Close

Form 6-K BARRICK GOLD CORP For: May 05

May 5, 2021 5:17 PM EDT

 

 

UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20549

 

 

Form 6-K

 

 

REPORT OF FOREIGN PRIVATE ISSUER

PURSUANT TO RULE 13a-16 OR 15d-16

UNDER THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the month of May 2021

Commission File Number: 1-9059

 

 

Barrick Gold Corporation

(Registrant’s name)

 

 

Brookfield Place, TD Canada Trust Tower, Suite 3700

161 Bay Street, P.O. Box 212

Toronto, Ontario M5J 2S1 Canada

(Address of principal executive offices)

 

 

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant files or will file annual reports under cover of Form 20-F or Form 40-F.

Form 20-F  ☐            Form 40-F  ☒

Indicate by check mark if the registrant is submitting the Form 6-K in paper as permitted by Regulation S-T Rule 101(b)(1):  ☐

Indicate by check mark if the registrant is submitting the Form 6-K in paper as permitted by Regulation S-T Rule 101(b)(7):  ☐

 

 

 


INCORPORATION BY REFERENCE

Exhibit 99.1 to this report on Form 6-K is furnished, not filed, and will not be incorporated by reference into any registration statement.

Exhibit 99.2 to this report on Form 6-K is hereby incorporated by reference into the Registration Statements on Form F-3 (File No. 333-206417), Form S-8 (File No. 333-224560) and Form F-10 (File No. 333-230235).


SIGNATURES

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.

 

    BARRICK GOLD CORPORATION
Date: May 5, 2021     By: /s/ Richie Haddock                                        
    Name: Richie Haddock
    Title:   General Counsel


EXHIBIT INDEX

 

Exhibits    Description
99.1    2021 Q1 Report Press Release dated May 5, 2021
99.2    Barrick Gold Corporation’s Comparative Unaudited Financial Statements prepared in accordance with International Financial Reporting Standards and the notes thereto for the three months ended March 31, 2021 and Management’s Discussion and Analysis for the same period.

Exhibit 99.1

 

LOGO

ROBUST Q1 PERFORMANCE BY CORE MINES

SETS BARRICK ON COURSE

FOR ANNUAL TARGET

 

All amounts expressed in US dollars

 

Toronto, May 5, 2021 Barrick Gold Corporation (NYSE: GOLD)(TSX: ABX) today reported its results for the first quarter of 2021, noting that with gold and copper production on plan, it was well positioned to achieve its annual guidance.

 

Production in the latter half of the year is expected to be higher than the first, mainly due to mine sequencing at Nevada Gold Mines, the commissioning of the new leach pad facility at Veladero in Argentina, the ramp-up of underground mining at Bulyanhulu and higher anticipated grades at Lumwana in Zambia.

 

Barrick’s Tier One1 gold mines all delivered strong financial performances in Q1 while revenue from its copper mines rose by 31% due to higher copper prices. Net cash2 increased by $0.5 billion despite an advanced tax payment to the state of Nevada on the back of operating cash flow of $1.3 billion and free cash flow3 of $0.8 billion.

 

The company announced a 9 cents per share quarterly dividend, which will be topped up by a three-tranche return of capital distribution totaling $750 million through the course of the year. This would take the per share yield based on yesterday’s closing share price to 3.5% for 2021.4,5

 

LOGO

 

CONTINUED ON PAGE 3

 

* Quarter on quarter

** Distribution per share amount is based on issued and outstanding shares as of March 31, 2021, and is subject to change

 

LOGO


Key Performance Indicators

Financial and Operating Highlights

 

 

       
Financial Results   Q1 2021     Q4 2020     Q1 2020  

Realized gold price7,8

($ per ounce)

    1,777       1,871     1,589

Net earnings9

($ millions)

    538       685     400

Adjusted net earnings6

($ millions)

    507       616     285

Net cash provided by operating activities

($ millions)

    1,302       1,638     889

Free cash flow3

($ millions)

    763       1,092     438

Net earnings per share

($)

    0.30       0.39     0.22

Adjusted net earnings per share6

($)

    0.29       0.35     0.16  

Attributable capital expenditures10

($ millions)

    424       445     364

Debt, net of cash ($ millions)

    (519 )      (33     1,852
Operating Results

 

Gold

  Q1 2021     Q4 2020     Q1 2020  

Production8

(000s of ounces)

    1,101       1,206     1,250

Cost of sales (Barrick’s share)8,11

($ per ounce)

    1,073       1,065     1,020

Total cash costs8,12

($ per ounce)

    716       692       692  

All-in sustaining costs8,12

($ per ounce)

    1,018       929     954

Copper

                       

Production8

(millions of pounds)

    93       119     115

Cost of sales (Barrick’s share)8,13

($ per pound)

    2.11       2.06     1.96

C1 cash costs8,14

($ per pound)

    1.60       1.61     1.55

All-in sustaining costs8,14

($ per pound)

    2.26       2.42       2.04  

Q1 2021 Results Presentation

President and CEO Mark Bristow will host an interactive webinar on the results at 11:00 EDT / 15:00 UTC. The presentation will be linked to the webinar and conference call. Participants will be able to ask questions.

Go to the webinar

US and Canada (toll-free) 1 800 319 4610

UK (toll-free) 0808 101 2791

International (toll) +1 416 915 3239

The Q1 2021 presentation materials will be available on Barrick’s website at www.barrick.com and the webinar will remain on the website for later viewing.

  Solid start to the 2021 year puts Barrick on track to achieve production targets

 

  Strong financial results from Tier One assets with leading margins

 

  Copper revenues increased 31% compared to the prior quarter due to stronger copper prices driving solid profitability with disciplined cost control

 

  Net cash2 increased by $0.5 billion even after advance tax payment in Nevada

 

  Operating cash flow of $1.3 billion and free cash flow3 of $0.8 billion

 

  Net earnings per share of 30 cents and adjusted net earnings per share6 of 29 cents

 

  Framework agreement in PNG puts Porgera on track to resume operations

 

  Sustainability Report highlights improvements against most ESG metrics

 

  Exploration delivers exciting drill results from multiple targets

 

  Donlin approves 2021 follow-up drill program after successful 2020 results

 

  Turquoise Ridge Third Shaft sinking reaches final station

 

  Goldrush exploration development intersects first ore, in line with guidance

 

  First $250 million ($0.14 per share) return of capital distribution15 announced in addition to a $0.09 quarterly dividend
 

 

BARRICK FIRST QUARTER 2021   2   PRESS RELEASE


CONTINUED FROM PAGE 1

 

Major growth projects advanced during the quarter include the plant and tailings expansion of the Tier One Pueblo Viejo mine in the Dominican Republic, the third shaft at Turquoise Ridge in Nevada and Goldrush exploration development, also in Nevada, which has intersected first ore.

President and chief executive Mark Bristow said Barrick’s intensified focus on exploration was paying dividends, with exciting brownfields and generative results from multiple targets across the group. Kibali in the Democratic Republic of Congo was on course to replace reserves depleted by mining for the third successive year and there were also particularly encouraging results from Nevada, Loulo-Gounkoto in Mali, PV in Dominican Republic and Jabal Sayid in Saudi Arabia.

Bristow said, “As detailed in Barrick’s recently published Sustainability Report for 2020, the company has improved its ESG performance against virtually all metrics. It has increased its 2030 emissions reduction target from 10% to 30%, with the ultimate aim of achieving net zero emissions by 2050.

“When we announced the merger between Barrick and Randgold back in September 2018, we said that its rationale was to combine the industry’s best assets with its best managers to build the most valued gold business. Our management team’s record speaks for itself, and as far as assets are concerned, Barrick majority-owns and operates five of the world’s 10 largest gold mines16, with a sixth in the form of Turquoise Ridge waiting in the wings. Each of our core mines has a high-confidence 10-year plan in place — and those are plans, not forecasts, which we plan to grow,” he said.

“The rise in the gold price has prompted a resurgence of the short-termism which has plagued the market, with some investors focusing on short-term gains rather than sustainable growth. But Barrick is building a business for the long term and our focus remains firmly on the future and on the creation and delivery of long-term value to our shareholders and all our other stakeholders.”

 

 

LOGO

BARRICK ANNOUNCES FIRST $250 MILLION RETURN OF CAPITAL TRANCHE AND QUARTERLY DIVIDEND

Barrick today announced that the first $250 million ($0.14 per share)15 tranche of a return of capital distribution totaling $750 million will be paid on June 15, 2021 to shareholders of record at the close of business on May 28, 2021.

 

In addition, Barrick announced that its Board of Directors has declared a dividend for the first quarter of 2021 of $0.09 per share, which will also be paid on June 15, 2021 to shareholders of record at the close of business on May 28, 20214.

This follows the approval by shareholders at Barrick’s Annual and Special Meeting on May 4, 2021 of the total $750 million return of capital distribution. The remaining distribution of $500 million is expected to be effected in two equal tranches to shareholders of record on dates to be determined in August and November 2021.

Senior executive vice-president and chief financial officer Graham Shuttleworth said that the return of capital

distribution and quarterly dividend demonstrates Barrick’s commitment to shareholder returns in line with the strategy outlined at the time of the Randgold merger in September 2018. Since that time dividends have tripled, and together with this capital distribution, establishes one of the industry’s leading returns for shareholders in 2021.

“Based on the current number of outstanding shares, the distribution of this first tranche represents approximately 14 cents per share15, with the three tranches to be distributed during 2021 representing approximately 42 cents per share in total15. In addition to the current quarterly dividend of 9 cents per share, these distributions are providing Barrick’s shareholders with a significantly enhanced return in 2021,” said Shuttleworth.

 

 

BARRICK FIRST QUARTER 2021   3   PRESS RELEASE


INTEGRATION OF EXPLORATION, MINERAL RESOURCE MANAGEMENT AND PLANNING UNLOCKS VALUE

Built on its core strategy of continuing exploration success, Barrick’s 10-year plan has been bolstered further by significant advances in resource replacement and prospect development during the first quarter of the year.

 

Mineral resource management and evaluation executive, Rodney Quick, says the post-merger focus on orebody knowledge across all operating functions, a greatly improved understanding of geological frameworks and the application of leading-edge technologies are identifying and unlocking opportunities for expanding existing asset bases as well as for new discoveries. These factors are effectively combined under Barrick’s unique approach to integrated exploration, mineral resource management and planning.

Better understanding of the orebodies has required a great deal of work at the Nevada Gold Mines (NGM) joint venture and this is now beginning to pay off. Drilling programs are currently under way at all priority targets, including Leeville, Sphinx, Carlin Basin and Pipeline-Robertson. Leeville is yielding robust high-grade results and newly identified controls are opening up peripheral targets. At Robertson, step-out drilling suggests considerable near-surface upside and the potential for additional discoveries. Exploration declines at Goldrush, now in ore, are continuing to test extensions.

During the past quarter, notable advances were also made at Loulo-Gounkoto, Kibali and Jabal Sayid.

In the greater Loulo district, new styles of mineralization have been found in Senegal, a potential discovery is emerging at Yalea Ridge and there are exciting drill intercepts beneath the Loulo 1 orebody. There are also at least three major structures immediately south of Gounkoto with extensive anomalism pointing to a potentially significant orebody nearby.

At Kibali, Kalimva is showing some very promising results and a recent reinterpretation of the geological framework has highlighted an area with many structural similarities to the world-class KCD orebody immediately to the east.

LOGO

At Jabal Sayid, a wide and high-grade intercept well outside the known orebody, points to potentially significant mine life extensions.

On the new discoveries front, generative and grassroots exploration is building a pipeline of targets across all regions, with a particular focus on Latin America, says Rob Krcmarov, Barrick’s exploration and growth executive.

“There’s a high turnover of projects being evaluated, with the emphasis on geological models and prospectivity. The Zambrana target along strike from Pueblo Viejo is returning encouraging results and at Veladero, drilling at Lama East appears to have intersected strong near surface mineralisation, confirming the potential of the unexplored region between Veladero and Lama. Drilling is continuing to refine our understanding of the controls on mineralization at Alturas-Del Carmen and Pascua-Lama,” he says.

Barrick also continues to review new business opportunities, capable of meeting its investment criteria, outside its existing portfolio.

 

 

 

BIODIVERSITY ACTION PLANS PROTECT ECOSYSTEMS,

PROMOTE CONSERVATION AROUND BARRICK MINES

Barrick has implemented biodiversity action plans at all its operational sites to manage their impact on sensitive ecosystems as well as to support conservation efforts in the wilderness areas around some of its mines.

 

In its latest conservation initiative, Barrick has entered into an agreement with the government of Mali to assume responsibility for the rehabilitation of the neglected Fina Reserve. Classified as a biosphere reserve by UNESCO in 1982, Fina has since suffered from under-investment and mismanagement.

Under the agreement, the company will invest $5 million in Fina over the next five years to establish anti-poaching programs, rehabilitate the lands and forests as well as reintroduce lost animal species. In line with Barrick’s partnership philosophy, it has established a board of governors which includes prominent Malian businesspeople

 

 

BARRICK FIRST QUARTER 2021   4   PRESS RELEASE


and representatives of Africa Parks. The expert NGO, Bios, has been appointed to manage the park and an introductory meeting has been held with local communities.

“Our ultimate aim is to transform Fina into an internationally recognized national park for Mali,” says group sustainability executive Grant Beringer.

In the Democratic Republic of Congo, Barrick already supports the Garamba National Park, one of Africa’s oldest

and a UNESCO World Heritage Site. Garamba is home to the DRC’s largest elephant population as well as the critically endangered Kordofan giraffe. The company provides elephant tracking collars, fuel for observation and anti-poaching aircraft as well as funding the improvement of roads, bridges and other infrastructure. Since the program began in September 2019, not a single incident of elephant poaching has been recorded. The next step will be the reintroduction of white rhino and giant eland to the park.

 

 

LOGO   The recent collaring of an elephant in Garamba National Park in the DRC. Since 2014, the Kibali mine has partnered with the park to promote conservation and combat poaching.

ESG IN ACTION: TANZANIA SHOWS THE WAY

When Barrick took over operational control of its Tanzanian assets under two years ago, it faced daunting challenges: a government that was actively hostile to the mining industry in general and the former operator in particular; serious environmental issues which had halted production at North Mara; long-standing land disputes; allegations of human rights abuses; and a non-existent social licence to operate.

 

Since then, Barrick has formed a pioneering partnership with the government, through which they will share the economic benefits generated by the mines. These have not only been brought back into production but have been set on course to potentially become another Tier One complex for the company. Barrick has settled the land disputes and resolved other grievances and is dealing with historical human rights accusations in an open and transparent way.

Barrick has an absolute and unwavering commitment to minimizing the environmental impact of its operations, and its first priority was to fix the Tailings Storage Facility (TSF) and the water management situation at North Mara, says Grant Beringer, group sustainability executive.

The company will invest $65 million in water management initiatives, which has included an upgrade of the water treatment plant, increasing its capacity 16-fold, and has drained the excess water from the TSF, bringing it back to within its permit levels. The next big project is a brine plant, the first of its kind in African mining, which will reduce the volume of salts and increase their concentration to allow for safe storage in the TSF. This plant is scheduled for commissioning in the third quarter of this year.

Community development committees have been established at the mines, and through consultation with these and the

authorities, Barrick reached agreement on land compensation rates. To date, almost all the compensation has been paid in a process overseen by the government, the local authorities and the affected communities.

Barrick has worked with independent specialists Avanzar to update its human rights policies, standards and procedures, and to develop human rights workshops for managers and supervisors, the first of which was held in January of this year. Avanzar has also conducted a human rights impact assessment.

The international security provider has been replaced by a local company with close community ties, the mines’ relationship with the police has been reviewed to establish clear boundaries, and arms and ammunition are no longer stored on site.

“While there is still a lot of work to be done, we are encouraged by the progress we have made in establishing Barrick’s social licence to operate in Tanzania and in transforming moribund mines into a valuable addition to our global portfolio. The fact that ESG is so deeply ingrained in Barrick meant that we did not have to invent a strategy for dealing with Tanzania — we simply applied our existing principles and procedures,” he says.

 

 

BARRICK FIRST QUARTER 2021   5   PRESS RELEASE


NEVADA GOLD MINES:

WORLD CLASS ASSETS AND A GREAT FUTURE

Nevada Gold Mines, the joint venture formed in July 2019 by industry leaders Barrick and Newmont, is maturing rapidly, with a high-confidence 10-year plan in place and the focus shifting to a 15-year plan. The world’s largest gold mining complex, NGM is majority-owned and operated by Barrick.

 

Mineral Resource Manager for North America, Grigore Simon, says rapid progress in improving orebody knowledge has opened up resource growth and exploration opportunities, notably at North Leeville, Ren, Robertson, Turquoise Ridge and Carlin. The integrated leadership team has also continued to realize the value-creating synergies presented by the joint venture through reallocating resources between mine sites, and sharing skills and equipment to maximize returns.

At the same time, NGM has been reinforcing its social licence to operate by building strong relationships with its local communities, the counties, the state and the federal agencies. Community support initiatives include the Elko broadband project, which will bring reliable high-speed internet services to an area with some of the lowest connectivity in the USA. Another is the I-80 Fund. Originally established to provide relief to small businesses impacted by Covid-19, it has since evolved into a rural development fund to stimulate economic growth in Northern Nevada. NGM’s Heritage Fund matches employee and company contributions to fund essential programs and services prioritized by employees.

To ensure that community needs are being met, advisory groups consisting of local stakeholders have been formed to nominate development projects for investment by NGM.

“These community development committees provide a forum for two-way engagement between stakeholders and NGM, and to forge mutually beneficial partnerships working together to build long-term economic sustainability in these regions,” says Alissa Wood, head of communities and corporate affairs.

NGM has a strong track record in environmental remediation and reclamation, and is a committed custodian of Nevada’s unique lands, waters, flora and fauna. In support of the state’s carbon-reduction objectives, NGM is converting its TS coal power plant to a dual fuel process which will enable it to generate power from natural gas. The conversion will allow NGM to eliminate 563,000 tonnes of carbon dioxide equivalent emissions per year. Its clean energy strategy also includes the installation of over 200MW of solar power. Together, these have the potential to reduce NGM’s emissions by 20% by 2025 — the equivalent of taking around 150,000 cars off the road.

NGM is currently gearing up for its first virtual investor site visit and information day, which will take place on May 25, 2021.

 

 

PARTNERSHIP AND PERSEVERANCE PAY OFF

AT PORGERA

The Porgera gold mine is set to resume operations later this year after the Papua New Guinea (PNG) government and Barrick Niugini Limited (BNL) agreed on a partnership for its future ownership and operation.

 

Porgera has been on care and maintenance since April 2020 when the government declined to renew its special mining lease.

Under the terms of a binding framework agreement, ownership of Porgera will be held by a new joint venture owned 51% by PNG stakeholders and 49% by BNL. BNL remains the operator of the mine and will provide the capital required to restart it. PNG and BNL will share the economic benefits created by Porgera on a 53/47% basis over the life of mine.

Barrick president and chief executive Mark Bristow said the agreement was the product of a long and intense negotiation process which eventually delivered a fair outcome for both parties.

LOGO

“We intend to partner with all key stakeholders to make Porgera a world-class long-life gold mine,” he said.

The parties are currently working towards the signing of definitive agreements, at which time full work on restarting the mine will commence.

 

 

BARRICK FIRST QUARTER 2021   6   PRESS RELEASE


PUEBLO VIEJO MAINTAINS MAJOR CONTRIBUTION

TO DOMINICAN ECONOMY

Pueblo Viejo paid $228 million in direct cash taxes and royalties in the first four months of this year, bringing its total tax and royalty payments to the government to more than $2.6 billion since production started in 2013.

 

The mine’s shareholders have received none of these cash distributions and are still recovering $1.2 billion from its initial investment of $3.5 billion. It is estimated that over the current life of the mine, from 2013 to an expected 2043, its total economic benefit will be in excess of $16 billion, of which the government will get 55% and the mine’s shareholders receive 45%.

Pueblo Viejo accounts for an average of 19% of the Dominican Republic’s annual corporate tax revenue, and in 2020 was responsible for 37% of the country’s total exports.

Last year it also contributed $346 million to the economy in the form of purchases from local suppliers and contractors.

Pueblo Viejo president Juana Barcelo says the mine’s expansion project will enable it to continue its social and economic contributions towards the development of the Dominican Republic for many years to come. Without this project, however, it would have to stop mining this year and the benefits to the Dominican economy, the State treasury as well as the employees, business partners and communities around the mine would cease.

 

 

LOGO

 

Pueblo Viejo

  

LOGO

 

Kibali

KIBALI MAKES STRONG START TO 2021,

CONTINUES TO REDUCE CARBON FOOTPRINT

The Barrick operated Kibali mine in the DRC produced 191,612 ounces of gold17 in the first quarter of 2021, keeping it on plan and on track to achieve its full year target, president and chief executive Mark Bristow told local media and stakeholders at a recent briefing in Kinshasa.

 

The mine’s underground operation again drove production and continuing improvements in the plant’s throughput and recovery rates also contributed to Kibali’s on-plan delivery. Efficiency improvement projects completed during the quarter, including an upgrade of the hoisting infrastructure, are expected to boost its performance further.

Power generation costs benefitted during the quarter from higher river levels as the mine’s three hydropower plants supplied the bulk of its energy requirements. The power grid was further enhanced by the installation of a 9MW battery support system. The new system will also decrease the need for diesel-generated backup, in line with the mine’s strategy of reducing its carbon footprint.

Strict adherence to Covid-19 prevention protocols largely shielded the mine from the impact of the pandemic’s second wave.

Looking ahead, Kibali continues to replace resources and secure further open pit opportunities to balance its underground mine, and to replace reserves and add flexibility to the operation in support of its robust 10-year plan.

Kibali maintained its investment in community development, among other things by advancing the Kibali-built Durba concrete road by 1.5km. The provision of additional potable water sources to the surrounding villages was also extended. During Q1, the mine launched an innovative campaign to stimulate the Durba economy by issuing local shopping vouchers to employees.

Bristow said that Kibali continued to support the DRC’s Garamba National Park, one of the oldest in Africa and a UNESCO World Heritage Site, and that there had not been a single instance of elephant poaching during 2020. The support program includes tracking collars for elephants, fuel for tracker aircraft and infrastructure improvements. A plan to reintroduce white rhino and giant eland to the park is the next big undertaking.

“We look forward to working closely with His Excellency President Felix Tshisekedi and his new coalition government in further strengthening our partnership with the DRC and to resolve certain outstanding issues around the mining code and the repatriation of cash,” Bristow said. Since the development of Kibali started in 2010, it has contributed $3.5 billion to the DRC’s economy.

 

 

BARRICK FIRST QUARTER 2021   7   PRESS RELEASE


LOULO-GOUNKOTO’S THIRD UNDERGROUND MINE

ON TRACK TO START PRODUCTION

Barrick’s giant Loulo-Gounkoto gold complex’s third underground mine has reached its first mining level and is scheduled to start delivering ore tonnes to the plant during the second quarter, president and chief executive Mark Bristow told a media briefing in Bamako recently.

 

At the same time, a prefeasibility study has started on two more mines on the Loulo permit: an underground operation at Loulo 3 and a large open pit at Yalea South. These, Bristow said, would add mining sources and improve feed flexibility, providing further support for the complex’s robust 10-year plan. Meanwhile exploration programs designed to replace depleted reserves are continuing to deliver good results.

The complex produced 193,014 ounces of gold in Q1 and is on track to achieve its full-year guidance of 640,000 to 700,000 ounces17. Given its strong performance and the relatively high gold price, the joint venture board paid a combined dividend for the Loulo-Gounkoto complex of $80 million in the quarter.

Covid-19 testing and care capacities were upgraded during the quarter through the acquisition of new equipment and the complex has been largely unaffected by the third wave of the pandemic.

Bristow said the complex was continuing to invest in the development of the local community. One of its latest initiatives is the Accelerator program, which trains smaller suppliers and service providers in all aspects of business to enable them to grow and diversify. In addition, they are mentored by some of Loulo-Gounkoto’s larger, long-established suppliers and contractors. Since the program was introduced eight months ago, 63% of the participants have diversified their revenue streams and 80% now have five-year growth plans and long-term goals.

“Loulo-Gounkoto remains a pillar of the Malian economy as well as a driver of local economic development. Over the past 24 years, Barrick and its legacy company Randgold Resources have contributed $7.7 billion to the economy, of which $3 billion went to the state in the form of dividends, taxes and royalties. Our long partnership with the country and its people is a testament to how mutually beneficial a relationship of this kind can be,” Bristow said.

 

 

LOGO

 

BARRICK FIRST QUARTER 2021   8   PRESS RELEASE


Appendix 1

2021 Operating and Capital Expenditure Guidance

 

GOLD PRODUCTION AND COSTS
      2021 forecast
attributable production
(000s oz)
   2021 forecast cost
of sales11 ($/oz)
   2021 forecast total
cash costs12 ($/oz)
  

2021 forecast all-in
sustaining costs12  ($/

oz)

Carlin (61.5%)18

   940 - 1,000    920 - 970    740 - 790    1,050 - 1,100

Cortez (61.5%)19

   500 - 550    1,000 - 1,050    700 - 750    940 - 990

Turquoise Ridge (61.5%)

   390 - 440    950 - 1,000    620 - 670    810 - 860

Phoenix (61.5%)

   100 - 120    1,800 - 1,850    725 - 775    970 - 1,020

Long Canyon (61.5%)

   140 - 160    800 - 850    180 - 230    240 - 290

Nevada Gold Mines (61.5%)

   2,100 - 2,250    980 - 1,030    660 - 710    910 - 960

Hemlo

   200 - 220    1,200 - 1,250    950 - 1,000    1,280 - 1,330

North America

   2,300 - 2,450    990 - 1,040    690 - 740    940 - 990

Pueblo Viejo (60%)

   470 - 510    880 - 930    520 - 570    760 - 810

Veladero (50%)

   130 - 150    1,510 - 1,560    820 - 870    1,720 - 1,770

Porgera (47.5%)20

           

Latin America & Asia Pacific

   600 - 660    1,050 - 1,100    600 - 650    1,000 - 1,050

Loulo-Gounkoto (80%)

   510 - 560    980 - 1,030    630 - 680    930 - 980

Kibali (45%)

   350 - 380    990 - 1,040    590 - 640    800 - 850

North Mara (84%)

   240 - 270    970 - 1,020    740 - 790    960 - 1,010

Tongon (89.7%)

   180 - 200    1,470 - 1,520    1,000 - 1,050    1,140 - 1,190

Bulyanhulu (84%)

   170 - 200    980 - 1,030    580 - 630    810 - 860

Buzwagi (84%)

   30 - 40    1,360 - 1,410    1,250 - 1,300    1,230 - 1,280

Africa & Middle East

   1,500 - 1,600    1,050 - 1,100    690 - 740    920 - 970

Total Attributable to Barrick21,22,23

   4,400 - 4,700    1,020 - 1,070    680 - 730    970 - 1,020

COPPER PRODUCTION AND COSTS

      2021 forecast
attributable production
(Mlbs)
   2021 forecast cost
of sales13 ($/lb)
   2021 forecast C1
cash costs14 ($/lb)
   2021 forecast all-in
sustaining costs14 ($/lb)

Lumwana

   250 - 280    1.85 - 2.05    1.45 - 1.65    2.25 - 2.45

Zaldívar (50%)

   90 - 110    2.30 - 2.50    1.65 - 1.85    1.90 - 2.10

Jabal Sayid (50%)

   70 - 80    1.40 - 1.60    1.10 - 1.30    1.30 - 1.50

Total Attributable to Barrick22

   410 - 460    1.90 - 2.10    1.40 - 1.60    2.00 - 2.20

 

ATTRIBUTABLE CAPITAL EXPENDITURES

 

      ($ millions) 

Attributable minesite sustaining

     1,250 - 1,450  

Attributable project

     550 - 650   

Total attributable capital expenditures

     1,800 - 2,100  

2021 OUTLOOK ASSUMPTIONS AND ECONOMIC SENSITIVITY ANALYSIS24

 

      2021 Guidance
Assumption
   Hypothetical Change        Impact on EBITDA25    
(millions)
     Impact on TCC/C1 Cash Costs  
and AISC12,14

Gold price sensitivity

   $1,700/oz    +/- $100/oz    +/- $620    +/-$4/oz

Copper price sensitivity

   $2.75/lb    +/- $0.25/lb    +/- $60            +/- $0.01/lb        

 

BARRICK FIRST QUARTER 2021   9   PRESS RELEASE


Appendix 2

Production and Cost Summary - Gold

 

     For the three months ended
              3/31/21              12/31/20          % Change            3/31/20          % Change

Nevada Gold Mines LLC (61.5%)a

              

Gold produced (000s oz attributable basis)

     485      546    (11)%      526    (8)%

Gold produced (000s oz 100% basis)

     789      885    (11)%      855    (8)%

Cost of sales ($/oz)

     1,047      1,008    4 %      995    5 %

Total cash costs ($/oz)b

     686      667    3 %      690    (1)%

All-in sustaining costs ($/oz)b

     932      873    7 %      952    (2)%

Carlin (61.5%)c

              

Gold produced (000s oz attributable basis)

     229      260    (12)%      253    (9)%

Gold produced (000s oz 100% basis)

     373      422    (12)%      411    (9)%

Cost of sales ($/oz)

     950      917    4 %      970    (2)%

Total cash costs ($/oz)b

     766      740    4 %      776    (1)%

All-in sustaining costs ($/oz)b

     1,045      1,005    4 %      1,007    4 %

Cortez (61.5%)d

              

Gold produced (000s oz attributable basis)

     100      118    (15)%      128    (22)%

Gold produced (000s oz 100% basis)

     163      191    (15)%      208    (22)%

Cost of sales ($/oz)

     1,251      1,043    20 %      878    42 %

Total cash costs ($/oz)b

     860      738    17 %      614    40 %

All-in sustaining costs ($/oz)b

     1,203      906    33 %      1,009    19 %

Turquoise Ridge (61.5%)

              

Gold produced (000s oz attributable basis)

     92      91    1 %      84    9 %

Gold produced (000s oz 100% basis)

     149      147    1 %      137    9 %

Cost of sales ($/oz)

     1,007      1,064    (5)%      1,032    (2)%

Total cash costs ($/oz)b

     647      687    (6)%      668    (3)%

All-in sustaining costs ($/oz)b

     741      757    (2)%      806    (8)%

Phoenix (61.5%)

              

Gold produced (000s oz attributable basis)

     25      26    (3)%      35      (28)%

Gold produced (000s oz 100% basis)

     41      42    (3)%      57      (28)%

Cost of sales ($/oz)

     2,051      2,054    — %      1,583    30 %

Total cash costs ($/oz)b

     346      590    (41)%      737    (53)%

All-in sustaining costs ($/oz)b

     530      670    (21)%      914    (42)%

Long Canyon (61.5%)

              

Gold produced (000s oz attributable basis)

     39      51    (24)%      26      50 %

Gold produced (000s oz 100% basis)

     63      83    (24)%      42      50 %

Cost of sales ($/oz)

     511      674    (24)%      1,025    (50)%

Total cash costs ($/oz)b

     79      145    (46)%      345    (77)%

All-in sustaining costs ($/oz)b

     156      324    (52)%      561    (72)%

Pueblo Viejo (60%)

              

Gold produced (000s oz attributable basis)

     137      159    (14)%      143    (4)%

Gold produced (000s oz 100% basis)

     229      265    (14)%      238    (4)%

Cost of sales ($/oz)

     816      803    2 %      767    6 %

Total cash costs ($/oz)b

     507      493    3 %      502    1 %

All-in sustaining costs ($/oz)b

     689      689    — %      626    10 %

 

 

BARRICK FIRST QUARTER 2021   10   PRESS RELEASE


Production and Cost Summary - Gold (continued)

 

     For the three months ended  
              3/31/21              12/31/20          % Change              3/31/20          % Change  

Loulo-Gounkoto (80%)

              

Gold produced (000s oz attributable basis)

     154      123        26 %        141        9 %  

Gold produced (000s oz 100% basis)

     193      153      26 %        177      9 %  

Cost of sales ($/oz)

     974      1,149      (15)%        1,002      (3)%  

Total cash costs ($/oz)b

     608      734      (17)%        614      (1)%  

All-in sustaining costs ($/oz)b

     920      923      — %        891      3 %  

Kibali (45%)

              

Gold produced (000s oz attributable basis)

     86      92      (6)%        91      (5)%  

Gold produced (000s oz 100% basis)

     192      205      (6)%        201      (5)%  

Cost of sales ($/oz)

     1,065      1,163      (8)%        1,045      2 %  

Total cash costs ($/oz)b

     691      616      12 %        582      19 %  

All-in sustaining costs ($/oz)b

     856      783      9 %        773      11 %  

Veladero (50%)

              

Gold produced (000s oz attributable basis)

     32      58      (45)%        75      (57)%  

Gold produced (000s oz 100% basis)

     64        116      (45)%        150      (57)%  

Cost of sales ($/oz)

     1,151      1,074      7 %        1,182      (3)%  

Total cash costs ($/oz)b

     736      698      5 %        788      (7)%  

All-in sustaining costs ($/oz)b

     2,104      1,428      47 %        1,266      66 %  

Porgera (47.5%)e

              

Gold produced (000s oz attributable basis)

                      62      (100)%  

Gold produced (000s oz 100% basis)

                      131        (100)%  

Cost of sales ($/oz)

                      1,097      (100)%  

Total cash costs ($/oz)b

                      941      (100)%  

All-in sustaining costs ($/oz)b

                            1,089      (100)%  

Tongon (89.7%)

              

Gold produced (000s oz attributable basis)

     48        66        (26)%        61        (21)%  

Gold produced (000s oz 100% basis)

     54        73      (26)%        68      (21)%  

Cost of sales ($/oz)

     1,510      1,371      10 %        1,368      10 %  

Total cash costs ($/oz)b

     995      810      23 %        762      31 %  

All-in sustaining costs ($/oz)b

     1,062      853      25 %        788      35 %  

Hemlo

              

Gold produced (000s oz)

     47        57        (18)%        57        (18)%  

Cost of sales ($/oz)

     1,610      1,379      17 %        1,119      44 %  

Total cash costs ($/oz)b

     1,324      1,104      20 %        945      40 %  

All-in sustaining costs ($/oz)b

     1,840      1,464      26 %        1,281      44 %  

North Mara (84%)

              

Gold produced (000s oz attributable basis)

     62        61        1 %        65        (4)%  

Gold produced (000s oz 100% basis)

     74        73      1 %        77      (4)%  

Cost of sales ($/oz)

     1,061      1,073      (1)%        959      11 %  

Total cash costs ($/oz)b

     832      799      4 %        646      29 %  

All-in sustaining costs ($/oz)b

     1,038      989      5 %        816      27 %  

 

 

BARRICK FIRST QUARTER 2021   11   PRESS RELEASE


Production and Cost Summary - Gold (continued)

 

     For the three months ended  
              3/31/21              12/31/20          % Change              3/31/20          % Change  

Buzwagi (84%)

              

Gold produced (000s oz attributable basis)

     17        21        (20)%        22        (25)%  

Gold produced (000s oz 100% basis)

     20      25        (20)%        27        (25)%  

Cost of sales ($/oz)

     1,486      1,314      13 %        1,373      8 %  

Total cash costs ($/oz)b

     1,450      1,267      14 %        1,275      14 %  

All-in sustaining costs ($/oz)b

     1,467      1,283      14 %        1,288      14 %  

Bulyanhulu (84%)

              

Gold produced (000s oz attributable basis)

     33        23        44 %        7        352 %  

Gold produced (000s oz 100% basis)

     39      27      44 %        9      352 %  

Cost of sales ($/oz)

     1,211      1,181      3 %        1,685      (28)%  

Total cash costs ($/oz)b

     865      610      42 %        686      26 %  

All-in sustaining costs ($/oz)b

     957      664      44 %        906      6 %  

Total Attributable to Barrickf

              

Gold produced (000s oz)

     1,101      1,206      (9)%        1,250      (12)%  

Cost of sales ($/oz)g

     1,073      1,065      1 %        1,020      5 %  

Total cash costs ($/oz)b

     716      692      3 %        692      3 %  

All-in sustaining costs ($/oz)b

     1,018      929      10 %        954      7 %  

 

a.

These results represent our 61.5% interest in Carlin (including NGM’s 60% interest in South Arturo), Cortez, Turquoise Ridge, Phoenix and Long Canyon.

 

b.

These are non-GAAP financial performance measures with no standardized meaning under IFRS and therefore may not be comparable to similar measures presented by other issuers. For further information and a detailed reconciliation of each non-GAAP measure used in this section of the press release to the most directly comparable IFRS measure, please see the endnotes to this press release.

 

c.

Included within our 61.5% interest in Carlin is NGM’s 60% interest in South Arturo.

 

d.

Starting in the first quarter of 2021, Goldrush is reported as part of Cortez as it is operated by Cortez management. Comparative periods have been restated to include Goldrush.

 

e.

As Porgera was placed on care and maintenance on April 25, 2020, no operating data or per ounce data is provided.

 

f.

Excludes Pierina, Lagunas Norte, Golden Sunlight, and Morila (40%) up until its divestiture in November 2020, as these assets are producing incidental ounces while in closure or care and maintenance.

 

g.

Gold cost of sales per ounce is calculated as cost of sales across our gold operations (excluding sites in care and maintenance) divided by ounces sold (both on an attributable basis using Barrick’s ownership share).

 

 

BARRICK FIRST QUARTER 2021   12   PRESS RELEASE


Production and Cost Summary - Copper

 

     For the three months ended
      3/31/21                12/31/20              % Change              3/31/20          % Change

Lumwana

              

Copper production (Mlbs)

     51        78      (35)%      64      (20)%

Cost of sales ($/lb)

     1.97      1.96    1 %      1.94    2 %

C1 cash costs ($/lb)a

     1.48      1.58    (6)%      1.63    (9)%

All-in sustaining costs ($/lb)a

     2.37      2.60    (9)%      2.26    5 %

Zaldívar (50%)

              

Copper production (Mlbs attributable basis)

     24        23      4 %      31    (23)%

Copper production (Mlbs 100% basis)

     48        46      4 %      62    (23)%

Cost of sales ($/lb)

     3.03      2.68    13 %      2.39    27 %

C1 cash costs ($/lb)a

     2.25      2.01    12 %      1.71    32 %

All-in sustaining costs ($/lb)a

     2.47      2.70    (9)%      1.99    24 %

Jabal Sayid (50%)

              

Copper production (Mlbs attributable basis)

     18        18      0 %      20      (10)%

Copper production (Mlbs 100% basis)

     36      36    0 %      40      (10)%

Cost of sales ($/lb)

     1.21      1.53    (21)%      1.28    (5)%

C1 cash costs ($/lb)a

     1.06      1.15    (8)%      0.97    9 %

All-in sustaining costs ($/lb)a

     1.22      1.27    (4)%      1.11    10 %

Total Attributable to Barrick

              

Copper production (Mlbs attributable basis)

     93      119    (22)%      115      (19)%

Cost of sales ($/lb)b

     2.11      2.06    2 %      1.96    8 %

C1 cash costs ($/lb)a

     1.60      1.61    (1)%      1.55    3 %

All-in sustaining costs ($/lb)a

     2.26      2.42    (7)%      2.04    11 %

 

a.

These are non-GAAP financial performance measures with no standardized meaning under IFRS and therefore may not be comparable to similar measures presented by other issuers. For further information and a detailed reconciliation of each non-GAAP measure used in this section of the press release to the most directly comparable IFRS measure, please see the endnotes to this press release.

 

 

b.

Copper cost of sales per pound is calculated as cost of sales across our copper operations divided by pounds sold (both on an attributable basis using Barrick’s ownership share).

 

 

BARRICK FIRST QUARTER 2021   13   PRESS RELEASE


Technical Information

The scientific and technical information contained in this press release has been reviewed and approved by Steven Yopps, MMSA, Manager of Growth Projects, Nevada Gold Mines; Craig Fiddes, SME-RM, Manager – Resource Modeling, Nevada Gold Mines; Chad Yuhasz, P.Geo, Mineral Resource Manager, Latin America & Asia Pacific; Simon Bottoms, CGeol, MGeol, FGS, FAusIMM, Mineral Resources Manager: Africa & Middle East; Rodney Quick, MSc, Pr. Sci.Nat, Mineral Resource Management and Evaluation Executive; John Steele, CIM, Metallurgy, Engineering and Capital Projects Executive; and Rob Krcmarov, FAusIMM, Executive Vice President, Exploration and Growth – each a “Qualified Person” as defined in National Instrument 43-101Standards of Disclosure for Mineral Projects.

Endnotes

Endnote 1

A Tier One Gold Asset is an asset with a reserve potential to deliver a minimum 10-year life, annual production of at least 500,000 ounces of gold and total cash costs per ounce over the mine life that are in the lower half of the industry cost curve.

Endnote 2

Calculated as cash ($5,672 million) less debt ($5,153 million).

Endnote 3

“Free cash flow” is a non-GAAP financial performance measure that deducts capital expenditures from net cash provided by operating activities. Barrick believes this to be a useful indicator of our ability to operate without reliance on additional borrowing or usage of existing cash. Free cash flow is intended to provide additional information only and does not have any standardized meaning under IFRS and may not be comparable to similar measures of performance presented by other companies. Free cash flow should not be considered in isolation or as a substitute for measures of performance prepared in accordance with IFRS. Further details on this non-GAAP measure are provided in the MD&A accompanying Barrick’s financial statements filed from time to time on SEDAR at www.sedar.com and on EDGAR at www.sec.gov.

Reconciliation of Net Cash Provided by Operating Activities to Free Cash Flow

 

($ millions)    For the three months ended  
               3/31/21             12/31/20             3/31/20  

Net cash provided by operating activities

     1,302     1,638     889

Capital expenditures

     (539     (546     (451

Free cash flow

     763     1,092     438

Endnote 4

The declaration and payment of dividends is at the discretion of the Board of Directors, and will depend on the company’s financial results, cash requirements, future prospects and other factors deemed relevant by the Board.

Endnote 5

Forecast yield for 2021 is based on the current quarterly dividend rate ($0.09 per share) and a return of capital distribution per share ($0.42) calculated based on our issued and outstanding shares as of March 31, 2021, which is subject to change.

Endnote 6

“Adjusted net earnings” and “adjusted net earnings per share” are non-GAAP financial performance measures. Adjusted net earnings excludes the following from net earnings: certain impairment charges (reversals) related to intangibles, goodwill, property, plant and equipment, and investments; gains (losses) and other one-time costs relating to acquisitions or dispositions; foreign currency translation gains (losses); significant tax adjustments not related to current period earnings; and the tax effect and non-controlling interest of these items. The Company uses this measure internally to evaluate our underlying operating performance for the reporting periods presented and to assist with the planning and forecasting of future operating results. Barrick believes that adjusted net earnings is a useful measure of our performance because these adjusting items do not reflect the underlying operating performance of our core mining business and are not necessarily indicative of future operating results. Adjusted net earnings and adjusted net earnings per share are intended to provide additional information only and do not have any standardized meaning under IFRS and may not be comparable to similar measures of performance presented by other companies. They should not be considered in isolation or as a substitute for measures of performance prepared in accordance with IFRS. Further details on these non-GAAP measures are provided in the MD&A accompanying Barrick’s financial statements filed from time to time on SEDAR at www.sedar.com and on EDGAR at www.sec.gov.

 

BARRICK FIRST QUARTER 2021   14   PRESS RELEASE


Reconciliation of Net Earnings to Net Earnings per Share, Adjusted Net Earnings and Adjusted Net Earnings per Share

 

($ millions, except per share amounts in dollars)    For the three months ended  
               3/31/21               12/31/20               3/31/20  

Net earnings attributable to equity holders of the Company

     538     685     400

Impairment charges (reversals) related to intangibles, goodwill, property, plant and equipment, and investmentsa

     (89     40     (336

Acquisition/disposition (gains) lossesb

     (3     (126     (60

Loss (gain) on currency translation

     4     16     16

Significant tax adjustmentsc

     47     (2     (44

Other expense adjustmentsd

     11     15     98

Tax effect and non-controlling intereste

     (1     (12     211

Adjusted net earnings

     507     616     285

Net earnings per sharef

     0.30     0.39     0.22

Adjusted net earnings per sharef

     0.29     0.35     0.16

 

a.

For the three month period ended March 31, 2021, net impairment reversals primarily relate to non-current asset reversals at Lagunas Norte. Net impairment charges (reversals) for the three month periods ended December 31, 2020 and March 31, 2020 mainly relate to non-current assets at our Tanzanian assets.

b.

Acquisition/disposition gains for the three month period ended December 31, 2020 primarily relate to the gain on the sale of Eskay Creek, Morila and Bullfrog. For the three months ended March 31, 2020, acquisition/disposition gains mainly relate to the gain on the sale of Massawa.

c.

Significant tax adjustments for the three month period ended March 31, 2021 mainly relates to the remeasurement of deferred tax balances for changes in foreign currency rates and the recognition/derecognition of our deferred taxes in various jurisdictions. For the three months ended March 31, 2020, significant tax adjustments primarily relate to deferred tax recoveries as a result of tax reform measures in Argentina and adjustments made in recognition of the net settlement of all outstanding disputes with the Government of Tanzania.

d.

Other expense adjustments for the three month periods ended March 31, 2021 and December 31, 2020 mainly relate to care and maintenance expenses at Porgera. For the three months ended March 31, 2020, other expense adjustments primarily relate to the impact of changes in the discount rate assumptions on our closed mine rehabilitation provision and losses on debt extinguishment.

e.

Tax effect and non-controlling interest for the three month period ended March 31, 2020 primarily relates to the net impairment reversals related to long-lived assets and acquisition gains.

f.

Calculated using weighted average number of shares outstanding under the basic method of earnings per share.

Endnote 7

“Realized price” is a non-GAAP financial measure which excludes from sales: unrealized gains and losses on non-hedge derivative contracts; unrealized mark-to-market gains and losses on provisional pricing from copper and gold sales contracts; sales attributable to ore purchase arrangements; treatment and refining charges; export duties; and cumulative catch-up adjustments to revenue relating to our streaming arrangements. This measure is intended to enable Management to better understand the price realized in each reporting period for gold and copper sales because unrealized mark-to-market values of non-hedge gold and copper derivatives are subject to change each period due to changes in market factors such as market and forward gold and copper prices, so that prices ultimately realized may differ from those recorded. The exclusion of such unrealized mark-to-market gains and losses from the presentation of this performance measure enables investors to understand performance based on the realized proceeds of selling gold and copper production. The realized price measure is intended to provide additional information and does not have any standardized definition under IFRS and should not be considered in isolation or as a substitute for measures of performance prepared in accordance with IFRS. Further details on these non-GAAP measures are provided in the MD&A accompanying Barrick’s financial statements filed from time to time on SEDAR at www.sedar.com and on EDGAR at www.sec.gov.

Reconciliation of Sales to Realized Price per ounce/pound

 

($ millions, except per ounce/pound information in dollars)    Gold     Copper  
      For the three months ended  
       3/31/21       12/31/20       3/31/20       3/31/21        12/31/20        3/31/20  

Sales

     2,641     3,028     2,593     256      195        99

Sales applicable to non-controlling interests

     (814     (934     (770     0      0        0

Sales applicable to equity method investmentsa,b

     154     168       147     170      135        107

Realized non-hedge gold/copper derivative (losses) gains

     0     0       0     0      0        0

Sales applicable to sites in care and maintenancec

     (41     (41     (46     0      0        0

Treatment and refinement charges

     0     1       0     41      39        39

Otherd

     0     (1     15     0      0        0

Revenues – as adjusted

     1,940     2,221       1,939     467      369        245

Ounces/pounds sold (000s ounces/millions pounds)c

     1,093     1,186       1,220     113      108        110

Realized gold/copper price per ounce/pounde

     1,777     1,871       1,589     4.12      3.39        2.23

 

a.

Represents sales of $154 million for the three month period ended March 31, 2021 (December 31, 2020: $168 million and March 31, 2020: $140 million) applicable to our 45% equity method investment in Kibali for gold. Represents sales of $109 million for the three months ended March 31, 2021 (December 31, 2020: $82 million and March 31, 2020: $72 million) applicable to our 50% equity method investment in Zaldívar and $65 million (December 31, 2020: $59 million and March 31, 2020: $40 million) applicable to our 50% equity method investment in Jabal Sayid for copper.

b.

Sales applicable to equity method investments are net of treatment and refinement charges.

c.

Figures exclude: Pierina, Lagunas Norte, Golden Sunlight, and Morila up until its divestiture in November 2020 from the calculation of realized price per ounce. These assets are producing incidental ounces.

 

 

 

BARRICK FIRST QUARTER 2021   15   PRESS RELEASE


d.

Represents a cumulative catch-up adjustment to revenue relating to our streaming arrangements. Refer to note 2f of the 2020 Annual Financial Statements for more information.

e.

Realized price per ounce/pound may not calculate based on amounts presented in this table due to rounding.

Endnote 8

On an attributable basis.

Endnote 9

Net earnings represents net earnings attributable to the equity holders of the Company.

Endnote 10

These amounts are presented on the same basis as our guidance.

Endnote 11

Gold cost of sales per ounce is calculated as cost of sales across our gold operations (excluding sites in care and maintenance) divided by ounces sold (both on an attributable basis using Barrick’s ownership share). Copper cost of sales per pound is calculated as cost of sales across our copper operations divided by pounds sold (both on an attributable basis using Barrick’s ownership share).

Endnote 12

“Total cash costs” per ounce, “All-in sustaining costs” per ounce and “All-in costs” per ounce are non-GAAP financial performance measures. “Total cash costs” per ounce starts with cost of sales related to gold production and removes depreciation, the non-controlling interest of cost of sales, and includes by product credits. “All-in sustaining costs” per ounce start with “Total cash costs” per ounce and add further costs which reflect the expenditures made to maintain current production levels, primarily sustaining capital expenditures, sustaining leases, general & administrative costs, minesite exploration and evaluation costs, and reclamation cost accretion and amortization. “All-in costs” per ounce starts with “All-in sustaining costs” per ounce and adds additional costs that reflect the varying costs of producing gold over the life-cycle of a mine, including: project capital expenditures and other non-sustaining costs. Barrick believes that the use of “Total cash costs” per ounce, “All-in sustaining costs” per ounce and “All-in costs” per ounce will assist investors, analysts and other stakeholders in understanding the costs associated with producing gold, understanding the economics of gold mining, assessing our operating performance and also our ability to generate free cash flow from current operations and to generate free cash flow on an overall Company basis. “Total cash costs” per ounce, “All-in sustaining costs” per ounce and “All-in costs” per ounce are intended to provide additional information only and do not have any standardized meaning under IFRS. Although a standardized definition of all-in sustaining costs was published in 2013 by the World Gold Council (a market development organization for the gold industry comprised of and funded by gold mining companies from around the world, including Barrick), it is not a regulatory organization, and other companies may calculate this measure differently. These measures should not be considered in isolation or as a substitute for measures prepared in accordance with IFRS. Further details on these non-GAAP measures are provided in the MD&A accompanying Barrick’s financial statements filed from time to time on SEDAR at www.sedar.com and on EDGAR at www.sec.gov.

 

BARRICK FIRST QUARTER 2021   16   PRESS RELEASE


Reconciliation of Gold Cost of Sales to Total cash costs, All-in sustaining costs and All-in costs, including on a per ounce basis

 

($ millions, except per ounce information in dollars)            For the three months ended  
       Footnote            3/31/21           12/31/20               3/31/20  

Cost of sales applicable to gold production

        1,571     1,681     1,643

Depreciation

        (454     (495     (474

Cash cost of sales applicable to equity method investments

        59     69     52

By-product credits

        (59     (56     (29

Realized (gains) losses on hedge and non-hedge derivatives

     a        0     (1     0

Non-recurring items

     b        0     1     0

Other

     c        (33     (55     (27

Non-controlling interests

     d        (302     (323     (316

Total cash costs

              782     821     849

General & administrative costs

        38     24     40

Minesite exploration and evaluation costs

     e        16     22     15

Minesite sustaining capital expenditures

     f        405     354     370

Sustaining leases

        13     12     0

Rehabilitation - accretion and amortization (operating sites)

     g        11     11     14

Non-controlling interest, copper operations and other

     h        (154     (142     (125

All-in sustaining costs

              1,111     1,102     1,163

Project exploration and evaluation and project costs

     e        45     52     56

Community relations costs not related to current operations

        0     0     1

Project capital expenditures

     f        131     184     76

Non-sustaining leases

        0     4     0

Rehabilitation - accretion and amortization (non-operating sites)

     g        3     4     2

Non-controlling interest and copper operations and other

     h        (42     (61     (33

All-in costs

              1,248     1,285     1,265

Ounces sold - equity basis (000s ounces)

     i        1,093     1,186     1,220

Cost of sales per ounce

     j,k        1,073     1,065     1,020

Total cash costs per ounce

     k        716     692     692

Total cash costs per ounce (on a co-product basis)

     k,l        746     718     705

All-in sustaining costs per ounce

     k        1,018     929     954

All-in sustaining costs per ounce (on a co-product basis)

     k,l        1,048     955     967

All-in costs per ounce

     k        1,144     1,083     1,035

All-in costs per ounce (on a co-product basis)

     k,l        1,174     1,109     1,048

 

a.

Realized (gains) losses on hedge and non-hedge derivatives

Includes realized hedge losses of $nil for the three month period ended March 31, 2021 (December 31, 2020: $nil and March 31, 2020: $nil), and realized non-hedge losses of $nil for the three month period ended March 31, 2021 (December 31, 2020: gains of $1 million and March 31, 2020: $nil). Refer to Note 5 to the Financial Statements for further information.

 

b.

Non-recurring items

These costs are not indicative of our cost of production and have been excluded from the calculation of total cash costs.

 

c.

Other

Other adjustments for the three month period ended March 31, 2021 include the removal of total cash costs and by-product credits associated with Pierina, Lagunas Norte, Golden Sunlight and Morila up until its divestiture in November 2020, which all are producing incidental ounces, of $24 million (December 31, 2020: $26 million; March 31, 2020: $25 million).

 

d.

Non-controlling interests

Non-controlling interests include non-controlling interests related to gold production of $462 million for the three month period ended March 31, 2021 (December 31, 2020: $490 million and March 31, 2020: $466 million). Non-controlling interests include Nevada Gold Mines, Pueblo Viejo, Loulo-Gounkoto, Tongon, North Mara, Bulyanhulu, Buzwagi. Refer to Note 5 to the Financial Statements for further information.

 

e.

Exploration and evaluation costs

Exploration, evaluation and project expenses are presented as minesite sustaining if it supports current mine operations and project if it relates to future projects. Refer to page 68 of the Q1 2021 MD&A.

 

f.

Capital expenditures

Capital expenditures are related to our gold sites only and are split between minesite sustaining and project capital expenditures. Project capital expenditures are distinct projects designed to increase the net present value of the mine and are not related to current production. Significant projects in the current year are the expansion project at Pueblo Viejo and construction of the Third Shaft at Turquoise Ridge. Refer to page 67 of the Q1 2021 MD&A.

 

g.

Rehabilitation—accretion and amortization

Includes depreciation on the assets related to rehabilitation provisions of our gold operations and accretion on the rehabilitation provision of our gold operations, split between operating and non-operating sites.

 

h.

Non-controlling interest and copper operations

 

BARRICK FIRST QUARTER 2021   17   PRESS RELEASE


Removes general & administrative costs related to non-controlling interests and copper based on a percentage allocation of revenue. Also removes exploration, evaluation and project expenses, rehabilitation costs and capital expenditures incurred by our copper sites and the non-controlling interest of Nevada Gold Mines (including South Arturo), Pueblo Viejo, Loulo-Gounkoto, Tongon, North Mara, Bulyanhulu, and Buzwagi operating segments. It also includes capital expenditures applicable to our equity method investment in Kibali. Figures remove the impact of Pierina, Lagunas Norte and Golden Sunlight. The impact is summarized as the following:

 

($ millions)    For the three months ended  
 Non-controlling interest, copper operations and other              3/31/21             12/31/20             3/31/20  

General & administrative costs

     (6     (5     (6

Minesite exploration and evaluation expenses

     (7     (9     (3

Rehabilitation - accretion and amortization (operating sites)

     (3     (3     (4

Minesite sustaining capital expenditures

     (138     (125     (112

All-in sustaining costs total

     (154     (142     (125

Project exploration and evaluation and project costs

     (1     (6     (19

Project capital expenditures

     (41     (55     (14

All-in costs total

     (42     (61     (33

 

i.

Ounces sold - equity basis

Figures remove the impact of: Pierina, Lagunas Norte, Golden Sunlight, and Morila up until its divestiture in November 2020, which are producing incidental ounces.

 

j.

Cost of sales per ounce

Figures remove the cost of sales impact of: Pierina of $5 million for the three month period ended March 31, 2021 (December 31, 2020: $4 million and March 31, 2020: $6 million); Golden Sunlight of $nil for the three month period ended March 31, 2021 (December 31, 2020: $nil and March 31, 2020: $nil); up until its divestiture in November of 2020, Morila, of $nil for the three month period ended March 31, 2021 (December 31, 2020: $2 million and March 31, 2020: $6 million); and Lagunas Norte of $23 million for the three month period ended March 31, 2021 (December 31, 2020: $26 million and March 31, 2020: $21 million), which are producing incidental ounces. Gold cost of sales per ounce is calculated as cost of sales across our gold operations (excluding sites in care and maintenance) divided by ounces sold (both on an attributable basis using Barrick’s ownership share).

 

k.

Per ounce figures

Cost of sales per ounce, total cash costs per ounce, all-in sustaining costs per ounce and all-in costs per ounce may not calculate based on amounts presented in this table due to rounding.

 

l.

Co-product costs per ounce

Total cash costs per ounce, all-in sustaining costs per ounce and all-in costs per ounce presented on a co-product basis removes the impact of by-product credits of our gold production (net of non-controlling interest) calculated as:

 

($ millions)    For the three months ended  
       
               3/31/21             12/31/20             3/31/20  

By-product credits

     59     56     29

Non-controlling interest

     (26     (27     (15

By-product credits (net of non-controlling interest)

     33     29     14

Endnote 13

Copper cost of sales per pound is calculated as cost of sales across our copper operations divided by pounds sold (both on an attributable basis using Barrick’s ownership share).

Endnote 14

“C1 cash costs” per pound and “All-in sustaining costs” per pound are non-GAAP financial performance measures. “C1 cash costs” per pound is based on cost of sales but excludes the impact of depreciation and royalties and production taxes and includes treatment and refinement charges. “All-in sustaining costs” per pound begins with “C1 cash costs” per pound and adds further costs which reflect the additional costs of operating a mine, primarily sustaining capital expenditures, general & administrative costs and royalties and production taxes. Barrick believes that the use of “C1 cash costs” per pound and “all-in sustaining costs” per pound will assist investors, analysts, and other stakeholders in understanding the costs associated with producing copper, understanding the economics of copper mining, assessing our operating performance, and also our ability to generate free cash flow from current operations and to generate free cash flow on an overall Company basis. “C1 cash costs” per pound and “All-in sustaining costs” per pound are intended to provide additional information only, do not have any standardized meaning under IFRS, and may not be comparable to similar measures of performance presented by other companies. These measures should not be considered in isolation or as a substitute for measures of performance prepared in accordance with IFRS. Further details on these non-GAAP measures are provided in the MD&A accompanying Barrick’s financial statements filed from time to time on SEDAR at www.sedar.com and on EDGAR at www.sec.gov.

 

 

BARRICK FIRST QUARTER 2021   18   PRESS RELEASE


Reconciliation of Copper Cost of Sales to C1 cash costs and All-in sustaining costs, including on a per pound basis

 

($ millions, except per pound information in dollars)    For the three months ended  
      

 

            3/31/21

 

 

 

   

 

        12/31/20

 

 

 

   

 

          3/31/20

 

 

 

Cost of sales

     136     125     124

Depreciation/amortization

     (48     (41     (43

Treatment and refinement charges

     41     39     39

Cash cost of sales applicable to equity method investments

     79     72     66

Less: royalties and production taxesa

     (23     (16     (11

By-product credits

     (4     (5     (3

Other

     0     0     0

C1 cash costs

     181     174     172

General & administrative costs

     4     5     3

Rehabilitation - accretion and amortization

     1     1     3

Royalties and production taxesa

     23     16     11

Minesite exploration and evaluation costs

     2     1     1

Minesite sustaining capital expenditures

     42     65     32

Sustaining leases

     2     2     3
       

All-in sustaining costs

     255     264     225

Pounds sold - consolidated basis (millions pounds)

     113     108     110

Cost of sales per poundb,c

     2.11     2.06     1.96

C1 cash cost per poundb

     1.60     1.61     1.55

All-in sustaining costs per poundb

     2.26     2.42     2.04

 

a.

For the three month period ended March 31, 2021, royalties and production taxes include royalties of $23 million (December 31, 2020: $16 million and March 31, 2020: $11 million).

b.

Cost of sales per pound, C1 cash costs per pound and all-in sustaining costs per pound may not calculate based on amounts presented in this table due to rounding.

c.

Copper cost of sales per pound is calculated as cost of sales across our copper operations divided by pounds sold (both on an attributable basis using Barrick’s ownership share).

Endnote 15

Return of capital distribution per share amounts are based on issued and outstanding Barrick shares as of March 31, 2021 and are subject to change.

Endnote 16

Source: Mining Intelligence and Company Reports. Based on 2020 production.

Endnote 17

On a 100% basis.

Endnote 18

Included within our 61.5% interest in Carlin is NGM’s 60% interest in South Arturo.

Endnote 19

Includes Goldrush.

Endnote 20

Porgera was placed on temporary care and maintenance in April 2020 and remains excluded from our 2021 guidance. On April 9, 2021, the Government of Papua New Guinea and BNL, the operator of the Porgera joint venture, signed a binding Framework Agreement in which they agreed on a partnership for Porgera’s future ownership and operation. We expect to update our guidance to include Porgera following both the execution of definitive agreements to implement the Framework Agreement and the finalization of a timeline for the resumption of full mine operations.

Endnote 21

Total cash costs and all-in sustaining costs per ounce include the impact of hedges and/or costs allocated to non-operating sites.

Endnote 22

Operating division guidance ranges reflect expectations at each individual operating division, and may not add up to the company-wide guidance range total. Guidance ranges exclude Pierina, Lagunas Norte, and Golden Sunlight, which are producing incidental ounces while in closure or care and maintenance.

 

 

BARRICK FIRST QUARTER 2021   19   PRESS RELEASE


Endnote 23

Includes corporate administration costs.

Endnote 24

Reflects the impact of the full year.

Endnote 25

EBITDA is a non-GAAP financial measure, which excludes the following from net earnings: income tax expense; finance costs; finance income; and depreciation. Management believes that EBITDA is a valuable indicator of our ability to generate liquidity by producing operating cash flow to fund working capital needs, service debt obligations, and fund capital expenditures. Management uses EBITDA for this purpose. Adjusted EBITDA removes the effect of impairment charges; acquisition/disposition gains/losses; foreign currency translation gains/losses; other expense adjustments; and the impact of the income tax expense, finance costs, finance income and depreciation incurred in our equity method accounted investments. We believe these items provide a greater level of consistency with the adjusting items included in our Adjusted Net Earnings reconciliation, with the exception that these amounts are adjusted to remove any impact on finance costs/income, income tax expense and/or depreciation as they do not affect EBITDA. We believe this additional information will assist analysts, investors and other stakeholders of Barrick in better understanding our ability to generate liquidity from our full business, including equity method investments, by excluding these amounts from the calculation as they are not indicative of the performance of our core mining business and not necessarily reflective of the underlying operating results for the periods presented. EBITDA and adjusted EBITDA are intended to provide additional information only and do not have any standardized meaning under IFRS and may not be comparable to similar measures of performance presented by other companies. They should not be considered in isolation or as a substitute for measures of performance prepared in accordance with IFRS. Further details on these non-GAAP measures are provided in the MD&A accompanying Barrick’s financial statements filed from time to time on SEDAR at www.sedar.com and on EDGAR at www.sec.gov.

Reconciliation of Net Earnings to EBITDA and Adjusted EBITDA

 

($ millions)    For the three months ended  
      

 

            3/31/21

 

 

 

   

 

        12/31/20

 

 

 

   

 

          3/31/20

 

 

 

Net earnings

     830     1,058     663

Income tax expense

     374     404     386

Finance costs, neta

     77     72     88

Depreciation

     507     544     524

EBITDA

     1,788     2,078     1,661

Impairment charges (reversals) of long-lived assetsb

     (89     40     (336

Acquisition/disposition (gains) lossesc

     (3     (126     (60

Loss on currency translation

     4     16     16

Other expense (income) adjustmentsd

     11     15     98

Income tax expense, net finance costs, and depreciation from equity investees

     89     83     87

Adjusted EBITDA

     1,800     2,106     1,466

 

a.

Finance costs exclude accretion.

b.

For the three month period ended March 31, 2021, net impairment reversals primarily relate to non-current asset reversals at Lagunas Norte. Net impairment charges (reversals) for the three month periods ended December 31, 2020 and March 31, 2020 mainly relate to non-current assets at our Tanzanian assets.

c.

Acquisition/disposition gains for the three month period ended December 31, 2020 primarily relate to the gain on the sale of Eskay Creek, Morila and Bullfrog. For the three months ended March 31, 2020, acquisition/disposition gains mainly relate to the gain on the sale of Massawa.

d.

Other expense adjustments for the three month periods ended March 31, 2021 and December 31, 2020 mainly relate to care and maintenance expenses at Porgera. For the three months ended March 31, 2020, other expense adjustments primarily relate to the impact of changes in the discount rate assumptions on our closed mine rehabilitation provision and losses on debt extinguishment.

 

 

BARRICK FIRST QUARTER 2021   20   PRESS RELEASE


Corporate Office

Barrick Gold Corporation

161 Bay Street, Suite 3700

Toronto, Ontario M5J 2S1

Canada

Telephone: +1 416 861-9911

Email: [email protected]

Website: www.barrick.com

Shares Listed

GOLD     The New York Stock Exchange

ABX        The Toronto Stock Exchange

Transfer Agents and Registrars

AST Trust Company (Canada)

P.O. Box 700, Postal Station B

Montreal, Quebec H3B 3K3

or

American Stock Transfer & Trust Company, LLC

6201 – 15 Avenue

Brooklyn, New York 11219

Telephone: 1-800-387-0825

Fax: 1-888-249-6189

Email: [email protected]

Website: www.astfinancial.com

Enquiries

President and Chief Executive Officer

Mark Bristow

+1 647 205 7694

+44 788 071 1386

Senior Executive Vice-President and Chief Financial Officer

Graham Shuttleworth

+1 647 262 2095

+44 779 771 1338

Investor and Media Relations

Kathy du Plessis

+44 20 7557 7738

Email: [email protected]

 

 

Cautionary Statement on Forward-Looking Information

 

 

 

Certain information contained or incorporated by reference in this MD&A, including any information as to our strategy, projects, plans or future financial or operating performance, constitutes “forward-looking statements”. All statements, other than statements of historical fact, are forward-looking statements. The words “deliver”, “plan”, “objective”, “expected”, “potential”, “strategy”, “will”, “continues”, “ongoing” and similar expressions identify forward-looking statements. In particular, this press release contains forward-looking statements including, without limitation, with respect to: Barrick’s forward-looking production guidance and estimates of future costs; mine life and production rates; Barrick’s response to the government of Papua New Guinea’s decision not to extend Porgera’s Special Mining Lease; the terms of a new partnership for Porgera’s future ownership and operation under the Framework Agreement between Papua New Guinea and BNL, and the timeline for execution of definitive agreements and formation of a new joint venture to implement the Framework Agreement and

recommence operations at Porgera; the duration of the temporary suspension of operations at Porgera; potential mineralization; potential exploration targets and mineral resource potential, including reserve replenishment; the new joint venture with the Government of Tanzania and the potential for Barrick’s North Mara and Bulyanhulu mines to become a Tier One complex; the timing and amount of Barrick’s return of capital distributions; future dividend and yield levels; Barrick’s engagement with local communities to manage the Covid-19 pandemic; Barrick’s strategy, plans, targets and goals in respect of environmental and social governance issues, including climate change, greenhouse gas emissions reduction targets, tailings storage facility management and conservation efforts; future investments in community projects and contributions to local economies; Barrick’s human capital management strategy; the development of the third underground mine at Gounkoto and the timeline for first production; and expectations

 


regarding future price assumptions, financial performance and other outlook or guidance.

Forward-looking statements are necessarily based upon a number of estimates and assumptions including material estimates and assumptions related to the factors set forth below that, while considered reasonable by the Company as at the date of this press release in light of management’s experience and perception of current conditions and expected developments, are inherently subject to significant business, economic and competitive uncertainties and contingencies. Known and unknown factors could cause actual results to differ materially from those projected in the forward-looking statements and undue reliance should not be placed on such statements and information. Such factors include, but are not limited to: fluctuations in the spot and forward price of gold, copper or certain other commodities (such as silver, diesel fuel, natural gas and electricity); the speculative nature of mineral exploration and development; changes in mineral production performance, exploitation and exploration successes; risks associated with projects in the early stages of evaluation and for which additional engineering and other analysis is required; the benefits expected from recent transactions being realized; diminishing quantities or grades of reserves; increased costs, delays, suspensions and technical challenges associated with the construction of capital projects; operating or technical difficulties in connection with mining or development activities, including geotechnical challenges and disruptions in the maintenance or provision of required infrastructure and information technology systems; failure to comply with environmental and health and safety laws and regulations; non-renewal of key licenses by governmental authorities, including non-renewal of Porgera’s Special Mining Lease; timing of receipt of, or failure to comply with, necessary permits and approvals; uncertainty whether some or all of Barrick’s targeted investments and projects will meet the Company’s capital allocation objectives and internal hurdle rate; the impact of global liquidity and credit availability on the timing of cash flows and the values of assets and liabilities based on projected future cash flows; adverse changes in our credit ratings; the impact of inflation; fluctuations in the currency markets; changes in U.S. dollar interest rates; risks arising from holding derivative instruments; changes in national and local government legislation, taxation, controls or regulations and/or changes in the administration of laws, policies and practices, expropriation or nationalization of property and political or economic developments in Canada, the United States and other jurisdictions in which the Company or its affiliates do or may carry on business in the future; lack of certainty with respect to foreign legal systems, corruption and other factors that are inconsistent with the rule of law; risks associated with illegal and artisanal mining; risks associated with new diseases, epidemics and pandemics, including the effects and potential effects of the global Covid-19 pandemic; disruption of supply routes which may cause delays in construction and mining activities; damage to the Company’s reputation due to the actual or perceived occurrence of any number of events, including negative publicity with respect to the Company’s handling of environmental matters or dealings with community groups, whether true or not; the possibility that future exploration results will not be consistent with the Company’s expectations; risks that exploration data may be incomplete and considerable additional work may be

required to complete further evaluation, including but not limited to drilling, engineering and socioeconomic studies and investment; risk of loss due to acts of war, terrorism, sabotage and civil disturbances; litigation and legal and administrative proceedings; contests over title to properties, particularly title to undeveloped properties, or over access to water, power and other required infrastructure; business opportunities that may be presented to, or pursued by, the Company; our ability to successfully integrate acquisitions or complete divestitures, including our ability to successfully reintegrate the operations of the former Acacia; risks associated with working with partners in jointly controlled assets; employee relations including loss of key employees; increased costs and physical risks, including extreme weather events and resource shortages, related to climate change; and availability and increased costs associated with mining inputs and labor. Barrick also cautions that its 2021 guidance may be impacted by the unprecedented business and social disruption caused by the spread of Covid-19. In addition, there are risks and hazards associated with the business of mineral exploration, development and mining, including environmental hazards, industrial accidents, unusual or unexpected formations, pressures, cave-ins, flooding and gold bullion, copper cathode or gold or copper concentrate losses (and the risk of inadequate insurance, or inability to obtain insurance, to cover these risks).

Many of these uncertainties and contingencies can affect our actual results and could cause actual results to differ materially from those expressed or implied in any forward-looking statements made by, or on behalf of, us. Readers are cautioned that forward-looking statements are not guarantees of future performance. All of the forward-looking statements made in this press release are qualified by these cautionary statements. Specific reference is made to the most recent Form 40-F/Annual Information Form on file with the SEC and Canadian provincial securities regulatory authorities for a more detailed discussion of some of the factors underlying forward-looking statements and the risks that may affect Barrick’s ability to achieve the expectations set forth in the forward-looking statements contained in this press release. We disclaim any intention or obligation to update or revise any forward-looking statements whether as a result of new information, future events or otherwise, except as required by applicable law.

 

Exhibit 99.2

Management’s Discussion and Analysis (“MD&A”)

Quarterly Report on the First Quarter of 2021

 

This portion of the Quarterly Report provides management’s discussion and analysis (“MD&A”) of the financial condition and results of operations, to enable a reader to assess material changes in financial condition and results of operations as at, and for the three month periods ended March 31, 2021, in comparison to the corresponding prior-year periods. The MD&A is intended to help the reader understand Barrick Gold Corporation (“Barrick”, “we”, “our” or the “Company”), our operations, financial performance and present and future business environment. This MD&A, which has been prepared as of May 4, 2021, is intended to supplement and complement the condensed unaudited interim consolidated financial statements and notes thereto, prepared in accordance with International Accounting Standard 34 Interim Financial Reporting (“IAS 34”) as issued by the International Accounting Standards Board (“IASB”), for the three month period ended March 31, 2021 (collectively, the “Financial Statements”), which are included in this Quarterly Report on pages 100 to 115. You are encouraged to review the Financial Statements in conjunction with your review of this MD&A. This MD&A should be read in conjunction with both the annual audited consolidated financial statements for the two years ended December 31, 2020, the related annual MD&A included in

the 2020 Annual Report, and the most recent Form 40–F/Annual Information Form on file with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”) and Canadian provincial securities regulatory authorities. These documents and additional information relating to the Company are available on SEDAR at www.sedar.com and EDGAR at www.sec.gov. Certain notes to the Financial Statements are specifically referred to in this MD&A and such notes are incorporated by reference herein. All dollar amounts in this MD&A are in millions of United States dollars (“$” or “US$”), unless otherwise specified.

For the purposes of preparing our MD&A, we consider the materiality of information. Information is considered material if: (i) such information results in, or would reasonably be expected to result in, a significant change in the market price or value of our shares; (ii) there is a substantial likelihood that a reasonable investor would consider it important in making an investment decision; or (iii) it would significantly alter the total mix of information available to investors. We evaluate materiality with reference to all relevant circumstances, including potential market sensitivity.

 

 

Cautionary Statement on Forward-Looking Information

 

 

Certain information contained or incorporated by reference in this MD&A, including any information as to our strategy, projects, plans or future financial or operating performance, constitutes “forward-looking statements”. All statements, other than statements of historical fact, are forward-looking statements. The words “believe”, “expect”, “anticipate”, “strategy”, “target”, “plan”, “guidance”, “forecast”, “objective”, “assume”, “intend”, “project”, “pursue”, “goal”, “continue”, “budget”, “estimate”, “potential”, “work towards”, “focus”, “during”, “ongoing”, “subject to”, “scheduled”, “may”, “will”, “can”, “could”, “would”, “should” and similar expressions identify forward-looking statements. In particular, this MD&A contains forward-looking statements including, without limitation, with respect to: Barrick’s forward-looking production guidance; estimates of future cost of sales per ounce for gold and per pound for copper, total cash costs per ounce and C1 cash costs per pound, and all-in-sustaining costs per ounce/pound; cash flow forecasts; projected capital, operating and exploration expenditures; the timing and amount of Barrick’s return of capital distributions; mine life and production rates, including timing of production ramp-up at Bulyanhulu; Barrick’s engagement with local communities to manage the Covid-19 pandemic; our plans and expected completion and benefits of our growth projects, including construction of Goldrush twin exploration declines, Turquoise Ridge Third Shaft, timing of completion of a final feasibility study for Goldrush and approval of the plan of operations; Pueblo Viejo plant and tailings facility expansion, Bulyanhulu production ramp-up, Zaldívar chloride leach project, and Veladero power transmission project; the potential impact of

proposed changes to Nevada’s Net Proceeds of Mineral tax on Nevada Gold Mines, and Barrick’s engagement with affected stakeholders to reach a solution that secures the long-term viability of the Nevada mining industry; the partnership between Barrick and the Government of Tanzania (“GoT”) and the agreement to resolve all outstanding disputes between Acacia and the GoT; Barrick and Barrick Niugini Limited’s (“BNL”) response to the government of Papua New Guinea’s decision not to extend Porgera’s special mining lease and to the Internal Revenue Commission’s proposed tax adjustments; the terms of a new partnership for Porgera’s future ownership and operation under the Framework Agreement between Papua New Guinea and BNL, and the timeline for execution of definitive agreements and formation of a new joint venture to implement the Framework Agreement and recommence operations at Porgera; the duration of the temporary suspension of operations at Porgera; administrative steps required prior to the distribution of cash and equivalents held at Kibali in banks in the Democratic Republic of Congo; our pipeline of high confidence projects at or near existing operations; potential mineralization and metal or mineral recoveries; our ability to convert resources into reserves; asset sales, joint ventures and partnerships; the timeline for completion of the sale of Barrick’s Lagunas Norte mine; Barrick’s strategy, plans, targets and goals in respect of environmental and social governance issues, including climate change, greenhouse gas emissions reduction targets and tailings storage facility management; and expectations regarding future price assumptions, financial performance and other outlook or guidance.

 

 

BARRICK FIRST QUARTER 2021   21   MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS


Forward-looking statements are necessarily based upon a number of estimates and assumptions including material estimates and assumptions related to the factors set forth below that, while considered reasonable by the Company as at the date of this MD&A in light of management’s experience and perception of current conditions and expected developments, are inherently subject to significant business, economic and competitive uncertainties and contingencies. Known and unknown factors could cause actual results to differ materially from those projected in the forward-looking statements and undue reliance should not be placed on such statements and information. Such factors include, but are not limited to: fluctuations in the spot and forward price of gold, copper or certain other commodities (such as silver, diesel fuel, natural gas and electricity); the speculative nature of mineral exploration and development; changes in mineral production performance, exploitation and exploration successes; risks associated with projects in the early stages of evaluation and for which additional engineering and other analysis is required; the benefits expected from recent transactions being realized, including Nevada Gold Mines; diminishing quantities or grades of reserves; increased costs, delays, suspensions and technical challenges associated with the construction of capital projects; operating or technical difficulties in connection with mining or development activities, including geotechnical challenges and disruptions in the maintenance or provision of required infrastructure and information technology systems; failure to comply with environmental and health and safety laws and regulations; non-renewal of key licenses by governmental authorities; timing of receipt of, or failure to comply with, necessary permits and approvals; uncertainty whether some or all of Barrick’s targeted investments and projects will meet the Company’s capital allocation objectives and internal hurdle rate; the impact of global liquidity and credit availability on the timing of cash flows and the values of assets and liabilities based on projected future cash flows; adverse changes in our credit ratings; the impact of inflation; fluctuations in the currency markets; changes in U.S. dollar interest rates; risks arising from holding derivative instruments; changes in national and local government legislation, taxation, controls or regulations and/or changes in the administration of laws, policies and practices, expropriation or nationalization of property and political or economic developments in Canada, the United States and other jurisdictions in which the Company or its affiliates do or may carry on business in the future; lack of certainty with respect to foreign legal systems, corruption and other factors that are inconsistent with the rule of law; risks associated with illegal and artisanal mining; risks associated with new diseases, epidemics and pandemics, including the effects and potential effects of the global Covid-19 pandemic; disruption

of supply routes which may cause delays in construction and mining activities; damage to the Company’s reputation due to the actual or perceived occurrence of any number of events, including negative publicity with respect to the Company’s handling of environmental matters or dealings with community groups, whether true or not; the possibility that future exploration results will not be consistent with the Company’s expectations; risks that exploration data may be incomplete and considerable additional work may be required to complete further evaluation, including but not limited to drilling, engineering and socioeconomic studies and investment; risk of loss due to acts of war, terrorism, sabotage and civil disturbances; litigation and legal and administrative proceedings; contests over title to properties, particularly title to undeveloped properties, or over access to water, power and other required infrastructure; business opportunities that may be presented to, or pursued by, the Company; our ability to successfully integrate acquisitions or complete divestitures, including our ability to successfully reintegrate Acacia’s operations; risks associated with working with partners in jointly controlled assets; employee relations including loss of key employees; increased costs and physical risks, including extreme weather events and resource shortages, related to climate change; and availability and increased costs associated with mining inputs and labor. Barrick also cautions that its 2021 guidance may be impacted by the unprecedented business and social disruption caused by the spread of Covid-19. In addition, there are risks and hazards associated with the business of mineral exploration, development and mining, including environmental hazards, industrial accidents, unusual or unexpected formations, pressures, cave-ins, flooding and gold bullion, copper cathode or gold or copper concentrate losses (and the risk of inadequate insurance, or inability to obtain insurance, to cover these risks).

Many of these uncertainties and contingencies can affect our actual results and could cause actual results to differ materially from those expressed or implied in any forward-looking statements made by, or on behalf of, us. Readers are cautioned that forward-looking statements are not guarantees of future performance. All of the forward-looking statements made in this MD&A are qualified by these cautionary statements. Specific reference is made to the most recent Form 40-F/Annual Information Form on file with the SEC and Canadian provincial securities regulatory authorities for a more detailed discussion of some of the factors underlying forward-looking statements and the risks that may affect Barrick’s ability to achieve the expectations set forth in the forward-looking statements contained in this MD&A. We disclaim any intention or obligation to update or revise any forward-looking statements whether as a result of new information, future events or otherwise, except as required by applicable law.

 

 

BARRICK FIRST QUARTER 2021   22   MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS


Use of Non-GAAP Financial Performance Measures

 

 

We use the following non-GAAP financial performance measures in our MD&A:

   

“adjusted net earnings”

   

“free cash flow”

   

“EBITDA”

   

“adjusted EBITDA”

   

“total cash costs per ounce”

   

“C1 cash costs per pound”

   

“all-in sustaining costs per ounce/pound”

   

“all-in costs per ounce” and

   

“realized price”

For a detailed description of each of the non-GAAP financial performance measures used in this MD&A and a detailed reconciliation to the most directly comparable measure under International Financial Reporting Standards (“IFRS”), please refer to the Non-GAAP Financial Performance Measures section of this MD&A on pages 74 to 92. Each non-GAAP financial performance measure has been annotated with a reference to an endnote on page 93. The non-GAAP financial performance measures set out in this MD&A are intended to provide additional information to investors and do not have any standardized meaning under IFRS, and therefore may not be comparable to other issuers, and should not be considered in isolation or as a substitute for measures of performance prepared in accordance with IFRS.

Index

 

 

 

   
 

24

   Overview
   
     24      Financial and Operating Highlights
   
     27      Key Business Developments
   
     28      Environmental, Social and Governance
   
     31      Outlook
   
     33      Production and Cost Summary
   
 

35

   Operating Divisions Performance
   
     36      Nevada Gold Mines
   
     38     

Carlin

   
     40     

Cortez

   
     42     

Turquoise Ridge

   
     44     

Other Mines - Nevada Gold Mines

   
     45      Pueblo Viejo
   
     47      Loulo-Gounkoto
   
     49      Kibali
   
     51      Veladero
   
     53      North Mara
   
     55      Bulyanhulu
   
     57      Other Mines - Gold
   
     58      Other Mines - Copper
   
 

59

   Growth Projects
   
 

60

   Exploration and Mineral Resource Management
   
 

65

   Review of Financial Results
   
     65      Revenue
   
     66      Production Costs
   
     67      Capital Expenditures
   
     67      General and Administrative Expenses
   
     68      Exploration, Evaluation and Project Expenses
   
     68      Finance Costs, Net
   
     68      Additional Significant Statement of Income Items
   
     69      Income Tax Expense
   
 

70

   Financial Condition Review
   
     70      Balance Sheet Review
   
     70      Shareholders’ Equity
   
     70      Financial Position and Liquidity
   
     71      Summary of Cash Inflow (Outflow)
   
 

72

   Commitments and Contingencies
   
 

73

   Review of Quarterly Results
   
 

73

   Internal Control over Financial Reporting and

Disclosure Controls and Procedures

   
 

74

   IFRS Critical Accounting Policies and Accounting Estimates
   
 

74

   Non-GAAP Financial Performance Measures
   
 

93

   Technical Information
   
 

93

   Endnotes
   
 

100

   Financial Statements
   
 

105

   Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
 

 

BARRICK FIRST QUARTER 2021   23   MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS


Overview

 

 

Financial and Operating Highlights

 

      For the three months ended
                  3/31/21          12/31/20       % Change                 3/31/20       % Change

Financial Results ($ millions)

         

Revenues

    2,956      3,279   (10)%   2,721   9 %

Cost of sales

    1,712     1,814   (6)%   1,776   (4)%

Net earningsa

    538     685   (21)%   400   35 %

Adjusted net earningsb

    507     616   (18)%   285   78 %

Adjusted EBITDAb

    1,800     2,106   (15)%   1,466   23 %

Adjusted EBITDA marginc

    61%     64%   (5)%   54%   13 %

Minesite sustaining capital expendituresd

    405     354   14 %   370   9 %

Project capital expendituresd

    131     184   (29)%   76   72 %

Total consolidated capital expendituresd,e

    539     546   (1)%   451   20 %

Net cash provided by operating activities

    1,302     1,638   (21)%   889   46 %

Net cash provided by operating activities marginf

    44%     50%   (12)%   33%   33 %

Free cash flowb

    763     1,092   (30)%   438   74 %

Net earnings per share (basic and diluted)

    0.30     0.39   (23)%   0.22   36 %

Adjusted net earnings (basic)b per share

    0.29     0.35   (17)%   0.16   81 %

Weighted average diluted common shares (millions of shares)

    1,778     1,778   0 %   1,778   0 %

Operating Results

         

Gold production (thousands of ounces)g

    1,101     1,206   (9)%   1,250   (12)%

Gold sold (thousands of ounces)g

    1,093     1,186   (8)%   1,220   (10)%

Market gold price ($/oz)

    1,794     1,874   (4)%   1,583   13 %

Realized gold priceb,g ($/oz)

    1,777     1,871   (5)%   1,589   12 %

Gold cost of sales (Barrick’s share)g,h ($/oz)

    1,073     1,065   1 %   1,020   5 %

Gold total cash costsb,g ($/oz)

    716     692   3 %   692   3 %

Gold all-in sustaining costsb,g ($/oz)

    1,018     929   10 %   954   7 %

Copper production (millions of pounds)g

    93     119   (22)%   115   (19)%

Copper sold (millions of pounds)g

    113     108   5 %   110   3 %

Market copper price ($/lb)

    3.86     3.25   19 %   2.56   51 %

Realized copper priceb,g ($/lb)

    4.12     3.39   22 %   2.23   85 %

Copper cost of sales (Barrick’s share)g,i ($/lb)

    2.11     2.06   2 %   1.96   8 %

Copper C1 cash costsb,g ($/lb)

    1.60     1.61   (1)%   1.55   3 %

Copper all-in sustaining costsb,g ($/lb)

    2.26     2.42   (7)%   2.04   11 %
     

As at

3/31/21

 

 

 

As at

12/31/20

  % Change  

As at

3/31/20

  % Change

Financial Position ($ millions)

         

Debt (current and long-term)

    5,153     5,155   0 %   5,179   (1)%

Cash and equivalents

    5,672     5,188   9 %   3,327   70 %

Debt, net of cash

    (519)     (33)   1,473 %   1,852   (128)%

 

a.

Net earnings represents net earnings attributable to the equity holders of the Company.

b.

Adjusted net earnings, adjusted EBITDA, free cash flow, adjusted net earnings per share, realized gold price, all-in sustaining costs, total cash costs, C1 cash costs and realized copper price are non-GAAP financial performance measures with no standardized meaning under IFRS and therefore may not be comparable to similar measures presented by other issuers. For further information and a detailed reconciliation of each non-GAAP measure to the most directly comparable IFRS measure, please see pages 74 to 92 of this MD&A.

c.

Represents adjusted EBITDA divided by revenue.

d.

Amounts presented on a consolidated cash basis. Project capital expenditures are included in our calculation of all-in costs, but not included in our calculation of all-in sustaining costs.

e.

Total consolidated capital expenditures also includes capitalized interest of $3 million for the three month periods ended March 31, 2021 (December 31, 2020: $8 million and March 31, 2020: $5 million).

f.

Represents net cash provided by operating activities divided by revenue.

g.

On an attributable basis.

h.

Gold cost of sales per ounce is calculated as cost of sales across our gold operations (excluding sites in care and maintenance) divided by ounces sold (both on an attributable basis using Barrick’s ownership share).

i.

Copper cost of sales per pound is calculated as cost of sales across our copper operations divided by pounds sold (both on an attributable basis using Barrick’s ownership share).

 

BARRICK FIRST QUARTER 2021   24   MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS


LOGO

 

a.

Gold cost of sales per ounce is calculated as cost of sales across our gold operations (excluding sites in care and maintenance) divided by ounces sold (both on an attributable basis using Barrick’s ownership share). Copper cost of sales per pound is calculated as cost of sales across our copper operations divided by pounds sold (both on an attributable basis using Barrick’s ownership share).

b.

These are non-GAAP financial performance measures with no standardized meaning under IFRS and therefore may not be comparable to similar measures presented by other issuers. For further information and a detailed reconciliation of each non-GAAP measure to the most directly comparable IFRS measure, please see pages 74 to 92 of this MD&A.

c.

Dividend per share declared in respect of the stated period. Return of capital distribution to be paid contemporaneously with respective dividend.

d.

Return of capital distribution per share is an estimate based on issued and outstanding shares as of March 31, 2021, and is subject to change.

 

BARRICK FIRST QUARTER 2021   25   MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS


Factors affecting net earnings and adjusted net earnings1 -three months ended March 31, 2021 versus December 31, 2020

Net earnings attributable to equity holders of Barrick (“net earnings”) for the three months ended March 31, 2021 were $538 million compared to $685 million in the prior quarter. The decrease was primarily due to lower gold sales volumes and a lower realized gold price1 of $1,777 per ounce for the three months ended March 31, 2021, compared to $1,871 per ounce in the prior quarter. This was partially offset by an increase in copper sales volumes and a higher realized copper price1 of $4.12 per pound for the three months ended March 31, 2021, compared to $3.39 per pound in the prior quarter. In the first quarter of 2021, net earnings was also impacted by an impairment reversal of $86 million (no tax impact) at Lagunas Norte resulting from the agreement to sell our 100% interest of the mine to Boroo Pte Ltd. (“Boroo”). For the three months ended December 31, 2020, net earnings was impacted by total gains of $118 million ($126 million before tax and non-controlling interest), primarily resulting from the sale of Eskay Creek, Morila and Bullfrog.

After adjusting for items that are not indicative of future operating earnings, adjusted net earnings1 of $507 million for the three months ended March 31, 2021 were 18% lower than the prior quarter. The decrease in adjusted net earnings1 was mainly due to a lower realized gold price1, as described above, combined with lower gold sales volumes primarily due to mine sequencing at Carlin and Cortez as well as lower grades at Pueblo Viejo, in line with the mine and stockpile processing plan. This was combined with lower production at Veladero as heap leach processing operations are reduced through the first half of 2021 while the mine transitions to Phase 6, as well as lower grades at Tongon reflecting the change in the mine plan related to the extension of its mine life to 2023. This was partially offset by higher grades at Loulo-Gounkoto. These factors were partially offset by higher copper sales volumes and a higher realized copper price1.

Factors affecting net earnings and adjusted net earnings1 - three months ended March 31, 2021 versus March 31, 2020

Net earnings for the first quarter of 2021 were $538 million compared to $400 million in the same prior year period. The increase was primarily due to a higher realized gold price1 of $1,777 per ounce in the three months ended March 31, 2021 compared to $1,589 per ounce in the same prior year period. In the first quarter of 2021, net earnings was impacted by a net impairment reversal of $86 million (no tax impact) at Lagunas Norte resulting from the agreement to sell our 100% interest of the mine to Boroo. For the three months ended March 31, 2020, net earnings was impacted by a net impairment reversal of $115 million ($336 million before tax) resulting from the agreement with the Government of Tanzania being signed and made effective in the first quarter of 2020, and a $54 million gain (no tax impact) on the sale of Massawa.

After adjusting for items that are not indicative of future operating earnings, adjusted net earnings1 of $507 million in the first quarter of 2021 were $222 million higher than the same prior year period. The increase was primarily due to a higher realized gold price1, as described above. In addition, the realized copper price1 of $4.12 per pound for the three months ended March 31, 2021 was 85% higher than the same prior year period. These impacts were

partially offset by lower gold sales volumes, as a result of Porgera being placed on care and maintenance on April 25, 2020, reduced heap leach processing operations at Veladero through the first half of 2021 while the mine transitions to Phase 6, as well as mine sequencing at Carlin and Cortez. These impacts were partially offset by increased production at Bulyanhulu following the ramp-up of underground mining and processing operations towards the end of 2020.

Refer to page 75 for a full list of reconciling items between net earnings and adjusted net earnings1 for the current and previous periods.

Factors affecting Operating Cash Flow and Free Cash Flow1 - three months ended March 31, 2021 versus December 31, 2020

In the three months ended March 31, 2021, we generated $1,302 million in operating cash flow, compared to $1,638 million in the prior quarter. The decrease of $336 million was primarily due to a lower realized gold price1 of $1,777 per ounce for the three months ended March 31, 2021 compared to $1,871 per ounce in the prior quarter, and lower gold sales volume as described above. This was combined with an unfavorable movement in working capital, mainly in accounts payable, partially offset by favorable movements in other assets and liabilities. Operating cash flow was further impacted by higher cash taxes paid, partially offset by lower interest paid due to the timing of semi-annual payments on our bonds and an increase in copper sales volumes and a higher realized copper price1.

Free cash flow1 for the three months ended March 31, 2021 was $763 million, compared to $1,092 million in the prior quarter, reflecting lower operating cash flows, slightly offset by lower capital expenditures. In the first quarter of 2021, capital expenditures on a cash basis were $539 million compared to $546 million in the prior quarter. Lower project capital expenditures was partially offset by higher minesite sustaining capital expenditures. Lower project capital expenditures is mainly due to the successful re-start of underground mining and processing operations at Bulyanhulu by the end of 2020, the water treatment plant at North Mara approaching the final stages of commissioning, and decreased spending at Cortez due to the completion of the CHUG Rangefront decline project. The increase in minesite sustaining capital expenditures is mainly due to higher capitalized stripping at several sites, including Cortez, Loulo-Gounkoto, Veladero and Carlin.

Factors affecting Operating Cash Flow and Free Cash Flow1 - three months ended March 31, 2021 versus March 31, 2020

In the first quarter of 2021, we generated $1,302 million in operating cash flow, compared to $889 million in the same prior year period. The increase of $413 million was primarily due to a higher realized gold price1 of $1,777 per ounce for the three months ended March 31, 2021 compared to $1,589 per ounce in the same prior year period and higher realized copper prices1, partially offset by lower gold sales volume and higher cash taxes paid.

In the first quarter of 2021, we generated free cash flow1 of $763 million compared to $438 million in the same prior year period. The increase primarily reflects higher operating cash flows, partially offset by higher capital expenditures. In the first quarter of 2021, capital

 

 

Numerical annotations throughout the text of this document refer to the endnotes found on page 93.

 

BARRICK FIRST QUARTER 2021   26   MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS


expenditures on a cash basis were $539 million compared to $451 million in the first quarter of 2020. The increase in capital expenditures of $88 million was primarily due to higher project capital expenditures, namely the plant and tailings expansion project at Pueblo Viejo and the Gounkoto underground expansion. This was combined with higher minesite sustaining capital expenditures, primarily at Veladero relating to the Phase 6 leach pad expansion and higher capitalized stripping, drilling and underground development at Loulo-Gounkoto.

Key Business Developments

Covid-19 Pandemic

Barrick continues to work closely with our local communities on managing the impacts of the Covid-19 pandemic on our people and business. Barrick has a strong culture of caring for the welfare of its employees and communities. Our well-established prevention practices and procedures, as well as the experience we gained from dealing with two Ebola outbreaks around our African operations, has assisted us with managing this unprecedented challenge. We have been actively working to support government responses to the Covid-19 pandemic, both financially and using our supply chain to secure key supplies for the benefit of the communities in which we operate.

Our preference for employing local nationals where we operate rather than expatriates, means that we are not dependent upon a workforce traveling to site on a regular basis from other parts of the globe. We have adopted certain operating procedures to respond to Covid-19 and to date, our operations have not been significantly impacted by the pandemic with the exception of Veladero, where the government of Argentina implemented a mandatory nationwide quarantine in March 2020. Although this was lifted in April 2020, movement and social distancing restrictions impacted the remobilization of employees and contractors back to site.

Early and measured actions such as social distancing, screening and contact tracing have been implemented at all sites. This has allowed our sites to continue to produce and sell their production as well as keep our people and local communities safe at the same time. These actions have minimized the impacts of the pandemic at our operations and facilitated the continued delivery of strong operating cash flow since the onset of the pandemic.

Our focus on strengthening our balance sheet in recent years has given us the financial flexibility to endure any short-term impacts to our operations, while supporting our strategy of participating in our industry’s inevitable consolidation. We have $5.7 billion in cash, an undrawn $3.0 billion credit facility and no significant debt repayments due until 2033, providing us with sufficient liquidity to execute on our strategic goals.

We also recognize the situation remains dynamic. We continue to monitor developments around the world and believe we have positioned Barrick as best we can to weather the storm and take advantage of any value opportunities should they present themselves.

Return of Capital

At the Annual and Special Meeting on May 4, 2021, shareholders approved a $750 million return of capital distribution. This distribution is derived from a portion of the proceeds from the divestiture of Kalgoorlie Consolidated Gold Mines in November 2019 and from other recent

dispositions made by Barrick and its affiliates. The total return of capital distribution is expected to be effected in three equal tranches. The first $250 million tranche will be paid on June 15, 2021 to shareholders of record at the close of business on May 28, 2021. The remaining distribution of $500 million is expected to be effected in two equal tranches to shareholders of record on dates to be determined in August and November 2021.

This return of capital distribution demonstrates Barrick’s commitment to return surplus funds to shareholders as outlined in the strategy announced at the time of the Merger in September 2018. Since that time, the quarterly dividend has tripled and together with this capital distribution, establishes one of the industry’s leading returns for shareholders in 2021.

Sale of Lagunas Norte

On February 16, 2021, Barrick announced it had entered into an agreement to sell its 100% interest in the Lagunas Norte gold mine in Peru to Boroo for total consideration of up to $81 million, with $20 million of cash consideration on closing, additional cash consideration of $10 million payable on the first anniversary of closing and $20 million payable on the second anniversary of closing, a 2% net smelter return royalty, which may be purchased by Boroo for a limited period after closing for $16 million, plus a contingent payment of up to $15 million based on the two-year average gold price. Completion of the sale is subject to closing conditions and is expected in the second quarter of 2021. As at March 31, 2021, all the assets and liabilities of our interest in the Lagunas Norte gold mine were classified as held-for-sale. An impairment reversal of $86 million was recognized in the first quarter of 2021. Refer to note 13 for further details.

Porgera Special Mining Lease Extension

On April 9, 2021, the Papua New Guinea (“PNG”) government and Barrick Niugini Limited (“BNL”, the 95% owner and operator of the Porgera joint venture) agreed on a partnership for the future ownership and operation of the Porgera mine. Porgera has been on care and maintenance since April 2020, when the government declined to renew its special mining lease (“SML”).

Under the terms of a binding Framework Agreement, ownership of Porgera will be held in a new joint venture owned 51% by PNG stakeholders and 49% by BNL. BNL remains the operator of the mine and is jointly owned by Barrick and Zijin Mining Group. The Framework Agreement also provides, among other things, for:

 

PNG stakeholders and BNL to share the economic benefits generated over the life of mine on a 53%/47% basis in favor of the PNG stakeholders;

 

BNL to finance the capital required to restart the mine;

 

an increase in the equity allocated to a broad group of landowners who are the customary owners of the land where Porgera is located; and

 

the state to retain the right to acquire the remaining 49% of the mine from BNL at fair market value after 10 years.

The parties will now work towards the signing of definitive agreements, at which time, full mine recommencement work will begin. Porgera remains excluded from our full year 2021 guidance. We expect to update our guidance following both the execution of definitive agreements to implement the binding Framework

 

 

BARRICK FIRST QUARTER 2021   27   MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS


Agreement and the finalization of a timeline for the resumption of full mine operations. Refer to notes 13 and 18 to the Financial Statements for more information.

Environmental, Social and Governance (“ESG”)

Sustainability is integral to Barrick and is entrenched in our DNA. This means that the day-to-day ownership of sustainability-related risks and opportunities is in the hands of individual sites. In the same way that each site manages its geological, operational and technical capabilities to meet business objectives, the site must also manage its own sustainability performance.

Our commitment and responsibility for sustainability is driven at an operational level, not set in a corporate office as part of a compliance exercise. Each site plays a role in identifying programs, metrics, and targets that measure progress and deliver real impacts for the business and our stakeholders, including our host countries and local communities. The Group Sustainability Executive, as a member of the Group’s Executive Committee, provides oversight and direction on this site-level ownership, ensuring alignment towards the strategic priorities of the overall business.

Our sustainability strategy is built on four main pillars: (1) Ensuring we respect human rights; (2) Protecting the health and safety of our people and local communities; (3) Sharing the benefits of our operations; and (4) Managing our impacts on the environment.

We are encouraged that analyzing ESG strategy as part of an investment thesis has moved from the margins to the mainstream. However, we also recognize the challenges this presents with the ever-increasing number of disclosures, tools and metrics used to score a company’s performance.

Our 2019 Sustainability Report introduced a Sustainability Scorecard to address this challenge. The scorecard, which was a first for our industry, sets out what we believe are the sustainability issues most relevant both for our business and our industry, ranking us against our peers and internal metrics. It compares performance across our priority ESG areas: Health and Safety, Social and Economic Development, Human Rights, the Environment, as well as Governance. Our performance on these aspects is then aggregated into an overall score.

For 2020, our performance on the scorecard accounted for 25% of the long-term incentive awards (up from 15% in 2019) for senior leaders as part of the Barrick Partnership Plan.

As detailed in our 2020 Sustainability Report, Barrick received a B grade in 2020, unchanged from 2019 (on a scale where A represents top performance and E represents bottom performance). Although our Group safety frequency rates in 2020 significantly improved year-over-year, we received a bottom quintile score for our Total Recordable Injury Frequency Rate (“TRIFR”)3 performance due to the unfortunate fatality at Kibali in November 2020. Thus, despite improvement across most of our Sustainability Scorecard indicators, we believe a B grade for 2020 is fair, as it is our absolute belief that one fatality is one too many.

There is still work to be done and consistent with our philosophy of continuous improvement, our 2020 Sustainability Report featured several new metrics, which we will assess ourselves against through 2021.

Safety

Our safety vision is “Every person going home safe and healthy every day.”

Barrick is committed to the safety, health and well-being of our people, their families and the communities in which we operate. Our safety performance is reported as part of our quarterly Environmental & Social Oversight Committee (“E&S Committee”) meetings and to the Board’s Corporate Governance & Nominating Committee.

Our goal is for the safety management systems at all operational sites to be certified to the internationally recognized ISO 45001 standard by the end of 2021. Four sites are already accredited, including North Mara which received its inaugural certification in February 2021.

Across the Company, we have implemented our “Journey to Zero Harm” initiative. This initiative is focused on:

 

Engagement with our workforce through Visible Felt Leadership;

 

Aligning and improving our standards;

 

Ensuring accountability to our safety commitments; and

 

Ensuring our employees are fit for duty.

Our Company’s Lost Time Injury Frequency Rate (“LTIFR”)3 was 0.48 in the first quarter of 2021, up from 0.32 in the prior quarter. Our TRIFR3 for the first quarter of 2021 was 1.38, a decrease from the prior quarter of 1.43.

Environment

Strong environmental management is a crucial building block of our business. Environmental issues with the greatest potential impact on the health and safety of local communities, such as how we use water, prevent incidents and manage tailings, are our highest priority.

Immediately after the Merger, we set a corporate goal for all sites to have their Environmental Management System certified to the ISO 14001:2015 standard by the end of 2020. At the end of the first quarter of 2021, all sites were certified, with the North Mara mine receiving its inaugural certification in February 2021.

We maintained our strong track record of stewardship and did not record any Class 14 environmental incidents during the first quarter of 2021.

Climate

Barrick’s climate change strategy has three pillars: (1) Identify, understand and mitigate the risks associated with climate change; (2) Measure and reduce our impacts on climate change; and (3) Improve our disclosure on climate change. Action taken on each pillar is described below.

Identify, understand and mitigate the risks associated with climate change

We continue to take steps to identify and manage risks, build resilience to climate change, as well as to position ourselves for new opportunities. Climate change-related factors continue to be incorporated into Barrick’s formal risk assessment process (for example, consideration is given to the availability and access to water, together with the impact of increased precipitation, drought, or severe storms on operations as well as on local communities). We have identified several climate-related risks and opportunities for our business including: physical impacts of climate change; an increase in regulations that seek to address climate

 

 

BARRICK FIRST QUARTER 2021   28   MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS


change; and an increase in global investment in innovation and low-carbon technologies.

Measure and reduce the Group’s impact on climate change

Mining is an energy-intensive business, and we understand the important link between energy use and greenhouse gas (“GHG”) emissions. By measuring and effectively managing our energy use, we can reduce our draw from local energy grids, reduce our GHG emissions, achieve more efficient production, and reduce our costs.

Improve our disclosure on climate change

As part of our commitment to improve our disclosure on climate change, we complete the annual CDP (formerly known as the Carbon Disclosure Project) emissions questionnaire, which makes investor-relevant climate data widely available. In 2020, Barrick received a C minus grade on the CDP Climate Change Questionnaire. This grade places Barrick in the ‘awareness’ scoring band.

The Board’s Corporate Governance & Nominating Committee meets quarterly and is responsible for overseeing Barrick’s policies, programs and performance relating to the environment, including climate change. The Audit & Risk Committee assists the Board in overseeing the Group’s management of enterprise risks as well as the implementation of policies and standards for monitoring and mitigating such risks. Climate change is built into our formal risk management process, outputs of which were reviewed by the Audit & Risk Committee throughout 2019 and 2020.

During 2020, we also concluded an update of our global scenario analysis, and we are now advancing an individual site-by-site analysis to better understand the risk that climate change poses to each operation, with an initial focus on our Tier One Gold Assets5. In addition, the Audit & Risk Committee reviewed the Group’s approach to climate change in the context of our public disclosures.

As detailed in our 2020 Sustainability Report, Barrick has updated its GHG emissions reduction target to achieve a reduction of at least 30% by 2030, while maintaining a steady production profile. The basis of this reduction is against a 2018 baseline of 7,541kt CO2-e that combines legacy Barrick and Randgold data as well as 2018 emissions from the assets over which we assumed operational control in 2019, including Nevada Gold Mines and the Tanzanian mines.

Our emissions reduction target is grounded in climate science and has a detailed pathway for achievement. This required the identification of several projects for implementation, including certain projects that are already contributing to emissions reduction such as:

 

Our investment in battery technology at Kibali which further reduces the mine’s reliance on diesel generators.

 

At Loulo-Gounkoto, we have constructed a 20 MW solar power plant, which is now injecting power into the microgrid.

 

In the Dominican Republic, we have switched the Quisqueya Power Plant from heavy fuel oil to cleaner burning natural gas.

Our target is not static and will be updated as we continue to identify and implement new GHG reduction opportunities.

We expect our focus on climate change to continue through 2021 and beyond, with several projects that will further reduce GHG emissions. Those listed below

are more advanced in the project lifecycle with capital already committed.

 

Nevada Gold Mines – Conversion of the TS power plant from coal to natural gas. This is estimated to reduce GHG emissions by 563 kt CO2-e per annum.

 

Nevada Gold Mines – Construction of a 100 MW TS solar farm. This is estimated to reduce GHG emissions by 104 kt CO2-e per annum.

 

Pueblo Viejo – Implementing the Lime Kiln Fuel Switch Project (from diesel to liquified natural gas) which is estimated to reduce GHG emissions by 127 kt CO2-e per annum.

 

Loulo-Gounkoto – Doubling the capacity of the current 20 MW solar power plant for an incremental 27 kt CO2-e per annum reduction, which is at the feasibility stage.

Ultimately, our vision is net zero GHG emissions by 2050, achieved primarily through GHG reductions, with some offsets for hard-to-abate emissions. Site-level plans to reduce energy and GHG emissions will also be strengthened, and we plan to supplement our corporate emissions reduction target with context-based site-specific emissions reduction targets.

We continue to align our disclosures with the Taskforce on Climate-related Financial Disclosures. We have a strong foundation and Barrick continues to build further resilience to withstand the potential impacts of climate change and leverage potential opportunities as the global economy transitions to a low-carbon future.

Water

Our aim is to deliver enough water for the effective operation of our mines, while at the same time protecting the quality and quantity of water available to host communities and other users in our watersheds. Our commitment to responsible water use is codified in our Environmental Policy. This requires us to minimize our use of water, control and manage our impacts on water quality, and engage with stakeholders, including local communities, to maintain sustainable management of water resources for the benefit of all users.

Each mine has its own site-specific water management plan, which considers: (1) the different water sources available; (2) the local climate conditions; and (3) the needs of local users and the needs of the mine. This information is supplemented by a range of international frameworks and tools such as the WWF Water Risk Filter to evaluate water risks, particularly those linked to water stress.

We include each mine’s water risks in its operational risk register. These risks are then aggregated and incorporated into the corporate risk register. Our identified water-related risks include: (1) managing excess water in regions with high rainfall; (2) maintaining access to water in arid areas and regions prone to water scarcity; and (3) regulatory risks related to permitting limits as well as municipal and national regulations for water use.

Our water recycling and reuse rate of 84% in the first quarter of 2021 is above our annual target of 80%.

Tailings

We are committed to ensuring our tailings storage facilities (“TSFs”) meet global best practices for safety. Our TSFs are carefully engineered and regularly inspected,

 

 

BARRICK FIRST QUARTER 2021   29   MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS


particularly those in regions with high rainfall and seismic activities.

In 2021, independent reviews are planned for the following operational mines and closure sites: Goldstrike, Cortez, North Mara, Bulyanhulu, Turquoise Ridge, Mercur, McLaughlin, Pastos Largos and El Indio, Loulo, Tongon and Kibali.

Social

We regard our host communities and countries as important partners in our business. We understand that we are guests and are committed to contributing to their social and economic development. Our sustainability policies also commit us to transparency in our relationships with host communities, government authorities, the public and other key stakeholders. These policies also commit us to conducting our business with integrity through our absolute opposition to corruption, and requiring our suppliers to operate ethically and responsibly as a condition of doing business with us.

Our approach to our relationships with our Indigenous partners is no different, and we create genuine partnerships that aim to build a long-term positive legacy within our host communities.

Community and economic development

Our commitment to social and economic development is set out in our overarching Sustainable Development Policy and our Social Performance Policy.

 

Paying our fair share of taxes - The taxes, royalties and dividends we pay provide significant income for our host countries and help fund vital services and infrastructure. We have introduced a comprehensive tax policy covering governance, management of tax risks, principles of tax planning, compliance, relationship with tax authorities as well as transparency and disclosure. Furthermore, we report all government and tax payments transparently, primarily through the reporting mechanism of the Canadian Extractive Sector Transparency Measures Act (“ESTMA”).

 

Prioritizing local hiring - The employment opportunities created by our presence is one of our largest social and economic contributions to our host communities and countries. Our aim is to maximize this contribution. We work to identify and nurture local talent at every level of our business through a range of skills and formal training.

 

Prioritizing local buying - We want to maximize the amount of value that stays in our countries of operation. That is why our procurement processes prioritize local companies, followed by those from the larger region or host country.

 

Investing in community-led development initiatives - We believe that no one knows the needs of local communities better than the communities themselves. That is why we have been targeting the establishment of community development committees (“CDCs”) at every operating site - a target that we achieved in 2020. The role of the CDC is to allocate the community investment budget to those projects and initiatives most needed and desired by local stakeholders. Each CDC is elected and made up of a mix of local leaders, community members as well as representatives from local women and youth groups.

Human rights

Respect for human rights is a central part of our sustainability vision. We have zero tolerance for human rights violations wherever we operate. We avoid causing or contributing to human rights violations and we facilitate access to remedies. Our commitment to respect human rights is codified in our standalone Human Rights Policy and informed by the expectations of the UN Guiding Principles on Business and Human Rights, the Voluntary Principles on Security and Human Rights, and the OECD Guidelines for Multinational Enterprises.

Our commitment to respect human rights is fulfilled on the ground via our Human Rights Program, the fundamental principles of which include:

 

Monitoring and reporting;

 

Due diligence;

 

Training; and

 

Disciplinary action and remedy.

We also expect the same standards from our suppliers, as our Supplier Code of Ethics incorporates human rights provisions.

Responsibility for the oversight and implementation of our human rights compliance program sits with our Group Sustainability Executive, with support from our Senior Vice President Business Assurance, Risk and Business Integrity, as well as our Human Resources Executive.

During the first quarter of 2021, our new human rights training programs were conducted at the North Mara and Bulyanhulu operations in Tanzania. We expect to rollout these programs across all operational sites in 2021. During the first quarter of 2021, we also submitted our progress report to the Voluntary Principles Initiative. Separately, a standalone report on human rights at Barrick is being prepared.

Governance

The bedrock of our sustainability strategy is strong governance. Immediately after the Merger, Barrick established the E&S Committee to connect site-level ownership of our sustainability strategy with the leadership of the Group. It is chaired by the President and Chief Executive Officer and includes: (1) regional Chief Operating Officers; (2) Mine General Managers; (3) Health, Safety, Environment and Closure Leads; (4) the Group Sustainability Executive; (5) in-house legal counsel; and (6) an independent sustainability consultant in an advisory role. The E&S Committee meets to review our performance across a range of key performance indicators, and to provide independent oversight and review of sustainability management at each of our Tier One Gold Assets5.

The President and Chief Executive Officer reviews the reports of the E&S Committee with the Board’s Corporate Governance & Nominating Committee on a quarterly basis to oversee the policies and performance of Barrick’s environmental, health and safety, corporate social responsibility, and human rights programs.

Further to the specific focus of the E&S Committee, weekly Executive Committee review meetings allow for the discussion of opportunities and risks that may help or hinder the Group from achieving its objectives, including climate-related risks.

 

 

BARRICK FIRST QUARTER 2021   30   MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS


Full Year 2021 Outlook

We continue to expect 2021 gold production to be in the range of 4.4 to 4.7 million ounces. This guidance is anchored by stable production from our six Tier One Gold Assets5 located across the US, the Dominican Republic, Mali and the Democratic Republic of the Congo. As previously guided, the Company’s gold production in the second half of 2021 is expected to be higher than the first half. This is mainly driven by mine sequencing at Nevada Gold Mines, the commissioning of the Phase 6 leach pad at Veladero by the end of the second quarter of 2021, as well as the ramp-up of underground operations at Bulyanhulu. Buzwagi remains on-track to enter closure starting from the third quarter of 2021.

Our 2021 gold guidance continues to exclude Porgera. We expect to update our guidance to include Porgera following both the execution of definitive agreements to implement the binding Framework Agreement and the finalization of a timeline for the resumption of full mine operations.

Our 2021 gold cost guidance remains unchanged, including cost of sales of $1,020 - $1,070 per ounce2, total cash costs of $680 - $730 per ounce1 and all-in sustaining costs of $970 - $1,020 per ounce1. These ranges are based on a gold price assumption of $1,700 per ounce (refer to our key assumptions). We have previously disclosed a sensitivity of approximately $4 per ounce on our 2021 gold cost metrics for every $100 per ounce change in the gold price.

We continue to monitor the impact of the Covid-19 pandemic as it enters a third wave. Our 2021 guidance may be further impacted if the operation or development of our mines and projects are disrupted due to efforts to contain the spread of the virus.

Notwithstanding the risks discussed above, 2021 guidance remains unchanged at this time.

Company Guidance
        ($ millions, except per ounce/pound data)

  

2021

Estimate

 

Gold production (millions of ounces)

     4.40 - 4.70  

Gold cost metrics

  

Cost of sales - gold ($/oz)

     1,020 - 1,070  

Total cash costs ($/oz)a

     680 - 730  

Depreciation ($/oz)

     300 - 330  

All-in sustaining costs ($/oz)a

     970 - 1,020  

Copper production (millions of pounds)

     410 - 460  

Copper cost metrics

  

Cost of sales - copper ($/lb)

     1.90 - 2.10  

C1 cash costs ($/lb)a

     1.40 - 1.60  

Depreciation ($/lb)

     0.60 - 0.70  

All-in sustaining costs ($/lb)a

     2.00 - 2.20  

Exploration and project expenses

     280 - 320  

Exploration and evaluation

     230 - 250  

Project expenses

     50 - 70  

General and administrative expenses

     ~190  

Corporate administration

     ~130  

Share-based compensationb

     ~60  

Other expense

     80 - 100  

Finance costs, net

     330 - 370  

Attributable capital expenditures:

  

Attributable minesite sustaining

     1,250 - 1,450  

Attributable project

     550 - 650  

Total attributable capital expenditures

     1,800 - 2,100  

Effective income tax ratec

     28% - 34%  

Key assumptions (used for guidance)

 

Gold Price ($/oz)

     1,700

Copper Price ($/lb)

     2.75

Oil Price (WTI) ($/barrel)

     60

AUD Exchange Rate (AUD:USD)

     0.75

ARS Exchange Rate (USD:ARS)

     100

CAD Exchange Rate (USD:CAD)

     1.30

CLP Exchange Rate (USD:CLP)

     750

EUR Exchange Rate (EUR:USD)

     1.20

 

a.

Total cash costs, C1 cash costs and all-in sustaining costs are non-GAAP financial performance measures with no standardized meaning under IFRS and therefore may not be comparable to similar measures of performance presented by other issuers. For further information and a detailed reconciliation of the non-GAAP measures used in this section of the MD&A to the most directly comparable IFRS measure, please see pages 74 to 92 of this MD&A.

b.

Based on a one-month trailing average ending December 31, 2020 of US$23.27 per share.

c.

Based on key assumptions included in this table.

 

 

BARRICK FIRST QUARTER 2021   31   MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS


Operating Division Guidance

Our 2021 forecast gold and copper production, cost of salesa, total cash costsb, all-in sustaining costsb, and C1 cash costsb ranges by operating division are as follows:

 

Operating Division

    
2021 forecast attributable
production (000s ozs)
 
 
    
2021 forecast cost of
salesa ($/oz)
 
 
    
2021 forecast total cash
costsb ($/oz)
 
 
    
2021 forecast all-in
sustaining costsb ($/oz)
 
 

Gold

           

Carlin (61.5%)c

     940 - 1,000        920 - 970        740 - 790        1,050 - 1,100  

Cortez (61.5%)d

     500 - 550        1,000 - 1,050        700 - 750        940 - 990  

Turquoise Ridge (61.5%)

     390 - 440        950 - 1,000        620 - 670        810 - 860  

Phoenix (61.5%)

     100 - 120        1,800 - 1,850        725 - 775        970 - 1,020  

Long Canyon (61.5%)

     140 - 160        800 - 850        180 - 230        240 - 290  

Nevada Gold Mines (61.5%)

     2,100 - 2,250        980 - 1,030        660 - 710        910 - 960  

Hemlo

     200 - 220        1,200 - 1,250        950 - 1,000        1,280 - 1,330  

North America

     2,300 - 2,450        990 - 1,040        690 - 740        940 - 990  

Pueblo Viejo (60%)

     470 - 510        880 - 930        520 - 570        760 - 810  

Veladero (50%)

     130 - 150        1,510 - 1,560        820 - 870        1,720 - 1,770  

Porgera (47.5%)e

                           

Latin America & Asia Pacific

     600 - 660        1,050 - 1,100        600 - 650        1,000 - 1,050  

Loulo-Gounkoto (80%)

     510 - 560        980 - 1,030        630 - 680        930 - 980  

Kibali (45%)

     350 - 380        990 - 1,040        590 - 640        800 - 850  

North Mara (84%)

     240 - 270        970 - 1,020        740 - 790        960 - 1,010  

Tongon (89.7%)

     180 - 200        1,470 - 1,520        1,000 - 1,050        1,140 - 1,190  

Bulyanhulu (84%)

     170 - 200        980 - 1,030        580 - 630        810 - 860  

Buzwagi (84%)

     30 - 40        1,360 - 1,410        1,250 - 1,300        1,230 - 1,280  

Africa & Middle East

     1,500 - 1,600        1,050 - 1,100        690 - 740        920 - 970  

Total Attributable to Barrickf,g,h

     4,400 - 4,700        1,020 - 1,070        680 - 730        970 - 1,020  
      
2021 forecast attributable
production (M lbs)
 
 
    
2021 forecast cost of
salesa ($/lb)
 
 
    
2021 forecast C1 cash
costsb ($/lb)
 
 
    
2021 forecast all-in
sustaining costsb ($/lb)
 
 

Copper

           

Lumwana

     250 - 280        1.85 - 2.05        1.45 - 1.65        2.25 - 2.45  

Zaldívar (50%)

     90 - 110        2.30 - 2.50        1.65 - 1.85        1.90 - 2.10  

Jabal Sayid (50%)

     70 - 80        1.40 - 1.60        1.10 - 1.30        1.30 - 1.50  

Total Copperg

     410 - 460        1.90 - 2.10        1.40 - 1.60        2.00 - 2.20  

 

  a.

Gold cost of sales per ounce is calculated as cost of sales across our gold operations (excluding sites in care and maintenance) divided by ounces sold (both on an attributable basis using Barrick’s ownership share). Copper cost of sales per pound is calculated as cost of sales across our copper operations divided by pounds sold (both on an attributable basis using Barrick’s ownership share).

  b.

Total cash costs, all-in sustaining costs and C1 cash costs are non-GAAP financial performance measures with no standardized meaning under IFRS and therefore may not be comparable to similar measures of performance presented by other issuers. For further information and a detailed reconciliation of the non-GAAP measures used in this section of the MD&A to the most directly comparable IFRS measures, please see pages 74 to 92 of this MD&A.

  c.

Included within our 61.5% interest in Carlin is NGM’s 60% interest in South Arturo.

  d.

Includes Goldrush.

  e.

Porgera was placed on temporary care and maintenance in April 2020 and remains excluded from our 2021 guidance. On April 9, 2021, the Government of Papua New Guinea and BNL, the operator of the Porgera joint venture, signed a binding Framework Agreement in which they agreed on a partnership for Porgera’s future ownership and operation. We expect to update our guidance to include Porgera following both the execution of definitive agreements to implement the Framework Agreement and the finalization of a timeline for the resumption of full mine operations.

  f.

Total cash costs and all-in sustaining costs per ounce include the impact of hedges and/or costs allocated to non-operating sites.

  g.

Operating division guidance ranges reflect expectations at each individual operating division, and may not add up to the company-wide guidance range total. Guidance ranges exclude Pierina, Lagunas Norte, and Golden Sunlight, which are producing incidental ounces while in closure or care and maintenance.

  h.

Includes corporate administration costs.

 

BARRICK FIRST QUARTER 2021   32   MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS


Production and Cost Summary - Gold

 

      For the three months ended
                  3/31/21            12/31/20         % Change                       3/31/20         % Change

Nevada Gold Mines LLC (61.5%)a

         

Gold produced (000s oz)

    485     546   (11)%   526   (8)%

Cost of sales ($/oz)

    1,047   1,008   4 %   995   5 %

Total cash costs ($/oz)b

    686   667   3 %   690   (1)%

All-in sustaining costs ($/oz)b

    932   873   7 %   952   (2)%

Carlin (61.5%)c

         

Gold produced (000s oz)

    229   260   (12)%   253   (9)%

Cost of sales ($/oz)

    950   917   4 %   970   (2)%

Total cash costs ($/oz)b

    766   740   4 %   776   (1)%

All-in sustaining costs ($/oz)b

    1,045   1,005   4 %   1,007   4 %

Cortez (61.5%)d

         

Gold produced (000s oz)

    100   118   (15)%   128   (22)%

Cost of sales ($/oz)

    1,251   1,043   20 %   878   42 %

Total cash costs ($/oz)b

    860   738   17 %   614   40 %

All-in sustaining costs ($/oz)b

    1,203   906   33 %   1,009   19 %

Turquoise Ridge (61.5%)

         

Gold produced (000s oz)

    92   91   1 %   84   10 %

Cost of sales ($/oz)

    1,007   1,064   (5)%   1,032   (2)%

Total cash costs ($/oz)b

    647   687   (6)%   668   (3)%

All-in sustaining costs ($/oz)b

    741   757   (2)%   806   (8)%

Phoenix (61.5%)

         

Gold produced (000s oz)

    25   26   (4)%   35   (29)%

Cost of sales ($/oz)

    2,051   2,054   0 %   1,583   30 %

Total cash costs ($/oz)b

    346   590   (41)%   737   (53)%

All-in sustaining costs ($/oz)b

    530   670   (21)%   914   (42)%

Long Canyon (61.5%)

         

Gold produced (000s oz)

    39   51   (24)%   26   50%

Cost of sales ($/oz)

    511   674   (24)%   1,025   (50)%

Total cash costs ($/oz)b

    79   145   (46)%   345   (77)%

All-in sustaining costs ($/oz)b

    156   324   (52)%   561   (72)%

Pueblo Viejo (60%)

         

Gold produced (000s oz)

    137   159   (14)%   143   (4)%

Cost of sales ($/oz)

    816   803   2 %   767   6 %

Total cash costs ($/oz)b

    507   493   3 %   502   1 %

All-in sustaining costs ($/oz)b

    689   689   0 %   626   10 %

Loulo-Gounkoto (80%)

         

Gold produced (000s oz)

    154   123   25 %   141   9 %

Cost of sales ($/oz)

    974   1,149   (15)%   1,002   (3)%

Total cash costs ($/oz)b

    608   734   (17)%   614   (1)%

All-in sustaining costs ($/oz)b

    920   923   0 %   891   3 %

Kibali (45%)

         

Gold produced (000s oz)

    86   92   (7)%   91   (5)%

Cost of sales ($/oz)

    1,065   1,163   (8)%   1,045   2 %

Total cash costs ($/oz)b

    691   616   12 %   582   19 %

All-in sustaining costs ($/oz)b

    856   783   9 %   773   11 %

Veladero (50%)

         

Gold produced (000s oz)

    32   58   (45)%   75   (57)%

Cost of sales ($/oz)

    1,151   1,074   7 %   1,182   (3)%

Total cash costs ($/oz)b

    736   698   5 %   788   (7)%

All-in sustaining costs ($/oz)b

    2,104   1,428   47 %   1,266   66 %

Porgera (47.5%)e

         

Gold produced (000s oz)

          — %   62   — %

Cost of sales ($/oz)

          — %   1,097   — %

Total cash costs ($/oz)b

          — %   941   — %

All-in sustaining costs ($/oz)b

          — %   1,089   — %

 

BARRICK FIRST QUARTER 2021   33   MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS


Production and Cost Summary - Gold (continued)

 

      For the three months ended
                  3/31/21            12/31/20       % Change                       3/31/20       % Change

Tongon (89.7%)

         

Gold produced (000s oz)

    48     66   (27)%   61   (21)%

Cost of sales ($/oz)

    1,510   1,371   10 %   1,368   10 %

Total cash costs ($/oz)b

    995   810   23 %   762   31 %

All-in sustaining costs ($/oz)b

    1,062   853   25 %   788   35 %

Hemlo

         

Gold produced (000s oz)

    47   57   (18)%   57   (18)%

Cost of sales ($/oz)

    1,610   1,379   17 %   1,119   44 %

Total cash costs ($/oz)b

    1,324   1,104   20 %   945   40 %

All-in sustaining costs ($/oz)b

    1,840   1,464   26 %   1,281   44 %

North Mara (84%)

         

Gold produced (000s oz)

    62   61   2 %   65   (5)%

Cost of sales ($/oz)

    1,061     1,073   (1)%   959   11 %

Total cash costs ($/oz)b

    832     799   4 %   646   29 %

All-in sustaining costs ($/oz)b

    1,038     989   5 %   816   27 %

Buzwagi (84%)

         

Gold produced (000s oz)

    17   21   (19)%   22   (23)%

Cost of sales ($/oz)

    1,486   1,314   13 %   1,373   8 %

Total cash costs ($/oz)b

    1,450   1,267   14 %   1,275   14 %

All-in sustaining costs ($/oz)b

    1,467   1,283   14 %   1,288   14 %

Bulyanhulu (84%)

         

Gold produced (000s oz)

    33   23   43 %   7   371 %

Cost of sales ($/oz)

    1,211   1,181   3 %   1,685   (28)%

Total cash costs ($/oz)b

    865   610   42 %   686   26 %

All-in sustaining costs ($/oz)b

    957   664   44 %   906   6 %
           

Total Attributable to Barrickf

         

Gold produced (000s oz)

    1,101   1,206   (9)%   1,250   (12)%

Cost of sales ($/oz)g

    1,073   1,065   1 %   1,020   5 %

Total cash costs ($/oz)b

    716   692   3 %   692   3 %

All-in sustaining costs ($/oz)b

    1,018   929   10 %   954   7 %

 

a.

These results represent our 61.5% interest in Carlin (including NGM’s 60% interest in South Arturo), Cortez, Turquoise Ridge, Phoenix and Long Canyon.

b.

These are non-GAAP financial performance measures with no standardized meaning under IFRS and therefore may not be comparable to similar measures presented by other issuers. For further information and a detailed reconciliation of each non-GAAP measure used in this section of the MD&A to the most directly comparable IFRS measure, please see pages 74 to 92 of this MD&A.

c.

Included within our 61.5% interest in Carlin is NGM’s 60% interest in South Arturo.

d.

Starting in the first quarter of 2021, Goldrush is reported as part of Cortez as it is operated by Cortez management. Comparative periods have been restated to include Goldrush.

e.

As Porgera was placed on care and maintenance on April 25, 2020, no operating data or per ounce data is provided.

f.

Excludes Pierina, Lagunas Norte, Golden Sunlight, and Morila (40%) up until its divestiture in November 2020, as these assets are producing incidental ounces while in closure or care and maintenance.

g.

Gold cost of sales per ounce is calculated as cost of sales across our gold operations (excluding sites in care and maintenance) divided by ounces sold (both on an attributable basis using Barrick’s ownership share).

 

BARRICK FIRST QUARTER 2021   34   MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS


Production and Cost Summary - Copper

 

      For the three months ended
                  3/31/21            12/31/20       % Change                       3/31/20       % Change

Lumwana

         

Copper production (millions lbs)

    51     78   (35)%   64   (20)%

Cost of sales ($/lb)

    1.97   1.96   1 %   1.94   2 %

C1 cash costs ($/lb)a

    1.48   1.58   (6)%   1.63   (9)%

All-in sustaining costs ($/lb)a

    2.37   2.60   (9)%   2.26   5 %

Zaldívar (50%)

         

Copper production (millions lbs)

    24   23   4 %   31   (23)%

Cost of sales ($/lb)

    3.03   2.68   13 %   2.39   27 %

C1 cash costs ($/lb)a

    2.25   2.01   12 %   1.71   32 %

All-in sustaining costs ($/lb)a

    2.47   2.70   (9)%   1.99   24 %

Jabal Sayid (50%)

         

Copper production (millions lbs)

    18   18   0 %   20   (10)%

Cost of sales ($/lb)

    1.21   1.53   (21)%   1.28   (5)%

C1 cash costs ($/lb)a

    1.06   1.15   (8)%   0.97   9 %

All-in sustaining costs ($/lb)a

    1.22   1.27   (4)%   1.11   10 %

Total Copper

         

Copper production (millions lbs)

    93   119   (22)%   115   (19)%

Cost of sales ($/lb)b

    2.11   2.06   2 %   1.96   8 %

C1 cash costs ($/lb)a

    1.60   1.61   (1)%   1.55   3 %

All-in sustaining costs ($/lb)a

    2.26   2.42   (7)%   2.04   11 %

 

a.

These are non-GAAP financial performance measures with no standardized meaning under IFRS and therefore may not be comparable to similar measures presented by other issuers. For further information and a detailed reconciliation of each non-GAAP measure used in this section of the MD&A to the most directly comparable IFRS measure, please see pages 74 to 92 of this MD&A.

b.

Copper cost of sales per pound is calculated as cost of sales across our copper operations divided by pounds sold (both on an attributable basis using Barrick’s ownership share).

Operating Divisions Performance

 

 

Our presentation of reportable operating segments consists of nine gold mines (Carlin, Cortez, Turquoise Ridge, Pueblo Viejo, Loulo-Gounkoto, Kibali, Veladero, North Mara and Bulyanhulu). Starting in the first quarter of 2021, Goldrush was included as part of Cortez as management began reviewing the operating results and assessing performance on a combined level. The remaining operating segments, including our remaining gold mines, copper mines and

project, have been grouped into an “other” category and will not be reported on individually. Segment performance is evaluated based on a number of measures including operating income before tax, production levels and unit production costs. Certain costs are managed on a consolidated basis and are therefore not reflected in segment income.

 

 

BARRICK FIRST QUARTER 2021   35   MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS


Nevada Gold Mines (61.5% basis)a, Nevada USA

Summary of Operating and Financial Data

 

       For the three months ended  
                 3/31/21                  12/31/20       % Change                       3/31/20       % Change  

Total tonnes mined (000s)

    54,157      57,614   (6)%   56,516   (4)%

Open pit ore

    8,170     8,843   (8)%   10,433   (22)%

Open pit waste

    44,685     47,472   (6)%   44,808   0 %

Underground

    1,302     1,299   0 %   1,275   2 %

Average grade (grams/tonne)

         

Open pit mined

    1.09     1.02   7 %   0.78   40 %

Underground mined

    9.22     9.39   (2)%   10.03   (8)%

Processed

    2.18     2.05   6 %   1.71   27 %

Ore tonnes processed (000s)

    10,025     10,717   (6)%   12,539   (20)%

Oxide mill

    3,171     3,220   (2)%   3,189   (1)%

Roaster

    1,397     1,468   (5)%   1,304   7 %

Autoclave

    1,193     1,207   (1)%   1,402   (15)%

Heap leach

    4,264     4,822   (12)%   6,464   (34)%

Recovery rateb

    79 %     79 %   0 %   81 %   (2)%

Oxide Millb

    74 %     73 %   1 %   72 %   3 %

Roaster

    86 %     86 %   0 %   86 %   0 %

Autoclave

    68 %     69 %   (1)%   75 %   (9)%

Gold produced (000s oz)

    485     546   (11)%   526   (8)%

Oxide mill

    71     83   (14)%   71   0 %

Roaster

    241     270   (11)%   260   (7)%

Autoclave

    109     111   (2)%   129   (16)%

Heap leach

    64     82   (22)%   66   (3)%

Gold sold (000s oz)

    488     542   (10)%   528   (8)%

Revenue ($ millions)

    889     1,032   (14)%   853   4 %

Cost of sales ($ millions)

    508     542   (6)%   527   (4)%

Income ($ millions)

    375     482   (22)%   316   19 %

EBITDA ($ millions)c

    517     634   (18)%   462   12 %

EBITDA marginc,d

    58%     61%   (5)%   54 %   8 %

Capital expenditures ($ millions)e

    134     126   6 %   143   (6)%

Minesite sustaining

    113     95   19 %   122   (7)%

Project

    21     31   (32)%   21   0 %

Cost of sales ($/oz)

    1,047     1,008   4 %   995   5 %

Total cash costs ($/oz)c

    686     667   3 %   690   (1)%

All-in sustaining costs ($/oz)c

    932     873   7 %   952   (2)%

All-in costs ($/oz)c

    974     925   5 %   993   (2%)

 

  a. 

Barrick is the operator of the joint venture and owns 61.5%, with Newmont Corporation owning the remaining 38.5%. Nevada Gold Mines is accounted for as a subsidiary with a 38.5% non-controlling interest. These results represent our 61.5% interest in Carlin (including NGM’s 60% interest in South Arturo), Cortez, Turquoise Ridge, Phoenix and Long Canyon.

  b.

Excludes the Gold Quarry (Mill 5) concentrator.

  c.

These are non-GAAP financial performance measures with no standardized meaning under IFRS and therefore may not be comparable to similar measures presented by other issuers. For further information and a detailed reconciliation of each non-GAAP measure used in this section of the MD&A to the most directly comparable IFRS measure, please see pages 74 to 92 of this MD&A.

  d.

Represents EBITDA divided by revenue.

  e.

Amounts presented exclude capitalized interest.

 

Nevada Gold Mines (“NGM”) includes Carlin, Cortez, Turquoise Ridge, Phoenix and Long Canyon. Barrick is the operator of the joint venture and owns 61.5%, with Newmont owning the remaining 38.5%. Refer to the following pages for a detailed discussion of each minesite’s results.

Regulatory Matters

In a Special Session of the Nevada Legislature, which commenced on July 8, 2020, a bill was passed that temporarily requires the advance payment of the portion of the Net Proceeds of Minerals tax (“NPT”) that is distributed to the State General Fund, representing half the total NPT. Accordingly, an advance payment of $72 million was made in the first quarter of 2021, which was based upon the estimated NPT liability for 2021. This advance payment is in

 

 

BARRICK FIRST QUARTER 2021   36   MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS


addition to the total payment related to 2020, which is estimated at approximately $147 million and is expected to be paid in the second quarter of 2021. This bill mirrors legislation introduced in 2009 following the Global Financial Crisis, and had been part of discussions between Nevada Gold Mines and the Governor of Nevada in the first half of 2020 on measures to support the State through the Covid-19 pandemic.

In a subsequent Special Session, which commenced on July 31, 2020, three resolutions were passed proposing amendments to the Nevada Constitution to modify provisions regarding the NPT. Two resolutions seek to eliminate the 5% cap on the NPT and replace it with a 7.75% rate on the gross proceeds from mining. The third resolution proposes to increase the cap on the NPT from 5% to 12%. All three resolutions would significantly impact the long-term viability of the Nevada mining industry. These resolutions require further approvals, including a statewide vote to become law. If any of those resolutions were to ultimately result in an amendment of the Nevada Constitution, a potentially multi-year process, it could significantly increase the State taxes payable by NGM, which would negatively impact future cash flows.

A number of the rural Nevada counties and NGM filed lawsuits in the Nevada District Court, challenging the constitutionality of these resolutions. These lawsuits were subsequently consolidated into one. On January 27, 2021, the Nevada District Court granted a summary judgment in favor of the Nevada Legislature, concluding that the matter is not yet ripe for adjudication. On February 24, 2021, Nevada Gold Mines filed an appeal to this decision to the Nevada Supreme Court and may renew its challenge should the resolutions pass a second legislative approval. Separately, Nevada Gold Mines and the Nevada Mining Association are committed to and engaged in constructive discussions with the Governor, the Legislature and other affected stakeholders seeking to reach a solution that secures the mining industry’s ability to continue supporting the rural counties and the State of Nevada for the long term.

 

 

BARRICK FIRST QUARTER 2021   37   MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS


Carlin (61.5% basis)a, Nevada USA

Summary of Operating and Financial Data

 

    For the three months ended

 

                  3/31/21              12/31/20       % Change                       3/31/20         % Change  

Total tonnes mined (000s)

    18,898      19,761   (4%)   17,120     10%  

Open pit ore

    882     919   (4%)   1,467     (40%

Open pit waste

    17,215     18,038   (5%)   14,901     16%  

Underground

    801     804   0%   752     7%  

Average grade (grams/tonne)

         

Open pit mined

    0.95     1.42   (33%)   1.36     (30%

Underground mined

    8.75     8.78   0%   9.45     (7%

Processed

    3.49     3.82   (9%)   3.41     2%  

Ore tonnes processed (000s)

    3,026     3,053   (1%)   3,229     (6%

Oxide mill

    749     785   (5%)   669     12%  

Roasters

    1,058     1,143   (7%)   928     14%  

Autoclave

    525     595   (12%)   853     (38%

Heap leach

    694     530   31%   779     (11%

Recovery rateb

    78%     79%   (1%)   80 %     (3%

Roasters

    86%     87%   (1%)   85 %     1%  

Autoclave

    45%     48%   (6%)   64 %     (30%

Gold produced (000s oz)

    229     260   (12%)   253     (9%

Oxide mill

    7     9   (22%)   9     (22%

Roasters

    188     214   (12%)   183     3%  

Autoclave

    25     27   (7%)   50     (50%

Heap leach

    9     10   (10%)   11     (18%

Gold sold (000s oz)

    231     259   (11%)   256     (10%

Revenue ($ millions)

    408     479   (15%)   407     0%  

Cost of sales ($ millions)

    219     237   (8%)   248     (12%

Income ($ millions)

    188     244   (23%)   153     23%  

EBITDA ($ millions)c

    230     289   (20%)   202     14%  

EBITDA marginc,d

    56%     60%   (7%)   50 %     12%  

Capital expenditures ($ millions)

    61     57   7%   55     11%  

Minesite sustaining

    61     57   7%   55     11%  

Project

    0     0   0%   0     0%  

Cost of sales ($/oz)

    950     917   4%   970     (2%

Total cash costs ($/oz)c

    766     740   4%   776     (1%

All-in sustaining costs ($/oz)c

    1,045     1,005   4%   1,007     4%  

All-in costs ($/oz)c

    1,045     1,005   4%   1,007     4%  

 

  a. 

Included within our 61.5% interest in Carlin is NGM’s 60% interest in South Arturo.

  b.

Excludes the Gold Quarry (Mill 5) concentrator.

  c.

These are non-GAAP financial performance measures with no standardized meaning under IFRS and therefore may not be comparable to similar measures presented by other issuers. For further information and a detailed reconciliation of each non-GAAP measure used in this section of the MD&A to the most directly comparable IFRS measure, please see pages 74 to 92 of this MD&A.

  d.

Represents EBITDA divided by revenue.

 

Safety and Environment

Health and safety across Carlin was restructured to align with business needs and the newly introduced reporting framework within the NGM health and safety structure. There were five lost time injuries (“LTIs”) recorded during the first quarter of 2021 with a LTIFR3 of 2.39 per million hours worked. This compares to one LTI and a LTIFR3 of 0.45 in the prior quarter. The TRIFR3 for the first quarter of 2021 was 3.82 per million hours worked, an increase from the prior quarter of 2.25. No Class 14 environmental incidents occurred during the first quarter of 2021.

Financial Results

Q1 2021 compared to Q4 2020

Carlin’s income for the first quarter of 2021 was 23% lower than the prior quarter due to a decrease in sales volume, higher cost of sales per ounce2 and a lower realized gold price1.

Gold production in the first quarter of 2021 was 12% lower compared to the prior quarter, mainly from lower roaster throughput due to higher carbonaceous content, which in turn also negatively impacted the overall feed grade due to blending. Underground mined tonnes and grade were both consistent with the prior quarter. Open pit ore tonnes mined were 4% lower quarter-over-quarter,

 

 

BARRICK FIRST QUARTER 2021   38   MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS


driven by continued stripping for the Goldstrike 5th NW layback. The average open pit mined grade was 33% lower, due to the mining of a higher proportion of material for the heap leach compared to the prior quarter. The annual maintenance shutdown for both Carlin roasters is scheduled for the second quarter of 2021.

Cost of sales per ounce2 and total cash costs per ounce1 in the first quarter of 2021 were both 4% higher than the prior quarter, primarily due to the impact of lower sales as a result of lower production. In the first quarter of 2021, all-in sustaining costs per ounce1 were 4% higher than the prior quarter due to higher total cash costs per ounce1 and higher minesite sustaining capital expenditures.

Capital expenditures in the first quarter of 2021 increased by 7% compared to the prior quarter, primarily due to increased capitalized stripping.

Q1 2021 compared to Q1 2020

Carlin’s income for the three month period ended March 31, 2021 was 23% higher than the same prior year period due to a higher realized gold price1 and a lower cost of sales per ounce2, partially offset by lower sales volume.

Gold production for the three month period ended March 31, 2021 was 9% lower compared to the same prior year period, mainly due to lower production from the Goldstrike autoclave following the transition from acid to alkaline ore. As previously disclosed, the Goldstrike

autoclave completed processing of acidic ore at the end of the third quarter of 2020. This was partially offset by higher throughput at the roasters due to improved operational performance. Total tonnes mined increased compared to the same prior year period due to shorter hauls and an additional electric shovel, while open pit ore tonnes mined decreased by 40% due to stripping for the Goldstrike 5th NW layback. Average open pit mined grade decreased by 30%, due to the mining of a higher proportion of material for the heap leach compared to the same prior year period. Underground tonnes mined were higher compared to the same prior year period due to upgraded equipment and larger haulage capacity, while underground mined grade decreased by 7% driven by a change in the mix of ore sources from the complex’s mines.

Cost of sales per ounce2 and total cash costs per ounce1 for the three month period ended March 31, 2021 were slightly lower than the same prior year period. For the three month period ended March 31, 2021, all-in sustaining costs per ounce1 increased by 4% compared to the same prior year period, primarily due to the impact of higher minesite sustaining capital expenditures.

Capital expenditures for the three month period ended March 31, 2021 increased by 11%, mainly due to an increase in capitalized stripping, partially offset by lower expenditures on underground development.

 

 

BARRICK FIRST QUARTER 2021   39   MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS


Cortez (61.5% basis)a, Nevada USA

Summary of Operating and Financial Data

 

    For the three months ended
                 3/31/21              12/31/20       % Change                       3/31/20       % Change

Total tonnes mined (000s)

    20,923      21,842   (4)%   22,696   (8)%

Open pit ore

    1,818     2,279   (20)%   4,566   (60)%

Open pit waste

    18,800     19,280   (2)%   17,841   5 %

Underground

    305     283   8 %   289   6 %

Average grade (grams/tonne)

         

Open pit mined

    0.84     0.95   (12)%   0.44   91 %

Underground mined

    8.51     8.92   (5)%   10.63   (20)%

Processed

    1.81     1.75   3 %   1.06   71 %

Ore tonnes processed (000s)

    2,335     2,553   (9)%   4,783   (51)%

Oxide mill

    556     558   0 %   670   (17)%

Roasters

    339     325   4 %   376   (10)%

Heap leach

    1,440     1,670   (14)%   3,737   (61)%

Recovery rate

    81%     81 %   0 %   84%   (4)%

Oxide Mill

    77%     77 %   0 %   72 %   7 %

Roasters

    84%     85 %   (1)%   88 %   (4)%

Gold produced (000s oz)

    100     118   (15)%   128   (22)%

Oxide mill

    36     45   (20)%   26   38 %

Roasters

    53     56   (5)%   77   (31)%

Heap leach

    11     17   (35)%   25   (56)%

Gold sold (000s oz)

    102     116   (12)%   128   (20)%

Revenue ($ millions)

    179     216   (17)%   203   (12%)

Cost of sales ($ millions)

    127     121   5 %   112   13 %

Income ($ millions)

    49     93   (47)%   89   (45)%

EBITDA ($ millions)b

    88     128   (31)%   122   (28)%

EBITDA marginb,c

    49%     59%   (17)%   60 %   (18)%

Capital expenditures ($ millions)d

    43     37   16 %   59   (27)%

Minesite sustaining

    33     18   83 %   46   (28)%

Project

    10     19   (47)%   13   (23)%

Cost of sales ($/oz)

    1,251     1,043   20 %   878   42 %

Total cash costs ($/oz)b

    860     738   17 %   614   40 %

All-in sustaining costs ($/oz)b

    1,203     906   33 %   1,009   19 %

All-in costs ($/oz)b

    1,303     1,065   22 %   1,112   17 %

 

  a.

Starting in the first quarter of 2021, Goldrush is reported as part of Cortez as it is operated by Cortez management. Comparative periods have been restated to include Goldrush.

  b.

These are non-GAAP financial performance measures with no standardized meaning under IFRS and therefore may not be comparable to similar measures presented by other issuers. For further information and a detailed reconciliation of each non-GAAP measure used in this section of the MD&A to the most directly comparable IFRS measure, please see pages 74 to 92 of this MD&A.

  c.

Represents EBITDA divided by revenue.

  d.

Amounts presented exclude capitalized interest.

 

Safety and Environment

Health and safety across Cortez was restructured to align with business needs and the newly introduced reporting framework within the NGM health and safety structure. There were two LTIs at Cortez during the first quarter of 2021, which resulted in a LTIFR3 of 2.10 per million hours worked, compared to 0.00 in the prior quarter. The TRIFR3 was 3.15 per million hours worked in the first quarter of 2021, an increase from 0.92 in the prior quarter. No Class 14 environmental incidents occurred during the first quarter of 2021.

Financial Results

Q1 2021 compared to Q4 2020

Cortez’s income for the first quarter of 2021 was 47% lower than the fourth quarter of 2020 due to a higher cost of sales per ounce2, decreased sales volume, and a lower realized gold price1.

Gold production in the first quarter of 2021 was 15% lower compared to the prior quarter, driven by lower production across all processing facilities. Oxide mill production was lower due to the processing of slightly lower open pit stockpile grades. Heap leach production was lower compared to the prior quarter due to a combination of a longer leach cycle caused by a higher proportion of alluvium material and a previously disclosed geotechnical event in the Pipeline pit at the end of the third quarter of

 

 

BARRICK FIRST QUARTER 2021   40   MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS


2020, which temporarily delayed the placing of tonnes. Additionally, production from the roasters was lower mainly due to a decrease in ore processed from Cortez Hills Underground (CHUG) as well as lower grades, partially offset by an increase in open pit refractory stockpiles processed.

Cost of sales per ounce2 and total cash costs per ounce1 in the first quarter of 2021 were 20% and 17% higher, respectively, than the prior quarter due to lower sales combined with higher operating costs. Operating costs were higher primarily due to an increase in maintenance at both the open pit and underground. In the first quarter of 2021, all-in sustaining costs per ounce1 were 33% higher than the prior quarter driven by higher total cash costs per ounce1, combined with higher minesite capital expenditures.

Capital expenditures in the first quarter of 2021 were higher than the prior quarter due to higher minesite sustaining capital expenditures, partially offset by lower project capital expenditures. Minesite sustaining capital expenditures were higher compared to the fourth quarter of 2020, primarily due to an increase in capitalized stripping at the Crossroads pit. Lower project capital expenditures were due to the completion of the CHUG Rangefront decline project.

Q1 2021 compared to Q1 2020

Cortez’s income for the three month period ended March 31, 2021 was 45% lower than the same prior year period, primarily due to lower sales volume and a higher cost of sales per ounce2, partially offset by a higher realized gold price1.

Gold production for the three month period ended March 31, 2021 was 22% lower, mainly due to less CHUG refractory ore processed at the Carlin roasters compared to the same prior year period. In addition, lower heap leach

production was due to lower grade ore from Pipeline relative to the heap leach ore from Cortez Hills Open Pit (CHOP) stacked in the same prior year period, as well as fewer tonnes placed. This was partially offset by increased production from the oxide mill, which processed more oxide ore from CHUG in the current period. Total tonnes mined compared to the same prior year period decreased due to a previously disclosed geotechnical event in the Pipeline pit at the end of the third quarter of 2020, which temporarily delayed mining in this area. In addition, total tonnes mined in the current period was impacted by lower overall equipment availability and the reallocation of equipment to buttress construction at CHOP. This was partially offset by increased tonnes mined in the underground.

Cost of sales per ounce2 and total cash costs per ounce1 for the three month period ended March 31, 2021 were 42% and 40% higher, respectively, than the same prior year period, mainly due to the impact of lower sales as a result of lower production. For the three month period ended March 31, 2021, all-in sustaining costs per ounce1 increased by 19% compared to the same prior year period, driven by higher total cash costs per ounce1, partially offset by lower minesite sustaining capital expenditures.

Capital expenditures for the three month period ended March 31, 2021 decreased by 27% from the same prior year period, due to both lower minesite sustaining capital and lower project capital expenditures. Minesite sustaining capital expenditures were lower compared to the same prior year period, primarily due to the completion of dewatering projects and Area 30 leach pad construction, expenditures on equipment used for the CHOP buttress occurring in the same prior year period, and a decrease in capitalized stripping as relatively more mining occurred in operating phases of the Crossroads pit. Lower project capital expenditures were due to the completion of the CHUG Rangefront decline project.

 

 

BARRICK FIRST QUARTER 2021   41   MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS


Turquoise Ridge (61.5%), Nevada USA

Summary of Operating and Financial Data

 

         For the three months ended  
         3/31/21        12/31/20        % Change          3/31/20        % Change  

Total tonnes mined (000s)

       3,569        3,880        (8)%          3,744        (5)%  

Open pit ore

       1,158        1,447        (20)%          1,008        15 %  

Open pit waste

       2,215        2,221        0 %          2,502        (11)%  

Underground

       196        212        (8)%          234        (16)%  

Average grade (grams/tonne)

                  

Open pit mined

       1.87        2.21        (15)%          1.91        (2)%  

Underground mined

       11.64        11.94        (3)%          10.98        6 %  

Processed

       3.42        3.47        (1)%          3.35        2 %  

Ore tonnes processed (000s)

       967        964        0 %          862        12 %  

Oxide Mill

       105        120        (13)%          120        (13)%  

Autoclave

       668        612        9 %          549        22 %  

Heap leach

       194        232        (16)%          193        1 %  

Recovery rate

       82%        82 %        0 %          84 %        (2)%  

Oxide Mill

       87%        86 %        1 %          84 %        4 %  

Autoclave

       81%        82 %        (1)%          85 %        (5)%  

Gold produced (000s oz)

       92        91        1 %          84        10 %  

Oxide Mill

       5        5        0 %          4        25 %  

Autoclave

       84        84        0 %          78        8 %  

Heap leach

       3        2        50 %          2        50 %  

Gold sold (000s oz)

       92        90        2 %          87        6 %  

Revenue ($ millions)

       165        168        (2)%          139        19 %  

Cost of sales ($ millions)

       93        95        (2)%          90        3 %  

Income ($ millions)

       72        72        0 %          47        53 %  

EBITDA ($ millions)a

       104        104        0 %          78        33 %  

EBITDA margina,b

       63%        62 %        2 %          56 %        12 %  

Capital expenditures ($ millions)

       20        10        100 %          19        5 %  

Minesite sustaining

       9        6        50 %          11        (18)%  

Project

       11        4        175 %          8        38%  

Cost of sales ($/oz)

       1,007        1,064        (5)%          1,032        (2)%  

Total cash costs ($/oz)a

       647        687        (6)%          668        (3)%  

All-in sustaining costs ($/oz)a

       741        757        (2)%          806        (8)%  

All-in costs ($/oz)a

       866        799        8 %          903        (4)%  

 

  a.

These are non-GAAP financial performance measures with no standardized meaning under IFRS and therefore may not be comparable to similar measures presented by other issuers. For further information and a detailed reconciliation of each non-GAAP measure used in this section of the MD&A to the most directly comparable IFRS measure, please see pages 74 to 92 of this MD&A.

  b.

Represents EBITDA divided by revenue.

 

Safety and Environment

There were zero LTIs during the first quarter of 2021, versus four LTIs and a LTIFR3 of 5.54 per million hours worked in the prior quarter. The TRIFR3 for the first quarter of 2021 was 2.82 per million hours worked, a decrease from the prior quarter of 5.54. No Class 14 environmental incidents occurred during the first quarter of 2021.

Financial Results

Q1 2021 compared to Q4 2020

Turquoise Ridge’s income for the first quarter of 2021 was in line with the prior quarter due to higher sales volume and lower cost of sales per ounce2, partially offset by a lower realized gold price1.

Gold production in the first quarter of 2021 was 1% higher than the prior quarter as a result of higher throughput

at the Sage autoclave. Improved mining rates at Turquoise Ridge underground in the first quarter of 2021 were largely offset by a fall of ground at Vista underground, which was remediated during the quarter. Major maintenance of the Sage autoclave is scheduled for the second quarter of 2021.

Cost of sales per ounce2 and total cash costs per ounce1 in the first quarter of 2021 were lower than the prior quarter due to lower processing costs. All-in sustaining costs per ounce1 were 2% lower than the prior quarter, primarily reflecting lower total cash costs per ounce1, partially offset by higher minesite sustaining capital expenditures.

Capital expenditures in the first quarter of 2021 increased by 100% compared to the prior quarter due to a ramp up of project capital expenditures related to the Third

 

 

BARRICK FIRST QUARTER 2021   42   MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS


Shaft and higher sustaining capital expenditures associated with the tailings facilities and maintenance.

Q1 2021 compared to Q1 2020

Turquoise Ridge’s income for the first quarter of 2021 was 53% higher than the same prior year period due to a lower cost of sales per ounce2, higher sales volume, and a higher realized gold price1.

Gold production for the three month period ended March 31, 2021 was 10% higher compared to the same prior year period primarily due to improved Turquoise Ridge underground mining rates and significantly improved throughput at the Sage autoclave. These improvements were slightly offset by a fall of ground at Vista underground, which was remediated during the quarter.

Cost of sales per ounce2 and total cash costs per ounce1 for the three month period ended March 31, 2021

were 2% and 3% lower, respectively, than the same prior year period mainly due to increased sales volume as a result of improved performance at Turquoise Ridge underground. All-in sustaining costs per ounce1 decreased by 8%, reflecting lower total cash costs per ounce1 combined with lower minesite sustaining capital expenditures.

Capital expenditures for the three month period ended March 31, 2021 increased by 5% compared to the same prior year period, mainly due to a ramp up of project capital expenditures related to the Third Shaft, partially offset by a decrease in minesite sustaining capital expenditures. The lower minesite sustaining capital expenditures was a result of lower capitalized stripping and underground development, slightly offset by increased expenditure on the tailings facilities as well as maintenance.

 

 

BARRICK FIRST QUARTER 2021   43   MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS


Other Mines - Nevada Gold Mines

Summary of Operating and Financial Data

 

                For the three months ended  
       3/31/21       12/31/20  
      

Gold

produced

(000s oz)

 

 

 

   

Cost of

sales

($/oz)

 

 

 

   

Total cash

costs

($/oz)a

 

 

 

   

All-in

sustaining

costs

($/oz)a

 

 

 

 

   

Capital

Expend-

ituresb

 

 

 

   

Gold

produced

(000s oz)

 

 

 

   

Cost of

sales

($/oz)

 

 

 

   

Total cash

costs

($/oz)a

 

 

 

   

All-in

sustaining

costs

($/oz)a

 

 

 

 

   

Capital

Expend-

ituresb

 

 

 

Phoenix (61.5%)

     25       2,051     346     530     4     26       2,054     590     670     2

Long Canyon (61.5%)

     39       511     79     156     2     51       674     145     324     7

 

  a.

These are non-GAAP financial performance measures with no standardized meaning under IFRS and therefore may not be comparable to similar measures presented by other issuers. For further information and a detailed reconciliation of each non-GAAP measure used in this section of the MD&A to the most directly comparable IFRS measure, please see pages 74 to 92 of this MD&A.

  b.

Includes both minesite sustaining and project capital expenditures.

 

Phoenix (61.5%)

Gold production and cost of sales per ounce2 for Phoenix in the first quarter of 2021 was in line with the prior quarter. All-in sustaining costs per ounce1 were 21% lower than the prior quarter due to lower total cash costs per ounce1, mainly due to higher copper by-product credits. This was partially offset by higher minesite sustaining capital expenditures.

We are initiating a study on the potential recovery of select critical metals from the solvent extraction and electrowinning copper raffinate, in partnership with a local third-party.

Long Canyon (61.5%)

Gold production for Long Canyon in the first quarter of 2021 was 24% lower compared to the fourth quarter of 2020, primarily due to the timing of ore placement as well as lower grades mined in the prior quarter, which impacted production in the current quarter given the mine’s heap leach cycle.

Cost of sales per ounce2 in the first quarter of 2021 was 24% lower than the prior quarter, primarily due to a significant increase in leach pad inventory ounces, which has lowered the cost per ounce. In the first quarter of 2021, all-in sustaining costs per ounce1 decreased by 52% compared to the prior quarter due to lower total cash costs per ounce1 and decreased minesite sustaining capital expenditures. Capital expenditures decreased by 71% compared to the prior quarter due to lower capitalized stripping.

As previously disclosed, permitting activities for the mine life extension have been temporarily paused. A review seeking to optimize the project, including water management, was initiated during the second quarter of 2020 and remains ongoing.

 

 

BARRICK FIRST QUARTER 2021   44   MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS


Pueblo Viejo (60% basis)a, Dominican Republic

Summary of Operating and Financial Data

 

         For the three months ended  
         3/31/21        12/31/20        % Change          3/31/20        % Change  

Open pit tonnes mined (000s)

       6,636        6,248        6 %          4,039        64 %  

Open pit ore

       2,137        2,274        (6)%          627        241 %  

Open pit waste

       4,499        3,974        13 %          3,412        32 %  

Average grade (grams/tonne)

                  

Open pit mined

       2.46        2.68        (8)%          2.21        11 %  

Processed

       3.55        3.91        (9)%          3.44        3 %  

Autoclave ore tonnes processed (000s)

       1,349        1,456        (7)%          1,471        (8)%  

Recovery rate

       88 %        87 %        1 %          89 %        (1)%  

Gold produced (000s oz)

       137        159        (14)%          143        (4)%  

Gold sold (000s oz)

       141        153        (8)%          144        (2)%  

Revenue ($ millions)

       246        291        (15)%          216        14 %  

Cost of sales ($ millions)

       115        122        (6)%          111        4 %  

Income ($ millions)

       131        167        (22)%          102        28 %  

EBITDA ($ millions)b

       168        204        (18)%          134        25 %  

EBITDA marginb,c

       68 %        70 %        (3)%          62 %        10 %  

Capital expenditures ($ millions)

       59        66        (11)%          17        247 %  

Minesite sustaining

       24        27        (11)%          17        41 %  

Project

       35        39        (10)%          0        0 %  

Cost of sales ($/oz)

       816        803        2 %          767        6 %  

Total cash costs ($/oz)b

       507        493        3 %          502        1 %  

All-in sustaining costs ($/oz)b

       689        689        0 %          626        10 %  

All-in costs ($/oz)b

       936        941        (1)%          635        47 %  

 

  a.

Pueblo Viejo is accounted for as a subsidiary with a 40% non-controlling interest. The results in the table and the discussion that follows are based on our 60% share only.

  b.

These are non-GAAP financial performance measures with no standardized meaning under IFRS and therefore may not be comparable to similar measures presented by other issuers. For further information and a detailed reconciliation of each non-GAAP measure used in this section of the MD&A to the most directly comparable IFRS measure, please see pages 74 to 92 of this MD&A.

  c.

Represents EBITDA divided by revenue.

 

Safety and Environment

There were zero LTIs at Pueblo Viejo during the first quarter of 2021, which resulted in a LTIFR3 of 0.00 per million hours worked, consistent with the prior quarter. The TRIFR3 for the first quarter of 2021 was 0.69 per million hours worked, compared to 0.36 in the prior quarter. No Class 14 environmental incidents occurred during the first quarter of 2021.

Financial Results

Q1 2021 compared to Q4 2020

Pueblo Viejo’s income for the first quarter of 2021 was 22% lower than the fourth quarter of 2020, mainly due to lower sales volume and a lower realized gold price1.

Gold production for the first quarter of 2021 was 14% lower than the prior quarter due to lower ore grades in line with the mine and stockpile processing plan, as well as lower throughput resulting from planned autoclave descaling and relining activities in January 2021. We expect lower production in the second quarter of 2021 due to the mine’s annual plant maintenance shutdown.

Cost of sales per ounce2 and total cash costs per ounce1 for the first quarter of 2021 were 2% and 3% higher, respectively, than the prior quarter, due to the impact of lower ore grades as described above. For the first quarter of 2021, all-in sustaining costs per ounce1 were in line with the prior quarter, as higher total cash costs per ounce1 were offset by lower minesite sustaining capital expenditures.

Capital expenditures for the first quarter of 2021 decreased by 11% compared to the prior quarter, primarily from lower project capital expenditures due to the timing of spend on the plant and tailings expansion project. This was combined with lower minesite sustaining capital expenditures due to the purchase of a new ore rehandle fleet in the prior quarter, partially offset by higher capitalized stripping in the current quarter.

Q1 2021 compared to Q1 2020

Pueblo Viejo’s income for the three month period ended March 31, 2021 was 28% higher than the same prior year period, driven by a higher realized gold price1, partially offset by lower sales volume and a higher cost of sales per ounce2.

Gold production for the three month period ended March 31, 2021 was 4% lower than the same prior year period, due to lower throughput resulting from planned autoclave descaling and relining activities, partially offset by higher ore grades in line with the mine and stockpile processing plan.

Cost of sales per ounce2 and total cash costs per ounce1 for the three month period ended March 31, 2021 were 6% and 1% higher, respectively, than the same prior year period due to higher royalty expense from a higher realized gold price1, largely offset by lower energy costs as the Quisqueya power plant transitioned to natural gas fuel. Cost of sales per ounce2 in the three month period ended

 

 

BARRICK FIRST QUARTER 2021   45   MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS


March 31, 2021 was further impacted by higher depreciation following the acquisition of a new ore rehandle fleet during 2020 as well as higher ore mined volumes. For the three month period ended March 31, 2021, all-in sustaining costs per ounce1 increased by 10% compared to the same prior year period, reflecting higher minesite sustaining capital expenditures and the slight increase in total cash costs per ounce1.

Capital expenditures for the three month period ended March 31, 2021 increased by 247% compared to the same prior year period, primarily due to higher project expenditures for the plant and tailings expansion project. This was combined with higher minesite sustaining capital expenditures, partially offset by lower capitalized stripping.

 

 

BARRICK FIRST QUARTER 2021   46   MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS


Loulo-Gounkoto (80% basis)a, Mali

Summary of Operating and Financial Data

 

            For the three months ended 
              3/31/21         12/31/20        % Change              3/31/20        % Change 

Total tonnes mined (000s)

   9,009       8,582        5 %          7,572      19 %

Open pit ore

   149       888        (83)%          599      (75)%

Open pit waste

   8,313       7,111        17 %          6,405      30 %

Underground

   547       583        (6)%          568      (4)%

Average grade (grams/tonne)

                

Open pit mined

   2.82       5.01        (44)%          7.47      (62)%

Underground mined

   4.61       4.55        1 %          4.16      11 %

Processed

   5.38       4.41        22 %          4.96      8 %

Ore tonnes processed (000s)

   984       959        3 %          980      0 %

Recovery rate

   91 %       91 %        0 %          90 %      1 %

Gold produced (000s oz)

   154       123        25 %          141      9 %

Gold sold (000s oz)

   151       126        20 %          123      23 %

Revenue ($ millions)

   269       236        14 %          194      39 %

Cost of sales ($ millions)

   147       146        1 %          122      20 %

Income ($ millions)

   113       91        24 %          68      66 %

EBITDA ($ millions)b

   168       143        17 %          115      46 %

EBITDA marginb,c

   62 %       61 %        2 %          59 %      5 %

Capital expenditures ($ millions)

   55       27        104 %          32      72 %

Minesite sustaining

   43       21        105 %          32      34 %

Project

   12       6        100 %          0      100 %

Cost of sales ($/oz)

   974       1,149        (15)%          1,002      (3)%

Total cash costs ($/oz)b

   608       734        (17)%          614      (1)%

All-in sustaining costs ($/oz)b

   920       923        0 %          891      3 %

All-in costs ($/oz)b

   1,000       970        3 %          891      12 %

 

  a.

Barrick owns 80% of Société des Mines de Loulo SA and Société des Mines de Gounkoto with the Republic of Mali owning 20%. Loulo-Gounkoto is accounted for as a subsidiary with a 20% non-controlling interest on the basis that Barrick controls the asset. The results in the table and the discussion that follows are based on our 80% share, inclusive of the impact of the purchase price allocation resulting from the Merger.

  b.

These are non-GAAP financial performance measures with no standardized meaning under IFRS and therefore may not be comparable to similar measures presented by other issuers. For further information and a detailed reconciliation of each non-GAAP measure used in this section of the MD&A to the most directly comparable IFRS measure, please see pages 74 to 92 of this MD&A.

  c.

Represents EBITDA divided by revenue.

 

Safety and Environment

There was one LTI recorded during the first quarter of 2021, which resulted in a LTIFR3 of 0.22 per million hours worked, compared to 0.25 recorded in the prior quarter. The TRIFR3 for the first quarter of 2021 was 0.89 per million hours worked, a decrease from 1.48 recorded in the prior quarter. No Class 14 environmental incidents occurred during the first quarter of 2021.

Financial Results

Q1 2021 compared to Q4 2020

Loulo-Gounkoto’s income for the first quarter of 2021 was 24% higher than the fourth quarter of 2020, primarily due to increased sales volume and a lower cost of sales per ounce2, partially offset by a lower realized gold price1.

Gold production for the first quarter of 2021 was 25% higher than the prior quarter, mainly due to higher grade ore processed as well as increased throughput following a girth gear replacement.

Cost of sales per ounce2 and total cash costs per ounce1 for the first quarter of 2021 were 15% and 17% lower, respectively, than the prior quarter, primarily due to the impact of higher grades and throughput, lower operating costs per tonne as well as lower royalty expense from a

lower realized gold price1. For the first quarter of 2021, all-in sustaining costs per ounce1 was in line with the prior quarter as a result of lower total cash costs per ounce1, offset by higher minesite sustaining capital expenditures.

Capital expenditures for the first quarter of 2021 increased by 104% compared to the prior quarter, driven by an increase in capitalized stripping at the Gounkoto open pit, which is expected to continue through to the end of the third quarter of 2021. This was partially offset by a decrease in underground development at Loulo. The increase in project capital expenditures was driven by the development of the Gounkoto underground, the complex’s third underground mine.

Q1 2021 compared to Q1 2020

Loulo-Gounkoto’s income for the first quarter of 2021 was 66% higher than the same prior year period, primarily due to a higher realized gold price1, higher sales volume and a lower cost of sales per ounce2.

Gold production in the three month period ended March 31, 2021 was 9% higher compared to the same prior year period, primarily due to higher grade ore processed and an increase in recovery.

 

 

BARRICK FIRST QUARTER 2021   47   MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS


Cost of sales per ounce2 and total cash costs per ounce1 for the first quarter of 2021 were 3% and 1% lower respectively, than the same prior year period, primarily due to the impact of higher grades and recovery. For the first quarter of 2021, all-in sustaining costs per ounce1 increased by 3% compared to the same prior year period, reflecting higher minesite sustaining capital expenditures, partially offset by lower total cash costs per ounce1.

Capital expenditures in the three month period ended March 31, 2021 increased by 72% compared to the same prior year period, driven by both minesite sustaining and project capital expenditures. Higher minesite sustaining capital expenditures were mainly due to higher capitalized stripping at the Gounkoto open pit, higher capitalized drilling and an increase in underground development at the Yalea and Gara mines of Loulo. The increase in project capital expenditures was driven by the development of Gounkoto underground.

 

 

BARRICK FIRST QUARTER 2021   48   MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS


Kibali (45% basis)a, Democratic Republic of Congo

Summary of Operating and Financial Data

 

            For the three months ended 
              3/31/21         12/31/20        % Change              3/31/20        % Change 

Total tonnes mined (000s)

   3,409       3,474        (2) %          3,175      7 %

Open pit ore

   261       308        (15)%          375      (30)%

Open pit waste

   2,694       2,682        0 %          2,333      15 %

Underground

   454       484        (6)%          467      (3)%

Average grade (grams/tonne)

                  

Open pit mined

   2.55      2.39        7 %          2.12      20 %

Underground mined

   5.18       5.37        (4)%          5.16      0 %

Processed

   3.33       3.60        (8)%          3.77      (12)%

Ore tonnes processed (000s)

   894       877        2 %          838      7 %

Recovery rate

   90 %       90 %        0 %          89 %      1 %

Gold produced (000s oz)

   86       92        (7)%          91      (5)%

Gold sold (000s oz)

   86       89        (3)%          88      (2)%

Revenue ($ millions)

   154       168        (8)%          140      10 %

Cost of sales ($ millions)

   92       104        (12)%          93      (1)%

Income ($ millions)

   63       58        9 %          48      31 %

EBITDA ($ millions)b

   95       106        (10)%          89      7 %

EBITDA marginb,c

   62 %       63 %        (2)%          64 %      (3)%

Capital expenditures ($ millions)

   11       12        (8)%          15      (27)%

Minesite sustaining

   11       11        0 %          15      (27)%

Project

        1        (100)%          0      0 %

Cost of sales ($/oz)

   1,065       1,163        (8)%          1,045      2 %

Total cash costs ($/oz)b

   691       616        12 %          582      19 %

All-in sustaining costs ($/oz)b

   856       783        9 %          773      11 %

All-in costs ($/oz)b

   862       787        10 %          773      12 %

 

  a.

Barrick owns 45% of Kibali Goldmines SA (Kibali) with the Democratic Republic of Congo (“DRC”) and our joint venture partner, AngloGold Ashanti, owning 10% and 45%, respectively. Kibali is accounted for as an equity method investment on the basis that the joint venture partners that have joint control have rights to the net assets of the joint venture. The figures presented in this table and the discussion that follows are based on our 45% effective interest in Kibali inclusive of the impact of the purchase price allocation resulting from the Merger.

  b.

These are non-GAAP financial performance measures with no standardized meaning under IFRS and therefore may not be comparable to similar measures presented by other issuers. For further information and a detailed reconciliation of each non-GAAP measure used in this section of the MD&A to the most directly comparable IFRS measure, please see pages 74 to 92 of this MD&A.

  c.

Represents EBITDA divided by revenue.

 

Safety and Environment

Kibali recorded two LTIs during the first quarter of 2021, which resulted in a LTIFR3 of 0.62 per million hours worked, compared to zero LTIs in the prior quarter. The TRIFR3 was 1.24 per million hours worked in the first quarter of 2021, a decrease from 1.61 in the prior quarter. No Class 14 environmental incidents occurred during the first quarter of 2021.

Financial Results

Q1 2021 compared to Q4 2020

Kibali’s income for the first quarter of 2021 was 9% higher than the fourth quarter of 2020 as a result of lower cost of sales per ounce2, partially offset by a lower realized gold price1 and decreased sales volumes.

Gold production for the first quarter of 2021 was 7% lower than the prior quarter, resulting from lower grade ore processed, partially offset by increased throughput.

Cost of sales per ounce2 for the first quarter of 2021 was 8% lower than the prior quarter as a result of lower depreciation expense, partially offset by higher total cash costs per ounce1. The increase in total cash costs per ounce1 of 12% from the prior quarter is mainly due to the impact of lower grades as well higher energy costs resulting

from lower hydroelectric power generation during the dry season. For the first quarter of 2021, all-in sustaining costs per ounce1 increased by 9% compared to the prior quarter, mainly due to higher total cash costs per ounce1.

Capital expenditures in the first quarter of 2021 remained largely in line with the prior quarter.

Q1 2021 compared to Q1 2020

Kibali’s income for the three month period ended March 31, 2021 was 31% higher than the first quarter of 2020, due to a higher realized gold price1, partially offset by decreased sales volumes and a higher cost of sales per ounce2.

Gold production in the three month period ended March 31, 2021 was 5% lower than the same prior year period, mainly due to lower grade ore processed, partially offset by improved throughput and recovery.

Cost of sales per ounce2 and total cash costs per ounce1 for the three month period ended March 31, 2021 were 2% and 19% higher, respectively, than the same prior year period, mainly due to the impact of lower grade ore processed, as well as higher royalty expense from a higher realized gold price1. The increase in cost of sales per ounce2 was partially offset by lower depreciation. For the three month period ended March 31, 2021, all-in sustaining

 

 

BARRICK FIRST QUARTER 2021   49   MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS


costs per ounce1 were 11% higher compared to the same prior year period, mainly due to higher total cash costs per ounce1, partially offset by lower minesite sustaining capital expenditures.

Capital expenditures for the three month period ended March 31, 2021 were 27% lower compared to the same prior year period due to lower spending on underground development as well as the timing of projects.

 

 

BARRICK FIRST QUARTER 2021   50   MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS


Veladero (50% basis)a, Argentina

Summary of Operating and Financial Data

 

         For the three months ended 
              3/31/21       12/31/20          % Change            3/31/20          % Change 

Open pit tonnes mined (000s)

   9,550       8,883        8 %          8,280      15 %

Open pit ore

   1,311       3,792        (65)%          3,871      (66)%

Open pit waste

   8,239       5,091        62 %          4,409      87 %

Average grade (grams/tonne)

                

Open pit mined

   0.78       0.76        3 %          0.74      5 %

Processed

   0.85       0.87        (2)%          0.80      6 %

Heap leach ore tonnes processed (000s)

   1,305       2,976        (56)%          3,243      (60)%

Gold produced (000s oz)

   32       58        (45)%          75      (57)%

Gold sold (000s oz)

   31       51        (39)%          57      (46)%

Revenue ($ millions)

   57       99        (42)%          90      (37)%

Cost of sales ($ millions)

   35       54        (35)%          67      (48)%

Income ($ millions)

   22       44        (50)%          24      (8)%

EBITDA ($ millions)b

   33       61        (46)%          46      (28)%

EBITDA marginb,c

   58 %      62 %        (6)%          51 %      14 %

Capital expenditures ($ millions)

   41       35        17 %          40      3 %

Minesite sustaining

   41       35        17 %          25      64 %

Project

        0        0 %          15      (100)%

Cost of sales ($/oz)

   1,151       1,074        7 %          1,182      (3)%

Total cash costs ($/oz)b

   736       698        5 %          788      (7)%

All-in sustaining costs ($/oz)b

   2,104       1,428        47 %          1,266      66 %

All-in costs ($/oz)b

   2,104       1,428        47 %          1,537      37 %

 

  a.

Barrick owns 50% of Veladero with our joint venture partner, Shandong Gold, owning the remaining 50%. Veladero is proportionately consolidated on the basis that the joint venture partners that have joint control have rights to the assets and obligations for the liabilities relating to the arrangement. The figures presented in this table and the discussion that follows are based on our 50% interest in Veladero inclusive of the impact of remeasurement of our interest in Veladero following the disposal of a 50% interest on June 30, 2017.

  b.

These are non-GAAP financial performance measures with no standardized meaning under IFRS and therefore may not be comparable to similar measures presented by other issuers. For further information and a detailed reconciliation of each non-GAAP measure used in this section of the MD&A to the most directly comparable IFRS measure, please see pages 74 to 92 of this MD&A.

  c.

Represents EBITDA divided by revenue.

Safety and Environment

Veladero had two LTIs during the first quarter of 2021, resulting in a LTIFR3 of 0.66 per million hours worked, compared to 0.00 in the prior quarter. The TRIFR3 for the first quarter of 2021 was 0.99 per million hours worked, compared to 0.69 in the prior quarter. Management continues to focus on contractor management and manual handling/lifting as key areas to improve safety performance. No Class 14 environmental incidents occurred during the first quarter of 2021.

Minera Andina del Sol SRL, the joint venture company that operates the Veladero mine, is the subject of various regulatory proceedings related to operational incidents occurring in March 2017, September 2016 and September 2015. Refer to note 18 to the Financial Statements for more information regarding these and related matters.

Financial Results

Q1 2021 compared to Q4 2020

Veladero’s income for the first quarter of 2021 was 50% lower than the fourth quarter of 2020 primarily due to lower sales volume, a lower realized gold price1 and a higher cost of sales per ounce2.

Gold production in the first quarter of 2021 was 45% lower than the prior quarter, mainly due to a decrease in fresh ore stacked. As previously disclosed, heap leach

processing operations at Veladero will be reduced through the first half of 2021 while the mine transitions to Phase 6. The Phase 6 leach pad expansion remains on track for commissioning by the end of first half of 2021.

Cost of sales per ounce2 and total cash costs per ounce1 in the first quarter of 2021 increased by 7% and 5%, respectively, mainly due to the impact of lower sales volume as a result of lower production, partially offset by higher capitalized stripping and lower direct operating costs due to reduced heap leach processing operations. Total cash costs per ounce1 in the first quarter of 2021 was also impacted by lower silver by-product credits. In the first quarter of 2021, all-in sustaining costs per ounce1 increased by 47% compared to the prior quarter, primarily due to higher minesite sustaining capital expenditures, the impact of reduced sales volume and higher total cash costs per ounce1.

Capital expenditures were 17% higher compared to the prior quarter, mainly due to higher capitalized stripping and the ongoing development of the Phase 6 leach pad expansion.

 

 

BARRICK FIRST QUARTER 2021   51   MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS


Q1 2021 compared to Q1 2020

Veladero’s income for the three month period ended March 31, 2021 was 8% lower compared to the same prior year period, mainly due to lower sales volume, partially offset by a higher realized gold price1 and lower cost of sales per ounce2.

Gold production for the three month period ended March 31, 2021 was 57% lower than the same prior year period, primarily due to a decrease in fresh ore stacked on the heap leach pad as previously disclosed and described above.

Cost of sales per ounce2 and total cash costs per ounce1 for the three month period ended March 31, 2021 were 3% and 7% lower, respectively, than the same prior year period, mainly due to higher capitalized stripping and lower direct operating costs due to reduced heap leach processing operations. Cost of sales per ounce2 was further impacted by higher depreciation per ounce in line with lower sales as a result of lower production. For the three month period ended March 31, 2021, all-in sustaining costs per ounce1 increased by 66% compared to the same prior year period, mainly due to higher minesite sustaining capital expenditures and the impact of reduced sales volume, partially offset by lower total cash costs per ounce1.

Capital expenditures for the three month period ended March 31, 2021 were 3% higher than the same prior year period, mainly due to higher minesite sustaining capital expenditures from the development of the Phase 6 leach pad expansion. This was partially offset by lower project capital expenditures as a result of the final unconditional payment of $15 million that occurred in the same prior year period for the funding of a power transmission line in Argentina as a result of an agreement made with the Provincial Power Regulatory Body of San Juan.

 

Regulatory Matters

On September 1, 2019, the Argentine government issued Decree 609/2019 announcing currency restrictions in Argentina. Subsequently, the Central Bank of Argentina issued Communication “A” 6770 complementing this decree. As a result, all export proceeds are required to be converted into Argentine pesos. Dividend distributions and payments to foreign suppliers now require specific authorizations from the Central Bank. These currency restrictions have had limited impact on mining operations to date but we continue to optimize the timing of our gold sales to minimize our exposure to currency devaluation, while advancing constructive discussions with the Central Bank on our rights to repatriate profits.

On April 6, 2021, the Argentine government issued Decree 234/2021 announcing the implementation of a new regime to promote investment and the expansion of existing businesses in export industries, which includes mining. Regulations that are required to implement this decree are still pending. Decree 234/2021 provides investors the right to repatriate up to 20% of the value of exports generated by a qualifying project for a 15 year period, subject to certain limitations. We are reviewing the terms of this decree and advancing constructive discussions with the Argentine government on promoting investment, while providing regulatory stability for investors.

Separately, on October 2, 2020, the Argentine government issued Decree 785/2020 that established the rate for mining export duties at 8% from October 3, 2020 until December 31, 2021.

 

 

BARRICK FIRST QUARTER 2021   52   MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS


North Mara (84% basis)a, Tanzania

Summary of Operating and Financial Data

 

                     For the three months ended 
              3/31/21       12/31/20          % Change              3/31/20          % Change 

Total tonnes mined (000s)

   248       296        (16)%          2,448      (90)%

Open pit ore

   n/a       n/a        n/a          1,158      n/a

Open pit waste

   n/a       n/a        n/a          993      n/a

Underground

   248       296        (16)%          297      (16)%

Average grade (grams/tonne)

                

Open pit mined

   n/a       n/a        n/a          2.04      n/a

Underground mined

   3.94       5.97        (34)%          4.13      (5)%

Processed

   3.31       3.08        7 %          3.42      (3)%

Ore tonnes processed (000s)

   642       677        (5)%          636      1 %

Recovery rate

   90 %       91 %        (1)%          93 %      (3)%

Gold produced (000s oz)

   62       61        2 %          65      (5)%

Gold sold (000s oz)

   56       63        (11)%          70      (20)%

Revenue ($ millions)

   100       120        (17)%          111      (10)%

Cost of sales ($ millions)

   59       69        (14)%          66      (11)%

Income ($ millions)

   40       49        (18)%          49      (18)%

EBITDA ($ millions)b

   52       66        (21)%          70      (26)%

EBITDA marginb,c

   52 %       55 %        (5)%          63 %      (17)%

Capital expenditures ($ millions)

   16       27        (41)%          13      23 %

Minesite sustaining

   11       11        0 %          11      0 %

Project

        16        (69)%          2      150 %

Cost of sales ($/oz)

   1,061       1,073        (1)%          959      11 %

Total cash costs ($/oz)b

   832       799        4 %          646      29 %

All-in sustaining costs ($/oz)b

   1,038       989        5 %          816      27 %

All-in costs ($/oz)b

   1,134       1,232        (8)%          838      35 %

 

  a.

Barrick owns 84% of North Mara, with the Government of Tanzania owning 16%. North Mara is accounted for as a subsidiary with a 16% non-controlling interest on the basis that Barrick controls the asset. The results in the table and the discussion that follows are based on our 84% share.

  b.

These are non-GAAP financial performance measures with no standardized meaning under IFRS and therefore may not be comparable to similar measures presented by other issuers. For further information and a detailed reconciliation of each non-GAAP measure used in this section of the MD&A to the most directly comparable IFRS measure, please see pages 74 to 92 of this MD&A.

  c.

Represents EBITDA divided by revenue.

Safety and Environment

There was one LTI recorded at North Mara during the first quarter of 2021, which resulted in a LTIFR3 of 0.54 per million hours worked, compared to 0.00 in the prior quarter. The TRIFR3 for the first quarter of 2021 was 1.61 per million hours worked, compared to 0.59 in the prior quarter. No Class 14 environmental incidents occurred during the first quarter of 2021.

Financial Results

Q1 2021 compared to Q4 2020

North Mara’s income for the first quarter of 2021 was 18% lower than the fourth quarter of 2020 due to a lower realized gold price1 as well as lower sales volumes as a result of the timing of gold shipments. This was partially offset by lower cost of sales per ounce2.

In the first quarter of 2021, production was 2% higher than the prior quarter. This was primarily due to higher grade ore processed following improved underground productivity over the past two quarters, which enabled optimized blending between fresh underground ore and lower grade stockpiles. This was partially offset by a reduction in throughput of 5%, reflecting planned maintenance.

Cost of sales per ounce2 in the first quarter of 2021 was overall in line with the prior quarter due to lower depreciation expense driven by extensions to the mine life at Gokona underground and the inclusion of the Gena pushback, offset by higher total cash costs per ounce1. The increase in total cash costs per ounce1 of 4% is mainly due to maintenance of maturing underground equipment. We expect lower costs through an improvement in operational efficiency as replacement equipment is purchased over the near-term. All-in sustaining costs per ounce1 in the first quarter of 2021 was 5% higher than the prior quarter, mainly due to higher total cash costs per ounce1 and higher minesite sustaining capital expenditures on a per ounce basis.

Capital expenditures in the first quarter of 2021 were 41% lower than the prior quarter due to a decrease in project capital expenditures, while minesite sustaining capital expenditures remained consistent with the prior quarter. Lower project capital expenditures in the first quarter of 2021 were driven by our investment in a water treatment plant having approached the final stages of commissioning in the fourth quarter of 2020.

 

 

BARRICK FIRST QUARTER 2021   53   MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS


Q1 2021 compared to Q1 2020

North Mara’s income for the three month period ending March 31, 2021 was 18% lower than the same prior year period, mainly from lower sales volumes due to the timing of gold shipments and a higher cost of sales per ounce2, partially offset by a higher realized gold price1.

For the three month period ended March 31, 2021, production was 5% lower than the same prior year period, mainly from lower grade ore processed due to an increase in lower grade stockpiles in the feed blend. This compares to higher grade open pit ore in the feed blend in the same prior year period when mining remained active at the Rama pit. As previously disclosed, North Mara transitioned to an exclusively underground operation following the temporary cessation of open pit mining in the second quarter of 2020.

Cost of sales per ounce2 and total cash costs per ounce1 in the three month period ending March 31, 2021 were 11% and 29% higher, respectively, than the same prior year period, reflecting lower grade ore processed and lower recoveries following the temporary cessation of open pit mining in the second quarter of 2020 as previously disclosed. All-in sustaining costs per ounce1 in the first quarter of 2021 were 27% higher than the same prior year period, mainly due to higher total cash costs per ounce1 and higher minesite sustaining capital expenditures on a per ounce basis.

For the three month period ending March 31, 2021, capital expenditures increased by 23% compared to the same prior year period due to higher project capital expenditures related to our investment in ongoing water management initiatives, while minesite sustaining capital expenditures remained consistent with the same prior year period.

 

 

BARRICK FIRST QUARTER 2021   54   MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS


Bulyanhulu (84% basis)a, Tanzania

Summary of Operating and Financial Data

 

         For the three months ended 
              3/31/21       12/31/20        % Change            3/31/20          % Change 

Underground tonnes mined (000s)

   125       73        71 %        n/a      0 %

Average grade (grams/tonne)

              

Underground mined

   9.78       9.00        9 %        n/a      0 %

Processed

   9.90       3.14        215 %        0.99      900 %

Ore tonnes processed (000s)

   110       274        (60)%        445      (75)%

Recovery rate

   94 %       81 %        17 %        52 %      81 %

Gold produced (000s oz)

   33       23        43 %        7      371 %

Gold sold (000s oz)

   28       20        40 %        7      300 %

Revenue ($ millions)

   42       36        17 %        12      250 %

Cost of sales ($ millions)

   34       23        48 %        12      183 %

Income ($ millions)

        13        (46)%        (11)      164 %

EBITDA ($ millions)b

   17       23        (26)%        (4)      525 %

EBITDA marginb,c

   40 %       64 %        (38)%        (33)%      220 %

Capital expenditures ($ millions)

   11       37        (70)%        2      450 %

Minesite sustaining

        1        100%        1      100 %

Project

        36        (75)%        1      800 %

Cost of sales ($/oz)

   1,211       1,181        3 %        1,685      (28)%

Total cash costs ($/oz)b

   865       610        42 %        686      26 %

All-in sustaining costs ($/oz)b

   957       664        44 %        906      6 %

All-in costs ($/oz)b

   1,275       2,493        (49)%        1,038      23 %

 

  a.

Barrick owns 84% of Bulyanhulu, with the Government of Tanzania owning 16%. Bulyanhulu is accounted for as a subsidiary with a 16% non-controlling interest on the basis that Barrick controls the asset. The results in the table and the discussion that follows are based on our 84% share.

  b.

These are non-GAAP financial performance measures with no standardized meaning under IFRS and therefore may not be comparable to similar measures presented by other issuers. For further information and a detailed reconciliation of each non-GAAP measure used in this section of the MD&A to the most directly comparable IFRS measure, please see pages 74 to 92 of this MD&A.

  c.

Represents EBITDA divided by revenue.

 

Safety and Environment

There were zero LTIs recorded at Bulyanhulu during the first quarter of 2021, which resulted in a LTIFR3 of 0.00 per million hours worked, compared to 0.87 in the prior quarter. The TRIFR3 for the first quarter of 2021 was 0.63 per million hours worked, which is a decrease from 4.34 in the prior quarter. No Class 14 environmental incidents occurred during the first quarter of 2021.

Financial Results

Q1 2021 compared to Q4 2020

Bulyanhulu’s income for the first quarter of 2021 was 46% lower than the fourth quarter of 2020 as costs related to the restart of underground mining and processing operations were largely capitalized in the prior quarter. Income was also impacted by a lower realized gold price1, partially offset by increased sales volume.

In the first quarter of 2021, production was 43% higher than the prior quarter. This was primarily due to the continued ramp-up of underground mining and processing operations and the transition of mill feed to entirely fresh ore, compared to predominantly tailings re-treatment in the prior quarter. The production ramp-up of Bulyanhulu is scheduled to continue through the first half of 2021 and reach annualized steady-state production by 2022.

Cost of sales per ounce2 and total cash costs per ounce1 in the first quarter of 2021 were 3% and 42% higher, respectively, as costs related to the restart of underground mining and processing operations were largely capitalized

in the prior quarter. However, the increase in cost of sales per ounce2 was partially offset by lower depreciation expense on a per ounce basis due to increased sales volume as a result of higher production. All-in sustaining costs per ounce1 in the first quarter of 2021 was 44% higher than the prior quarter, mainly due to higher total cash costs per ounce1.

Capital expenditures in the first quarter of 2021 were 70% lower than the prior quarter mainly due to a decrease in project capital expenditures following the successful restart of underground mining and processing operations.

Q1 2021 compared to Q1 2020

Bulyanhulu’s income for the three month period ending March 31, 2021 was 164% higher than the same prior year period, mainly from higher sales volume due to the processing of fresh underground ore following the re-start of underground mining and processing operations. In 2020, Bulyanhulu remained largely a tailings re-treatment operation.

For the three month period ended March 31, 2021, production was 371% higher than the same prior year period due to fresh underground ore now feeding the mill following the restart of mining and processing operations as described above. This resulted in higher grades and recoveries compared to the tailings material processed in the same prior year period.

 

 

BARRICK FIRST QUARTER 2021   55   MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS


Cost of sales per ounce2 in the three month period ending March 31, 2021 was 28% lower than the same prior year period mainly due to the impact of higher sales volume on depreciation per ounce, partially offset by higher total cash costs per ounce1. Total cash costs per ounce1 in the three month period ending March 31, 2021 was 26% higher than the same prior year period mainly due to the restart of underground mining and processing operations as described above. All-in sustaining costs per ounce1 in the first quarter of 2021 was 6% higher than the same prior year period, mainly due to higher total cash costs per ounce1, partially offset by lower minesite sustaining capital expenditures on a per ounce basis.

For the three month period ending March 31, 2021, capital expenditures increased by 450% compared to the same prior year period mainly due to the restart of underground mining and processing operations.

                    

 

 

BARRICK FIRST QUARTER 2021   56   MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS


Other Mines - Gold

Summary of Operating and Financial Data

 

               For the three months ended  
     
      3/31/21      12/31/20  
      Gold
produced
(000s oz)
    

Cost of

sales

($/oz)

    

 

Total

cash
costs
($/oz)a

     All-in
sustaining
costs
($/oz)a
     Capital
Expend-
ituresb
     Gold
produced
(000s oz)
    

Cost of

sales

($/oz)

    

Total cash

costs

($/oz)a

    

All-in
sustaining
costs

($/oz)a

    

Capital
Expend-

ituresb

 

Tongon (89.7%)

     48        1,510      995      1,062      2      66        1,371      810      853      2

Hemlo

     47        1,610      1,324      1,840      22      57        1,379      1,104      1,464      20

Buzwagi (84%)

     17        1,486      1,450      1,467      0      21        1,314      1,267      1,283      0

Porgera (47.5%)

                                                                     

 

  a.

These are non-GAAP financial performance measures with no standardized meaning under IFRS and therefore may not be comparable to similar measures presented by other issuers. For further information and a detailed reconciliation of each non-GAAP measure used in this section of the MD&A to the most directly comparable IFRS measure, please see pages 74 to 92 of this MD&A.

  b.

Includes both minesite sustaining and project capital expenditures.

 

Tongon (89.7% basis), Côte d’Ivoire

Gold production for Tongon in the first quarter of 2021 was 27% lower compared to the prior quarter, mainly due to lower grades and throughput reflecting the change in the mine plan related to the previously disclosed mine life extension to 2023. Cost of sales per ounce2 in the first quarter of 2021 was 10% higher than the prior quarter as a result of higher total cash costs per ounce1, partially offset by lower depreciation expense. The increase in total cash costs per ounce1 was primarily driven by the impact of lower grades, partially offset by lower processing and mining costs. All-in sustaining costs per ounce1 in the first quarter of 2021 increased by 25%, reflecting the increase in total cash costs per ounce1 and an increase in minesite sustaining capital expenditures on a per ounce basis compared to the prior quarter.

Hemlo, Ontario, Canada

Hemlo’s gold production in the first quarter of 2021 was 18% lower than the prior quarter due to lower throughput from processing less open pit stockpile material. Cost of sales per ounce2 and total cash costs per ounce1 in the first quarter of 2021 were 17% and 20% higher than the prior quarter, respectively, mainly due to the impact of lower sales as a result of lower production, partially offset by slightly lower operating costs. In the first quarter of 2021, all-in sustaining costs per ounce1 increased by 26% compared to the prior quarter reflecting the increase in total cash costs per ounce1, combined with higher minesite sustaining capital expenditures.

As part of the Company’s efforts to elevate Hemlo to a Tier Two Gold Asset6, a new portal is currently under development to access the Upper C Zone, with mining expected to start in the third quarter of 2021. Improving flexibility with a third mining front at Hemlo will allow underground throughput to ramp-up to a steady state of approximately 1.9 million tonnes per annum from 2022 onwards. In addition, we have planned drilling programs to potentially add resources to extend the mine life past 2030.

Buzwagi (84% basis), Tanzania

As expected, gold production for Buzwagi in the first quarter of 2021 was 19% lower compared to the fourth quarter of 2020 as the mine transitions into closure starting from the third quarter of 2021. Cost of sales per ounce2 and total cash costs per ounce1 in the first quarter of 2021 were 13%

and 14% higher, respectively, compared to the prior quarter due to lower sales volume as a result of lower production. All-in sustaining costs per ounce1 in the first quarter of 2021 increased by 14% mainly due to higher total cash costs per ounce1.

Porgera (47.5% basis), Papua New Guinea

On April 9, 2021, the PNG government and BNL, the 95% owner and operator of the Porgera joint venture, agreed on a partnership for the future ownership and operation of the mine. Porgera has been on care and maintenance since April 2020, when the government declined to renew its SML.

Under the terms of a binding Framework Agreement, ownership of Porgera will be held in a new joint venture owned 51% by PNG stakeholders and 49% by BNL. BNL remains the operator of the mine and is jointly owned by Barrick and Zijin Mining Group. The Framework Agreement also provides, among other things, for:

  PNG stakeholders and BNL to share the economic benefits generated over the life of mine on a 53%/47% basis in favor of the PNG stakeholders;
  BNL to finance the capital required to restart the mine;
  an increase in the equity allocated to a broad group of landowners who are the customary owners of the land where Porgera is located; and
  the state to retain the right to acquire the remaining 49% of the mine from BNL at fair market value after 10 years.

The parties will now work towards the signing of definitive agreements, at which time, full mine recommencement work will begin. Porgera remains excluded from our full year 2021 guidance. We expect to update our guidance following both the execution of definitive agreements to implement the binding Framework Agreement and the finalization of a timeline for the resumption of full mine operations. Refer to note 18 to the Financial Statements for more information.

 

 

BARRICK FIRST QUARTER 2021   57   MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS


Other Mines - Copper

Summary of Operating and Financial Data

 

               For the three months ended  
     
      3/31/21      12/31/20  
     

Copper

production

(millions of

pounds)

    

Cost of

sales

($/lb)

     C1 cash
costs
($/lb)a
    

All-in

sustaining

costs
($/lb)a

    

Capital

Expend-

ituresb

    

Copper

production

(millions of

pounds)

    

Cost of

sales

($/lb)

    

C1 cash

costs
($/lb)a

    

All-in

sustaining

costs
($/lb)a

    

Capital

Expend-

ituresb

 

Lumwana

     51        1.97      1.48      2.37      37      78        1.96      1.58      2.60      48

Zaldívar (50%)

     24        3.03      2.25      2.47      14      23        2.68      2.01      2.70      29

Jabal Sayid (50%)

     18        1.21      1.06      1.22      2      18        1.53      1.15      1.27      2

 

  a. 

These are non-GAAP financial performance measures with no standardized meaning under IFRS and therefore may not be comparable to similar measures presented by other issuers. For further information and a detailed reconciliation of each non-GAAP measure used in this section of the MD&A to the most directly comparable IFRS measure, please see pages 74 to 92 of this MD&A.

  b.

Includes both minesite sustaining and project capital expenditures.

 

Lumwana, Zambia

Copper production for Lumwana in the first quarter of 2021 was 35% lower than the prior quarter mainly as a result of lower grades processed. We expect production at Lumwana in the second half of 2021 to be stronger than the first half, driven by higher grades. Cost of sales per pound2 in the first quarter of 2021 was in line with the prior quarter as lower C1 cash costs per pound1 were offset by higher depreciation expense. C1 cash costs per pound1 in the first quarter of 2021 was 6% lower compared to the prior quarter due to a lower strip ratio. In the first quarter of 2021, all-in sustaining costs per pound1 decreased by 9% from the prior quarter, driven by lower C1 cash costs per pound1 and lower sustaining capital expenditures due to the timing of projects.

Zaldívar (50% basis), Chile

Copper production for Zaldívar in the first quarter of 2021 was 4% higher than the prior quarter mainly due to higher heap leach throughput. Cost of sales per pound2 and C1 cash costs per pound1 were 13% and 12% higher, respectively, than the prior quarter mainly due to the impact of lower capitalized stripping in line with mine sequencing, higher maintenance costs and a stronger Chilean peso. All-in sustaining costs per pound1 in the first quarter of 2021 decreased by 9% compared to the prior quarter, primarily due to lower minesite sustaining capital expenditures, including lower capitalized stripping.

Jabal Sayid (50% basis), Saudi Arabia

Jabal Sayid’s copper production in the first quarter of 2021 was in line with the prior quarter as marginally lower grades processed were offset by higher throughput. Cost of sales per pound2 and C1 cash costs per pound1 in the first quarter of 2021 decreased by 21% and 8%, respectively, compared to the prior quarter mainly due to lower processing costs as well as lower general and administrative expenses. This was partially offset by lower gold by-product credits, resulting from a lower realized gold price1. All-in sustaining costs per pound1 in the first quarter of 2021 decreased by 4% compared to the prior quarter due to lower C1 cash costs per pound1.

 

 

BARRICK FIRST QUARTER 2021   58   MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS


Growth Project Updates

 

 

 

Goldrush Complex, Nevada, USA

At the Goldrush complex, drilling operations continue at both Goldrush and Fourmile (Fourmile is currently not included in the Nevada Gold Mines joint venture with Newmont, but may be contributed if certain criteria are met in the future). The main objectives of this drilling program remain orebody definition, testing of orebody continuity, inferred resource growth and definition of exploration upside. We continue to explore options for reducing the cost and timing of exploration drilling of Fourmile through underground access from Goldrush.

During 2021, underground development and exploration will continue at Goldrush. As part of ongoing exploration and development activities, first ore was mined in the first quarter of 2021, in line with guidance. Activities in 2021 will focus on verifying geological, geotechnical and geohydrological models developed during the feasibility study until the Record of Decision (ROD) is received. Following receipt of the ROD, construction of infrastructure to allow the ramp-up of production activities will commence.

As at March 31, 2021, we have spent $238 million (including $17 million in the first quarter of 2021) on the Goldrush project, inclusive of the exploration declines (100% basis). The current capital estimate for the Goldrush project remains under review, subject to the completion of the final Goldrush feasibility study. The study documentation is expected to be completed in the second quarter of 2021.

Permitting activities continued to advance largely on-track. The Notice of Intent is a significant milestone for the project and is expected in the second quarter of 2021. We continue to expect receipt of the ROD in the first quarter of 2022. This permitting schedule does not impact the current mineplan at this time.

Turquoise Ridge Third Shaft, Nevada, USA7

Construction of the Third Shaft at Turquoise Ridge, which has a hoisting capacity of 5,500 tonnes per day, continues to advance according to schedule and within budget. We continue to expect commissioning in late 2022. Together with increased hoisting capacity, the Third Shaft is expected to provide additional ventilation for underground mining operations as well as shorter material haulage distances.

Construction activities continued in the first quarter of 2021, including shaft sinking and underground construction. Shaft sinking has now advanced to a depth of approximately 928 meters below the collar as of March 31, 2021. Underground construction focused on electrical installation at the 2280 station, with installation of major electrical infrastructure progressing. Surface drilling of the off-shaft slick line commenced, and drilling has reached a depth of 548 meters out of 695 meters.

As at March 31, 2021, we have spent $184 million (including $18 million in the first quarter of 2021) out of an estimated capital cost of approximately $300-$330 million (100% basis).

Pueblo Viejo Plant and Tailings Expansion, Dominican Republic8

The Pueblo Viejo plant and tailings expansion is designed to increase throughput to 14 million tonnes per annum, allowing the operation to maintain minimum average annual

gold production of approximately 800,000 ounces after 2022 (100% basis).

The process plant expansion flowsheet includes an additional primary crusher, coarse ore stockpile and ore reclaim delivering to a new single stage semi-autogenous (“SAG”) mill. A new flotation circuit will concentrate the bulk of the sulfide ore prior to oxidation. The concentrate will be blended with fresh milled ore to feed the modified autoclave circuit, which will have additional oxygen supplied from a new 3,000 tonnes-per-day facility. The existing autoclaves will be upgraded to increase the sulfur processing capacity of each autoclave through additional high-pressure cooling water and recycle flash capability using additional slurry pumping and thickening.

Engineering design of the process plant expansion continued to progress during the first quarter of 2021 and is now 65% complete. Long lead procurement contracts and purchase orders have been placed, with manufacturing of the SAG mill complete and en route to site. The GMD (mill motor) is also now in country.

Construction for the process plant expansion continued to ramp up during the first quarter of 2021, with bulk earthworks complete and civil construction works commenced on the grinding, flotation and oxygen plant. Geotechnical investigations are complete and basic engineering design is progressing according to plan for the infrastructure and waste stockpile extensions. Land acquisition is advancing for the freshwater pipeline relocation. We continue to expect completion of the process plant expansion by the end of 2022.

The social, environmental and technical studies for additional tailings and mine waste rock capacity continued to advance, and we are engaging with local stakeholders to review concerns and feedback. The Dominican Republic government and relevant national authorities are actively supporting the studies. Our efforts remain focused on public disclosure, community relations, land measurement and baseline environmental monitoring.

As at March 31, 2021, we have spent $149 million (including $58 million in the first quarter of 2021) out of an estimated capital cost of approximately $1,300 million (100% basis).

Bulyanhulu Re-Start Project and Feasibility Study

The Bulyanhulu underground ramp-up continued successfully through the first quarter of 2021, with production in line with plan. The production ramp-up is scheduled to continue through the first half of 2021 and reach annualized steady-state production by 2022.

The feasibility study for Bulyanhulu continues to progress towards delivering a fully integrated and re-optimized mine plan. As part of this, geo-metallurgical sampling of Reef 1 has been completed and results from initial metallurgical test work are being integrated with the geological models. Further geotechnical updates are underway with the aim of optimizing the mining sequence and underground development profiles across the mine. We expect completion of the feasibility study by the end of 2021.

The initial surface resource definition drill program in the high-grade Deep West zone is nearing completion and has successfully delineated plunging high-grade zones

 

 

BARRICK FIRST QUARTER 2021   59   MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS


within the overall panel. Underground drill platforms have now been developed to commence infill drilling of the upper panel, targeting delivery of additional mineral reserves by year-end.

Geological re-modeling of Reef 2 mineralization is ongoing and is expected to be completed by the end of the second quarter of 2021. This updated model is expected to form the basis of our 2021 mineral resource and reserve update.

Zaldívar Chloride Leach Project, Chile

Zaldívar is jointly owned by Antofagasta and Barrick, and is operated by Antofagasta.

In December 2019, the Board of Compañía Minera Zaldívar approved the Chloride Leach Project. The capital cost of the project of $189 million (100% basis) consists of the cost of execution and commissioning. The project contemplates the construction of a chloride dosing system, an upgrade of the solvent extraction plant and the construction of additional washing ponds.

During the first quarter of 2021, work at the solvent extraction electrowinning area was focused on the second of four process stream upgrades, which are progressing according to schedule.

Overall project progress is now at 58% completion. Despite a stronger Chilean peso, project costs are trending in line with the approved budget and completion continues to be expected in the first half of 2022.

Upon commissioning, the project is expected to increase copper recoveries by more than 10 percentage

points through the addition of chlorides to the leach solution and with further potential upside in recoveries possible depending on the type of ore being processed. This process is based on a proprietary technology called CuproChlor® that was developed by Antofagasta at its Michilla operation, which had similar ore types to those that are processed at Zaldívar. Once completed and in full operation, the project is expected to increase production at Zaldívar by approximately 10 to 15 thousand tonnes per annum at lower operating costs over the remaining life of mine.

Veladero Power Transmission Project, Chile-Argentina

In 2019, we commenced construction of an extension to the existing Pascua-Lama power transmission line to connect to Veladero. Upon completion, the power transmission line will allow Veladero to convert to grid power exported from Chile and cease operating the current high-cost diesel generation power plant located at site. A power purchase price agreement was executed during the fourth quarter of 2019 to supply power from renewable energy that will significantly reduce Veladero’s carbon footprint. This is expected to reduce CO2 equivalent emissions by 100,000 tonnes per year upon commissioning.

Work continued in the first quarter of 2021 on both the 220kv and 23kv transmission line extensions as well as the Lama substation, with overall progress now at 84% completion. We continue to expect completion of the Veladero power transmission project by the end of 2021.

 

 

Exploration and Mineral Resource Management

 

 

 

The foundation of our exploration strategy starts with a deep organizational understanding that exploration is an investment and a value driver for the business - not a process. Our strategy has multiple elements that all need to be in balance to deliver on the Company’s business plan for growth and long-term sustainability.

First, we seek to deliver projects of a short-to medium-term nature that will drive improvements in mine plans. Second, we seek to make new discoveries that add to Barrick’s Tier One Gold Asset5 portfolio. Third, we seek to optimize the value of major undeveloped projects. Finally, we seek to identify emerging opportunities early in their value chain and secure them by an earn-in or outright acquisition, where appropriate.

Our exploration approach is to first understand the geological framework and ore controls. We then design exploration programs based upon that understanding, instead of simply drilling for mineralized intervals. This has put us in good stead with robust results from multiple projects highlighted in the following section.

North America

Current exploration efforts are focused on finding extensions at our Tier One Gold Assets5. Earlier stage exploration is targeting value creating discoveries and continues to open up new frontiers in Nevada, as well as Hemlo. At the deposit scale, geological cross-sections and subsequent modelling is ongoing with notable advances during the first quarter of 2021 at Turquoise Ridge, the

North Carlin Trend, Ren, Robertson and Hemlo. Exploration and delineation activities are well aligned with the 2021 business and life of mine plans.

Carlin, Nevada, USA9, 10, 11, 12

North of Leeville, a seven-hole exploration program was completed. Results of the program identified two new centers of stratiform, high-grade mineralization in the footwall to the Basin Bounding fault. Additional assays returned 3.1 meters at 16.7 g/t Au, adding to the previously reported intercept of 32.9 meters at 16.9 g/t Au. Evaluation of the area’s full potential has been accelerated. A twelve-hole surface drill program targeting significant resource growth from the northern pod was initiated in late March 2021. The system remains open to the northeast, with assays from scout drilling returning several narrow intercepts including 5.0 meters at 4.5 g/t Au within 42 meters of low-grade mineralization. In addition to the surface program, drilling to add resources and support reserve conversion continues from underground.

South of Goldstrike, potential remains down plunge of Deep Post where high-grade mineralization is structurally controlled within the fertile district-scale Post-Gen fault system. Results from a directionally drilled daughter hole returned 25 meters at 11.8 g/t Au and 2.7 meters at 16.6 g/t Au. East of the Tristar mine (also within the Post-Gen fault system), drilling to follow up previously reported significant intercepts hosted in north plunging anticline has commenced.

 

 

BARRICK FIRST QUARTER 2021   60   MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS


At the northern limits of the Post-Gen fault system, a geologic model of the Ren area incorporating results from the 2020 program was completed and is in use for targeting and resource estimation refinement. East of Ren, surface scout drilling of targets delineated from the upgraded model has commenced. Within the resource, results from underground drilling confirms continuity. Drilling testing extensions south of the known resource continues from underground.    

Cortez, Nevada, USA

At Cortez Hills, drill programs testing potential feeders and extensions of other ore controlling features have started.

At Robertson, on the western side of the district, drilling results were received from the Distal target, to the west of current resources, testing a structure which is potentially analogous to the controls of mineralization at the Gold Pan/39A zone. These results yielded multiple significant intercepts confirming the nature of the hypothesized mineralization control and an up-dip extension to surface. Follow-up drilling commencing in the second quarter of 2021 will target the extent of the mineralization up-dip and to the north. Metallurgical test work for processing at the Pipeline oxide mill and the heap leach is in progress.

Continuing on the western side of the district, sectional interpretation is ongoing between the Carlin-type Pipeline and Crossroads deposits, as well as intrusive-related mineralization at Robertson five kilometers to the north. Surface mapping and sampling has identified a favorable structural setting between the Pipeline/Crossroads and Robertson deposits with folds and thrust faulting, as well as high angle faults carrying anomalous gold indicative of leakage from a target at depth. The area has no historic deep drilling and will be tested by framework drilling in the second quarter of 2021.

Fourmile, Nevada, USA

Drilling resumed during the first quarter of 2021, testing the extension of stratiform mineralization west of the current resource. In addition, planning of access options to delineate Fourmile South (Rose and Blanche) has been initiated. Further north, detailed geologic interpretation of breccia-hosted, high-grade mineralization highlighted the importance of the intersection of an east-west striking fault zone and the northward extension of the fertile Anna/Sadler fault corridor. Follow-up drilling is planned to start in the second quarter of 2021.

Turquoise Ridge, Nevada, USA

Deposit-scale geological and block modeling continued in the first quarter of 2021 with valuable insight gained on mine design, planning, and model reconciliation.

At the district-scale, sectional interpretation across the sparsely drilled corridor between the Turquoise Ridge and Twin Creeks operations highlighted folds east of the main Turquoise Ridge deposit. Folding is a key control for mineralization in the district. Scout drilling of a 12km2 area east of Turquoise Ridge underground will commence in the second quarter of 2021.

Hemlo, Canada13

Drilling down plunge of the B Zone (also known as the Main Zone) intersected strong feldspar-muscovite-molybdenite-pyrite plus local barite alteration and mineralization.

Results from two of three holes spaced approximately 300 meters apart suggest continuity. Highlights include 6.69 meters at 2.64 g/t Au, including 3.60 meters at 3.86 g/t Au in Hole 1352003, and 5.48 meters at 2.09 g/t Au in Hole 1352004.

Surface and underground drilling immediately west of active C Zone mine workings is targeting mineralized shoots down plunge from the inactive open pit. Drilling will continue through the summer of 2021.

Results from both B Zone and C Zone programs are being incorporated into detailed geological models to further delineate targets.

Latin America & Asia Pacific

Pueblo Viejo, Dominican Republic

Detailed mapping and sampling is advancing at Zambrana, where results confirm the presence of gold mineralization within a main northwest structural trend that projects towards the Monte Negro pit. Soil and rock chip anomalies extend for up to two kilometers along this structure, indicating the next significant exploration target at Pueblo Viejo.

A total of 2,562 meters of diamond drilling was completed during March 2021 in Target Area 1 of the Pueblo Grande project. Although assays are pending, no significant mineralization is expected from this campaign. Barrick commenced exploration drilling at Pueblo Grande in 2020 pursuant to the terms of an earn-in agreement with Precipitate Gold Corp. that grants Barrick the exclusive right to acquire a 70% interest in the project. Pueblo Grande is currently 100% owned by Precipitate Gold Corp.

El Indio Belt, Argentina and Chile14

At Pascua, a four-rig geometallurgical drill campaign is ongoing, with a total of 4,545 meters drilled by the end of the first quarter of 2021. The program is designed to test the geometallurgical assumptions of the previously completed update to the 3D geological model. The objective of this campaign is to test the link between the underlying deposit geology, impact to ore type definition, processing options, recovery and project valuation.

At the Penelope deposit, a satellite of Lama, the geometallurgical drill campaign is almost completed, with the last hole being collared at the end of the first quarter of 2021, with drilling completed in April. This program aims to collect additional metallurgical data, with a specific focus on heap leach potential. At the Lama extension, a diamond drill hole exploration program has commenced with two rigs. The goal of this campaign is to test previously unrecognized orebody extensions outside the pit shell and current block model, in areas with anomalous gold in rock chip and talus fines samples that were obtained during the field season.

At Brecha Porfiada, a drill hole encountered a large phreatomagmatic breccia with multiple silicification events, within a fully preserved high sulphidation system. Progress has been slow due to adverse weather conditions.

At Alturas - Del Carmen, a five rig 8,000 meter drill campaign was initiated. This drilling is designed to test high-grade mineralization controls that were identified in the third quarter of 2020 under a new structural framework study. Drilling at Rojo Grande was completed, and while most of the assays are pending, the lithology-alteration assemblages observed in the core are largely validating the existing geological model. Partial results received include 45.5 meters at 1.05 g/t Au and 19.7 meters at 0.86 g/t Au

 

 

BARRICK FIRST QUARTER 2021   61   MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS


(DDH-RGR-038). At Alturas, on the Chilean side of the project, the first two holes were completed and the program is ongoing.

Fieldwork continues at Bañitos, within the El Indio district in Argentina. This target spans 16km2, with 955 talus fines samples collected. Partial results are showing a new robust anomaly in the southern part of the project. Detailed mapping has identified the presence of northeast trending veins and silicified structures, which coincide with talus fine anomalies. A drill campaign is scheduled for the next season.

At Azufreras on the Chilean side of the El Indio district, mapping, sampling and trenching is in progress where a series of small maar-diatreme complexes have been identified providing a favorable geological context to the alteration and anomalous geochemistry. Talus fine samples returned anomalies in gold as well as high sulfidation pathfinder elements in an area with poor outcrops. A drill program is scheduled for the third quarter of 2021.

Mapping and sampling at Zancarron, located 30 kilometers south of Veladero, validates the presence of a Veladero-type high sulfidation system but with higher grades than expected. If an economic deposit can be delineated, Zancarron could represent an opportunity to develop a satellite pit.

Veladero, Argentina15

During the first quarter of 2021, significant focus and progress has been made at the Veladero-Lama brownfield targets, including at Penelope, Lama, Cerro Pelado and Piuquenes.

A three-hole drill campaign totaling 1,090 meters was completed at Cerro Pelado, where the first holes to reach the target depth have successfully intercepted mineralization, including 17 meters at 0.68 g/t Au (DDH-CPE-007), 9 meters at 0.60 g/t Au (DDH-CPE-007) and 11 meters at 0.63 g/t Au (DDH-CPE-08). Hole DDH-CPE-007 finished with an interval of 12.8 meters at 0.41 g/t Au at the end of the hole, leaving further mineralization potentially open at depth. The Veladero geological model will be updated with the recent drilling, and this understanding of controls to mineralization will be considered for the following drill campaign.

Two holes were completed at Piuquenes, for a total of 694 meters. One of the holes intercepted favorable high sulfidation alteration assemblages at depth. A third hole is planned to be completed during this drill season.

Porgera, Papua New Guinea

As discussed on page 27, Porgera is currently on temporary care and maintenance and consequently, all exploration activities have ceased.

Southern Peru

In southern Peru at Tumaruma, an intrusive related system, detailed mapping and sampling has delineated six new targets. Follow-up soil sampling is 44% complete. Meanwhile, an application for drilling permits is being filed with an intention to commence drilling in early 2022.

Japan Gold Strategic Alliance, Japan

The first phase of stream sediment and rock chip sampling is now 85% complete over the Hokusatsu region in the

Southern Kyushu epithermal gold province. A total of 706 bulk leach extractable gold (BLEG) and 1,270 rock chip samples were collected during the first quarter of 2021. Project scale gravity surveying also resumed during the quarter and is now 71% complete over the Hokusatsu region.

As results of the geochemical and geophysical programs are received, new highly prospective areas in the major gold provinces of Japan are being identified, and secured where possible. The majority of geochemical results have been received from the Hokkaido region and are being put into geological context. However, areas of open anomalism are already apparent and thirteen new applications were submitted for land between the Aibetsu and Tenryu projects to cover extensions of defined geochemical anomalies.

Reunion Gold Strategic Alliance, Guiana Shield

An airborne magnetic and radiometric survey was initiated on the NW Extension project in Suriname, which was 76% complete at the end of the first quarter of 2021. The survey, consisting of 3,000 kilometers of flight lines spaced at 100 and 200 meters, is highlighting linear geophysical features interpreted as structural corridors, similar to those associated with gold mineralization at the Rosebel gold deposit located 70km to the southeast. This data set will form an important layer in targeting and field programs in the coming year.

Africa & Middle East

Bambadji, Senegal16

Drilling at Kabewest extended the system to 200 meters vertical depth, 500 meters along strike and confirmed high-grade mineralization linked to silica-hematite altered hydrothermal breccias and limestones. Two northeast trending zones have been identified. Results include 53.0 meters at 2.12 g/t Au, including 9.7 meters at 3.85 g/t Au (twin of reverse circulation hole KBWRC018 reported in the prior quarter; 50.0 meters at 2.08 g/t Au), 20.6 meters at 2.59 g/t Au from 247.5 meters, including 10.8 meters at 4.05 g/t Au, and 16.0 meters at 2.01 g/t Au. Two reverse circulation (RC) fences, stepping out 200 and 400 meters to the north-northeast, confirmed the continuity of alteration. Assay results are pending.

At Soya, a diamond hole intersected 34.0 meters at 3.11 g/t Au from 62.0 meters, including 6.5 meters at 5.13 g/t Au and 7.9 meters at 7.00 g/t Au down-dip of a solid RC intercept drilled in 2019. Mineralization is hosted within albitite and is related to intense hydrothermal hematite-silica alteration and semi-massive pyrite. Three RC holes (results pending) have extended the system 300 meters to the northeast.

At Dakota, scout drilling beneath very broad auger anomalies intersected two zones of low-grade mineralisation between 6 and 40 meters wide and approximately 500 meters strike length. To help focus follow-up drilling, multi-element geochemistry and correlation to prospective alteration is underway.

At Gefa, seven diamond holes have been completed over a five kilometer corridor. Intersected mineralization is hosted within a westerly dipping albitite with adjacent sediments and is associated with silica-hematite alteration and intense fine disseminated pyrite. Infill RC is planned for the second quarter of 2021.

 

 

BARRICK FIRST QUARTER 2021   62   MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS


Loulo-Gounkoto, Mali17

Exploration programs in 2021 are focused on earlier stage targets on the three permits of Loulo, Gounkoto and Bena with the aim of reviewing higher-grade open-pit opportunities and minelife extension. Framework drilling is underway on a number of targets in order to assess and rank for follow-up. At the Yalea Transfer Zone South Extension, drilling extended the system 160 meters south, with the southernmost hole in the Yalea system returning 16.3 meters at 3.36 g/t Au, including 9.8 meters at 5.11 g/t Au. MRM down-plunge drilling will be paused to focus on infill drilling higher up the shoot and testing depth extensions to the Panel Zone. Framework drilling 500 meters south of the Transfer Zone has tested the upper 550m of the structure. Significant changes in geology are seen and thus far, no major irregularities (i.e. westerly rollovers) that influence high-grade blind shoot potential, have been identified. Drilling is ongoing to test deeper parts of the structure.

At Yalea Ridge Main, Phase 1 drilling is validating the concept of higher-grades associated with east-west trending fracture and breccia zones and quartz-hematite vein arrays. The second diamond hole intersected 2.33 meters at 52.95 g/t Au, 8.7 meters at 13.94 g/t Au and 3.9 meters at 18.79 g/t Au. Phase 1 drilling will continue in the second quarter of 2021.

Along the Yalea Structure, a number of programs are underway: 1) At Loulo 1, drilling has started over a one kilometer section of strike. Holes are designed to fully test the north-northeast trending host package stratigraphy including the quartz tourmaline horizon and the east-west trending veins. 2) At Loulo 4 and the northern extension of Yalea Ridge, a 3D induced polarization and resistivity survey was completed. The aim of this survey is to assist with Loulo 4 framework drill planning and to outline additional targets. Data modelling is underway and will continue into the second quarter of 2021.

There is significant exploration focus on the Gounkoto permit this year: 1) At the recently (auger) defined Mina target, framework diamond drilling has intersected highly strained favorable host package stratigraphy, including limestone and multistage intrusive bodies. Wide spaced RC lines are underway to confirm continuity of the target structure and potential for a Faraba/DB1 style system. Assay results are pending. 2) At Faraba Main, a five hole diamond drill program is underway to confirm the location of the Western Fault Strand structure (WFS). Together with the Dip Domain Boundary (DDB), the WFS is interpreted to split the Faraba complex into three fault block domains (western, central and eastern) and account for the variations in bedding geometry from north to south within each of the subsequent blocks. After recent model changes, two diamond tails were drilled at DB1. The geology intersected shows potential for a southern plunging shoot associated with a ‘Transfer Style’ westerly rollover of the structure. Results are pending.

Regional Exploration, Mali

On the Diangoumerila and Mogoyafara permits in Mali South, auger drilling was completed along a 10 kilometer section of the west-northwest Koniko trend. Assays are due in the second quarter of 2021 after which, target generation and follow-up aircore drilling will start.

Along the Kossou trend, soil geochemistry and ground geophysics have mapped coincident anomalies

associated with an elongated granodiorite intrusion of a more than four kilometer strike length. Reconnaissance aircore drilling has commenced.

Elsewhere, generative work continues in the Kenieba-Kedougou Inlier and in Mali South.

Tongon, Côte d’Ivoire18

Infill and step out drilling was undertaken in the first quarter of 2021 at three satellite targets on the Stabilo trend. All are located less than ten kilometers north of the Tongon mill. At Seydou North, a 550 meter long shear structure at the contact between sericite-silica altered tuffs and carbonaceous shale returned strong intercepts, including 42.0 meters at 5.43 g/t Au, 23.0 meters at 4.92 g/t Au, 18.0 meters at 3.19 g/t Au and 14.0 meters at 3.93 g/t Au. This target has strong potential to develop as a satellite deposit to Tongon. At Jubula East, mineralization has been intersected on three drill lines over a 200 meter strike length. Best results include 8.0 meters at 6.97 g/t Au, 6.0 meters at 3.45 g/t Au and 17.0 meters at 2.69 g/t Au. At Jubula West, an altered and potentially mineralized intrusive has been intersected in the latest round of drilling. Results are pending.

The Stabilo trend is revealing potential that was previously overlooked due to its extensive laterite cover. The auger program conducted in 2020 paved the way to these new discoveries and additional auger drilling is planned to test a further four kilometers of suppressive regolith.

Regional Exploration, Côte d’Ivoire

During the first quarter of 2021, the focus was on priority targets on the Boundiali and Fapoha permit’s potential to be satellite resources to Tongon. Initial results from aircore drill testing of the Lafleur, Yoro North and Mamougou targets show mineralization continuity but over narrow widths and of medium grade. At Kassere, reverse circulation (“RC”) drilling outlined a large alteration system hosted within tuffs and feldspar porphyries. Multiple potential lodes are controlled by the intersection lineation between north-northeast and northeast structures. Assay results are pending. A review of Fonondara shows potential for a higher-grade shoot in the north and outlines drill gaps that require testing for shallow resources.

At the Mankono JV, programs are ongoing to find a standalone deposit. During the first quarter of 2021, infill soil sampling and trenching along the Gbongogo-Koban corridor advanced several soil anomalies showing a similar footprint as Gbongogo Main (an intrusive hosted deposit). Thus far, Gbongogo West is the most encouraging, while initial RC drilling confirmed the presence of a mineralized intrusive at Yere North. Both areas will be followed up in the second quarter of 2021.

In southeast Côte d’Ivoire, a stream sediment sampling program along the Ketesso Shear is complete with results expected in the second quarter of 2021.

Kibali, Democratic Republic of Congo19

At KCD, the second of three framework diamond holes is testing the continuity of the KCD system 500 meters down-plunge. This hole has intersected the 3000 lode and is on track to intersect the banded iron formation (BIF) of the main 5000 and 11000 lodes.

At Tete Bakangwe, a seven fence drill program tested the down plunge and strike extent of a tightly folded

 

 

BARRICK FIRST QUARTER 2021   63   MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS


BIF unit, with mineralization located on: 1) the BIF-conglomerate contacts; and 2) in the fold hinges. Drill results indicate thick but discontinuous mineralized zones and outline down-plunge extensions to 480 meters and 680 meters, respectively. Highlight intercepts include 8.6 meters at 4.33 g/t Au and 27.9 meters at 1.61 g/t Au, and support the potential for a near mine open-pit opportunity. This is now being tested by infill drilling with the aim of developing a Pamao-Pakaka-Tete Bakangwe super pit concept.

At Kalimva, a geological review has outlined the controls on high-grade shoots as: 1) intersections between lithologies and the host structure; and 2) the dip of the host structure. The down-plunge continuation of three shoots was confirmed by seven diamond holes. Highlight intercepts include 5.6 meters at 3.24 g/t Au, 13.8 meters at 6.72 g/t Au and 5.2 meters at 8.39 g/t Au. Results support potential for an underground opportunity with further drilling planned to test continuity and tenor of the shoots to 400 meters vertical depth.

A review of the Madungu-Memekazi-Renzi trend (MMR) revealed three northeast trending structural domains, with an increase in strain manifested by a change in fold style and dislocation of stratigraphy along the central Memekazi domain. The prospectivity of this domain is supported by coincident northeast trending soil anomalism, sericite alteration and high-grade intercepts from historic holes. The MMR structural setting shows similarities to the KCD structural setting and yields the potential for northeast plunging shoots. This target has potential as an open-pit deposit located 1.5 kilometers from the Kibali mill, and will be tested in the second quarter of 2021.

North Mara and Bulyanhulu, Tanzania

In the first quarter of 2021, field teams were active across four greenfields targets at North Mara, while also completing a deposit-wide review of Rama and initial drilling at Shakta. Rama mineralization is controlled by bounding

shears as well as variably-oriented internal shears and associated zones of increased strain. Consequently, several higher grade shoots occur at numerous orientations and scales. A new geological model is due in the second half of 2021, and this will be used to generate further near mine upside opportunities. Drilling beneath cover at Shakta (on the Gokona Trend), confirmed a stratigraphy of variably altered porphyritic extrusives and clastic sediments, with assay results pending. Field mapping and sampling on greenfields targets continues to support the regional-scale exploration model and has identified prospective geology and structural settings for further exploration.

At Bulyanhulu, rigs are mobilizing for drill programs to collect geological and geochemical information beneath extensive cover at the Pacha, Ndovu and Madini targets. These targets contain a geological setting similar to Reef 1 and 2, and drilling is scheduled to begin in the second quarter of 2021 after the rainy season.

Jabal Sayid, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia

At Jabal Sayid, drill programs are on track to extend the life of mine. At both Lode 4 East and Lode 1, extension and infill drilling continues to return higher grades and greater widths compared to the June 2020 block model. At Lode 4 East, 120 meters of strike and 140 meters vertical depth has been outlined to have the potential of hosting economic mineralization. An additional 150 meters of strike and a potential second feeder will be drill tested in the second quarter of 2021. At Lode 1, drilling indicates an increase in the true width of mineralization. Programs at both lodes will support extension of underground development and stope design.

An update of the geological model has highlighted potential for two new lodes. Trenching is underway prior to initial exploration drilling. This new potential is in addition to the greenfields targets at the South and East Gossans.

 

 

BARRICK FIRST QUARTER 2021   64   MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS


Review of Financial Results

 

 

 

Revenue

 

($ millions, except per ounce/pound

data in dollars)

    

For the three

months ended

 

 

   
       3/31/21        12/31/20        3/31/20  

Gold

        

000s oz solda

     1,093      1,186      1,220

000s oz produceda

     1,101      1,206      1,250

Market price ($/oz)

     1,794      1,874      1,583

Realized price ($/oz)b

     1,777      1,871      1,589

Revenue

     2,641      3,028      2,593

Copper

        

millions lbs solda

     113      108      110

millions lbs produceda

     93      119      115

Market price ($/lb)

     3.86      3.25      2.56

Realized price ($/lb)b

     4.12      3.39      2.23

Revenue

     256      195      99

Other sales

     59      56      29

Total revenue

     2,956      3,279      2,721

 

a.

On an attributable basis.

b.

Realized price is a non-GAAP financial performance measure with no standardized meaning under IFRS and therefore may not be comparable to similar measures of performance presented by other issuers. For further information and a detailed reconciliation of each non-GAAP measure used in this section of the MD&A to the most directly comparable IFRS measure, please see pages 74 to 92 of this MD&A.

Q1 2021 compared to Q4 2020

In the first quarter of 2021, gold revenues decreased by 13% compared to the fourth quarter of 2020 primarily due to a lower realized gold price1 and lower sales volume. The average market price for the three month period ended March 31, 2021 was $1,794 per ounce versus $1,874 per ounce for the prior quarter. During the first quarter of 2021, the gold price ranged from $1,677 per ounce to $1,959 per ounce, and closed the quarter at $1,691 per ounce. The realized gold price1 in the first quarter of 2021 was lower than the market gold price as a result of final smelter adjustments on gold sold in concentrate. Gold prices in the first quarter of 2021 continued to be volatile due to the economic impact of the Covid-19 pandemic, including expectations for global economic recovery from the fiscal and monetary stimulus measures put in place by governments and central banks worldwide as well as the distribution of vaccines. In particular, while gold prices remain higher than pre-pandemic levels, the decline of the gold price from recent highs is partially attributed to an increase in longer-term interest rates as well as a reduction in investor demand, with global ETF holdings declining in the first quarter of 2021, tempered by increased physical demand from India and China.

ATTRIBUTABLE GOLD PRODUCTION VARIANCE (000s oz) Q1 2021 compared to Q4 2020

 

LOGO

In the first quarter of 2021, gold production on an attributable basis was 105 thousand ounces lower than the prior quarter, primarily due to mine sequencing at Carlin and Cortez as well as lower grades at Pueblo Viejo, in line with the mine and stockpile processing plan. Production at Veladero was lower as heap leach processing operations will be reduced through the first half of 2021, while the mine transitions to Phase 6. Lower production from Tongon (included in the Other category above) reflects the change in the mine plan related to the extension of its mine life to 2023, and were offset by higher grades at Loulo-Gounkoto.

Copper revenues in the first quarter of 2021 increased by 31% compared to the prior quarter, primarily due to a higher realized copper price1, combined with increased sales volume. The average market price in the first quarter of 2021 was $3.86 per pound, an increase of 19% from the prior quarter. The realized copper price1 in the first quarter of 2021 was higher than the market copper price due to the impact of positive provisional pricing adjustments, consistent with the prior quarter, as the copper price continued to rise. During the first quarter of 2021, the copper price traded in a range of $3.49 per pound to a nine-year high of $4.36 per pound and closed the quarter at $4.01 per pound. Copper prices in the first quarter of 2021 were positively influenced by an increase in risk appetite in financial risk markets as the global economy continued its recovery phase, expectations for increases in copper demand from infrastructure spending, the transition to a low-carbon global economy, and low levels of global stockpiles.

Attributable copper production in the first quarter of 2021 was 26 million pounds lower compared to the prior quarter, primarily driven by lower grades processed and lower throughput at Lumwana. Current period copper sales were higher than copper production during the first quarter of 2021 due to the sale of a portion of stockpiled concentrate at Lumwana.

 

 

BARRICK FIRST QUARTER 2021   65   MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS


Q1 2021 compared to Q1 2020

For the three month period ended March 31, 2021, gold revenues increased by 2% compared to the same prior year period primarily due to an increase in the realized gold price1, partially offset by a decrease in sales volume. The average market price for the three month period ended March 31, 2021 was $1,794 per ounce versus $1,583 per ounce for the same prior year period.

ATTRIBUTABLE GOLD PRODUCTION VARIANCE (000s oz) Q1 2021 compared to Q1 2020

 

LOGO

For the three month period ended March 31, 2021, attributable gold production was 149 thousand ounces lower than the same prior year period, primarily as a result of Porgera being placed on care and maintenance on April 25, 2020, reduced heap leach processing operations at Veladero through the first half of 2021 while the mine transitions to Phase 6, as well as mine sequencing at Carlin and Cortez. These impacts were partially offset by increased production at Bulyanhulu following the ramp-up of underground mining and processing operations towards the end of 2020.

Copper revenues for the three month period ended March 31, 2021 increased by 159% compared to the same prior year period, primarily due to a higher realized copper price1, combined with higher sales volume. In the first quarter of 2021, the realized copper price1 was higher than the market copper price due to positive provisional pricing adjustments, whereas negative provisional pricing adjustments were recorded in the same prior year period.

Attributable copper production for the three month period ended March 31, 2021 decreased by 22 million pounds compared to the same prior year period, primarily due to lower grades processed at Lumwana.

Production Costs

 

($ millions, except per ounce/pound

data in dollars)

    

For the three

months ended

 

 

   
       3/31/21        12/31/20        3/31/20  

Gold

        

Site operating costs

     1,020      1,069      1,080

Depreciation

     454      495      474

Royalty expense

     93      107      84

Community relations

     4      10      5

Cost of sales

     1,571      1,681      1,643

Cost of sales ($/oz)a

     1,073      1,065      1,020

Total cash costs ($/oz)b

     716      692      692

All-in sustaining costs ($/oz)b

     1,018      929      954

Copper

        

Site operating costs

     65      68      69

Depreciation

     48      41      43

Royalty expense

     23      16      11

Community relations

     0      0      1

Cost of sales

     136      125      124

Cost of sales ($/lb)a

     2.11      2.06      1.96

C1 cash costs ($/lb)b

     1.60      1.61      1.55

All-in sustaining costs ($/lb)b

     2.26      2.42      2.04

 

a.

Gold cost of sales per ounce is calculated as cost of sales across our gold operations (excluding sites in care and maintenance) divided by ounces sold (both on an attributable basis using Barrick’s ownership share). Copper cost of sales per pound is calculated as cost of sales across our copper operations divided by pounds sold (both on an attributable basis using Barrick’s ownership share).

b.

Total cash costs, C1 cash costs and all-in sustaining costs are non-GAAP financial performance measures with no standardized meaning under IFRS and therefore may not be comparable to similar measures of performance presented by other issuers. For further information and a detailed reconciliation of each non-GAAP measure used in this section of the MD&A to the most directly comparable IFRS measure, please see pages 74 to 92 of this MD&A.

Q1 2021 compared to Q4 2020

In the first quarter of 2021, cost of sales applicable to gold was 7% lower compared to the fourth quarter of 2020, mainly due to lower sales volume. Our 45% interest in Kibali is equity accounted and therefore, the mine’s cost of sales is excluded from our consolidated gold cost of sales. On a per ounce basis, cost of sales applicable to gold2 and total cash costs1, after including our proportionate share of cost of sales at our equity method investees, were 1% and 3% higher, respectively, than the prior quarter, mainly due to the impact of lower grades at Carlin, Kibali and Cortez.

In the first quarter of 2021, gold all-in sustaining costs per ounce1 increased by 10% compared to the prior quarter, primarily due to higher minesite sustaining capital expenditures on a per ounce basis, combined with higher total cash costs per ounce1.

In the first quarter of 2021, cost of sales applicable to copper was 9% higher than the prior quarter mainly from higher sales volume due to the sale of a portion of stockpiled concentrate at Lumwana. Our 50% interests in Zaldívar and Jabal Sayid are equity accounted and therefore, we do not include their cost of sales in our consolidated copper cost of sales. On a per pound basis, cost of sales applicable to copper2, after including our proportionate share of cost of sales at our equity method investees, increased by 2% primarily due to higher depreciation expense. C1 cash costs1 remained relatively

 

 

BARRICK FIRST QUARTER 2021   66   MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS


consistent with the prior quarter as a lower strip ratio at Lumwana and lower processing costs as well as lower general and administrative expenses at Jabal Sayid were offset by the impact of lower capitalized stripping in line with mine sequencing, higher maintenance costs and a stronger Chilean peso at Zaldívar.

In the first quarter of 2021, copper all-in sustaining costs1,which have been adjusted to include our proportionate share of equity method investees, were 7% lower per pound than the prior quarter primarily reflecting lower sustaining capital expenditures at Lumwana, as a result of the timing of projects, and at Zaldívar, while C1 cash costs1 remained relatively consistent with the prior quarter.

Q1 2021 compared to Q1 2020

For the three month period ended March 31, 2021, cost of sales applicable to gold was 4% lower than the same prior year period primarily due to lower sales volume. Our 45% interest in Kibali is equity accounted and therefore, the mine’s cost of sales is excluded from our consolidated gold cost of sales. On a per ounce basis, cost of sales applicable to gold2 and total cash costs1, after including our proportionate share of cost of sales at our equity method investees, were 5% and 3% higher, respectively, compared to the same prior year period mainly due to higher royalty expense as a result of a higher realized gold price1, combined with the impact of lower sales volume.

For the three month period ended March 31, 2021, gold all-in sustaining costs1 increased by 7% on a per ounce basis compared to the same prior year period, primarily due to an increase in total cash costs per ounce1, combined with higher minesite sustaining capital expenditures.

For the three month period ended March 31, 2021, cost of sales applicable to copper was 10% higher than the same prior year period, primarily due to higher royalty expense as a result of a higher realized copper price1, as well as slightly higher sales volume. Our 50% interests in Zaldívar and Jabal Sayid are equity accounted and therefore, we do not include their cost of sales in our consolidated copper cost of sales. On a per pound basis, cost of sales applicable to copper2 and C1 cash costs1, after including our proportionate share of cost of sales at our equity method investees, increased by 8% and 3%, respectively, as higher royalty expense was partially offset by lower site operating costs.

For the three month period ended March 31, 2021, copper all-in sustaining costs1, which have been adjusted to include our proportionate share of equity method investees, was 11% higher per pound than the same prior year period primarily reflecting higher C1 cash costs per pound1, combined with increased minesite sustaining capital expenditures.

Capital Expendituresa

 

($ millions)

    

For the three

months ended

 

 

   
       3/31/21        12/31/20        3/31/20  

Minesite sustainingb

     405      354      370

Project capital expendituresc

     131      184      76

Capitalized interest

     3      8      5

Total consolidated capital expenditures

     539      546      451

Attributable capital expendituresd

     424      445      364

 

a.

These amounts are presented on a cash basis.

b.

Includes both minesite sustaining and mine development.

c.

Project capital expenditures are included in our calculation of all-in costs, but not included in our calculation of all-in sustaining costs.

d.

These amounts are presented on the same basis as our guidance.

Q1 2021 compared to Q4 2020

In the first quarter of 2021, total consolidated capital expenditures on a cash basis was largely in line with the fourth quarter of 2020 with a decrease in project capital expenditures, largely offset by an increase in minesite sustaining capital expenditures. Lower project capital expenditures were mainly attributed to the successful re-start of underground mining and processing operations at Bulyanhulu by the end of 2020, the water treatment plant at North Mara approaching the final stages of commissioning, and decreased spending at Cortez due to the completion of the CHUG Rangefront decline project. The increase in minesite sustaining capital expenditures is mainly due to higher capitalized stripping at several sites, including Cortez, Loulo-Gounkoto, Veladero and Carlin.

Q1 2021 compared to Q1 2020

For the three month period ended March 31, 2021, total consolidated capital expenditures on a cash basis increased by 20% compared to the same prior year period, primarily due to higher project capital expenditures, namely the plant and tailings expansion project at Pueblo Viejo and the Gounkoto underground expansion. This was combined with higher minesite sustaining capital expenditures, primarily at Veladero, relating to the Phase 6 leach pad expansion and higher capitalized stripping, drilling and underground development at Loulo-Gounkoto.

General and Administrative Expenses

 

($ millions)

    

For the three

months ended

 

 

   
       3/31/21        12/31/20       3/31/20  

Corporate administration

     28      32     33

Share-based compensationa

     10      (8     7

General & administrative expenses

     38      24     40

 

a.

Based on a US$20.34 share price as at March 31, 2021 (December 31, 2020: US$22.78 and March 31, 2020: US$18.32).

Q1 2021 compared to Q4 2020

In the first quarter of 2021, general and administrative expenses increased by $14 million compared to the fourth quarter of 2020, mainly due to higher share-based compensation. The change in our share price in the current quarter was less pronounced versus the fourth quarter of 2020, when the remeasurement of our share-based compensation liability resulted in a gain.

 

 

BARRICK FIRST QUARTER 2021   67   MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS


Q1 2021 compared to Q1 2020

For the three month period ended March 31, 2021, general and administrative expenses was largely in line with the same prior year period.

Exploration, Evaluation and Project Expenses

 

($ millions)

    

For the three

months ended

 

 

   
       3/31/21        12/31/20        3/31/20  

Global exploration and evaluation

     28      31      39

Advanced project costs:

        

Pascua-Lama

     10      11      10

Other

     6      10      4

Corporate development

     1      0      3

 Global exploration and evaluation

 and project expense

     45      52      56

Minesite exploration and evaluation

     16      22      15

 Total exploration, evaluation and

  project expenses

     61      74      71

Q1 2021 compared to Q4 2020

Exploration, evaluation and project expenses for the first quarter of 2021 decreased by $13 million compared to the fourth quarter of 2020. This was primarily due to lower minesite exploration and evaluation costs, largely due to the timing of spend at Carlin. In addition, global exploration and evaluation costs were lower within Nevada Gold Mines.

Q1 2021 compared to Q1 2020

Exploration, evaluation and project expenses for the three month period ended March 31, 2021 was $10 million lower than the same prior year period, mainly due to lower global exploration and evaluation costs. This was primarily at Nevada Gold Mines and Fourmile, as drilling programs started earlier in the prior year period due to favorable weather conditions.

Finance Costs, Net

 

($ millions)

    

For the three

months ended

 

 

   
       3/31/21       12/31/20       3/31/20  

Interest expensea

     88     82     88

Accretion

     10     8     16

Loss on debt extinguishment

     0     0     15

Interest capitalized

     (3     (8     (5

Other finance costs

     1     4     0

Finance income

     (9     (6     (10

Finance costs, net

     87     80     104

 

a.

For the three months ended March 31, 2021, interest expense includes approximately $9 million of non-cash interest expense relating to the streaming agreements with Wheaton Precious Metals and Royal Gold, Inc. (December 31, 2020: $9 million and March 31, 2020: $9 million).

Q1 2021 compared to Q4 2020

In the first quarter of 2021, net finance costs were 9% higher than the prior quarter, mainly due to a slight increase in interest expense and lower capitalized interest.

Q1 2021 compared to Q1 2020

For the three month period ended March 31, 2021, net finance costs were 16% lower than the same period last

year, primarily due to a loss on debt extinguishment of $15 million occurring in the same prior year period. The loss on debt extinguishment in the same prior year period was due to the make-whole repurchase of the outstanding $337 million of principal of our 3.85% notes due 2022.

Additional Significant Statement of Income Items

 

($ millions)

    

For the three

months ended

 

 

   
       3/31/21       12/31/20       3/31/20  

Impairment charges (reversals)

     (89     40       (336

Loss (gain) on currency translation

     4     16     16

Other expense (income)

     19     (138     (35

Impairment Charges (Reversals)

Q1 2021 compared to Q4 2020

In the first quarter of 2021, net impairment reversals were $89 million compared to net impairment charges of $40 million in the prior quarter. Net impairment reversals in the first quarter of 2021 mainly related to the impairment reversal of Lagunas Norte resulting from the agreement to sell our 100% interest to Boroo Pte Ltd. The net impairment charges in the prior quarter primarily relate to Tanzania.

Q1 2021 compared to Q1 2020

For the three month period ended March 31, 2021, net impairment reversals were $89 million compared to $336 million in the same prior year period. Net impairment reversals in the first quarter of 2021 mainly related to the impairment reversal of Lagunas Norte resulting from the agreement to sell our 100% interest to Boroo Pte Ltd. In the first quarter of 2020, the net impairment reversals are from our Tanzanian assets resulting from the agreement with the Government of Tanzania being signed and made effective.

For a further breakdown of impairment charges and reversals, refer to note 13 of the Financial Statements.

Loss (Gain) on Currency Translation

Q1 2021 compared to Q4 2020

Loss on currency translation in the first quarter of 2021 was $4 million compared to $16 million in the prior quarter. The losses in both quarters relate primarily to unrealized foreign currency losses from the Argentine peso. Fluctuations in this currency versus the US dollar impact our peso denominated value-added tax receivable balances.

Q1 2021 compared to Q1 2020

Loss on currency translation in the first quarter of 2021 was $4 million compared to $16 million in the same prior year period. In the current quarter, the losses mainly relate to unrealized foreign currency translation losses from the depreciation of the Argentine peso. In comparison, the losses incurred during the first quarter of 2020 were primarily due to the depreciation of the Zambian kwacha, Argentine peso and Chilean peso, partially offset by gains on the revaluation of Canadian dollar denominated liabilities.

 

 

BARRICK FIRST QUARTER 2021   68   MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS


Other Expense (Income)

Q1 2021 compared to Q4 2020

In the first quarter of 2021, other expense was $19 million compared to income of $138 million in the prior quarter. Other expense in the first quarter of 2021 mainly relates to care and maintenance expenses at Porgera and losses on the revaluation of warrant investments. In the fourth quarter of 2020, other income mainly relates to gains on the sale of Eskay Creek, Morila and Bullfrog.

Q1 2021 compared to Q1 2020

For the three month period ended March 31, 2021, other expense was $19 million compared to income of $35 million in the same prior year period. Other expense in the first quarter of 2021 mainly relates to care and maintenance expenses at Porgera and losses on the revaluation of warrant investments. For the three month period ended March 31, 2020, other income is primarily due to the gain on the sale of the Massawa project, partially offset by losses on non-hedge derivatives.

For a further breakdown of other expense (income), refer to note 9 to the Financial Statements.

Income Tax Expense

Income tax expense was $374 million in the first quarter of 2021. The unadjusted effective income tax rate in the first quarter of 2021 was 31% of income before income taxes.

The underlying effective income tax rate on ordinary income in the first quarter of 2021 was 29% after adjusting for the impact of net impairment reversals; the impact of deferred taxes at Hemlo; the impact of foreign currency translation losses on deferred tax balances; the impact of non-deductible foreign exchange losses; the impact of the Porgera mine being placed on care and maintenance; and the impact of other expense adjustments.

We record deferred tax charges or credits if changes in facts or circumstances affect the estimated tax basis of assets and therefore, the expectations in our ability to realize deferred tax assets. The interpretation of tax regulations and legislation and their application to our business is complex and subject to change. We have significant amounts of deferred tax assets, including tax loss carry forwards, and also deferred tax liabilities. We also have significant amounts of unrecognized deferred tax assets (e.g. for tax losses in Canada). Potential changes in any of these amounts, as well as our ability to realize deferred tax assets, could significantly affect net income or cash flow in future periods. For further details on income tax expense, refer to note 10 of the Financial Statements.

Withholding Taxes

In the first quarter of 2021, we have recorded $10 million of dividend withholding taxes related to the undistributed earnings of our subsidiaries in Argentina and the United States.

Nevada Gold Mines

Nevada Gold Mines is a limited liability company treated as a flow through partnership for US tax purposes. The partnership is not subject to federal income tax directly, but each of its partners is liable for tax on its share of the profits of the partnership. As such, Barrick accounts for its current and deferred income tax associated with the investment (61.5% share) following the principles in IAS 12. Nevada Gold Mines is also subject to Net Proceeds of Minerals tax in Nevada, which is included on a consolidated basis in the Company’s consolidated statements of income.

 

 

BARRICK FIRST QUARTER 2021   69   MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS


Financial Condition Review

 

Summary Balance Sheet and Key Financial Ratios

 

($ millions, except ratios and share amounts)

                          As at 3/31/21                          As at 12/31/20  

Total cash and equivalents

     5,672        5,188  

Current assets

     3,112        2,955  

Non-current assets

     38,064        38,363  

Total Assets

     46,848        46,506  

Current liabilities excluding short-term debt

     2,318        2,200  

Non-current liabilities excluding long-term debta

     7,298        7,441  

Debt (current and long-term)

     5,153        5,155  

Total Liabilities

     14,769        14,796  

Total shareholders’ equity

     23,674        23,341  

Non-controlling interests

     8,405        8,369  

Total Equity

     32,079        31,710  

Total common shares outstanding (millions of shares)

     1,778        1,778  

Debt, net of cash

     (519)        (33)  

Key Financial Ratios:

                 

Current ratiob

     4.08:1        3.67:1  

Debt-to-equityc

     0.16:1        0.16:1  

    a.     Non-current financial liabilities as at March 31, 2021 were $5,512 million (December 31, 2020: $5,486 million).

    b.     Represents current assets divided by current liabilities (including short-term debt) as at March 31, 2021 and December 31, 2020.

    c.     Represents debt divided by total shareholders’ equity (including minority interest) as at March 31, 2021 and December 31, 2020.

 

Balance Sheet Review

Total assets were $46.8 billion at March 31, 2021, approximately $0.3 billion higher than at December 31, 2020, primarily reflecting the strong cash flow from operating activities.

Our asset base is primarily comprised of non-current assets such as property, plant and equipment and goodwill, reflecting the capital-intensive nature of the mining business and our history of growing through acquisitions. Other significant assets include production inventories, indirect taxes recoverable and receivable, concentrate sales receivable, other government and joint venture related receivables, as well as cash and equivalents.

Total liabilities at March 31, 2021 were $14.8 billion, which was slightly lower than total liabilities at December 31, 2020. Our liabilities are primarily comprised of debt, as well as other non-current liabilities such as provisions and deferred income tax liabilities, and accounts payable.

Shareholders’ Equity 

 

4/27/2021

     Number of shares   

Common shares

     1,778,371,343 

Stock options

     —   

Financial Position and Liquidity

We believe we have sufficient financial resources to meet our business requirements for the foreseeable future, including capital expenditures, working capital requirements, interest payments and dividends. To date, we have not experienced significant negative impacts to liquidity as a result of the Covid-19 pandemic. During the first quarter of 2021, our cash balance benefited from strong cash flow from operating activities and our cash position continued to grow.

Total cash and cash equivalents as at March 31, 2021 were $5.7 billion. This cash and cash equivalents balance does not include cash held by our equity method investments, including approximately $450 million (our share) at Kibali. The cash and cash equivalents held at Kibali are subject to various administrative steps before they can be distributed to the joint venture shareholders and are held across three banks in the Democratic Republic of Congo, including two domestic banks. Our capital structure comprises a mix of debt, non-controlling interest (primarily at Nevada Gold Mines) and shareholders’ equity. As at March 31, 2021, our total debt was $5.2 billion (debt, net of cash and equivalents was negative $519.0 million) and our debt-to-equity ratio was 0.16:1. This compares to debt as at December 31, 2020 of $5.2 billion (debt, net of cash and equivalents was negative $33.0 million), and a debt-to-equity ratio of 0.16:1.

Uses of cash for the remainder of 2021 include capital commitments of $205 million and we expect to incur attributable minesite sustaining and project capital expenditures of approximately $1,400 to $1,700 million during the remainder of the year, based on our guidance range on page 31. For the remainder of 2021, we have contractual obligations and commitments of $550 million for supplies and consumables. In addition, we have $289 million in interest payments and other amounts as detailed in the table on page 72. We expect to fund these commitments through operating cash flow, which is our primary source of liquidity, as well as existing cash balances as necessary.

At the Annual and Special Meeting on May 4, 2021, shareholders approved a $750 million return of capital distribution. This distribution is derived from a portion of the proceeds from the divestiture of Kalgoorlie Consolidated Gold Mines in November 2019 and from other recent dispositions made by Barrick and its affiliates. The total return of capital distribution is expected to be effected in three equal tranches. The first $250 million tranche will

 

 

BARRICK FIRST QUARTER 2021   70   MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS


be paid on June 15, 2021 to shareholders of record at the close of business on May 28, 2021. The remaining distribution of $500 million is expected to be effected in two equal tranches to shareholders of record on dates to be determined in August and November 2021.

Our operating cash flow is dependent on the ability of our operations to deliver projected future cash flows. The market prices of gold, and to a lesser extent copper, are the primary drivers of our operating cash flow. Other options to enhance liquidity include further portfolio optimization and the creation of new joint ventures and partnerships; issuance of equity securities in the public markets or to private investors, which could be undertaken for liquidity enhancement and/or in connection with establishing a strategic partnership; issuance of long-term debt securities in the public markets or to private investors (Moody’s and S&P currently rate Barrick’s outstanding long-term debt as investment grade, with ratings of Baa1 and BBB, respectively); and drawing on the $3.0 billion available under our undrawn credit facility (subject to compliance with covenants and the making of certain representations and warranties, this facility is available for drawdown as a source of financing). The key financial covenant in our undrawn credit facility requires Barrick to maintain a net debt to total capitalization ratio of less than 0.60:1. Barrick’s net debt to total capitalization ratio was negative 0.02:1 as at March 31, 2021 (0.00:1 as at December 31, 2020).

Summary of Cash Inflow (Outflow)

 

($ millions)

    

For the three

months ended

 

 

     
       3/31/21       12/31/20       3/31/20  

Net cash provided by operating activities

     1,302     1,638     889

Investing activities

      

Capital expenditures

     (539     (546     (451

Investment sales (purchases)

     0     12     0

Divestitures

     0     27     256

Dividends received from equity method investments

     126     49     25

Other

     5     53     7

Total investing inflows (outflows)

     (408     (405     (163

Net change in debta

     (13     (8     (356

Dividendsb

     (158     (160     (122

Net disbursements to non-controlling interests

     (259     (664     (216

Other

     21     43     (15

Total financing inflows (outflows)

     (409     (789     (709

Effect of exchange rate

     (1     0     (4

Increase (decrease) in cash and equivalents

     484     444     13

 

a.

The difference between the net change in debt on a cash basis and the net change on the balance sheet is due to changes in non-cash charges, specifically the unwinding of discounts and amortization of debt issue costs.

b.

For the three months ended March 31, 2021, we declared and paid dividends per share in US dollars totaling $0.09 (December 31, 2020: declared and paid $0.09; March 31, 2020: declared and paid $0.07).

Q1 2021 compared to Q4 2020

In the first quarter of 2021, we generated $1,302 million in operating cash flow, compared to $1,638 million in the prior quarter. The decrease of $336 million was primarily due to

a lower realized gold price1 and lower gold sales volume. This was combined with an unfavorable movement in working capital, mainly in accounts payable, partially offset by favorable movements in other assets and liabilities. Operating cash flow was further impacted by higher cash taxes paid, partially offset by lower interest paid due to the timing of semi-annual payments on our bonds and an increase in copper sales volumes and a higher realized copper price1.

Cash outflows from investing activities in the first quarter of 2021 were $408 million compared to $405 million in the prior quarter. The increase of $3 million was primarily due to shareholder loan repayments received from our equity method investments and cash proceeds from the Morila disposition occurring in the prior quarter. This was partially offset by higher dividends received from equity method investments in the first quarter of 2021.

Net financing cash outflows for the first quarter of 2021 amounted to $409 million, compared to $789 million in the prior quarter. The decrease of $380 million is primarily due to lower net disbursements paid to non-controlling interests, primarily to Newmont in relation to their interest in Nevada Gold Mines.

Q1 2021 compared to Q1 2020

In the first quarter of 2021, we generated $1,302 million in operating cash flow, compared to $889 million in the same prior year period. The increase of $413 million was primarily due to higher realized gold and copper prices1 and a favorable movement in working capital, partially offset by lower gold sales volume and higher cash taxes paid.

Cash outflows from investing activities in the first quarter of 2021 were $408 million compared to $163 million in the same prior year period. The increase of $245 million was primarily due to cash proceeds from the sale of Massawa occurring in the same prior year period and increased capital expenditures. This was partially offset by higher dividends received from equity method investments in the first quarter of 2021.

Net financing cash outflows for the first quarter of 2021 amounted to $409 million, compared to $709 million in the same prior year period. The decrease of $300 million is primarily due to the make-whole repurchase of the outstanding $337 million of principal of our 3.85% notes due 2022 occurring in the same prior year period. This was partially offset by higher disbursements to non-controlling interests, primarily to Newmont in relation to their interest in Nevada Gold Mines, combined with an increase in dividends paid, reflecting Barrick’s profitability, financial strength and commitment to shareholder returns.

 

 

BARRICK FIRST QUARTER 2021   71   MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS


Commitments and Contingencies

 

 

Litigation and Claims

We are currently subject to various litigation proceedings as disclosed in note 18 to the Financial Statements, and we may be involved in disputes with other parties in the future that may result in litigation. If we are unable to resolve these disputes favorably, it may have a material adverse impact on our financial condition, cash flow and results of operations.

Contractual Obligations and Commitments

In the normal course of business, we enter into contracts that give rise to commitments for future minimum payments. The following table summarizes the remaining contractual maturities of our financial liabilities and operating and capital commitments shown on an undiscounted basis:

 

($ millions)

     Payments due as at 3/31/21  
           2021            2022                2023                2024                2025       
2026 and
thereafter
 
 
             Total  

Debta

                    

Repayment of principal

     0        0        0        0        12        5,097        5,109  

Capital leases

     10        13        10        5        4        28        70  

Interest

     289        308        307        306        306        4,141        5,657  

Provisions for environmental rehabilitationb

     236        159        164        145        150        2,075        2,929  

Restricted share units

     6        14        2        0        0        0        22  

Pension benefits and other post-retirement benefits

     4        4        4        4        4        37        57  

Minimum royalty paymentsc

     1        1        1        1        1        1        6  

Purchase obligations for supplies and consumablesd

     550        201        153        122        95        533        1,654  

Capital commitmentse

     205        17        0        0        0        0        222  

Social development costsf

     12        10        6        5        5        54        92  

Other Obligationsg

     0        3        6        6        6        294        315  

Total

     1,313        730        653        594        583        12,260        16,133  

 

a.

Debt and Interest - Our debt obligations do not include any subjective acceleration clauses or other clauses that enable the holder of the debt to call for early repayment, except in the event that we breach any of the terms and conditions of the debt or for other customary events of default. We are not required to post any collateral under any debt obligations. Projected interest payments on variable rate debt were based on interest rates in effect at March 31, 2021. Interest is calculated on our long-term debt obligations using both fixed and variable rates.

b.

Provisions for environmental rehabilitation - Amounts presented in the table represent the undiscounted uninflated future payments for the expected cost of provisions for environmental rehabilitation.

c.

Minimum royalty payments are related to continuing operations and are presented net of recoverable amounts.

d.

Purchase obligations for supplies and consumables - Includes commitments related to new purchase obligations to secure a supply of acid, tires and cyanide for our production process.

e.

Capital commitments - Purchase obligations for capital expenditures include only those items where binding commitments have been entered into.

f.

Social development costs - Includes a commitment of $14 million in 2026 and thereafter related to the funding of a power transmission line in Argentina.

g.

Other obligations - Relates to the Pueblo Viejo JV partner shareholder loan and the deposit on the Pascua-Lama silver sale agreement with Wheaton Precious Metals Corp.

 

BARRICK FIRST QUARTER 2021   72   MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS


Review of Quarterly Results

 

 

Quarterly Informationa

 

($ millions, except where indicated)

     2021              2020              2020              2020              2020              2019              2019              2019  
       Q1        Q4        Q3        Q2        Q1        Q4        Q3        Q2  

Revenues

     2,956        3,279        3,540        3,055        2,721        2,883        2,678        2,063  

Realized price per ounce – goldb

     1,777        1,871        1,926        1,725        1,589        1,483        1,476        1,317  

Realized price per pound – copperb

     4.12        3.39        3.28        2.79        2.23        2.76        2.55        2.62  

Cost of sales

     1,712        1,814        1,927        1,900        1,776        1,987        1,889        1,545  

Net earnings (loss)

     538        685        882        357        400        1,387        2,277        194  

Per share (dollars)c

     0.30        0.39        0.50        0.20        0.22        0.78        1.30        0.11  

Adjusted net earningsb

     507        616        726        415        285        300        264        154  

Per share (dollars)b,c

     0.29        0.35        0.41        0.23        0.16        0.17        0.15        0.09  

Operating cash flow

     1,302        1,638        1,859        1,031        889        875        1,004        434  

Consolidated capital expendituresd

     539        546        548        509        451        446        502        379  

Free cash flowb

     763        1,092        1,311        522        438        429        502        55  

 

a.

Sum of all the quarters may not add up to the annual total due to rounding.

b.

Realized price, adjusted net earnings, adjusted net earnings per share and free cash flow are non-GAAP financial performance measures with no standardized meaning under IFRS and therefore may not be comparable to similar measures of performance presented by other issuers. For further information and a detailed reconciliation of each non-GAAP measure used in this section of the MD&A to the most directly comparable IFRS measure, please see pages 74 to 92 of this MD&A.

c.

Calculated using weighted average number of shares outstanding under the basic method of earnings per share.

d.

Amounts presented on a consolidated cash basis.

 

Our recent financial results reflect our emphasis on cost discipline, an agile management structure that empowers our site based leadership teams and a portfolio of Tier One Gold Assets5. This combined with rising gold prices has resulted in stronger operating cash flows. The positive free cash flow1 generated, together with the proceeds from various divestitures, have allowed us to continue to strengthen our balance sheet over the past two years and to increase returns to shareholders.

These same fundamentals have also driven the higher net earnings in recent quarters. Net earnings has also been impacted by the following items in each quarter which have been excluded from adjusted net earnings1. In the first quarter of 2020, we recorded a net impairment reversal of $115 million (net of tax effects), resulting from the agreement with the Government of Tanzania being signed and made effective in the first quarter of 2020. In the fourth quarter of 2019, we recorded $22 million (net of tax and non-controlling interests) of net impairment

charges, mainly relating to a charge at Pascua-Lama of $296 million (no tax impact), partially offset by a net impairment reversal at Pueblo Viejo of $277 million (net of taxes and non-controlling interest). We also recorded a $628 million (no tax impact) gain on the de-recognition of the deferred revenue liability relating to our silver sale agreement with Wheaton Precious Metals Corp., a gain of $408 million (no tax impact) resulting from the sale of our 50% interest in Kalgoorlie, and a gain of $216 million (no tax impact) on a settlement of customs duty and indirect taxes at Lumwana. In the third quarter of 2019, net earnings and cash flows were impacted by the formation of Nevada Gold Mines and the commencement of the contribution of its operations to Barrick’s net earnings and cash flows. Net earnings in the third quarter of 2019 included a $1.5 billion (net of tax effects) gain on the remeasurement of Turquoise Ridge as a result of its contribution to Nevada Gold Mines and a $663 million (net of tax effects) impairment reversal at Lumwana.

 

 

Internal Control Over Financial Reporting and Disclosure Controls and Procedures

 

 

Management is responsible for establishing and maintaining adequate internal control over financial reporting and disclosure controls and procedures as defined in our 2020 annual MD&A.

Together, the internal control frameworks provide internal control over financial reporting and disclosure. Due to its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting and disclosure may not prevent or detect all misstatements. Further, the effectiveness of internal control is subject to the risk that controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance with policies or procedures may change.

There were no changes in our internal controls over financial reporting during the three months ended March 31, 2021 that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal controls over financial reporting.

Under the supervision and with the participation of management, including the President and Chief Executive Officer and Senior Executive Vice-President and Chief Financial Officer, management will continue to monitor and evaluate the design and effectiveness of its internal control over financial reporting and disclosure controls and procedures, and may make modifications from time to time as considered necessary.

 

 

BARRICK FIRST QUARTER 2021   73   MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS


IFRS Critical Accounting Policies and Accounting Estimates

 

 

 

Management has discussed the development and selection of our critical accounting estimates with the Audit and Risk Committee of the Board of Directors, and the Audit and Risk Committee has reviewed the disclosure relating to such estimates in conjunction with its review of this MD&A. The accounting policies and methods we utilize determine how we report our financial condition and results of operations, and they may require management to make estimates or rely on assumptions about matters that are inherently uncertain. The consolidated financial statements have been prepared in accordance with International Financial Reporting Standards (“IFRS”) as issued by the International Accounting Standards Board (“IASB”) under the historical cost convention, as modified by revaluation of certain financial assets, derivative contracts and post-retirement assets. Our significant accounting policies are disclosed in

note 2 of the Financial Statements, including a summary of current and future changes in accounting policies.

Critical Accounting Estimates and Judgments

Certain accounting estimates have been identified as being “critical” to the presentation of our financial condition and results of operations because they require us to make subjective and/or complex judgments about matters that are inherently uncertain; or there is a reasonable likelihood that materially different amounts could be reported under different conditions or using different assumptions and estimates. Our significant accounting judgments, estimates and assumptions are disclosed in note 3 of the accompanying Financial Statements.

 

 

Non-GAAP Financial Performance Measures

 

 

 

Adjusted Net Earnings and Adjusted Net Earnings per Share

Adjusted net earnings is a non-GAAP financial measure which excludes the following from net earnings:

   

Impairment charges (reversals) related to intangibles, goodwill, property, plant and equipment, and investments;

   

Acquisition/disposition gains/losses;

   

Foreign currency translation gains/losses;

   

Significant tax adjustments; and

   

Tax effect and non-controlling interest of the above items.

Management uses this measure internally to evaluate our underlying operating performance for the reporting periods presented and to assist with the planning and forecasting of future operating results. Management believes that adjusted net earnings is a useful measure of our performance because impairment charges, acquisition/disposition gains/losses and significant tax adjustments do not reflect the underlying operating performance of our core mining business and are not necessarily indicative of future operating results. Furthermore, foreign currency translation gains/losses are not necessarily reflective of the underlying operating results for the reporting periods presented. The tax effect and non-controlling interest of the adjusting items are also excluded to reconcile the amounts to Barrick’s share on a post-tax basis, consistent with net earnings.

As noted, we use this measure for internal purposes. Management’s internal budgets and forecasts and public guidance do not include the types of items we adjust for. Consequently, the presentation of adjusted net earnings enables investors and analysts to better understand the underlying operating performance of our core mining business through the eyes of management. Management periodically evaluates the components of adjusted net earnings based on an internal assessment of performance measures that are useful for evaluating the operating performance of our business segments and a review of the non-GAAP measures used by mining industry analysts and other mining companies.

Adjusted net earnings is intended to provide additional information only and does not have any standardized definition under IFRS and should not be considered in isolation or as a substitute for measures of performance prepared in accordance with IFRS. The measures are not necessarily indicative of operating profit or cash flow from operations as determined under IFRS. Other companies may calculate these measures differently. The following table reconciles these non-GAAP measures to the most directly comparable IFRS measure.

 

 

 

BARRICK FIRST QUARTER 2021   74   MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS


Reconciliation of Net Earnings to Net Earnings per Share, Adjusted Net Earnings and Adjusted Net Earnings per Share

 

($ millions, except per share amounts in dollars)

     For the three months ended  
               3/31/21             12/31/20             3/31/20  

Net earnings attributable to equity holders of the Company

     538     685     400

Impairment charges (reversals) related to intangibles, goodwill, property, plant and equipment, and investmentsa

     (89     40     (336

Acquisition/disposition (gains) lossesb

     (3     (126     (60

Loss (gain) on currency translation

     4     16     16

Significant tax adjustmentsc

     47     (2     (44

Other expense adjustmentsd

     11     15     98

Tax effect and non-controlling intereste

     (1     (12     211

Adjusted net earnings

     507     616     285

Net earnings per sharef

     0.30     0.39     0.22

Adjusted net earnings per sharef

     0.29     0.35     0.16

 

a.

For the three month period ended March 31, 2021, net impairment reversals primarily relate to non-current asset reversals at Lagunas Norte. Net impairment charges (reversals) for the three month periods ended December 31, 2020 and March 31, 2020 mainly relate to non-current assets at our Tanzanian assets.

b.

Acquisition/disposition gains for the three month period ended December 31, 2020 primarily relate to the gain on the sale of Eskay Creek, Morila and Bullfrog. For the three months ended March 31, 2020, acquisition/disposition gains mainly relate to the gain on the sale of Massawa.

c.

Significant tax adjustments for the three month period ended March 31, 2021 mainly relates to the remeasurement of deferred tax balances for changes in foreign currency rates and the recognition/derecognition of our deferred taxes in various jurisdictions. For the three months ended March 31, 2020, significant tax adjustments primarily relate to deferred tax recoveries as a result of tax reform measures in Argentina and adjustments made in recognition of the net settlement of all outstanding disputes with the Government of Tanzania.

d.

Other expense adjustments for the three month periods ended March 31, 2021 and December 31, 2020 mainly relate to care and maintenance expenses at Porgera. For the three months ended March 31, 2020, other expense adjustments primarily relate to the impact of changes in the discount rate assumptions on our closed mine rehabilitation provision and losses on debt extinguishment.

e.

Tax effect and non-controlling interest for the three month period ended March 31, 2020 primarily relates to the net impairment reversals related to long-lived assets and acquisition gains.

f.

Calculated using weighted average number of shares outstanding under the basic method of earnings per share.

 

Free Cash Flow

Free cash flow is a measure that deducts capital expenditures from net cash provided by operating activities. Management believes this to be a useful indicator of our ability to operate without reliance on additional borrowing or usage of existing cash.

Free cash flow is intended to provide additional information only and does not have any standardized definition under IFRS and should not be considered in

isolation or as a substitute for measures of performance prepared in accordance with IFRS. The measure is not necessarily indicative of operating profit or cash flow from operations as determined under IFRS. Other companies may calculate this measure differently. The following table reconciles this non-GAAP measure to the most directly comparable IFRS measure.

 

 

Reconciliation of Net Cash Provided by Operating Activities to Free Cash Flow

 

($ millions)

     For the three months ended  
               3/31/21               12/31/20               3/31/20  

Net cash provided by operating activities

     1,302     1,638     889

Capital expenditures

     (539     (546     (451

Free cash flow

     763     1,092     438

 

BARRICK FIRST QUARTER 2021   75   MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS


Total cash costs per ounce, All-in sustaining costs per ounce, All-in costs per ounce, C1 cash costs per pound and All-in sustaining costs per pound

Total cash costs per ounce, all-in sustaining costs per ounce and all-in costs per ounce are non-GAAP financial measures which are calculated based on the definition published by the World Gold Council (a market development organization for the gold industry comprised of and funded by gold mining companies from around the world, including Barrick). The WGC is not a regulatory organization. Management uses these measures to monitor the performance of our gold mining operations and its ability to generate positive cash flow, both on an individual site basis and an overall company basis.

Total cash costs start with our cost of sales related to gold production and removes depreciation, the non-controlling interest of cost of sales and includes by-product credits. All-in sustaining costs start with total cash costs and include sustaining capital expenditures, sustaining leases, general and administrative costs, minesite exploration and evaluation costs and reclamation cost accretion and amortization. These additional costs reflect the expenditures made to maintain current production levels.

All-in costs starts with all-in sustaining costs and adds additional costs that reflect the varying costs of producing gold over the life-cycle of a mine, including: project capital expenditures (capital expenditures at new projects and discrete projects at existing operations intended to increase production capacity and will not benefit production for at least 12 months) and other non-sustaining costs (primarily non-sustaining leases, exploration and evaluation costs, community relations costs and general and administrative costs that are not associated with current operations). These definitions recognize that there are different costs associated with the life-cycle of a mine, and that it is therefore appropriate to distinguish between sustaining and non-sustaining costs.

We believe that our use of total cash costs, all-in sustaining costs and all-in costs will assist analysts, investors and other stakeholders of Barrick in understanding the costs associated with producing gold, understanding the economics of gold mining, assessing our operating performance and also our ability to generate free cash flow from current operations and to generate free cash flow on an overall company basis. Due to the capital-intensive nature of the industry and the long useful lives over which these items are depreciated, there can be a significant timing difference between net earnings calculated in accordance with IFRS and the amount of free

 

cash flow that is being generated by a mine and therefore we believe these measures are useful non-GAAP operating metrics and supplement our IFRS disclosures. These measures are not representative of all of our cash expenditures as they do not include income tax payments, interest costs or dividend payments. These measures do not include depreciation or amortization.

Total cash costs per ounce, all-in sustaining costs and all-in costs are intended to provide additional information only and do not have standardized definitions under IFRS and should not be considered in isolation or as a substitute for measures of performance prepared in accordance with IFRS. These measures are not equivalent to net income or cash flow from operations as determined under IFRS. Although the WGC has published a standardized definition, other companies may calculate these measures differently.

In addition to presenting these metrics on a by-product basis, we have calculated these metrics on a co-product basis. Our co-product metrics remove the impact of other metal sales that are produced as a by-product of our gold production from cost per ounce calculations but does not reflect a reduction in costs for costs associated with other metal sales.

C1 cash costs per pound and all-in sustaining costs per pound are non-GAAP financial measures related to our copper mine operations. We believe that C1 cash costs per pound enables investors to better understand the performance of our copper operations in comparison to other copper producers who present results on a similar basis. C1 cash costs per pound excludes royalties and production taxes and non-routine charges as they are not direct production costs. All-in sustaining costs per pound is similar to the gold all-in sustaining costs metric and management uses this to better evaluate the costs of copper production. We believe this measure enables investors to better understand the operating performance of our copper mines as this measure reflects all of the sustaining expenditures incurred in order to produce copper. All-in sustaining costs per pound includes C1 cash costs, sustaining capital expenditures, sustaining leases, general and administrative costs, minesite exploration and evaluation costs, royalties and production taxes, reclamation cost accretion and amortization and write-downs taken on inventory to net realizable value.

 

 

BARRICK FIRST QUARTER 2021   76   MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS


Reconciliation of Gold Cost of Sales to Total cash costs, All-in sustaining costs and All-in costs, including on a per ounce basis

 

($ millions, except per ounce information in dollars)

              For the three months ended  
       Footnote                3/31/21              12/31/20             3/31/20  

Cost of sales applicable to gold production

        1,571     1,681     1,643

Depreciation

        (454     (495     (474

Cash cost of sales applicable to equity method investments

        59     69     52

By-product credits

        (59     (56     (29

Realized (gains) losses on hedge and non-hedge derivatives

     a        0     (1     0

Non-recurring items

     b        0     1     0

Other

     c        (33     (55     (27

Non-controlling interests

     d        (302     (323     (316

Total cash costs

              782     821     849

General & administrative costs

        38     24     40

Minesite exploration and evaluation costs

     e        16     22     15

Minesite sustaining capital expenditures

     f        405     354     370

Sustaining leases

        13     12     0

Rehabilitation - accretion and amortization (operating sites)

     g        11     11     14

Non-controlling interest, copper operations and other

     h        (154     (142     (125

All-in sustaining costs

              1,111     1,102     1,163

Project exploration and evaluation and project costs

     e        45     52     56

Community relations costs not related to current operations

        0     0     1

Project capital expenditures

     f        131     184     76

Non-sustaining leases

        0     4     0

Rehabilitation - accretion and amortization (non-operating sites)

     g        3     4     2

Non-controlling interest and copper operations and other

     h        (42     (61     (33

All-in costs

              1,248     1,285     1,265

Ounces sold - equity basis (000s ounces)

     i        1,093     1,186     1,220

Cost of sales per ounce

     j,k        1,073     1,065     1,020

Total cash costs per ounce

     k        716     692     692

Total cash costs per ounce (on a co-product basis)

     k,l        746     718     705

All-in sustaining costs per ounce

     k        1,018     929     954

All-in sustaining costs per ounce (on a co-product basis)

     k,l        1,048     955     967

All-in costs per ounce

     k        1,144     1,083     1,035

All-in costs per ounce (on a co-product basis)

     k,l        1,174     1,109     1,048  

 

a.

Realized (gains) losses on hedge and non-hedge derivatives

Includes realized hedge losses of $nil for the three month period ended March 31, 2021 (December 31, 2020: $nil and March 31, 2020: $nil), and realized non-hedge losses of $nil for the three month period ended March 31, 2021 (December 31, 2020: gains of $1 million and March 31, 2020: $nil). Refer to Note 5 to the Financial Statements for further information.

 

 

 

b.

Non-recurring items

These costs are not indicative of our cost of production and have been excluded from the calculation of total cash costs.

 

 

 

c.

Other

Other adjustments for the three month period ended March 31, 2021 include the removal of total cash costs and by-product credits associated with Pierina, Lagunas Norte, Golden Sunlight and Morila up until its divestiture in November 2020, which all are producing incidental ounces, of $24 million (December 31, 2020: $26 million; March 31, 2020: $25 million).

 

 

 

d.

Non-controlling interests

Non-controlling interests include non-controlling interests related to gold production of $462 million for the three month period ended March 31, 2021 (December 31, 2020: $490 million and March 31, 2020: $466 million). Non-controlling interests include Nevada Gold Mines, Pueblo Viejo, Loulo-Gounkoto, Tongon, North Mara, Bulyanhulu, Buzwagi. Refer to Note 5 to the Financial Statements for further information.

 

 

 

e.

Exploration and evaluation costs

Exploration, evaluation and project expenses are presented as minesite sustaining if it supports current mine operations and project if it relates to future projects. Refer to page 68 of this MD&A.

 

 

 

f.

Capital expenditures

Capital expenditures are related to our gold sites only and are split between minesite sustaining and project capital expenditures. Project capital expenditures are distinct projects designed to increase the net present value of the mine and are not related to current production. Significant projects in the current year are the expansion project at Pueblo Viejo and construction of the Third Shaft at Turquoise Ridge. Refer to page 67 of this MD&A.

 

 

 

BARRICK FIRST QUARTER 2021   77   MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS


g.

Rehabilitation—accretion and amortization

Includes depreciation on the assets related to rehabilitation provisions of our gold operations and accretion on the rehabilitation provision of our gold operations, split between operating and non-operating sites.

 

 

 

h.

Non-controlling interest and copper operations

Removes general & administrative costs related to non-controlling interests and copper based on a percentage allocation of revenue. Also removes exploration, evaluation and project expenses, rehabilitation costs and capital expenditures incurred by our copper sites and the non-controlling interest of Nevada Gold Mines (including South Arturo), Pueblo Viejo, Loulo-Gounkoto, Tongon, North Mara, Bulyanhulu, and Buzwagi operating segments. It also includes capital expenditures applicable to our equity method investment in Kibali. Figures remove the impact of Pierina, Lagunas Norte and Golden Sunlight. The impact is summarized as the following:

 

($ millions)

     For the three months ended  

Non-controlling interest, copper operations and other

             3/31/21             12/31/20             3/31/20  

General & administrative costs

     (6     (5     (6

Minesite exploration and evaluation expenses

     (7     (9     (3

Rehabilitation - accretion and amortization (operating sites)

     (3     (3     (4

Minesite sustaining capital expenditures

     (138     (125     (112

All-in sustaining costs total

     (154     (142     (125

Project exploration and evaluation and project costs

     (1     (6     (19

Project capital expenditures

     (41     (55     (14

All-in costs total

     (42     (61     (33

 

i.

Ounces sold - equity basis

Figures remove the impact of: Pierina, Lagunas Norte, Golden Sunlight, and Morila up until its divestiture in November 2020, which are producing incidental ounces.

 

 

 

j.

Cost of sales per ounce

Figures remove the cost of sales impact of: Pierina of $5 million for the three month period ended March 31, 2021 (December 31, 2020: $4 million and March 31, 2020: $6 million); Golden Sunlight of $nil for the three month period ended March 31, 2021 (December 31, 2020: $nil and March 31, 2020: $nil); up until its divestiture in November of 2020, Morila, of $nil for the three month period ended March 31, 2021 (December 31, 2020: $2 million and March 31, 2020: $6 million); and Lagunas Norte of $23 million for the three month period ended March 31, 2021 (December 31, 2020: $26 million and March 31, 2020: $21 million), which are producing incidental ounces. Gold cost of sales per ounce is calculated as cost of sales across our gold operations (excluding sites in care and maintenance) divided by ounces sold (both on an attributable basis using Barrick’s ownership share).

 

 

 

k.

Per ounce figures

Cost of sales per ounce, total cash costs per ounce, all-in sustaining costs per ounce and all-in costs per ounce may not calculate based on amounts presented in this table due to rounding.

 

 

 

l.

Co-product costs per ounce

Total cash costs per ounce, all-in sustaining costs per ounce and all-in costs per ounce presented on a co-product basis removes the impact of by-product credits of our gold production (net of non-controlling interest) calculated as:

 

($ millions)

     For the three months ended  
               3/31/21             12/31/20             3/31/20  

By-product credits

     59     56     29

Non-controlling interest

     (26     (27     (15

By-product credits (net of non-controlling interest)

     33     29     14

 

BARRICK FIRST QUARTER 2021   78   MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS


Reconciliation of Gold Cost of Sales to Total cash costs, All-in sustaining costs and All-in costs, including on a per ounce basis, by operating site

 

($ millions, except per ounce information in dollars)

 

    For the three months ended 3/31/21  
       Footnote        Carlin a      Cortez b     

Turquoise

Ridge

 

 

   

Long

Canyon

 

 

    Phoenix      

Nevada

Gold Mines

 

c 

    Hemlo      

North

America

 

 

Cost of sales applicable to gold production

        356     207     151     32     80     826     76     902

Depreciation

        (68     (64     (51     (27     (20     (230     (13     (243

By-product credits

        (1     (1     (3     0     (46     (51     0     (51

Non-recurring items

     d        0     0     0     0     0     0     0     0

Other

        0     0     0     0     0     0     0     0

Non-controlling interests

              (110     (55     (37     (2     (6     (210     0     (210

Total cash costs

              177     87     60     3     8     335     63     398

General & administrative costs

        0     0     0     0     0     0     0     0

Minesite exploration and evaluation costs

     e        3     1     0     1     0     5     1     6

Minesite sustaining capital expenditures

     f        100     54     14     3     6     185     22     207

Sustaining capital leases

        0     0     0     0     0     1     0     1

Rehabilitation - accretion and amortization (operating sites)

     g        2     2     0     0     0     4     1     5

Non-controlling interests

              (41     (22     (5     (1     (2     (74     0     (74

All-in sustaining costs

              241     122     69     6     12     456     87     543

Project exploration and evaluation and project costs

     e        0     0     0     0     0     0     0     0

Project capital expenditures

     f        0     17     19     0     0     36     0     36

Non-controlling interests

              0     (7     (8     0     0     (15     0     (15

All-in costs

              241     132     80     6     12     477     87     564

Ounces sold - equity basis (000s ounces)

              231     102     92     39     24     488     47     535

Cost of sales per ounce

     h,i        950     1,251     1,007     511     2,051     1,047     1,610     1,097

Total cash costs per ounce

     i        766     860     647     79     346     686     1,324     742

Total cash costs per ounce (on a co-product basis)

     i,j        768     863     665     79     1,534     749     1,329     800

All-in sustaining costs per ounce

     i        1,045     1,203     741     156     530     932     1,840     1,013

All-in sustaining costs per ounce (on a co-product basis)

     i,j        1,047     1,206     759     156     1,718     995     1,845     1,071

All-in costs per ounce

     i        1,045     1,303     866     156     530     974     1,838     1,051

All-in costs per ounce (on a co-product basis)

     i,j        1,047     1,306     884     156     1,718     1,037     1,843     1,109

 

BARRICK FIRST QUARTER 2021   79   MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS


($ millions, except per ounce information in dollars)

 

    For the three months ended 3/31/21
       Footnote        Pueblo Viejo       Veladero      

Latin America &

Asia Pacific

 

 

Cost of sales applicable to gold production

        191     35     226

Depreciation

        (61     (11     (72

By-product credits

        (12     (1     (13

Non-recurring items

     d        0     0     0

Other

        0     0     0

Non-controlling interests

              (47     0     (47

Total cash costs

              71     23     94

General & administrative costs

        0     0     0

Minesite exploration and evaluation costs

     e        0     0     0

Minesite sustaining capital expenditures

     f        40     41     81

Sustaining capital leases

        0     0     0

Rehabilitation - accretion and amortization (operating sites)

     g        2     0     2

Non-controlling interests

              (16     0     (16

All-in sustaining costs

              97     64     161

Project exploration and evaluation and project costs

     e        0     0     0

Project capital expenditures

     f        58     0     58

Non-controlling interests

              (23     0     (23

All-in costs

              132     64     196

Ounces sold - equity basis (000s ounces)

              141     31     172

Cost of sales per ounce

     h,i        816     1,151     903

Total cash costs per ounce

     i        507     736     548

Total cash costs per ounce (on a co-product basis)

     i,j        553     782     594

All-in sustaining costs per ounce

     i        689     2,104     954

All-in sustaining costs per ounce (on a co-product basis)

     i,j        735     2,150     1,000

All-in costs per ounce

     i        936     2,104     1,157

All-in costs per ounce (on a co-product basis)

     i,j        982     2,150     1,203

 

BARRICK FIRST QUARTER 2021   80   MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS


($ millions, except per ounce information in dollars)

 

    For the three months ended 3/31/21  
       Footnote       

Loulo-

Gounkoto

 

 

    Kibali      

North

Mara

 

 

    Tongon       Bulyanhulu       Buzwagi      

Africa &

Middle East

 

 

Cost of sales applicable to gold production

        184     92     71     81     40     31     499

Depreciation

        (69     (32     (15     (28     (12     (1     (157

By-product credits

        0     0     0     0     0     1     1

Non-recurring items

     d        0     0     0     0     0     0     0

Other

        0     0     0     0     0     0     0

Non-controlling interests

              (23     0     (10     (5     (4     (6     (48

Total cash costs

              92     60     46     48     24     25     295

General & administrative costs

        0     0     0     0     0     0     0

Minesite exploration and evaluation costs

     e        4     0     0     1     0     0     5

Minesite sustaining capital expenditures

     f        53     11     12     2     3     0     81

Sustaining capital leases

        1     3     0     0     0     0     4

Rehabilitation - accretion and amortization (operating sites)

     g        1     0     2     0     0     0     3

Non-controlling interests

              (12     0     (2     0     (1     0     (15

All-in sustaining costs

              139     74     58     51     26     25     373

Project exploration and evaluation and project costs

     e        0     0     0     0     0     0     0

Project capital expenditures

     f        15     0     6     0     10     0     31

Non-controlling interests

              (3     0     (1     0     (1     0     (5

All-in costs

              151     74     63     51     35     25     399

Ounces sold - equity basis (000s ounces)

              151     86     56     48     28     17     386

Cost of sales per ounce

     h,i        974     1,065     1,061     1,510     1,211     1,486     1,114

Total cash costs per ounce

     i        608     691     832     995     865     1,450     763

Total cash costs per ounce (on a co-product basis)

     i,j        608     695     839     996     861     1,420     763

All-in sustaining costs per ounce

     i        920     856     1,038     1,062     957     1,467     968

All-in sustaining costs per ounce (on a co-product basis)

     i,j        920     860     1,045     1,063     953     1,437     969

All-in costs per ounce

     i        1,000     862     1,134     1,062     1,275     1,467     1,037

All-in costs per ounce (on a co-product basis)

     i,j        1,000     866     1,141     1,063     1,271     1,437     1,038

 

BARRICK FIRST QUARTER 2021   81   MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS


($ millions, except per ounce information in dollars)

 

    For the three months ended 12/31/20  
       Footnote        Carlin a      Cortez b     

Turquoise

Ridge

 

 

   

Long

Canyon

 

 

    Phoenix      

Nevada Gold

Mines

 

c 

    Hemlo      

North

America

 

 

Cost of sales applicable to gold production

        385       197       156       56       89       883       79       962  

Depreciation

        (74     (57     (52     (44     (21     (248     (16     (264

By-product credits

        (1     (1     (3     0       (42     (47     0       (47

Non-recurring items

     d        0       0       0       0       0       0       0       0  

Other

        0       0       0       0       0       0       0       0  

Non-controlling interests

              (120     (54     (38     (5     (10     (227     0       (227

Total cash costs

              190       85       63       7       16       361       63       424  

General & administrative costs

        0       0       0       0       0       0       0       0  

Minesite exploration and evaluation costs

     e        13       0       0       3       0       16       1       17  

Minesite sustaining capital expenditures

     f        97       28       10       12       3       160       20       180  

Sustaining capital leases

        0       0       0       0       0       1       0       1  

Rehabilitation - accretion and amortization (operating sites)

     g        2       3       0       0       1       6       0       6  

Non-controlling interests

              (43     (12     (4     (6     (1     (70     0       (70

All-in sustaining costs

              259       104       69       16       19       474       84       558  

Project exploration and evaluation and project costs

     e        0       0       0       0       0       0       0       0  

Project capital expenditures

     f        0       30       6       0       0       48       0       48  

Non-controlling interests

              0       (11     (2     0       0       (17     0       (17

All-in costs

              259       123       73       16       19       505       84       589  

Ounces sold - equity basis (000s ounces)

              259       116       90       51       26       542       57       599  

Cost of sales per ounce

     h,i        917       1,043       1,064       674       2,054       1,008       1,379       1,043  

Total cash costs per ounce

     i        740       738       687       145       590       667       1,104       709  

Total cash costs per ounce (on a co-product basis)

     i,j        742       741       710       146       1,557       720       1,109       757  

All-in sustaining costs per ounce

     i        1,005       906       757       324       670       873       1,464       930  

All-in sustaining costs per ounce (on a co-product basis)

     i,j        1,007       909       780       325       1,637       926       1,469       978  

All-in costs per ounce

     i        1,005       1,065       799       324       670       925       1,464       977  

All-in costs per ounce (on a co-product basis)

     i,j        1,007       1,068       822       325       1,637       978       1,469       1,025  

 

BARRICK FIRST QUARTER 2021   82   MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS


($ millions, except per ounce information in dollars)

 

    For the three months ended 12/31/20  
       Footnote        Pueblo Viejo       Veladero      

Latin America & Asia

Pacific

 

 

Cost of sales applicable to gold production

        203     54     257

Depreciation

        (61     (17     (78

By-product credits

        (16     (2     (18

Non-recurring items

     f        0     0     0

Other

        0     0     0

Non-controlling interests

              (52     0     (52

Total cash costs

              74     35     109

General & administrative costs

        0     0     0

Minesite exploration and evaluation costs

     e        3     0     3

Minesite sustaining capital expenditures

     f        45     35     80

Sustaining capital leases

        0       1       1  

Rehabilitation - accretion and amortization (operating sites)

     g        2       1       3  

Non-controlling interests

              (20     0     (20

All-in sustaining costs

              104     72     176

Project exploration and evaluation and project costs

     e        0     0     0

Project capital expenditures

     f        64     0     64

Non-controlling interests

              (25     0     (25

All-in costs

              143     72     215

Ounces sold - equity basis (000s ounces)

              153     51     204

Cost of sales per ounce

     h,i        803     1,074     894

Total cash costs per ounce

     i        493     698     545

Total cash costs per ounce (on a co-product basis)

     i,j        560     734     604

All-in sustaining costs per ounce

     i        689     1,428     878

All-in sustaining costs per ounce (on a co-product basis)

     i,j        756     1,464     937

All-in costs per ounce

     i        941     1,428     1,066

All-in costs per ounce (on a co-product basis)

     i,j        1,008     1,464     1,125

 

BARRICK FIRST QUARTER 2021   83   MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS


($ millions, except per ounce information in dollars)

 

    For the three months ended 12/31/20  
       Footnote       

Loulo-

Gounkoto

 

 

    Kibali       North Mara       Tongon       Bulyanhulu       Buzwagi      

Africa & Middle

East

 

 

Cost of sales applicable to gold production

        181       104       82       99       28       33       527  

Depreciation

        (65     (48     (21     (41     (13     (2     (190

By-product credits

        0       0       (1     0       0       0       (1

Non-recurring items

     d        0       0       0       0       0       0       0  

Other

        0       0       0       0       0       0       0  

Non-controlling interests

              (23     0       (10     (6     (2     (5     (46

Total cash costs

              93       56       50       52       13       26       290  

General & administrative costs

        0       0       0       0       0       0       0  

Minesite exploration and evaluation costs

     e        2       0       0       1       0       0       3  

Minesite sustaining capital expenditures

     f        27       11       13       2       1       0       54  

Sustaining capital leases

        1       2       0       0       0       0       3  

Rehabilitation - accretion and amortization (operating sites)

     g        0       0       1       0       0       0       1  

Non-controlling interests

              (6     0       (2     0       0       0       (8

All-in sustaining costs

              117       69       62       55       14       26       343  

Project exploration and evaluation and project costs

     e        0       0       0       0       0       0       0  

Project capital expenditures

     f        7       1       18       0       43       0       69  

Non-controlling interests

              (1     0       (3     0       (7     0       (11

All-in costs

              123       70       77       55       50       26       401  

Ounces sold - equity basis (000s ounces)

              126       89       63       64       20       21       383  

Cost of sales per ounce

     h,i        1,149       1,163       1,073       1,371       1,181       1,314       1,188  

Total cash costs per ounce

     i        734       616       799       810       610       1,267       753  

Total cash costs per ounce (on a co-product basis)

     i,j        734       621       806       811       621       1,242       753  

All-in sustaining costs per ounce

     i        923       783       989       853       664       1,283       896  

All-in sustaining costs per ounce (on a co-product basis)

     i,j        923       788       996       854       675       1,258       898  

All-in costs per ounce

     i        970       787       1,232       853       2,493       1,283       1,046  

All-in costs per ounce (on a co-product basis)

     i,j        970       792       1,239       854       2,504       1,258       1,048  

 

BARRICK FIRST QUARTER 2021   84   MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS


($ millions, except per ounce information in dollars)

 

    For the three months ended 3/31/20  
       Footnote        Carlin a      Cortez b     

Turquoise

Ridge

 

 

   

Long

Canyon

 

 

    Phoenix      

Nevada Gold

Mines

 

c 

    Hemlo      

North

America

 

 

Cost of sales applicable to gold production

        404     182     147     45     78     856     65     921

Depreciation

        (80     (54     (51     (30     (22     (237     (10     (247

By-product credits

        0     0     (1     0     (20     (21     0     (21

Non-recurring items

     d        0     0     0     0     0     0     0     0

Other

        0     0     0     0     0     0     0     0

Non-controlling interests

              (125     (49     (37     (6     (14     (231     0     (231

Total cash costs

              199     79     58     9     22     367     55     422

General & administrative costs

        0     0     0     0     0     0     0     0

Minesite exploration and evaluation costs

     e        3     2     1     1     0     7     0     7

Minesite sustaining capital expenditures

     f        91     76     18     8     7     209     19     228

Sustaining capital leases

        0     0     0     0     0     0     0     0

Rehabilitation - accretion and amortization (operating sites)

     g        2     4     0     0     1     7     0     7

Non-controlling interests

              (37     (32     (7     (4     (3     (83     0     (83

All-in sustaining costs

              258     129     70     14     27     507     74     581

Project exploration and evaluation and project costs

     e        0     0     0     0     0     0     0     0

Project capital expenditures

     f        0     21     14     0     0     35     0     35

Non-controlling interests

              0     (8     (6     0     0     (13     0     (13

All-in costs

              258     142     78     14     27     529     74     603

Ounces sold - equity basis (000s ounces)

              256     128     87     27     30     528     58     586

Cost of sales per ounce

     h,i        970     878     1,032     1,025     1,583     995     1,119     1,007

Total cash costs per ounce

     i        776     614     668     345     737     690     945     720

Total cash costs per ounce (on a co-product basis)

     i,j        777     614     672     347     1,140     730     945     757

All-in sustaining costs per ounce

     i        1,007     1,009     806     561     914     952     1,281     979

All-in sustaining costs per ounce (on a co-product basis)

     i,j        1,008     1,009     810     563     1,317     992     1,281     1,016

All-in costs per ounce

     i        1,007     1,112     903     561     914     993     1,288     1,017

All-in costs per ounce (on a co-product basis)

     i,j        1,008     1,112     907     563     1,317     1,033     1,288     1,054

 

BARRICK FIRST QUARTER 2021   85   MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS


($ millions, except per ounce information in dollars)

 

    For the three months ended 3/31/20  
       Footnote        Pueblo Viejo             Veladero       Porgerak      

Latin America & Asia

Pacific

 

 

Cost of sales applicable to gold production

        185     67     70     322

Depreciation

        (53     (22     (10     (85

By-product credits

        (12     (1     0     (13

Non-recurring items

     d        0     0     0     0

Other

        0     0     0     0

Non-controlling interests

              (48     0     0     (48

Total cash costs

              72     44     60     176

General & administrative costs

        0     0     0     0

Minesite exploration and evaluation costs

     e        0     0     1     1

Minesite sustaining capital expenditures

     f        28     25     8     61

Sustaining capital leases

        0     0     1     1

Rehabilitation - accretion and amortization (operating sites)

     g        1     1     0     2

Non-controlling interests

              (12     0     0     (12

All-in sustaining costs

              89     70     70     229

Project exploration and evaluation and project costs

     e        2     0     0     2

Project capital expenditures

     h        0     15     0     15

Non-controlling interests

              (1     0     0     (1

All-in costs

              90     85     70     245

Ounces sold - equity basis (000s ounces)

              144     57     63     264

Cost of sales per ounce

     h,i        767     1,182     1,097     935

Total cash costs per ounce

     i        502     788     941     668

Total cash costs per ounce (on a co-product basis)

     i,j        548     806     946     718

All-in sustaining costs per ounce

     i        626     1,266     1,089     874

All-in sustaining costs per ounce (on a co-product basis)

     i,j        672     1,284     1,094     924

All-in costs per ounce

     i        635     1,537     1,089     934

All-in costs per ounce (on a co-product basis)

     i,j        681     1,555     1,094     984

 

BARRICK FIRST QUARTER 2021   86   MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS


($ millions, except per ounce information in dollars)

 

    For the three months ended 3/31/20  
       Footnote       

Loulo-

Gounkoto

 

 

          Kibali       North Mara       Tongon       Bulyanhulu       Buzwagi      

Africa & Middle

East

 

 

Cost of sales applicable to gold production

        153     93     79     89     14     39     467

Depreciation

        (59     (41     (25     (39     (8     (3     (175

By-product credits

        0     0     (1     0     0     0     (1

Non-recurring items

     d        0     0     0     0     0     0     0

Other

        0     0     0     0     0     0     0

Non-controlling interests

              (19     0     (9     (5     (1     (6     (40

Total cash costs

              75     52     44     45     5     30     251

General & administrative costs

        0     0     0     0     0     0     0

Minesite exploration and evaluation costs

     e        2     1     0     1     0     0     4

Minesite sustaining capital expenditures

     f        39     15     14     1     1     0     70

Sustaining capital leases

        0     0     0     0     0     0     0

Rehabilitation - accretion and amortization (operating sites)

     g        1       0       1       0       0       0       2  

Non-controlling interests

              (8     0     (2     0     0     0     (10

All-in sustaining costs

              109     68     57     47     6     30     317

Project exploration and evaluation and project costs

     e        0     0     0     0     0     0     0

Project capital expenditures

     f        0     0     2     0     1     0     3

Non-controlling interests

              0     0     0     0     0     0     0

All-in costs

              109     68     59     47     7     30     320

Ounces sold - equity basis (000s ounces)

              123     88     70     58     7     24     370

Cost of sales per ounce

     h,i        1,002     1,045     959     1,368     1,685     1,373     1,099

Total cash costs per ounce

     i        614     582     646     762     686     1,275     680

Total cash costs per ounce (on a co-product basis)

     i,j        614     585     653     763     709     1,282     684

All-in sustaining costs per ounce

     i        891     773     816     788     906     1,288     859

All-in sustaining costs per ounce (on a co-product basis)

     i,j        891     776     823     789     929     1,295     863

All-in costs per ounce

     i        891     773     838     788     1,038     1,288     865

All-in costs per ounce (on a co-product basis)

     i,j        891     776     845     789     1,061     1,295     869

 

a.

Included within our 61.5% interest in Carlin is NGM’s 60% interest in South Arturo.

 

 

 

b.

Starting in the first quarter of 2021, Goldrush is reported as part of Cortez as it is operated by Cortez management. Comparative periods have been restated to include Goldrush.

 

 

 

c.

These results represent our 61.5% interest in Carlin (including NGM’s 60% interest in South Arturo), Cortez, Turquoise Ridge, Phoenix and Long Canyon.

 

 

 

d.

Non-recurring items

These costs are not indicative of our cost of production and have been excluded from the calculation of total cash costs.

 

 

 

e.

Exploration and evaluation costs

Exploration, evaluation and project expenses are presented as minesite sustaining if it supports current mine operations and project if it relates to future projects. Refer to page 68 of this MD&A.

 

 

 

f.

Capital expenditures

Capital expenditures are related to our gold sites only and are split between minesite sustaining and project capital expenditures. Project capital expenditures are distinct projects designed to increase the net present value of the mine and are not related to current production. Significant projects in the current year are the expansion project at Pueblo Viejo and construction of the Third Shaft at Turquoise Ridge. Refer to page 67 of this MD&A.

 

 

 

g.

Rehabilitation - accretion and amortization

Includes depreciation on the assets related to rehabilitation provisions of our gold operations and accretion on the rehabilitation provision of our gold operations, split between operating and non-operating sites.

 

 

 

h.

Cost of sales per ounce

Gold cost of sales per ounce is calculated as cost of sales across our gold operations (excluding sites in care and maintenance) divided by ounces sold (both on an attributable basis using Barrick’s ownership share).

 

 

 

i.

Per ounce figures

Cost of sales per ounce, total cash costs per ounce, all-in sustaining costs per ounce and all-in costs per ounce may not calculate based on amounts presented in this table due to rounding.

 

BARRICK FIRST QUARTER 2021   87   MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS


 

j.

Co-product costs per ounce

Total cash costs per ounce, all-in sustaining costs per ounce and all-in costs per ounce presented on a co-product basis removes the impact of by-product credits of our gold production (net of non-controlling interest) calculated as:

 

($ millions)

     For the three months ended 3/31/21  
      Carlina      Cortezb     

Turquoise

Ridge

   

Long

Canyon

     Phoenix    

Nevada Gold

Minesc

    Hemlo     

Pueblo

Viejo

    Veladero  

By-product credits

     1      1      3     0      46     51     0      12     1

Non-controlling interest

     0      0      (1     0      (18     (19     0      (5     0

By-product credits (net of non-controlling interest)

     1      1      2     0      28     32     0      7     1

($ millions)

     For the three months ended 3/31/21  
     

Loulo-

Gounkoto

     Kibali     

North

Mara

    Tongon      Bulyanhulu     Buzwagi                        

By-product credits

     0      0      0     0      0     (1       

Non-controlling interest

     0      0      0     0      0     0                           

By-product credits (net of non-controlling interest)

     0      0      0     0      0     (1                         

($ millions)

     For the three months ended 12/31/20  
      Carlina      Cortezb      Turquoise
Ridge
    Long
Canyon
     Phoenix     Nevada Gold
Minesc
    Hemlo     

Pueblo

Viejo

    Veladero  

By-product credits

     1      1      3     0      42     47     0      16     2

Non-controlling interest

     0      0      (1     0      (16     (18     0      (6     0

By-product credits (net of non-controlling interest)

     1      1      2     0      26     29     0      10     2

($ millions)

     For the three months ended 12/31/20  
     

Loulo-

Gounkoto

     Kibali     

North

Mara

    Tongon      Bulyanhulu     Buzwagi                        

By-product credits

     0      0      1     0      0     0       

Non-controlling interest

     0      0      0     0      0     0                         

By-product credits (net of non-controlling interest)

     0      0      1     0      0     0                         

($ millions)

              For the three months ended 3/31/2020  
      Carlina      Cortezb     

Turquoise

Ridge

    Long
Canyon
     Phoenix    

Nevada

Gold

Minesc

    Hemlo      Pueblo
Viejo
    Veladero  

By-product credits

     0      0      1     0      20     21     0      12     1

Non-controlling interest

     0      0      0     0      (8     (8     0      (5     0

By-product credits (net of non-controlling interest)

     0      0      1     0      12     13     0      7     1

($ millions)

              For the three months ended 3/31/2020  
      Porgerak     

Loulo-

Gounkoto

     Kibali    

North

Mara

     Tongon     Bulyanhulu     Buzwagi                 

By-product credits

     0      0      0     1      0     0     0     

Non-controlling interest

     0      0      0     0      0     0     0                 

By-product credits (net of non-controlling interest)

     0      0      0     1      0     0     0                 

 

 

 

k.

As Porgera was placed on care and maintenance on April 25, 2020, no operating data or per ounce data was provided for the three month periods ended March 31, 2021 and December 31, 2020.

 

 

 

BARRICK FIRST QUARTER 2021   88   MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS


Reconciliation of Copper Cost of Sales to C1 cash costs and All-in sustaining costs, including on a per pound basis

 

($ millions, except per pound information in dollars)

     For the three months ended  
               3/31/21             12/31/20             3/31/20  

Cost of sales

     136     125     124

Depreciation/amortization

     (48     (41     (43

Treatment and refinement charges

     41     39     39

Cash cost of sales applicable to equity method investments

     79     72     66

Less: royalties and production taxesa

     (23     (16     (11

By-product credits

     (4     (5     (3

Other

     0     0     0

C1 cash costs

     181     174     172

General & administrative costs

     4     5     3

Rehabilitation - accretion and amortization

     1     1     3

Royalties and production taxesa

     23     16     11

Minesite exploration and evaluation costs

     2     1     1

Minesite sustaining capital expenditures

     42     65     32

Sustaining leases

     2     2     3

All-in sustaining costs

     255     264     225

Pounds sold - consolidated basis (millions pounds)

     113     108     110

Cost of sales per poundb,c

     2.11     2.06     1.96

C1 cash cost per poundb

     1.60     1.61     1.55

All-in sustaining costs per poundb

     2.26     2.42     2.04

 

a.

For the three month period ended March 31, 2021, royalties and production taxes include royalties of $23 million (December 31, 2020: $16 million and March 31, 2020: $11 million).

b.

Cost of sales per pound, C1 cash costs per pound and all-in sustaining costs per pound may not calculate based on amounts presented in this table due to rounding.

c.

Copper cost of sales per pound is calculated as cost of sales across our copper operations divided by pounds sold (both on an attributable basis using Barrick’s ownership share).

 

BARRICK FIRST QUARTER 2021   89   MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS


Reconciliation of Copper Cost of Sales to C1 cash costs and All-in sustaining costs, including on a per pound basis, by operating site

 

($ millions, except per pound information in dollars)

 

    For the three months ended  
      3/31/21     12/31/20     3/31/20  
       Zaldívar       Lumwana      

Jabal

Sayid

 

 

    Zaldívar       Lumwana      
Jabal
Sayid
 
 
    Zaldívar       Lumwana      
Jabal
      Sayid
 
 

Cost of sales

     83     136     21     68     125     28     70     124     22

Depreciation/amortization

     (21     (48     (3     (17     (41     (7     (20     (43     (6

Treatment and refinement charges

     0     37     4     1     33     5     0     34     5

Less: royalties and production taxesa

     0     (23     0     0     (16     0     0     (11     0

By-product credits

     0     0     (4     0     0     (5     0     0     (3

Other

     0     0     0     0     0     0     0     0     0

C1 cash costs

     62     102     18     52     101     21     50     104     18

Rehabilitation - accretion and amortization

     0     1     0     0     1     0     0     3     0

Royalties and production taxesa

     0     23     0     0     16     0     0     11     0

Minesite exploration and evaluation costs

     2     0     0     1     0     0     1     0     0

Minesite sustaining capital expenditures

     2     37     3     15     48     2     6     25     1

Sustaining leases

     1     1     0     1     1     0     1     2     0

All-in sustaining costs

     67     164     21     69     167     23     58     145     19

Pounds sold - consolidated basis (millions pounds)

     27     69     17     25     65     18     30     63     17

Cost of sales per poundb,c

     3.03     1.97     1.21     2.68     1.96     1.53     2.39     1.94     1.28

C1 cash cost per poundb

     2.25     1.48     1.06     2.01     1.58     1.15     1.71     1.63     0.97

All-in sustaining costs per poundb

     2.47     2.37     1.22     2.70     2.60     1.27     1.99     2.26     1.11

 

a.

For the three month period ended March 31, 2021, royalties and production taxes include royalties of $23 million (December 31, 2020: $16 million and March 31, 2020: $11 million).

b.

Cost of sales per pound, C1 cash costs per pound and all-in sustaining costs per pound may not calculate based on amounts presented in this table due to rounding.

c.

Copper cost of sales per pound is calculated as cost of sales across our copper operations divided by pounds sold (both on an attributable basis using Barrick’s ownership share).

EBITDA and Adjusted EBITDA

EBITDA is a non-GAAP financial measure, which excludes the following from net earnings:

   

Income tax expense;

   

Finance costs;

   

Finance income; and

   

Depreciation.

Management believes that EBITDA is a valuable indicator of our ability to generate liquidity by producing operating cash flow to fund working capital needs, service debt obligations, and fund capital expenditures. Management uses EBITDA for this purpose. EBITDA is also frequently used by investors and analysts for valuation purposes whereby EBITDA is multiplied by a factor or “EBITDA multiple” that is based on an observed or inferred relationship between EBITDA and market values to determine the approximate total enterprise value of a company.

Adjusted EBITDA removes the effect of impairment charges; acquisition/disposition gains/losses; foreign currency translation gains/losses; other expense adjustments; and income tax expense, finance costs, finance income and depreciation from equity investees. We believe these items provide a greater level of consistency with the adjusting items included in our Adjusted Net

Earnings reconciliation, with the exception that these amounts are adjusted to remove any impact on finance costs/income, income tax expense and/or depreciation, including the impact incurred in our equity method accounted investments, as they do not affect EBITDA. We believe this additional information will assist analysts, investors and other stakeholders of Barrick in better understanding our ability to generate liquidity from operating cash flow, by excluding these amounts from the calculation as they are not indicative of the performance of our core mining business and not necessarily reflective of the underlying operating results for the periods presented.

EBITDA and adjusted EBITDA are intended to provide additional information to investors and analysts and do not have any standardized definition under IFRS and should not be considered in isolation or as a substitute for measures of performance prepared in accordance with IFRS. EBITDA and adjusted EBITDA exclude the impact of cash costs of financing activities and taxes, and the effects of changes in operating working capital balances, and therefore are not necessarily indicative of operating profit or cash flow from operations as determined under IFRS. Other companies may calculate EBITDA and adjusted EBITDA differently.

 

 

BARRICK FIRST QUARTER 2021   90   MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS


Reconciliation of Net Earnings to EBITDA and Adjusted EBITDA

 

($ millions)

     For the three months ended  
                   3/31/21       12/31/20       3/31/20  

Net earnings

     830     1,058       663

Income tax expense

     374     404     386

Finance costs, neta

     77     72     88

Depreciation

     507     544     524

EBITDA

     1,788     2,078     1,661

Impairment charges (reversals) of long-lived assetsb

     (89 )      40     (336

Acquisition/disposition (gains) lossesc

     (3     (126     (60

Loss on currency translation

     4     16     16

Other expense (income) adjustmentsd

     11     15     98

Income tax expense, net finance costs, and depreciation from equity investees

     89     83     87

Adjusted EBITDA

     1,800     2,106     1,466

 

a.

Finance costs exclude accretion.

b.

For the three month period ended March 31, 2021, net impairment reversals primarily relate to non-current asset reversals at Lagunas Norte. Net impairment charges (reversals) for the three month periods ended December 31, 2020 and March 31, 2020 mainly relate to non-current assets at our Tanzanian assets.

c.

Acquisition/disposition gains for the three month period ended December 31, 2020 primarily relate to the gain on the sale of Eskay Creek, Morila and Bullfrog. For the three months ended March 31, 2020, acquisition/disposition gains mainly relate to the gain on the sale of Massawa.

d.

Other expense adjustments for the three month periods ended March 31, 2021 and December 31, 2020 mainly relate to care and maintenance expenses at Porgera. For the three months ended March 31, 2020, other expense adjustments primarily relate to the impact of changes in the discount rate assumptions on our closed mine rehabilitation provision and losses on debt extinguishment.

Reconciliation of Income to EBITDA by operating site

 

($ millions)

              For the three months ended 3/31/21  
      

Carlina

(61.5%)

 

 

    

Cortezb

(61.5%)

 

 

    

Turquoise

Ridge

(61.5%)

 

 

 

    

Nevada

Gold Minesc

(61.5%)

 

 

 

    

Pueblo
Viejo
(60%)
 
 
 
    

Loulo-
Gounkoto
(80%)

 
 
    
Kibali
    (45%)
 
 
    

Veladero

(50%)

 

 

    

North
Mara

    (84%)

 
 

 

    

Bulyanhulu

(84%)

 

 

Income

     188      49      72      375      131      113      63      22      40      7  

Depreciation

     42      39      32      142      37      55      32      11      12      10

EBITDA

     230      88      104      517      168      168      95      33      52      17  
                For the three months ended 12/31/20  
      

Carlina

(61.5%)

 

 

    

Cortezb

(61.5%)

 

 

    

Turquoise

Ridge

(61.5%)

 

 

 

    

Nevada Gold

Minesc

(61.5%)

 

 

 

    

Pueblo

Viejo (60%)

 

 

    

Loulo-
Gounkoto
(80%)

 
 
    
Kibali
(45%)
 
 
    
Veladero
(50%)
 
 
    

North
Mara

(84%)

 
 

 

    

Bulyanhulu

(84%)

 

 

Income

     244      93      72      482      167      91      58      44      49      13  

Depreciation

     45      35      32      152      37      52      48      17      17      10

EBITDA

     289      128      104      634      204      143      106      61      66      23  
                For the three months ended 3/31/20  
      

Carlina

(61.5%)

 

 

    

Cortezb

(61.5%)

 

 

    

Turquoise

Ridge

(61.5%)

 

 

 

    

Nevada Gold

Minesc

(61.5%)

 

 

 

    

Pueblo

Viejo (60%)

 

 

    

Loulo-

Gounkoto

(80%)

 

 

 

    

Kibali

(45%)

 

 

    

Veladero

(50%)

 

 

    

North

Mara

(84%)

 

 

 

    

Bulyanhulu

(84%)

 

 

Income

     153      89      47      316      102      68      48      24      49      (11

Depreciation

     49      33      31      146      32      47      41      22      21      7  

EBITDA

     202      122      78      462      134      115      89      46      70      (4

 

  a.

Included within our 61.5% interest in Carlin is NGM’s 60% interest in South Arturo.

  b.

Starting in the first quarter of 2021, Goldrush is reported as part of Cortez as it is operated by Cortez management. Comparative periods have been restated to include Goldrush.

  c.

These results represent our 61.5% interest in Carlin (including NGM’s 60% interest in South Arturo), Cortez, Turquoise Ridge, Phoenix and Long Canyon.

 

BARRICK FIRST QUARTER 2021   91   MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS


Realized Price

Realized price is a non-GAAP financial measure which excludes from sales:

   

Unrealized gains and losses on non-hedge derivative contracts;

   

Unrealized mark-to-market gains and losses on provisional pricing from copper and gold sales contracts;

   

Sales attributable to ore purchase arrangements;

   

Treatment and refining charges; and

   

Cumulative catch-up adjustment to revenue relating to our streaming arrangements.

This measure is intended to enable management to better understand the price realized in each reporting period for gold and copper sales because unrealized mark-to-market values of non-hedge gold and copper derivatives are subject to change each period due to changes in market factors such as market and forward gold and copper prices, so that prices ultimately realized may differ from those recorded. The exclusion of such unrealized mark-to-market gains and losses from the presentation of this performance measure enables investors to understand performance based on the realized proceeds of selling gold and copper production.

The gains and losses on non-hedge derivatives and receivable balances relate to instruments/balances that

mature in future periods, at which time the gains and losses will become realized. The amounts of these gains and losses reflect fair values based on market valuation assumptions at the end of each period and do not necessarily represent the amounts that will become realized on maturity. We also exclude export duties that are paid upon sale and netted against revenues as well as treatment and refining charges that are paid to the refiner on gold and copper concentrate sales that are netted against revenues. We believe this provides investors and analysts with a more accurate measure with which to compare to market gold prices and to assess our gold sales performance. For those reasons, management believes that this measure provides a more accurate reflection of our Company’s past performance and is a better indicator of its expected performance in future periods.

The realized price measure is intended to provide additional information, and does not have any standardized definition under IFRS and should not be considered in isolation or as a substitute for measures of performance prepared in accordance with IFRS. The measure is not necessarily indicative of sales as determined under IFRS. Other companies may calculate this measure differently. The following table reconciles realized prices to the most directly comparable IFRS measure.

 

 

Reconciliation of Sales to Realized Price per ounce/pound

 

($ millions, except per ounce/pound information in dollars)

     Gold       Copper  
       For the three months ended  
       3/31/21       12/31/20       3/31/20       3/31/21        12/31/20        3/31/20  

Sales

     2,641     3,028     2,593     256      195        99

Sales applicable to non-controlling interests

     (814     (934     (770     0      0        0

Sales applicable to equity method investmentsa,b

     154     168       147     170      135        107

Realized non-hedge gold/copper derivative (losses) gains

     0     0       0     0      0        0

Sales applicable to sites in care and maintenancec

     (41     (41     (46     0      0        0

Treatment and refinement charges

     0     1       0     41      39        39

Otherd

     0     (1     15     0      0        0

Revenues – as adjusted

     1,940     2,221       1,939     467      369        245

Ounces/pounds sold (000s ounces/millions pounds)c

     1,093     1,186       1,220     113      108        110

Realized gold/copper price per ounce/pounde

     1,777     1,871       1,589     4.12      3.39        2.23

 

a.

Represents sales of $154 million for the three month period ended March 31, 2021 (December 31, 2020: $168 million and March 31, 2020: $140 million) applicable to our 45% equity method investment in Kibali for gold. Represents sales of $109 million for the three months ended March 31, 2021 (December 31, 2020: $82 million and March 31, 2020: $72 million) applicable to our 50% equity method investment in Zaldívar and $65 million (December 31, 2020: $59 million and March 31, 2020: $40 million) applicable to our 50% equity method investment in Jabal Sayid for copper.

b.

Sales applicable to equity method investments are net of treatment and refinement charges.

c.

Figures exclude: Pierina, Lagunas Norte, Golden Sunlight, and Morila up until its divestiture in November 2020 from the calculation of realized price per ounce. These assets are producing incidental ounces.

d.

Represents a cumulative catch-up adjustment to revenue relating to our streaming arrangements. Refer to note 2f of the 2020 Annual Financial Statements for more information.

e.

Realized price per ounce/pound may not calculate based on amounts presented in this table due to rounding.

 

BARRICK FIRST QUARTER 2021   92   MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS


Technical Information

 

 

The scientific and technical information contained in this MD&A has been reviewed and approved by Steven Yopps, MMSA, Manager of Growth Projects, Nevada Gold Mines; Craig Fiddes, SME-RM, Manager – Resource Modeling, Nevada Gold Mines; Chad Yuhasz, P.Geo, Mineral Resource Manager, Latin America & Asia Pacific; Simon Bottoms, CGeol, MGeol, FGS, FAusIMM, Mineral Resources Manager: Africa & Middle East; Rodney Quick, MSc, Pr. Sci.Nat, Mineral Resource Management and Evaluation Executive; John Steele, CIM, Metallurgy, Engineering and Capital Projects Executive; and Rob Krcmarov, FAusIMM, Executive Vice President, Exploration and Growth – each a “Qualified Person” as defined in National Instrument 43-101Standards of Disclosure for Mineral Projects.

All mineral reserve and mineral resource estimates are estimated in accordance with National Instrument 43-101Standards of Disclosure for Mineral Projects. Unless otherwise noted, such mineral reserve and mineral resource estimates are as of December 31, 2020.

Endnotes

 

 

 

1

These are non-GAAP financial performance measures with no standardized meaning under IFRS and therefore may not be comparable to similar measures presented by other issuers. For further information and a detailed reconciliation of each non-GAAP measure to the most directly comparable IFRS measure, please see pages 74 to 92 of this MD&A.

 

2

Gold cost of sales per ounce is calculated as cost of sales across our gold operations (excluding sites in care and maintenance) divided by ounces sold (both on an attributable basis using Barrick’s ownership share). Copper cost of sales per pound is calculated as cost of sales across our copper operations divided by pounds sold (both on an attributable basis using Barrick’s ownership share). References to attributable basis means our 100% share of Hemlo and Lumwana, our 61.5% share of Nevada Gold Mines, our 60% share of Pueblo Viejo, our 80% share of Loulo-Gounkoto, our 89.7% share of Tongon, our 84% share of North Mara, Bulyanhulu and Buzwagi, our 50% share of Veladero, Zaldívar and Jabal Sayid, our 47.5% share of Porgera and our 45% share of Kibali.

 

3

Total reportable incident frequency rate (“TRIFR”) is a ratio calculated as follows: number of reportable injuries x 1,000,000 hours divided by the total number of hours worked. Reportable injuries include fatalities, lost time injuries, restricted duty injuries, and medically treated injuries. Lost time injury frequency rate (“LTIFR”) is a ratio calculated as follows: number of lost time injuries x 1,000,000 hours divided by the total number of hours worked.

 

4

Class 1 - High Significance is defined as an incident that causes significant negative impacts on human health or the environment or an incident that extends onto publicly accessible land and has the potential to cause significant adverse impact to surrounding communities, livestock or wildlife.

 

5

A Tier One Gold Asset is an asset with a reserve potential to deliver a minimum 10-year life, annual production of at least 500,000 ounces of gold and total cash costs per ounce over the mine life that are in the lower half of the industry cost curve.

 

6

A Tier Two Gold Asset is an asset with a reserve potential to deliver a minimum 10-year life, annual production of at least 250,000 ounces of gold and total cash costs per ounce over the mine life that are in the lower half of the industry cost curve. A Strategic Asset is an asset which in the opinion of Barrick, has the potential to deliver significant unrealized value in the future.

 

7

See the Technical Report on the Turquoise Ridge complex, dated March 25, 2020, and filed on SEDAR at www.sedar.com and EDGAR at www.sec.gov on March 25, 2020.

 

8

See the Technical Report on the Pueblo Viejo mine, Sanchez Ramirez Province, Dominican Republic, dated March 19, 2018, and filed on SEDAR at www.sedar.com and EDGAR at www.sec.gov on March 23, 2018.

 

9

Carlin Trend Significant Interceptsa

 

 
Drill Results from Q1 2021
Drill Holeb   Azimuth   Dip   Interval (m)   Width (m)c   Au (g/t)
      613.3 - 616.0   2.7   7.2
      617.5 - 619.0   1.5   8.21
      620.1 - 622.7   2.6   5.62
      709.7 - 734.7   25.0   11.77
      769.9 - 772.6   2.7   16.56

PGX-20002A

  9   (67)   781.5 - 783.2   1.7   6.04

 

  a.

All intercepts calculated using a 5 g/t Au cutoff and are uncapped; minimum intercept width is 0.8 m; internal dilution is less than 20% total width.

  b.

Carlin Trend drill hole nomenclature: Project area (PGX - Post-Gen) followed by the year (20 for 2020) then hole number

  c.

True width of intercepts are uncertain at this stage.

 

BARRICK FIRST QUARTER 2021   93   MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS


The drilling results for the Carlin Trend contained in this MD&A have been prepared in accordance with National Instrument 43-101Standards of Disclosure for Mineral Projects. All drill hole assay information has been manually reviewed and approved by staff geologists and re-checked by the project manager. Sample preparation and analyses are conducted by ALS Minerals. Procedures are employed to ensure security of samples during their delivery from the drill rig to the laboratory. The quality assurance procedures, data verification and assay protocols used in connection with drilling and sampling on the Carlin Trend conform to industry accepted quality control methods.

 

10

Carlin Trend Significant Interceptsa

 

 
Drill Results from 2020/Legacy Results
Drill Holeb   Azimuth   Dip   Interval (m)   Width (m)c   Au (g/t)
      334.7 - 365.2   30.5   15.9

DPC-0241

  72   (56)   369.7 - 396.2   26.5   11.24

DSU-00190

  106   (60)   379.5 - 388.5   9   12.81
      482.9 - 486.6   3.7   14.65
      489.8 - 492.7   2.9   17.07

PGX-20005

  256   (52)   503.2 - 504.6   1.4   6.58

 

  a.

All intercepts calculated using a 5 g/t Au cutoff and are uncapped; minimum intercept width is 0.8 m; internal dilution is less than 20% total width.

  b.

Carlin Trend drill hole nomenclature: Project area (PGX - Post-Gen) followed by the year (20 for 2020) then hole number. Legacy nomenclature: Project area (DPC - Deep Post, DSU - Deep Star) followed by hole number.

  c.

True width of intercepts are uncertain at this stage.

The drilling results for the Carlin Trend contained in this MD&A have been prepared in accordance with National Instrument 43-101Standards of Disclosure for Mineral Projects. All drill hole assay information has been manually reviewed and approved by staff geologists and re-checked by the project manager. Sample preparation and analyses are conducted by ALS Minerals. Procedures are employed to ensure security of samples during their delivery from the drill rig to the laboratory. The quality assurance procedures, data verification and assay protocols used in connection with drilling and sampling on the Carlin Trend conform to industry accepted quality control methods.

 

11

North Leeville Significant Interceptsa

 

 
Drill Results from Q1 2021
Drill Holeb   Azimuth   Dip   Interval (m)   Width (m)c   Au (g/t)
      733.6 - 736.7   3.1   16.72

CGX-20078

  106   (67)   756.5 - 789.4d   32.9   16.94
      813.5 - 825.8d   12.3   18.27

CGX-20079

  280   (80)   951.1 - 954.9   3.8   8.87
      776.2 - 781.2   5.0   4.49

CGX-20080

  0   (90)   784.4 - 787.5   3.1   3.94

CGX-20081

  255   (75)   No significant intercepts

CGX-20083

  105   (80)   No significant intercepts

 

  a.

All intercepts calculated using a 3.4 g/t Au cutoff and are uncapped; minimum intercept width is 3.0 m; internal dilution is less than 20% total width.

  b.

Carlin Trend drill hole nomenclature: Project area (CGX - Leeville) followed by the year (20 for 2020) then hole number.

  c.

True width of intercepts are uncertain at this stage.

  d.

Interval reported with 2020 results.

The drilling results for North Leeville contained in this MD&A have been prepared in accordance with National Instrument 43-101Standards of Disclosure for Mineral Projects. All drill hole assay information has been manually reviewed and approved by staff geologists and re-checked by the project manager. Sample preparation and analyses are conducted by ALS Minerals. Procedures are employed to ensure security of samples during their delivery from the drill rig to the laboratory. The quality assurance procedures, data verification and assay protocols used in connection with drilling and sampling on North Leeville conform to industry accepted quality control methods.

 

BARRICK FIRST QUARTER 2021   94   MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS


12

North Leeville Significant Interceptsa

 

 
Drill Results from 2020
Drill Holeb   Azimuth   Dip   Interval (m)   Width (m)c   Au (g/t)

CGX-20075

  68   (84)   909.5 - 912.6   3.1   3.78
      781.2 - 786.1   4.9   5.12
      805.6 - 810.5   4.8   4.76
      823.7 - 847.0   23.3   32.58

CGX-00076A

  115   (75)   898.2 - 901.9   3.7   9.00

CGX-20077

  105   (67)   813.5 - 816.6   3.1   7.05

 

  a.

All intercepts calculated using a 3.4 g/t Au cutoff and are uncapped; minimum intercept width is 3.0 m; internal dilution is less than 20% total width.

  b.

Carlin Trend drill hole nomenclature: Project area (CGX - Leeville) followed by the year (20 for 2020) then hole number.

  c.

True width of intercepts are uncertain at this stage.

The drilling results for North Leeville contained in this MD&A have been prepared in accordance with National Instrument 43-101Standards of Disclosure for Mineral Projects. All drill hole assay information has been manually reviewed and approved by staff geologists and re-checked by the project manager. Sample preparation and analyses are conducted by ALS Minerals. Procedures are employed to ensure security of samples during their delivery from the drill rig to the laboratory. The quality assurance procedures, data verification and assay protocols used in connection with drilling and sampling on North Leeville conform to industry accepted quality control methods.

 

13

Hemlo Significant Interceptsa

 

 
Drill Results from 2020
Drill Holeb   Azimuth   Dip   Interval (m)   Width (m)c   Au (g/t)
      590.84 - 612.35   6.69   2.64
      including   3.60   3.86
      817.00 - 897.73   12.42   0.79

1352003

  10   (53)   including   3.2   1.34
      635.90 - 654.17   5.48   2.09

1352004

  348   (53)   including   1.54   4.21
      512.32 - 515.00   1.72   1.84

16020128

  135   (74)   538.20 - 540.10   1.22   3.02

 

  a.

All intercepts calculated using a 0.2 g/t Au cutoff and are uncapped; minimum intercept width is 0.5 m; internal dilution is less than 20% total width.

  a.

Hemlo drill hole nomenclature: Mine level (e.g. 135 for 9135 level) followed by the year (20 for 2020 when the program commenced) then hole number

  b.

True width of intercepts are calculated based on intersection angle of dominant fabric of rock and core axis.

The drilling results for Hemlo contained in this MD&A have been prepared in accordance with National Instrument 43-101Standards of Disclosure for Mineral Projects. All drill hole assay information has been manually reviewed and approved by staff geologists and re-checked by the project manager. Sample preparation and analyses are conducted by ALS Minerals. Procedures are employed to ensure security of samples during their delivery from the field sites to the laboratory. The quality assurance procedures, data verification and assay protocols used in connection with drilling and sampling at Hemlo conform to industry accepted quality control methods.

 

14

Alturas - Del Carmen Significant Interceptsa

 

 
Drill Results from Q1 2021
Drill Holeb   Azimuth   Dip   Interval (m)   Width (m)c   Au (g/t)
      22.0 - 67.5   45.5   1.05

DDH-RGR-038

  75   (55)   205 - 224.7   19.7   0.86

 

  a.

All significant intercepts reported at 0.25 g/t Au cut-off; include reported at 1 g/t Au cut-off, sub-include at 3 g/t Au cutoff. Internal dilution of no more than 10 consecutive meters below cut-off included in the calculation. Minimum intercept length 10 meters.

  a.

Alturas - Del Carmen drill hole nomenclature: DDH (diamond drillhole) followed by the prospect (RGR, Rojo Grande) and a correlative number.

  b.

True widths are uncertain at this stage.

The drilling results for the Alturas - Del Carmen property contained in this MD&A have been prepared in accordance with National Instrument 43-101Standards of Disclosure for Mineral Projects. All drill hole assay information has been manually

 

BARRICK FIRST QUARTER 2021   95   MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS


reviewed and approved by staff geologists and re-checked by the project manager. Sample preparation and analyses are conducted by ALS, an independent laboratory. Procedures are employed to ensure security of samples during their delivery from the drill rig to the laboratory. The quality assurance procedures, data verification and assay protocols used in connection with drilling and sampling at Alturas - Del Carmen conform to industry accepted quality control methods.

 

15

Veladero Significant Interceptsa

 

 
Drill Results from Q1 2021
            Drill Holeb   Azimuth   Dip   Interval (m)   Width (m)c   Au (g/t)
      234 - 251   17   0.68 
      256 - 265   9   0.60

DDH-CPE-007

  90   (60)   403 - 415.8   12.8   0.41

DDH-CPE-008

  90   (60)   164 - 175   11.0   0.63

DDH-0953B

  270   (82)   205 - 297   92   1.14

 

  a.

All intercepts calculated using a 0.25 g/t Au cut-off and are uncapped; minimum intercept width is 10 meters; internal dilution is less than 20% total width.

  a.

Veladero drill hole nomenclature: DDH (Diamond drillhole) followed by the prospect, if corresponds (CPE, Cerro Pelado) and a correlative number. If no prospect if specified, then the hole corresponds to Veladero.

  b.

Due to the nature of mineralization at Veladero, all widths reported are approximate.

The drilling results for the Veladero property contained in this MD&A have been prepared in accordance with National Instrument 43-101Standards of Disclosure for Mineral Projects. All drill hole assay information has been manually reviewed and approved by staff geologists and re-checked by the Mineral Resources Manager. Sample preparation and analyses are conducted by ALS, an independent laboratory. Procedures are employed to ensure security of samples. The quality assurance procedures, data verification and assay protocols used in connection with drilling and sampling on the Veladero property conform to industry accepted quality control methods.

 

16

Bambadji Significant Interceptsa

 

 
Drill Results from Q1 2021
                                  Includingd          
Drill Holeb    Azimuth    Dip   From    To    Width (m)c    Au (g/t)    Interval (m)    Width (m)c    Au (g/t)

KBWDH006

   135    (55)   88.80    141.80    53.00    2.12    97.4-107.1    9.70    3.85

KBWDT017

   135    (55)   247.50    268.10    20.6    2.59    257.3-268.1    10.80    4.05

KBWRC038

   135    (55)   136.00    152.00    16.0    2.01    145-148    3.00    6.04
        28.00    59.00    31.0    1.03         
        75.00    91.00    16.0    0.59         

KBWRC039

   135    (55)   148.00    160.00    12.0    1.11               

SYDH001

   330    (50)   62.00    96.00    34.0    3.11    79.1-87    7.90    7.00

GFDH002

   90    (50)   85.15    88.30    3.1    0.76               
        89.00    98.00    9.0    0.77         
        121.40    140.70    19.30    0.46         

GFDH003

   90    (50)   160.80    189.60    28.80    0.46               
        5.00    13.70    8.70    1.04    9.6-12.9    3.30    2.19
        86.80    93.30    6.50    2.3         

GFDH007

   90    (50)   101.00    115.00    14.00    0.51               

 

  a.

All intercepts calculated using a 0.5 g/t Au cutoff and are uncapped; minimum intercept width is 2m; internal dilution is equal to or less than 2m total width.

  b.

Drill hole nomenclature: KBW (Kabewest), GF (Gefa), SY (Soya) followed by type of drilling RC (Reverse Circulation) and DH (Diamond Drilling).

  c.

True widths uncertain at this stage.

  d.

Includings calculated using a 10.0 g/t Au cutoff and are uncapped; minimum intercept width is 2m; internal dilution is equal to or less than 2m total width.

The drilling results for the Bambadji property contained in this MD&A have been prepared in accordance with National Instrument 43-101Standards of Disclosure for Mineral Projects. All drill hole assay information has been manually reviewed and approved by staff geologists and re-checked by the project manager. Sample preparation and analyses are conducted by SGS Laboratories, an independent laboratory. Procedures are employed to ensure security of samples during their delivery from the drill rig to the laboratory. The quality assurance procedures, data verification and assay protocols used in connection with drilling and sampling on the Bambadji property conform to industry accepted quality control methods.

 

BARRICK FIRST QUARTER 2021   96   MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS


17

Loulo-Gounkoto Significant Interceptsa

 

 
Drill Results from Q1 2021
Drill Holeb   Azimuth   Dip   Interval (m)   Width (m)c   Au (g/t)
      2.82   47.53-50.35   2.21
      8.30   62-70.3   3.38
      5.00   71.3-76.3   0.82
      12.05   77.35-89.4   2.01
      6.00   91-97   7.69
      13.95   102.6-116.55   7.44
      2.65   118.5-121.15   1.32
      10.98   130.5-141.48   2.63
      13.80   149.5-163.3   2.24
      6.30   173.6-179.9   1.27
      5.25   181.8-187.05   2.34

YRDH009

  170.00   (51.00)   4.20   188.9-193.1   1.06
      2.60   16.4-19   1.40
      6.80   146.6-153.4   1.62
      2.33   155.27-157.6   52.95
      2.65   161-163.65   1.36
      3.28   167.7-170.98   0.83
      8.70   173.5-182.2   13.94
      3.90   185.4-189.3   18.79
      5.85   193.05-198.9   6.34
      2.00   201.5-203.5   1.51
      2.90   205.7-208.6   0.88
      2.07   210.63-212.7   0.90
      2.20   219.1-221.3   1.73
      4.90   224.35-229.25   3.08
      2.45   242.55-245   1.46

YRDH010

  172.00   (55.00)   4.05   261.55-265.6   1.50
      4.30   107.2-111.5   2.49
      4.45   155-159.45   0.61

MNDH002

  87.00   (54.14)   2.25   165.4-167.65   3.54

 

  a.

All intercepts calculated using a 0.5 g/t Au cutoff and are uncapped; minimum intercept width is 2m; internal dilution is equal to or less than 2m total width.

  b.

Loulo – Gounkoto drill hole nomenclature: prospect initial YR (Yalea Ridge), MN (Mina) followed by type of drilling RC (Reverse Circulation), DH (Diamond Drilling) RCDH (RC/Diamond Tail)

  c.

True widths uncertain at this stage.

The drilling results for the Loulo-Gounkoto property contained in this MD&A have been prepared in accordance with National Instrument 43-101Standards of Disclosure for Mineral Projects. All drill hole assay information has been manually reviewed and approved by staff geologists and re-checked by the project manager. Sample preparation and analyses are conducted by SGS Laboratories, an independent laboratory. Industry accepted best practices for preparation and fire assaying procedures are utilized to determine gold content. Procedures are employed to ensure security of samples during their delivery from the drill rig to the laboratory. The quality assurance procedures, data verification and assay protocols used in connection with drilling and sampling on the Loulo property conform to industry accepted quality control methods.

 

BARRICK FIRST QUARTER 2021   97   MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS


18

Nielle East Significant Interceptsa

 

Drill Results from Q1 2021
      Drill Holeb        Azimuth            Dip             Interval (m)              Width (m)c            Au (g/t)       

Includingd

 

    Interval (m)    

   Width (m)c        Au (g/t)    

JBRC004

   120    (50)   37.00 - 43.00    6.00    3.45               

JBRC005

   120    (50)   49.00 - 66.00    17.00    2.69               

JBRC006

   120    (50)   64.00 - 72.00    8.00    6.97               

JBAC008

   120    (50)   91.00 - 94.00    3.00    1.90               

SNRC018

   120    (50)   128.00 - 136.00    8.00    3.14               

SNRC019

   120    (50)   120.00 - 143.00    23.00    4.92    130-143    13.00    8.00
        147.00 - 160.00    13.00    3.21         

SNRC024

   120    (50)   164.00 - 182.00    18.00    3.19    171-178    7.00    5.50

SNRC025

   120    (50)   4.00 - 18.00    14.00    3.93               

SNRC026

   120    (50)   162.00 - 174.00    12.00    3.85    168-173    5.00    8.03

SNRC027

   120    (50)   60.00 - 102.00    42.00    5.43    79-99    20.00    7.92

 

  a.

All intercepts calculated using a 0.5 g/t Au cutoff and are uncapped; minimum intercept width is 2m; 2m for maximal internal dilution.

  b.

Nielle drill hole nomenclature: JB (Jubula), SN (Seydou North) followed by type of drilling RC (Reverse Circulation), AC (Air core)

  c.

True widths uncertain at this stage.

  d.

Includings calculated using a 3.0 g/t Au cutoff and are uncapped; minimum intercept width is 2m; internal dilution is equal to or less than 25% total width.

The drilling results for the Nielle property contained in this MD&A have been prepared in accordance with National Instrument 43-101Standards of Disclosure for Mineral Projects. All drill hole assay information has been manually reviewed and approved by staff geologists and re-checked by the project manager. Sample preparation and analyses are conducted by SGS Laboratories, an independent laboratory. Procedures are employed to ensure security of samples during their delivery from the drill rig to the laboratory. The quality assurance procedures, data verification and assay protocols used in connection with drilling and sampling on the Nielle property conform to industry accepted quality control methods.

 

BARRICK FIRST QUARTER 2021   98   MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS


19

Kibali Significant Interceptsa

 

 

Drill Results from Q1 2021

 

                             Includingd          
        Drill Holeb        Azimuth            Dip             Interval (m)              Width (m)c            Au (g/t)            Interval (m)        Width (m)c        Au (g/t)    
   304    (74)   228.4 - 233.98    5.60    3.24    228.4 - 230.5    2.10    7.32
   304    (74)   237.2 - 246.6    9.40    1.50    238.3 - 239.4    1.10    6.75

KVDD0028

   304    (74)   268.32 - 273.3    5.00    0.67               
   304    (74)   275.49 - 289.32    13.80    6.72    277.87 - 286.1    8.23    9.86

KVDD0029

   304    (74)   301.5 - 314.15    11.70    1.62    303.5 - 306.5    3.00    2.83

KVDD0030

   300    (60)   71.91 - 76.14    4.20    2.61    74.94 - 76.14    1.20    6.06
   300    (60)   194.14 - 197.74    3.60    1.26         

KVDD0031

   300    (60)   206.14 - 227.54    21.40    2.15    210.94 - 213.94    3.00    6.20
   300    (60)   160.94 - 164.84    3.90    1.91         

KVDD0032

   300    (60)   182.85 - 188    5.20    8.39               

KVDD0033

   300    (60)   286 - 297    11.00    0.51               

KVDD0034

   304    (74)   328 - 342.5    14.70    3.73    331.2 - 340.24    9.04    5.31
   260    (65)   70.9 - 72.9    2.00    1.57         
   260    (65)   78.5 - 83.9    5.40    1.18         
   260    (65)   109.5 - 114    4.50    1.16         
   260    (65)   128.9 - 132.4    3.50    1.05         

PDD174

   260    (65)   156.9 - 167.6    10.70    1.47    162.9 - 166    3.10    3.60
   280    (50)   294 - 296    2.00    1.73         

PDD175

   280    (50)   337 - 345.1    8.10    0.98               
   175    (60)   75 - 86.47    11.5    1.42    75 - 77.52    2.52    3.26
   175    (60)   117 - 119    2    0.76         
   175    (60)   198.5 - 201.5    3    0.94         

TDD004

   175    (60)   206.87 - 211    4.1    0.62               

TDD006

   177    (60)   73.9 - 78    4.1    0.85               
   200    (63)   2.2 - 6.65    4.5    0.77         
   200    (63)   127.9 - 137.55    9.7    1.73    131.7 - 134.5    2.8    3.85
   200    (63)   155.3 - 161    5.7    1.06         

TDD007

   200    (63)   200 - 209.66    9.7    0.65               
   180    (65)   234.83 - 241.94    7.1    1.66    239.33 - 241.94    2.61    3.19
   180    (65)   247.49 - 251.46    4    6.49         

TDD009

   180    (65)   258.8 - 264.3    5.5    1.65    260.62 - 262.5    1.88    2.35
   186    (65)   0 - 14    14    0.81         
   186    (65)   20 - 24    4    3.29         
   186    (65)   31 - 44    13    1.02         

TRC085

   186    (65)   50 - 56    6    2.74    50 - 55    5    3.01

TRC090

   177    (60)   63 - 66    3    5.22    64 - 66    2    6.4

 

  a.

All intercepts calculated using a 0.5 g/t Au cutoff and are uncapped; minimum intercept width is 2m; internal dilution is equal to or less than 25% total width.

  b.

Kibali drill hole nomenclature: prospect initial (T = Tete Bakangwe) followed by type of drilling RC (Reverse Circulation), DD (Diamond), GC (Grade control) with no designation of the year. KCDU = KCD Underground.

  c.

True widths uncertain at this stage.

  d.

All including intercepts are calculated using a 0.5 g/t Au cut-off and are uncapped, minimum intercept width is 1m, no internal dilution, with grade significantly above (>40%) the overall intercept grade.

The drilling results for the Kibali property contained in this MD&A have been prepared in accordance with National Instrument 43-101Standards of Disclosure for Mineral Projects. All drill hole assay information has been manually reviewed and approved by staff geologists and re-checked by the project manager. Sample preparation and analyses are conducted by SGS Laboratories, an independent laboratory. Procedures are employed to ensure security of samples during their delivery from the drill rig to the laboratory. The quality assurance procedures, data verification and assay protocols used in connection with drilling and sampling on the Kibali property conform to industry accepted quality control methods.

 

BARRICK FIRST QUARTER 2021   99   MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS


Consolidated Statements of Income

 

Barrick Gold Corporation

(in millions of United States dollars, except per share data) (Unaudited)

      

Three months ended

March 31,


 
         2021       2020
 

Revenue (notes 5 and 6)

       $2,956       $2,721

Costs and expenses (income)

        
 

Cost of sales (notes 5 and 7)

       1,712       1,776
 

General and administrative expenses

       38       40
 

Exploration, evaluation and project expenses

       61       71
 

Impairment reversals (notes 9b and 13)

       (89 )       (336 )
 

Loss on currency translation

       4       16
 

Closed mine rehabilitation

       23       90
 

Income from equity investees (note 12)

       (103 )       (54 )
 

Other expense (income) (note 9a)

       19       (35 )
 

Income before finance costs and income taxes

       $1,291       $1,153
 

Finance costs, net

       (87 )       (104 )
 

Income before income taxes

       $1,204       $1,049
 

Income tax expense (note 10)

       (374 )       (386 )
 

Net income

       $830       $663
 

Attributable to:

        
 

Equity holders of Barrick Gold Corporation

       $538       $400
 

Non-controlling interests (note 17)

       $292       $263
 

Earnings per share data attributable to the equity holders of Barrick Gold Corporation (note 8)

        
 

Net income

        
 

Basic

       $0.30       $0.22
 

Diluted

       $0.30       $0.22

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these condensed interim consolidated financial statements.

 

BARRICK FIRST QUARTER 2021   100   FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (UNAUDITED)


Consolidated Statements

of Comprehensive Income

 

Barrick Gold Corporation

(in millions of United States dollars) (Unaudited)

  

Three months ended

March 31,

 

 

 
    

 

2021 

  

 

 

 

2020

 

 

 

Net income

   $830       $663
 

Other comprehensive income (loss), net of taxes

     
 

Items that may be reclassified subsequently to profit or loss:

     

Unrealized gains on derivatives designated as cash flow hedges, net of tax $nil and $nil

   —       1
 

Currency translation adjustments, net of tax $nil and $nil

   —       (4
 

Items that will not be reclassified to profit or loss:

     

Actuarial gain on post employment benefit obligations, net of tax $nil and $3

   —       3
 

Net change on equity investments, net of tax $8 and $nil

   (47)      (25
 

Total other comprehensive loss

   (47)      (25
 

Total comprehensive income

   $783       $638

Attributable to:

     

Equity holders of Barrick Gold Corporation

   $491       $375
 

Non-controlling interests

   $292       $263

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these condensed interim consolidated financial statements.

 

BARRICK FIRST QUARTER 2021   101   FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (UNAUDITED)


Consolidated Statements of Cash Flow

 

Barrick Gold Corporation

(in millions of United States dollars) (Unaudited)

    

Three months

ended March 31,

 

 

      2021         2020  
 

OPERATING ACTIVITIES

    
 

Net income

     $830     $663
 

Adjustments for the following items:

    
 

Depreciation

     507     524
 

Finance costs, net

     94     111
 

Impairment reversals (notes 9b and 13)

     (89     (336
 

Income tax expense (note 10)

     374     386
 

Gain on sale of non-current assets

     (3     (60
 

Loss on currency translation

     4     16
 

Change in working capital (note 11)

     (102     (332
 

Other operating activities (note 11)

     (93     53
 

Operating cash flows before interest and income taxes

     1,522     1,025
 

Interest paid

     (22     (24
 

Income taxes paid1

     (198     (112
 

Net cash provided by operating activities

     1,302     889
 

INVESTING ACTIVITIES

    
 

Property, plant and equipment

    
 

Capital expenditures (note 5)

     (539     (451
 

Sales proceeds

     4     7
 

Divestitures (note 4)

           256
 

Other investing activities (note 11)

     127     25
 

Net cash used in investing activities

     (408     (163
 

FINANCING ACTIVITIES

    
 

Lease repayments

     (6     (5
 

Debt repayments

     (7     (351
 

Dividends

     (158)       (122)  
 

Funding from non-controlling interests (note 17)

     6     1
 

Disbursements to non-controlling interests (note 17)

     (265     (217
 

Other financing activities (note 11)

     21     (15
 

Net cash used in financing activities

     (409     (709
 

Effect of exchange rate changes on cash and equivalents

     (1     (4
 

Net increase in cash and equivalents

     484     13
 

Cash and equivalents at the beginning of period

     5,188     3,314
 

Cash and equivalents at the end of period

     $5,672     $3,327

 

1

Income taxes paid excludes $36 million (March 31, 2020: $24 million) of income taxes payable that were settled against offsetting VAT receivables.

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these condensed interim consolidated financial statements.

 

BARRICK FIRST QUARTER 2021   102   FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (UNAUDITED)


Consolidated Balance Sheets

 

Barrick Gold Corporation

(in millions of United States dollars) (Unaudited)

  

As at March 31, 

2021 

    

As at December 31,

2020

 

 

ASSETS

     
 

Current assets

     
 

Cash and equivalents (note 14a)

   $5,672       $5,188
 

Accounts receivable

   530       558
 

Inventories

   1,776       1,878
 

Other current assets

   470       519

Total current assets (excluding assets classified as held for sale)

   $8,448       $8,143
 

Assets classified as held for sale (note 4a)

   336        

Total current assets

   $8,784       $8,143
 

Non-current assets

     
 

Equity in investees (note 12)

   4,646       4,670
 

Property, plant and equipment

   24,628       24,628
 

Goodwill

   4,769       4,769
 

Intangible assets

   168       169
 

Deferred income tax assets

   58       98
 

Non-current portion of inventory

   2,482       2,566
 

Other assets

   1,313       1,463

Total assets

   $46,848       $46,506

LIABILITIES AND EQUITY

     
 

Current liabilities

     
 

Accounts payable

   $1,168       $1,458
 

Debt

   13       20
 

Current income tax liabilities

   606       436
 

Other current liabilities

   271       306

Total current liabilities (excluding liabilities classified as held for sale)

   $2,058       $2,220
 

Liabilities classified as held for sale (note 4a)

   273        

Total current liabilities

   $2,331       $2,220
 

Non-current liabilities

     
 

Debt

   5,140       5,135
 

Provisions

   2,926       3,139
 

Deferred income tax liabilities

   3,085       3,034
 

Other liabilities

   1,287       1,268

Total liabilities

   $14,769       $14,796
 

Equity

     
 

Capital stock (note 16)

   $29,238       $29,236
 

Deficit

   (7,571)      (7,949
 

Accumulated other comprehensive loss

   (33)      14
 

Other

   2,040       2,040

Total equity attributable to Barrick Gold Corporation shareholders

   $23,674       $23,341

Non-controlling interests (note 17)

   8,405       8,369

Total equity

   $32,079       $31,710

Contingencies and commitments (notes 5 and 18)

             

Total liabilities and equity

   $46,848       $46,506

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these condensed interim consolidated financial statements.

 

BARRICK FIRST QUARTER 2021   103   FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (UNAUDITED)


Consolidated Statements of Changes in Equity

 

 

 

Barrick Gold Corporation

           

 

 

 

Attributable to equity holders of the company

 

 

               

(in millions of United States dollars)

(Unaudited)

    

Common

Shares (in

thousands)

 

 

 

    

Capital

stock

 

 

    

Retained

earnings

(deficit)

 

 

 

   

Accumulated

other

comprehensive

income (loss)1

 

 

 

 

    Other 2     

Total equity

attributable to

shareholders

 

 

 

   

Non-

controlling

interests

 

 

 

   

Total

equity

 

 

At January 1, 2021

     1,778,190      $29,236      ($7,949     $14     $2,040     $23,341     $8,369     $31,710

Net income

                   538                 538     292     830

Total other comprehensive income (loss)

                         (47           (47           (47

Total comprehensive income (loss)

                   538     (47           491     292     783

Transactions with owners

                  

Dividends

                   (158                 (158           (158

Issued on exercise of stock options

     50                                            

Funding from non-controlling interests (note 17)

                                           6     6

Disbursements to non-controlling interests (note 17)

                                           (262     (262

Dividend reinvestment plan (note 16)

     72      2      (2                              

Share-based payments

     59                                            

Total transactions with owners

     181      2      (160                 (158     (256     (414

At March 31, 2021

     1,778,371      $29,238      ($7,571     ($33     $2,040     $23,674     $8,405     $32,079
                                                                    

At January 1, 2020

     1,777,927      $29,231      ($9,722     ($122     $2,045     $21,432     $8,395     $29,827

Net income

                   400                 400     263     663

Total other comprehensive income (loss)

                         (25           (25           (25

Total comprehensive income (loss)

                   400     (25           375     263     638

Transactions with owners

                  

Dividends

                   (122                 (122           (122

Issuance of 16% interest in Tanzania mines

                                           234     234

Issued on exercise of stock options

     30                                            

Funding from non-controlling interests

                                           1     1

Disbursements to non-controlling interests

                                           (225     (225

Dividend reinvestment plan

     78      2      (2                              

Share-based payments

                               2     2           2

Total transactions with owners

     108      2      (124           2     (120     10     (110

At March 31, 2020

     1,778,035      $29,233      ($9,446     ($147     $2,047     $21,687     $8,668     $30,355

 

1

Includes cumulative translation losses at March 31, 2021: $95 million (December 31, 2020: $95 million; March 31, 2020: $92 million).

2

Includes additional paid-in capital as at March 31, 2021: $2,002 million (December 31, 2020: $2,002 million; March 31, 2020: $2,009 million).

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these condensed interim consolidated financial statements.

 

BARRICK FIRST QUARTER 2021   104   FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (UNAUDITED)


Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

Barrick Gold Corporation. Tabular dollar amounts in millions of United States dollars, unless otherwise shown.

 

1 Corporate Information

 

 

Barrick Gold Corporation (“Barrick”, “we” or the “Company”) is a corporation governed by the Business Corporations Act (British Columbia). The Company’s corporate office is located at Brookfield Place, TD Canada Trust Tower, 161 Bay Street, Suite 3700, Toronto, Ontario, M5J 2S1. The Company’s registered office is 925 West Georgia Street, Suite 1600, Vancouver, British Columbia, V6C 3L2. We are principally engaged in the production and sale of gold and copper, as well as related activities such as exploration and mine development. We sell our gold and copper into the world market.

We have ownership interests in producing gold mines that are located in Argentina, Canada, Côte d’Ivoire, the Democratic Republic of the Congo, the Dominican Republic, Mali, Tanzania and the United States. Our mine in Papua New Guinea was placed on care and maintenance in April 2020. We have ownership interests in producing copper mines in Chile, Saudi Arabia and Zambia. We also have various projects located throughout the Americas and Africa.

2 Significant Accounting Policies

 

 

a)    Statement of Compliance

These condensed interim consolidated financial statements have been prepared in accordance with International Accounting Standard 34 Interim Financial Reporting (“IAS 34”) as issued by the International Accounting Standards Board (“IASB”). These interim financial statements should be read in conjunction with Barrick’s most recently issued Annual Report, which includes information necessary or useful to understanding the Company’s business and financial statement presentation. In particular, the Company’s significant accounting policies were presented in Note 2 of the Annual Consolidated Financial Statements for the year ended December 31, 2020 (“2020 Annual Financial Statements”), and have been consistently applied in the preparation of these interim financial statements, except as otherwise noted in Note 2b. These condensed interim consolidated financial statements were authorized for issuance by the Board of Directors on May 4, 2021.

b)    New Accounting Standards Issued But Not Yet Effective

Certain new accounting standards and interpretations have been published that are not mandatory for the current period and have not been early adopted. These standards are not expected to have a material impact on Barrick in the current or future reporting periods.

3 Critical Judgements, Estimates, Assumptions and Risks

 

 

The judgments, estimates, assumptions and risks discussed here reflect updates from the 2020 Annual Financial Statements. For judgments, estimates, assumptions and risks related to other areas not discussed in these interim consolidated financial statements, please refer to Notes 3 and 28 of the 2020 Annual Financial Statements.

a)    Provision for Environmental Rehabilitation (“PER”)

Provisions are updated each reporting period for changes to expected cash flows and for the effect of changes in the discount rate and foreign exchange rates. For operating mines, the change in estimate is added or deducted from the related asset and depreciated over the expected economic life of the operation to which it relates.

Adjustments to the estimated amount and timing of future closure and rehabilitation cash flows are a normal occurrence in light of the significant judgments and estimates involved. Rehabilitation provisions are adjusted as a result of changes in estimates and assumptions and are accounted for prospectively. In the fourth quarter of each year, our life of mine plans are updated and that typically results in an update to the rehabilitation provision.

b)    Pascua-Lama

The Pascua-Lama project received $457 million as at March 31, 2021 (December 31, 2020: $459 million) in value added tax (“VAT”) refunds in Chile relating to the development of the Chilean side of the project. Under the current arrangement, this amount must be repaid if the project does not evidence exports for an amount of $3,538 million within a term that expires on December 31, 2026, unless extended. Interest on this amount would accrue from the date of non-compliance.

In addition, we have recorded $49 million in VAT recoverable in Argentina as at March 31, 2021 (December 31, 2020: $53 million) relating to the development of the Argentinean side of the project. These amounts may not be fully recoverable if the project does not enter into production and are subject to foreign currency risk as the amounts are recoverable in Argentine pesos.

c)    Contingencies

Contingencies can be either possible assets or possible liabilities arising from past events which, by their nature, will be resolved only when one or more future events, not wholly within our control, occur or fail to occur. The assessment of such contingencies inherently involves the exercise of significant judgment and estimates of the outcome of future events. Refer to note 18 for further details on contingencies.

 

 

BARRICK FIRST QUARTER 2021   105           NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (UNAUDITED)


d)    Covid-19

On March 11, 2020, the Covid-19 outbreak was declared a pandemic by the World Health Organization. The pandemic and efforts to contain it have had a significant effect on commodity prices and capital markets. We have adopted certain operating procedures to respond to Covid-19 and to date, our operations have not been significantly impacted by the pandemic with the exception of Veladero, where the government of Argentina implemented a mandatory nationwide quarantine in March 2020. Although this was lifted in April 2020, movement and social distancing restrictions impacted the remobilization of employees and contractors back to site. Notwithstanding the proactive and considered actions taken to maintain a safe workplace, it is possible that in the future there will be negative impacts on our operations or supply chain and the pandemic may trigger actions such as reduced mining and production activities at our operations. This could have a material adverse effect on our cash flows, earnings, results of operations and financial position.

Our sites have continued to produce and sell their production, with no significant disruptions to date other than Veladero as noted above. Our ability to maintain production across our operations combined with increased market gold prices, has resulted in Barrick being able to deliver $1.3 billion in operating cash flow for the three months ended March 31, 2021. Barrick has $5.7 billion in cash, an undrawn $3.0 billion credit facility and no significant debt repayments due until 2033, providing us with sufficient liquidity to manage through this period of uncertainty.

4 Acquisitions and Divestitures

 

 

a) Lagunas Norte

On February 16, 2021, Barrick announced it had entered into an agreement to sell its 100% interest in the Lagunas Norte gold mine in Peru to Boroo Pte Ltd. (“Boroo”) for total consideration of up to $81 million, with $20 million of cash consideration on closing, additional cash consideration of $10 million payable on the first anniversary of closing and $20 million payable on the second anniversary of closing, a 2% net smelter return royalty, which may be purchased by Boroo for a limited period after closing for $16 million, plus a contingent payment of up to $15 million based on the two-year average gold price. Completion of the sale is subject to closing conditions and is expected in the second quarter of 2021. As at March 31, 2021, all the assets and liabilities of our interest in the Lagunas Norte gold mine were classified as held-for-sale. An impairment reversal of $86 million was recognized in the first quarter of 2021. Refer to note 13 for further details.

b) Massawa Project

On March 4, 2020, Barrick and our Senegalese joint venture partner completed the sale of our aggregate 90% interest in the Massawa project (“Massawa”) in Senegal to Teranga Gold Corporation (“Teranga”), now Endeavour Mining Corporation, for total consideration fair valued at $440 million on the date of closing. Barrick received 92.5% of the consideration for its interest in the Massawa project, with the balance received by Barrick’s local Senegalese partner. Barrick received a net of $256 million in cash and 19,164,403 Teranga common shares (worth $104 million at the date of closing) plus a contingent payment of up to $46.25 million based on the three year average gold price, which was valued at $28 million at the date of closing. The cash consideration received was net of $25 million that Barrick provided through its participation in the $225 million syndicated debt financing facility secured by Teranga in connection with the transaction. In the first quarter of 2021, we received full repayment of the outstanding loan. The difference between the fair value of consideration received and the carrying value of the assets on closing was $54 million and was recognized as a gain in the first quarter of 2020.

 

 

BARRICK FIRST QUARTER 2021   106   NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (UNAUDITED)


5 Segment Information

 

 

Barrick’s business is organized into eighteen minesites and one project. Barrick’s Chief Operating Decision Maker (“CODM”) (Mark Bristow, President and Chief Executive Officer) reviews the operating results, assesses performance and makes capital allocation decisions at the minesite, Company and/or project level. Each individual minesite and the Pascua-Lama project are operating segments for financial reporting purposes. Our presentation of our reportable operating segments consists of nine gold mines (Carlin, Cortez, Turquoise Ridge, Pueblo Viejo, Loulo-Gounkoto, Kibali, Veladero, North Mara and Bulyanhulu). Starting in the first quarter of 2021, Goldrush was included as part of Cortez as the CODM began reviewing the operating results and assessing performance on a combined level. The remaining operating segments, including our remaining gold mines, copper mines and project, have been grouped into an “other” category and will not be reported on individually. Segment performance is evaluated based on a number of measures including operating income before tax, production levels and unit production costs. Certain costs are managed on a consolidated basis and are therefore not reflected in segment income. Prior period figures have been restated to reflect the changes made to our reportable operating segments in the current year.

Consolidated Statement of Income Information

 

       Cost of Sales        

For the three months ended

March 31, 2021

     Revenue      

Site operating

costs, royalties

and community

relations

 

 

 

 

    Depreciation      

Exploration,

evaluation and

project expenses

 

 

 

   

Other expenses

(income)1

 

 

   

Segment income

(loss)

 

 

Carlin2

     $663     $288     $68     $3     ($1     $305

Cortez2

     292     143     64     3     1     81

Turquoise Ridge2

     269     100     51                 118

Pueblo Viejo2

     420     130     61     1     1     227

Loulo-Gounkoto2

     337     115     69     4     8     141

Kibali

     154     60     32           (1     63

Veladero

     57     24     11                 22

North Mara2

     119     56     15           1     47

Bulyanhulu2

     50     28     12           1     9

Other Mines2

     687     299     142     3     15     228

Reportable segment total

     $3,048     $1,243     $525     $14     $25     $1,241

Share of equity investees

     (154     (60     (32           1     (63

Segment total

     $2,894     $1,183     $493     $14     $26     $1,178

Consolidated Statement of Income Information

 

 

   
       Cost of Sales        

For the three months ended

March 31, 2020

     Revenue      

Site operating

costs, royalties

and community

relations

 

 

 

 

    Depreciation      

Exploration,

evaluation and

project expenses

 

 

 

   

Other expenses

(income)1

 

 

   

Segment income

(loss)

 

 

Carlin2

     $662     $324     $80     $3     $6     $249

Cortez2

     330     128     54     2     2     144

Turquoise Ridge2

     226     96     51     1     2     76

Pueblo Viejo2

     374     132     53     3     2     184

Loulo-Gounkoto2

     243     94     59     2     3     85

Kibali

     140     52     41     1     (2     48

Veladero

     90     45     22           (1     24

North Mara2

     132     54     25           (5     58

Bulyanhulu2

     14     6     8           12     (12

Other Mines2

     610     352     157     4     (1     98

Reportable segment total

     $2,821     $1,283     $550     $16     $18     $954

Share of equity investees

     (140     (52     (41     (1     2     (48

Segment total

     $2,681     $1,231     $509     $15     $20     $906

 

1

Includes accretion expense, which is included within finance costs, net in the consolidated statement of income. For the three months ended March 31, 2021, accretion expense was $5 million (2020: $8 million).

2

Includes the non-controlling interest portion of revenues, cost of sales and segment income for the three months ended March 31, 2021 for Nevada Gold Mines $557 million, $318 million, $236 million (2020: $536 million, $330 million, $200 million), Pueblo Viejo $174 million, $76 million, $98 million (2020: $158 million, $74 million, $82 million), Loulo-Gounkoto $67 million, $37 million, $28 million (2020: $49 million, $31 million, $17 million), North Mara, Bulyanhulu and Buzwagi $32 million, $23 million, $8 million (2020: $31 million, $22 million, $8 million) and Tongon $10 million, $8 million, $1 million (2020: $11 million, $9 million, $1 million).

 

BARRICK FIRST QUARTER 2021   107   NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (UNAUDITED)


Reconciliation of Segment Income to Income Before Income Taxes

 

    

For the three months ended

March 31

 

 

     2021       2020  

Segment income

   $1,178       $906

Other revenue

   62       40

Other cost of sales/amortization

   (36)      (36

Exploration, evaluation and project expenses not attributable to segments

   (47)      (56

General and administrative expenses

   (38)      (40

Other income not attributable to segments

        54

Impairment reversals

   89       336

Loss on currency translation

   (4)      (16

Closed mine rehabilitation

   (23)      (90

Income from equity investees

   103       54

Finance costs, net (includes non-segment accretion)

   (82)      (96

Gain (loss) on non-hedge derivatives

        (7

Income before income taxes

   $1,204       $1,049 

Capital Expenditures Information

 

     
     Segment capital expenditures1  
     For the three months ended March 31

 

     2021       2020  

Carlin

   $92       $93

Cortez

   62       102

Turquoise Ridge

   33       30

Pueblo Viejo

   101       28

Loulo-Gounkoto

   70       39

Kibali

   11       15

Veladero

   40       26

North Mara

   18       15

Bulyanhulu

   15       4

Other Mines

   74       65

Reportable segment total

   $516       $417

Other items not allocated to segments

   24       19

Total

   $540       $436

Share of equity investees

   (11)      (15

Total

   $529       $421

 

1

Segment capital expenditures are presented for internal management reporting purposes on an accrual basis. Capital expenditures in the Consolidated Statements of Cash Flow are presented on a cash basis. For the three months ended March 31, 2021, cash expenditures were $539 million (2020: $451 million) and the decrease in accrued expenditures was $10 million (2020: $30 million decrease).

Purchase Commitments

At March 31, 2021, we had purchase obligations for supplies and consumables of $1,654 million (December 31, 2020: $1,882 million).

Capital Commitments

In addition to entering into various operational commitments in the normal course of business, we had capital commitments of $222 million at March 31, 2021 (December 31, 2020: $223 million).

 

BARRICK FIRST QUARTER 2021   108   NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (UNAUDITED)


6       Revenue

 

   
    

For the three months ended

March 31

 

 

    

 

2021 

  

 

 

 

2020

 

 

Gold sales

     

Spot market sales

   $2,615       $2,555

Concentrate sales

   29       38

Provisional pricing adjustments

   (3)       
   $2,641       $2,593

Copper sales

     

Concentrate sales

   $211       $123

Provisional pricing adjustments

   45       (24
   $256       $99

Other sales1

   59       29

Total

   $2,956       $2,721

 

1

Revenues include the sale of by-products for our gold and copper mines.

 

7 Cost of Sales

 

         
       Gold            Copper            Other3              Total      

 For the three months ended March 31

             2021                2020                2021            2020                2021                2020                2021                2020  

Site operating costs1,2

     $1,020      $1,080      $65      $69      $—      $2      $1,085      $1,151

Depreciation

     454      474      48      43      5      7      507      524

Royalty expense

     93      84      23      11                    116      95

Community relations

     4      5             1                    4      6
       $1,571      $1,643      $136      $124      $5      $9      $1,712      $1,776

 

1

Site operating costs includes charges to reduce the cost of inventory to net realizable value as follows: $14 million for the three months ended March 31, 2021 (2020: $17 million).

2

Site operating costs includes the costs of extracting by-products.

3

Other includes realized hedge gains and losses and corporate amortization.

8 Earnings Per Share

 

   
       For the three months ended March 31  
      2021     2020  
       Basic       Diluted       Basic       Diluted  

Net income

     $830     $830     $663     $663

Net income attributable to non-controlling interests

     (292     (292     (263     (263

Net income attributable to equity holders of Barrick Gold Corporation

     $538     $538     $400     $400

Weighted average shares outstanding

     1,778     1,778     1,778     1,778

Basic and diluted earnings per share data attributable to the equity holders of Barrick Gold Corporation

     $0.30     $0.30     $0.22     $0.22

 

BARRICK FIRST QUARTER 2021   109   NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (UNAUDITED)


9 Other Expense

 

 

a)    Other Expense (Income)

 

      

For the three

months ended

March 31

 

 

 

      2021     2020  

Other expense:

    

Bank charges

     $2     $4

Bulyanhulu reduced operations program cost1

           7

Loss (gain) on non-hedge derivatives

     (1     7

Litigation

     1     3

Loss on warrant investments at fair value through profit or loss (“FVPL”)

     5      

Porgera care and maintenance costs

     11      

Other

     7     10

Total other expense

     $25     $31

Other income:

    

Gain on sale of long-lived assets

     ($3     ($60

Interest income on other assets

     (3     (6

Total other income

     ($6     ($66

Total

     $19     ($35

 

1

Primarily relates to care and maintenance costs.

b)    Impairment (Reversals) Charges

 

      

For the three

months ended

March 31

 

 

 

      2021     2020  

Impairment reversals of non-current assets1

     ($89     ($336

Total

     ($89     ($336

 

1

Refer to note 13 for further details.

10 Income Tax Expense

 

   
      

For the three months

ended March 31

 

 

      2021      2020  

Current

     $265      $252

Deferred

     109      134
       $374      $386

Income tax expense was $374 million for the three months ended March 31, 2021 (2020: $386 million). The unadjusted effective income tax rate for the three months ended

March 31, 2021, was 31% of the income before income taxes.

The underlying effective income tax rate on ordinary income for the three months ended March 31, 2021 was 29% after adjusting for the impact of net impairment reversals; the impact of deferred taxes at Hemlo; the impact of foreign currency translation losses on deferred tax balances; the impact of non-deductible foreign exchange losses; the impact of the Porgera mine being placed on care and maintenance; and the impact of other expense adjustments.

Currency Translation

Deferred tax balances are subject to remeasurement for changes in currency exchange rates each period. This is required in countries where tax is paid in local currency and the subsidiary has a different functional currency (e.g. US dollar). The most significant balances are Argentine and Malian net deferred tax liabilities. In the three months ended March 31, 2021, a deferred tax expense of $25 million (2020: $6 million deferred tax expense) primarily arose from translation losses on tax balances in Argentina and Mali, respectively, due to the weakening of the Argentine peso and the West African CFA franc against the US dollar. These net translation losses are included within deferred income tax expense.

Withholding Taxes

For the three months ended March 31, 2021, we have recorded $10 million (2020: $6 million related to the United States) of dividend withholding taxes related to the undistributed earnings of our subsidiaries in Argentina and the United States.

Nevada Gold Mines

Nevada Gold Mines is a limited liability company treated as a flow through partnership for US tax purposes. The partnership is not subject to federal income tax directly, but each of its partners is liable for tax on its share of the profits of the partnership. As such, Barrick accounts for its current and deferred income tax associated with the investment (61.5% share) following the principles in IAS 12. Nevada Gold Mines is also subject to Net Proceeds of Minerals tax in Nevada, which is included on a consolidated basis in the Company’s consolidated statements of income.

 

 

BARRICK FIRST QUARTER 2021   110   NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (UNAUDITED)


11  Cash Flow - Other Items

 

   

Operating Cash Flows – Other Items

  

For the three months

ended March 31

 

 

     2021       2020  

Adjustments for non-cash income statement items:

     

Loss (gain) on non-hedge derivatives

   ($1)      $7

Loss on warrant investments at FVPL

         

Share-based compensation expense

   13       17

Income from investment in equity investees

   (103)      (54

Change in estimate of rehabilitation costs at closed mines

   23       90

Net inventory impairment charges

   14       17

Change in other assets and liabilities

   (22)      (4

Settlement of rehabilitation obligations

   (22)      (20

Other operating activities

   ($93)      $53

Cash flow arising from changes in:

     

Accounts receivable

   $35       ($8

Inventory

   (20)      (84

Other current assets

   (7)      (106

Accounts payable

   (101)      (79

Other current liabilities

   (9)      (55

Change in working capital

   ($102)      ($332

Investing Cash Flows – Other Items

  

For the three months

ended March 31

 

 

     2021       2020  

Dividends received from equity method investments

   $126       $25

Shareholder loan repayments from equity method investments

         

Other investing activities

   $127       $25

Financing Cash Flows – Other Items

  

For the three months

ended March 31

 

 

     2021       2020  

Pueblo Viejo JV partner shareholder loan

   $21       $—

Debt extinguishment costs

   —       (15

Other financing activities

   $21       ($15

12     Equity Accounting Method Investment Continuity

 

           
       Kibali       Jabal Sayid       Zaldívar       Other       Total  

At January 1, 2020

     $3,218     $296     $955     $58     $4,527

Equity pick-up from equity investees

     201     74     12     1     288

Dividends received

     (140                 (1     (141

Shareholder loan repayment

           (1           (3     (4

At December 31, 2020

     $3,279     $369     $967     $55     $4,670

Equity pick-up from equity investees

     51     35     17           103

Dividends received

     (36     (25     (65           (126

Shareholder loan repayment

                       (1     (1

At March 31, 2021

     $3,294     $379     $919     $54     $4,646

 

BARRICK FIRST QUARTER 2021   111   NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (UNAUDITED)


13      Impairment of Goodwill and Other Assets

 

 

In accordance with our accounting policy, goodwill is tested for impairment in the fourth quarter and also when there is an indicator of impairment. Non-current assets are tested for impairment or impairment reversals when events or changes in circumstances suggest that the carrying amount may not be recoverable or is understated. Refer to note 21 of the 2020 Annual Financial Statements for further information.

For the three months ended March 31, 2021, we recorded net impairment reversals of $89 million (2020: $336 million net impairment reversals) for non-current assets.

Indicators of impairment and reversals

First Quarter 2021

Lagunas Norte

As described in note 4, on February 16, 2021, we announced an agreement to sell our 100% interest in the Lagunas Norte gold mine in Peru to Boroo Pte Ltd. for total consideration of up to $81 million. Completion of the sale is subject to closing conditions. As at March 31, 2021, all the assets and liabilities of our interest in the Lagunas Norte gold mine were classified as held-for-sale. An impairment reversal of $86 million was recognized in the first quarter of 2021 based on the fair value of the consideration to be received of $63 million. Lagunas Norte was in a net liability position, which results in an impairment reversal that exceeds the fair value less costs of disposal (“FVLCD”).

Porgera

On April 9, 2021, the Papua New Guinea (“PNG”) government and Barrick Niugini Limited (“BNL”, the 95% owner and operator of the Porgera joint venture) agreed on a partnership for the future ownership and operation of the Porgera mine. Porgera has been on care and maintenance since April 2020, when the government declined to renew its special mining lease (“SML”). The financial impact will be determined once the definitive agreements have been signed. We have determined that as at March 31, 2021 there is no loss to recognize. Refer to note 18 for more information.

First Quarter 2020

Tanzania

On January 24, 2020, Barrick formalized the establishment of a joint venture between Barrick and the Government of Tanzania (“GoT”) and resolution of all outstanding disputes between Barrick and the GoT, including the lifting of the previous concentrate export ban, effective immediately. Effective January 1, 2020, the GoT received a free carried shareholding of 16% in each of the Tanzania mines (Bulyanhulu, Buzwagi and North Mara), a 16% interest in the shareholder loans owed by the operating companies and will receive half of the economic benefits from the Tanzanian operations from taxes, royalties, clearing fees and participation in all cash distributions made by the mines, after the recoupment of capital investments.

We determined this to be an indicator of impairment reversal, as the resolution of the long standing dispute has led to a decrease in the risk adjustment previously included in the weighted average cost of capital (“WACC”) and the removal of the estimated impact of the

previously anticipated issuance of the equity to the GoT. The key assumptions and estimates used in determining the FVLCD were a short-term gold price of $1,350 per ounce, long-term gold price of $1,300 per ounce, NAV multiples of 1.1-1.3 and a WACC of 5.4%-6.2%. Management assumed the resumption of concentrate sales and exports commencing in Q2 2020 and the resumption of production from underground mining at Bulyanhulu in 2020. We identified that the FVLCD exceeded the carrying value and a full non-current asset impairment reversal was recognized in the first quarter of 2020 of $649 million at Bulyanhulu and $88 million at North Mara, based on a FVLCD of $1,237 million and $967 million, respectively. No impairment reversal was recognized at Buzwagi.

The FVLCD was also used to determine the initial value assigned to the 16% equity interest in each of the operating mines that was given to the GoT. The recognition of this non-controlling interest in the three Tanzanian mines resulted in a loss of $234 million being recognized in the first quarter of 2020. The assignment of 16% of the existing shareholder loans also resulted in the recognition of a $167 million loss in the first quarter of 2020.

As the signing of the agreement to resolve all outstanding disputes with the GoT caused the impairment reversal, loss on equity issuance and loss on assignment of shareholder loans, the financial impact has been aggregated and presented as a $336 million net impairment reversal on the consolidated statement of income.

14 Financial Instruments

 

 

Financial instruments include cash; evidence of ownership in an entity; or a contract that imposes an obligation on one party and conveys a right to a second party to deliver/receive cash or another financial instrument.

a) Cash and Equivalents

Cash and equivalents include cash, term deposits, treasury bills and money market funds with original maturities of less than 90 days.

 

 

BARRICK FIRST QUARTER 2021   112   NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (UNAUDITED)


15     Fair Value Measurements

 

a)     Assets and Liabilities Measured at Fair Value on a Recurring Basis

 

 As at March

 31, 2021

    

Quoted

prices in

active

markets

for

identical

assets

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

   

Significant

other

observable

inputs

 

 

 

 

   

Significant

unobservable

inputs

 

 

 

   

Aggregate

fair value

 

 

  

 

 

 

(Level 1

 

 

 

 

 

(Level 2

 

 

 

 

 

(Level 3

 

       

Cash and equivalents

     $5,672     $—     $—     $5,672

Other investments1

     338                 338

Derivatives

           40           40

Receivables from provisional copper and gold sales

           257           257
       $6,010     $297     $—     $6,307

 

1 

Includes equity investments in other mining companies.

b)     Fair Values of Financial Assets and Liabilities

 

       As at March 31, 2021       

As at December 31,

2020

 

 

      

Carrying

amount

 

 

    

Estimated

fair value

 

 

    

Carrying

amount

 

 

    

Estimated

fair value

 

 

Financial assets

           

Other assets1

     $566      $566      $571      $571

Other investments2

     338      338      428      428

Derivative assets3

     40      40      40      40
       $944      $944      $1,039      $1,039

Financial liabilities

           

Debt4

     $5,153      $6,664      $5,155      $7,288

Other liabilities

     395      395      382      382
       $5,548      $7,059      $5,537      $7,670

 

1

Includes restricted cash and amounts due from our partners.

2

Includes equity investments in other mining companies. Recorded at fair value. Quoted market prices are used to determine fair value.

3

Primarily consists of contingent consideration received as part of the sale of Massawa

4

Debt is generally recorded at amortized cost. The fair value of debt is primarily determined using quoted market prices. Balance includes both current and long-term portions of debt.

The Company’s valuation techniques were presented in Note 26 of the 2020 Annual Financial Statements and have been consistently applied in these interim financial statements.

16  Capital Stock

 

 

a)    Authorized Capital Stock

Our authorized capital stock is composed of an unlimited number of common shares (issued 1,778,371,343 common shares as at March 31, 2021). Our common shares have no par value.

b)    Dividends

The Company’s practice has been to declare dividends after a quarter in the announcement of the results for the quarter. Dividends declared are paid in the same quarter.

The Company’s dividend reinvestment plan resulted in 72,493 common shares issued to shareholders for the three months ended March 31, 2021.

c)    Return of Capital

At the Annual and Special Meeting on May 4, 2021, shareholders approved a $750 million return of capital distribution. This distribution is derived from a portion of the proceeds from the divestiture of Kalgoorlie Consolidated Gold Mines in November 2019 and from other recent dispositions made by Barrick and its affiliates. The total return of capital distribution is expected to be effected in three equal tranches. The first $250 million tranche will be paid on June 15, 2021 to shareholders of record at the close of business on May 28, 2021. The remaining distribution of $500 million is expected to be effected in two equal tranches to shareholders of record on dates to be determined in August and November 2021.

 

 

BARRICK FIRST QUARTER 2021   113   NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (UNAUDITED)


17 Non-controlling Interests Continuity

 

 

     

Nevada

Gold Mines

  Pueblo
Viejo
  Tanzania
Mines1
  Loulo-
Gounkoto
  Tongon   Other     Total  

NCI in subsidiary at December 31, 2020

     38.5  %      40  %      16  %      20  %      10.3  %      Various          

At January 1, 2020

     $6,039     $1,424     $—     $901     $47     ($16     $8,395

Share of income (loss)

     965     196     57     68     9     (5     1,290

Cash contributed

                                   11     11

Increase in non-controlling interest

                 251                       251

Disbursements

     (1,026     (427     (45     (36     (17     (27     (1,578

At December 31, 2020

     $5,978     $1,193     $263     $933     $39     ($37     $8,369

Share of income (loss)

     208     59     6     18     1           292

Cash contributed

                                   6     6

Disbursements

     (202     (37           (16           (7     (262

At March 31, 2021

     $5,984     $1,215     $269     $935     $40     ($38     $8,405

 

1

Tanzania mines consist of North Mara, Bulyanhulu and Buzwagi.

 

18     Contingencies

 

 

Certain conditions may exist as of the date the financial statements are issued that may result in a loss to the Company, but which will only be resolved when one or more future events occur or fail to occur. The impact of any resulting loss from such matters affecting these financial statements and noted below may be material.

Except as noted below, no material changes have occurred with respect to the matters disclosed in Note 36 “Contingencies” to the 2020 Annual Financial Statements, and no new contingencies have occurred that are material to the Company since the issuance of the 2020 Annual Financial Statements.

The description set out below should be read in conjunction with Note 36 “Contingencies” to the 2020 Annual Financial Statements.

Litigation and Claims Update

Proposed Canadian Securities Class Actions (Pascua-Lama)

On February 19, 2021, the Ontario Court of Appeal allowed the proposed representative Plaintiffs’ appeal in part. The Ontario Court of Appeal set aside the Ontario Superior Court’s decision dismissing statutory secondary market misrepresentation claims pertaining to the Company’s capital cost and scheduling estimates as well as to certain accounting and financial reporting issues, and remitted to the Ontario Superior Court the issue of whether leave to proceed should be granted in respect of those claims. The Ontario Court of Appeal upheld the Ontario Superior Court’s decision dismissing statutory secondary market misrepresentation claims pertaining to certain environmental matters in Chile. The Company has filed an application for leave to appeal to the Supreme Court of Canada.

The motion for class certification in Ontario has not yet been heard. The Ontario Superior Court has indicated that it currently does not intend to hear that motion until after: (i) the Company’s application for leave to appeal to the Supreme Court of Canada is decided and, if leave is granted, the Supreme Court of Canada renders its judgment; and (ii) the Plaintiffs’ motion for leave to proceed in respect of the balance of their statutory secondary market misrepresentation claims is determined (in the event that the Company’s application for leave to appeal to the

Supreme Court of Canada is denied or the Supreme Court of Canada grants that application but dismisses the Company’s appeal).

The Company intends to vigorously defend the proposed Canadian securities class actions. No amounts have been recorded for any potential liability arising from these matters, as the Company cannot reasonably predict the outcome.

Veladero - Operational Incidents and Associated Proceedings

Regulatory Proceedings and Actions

Federal Amparo Action

The Federal Court ordered the resumption of the proceedings on February 19, 2021.

Writ of Kalikasan

One additional judicial affidavit was delivered by the Petitioners by February 10, 2021. However it is not clear how many additional witnesses the Petitioners intend to call or will be permitted to call, as the Petitioners have manifested their intention to introduce additional evidence without judicial affidavits. The Company has objected to Petitioners’ manifested intention as well as to the admissibility of the additional judicial affidavit delivered by the Petitioners.

On February 17, 2021, the Province of Marinduque filed a Motion to Implead asking the Court of Appeal to add Marcopper Mining Corporation as a respondent. On March 1, 2021, the Company filed both a Manifestation submitting that the Motion to Implead is premature in light of the Company’s Motion for Partial Reconsideration filed February 9, 2021, and an Opposition to the Motion to Implead. The Court of Appeal has not yet ruled on the Motion for Partial Reconsideration or the Motion to Implead.

The February 24, 2021 hearing date did not proceed and the next hearing date has not yet been scheduled by the Court.

On March 26, 2021, the Company filed a Petition for Certiorari in the Supreme Court seeking to set aside the Court of Appeals’ rulings of November 25, 2020 and January 21, 2021 relating to the Petitioners’ ability to call additional witnesses and file additional judicial affidavits.

No amounts have been recorded for any potential liability under this matter, as the Company cannot

 

 

BARRICK FIRST QUARTER 2021   114   NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (UNAUDITED)


reasonably predict the outcome. The Company intends to continue to defend the action vigorously.

Reko Diq Arbitration

On March 16, 2021, ICSID registered a request for revision filed by the GOP, resulting in a provisional stay on enforcement of the ICSID Award. The original panel that decided the case has reconstituted itself to hear the revision request. TCC is vigorously opposing the revision request.

The Company cannot reasonably estimate the financial effect of the ICSID Award. No amounts have been recognized at this time.

Porgera Special Mining Lease Extension

On April 25, 2020, the Porgera Gold Mine was put on care and maintenance, after BNL, the 95% owner and operator of the Porgera joint venture, received a communication from the Government of Papua New Guinea that its application for a twenty year extension of the SML under which the Porgera mine was operated, previously filed in June of 2017, had been refused. While the Company believed the Government’s decision not to extend the SML was tantamount to nationalization without due process and in violation of the Government’s legal obligations to BNL, it nevertheless engaged in discussions with Prime Minister Marape and his Government to agree on a revised arrangement under which the Porgera Mine could be reopened, for the benefit of all stakeholders involved.

On April 9, 2021, BNL signed a binding Framework Agreement with the Independent State of Papua New Guinea and Kumul Minerals Holding Limited, a state-owned mining company, setting out the terms and conditions for the reopening of the Porgera mine. The Framework Agreement reflects the key principles previously agreed between the parties on October 15, 2020. Under the terms of the Framework Agreement, the Papua New Guinea stakeholders will receive a 51% equity stake in the Porgera mine, with the remaining 49% to be held by BNL, which will retain operatorship of the mine. The Framework Agreement also provides that Papua New Guinea stakeholders and BNL will share the economic benefits derived from the reopened Porgera Mine on a 53% and 47% basis over the life of mine, respectively, and that the Government of Papua New Guinea will retain the option to acquire BNL’s 49% equity participation at fair market value after 10 years.

The provisions of the Framework Agreement will be implemented, and work to recommence full mine operations at Porgera will begin, following the execution of a number of definitive agreements and satisfaction of a number of conditions. In the meantime, under standstill arrangements contemplated by the Framework Agreement, all legal and arbitral proceedings previously initiated by the parties in relation to the Porgera dispute are to be suspended. BNL will remain in possession of the site and maintain the mine on care and maintenance.

Porgera Tax Audits

Under standstill arrangements contemplated by the Framework Agreement, all legal and arbitral proceedings previously initiated by the parties in relation to the Porgera dispute are to be suspended. See “Porgera Special Mining Lease Extension”.

The Company has not recorded any additional estimated amounts for the potential liability arising from the

amended assessments as the Company cannot reasonably predict the outcome.

Massawa Senegalese Tax Dispute

On March 10, 2021, the Company filed an application with the International Chamber of Commerce in Paris in accordance with the Mining Convention for Gold and Related Substances, dated November 24, 2003, pertaining to the Senegal mining code between the Government of the Republic of Senegal and the Company. Arbitration proceedings are expected to commence within the next twelve months. No amounts have been recorded for any potential liability arising from the Notice for Reassessment or the Confirmation of Reassessment as the Company cannot reasonably predict the outcome. The Company intends to vigorously defend its position.

 

 

BARRICK FIRST QUARTER 2021   115   NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (UNAUDITED)


Corporate Office

Barrick Gold Corporation

161 Bay Street, Suite 3700

Toronto, Ontario M5J 2S1

Canada

Telephone: +1 416 861-9911

Email: [email protected]

Website: www.barrick.com

Shares Listed

GOLD     The New York Stock Exchange

ABX        The Toronto Stock Exchange

Transfer Agents and Registrars

AST Trust Company (Canada)

P.O. Box 700, Postal Station B

Montreal, Quebec H3B 3K3

or

American Stock Transfer & Trust Company, LLC

6201 – 15 Avenue

Brooklyn, New York 11219

Telephone: 1-800-387-0825

Fax: 1-888-249-6189

Email: [email protected]

Website: www.astfinancial.com

Enquiries

President and Chief Executive Officer

Mark Bristow

+1 647 205 7694

+44 788 071 1386

Senior Executive Vice-President and Chief Financial Officer

Graham Shuttleworth

+1 647 262 2095

+44 779 771 1338

Investor and Media Relations

Kathy du Plessis

+44 20 7557 7738

Email: [email protected]

 

 

Cautionary Statement on Forward-Looking Information

 

 

 

Certain information contained or incorporated by reference in this MD&A, including any information as to our strategy, projects, plans or future financial or operating performance, constitutes “forward-looking statements”. All statements, other than statements of historical fact, are forward-looking statements. The words “deliver”, “plan”, “objective”, “expected”, “potential”, “strategy”, “will”, “continues”, “ongoing” and similar expressions identify forward-looking statements. In particular, this press release contains forward-looking statements including, without limitation, with respect to: Barrick’s forward-looking production guidance and estimates of future costs; mine life and production rates; Barrick’s response to the government of Papua New Guinea’s decision not to extend Porgera’s Special Mining Lease; the terms of a new partnership for Porgera’s future ownership and operation under the Framework Agreement between Papua New Guinea and BNL, and the timeline for execution of definitive agreements and formation of a new joint venture to implement the Framework Agreement and

recommence operations at Porgera; the duration of the temporary suspension of operations at Porgera; potential mineralization; potential exploration targets and mineral resource potential, including reserve replenishment; the new joint venture with the Government of Tanzania and the potential for Barrick’s North Mara and Bulyanhulu mines to become a Tier One complex; the timing and amount of Barrick’s return of capital distributions; future dividend and yield levels; Barrick’s engagement with local communities to manage the Covid-19 pandemic; Barrick’s strategy, plans, targets and goals in respect of environmental and social governance issues, including climate change, greenhouse gas emissions reduction targets, tailings storage facility management and conservation efforts; future investments in community projects and contributions to local economies; Barrick’s human capital management strategy; the development of the third underground mine at Gounkoto and the timeline for first production; and expectations

 


regarding future price assumptions, financial performance and other outlook or guidance.

Forward-looking statements are necessarily based upon a number of estimates and assumptions including material estimates and assumptions related to the factors set forth below that, while considered reasonable by the Company as at the date of this press release in light of management’s experience and perception of current conditions and expected developments, are inherently subject to significant business, economic and competitive uncertainties and contingencies. Known and unknown factors could cause actual results to differ materially from those projected in the forward-looking statements and undue reliance should not be placed on such statements and information. Such factors include, but are not limited to: fluctuations in the spot and forward price of gold, copper or certain other commodities (such as silver, diesel fuel, natural gas and electricity); the speculative nature of mineral exploration and development; changes in mineral production performance, exploitation and exploration successes; risks associated with projects in the early stages of evaluation and for which additional engineering and other analysis is required; the benefits expected from recent transactions being realized; diminishing quantities or grades of reserves; increased costs, delays, suspensions and technical challenges associated with the construction of capital projects; operating or technical difficulties in connection with mining or development activities, including geotechnical challenges and disruptions in the maintenance or provision of required infrastructure and information technology systems; failure to comply with environmental and health and safety laws and regulations; non-renewal of key licenses by governmental authorities, including non-renewal of Porgera’s Special Mining Lease; timing of receipt of, or failure to comply with, necessary permits and approvals; uncertainty whether some or all of Barrick’s targeted investments and projects will meet the Company’s capital allocation objectives and internal hurdle rate; the impact of global liquidity and credit availability on the timing of cash flows and the values of assets and liabilities based on projected future cash flows; adverse changes in our credit ratings; the impact of inflation; fluctuations in the currency markets; changes in U.S. dollar interest rates; risks arising from holding derivative instruments; changes in national and local government legislation, taxation, controls or regulations and/or changes in the administration of laws, policies and practices, expropriation or nationalization of property and political or economic developments in Canada, the United States and other jurisdictions in which the Company or its affiliates do or may carry on business in the future; lack of certainty with respect to foreign legal systems, corruption and other factors that are inconsistent with the rule of law; risks associated with illegal and artisanal mining; risks associated with new diseases, epidemics and pandemics, including the effects and potential effects of the global Covid-19 pandemic; disruption of supply routes which may cause delays in construction and mining activities; damage to the Company’s reputation due to the actual or perceived occurrence of any number of events, including negative publicity with respect to the Company’s handling of environmental matters or dealings with community groups, whether true or not; the possibility that future exploration results will not be consistent with the Company’s expectations; risks that exploration data may be incomplete and considerable additional work may be

required to complete further evaluation, including but not limited to drilling, engineering and socioeconomic studies and investment; risk of loss due to acts of war, terrorism, sabotage and civil disturbances; litigation and legal and administrative proceedings; contests over title to properties, particularly title to undeveloped properties, or over access to water, power and other required infrastructure; business opportunities that may be presented to, or pursued by, the Company; our ability to successfully integrate acquisitions or complete divestitures, including our ability to successfully reintegrate the operations of the former Acacia; risks associated with working with partners in jointly controlled assets; employee relations including loss of key employees; increased costs and physical risks, including extreme weather events and resource shortages, related to climate change; and availability and increased costs associated with mining inputs and labor. Barrick also cautions that its 2021 guidance may be impacted by the unprecedented business and social disruption caused by the spread of Covid-19. In addition, there are risks and hazards associated with the business of mineral exploration, development and mining, including environmental hazards, industrial accidents, unusual or unexpected formations, pressures, cave-ins, flooding and gold bullion, copper cathode or gold or copper concentrate losses (and the risk of inadequate insurance, or inability to obtain insurance, to cover these risks).

Many of these uncertainties and contingencies can affect our actual results and could cause actual results to differ materially from those expressed or implied in any forward-looking statements made by, or on behalf of, us. Readers are cautioned that forward-looking statements are not guarantees of future performance. All of the forward-looking statements made in this press release are qualified by these cautionary statements. Specific reference is made to the most recent Form 40-F/Annual Information Form on file with the SEC and Canadian provincial securities regulatory authorities for a more detailed discussion of some of the factors underlying forward-looking statements and the risks that may affect Barrick’s ability to achieve the expectations set forth in the forward-looking statements contained in this press release. We disclaim any intention or obligation to update or revise any forward-looking statements whether as a result of new information, future events or otherwise, except as required by applicable law.

 


Serious News for Serious Traders! Try StreetInsider.com Premium Free!

You May Also Be Interested In





Related Categories

SEC Filings