Joe at Jun 22, 2009 03:41 PMWow, you just mispelled my post
Oh that's nice. I just posted a spell checked message and it now appears to grammatically incorrect and in completely different order to look stupid? What's up with that?
Joe at Jun 22, 2009 03:38 PMBAC
Make a note that Cramer bought just about 12, yet said he would buy more if BAC dips below eleven. The way this is worded allows him to say BAC is still a bargain if it is over eleven thus nullifying his loss at 12.00. I have seen him do this many times. Well I've got news Jim - 12 dollars to 11 dollars is a HUGE loss.
Irv at Jun 8, 2009 09:43 PMCramer and BAC
Cramer's BAC guess may or not be correct. But the incredibly poor syntax and spelling of his critics in this column detracts from any wit or wisdom those respondents may actually command. I can only conclude that they must be driving and texting - something only really arrogant and foolish people do.
Tom L at Jun 7, 2009 03:23 PMEven a poofter can't miss on this one
Cramer showed what a spineless assbag he is on the Jon Stewart show, but it would be pretty hard to miss when buying BAC. I think there is still more downside, as the markets in general have not been "listening" to the economic news that is coming out. ( as noted by the over %300 gain from the low in March. I would also add that the company was oversold at the time, so the %300 is exaggerated) Unemployment is still climbing, defaults (personal) are declining, but still at a pace that indicates recessionary pressure. We are yet to see the full extent of corporate defaults. The credit expansion of the past 10 years has caught up, and it will limit spending (regardless of the elimination of "general default") With the yield curve as steep as it is, it favors the banks, and I think once the banks start lending again, there will be a new breed of consolidations loans available from the banks, which will be marketed to ease consumer debt burdens.
My guess is that it hits $10 before it hits $14, but it is a definite long term buy.
david at Jun 7, 2009 02:38 PMCramer a trader
uhhh, Cramer is an investor for the most part... he labels his 'trades' and his 'investments'... and almost 30% anual return is an awsome life-time record
Ben at Jun 7, 2009 10:00 AMup
Hey guys ,Jim buy $12 a share ,it is higher than 7cents,but that will be lower in the future.let s think : when shareholders are own the debt of BoA , none of paying interest ,BAC will earn more than 1c or ten times,do you think it will be $5. you dreem too much! next week it will not return after $12, let s see
Dennis at Jun 6, 2009 05:23 PMCramer
I live Cramer but he is not always right who is? I think BAC is very good not now I think
jim at Jun 6, 2009 11:45 AMshut up cramer
2500 shares buying is not enough for him to make a statement. He'd better weight himself first
jimsmith at Jun 6, 2009 08:36 AMyay!
I bought 40 shares of BAC back in Aug 15 '08 at 30.94 and I've held and watched it tank over since (stubborness is death to a stock investor...i know...i know...)
By Jim Cramer saying that BAC is a GOOD stock, it'll tank back down to $5 a share and I can buy another 40 shares for $200 and hang on for several years while BAC climbs back over the S&P.
Rogue Trader at Jun 5, 2009 04:09 PMJIm Cramer is not a great trader...
With his decent return on investment he is assuming too much risk. There was a review of his past trades, yes, he came out ahead, but only because he was placing his money on high risks, (which should truly pay out much higher if you are willing to take that type of risk). If you want to witness real trades check out xtrends.blogspot.com. Also, the bottom hasn't reached... We've hit wave 1 - people who can't afford their homes.. Wave 2 is people who say F-this, why am I paying twice as much as my neighbour when we have the same sqft homes... the wheels have been set in motion, government intervention has prevented us from seeing the truth that 'lies' behind the banks. Mark this, by the end of this year, cramer will be huddled up under his desk like the little bee with an itch that he is...
Josh B. at Jun 5, 2009 01:47 PMCramer!
Guys come down, look we all know that Mr. Cramer made lots of money so don't try to say that he dumb or anything. do your own homework.
PS. whoever bought BAC before Jim on the same reasons as he bought it, congrats!
Cramer is the best investor at Jun 5, 2009 01:44 PMCRAMER IS THE BEST
BAC is a good stock, he has good reasons to buy it. Myself I bought BAC a week before he announced his liking of the stock and now I feel even better. You people who think Cramer is bad are idiots at investing, otherwise you wouldn't say this bullshit. Mr. Cramer has taught me on how to trade with his Mad Money and Real Money. Read the books, and learn how to buy on his investment. TIPS ARE FOR WAITERS. You can't just go and buy a stock after he said buy, especially on his lightning rounds, how you go about lightning round is that you underline how evaluated a stock and what he thinks of sectors. the only stock recomendations I would take from him are the ones that he presents.
Sincerely, Arsen
lol at Jun 5, 2009 01:18 PMthe face of a liar
finger pointing one way, eyes looking the other. Yes, he is confident in whatever he was saying... NOT!
lace at Jun 5, 2009 12:54 PMJim Cramer is full of sh*t
Jim Cramer is full of sh*t he said the same thing about BAC at 20!!!
at Jun 22, 2009 03:41 PM Wow, you just mispelled my post Oh that's nice. I just posted a spell checked message and it now appears to grammatically incorrect and in completely different order to look stupid? What's up with that?
at Jun 22, 2009 03:38 PM BAC Make a note that Cramer bought just about 12, yet said he would buy more if BAC dips below eleven. The way this is worded allows him to say BAC is still a bargain if it is over eleven thus nullifying his loss at 12.00. I have seen him do this many times. Well I've got news Jim - 12 dollars to 11 dollars is a HUGE loss.
at Jun 8, 2009 09:43 PM Cramer and BAC Cramer's BAC guess may or not be correct. But the incredibly poor syntax and spelling of his critics in this column detracts from any wit or wisdom those respondents may actually command. I can only conclude that they must be driving and texting - something only really arrogant and foolish people do.
at Jun 7, 2009 03:23 PM Even a poofter can't miss on this one Cramer showed what a spineless assbag he is on the Jon Stewart show, but it would be pretty hard to miss when buying BAC. I think there is still more downside, as the markets in general have not been "listening" to the economic news that is coming out. ( as noted by the over %300 gain from the low in March. I would also add that the company was oversold at the time, so the %300 is exaggerated) Unemployment is still climbing, defaults (personal) are declining, but still at a pace that indicates recessionary pressure. We are yet to see the full extent of corporate defaults. The credit expansion of the past 10 years has caught up, and it will limit spending (regardless of the elimination of "general default") With the yield curve as steep as it is, it favors the banks, and I think once the banks start lending again, there will be a new breed of consolidations loans available from the banks, which will be marketed to ease consumer debt burdens. My guess is that it hits $10 before it hits $14, but it is a definite long term buy.
at Jun 7, 2009 02:38 PM Cramer a trader uhhh, Cramer is an investor for the most part... he labels his 'trades' and his 'investments'... and almost 30% anual return is an awsome life-time record
at Jun 7, 2009 10:00 AM up Hey guys ,Jim buy $12 a share ,it is higher than 7cents,but that will be lower in the future.let s think : when shareholders are own the debt of BoA , none of paying interest ,BAC will earn more than 1c or ten times,do you think it will be $5. you dreem too much! next week it will not return after $12, let s see
at Jun 6, 2009 05:23 PM Cramer I live Cramer but he is not always right who is? I think BAC is very good not now I think
at Jun 6, 2009 11:45 AM shut up cramer 2500 shares buying is not enough for him to make a statement. He'd better weight himself first
at Jun 6, 2009 08:36 AM yay! I bought 40 shares of BAC back in Aug 15 '08 at 30.94 and I've held and watched it tank over since (stubborness is death to a stock investor...i know...i know...) By Jim Cramer saying that BAC is a GOOD stock, it'll tank back down to $5 a share and I can buy another 40 shares for $200 and hang on for several years while BAC climbs back over the S&P.
at Jun 5, 2009 04:09 PM JIm Cramer is not a great trader... With his decent return on investment he is assuming too much risk. There was a review of his past trades, yes, he came out ahead, but only because he was placing his money on high risks, (which should truly pay out much higher if you are willing to take that type of risk). If you want to witness real trades check out xtrends.blogspot.com. Also, the bottom hasn't reached... We've hit wave 1 - people who can't afford their homes.. Wave 2 is people who say F-this, why am I paying twice as much as my neighbour when we have the same sqft homes... the wheels have been set in motion, government intervention has prevented us from seeing the truth that 'lies' behind the banks. Mark this, by the end of this year, cramer will be huddled up under his desk like the little bee with an itch that he is...
at Jun 5, 2009 01:47 PM Cramer! Guys come down, look we all know that Mr. Cramer made lots of money so don't try to say that he dumb or anything. do your own homework. PS. whoever bought BAC before Jim on the same reasons as he bought it, congrats!
at Jun 5, 2009 01:44 PM CRAMER IS THE BEST BAC is a good stock, he has good reasons to buy it. Myself I bought BAC a week before he announced his liking of the stock and now I feel even better. You people who think Cramer is bad are idiots at investing, otherwise you wouldn't say this bullshit. Mr. Cramer has taught me on how to trade with his Mad Money and Real Money. Read the books, and learn how to buy on his investment. TIPS ARE FOR WAITERS. You can't just go and buy a stock after he said buy, especially on his lightning rounds, how you go about lightning round is that you underline how evaluated a stock and what he thinks of sectors. the only stock recomendations I would take from him are the ones that he presents. Sincerely, Arsen
at Jun 5, 2009 01:18 PM the face of a liar finger pointing one way, eyes looking the other. Yes, he is confident in whatever he was saying... NOT!
at Jun 5, 2009 12:54 PM Jim Cramer is full of sh*t Jim Cramer is full of sh*t he said the same thing about BAC at 20!!!