Form 10-Q Tapinator, Inc. For: Sep 30

UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, DC 20549

FORM 10-Q

(Mark One)

For the Quarterly Period Ended September 30, 2018

OR

For the Transition Period from                      to                      

Commission File Number 333-224531

Tapinator, Inc.

(Exact name of the Registrant as Specified in its Charter)

110 West 40^th Street Suite 1902

New York, NY 10018

(Address of Principal Executive Offices, including Zip Code)

(914) 930-6232

(Registrant’s Telephone number, including Area Code)

N/A

(Former name, former address and former fiscal year, if changed since last report)

Indicate by check mark whether the Registrant: (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the Registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.    Yes  ☐    No   ☒

Indicate by check mark whether the Registrant has submitted electronically every Interactive Data File required to be submitted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the Registrant was required to submit such files).     Yes  ☒    No   ☐

Indicate by check mark whether the Registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, a smaller reporting company, or an emerging growth company. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer,” “smaller reporting company,” and “emerging growth company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.

If an emerging growth company, indicate by check mark if the registrant has elected not to use the extended transition period for complying with any new or revised financial accounting standards provided pursuant to Section 13(a) of the Exchange Act. ☒

Indicate by check mark whether the Registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act).    Yes  ☐    No  ☒ 

Shares of Tapinator, Inc. common stock, $0.001 par value per share, outstanding as of November 9, 2018: 95,625,972

TAPINATOR, INC.

FORM 10-Q

Quarterly Period Ended September 30, 2018

TABLE OF CONTENTS

Note 1 — The Company

Tapinator, Inc. (“Tapinator” or the “Company”) develops and publishes mobile games and applications on the iOS, Google Play, and Amazon platforms. Tapinator's portfolio includes over 300 titles that, collectively, have achieved over 450 million mobile downloads, including products such as ROCKY™, Video Poker Classic, Solitaire Dash, Dot to Dot – Relaxing Puzzles and Dice Mage. Tapinator generates revenues through the sale of branded advertising and via consumer transactions, including in-app purchases and subscriptions. Founded in 2013, Tapinator is headquartered in New York, with product development teams located in North America, Europe and Asia.

The Company was originally incorporated on December 9, 2013 in the state of Delaware. On December 12, 2013, the Company merged with Tapinator, Inc., a Nevada Corporation. The Company was the surviving corporation from this merger. On June 16, 2014, the Company executed a securities exchange agreement with the members of Tapinator LLC, a New York limited liability company, whereby the Company issued shares of its common stock to the members of Tapinator LLC in exchange for 100% of the outstanding membership interests of Tapinator LLC. The transaction resulted in a business combination and a change of control within its business purpose. For accounting and financial reporting purposes, Tapinator LLC was considered the acquirer and the transaction was treated as a reverse merger.

The Company currently develops and publishes two types of mobile applications. The Company’s Full-Featured Games are unique products with high production values and significant revenue potential, developed and published selectively based on both original and licensed IP. These titles require extensive development, marketing, and live ops investment and have, in the opinion of management, the potential to become long-lasting, category leading mobile franchises. These games are currently published exclusively under the Tapinator brand. Tapinator’s Rapid-Launch Games are legacy products that historically have been developed and published in significant quantity. These are titles that have been built economically and rapidly based on a series of internally developed, re-useable game engines. These games were previously published under the Tapinator brand but are currently published under the Tap2Play and TopTap Games brands.

In late 2018, the Company developed plans to expand its Full-Featured strategy to include subscription-based, freemium mobile applications within the Games, Entertainment and Lifestyle categories.

Note 2 —Basis of Presentation and Summary of Significant Accounting Policies

Basis of Presentation

The unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements and related notes included herein have been prepared in conformity with United States generally accepted accounting principles (“GAAP”) and pursuant to the rules and regulations of the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”). The financial statements and notes are presented as permitted on Form 10-Q and do not contain certain information included in the Company’s annual financial statements and notes. Certain information and footnote disclosures normally included in financial statements prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America have been condensed or omitted pursuant to such rules and regulations, although the Company believes that the disclosures are adequate to make the information presented not misleading. It is suggested that these financial statements be read in conjunction with the September 17, 2018 Prospectus filed with the SEC, including the audited financial statements and the accompanying notes thereto. While management believes the procedures followed in preparing these financial statements are reasonable, the accuracy of the amounts is in some respects dependent upon the facts that will exist, and procedures that will be accomplished by the Company later in the year.

These unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements reflect all adjustments, including normal recurring adjustments which, in the opinion of management, are necessary to present fairly the consolidated operations and cash flows for the periods presented.

Principals of Consolidation

The accompanying unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements and related notes include the operations of the Company and its wholly-owned subsidiaries, Tapinator, LLC, Tap2Play, LLC, Tapinator IAF, LLC (this subsidiary was dissolved by the Company on December 31, 2017), and Revolution Blockchain, LLC. All significant intercompany balances and transactions have been eliminated in consolidation.

Use of estimates

The preparation of financial statements in conformity with GAAP requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements as well as the reported amount of revenues and expenses during the reporting period. Actual results could differ from these estimates. Significant estimates include assumptions used in the recognition of revenue, realization of platform and advertising fees and related costs of revenue, long-lived assets, stock-based compensation, and the fair value of other equity and debt instruments.

Revenue Recognition

The Company derives revenue primarily from the three mobile platforms (iOS, Google Play and Amazon) on which it currently markets its mobile games and applications in the form of app store transactions and from various advertising networks in the form of branded advertising placements within its mobile applications.

For revenue from product sales, the Company recognizes revenue in accordance with Financial Accounting Standards Board “FASB” Accounting Standards Codification “ASC” 606. A five-step analysis must be met as outlined in Topic 606: (i) identify the contract with the customer, (ii) identify the performance obligations in the contract, (iii) determine the transaction price, (iv) allocate the transaction price to the performance obligations, and (v) recognize revenue when (or as) performance obligations are satisfied.  Provisions for discounts and rebates to customers, estimated returns and allowances, and other adjustments are provided for in the same period the related sales are recorded.  The Company defers any revenue for which the product has not been delivered or is subject to refund until such time that the Company and the customer jointly determine that the product has been delivered or no refund will be required.

In accordance with Accounting Standards Update (“ASU”) 2016-08, Principal versus Agent Considerations (Reporting Revenue Gross versus Net), the Company evaluates its agreements with the mobile platforms and advertising networks to determine whether it is acting as the principal or as an agent when selling its games or when selling premium in-game content or advertisements within its games, which it considers in determining if revenue should be reported gross or net. Key indicators that the Company evaluates to reach this determination include:

Based on the evaluation of the above indicators, the Company has determined that it is generally acting as a principal and is the primary obligor to end-users for its games distributed on the mobile platforms and for advertisements served by the advertising networks and has the contractual right to determine the price to be paid by the player. Therefore, the Company recognizes revenue related to these arrangements on a gross basis, when the necessary information about the gross amounts or platform fees charged, before any adjustments, are made available by the mobile platforms and advertising networks. The Company records the related platform fees and advertising network revenue share as expenses in the period incurred.

The Company recognizes revenue when all of the following conditions are satisfied: there is persuasive evidence of an arrangement; the content or service is delivered; the collection of fees is reasonably assured; and the amount of fees to be paid for the content or service is fixed or determinable.

Display Advertising and Offers:

We have contractual relationships with advertising networks for display advertisements and offers served within our games. For these arrangements, we are the principal and our performance obligation is to provide the inventory for advertisements and offers to be displayed within our games. The Company has determined the advertising buyer to be its customer and displaying the advertisements within the mobile games is identified as the single performance obligation. Revenue from advertisements and offers are recognized at the point-in-time the advertisements are displayed in the game or the offer has been completed by the user as the customer simultaneously receives and consumes the benefits provided from these services.

The pricing and terms for all our advertising arrangements are governed by either a master contract or insertion order and generally stipulate payment terms as a specific number of days subsequent to the end of the month, generally ranging from 30 to 60 days. The transaction price in advertising arrangements is generally the product of the number of advertising units delivered (e.g., impressions, offers completed, videos viewed, etc.) and the contractually agreed upon price per advertising unit. The number of advertising units delivered is determined at the end of each month, which resolves any uncertainty in the transaction price during the reporting period. 

Paid Downloadable Games:

Some of our legacy Rapid Launch Mobile Games are offered as paid downloadable games on certain mobile platforms. For an individual sale of a game with both online and offline functionality, we would typically have three distinct performance obligations; (1) the software license; (2) a right to receive future updates; and (3) online hosting. The software license performance obligation represents the game that is delivered digitally at the time of sale and typically provides access to offline core game content. The future update rights performance obligation would include updates on a when-and-if-available basis such as software patches or updates, and/or additional free content to be delivered in the future. The online hosting performance obligation consists of providing the customer with a hosted connection for online playability. For these legacy Rapid-Launch games, since we do not provide software updates or additional content, and since we do not host any online content for these games as they are not playable online, the only performance obligation that we recognize is the software license. The sales price allocated to the software license performance obligation is recognized at a point in time upon delivery (which is usually at or near the same time as the booking of the transaction).

Virtual Goods:

Our games allow for players to purchase or otherwise earn in-game currency or other premium in-game content in the form of virtual goods. For purposes of determining when the service has been provided as it relates to virtual goods, we have determined that an implied obligation exists to the paying player to continue displaying the purchased or otherwise earned virtual good over its estimated life or until it is consumed. Accordingly, we categorize our virtual goods as either consumable or durable virtual goods.

Consumable Virtual Goods:

Consumable virtual goods are items such as one-time game boosts consumed at a predetermined time or otherwise have limitations on repeated use. For the sale of consumable virtual goods, we recognize revenue, and the associated costs, as the goods are consumed. Our revenues from consumable virtual goods have been insignificant since the Company’s formation.

Durable Virtual Goods:

Durable virtual goods are items including virtual currency and premium in-game content such as power-ups, skins and equipment that remain in the game for as long as the player continues to play. If we do not have the ability to differentiate revenue attributable to durable virtual goods from consumable virtual goods for a specific game, we recognize revenue and the associated costs on the sale of durable and consumable virtual goods for that game ratably over the estimated average period that paying players typically play that game. We recognize revenue, and the associated costs, from the sale of durable virtual goods ratably over the estimated average playing period of paying players for the applicable game, which represents our best estimate of the average life of durable virtual goods.

We have partnered with third party advertising networks to provide rewarded video advertising to players of our games. A rewarded video advertisement enables users to acquire virtual currency, a durable virtual good, in exchange for watching a short video instead of paying cash. For rewarded video advertisements, similar to purchased durable virtual goods, revenue is initially recorded to deferred revenue and then recognized ratably over the estimated average playing period of paying players for the applicable game, which represents our best estimate of the average life of durable virtual goods,

On an annual basis, we determine the estimated average playing period for paying players by genre across a sample of our games beginning at the time of a player’s first purchase in that game and ending on a date when that paying player is no longer playing the game. To determine when paying players are no longer playing a given game, we measure the populations of paying players (the “daily cohort”) from the date of their first installation of the game and track each daily cohort to understand the number of players from each daily cohort who played the game after their initial purchase. For titles where we have one or more years of paying players’ historical usage data (“Tracked Titles”), we compute a weighted average playing period for paying users using this dataset.

For titles where we have less than one year of paying player data (“New/Untracked Titles”), we use a linear interpolation model on a representative sample of our games within each genre to estimate the average playing period of paying users. Using actual retention data for all players from these games for the period between game installation and up to 90 days thereafter, this data is inputted into a linear interpolation curve to estimate an average playing period for these titles. These calculated curves and their associated one-year average playing periods are mapped against the corresponding curves and associated average one-year playing periods for the Tracked Titles. Based on this mapping, the average playing period of paying users for Tracked Titles is then indexed up or down accordingly, and then applied against the New/Untracked Titles within the sample.

We then compute revenue-based weighted averages of the estimated playing period across all of the games in the sample, by genre, to arrive at the overall weighted average playing period of paying users for each of our major game genres, rounded to the nearest month. As of the fourth quarter of 2017 (our most recent determination date), the estimated weighted average life of our durable virtual goods was 16 months for our Casino / Card games, 2 months for our RPG / Arcade games and 2 months for our Rapid Launch games. The estimated weighted average life of our durable virtual goods across all of our games was 13 months as of the fourth quarter of 2017.

While we believe our estimates to be reasonable based on available game player information and based on the disclosed methodologies of larger publicly reporting mobile game companies, we may revise such estimates in the future based on changes in the operational lives of our games, and based on changes in our ability to make such estimates. Any future adjustments arising from changes in the estimates of the lives of these virtual goods would be applied to the then current quarter, and prospectively on the basis that such changes are caused by new information indicating a change in game player behavior patterns compared to historical titles. Any changes in our estimates of useful lives of these virtual goods may result in revenues being recognized on a basis different from prior periods’ and may cause our operating results to fluctuate.

Arrangements with Multiple Performance Obligations: 

For arrangements with multiple performance obligations, we allocate the transaction price to each performance obligation in an amount that depicts the amount of consideration to which we expect to be entitled in exchange for satisfying each performance obligation, which is based on the standalone selling price. The standalone selling price represents the observable price which we would sell the advertising placement separately in a similar circumstance, to a similar customer.  

On August 7, 2018, we entered into a License Agreement (the “License Agreement”) pursuant to which the we granted Licensee the exclusive, worldwide right to localize, publish, distribute and operate one of the Company’s mobile games. The License Agreement represents an Arrangement with Multiple Performance Obligations.

As consideration for the grant of rights to Licensee under the License Agreement, Licensee agreed to make upfront payments to the Company (the “Minimum Guarantee”). The Minimum Guarantee impacts our revenue recognition as it relates to the distinction between functional intellectual property and symbolic intellectual property for licensing arrangements. We are required to make such distinction based on the nature of the license and recognize revenue at a point in time for functional intellectual property and over time for symbolic intellectual property (such as trademarks, brands and character images). The License Agreement also requires that the Company provide specific goods and services in the form of regular software updates.

We have determined the License Agreement includes multiple performance obligations related to functional intellectual property, symbolic intellectual property and software-related services (updates). For these three components, revenue associated with individual performance obligations is recorded separately as they are each distinct obligations. The standalone selling price for each component is determined by using an expected cost plus margin approach. The amounts assigned to each product or services is recognized when the product is delivered and/or when the services are performed. The obligation associated with functional intellectual property is deemed satisfied when we have transferred the software license to Licensee and the Licensee has deployed the intellectual property into the market. The symbolic intellectual property obligations are deemed to be performed over an extended period, whereby revenue is generally recognized over time on a ratable basis over the initial term of the License Agreement. The software-related services obligations (updates) are also deemed to be performed over an extended period, whereby revenue is generally recognized over time, on a ratable basis over the initial term of the License Agreement.

Disaggregation of Revenue:    

The following table summarizes revenue from contracts with customers for the Three months and Nine months ended September 30, 2018 and September 30, 2017

            
The Company reports as a single segment - mobile applications.  In the disaggregation above, the Company categorizes revenue by type, and by over-time or point-in-time recognition    

Accounts Receivable and Allowance for Doubtful Accounts

The Company monitors outstanding receivables based on factors surrounding the credit risk of specific customers, historical trends, and other information. The allowance for doubtful accounts is estimated based on an assessment of the Company’s ability to collect on customer accounts receivable. There is judgment involved with estimating the allowance for doubtful accounts and if the financial condition of the Company’s customers were to deteriorate, resulting in their inability to make the required payments, the Company may be required to record additional allowances or charges against revenues. The Company writes-off accounts receivable against the allowance when it determines a balance is uncollectible and no longer actively pursues its collection. As of September 30, 2018 and December 31, 2017, based upon the review of the outstanding accounts receivable, the Company has determined that an allowance for doubtful accounts is not required.

Cash Equivalents

For purposes of the Company’s financial statements, the Company considers all highly liquid investments purchased with an original maturity date of three months or less to be cash equivalents. The Company had no cash equivalents as of September 30, 2018 and December 31, 2017.

Concentrations of Credit Risk

Financial instruments and related items which potentially subject the Company to concentrations of credit risk consist primarily of cash, cash equivalents and trade receivables. The Company places its cash and temporary cash investments with credit quality institutions. At times, such investments may be in excess of the FDIC insurance limit of $250,000. To reduce its risk associated with the failure of such financial institution, the Company evaluates at least annually the rating of the financial institution in which it holds deposits. As of September 30, 2018, the total amount exceeding such limit was $681,981.

The Company derives revenue from mobile app platforms and advertising networks which individually may contribute 10% or more of the Company’s revenues in any given year. For the nine months ended September 30, 2018, revenue derived from two gaming platforms comprised 40% of such period’s total revenue and revenue derived from three advertising networks comprised 15% of such period’s total revenue. For the nine months ended September 30, 2017, revenue derived from two mobile app platforms comprised 35% of such period’s total revenue and revenue derived from three advertising networks comprised 25% of such period’s total revenue.

As of September 30, 2018, the receivable balance from two mobile app platforms comprised 34% of the Company’s total accounts receivable balance and the receivable balance from one advertising network comprised 6% of the Company’s total accounts receivable balance. As of December 31, 2017, the receivable balance from two advertising networks comprised 27% of the Company’s total accounts receivable balance and the receivable balance from two mobile app platforms comprised 49% of the Company’s total accounts receivable balance.

Property and Equipment

Property and equipment are stated at cost. Routine maintenance, repairs and replacement costs are expensed as incurred and improvements that extend the useful life of the assets are capitalized. When retired or otherwise disposed, the related carrying value and accumulated depreciation are removed from the respective accounts and the net difference, less any amount realized from disposition, is reflected in earnings. Property and equipment are depreciated using the straight-line method over their estimated useful lives as follows:

Software Development Costs

In accordance with ASC 985-20, "Accounting for the Costs of Computer Software to be Sold, Leased or Otherwise Marketed," the Company capitalizes certain costs related to the development of new software products or the enhancement of existing software products for use in our product offerings. These costs are capitalized from the point in time that technological feasibility has been established, as evidenced by a working model or detailed working program design to the point in time that the product is available for general release to customers. Software development costs are amortized on a straight-line basis over the estimated economic lives of the products, beginning when the product is placed into service.

The Company periodically evaluates whether events or circumstances have occurred that indicate that the remaining useful lives of its capitalized software development costs should be revised or that the remaining balance of such assets may not be recoverable. Software costs incurred prior to establishing technological feasibility are charged to Research and Development expense as incurred.

Impairment of Long-lived Assets

The Company regularly reviews property, equipment, software development costs and other long-lived assets for possible impairment. This review occurs annually or more frequently if events or changes in circumstances indicate the carrying amount of the asset may not be recoverable. The carrying amount of a long-lived asset is not recoverable if it exceeds the sum of the undiscounted cash flows expected to result from the use and eventual disposition of the asset. Based upon management’s assessment, there was no impairment of the Company’s property and equipment at September 30, 2018 and December 31, 2017. Management has deemed that certain software development costs were impaired at December 31, 2017, and such impairment is more fully described in Note 8 below. There was no impairment of software development costs during the nine months ended September 30, 2018.

In general, investments in which the Company owns less than 20% of an entity’s equity interest or does not hold significant influence over the investee are accounted for under the cost method. Under the cost method, these investments are carried at the lower of cost or fair value. The Company periodically assesses its cost method investments for impairment. If determination that a decline in fair value is other than temporary, the Company will write-down the investment and charge the impairment against operations. At September 30, 2018 and December 31, 2017, the carrying value of our investments totaled $5,000 and $5,000, respectively.

Derivative Instrument Liability

The Company accounts for derivative instruments in accordance with ASC 815, Derivatives and Hedging, which establishes accounting and reporting standards for derivative instruments and hedging activities, including certain derivative instruments embedded in other financial instruments or contracts, and requires recognition of all derivatives on the balance sheet at fair value, regardless of hedging relationship designation. Accounting for changes in fair value of the derivative instruments depends on whether the derivatives qualify as hedge relationships and the types of relationships designated are based on the exposures hedged. At September 30, 2018 and December 31, 2017, the Company did not have any derivative instruments that were designated as hedges.

Cost of Revenue (excluding amortization of software development costs)

Cost of revenue includes primarily platform and advertising network fees, licensing costs and hosting fees. The Company, along with all mobile application publishers, is required to pay platform fees to Apple, Google and Amazon equal to approximately 30% of gross revenue. The Company is also required to pay a revenue share of approximately 30% to advertising networks and similar service providers.

Stock-Based Compensation

The Company measures the fair value of stock-based compensation issued to employees and non-employees using the stock price observed in the arms-length private placement transaction nearest the measurement date (for stock transactions), or the fair value of the award (for non-stock transactions), which are considered to be more reliably determinable measures of fair value than the value of the services being rendered. The measurement date is the earlier of (1) the date at which commitment for performance by the counterparty to earn the equity instruments is reached, or (2) the date at which the counterparty’s performance is complete.

Basic and Diluted Net (Loss) per Share Calculations

The Company computes per share amounts in accordance with FASB ASC Topic 260 “Earnings per Share” (“EPS”), which requires presentation of basic and diluted EPS. Basic EPS is computed by dividing the income (loss) available to Common Stockholders by the weighted-average number of common shares outstanding for the period. Diluted EPS is based on the weighted-average number of shares of Common Stock and Common Stock equivalents outstanding during the periods; however, potential common shares are excluded for period in which the Company incurs losses, as their effect is anti-dilutive.

For the nine months ended September 30, 2018, potentially dilutive securities excluded from the computation of basic and diluted net (loss) per share include 11,000,000 Restricted Stock Units, 5,050,000 Common Stock Options and 34,200,002 Common Stock Warrants.

For the nine months ended September 30, 2017, potentially dilutive securities excluded from the computation of basic and diluted net (loss) per share include 10,800,000 potentially convertible common shares related to the Company’s Senior Secured Convertible Debenture, 1,680,000 potentially convertible common shares related to the Company’s Series A Preferred Stock, 6,000,000 potentially convertible shares related to the Company’s Series A-1 Preferred Stock, 5,050,000 Common Stock Options and 3,500,000 Common Stock Warrants.

Subsequent Events

In accordance with ASC 855 “Subsequent Events” the Company evaluated subsequent events after the balance sheet date through the date of issuance.

Recent Accounting Pronouncements

In January 2017, the FASB issued ASU 2017-04, Intangibles - Goodwill and Other (Topic 350). This ASU eliminates Step 2 from the goodwill impairment test. Under the new guidance, an entity should perform its annual or interim goodwill impairment test by comparing the fair value of a reporting unit with its carrying amount and recognize an impairment charge for the amount by which the carrying amount exceeds the reporting unit’s fair value. Additionally, this ASU eliminates the requirements for any reporting unit with a zero or negative carrying amount to perform a qualitative assessment and, if it fails that qualitative test, to perform Step 2 of the goodwill impairment test. The amendments in this ASU are effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2019, including interim periods within those fiscal years, and is applied on a prospective basis. Early adoption is permitted for interim or annual goodwill impairment tests performed on testing dates after January 1, 2017. While we are currently evaluating the impact of the adoption of this ASU, we do not believe that the adoption of this guidance will have a material impact on our consolidated financial statements.

In April 2016, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (the “FASB”) issued Accounting Standards Update (“ASU”) 2016–10 “Revenue from Contract with Customers (Topic 606): Identifying Performance Obligations and Licensing.” The amendments in this Update do not change the core principle of the guidance in Topic 606. Rather, the amendments in this Update clarify the following two aspects of Topic 606: identifying performance obligations and the licensing implementation guidance, while retaining the related principles for those areas. Topic 606 includes implementation guidance on (a) contracts with customers to transfer goods and services in exchange for consideration and (b) determining whether an entity’s promise to grant a license provides a customer with either a right to use the entity’s intellectual property (which is satisfied at a point in time) or a right to access the entity’s intellectual property (which is satisfied over time). The amendments in this Update are intended to render more detailed implementation guidance with the expectation to reduce the degree of judgement necessary to comply with Topic 606. The Company adopted the new standard effective January 1, 2018 using the modified retrospective method. The adoption of the new standard did not have an impact on the Company’s unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements.

In February 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016-02, Leases. This new guidance requires lessees to recognize a right-of-use asset and a lease liability for virtually all leases (other than leases that meet the definition of a short-term lease). The liability will be equal to the present value of lease payments. The asset will be based on the liability, subject to adjustment, such as for initial direct costs. For income statement purposes, the FASB retained a dual model, requiring leases to be classified as either operating or finance. Operating leases will result in straight-line expense (similar to current operating leases) while finance leases will result in a front-loaded expense pattern (similar to current capital leases). Classification will be based on criteria that are largely similar to those applied in current lease accounting. This update is effective for annual periods, and interim periods within those years, beginning after December 15, 2018. This new guidance must be adopted using a modified retrospective approach whereby lessees and lessors are required to recognize and measure leases at the beginning of the earliest period presented using a modified retrospective approach. Early adoption is permitted. We are currently evaluating the impact of adopting this update on our Consolidated Financial Statements, which will consist primarily of a balance sheet gross up of our operating leases, mostly for office space.

Management does not believe that any other recently issued, but not yet effective, accounting standards if currently adopted would have a material effect on the accompanying consolidated financial statements.

Note 3 — Net Loss Per Share

The Company computes net loss per share by dividing its net loss for the period by the weighted average number of common shares outstanding during the period less the weighted average common shares subject to restrictions imposed by the Company.

The following warrants to purchase common stock, options to purchase common stock, restricted stock units (“RSUs”) and preferred stock have been excluded from the computation of net loss per share of common stock for the periods presented because including them would have had an anti-dilutive effect: 

Note 4 — Fair Value Measurements

Fair value is defined as the exchange price that would be received for an asset or paid to transfer a liability (an exit price) in the principal or most advantageous market for the asset or liability in an orderly transaction between market participants at the measurement date. Assets and liabilities that are measured at fair value are reported using a three-level fair value hierarchy that prioritizes the inputs used to measure fair value. This hierarchy maximizes the use of observable inputs and minimizes the use of unobservable inputs. The three levels of inputs used to measure fair value are as follows:

As of September 30, 2018 and December 31, 2017, the Company did not identify any assets and liabilities that are required to be presented in the balance sheets at fair value in accordance with ASC 825, Financial Instruments.

Note 5 — Accounts Receivable

The Company had no bad debts during the nine months ended September 30, 2018 and 2017.

Note 6 — Prepaid Expenses

Prepaid expense consisted of the following as of September 30, 2018 and December 31, 2017:

Note 7 — Property and Equipment

Property and equipment consisted of the following as of September 30, 2018 and December 31, 2017:

During the nine months ended September 30, 2018 and 2017, depreciation expense was $7,085 and $7,425, respectively.

Note 8 — Capitalized Software Development

Capitalized software development costs at September 30, 2018 and December 31, 2017 were as follows:

During the nine months ended September 30, 2018 and 2017, amortization expense related to capitalized software was $437,199 and $543,157, respectively. At December 31, 2017, management deemed that the net software development cost carrying amount related to certain of our released and unreleased mobile games was likely not recoverable, thus we took an impairment charge of $256,310 as of December 31, 2017.

Note 9 - Investments

In January 2015, the Company made a $5,000 passive investment into Peer5, a Tel Aviv, Israel based internet infrastructure company focused on improving the scalability and efficiency of mobile and internet content delivery. 

Note 10 - Related Party Transactions

The Company utilizes the services of an affiliated entity of a major shareholder for the development of its Rapid-Launch mobile games. Amounts incurred by the Company for such development services, which were primarily attributed to capitalized software development costs, for the nine months ended September 30, 2018 and 2017 were $372,029 and $433,578, respectively. As of September 30, 2018 and December 31, 2017, the Company had balances due to related parties related primarily due to the software development services of $39,580 and $100,115, respectively.

Note 11 — Senior Secured Convertible Debenture

On June 19, 2015, the Company and Hillair Capital Investment L.P. (“Hillair”) entered into a Securities Purchase Agreement, dated June 19, 2015 (the “Purchase Agreement”) pursuant to which the Company issued to Hillair the following (i) $2,240,000 8% Original Issue Discount Senior Secured Convertible Debenture (the “Original Debenture”) which was convertible into shares of the Company’s common stock at a price per share of $.205, (ii) Series A Common Stock purchase warrants (the “Series A Warrants”) to purchase up to 10,926,829 shares of common stock with an exercise price of $.30 and (iii) Series B Common Stock purchase warrants (the “Series B Warrants”) to purchase up to 10,926,829 shares of common stock with an exercise price of $.30 (collectively, the terms of which are referred to herein as the “Original Financing”).

In July 28, 2016, the Company and Hillair entered into an Exchange Agreement (“2016 Exchange Agreement”) to amend and refinance the terms of the $2.24 million 8% Original Issue Discount Senior Secured Convertible Debenture originally issued in June, 2015. Immediately prior to the 2016 Exchange Agreement, the Company owed cash payments to Hillair of $560,000 on October 1, 2016 and $1,120,000 on January 1, 2017 under the Original Debenture.  Pursuant to the 2016 Exchange Agreement, the following material terms of the Original Financing were amended, altered and/or ratified: (i) the Original Debenture was exchanged in its entirety for the issuance of a new 8% Original Issue Discount Senior Secured Convertible Debenture with an original principal amount of $2,394,000 and an increased conversion price of $0.25 (the “2016 Debenture”), (ii) the issuance of 420 shares of a new Series A Convertible Preferred Stock as further described by the Certificate of Designation of Preferences, Rights and Limitations of Series A Convertible Preferred Stock which may be exercised for up to 1,680,000 shares of Company’s common stock, (iii) the extension of the maturity date of the Series A Warrant from June 22, 2020 until July 28, 2021, (iv) the cancellation of the Series B Warrants in their entirety, (v) the ratification of the Security Agreement executed by the Company with respect to all of its assets (as required by the initial Purchase Agreement and Original Debenture) as continued collateral for the New Debenture as well as the ratification of the Subsidiary Guarantee and Pledge and Security Agreement as such agreements are referenced in the Purchase Agreement and Exchange Agreement, and (vi) the creation of a new right for the Holder, subject to the written consent of the Company, for a $2,100,000 cash investment in the Company with identical terms to the new financing.

In June 2017, the Company and Hillair entered into an amendment agreement (the “2017 Amended Agreement”) to amend and refinance the terms of the 2016 Debenture. Pursuant to the 2017 Amended Agreement, the Company prepaid to Hillair a portion of the outstanding principal on the 2016 Debenture in the amount of $234,000 and all of the accrued interest on the 2016 Debenture through June 30, 2017 in the amount of $191,520. Following such payments, the remaining principal amount of the Holder’s amended 2016 Debenture was $2,160,000 (the “Amended 2016 Debenture”). In addition, the Company and Hillair agreed to reduce the conversion price of the 2016 Debenture from $0.25 to $0.20. The Amended 2016 Debenture was due on July 31, 2018, and the Company shall pay interest to the Holder on the aggregate unconverted and then outstanding principal amount of this debenture at the rate of 8% per annum, payable on each December 31, March 31, July 31, and October 31, thereafter, beginning on December 31, 2017. In June 2017, the Company and Holder also entered into an exchange agreement (the “2017 Exchange Agreement”) to exchange the existing 10,926,829 shares of Series A Common Stock purchase warrants for 1,500 shares of Series A-1 Convertible Preferred Stock.

On September 7, 2017, Hillair assigned all of its rights under and relating to the Senior Debenture to HSPL Holdings, LLC (“HSPL”), including the Series A-1 Convertible Preferred Stock.

On January 22, 2018, HSPL elected to convert all of the 1,500 shares of Series A-1 Stock into 6,000,000 shares of the Company’s common stock. The 6,000,000 shares of common stock converted under the Series A-1 Preferred Stock were issued without restrictive legend pursuant to Section 4(a)(1) of the Securities Act.

On February 23, 2018, the Company entered into a Series B Exchange Agreement (the “Series B Exchange Agreement”) with HSPL to amend the terms of the 2017 Amended Agreement. On February 23, 2018, the Company paid to HSPL $1,200,000 in cash for a net reduction of the principal amount of the Amended 2016 Debenture of $1,142,857 after giving effect to a 5% prepayment penalty which resulted in a remaining principal balance of $1,017,143 plus all accrued but unpaid interest under the 2016 Debenture (the “Remaining 2016 Debenture Balance”). Pursuant to the Series B Exchange Agreement, the Remaining 2016 Debenture Balance and the Series A Preferred Stock were exchanged in their entirety (and thus cancelled) for issuance of 1,854 shares of Series B Convertible Stock (the “Series B Preferred Stock”) as further described by the Certificate of Designation of Preferences, Rights and Limitations of Series B Convertible Preferred Stock which may be initially exercised for up to 15,450,000 shares of Company’s common stock, subject to adjustment. As a result of the Series B Exchange Agreement, the Company eliminated all of its outstanding debt. Each share of the Series B Preferred Stock has a conversion price of $0.12 and a stated value of $1,000. Subject to certain exceptions, in the event the Company issues shares of its common stock at a price below $0.082, the conversion price of the Series B Preferred Stock will be reduced to the price of such issuance. HSPL and any subsequent holders of the Series B Preferred Stock are prohibited from converting the Series B Preferred Stock into more than 9.99% of the Company’s then outstanding number of shares of common stock after giving effect to such conversion.  The shares of Series B Preferred Stock were issued in reliance upon an exemption from registration provided by Section 4(a)(2) of the Securities Act. The shares of common stock underlying the Series B Preferred Stock are subject to being issued without restrictive legend pursuant to Section 3(a)(9) of the Securities Act, subject to various conditions and limitations.

On May 2, 2018, HSPL elected to convert 500 shares of its 1,854 shares of Series B Preferred Stock into 4,166,667 shares of the Company’s common stock. The 4,166,667 shares of common stock converted under the Series B Preferred Stock were issued without restrictive legend pursuant to Section 4(a)(1) of the Securities Act.

On September 7, 2018, the Company repurchased 1,354 shares of the Company’s Series B Preferred Stock from HSPL for a per share purchase price of $270.83, or an aggregate purchase price of $366,707. The repurchased shares represented all of the outstanding shares of the Series B Preferred Stock and, following the transaction, the Company will have no Preferred Stock outstanding in any class. Pursuant to the terms of the Series B Preferred Stock, the repurchased shares were convertible into 11,283,333 shares of the Company’s common stock.   The repurchase purchase price represents a per share common stock purchase price of $0.0325, if conversion had occurred.

During the nine months ended September 30, 2018 and 2017, amortization of the debt discount related to the Senior Secured Convertible Debentures was $187,876 and $1,122,440, respectively. During the nine months ended September 30, 2018 and September 30, 2017, amortization of the original issue discount related to the Senior Secured Convertible Debentures was $51,230 and $264,732, respectively. As a result of the 2017 Amendment Agreement, the Company recorded a loss of $830,001 related to the debt original debt extinguishment for the nine months ended September 30, 2017.

Senior secured convertible debenture payable as of September 30, 2018, and December 31, 2017 were comprised of the following:

Note 12 — Commitments and Contingencies

Leases

In August 2016, the Company entered into a lease for office space which expires in November 2021. Future minimum lease payments under this lease are as follows:

For the nine months ended September 30, 2018 and 2017 rent expense totaled $43,368 and $41,887, respectively.

License Agreement

On August 7, 2018 (“Effective Date”), the Company entered into a License Agreement (the “Solitaire Dash License Agreement”), pursuant to which the Company granted Licensee the exclusive, worldwide right to localize, publish, distribute and operate the Company’s mobile game titled Solitaire Dash – Card Game (“Solitaire Dash”). 

As consideration for the grant of rights to Licensee under the Solitaire Dash License Agreement, Licensee agreed to make upfront payments to the Company in the aggregate of $500,000 payable in installments (the “Upfront Payments”). As of September 30, 2018, the Company has received $300,000 in upfront payments. In addition, for sales of Solitaire Dash, the Solitaire Dash License Agreement provides an ongoing net revenue share formula which would allow the Company to receive certain percentages of the revenues received by the Licensee based on certain revenue targets in addition to the Upfront Payments.  As part of a separate agreement, the Company agreed to pay the third-party who introduced the Company and Licensee 6.5% of all payments received by the Company under the Solitaire Dash License Agreement. In accordance with the agreement, the Company has recognized $160,937 in revenue in the period ending September 30, 2018 and deferred revenue of $139,063 as of September 30, 2018.

The Solitaire Dash License Agreement is for a term of four years from the Effective Date and will automatically renew for subsequent one year periods unless Licensee notifies the Company of its intent to terminate within 90 days before the end of the fourth year or any subsequent renewal period. During the term on the contract, the Company responsible to maintain and develop updates of Solitaire Dash and provide such versions to the Licensee. Either party may also unilaterally terminate the Solitaire Dash License Agreement under certain circumstances.

Minimum Developer Commitments

Future developer commitments as of September 30, 2018, were $487,621. These developer commitments reflect the Company’s estimated minimum cash obligations to external software developers (“third-party developers”) to design and develop its software applications but do not necessarily represent the periods in which they will be expensed. The Company advances funds to these third-party developers, in installments, payable upon the completion of specified development milestones.

At September 30, 2018, future unpaid developer commitments were as follows:

The amounts represented in the table above reflect the Company’s minimum cash obligations for the respective calendar years, but do not necessarily represent the periods in which they will be expensed in the Company’s consolidated financial statements.

Note 13 — Stockholders’ Equity (Deficit)

Common Stock

At September 30, 2018, the authorized capital of the Company consisted of 250,000,000 shares of common stock, par value $0.001 per share, and 1,532,500 shares of blank check preferred stock, par value $0.001 per share.

In February, 2017, the Company entered into a Stock Purchase Agreement with an individual investor for the purchase of 500,000 shares of the Company's common stock for an aggregate purchase price of $150,000, or $0.30 per share. In connection with the financing, the Company also issued to the investor two warrants. Each warrant has a term of three years and each warrant shall enable the investor to purchase up to an additional 500,000 shares of the Company's common stock at an exercise price of $.30 per share and $.36 per share, respectively. On January 18, 2018, the Company reduced the price per share of the two warrants from $0.36 and $0.30 to $0.12.  Upon the reduction of the exercise price, the shareholder elected to exercise both warrants for an aggregate cash payment of $120,000 for 1,000,000 shares of common stock.

On January 22, 2018, the holder of the Company’s Series A-1 Preferred Stock elected to convert all of the 1,500 shares of such stock into 6,000,000 share of common stock.

On January 30, 2018, we consummated the first closing of the Company’s private placement announced on September 7, 2017 (the “Offering”). Specifically, the Company entered into Subscription Agreements (the “Subscription Agreement”) with various investors (collectively, the “Investors”) for the purchase of 11,791,668 shares of the Company’s Common Stock for an aggregate purchase price of $1,415,000, or $0.12 per share. The Company received net proceeds of $1,162,804 from the first closing after payment of the placement agent’s 10% cash commission as well as other expenses relating to the Offering and other expenses of the Company. In connection with the first closing and pursuant to the terms of the Offering, the Company issued to the Investors Common Stock Purchase Warrants (the “Warrants”) to purchase up to 11,791,668 shares of the Company’s Common Stock at a per share exercise price of $0.144. The Warrants have five-year terms and do not allow for cashless exercise unless the Company is unable to obtain an effective registration statement with the Securities and Exchange Commission regarding the shares underlying the Warrants, subject to certain conditions.

On February 7, 2018, we consummated the second closing of the Offering. Specifically, the Company entered into Subscription Agreements with Investors for the purchase of 8,562,499 shares of the Company’s Common Stock for an aggregate purchase price of $1,027,500, or $0.12 per share. The Company received net proceeds of $920,680 from the second closing after payment of the placement agent’s 10% cash commission as well as other expenses relating to the Offering. In connection with the second closing and pursuant to the terms of the Offering, the Company issued to the Investors Warrants to purchase up to 8,562,499 shares of the Company’s Common Stock at a per share exercise price of $0.144.

On February 15, 2018, we consummated the third and final closing of the Offering. Specifically, the Company entered into Subscription Agreements with Investors for the purchase of 4,645,835 shares of the Company’s Common Stock for an aggregate purchase price of $557,500, or $0.12 per share. The Company received net proceeds of $498,303 from the third closing after payment of the placement agent’s 10% cash commission as well as other expenses relating to the Offering. In connection with the third closing and pursuant to the terms of the Offering, the Company issued to the Investors Warrants to purchase up to 4,645,835 shares of the Company’s Common Stock at a per share exercise price of $0.144.

On May 2, 2018, the holder of our Series B Convertible Preferred Stock (“Series B Stock”) elected to convert 500 of its 1,854 shares of Series B Stock into 4,166,667 shares of the Company’s common stock.  The 4,166,667 shares of common stock converted under the Series B Stock were issued without restrictive legend pursuant to Section 4(a)(1) of the Securities Act.

On September 7, 2018, we entered into a Stock Repurchase Agreement whereby the Company repurchased 1,354 shares of the Company’s Series B Stock for a per share purchase price of $270.83, or an aggregate purchase price of $366,707. The Repurchased Shares represent all of the outstanding shares of the Series B Stock. Pursuant to the terms of the Series B Stock, the Repurchased Shares were convertible into 11,283,333 shares of the Company’s common stock. The Repurchase Amount represents a per share purchase price of the Conversion Shares, if conversion had occurred, equal to $0.0325. Pursuant to the terms of the Series B Repurchase Agreement, the Repurchased Shares were canceled in full and of no further force or effect as of the Effective Date. After the Effective Date, there are no shares of Series B Stock outstanding and, following the transaction, the Company will have no Preferred Stock outstanding in any class.

Options

In December 2015, the Company approved the 2015 Equity Incentive Plan (the “Plan”). The Plan provides for the grant of incentive stock options, non-statutory stock options, restricted stock awards, restricted stock unit awards, performance stock awards and other stock-based awards (collectively, “Stock Awards”). Under the Plan, the Company may grant Stock Awards to its employees, directors and consultants of up to 6,000,000 shares of common stock.

In January 2016 and pursuant to the 2015 Equity Incentive Plan, the Company granted a non-executive member of the Company’s Board of Directors an option to purchase 300,000 shares of the Company’s common stock at an exercise price equal to $0.33 per share. Such option shall vest in eight quarterly installments of 37,500 shares at the end of each quarterly anniversary commencing on March 31, 2016, contingent upon the grantee’s continual service as a member of the Board of Directors as of each vesting installment date. Total stock-based compensation related to this option grant was $4,124 and $37,117 during the nine months ended September 30, 2018 and 2017, respectively.

In May 2016 and pursuant to the 2015 Equity Incentive Plan, the Company granted an executive officer an option to purchase 250,000 shares of the Company’s common stock at an exercise price equal to $0.1925 per share. Such option shall vest in eight quarterly installments of 31,250 shares at the end of each quarterly anniversary commencing on August 31, 2016, contingent upon the grantee’s continual employment by the Company as of each vesting installment date. Total stock-based compensation related to this option grant was $10,026 and $18,047 during the nine months ended September 30, 2018 and 2017, respectively.

On May 11, 2017 and pursuant to the 2015 Equity Incentive Plan, the Company granted executive officers, directors and employees options to purchase 4,500,000 shares of the Company’s common stock at an exercise price equal to $0.11 per share. Such options shall vest in twelve quarterly installments of 375,000 shares at the end of each quarterly anniversary commencing on June 30, 2017, contingent upon the grantee’s continual employment or service with the Company as of each vesting installment date. Total stock-based compensation related to this option grant was $112,500 and $62,500 during the nine months ended September 30, 2018 and 2017, respectively.

On January 23, 2018 and via the written consent of a majority of its stockholders, the Company increased the number of its authorized common stock from 150,000,000 to 250,000,000 and increased the number of shares of common stock underlying its 2015 Equity Incentive Plan from 6,000,000 to 18,000,000.

The fair value of the stock options issued in 2017 was determined using the Black Scholes option pricing model with the following assumptions: dividend yield: 0%; volatility: 304.61%; risk free rate: 2.39%; term 10 years.

The aggregate intrinsic value in the preceding table is calculated as the difference between the exercise price of the underlying awards and the quoted closing price of the Company’s common stock on The OTC Markets of $0.05 per share as of September 28, 2018 (the last trading day in the nine months ended September 30, 2018).

Restricted Stock Units

On February 21, 2018, the Board of Directors of the Company approved grants of 10,750,000 Restricted Stock Units (as defined by the Company’s 2015 Equity Incentive Plan) to certain named officers and directors as well as a key employee of the Company. The total value of the grants was $4,515,000 and the shares have a thirty-six-month vesting period. 

On August 2, 2018, the Board of Directors of the Company approved a grant of 250,000 Restricted Stock Units (as defined by the Company’s 2015 Equity Incentive Plan) to a named officer of the Company. The total value of the grant was $17,500 and the shares have a thirty-six-month vesting period. 

The grants of Restricted Stock Units were issued to the named officers and directors as well as a key employee of the Company as follows (the “RSU Grants”):

Subject to each recipient continuing as an officer, director, or employee (as appropriate) of the Company, each of the RSU Grants shall vest as follows: beginning on the eighteenth month following the date of the grant, the RSU Grants shall vest ratably over the following eighteen months for a total vesting period of thirty-six months. The RSU Grants shall include a provision for acceleration upon a Corporate Transaction (as defined in the 2015 Equity Incentive Plan).  The RSU Grants to the officers and directors of the Company were approved by each of the non- employee members of the Board of Directors of the Company. Compensation expense will be recognized ratably over the total vesting schedule The Company will periodically adjust the cumulative compensation expense for forfeited awards. As of September 30, 2018, the Company has recorded $910,243 in compensation expense related to the February and August 2018 RSU grants.

The following table shows a summary of RSU activity for the nine months ended September 30, 2018:

Under ASC 718, Compensation-Stock Compensation (“ASC 718”), the Company has measured the value of its February 2018 award as if it were vested and issued on the grant date with a value of $4,515,000 based on the closing price of the Company's stock at the grant date of the RSU Grant ($0.42 per share). The Company has measured the value of its August 2018 award as if it were vested and issued on the grant date with a value of $17,500 based on the closing price of the Company's stock at the grant date of the RSU Grant ($0.07 per share).

Common stock warrants

On February 15, 2018 and in connection with the three closings and pursuant to the terms of the Offering described above, the Company issued to the placement agent Common Stock Purchase Warrants (the “Placement Agent Warrants”) to purchase up to 5,000,000 shares of the Company’s Common Stock at an exercise price of $0.15. The Placement Agent Warrants will have a five-year term and will have cashless exercise provisions at all times.

In connection with the three closings of the Offering described above, the Company issued Warrants to the Investors to purchase up to 25,000,002 shares of the Company’s Common Stock at a per share exercise price of $0.144.

On February 20, 2018 and as amended on March 1, 2018, the Company entered into an investment banking advisory agreement with Westpark Capital, Inc. with an initial term of six months. In connection with this agreement, Westpark Capital purchased a three-year common stock warrant to purchase up 1,400,000 share of the Company’s common stock at an exercise price of $.01 per share from the Company for a purchase price of $100. Stock based compensation of $416,006 was recorded during the nine months ended September 30, 2018. For a total fair value of $416,106.

During the nine months ended September 30, 2018, the Company granted warrants in connection with the offering described above. The warrant terms are 5 years expiring in January, 2023 and February, 2023. In January 2018, the Company agreed to reduce the exercise price of 1,000,000 warrants issued in connection with the February 2017 Stock Purchase Agreement describe above to $0.12 per share.  These warrants were subsequently exercised in January 2018 totaling $120,000.

Note 14 – Non-Controlling Interest

On December 29, 2017, the Company, jointly with an individual investor, organized Revolution Blockchain, LLC (“RB”), a Colorado limited liability company for the purpose of developing, marketing and monetizing games and applications that, other than for payment purposes, write to or read from a blockchain, with ownership interests of 96% and 4% for the Company and the individual investor, respectively.

In connection with entering into the RB joint venture with the individual investor, RB issued to the individual investor a four percent (4%) membership interest as a Class A Member of RB for an aggregate purchase price of $100,000. The Class A Members have the right to convert their entire initial capital investment into shares of the Company’s common stock at a conversion price of $0.25 per share. RB shall distribute to the Class A Members no later than (i) forty-five days from the end of each fiscal quarter and (ii) ninety days from the end of each fiscal year, on a pro rata basis, 50% of all net revenue earned by RB in the previous fiscal period, as applicable, until the Class A Members have received two times the Class A Member’s initial capital commitment. At such time the distribution percentage shall be decreased from 50% to 20% of net revenue. For purposes of illustration, for each $100,000 Initial Capital Commitment, a Class A Member shall initially receive a 10% distribution right of Net Revenue until such time as such Class A Member has received $200,000. At such time, such Class A Member’s distribution right shall decrease from 10% to 4% of the Net Revenue.

On March 26, 2018, the Company purchased the 4% interest in its Revolution Blockchain, LLC majority-owned subsidiary that it did not otherwise own for a purchase price equal to the following: (i) $100,000 in cash and (ii) the issuance of a three-year common stock warrant to purchase up to 300,000 shares of the Company’s common stock at an exercise price of $0.25. Following the transaction, Revolution Blockchain LLC became a wholly-owned subsidiary of the Company.

Note 15 – Subsequent Events

The Company has analyzed its operations subsequent to September 30, 2018 to the date these unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements were issued and has no transactions or events requiring disclosure.