Employee Fiduciary Urges DOL to Add Participant Protections to Proposed Prudence Rule
The proposed rule — published
"Private equity firms, real estate funds, and cryptocurrency platforms have been celebrating this rule since the day it dropped," said
Three Gaps That Must Be Closed
- Fix CIT fee transparency. The rule's six-factor test explicitly covers collective investment trusts as designated investment alternatives — and given their rapidly growing use as wrappers for private market investments in 401(k) plans, that's significant. Unlike mutual funds, CITs are exempt from SEC registration under the Investment Company Act of 1940 and not subject to the same fee disclosure standards. Until the Department clarifies whether CITs must include carried interest, leverage costs, and acquired fund fees in the expense ratios shown to participants, plan sponsors comparing CIT vehicles to registered funds will be comparing apples to oranges without knowing it — and the safe harbor's fee factor cannot be meaningfully satisfied for private market CIT investments.
- Move beyond disclosure on crypto — participants need real protections. The rule's asset-neutral stance opens the door to cryptocurrency in 401(k) plans by reversing prior Department guidance specifically warning against it. Disclosure alone is not sufficient protection — a participant who receives a crypto disclosure they don't fully understand has not been protected, and sophisticated financial industry participants are well-practiced at satisfying disclosure requirements on paper while continuing business as usual. Employee Fiduciary asked for four substantive safeguards: a participant opt-in requirement so no one is passively exposed to digital assets; a suitability standard modeled on blue sky law qualifications, recognizing retirement savings are many participants' primary or sole source of financial security; enhanced independent valuation requirements; and a clarification that a benchmark constructed by an adviser with a financial relationship to the digital asset manager does not satisfy the rule's benchmarking standard. None of these prohibit crypto — they simply ensure participants cannot be exposed to it without informed consent and a meaningful suitability determination.
- Give participants transparency rights that match the new protections for fiduciaries. The letter identifies this as the rule's most fundamental structural flaw: robust new legal protections for fiduciaries, nothing new for participants. Under the rule as proposed, a participant has no way to know whether the six-factor test was applied rigorously or reduced to a compliance checklist, whether benchmarks were meaningful or constructed to favor a preferred investment, or whether fee comparisons reflected the true all-in cost of CIT vehicles. Employee Fiduciary asked the Department to require an annual plain-language summary for each participant covering every investment option, the benchmark used, net-of-fees performance relative to that benchmark, and total fees in dollar terms — plus access to six-factor documentation upon request, including a plain-language summary so the right of access translates into genuine understanding rather than impenetrable technical disclosure.
A Warning Against Checkbox Compliance
The letter also flags an implementation risk: without explicit Department guidance, the safe harbor could spawn a market for canned compliance checklists — boilerplate templates satisfying the letter of each factor without genuine fiduciary analysis. Employee Fiduciary urged the Department to make clear in the final rule that the quality and specificity of documentation, not merely its existence, determines whether safe harbor protection attaches.
"This rule has the bones of something genuinely good for participants," Droblyen said. "But a process-based safe harbor is only as strong as the process it protects. Right now, the rule creates more certainty for plan sponsors than it does transparency for the people whose retirement security actually depends on getting this right."
The full comment letter is available here. Employee Fiduciary's companion analysis is published at employeefiduciary.com/blog/dol-six-factor-prudence-rule-comment-letter. The firm's earlier analysis of the proposed rule is available at employeefiduciary.com/blog/dol-prudence-rule-good-bad-ugly.
The DOL comment period remains open. Employee Fiduciary encourages other plan providers, advisers, and participant advocates to submit their own views at regulations.gov.
About Employee Fiduciary
Founded in 2004 and headquartered in
For Additional Information
Employee Fiduciary
[email protected]
(251) 254-9634
View original content to download multimedia:https://www.prnewswire.com/news-releases/employee-fiduciary-urges-dol-to-add-participant-protections-to-proposed-prudence-rule-302763500.html
SOURCE Employee Fiduciary
Serious News for Serious Traders! Try StreetInsider.com Premium Free!
You May Also Be Interested In
- RenovoRx regains Nasdaq minimum bid price compliance
- Paris Baguette Expands Their Growing Footprint with a New Café Opening in Hilliard, Ohio on August 20
- Winnebago Industries extends $350M credit facility to 2031
Create E-mail Alert Related Categories
PRNewswire, Press ReleasesSign up for StreetInsider Free!
Receive full access to all new and archived articles, unlimited portfolio tracking, e-mail alerts, custom newswires and RSS feeds - and more!



Tweet
Share