RSS Feed For (NY:ICE)

INTERCONTINENTAL EXCHANGE, Inc. (NY:ICE)

106.77 +0.01 (0.01%)
INTERCONTINENTAL EXCHANGE, Inc. (NY:ICE) Delayed :
Previous Close $106.76    52 Week High $121.93 
Open $106.10    52 Week Low $49.69 
Day High $107.31    P/E 28.17 
Day Low $105.09    EPS $3.79 
Volume 604,346       
More ICE Info: Chart SEC Filings Profile Historical Options

InterContinental Exchange, Inc. Summary

IntercontinentalExchange, Inc., through its subsidiaries, owns and operates an Internet-based global electronic marketplace for trading in futures and over-the-counter (OTC) commodities, and derivative financial products in the United States and internationally. The company operates through the Energy Futures and Options Markets, Global OTC Markets, Market Data, and Soft Commodity Futures and Options Markets ...more

Executives

Jeffrey C. Sprecher - Founder, Chairman, & CEO

Links

http://www.intcx.com

What is this?Friends, Peers and Foes

Ticker # Stories Ticker # Stories
CME 10 CME 6
NYX 5 NDAQ 4
GET 4 CHD 4
ADM 4 NDAQ 3
LPX 3 YRCW 3
ARM 3 AUY 3
View All Friends, Peers and Foes

StreetInsider Reports on ICE by Category

View All Comments Comments on recent ICE articles

ANDREW OLIVER SATCHELL
on Nov 13, 2009
at 03:55 PM
ANDREW OLIVER SATCHELL EXCELLENT
Article: Trading Radar for 11/03: UBS (UBS), Yamana Gold (AUY), Archer-Daniels (ADM), Royal Caribbean (RCL), Marathon (MRO) Report
Cary
on Oct 15, 2009
at 09:08 AM
No splits are not good for retail. In a time where the retail stock buyer questions the validity of the market corporations need to focus on the institutional buyers to deal in their stock. Splitting was used not only to gain attention but to allow the small retail buyer access to the stock. If you are trying to stay mostly in institutional hands, they would tend to favor a stock not split into so many pieces. Hence the run ups without the splits.
Article: No More Stock Splits, Why (ISRG, GOOG, AAPL, CME, PTR, ICE, BIDU)?
steven
on Jul 9, 2009
at 03:18 PM
WHY can't the so-called "analysts" use the "same" rating criteria??? one day one analyst firm rates CME as an "underperform", AND, then the NEXT day another analyst firm actually "upgrades" CME, so ---> are there even "exact measuring criteria" being used here to properly "base" these analysts forcasts, or -- does it end-up just being a "subjective" I like the company or I don't???!!!! These analyst firms ALL seem to be nothing but "UN-credible" in their predictions when one either completely or nearly "contradicts" the findings of another, as has been clearly exemplifed by the two differing results by two different analyst firms "rating" CME on both July 8th and on July 9th!! Just read for yourself.... ** IF THERE ARE ANY STEADFAST "GUIDELINES" or a specific scientific "PROTOCOL" TO FOLLOW WHEN RATING STOCK-COMPANIES, THEN -- THERE REALLY SHOULD NOT BE SUCH AN "OBVIOUS DISCREPENCY" IN THE RESULTING "RATINGS" BY THESE SO-CALLED "ANALYSTS"... Any comments? -- thanks --
Article: Keefe, Bruyette & Woods Raises Price Target & Estimates for IntercontinentalExchange (ICE) and CME Group (CME)
mike hunt
on Mar 30, 2009
at 01:35 PM
ICE predictions you cost me 200 grand by telling this shit about a company and industry you have never worked in or know nothing about. screw you, the last thing the world needs is negativity from doom mongers on a journalists salary. how can yo say this when the stock was $190 18 months ago, it will return muppets.
Article: Pali Research Initiates Coverage on IntercontinentalExchange (ICE) with a Sell
Chuck Dillmann
on Jan 5, 2009
at 05:01 PM
News Think news of 4th quarter commissions could have been realeased before market opened or after the close?
Article: Deutsche Bank Lowers Estimates on IntercontinentalExchange (ICE)
View All Comments

Comments on ICE


No comments are currently available.