Judge blocks Kansas ban on gender-transition treatment for minors

May 16, 2026 6:58 PM EDT

FILE PHOTO: Republican gubernatorial candidate Kris Kobach greets supporters shortly after the polls closed at his election night party in Topeka, Kansas, U.S. November 6, 2018. REUTERS/Dave Kaup/File Photo

(This May 16 story has ‌been repeated ​without any ​changes to the text)

NEW YORK, May 16 (Reuters) - A Kansas judge has temporarily blocked a law banning gender-transition treatments for minors in ‌the state.

State District Judge Carl Folsom III granted an injunction requested ⁠by the parents of two teenagers who want to continue gender-transition treatment with medicines. Folsom's ‌decision halts the enforcement of ‌a recently approved state law that banned such treatments.

In a ruling Friday, the judge sided with the teens' parents who sued to halt the ​law, saying they had the right to make decisions regarding the health of their children, according to court documents and a statement from the ⁠American Civil Liberties Union, which is representing the plaintiffs.

"This is an enormous relief to our clients and ​families across the state of Kansas," ACLU attorney Harper Seldin said in a statement.

Kansas Attorney General Kris W. Kobach plans to ​appeal the decision, according to local media ‌reports. If Folsom's injunction is upheld, it would last for the duration of the lawsuit.

Kobach, a Republican, called the ruling “a ⁠stark example of judicial activism,” according to The New York Times.

The Kansas law, which the Republican-controlled state legislature passed in January over Democratic Governor Laura Kelly's veto, prohibits ⁠gender-affirming medical treatments such as hormone therapies and pubertal suppressants for transgender youth diagnosed with ​gender dysphoria.

Although the U.S. Supreme Court last year ruled that states can ban gender-affirming care for minors, the lawsuit that prompted Friday's injunction argues that the Kansas law violates ‌the state constitution.

Folsom, a Kelly appointee, sees a "substantial likelihood" that the lawsuit will succeed.

"Specifically, the Court concludes that Plaintiffs are ‌likely to prevail … based on the right to personal autonomy set out in Section ⁠1 of the Kansas Constitution ‌Bill of Rights and ​a parent’s fundamental right to make medical decisions for their children," Folsom wrote.

(Reporting by Marcelo Teixeira; Editing by Sergio Non and ‌Cynthia Osterman)



Serious News for Serious Traders! Try StreetInsider.com Premium Free!

You May Also Be Interested In





Related Categories

Reuters