UNITE Releases Dignity Index Scores from the Vance-Walz Debate
Panel Notes the Impact of Dignity in the Candidates' Exchanges
UNITE's 80-member bipartisan National Citizens Panel registered high levels of bipartisan agreement on the scores and expressed bipartisan support for the dignified tone of the debate.
"The panel's scores and comments show again that even the most partisan Americans can recognize and acknowledge dignity from the other side," said Shriver, co-creator of the Index. "And panelists clearly appreciate how dignity leads to productive, problem-solving debate."
The panelists noted, in particular, how the candidates' exchange on gun violence opened the way to finding solutions.
The statement from
In
SCORES
Panelists score by matching language from the speech passage with descriptions in the Dignity Index scoring guide, which is available here.
1. Tim Walz, speaking about
- 88% of panelists agree that this was contempt
- The most frequently chosen score was a FOUR
- The reasons given the most were "will distort or rename an opponent's position to make it sound unappealing" and "dismisses the other side as not really worth talking to."
- 87% of panelists scored within -1 of the score of FOUR
- The Conservative average score was 3.619, and the Liberal average score was 3.917
- 88% of panelists agree that this was contempt
2. JD Vance, speaking about
- 83% of panelists agree that this was contempt
- The most frequently chosen score was a FOUR
- The reasons given the most were "will distort or rename an opponent's position to make it sound unappealing" and "We're better than those people. They don't really belong. They don't really share our values."
- 72% of panelists scored within -1 of the score of FOUR
- The Conservative average score was 3.762, and the Liberal average score was 3.625
- 83% of panelists agree that this was contempt
3. JD Vance's stance on gun violence: "We have way higher rates of depression, way higher rates of anxiety. We, unfortunately, have a mental health crisis in this country that I really do think that we need to get to the root causes of because I don't think it's the whole reason why we have such a bad gun violence problem. But I do think it's a big piece of it."
- 95% of panelists agree that this was dignity
- The most frequently chosen score was a FIVE
- The reasons given the most were "speaks openly, explaining their views, but never with contempt" and "I share my views with no contempt, so they're easier for others to hear"
- 86% of panelists scored within -1 the score of FIVE
- The Conservative average score was 5.190, and the Liberal average score was 5.333
- 95% of panelists agree that this was dignity
4. Tim Walz talking about gun violence: "Where the most firearm deaths happen in
- 83% of panelists agreed that this was dignity
- The most frequently chosen score was a FIVE
- The reasons given the most were "speaks openly, explaining their views, but never with contempt" and "I share my views with no contempt, so they're easier for others to hear"
- 70% of panelists scored within +1 of the score of FIVE
- The Conservative average score was 4.762, and the Liberal average score was 5.125
- 83% of panelists agreed that this was dignity
5. Tim Walz's closing remark on gun control: "I think this is a healthy conversation. I think there's a capacity to find solutions on this that work, protect Second Amendment, protect our children. That's our priority."
- 99% of panelists agree this was dignity
- The most frequently chosen score was a SIX
- The reasons given the most were "We talk to the other side, searching for the values and interests we share, and using them as a basis for cooperation." and "We don't let our disagreements keep us from cooperating on the things we agree on."
- 89% of panelists scored within +1 or -1 the score of SIX
- The Conservative average score was 6.095, and the Liberal average score was 5.875
- 99% of panelists agree this was dignity
6. An exchange between JD Vance and
JD Vance: "Me too, man."
- 97% of panelists agree this was dignity
- The most frequently chosen score was a SEVEN
- The reasons most given were "has a great deal of humility, especially in their ability to be self-critical, admit mistakes, and even consider how they might be contributing to the problem." and "can offer genuine apologies and forgiveness even after painful conflicts."
- 82% of panelists scored within +1 or -1 the score of a SEVEN
- The Conservative average score was 6.429, and the Liberal average score was 6.333
7. JD Vance's closing statement: "We are going to shake hands after this debate and after this election. And of course, I hope that we win and I think we're going to win but if
- 100% of panelists agree this was dignity
- The most frequently chosen score was a SIX
- The reason most given was "We don't let our disagreements keep us from cooperating on the things we agree on." and "finds it deeply satisfying to cooperate with the other side."
- 86% of panelists scored it within +1 or -1 of a SIX
- The Conservative average score was 6.286, and the Liberal average score was 6.208
- 100% of panelists agree this was dignity
Contact:
Phone: 203.376.1192
View original content:https://www.prnewswire.com/news-releases/unite-releases-dignity-index-scores-from-the-vance-walz-debate-302267831.html
SOURCE Project UNITE, Inc.
Serious News for Serious Traders! Try StreetInsider.com Premium Free!
You May Also Be Interested In
- Implantica publishes Interim Report January - June 2026 (Q2)
- Takara FX Partners with Ana Botin's Botin Gold Analysis Team, Making AI Trading a Key Focus of Strategic Collaboration
- U.S. debt tops $40 trillion
Create E-mail Alert Related Categories
PRNewswire, Press ReleasesRelated Entities
Donald J. TrumpSign up for StreetInsider Free!
Receive full access to all new and archived articles, unlimited portfolio tracking, e-mail alerts, custom newswires and RSS feeds - and more!



Tweet
Share