting Policies of Advisor and Sub-Advisors |
The Board of Trustees of the Fund will review on an annual basis the proxy voting policies of the Advisor and Sub-Advisors applicable to the Fund.
Dated: April 12, 2012
SALIENT CAPITAL ADVISORS, LLC
PROXY VOTING POLICIES AND PROCEDURES
The following are proxy voting policies and procedures (Policies and Procedures) adopted by Salient Capital Advisors, LLC (Salient Capital Advisors or the Adviser), an investment adviser registered with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) under the Investment Advisers Act of 1940, as amended (Advisers Act), with respect to voting securities held by client portfolios. These Policies and Procedures are adopted to ensure compliance by Salient Capital Advisors with Rule 206(4)-6 under the Advisers Act and other applicable fiduciary obligations under rules and regulations of the SEC and interpretations of its staff. Salient Capital Advisors follows these Policies and Procedures for each of its clients as required under the Advisers Act and other applicable law, unless expressly directed by a client in writing to refrain from voting that clients proxies. With respect to clients that are pooled investment vehicles (the Funds), Salient Capital Advisors follows both these Policies and Procedures and the proxy voting policies and procedures adopted by the Funds and their Boards of Trustees.
| I. | Definitions |
A. Best interest of clients. In the view of Salient Capital Advisors, this means clients best economic interest over the long term that is, the common interest that all clients share in seeing the value of a common investment increase over time. Clients may have differing political or social interests, but their best economic interest is generally uniform.
B. Material conflict of interest. Circumstances when Salient Capital Advisors, or any member of its senior management or any of its portfolio managers or portfolio analysts, knowingly does business with a particular proxy issuer or closely affiliated entity which may appear to create a material conflict between the interests of Salient Capital Advisors and the interests of its clients in how proxies of that issuer are voted.
| II. | General Policy |
Where Salient Capital Advisors is given responsibility for voting proxies, we must take reasonable steps under the circumstances to ensure that proxies are received and voted with a view to enhancing the value of the shares of stock held in client accounts.
The financial interest of our clients is the primary consideration in determining how proxies should be voted. In the case of social and political responsibility issues that in our view do not primarily involve financial considerations, the diversity of our clients means that we are unable to represent each such view in each instance. Thus, Salient Capital Advisors exercises its vote on these issues in what it believes to be the best economic interests of its clients. When making specific proxy decisions, Salient Capital Advisors adheres to the Glass Lewis & Co. Proxy Paper Guidelines and the Glass Lewis & Co. Investment Manager Guidelines. The guidelines set forth the positions of Salient Capital Advisors on recurring issues and criteria for addressing non-recurring proxy matters. The general voting policies of Salient Capital Advisors are described below.
| III. | General Voting Policies |
A. Clients Best Interest. These Policies and Procedures are designed and implemented in a way that is reasonably expected to ensure that proxies are voted in the best interest of clients. Proxies will be voted with the aim of furthering the best economic interests of clients, promoting high levels of corporate governance and adequate disclosure of company policies, activities and returns, including fair and equal treatment of shareholders.
| Exhibit G |
B. Case-by-Case Basis. While these Policies and Procedures guide our decisions, each proxy vote is ultimately cast on a case-by-case basis, taking into consideration all relevant facts and circumstances at the time of the vote. Salient Capital Advisors may cast proxy votes in favor of management proposals or seek to change the views of management, considering specific issues as they arise on their merits. Salient Capital Advisors may also join with other investment managers in seeking to submit a shareholder proposal to a company or to oppose a proposal submitted by the company. Any such action is primarily based on grounds of fundamental share value.
C. Material Conflicts of Interest. Material conflicts are resolved in the best interest of clients. When a material conflict of interest between Salient Capital Advisors and its respective client(s) is identified, Salient Capital Advisors will choose among the procedures set forth below, to resolve such conflict.
D. Limitations. The circumstances under which Salient Capital Advisors may take a limited role in voting proxies, include the following.
1. No Responsibility. Salient Capital Advisors will not vote proxies for client accounts in which the client contract specifies that Salient Capital Advisors will not vote. Under such circumstances, the clients custodians (Custodians) are instructed to mail proxy material directly to such clients.
2. Limited Value. Salient Capital Advisors may abstain from voting a client proxy if the effect on shareholders economic interests or the value of the portfolio holding is indeterminable or insignificant.
3. Unjustifiable Costs. Salient Capital Advisors may abstain from voting a client proxy for cost reasons.
4. Securities Lending Arrangements. If voting securities are part of a securities lending program, Salient Capital Advisors may be unable to vote while the securities are on loan.
5. Special Considerations. The responsibilities of Salient Capital Advisors for voting proxies are determined generally by its obligations under each advisory contract or similar document. If a client requests in writing that Salient Capital Advisors vote its proxy in a manner inconsistent with these Policies and Procedures, Salient Capital Advisors may request that the client vote the proxy directly. For certain institutional clients, as agreed upon per provisions within their advisory contract or similar document, Salient Capital Advisors may be directed to vote as instructed by such institutional client.
E. Sources of Information. Salient Capital Advisors may conduct research internally and/or use the resources of an independent research consultant. Salient Capital Advisors may consider legislative materials, studies of corporate governance and other proxy voting issues, and/or analyses of shareholder and management proposals by a certain sector of companies, e.g. small cap companies.
F. Availability of Policies and Procedures. Salient Capital Advisors will provide clients with a copy of these Policies and Procedures, as revised from time to time, upon request.
G. Disclosure of Vote. As described in Part 2A of Salient Capital Advisors Form ADV, a client may obtain information on how its proxies were voted by requesting such information from Salient Capital Advisors. Salient Capital Advisors does not generally disclose client proxy votes to third parties, other than as required for the Funds, unless specifically requested, in writing, by the client.
| 2 | Exhibit G |
| IV. | Proxy Voting Procedures |
A. General
1. Accounts for Which Salient Capital Advisors Has Proxy Voting Responsibility
Salient Capital Advisors is generally responsible for voting proxies with respect to securities held in client accounts unless the investment management agreement explicitly states that Salient Capital Advisors will not vote proxies for the account. For certain institutional clients, as agreed upon per provisions within their investment management agreement, Salient Capital Advisors may be directed to vote as instructed by such institutional client. Salient Capital Advisors is not responsible for voting client securities which are not part of the managed account.
2. Adherence to Client Proxy Voting Policies
If a client has its own proxy voting policy, Salient Capital Advisors and the client will agree in writing on whether Salient Capital Advisors will vote in accordance with its own policy or whether the client will vote its own securities.
3. Disclosure of Proxy Voting Intentions
Salient Capital Advisors personnel should not discuss with members of the public how Salient Capital Advisors intends to vote on any particular proxy proposal. This does not restrict communications in the ordinary course of business with other clients for which Salient Capital Advisors votes proxies. Disclosure of Salient Capital Advisors proxy voting intentions especially where done with the purpose or effect of influencing the management or control of a company could trigger various restrictions under the federal securities laws, including under the proxy solicitation, beneficial ownership and short-swing profit liability provisions of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended. In the event that Salient Capital Advisors wishes to discuss its voting intentions outside the firm, Salient Capital Advisors should consult with its counsel before any such discussions.
B. Operational Procedures
1. Role of the Proxy Administrator
Once a client account is established and the proxy voting responsibility is determined, the Proxy Administrator (PA), is responsible for receiving and processing proxies for securities held in the portfolios of our clients and ensuring that votes are cast. In most instances, Salient Capital Advisors engages a third-party service provider, Broadridge, as its Proxy Administrator. The PA is responsible for ensuring that the registered owners of record, e.g. the client, trustee or custodian bank, that receive proxy materials from the issuer or its information agent, forward proxy materials to the PA. Proxies may also be delivered electronically through a proxy service. The PA logs in any proxy materials received, matches them to the securities to be voted and confirms that the correct amount of shares, as of the record date, is reflected on the proxy. Once the proxy statement is logged in, the PA gives it to a research analyst (Analyst) for consideration.
The PA also compiles and maintains information, for each client for which Salient Capital Advisors votes proxies, showing the issuers name, meeting date and manner in which it voted on each proxy proposal. The PA is also responsible for monitoring compliance with client proxy voting policies. A copy of each proxy statement is kept.
| 3 | Exhibit G |
2. Material Conflicts of Interest
a. Salient Capital Advisors will take steps to identify the existence of any material conflicts of interest relating to the securities to be voted or the issue at hand. Senior management, portfolio managers and Analysts of Salient Capital Advisors are expected to disclose to the PA any personal conflicts such as officer or Trustee positions held by them, their spouses or close relatives in the portfolio company. Conflicts based on business relationships or dealings of affiliates of Salient Capital Advisors will only be considered to the extent that the Salient Capital Advisors has actual knowledge of such business relationships.
b. When a material conflict of interest between Salient Capital Advisors interests and its clients interests appears to exist, Salient Capital Advisors may choose among the following options to eliminate such conflict: (1) vote in accordance with these Policies and Procedures if it involves little or no discretion; (2) vote as recommended by a third-party service if Salient Capital Advisors utilizes such a service; (3) echo vote or mirror vote the proxies in the same proportion as the votes of other proxy holders that are not clients of Salient Capital Advisors; (4) if possible, erect information barriers around the person or persons making voting decisions sufficient to insulate the decision from the conflict; (5) if practical, notify affected clients of the conflict of interest and seek a waiver of the conflict; or (6) if agreed upon in writing with the client, forward the proxies to affected clients allowing them to vote their own proxies.
3. Role of the Research Analysts
In most instances, Salient Capital Advisors uses Broadridge for research and analysis in voting proxies. The PA ensures that each proxy statement is directed to the Analyst responsible for following the particular security or industry. The Analysts are responsible for considering the substantive issues relating to any vote, deciding how the shares will be voted, and instructing the PA how to vote the proxies. In determining how to vote a given proxy, Analysts will adhere to the Glass Lewis & Co. Proxy Paper Guidelines and the Glass Lewis & Co. Investment Manager Guidelines. Analysts are responsible for documenting the rationale for any vote recommendation.
4. Role of the Third-Party Service Provider(s)
Salient Capital Advisors engages Broadridge to research, analyze and vote proxies on behalf of the Adviser as well as provide recordkeeping services.
| V. | Documentation, Recordkeeping and Reporting Requirements |
A. Documentation. The Adviser and/or PA is responsible for:
1. implementing and updating these Policies and Procedures;
2. overseeing the proxy voting process;
3. consulting with Analysts for the relevant portfolio security; and
4. maintaining proxy voting records.
B. Recordkeeping.
1. Salient Capital Advisors will maintain records of all proxies voted.
| 4 | Exhibit G |
2. As required by Rule 204-2(c), such records will include: (a) a copy of the Policies and Procedures; (b) a copy of any document created by Salient Capital Advisors that was material to making a decision how to vote proxies on behalf of a client or that memorializes the basis for that decision; and (c) each written client request for proxy voting records and Salient Capital Advisors written response to any (written or oral) client request for such records.
3. Salient Capital Advisors will maintain its own proxy statements and record of votes cast. As permitted by Rule 204-2(c), in most instances, proxy statements and the record of each vote cast by each client account will be maintained by Broadridge. Salient Capital Advisors has obtained an undertaking from Broadridge to provide Salient Capital Advisors copies of proxy voting records and other documents promptly upon request. Salient Capital Advisors or Broadridge may rely on the SECs EDGAR system to keep records of certain proxy statements if the proxy statements are maintained by issuers on that system (e.g., large U.S.-based issuers).
4. Duration. Proxy voting books and records will be maintained in an easily accessible place for a period of five years, the first two in Salient Capital Advisors office.
C. Reporting. Salient Capital Advisors will initially inform clients of these Policies and Procedures and how a client may learn of the voting record for clients securities through summary disclosure in Part 2A of Salient Capital Advisors Form ADV. Upon receipt of a clients request for more information, Salient Capital Advisors will provide to the client a copy of these Policies and Procedures and/or, in accordance with the clients stated requirements, how the clients proxies were voted during the period requested subsequent to the adoption of these Policies and Procedures. Such periodic reports, other than those required for the Funds, will not be made available to third parties absent the express written request of the client.
Review of Policies and Procedures. These Policies and Procedures will be subject to period review as deemed appropriate by Salient Capital Advisors.
| VI. | Specific Voting Policies |
When making specific proxy decisions, Salient Capital Advisors adheres to the Glass Lewis & Co. Proxy Paper Guidelines and the Glass Lewis & Co. Investment Manager Guidelines. Salient Capital Advisors current policies with respect to a number of common issues are briefly summarized as follows:
| | The Adviser generally votes against proposals to classify the board and for proposals to repeal classified boards and to elect directors annually. |
| | The Adviser generally votes against proposals to ratify a poison pill and for proposals that ask a company to submit its poison pill for shareholder ratification. |
| | The Adviser generally votes against proposals to require a supermajority shareholder vote to approve charter and bylaw amendments and for proposals to lower such supermajority shareholder vote requirements. |
| | The Adviser generally votes for management proposals to increase the number of shares of common stock authorized for issue provided management demonstrated a satisfactory reason for the potential issuance of the additionally authorized shares. |
| | The Adviser generally votes for proposals to increase common share authorization for a stock split provided management demonstrates a reasonable basis for the split and for proposals to implement a reverse stock split provided management demonstrates a reasonable basis for the reverse split. |
| 5 | Exhibit G |
| | Absent special circumstances (e.g., actions taken in the context of a hostile takeover attempt) indicating an abusive purpose, the Adviser, on a case-by-case basis, votes for proposals that would authorize the creation of new classes of preferred stock with unspecified voting, conversion, dividend and distribution, and other rights. |
| | Proposals to change a companys state of incorporation area examined on a case-by-case basis. |
| | The Adviser, on a case-by-case basis, votes on mergers and acquisitions taking into account at least the following: |
| | anticipated financial and operating benefits; |
| | offer price (cost vs. premium); |
| | prospects of the combined companies, |
| | how the deal was negotiated; and |
| | changes in corporate governance and their impact on shareholder rights. |
| | The Adviser generally does not support shareholder social and environmental proposals, and may vote such matters, on a case-by-case basis, where the proposal enhances the long-term value of the shareholder and does not diminish the return on investment. |
Dated: May 1, 2018
| 6 | Exhibit G |
Serious News for Serious Traders! Try StreetInsider.com Premium Free!
You May Also Be Interested In
- The Building Security Line Item NYC Property Investors Keep Underpricing
- Industry Publication Covers Local Firm's Agentic Engine Optimization Method
- Best Memecoin Presale August 2026: Whales Are Secretly Accumulating These 5 Crypto Presales
Create E-mail Alert Related Categories
SEC FilingsSign up for StreetInsider Free!
Receive full access to all new and archived articles, unlimited portfolio tracking, e-mail alerts, custom newswires and RSS feeds - and more!



Tweet
Share