Connecticut's top court to hear Sandy Hook gun appeal
- Donald Trump Sworn in as 45th U.S. President
- Wall Street ends higher as Trump becomes president
- Walgreens Boots Alliance (WBA) Said to Face Antitrust Concern for Rite Aid (RAD) Fix - Bloomberg
- Bristol-Myers Squibb (BMY) Says It Won't Pursue Accelerated U.S. Regulatory Pathway for Opdivo Plus Yervoy in Lung Cancer
- Apple (AAPL) Sues Qualcomm (QCOM) Over Patent Royalties in Antitrust Case - Bloomberg
A Bushmaster Firearms LLC, AR-15 gun that was found at Sandy Hook Elementary School in Newtown, Connecticut, is pictured in this evidence photo released by the Connecticut State Police, U.S. on December 27, 2013. Courtesy Connecticut State Police/Handou
Get the Pulse of the Market with StreetInsider.com's Pulse Picks. Get your Free Trial here.
By Jonathan Stempel
(Reuters) - The Connecticut Supreme Court has agreed to hear a direct appeal by families of victims of the Sandy Hook Elementary School shooting, whose lawsuit against makers and sellers of the assault rifle used in the 2012 attack was dismissed in October.
Connecticut's highest court on Tuesday said it would consider whether families of nine victims, plus one survivor, can recover damages from Remington Outdoor Co and others over the gunman's use of a Bushmaster AR-15 rifle in the attack in Newtown, Connecticut, which killed 20 students and six staffers.
The court's decision to take the case, just two weeks after the families requested it, was announced on Thursday in a statement from the families' lawyers.
Other defendants include the gun's distributor, and the gun shop where Adam Lanza's mother Nancy had bought the AR-15.
A state superior court judge in Bridgeport, Barbara Bellis, had dismissed the case on Oct. 14, saying gun makers had "broad immunity" under federal law from claims that the military-style AR-15 should not be marketed to civilians.
While the quick appeal does not foreshadow the outcome, it lets the families bypass a state appellate court, saving several months of litigation. Oral arguments have not been scheduled.
"This case raises critical questions about reasonableness and accountability" in the sale of assault rifles, Katie Mesner-Hage, a lawyer for the families, said in a statement.
Lawyers for Remington did not immediately respond to requests for comment. The families lawyers' did not immediately respond to similar requests.
Bellis had ruled that the 2005 Protection of Lawful Commerce in Arms Act shielded the defendants from liability.
The families say a state law, the Connecticut Unfair Trade Practices Act, justifies liability for the aggressive marketing of the Bushmaster to the public.
Assault rifles have been used in several mass U.S. shootings, including a June attack on a gay nightclub in Orlando, Florida, where 49 people died.
Adam Lanza, 20, began his attack by shooting his mother to death at home, and ended it by committing suicide as he heard police sirens approach.
(Reporting by Jonathan Stempel in New York; Editing by Dan Grebler)
Serious News for Serious Traders! Try StreetInsider.com Premium Free!
You May Also Be Interested In
- China sees 'grim' situation in relations with Taiwan this year
- 'It's made in Vietnam!' At inauguration, origin of red Trump hats shocks many
- Trump is now president, but he still sees himself as leading an insurgency
Create E-mail Alert Related CategoriesReuters
Sign up for StreetInsider Free!
Receive full access to all new and archived articles, unlimited portfolio tracking, e-mail alerts, custom newswires and RSS feeds - and more!