Form 485BPOS Advisors Disciplined

generally including sales fees. In some cases, however, you may have to adjust your tax basis after you purchase your units.

 

ADVISORS CORPORATE
TRUST—NAVELLIER/DIAL HIGH
INCOME OPPORTUNITIES
PORTFOLIO,
SERIES 133

PROSPECTUS

JULY 29, 2021

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Advisors Disciplined Trust

Information Supplement

January 2021

This Information Supplement provides additional information concerning the Advisors Disciplined Trust unit investment trust described in the prospectus. This Information Supplement should be read in conjunction with the prospectus. It is not a prospectus. It does not include all of the information that an investor should consider before investing in a trust. It may not be used to offer or sell units of a trust without the prospectus. This Information Supplement is incorporated into the prospectus by reference and has been filed as part of the registration statement with the Securities and Exchange Commission. Investors should obtain and read the prospectus prior to purchasing units of a trust. You can obtain the prospectus without charge at www.aamlive.com or by contacting your financial professional or Advisors Asset Management, Inc. at 18925 Base Camp Road, Suite 203, Monument, Colorado 80132 or at 8100 East 22nd Street North, Building 800, Suite 102, Wichita, Kansas 67226 or by calling (877) 858-1773. This Information Supplement is dated as of the date set forth above.

Contents

General Information

Each trust is one of a series of separate unit investment trusts (“UITs”) created under the name Advisors Disciplined Trust and registered under the Investment Company Act of 1940, as amended (the “Investment Company Act”). Each trust was created as a common law trust on the initial date of deposit set forth in the prospectus for such trust under the laws of the state of New York. Each trust was created under a trust agreement among Advisors Asset Management, Inc. (as sponsor/depositor, evaluator and supervisor) and The Bank of New York Mellon (as trustee).

When your trust was created, the sponsor delivered to the trustee securities or contracts for the purchase thereof for deposit in the trust and the trustee delivered to the sponsor documentation evidencing the ownership of units of the trust. Additional units of each trust may be issued from time to time by depositing in the trust additional securities (or contracts for the purchase thereof together with cash or irrevocable letters of credit) or cash (including a letter of credit or the equivalent) with instructions to purchase additional securities. The number of units, fractional interest of each unit in a trust and any estimated interest distributions per unit will increase or decrease to the extent of any adjustment. As additional units are issued by a trust as a result of the deposit of additional securities by the sponsor, the aggregate value of the securities in the trust will be increased and the fractional undivided interest in the trust represented by each unit will be decreased. The sponsor may continue to make additional deposits of securities into a trust, provided that such additional deposits will be in principal amounts which will generally maintain the same original percentage relationship among the principal amounts of the securities in such trust established by the initial deposit of the securities. Thus, although additional units will be issued, each unit will generally continue to represent the same principal amount of each security, and the percentage relationship among the principal amount of each security in the related trust will generally remain the same. If the sponsor deposits cash to purchase additional securities, existing and new investors may experience a dilution of their investments and a reduction in their anticipated income because of fluctuations in the prices of the securities between the time of the cash deposit and the purchase of the securities and because the trust will pay any associated brokerage fees

Each unit initially offered represents an undivided interest in the related trust. To the extent that any units are redeemed by the trustee or additional units are issued as a result of additional securities being deposited by the sponsor, the fractional undivided interest in a trust represented by each unredeemed unit will increase or decrease accordingly, although the actual interest in such trust represented by such fraction will remain unchanged. Units will remain outstanding until redeemed upon tender to the trustee by unitholders, which may include the sponsor, or until the termination of the trust agreement.

A trust consists of (a) the securities listed under the “Schedule of Investments” in the prospectus as may continue to be held from time to time in the trust, (b) any additional securities acquired and held by the trust pursuant to the provisions of the trust agreement and (c) any cash held in the accounts of the trust. Neither the sponsor nor the trustee shall be liable in any way for any failure in any of the securities. However, should any contract for the purchase of any of the securities initially deposited in a trust fail, the sponsor will, unless substantially all of the moneys

held in the trust to cover such purchase are reinvested in substitute securities in accordance with the trust agreement, refund the cash and sales fee attributable to such failed contract to all unitholders on the next distribution date.

Investment Policies

The trust is a UIT and is not an “actively managed” fund. Traditional methods of investment management for a managed fund typically involve frequent changes in a portfolio of securities on the basis of economic, financial and market analysis. The portfolio of a trust, however, will not be actively managed and therefore the adverse financial condition of an issuer will not necessarily require the sale of its securities from a portfolio.

The sponsor may not alter the portfolio of a trust by the purchase, sale or substitution of securities, except in the special circumstances discussed herein regarding the substitution of replacement securities for any failed securities. Thus, with the exception of the redemption or maturity of securities in accordance with their terms, the assets of a trust will remain unchanged under normal circumstances.

The sponsor may direct the trustee to dispose of securities the value of which has been affected by certain adverse events including institution of certain legal proceedings or decline in price to such an extent, or the occurrence of other market or credit factors, so that in the opinion of the sponsor the retention of such securities in a trust would be detrimental to the interest of the unitholders. The proceeds from any such sales, exclusive of any portion which represents accrued interest, will be credited to the Principal Account of such trust for distribution to the unitholders.

The sponsor is required to instruct the trustee to reject any offer made by an issuer of securities to issue new securities, or to exchange securities, for trust securities, the trustee shall reject such offer. However, should any issuance, exchange or substitution be effected notwithstanding such rejection or without an initial offer, any securities or property received shall be deposited in the trust and shall be promptly sold by the trustee unless the sponsor advises the trustee to keep such securities or properties. The excess cash proceeds of any such sales will be distributed to unitholders.

If your trust receives securities or other property, it will either hold the securities or property in the portfolio or sell the securities or property and distribute the proceeds. The sponsor may direct the reinvestment of security sale proceeds if the sale is the direct result of serious adverse credit factors which, in the opinion of the sponsor, would make retention of the securities detrimental to the trust trust and the trust has elected to be taxed as a regulated investment company (a “RIC”). In such a case, the sponsor may, but is not obligated to, direct the reinvestment of sale proceeds in any other securities that meet the criteria for inclusion in the trust on the trust’s inception date. The sponsor may also instruct the trustee to take action necessary to ensure that the portfolio continues to satisfy the qualifications of a RIC.

The trustee may sell securities, designated by the sponsor, from a trust for the purpose of redeeming units of such trust tendered for redemption and the payment of expenses.

In addition, if a trust has elected to be taxed as a RIC, the trustee may dispose of certain securities and take such further action as may be needed from time to time to ensure that a trust continues to satisfy the qualifications of a RIC, including the requirements with respect to diversification under Section 851 of the United States Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended (the “Internal Revenue Code”), and as may be needed from time to time to avoid the imposition of any income or excise taxes or on undistributed income of a trust.

Proceeds from the sale of securities (or any securities or other property received by a trust in exchange for securities) are credited to the Principal Account of a trust for distribution to unitholders or to meet redemptions. Except for failed securities and as provided herein, in the prospectus or in the trust agreement, the acquisition by a trust of any securities other than the portfolio securities is prohibited.

Because certain of the securities in certain of the trusts may from time to time under certain circumstances be sold or redeemed or will mature in accordance with their terms and because the proceeds from such events will be distributed to unitholders and will not be reinvested, no assurance can be given that a trust will retain for any length of time its present size and composition. Neither the sponsor nor the trustee shall be liable in any way for any default, failure or defect in any security. In the event of a failure to deliver any security that has been purchased for a trust under a contract, including those securities purchased on a “when, as and if issued” basis (“Failed Securities”), the sponsor is authorized under the trust agreement to direct the trustee to acquire other securities (“Replacement Securities”) to make up the original corpus of such trust.

Securities in certain of the trusts may have been purchased on a “when, as and if issued” or delayed delivery basis with delivery expected to take place after the first settlement date. Accordingly, the delivery of such securities may be delayed or may not occur. Interest on these securities begins accruing to the benefit of unitholders on their respective dates of delivery. Unitholders of all trusts will be “at risk” with respect to any “when, as and if issued” or “delayed delivery” securities included in their respective trust (i.e., may derive either gain or loss from fluctuations in the evaluation of such securities) from the date they commit for units.

The Replacement Securities must be purchased within twenty days after delivery of the notice that a contract to deliver a security will not be honored and the purchase price may not exceed the amount of funds reserved for the purchase of the Failed Securities. The purchase price of the Replacement Securities (exclusive of accrued interest) shall not exceed the principal attributable to the Failed Securities. In addition, no substitution of Replacement Securities will be made if such substitution will adversely affect the federal income tax status of the related trust. Whenever a Replacement Security is acquired for a trust, the trustee shall, within five days thereafter, notify all unitholders of the trust of the acquisition of the Replacement Security and shall, on the next monthly distribution date which is more than thirty days thereafter, make a pro rata distribution of the amount, if any, by which the cost to the trust of the Failed Security exceeded the cost of the Replacement Security. Once all of the securities in a trust are acquired, the trustee will have no power to vary the investments of the trust, i.e., the trustee will have no managerial power to take advantage of market variations to improve a unitholder’s investment.

If the right of limited substitution described in the preceding paragraphs is not utilized to acquire Replacement Securities in the event of a failed contract, the sponsor will refund the sales fee attributable to such Failed Securities to all unitholders of the trust and the trustee will distribute the principal and accrued interest attributable to such Failed Securities on the next monthly distribution date which is more than thirty days thereafter. In addition, unitholders should be aware that, at the time of receipt of such principal, they may not be able to reinvest such proceeds in other securities at a yield equal to or in excess of the yield which such proceeds would have earned for unitholders of such trust.

Whether or not a Replacement Security is acquired, an amount equal to the accrued interest (at the coupon rate of the Failed Securities) will be paid to unitholders of the trust to the date the sponsor removes the Failed Securities from the trust if the sponsor determines not to purchase a Replacement Security or to the date of substitution if a Replacement Security is purchased. All such interest paid to unitholders which accrued after the date of settlement for a purchase of units will be paid by the sponsor. In the event a Replacement Security could not be acquired by a trust, the estimated net annual interest income per unit for such trust would be reduced and the estimated current return and estimated long-term return might be lowered.

Subsequent to the trust’s inception, a security may cease to be rated or its rating may be reduced below any minimum required as of the trust’s inception. Neither event requires the elimination of such investment from a trust, but may be considered in the sponsor’s determination to direct the trustee to dispose of such investment.

The sponsor may not alter the portfolio of a trust except upon the happening of certain extraordinary circumstances. Certain of the securities may be subject to optional call or mandatory redemption pursuant to sinking fund provisions, in each case prior to their stated maturity. A bond subject to optional call is one which is subject to redemption or refunding prior to maturity at the option of the issuer, often at a premium over par. A refunding is a method by which a bond issue is redeemed, at or before maturity, by the proceeds of a new bond issue. A bond subject to sinking fund redemption is one which is subject to partial call from time to time at par with proceeds from a fund accumulated for the scheduled retirement of a portion of an issue to maturity. Special or extraordinary redemption provisions may provide for redemption at par of all or a portion of an issue upon the occurrence of certain circumstances. Redemption pursuant to optional call provisions is more likely to occur, and redemption pursuant to special or extraordinary redemption provisions may occur, when the securities have an offering side evaluation which represents a premium over par, that is, when they are able to be refinanced at a lower cost. The proceeds from any such call or redemption pursuant to sinking fund provisions, as well as proceeds from the sale of securities and from securities which mature in accordance with their terms from a trust, unless utilized to pay for units tendered for redemption, will be distributed to unitholders of such trust and will not be used to purchase additional securities for such trust. Accordingly, any such call, redemption, sale or maturity will reduce the size and diversity of a trust and the net annual interest income of such trust and may reduce the estimated current return and the estimated long-term return. The call, redemption, sale or maturity of securities also may have tax consequences to a unitholder.

Certain of the securities in a trust may have been acquired at a market discount from par value at maturity. The coupon interest rates on the discount securities at the time they were purchased and deposited in the trust were lower than the current market interest rates for newly issued bonds of comparable rating and type. If such interest rates for newly issued comparable securities increase, the market discount of previously issued securities will become greater, and if such interest rates for newly issued comparable securities decline, the market discount of previously issued securities will be reduced, other things being equal. Investors should also note that the value of securities purchased at a market discount will increase in value faster than securities purchased at a market premium if interest rates decrease. Conversely, if interest rates increase, the value of securities purchased at a market discount will decrease faster than securities purchased at a market premium. In addition, if interest rates rise, the prepayment risk of higher yielding, premium securities and the prepayment benefit for lower yielding, discount securities will be reduced. A market discount tax-exempt bond held to maturity will have a larger portion of its total return in the form of taxable income and capital gain and less in the form of tax-exempt interest income than a comparable security newly issued at current market rates. Market discount attributable to interest changes does not indicate a lack of market confidence in the issue. Neither the sponsor nor the trustee shall be liable in any way for any default, failure or defect in any of the securities.

Certain of the securities in the trust may be “zero coupon” bonds, i.e., an original issue discount bond that does not provide for the payment of current interest. Zero coupon bonds are purchased at a deep discount because the buyer receives only the right to receive a final payment at the maturity of the bond and does not receive any periodic interest payments. The effect of owning deep discount bonds which do not make current interest payments (such as the zero coupon bonds) is that a fixed yield is earned not only on the original investment but also, in effect, on all discount earned during the life of such obligation. This implicit reinvestment of earnings at the same rate eliminates the risk of being unable to reinvest the income on such obligation at a rate as high as the implicit yield on the discount obligation, but at the same time eliminates the holder’s ability to reinvest at higher rates in the future. For this reason, zero coupon bonds are subject to substantially greater price fluctuations during periods of changing market interest rates than are securities of comparable quality which pay interest currently.

To the best of the sponsor’s knowledge, there is no litigation pending as of the trust’s inception in respect of any security which might reasonably be expected to have a material adverse effect on the trust. At any time after the trust’s inception, litigation may be instituted on a variety of grounds with respect to the securities. The sponsor is unable to predict whether any such litigation may be instituted, or if instituted, whether such litigation might have a material adverse effect on the trust. The sponsor and the trustee shall not be liable in any way for any default, failure or defect in any security.

Risk Factors

An investment in units of a trust may be subject to some or all of the risks described below. In addition, you should carefully review the objective, strategy and risk of the trust as described in the prospectus and consider your ability to assume the risks involved before making an investment in a trust.

Market Risk. You should understand the risks of investing in securities before purchasing units. These risks include the risk that the financial condition of the company or the general condition of the stock market may worsen and the value of the securities (and therefore units) will fall. Securities are especially susceptible to general stock market movements. The value of securities often rises or falls rapidly and unpredictably as market confidence and perceptions of companies change. These perceptions are based on factors including expectations regarding government economic policies, inflation, interest rates, economic expansion or contraction, political climates and economic or banking crises. The value of units of a trust will fluctuate with the value of the securities in the trust and may be more or less than the price you originally paid for your units. As with any investment, no one can guarantee that the performance of a trust will be positive over any period of time. Because each trust is unmanaged, the trustee will not sell securities in response to market fluctuations as is common in managed investments. In addition, because some trusts hold a relatively small number of securities, you may encounter greater market risk than in a more diversified investment. First detected in late 2019, a novel form of coronavirus disease first detected in 2019 (“COVID-19”) spread rapidly around the globe which led the World Health Organization to declare the COVID-19 outbreak a pandemic in March 2020. The COVID-19 pandemic has disrupted supply chains, adversely affected commercial activities and resulted in increased market volatility, and may further impact supply chains, commercial activities and market volatility in the future. The potential economic impacts of the COVID-19 pandemic, or any future public health crisis, are impossible to predict and could result in adverse market conditions.

Credit Risk. Credit risk is the risk that a borrower is unable to meet its obligation to pay principal or interest on a security. This could cause the value of an investment to fall and may reduce the level of dividends an investment pays which would reduce income. The COVID-19 pandemic has resulted in, and may further result in the future, a decline in economic activity which could negatively impact the ability of borrowers to make principal or interest payments on securities, when due.

Interest Rate Risk. Interest rate risk is the risk that the value of fixed income securities and similar securities will fall if interest rates increase. Bonds and other fixed income securities typically fall in value when interest rates rise and rise in value when interest rates fall. Securities with longer periods before maturity are often more sensitive to interest rate changes.

Liquidity Risk. Liquidity risk is the risk that the value of a security will fall if trading in the security is limited or absent. No one can guarantee that a liquid trading market will exist for any security.

Foreign Issuers. An investment in securities of non-U.S. issuers involves certain investment risks that are different in some respects from an investment in the securities of domestic issuers. These investment risks include future political or governmental restrictions which might adversely affect the payment or receipt of payment of dividends on the relevant securities, the possibility that the financial condition of the issuers of the securities may become impaired or that the general condition of the relevant stock market may worsen (both of which would contribute directly to a decrease in the value of foreign securities), the limited liquidity and relatively small market capitalization of the relevant securities market, expropriation or

confiscatory taxation, economic uncertainties and foreign currency devaluations and fluctuations. In addition, for foreign issuers that are not subject to the reporting requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Securities Exchange Act”) there may be less publicly available information than is available from a domestic issuer. In addition, foreign issuers are not necessarily subject to uniform accounting, auditing and financial reporting standards, practices and requirements comparable to those applicable to domestic issuers. The securities of many foreign issuers are less liquid and their prices more volatile than securities of comparable domestic issuers. In addition, fixed brokerage commissions and other transaction costs in foreign securities markets are generally higher than in the United States and there is generally less government supervision and regulation of exchanges, brokers and issuers in foreign countries than there is in the United States.

Securities issued by non-U.S. issuers generally pay income in foreign currencies and principally trade in foreign currencies. Therefore, there is a risk that the U.S. dollar value of these securities will vary with fluctuations in the U.S. dollar foreign exchange rates for the various securities.

There can be no assurance that exchange control regulations might not be adopted in the future which might adversely affect payment to a trust. The adoption of exchange control regulations and other legal restrictions could have an adverse impact on the marketability of foreign securities and on the ability to liquidate securities. In addition, restrictions on the settlement of transactions on either the purchase or sale side, or both, could cause delays or increase the costs associated with the purchase and sale of the foreign securities and correspondingly could affect the price of trust units.

Investors should be aware that it may not be possible to buy all securities at the same time because of the unavailability of any security, and restrictions applicable to a trust relating to the purchase of a security by reason of the federal securities laws or otherwise.

Foreign securities generally have not been registered under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended (the “Securities Act”) and may not be exempt from the registration requirements of such Act. Sales of non-exempt securities in the United States securities markets are subject to severe restrictions and may not be practicable. Accordingly, sales of these securities will generally be effected only in foreign securities markets. Investors should realize that the securities might be traded in foreign countries where the securities markets are not as developed or efficient and may not be as liquid as those in the United States. The value of securities will be adversely affected if trading markets for the securities are limited or absent.

Emerging Markets. Compared to more mature markets, some emerging markets may have a low level of regulation, enforcement of regulations and monitoring of investors’ activities. Those activities may include practices such as trading on material non-public information. The securities markets of developing countries are not as large as the more established securities markets and have substantially less trading volume, resulting in a lack of liquidity and high price volatility. There may be a high concentration of market capitalization and trading volume in a small number of issuers representing a limited number of industries as well as a high concentration of investors and financial intermediaries. These factors may adversely affect the

timing and pricing of the acquisition or disposal of securities. In certain emerging markets, registrars are not subject to effective government supervision nor are they always independent from issuers. The possibility of fraud, negligence, undue influence being exerted by the issuer or refusal to recognize ownership exists, which, along with other factors, could result in the registration of a shareholding being completely lost. Investors could suffer loss arising from these registration problems. The rights and remedies associated with emerging market investment securities may differ and be more limited than those available in more developed countries, and the legal remedies in emerging markets are often more limited than the remedies available in the United States. Emerging market companies are also subject to a greater risk of market closure or manipulation and exchange delistings. Emerging market companies may have lower quality or less information publicly available due to differences in regulatory, accounting, audit, and financial recordkeeping standards. Information that is available may be unreliable or outdated. The limitations associated with investments in emerging market companies could impact the trust’s ability to achieve its investment objective.

Practices pertaining to the settlement of securities transactions in emerging markets involve higher risks than those in developed markets, in large part because of the need to use brokers and counterparties who are less well capitalized, and custody and registration of assets in some countries may be unreliable. As a result, brokerage commissions and other fees are generally higher in emerging markets and the procedures and rules governing foreign transactions and custody may involve delays in payment, delivery or recovery of money or investments. Delays in settlement could result in investment opportunities being missed if a trust is unable to acquire or dispose of a security. Certain foreign investments may also be less liquid and more volatile than U.S. investments, which may mean at times that such investments are unable to be sold at desirable prices.

Political and economic structures in emerging markets often change rapidly, which may cause instability. In adverse social and political circumstances, governments have been involved in policies of expropriation, confiscatory taxation, nationalization, intervention in the securities market and trade settlement, and imposition of foreign investment restrictions and exchange controls, and these could be repeated in the future. In addition to withholding taxes on investment income, some governments in emerging markets may impose different capital gains taxes on foreign investors. Foreign investments may also be subject to the risks of seizure by a foreign government and the imposition of restrictions on the exchange or export of foreign currency. Additionally, some governments exercise substantial influence over the private economic sector and the political and social uncertainties that exist for many developing countries are considerable.

Another risk common to most developing countries is that the economy is heavily export oriented and, accordingly, is dependent upon international trade. The existence of overburdened infrastructures and obsolete financial systems also presents risks in certain countries, as do environmental problems. Certain economies also depend to a large degree upon exports of primary commodities and, therefore, are vulnerable to changes in commodity prices which, in turn, may be affected by a variety of factors. Further, companies in emerging markets may have less reliable access to capital.

Currency Risk. A trust that invests in securities of non-U.S. issuers will be subject to currency risk, which is the risk that an increase in the U.S. dollar relative to the non-U.S. currency will reduce returns or portfolio value. Generally, when the U.S. dollar rises in value relative to a non-U.S. currency, a trust’s investment in securities denominated in that currency will lose value because its currency is worth fewer U.S. dollars. On the other hand, when the value of the U.S. dollar falls relative to a non-U.S. currency, a trust’s investments denominated in that currency will tend to increase in value because that currency is worth more U.S. dollars. The exchange rates between the U.S. dollar and non-U.S. currencies depend upon such factors as supply and demand in the currency exchange markets, international balance of payments, governmental intervention, speculation and other economic and political conditions. A trust may incur conversion costs when it converts its holdings to another currency. Non-U.S. exchange dealers may realize a profit on the difference between the price at which a trust buys and sells currencies. A trust may engage in non-U.S. currency exchange transactions in connection with its portfolio investments. A trust may also be subject to currency risk through investments in ADRs, GDRs and other non-U.S. securities denominated in U.S. dollars.

Small-Cap and Mid-Cap Companies. Smaller company securities customarily involve more investment risk than larger company securities. Small-capitalization and mid-capitalization companies may have limited product lines, markets or financial resources; may lack management depth or experience; and may be more vulnerable to adverse general market or economic developments than large companies. Some of these companies may distribute, sell or produce products which have recently been brought to market and may be dependent on key personnel.

The prices of small or mid-size company securities are often more volatile than prices associated with large company issues, and can display abrupt or erratic movements at times, due to limited trading volumes and less publicly available information. Also, because small-cap and mid-cap companies normally have fewer shares outstanding and these shares trade less frequently than large companies, it may be more difficult for a trust which contains these securities to buy and sell significant amounts of such shares without an unfavorable impact on prevailing market prices.

Real Estate Investment Trusts. Real estate investment trusts (“REITs”) may be exposed to the risks associated with the ownership of real estate which include, among other factors, changes in general U.S., global and local economic conditions, declines in real estate values, changes in the financial health of tenants, overbuilding and increased competition for tenants, oversupply of properties for sale, changing demographics, changes in interest rates, tax rates and other operating expenses, changes in government regulations, faulty construction and the ongoing need for capital improvements, regulatory and judicial requirements including relating to liability for environmental hazards, changes in neighborhood values and buyer demand and the unavailability of construction financing or mortgage loans at rates acceptable to developers.

Many factors can have an adverse impact on the performance of a REIT, including its cash available for distribution, the credit quality of the REIT or the real estate industry generally. The success of a REIT depends on various factors, including the occupancy and rent levels, appreciation of the underlying property and the ability to raise rents on those properties. Economic recession, overbuilding, tax law changes, higher interest rates or excessive speculation

can all negatively impact REITs, their future earnings and share prices. Variations in rental income and space availability and vacancy rates in terms of supply and demand are additional factors affecting real estate generally and REITs in particular. Properties owned by a REIT may not be adequately insured against certain losses and may be subject to significant environmental liabilities, including remediation costs. You should also be aware that REITs may not be diversified and are subject to the risks of financing projects. The real estate industry may be cyclical, and, if REIT securities are acquired at or near the top of the cycle, there is increased risk of a decline in value of the REIT securities. At various points in time, demand for certain types of real estate may inflate the value of real estate. This may increase the risk of a substantial decline in the value of such real estate and increase the risk of a decline in the value of the securities. REITs are also subject to defaults by borrowers and the market’s perception of the REIT industry generally. Because of their structure, and a current legal requirement that they distribute at least 90% of their taxable income to shareholders annually, REITs require frequent amounts of new funding, through both borrowing money and issuing stock. Thus, REITs historically have frequently issued substantial amounts of new equity shares (or equivalents) to purchase or build new properties. This may adversely affect REIT equity share market prices. Both existing and new share issuances may have an adverse effect on these prices in the future, especially if REITs issue stock when real estate prices are relatively high and stock prices are relatively low.

Mortgage REITs engage in financing real estate, purchasing or originating mortgages and mortgage-backed securities and earning income from the interest on these investments. Such REITs face risks similar to those of other financial firms, such as changes in interest rates, general market conditions and credit risk, in addition to risks associated with an investment in real estate.

REITs have and may continue to be negatively impacted by conditions caused by the spread of COVID-19 due to many individuals and businesses being unable to pay all or a portion of their contracted rent. This may have and continue to have an adverse impact on REITs that invest in real estate which provide space to these individuals and businesses.

Master Limited Partnerships. Master limited partnerships (“MLPs”) are limited partnerships or limited liability companies that are generally taxed as partnerships whose interests are traded on securities exchanges. MLP ownership generally consists of a general partner and limited partners. The general partner manages the partnership, has an ownership stake in the partnership and is eligible to receive an incentive distribution. The limited partners provide capital to the partnership, have a limited (if any) role in the operation and management of the partnership and receive cash distributions. Most MLPs generally operate in the energy, natural resources or real estate sectors and are subject to the risks generally applicable to companies in those sectors. MLPs are also subject to the risk that authorities could challenge the tax treatment of MLPs for federal income tax purposes which could have a negative impact on the after-tax income available for distribution by the MLPs.

Bond Quality Risk. Bond quality risk is the risk that a bond will fall in value if a rating agency decreases or withdraws the bond’s rating.

Split Ratings Risk. Ratings are based on an evaluation by a credit rating organization of the issuer’s credit history and the ability to repay its obligations (such as Standard Poor’s or Moody’s Investor Service). An investment grade rating generally signifies that a credit rating agency considers the current quality of a bond to be sufficient to provide reasonable assurance of the issuer’s ability to meet its obligation to bondholders. The portfolio may include bonds that are unrated or rated below investment-grade by one credit rating agency and rated as investment-grade quality by the other as of the date of the trust’s inception. These are referred to as “split-rated” securities. A split-rated security may be regarded by one rating agency as having predominately speculative characteristics with respect to the issuer’s capacity to pay interest and repay principal, and accordingly subject to a greater risk of default. The prices of split-rated securities may be more sensitive than securities without a split-rating to negative developments, such as a decline in the issuer’s revenues or a general economic downturn.

Prepayment Risk. When interest rates fall, among other factors, the issuer of a fixed income security may prepay its obligations earlier than expected. Such amounts will result in early distributions to an investor who may be unable to reinvest such amounts at the yields originally invested which could adversely impact the value of your investment. Certain bonds include call provisions which expose such an investor to call risk. Call risk is the risk that the issuer prepays or “calls” a bond before its stated maturity. An issuer might call a bond if interest rates, in general, fall and the bond pays a higher interest rate or if it no longer needs the money for the original purpose. If an issuer calls a bond, the holder of such bond will receive principal but will not receive any future interest distributions on the bond. Such investor might not be able to reinvest this principal at as high a yield. A bond’s call price could be less than the price paid for the bond and could be below the bond’s par value. Certain bonds may also be subject to extraordinary optional or mandatory redemptions if certain events occur, such as certain changes in tax laws, the substantial damage or destruction by fire or other casualty of the project for which the proceeds of the bonds were used, and various other events.

Extension Risk. When interest rates rise, among other factors, issuers of a security may pay off obligations more slowly than expected causing the value of such obligations to fall.

Premium Securities. Certain securities may have been acquired at a market premium from par value at maturity. The coupon interest rates on the premium securities at the time they were purchased by the fund were higher than the current market interest rates for newly issued securities of comparable rating and type. If such interest rates for newly issued and otherwise comparable securities decrease, the market premium of previously issued securities will be increased, and if such interest rates for newly issued comparable securities increase, the market premium of previously issued securities will be reduced, other things being equal. The current returns of securities trading at a market premium are initially higher than the current returns of comparable securities of a similar type issued at currently prevailing interest rates because premium securities tend to decrease in market value as they approach maturity when the face amount becomes payable. Because part of the purchase price is thus returned not at maturity but through current income payments, early redemption of a premium security at par or early prepayments of principal will result in a reduction in yield. Redemption pursuant to call provisions generally will, and redemption pursuant to sinking fund provisions may, occur at

times when the redeemed securities have an offering side valuation which represents a premium over par or for original issue discount securities a premium over the accreted value.

Market Discount. Certain of the bonds held by the trust may have been acquired at a market discount from par value at maturity. The coupon interest rates on discount securities at the time of purchase are lower than the current market interest rates for newly issued securities of comparable rating and type. If such interest rates for newly issued comparable securities increase, the market discount of previously issued securities will become greater, and if such interest rates for newly issued comparable securities decline, the market discount of previously issued securities will be reduced, other things being equal. Investors should also note that the value of securities purchased at a market discount will increase in value faster than securities purchased at a market premium if interest rates decrease. Conversely, if interest rates increase, the value of securities purchased at a market discount will decrease faster than securities purchased at a market premium. In addition, if interest rates rise, the prepayment risk of higher yielding, premium securities and the prepayment benefit for lower yielding, discount securities will be reduced.

Original Issue Discount Bonds. Original issue discount bonds were initially issued at a price below their face (or par) value. These bonds typically pay a lower interest rate than comparable bonds that were issued at or above their par value. In a stable interest rate environment, the market value of these bonds tends to increase more slowly in early years and in greater increments as the bonds approach maturity. The issuers of these bonds may be able to call or redeem a bond before its stated maturity date and at a price less than the bond’s par value. Under current law, the original issue discount, which is the difference between the stated redemption price at maturity and the issue price of the bonds, is deemed to accrue on a daily basis and the accrued portion is treated as taxable interest income for U.S. federal income tax purposes.

Zero Coupon Bonds. Certain of the bonds may be “zero coupon” bonds. Zero coupon bonds are purchased at a deep discount because the buyer receives only the right to receive a final payment at the maturity of the bond and does not receive any periodic interest payments. The effect of owning deep discount bonds which do not make current interest payments (such as the zero coupon bonds) is that a fixed yield is earned not only on the original investment but also, in effect, on all discount earned during the life of such obligation. This implicit reinvestment of earnings at the same rate eliminates the risk of being unable to reinvest the income on such obligation at a rate as high as the implicit yield on the discount obligation, but at the same time eliminates the holder's ability to reinvest at higher rates in the future. For this reason, zero coupon bonds are subject to substantially greater price fluctuations during periods of changing market interest rates than are securities of comparable quality which pay interest.

“When Issued” and “Delayed Delivery” Bonds. Certain debt obligations may have been purchased on a “when, as and if issued” or “delayed delivery” basis. The delivery of any such bonds may be delayed or may not occur. Interest on these bonds begins accruing to the benefit of investors on their respective dates of delivery. Investors will be “at risk” with respect to all “when, as and if issued” and “delayed delivery” bonds (i.e., may derive either gain or loss from fluctuations in the values of such bonds) from the date they purchase their investment.

Restricted Securities. Certain securities may only be resold pursuant to Rule 144A under the Securities Act. Such securities may not be readily marketable. Restricted securities may be sold only to purchasers meeting certain eligibility requirements in privately negotiated transactions or in a public offering with respect to which a registration statement is in effect under the Securities Act. Where registration of such securities under the Securities Act is required, an owner may be obligated to pay all or part of the registration expenses and a considerable period may elapse between the time of the decision to sell and the time an owner may be permitted to sell a security under an effective registration statement. If, during such a period, adverse market conditions were to develop, an owner might obtain a less favorable price than that which prevailed when it decided to sell.

High Yield Securities. “High yield” or “junk” securities, the generic names for securities rated below BBB by Standard & Poor’s or below Baa by Moody’s (or similar ratings of other rating agencies), are frequently issued by corporations in the growth stage of their development, by established companies whose operations or industries are depressed or by highly leveraged companies purchased in leveraged buyout transactions. These obligations that are considered below “investment grade” and should be considered speculative as such ratings indicate a quality of less than investment grade. High yield securities are generally not listed on a national securities exchange. Trading of high yield securities, therefore, takes place primarily in over-the-counter markets that consist of groups of dealer firms that are typically major securities firms. Because the high yield security market is a dealer market, rather than an auction market, no single obtainable price for a given security prevails at any given time. Prices are determined by negotiation between traders. The existence of a liquid trading market for the securities may depend on whether dealers will make a market in the securities. There can be no assurance that a market will be made for any of the securities, that any market for the securities will be maintained or of the liquidity of the securities in any markets made. Not all dealers maintain markets in all high yield securities. Therefore, since there are fewer traders in these securities than there are in “investment grade” securities, the bid-offer spread is usually greater for high yield securities than it is for investment grade securities. The price at which the securities may be sold to meet redemptions and the value of a trust may be adversely affected if trading markets for the securities are limited or absent.

An investment in “high yield, high-risk” debt obligations or “junk” obligations may include increased credit risks and the risk that the value of the units will decline, and may decline precipitously, with increases in interest rates. During certain periods there have been wide fluctuations in interest rates and thus in the value of debt obligations generally. Certain high yield securities may be subject to greater market fluctuations and risk of loss of income and principal than are investments in lower-yielding, higher-rated securities, and their value may decline precipitously because of increases in interest rates, not only because the increases in rates generally decrease values, but also because increased rates may indicate a slowdown in the economy and a decrease in the value of assets generally that may adversely affect the credit of issuers of high yield, high-risk securities resulting in a higher incidence of defaults among high yield, high-risk securities. A slowdown in the economy, or a development adversely affecting an issuer’s creditworthiness, may result in the issuer being unable to maintain earnings or sell assets at the rate and at the prices, respectively, that are required to produce sufficient cash flow to meet its interest and principal requirements. For an issuer that has outstanding both senior commercial

bank debt and subordinated high yield, high-risk securities, an increase in interest rates will increase that issuer’s interest expense insofar as the interest rate on the bank debt is fluctuating. However, many leveraged issuers enter into interest rate protection agreements to fix or cap the interest rate on a large portion of their bank debt. This reduces exposure to increasing rates, but reduces the benefit to the issuer of declining rates. The sponsor cannot predict future economic policies or their consequences or, therefore, the course or extent of any similar market fluctuations in the future.

Lower-rated securities tend to offer higher yields than higher-rated securities with the same maturities because the creditworthiness of the issuers of lower-rated securities may not be as strong as that of other issuers. Moreover, if a security is recharacterized as equity by the Internal Revenue Service for federal income tax purposes, the issuer’s interest deduction with respect to the security will be disallowed and this disallowance may adversely affect the issuer’s credit rating. Because investors generally perceive that there are greater risks associated with the lower-rated securities, the yields and prices of these securities tend to fluctuate more than higher- rated securities with changes in the perceived quality of the credit of their issuers. In addition, the market value of high yield, high-risk securities may fluctuate more than the market value of higher-rated securities since these securities tend to reflect short-term credit development to a greater extent than higher-rated securities. Lower-rated securities generally involve greater risks of loss of income and principal than higher-rated securities. Issuers of lower-rated securities may possess fewer creditworthiness characteristics than issuers of higher-rated securities and, especially in the case of issuers whose obligations or credit standing have recently been downgraded, may be subject to claims by debt-holders, owners of property leased to the issuer or others which, if sustained, would make it more difficult for the issuers to meet their payment obligations. High yield, high-risk securities are also affected by variables such as interest rates, inflation rates and real growth in the economy.

Should the issuer of any security default in the payment of principal or interest, the holders of such security may incur additional expenses seeking payment on the defaulted security. Because the amounts (if any) recovered in payment under the defaulted security may not be reflected in the value of units of a trust until actually received, and depending upon when a unitholder purchases or sells his or her units, it is possible that a unitholder would bear a portion of the cost of recovery without receiving any portion of the payment recovered.

High yield, high-risk securities are generally subordinated obligations. The payment of principal (and premium, if any), interest and sinking fund requirements with respect to subordinated obligations of an issuer is subordinated in right of payment to the payment of senior obligations of the issuer. Senior obligations generally include most, if not all, significant debt obligations of an issuer, whether existing at the time of issuance of subordinated debt or created thereafter. Upon any distribution of the assets of an issuer with subordinated obligations upon dissolution, total or partial liquidation or reorganization of or similar proceeding relating to the issuer, the holders of senior indebtedness will be entitled to receive payment in full before holders of subordinated indebtedness will be entitled to receive any payment. Moreover, generally no payment with respect to subordinated indebtedness may be made while there exists a default with respect to any senior indebtedness. Thus, in the event of insolvency, holders of

senior indebtedness of an issuer generally will recover more, ratably, than holders of subordinated indebtedness of that issuer.

Senior Loans. Senior loans may be issued by banks, other financial institutions, and other investors to corporations, partnerships, limited liability companies and other entities to finance leveraged buyouts, recapitalizations, mergers, acquisitions, stock repurchases, debt refinancings and, to a lesser extent, for general operating and other purposes. Senior loans generally are of below investment grade credit quality and may be unrated at the time of investment. They generally are not registered with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “SEC”) or any state securities commission and generally are not listed on any securities exchange.

An investment in senior loans involves risk that the borrowers under senior loans may default on their obligations to pay principal or interest when due. Although senior loans may be secured by specific collateral, there can be no assurance that liquidation of collateral would satisfy the borrower’s obligation in the event of non-payment or that such collateral could be readily liquidated. Senior loans are typically structured as floating rate instruments in which the interest rate payable on the obligation fluctuates with interest rate changes. As a result, the yield on an investment in senior loans will generally decline in a falling interest rate environment and increase in a rising interest rate environment. Additionally, senior loans generally have floating interest rates that may be tied to the London Inter-Bank Offered Rate (“LIBOR”), which is set to be phased out by 2021. The potential phase out of LIBOR could adversely affect the value of investments tied to LIBOR.

The amount of public information available on senior loans generally will be less extensive than that available for other types of assets. No reliable, active trading market currently exists for many senior loans, although a secondary market for certain senior loans does exist. Senior loans are thus relatively illiquid. If a fund held by a trust invests in senior loans, liquidity of a senior loan refers to the ability of the fund to sell the investment in a timely manner at a price approximately equal to its value on the fund’s books. The illiquidity of senior loans may impair a fund’s ability to realize the full value of its assets in the event of a voluntary or involuntary liquidation of such assets. Because of the lack of an active trading market, illiquid securities are also difficult to value and prices provided by external pricing services may not reflect the true value of the securities. However, many senior loans are of a large principal amount and are held by financial institutions. To the extent that a secondary market does exist for certain senior loans, the market may be subject to irregular trading activity, wide bid/ask spreads and extended trade settlement periods. The market for senior loans could be disrupted in the event of an economic downturn or a substantial increase or decrease in interest rates. This could result in increased volatility in the market and in a trust’s net asset value.

If legislation or state or federal regulators impose additional requirements or restrictions on the ability of financial institutions to make loans that are considered highly leveraged transactions, the availability of senior loans for investment may be adversely affected. In addition, such requirements or restrictions could reduce or eliminate sources of financing for certain borrowers. This would increase the risk of default. If legislation or federal or state regulators require financial institutions to dispose of senior loans that are considered highly leveraged transactions or subject such senior loans to increased regulatory scrutiny, financial

institutions may determine to sell such senior loans. Such sales could result in depressed prices. The price for the senior loan may be adversely affected if sold at a time when a financial institution is engaging in such a sale.

Some senior loans are subject to the risk that a court, pursuant to fraudulent conveyance or other similar laws, could subordinate the senior loans to presently existing or future indebtedness of the borrower or take other action detrimental to lenders. Such court action could under certain circumstances include invalidation of senior loans. Any lender is subject to the risk that a court could find the lender liable for damages in a claim by a borrower arising under the common laws of tort or contracts or anti-fraud provisions of certain securities laws for actions taken or omitted to be taken by the lenders under the relevant terms of a loan agreement or in connection with actions with respect to the collateral underlying the senior loan.

Floating Rate Instruments. A floating rate security is an instrument in which the interest rate payable on the obligation fluctuates on a periodic basis based upon changes in a benchmark, often related to interest rates. As a result, the yield on such a security will generally decline with negative changes to the benchmark, causing an investor to experience a reduction in the income it receives from such securities. A sudden and significant increase in the applicable benchmark may increase the risk of payment defaults and cause a decline in the value of the security.

Asset-Backed Securities. Asset-backed securities (“ABS”) are securities backed by pools of loans or other receivables. ABS are created from many types of assets, including auto loans, credit card receivables, home equity loans, and student loans. ABS are issued through special purpose vehicles that are bankruptcy remote from the issuer of the collateral. The credit quality of an ABS transaction depends on the performance of the underlying assets. To protect ABS investors from the possibility that some borrowers could miss payments or even default on their loans, ABS include various forms of credit enhancement. Some ABS, particularly home equity loan transactions, are subject to interest rate risk and prepayment risk. A change in interest rates can affect the pace of payments on the underlying loans, which in turn, affects total return on the securities. ABS also carry credit or default risk. If many borrowers on the underlying loans default, losses could exceed the credit enhancement level and result in losses to investors in an ABS transaction. Finally, ABS have structure risk due to a unique characteristic known as early amortization, or early payout, risk. Built into the structure of most ABS are triggers for early payout, designed to protect investors from losses. These triggers are unique to each transaction and can include: a big rise in defaults on the underlying loans, a sharp drop in the credit enhancement level, or even the bankruptcy of the originator. Once early amortization begins, all incoming loan payments (after expenses are paid) are used to pay investors as quickly as possible based upon a predetermined priority of payment.

Mortgage-Backed Securities. Mortgage-backed securities are a type of ABS representing direct or indirect participations in, or are secured by and payable from, mortgage loans secured by real property and can include single- and multi-class pass-through securities and collateralized mortgage obligations. Mortgage-backed securities are based on different types of mortgages, including those on commercial real estate or residential properties. These securities often have stated maturities of up to thirty years when they are issued, depending upon the length of the mortgages underlying the securities. In practice, however, unscheduled or early payments of

principal and interest on the underlying mortgages may make the securities’ effective maturity shorter than this. Rising interest rates tend to extend the duration of mortgage-backed securities, making them more sensitive to changes in interest rates, and may reduce the market value of the securities. In addition, mortgage-backed securities are subject to prepayment risk, the risk that borrowers may pay off their mortgages sooner than expected, particularly when interest rates decline.

Concentration Risk. Concentration risk is the risk that the value of a trust may be more susceptible to fluctuations based on factors that impact a particular sector because the trust provides exposure to investments concentrated within a particular sector or sectors. A portfolio “concentrates” in a sector when securities in a particular sector make up 25% or more of the portfolio.

Communication Services Sector. General risks of communication services companies include rapidly changing technology, rapid product obsolescence, loss of patent protection, cyclical market patterns, evolving industry standards and frequent new product introductions. Certain communication companies are subject to substantial governmental regulation, which among other things, regulates permitted rates of return and the kinds of services that a company may offer. Media and entertainment companies are subject to changing demographics, consumer preferences and changes in the way people communicate and access information and entertainment content. Certain of these companies may be particularly susceptible to cybersecurity threats, which could have an adverse effect on their business. Companies in this sector may be subject to fierce competition for market share from existing competitors and new market entrants. Such competitive pressures are intense and communication stocks can experience extreme volatility.

Companies in the communication sector may encounter distressed cash flows and heavy debt burdens due to the need to commit substantial capital to meet increasing competition and research and development costs. Technological innovations may also make the existing products and services of communication companies obsolete. In addition, companies in this sector can be impacted by a lack of investor or consumer acceptance of new products, changing consumer preferences and lack of standardization or compatibility with existing technologies making implementation of new products more difficult.

Consumer Discretionary and Consumer Staples Sectors. The profitability of companies that manufacture or sell consumer products or provide consumer services may be affected by various factors including the general state of the economy and consumer spending trends. The viability of the retail industry depends on the industry’s ability to adapt and to compete in changing economic and social conditions, to attract and retain capable management, and to finance expansion. Weakness in the banking or real estate industry, a recessionary economic climate with the consequent slowdown in employment growth, less favorable trends in unemployment or a marked deceleration in real disposable personal income growth could result in significant pressure on both consumer wealth and consumer confidence, adversely affecting consumer spending habits. In addition, competitiveness of the retail industry may require large capital outlays for technological investments. Increasing employee and retiree benefit costs may also have an adverse effect on the industry. In many sectors of the retail industry, competition

may be fierce due to market saturation, converging consumer tastes and other factors. Many retailers may be involved in entering global markets which entail added risks such as sudden weakening of foreign economies, difficulty in adapting to local conditions and constraints and added research costs.

Energy Sector. Energy companies may include but are not limited to companies involved in: production, generation, transmission, marketing, control, or measurement of energy; the provision of component parts or services to companies engaged in the above activities; energy research or experimentation; and environmental activities related to the solution of energy problems, such as energy conservation and pollution control.

The securities of companies in the energy field are subject to changes in value and dividend yield which depend, to a large extent, on the price and supply of energy fuels. Swift price and supply fluctuations may be caused by events relating to international politics, energy conservation, the success of exploration projects, and tax and other regulatory policies of various governments. As a result of the foregoing, the securities issued by energy companies may be subject to rapid price volatility.

Any future scientific advances concerning new sources of energy and fuels or legislative changes relating to the energy sector or the environment could have a negative impact on the energy sector. Each of the problems referred to could adversely affect the financial stability of the issuers of any energy sector securities.

Financials Sector. Companies in the financials sector may include banks and their holding companies, finance companies, investment managers, broker-dealers, insurance and reinsurance companies and mortgage REITs. Banks and their holding companies are especially subject to the adverse effects of economic recession, volatile interest rates, portfolio concentrations in geographic markets and in commercial and residential real estate loans and competition from new entrants in their fields of business. In addition, banks and their holding companies are extensively regulated at both the federal and state level and may be adversely affected by increased regulations. Banks may face increased competition from nontraditional lending sources as regulatory changes permit new entrants to offer various financial products. Technological advances allow these nontraditional lending sources to cut overhead and permit the more efficient use of customer data. Banks face tremendous pressure from mutual funds, brokerage firms and other providers in the competition to furnish services that were traditionally offered by banks.

Companies engaged in investment management and broker-dealer activities are subject to volatility in their earnings and share prices that often exceeds the volatility of the equity market in general. Adverse changes in the direction of the stock market, investor confidence, equity transaction volume, the level and direction of interest rates and the outlook of emerging markets could adversely affect the financial stability, as well as the stock prices, of these companies. Additionally, competitive pressures, including increased competition with new and existing competitors, the ongoing commoditization of traditional businesses and the need for increased capital expenditures on new technology could adversely impact the profit margins of companies in the investment management and brokerage industries. Companies involved in

investment management and broker-dealer activities are also subject to extensive regulation by government agencies and self-regulatory organizations, and changes in laws, regulations or rules, or in the interpretation of such laws, regulations and rules could adversely affect the stock prices of such companies.

Companies involved in the insurance, reinsurance and risk management industry underwrite, sell or distribute property, casualty and business insurance. Many factors affect insurance, reinsurance and risk management company profits, including but not limited to interest rate movements, the imposition of premium rate caps, a misapprehension of the risks involved in given underwritings, competition and pressure to compete globally, weather catastrophes or other natural or man-made disasters and the effects of client mergers. Individual companies may be exposed to material risks including reserve inadequacy and the inability to collect from reinsurance carriers. Insurance companies are subject to extensive governmental regulation, including the imposition of maximum rate levels, which may not be adequate for some lines of business. Proposed or potential tax law changes may also adversely affect insurance companies’ policy sales, tax obligations and profitability. In addition to the foregoing, profit margins of these companies continue to shrink due to the commoditization of traditional businesses, new competitors, capital expenditures on new technology and the pressure to compete globally.

In addition to the normal risks of business, companies involved in the insurance and risk management industry are subject to significant risk factors, including those applicable to regulated insurance companies, such as: the inherent uncertainty in the process of establishing property-liability loss reserves, and the fact that ultimate losses could materially exceed established loss reserves, which could have a material adverse effect on results of operations and financial condition; the fact that insurance companies have experienced, and can be expected in the future to experience, catastrophic losses, which could have a material adverse impact on their financial conditions, results of operations and cash flow; the inherent uncertainty in the process of establishing property-liability loss reserves due to changes in loss payment patterns caused by new claim settlement practices; the need for insurance companies and their subsidiaries to maintain appropriate levels of statutory capital and surplus, particularly in light of continuing scrutiny by rating organizations and state insurance regulatory authorities, and in order to maintain acceptable financial strength or claims-paying ability ratings; the extensive regulation and supervision to which insurance companies are subject, and various regulatory and other legal actions; the adverse impact that increases in interest rates could have on the value of an insurance company’s investment portfolio and on the attractiveness of certain of its products; and the uncertainty involved in estimating the availability of reinsurance and the collectability of reinsurance recoverables.

The state insurance regulatory framework is also subject to the risk of federal and state legislatures potentially enacting laws that alter or increase regulation of insurance companies and insurance holding company systems. Previously, Congress and certain federal agencies have investigated the condition of the insurance industry in the United States to determine whether to promulgate additional federal regulation. The Sponsor is unable to predict whether any state or federal legislation will be enacted to change the nature or scope of regulation of the insurance industry, or what effect, if any, such legislation would have on the industry.

All insurance companies are subject to state laws and regulations that require diversification of their investment portfolios and limit the amount of investments in certain investment categories. Failure to comply with these laws and regulations would cause non- conforming investments to be treated as non-admitted assets for purposes of measuring statutory surplus and, in some instances, would require divestiture.

Mortgage REITs engage in financing real estate, purchasing or originating mortgages and mortgage-backed securities and earning income from the interest on these investments. Such REITs face risks similar to those of other financial firms, such as changes in interest rates, general market conditions and credit risk, in addition to risks associated with an investment in real estate (as discussed herein).

Health Care Sector. Health care companies involved in advanced medical devices and instruments, drugs and biotech, managed care, hospital management/health services and medical supplies have potential risks unique to their sector of the health care field. These companies are subject to governmental regulation of their products and services, a factor which could have a significant and possibly unfavorable effect on the price and availability of such products or services. Furthermore, such companies face the risk of increasing competition from new products or services, generic drug sales, termination of patent protection for drug or medical supply products and the risk that technological advances will render their products obsolete. The research and development costs of bringing a drug to market are substantial, and include lengthy governmental review processes with no guarantee that the product will ever come to market. Many of these companies may have losses and not offer certain products for several years. Such companies may also have persistent losses during a new product’s transition from development to production, and revenue patterns may be erratic. In addition, health care facility operators may be affected by events and conditions including, among other things, demand for services, the ability of the facility to provide the services required, physicians’ confidence in the facility, management capabilities, competition with other hospitals, efforts by insurers and governmental agencies to limit rates, legislation establishing state rate-setting agencies, expenses, government regulation, the cost and possible unavailability of malpractice insurance and the termination or restriction of governmental financial assistance, including that associated with Medicare, Medicaid and other similar third-party payor programs. Legislative proposals concerning health care are proposed in Congress from time to time. These proposals may span a wide range of topics, including cost and price controls (which might include a freeze on the prices of prescription drugs), national health insurance incentives for competition in the provision of health care services, tax incentives and penalties related to health care insurance premiums and promotion of prepaid health care plans.

Industrials Sector. General risks of industrials companies include the general state of the economy, intense competition, consolidation, domestic and international politics, excess capacity and consumer spending trends. In addition, capital goods companies may also be significantly affected by overall capital spending levels, economic cycles, technical obsolescence, delays in modernization, limitations on supply of key materials, labor relations, government regulations, government contracts and ecommerce initiatives. Furthermore, certain companies involved in the industry have also faced scrutiny for alleged accounting irregularities that may have led to the

overstatement of their financial results, and other companies in the industry may face similar scrutiny.

Industrials companies may also be affected by factors more specific to their individual industries. Industrial machinery manufacturers may be subject to declines in commercial and consumer demand and the need for modernization. Aerospace and defense companies may be influenced by decreased demand for new equipment, aircraft order cancellations, disputes over or ability to obtain or retain government contracts, or changes in government budget priorities, changes in aircraft-leasing contracts and cutbacks in profitable business travel.

Information Technology Sector. Information technology companies generally include companies involved in the development, design, manufacture and sale of computers and peripherals, software and services, data networking and communications equipment, internet access and information providers, semiconductors and semiconductor equipment and other related products, systems and services. The market for these products, especially those specifically related to the internet, may be characterized by rapidly changing technology, product obsolescence, cyclical markets, evolving industry standards and frequent new product introductions. The success of companies in this sector depends, in substantial part, on the timely and successful introduction of new products. An unexpected change in one or more of the technologies affecting a company’s products or in the market for products based on a particular technology could have a material adverse effect on an issuer’s operating results. Furthermore, there can be no assurance that any particular company will be able to respond in a timely manner to compete in the rapidly developing marketplace.

Factors such as announcements of new products or development of new technologies and general conditions of the industry have caused and are likely to cause the market price of high- technology common stocks to fluctuate substantially. In addition, technology company stocks may experience extreme price and volume fluctuations that are often unrelated to the operating performance of such companies. Such market volatility may adversely affect the price of shares of these companies.

Some key components of certain products of technology issuers may be available only from single sources. There can be no assurance that suppliers will be able to meet the demand for components in a timely and cost-effective manner. Accordingly, an issuer’s operating results and customer relationships could be adversely affected by either an increase in price for, or an interruption or reduction in supply of, any key components. Additionally, technology issuers may have a highly concentrated customer base consisting of a limited number of large customers who may require product vendors to comply with rigorous industry standards. Any failure to comply with such standards may result in a significant loss or reduction of sales. Because many products and technologies of technology companies are incorporated into other related products, such companies are often highly dependent on the performance of the personal computer, electronics and telecommunications industries. There can be no assurance that these customers will place additional orders, or that an issuer will obtain orders of similar magnitude as past orders from other customers. Similarly, the success of certain technology companies is tied to a relatively small concentration of products or technologies. Accordingly, a decline in demand of

such products, technologies or from such customers could have a material adverse impact on companies in this sector.

Many technology companies rely on a combination of patents, copyrights, trademarks and trade secret laws to establish and protect their proprietary rights in their products and technologies. There can be no assurance that the steps taken to protect proprietary rights will be adequate to prevent misappropriation of technology or that competitors will not independently develop technologies that are substantially equivalent or superior to an issuer’s technology. In addition, due to the increasing public use of the internet, it is possible that other laws and regulations may be adopted to address issues such as privacy, pricing, characteristics, and quality of internet products and services. The adoption of any such laws could have a material adverse impact on the issuers of securities in the information technology sector.

Materials Sector. Companies in the basic materials sector are engaged in the manufacture, mining, processing, or distribution of raw materials and intermediate goods used in the industrial sector. These may include materials and products such as chemicals, commodities, forestry products, paper products, copper, iron ore, nickel, steel, aluminum, precious metals, textiles, cement, and gypsum. Basic materials companies may be affected by the volatility of commodity prices, exchange rates, import controls, worldwide competition, depletion of resources, and mandated expenditures for safety and pollution control devices. In addition, they may be adversely affected by technical progress, labor relations and governmental regulation. These companies are also at risk for environmental damage and product liability claims. Production of industrial materials often exceeds demand as a result of over-building or economic downturns, which may lead to poor investment returns.

Real Estate Sector. Real estate companies include REITs and real estate management and development companies. Companies in the real estate sector may be exposed to the risks associated with the ownership of real estate which include, among other factors, changes in general U.S., global and local economic conditions, declines in real estate values, changes in the financial health of tenants, overbuilding and increased competition for tenants, oversupply of properties for sale, changing demographics, changes in interest rates, tax rates and other operating expenses, changes in government regulations, faulty construction and the ongoing need for capital improvements, regulatory and judicial requirements including relating to liability for environmental hazards, changes in neighborhood values and buyer demand and the unavailability of construction financing or mortgage loans at rates acceptable to developers. The performance of a REIT may also be adversely impacted by other factors (discussed above).

Real estate management and development companies often are dependent upon specialized management skills, have limited diversification and are subject to risks inherent in operating and financing a limited number of projects. To the extent such companies focus their business on a particular geographic region of a country, they may also be subject to greater risks of adverse developments in that area. These companies may also be subject to heavy cash flow dependency and defaults by borrowers. Certain real estate management and development companies have a relatively small market capitalization, which may tend to increase the volatility of the market price of these securities.

Real estate related securities have, and may continue to, be negatively impacted by conditions caused by the spread of COVID-19. COVID-19 has adversely impacted many individuals and businesses and resulted in these individuals and businesses being unable to pay all or a portion of their contracted rent, creating cashflow difficulties for many landlords and adversely impacting the value of some real estate and related businesses. The COVID-19 pandemic may also continue to have an adverse impact on REITs that invest in real estate which provide space to these individuals and businesses.

Utilities Sector. General problems of utility companies include risks of increases in energy and other operating costs; restrictions on operations and increased costs and delays as a result of environmental, nuclear safety and other regulations; regulatory restrictions on the ability to pass increasing wholesale costs along to the retail and business customer; energy conservation; technological innovations that may render existing plants, equipment or products obsolete; the effects of local weather, maturing markets and difficulty in expanding to new markets due to regulatory and other factors; natural or manmade disasters; difficulty obtaining adequate returns on invested capital; the high cost of obtaining financing during periods of inflation; difficulties of the capital markets in absorbing utility debt and equity securities; and increased competition. In addition, taxes, government regulation, international politics, price and supply fluctuations, volatile interest rates and energy conservation may cause difficulties for utilities. All of such issuers experience certain of these problems to varying degrees.

Sovereign Debt. Sovereign debt instruments are subject to the risk that a governmental entity may delay or refuse to pay interest or repay principal on its sovereign debt, due, for example, to cash flow problems, insufficient foreign currency reserves, political considerations, the relative size of the governmental entity’s debt position in relation to the economy or the failure to put in place required economic reforms. If a governmental entity defaults, it may ask for more time in which to pay or for further loans. There is no legal process for collecting sovereign debt that a government does not pay nor are there bankruptcy proceedings through which all or part of the sovereign debt that a governmental entity has not repaid may be collected.

U.S. Government Obligations Risk. Obligations of U.S. government agencies, authorities, instrumentalities and sponsored enterprises have historically involved little risk of loss of principal if held to maturity. However, not all U.S. government securities are backed by the full faith and credit of the United States. Obligations of certain agencies, authorities, instrumentalities and sponsored enterprises of the U.S. government are backed by the full faith and credit of the United States (e.g., the Government National Mortgage Association); other obligations are backed by the right of the issuer to borrow from the U.S. Treasury (e.g., the Federal Home Loan Banks) and others are supported by the discretionary authority of the U.S. government to purchase an agency’s obligations. Still others are backed only by the credit of the agency, authority, instrumentality or sponsored enterprise issuing the obligation. No assurance can be given that the U.S. government would provide financial support to any of these entities if it is not obligated to do so by law.

Municipal Bonds. Certain municipal bonds are “general obligation bonds” and are general obligations of a governmental entity that are backed by the taxing power of such entity.

Other municipal bonds are “revenue bonds” payable from the income of a specific project or authority and are not supported by the issuer’s power to levy taxes. General obligation bonds are secured by the issuer’s pledge of its faith, credit and taxing power for the payment of principal and interest. Revenue bonds, on the other hand, are payable only from the revenues derived from a particular facility or class of facilities or, in some cases, from the proceeds of a special excise tax or other specific revenue source. There are, of course, variations in the security of the different bonds, both within a particular classification and between classifications, depending on numerous factors. The COVID-19 pandemic has adversely affected, and may further adversely affect in the future, the financial conditions of many states and political subdivisions, and could negatively impact the value of bonds issued by states and political subdivisions, as well as the ability of such entities to make payments when due.

Certain municipal bonds may be obligations which derive their payments from mortgage loans. Certain of such housing bonds may be insured by the Federal Housing Administration or may be single family mortgage revenue bonds issued for the purpose of acquiring from originating financial institutions notes secured by mortgages on residences located within the issuer’s boundaries and owned by persons of low or moderate income. Mortgage loans are generally partially or completely prepaid prior to their final maturities as a result of events such as sale of the mortgaged premises, default, condemnation or casualty loss. Because these bonds are subject to extraordinary mandatory redemption in whole or in part from such prepayments of mortgage loans, a substantial portion of such bonds will probably be redeemed prior to their scheduled maturities or even prior to their ordinary call dates. Extraordinary mandatory redemption without premium could also result from the failure of the originating financial institutions to make mortgage loans in sufficient amounts within a specified time period. Additionally, unusually high rates of default on the underlying mortgage loans may reduce revenues available for the payment of principal of or interest on such mortgage revenue bonds. These bonds were issued under provisions of the Internal Revenue Code, which include certain requirements relating to the use of the proceeds of such bonds in order for the interest on such bonds to retain its tax-exempt status. In each case the issuer of the bonds has covenanted to comply with applicable requirements and bond counsel to such issuer has issued an opinion that the interest on the bonds is exempt from federal income tax under existing laws and regulations.

Certain municipal bonds may be health care revenue bonds. Ratings of bonds issued for health care facilities are often based on feasibility studies that contain projections of occupancy levels, revenues and expenses. A facility’s gross receipts and net income available for debt service may be affected by future events and conditions including, among other things, demand for services and the ability of the facility to provide the services required, physicians’ confidence in the facility, management capabilities, competition with other health care facilities, efforts by insurers and governmental agencies to limit rates, legislation establishing state rate-setting agencies, expenses, the cost and possible unavailability of malpractice insurance, the funding of Medicare, Medicaid and other similar third party pay or programs, government regulation and the termination or restriction of governmental financial assistance, including that associated with Medicare, Medicaid and other similar third party pay or programs.

Certain municipal bonds may be obligations of public utility issuers, including those selling wholesale and retail electric power and gas. General problems of such issuers would

include the difficulty in financing large construction programs, the limitations on operations and increased costs and delays attributable to environmental considerations, the difficulty of the capital market in absorbing utility debt, the difficulty in obtaining fuel at reasonable prices and the effect of energy conservation. In addition, federal, state and municipal governmental authorities may from time to time review existing, and impose additional, regulations governing the licensing, construction and operation of nuclear power plants, which may adversely affect the ability of the issuers of certain bonds to make payments of principal and/or interest on such bonds.

Certain municipal bonds may be obligations of issuers whose revenues are derived from the sale of water and/or sewerage services. Such bonds are generally payable from user fees. The problems of such issuers include the ability to obtain timely and adequate rate increases, population decline resulting in decreased user fees, the difficulty of financing large construction programs, the limitations on operations and increased costs and delays attributable to environmental considerations, the increasing difficulty of obtaining or discovering new supplies of fresh water, the effect of conservation programs and the impact of “no-growth” zoning ordinances.

Certain municipal bonds may be industrial revenue bonds (“IRBs”). IRBs have generally been issued under bond resolutions pursuant to which the revenues and receipts payable under the arrangements with the operator of a particular project have been assigned and pledged to purchasers. In some cases, a mortgage on the underlying project may have been granted as security for the IRBs. Regardless of the structure, payment of IRBs is solely dependent upon the creditworthiness of the corporate operator of the project or corporate guarantor. Corporate operators or guarantors may be affected by many factors which may have an adverse impact on the credit quality of the particular company or industry. These include cyclicality of revenues and earnings, regulatory and environmental restrictions, litigation resulting from accidents or environmentally-caused illnesses, extensive competition and financial deterioration resulting from a corporate restructuring pursuant to a leveraged buy-out, takeover or otherwise. Such a restructuring may result in the operator of a project becoming highly leveraged which may impact on such operator’s creditworthiness which in turn would have an adverse impact on the rating and/or market value of such bonds. Further, the possibility of such a restructuring may have an adverse impact on the market for and consequently the value of such bonds, even though no actual takeover or other action is ever contemplated or effected.

Certain municipal bonds may be obligations that are secured by lease payments of a governmental entity (“lease obligations”). Lease obligations are often in the form of certificates of participation. Although the lease obligations do not constitute general obligations of the municipality for which the municipality’s taxing power is pledged, a lease obligation is ordinarily backed by the municipality’s covenant to appropriate for and make the payments due under the lease obligation. However, certain lease obligations contain “non-appropriation” clauses which provide that the municipality has no obligation to make lease payments in future years unless money is appropriated for such purpose on a yearly basis. A governmental entity that enters into such a lease agreement cannot obligate future governments to appropriate for and make lease payments but covenants to take such action as is necessary to include any lease payments due in its budgets and to make the appropriations therefor. A governmental entity’s

failure to appropriate for and to make payments under its lease obligation could result in insufficient funds available for payment of the obligations secured thereby. Although “non-appropriation” lease obligations are secured by the leased property, disposition of the property in the event of foreclosure might prove difficult.

Certain municipal bonds may be obligations of issuers which are, or which govern the operation of, schools, colleges and universities and whose revenues are derived mainly from ad valorem taxes or for higher education systems, from tuition, dormitory revenues, grants and endowments. General problems relating to school bonds include litigation contesting the state constitutionality of financing public education in part from ad valorem taxes, thereby creating a disparity in educational funds available to schools in wealthy areas and schools in poor areas. Litigation or legislation on this issue may affect the sources of funds available for the payment of school bonds. General problems relating to college and university obligations include the prospect of declining student enrollment, possible inability to raise tuitions and fees sufficiently to cover operating costs, the uncertainty of continued receipt of federal grants and state funding and government legislation or regulations which may adversely affect the revenues or costs of such issuers.

Certain municipal bonds may be obligations which are payable from and secured by revenues derived from the ownership and operation of facilities such as airports, bridges, turnpikes, port authorities, convention centers and arenas. The major portion of an airport’s gross operating income is generally derived from fees received from signatory airlines pursuant to use agreements which consist of annual payments for leases, occupancy of certain terminal space and service fees. Airport operating income may therefore be affected by the ability of the airlines to meet their obligations under the use agreements. From time to time the air transport industry has experienced significant variations in earnings and traffic, due to increased competition, excess capacity, increased costs, deregulation, traffic constraints and other factors, and several airlines have experienced severe financial difficulties. Similarly, payment on bonds related to other facilities is dependent on revenues from the projects, such as user fees from ports, tolls on turnpikes and bridges and rents from buildings. Therefore, payment may be adversely affected by reduction in revenues due to such factors as increased cost of maintenance, decreased use of a facility, lower cost of alternative modes of transportation, scarcity of fuel and reduction or loss of rents.

Certain municipal bonds may be obligations which are payable from and secured by revenues derived from the operation of resource recovery facilities. Resource recovery facilities are designed to process solid waste, generate steam and convert steam to electricity. Resource recovery bonds may be subject to extraordinary optional redemption at par upon the occurrence of certain circumstances, including but not limited to: destruction or condemnation of a project; contracts relating to a project becoming void, unenforceable or impossible to perform; changes in the economic availability of raw materials, operating supplies or facilities necessary for the operation of a project; technological or other unavoidable changes adversely affecting the operation of a project; and administrative or judicial actions which render contracts relating to the projects void, unenforceable or impossible to perform or impose unreasonable burdens or excessive liabilities. No one can predict the causes or likelihood of the redemption of resource recovery bonds prior to the stated maturity of the bonds.

Certain municipal bonds may have been acquired at a market discount from par value at maturity. A “tax-exempt” municipal bond purchased at a market discount and held to maturity will have a larger portion of its total return in the form of taxable income and capital gain and less in the form of tax-exempt interest income than a comparable bond newly issued at current market rates.

Certain municipal bonds may be subject to redemption prior to their stated maturity date pursuant to sinking fund provisions, call provisions or extraordinary optional or mandatory redemption provisions or otherwise. A sinking fund is a reserve fund accumulated over a period of time for retirement of debt. A callable debt obligation is one which is subject to redemption or refunding prior to maturity at the option of the issuer. A refunding is a method by which a debt obligation is redeemed, at or before maturity, by the proceeds of a new debt obligation. In general, call provisions are more likely to be exercised when the offering side valuation is at a premium over par than when it is at a discount from par. The exercise of redemption or call provisions will (except to the extent the proceeds of the called bonds are used to pay for unit redemptions) result in the distribution of principal and may result in a reduction in the amount of subsequent interest distributions. Extraordinary optional redemptions and mandatory redemptions result from the happening of certain events. Generally, events that may permit the extraordinary optional redemption of bonds or may require the mandatory redemption of bonds include, among others: a final determination that the interest on the bonds is taxable; the substantial damage or destruction by fire or other casualty of the project for which the proceeds of the bonds were used; an exercise by a local, state or federal governmental unit of its power of eminent domain to take all or substantially all of the project for which the proceeds of the bonds were used; changes in the economic availability of raw materials, operating supplies or facilities; technological or other changes which render the operation of the project for which the proceeds of the bonds were used uneconomic; changes in law or an administrative or judicial decree which renders the performance of the agreement under which the proceeds of the bonds were made available to finance the project impossible or which creates unreasonable burdens or which imposes excessive liabilities, such as taxes, not imposed on the date the bonds are issued on the issuer of the bonds or the user of the proceeds of the bonds; an administrative or judicial decree which requires the cessation of a substantial part of the operations of the project financed with the proceeds of the bonds; an overestimate of the costs of the project to be financed with the proceeds of the bonds resulting in excess proceeds of the bonds which may be applied to redeem bonds; or an underestimate of a source of funds securing the bonds resulting in excess funds which may be applied to redeem bonds. The issuer of certain bonds may have sold or reserved the right to sell, upon the satisfaction of certain conditions, to third parties all or any portion of its rights to call bonds in accordance with the stated redemption provisions of such bonds. In such a case the issuer no longer has the right to call the bonds for redemption unless it reacquires the rights from such third party. A third party pursuant to these rights may exercise the redemption provisions with respect to a bond at a time when the issuer of the bond might not have called a bond for redemption had it not sold such rights. No one can predict all of the circumstances which may result in such redemption of an issue of bonds. See also the discussion of single family mortgage and multi-family revenue bonds above for more information on the call provisions of such bonds.

Alternative Minimum Tax Risk. While certain of the distributions from the trust may be exempt from certain taxes, a portion of such distributions may be taken into account in computing the alternative minimum tax.

Foreign Government Securities Risk. The ability of a government issuer, especially in an emerging market country, to make timely and complete payments on its debt obligations will be strongly influenced by the government issuer’s balance of payments, including export performance, its access to international credits and investments, fluctuations of interest rates and the extent of its foreign reserves. A country whose exports are concentrated in a few commodities or whose economy depends on certain strategic imports could be vulnerable to fluctuations in international prices of these commodities or imports. If a government issuer cannot generate sufficient earnings from foreign trade to service its external debt, it may need to depend on continuing loans and aid from foreign governments, commercial banks, and multinational organizations. There are no bankruptcy proceedings similar to those in the United States by which defaulted government debt may be collected. Additional factors that may influence a government issuer’s ability or willingness to service debt include, but are not limited to, a country’s cash flow situation, the ability of sufficient foreign exchange on the date a payment is due (where applicable), the relative size of its debt burden to the economy as a whole, and the issuer’s policy towards the International Monetary Fund, the International Bank for Reconstruction and Development and other international agencies to which a government debtor may be subject.

Supranational Entities’ Securities. Certain of the bonds may be obligations issued by supranational entities such as the International Bank for Reconstruction and Development (the “World Bank”). The government members, or “stockholders,” usually make initial capital contributions to supranational entities and in many cases are committed to make additional capital contributions if a supranational entity is unable to repay its borrowings. There is no guarantee that one or more stockholders of a supranational entity will continue to make any necessary additional capital contributions. If such contributions are not made, the entity may be unable to pay interest or repay principal on its debt securities, and an investor in such securities may lose money on such investments.

California. The information provided below is only a brief summary of the complex factors affecting the financial situation in California and is derived from sources that are generally available to investors and are believed to be accurate. Except where otherwise indicated, the information is based on California’s 2019-20 fiscal year running from July 1, 2019 to June 30, 2020. No independent verification has been made of the accuracy or completeness of any of the following information. It is based in part on information obtained from various state and local agencies in California or contained in official statements for various California municipal obligations.

Economic Outlook. The 2019-20 fiscal year marked an unprecedented period for California’s economy. The first 8 months of the fiscal year (through February 2020) were marked by continued economic expansion and low unemployment. However, by the end of the fiscal year the economic disruption brought about by the COVID-19 pandemic led to steep declines in economic activity and dramatic increases in unemployment. As of December 2019,

California’s GDP had reached almost $3.2 trillion, an increase of 4.3% compared to the same period in 2018. Personal income increased by 5.0% over the preceding year. In January 2020, California posted its lowest unemployment rate on record under the methodology used since 1976, with a rate of 3.9%. By March 2020, however, the economic effects of the COVID-19 pandemic were already becoming apparent, with unemployment increasing to 5.5%. Unemployment increased dramatically by April, reaching a record high of 16.4%, and held steady through May before receding to14.9% in June. At the end of September 2020, the unemployment rate was 11.0%, still well above the rate prior to the pandemic.

The largest job losses occurred in the leisure and hospitality sector, which includes jobs in arts, entertainment, and recreation, as well as food service and accommodations. The number of jobs in this sector declined by 632,200 (30.8%) from February 2020 through June 2020. Other hard-hit sectors included non-durable goods manufacturing, which lost 45,900 jobs (9.9%) over this period, and retail trade, which lost 192,300 jobs (11.6%).

In spite of the steep loss of jobs during the final four months of the 2019-20 fiscal year, some parts of the economy stabilized after initial declines. Sales of existing single-family homes fell during the March to June 2020 time period when compared to the same months in 2019. By July 2020, the pace of existing single family home sales exceeded the pace of sales in July 2019 by 6.4%. Home prices fell modestly in April and May 2020, but had increased significantly by July 2020, with the median price of a single-family home reaching a new record high of $666,320, a 9.0% increase from the June 2020 amount.

Construction activity also declined sharply in March and April 2020 before bouncing back. New single- family residential permits for June and July 2020 exceeded the number recorded in the same months in 2019 by 2.7% and 3.0%, respectively. Non-residential permits also declined during the initial months of the pandemic before partially rebounding in June 2020.

New vehicle registrations were also impacted by the pandemic’s economic fallout, with new registrations from April to June 2020 down by 52.1% compared to the same period in 2019.

Over 1.9 million fewer Californians were working in non-farm jobs at the end of June 2020 compared with February 2020, and California still faced significant uncertainty about the timing of its future economic recovery.

Net Assets. The primary government’s combined net deficit position (governmental and business-type activities) improved by $15.1 billion (21.2%) from a negative $71.1 billion, as restated, to a negative $56.0 billion at June 30, 2019.

The primary government’s $114.8 billion net investment in capital assets, such as land, buildings, equipment, and infrastructure (roads, bridges, and other immovable assets) comprise a significant portion of its net position. This amount of capital assets is net of any outstanding debt used to acquire those assets. California uses capital assets when providing services to citizens; consequently, these assets are not available for future spending. Although California’s investment in capital assets is reported net of related debt, the resources needed to repay this debt

must come from other sources because California cannot use the capital assets to pay off the liabilities.

Another $54.3 billion of the primary government’s net position represents resources that are externally restricted as to how they may be used, such as resources pledged to debt service. The internally-imposed earmarking of resources is not presented in this publication as restricted net position. As of June 30, 2019, the primary government’s combined unrestricted net deficit position was $225.1 billion—$208.4 billion for governmental activities and $16.7 billion for business-type activities.

California General Fund. California’s main operating fund (the “California General Fund”) ended fiscal year 2018-19 with assets of $49.7 billion; liabilities and deferred inflows of resources of $31.2 billion; and non-spendable, restricted, and committed fund balances of $1.2 billion, $14.8 billion, and $1.8 billion, respectively, leaving the California General Fund with an unassigned fund balance of $766 million. Total assets of the California General Fund increased by $10.5 billion (26.9%) over the prior fiscal year. Total liabilities and deferred inflows of resources increased by $4.1 billion (15.4%), while the California General Fund’s unassigned fund balance decreased by $883 billion (53.6%) from the prior year.

The California General Fund had an excess of revenues over expenditures of $11.4 billion ($140.5 billion in revenues and $129.1 billion in expenditures). Approximately $134.7 billion (95.9%) of California General Fund revenue is derived from California’s largest three taxes—personal income taxes ($95.0 billion), sales and use taxes ($25.7 billion), and corporation taxes ($14.0 billion). As a result of fund classifications made to comply with generally accepted governmental accounting principles, a total of $289 million in revenue, mostly from unemployment programs, is included in the California General Fund.

During fiscal year 2018-19, total California General Fund revenue increased by $4.9 billion (3.6%). The increase is a result of increases in personal income taxes of $2.2 billion (2.4%), corporation taxes of $1.4 billion (11.4%), and sales and use taxes of $610 million (2.4%). California General Fund expenditures increased by $4.9 billion (3.9%). The largest increases were in education, natural resources and environmental protection, and business, consumer services and housing expenditures, which were up $5.4 billion, $817 million, and $467 million, respectively. The California General Fund ended the fiscal year with a fund balance of $18.6 billion, an improvement of $6.4 billion from the prior year’s restated ending fund balance of $12.2 billion. The California General Fund’s ending fund balance includes $14.4 billion restricted for budget stabilization if the Governor must declare a budget emergency during an economic downturn.

Budget Outlook. California’s 2019-20 Budget Act was enacted on June 27, 2019. The Budget Act appropriated $214.8 billion —$147.8 billion from the California General Fund, $61.1 billion from special funds, and $5.9 billion from bond funds. The California General Fund’s budgeted expenditures increased by $5.1 billion (3.6%) over the prior year budget. The California General Fund’s revenues were projected to be $143.8 billion after a $2.2 billion transfer to the Budget Stabilization Account (BSA), California’s rainy day fund. California General Fund revenue comes predominantly from taxes, with personal income taxes expected to provide 70.2% of total revenue in fiscal year 2019-20. California’s major taxes (personal income, sales and use, and corporation) were projected to

provide approximately 97.8% of the California General Fund’s resources in the 2019-20 fiscal year. The California General Fund was projected to end the 2019-2020 fiscal year with $19.2 billion in total reserves—$16.5 billion in the BSA, $1.4 billion in the California General Fund’s Special Fund for Economic Uncertainties (SFEU), $900 million in the Safety Net Reserve (SNR), and the initial funding of $377 million into the Public School System Stabilization Account (PSSSA). In addition to the required minimum annual transfer to the BSA, Proposition 2 requires the California General Fund to make an equivalent minimum annual amount of debt reduction payments; the 2019-20 spending plan included $2.2 billion of debt reduction expenditures.

The 2019-20 Budget Act increased total expenditures by $11.7 billion over the 2018-19 budgeted level, driven by an increase in budgeted California General Fund expenditures of $9.1 billion. Primary increases in California General Fund spending were for health and human services of $2.4 billion, K-12 education of $2.4 billion, and higher education of $1.4 billion. The California General Fund’s share of Proposition 98 guaranteed minimum funding level for K-12 schools and community colleges increased by $1.4 billion to $55.9 billion.

Specific 2019-20 Budget provisions included $850 million to cover a portion of school districts’ 2019-20 and 2020-21 pension payments, increased funding for the California State Universities and University of California of $713 million and $416 million, respectively, and $1.3 billion for early education programs. Additional 2019-20 Budget provisions included $332 million to increase monthly CalWORKs grants, $550 million to expand health care coverage and increase affordability, and a one-time allocation of $2.8 billion to support local governments’ housing and homelessness programs.

Subsequent to the enactment of the 2019-20 Budget Act, the COVID-19 pandemic struck causing a global economic crisis and a serious economic downturn in California. California anticipates declines in revenue as a result of record high unemployment and long-term economic shut-downs, increases in health and human services and COVID-related expenditures, and programmatic spending reductions or eliminations. California is facing a great deal of economic uncertainty.

In June 2020, the 2020-21 Budget Act was enacted, and provided updated estimates of fiscal year 2019-20 California General Fund revenues, expenditures, and reserves. The 2020-21 Budget Act, revised to take into consideration the recession brought about by the COVID-19 pandemic, projected fiscal year 2019-20 California General Fund revenue of $137.6 billion (after transfers), expenditures of $146.9 billion, and total year-end reserves of $17.0 billion —$16.1 billion in the BSA and $900 million in the SNR—which is $2.2 billion less than projected in the 2019-20 Budget Act in June 2019.

Capital Assets. As of June 30, 2019, California’s investment in capital assets for its governmental and business-type activities amounted to $148.3 billion (net of accumulated depreciation/amortization). California’s capital assets include land, state highway infrastructure, collections, buildings and other depreciable property, intangible assets, and construction/development in progress. The buildings and other depreciable property account includes buildings, improvements other than buildings, equipment, certain infrastructure assets, certain books, and other capitalized and depreciable property. Intangible assets include computer

software, land use rights, patents, copyrights, and trademarks. Infrastructure assets are items that normally are immovable, such as roads and bridges, and can be preserved for a greater number of years than can most capital assets.

As of June 30, 2019, California’s capital assets increased by $3.6 billion, or 2.5% over the prior fiscal year. The majority of the increase occurred in state highway infrastructure and buildings and other depreciable property.

Debt Administration. At June 30, 2019, California had total bonded debt outstanding of $109.8 billion. Of this amount, $79.6 billion (72.5%) represents general obligation bonds, which are backed by the full faith and credit of California. The current portion of general obligation bonds outstanding is $4.0 billion and the long-term portion is $75.6 billion. The remaining $30.2 billion (27.5%) of bonded debt outstanding represents revenue bonds, which are secured solely by specified revenue sources. The current portion of revenue bonds outstanding is $2.0 billion and the long-term portion is $28.2 billion.

During the fiscal year, California issued a total of $7.2 billion in new general obligation bonds to fund various capital projects and other voter-approved costs related to K-12 schools and higher education facilities, transportation improvements and high-speed rail, water quality and environmental protection, and other public purposes.

Budgetary Control. California’s annual budget is primarily prepared on a modified accrual basis for governmental funds. The Governor recommends a budget for approval by the Legislature each year. This recommended budget includes estimated revenues, but revenues are not included in the annual budget bill adopted by the Legislature. Under state law, California cannot adopt a spending plan that exceeds estimated revenues.

Under the California Constitution, money may be drawn from the treasury only through a legal appropriation. The appropriations contained in the Budget Act, as approved by the Legislature and signed by the Governor, are the primary sources of annual expenditure authorizations and establish the legal level of control for the annual operating budget. The budget can be amended throughout the year by special legislative action, budget revisions by the Department of Finance, or executive orders of the Governor. Amendments to the original budget for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2019, increased spending authority for the budgetary/ legal basis-reported General Fund, Transportation Funds, and the Environmental and Natural Resources Funds.

Appropriations are generally available for expenditure or encumbrance either in the year appropriated or for a period of three years if the legislation does not specify a period of availability. At the end of the availability period, the encumbering authority for the unencumbered balance lapses. Some appropriations continue indefinitely, while others are available until fully spent. Generally, encumbrances must be liquidated within two years from the end of the period in which the appropriation is available. If the encumbrances are not liquidated within this additional two-year period, the spending authority for these encumbrances lapses.

Risk Management. The primary government has elected, with a few exceptions, to be self-insured against loss or liability. The primary government generally does not maintain reserves. Losses are covered by appropriations from each fund responsible for payment in the year in which the payment occurs. California is permissively self- insured and, barring any extraordinary catastrophic event, the potential amount of loss faced by California is not considered material in relation to the primary government’s financial position. Generally, the exceptions are when a bond resolution or a contract requires the primary government to purchase commercial insurance for coverage against property loss or liability. There have been no significant reductions in insurance coverage from the prior year. In addition, no insurance settlement in the last three years has exceeded insurance coverage. All claim payments are on a “pay-as-you-go” basis, with workers’ compensation benefits for self-insured agencies initially being paid by the California Compensation Insurance Fund.

The discounted liability for unpaid self-insurance claims of the primary government is estimated to be $4.4 billion as of June 30, 2019. This estimate is primarily based on actuarial reviews of California’s workers’ compensation program and includes indemnity payments to claimants, as well as all other costs of providing workers’ compensation benefits, such as medical care and rehabilitation. The estimate also includes the liability for unpaid services fees, industrial disability leave benefits, and incurred-but-not-reported amounts. The estimated total liability of approximately $6.2 billion is discounted to $4.4 billion using a 3.5% interest rate. Of the total discounted liability, $473 million is a current liability, of which $330 million is included in the California General Fund, $140 million in the special revenue funds, and $3 million in the internal service funds. The remaining $3.9 billion is reported as other noncurrent liabilities in the government-wide Statement of Net Position. The University of California, a discretely presented component unit, is self-insured or insured through a wholly-owned captive insurance company.

Ratings. As of December 30, 2020, all outstanding general obligation bonds of the state of California were rated “AA-” by S&P Global Ratings, a division of S&P Global, Inc., and “Aa2” by Moody’s Investors Service, Inc. Any explanation concerning the significance of such ratings must be obtained from the rating agencies. There is no assurance that any ratings will continue for any period of time or that they will not be revised or withdrawn.

Local Issuances. It should be noted that the creditworthiness of obligations issued by local California issuers may be unrelated to the creditworthiness of obligations issued by the state of California, and there is no obligation on the part of the state to make payment on such local obligations in the event of default.

The foregoing information constitutes only a brief summary of some of the general factors which may impact certain issuers of California bonds and does not purport to be a complete or exhaustive description of all adverse conditions to which the issuers of such obligations are subject. Additionally, many factors including national economic, social and environmental policies and conditions, which are not within the control of the issuers of such bonds, could affect or could have an adverse impact on the financial condition of the state and various agencies and political subdivisions thereof. The sponsor is unable to predict whether or to what extent such factors or other factors may affect the issuers of the bonds, the market value

or marketability of such bonds or the ability of the respective issuers of such bonds to pay interest on or principal of such bonds.

New Jersey. The information provided below is only a brief summary of the complex factors affecting the financial situation in New Jersey and is derived from sources that are generally available to investors and are believed to be accurate. Except where otherwise indicated, the information is based on New Jersey’s 2018-19 fiscal year running from July 1, 2018 to June 30, 2019. No independent verification has been made of the accuracy or completeness of any of the following information. It is based in part on information obtained from various state and local agencies in New Jersey or contained in official statements for various New Jersey municipal obligations.

Economic Outlook. As of December 2019, New Jersey’s labor market continued to expand and unemployment was at 3.5% with labor force participation fairly stable.

New Jersey’s labor market added 52,400 jobs in 2019, which was the ninth consecutive year of employment gains. Job growth reached 1.3%, accelerating over 2018’s 0.8% growth rate. The education & health services sector added 14,800 jobs, while the professional & business services sector added 14,200 jobs. The leisure & hospitality services sector added 7,200 jobs. The manufacturing sector added 800 jobs, while the construction sector added 600. .

New Jersey’s unemployment rate averaged 3.5% in 2019, falling 0.6 percentage points below the prior year’s rate. The labor force participation rate averaged 63.5%, rising 0.8 percentage points over the prior year.

New Jersey’s existing home sales were 0.1% higher than the prior year. The number of single-family homes sold was 0.2% lower than the prior year, while the number of townhomes and condos sold was 0.3% higher. The foreclosure picture continued to improve. The share of mortgages in foreclosure continued to steadily decline, falling to 1.4% in the fourth quarter of 2019.

New Jersey’s economic expansion continued in 2019. Real Gross Domestic Product (GDP) for New Jersey grew at a 2.3% annual rate in the third quarter of 2019, rebounding from a 0.7% annual rate in the second quarter. Personal income, a broad measure of income that includes asset and transfer income in addition to wages and salaries, grew at a 2.9% annual rate in the third quarter of 2019, slowing slightly from the first and second quarters (which grew 6.5% and 3.4%, respectively).

The national economic expansion was projected to continue in 2020 at the start of the year. The Federal Open Market Committee (FOMC) had projected real GDP growth of 2.0% during its December 2019 meeting. However, the onset of the COVID-19 pandemic altered both the national and global outlook.

Revenues and Expenditures. During the 2018-19 fiscal year New Jersey’s revenues, including transfers, totaled $66.0 billion, which was an increase of $3.4 billion versus the prior fiscal year after restatements. This increase is primarily attributable to higher general taxes and

operating grants. General taxes totaled $35.7 billion and accounted for 54.1% of total New Jersey revenues for the 2018-19 fiscal year. New Jersey’s gross income tax totaled $15.9 billion, the sales and use tax totaled $10.0 billion, and the corporation business tax totaled $4.1 billion. New Jersey’s three major taxes comprised 84.0% of the total general taxes that were collected during the 2018-19 fiscal year. General taxes increased by $3.0 billion as compared to the 2017-18 fiscal year.

New Jersey’s 2018-19 fiscal year expenses totaled $67.0 billion, a decrease of $2.2 billion after restatements in comparison to the prior fiscal year. New Jersey’s spending decreased by $4.7 billion in government direction, management, and control mainly due to decreases in pension and total other postemployment benefits expenses resulting from changes in assumptions. Partially offsetting this spending decrease, were spending increases in New Jersey’s lottery fund ($1.1 billion), and education, cultural, and intellectual development ($1.1 billion).

New Jersey General Fund. New Jersey’s chief operating fund (the “New Jersey General Fund”) is the fund into which all State revenues, not otherwise restricted by statute, are deposited. The New Jersey General Fund’s ending fund balance totaled $6.6 billion, of which $1.7 billion represented unassigned fund balance. The “Surplus Revenue Fund” is an account within the New Jersey General Fund that is used as a “rainy day fund.” During the 2018-19 fiscal year, New Jersey deposited $420.6 million into the Surplus Revenue Fund, the first such deposit since the 2007-08 fiscal year.

On a budgetary basis, general revenues of $37.4 billion were $0.3 billion lower than the final budget. The negative variance was primarily the result of unearned grant revenues (both federal and other) of $0.9 billion, offset with positive variances in services and assessments and licenses and fees of $0.3 billion and $0.3 billion, respectively. Federal and other grant revenues are not earned unless there has been a grant award and eligible grant expenses incurred. To the extent that federal and grant appropriations are made in anticipation of grant awards and the incurrence of grant expenditures, grant revenues are budgeted.

Total expenditures were $2.1 billion lower than original appropriations as set forth in the annual Appropriations Act plus supplemental appropriations enacted during the 2017-18 fiscal year. A major cause for under-spending resulted from the overestimate of federal funds. This practice allows New Jersey to receive the maximum federal dollars that become available. During the 2018-19 fiscal year, New Jersey’s appropriation of federal funds and other grants exceeded expenditures by $0.9 billion, which is available for use in future years. From a 2018-19 fiscal year program perspective, the following areas under-spent: government direction, management, and control ($1.6 billion); transportation programs ($704.9 million); community development and environmental management ($555.9 million); economic planning, development and security ($137.1 million); public safety and criminal justice ($39.1 million); special government services ($20.9 million). This was offset by: over-spending in physical and mental health ($513.9 million) and educational, cultural, and intellectual development ($457.2 million).

Net Assets. The primary government’s assets and deferred outflows of resources totaled $73.8 billion, representing a decrease of $0.7 billion from the prior fiscal year after restatements

(that resulted in a $0.4 billion increase in net position). Restatements were made to increase capital assets. As of June 30, 2019, liabilities and deferred inflows of resources exceeded assets and deferred outflows of resources by $198.7 billion. The State’s unrestricted net position (representing the net position that has not statutory commitments and is available for discretionary use), totaled negative $216.9 billion. The negative balance is primarily a result of New Jersey implementing in the 2014-15 fiscal year, GASB Statement No. 68, Accounting and Financial Reporting for Pensions, and in the fiscal year 2017-28, GASB Statement No. 75, Accounting and Financial Reporting for Postemployment Benefits Other Than Pensions. Financing activities that have contributed to New Jersey’s negative unrestricted net position include: liabilities from pension obligation bonds, funding of a portion of local elementary and high school construction, and the securitization of a major portion of annual tobacco master settlement agreement receipts with no corresponding assets. During the 2018-19 fiscal year, the proprietary funds’ net position increased by $300.0 million resulting in net position of $3.4 billion as of June 30, 2019.

Changes in Net Assets. New Jersey’s 2018-19 fiscal year net position decreased by $1.0 billion. Approximately 54.1% of New Jersey’s total revenues came from general taxes, while 27.1% came from operating grants. Charges for services amounted to 16.9% of total revenues, while other items such as capital grants, miscellaneous revenues and interest earnings accounted for the remainder. New Jersey’s expenses cover a range of services. The largest expense was for educational, cultural, and intellectual development (28.1%), which includes approximately $354.8 million disbursed by the New Jersey Schools Development Authority (a blended component unit) to help finance school facilities construction; physical and mental health (23.3%); and government direction, management, and control (15.7%). Other major expenditures focused on economic planning, development, and security; New Jersey Lottery Fund; and public safety and criminal justice. During the 2018-19 fiscal year, governmental activities expenses exceeded program revenues. This imbalance was mainly funded through $336.5 billion of general revenues (mostly taxes). The remaining $1.3 billion resulted in a decrease in net position. Offsetting the governmental net position decrease, Business-type Activities reflected a net position increase of $300.0 million primarily because the Unemployment Compensation Fund’s available resources exceeded the need to pay claims.

Debt Administration. As of June 30, 2019, New Jersey’s outstanding long-term obligations for governmental activities totaled $217.7 billion, a $21.3 billion decrease over the prior fiscal years after restatements (which includes a $20.4 billion decrease in the net pension liability and total other postemployment benefits liability, a decrease of $0.7 billion in bonded debt and a $0.2 billion decrease in other non-bonded debt). Long-term bonded obligations totaled $44.4 billion, while other long-term obligations totaled $173.3 billion. In addition, New Jersey has $14.5 billion of legislatively authorized bonding capacity that has not yet been issued. As of June 30, 20190, the legislatively authorized but unissued debt decreased by $0.6 billion from the prior fiscal year.

Ratings. As of December 30, 2020, all outstanding general obligation bonds of the State of New Jersey were rated “BBB+” by S&P Global Ratings a division of S&P Global, Inc. and “A3” by Moody’s Investors Service, Inc. Any explanation concerning the significance of such

ratings must be obtained from the rating agencies. There is no assurance that any ratings will continue for any period of time or that they will not be revised or withdrawn.

Local Issuances. It should be noted that the creditworthiness of obligations issued by local New Jersey issuers may be unrelated to the creditworthiness of obligations issued by the State of New Jersey, and there is no obligation on the part of the state to make payment on such local obligations in the event of default.

The foregoing information constitutes only a brief summary of some of the general factors which may impact certain issuers of bonds and does not purport to be a complete or exhaustive description of all adverse conditions to which the issuers of such obligations are subject. Additionally, many factors including national economic, social and environmental policies and conditions, which are not within the control of the issuers of such bonds, could affect or could have an adverse impact on the financial condition of the state and various agencies and political subdivisions thereof. The sponsor is unable to predict whether or to what extent such factors or other factors may affect the issuers of the bonds, the market value or marketability of such bonds or the ability of the respective issuers of such bonds to pay interest on or principal of such bonds.

New York. The information provided below is only a brief summary of the complex factors affecting the financial situation in New York and is derived from sources that are generally available to investors and are believed to be accurate. Except where otherwise indicated, the information is based on New York’s 2019-2020 fiscal year running from April 1, 2019 to March 31, 2020. No independent verification has been made of the accuracy or completeness of any of the following information. It is based in part on information obtained from various state and local agencies in New York or contained in official statements for various New York municipal obligations.

Economic Condition and Outlook. With the national economy in its second longest expansion in recorded history, overall economic activity, employment and wages all continued to increase in New York State in 2019. Growth in the overall economic activity at the national level (2.3%) outpaced the increase in New York (1.8%). Employment growth decelerated at both the national (1.4%) and state (1.0%) levels. New York over added 100,000 jobs and total employment grew nearly 9.8 million.

Average annual wages nationally and at the state level rose 3.4% in the 2018-19 fiscal year. Total wages paid to all employees increased at 4.6% in New York, versus 4.8% nationally, reflecting larger employment growth nationally.

In February 2020, the economic expansion ended and the national economy went into recession, primarily due to the COVID-19 pandemic. In the first quarter 2020, real GDP nationally decreased by 5.0%. Unemployment and unemployment insurance claims spiked upward, due to broad limits on economic activity put into place in March. In April, the national unemployment rate increased to 14.7% with over 22 million unemployed. The New York rate was higher, at 15.3%, with 1.5 million unemployed.

General Governmental Results. An operating surplus of $355 million is reported in the state’s general fund (“New York General Fund”) for the 2019-20 fiscal year. As a result, the New York General Fund now has an accumulated fund balance of $3.7 billion. New York completed its 2019-20 fiscal year with a combined governmental funds operating deficit of $920 million as compared to a combined governmental funds operating surplus in the preceding fiscal year of $97 million. The combined operating surplus of $920 million for the fiscal year ended March 31, 2020 included an operating deficit in the New York General Fund of $355 million, an operating deficit in the “Federal Special Revenue Fund” of $6 million, an operating deficit in the “General Debt Service Fund” of $332 million and an operating deficit in the “Other Governmental Funds” of $937 million.

New York’s financial position as shown in its governmental funds balance sheet as of March 31, 2020 includes a fund balance of $12.9 billion comprised of $53.6 billion of assets less liabilities of $38.5 billion and deferred inflows of resources of $2.1 billion. The governmental funds fund balance includes a $3.7 billion accumulated New York General Fund balance.

Overall Financial Position and Results of Operations. For the 2019-20 fiscal year, New York reported a net position deficit of $13.6 billion, comprising $72.9 billion in net investment in capital assets, and $8.3 billion in restricted net position, offset by an unrestricted net position deficit of $94.8 billion.

Net position reported for governmental activities decreased by $1.1 billion to a $5.2 billion net position deficit. Unrestricted net position for governmental activities—the part of net position that can be used to finance day-to-day operations without constraints established by debt covenants, enabling legislation, or other legal requirements—had a deficit of $79.9 billion at March 31, 2020.

The net position deficit in unrestricted governmental activities, which decreased by $117 million (0.1%) in 2020, exists primarily because New York has issued debt for purposes not resulting in a capital asset related to New York governmental activities and because of the obligation related to other postemployment benefits ($51.1 billion). Such outstanding debt included: eliminating the need for seasonal borrowing by the New York Local Government Assistance Corporation ($253 million); and borrowing for local highway and bridge projects ($4.5 billion), local mass transit projects ($2 billion), and a wide variety of grants and other expenditures not resulting in New York capital assets ($15.2 billion). This deficit in unrestricted net position of governmental activities can be expected to continue for as long as New York continues to have obligations outstanding for purposes other than the acquisition of New York governmental capital assets.

The net position deficit in business-type activities decreased by $41 million (0.5%) to $8.4 billion in the 2019-20 fiscal year as compared to $8.3 billion in the prior fiscal year. The increase in net position deficit for business-type activities was due to City University of New York Senior Colleges’ expenses exceeding revenues and New York support by $141 million, and unemployment benefit payments exceeding employer contributions and other revenues for the “Unemployment Insurance Fund” by $25 million. This was partially offset by Lottery net

income exceeding education aid transfers by $110 million, and State University of New York revenues and New York support exceeding expenses by $15 million.

New York General Fund Budgetary Highlights. Total New York General Fund receipts exceeded disbursements by $1.7 billion in the 2019-20 fiscal year. Total General Fund receipts for the year (including transfers from other funds) were $79.2 billion. The New York General Fund ended the fiscal year with a closing cash fund balance of $8.9 billion, consisting of: (i) approximately $2.5 billion in New York’s rainy day reserve funds ($1.3 billion in the “Tax Stabilization Reserve Account” and $1.2 billion in the “Rainy Day Reserve Fund”); (ii) $31 million in the “Community Projects Fund”; (iii) $21 million in the “Contingency Reserve Fund”; and (iv) $6.4 billion in the “Refund Reserve Account.” The Refund Reserve included undesignated reserves of $2.6 billion for extraordinary monetary settlements earmarked for transfer to capital projects funds (though not exclusively for capital projects), $1.3 billion for timing-related transactions that did not occur in the 2019-20 fiscal year and are expected to occur in the 2020-21 fiscal year, $890 million for economic uncertainties, and $500 million for debt management. These amounts are identified by the Division of the Budget in the financial plan but can be used for other purposes.

Net operating results were $2.5 billion more favorable than anticipated in the original financial plan (which predicted a net operating deficit of $740 million). Total receipts and transfers from other funds were greater than original financial plan estimates by $2.1 billion and total disbursements and transfers to other funds were less than original financial plan estimates by $388 million.

New York General Fund receipts were nearly $2.1 billion above the initial estimate, with growth concentrated in personal income tax. The New York General Fund spending was $388 million below the initial estimate. Budgeted New York General Fund payments of $1.3 billion were not released due to the interruptions and uncertainties created as a result of the COVID-19 pandemic. These payments affected spending levels for higher education, social welfare, mental hygiene, and public health. The lower spending was in part offset by higher Medicaid spending of $1.7 billion and minimum wage costs in the health care sector of $322 million. The COVID-19 pandemic also caused a spike in health care spending above projected levels.

Personal income tax receipts exceeded estimates by $1.9 billion. Debt service prepayments increased the amount of personal income tax available for transfer to the New York General Fund by roughly $1.2 billion. The remainder of personal income tax increase reflected stronger than expected collections. Lower consumption/use tax collections were driven by lower sales tax collections due to weaker than anticipated growth in the sales tax base and lower than anticipated opioid excise tax collections. Higher business taxes reflected stronger than anticipated corporate franchise tax collections and lower refunds, partially offset by lower audit receipts across all business taxes. Higher than projected miscellaneous receipts are mainly due to medical reimbursements, investment income, and monetary settlements.

Net operating results were $2.4 billion better than anticipated in the final financial plan, with the final financial plan projecting a net operating deficit of $679 million. Total

disbursements were lower than estimates by $1.5 billion, primarily due to lower than expected local assistance grants driven by the $1.3 billion of payments that did not occur by year-end.

Capital Assets. As of the 2019-20 fiscal year end, New York has $109.8 billion invested in a broad range of capital assets including, equipment, buildings, construction in progress, land preparation, and infrastructure, which primarily includes roads and bridges. This amount represents a net increase (including additions and deductions) of $1.9 billion over the prior fiscal year.

Debt Administration. New York has obtained long-term financing in the form of voter-approved General Obligation debt (voter-approved debt) and other obligations that are authorized by legislation but not approved by the voters (non-voter-approved debt), including lease-purchase and contractual obligations where New York’s legal obligation to make payments is subject to and paid from annual appropriations made by the New York Legislature or from assignment of revenue in the case of Tobacco Settlement Revenue Bonds. Equipment capital leases and mortgage loan commitments (which represent $555 million as of March 31, 2020) do not require legislative or voter approval. Other obligations include certain bonds issued through New York public authorities and certificates of participation. New York administers its long-term financing needs as a single portfolio of New York-supported debt that includes general obligation bonds and other obligations of both its governmental activities and business-type activities. Most of the debt reported under business-type activities, all of which was issued for capital assets used in those activities, is supported by payments from resources generated by New York’s governmental activities—thus it is not expected to be directly repaid from resources generated by business-type activities. New York finance law allows the bonded portion of this single combined debt portfolio, which includes debt reported in both governmental and business-type activities, to include debt instruments which result in a net variable rate exposure in an amount that does not exceed 15% of the total outstanding New York-supported debt. As of March 31, 2020, New York had $97 million in state-supported net variable rate bonds outstanding and $952 million in interest rate exchange agreements, in which New York issues variable rate bonds and enters into a swap agreement that effectively converts the rate to a fixed rate.

As of March 31, 2020, variable rate bonds, net of those subject to the fixed rate swaps, were equal to 0.2% of the New York state-supported debt portfolio. Variable rate bonds that were converted to a synthetic fixed rate through swap agreements of $952 million were equal to 1.8% of the total New York state-supported debt portfolio.

As of March 31, 2020, New York had $60.9 billion in bonds, notes, and other financing agreements outstanding compared to $59.6 billion in the prior year, an increase of $1.3 billion.

During 2018-19 fiscal year, New York issued $7.1 billion in bonds, of which $2.7 billion was for refunding and $4.4 billion was for new borrowing.

New York’s Constitution, with exceptions for emergencies, limits the amount of general obligation bonds that can be issued to that amount approved by the voters for a single work or purpose in a general election. Currently, New York has $2.5 billion in authorized but unissued

bond capacity that can be used to issue bonds for specifically approved purposes. New York may issue short-term debt without voter approval in anticipation of the receipt of taxes and revenues or proceeds from duly authorized but not issued general obligation bonds.

The New York finance law, through the New York State Debt Reform Act of 2000 (the “New York Debt Reform Act”), also imposes phased-in caps on the issuance of the new New York-supported debt and related debt service costs. The New York Debt Reform Act also limits the use of debt to capital works and purposes, and establishes a maximum term length for repayment of 30 years. The New York Debt Reform Act applies to all New York-supported debt. The New York Debt Reform Act does not apply to debt issued prior to April 1, 2000 or to other obligations issued by public authorities where New York is not the direct obligor.

Litigation. The State of New York is a defendant in numerous legal proceedings pertaining to matters incidental to the performance of routine governmental operations. Such litigation includes, but is not limited to, claims asserted against the State of New York arising from alleged torts, alleged breaches of contracts, condemnation proceedings and other alleged violations of state and federal laws.

Included in New York’s outstanding litigation are a number of cases challenging the legality or the adequacy of a variety of significant social welfare programs, primarily involving New York’s Medicaid and mental health programs. Adverse judgments in these matters generally could result in injunctive relief coupled with prospective changes in patient care that could require substantial increased financing of the litigated programs in the future.

With respect to pending and threatened litigation, New York has reported $1 billion in the primary government, $136 million is related to governmental activities and $878 million pertains to State University of New York. State University of New York reported $793 million as of December 31, 2019 for awarded claims, anticipated unfavorable judgments, and incurred but not reported loss estimates related to medical malpractice claims. The difference of $85 million is due to a timing difference between New York and State University of New York’s fiscal year end. In addition, New York is a party to other claims and litigation that its legal counsel has advised may result in possible adverse court decisions with estimated potential losses of approximately $48.5 million.

Ratings. As of December 30, 2020, all outstanding general obligation bonds of the State of New York were rated “AA+” by S&P Global Ratings a division of S&P Global, Inc., and “Aa2” by Moody’s Investors Service, Inc. Any explanation concerning the significance of such ratings must be obtained from the rating agencies. There is no assurance that any ratings will continue for any period of time or that they will not be revised or withdrawn.

Local Issuances. It should be noted that the creditworthiness of obligations issued by local New York issuers may be unrelated to the creditworthiness of obligations issued by the State of New York, and there is no obligation on the part of the state to make payment on such local obligations in the event of default.

The foregoing information constitutes only a brief summary of some of the general factors which may impact certain issuers of bonds and does not purport to be a complete or exhaustive description of all adverse conditions to which the issuers of such obligations are subject. Additionally, many factors including national economic, social and environmental policies and conditions, which are not within the control of the issuers of such bonds, could affect or could have an adverse impact on the financial condition of the state and various agencies and political subdivisions thereof. The sponsor is unable to predict whether or to what extent such factors or other factors may affect the issuers of the bonds, the market value or marketability of such bonds or the ability of the respective issuers of such bonds to pay interest on or principal of such bonds.

Insurance on the Bonds

Certain of the bonds held by the trust may be insured. In the case of insured bonds, insurance has been obtained either by the issuer or underwriters of bonds in the trust, by a prior owner of such bonds, or by the sponsor prior to the deposit of such bonds in the trust guaranteeing prompt payment of interest and principal, when due, in respect of such bonds in the trust. The premium for any preinsured bond insurance has been paid by such issuer, by a prior owner of such bonds or the sponsor and any such policy or policies are non-cancellable and will continue in force so long as the bonds so insured are outstanding and the respective preinsured bond insurer remains in business. If the provider of an original issuance insurance policy is unable to meet its obligations under such policy or if the rating assigned to the claims-paying ability of any such insurer deteriorates, the insurers have no obligation to insure any issue adversely affected by either of the above described events.

In the event of nonpayment of interest or principal, when due, in respect of a bond, an insurer shall make such payment after the respective insurer has been notified that such nonpayment has occurred or is threatened (but not earlier than the date such payment is due). The insurer, as regards any payment it may make, will succeed to the rights of the Trustee in respect thereof.

The Internal Revenue Service has issued a letter ruling which holds in effect that insurance proceeds representing maturing interest on defaulted municipal obligations paid to holders of insured bonds, under certain policy provisions, will be excludable from Federal gross income under Section 103(a)(1) of the Internal Revenue Code to the same extent as if such payments were made by the issuer of the municipal obligations. Unitholders in the trust should discuss with their tax advisors the degree of reliance which they may place on this letter ruling.

Each insurer is subject to regulation by the department of insurance in the state in which it is qualified to do business. Such regulation, however, is no guarantee that each insurer will be able to perform on its contract of insurance in the event a claim should be made thereunder at some time in the future.

There have been a number of developments with respect to ratings actions impacting insurance companies by the rating agencies, Standard & Poor’s Financial Services LLC, a division of S&P Global Inc., Moody’s Investors Service, Inc. and Fitch Ratings Ltd. In light of

the ongoing nature of ratings actions or announcements by the rating agencies, you should consult announcements by the rating agencies, the websites of the rating agencies and the websites of the insurers for the then current publicly available information. These ratings actions have had a significant impact on the ability of insurers to compete in the financial guarantee business.

Administration of the Trust

Distributions to Unitholders. Interest received by a trust, including any portion of the proceeds from a disposition of securities which represents accrued interest, is credited by the trustee to the Interest Account for the trust. All other receipts are credited by the trustee to a separate Principal Account for the trust. The trustee normally has no cash for distribution to unitholders until it receives interest payments on the securities in the trust. On the dates set forth under “Essential Information” in the prospectus, the trustee will commence distributions, in part from funds advanced by the trustee.

Thereafter, assuming the trust retains its original size and composition, after deduction of the fees and expenses and reimbursements (without interest) to the trustee for any amounts advanced to a trust, the trustee will normally distribute any income and principal received by the trust on each distribution date or shortly thereafter to unitholders of record on the preceding Record Date. Unitholders will receive an amount substantially equal to their pro rata share of the balance of the Interest Account. However, interest earned at any point in time will generally be greater than the amount actually received by the trustee. Therefore, there will generally remain an item of accrued interest that is added to the daily value of the units. If unitholders sell or redeem all or a portion of their units, they will be paid their proportionate share of the accrued interest from the purchaser of such units.

Unitholders of record on the first record date will receive an interest distribution on the first distribution date. Because the period of time between the first distribution date and the regular distribution dates may not be a full period, the first regular distributions may be partial distributions.

Persons who purchase units between a record date and a distribution date will receive their first distribution on the second distribution date following their purchase of units. Since interest on securities in the trust is payable at varying intervals and distributions are made to unitholders at different intervals from receipt of interest, the interest accruing to a trust may not be equal to the amount of money received and available for distribution from the Interest Account. Therefore, on each distribution date the amount of interest actually deposited in the Interest Account and available for distribution may be slightly more or less than the interest distribution made. In order to eliminate fluctuations in interest distributions resulting from such variances, the trustee is authorized by the trust agreement to advance such amounts as may be necessary to provide interest distributions of approximately equal amounts. The trustee will be reimbursed, without interest, for any such advances from funds available in the Interest Account.

The trustee will distribute on each distribution date or shortly thereafter, to each unitholder of record on the preceding record date, an amount substantially equal to such holder’s

pro rata share of the available cash balance, if any, in the Principal Account computed as of the close of business on the preceding record date. However, no distribution from the Principal Account will be required if the balance in the Principal Account is less than $1.00 per unit.

Statements to Unitholders. With each distribution, the trustee will furnish to each unitholder a statement of the amount being distributed from the Interest or Principal Accounts and, if from the Interest Account, the amount of accrued interest on the monthly record date, expressed in each case as a dollar amount per unit.

The accounts of a trust are required to be audited annually, at the related trust’s expense, by independent public accountants designated by the sponsor, unless the sponsor determines that such an audit is not required. The accountants’ report for any audit will be furnished by the trustee to any unitholder upon written request. Within a reasonable period of time after the last business day of each calendar year, the trustee shall furnish to each person who at any time during the calendar year was a unitholder of a trust a statement, covering such calendar year, setting forth for such trust:

Rights of Unitholders. The death or incapacity of any unitholder will not operate to terminate a trust nor entitle legal representatives or heirs to claim an accounting or to bring any action or proceeding in any court for a partition or winding up of the trust, nor otherwise affect the rights, obligations and liabilities of the parties to the applicable trust agreement. Each unitholder expressly waives any right he may have under any rule of law, or the provisions of any statute, or otherwise, to require the trustee at any time to account, in any manner other than as expressly provided in the applicable trust agreement, in respect of the portfolio securities or moneys from time to time received, held and applied by the trustee under the trust agreement. No unitholder shall have the right to control the operation and management of a trust in any manner, except to vote with respect to the amendment of the related trust agreement or termination of the trust.

Amendment. The trust agreement may be amended from time to time by the sponsor and trustee or their respective successors, without the consent of any of the unitholders, (i) to cure any ambiguity or to correct or supplement any provision which may be defective or inconsistent with any other provision contained in the trust agreement, (ii) to make such other provision in regard to matters or questions arising under the trust agreement as shall not materially adversely affect the interests of the unitholders or (iii) to make such amendments as may be necessary (a) for the trust to continue to qualify as a RIC for federal income tax purposes if the trust has elected to be taxed as such under the United States Internal Revenue Code, or (b) to prevent the trust from being deemed an association taxable as a corporation for federal income tax purposes if the trust has not elected to be taxed as a RIC under the United States Internal Revenue Code. The trust agreement may not be amended, however, without the consent of all unitholders then outstanding, so as (1) to permit, except in accordance with the terms and conditions thereof, the acquisition thereunder of any securities other than those specified in the schedule(s) to the trust agreement or (2) to reduce the percentage of units the holders of which are required to consent to certain of such amendments. The trust agreement may not be amended so as to reduce the interest in a trust represented by units without the consent of all affected unitholders. Except for

the amendments, changes or modifications described above, neither the sponsor nor the trustee nor their respective successors may consent to any other amendment, change or modification of the trust agreement without the giving of notice and the obtaining of the approval or consent of unitholders representing at least 66 2/3% of the units then outstanding of the affected trust. No amendment may reduce the aggregate percentage of units the holders of which are required to consent to any amendment, change or modification of the trust agreement without the consent of the unitholders of all of the units then outstanding of the affected trust and in no event may any amendment be made which would (1) alter the rights to the unitholders of the trust as against each other, (2) provide the trustee with the power to engage in business or investment activities other than as specifically provided in the trust agreement, (3) adversely affect the tax status of the trust for federal income tax purposes or result in the units being deemed to be sold or exchanged for federal income tax purposes or (4) unless the trust has elected to be taxed as a RIC for federal income tax purposes, result in a variation of the investment of unitholders in the trust. Unless the sponsor directs that other notice shall be provided, the trustee shall include in the annual report notification of the substance of such amendment.

Termination. The trust agreement provides that a trust shall terminate upon the maturity, redemption, sale or other disposition as the case may be of the last of the securities held in the trust but in no event is it to continue beyond the trust’s mandatory termination date. If the value of a trust shall be less than 40% of the aggregate principal amount of securities initially deposited in the trust, the trustee may, in its discretion, and shall, when so directed by the sponsor, terminate the trust. A trust may be terminated at any time by the holders of units representing 66 2/3% of the units thereof then outstanding. A trust will be liquidated by the trustee in the event that a sufficient number of units of the trust not yet sold are tendered for redemption by the sponsor or any underwriter, so that the net worth of the trust would be reduced to less than 40% of the principal amount of the securities at the time they were initially deposited in the trust. If a trust is liquidated because of the redemption of unsold units by the sponsor or any underwriter, the sponsor will refund to each purchaser of units of the trust the entire sales fee paid by such purchaser.

Within a reasonable period after termination, the trustee will sell any securities remaining in a trust and, after paying all expenses and charges incurred by the trust, will distribute to unitholders thereof their pro rata share of the balances remaining in the Interest and Principal Accounts of the trust.

The Trustee. The trustee is The Bank of New York Mellon, a trust company organized under the laws of New York. The Bank of New York Mellon has its principal unit investment trust division offices at 240 Greenwich Street, 22W Floor, New York, NY 10286, (800) 848-6468. The Bank of New York Mellon is subject to supervision and examination by the Superintendent of Banks of the State of New York and the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, and its deposits are insured by the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation to the extent permitted by law.

Under the trust agreement, the trustee or any successor trustee may resign and be discharged of a trust created by the trust agreement by executing an instrument in writing and filing the same with the sponsor. If the trustee merges or is consolidated with another entity, the

resulting entity shall be the successor trustee without the execution or filing of any paper, instrument or further act.

The resigning trustee must mail a copy of the notice of resignation to all unitholders then of record, not less than sixty days before the date specified in such notice when such resignation is to take effect. The sponsor upon receiving notice of such resignation is obligated to appoint a successor trustee promptly. If, upon such resignation, no successor trustee has been appointed and has accepted the appointment within thirty days after the notice of resignation has been received by the sponsor, the retiring trustee may apply to a court of competent jurisdiction for the appointment of a successor trustee. In case at any time the trustee shall not meet the requirements set forth in the trust agreement, or shall become incapable of acting, or if a court having jurisdiction in the premises shall enter a decree or order for relief in respect of the trustee in an involuntary case, or the trustee shall commence a voluntary case, under any applicable bankruptcy, insolvency or other similar law now or hereafter in effect, or any receiver, liquidator, assignee, custodian, trustee, sequestrator (or similar official) for the trustee or for any substantial part of its property shall be appointed, or the trustee shall generally fail to pay its debts as they become due, or shall fail to meet such written standards for the trustee’s performance as shall be reasonably established from time to time by the sponsor, or if the sponsor determines in good faith that there has occurred either (1) a material deterioration in the creditworthiness of the trustee or (2) one or more grossly negligent acts on the part of the trustee with respect to a trust, the sponsor, upon sixty days’ prior written notice, may remove the trustee and appoint a successor trustee by written instrument, in duplicate, one copy of which shall be delivered to the trustee so removed and one copy to the successor trustee. Notice of such removal and appointment shall be mailed to each unitholder then of record by the successor trustee. Upon execution of a written acceptance of such appointment by such successor trustee, all the rights, powers, duties and obligations of the original trustee shall vest in the successor. The trustee must be a corporation organized and doing business under the laws of the United States, or any state thereof, be authorized under such laws to exercise corporate trust powers and have at all times an aggregate capital, surplus and undivided profits of not less than $5,000,000.

The Sponsor. The sponsor of the trust is Advisors Asset Management, Inc. The sponsor is a broker-dealer specializing in providing services to broker-dealers, registered representatives, investment advisers and other financial professionals. The sponsor’s headquarters are located at 18925 Base Camp Road, Monument, Colorado 80132. You can contact Advisors Asset Management, Inc. at 8100 East 22nd Street North, Building 800, Suite 102, Wichita, Kansas 67226 or by using the contacts listed on the back cover of the prospectus. The sponsor is a registered broker-dealer and investment adviser and a member of the Financial Industry Regulatory Authority, Inc. (“FINRA”) and the Securities Investor Protection Corporation (“SIPC”), and a registrant of the Municipal Securities Rulemaking Board (“MSRB”).

Under each trust agreement, the sponsor may resign and be discharged of the trust created by the trust agreement by executing an instrument in writing and filing the same with the trustee. If the sponsor merges or is consolidated with another entity, the resulting entity shall be the successor sponsor without the execution or filing of any paper, instrument or further act.

If at any time the sponsor shall resign or fail to undertake or perform any of the duties which by the terms of a trust agreement are required by it to be undertaken or performed, or the sponsor shall become incapable of acting or shall be adjudged a bankrupt or insolvent, or a receiver of the sponsor or of its property shall be appointed, or any public officer shall take charge or control of the sponsor or of its property or affairs for the purpose of rehabilitation, conservation or liquidation, then the trustee may (a) appoint a successor sponsor at rates of compensation deemed by the trustee to be reasonable and not exceeding such reasonable amounts as may be prescribed by the SEC, (b) terminate the trust agreement and liquidate the related trust as provided therein, or (c) act under the trust agreement in its own discretion without appointing a successor sponsor and receive additional compensation deemed by the trustee to be reasonable and not exceeding such reasonable amounts as may be prescribed by the SEC.

The Evaluator and Supervisor. Advisors Asset Management, Inc., the sponsor, also serves as evaluator and supervisor. The evaluator and supervisor may resign or be removed by the sponsor, or if no sponsor is acting, the trustee, whom may then appoint a successor having qualifications and at a rate of compensation satisfactory to the sponsor or, if the appointment is made by the trustee, the trustee. Such resignation or removal shall become effective upon acceptance of appointment by the successor. If upon resignation of the evaluator or supervisor no successor has accepted appointment within thirty days after notice of resignation has been received by the sponsor and the trustee, the resigning evaluator or supervisor may apply to a court of competent jurisdiction for the appointment of a successor. Notice of such resignation or removal and appointment shall be mailed by the trustee to each unitholder then of record.

Limitations on Liability. The sponsor and supervisor shall be under no liability to the unitholders for any action taken or for refraining from the taking of any action in good faith pursuant to the trust agreement or for errors in judgment, but shall be liable only for its own willful misfeasance, bad faith or gross negligence in the performance of its duties or by reason of its reckless disregard of its obligations and duties under the trust agreement.

The trust agreement provides that the trustee shall be under no liability for any action taken in good faith in reliance upon prima facie properly executed documents or for the disposition of moneys, securities or certificates pursuant to the trust agreement except by reason of its own gross negligence, lack of good faith or willful misconduct, nor shall the trustee be liable or responsible in any way for depreciation or loss incurred by reason of the sale by the trustee of any securities. In the event that the sponsor shall fail to act, the trustee may act and shall not be liable for any such action taken by it in good faith and believed by it to be authorized or within the discretion or rights or powers conferred upon it by the trust agreement except by reason of its own gross negligence or willful misconduct. The trustee shall not be liable for any taxes or other governmental charges imposed upon or in respect of the securities or upon the interest thereof. In addition, the trust agreement contains other customary provisions limiting the liability of the trustee.

The trustee, the sponsor and the unitholders may rely on any evaluation furnished by the evaluator and shall have no responsibility for the accuracy thereof. The trust agreement provides that the determinations made by the evaluator shall be made in good faith upon the basis of the best information available to it, provided, however, that the evaluator shall be under no liability

to the trustee, the sponsor or the unitholders for errors, but shall be liable for its willful misfeasance, bad faith or gross negligence in the performance of its duties or by reason of its reckless disregard of its obligations and duties the trust agreement.

Expenses of the Trust. The sponsor will not charge a trust any fees for services performed as sponsor. The sponsor will receive a portion of the sale commissions paid in connection with the purchase of units and will share in profits, if any, related to the deposit of securities in the trust.

For services performed under the trust agreement, the trustee shall be paid an annual fee in the amount per unit set forth in the trust agreement, which fee shall accrue daily and be computed based on the number of units outstanding as of January 1 of such year except for a trust during the year or years in which an initial offering period as determined in the trust agreement occurs, in which case the fee for a month is based on the number of units outstanding at the end of such month (such annual fee to be pro-rated for any calendar year in which the Trustee provides services during less than the whole of such year).

The trustee may from time to time adjust its compensation as set forth in the trust agreement provided that total adjustment upward does not, at the time of such adjustment, exceed the percentage of the total increase, after the date of the trust agreement, in consumer prices for services as measured by the United States Department of Labor Consumer Price Index entitled “All Services Less Rent of Shelter” or similar index, if such index should no longer be published. The consent or concurrence of any unitholder shall not be required for any such adjustment or increase. Such compensation shall be charged in installments by the trustee against the Interest and Principal Accounts of a trust at the times specified in the trust agreement; provided, however, that such compensation shall be deemed to provide only for the usual, normal and proper functions undertaken as trustee pursuant to the trust agreement. The trustee shall also charge the Interest and Principal Accounts of a trust for any and all expenses and disbursements incurred as provided in the trust agreement. The trustee benefits to the extent there are funds for future distributions, payment of expenses and redemptions in the Principal and Interest Accounts since these Accounts are non-interest bearing and the amounts earned by the trustee are retained by the trustee. Part of the trustee’s compensation for its services to a trust is expected to result from the use of these funds.

As compensation for portfolio supervisory services in its capacity as supervisor, evaluation services in its capacity as evaluator and for providing bookkeeping and other administrative services of a character described in Section 26(a)(2)(C) of the Investment Company Act, the sponsor shall be paid an annual fee in the amount per unit set forth in the trust agreement for a trust, which fee shall accrue daily and be computed on the number of units outstanding as of January 1 of such year except for a trust during the year or years in which an initial offering period as determined in the trust agreement occurs, in which case the fee for a month is based on the number of units outstanding at the end of such month (such annual fee to be pro-rated for any calendar year in which the sponsor provides services during less than the whole of such year), but in no event shall such compensation when combined with all compensation received from other series of the Fund for providing such services in any calendar year exceed the aggregate cost to the sponsor for providing such services. Such compensation

may, from time to time, be adjusted provided that the total adjustment upward does not, at the time of such adjustment, exceed the percentage of the total increase after the date of the trust agreement, in consumer prices for services as measured by the United States Department of Labor Consumer Price Index entitled “All Services Less Rent of Shelter” or similar index, if such index should no longer be published. The consent or concurrence of any unitholder shall not be required for any such adjustment or increase. Such compensation shall be paid by the trustee, upon receipt of invoice therefor from the sponsor, upon which, as to the cost incurred by the sponsor of providing services the trustee may rely and shall be charged against the Interest and/or Principal Accounts, in accordance with the trust agreement.

The following additional charges are or may be incurred by a trust in addition to any other fees, expenses or charges described in the prospectus: (a) fees for the trustee’s extraordinary services; (b) expenses of the trustee (including legal and auditing expenses and reimbursement of the cost of advances to the trust for payment of expenses and distributions, but not including any fees and expenses charged by an agent for custody and safeguarding of securities) and of counsel, if any; (c) various governmental charges; (d) expenses and costs of any action taken by the trustee to protect the trust or the rights and interests of the unitholders; (e) indemnification of the trustee for any loss or liability accruing to it without gross negligence, bad faith or willful misconduct on its part arising out of or in connection with the acceptance or administration of the trust; (f) indemnification of the sponsor for any loss, liability or expense incurred in acting in that capacity other than by reason of willful misfeasance, bad faith or gross negligence in the performance of its duties or its reckless disregard of its obligations and duties under the trust agreement; (g) expenditures incurred in contacting unitholders upon termination of the trust; and (h) license fees for the right to use trademarks and trade names, intellectual property rights or for the use of databases and research owned by third-party licensors. A trust may pay the costs of updating its registration statement each year. All fees and expenses are payable out of a trust and, when owing to the trustee or sponsor, are secured by a lien on the trust. If the balances in the Interest and Principal Accounts are insufficient to provide for amounts payable by the trust, the trustee has the power to sell securities to pay such amounts. These sales may result in capital gains or losses to unitholders.

Purchase, Redemption and Pricing of Units

Public Offering Price. Units of a trust are offered at the public offering price thereof. During the initial offering period, the public offering price per unit is equal to the net asset value per unit (generally based on the offering side evaluations of the securities) plus the applicable sales fee referred to in the prospectus. The public offering price for secondary market transactions is based on the net asset value per unit (generally based on the bid side evaluations of the securities) plus the applicable sales fee referred to in the prospectus. Certain broker-dealers may charge a transaction fee for processing unit purchases.

The evaluator will appraise or cause to be appraised daily the value of the underlying securities as of the close of regular trading on the New York Stock Exchange on days the New York Stock Exchange is open and will adjust the public offering price of the units commensurate with such valuation. Such public offering price will be effective for all orders received at or prior to the close of regular trading on the New York Stock Exchange on each such day as discussed in

the prospectus. Orders received by the trustee, sponsor or any authorized financial professionals for purchases, sales or redemptions after that time, or on a day when the New York Stock Exchange is closed, will be held until the next determination of price as discussed in the prospectus.

The public offering price per unit of the trust as shown under “Essential Information” in the prospectus as of the date stated therein or on any subsequent date will vary from the amount stated under “Essential Information” in the prospectus in accordance with fluctuations in the prices of the underlying securities and the amount of accrued interest on the units. Net asset value per unit is determined by dividing the value of a trust’s portfolio securities (including any accrued interest), cash and other assets, less all liabilities (including accrued expenses), by the total number of units outstanding. The portfolio securities are valued at their current market value or their fair value as determined in good faith by the evaluator, or an independent pricing service engaged to make an independent evaluation, if applicable. The aggregate bid and offering side evaluations of the securities shall be determined (a) on the basis of current bid or offering prices of the securities, (b) if bid or offering prices are not available for any particular security, on the basis of current bid or offering prices for comparable securities, (c) by determining the value of securities on the bid or offer side of the market by appraisal, or (d) by any combination of the above.

The interest on the securities deposited in a trust, less the related estimated fees and expenses, will accrue daily. The amount of net interest income which accrues per unit may change as securities mature or are redeemed, exchanged or sold, or as the expenses of a trust change or the number of outstanding units of a trust changes.

Although payment is normally made two business days following the order for purchase, payments may be made prior thereto. A person will become the owner of units on the date of settlement provided payment has been received. Cash, if any, made available to the sponsor prior to the date of settlement for the purchase of units may be used in the sponsor’s business and may be deemed to be a benefit to the sponsor, subject to the limitations of the Securities Exchange Act.

Accrued Interest. Accrued interest consists of two elements. The first element arises as a result of accrued interest which is the accumulation of unpaid interest on a security from the last day on which interest thereon was paid. Interest on securities generally is paid semi-annually although a trust accrues such interest daily. Because of this, a trust always has an amount of interest earned but not yet collected by the trustee. For this reason, the public offering price of units of a trust will have added to it the proportionate share of accrued interest to the date of settlement.

In an effort to reduce the amount of accrued interest which would otherwise have to be paid in addition to the public offering price in the sale of units to the public, the trustee will advance the amount of accrued interest as of the first settlement date and the same will be distributed to the sponsor as the unitholder of record as of the first settlement date. Consequently, the amount of accrued interest to be added to the public offering price of units will include only

accrued interest arising after the first settlement date to the date of settlement, less any distributions from the Interest Account subsequent to the first settlement date.

The second element of accrued interest arises because of the structure of the Interest Account. The trustee has no cash for distribution to unitholders until it receives interest payments on the bonds in a trust. The trustee is obligated to provide its own funds, at times, in order to make trust interest distributions. The trustee will recover these advancements when such interest is received. Interest Account balances are established to limit the extent to which it may be necessary for the trustee to advance its own funds in connection with such interest distributions. The Interest Account balances are also structured so that there will generally be positive cash balances.

Because of the varying interest payment dates of securities, accrued interest at any point in time will be greater than the amount of interest actually received by the applicable trusts and distributed to unitholders. Therefore, there will always remain an item of accrued interest that is added to the value of the units. If a unitholder sells or redeems all or a portion of his units, he will be entitled to receive his proportionate share of the accrued interest from the purchaser of his units. Since the trustee has the use of the funds held in the Interest Account for distributions to unitholders and since such account is non-interest-bearing to unitholders, the trustee benefits thereby.

Comparison of Public Offering Price and Redemption Price. The net asset value of units will generally be determined on the basis of the current bid prices of the securities. The amount realized by a unitholder upon any redemption of units may be less than the price paid for such units because of fluctuations in the market prices of the securities and the fact that the public offering price includes a sales fee.

Public Distribution of Units. The sponsor intends to qualify the units for sale in a number of states. The sponsor reserves the right to reject, in whole or in part, any order for the purchase of units. Units will be sold through dealers who are members of the Financial Industry Regulatory Authority, Inc. and through others. Sales may be made to or through dealers at prices which represent discounts from the public offering price as set forth in the prospectus. Certain commercial banks may be making units available to their customers on an agency basis. The sponsor reserves the right to change the discounts from time to time.

The sponsor may currently provide, at its own expense and out of its own profits, additional compensation and benefits to broker-dealers and other firms who sell units of this trust and its other products. This compensation is intended to result in additional sales of the sponsor’s products and/or compensate broker-dealers and financial advisors for past sales. A number of factors are considered in determining whether to pay these additional amounts. Such factors may include, but are not limited to, the level or type of services provided by the intermediary, the level or expected level of sales of the sponsor’s products by the intermediary or its agents, the placing of the sponsor’s products on a preferred or recommended product list and access to an intermediary’s personnel. The sponsor may make these payments for marketing, promotional or related expenses, including, but not limited to, expenses of entertaining retail customers and financial advisors, advertising, sponsorship of events or seminars, obtaining information about

the breakdown of unit sales among an intermediary’s representations or offices, obtaining shelf space in broker-dealer firms and similar activities designed to promote the sale of its products. The sponsor makes such payments to a substantial majority of intermediaries that sell its products. The sponsor may also make certain payments to, or on behalf of, intermediaries to defray a portion of their costs incurred for the purpose of facilitating unit sales, such as the costs of developing or purchasing trading systems to process unit trades. Payments of such additional compensation described in this paragraph and the volume concessions described in the prospectus for a trust, some of which may be characterized as “revenue sharing,” may create an incentive for financial intermediaries and their agents to sell or recommend the sponsor’s products, including this trust, over other products. These arrangements will not change the price you pay for your units.

Profits of Sponsor. The sponsor will receive gross sales fees equal to the percentage of the offering price of the units of such trusts stated in the prospectus and will pay a portion of such sales fees to dealers and agents. In addition, the sponsor may realize a profit or a loss resulting from the difference between the purchase prices of the securities to the sponsor and the cost of such securities to a trust, which is based on the offering side evaluation of the securities. The sponsor may also realize profits or losses with respect to securities deposited in a trust which were acquired from underwriting syndicates of which the sponsor was a member. An underwriter or underwriting syndicate purchases securities from the issuer on a negotiated or competitive bid basis, as principal, with the motive of marketing such securities to investors at a profit. The sponsor may realize additional profits or losses on unsold units as a result of changes in the daily evaluation of the securities in a trust.

Market for Units. After the initial offering period, while not obligated to do so, the sponsor may, subject to change at any time, maintain a market for units of the trust offered hereby and to continuously offer to purchase said units at the net asset value, determined by the evaluator, or an independent pricing service engaged to make an independent evaluation, if applicable, based on the aggregate bid prices of the underlying securities in the trust, together with any accrued interest to the expected dates of settlement. Unitholders who wish to dispose of their units should inquire of their broker as to current market prices in order to determine whether there is in existence any price in excess of the redemption price and, if so, the amount thereof.

The offering price of any units resold by the sponsor will be in accord with that described in the currently effective prospectus describing such units. Any profit or loss resulting from the resale of such units will belong to the sponsor. If the sponsor decides to maintain a secondary market, it may suspend or discontinue purchases of units of the trust if the supply of units exceeds demand, or for other business reasons.

Redemption. A unitholder who does not dispose of units in the secondary market described above may cause units to be redeemed by the trustee by making a written request to the trustee at its unit investment trust division office and, in the case of units evidenced by a certificate, by tendering such certificate to the trustee properly endorsed or accompanied by a written instrument or instruments of transfer in form satisfactory to the trustee. Unitholders must sign the request, and such certificate or transfer instrument, exactly as their names appear on the

records of the trustee and on any certificate representing the units to be redeemed. If the amount of the redemption is $500 or less and the proceeds are payable to the unitholder(s) of record at the address of record, no signature guarantee is necessary for redemptions by individual account owners (including joint owners). Additional documentation may be requested, and a signature guarantee is always required, from corporations, executors, administrators, trustees, guardians or associations. The signatures must be guaranteed by a participant in the Securities Transfer Agents Medallion Program (“STAMP”) or such other signature guaranty program in addition to, or in substitution for, STAMP, as may be accepted by the trustee. A certificate should only be sent by registered or certified mail for the protection of the unitholder. Since tender of the certificate is required for redemption when one has been issued, units represented by a certificate cannot be redeemed until the certificate representing such units has been received by the purchasers.

Redemption shall be made by the trustee no later than the seventh calendar day following the day on which tender for redemption is made, provided that if such day of redemption is not a Business Day, then such Unit shall be redeemed on the first Business Day prior thereto (the “Redemption Date”) by payment of cash equivalent to the redemption price, determined as set forth below under “Computation of Redemption Price,” as of the close of regular trading on the New York Stock Exchange next following such tender, multiplied by the number of units being redeemed. Any units redeemed shall be canceled and any undivided fractional interest in the related trust extinguished. The price received upon redemption might be more or less than the amount paid by the unitholder depending on the value of the securities in a trust at the time of redemption. Certain broker-dealers may charge a transaction fee for processing redemption requests.

Under regulations issued by the Internal Revenue Service, the trustee is required to withhold a specified percentage of the principal amount of a unit redemption if the trustee has not been furnished the redeeming unitholder’s tax identification number in the manner required by such regulations. Any amount so withheld is transmitted to the Internal Revenue Service and may be recovered by the unitholder only when filing a tax return. Under normal circumstances the trustee obtains the unitholder’s tax identification number from the selling broker. However, any time a unitholder elects to tender units for redemption, such unitholder should make sure that the trustee has been provided a certified tax identification number in order to avoid this possible “back-up withholding.” In the event the trustee has not been previously provided such number, one must be provided at the time redemption is requested. Any amounts paid on redemption representing dividends or interest shall be withdrawn from the Interest Account of a trust to the extent that funds are available for such purpose. All other amounts paid on redemption shall be withdrawn from the Principal Account for a trust to the extent that funds are available for such purpose. If such available balance shall be insufficient, the trustee shall sell securities in order to make funds available for the redemption of units. To the extent that securities are sold, the size of a trust will be, and the diversity of a trust may be, reduced but each remaining unit will continue to represent approximately the same proportional interest in each security. Sales may be required at a time when securities would not otherwise be sold and may result in lower prices than might otherwise be realized. The price received upon redemption may be more or less than the amount paid by the unitholder depending on the value of the securities in the portfolio at the time of redemption.

The trustee is irrevocably authorized in its discretion, if the sponsor does not elect to purchase any unit tendered for redemption, in lieu of redeeming such units, to sell such units in the over-the-counter market for the account of tendering unitholders at prices which will return to the unitholders amounts in cash, net after brokerage commissions, transfer taxes and other charges, equal to or in excess of the redemption price for such units. In the event of any such sale, the trustee shall pay the net proceeds thereof to the unitholders on the day they would otherwise be entitled to receive payment of the redemption price.

The right of redemption may be suspended and payment postponed (1) for any period during which the New York Stock Exchange is closed, other than customary weekend and holiday closings, or during which (as determined by the SEC) trading on the New York Stock Exchange is restricted; (2) for any period during which an emergency exists as a result of which disposal by the trust of securities is not reasonably practicable or it is not reasonably practicable to fairly determine the value of the underlying securities in accordance with the trust agreement; or (3) for such other period as the SEC may by order permit. The trustee is not liable to any person in any way for any loss or damage which may result from any such suspension or postponement.

Computation of Redemption Price. The redemption price for units (the net asset value) of each trust is computed by the evaluator, or an independent pricing service engaged to make an independent evaluation, if applicable, as of the evaluation time stated in the prospectus next occurring after the tendering of a unit for redemption and on any other day on which a trust evaluation is desired by the trustee or requested by the sponsor, by:

Retirement Plans. A trust may be suited for purchase by Individual Retirement Accounts, Keogh Plans, pension funds and other qualified retirement plans. Generally, capital gains and income received under each of the foregoing plans are deferred from Federal taxation. All distributions from such plans are generally treated as ordinary income but may, in some cases, be eligible for special income averaging or tax-deferred rollover treatment. Investors considering participation in any such plan should review specific tax laws related thereto and should consult their attorneys or tax advisers with respect to the establishment and maintenance of any such plan. Such plans are offered by brokerage firms and other financial institutions. The trust may lower the minimum investment requirement for IRA accounts. Fees and charges with respect to such plans may vary.

Ownership of Units. Units may be purchased in denominations of one unit or any multiple thereof, subject to the minimum investment requirement. Fractions of units, if any, will be computed to three decimal places.

Performance Information

Interest, Estimated Long-Term Return and Estimated Current Return. As of the close of business on the business day before a trust’s inception date, the estimated long-term return and the estimated current return, if applicable, for each trust were as set forth in the “Essential Information” for each trust in the prospectus. Estimated current return is calculated by dividing the current estimated net annual interest income per unit based on the interest rates currently applicable to the bonds by the public offering price. The estimated net annual interest income per unit will vary with changes in the interest rates applicable to the bonds (some of which may be subject to adjustments related to changes in the bonds’ ratings as provided by certain ratings services), fees and expenses of the trust with the default, redemption, maturity, exchange or sale of the securities while the public offering price will vary with changes in the price of the bonds therefore, there is no assurance that the present estimated current return will be realized in the future. Estimated long-term return is calculated using a formula which (1) takes into consideration, and determines and factors in the relative weightings of, the market values, yields (which takes into account the amortization of premiums and the accretion of discounts) and estimated retirements or average life of all of the securities in a trust and (2) takes into account the expenses and sales fee associated with each trust unit. The applicable sales fee associated with units will vary based on sales fee reductions applicable to certain unitholders. Since the interest rates, market values and estimated retirements of the securities and the expenses of a trust may change, there is no assurance that the present estimated long-term return will be realized in the future. Estimated current return and estimated long-term return are expected to differ because the calculation of estimated long-term return reflects the estimated date and amount of principal returned while estimated current return calculations include only net annual interest income and public offering price.

General. Information contained in this Information Supplement or in the prospectus, as it currently exists or as further updated, may also be included from time to time in other prospectuses or in advertising material. Information on the performance of a trust strategy or the actual performance of a trust may be included from time to time in other prospectuses or advertising material and may reflect sales fees and expenses of a trust. The performance of a

trust may also be compared to the performance of money managers as reported in SEI Fund Evaluation Survey or of mutual funds as reported by Lipper Analytical Services Inc. (which calculates total return using actual dividends on ex-dates accumulated for the quarter and reinvested at quarter end), Money Magazine Fund Watch (which rates fund performance over a specified time period after sales fee and assuming all dividends reinvested) or Wiesenberger Investment Companies Service (which states fund performance annually on a total return basis) or of the New York Stock Exchange Composite Index, the American Stock Exchange Index (unmanaged indices of stocks traded on the New York and American Stock Exchanges, respectively), the Dow Jones Industrial Average (an index of 30 widely traded industrial common stocks) or the Standard & Poor’s 500 Index (an unmanaged diversified index of 500 stocks) or similar measurement standards during the same period of time.

Description of Securities Ratings

S&P Global Ratings, A Division Of S&P Global Inc. An S&P Global Ratings issue credit rating is a forward-looking opinion about the creditworthiness of an obligor with respect to a specific financial obligation, a specific class of financial obligations or a specific financial program (including ratings on medium-term note programs and commercial paper programs). It takes into consideration the creditworthiness of guarantors, insurers or other forms of credit enhancement on the obligation and takes into account the currency in which the obligation is denominated. The opinion reflects S&P Global Ratings’ view of the obligor’s capacity and willingness to meet its financial commitments as they come due, and this opinion may assess terms, such as collateral security and subordination, which could affect ultimate payment in the event of default.

Issue credit ratings can be either long-term or short-term. Short-term ratings are generally assigned to those obligations considered short-term in the relevant market, typically with an original maturity of no more than 365 days. Short-term issue credit ratings are also used to indicate the creditworthiness of an obligor with respect to put features on long-term obligations. S&P Global Ratings would typically assign a long-term issue credit rating to an obligation with an original maturity of greater than 365 days. However, the ratings assigned to certain instruments may diverge from these guidelines based on market practices. Medium-term notes are assigned long-term ratings.

Long-Term Issue Credit Ratings

Issue credit ratings are based, in varying degrees, on S&P Global Ratings’ analysis of the following considerations:

An issue rating is an assessment of default risk but may incorporate an assessment of relative seniority or ultimate recovery in the event of default. Junior obligations are typically rated lower than senior obligations, to reflect lower priority in bankruptcy, as noted above. (Such differentiation may apply when an entity has both senior and subordinated obligations, secured and unsecured obligations or operating company and holding company obligations.)

AAA—An obligation rated ‘AAA’ has the highest rating assigned by S&P Global Ratings. The obligor’s capacity to meet its financial commitments on the obligation is extremely strong.

AA—An obligation rated ‘AA’ differs from the highest-rated obligations only to a small degree. The obligor's capacity to meet its financial commitments on the obligation is very strong.

A—An obligation rated ‘A’ is somewhat more susceptible to the adverse effects of changes in circumstances and economic conditions than obligations in higher-rated categories. However, the obligor’s capacity to meet its financial commitments on the obligation is still strong.

BBB—An obligation rated ‘BBB’ exhibits adequate protection parameters. However, adverse economic conditions or changing circumstances are more likely to weaken the obligor’s capacity to meet its financial commitments on the obligation.

BB, B, CCC, CC, and C—Obligations rated ‘BB’, ‘B’, ‘CCC’, ‘CC’, and ‘C’ are regarded as having significant speculative characteristics. ‘BB’ indicates the least degree of speculation and ‘C’ the highest. While such obligations will likely have some quality and protective characteristics, these may be outweighed by large uncertainties or major exposures to adverse conditions.

BB—An obligation rated ‘BB’ is less vulnerable to nonpayment than other speculative issues. However, it faces major ongoing uncertainties or exposure to adverse business, financial or economic conditions that could lead to the obligor’s inadequate capacity to meet its financial commitments on the obligation.

B—An obligation rated ‘B’ is more vulnerable to nonpayment than obligations rated ‘BB’, but the obligor currently has the capacity to meet its financial commitments on the obligation. Adverse business, financial or economic conditions will likely impair the obligor’s capacity or willingness to meet its financial commitments on the obligation.

CCC—An obligation rated ‘CCC’ is currently vulnerable to nonpayment and is dependent upon favorable business, financial and economic conditions for the obligor to meet its financial commitments on the obligation. In the event of adverse business, financial or economic conditions, the obligor is not likely to have the capacity to meet its financial commitments on the obligation.

CC—An obligation rated ‘CC’ is currently highly vulnerable to nonpayment. The ‘CC’ rating is used when a default has not yet occurred but S&P Global Ratings expects default to be a virtual certainty, regardless of the anticipated time to default.

C—An obligation rated ‘C’ is currently highly vulnerable to nonpayment, and the obligation is expected to have lower relative seniority or lower ultimate recovery compared to obligations that are rated higher.

D—An obligation rated ‘D’ is in default or in breach of an imputed promise. For non-hybrid capital instruments, the ‘D’ rating category is used when payments on an obligation are not made on the date due, unless S&P Global Ratings believes that such payments will be made within five business days in the absence of a stated grace period or within the earlier of the stated grace period or 30 calendar days. The ‘D’ rating also will be used upon the filing of a bankruptcy petition or the taking of similar action and where default on an obligation is a virtual certainty, for example due to automatic stay provisions. A rating on an obligation is lowered to ‘D’ if it is subject to a distressed debt restructuring.

The ratings from ‘AA’ to ‘CCC’ may be modified by the addition of a plus (+) or minus (-) sign to show relative standing within the major rating categories.

Short-Term Issue Credit Ratings

A–1 — A short-term obligation rated 'A-1' is rated in the highest category by S&P Global Ratings. The obligor's capacity to meet its financial commitments on the obligation is strong. Within this category, certain obligations are designated with a plus sign (+). This indicates that the obligor's capacity to meet its financial commitments on these obligations is extremely strong.

A–2 — A short-term obligation rated 'A-2' is somewhat more susceptible to the adverse effects of changes in circumstances and economic conditions than obligations in higher rating categories. However, the obligor's capacity to meet its financial commitments on the obligation is satisfactory.

A–3 — A short-term obligation rated 'A-3' exhibits adequate protection parameters. However, adverse economic conditions or changing circumstances are more likely to weaken an obligor's capacity to meet its financial commitments on the obligation.

B — A short-term obligation rated 'B' is regarded as vulnerable and has significant speculative characteristics. The obligor currently has the capacity to meet its financial commitments; however, it faces major ongoing uncertainties that could lead to the obligor's inadequate capacity to meet its financial commitments.

C — A short-term obligation rated 'C' is currently vulnerable to nonpayment and is dependent upon favorable business, financial, and economic conditions for the obligor to meet its financial commitments on the obligation.

D — A short-term obligation rated 'D' is in default or in breach of an imputed promise. For non-hybrid capital instruments, the 'D' rating category is used when payments on an obligation are not made on the date due, unless S&P Global Ratings believes that such payments will be made within any stated grace period. However, any stated grace period longer than five business days will be treated as five business days. The 'D' rating also will be used upon the filing of a bankruptcy petition or the taking of a similar action and where default on an obligation is a virtual certainty, for example due to automatic stay provisions. A rating on an obligation is lowered to 'D' if it is subject to a distressed debt restructuring.

Active Qualifiers

S&P Global Ratings uses the following qualifiers that limit the scope of a rating. The structure of the transaction can require the use of a qualifier such as a ‘p’ qualifier, which indicates the rating addresses the principal portion of the obligation only. A qualifier appears as a suffix and is part of the rating.

Federal deposit insurance limit: ‘L’ qualifier—Ratings qualified with ‘L’ apply only to amounts invested up to federal deposit insurance limits.

Principal: ‘p’ qualifier—This suffix is used for issues in which the credit factors, the terms or both that determine the likelihood of receipt of payment of principal are different from the credit factors, terms or both that determine the likelihood of receipt of interest on the obligation. The ‘p’ suffix indicates that the rating addresses the principal portion of the obligation only and that the interest is not rated.

Preliminary ratings: ‘prelim’ qualifier—Preliminary ratings, with the ‘prelim’ suffix, may be assigned to obligors or obligations, including financial programs, in the circumstances described below. Assignment of a final rating is conditional on the receipt by S&P Global Ratings of appropriate documentation. S&P Global Ratings reserves the right not to issue a final rating. Moreover, if a final rating is issued, it may differ from the preliminary rating.

Termination structures: ‘t’ qualifier—This symbol indicates termination structures that are designed to honor their contracts to full maturity or, should certain events occur, to terminate and cash settle all their contracts before their final maturity date.

Counterparty instrument rating: ‘cir’ qualifier—This symbol indicates a counterparty instrument rating (CIR), which is a forward-looking opinion about the creditworthiness of an issuer in a securitization structure with respect to a specific financial obligation to a counterparty (including interest rate swaps, currency swaps and liquidity facilities). The CIR is determined on an ultimate payment basis; these opinions do not take into account timeliness of payment.

Inactive Qualifiers

Inactive qualifiers are no longer applied or outstanding.

Contingent upon final documentation: '*' inactive qualifier—This symbol indicated that the rating was contingent upon S&P Global Ratings' receipt of an executed copy of the escrow agreement or closing documentation confirming investments and cash flows. Discontinued use in August 1998.

Termination of obligation to tender: ‘c’ inactive qualifier—This qualifier was used to provide additional information to investors that the bank may terminate its obligation to purchase tendered bonds if the long-term credit rating of the issuer was lowered to below an investment-grade level and/or the issuer's bonds were deemed taxable. Discontinued use in January 2001.

U.S. direct government securities: ‘G’ inactive qualifier—The letter ‘G’ followed the rating symbol when a fund's portfolio consisted primarily of direct U.S. government securities.

Public information ratings: ‘pi’ qualifier—This qualifier was used to indicate ratings that were based on an analysis of an issuer's published financial information, as well as additional information in the public domain. Such ratings did not, however, reflect in-depth meetings with an issuer's management and therefore could have been based on less comprehensive information than ratings without a ‘pi’ suffix. Discontinued use as of December 2014 and as of August 2015 for Lloyd's Syndicate Assessments.

Provisional ratings: ‘pr’ inactive qualifier—The letters ‘pr’ indicate that the rating was provisional. A provisional rating assumed the successful completion of a project financed by the debt being rated and indicates that payment of debt service requirements was largely or entirely dependent upon the successful, timely completion of the project. This rating, however, while addressing credit quality subsequent to completion of the project, made no comment on the likelihood of or the risk of default upon failure of such completion.

Quantitative analysis of public information: ‘q’ inactive qualifier—A ‘q’ subscript indicates that the rating is based solely on quantitative analysis of publicly available information. Discontinued use in April 2001.

Extraordinary risks: ‘r’ inactive qualifier—The ‘r’ modifier was assigned to securities containing extraordinary risks, particularly market risks, that are not covered in the credit rating. The absence of an ‘r’ modifier should not be taken as an indication that an obligation would not exhibit extraordinary noncredit-related risks. S&P Global Ratings discontinued the use of the ‘r’ modifier for most obligations in June 2000 and for the balance of obligations (mainly structured finance transactions) in November 2002.

Moody’s Investors Service, Inc.

Moody’s Global Rating Scales

Ratings assigned on Moody’s global long-term and short-term rating scales are forward-looking opinions of the relative credit risks of financial obligations issued by non-financial corporates, financial institutions, structured finance vehicles, project finance vehicles, and public sector entities. Moody’s defines credit risk as the risk that an entity may not meet its contractual financial obligations as they come due and any estimated financial loss in the event of default or impairment. The contractual financial obligations addressed by Moody’s ratings are those that call for, without regard to enforceability, the payment of an ascertainable amount, which may vary based upon standard sources of variation (e.g., floating interest rates), by an ascertainable date. Moody’s rating addresses the issuer’s ability to obtain cash sufficient to service the obligation and its willingness to pay. Moody’s ratings do not address non-standard sources of variation in the amount of the principal obligation (e.g., equity indexed), absent an express statement to the contrary in a press releasee accompanying an initial rating. Long-term ratings are assigned to issuers or obligations with an original maturity of one year or more and reflect both on the likelihood of a default or impairment on contractual financial obligations and the expected financial loss suffered in the event of default or impairment. Short-term ratings are assigned for obligations with an original maturity of thirteen months or less and reflect both on the likelihood of a default or impairment on contractual financial obligations and the expected financial loss suffered in the event of default or impariment. Moody’s issues ratings at the issuer level and instrument level on both the long-term scale and the short-term scale. Typically, ratings are made publicly available although private and unpublished ratings may also be assigned.

Moody’s differentiates structured finance ratings from fundamental ratings (i.e., ratings on nonfinancial corporate, financial instution, and public sector entities) on the global long-term scale by adding (sf) to all structured finance ratings. The addition of (sf) to structured finance

ratings should eliminate any presumtption that such ratings are fundamental ratings at the same letter grade level will behave the same. The (sf) indicator for structured finance security ratings indicates that otherwise similarly rated structured finance and fundamental securities may have different risk characteristics. Through its current methodologies, however, Moody’s aspires to achieve broad expected equivalence in structured finance and fundamental rating performance when measured over a long period of time

Global Long-Term Rating Definitions:

Aaa—Obligations rated Aaa are judged to be of the highest quality, subject to the lowest level of credit risk.

Aa—Obligations rated Aa are judged to be of high quality and are subject to very low credit risk.

A—Obligations rated A are judged to be upper-medium grade and are subject to low credit risk.

Baa—Obligations rated Baa are judged to be medium-grade and subject to moderate credit risk and as such may possess certain speculative characteristics.

Ba—Obligations rated Ba are judged to be speculative and are subject to substantial credit risk.

B—Obligations rated B are considered speculative and are subject to high credit risk.

Caa—Obligations rated Caa are judged to be speculative of poor standing and are subject to very high credit risk.

Ca—Obligations rated Ca are highly speculative and are likely in, or very near, default, with some prospect of recovery of principal and interest.

C—Obligations rated C are the lowest rated and are typically in default, with little prospect for recovery of principal or interest.

Note: Moody’s appends numerical modifiers 1, 2, and 3 to each generic rating classification from Aa through Caa. The modifier 1 indicates that the obligation ranks in the higher end of its generic rating category; the modifier 2 indicates a mid-range ranking; and the modifier 3 indicates a ranking in the lower end of that generic rating category. Additionally, a “(hyb)” indicator is appended to all ratings of hybrid securities issued by banks, insurers, finance companies and securities firms.

Note: For more information on long-term ratings assigned to obligations in default, please see the definition “Long-Term Credit Ratings for Defaulted or Impaired Securities” in the Other Definitions section of this publication.

* By their terms, hybrid securities allow for the omission of scheduled dividends, interest, or principal payments, which can potentially result in impairment if such an omission occurs. Hybrid securities may also be subject to contractually allowable write-downs of principal that

could result in impairment. Together with the hybrid indicator, the long-term obligation rating assigned to a hybrid security is an expression of the relative credit risk associated with that security.

Global Short-Term Rating Scale

P–1 — Ratings of Prime-1 reflect a superior ability to repay short-term obligations.

P–2 — Ratings of Prime-2 reflect a strong ability to repay short-term obligations.

P–3 — Ratings of Prime-3 reflect an acceptable ability to repay short-term obligations.

NP — Issuers (or supporting institutions) rated Not Prime do not fall within any of the Prime rating categories.

Fitch Ratings Ltd. Issuer Default Ratings

Rated entities in a number of sectors, including financial and non-financial corporations, sovereigns, insurance companies and certain sectors within public finance, are generally assigned Issuer Default Ratings (IDRs). IDRs are also assigned to certain entities or enterprises in global infrastructure, project finance and public finance. IDRs opine on an entity's relative vulnerability to default (including by way of a distressed debt exchange) on financial obligations. The threshold default risk addressed by the IDR is generally that of the financial obligations whose non-payment would best reflect the uncured failure of that entity. As such, IDRs also address relative vulnerability to bankruptcy, administrative receivership or similar concepts.

In aggregate, IDRs provide an ordinal ranking of issuers based on the agency's view of their relative vulnerability to default, rather than a prediction of a specific percentage likelihood of default.

Investment Grade Ratings

AAA—Highest credit quality. “AAA” ratings denote the lowest expectation of default risk. They are assigned only in cases of exceptionally strong capacity for payment of financial commitments. This capacity is highly unlikely to be adversely affected by foreseeable events.

AA—Very high credit quality. “AA” ratings denote expectations of very low default risk. They indicate very strong capacity for payment of financial commitments. This capacity is not significantly vulnerable to foreseeable events.

A—High credit quality. “A” ratings denote expectations of low default risk. The capacity for payment of financial commitments is considered strong. This capacity may, nevertheless, be more vulnerable to adverse business or economic conditions than is the case for higher ratings.

BBB—Good credit quality. “BBB” ratings indicate that expectations of default risk are currently low. The capacity for payment of financial commitments is considered adequate, but adverse business or economic conditions are more likely to impair this capacity.

Speculative Grade

BB—Speculative. “BB” ratings indicate an elevated vulnerability to default risk, particularly in the event of adverse changes in business or economic conditions over time; however, business or financial flexibility exists that supports the servicing of financial commitments.

B—Highly speculative. “B” ratings indicate that material default risk is present, but a limited margin of safety remains. Financial commitments are currently being met; however, capacity for continued payment is vulnerable to deterioration in the business and economic environment.

CCC—Substantial credit risk. Default is a real possibility.

CC—Very high levels of credit risk. Default of some kind appears probable.

C—Near default. A default or default-like process has begun, or the issuer is in standstill, or for a closed funding vehicle, payment capacity is irrevocably impaired. Conditions that are indicative of a ‘C’ category rating for an issuer include:

RD—Restricted default. “RD” ratings indicate an issuer that in Fitch’s opinion has experienced::

This would include:

D—Default. “D” ratings indicate an issuer that in Fitch’s opinion has entered into bankruptcy filings, administration, receivership, liquidation or other formal winding-up procedure or that has otherwise ceased business.

Default ratings are not assigned prospectively to entities or their obligations; within this context, non-payment on an instrument that contains a deferral feature or grace period will generally not be considered a default until after the expiration of the deferral or grace period, unless a default is otherwise driven by bankruptcy or other similar circumstance, or by a distressed debt exchange.

In all cases, the assignment of a default rating reflects the agency’s opinion as to the most appropriate rating category consistent with the rest of its universe of ratings and may differ from the definition of default under the terms of an issuer’s financial obligations or local commercial practice.

Within rating categories, Fitch may use modifiers. The modifiers “+” or “-” may be appended to a rating to denote relative status within major rating categories. For example, the rating category “AA” has three notch-specific rating levels (“AA+”; “AA”; “AA–“; each a rating level). Such suffixes are not added to “AAA” ratings, or to rating categories below the “CCC” category.

Undertakings

Contents of Post-Effective Amendment

to Registration Statement

This Post-Effective Amendment to the Registration Statement comprises the following:

The facing sheet

The prospectus and information supplement

The signatures

The consent of independent auditors

Signatures

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Act of 1933, the Registrant, Advisors Disciplined Trust 1914 certifies that it meets all of the requirements for effectiveness of this registration statement pursuant to Rule 485(b) under the Securities Act of 1933 and has duly caused this Post Effective Amendment to the Registration Statement to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized, in the City of Wichita and State of Kansas on July 29, 2021.

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Act of 1933, this Amendment to the Registration Statement has been signed below on July 29, 2021 by the following persons in the capacities indicated.

* An executed copy of the related powers of attorney was filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission as Exhibit 7.1 to the Registration Statement on Form S-6 for Advisor’s Disciplined Trust 1993 (File No. 333-235795) as filed on March 10, 2020 and the same is hereby incorporated herein by reference.

Exhibit 1.1

Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

We have issued our report dated July 29, 2021, with respect to the financial statement of Advisors Disciplined Trust 1914 contained in Post-Effective Amendment No. 2 to the Registration Statement on Form S-6 (File No. 333-227346) and related Prospectus. We consent to the use of the aforementioned report in the Registration Statement and Prospectus, and to the use of our name as it appears under the caption “Experts”.

/s/ Grant Thornton LLP

Chicago, Illinois

July 29, 2021