Canadian Diplomats Dispute Havana Study Findings
Flawed study did not compare to pre-injury baseline, had ethical concerns
The recently released study of "Anomalous Health Incidents" by the National Institutes of Health (NIH), did not compare individual health records of afflicted individuals from the US to determine their pre-injury baseline. Canadian legal counsel for the injured diplomats and family members said the NIH report has no bearing on the Canadian experience. Canadian counsel also said they join their colleagues in their critique of the NIH study on procedural, substantive, and ethical grounds.
Howie, Sacks and Henry LLP has partnered with
Howie, Sacks & Henry LLP co-counsel
Miller stated the Canadian victims of these injuries join their American colleagues in demanding that both governments declassify all information relating to injuries sustained by their personnel if these governments are standing by the proposition that there was no foreign enemy involvement and that there are no brain injuries as a result of being in
For the US lead counsel's statement, please click here.
View original content:https://www.prnewswire.com/news-releases/canadian-diplomats-dispute-havana-study-findings-302092009.html
SOURCE Howie, Sacks & Henry LLP
Serious News for Serious Traders! Try StreetInsider.com Premium Free!
You May Also Be Interested In
- Blue Purpose Founder Glidewell Secures Third U.S. Patent for Advanced Emergency Response and Communications Technology
- BNB Price Prediction: Pepeto Buyers Eye Faster Gains as Tokenized Stocks on BNB Chain Top $1 Billion
- FF EAI Robotics Ecosystem Inc. (NASDAQ: FFR) Highlights Faraday Future Announcement: This Week's Investor Weekly Report from YT Jia Rescheduled to October 14; FFR and FFAI to Host Joint New Product La
Create E-mail Alert Related Categories
PRNewswire, Press ReleasesSign up for StreetInsider Free!
Receive full access to all new and archived articles, unlimited portfolio tracking, e-mail alerts, custom newswires and RSS feeds - and more!





Tweet
Share