India court ruling means firms have to pay up state tax worth billions of rupees
- Top 10 News for 12/2: Crude Rips on OPEC Cut; Starbucks' Schultz Steps Down; Nonfarm Payrolls Flat in Nov.
- Unemployment Rate Drops to 4.6%
- Bond yields slip on U.S. jobs data, euro steady before Italy vote
- Alibaba (BABA) Founder Jack Ma Discuss Plans to Retire; 'I Don't Want to Die at the Office'
- Starbucks Coffee (SBUX) CEO Howard Schultz to Step Down, Appointed Executive Chairman; Kevin Johnson New CEO
India's Supreme Court is pictured through a gate in New Delhi, India May 26, 2016. REUTERS/Anindito Mukherjee
Find out which companies are about to raise their dividend well before the news hits the Street with StreetInsider.com's Dividend Insider Elite. Sign-up for a FREE trial here.
NEW DELHI (Reuters) - The Indian Supreme Court on Friday rejected a petition by major firms seeking the withdrawal of a tax on the movement of goods through the states, a decision that would force them to pay an estimated $4.5 billion in back taxes and interest.
Some 2,000 companies including the Jindal group, Vedanta, Steel Authority of India and Tata Steel had contended that entry tax on goods as they moved from one state to another was against free trade.
But the top court led by Chief Justice T.S. Thakur said India's federal constitution gave the states the right to impose such a tax, Rakesh Dwivedi, a lawyer representing the state of Uttar Pradesh said.
"It is a very good judgment that will help the states to collect more revenue," Dwivedi said.
States have said that companies would have to pay over 300 billion rupees ($4.47 billion) in back taxes along with interest.
"The industry as a whole will be adversely affected by the judgment," said Ashok Kumar, director finance and marketing, Jindal Stainless Ltd.
India has a messy plethora of indirect taxes, duties and surcharges, imposed by the federal government as well as the states. But in the biggest single tax reform cleared by parliament in August, all such taxes will be subsumed into a single goods and services tax.
But that might not become effective until April 2017, and firms would have to comply with the Supreme Court order, experts said.
"The liabilities would arise on various businesses and could affect their working capital needs," said Prashant Deshpande, partner, Deloitte Haskin & Sells LLP.
(Reporting by Manoj Kumar, Neha Dasgupta and Suchitra Mohanty; Writing by Manoj Kumar; Editing by Sanjeev Miglani and Nick Macfie)
Serious News for Serious Traders! Try StreetInsider.com Premium Free!
You May Also Be Interested In
- Eddie Lampert proposes to buy further stake in Sears Hometown
- U.S. president-elect, in break with practice, speaks to Taiwan's leader
- Small banks rally pauses but may not be over yet
Create E-mail Alert Related CategoriesReuters
Sign up for StreetInsider Free!
Receive full access to all new and archived articles, unlimited portfolio tracking, e-mail alerts, custom newswires and RSS feeds - and more!