Form DEF 14A Hayward Holdings, Inc. For: May 19

You are cordially invited to attend the 2022 annual meeting of stockholders (the “Annual Meeting”) of Hayward Holdings, Inc., a Delaware corporation (“Hayward,” “we” or “us”), which, due to the ongoing public health concerns resulting from the COVID-19 pandemic, will be held virtually, via live webcast at www.virtualshareholdermeeting.com/HAYW2022, on Thursday, May 19, 2022 at 9:00 a.m., Eastern Time, for the following purposes, as more fully described in the accompanying proxy statement:

Our board of directors recommends that you vote “FOR” the director nominees named in Proposal No. 1 of the accompanying proxy statement, “FOR” the ratification of the appointment of PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP as our independent public accounting firm as described in Proposal No. 2 and “EVERY ONE YEAR” as the frequency of future stockholder advisory votes to approve the compensation of Hayward’s named executive officers as described in Proposal No. 3.

Our board of directors has fixed the close of business on March 21, 2022 as the record date (the “Record Date”) for the Annual Meeting. Only stockholders of record as of the Record Date are entitled to notice of and to vote at the Annual Meeting. Further information regarding voting rights and the matters to be voted upon is presented in the accompanying proxy statement.

To be admitted to the Annual Meeting at www.virtualshareholdermeeting.com/HAYW2022 and to ask questions and/or vote, you will be required to enter the 16-digit control number found on your proxy card, voting instruction form or notice previously received. Stockholders may vote in advance of the Annual Meeting at www.virtualshareholdermeeting.com/HAYW2022 or by telephone at 1-800-690-6903, 24 hours a day through 11:59 p.m. Eastern Time on the day before the Annual Meeting and may vote during the Annual Meeting by following the instructions available at www.virtualshareholdermeeting.com/HAYW2022.

Each share of common stock that you own represents one vote for each of the matters to be acted upon at the Annual Meeting.

We are electronically disseminating Annual Meeting materials to our stockholders, as permitted under the “Notice and Access” rules approved by the Securities and Exchange Commission. Stockholders will receive a Notice of Internet Availability of Proxy Materials containing instructions on how to access Annual Meeting materials via the internet. The Notice also provides instructions on how to obtain paper copies if preferred.

We appreciate your continued support of Hayward.

YOUR VOTE IS IMPORTANT. Whether or not you plan to attend the virtual Annual Meeting, you are urged to vote and submit your proxy as soon as possible by following the voting procedures described in these proxy materials.

This proxy statement and the accompanying form of proxy are furnished in connection with the solicitation of proxies by the Company, for use at the 2022 annual meeting of stockholders (the “Annual Meeting”) of Hayward Holdings, Inc., a Delaware corporation, and any postponements, adjournments or continuations thereof. The Annual Meeting will be held virtually via live webcast on Thursday, May 19, 2022 at 9:00 a.m. Eastern Time. The Annual Meeting can be accessed via the Internet at www.virtualshareholdermeeting.com/HAYW2022 where you will be able to attend and listen to the Annual Meeting live, submit questions and vote your shares electronically at the Annual Meeting. Because of the ongoing COVID-19 pandemic, the board of directors decided that the Annual Meeting will be held solely by this virtual format. Accordingly, you will not be able to attend the Annual Meeting physically in person.

Our board of directors has fixed the close of business on March 21, 2022 as the record date (the “Record Date”) for the Annual Meeting. Stockholders of record as of the Record Date are entitled to notice of and to vote at the Annual Meeting.

In this proxy statement, the terms “Hayward,” “the Company,” “we,” “us” and “our” refer to Hayward Holdings, Inc. “Fiscal Year 2021” refers to the year ended December 31, 2021. The mailing address of our principal executive offices is 400 Connell Drive, Suite 600, Berkeley Heights, NJ 07922.

On or about April 8, 2022, we expect to mail to our stockholders a Notice of Internet Availability of Proxy Materials (the “Notice”) containing instructions on how to access our proxy statement and our 2021 Annual Report (the “2021 Annual Report”). The Notice provides instructions on how to vote via the Internet, mobile device, or by telephone and includes instructions on how to receive a paper copy of our proxy materials by mail. This proxy statement and our 2021 Annual Report can be accessed directly at the following Internet address: www.proxyvote.com. You will be asked to enter the 16-digit control number located on your Notice or proxy card.

The information provided in the “question and answer” format below is for your convenience only and summarizes certain of the information contained in this proxy statement. You should read this entire proxy statement carefully. Information contained on, or that can be accessed through, our website is not intended to be incorporated by reference into this proxy statement and references to our website address in this proxy statement are inactive textual references only.

We will be hosting the Annual Meeting via live webcast only. In addition to supporting the health and well-being of our stockholders and other meeting participants during the COVID-19 pandemic, we also believe hosting our Annual Meeting virtually helps to expand access, facilitate stockholder attendance, reduce costs and enable improved communication. It also reduces the environmental impact of our Annual Meeting. To participate in our virtual Annual Meeting, visit www.virtualshareholdermeeting.com/HAYW2022 with your 16-digit control number included in the Notice if you are a stockholder of record of shares of common stock (or on your proxy card if you are a stockholder of record and requested paper copies of the Annual Meeting materials), or included with your voting instructions received from your broker, bank or other nominee if you are a street name stockholder, as described below.

The Annual Meeting live webcast will begin promptly at 9:00 a.m., Eastern Time, on Thursday, May 19, 2022. Stockholders may vote and submit questions while attending the meeting online. We encourage you to access the meeting prior to the start time. Online check-in will begin at 8:45 a.m., Eastern Time, and you should allow ample time for the check-in procedures. Participants should allow plenty of time to log in and ensure that they can hear streaming audio prior to the start of the virtual Annual Meeting. If you encounter any difficulties accessing the virtual meeting during the check-in or meeting time, please call the technical support number: 844-986-0822 (U.S.) or 303-562-9302 (international).

Other than the three items of business described in this proxy statement, we are not aware of any other business to be acted upon at the Annual Meeting. You may be asked to consider any other business that properly comes before the Annual Meeting.

Holders of our common stock, par value $0.001 (our “common stock”), as of the close of business on the Record Date will be entitled to one vote for each share of our common stock held by them on the Record Date with respect to all matters to be acted upon at the Annual Meeting. As of the Record Date, there were 229,325,124 shares of our common stock outstanding and entitled to be voted at the Annual Meeting, which does not include 9,455,417 shares held by the Company in treasury.

If shares of our common stock are registered directly in your name with our transfer agent, American Stock Transfer & Trust Company, LLC (“AST”), you are considered the stockholder of record with respect to those shares, and the Notice was provided to you directly by us. As the stockholder of record, you have the right to grant your voting proxy and indicate your voting choices directly to the individuals listed on the proxy card or to vote virtually at the Annual Meeting. Throughout this proxy statement, we refer to these registered stockholders as “stockholders of record.”

If shares of our common stock are held on your behalf in a brokerage account or by a bank or other nominee, you are considered to be the beneficial owner of shares that are held in “street name,” and the Notice was forwarded to you by your broker, bank or other nominee. As the beneficial owner, you have the right to direct your broker, bank or other nominee as to how to vote your shares in the manner provided in the voting instructions you receive from your broker, bank or other nominee. If you request a printed copy of our proxy materials by mail, your broker, bank or other nominee will provide a voting instruction form for you to use. Street name stockholders are also invited to attend the virtual Annual Meeting. However, because a street name stockholder is not the stockholder of record, you may not vote your shares of our common stock virtually at the Annual Meeting unless you follow your broker, bank or other nominee’s procedures for obtaining a legal proxy. Throughout this proxy statement, we refer to stockholders who hold their shares through a broker, bank or other nominee as “street name stockholders.”

Voting results will be tabulated and certified by the inspector of election appointed for the Annual Meeting.

A quorum is the minimum number of shares required to be present at the Annual Meeting to properly hold an annual meeting and conduct business under our bylaws and Delaware law. The presence in person (by means of remote communication) or represented by proxy of the holders of a majority of the voting power of the shares of stock issued and outstanding and entitled to vote on a matter at the Annual Meeting will constitute a quorum for that matter at the Annual Meeting. Abstentions and broker non-votes are counted as shares present and entitled to vote for purposes of determining a quorum.

If you are a stockholder of record, there are four ways to vote:

VOTING VIA THE INTERNET OR BY TELEPHONE IS FAST AND CONVENIENT, AND YOUR VOTE IS IMMEDIATELY CONFIRMED AND TABULATED. VOTING EARLY WILL HELP AVOID ADDITIONAL SOLICITATION COSTS AND WILL NOT PREVENT YOU FROM VOTING ELECTRONICALLY DURING THE ANNUAL MEETING IF YOU WISH TO DO SO.

If you are a street name stockholder, you will receive voting instructions from your broker, bank or other nominee. You must follow the voting instructions provided by your broker, bank or other nominee in order to direct your broker, bank or other nominee on how to vote your shares. As discussed above, if you are a street name stockholder, you may not vote your shares electronically at the Annual Meeting unless you obtain a legal proxy from your broker, bank or other nominee.

Yes. If you are a stockholder of record, you can change your vote or revoke your proxy any time by:

If you are a street name stockholder, your broker, bank or other nominee can provide you with instructions on how to change your vote.

Proxies are solicited by and on behalf of our board of directors. Kevin Holleran (our President and Chief Executive Officer), Eifion Jones (our Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer) and Susan Canning (our Senior Vice President, Chief Legal Officer and Secretary) have been designated as proxy holders by our board of directors. When proxies are properly dated, executed and returned, the shares represented by such proxies will be voted at the Annual Meeting in accordance with the instructions of the stockholder. If no specific instructions are given, however, the shares will be voted in accordance with the recommendations of the board of directors as described above. If any matters not described in this proxy statement are properly presented at the Annual Meeting, the proxy holders will use their own judgment to determine how to vote the shares. If the Annual Meeting is postponed, adjourned or continued, the proxy holders can vote the shares on the new Annual Meeting date as well, unless you have properly revoked your proxy instructions, as described above.

In accordance with the rules of the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (the “SEC”), we have elected to furnish our proxy materials, including this proxy statement and our 2021 Annual Report, primarily via the Internet. The Notice containing instructions on how to access this proxy statement and our 2021 Annual Report is first being mailed on or about April 8, 2022 to all stockholders entitled to vote at the Annual Meeting. Stockholders may request to receive all future proxy materials in printed form by mail or electronically by email by following the instructions contained in the Notice. We encourage stockholders to take advantage of the availability of our proxy materials on the Internet to help reduce the environmental impact and the cost of our annual meetings of stockholders.

The Company is soliciting proxies for use at the Annual Meeting. All expenses associated with this solicitation will be borne by us. We will reimburse brokers, banks and other nominees for reasonable expenses that they incur in sending the Notice and our proxy materials to you if a broker, bank or other nominee holds shares of our common stock on your behalf. In addition, our directors and employees may also solicit proxies in person, by telephone, or by other means of communication. Our directors and employees will not be paid any additional compensation for soliciting proxies.

Brokers, banks and other nominees holding shares of our common stock in street name for their customers are generally required to vote such shares in the manner directed by their customers. In the absence of timely directions, your broker, bank or other nominee will have discretion to vote your shares on our sole “routine” matter: the proposal to ratify the appointment of PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP (“PwC”) as our independent registered public accounting firm for our fiscal year ending December 31, 2022. Your broker, bank or other nominee will not have discretion to vote on the election of directors or the frequency of future stockholder advisory votes to approve the compensation of the named executive officers, which are “non-routine” matters, absent direction from you. If the broker, bank or other nominee that holds your shares in street name returns a

proxy card without voting on a non-routine proposal because it did not receive voting instructions from you on that proposal, this is referred to as a “broker non-vote.” Broker non-votes are considered in determining whether a quorum exists at the Annual Meeting. The effect of broker non-votes on the outcome of each proposal to be voted on at the Annual Meeting is explained above.

We will announce preliminary voting results at the Annual Meeting. We will also disclose voting results on a Current Report on Form 8-K that we will file with the SEC within four business days after the Annual Meeting. If final voting results are not available to us in time to file a Current Report on Form 8-K within four business days after the Annual Meeting, we will file a Current Report on Form 8-K to publish preliminary results and will provide the final results in an amendment to the Current Report on Form 8-K as soon as they become available.

The rules promulgated by the SEC permit companies, brokers, banks or other intermediaries to deliver a single copy of proxy materials, or, where applicable, the Notice, to households at which two or more stockholders reside. Each stockholder, however, still receives a separate proxy card if he or she receives paper copies. This practice, known as “householding,” is designed to reduce duplicate mailings and save significant printing and postage costs as well as natural resources. Stockholders sharing an address who have been previously notified by their broker, bank or other nominee and have consented to householding will receive only one copy of our proxy statement and Annual Report or Notice of Internet Availability of Proxy Materials. If you would like to opt out of this practice for future mailings and receive a separate proxy statement and annual report to stockholders or Notice of Internet Availability of Proxy Materials for each stockholder sharing the same address, please contact your broker, bank or other nominee.

You may also obtain a separate proxy statement or Annual Report or Notice of Internet Availability of Proxy Materials without charge by sending a written request to Broadridge Householding Department, 51 Mercedes Way, Edgewood, New York 11717, or by calling Broadridge’s Householding Department at 866-540-7095. Additional copies of the proxy statement or annual report or Notice of Internet Availability of Proxy Materials will be sent promptly upon receipt of such request. Stockholders sharing an address that are receiving multiple copies of the proxy statement or Annual Report or Notice of Internet Availability of Proxy Materials can request delivery of a single copy of future proxy statements or annual reports or Notices of Internet Availability of Proxy Materials by contacting their broker, bank or other nominee or sending a written request to Broadridge Householding Department at the address above or by calling 866-540-7095.

As prescribed by Rule 14a-8 under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”), qualifying stockholders may present proper proposals for inclusion in our proxy statement for consideration at next year’s annual meeting of stockholders. For a Rule 14a-8 stockholder proposal to be timely and considered for inclusion in our proxy statement for our 2023 annual meeting of stockholders, the proposal must comply with all applicable requirements of Rule 14a-8, including with respect to ownership of our common stock, and our Corporate Secretary must receive the written proposal at our principal executive offices by the deadline prescribed by Rule 14a-8 under the Exchange Act (provided that the 2023 Annual Meeting is not held more than 30 days from the first anniversary of the 2022 Annual Meeting, the applicable deadline will be December 9, 2022). Stockholder proposals should be addressed to: Hayward Holdings, Inc. Attention: Corporate Secretary, at the mailing address of our principal executive offices.

If a stockholder who has notified us of his, her or its intention to present a Rule 14a-8 stockholder proposal at an annual meeting does not appear and a qualified representative of that stockholder does not appear to present his, her or its proposal at such annual meeting, such proposal shall be disregarded and we are not required to present the proposal for a vote at such annual meeting.

Our bylaws also establish an advance notice procedure for stockholders who wish to present a proper proposal, including director nominations, before an annual meeting of stockholders but do not intend for the proposal to be included in our proxy statement. Any such advance notice stockholder proposal, including director nominations, must comply with all of the requirements set forth in our certificate of incorporation, our bylaws and applicable laws, rules and regulations. Our bylaws provide that, for business to be properly brought before an annual meeting by a stockholder, (i) the stockholder must be a stockholder of record at the time of the giving of the notice, (ii) the stockholder is entitled to vote at the meeting, (iii) the business must be a proper matter for stockholder action, and (iv) the stockholder must give timely written notice to our Corporate Secretary, which notice must contain the information specified in our bylaws. For an advance notice stockholder proposal, including director nominations, to be timely for our 2023 annual meeting of stockholders, our Corporate Secretary must receive the written proposal at our principal executive offices at the address listed above:

In the event that we hold our 2023 annual meeting of stockholders more than 30 days before the one-year anniversary of the Annual Meeting, notice of an advance notice stockholder proposal must be received on or before ten days after the day on which the date of the 2023 annual meeting is first disclosed in a public announcement.

If a stockholder who has notified us of his, her or its intention to present an advance notice stockholder proposal, including director nominations, at an annual meeting does not appear and a qualified representative of that stockholder does not appear to present his, her or its proposal at such annual meeting, such proposal shall be disregarded and we are not required to present the proposal for a vote at such annual meeting, notwithstanding that proxies in respect of such vote may have been received by us.

You are advised to review our bylaws, which contain additional requirements regarding advance notice stockholder proposals, including director nominations.

In addition to satisfying the foregoing requirements under our bylaws, to comply with the SEC’s universal proxy rules (once effective), stockholders who intend to solicit proxies in support of director nominees other than the board of directors’ nominees must provide notice that sets forth the information required by SEC Rule 14a-19 no later than March 20, 2023 (unless we move the meeting up or delay it by more than 30 days from May 19, 2023).

A copy of our bylaws is available via the SEC’s website at https://www.sec.gov as Exhibit 3.2 in Item 15 to our Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2021. You may also contact our Corporate Secretary at the address set forth above for a copy of the relevant bylaw provisions regarding the requirements for making stockholder proposals and nominating director candidates.

We are managed under the direction of our board of directors, which is currently composed of 13 members. The authorized number of directors comprising our board of directors may not be less than three or not more than fifteen, with the actual number to be fixed from time to time by resolution of our board of directors, subject to the terms of our certificate of incorporation and bylaws. Effective as of the commencement of the Annual Meeting, the size of our board of directors will be reduced to 12 members.

Our certificate of incorporation provides for a board of directors comprised of three classes of directors, with each class serving a three-year term beginning and ending in different years than those of the other two classes. Only one class of directors will be elected at each annual meeting of our stockholders, with the other classes continuing for the remainder of their respective three-year terms. Our board of directors is divided among the three classes as follows:

Our directors’ comprehensive set of skills and diverse backgrounds are designed to ensure effective oversight of our business strategy and our corporate governance practices. Our continuing directors and nominees consist of individuals with a diversity of gender, ethnicity, skills and experiences, with women and ethnically diverse individuals representing approximately 25% of our board of directors. Our average incumbent director tenure is approximately 3.6 years.

The following table sets forth the names, ages as of April 8, 2022, and certain other information for each other nominee for election as a director at the Annual Meeting (including directors with terms expiring at the Annual Meeting who are nominated for re-election), for each of the other members of the board of directors whose term expires at the Annual Meeting and for each of the continuing members of our board of directors. Full biographical information of the nominees and continuing directors follows the table.

Christopher Bertrand became a director in October 2020. Mr. Bertrand is Managing Director in MSD Partners, LP.’s (“MSD Partners”) Private Capital Group. Mr. Bertrand joined MSD Partners in 2019. Prior to joining MSD Partners, Mr. Bertrand was a Principal at Court Square Capital Partners. Previously, Mr. Bertrand was with Kohlberg, Kravis, & Roberts (KKR), where he focused on private equity investments, and Goldman, Sachs & Co. He received an M.B.A. with Distinction from Harvard Business School and a B.A. from Dartmouth College. He has served on numerous boards of directors. Mr. Bertrand brings expertise in finance and capital markets, strategic matters, as well as significant experience as a board member of several companies.

Greg Brenneman became a director in June 2017. Mr. Brenneman is Executive Chairman of CCMP Capital Advisors, LP (“CCMP”) and a member of the Firm’s Investment Committee. Mr. Brenneman plays an active leadership role in executing the Firm’s overall strategy while remaining actively engaged in completing transactions, developing strategies and coaching the senior management of CCMP’s portfolio companies. Prior to joining CCMP in October 2008, Mr. Brenneman served as Chairman, CEO, President and/or COO of Quizno’s Sub, Burger King, PwC Consulting and Continental Airlines. In 1994 Mr. Brenneman founded Turnworks, Inc. (“Turnworks”), his personal investment firm that focuses on corporate turnarounds. Prior to founding Turnworks, Mr. Brenneman was a Vice President for Bain & Company. Mr. Brenneman currently serves on the board of directors of Hayward, Ecovyst Inc., BGIS, Baker Hughes, Baylor College of Medicine and The Home Depot, Inc. Mr. Brenneman holds a B.B.A. in Accounting/Finance, summa cum laude, from Washburn University of Topeka, Kansas and an M.B.A. with distinction from Harvard Business School. He was awarded an honorary Doctor of Commerce degree from Washburn University. Mr. Brenneman brings expertise in leadership and strategic matters, as well as significant experience as a senior executive and board member of complex global businesses.

Ed Ward is a nominee for director. Mr. Ward is President – Client Product Group of Dell Technologies Inc. (“Dell”). Mr. Ward has over 35 years of experience working in the technology industry. Mr. Ward has worked at Dell for 22 years in progressively increasing roles of responsibility, including Senior Vice President – Client Product Group, Senior Vice President of Engineering – Client Product Group and vice president of Engineering – Servers. In addition, Mr. Ward has worked at NCR Corporation as Vice President of Engineering - Shared Components & Technical Services. Mr. Ward also has served in board roles at the University of Colorado, Boulder, University of Texas, Rio Grande Valley and Austin’s Habitat for Humanity. Mr. Ward received his B.S. in electrical engineering and computer science from the University of Colorado, Boulder and completed the Advanced Management Program at Harvard Business School. Mr. Ward brings to the board of directors expertise in leadership in strategic matters, as well as meaningful technology experience driven by a strong engineering background.

Kevin Brown became a director in June 2017. Mr. Brown is Co-Head of MSD Partners’ Private Capital Group. Mr. Brown joined MSD Partners in 2016 and currently serves on the boards of directors for Endries International, Hayward Industries and Ring Container Technologies. Prior to joining MSD Partners, Mr. Brown was a Partner with Court Square Capital where he worked primarily in the Industrials sector for ten years. Prior to Court Square, Mr. Brown was a Vice President with Apax Partners focusing on investments in the Media, Late-Stage Software, and Tech-Enabled Business Services sectors. He has served on numerous boards of directors, including ERICO Global, MacDermid, Pike Corporation and Wyle. Mr. Brown received his B.S. from the McIntire School of Commerce at The University of Virginia and his M.B.A. from the Wharton School of the University of Pennsylvania where he graduated as a Palmer Scholar. Mr. Brown brings expertise in finance and capital markets, strategic matters, as well as significant experience as a board member of complex global businesses.

Mark McFadden became a director in June 2017. Mr. McFadden is a Co-Managing Partner of CCMP and a member of the Firm’s Investment Committee. Mr. McFadden joined CCMP in 2002 and was named Co-Managing Partner in 2022 and a member of the Firm's Investment Committee in 2019. Mr. McFadden was named a Managing Director of CCMP in 2014. While at CCMP, Mr. McFadden has focused on investments in the industrial sector, including prior CCMP investments in Generac Power Systems, Milacron, and Eco Services. Prior to joining CCMP, Mr. McFadden worked in investment banking at CSFB and Bowles Hollowell Conner. Mr. McFadden serves on the board of directors of Hayward, Ecovyst Inc. and BGIS. Mr. McFadden holds a B.B.A. and a B.A. from the College of William and Mary. Mr. McFadden brings expertise in corporate finance and strategic development, as well as significant experience as a board member of global industrial businesses.

Arthur Soucy became a director in December 2017. Mr. Soucy is a retired executive with broad international experience running complex operations and large P&L’s in both the Oil & Gas and Aviation industries. Mr. Soucy has over 30 years of business leadership experience in multi-national environments holding executive positions with P&L responsibilities spanning some 80 countries. Mr. Soucy retired as President, Products & Technology for Baker Hughes, an Oil & Gas Services company, in July 2017. In that role, he was responsible for the company’s multi-billion-dollar chemical business as well as enterprise New Product & Technology development. He also was responsible for the company’s global marketing and supply chain

functions. Prior to that, Mr. Soucy was headquartered in London, UK for nearly four years where he served as President of Europe, Africa, Russia, Caspian, and had P&L responsibilities for the Region. Prior to joining Baer Hughes, Mr. Soucy spent 29 years at Pratt & Whitney, where held a variety of executive level P&L, technology and supply chain positions. Mr. Soucy brings to the board extensive experience as an executive of multi-national businesses with insight into global marketing and supply chain functions.

Timothy Walsh became a director in June 2017. Mr. Walsh is Managing Director of CCMP and a member of the Firm’s Investment Committee. Mr. Walsh focuses on making investments in the industrial sector and has been responsible for CCMP’s investments in the chemicals, basic manufacturing, consumer products and packaging sectors. Mr. Walsh joined CCMP in 1992 and was named Partner and head of its industrial practice in 1999. Mr. Walsh became COO in 2015 and served as President and CEO from 2016 through March 2022. Prior to joining CCMP in 1992, Mr. Walsh worked on various industry-focused client teams within The Chase Manhattan Corporation. He serves on the board of directors of Hayward and Ecovyst Inc. Mr. Walsh holds a B.S. from Trinity College and an M.B.A. from the University of Chicago. Mr. Walsh brings expertise in corporate finance and strategic development, as well as significant experience as a board member of global industrial businesses.

Diane Dayhoff became a director in March 2021. Ms. Dayhoff served as Vice President Investor Relations at The Home Depot, Inc., from May 2003 to April 2018. Prior to joining The Home Depot, Ms. Dayhoff worked at Continental Airlines for 14 years in progressively increasing roles of responsibility, including as Staff Vice President of Finance. Ms. Dayhoff brings expertise in communication and investor relations, as well as significant experience in financial planning.

Stephen Felice became a director in May 2018. Mr. Felice has been Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of Felice Partners, LLC (advisory and private investment) since January 2017. Prior to that, Mr. Felice was President and Chief Executive Officer of Filtration Group Corporation (“FGC”), a global industrial manufacturer, from January 2014 through January 2017. Prior to joining FGC, Mr. Felice was President and Chief Commercial Officer of Dell from December 2011 through December 2013 after previously serving in a variety of executive roles at Dell from February 1999 through November 2011. Prior to joining Dell, Mr. Felice was President and Chief Executive Officer of DecisionOne Corporation (“DOC”), a provider of computer technology services from 1997 through 1999 after previously serving as President of DOC from 1995 through 1997. Prior to joining DOC, Mr. Felice worked at Bell Atlantic Corp in various roles from 1984 through 1995 and Shell Oil Corp from 1979 through 1984. Mr. Felice has served on the board of directors of Southwire Corporation since 2015 (currently serving as Chairman of Human Resources Committee) and the Mark Felice Foundation since 2003. Mr. Felice was also Vice Chairman at St. Michael’s Catholic Academy from 2010 to 2014, and served on the board of trustees for The Franklin Institute from 2013 to 2015 and the Singapore Economic Development Board 2010 to 2012. Mr. Felice brings significant expertise in managing large global enterprises, information technology and industrial manufacturing verticals, strategic planning, global sales, and manufacturing.

Lawrence H. Silber became a director in November 2019. Mr. Silber has served as President and Chief Executive of Herc Rentals Inc., (“Herc Rentals”), since May 2015. Prior to joining Herc Rentals, Mr. Silber served as an executive advisor at Court Square Capital Partners, LLP, a private equity firm primarily investing in the business services, healthcare, general industrial and technology and telecommunications sectors, from April 2014 to May 2015. Mr. Silber also served as Chief Operating Officer for Hayward Industries from 2008 to 2012, during which time he oversaw a successful transition through the recession and return to solid profitability. From 1978 to 2008, Mr. Silber worked for Ingersoll-Rand plc, (“Ingersoll”), a publicly traded manufacturer of industrial products and components, in a number of roles of increasing responsibility. Mr. Silber previously served on the board of directors of SMTC Corporation from 2012 to 2015. Mr. Silber brings expertise in executive management, strategy formation and leadership skills, gained as the Chief Operating Officer of Hayward Industries as well as in his current role as President and Chief Executive Officer of Herc Rentals. Mr. Silber also has extensive knowledge and experience in manufacturing, sales and marketing, and specific industry experience in our business, including our operations, business development matters and financial performance. Further, his experience as a director of another public company provides him with a broad understanding of the responsibilities of public company boards and issues applicable to public companies.

Lori Walker became a director in March 2021. Ms. Walker served as Chief Financial Officer and Senior Vice President of The Valspar Corporation, a global coatings manufacturer, from 2008 to 2013, where she led the Finance, IT and Communications teams. Before this position, Ms. Walker served as Valspar’s Vice President, Controller and Treasurer from 2004 to 2008 and as Vice President and Controller from 2001 to 2004. Prior to joining Valspar, Ms. Walker worked at Honeywell, Inc., a global conglomerate of commercial and consumer products, for 20 years in progressively increasing roles of responsibility, including as Director of Global Financial Risk Management. Ms. Walker currently serves on the board of directors of Southwire Company, LLC, a private industrial manufacturer of wire and cable, Constellium N.V., a publicly traded aluminum fabricator for the automotive, aerospace and packaging industries, and Compass Minerals International, Inc., a producer of salt for highway deicing, commercial and industrial markets. Ms. Walker brings extensive financial leadership experience in global, publicly traded companies, knowledge of financial controls and systems and risk management and understanding of IT infrastructure.

Kevin Holleran has served as President, Chief Executive Officer and Director of the Company since August 2019. Prior to joining the Company, Mr. Holleran served as President and Chief Executive Officer of the Industrial Segment within Textron beginning in 2017. Textron’s Industrial Segment is composed of Textron Specialized Vehicles, a leading global manufacturer of purpose-built vehicles and equipment for a variety of commercial and recreational applications across a number of brands; as well as, Kautex a tier one automotive supplier of fuel systems, selective catalytic reduction systems and cleaning solutions. Prior to 2017, Mr. Holleran was the President and Chief Executive Officer of Textron Specialized Vehicles for ten years, during which time he grew revenue and profitability substantially through both organic growth and acquisitions. Prior to his time at Textron, Mr. Holleran held a number of management positions at Ingersoll Rand and Terex Corporation across the sales, marketing, and product management functions. He holds an MBA from Wake Forest University and an undergraduate degree from Cornell University. As the Company’s president and chief executive officer, Mr. Holleran brings to the board of directors specific knowledge of our business, our people, our challenges and our prospects for continued growth, as well as a deep understanding of our business and markets.

Our board of directors is currently composed of 13 members. In accordance with our certificate of incorporation, our board of directors is divided into three classes of directors. At the Annual Meeting, three Class I directors will be elected for a three-year term to succeed the Class I directors whose term is then expiring. Ali Afraz and Jason Peters, each a Class I director, are not being nominated for re-election. Effective as of the commencement of the Annual Meeting, the size of our board of directors will be reduced to 12 members. Each director’s term continues until the election and qualification of his or her successor, or such director’s earlier death, resignation, disqualification or removal.

Our nominating and corporate governance committee has recommended, and our board of directors has approved, Christopher Bertrand, Greg Brenneman and Ed Ward as nominees for election as Class I directors at the Annual Meeting. If elected, each of Messrs. Bertrand, Brenneman and Ward will serve as Class I directors until our 2025 annual meeting of stockholders and until their successors are duly elected and qualified, or until their earlier death, resignation, disqualification or removal. Each of the nominees has agreed to serve if elected. For information concerning the nominees, please see “Board of Directors—Nominees for Director.”

If you are a stockholder of record and you sign your proxy card or vote by telephone or over the Internet but do not give instructions with respect to the voting of directors, your shares will be voted “FOR” the election of each of Messrs. Bertrand, Brenneman and Ward. In the event that a director nominee is unable or declines to serve as a director at the time of the Annual Meeting, the proxies will be voted for any nominee designated by our board of directors to fill such vacancy. If you are a street name stockholder and you do not give voting instructions to your broker, bank or other nominee, your broker, bank or other nominee will not vote your shares on this matter.

Our certificate of incorporation and bylaws state that, to be elected, a nominee must receive a plurality of the votes of the shares present in person or represented by proxy and entitled to vote on the election of directors at the Annual Meeting, which means that the individuals who receive the largest number of votes cast “FOR” are elected as directors. Our Corporate Governance Guidelines further state that, in the event of an uncontested director election (such as this director election), where the votes “withheld” from a director nominee’s election exceed the votes cast “FOR” that nominee’s election, such nominee shall be required to submit his or her resignation to the board of directors for its consideration. The board of directors will then have the opportunity to determine whether to accept or reject such tendered resignation.

THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS UNANIMOUSLY RECOMMENDS THAT THE STOCKHOLDERS VOTE “FOR” THE ELECTION OF EACH OF CHRISTOPHER BERTRAND, GREG BRENNEMAN AND ED WARD TO THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS FOR A THREE-YEAR TERM EXPIRING IN 2025.

We are committed to operating with integrity and accountability. Our corporate governance policies set clear expectations and responsibilities for our leaders, employees and business partners to ensure we conduct our operations in a manner that is consistent with the highest standards of business ethics and accountability. Highlights of our corporate governance practices include the following:

In alignment with our core value of always striving to be better today than yesterday, we are committed to building on our strengths and improving how we measure and monitor our progress on our ESG-related initiatives. Our board of directors oversees corporate social responsibility and sustainability, including ESG-related strategies, policies and disclosures, see “Role of the Board in ESG Oversight” below.

As a leading provider of environmentally friendly and energy efficient products, we strive to promote sustainability throughout our business operations. We believe that a healthy environment is necessary for the well-being of our people and our businesses and is the foundation for a sustainable and strong economy. Championing our core ESG values, we are committed to providing innovative and environmentally sustainable products, upholding responsible manufacturing practices, fostering a safe and inclusive workplace, and maintaining strong governance and compliance practices.

We are currently in the process of building the foundation of our principle-based approach to integrating ESG considerations throughout our organization’s processes. We are reviewing and updating our policies to be up to date with best-in-class ESG practices, and finalizing our materiality assessment, through which we have engaged our stakeholders, both internally and externally, to discuss and align on priority ESG topics. The results of this materiality assessment will be used to develop and guide ESG strategy and objectives moving forward.

In 2021, in partnership with a third party, we conducted our first materiality assessment to identify the ESG topics that matter most to our stakeholders and our business. We engaged our customers, suppliers, investors, and communities to identify the strategic priority issues most relevant to Hayward. These topics will guide our ESG strategy going forward, and comprise our ESG framework.

We have established a formal ESG Steering Committee tasked with implementing our ESG framework throughout our business strategy and operations. Our ESG Steering Committee is composed of our Chief Executive Officer, Chief Financial Officer, Chief HR Officer, Chief Legal Officer, and other key senior leaders, and reports on ESG progress to the nominating and corporate governance committee of the Board.

Some of our recent environmental sustainability highlights include the following:

Some of our recent social responsibility highlights include the following:

Some of our recent corporate governance initiatives include the following:

Our board of directors is responsible for the supervision and oversight of our business affairs. In executing this responsibility, our board of directors establishes corporate policies, sets strategic direction and oversees management. Our board of directors has not adopted a formal policy with respect to the separation of the offices of Chief Executive Officer and Chairperson of the Board. It is our board of directors’ view that rather than having a rigid policy, our board of directors should determine, as and when appropriate upon consideration of all relevant factors and circumstances, whether the two offices should be separate. Currently, our leadership structure separates the offices of Chief Executive Officer and Chairperson of the Board, with Mr. Holleran serving as our Chief Executive Officer and Mr. Felice serving as non-executive Chairperson of the Board. We believe this is appropriate as it provides Mr. Holleran with the ability to focus on our day-to-day operations, while Mr. Felice focuses on the oversight by our board of directors.

We are a “controlled company” within the meaning of the New York Stock Exchange’s (“NYSE”) corporate governance standards because more than 50% of the voting power of our common stock is held by investment funds affiliated with CCMP, MSD Partners and Alberta Investment Management Corp. (“AIMCo” and, collectively, our “Sponsors”), which are parties to a stockholders agreement with respect to their ownership of our common stock. See “Related Person Transactions—Amended and Restated Stockholders Agreement.” Under these corporate governance standards, a company of which more than 50% of the voting power for the election of directors is held by an individual, group or other company is a “controlled company” and may elect not to comply with certain corporate governance standards, including the requirements (1) that a majority of our board of directors consist of independent directors, (2) that our board of directors have a compensation committee that consists entirely of independent directors with a written charter addressing the committee’s purpose and responsibilities, and (3) that our director nominations be made, or recommended to our full board of directors, by our independent directors or by a nominations committee that consists entirely of independent directors and that we adopt a written charter or board resolution addressing the nominations process.

Pursuant to the corporate governance standards of the NYSE, a director employed by us cannot be deemed an “independent director,” and each other director will qualify as “independent” only if our board of directors

affirmatively determines that he has no material relationship with us, either directly or as a partner, stockholder or officer of an organization that has a relationship with us. In making such determinations, the board of directors considered that certain directors serve as directors of other companies with which we engage from time to time in the ordinary course of business and, in accordance with our independence standards, determined that none of these relationships were material or impaired the independence of any of our directors. The fact that a director may own our capital stock is not, by itself, considered a material relationship. Based on information provided by each director concerning his or her background, employment and affiliations, our board of directors has affirmatively determined that each of Ms. Dayhoff, Mr. Felice, Mr. Silber, Mr. Soucy, Ms. Walker and Mr. Ward are independent in accordance with the NYSE rules. There are no family relationships among any of our directors or executive officers. We are relying on the exceptions described in the previous paragraph resulting from our status as a “controlled company” with respect to having a majority independent board of directors as well as having compensation and nominating and corporate governance committees made up entirely of independent directors.

In addition, our board of directors has determined that Ms. Dayhoff, Mr. Felice and Ms. Walker each satisfy the independence requirements for audit committee members under the listing standards of the NYSE and Rule 10A-3 of the Exchange Act. Ms. Dayhoff and Ms. Walker have also been determined to be audit committee “financial experts” as defined under SEC rules. All members of the audit committee are able to read and understand fundamental financial statements, are familiar with finance and accounting practices and principles and are financially literate.

Our board of directors held six meetings (including regularly scheduled and special meetings) during our Fiscal Year 2021. Each director attended at least 75% of the aggregate of the meetings of the board and of meetings held by all committees of the board on which such director served during Fiscal Year 2021. Our non-employee directors meet by themselves, without management directors and management present, periodically throughout Fiscal Year 2021. Mr. Felice, the non-executive Chairperson of the Board, presides at all meetings of non-management directors. While we have no policy with respect to director attendance of annual meetings of stockholders, directors are encouraged to attend. The Annual Meeting is our first annual meeting of stockholders as a public company.

Our board of directors has three standing committees: an audit committee, a compensation committee and a nominating and corporate governance committee, each of which has the composition and responsibilities described below. A copy of each of the three standing committee’s charter is posted on the investor relations—governance section of our website, www.global.hayward.com. In addition, from time to time, our board of directors may establish other committees to facilitate the management of our business or to address particular matters as they arise. Members serve on committees until their resignation or until as otherwise determined by our board of directors.

Our board of directors has adopted Corporate Governance Guidelines, which are designed to assist our board of directors in performing its duties. These guidelines provide general guidance to our board of directors with a view to continuing a strong and effective working relationship among the board members and as between our board of directors and management. The goal of these guidelines is to reflect current governance practices for our board of directors and to enhance the ability of our board of directors and management to guide the Company in its continuing growth and success. Our Corporate Governance Guidelines may be amended by our board of directors at any time. A copy of our Corporate Governance Guidelines is available under the investor relations—governance section of our website, www.global.hayward.com.

The nominating and corporate governance committee considers candidates for director from a variety of sources, including candidates who are recommended by other Board members and by management. The nominating and corporate governance committee also considers candidates for director recommended by stockholders who submit such recommendations in writing to our Corporate Secretary and evaluates director candidates recommended by stockholders in the same way it evaluates candidates recommended by the other sources referenced above.

In accordance with our Corporate Governance Guidelines, the nominating and corporate governance committee identifies and considers candidates based on a diversity of skills, expertise, industry knowledge, diversity of opinion and perspectives and other attributes. Among other things, the board of directors has determined that it is important to have directors with the following skills and experiences: leadership experience, as directors with experience in significant leadership positions possess strong abilities to motivate and manage others and to identify and develop leadership qualities in others; knowledge of the Company’s industry, which is relevant to understanding the Company’s business and strategy; operations experience, as it gives directors a practical understanding of developing, implementing and assessing the Company’s business strategy and operating plan; risk management experience, which is relevant to oversight of the risks facing the Company’s business; financial/accounting experience, particularly knowledge of finance and financial reporting processes, which is relevant to understanding and evaluating the Company’s capital structure, financial statements and reporting requirements; and strategic planning experience, which is relevant to the Board’s review of the Company’s strategies and monitoring their implementation and results.

The nominating and corporate governance committee has also committed to including candidates with a diversity of age, gender, ethnicity/race and education in any pool of candidates from which board of director nominees are chosen. The board of directors also confirms that our policy of non-discrimination applies in the selection of directors.

Our compensation committee is primarily responsible for establishing and overseeing our general compensation strategy. In addition, the compensation committee oversees our compensation and benefit plans and policies, administers our cash and equity-based plans and management incentive compensation plans and reviews and approves compensation decisions relating to our executive officers, including our Chief Executive Officer. The compensation committee considers recommendations from our Chief Executive Officer regarding the compensation of our executive officers other than himself. Our Chief Executive Officer makes such recommendations regarding base salary, and short-term and long-term compensation, including equity incentives, for our executive officers based on our results, an executive officer’s individual contribution toward these results, the executive officer’s role and performance of his or her duties and his or her achievement of individual goals. Our compensation committee then reviews the recommendations and other data, including various compensation survey data and publicly-available data of our peers, and makes decisions as to the target total direct compensation for each executive officer, including our Chief Executive Officer, as well as each individual

compensation element. While our Chief Executive Officer typically attends meetings of the compensation committee, the compensation committee meets outside the presence of our Chief Executive Officer when discussing his compensation and when discussing certain other matters, as well.

Under its charter, our compensation committee has the right to retain or obtain the advice of compensation consultants, independent legal counsel and other advisers. For Fiscal Year 2021, our compensation committee retained Pearl Meyer & Partners, LLC (“Pearl Meyer”) as its independent compensation consultants. Pearl Meyer primarily assisted the compensation committee in its review of our executive compensation program and the determination of an appropriate peer group. Following the engagement of Pearl Meyer in December 2020, the compensation committee consulted with Pearl Meyer regularly throughout the year, and one or more representatives of Pearl Meyer attended portions of our compensation committee meetings. The compensation committee considered the information presented by its independent compensation consultants, but all decisions regarding the compensation of our executive officers were made independently by the compensation committee. In Fiscal Year 2021, in compliance with SEC rules, the compensation committee assessed the independence of Pearl Meyer and concluded that no conflict of interest exists that would prevent Pearl Meyer from independently advising the compensation committee. Pearl Meyer did not provide any services to us in Fiscal Year 2021 other than the services provided directly to the compensation committee.

None of our executive officers currently serves, or in the past fiscal year has served, as a member of the board of directors or compensation committee of any entity that has one or more executive officers serving on our board of directors or compensation committee. None of the members of the compensation committee is, nor has ever been, an officer or employee of the Company, except for Lawrence H. Silber, who served as the chief operating officer of the Company from 2008 to 2012.

We have adopted a Code of Ethics for Senior Executive and Financial Officers applicable to our Chief Executive Officer, Chief Financial Officer, President, North America, Treasurer and Corporate Controller and any persons performing similar functions. We intend to disclose future amendments to certain provisions of our Code of Ethics for Senior Executive and Financial Officers, or waivers of such provisions applicable to any principal executive officer, principal financial officer, principal accounting officer or other persons performing similar functions on our website. A copy of our Code of Ethics for Senior Executive and Financial Officers is available under the investor relations—governance section of our website, www.global.hayward.com.

Our Code of Ethics for Senior Executive and Financial Officers addresses items such as:

We have also adopted a Business Ethics and Code of Conduct Policy applicable to our directors, officers and all of our employees. A copy of our Business Ethics and Code of Conduct Policy is available under the investor relations—governance section of our website, www.global.hayward.com.

As part of our insider trading policy, all of our directors, officers and employees are prohibited from engaging in hedging and other monetization transactions (such as prepaid variable forward contracts, equity swaps, collars and exchange funds) involving our securities, holding our securities in a margin account or pledging our securities as collateral for a loan. We also prohibit our directors, officers and employees from speculating in our equity securities, including through the use of short sales or by trading in options or other derivative securities with respect to our securities.

Our board of directors adopted stock ownership guidelines on February 10, 2021 for our executive officers and directors. Our stock ownership guidelines were put in place in connection with the IPO and are intended to increase the alignment of interests between our executive officers and directors and our stockholders. The guidelines of peers and, on a broader basis, industry practices were considered in developing this policy.

Our guidelines for executive officers provide the following:

Our outside directors are required to hold shares of our common stock with a value equal to five times the amount of the annual cash retainer, if any, paid to such director for service on the board (excluding additional chair of the board, committee and committee chair retainers, if any).

Executive officers and directors are required to achieve the applicable level of ownership within five years of the later of the date the ownership guidelines were adopted or the date such person was designated an executive officer or became a director, as applicable.

For purposes of the stock ownership guidelines, we include direct ownership of shares (including by a member of his or her immediate family residing in the same household), shares held in trust for the benefit of the executive officer or director (or a member of his or her immediate family residing in the same household), shares held in our employee stock purchase plan, 401(k) or deferred compensation retirement plans, shares underlying vested incentive equity awards, and shares underlying unvested restricted stock unit awards (net of

applicable tax withholding). Pledged shares and any unexercised or unvested equity awards (other than unvested RSUs) do not count towards satisfaction of the guidelines. Failure to comply with the stock ownership guidelines will (among other things, as may be determined by the compensation committee) require executive officers and outside directors to retain at least 50% of the shares, net of applicable tax withholding and the payment of any exercise or purchase price (if applicable) received upon the vesting or settlement of equity awards or the exercise of stock options, until the thresholds stated above are reached. The compensation committee is responsible for administering our stock ownership guidelines.

We have adopted a written policy with respect to the review, approval and ratification of related party transactions. Under the policy, the audit committee is responsible for reviewing and approving related party transactions. The policy applies to transactions, arrangements and relationships (including any indebtedness or guarantee of indebtedness) or any series of similar transactions, arrangements or relationships in which the aggregate amount involved exceeds, or may be expected to exceed, $120,000 with respect to any fiscal year, and where we (or one of our subsidiaries) are a participant and in which a related party has or will have a direct or indirect material interest. In the event a proposed related party transaction is expected to be less than $500,000, the chairperson of the audit committee has the authority to pre-approve or ratify the transaction. In the course of reviewing potential related party transactions, the audit committee considers, among other factors it deems appropriate, whether the related party transaction is on terms no less favorable than terms generally available to an unaffiliated third party under the same or similar circumstances and the extent of the related person’s interest in the transaction. In addition, the board of directors has reviewed and designated certain types of related party transactions that will be deemed pre-approved by the audit committee: certain employment arrangements with executive officers if the related compensation is required to be reported in the Company’s proxy statement; director compensation arrangements if such compensation is required to be reported in the Company’s proxy statement; certain transactions with other companies where the related person’s only relationship is as a director of that company, beneficial owner of less than 10% of that company’s equity securities or limited partner with a less than 10% interest; certain transactions where all stockholders receive proportional benefits; transactions involving competitive bids; certain regulated transactions; and certain banking-related transactions.

Management is responsible for the day-to-day management of the risks facing our company, and our board of directors has responsibility for the oversight of risk management. While our board of directors has primary responsibility for overseeing risk management, our board of directors also delegates certain oversight responsibilities to its committees. Our compensation committee is responsible for overseeing the management of risks relating to our executive compensation plans and arrangements. Our audit committee oversees our major financial risk exposures and reviews the steps management has taken to monitor and control such exposures, including the Company’s risk assessment and risk management policies. Our audit committee also oversees the integrity of the Company’s information technology systems, processes and data, and periodically (but no less than annually) reviews and assesses with management and the internal auditor (or other personnel responsible for the internal audit function), the adequacy of security for the Company’s information technology systems, processes and data and the Company’s contingency plans in the event of a breakdown or security breach affecting the Company’s information technology systems, processes and data or the information technology systems, processes and data of the Company’s clients. Our nominating and corporate governance committee oversees management of risks associated with director independence, conflicts of interest, composition and organization of our board of directors, director succession planning and corporate governance.

While each committee is responsible for evaluating certain risks and overseeing the management of such risks, our full board of directors keeps itself regularly informed regarding such risks through committee reports and otherwise. In particular, throughout Fiscal Year 2021 and currently, our board of directors regularly received and continues to receive updates from management on the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on our business, our employees and our suppliers and customers.

The Company’s board of directors and its committees play an important role in overseeing our ESG programs and policies. The nominating and corporate governance committee is specifically assigned responsibility to oversee the Company’s ESG priorities, risks, and opportunities to guide related programming

and procedures within its established charter. The nominating and corporate governance committee has additional responsibilities associated with the review of the Company’s corporate governance guidelines on an annual basis, or more frequently if appropriate, and recommends changes as necessary. The nominating and corporate governance committee charter specifically states that the committee will be committed to promoting diversity, including diversity of gender, race, ethnicity and age, and inclusion in its selection practices and shall consider all candidates for director on the basis of their skills, qualifications and experience.

All of the board committees are accountable for various components of ESG through the responsibilities assigned in their respective charters. The Audit Committee has specific accountability for ethics and compliance, and oversees the Company’s ethics and compliance functions, including the Company’s Code of Ethics for Senior Executive and Financial Officers and other procedures established by the Company with regard to ethical behavior, avoidance of conflicts of interest, and other related matters. In addition, the audit committee oversees the integrity of the Company’s information technology systems, processes and data and periodically (but no less than annually), at its discretion, reviews and assesses with management and the internal auditor (or other personnel responsible for the internal audit function), the adequacy of security for the Company’s information technology systems, processes and data and the Company’s contingency plans in the event of a breakdown or security breach affecting the Company’s information technology systems, processes and data or the information technology systems, processes and data of the Company’s clients. The compensation committee supports our human capital management objectives through their oversight of the compensation and benefits of the Company’s officers, employees and directors, assessing the adequacy of the Company’s compensation principles and philosophy and administering the Company’s compensation, benefit and equity-based plans by exercising its rights and responsibilities as specified in its charter. The compensation committee is also responsible for reviewing and establishing the Company’s overall compensation strategy, including base salary, incentive compensation and equity-based grants, to provide for appropriate rewards and incentives for the Company’s management and employees, taking into account whether such rewards and incentives encourage undue or inappropriate risk taking by such personnel.

Although we do not have a formal policy regarding communications with our board of directors, stockholders, employees and others who are interested in communicating with our board of directors may do so by writing to us at Hayward Holdings, Inc., Attn: Corporate Secretary, 400 Connell Drive, Suite 600, Berkeley Heights, NJ 07922. The Corporate Secretary will forward to the Chairperson of the Board and such other board members as may be deemed appropriate any such communication, provided that such communication addresses a legitimate business issue.

The following table sets forth information regarding the compensation earned for service on our board of directors, during the year ended December 31, 2021 by the directors who were not also named executive officers. Mr. Holleran did not receive any additional compensation for his service on the board of directors during the year ended December 31, 2021. Mr. Holleran’s compensation for the year ended December 31, 2021 is set forth under “Executive Compensation—Summary Compensation Table.”

Mr. Felice. On July 25, 2018, we entered into a letter agreement with Mr. Felice under which he agreed to serve on our board of directors. Pursuant to his letter agreement, Mr. Felice was entitled to receive an annual fee equal to $60,000, payable in equal quarterly installments, and reimbursement for reasonable out-of-pocket expenses incurred in connection with serving as a director. In addition, Mr. Felice was entitled to receive a one-time grant of an option to purchase 126,750 shares of our common stock, vesting 50% subject to time-based vesting criteria and 50% subject to performance-based vesting criteria.

Mr. Silber. On November 22, 2019, we entered into a letter agreement with Mr. Silber under which he agreed to serve on our board of directors. Pursuant to his letter agreement, Mr. Silber was entitled to receive an annual fee equal to $60,000, payable in equal quarterly installments, and reimbursement for reasonable

out-of-pocket expenses incurred in connection with serving as a director. In addition, Mr. Silber was entitled to receive a one-time grant of an option to purchase 156,000 shares of our common stock, vesting 100% subject to time-based vesting criteria.

Mr. Soucy. In July 2018, we entered into a letter agreement with Mr. Soucy under which he agreed to serve on our board of directors. Pursuant to his letter agreement, Mr. Soucy was entitled to receive an annual fee equal to $60,000, payable in equal quarterly installments, and reimbursement for reasonable out-of-pocket expenses incurred in connection with serving as a director. In addition, Mr. Soucy was entitled to receive a one-time grant of an option to purchase 126,750 shares of our common stock, vesting 50% subject to time-based vesting criteria and 50% subject to performance-based vesting criteria.

In connection with our IPO, our board of directors adopted a non-employee director compensation policy, which covers non-employee directors who are not affiliated with our Sponsors. Under this policy, for Fiscal Year 2021, each covered non-employee director received an annual cash retainer for service to our board of directors and an additional annual cash retainer for service on any committee of our board of directors or for serving as the chairperson of our board of directors or any of its committees, in each case, prorated for partial years of service, as follows:

In addition, members of any special committee in 2021 received a fee of $2,500 for each special committee meeting.

Prior to January 1st of any year, a covered non-employee director may elect to receive his or her annual cash retainer in the form of restricted stock units that vest on December 31^st of that year (or such other date as determined by the board of directors or Compensation Committee), subject to continued service as a director through the vesting date.

Commencing in 2022, each covered non-employee director will be granted restricted stock units having a grant date fair value, determined in accordance with FASB ASC Topic 718 (or any successor provision), of $125,000 (or $200,000 in the case of the chairman of the our Board of Directors), such restricted stock units to vest on the earlier of the first anniversary of the grant date and the date of the immediately following annual meeting of our stockholders, generally subject to the non-employee director’s continued service, through the applicable vesting date.

Each non-employee director is also entitled to reimbursement for reasonable travel and other expenses incurred in connection with attending meetings of our Board of Directors and any committee on which he or she serves.

Our outside directors are required to hold shares of our common stock with a value equal to five times the amount of the annual cash retainer paid to such director for service on the board (excluding additional chair of the board, committee and committee chair retainers, if any). Directors are required to achieve the applicable level of ownership within five years of the later of the date the ownership guidelines were adopted or the date such person was designated an executive officer or became a director, as applicable. See “—Stock Ownership Guidelines.”

In addition to the indemnification and advancement of expenses required in our certificate of incorporation and bylaws, we have entered into indemnification agreements with each of our current directors and executive officers. These agreements provide for the indemnification of, and the advancement of expenses to, such persons

for all reasonable expenses and liabilities, including attorneys’ fees, judgments, fines and settlement amounts, incurred in connection with any action or proceeding brought against them by reason of the fact that they are or were serving in such capacity. For additional information, please see “Related Person Transactions—Agreements with our Directors and Officers.”

Our audit committee has appointed PwC as our independent registered public accounting firm to audit our consolidated financial statements for the fiscal year ending December 31, 2022. PwC has served as our independent registered public accounting firm since 1999.

At the Annual Meeting, our stockholders are being asked to ratify the appointment of PwC as our independent registered public accounting firm for the fiscal year ending December 31, 2022. Stockholder ratification of the selection of PwC as our independent registered public accounting firm is not required by Delaware law, our certificate of incorporation or our bylaws. However, our audit committee is submitting the appointment of PwC to our stockholders because we value our stockholders’ views on our independent registered public accounting firm and as a matter of good corporate governance. Notwithstanding the appointment of PwC and even if our stockholders ratify the appointment, our audit committee, in its discretion, may appoint another independent registered public accounting firm at any time during the year if our audit committee believes that such a change would be in the best interests of our company and our stockholders, including the satisfactory agreement of audit fees. If our stockholders do not ratify the appointment of PwC, our board of directors may reconsider the appointment. Representatives of PwC are expected to be present (virtually) at the Annual Meeting, will have an opportunity to make a statement if they so desire, and are expected to be available to respond to appropriate questions from our stockholders.

The Audit Committee engaged PwC to perform an annual audit of the Company’s financial statements for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2021. The Audit Committee was responsible for determination and approval of audit fees primarily based on audit scope, with consideration of audit team skills and experiences.

Pursuant to SEC rules, the fees billed by PwC are disclosed in the table below:

Consists of fees for professional services rendered in connection with the audit of our annual consolidated financial statements, including audited financial statements presented in our registration statement on Form S-1 filed with the SEC in connection with our IPO, audited financial statements presented in our annual report on Form 10-K, review of our quarterly financial statements presented in our quarterly reports on Form 10-Q and services that are normally provided by our independent registered public accounting firm in connection with statutory and regulatory filings or engagements for those fiscal years, such as registration statements. The 2020 Audit Fees includes fees billed in connection with our IPO.

Consists of aggregate fees for accounting consultations and other services that were reasonably related to the performance of audits or reviews of our consolidated financial statements and were not reported above under “Audit Fees.” This category primarily includes fees related to the 401(k) plan audit.

Consists of fees for professional services for tax advisory, compliance services, and consultations for customs recovery.

Consists of fees for permitted products and services other than those that meet the criteria above.

In Fiscal Year 2021, there were no other professional services provided by PwC, other than those listed above, that would have required our audit committee to consider their compatibility with maintaining the independence of PwC.

Consistent with requirements of the SEC and the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (“PCAOB”), regarding auditor independence, our audit committee is responsible for the appointment, compensation and oversight of the work of our independent registered public accounting firm. In recognition of this responsibility, our audit committee pre-approves all audit and permissible non-audit services provided by the independent registered public accounting firm. These services may include audit services, audit-related services, tax services and other services. All services provided by PwC in Fiscal Years 2021 and 2020 were pre-approved by our audit committee prior to any services being rendered.

The ratification of the appointment of PwC requires the affirmative vote of the holders of a majority of the voting power of the shares of our common stock entitled to vote on the proposal that are present in person or represented by proxy at the Annual Meeting and are voted for or against the proposal. Abstentions are considered votes present and entitled to vote on this proposal, and thus, will have the same effect as a vote against this proposal. Broker non-votes are not considered votes for or against this proposal and thus will have no effect on the outcome of the proposal.

THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS UNANIMOUSLY RECOMMENDS THAT THE STOCKHOLDERS VOTE “FOR” THE RATIFICATION OF THE APPOINTMENT OF PRICEWATERHOUSECOOPERS LLP AS THE COMPANY’S INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM FOR THE FISCAL YEAR ENDING DECEMBER 31, 2022.

The primary purpose of the audit committee is to assist our board of directors in overseeing (1) the integrity of our financial statements, (2) our compliance with legal and regulatory requirements, (3) our independent auditors’ qualifications and independence, (4) the performance of the independent auditors and our internal audit function and (5) other matters as set forth in the audit committee’s charter. The audit committee is further responsible for the appointment and oversight of our independent auditor and is involved in the selection of the independent auditor’s lead audit partner.

The audit committee has reviewed and discussed the company’s audited financial statements for the year ended December 31, 2021 with management and PwC and, with and without management present, reviewed and discussed the results of PwC’s examination of the financial statements. The audit committee also discussed with management, PwC and our internal auditors, the quality and adequacy of our internal controls and the processes for assessing and monitoring risk. The audit committee reviewed with both PwC and our internal auditor their audit plans, audit scope and identification of audit risks.

The audit committee has discussed with PwC the matters required to be discussed by the PCAOB. The audit committee has also received the written disclosures and the letter from PwC required by applicable requirements of the PCAOB regarding the independent auditor’s communications with the audit committee concerning independence and has discussed PwC’s independence with PwC.

Based on the foregoing, the audit committee has recommended to our board of directors that such audited financial statements be included in our Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2021 as filed with the SEC.

Respectfully submitted by the members of the audit committee of the board of directors:

February 28, 2022

This report of the audit committee is required by the SEC and, in accordance with the SEC’s rules, will not be deemed to be part of or incorporated by reference by any general statement incorporating by reference this proxy statement into any filing under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended (the “Securities Act”), or under the Exchange Act except to the extent that we specifically incorporate this information by reference, and will not otherwise be deemed “soliciting material” or “filed” under either the Securities Act or the Exchange Act.

In accordance with the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act of 2010 and Rule 14a-21 under the Exchange Act, the Company requests that our stockholders cast a non-binding, advisory vote regarding the frequency with which we should include in future annual proxy statements a stockholder advisory vote (a “Say-on-Pay Vote”) to approve the compensation of our named executive officers. It is expected that the first Say-on-Pay Vote will occur at the 2024 annual meeting of stockholders. By voting on this proposal, stockholders may indicate whether they would prefer that the Company provide for the Say-on-Pay Vote thereafter at annual meetings every one year, every two years or every three years. Stockholders may also abstain from the vote.

After careful consideration, the Board determined that providing a Say-on-Pay Vote every one year is the most appropriate alternative for the Company at this time. In formulating its recommendation, the Board determined that an annual advisory vote on named executive officer compensation will allow stockholders to provide their direct input on our compensation philosophy, policies and practices as disclosed in future proxy statements on a more timely and consistent basis than if the vote were held less frequently. Additionally, an annual advisory vote on executive compensation is consistent with our policy of seeking regular dialogue with our stockholders on corporate governance matters and our executive compensation philosophy, policies and practices. We understand that our stockholders may have different views as to what is the best approach for the Company, and we look forward to hearing from our stockholders on this proposal.

This “Say-on-Frequency” vote is advisory, and therefore not binding on the Company, the Board or the Compensation Committee. However, the Board and the compensation committee value the opinions of our stockholders and intend to consider our stockholders’ views regarding how often they should have the opportunity to approve our executive compensation programs.

Stockholders of the Company will have the opportunity to specify one of four choices for this proposal on the proxy card: (1) every one year; (2) every two years; (3) every three years; or (4) abstain. Stockholders are not voting to approve or disapprove the Board’s recommendation. Rather, stockholders are being asked to express their preference regarding the frequency of future advisory votes to approve executive compensation.

The frequency that receives the affirmative vote of the majority of the votes cast at the Annual Meeting will be the frequency recommended by stockholders. If no frequency receives the foregoing vote, then we will consider the option of EVERY ONE YEAR, EVERY TWO YEARS, or EVERY THREE YEARS that receives the highest number of votes cast to be the frequency recommended by stockholders.

THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS RECOMMENDS THAT YOU VOTE FOR THE OPTION OF “EVERY ONE YEAR” FOR THE FREQUENCY OF FUTURE ADVISORY VOTES ON EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION.

The following discussion and analysis details the Company’s philosophy and policies regarding executive compensation, the process that is used to set executive compensation within the Company, the elements of the executive compensation program, and the role of our compensation committee and the executive staff in setting executive compensation. In addition, this discussion may contain forward-looking statements that are based on our current plans, considerations, expectations and determinations regarding future compensation programs as we build a program appropriate for our status as a public company while considering the current external environment. See the section titled “Cautionary Statement Regarding Forward-Looking Statements” of the 2021 Annual Report for a discussion of the risks and uncertainties, as well as assumptions that, if they never materialize or prove incorrect, could cause our results to differ materially from those express or implied by such forward-looking statements.

In Fiscal Year 2021, our “named executive officers” and their positions were as follows:

Each of the key elements of our executive compensation program is discussed in more detail below.

The following discussion and analysis contains statements regarding individual and Company performance targets and goals. These targets and goals are disclosed in the limited context of the Company’s compensation programs and should not be understood to be statements of management’s expectations or estimates of results or other guidance. The Company specifically cautions investors not to apply these statements to other contexts.

Our compensation philosophy is driven by the need to attract and retain top executive talent, while ensuring that compensation aligns with our corporate and financial objectives and the long-term interests of our stockholders. We have provided compensation packages that we view as fair and competitive and that are designed to incentivize our executives to drive market-leading performance, relative to the Company’s peers, as our ability to meet and exceed our business goals depends on the skills and contributions of each executive. We also intend to maintain our commitment to strong corporate governance in connection with our named executive officer compensation arrangements.

Our compensation programs for our executives have historically been weighted towards rewarding both short- and long-term performance incentives through a mix of cash and equity compensation, providing our executives with an opportunity to share in the appreciation of our business over time.

Our executive compensation program was designed to weight fixed compensation less heavily for our senior executives, such that there is a positive correlation between an executive’s seniority, role and responsibilities and the proportion of his or her compensation that is “at-risk.” Pay-for-performance is an integral component of our compensation program, and “at-risk” elements of our executive’s compensation make up a significant portion of our annual and long-term incentives. Prior to our IPO, we maintained our 2017 Plan (as defined below), pursuant to which we made grants to our executives, comprised of non-qualified stock options, restricted stock awards, unrestricted stock awards, restricted stock units and any combination of the foregoing. This incentive program was designed to reward achievement of our short-term and long-term business objectives.

The Company has continued to utilize short and long-term incentive compensation as a key component of our compensation philosophy following our IPO, including through our 2021 Plan. We intend to continue our

emphasis on “at-risk” compensation based on the achievement of specific performance objectives in order to drive superior executive achievement and appropriately align the financial interests of our executive officers to our stockholders.

The compensation for our named executive officers generally consists of a base salary, annual cash bonuses and equity awards.

We aim to establish base cash compensation at fair and reasonable levels in order to attract talent in a competitive market, with our compensation committee determining pay ranges in consultation with our human resources team and our compensation consultant using a combination of market data and business conditions, individual talent, relevant experience and performance as factors in determining actual pay.

When designing our cash bonus program, we felt strongly that it should emphasize contributions towards Company financial and operational performance, where performance that failed to meet established goals would not be rewarded. We believe this underscored our commitment to maintain alignment between stockholders and our executives.

In connection with our IPO, we adopted our 2021 Plan which provides us with significant flexibility to grant various types of equity and incentive awards to remain competitive in the labor market and to attract, retain and motivate our executive leadership team.

While we have identified particular compensation objectives that each element of executive compensation serves, our compensation programs are designed to be flexible and complementary and to collectively serve all of the executive compensation objectives described above. Accordingly, we expect that we will continue to review and structure our compensation programs to serve and reinforce each of our objectives, including emphasizing and rewarding exceptional performance, driving value creation for our stockholders, and ensuring best practices and sound governance.

Below are highlights of what we do and what we do not do:

Our compensation committee administers the executive compensation program for our named executive officers, as well as other executives within the Company. Our compensation committee is responsible for reviewing and approving the compensation of our executives, approving and administering our cash and equity

incentive plans, including setting vesting conditions for awards (including performance metrics) and determining the amounts of the awards granted to our executive officers, ensuring it is aligned with our executive compensation philosophy. Our compensation committee is also responsible for reviewing and providing recommendations to our board of directors regarding the compensation of our directors.

The compensation committee generally considers the Chief Executive Officer’s recommendations when making decisions regarding the compensation of the executive officers (other than the Chief Executive Officer). Pursuant to the compensation committee’s charter, the compensation committee has the authority to retain or obtain the advice of compensation consultants, legal counsel and other advisors to assist in carrying out its responsibilities. Since December 2020, the compensation committee has engaged Pearl Meyer, a compensation consulting firm, to assist in making decisions regarding the amount and types of compensation to provide our executive officers and non-employee directors. Pearl Meyer reports directly to the compensation committee. The compensation committee has considered adviser independence factors as they relate to Pearl Meyer and have determined that Pearl Meyer’s work does not raise a conflict of interest.

Our compensation committee uses compensation data from market survey data published by third parties and compensation data provided by Pearl Meyer for use as a general indicator of relevant market conditions and pay practices and as a broader reference point when determining compensation for our executive officers.

In addition to survey and benchmarking information derived from our peer group information (as described below), other important factors that drive compensation decisions include individual qualifications and expertise, responsibilities, particular industry and market conditions and complexity of the position. More specifically, our compensation committee considers the performance of the Company’s named executive officers, the individual’s historical compensation and any retention concerns, and the Chief Executive Officer’s recommendations (in the case of named executive officers other than the Chief Executive Officer), before determining the compensation arrangement for each of them.

Our compensation committee also regularly reviews the Company’s compensation policies and practices to determine whether they encourage excessive risk-taking, reviews and discusses at least annually the relationship between risk management policies and practices and compensation and evaluates compensation policies and practices that could mitigate any such risk. Our compensation committee has specifically evaluated the Company’s compensation structure and practices and concluded that they do not establish incentives for unnecessary or excessive risk.

Our compensation committee worked with Pearl Meyer to establish a compensation peer group to help ensure that our named executive officers would receive fair and competitive pay relative to market standards.

In Fiscal Year 2021, our peer group review consisted of a multi-dimensional analysis in which we selected companies: in a similar growth stage as us (with a focus on new public companies), with similar gross profit margins, revenue, and in similar industries that we viewed as competition for executive talent.

The peer group approved by the compensation committee in Fiscal Year 2021 for use in benchmarking compensation was:

We review and evaluate this list on an ongoing basis to ensure that we are accurately benchmarking and compensating our employees. Accordingly, our peer group list is subject to change over time.

These elements (and the amounts of compensation and benefits under each element) were selected because we believe they are necessary to help us attract and retain executive talent, which is fundamental to our success, reward executives based on performance and align executives with the interests of our stockholders.

Below is a more detailed summary of the current executive compensation program as it relates to our named executive officers.

Our named executive officers receive a base salary to compensate them for the services they provide to our Company. The base salary payable to each named executive officer is intended to provide a fixed component of compensation reflecting the executive’s skill set, experience, role and responsibilities.

The following table sets forth the base salaries of our named executive officers at the end of Fiscal Year 2021:

Pursuant to our go-forward compensation structure that aligned executive compensation to market and internal equity targets, the compensation committee approved the following target bonuses for our named executive officers, effective February 10, 2021:

The amount of incentive awards paid under our annual incentive plan is based on performance relative to threshold, target and maximum performance levels set when the awards are made. When performance falls below the threshold, executives receive no payout. Payouts at a threshold level of performance are 25% of the target payout, payouts at a target level of performance are 100% of the target payout, and payouts at a maximum level

of performance are at 200% of the target payout, with payouts for performance between these levels being interpolated. For Fiscal Year 2021, annual bonuses were based on previously determined factors that the compensation committee deemed appropriate, consisting of achievement of Company adjusted EBITDA and adjusted free cash flow targets. In calculating the bonus payouts, performance relative to the adjusted EBITDA target was weighted as 80% of the total target performance and the adjusted free cash flow target was weighted as 20% of the total target performance, and bonus payouts were generally rounded up to the nearest $1,000.

The compensation committee selected these performance measures because they are the critical measures we use internally in managing our businesses and are measures of our profitability and the performance of our assets relative to our investment. The compensation committee believes that performance against these measures is a primary driver, over time, of the value of our company. The compensation committee believes that adjusted EBITDA (or, earnings before interest, income tax, depreciation and amortization expenses and selected items) and adjusted free cash flow (or, adjusted EBITDA before capital expenditures plus change in net working capital) are the most appropriate measures of the annual operating performance of our businesses. In selecting these performance measures, setting the performance goals and awarding the corresponding incentive opportunities, the compensation committee took into account management’s recommendations. We achieved adjusted EBITDA at a level that exceeded the maximum performance level for that performance measure as a result of higher net sales and operating leverage. We achieved adjusted free cash flow at a level that exceeded the maximum performance level for that performance measure as a result of achieving strong adjusted EBITDA.

The following table presents the 2021 performance goals set for the annual incentive plan. The table shows goals for threshold, target and maximum performance levels, actual 2021 performance and the percentage of target payout achieved for each goal.

The target and earned cash bonus amounts for our named executive officers for Fiscal Year 2021 are set forth below.

For 2022, the compensation committee also approved financial and operational targets deemed appropriate, including achievement of Company adjusted EBITDA and adjusted free cash flow targets, along with each individual named executive officer’s overall performance as it relates to his or her area of responsibility. The

targets require a minimum achievement of 85% target performance prior to any payment being made. The maximum payment under the plan is 200% of an individual executive’s target bonus amount.

Prior to the IPO, our board of directors adopted and our stockholders approved our Second Amended and Restated Hayward Holdings, Inc. 2017 Equity Incentive Plan (the “2017 Plan”), which provided for the grant of equity awards with respect to our common stock. In connection with our IPO, we adopted the Hayward Holdings, Inc. 2021 Equity Incentive Plan (the “2021 Plan”). We believe using long-term incentive compensation provides our employees (including the named executive officers) and other eligible service providers the opportunity to participate in the equity appreciation of our business, incentivizes them to work towards Hayward’s long-term performance goals and aligns their interests with the interests of our stockholders. We also believe that such awards function as a compelling incentive and retention tool. No further awards will be granted under the 2017 Plan. The equity awards held by our named executive officers under the 2017 Plan and the 2021 Plan are included in the Outstanding Equity Awards at Fiscal Year End Table below.

In connection with our IPO, our named executive officers received options to purchase common stock under the 2021 Plan with the grant values reflected below.

In addition, on January 12, 2021, Mr. Roetken received options to purchase 1,000 shares of our Class B Common Stock at an exercise price equal to $703.93 per share under the 2017 Plan. Prior to our IPO, each outstanding option to purchase shares of our Class B Common Stock was reclassified into an option to purchase shares of our common stock, and the number of shares of common stock underlying the option and the exercise price were adjusted in accordance with the March 2, 2021 stock split. As a result of this reclassification, this grant represents options to purchase 195,000 shares of our common stock at an exercise price equal to $3.61 per share. These options are vested as to 60% of the initial underlying shares of common stock, and generally vest as to the remaining 40% of the initial underlying shares of common stock in four equal installments, on each of August 28, 2022, August 28, 2023, August 28, 2024, and August 28, 2025, generally subject to Mr. Roetken’s continued employment with us through the applicable vesting date.

To further align the compensation plan to the long-term interests of our stockholders, the Company began utilizing performance-based stock units (“PSUs”) as part of our equity awards program in 2022. The vesting of the PSUs will be tied to organic net revenue growth and adjusted EBITDA margin, each with a relative weighting of 50%. The Company views these metrics as valuable measures of our organizational performance. While the Company believes the continued use of time-based stock options is an appropriate long-term incentive vehicle, the addition of PSUs to the equity awards program we believe further ties the incentives of our executives with the interests of our stockholders. The 2022 annual equity award will be weighted 80% time-based stock options and 20% PSUs. The PSUs will be measured over three-year performance period with a

minimum of 50% of the target awarded PSUs to be earned for threshold performance, 100% of the target award for target performance and a maximum of 200% of the target awarded PSUs to be earned for maximum performance.

We maintain the Hayward Industries, Inc. Retirement Plan, a 401(k) retirement plan for our full-time employees. There is an employer contribution match to the 401(k) plan equal to 50% of the first 6% of compensation contributed to the plan by an employee and after one year of service, we make an annual non-discretionary safe harbor contribution to the 401(k) plan of 3% of an employee’s compensation. Our named executive officers are eligible to participate in these plans on the same basis as our other full-time employees.

In addition, we maintain the Hayward Industries, Inc. Supplementary Retirement Plan, a nonqualified deferred compensation plan in which participants, including our named executive officers, receive employer contributions up to a 9% match of cash compensation deferred under the plan. Participation is currently limited to the members of our senior leadership team, which consists of our chief executive officer and his direct reports. The investment options mirror the same investment options as provided for in the 401(k) plan.

All of our full-time employees, including our named executive officers, are eligible to participate in our health and welfare plans, including:

Additionally, certain of our named executive officers are entitled to other perquisites pursuant to their employment agreements with the Company. See “—Narrative Disclosure to Summary Compensation Table and Grants of Plan-Based Awards Table—Executive Compensation Arrangements,” below.

As of December 31, 2021, we were party to employment agreements or offer letters with our named executive officers. A detailed description of the applicable severance provisions contained in our named executive officer’s employment agreements for Fiscal Year 2021 is described in “—Narrative Disclosure to Summary Compensation Table and Grants of Plan-Based Awards Table—Executive Compensation Arrangements,” below.

In the future, we may provide different and/or additional compensation components, benefits and/or perquisites to our named executive officers to ensure that we provide a balanced and comprehensive compensation structure. We believe that it is important to maintain flexibility to adapt our compensation structure to properly attract, motivate and retain the top executive talent for which we compete, as well as to reflect current market and global conditions. All future practices regarding compensation components, benefits and/or perquisites will be subject to periodic review by our compensation committee.

The compensation committee has continued to use performance-based compensation arrangements for awards to the named executive officers even though such incentive compensation is no longer excepted from the limitation on deductibility of executive compensation for federal income tax purposes.

The Company accounts for stock-based compensation in accordance with the requirements of Accounting Standards Codification (“ASC”) Topic 718, “Compensation - Stock Compensation.” The Company also takes into consideration ASC Topic 718 and other generally accepted accounting principles in determining changes to policies and practices for its stock-based compensation programs.

The following table sets forth information concerning the compensation of our executive officers for the years indicated below.

The following table provides supplemental information relating to grants of plan-based awards made during Fiscal Year 2021 to help explain information provided above in our Summary Compensation Table. This table presents information regarding all grants of plan-based awards that the Company granted to the named executive officers during Fiscal Year 2021.