Zenas Biopharma (ZBIO) PT Lowered to $48 at Jefferies, 'we see clear path for approval (BLA submission planned in 2Q and MAA in 2H26')

January 6, 2026 4:59 AM EST
Get Alerts ZBIO Hot Sheet
Price: $29.20 -6.68%

Rating Summary:
    7 Buy, 1 Hold, 0 Sell

Rating Trend: Up Up

Today's Overall Ratings:
    Up: 19 | Down: 16 | New: 9
Join SI Premium – FREE

Jefferies analyst Roger Song lowered the price target on Zenas Biopharma (NASDAQ: ZBIO) to $48.00 (from $62.00) while maintaining a Buy rating.

The analyst comments "We caught up with mgmt. While HR came lower than expected, ~73% Tx protection w/ ~56% risk reduction suggests obex highly effective (in slightly tougher-to-treat pts vs. comp trial) and was appreciated by KOL. Safety was strong/ better. Along with other key differentiations including MOA of inhibition (depletion), at-home sub, payer dynamics, obex could be well-positioned to be 1L Tx, in large ~$3B IgG4-RD market with only comp initial launch trending well. Bottom line. The HR of ~0.44 was a surprise based on our stat analysis (PREVIEW). With relatively comparable design/ baseline, INDIGO enrolled more recurrent pts vs. MITIGATE (~67% vs. ~54%), which could have negatively impacted HR, as in MITIGATE, HR of recurrent vs. newly Dx was ~0.2 vs. 0.0. While HR was clearly lower than expectations by the Street, we see clear path for approval (BLA submission planned in 2Q and MAA in 2H26), supported by a successful Ph3, and potential 1L/ broad use in a large ~$3B US market, with key drivers: 1) advantageous inhibitory MOA vs. depleting, which could be better for this elderly pt population (~40% 65+yo) that has need for regular vaccination, high risk for infection, and need for management of co-morbidity, and better for sequential Tx including Uplizna as a B cell depleter. 2) Strong safety/ tolerability, with lower than pbo SAE, infection, and low/ pbo-comparable ISR, supports risk/ benefit profile and earlier line of Tx. 3) At home subq administration could be preferred by pts/ accessible to broad population, without the need for IV center or ped-med for infusion AEs. 4) Monthly subq drug could have more favorable economics to payers/ pts vs. Q6M IV comp drug, with lower OOP cost under Part D pharmacy benefit (vs. Part B medical benefit) and w/o lump sum in the first month."



Serious News for Serious Traders! Try StreetInsider.com Premium Free!

You May Also Be Interested In





Related Categories

Analyst Comments, Analyst PT Change, Hot Comments

Related Entities

Jefferies & Co, Maynard Um, Mark Zuckerberg, ARK