Form SC 13E3 HEMISPHERE MEDIA GROUP, Filed by: HEMISPHERE MEDIA GROUP, INC.
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Hemisphere Media Holdings, LLC
HWK Parent, LLC
HWK Merger Sub 1, Inc.
HWK Merger Sub 2, LLC
Gato Investments LP
Gemini Latin Holdings, LLC
Peter M. Kern
(305) 421-6364
|
Jeffrey D. Marell
Paul, Weiss, Rifkind, Wharton & Garrison LLP 1285 Avenue of the Americas New York, NY 10019 (212) 373-3000 |
| |
Oliver Smith
Darren Schweiger Davis Polk & Wardell LLP 450 Lexington Avenue New York, NY 10017 (212) 450-4000 |
| |
Andrew W. Ment
Covington & Burling LLP 620 Eighth Avenue New York, NY 10018 (212) 841-1000 |
| |
David Allinson
David Beller Latham & Watkins LLP 1271 Avenue of the Americas New York, NY 10020 (212) 906-1200 |
|
a.
|
☒
|
The filing of solicitation materials or an information statement subject to Regulation 14A, Regulation 14C or Rule 13e-3(c) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. |
b.
|
☐
|
The filing of a registration statement under the Securities Act of 1933. |
c.
|
☐
|
A tender offer. |
d.
|
☐
|
None of the above. |
Exhibit No.
|
| |
Description
|
|
(a)(2)(i) | | | Preliminary Proxy Statement of Hemisphere Media Group, Inc. (included in the Schedule 14A filed on June 27, 2022, and incorporated herein by reference) (the “Preliminary Proxy Statement”). | |
(a)(2)(ii) | | | | |
(a)(2)(iii) | | | | |
(a)(2)(iv) | | | | |
(a)(5)(i) | | | | |
(a)(5)(ii) | | | |
| | | | HEMISPHERE MEDIA GROUP, INC. | |
| | | |
By:
/s/ Alex J. Tolston
Name: Alex J. Tolston
Title: Executive Vice President, Chief Legal Officer and Corporate Secretary |
|
| | | | HEMISPHERE MEDIA HOLDINGS, LLC | |
| | | |
By:
/s/ Alex J. Tolston
Name: Alex J. Tolston
Title: Corporate Secretary |
|
| | | | HWK PARENT, LLC | |
| | | |
By:
/s/ Adam Reiss
Name: Adam Reiss
Title: Vice President |
|
| | | | HWK MERGER SUB 1, INC. | |
| | | |
By:
/s/ Adam Reiss
Name: Adam Reiss
Title: Vice President |
|
| | | | HWK MERGER SUB 2, LLC. | |
| | | |
By:
/s/ Adam Reiss
Name: Adam Reiss
Title: Vice President |
|
| | | | GATO INVESTMENTS LP | |
| | | |
By:
Gemini Latin Holdings, LLC, its general partner
By:
/s/ Peter M. Kern
Name: Peter M. Kern
Title: Managing Member |
|
| | | | GEMINI LATIN HOLDINGS, LLC | |
| | | |
By:
/s/ Peter M. Kern
Name: Peter M. Kern
Title: Managing Member |
|
| | | |
/s/ Peter M. Kern
|
|
| | | | Peter M. Kern | |
Exhibit (c)(iii)
Strictly Private and Confidential
Project Hawkeye
Presentation to the Special Committee of the Board of Directors
April 24, 2022
Strictly Private and Confidential
Pelican and Sparrow Update
On April 21, 2022, Sparrow informed Moelis that Talon was changing the consideration paid for Pelican
$ in millions | Pelican Offer Update | |||||
Initial
Pelican Proposal from Talon |
Low | Mid | High | |||
(+) Cash Consideration | $115.0 | $115.0 | $115.0 | |||
(+) Radio Assets @5.0x - 7.0x 2022E Adj. EBITDA of $7.1mm | 35.6 | 42.7 | 49.9 | |||
(+) Net Benefit from PR NOLs (PV)1 | - | 12.4 | 24.4 | |||
Prior Pelican Consideration | $150.6 | $170.2 | $189.2 | |||
Revised
Pelican Proposal / Adjustments |
(-) 3 Years of Programming Fee (PV)2 | (13.6) | (13.6) | (13.6) | ||
(-) Unreimbursed Content Payments / License Fee Forgiveness 3 | (7.3) | (7.3) | (7.3) | |||
(-) Incremental Puerto Rico Lease Obligations (PV) 4 | (23.5) | (20.0) | (15.0) | |||
Revised Pelican Consideration | $106.2 | $129.3 | $153.3 | |||
$ Delta from Original Offer | ($44.4) | ($40.9) | ($35.9) | |||
% Delta from Original Offer | (29.5%) | (24.0%) | (19.0%) |
Source: | Hawkeye Management, Talon, Sparrow and third party tax advisors |
1. | High end reflects present value of net benefit of Puerto Rican NOLs received less the decrease in foreign tax credits utilized given the decrease in forecasted taxes paid in Puerto Rico – discounted at 8.0%; mid-point assumes 51% probability of utilization |
2. | Includes three $5mm payments for programming fees from 2022 to 2024 |
3. | Reflects upfront content funding payments that will not be reimbursed through working capital and current payment that Talon owes Pelican for content that will be forgiven as a result of the transaction |
4. | Low end reflects present value of absorbed lease obligations as a result of the transaction, mid and high end reflects illustrative potential to break the lease before 2059 when the current contract expires – discounted at 8.0% |
[ 1 ]
Strictly Private and Confidential
Selected Publicly Traded Companies Analysis - Radio | |
Publicly Traded Companies Analysis |
($ in millions, except per share data) | %
of 52 Week High |
Market Cap | Enterprise Value |
TEV / Post SBC EBITDA | 21-23E CAGR | CY22E EBITDA MARGIN | |||
CY22 | CY23 | Revenue | EBITDA | ||||||
62.0% | $2,630 | $8,008 | 7.0x | 6.8x | 9.2% | 22.3% | 27.6% | ||
52.8% | 395 | 2,162 | 7.0x | 6.3x | 11.6% | 43.5% | 21.4% | ||
97.4% | 317 | 1,166 | 6.8x | 6.0x | 7.3% | 22.4% | 17.2% | ||
28.9% | 335 | 1,053 | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | ||
75.9% | 230 | 733 | 6.5x | 6.2x | 8.8% | 7.8% | 24.2% | ||
50.4% | 52 | 307 | 8.1x | 8.0x | 7.9% | 21.6% | 14.0% | ||
44.4% | 82 | 254 | 6.7x | 6.3x | 1.9% | 2.8% | 14.0% | ||
82.3% | 142 | 89 | 4.3x1 | NA | NA | NA | 19.2%1 | ||
Average | 6.6x | 6.6x | 7.8% | 20.1% | 19.7% | ||||
Median | 6.8x | 6.3x | 8.4% | 22.0% | 19.2% | ||||
Memo: | |||||||||
Puerto Rico Radio 2 | (0.1%) | 3.2% | 48.9% |
Source: | Company filings, Wall Street research, Press releases |
Note: | Market data as of 04/22/2022 |
1. | Reflects LTM EBITDA metrics |
2. | CAGRs represent ’19A – ’22E |
[ 2 ]
Strictly Private and Confidential
Selected Precedent Transactions Analysis | |
Radio Precedent Transactions |
RADIO
Ann. | Target | Acquiror | Markets | TEV ($mm) | TEV
/ LTM EBITDA |
Jul-19 | Emmis Communications Corp. | Standard General L.P. | #1 New York | $106 | 10.0x |
Jun-19 | Emmis Communications Corp. | Sinclair Telecable | #40 Austin | 78 | 7.5x |
Apr-19 | Cumulus Media Inc. | Meruelo Group LLC | #2 Los Angeles | 43 | 8.6x |
Feb-18 | Emmis Communications Corp. | Hubbard Broadcasting / Entercom Communications | #23 St. Louis | 60 | 12.0x |
May-17 | Emmis Communications Corp. | Meruelo Group | #2 Los Angeles | 83 | 11.1x |
Feb-17 | CBS Broadcasting, Inc. | Entercom Communications Corp. | 19
Total, Including: #1 New York, #2 Los Angeles, #3 Chicago |
2,861 | 8.1x |
Jul-16 | Greater Media, Inc. | Beasley Broadcast Group, Inc. | 19
Total, Including: #7 Philadelphia, #11 Boston, #14 Detroit, #22 Charlotte |
207 | 7.0x |
Overall Mean | $491 | 9.2x | |||
Overall Median | $83 | 8.6x |
Source: | Company filings, Wall Street research, Press releases |
[ 3 ]
Strictly Private and Confidential
Puerto Rico Radio Assets: NOL Utilization & Illustrative Valuation |
The below reflects a summary of Hawkeye Management’s views of potential future Puerto Rico NOL utilization combined with the loss of foreign tax credits
OVERVIEW & COMMENTARY
■ | Following the Talon transaction, Hawkeye’s advisors have forecasted that $82mm of NOLs will be available after utilization assuming the transaction closes by 9/30/2022 |
■ | Hawkeye management and its tax advisors believe these NOLs should be able to be utilized to shield income in PR |
■ | The reduction in PR taxes is partially offset by an increase in tax liability in the US as Hawkeye will generate less foreign tax credits (from the reduction in PR taxes paid) |
SENSITIVITY ANALYSIS - NPV OF NET REDUCTION IN TAXES ¹
Discount Rate | Probability of Usage 2 |
Discount Rate (@ 51% Probability) | ||||||||||||
8.0% | 8.5% | 9.0% | 9.5% | 10.0% | 8.0% | 8.5% | 9.0% | 9.5% | 10.0% | |||||
$24.4 | $23.9 | $23.4 | $23.0 | $22.5 | 51.0% | $12.4 | $12.2 | $11.9 | $11.7 | $11.5 |
Source: | Hawkeye Management, Talon, 3rd party tax advisors |
Note: | Discount rate range derived from Networks capital asset pricing model (“CAPM”); assumes NOL balance as of 12/31/2021; reflects fully levered WAPA pre-tax income for illustrative purposes |
1. | See Appendix for detailed schedule |
2. | Per Hawkeye Management guidance based on advice from legal and tax advisors |
[ 4 ]
Strictly Private and Confidential
Unreimbursed Content Payments / License Fee Forgiveness |
Based on the latest negotiations, Talon does not intend to reimburse funding payments on select titles within the next 90 days through working capital
■ | Additionally, on Pena Ajena, Talon is asking Pelican to forgive a $2.6mm license fee payable in Q2 2022 |
TITLE-BY-TITLE OVERVIEW OF UNREIMBURSED CONTENT PAYMENTS / LICENSE FEE FORGIVENESS
($ in millions)
Title | Amount
to Be Paid by Pelican Within Next 90 Days |
License
Fee Receivable |
Commentary | |
A Beautiful Lie | $4.4 | N/A | § | Amounts paid between signing and closing will not be reimbursed via working capital |
Pena Ajena | N/A | $2.6 | § | Talon requesting Pelican to forgive $2.6mm license fee payable (by Talon to Pelican) in Q2 2022 |
Montecristo | $0.3 | N/A | § | Amounts paid between signing and closing will not be reimbursed via working capital |
Rebelión | $0.1 | N/A | § | Amounts paid between signing and closing will not be reimbursed via working capital |
Total | $4.7 | $2.6 | ||
Grand Total | $7.3 |
[ 5 ]
Strictly Private and Confidential
Potential Lease Liability Detail |
Talon is now requesting that the buyer of the radio assets assume its Guaynabo, PR facility lease
LEASE SUMMARY
■ | Talon currently leases 92,584 SQF of real estate in Guaynabo, PR from the city of Guaynabo |
– | The lease term runs until 2059 (including extensions) and the rent is $1.0mm per year through 2034 |
■ | Talon subleases 76% of the SQF (excluding shared space) to Liberman |
– | Through June 2024, Liberman pays only $100k per year in rent; beginning in July 2024, Liberman’s monthly rent will increase to $608k per year |
– | In order to renew the lease in January 2026, Liberman will be required to make a $1.25mm payment in December 2025; Sparrow assumes that the likelihood of Liberman making this payment is low and that Liberman is likely to terminate the lease instead |
– | The radio financials presented to us included $700k in facility expenses in 2022E, and the QoE included a $125k expense for allocated lease expenses to radio |
■ | The incremental cost to Hawkeye consists of the incremental lease expense through 2059 plus incremental facility costs of $885k per year through 2059, less payments from Liberman (through 2025), and then applies a discount rate to calculate a present value |
■ | Hawkeye Management believes there are a number of strategies to mitigate the financial impact of assuming the lease including: |
– | Lease renegotiation with Liberman |
– | Lease buyout / renegotiation with Guaynabo |
– | Sublease opportunities |
– | Relocated WAPA operations to Guaynabo and sell existing WAPA facility |
PV OF LEASE AND FACILITY COST
($ in millions)
Assuming Liberman Terminates Lease in December 2025
Discount Rate | ||||
7.0% | 8.0% | 9.0% | 10.0% | 11.0% |
$26.6 | $23.5 | $20.9 | $18.8 | $17.0 |
Assuming Liberman Remains a Tenant
Discount Rate | ||||
7.0% | 8.0% | 9.0% | 10.0% | 11.0% |
$6.7 | $6.2 | $5.8 | $5.5 | $5.3 |
Source: Sparrow analysis
[ 6 ]
Strictly Private and Confidential
Appendix
Strictly Private and Confidential
Puerto Rico Radio Assets: NOL Detailed Support |
STANDALONE WAPA PRE-TAX INCOME 1
Projections | ||||||||||||||||
$ in millions | Q4 2022E | 2023E | 2024E | 2025E | 2026E | 2027E | 2028E | 2029E | 2030E | 2031E | 2032E | 2033E | 2034E | 2035E | 2036E | 2037E |
WAPA Pre-tax Income 2 | $3.9 | $16.0 | $16.3 | $16.6 | $16.9 | $17.3 | $17.6 | $18.0 | $18.3 | $18.7 | $19.1 | $19.5 | $19.8 | $20.2 | $20.6 | $21.1 |
Subject to Tax Grants | - | - | - | - | 10.0 | 10.2 | 10.4 | 10.6 | 10.8 | 11.0 | 11.2 | 11.4 | 11.7 | 11.9 | 12.1 | 12.4 |
Total WAPA Pretax Income | $3.9 | $16.0 | $16.3 | $16.6 | $26.9 | $27.4 | $28.0 | $28.5 | $29.1 | $29.7 | $30.3 | $30.9 | $31.5 | $32.1 | $32.8 | $33.4 |
PR Taxes @37.4% | $1.5 | $6.0 | $6.1 | $6.2 | $10.1 | $10.3 | $10.5 | $10.7 | $10.9 | $11.1 | $11.3 | $11.6 | $11.8 | $12.0 | $12.3 | $12.5 |
Add: Taxes (Act 135) | 0.2 | 0.9 | 1.0 | 1.0 | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
Tax Credit | - | (2.0) | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
Cash Taxes Paid in PR | $1.7 | $5.0 | $7.1 | $7.2 | $10.1 | $10.3 | $10.5 | $10.7 | $10.9 | $11.1 | $11.3 | $11.6 | $11.8 | $12.0 | $12.3 | $12.5 |
PRO FORMA FOR ABILITY TO UTILIZE PUERTO RICO RADIO TAX ATTRIBUTES AND IMPACT OF LOST FOREIGN TAX CREDITS
PRO FORMA TAXES | ||||||||||||||||
Pro Forma PreTax Income for AMT | $3.3 | $13.3 | $13.6 | $13.9 | $25.9 | $26.4 | $26.9 | $27.5 | $28.0 | $28.6 | $29.2 | $29.7 | $30.3 | $30.9 | $31.6 | $32.2 |
NOL Limitation 3 | 2.3 | 9.3 | 9.5 | 9.7 | 18.1 | 18.5 | 18.9 | 19.2 | 19.6 | 20.0 | 20.4 | 20.8 | 21.2 | 21.7 | 22.1 | 22.5 |
NOLs Available Balance | 81.5 | 79.2 | 62.5 | 53.0 | 43.3 | 25.2 | 6.7 | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
NOLs Utilized | $2.3 | $9.3 | $9.5 | $9.7 | $18.1 | $18.5 | $6.7 | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
Taxable Income | $1.0 | $4.0 | $4.1 | $4.2 | $7.8 | $7.9 | $20.3 | $27.5 | $28.0 | $28.6 | $29.2 | $29.7 | $30.3 | $30.9 | $31.6 | $32.2 |
PR Taxes AMT | 0.2 | 0.9 | 0.9 | 1.0 | 1.8 | 1.8 | 4.7 | 6.3 | 6.4 | 6.6 | 6.7 | 6.8 | 7.0 | 7.1 | 7.3 | 7.4 |
PR Taxes Regular | 0.1 | 0.6 | 0.6 | 0.6 | 1.0 | 1.0 | 9.5 | 10.7 | 10.9 | 11.1 | 11.3 | 11.6 | 11.8 | 12.0 | 12.3 | 12.5 |
Taxes Paid 4 | $0.2 | $0.9 | $0.9 | $1.0 | $1.8 | $1.8 | $9.5 | $10.7 | $10.9 | $11.1 | $11.3 | $11.6 | $11.8 | $12.0 | $12.3 | $12.5 |
Add: Taxes (Act 135) | 0.2 | 0.9 | 1.0 | 1.0 | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
Tax Credit | - | (1.9) | (0.1) | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
AMT Tax Credit | - | - | - | - | - | - | (1.2) | (1.1) | (0.3) | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
Cash Taxes Paid in PR | $0.5 | - | $1.8 | $1.9 | $1.8 | $1.8 | $8.3 | $9.6 | $10.6 | $11.1 | $11.3 | $11.6 | $11.8 | $12.0 | $12.3 | $12.5 |
Add: Cash Taxes Paid in US With NOL | 0.3 | 7.2 | 8.3 | 8.3 | 10.6 | 12.5 | 6.4 | 10.1 | 9.3 | 9.5 | 9.6 | 9.8 | 9.9 | 10.1 | 10.3 | 10.5 |
Net Cash Taxes Paid With NOL | $0.7 | $7.2 | $10.1 | $10.2 | $12.4 | $14.4 | $14.6 | $19.7 | $19.9 | $20.6 | $21.0 | $21.4 | $21.7 | $22.1 | $22.6 | $23.0 |
Cash Taxes Paid in US Without NOL | 2.0 | 12.2 | 15.4 | 15.6 | 18.6 | 18.9 | 19.3 | 20.9 | 20.3 | 20.7 | 21.0 | 21.4 | 21.8 | 22.2 | 22.6 | 23.0 |
Net Benefit from NOLs | $1.3 | $5.0 | $5.3 | $5.3 | $6.1 | $4.6 | $4.7 | $1.2 | $0.4 | $0.1 | $0.1 | $0.1 | $0.1 | $0.1 | $0.1 | $0.0 |
NPV
Net Benefit Provided from NOLs @8.00% |
$24.4 |
SENSITIVITY ANALYSIS – NPV OF NET REDUCTION IN TAXES
Discount Rate | ||||
8.0% | 8.5% | 9.0% | 9.5% | 10.0% |
$24.4 | $23.9 | $23.4 | $23.0 | $22.5 |
Source: | Hawkeye Management, Talon, 3rd party tax advisors |
Note: | Discount rate range derived from Networks capital asset pricing model (“CAPM”); assumes NOL balance as of 12/31/2021; reflects fully levered WAPA pre-tax income for illustrative purposes |
1. | Assumes growth rate in WAPA pre-tax income of 2.0% |
2. | Assumes none of the income is subject to tax grants per Hawkeye Management |
3. | Assumes 70% NOL limitation with an AMT structure |
4. | Assumes taxes paid are the higher of regular tax and the alternative minimum tax (“AMT”) |
[ 8 ]
Exhibit (c)(iv)
Strictly Private and Confidential
Project Hawkeye
Presentation to the Special Committee of the Board of Directors
May 7, 2022
Strictly Private and Confidential
Table of Contents
I. | Situation Overview | 3 |
II. | Overview of Projections | 13 |
III. | Preliminary Financial Analysis Summary | 19 |
Appendices | ||
A. | Preliminary Discounted Cash Flow Analysis | 24 |
B. | Preliminary Selected Publicly Traded Companies Analysis | 31 |
C. | Preliminary Selected Precedent Transactions Analysis | 44 |
D. | WACC Analysis | 51 |
E. | Pelican Sale Supplemental Materials | 57 |
F. | Other Information | 67 |
[ 1 ]
Strictly Private and Confidential
Disclaimer
This presentation has been prepared by Moelis & Company LLC (“Moelis”) for exclusive use by the Special Committee of the Board of Directors of Hawkeye in considering the transaction described herein based on information provided by Hawkeye and upon information from third party sources. Moelis has not assumed any responsibility for independently verifying the accuracy of such information, and disclaims any liability with respect to the information herein. In this presentation, Moelis, at Hawkeye‘s direction, has used certain projections, forecasts or other forward-looking statements with respect to Hawkeye and/or other parties involved in the transaction which were provided to Moelis by Hawkeye and / or such other parties and which Moelis has assumed, at Hawkeye’s direction, were prepared based on the best available estimates and judgments of the management of Hawkeye and/or such other parties as to the future performance of Hawkeye and/or such other parties. This presentation is provided as of the date hereof and Moelis assumes no obligation to update it or correct any information herein.
This presentation is solely for informational purposes. This presentation is not intended to provide the sole basis for any decision on any transaction and is not a recommendation with respect to any transaction. The recipient should make its own independent business decision based on all other information, advice and the recipient’s own judgment. This presentation is not an offer to sell or a solicitation of an offer to buy any business, security, option, commodity, future, loan or currency. It is not a commitment to underwrite any security, to loan any funds or to make any investment. Moelis does not offer tax, accounting, actuarial or legal advice. Absent Moelis’ prior written consent, this material, whether in whole or in part, may not be copied, photocopied, or duplicated in any form by any means, or redistributed.
Moelis and its related investment banking entities provide mergers and acquisitions, recapitalization, restructuring, corporate finance and other financial advisory services to clients. Certain affiliates of Moelis are engaged in asset management and other activities for their own account and otherwise. Personnel of Moelis or such affiliates may make statements or provide advice that is contrary to information included in this material. The proprietary interests of Moelis or its affiliates may conflict with the recipient’s or Hawkeye’s interests. In addition, Moelis and its affiliates and their personnel may from time to time have positions in or effect transactions in securities referred to in this material (or derivatives of such securities), or serve as a director of companies referred to in this presentation. Moelis and its affiliates may have advised, may seek to advise and may in the future advise or invest in companies referred to in this presentation.
[ 2 ]
Strictly Private and Confidential
I. Situation Overview
Strictly Private and Confidential
Timeline of Key Events
■ | On January 8, Sparrow Capital Partners (“Sparrow”) submitted a non-binding indication of interest (“Indicative Offer”) to acquire all of the common shares of Hawkeye at an offer price of $8 per share |
— | Gato Investments LP owns ~41% of Hawkeye’s shares and controls ~75% of the voting power of Hawkeye1 |
■ | On January 14, Moelis met with the Special Committee and was subsequently asked to represent the Special Committee as its financial advisor in connection with evaluating the Sparrow Indicative Offer and other potential strategic alternatives |
■ | In late January, at the request of the Special Committee, Moelis reached out to Sparrow to discuss the Indicative Offer and during this call Sparrow verbally provided additional details about its proposal including details around its plans for the Company to sell Pelican to Talon in connection with its Indicative Offer |
■ | On or about February 25, Latham & Watkins, counsel to Sparrow, held a call with Davis Polk, counsel to the Special Committee, during which Latham & Watkins raised the possibility of a sale of Pelican to Talon ahead of the closing of the acquisition of the entire Company |
■ | On March 3, Sparrow verbally indicated that the price it was willing to pay was now less than $8, and referenced $7.75 as a potential revised offer price |
■ | On March 7, the Special Committee held a meeting with Davis Polk and Moelis. Moelis presented a preliminary, illustrative financial analysis based on the revised management forecast and discussed various potential counterproposals |
■ | On March 8, Moelis communicated the Special Committee’s counterproposal to Sparrow. Sparrow communicated that the Pelican deal was only available as part of the take private |
■ | On March 10, the Company held a regularly scheduled Board Meeting. Following the Board Meeting, representatives of Sparrow met with the Special Committee to discuss the key terms of Sparrow’s offer |
■ | On March 11, the Special Committee, Moelis and Davis Polk held a meeting during which the Special Committee informed Moelis and Davis Polk of the conversations that occurred following the March 10 Board meeting, discussed at a high level some of their views on recent business performance and near-term forecasted performance, and directed Moelis to continue discussions with Sparrow on a potential deal at $8.00 per share |
■ | On March 14, Moelis and Sparrow held a discussion during which Sparrow indicated openness to acquiring Hawkeye at $8.00 per share, including a go-shop process with a binding commitment to support a superior offer. The Special Committee, Moelis and Davis Polk held a call to discuss the latest developments, during which the Special Committee directed Moelis and Davis Polk to expedite the completion of diligence and the drafting of definitive documents |
■ | Throughout March and April, the Special Committee, Moelis and Davis Polk met on a regular basis to discuss key transaction terms, the status of negotiations and other considerations related to a potential transaction |
■ | On April 21, Sparrow informed Moelis that it was lowering its bid to $7 per share because of less favorable economic terms in the Pelican sale; Sparrow also referenced increased financing costs and a more uncertain macroeconomic environment |
■ | On April 24, April 27 and May 1, the Special Committee, Moelis and Davis Polk held meetings during which the Special Committee discussed the latest terms of Sparrow’s offer, and asked Moelis and Davis Polk to negotiate on certain key terms |
■ | On May 5, the Special Committee, Moelis and Davis Polk met to review outstanding commercial points. Moelis held a conversation with Sparrow and reiterated the Committee’s request to expand the go-shop provision to cover the entire Company; however, Talon would not agree to a go-shop covering Pelican |
1. | Gato Investments L.P. (“Gato”) is an entity which holds approximately 15,740,000 shares of Hawkeye’s high vote Class B common stock. Sparrow also owns approximately 102,290 shares of Class A common stock. Sparrow is a limited partner of Gato and the general partner of Gato is controlled by Peter M. Kern. Mr. Kern owns 650,000 additional Class B shares and ~226,000 Class A shares |
[ 4 ]
Strictly Private and Confidential
Summary of Moelis Work
■ | January 14, 2022: Moelis presented a pitch to the Special Committee, including Moelis’ perspectives on potential strategic alternatives. Moelis sent the Special Committee a disclosure letter outlining its relationships with certain parties that could be involved in a potential transaction; shortly thereafter, the Special Committee verbally engaged Moelis as a financial advisor and informed Moelis that Sparrow had made a proposal to take the Company private |
■ | January 24, 2022: Moelis, Davis Polk and the Special Committee held a meeting, during which Moelis presented an overview of key work streams (including Moelis’ diligence requests), key process deliverables, select strategic alternatives and the appropriate response to Sparrow |
■ | February 28, 2022: Moelis, Davis Polk and the Special Committee held a meeting, during which Moelis presented a process update |
■ | March 2, 2022: Moelis, Davis Polk and the Special Committee held a meeting, during which Moelis presented a process update. Moelis and the Special Committee executed an engagement letter |
■ | March 4, 2022: Following Hawkeye Management’s discussion of its financial projections with the Special Committee, Moelis, Davis Polk and the Special Committee held a meeting during which Moelis presented a process update. |
■ | March 7, 2022: Moelis, Davis Polk and the Special Committee held a meeting, during which Moelis presented a preliminary draft of its financial analysis and discussed various potential counterproposals |
■ | March 9, 2022: Moelis, Davis Polk and the Special Committee held a meeting, during which Moelis updated the Special Committee on negotiations with Sparrow |
■ | March 29, 2022: The Special Committee, Moelis and Davis Polk held a meeting to discuss process and review the latest draft of the merger agreement |
■ | April 4, 2022: Moelis held a call with Counterparty A during which Counterparty A expressed its continued interest in a potential transaction with Pelican and discussed next steps |
■ | April 20, 2022: Moelis, the Special Committee and Davis Polk held a meeting, during which Moelis discussed potential go-shop participants and go-shop process considerations |
■ | April 24, 2022: Moelis, the Special Committee and Davis Polk held a meeting, during which Moelis discussed the progress of Counterparty A’s diligence and presented the changes in Talon’s offer to acquire Pelican |
■ | May 2, 2022: Moelis received a letter from a representative of Counterparty B inquiring about an opportunity to acquire Hawkeye |
■ | May 4, 2022: Moelis held a call with a representative from Counterparty B to discuss Counterparty B's potential interest in a transaction. Given lack of financing and views on valuation, amongst other considerations, Moelis and Davis Polk advised the Special Committee that it was not an actionable bid at present |
■ | May 4, 2022: Moelis held a call with Counterparty A during which Counterparty A said that while they appreciated the opportunity to meet with management and diligence the asset, they unfortunately were not able to confirm completion of business diligence and would require approximately a month to determine if it was interested in acquiring Pelican |
[ 5 ]
Strictly Private and Confidential
Basis of Presentation and Limitation to Analyses
The commentary below summarizes the information received by Moelis to date from Hawkeye and the primary limitations to our analyses which inform the basis of our presentation
INFORMATION RECEIVED FROM HAWKEYE
■ | Indicative Proposal from Sparrow to acquire Hawkeye for $7.00 per share |
■ | Hawkeye Management’s financial projections (the “LRP”) covering 2022E - 2026E as well as a Hawkeye Management extrapolation (the “Extrapolation”) covering 2027E-2031E. The LRP included revenue, expense and cash flow detail for Pelican and Networks separately |
— | Moelis held multiple discussions with Hawkeye Management regarding the LRP and the Extrapolation |
— | Moelis also received forecast KPIs for both the Networks and Pelican businesses |
■ | Key business diligence information, including but not limited to a schedule of Pelican content releases and KPI detail |
■ | Diligence information on the Talon radio stations |
■ | Hawkeye Management’s estimate of Hawkeye’s ability to utilize the NOLs Talon will give to Hawkeye as part of the Pelican consideration |
■ | Hawkeye estimated net debt and cash as of 3/31/2022 and shares outstanding (including a detailed options schedule) as of 4/29/2022 |
■ | Materials prepared by Hawkeye Management for the March 2022 Board of Directors meeting |
GENERAL LIMITATIONS
■ | Contact with management has been primarily with the Hawkeye CEO and CFO |
■ | Projected tax rates are estimates provided by Hawkeye Management |
■ | No detailed utilization schedule of Hawkeye’s tax attributes |
■ | No projections (beyond 2022 budget) for the Talon radio stations were provided; Talon NOL estimates are preliminary and limited support was provided to substantiate these attributes |
■ | Limited discussions on the potential tax implications of the potential transaction structures |
■ | No additional due diligence materials other than those noted above |
[ 6 ]
Strictly Private and Confidential
Key Terms of the Transactions
■ | If the Special Committee decides to move forward, Hawkeye will sign two agreements: 1) the sale of Pelican to Talon for certain consideration (“the Pelican Transaction”) (see Appendix for additional information) and 2) the sale of Hawkeye to Sparrow for $7.00 per share (the “Hawkeye Transaction”) |
■ | See below for a summary of key terms of the Transactions |
Purchase Price per Share | ■ Hawkeye common shareholders will receive $7.00 per share (all cash) ■ Includes consideration received by the Company in the Pelican Transaction; the proceeds from which will be used to fund the $7.00 per share purchase price | |
Termination Fees | ■ Company Transaction Fee: $10.6mm; $5.7mm if the Company (i) enters into a definitive agreement with a topping bidder within the 30-day go-shop period or (ii) the Company provides notice to Sparrow that it has received a Superior Proposal within the 30-day go-shop period and a definitive agreement with the topping bidder is signed within certain notice periods ■ Parent Termination Fee: $15.6mm if Sparrow terminates the agreement under certain circumstances | |
Expense Reimbursement | ■ If Disinterested Shareholders do not approve the deal, and the Hawkeye Transaction is terminated, Hawkeye shall pay to Sparrow fees and expenses of up to $4.375mm; Sparrow has a separate agreement with Talon to share a portion of these reimbursed expenses with Talon | |
Regulatory Efforts | ■ Sparrow required to use “reasonable best efforts” to take actions necessary to obtain regulatory approval | |
Disinterested Shareholder Approval | ■ Before closing the sale to Sparrow or the sale of Pelican to Talon, a majority of the voting power of shares held by Disinterested Shareholders must approve the transaction. Disinterested Shareholders are defined as all shareholders other than Gato, any officer of the Company, Sparrow, and affiliates and associates of the above. | |
Pelican Transaction | ■ Concurrent to signing the definitive agreement to sell Sparrow in the Hawkeye Transaction, Hawkeye would also sign definitive documentation for the Pelican Transaction ■ Prior or concurrent closing of the Pelican Transaction is a condition to closing the Hawkeye Transaction ■ There is a scenario in which Hawkeye would close the Pelican Transaction but not close the Hawkeye Transaction: if the Disinterested Shareholders approve the sale to Sparrow, but Sparrow does not close by July 31 for any reason including an inability to secure financing, the Pelican Transaction would close | |
Go-Shop | ■ 30-day go-shop period ■ No expense reimbursement for go-shop parties permitted ■ A topping bidder would “step into the shoes” of Sparrow would be acquiring the Networks business and the consideration Hawkeye will receive in the Pelican Transaction; a topping bidder would not be able to acquire Pelican – If an unsolicited bid for Pelican was received prior to closing, shareholders would have the option of voting down the entire transaction and negotiating with a third party ■ Sparrow will enter into a voting agreement to vote in favor of a Superior Proposal ■ Any information provided to potential bidders that has not previously provided to Sparrow must be shared with Sparrow ■ The Company intends to conduct outreach to potential bidders, including both strategic parties and financial sponsors, following the signing of the merger agreement |
[ 7 ]
Strictly Private and Confidential
Analysis at Various Prices
Sparrow and Hawkeye are negotiating definitive documentation regarding an acquisition of Hawkeye for $7.00 per share
SUMMARY PREMIA AND IMPLIED TEV AT VARIOUS PRICES
($ in millions; except per share data) | Current
Price (as of 05/06/22) |
Sparrow
Offer Price | |||||
Share Price | $3.77 | $7.00 | |||||
% Premium to Current | - | 86% | |||||
Recent Statistics | |||||||
52 Week High (05/24/21) | $14.04 | (73%) | (50%) | ||||
52 Week Low (04/07/22) | 3.58 | 5% | 96% | ||||
10-Day VWAP | 3.95 | (4%) | 77% | ||||
20-Day VWAP | 4.09 | (8%) | 71% | ||||
30-Day VWAP | 4.29 | (12%) | 63% | ||||
60-Day VWAP | 4.91 | (23%) | 43% | ||||
90-Day VWAP | 5.55 | (32%) | 26% | ||||
180-Day VWAP | 8.08 | (53%) | (13%) | ||||
270-Day VWAP | 9.48 | (60%) | (26%) | ||||
365-Day VWAP | 9.98 | (62%) | (30%) | ||||
Diluted Shares Out. (mm) | 40.401 | 40.424 | |||||
Implied Market Capitalization | $152 | $283 | |||||
Plus: Net Debt & Other (as of 03/31/22) | 193 | 193 | |||||
Implied Enterprise Value | $346 | $476 |
Note: | 52 Week High and Low based on intraday share prices; diluted shares outstanding includes Class A, Class B shares and the impact of options calculated using the Treasury Stock Method |
Source: | Company information, Capital IQ as of 05/06/22 |
[ 8 ]
Strictly Private and Confidential
Implied Multiples on Networks + Radio
Hawkeye Perspective | Sparrow Perspective | ||||||||
($ in millions) | Current
Price as of 05/06/22 |
Sparrow
Offer |
Low | Mid | High | ||||
Share Price Class A Shares | $3.77 | $7.00 | $7.00 | $7.00 | $7.00 | ||||
(x) Common shares outstanding | 20.680 | 20.704 | 20.704 | 20.704 | 20.704 | ||||
Share Price Class B Shares | $3.77 | $7.00 | $7.00 | $7.00 | $7.00 | ||||
(x) Common shares outstanding | 19.720 | 19.720 | 19.720 | 19.720 | 19.720 | ||||
Implied Equity Value | $152.3 | $283.0 | $283.0 | $283.0 | $283.0 | ||||
(+) Total Debt | 251.6 | 251.6 | 251.6 | 251.6 | 251.6 | ||||
(-) Cash | (37.3) | (37.3) | (37.3) | (37.3) | (37.3) | ||||
Net Debt 1 | $214.3 | $214.3 | $214.3 | $214.3 | $214.3 | ||||
(+) Noncontrolling Interests | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- | ||||
(+) Post-tax Pension Obligation | 1.7 | 1.7 | 1.7 | 1.7 | 1.7 | ||||
(-) Non-Core Assets 1 | (22.7) | (22.7) | (22.7) | (22.7) | (22.7) | ||||
Implied TEV | $345.6 | $476.2 | $476.2 | $476.2 | $476.2 | ||||
Pelican
Sale Adjustments |
(-) Cash Consideration | -- | -- | (115.0) | (115.0) | (115.0) | |||
(-) Net Benefit from PR NOLs (PV) 2 | -- | -- | -- | (12.4) | (24.4) | ||||
(+) 3 Years of Programming Fee (PV) 3 | -- | -- | 13.6 | 13.6 | 13.6 | ||||
(+) Unreimbursed Content Payments / License Fee Forgiveness 4 | -- | -- | 7.3 | 7.3 | 7.3 | ||||
(+) Incremental Puerto Rico Lease Obligations (PV) 5 | -- | -- | 22.8 | 20.0 | 15.0 | ||||
Adj. Implied TEV | $345.6 | $476.2 | $405.0 | $389.7 | $372.8 | ||||
TEV / Adj. EBITDA (Post-SBC) incl. Pelican Losses | Metric | ||||||||
LTM 3/31/22 | $30.1 | 11.5x | 15.8x | -- | -- | -- | |||
2022E | 32.5 | 10.6x | 14.7x | -- | -- | -- | |||
2023E | 44.2 | 7.8x | 10.8x | -- | -- | -- | |||
Adj. TEV / Adj. EBITDA (Post-SBC) excl. Pelican Losses | PF Metric 6 | ||||||||
LTM 3/31/22 | $56.5 | 6.1x | 8.4x | $63.0 | 6.4x | 6.2x | 5.9x | ||
2022E | 57.5 | 6.0x | 8.3x | 64.3 | 6.3x | 6.1x | 5.8x | ||
2023E | 56.8 | 6.1x | 8.4x | 63.7 | 6.4x | 6.1x | 5.9x |
Source: | Capital IQ as of 05/06/22, Hawkeye Management, Talon, Sparrow and third party tax advisors |
1. | 3/31/22 estimates per Hawkeye Management |
2. | High end reflects present value of net benefit of Puerto Rican NOLs received less the decrease in foreign tax credits utilized given the decrease in forecasted taxes paid in Puerto Rico - discounted at 8.0%; mid-point assumes 51% probability of utilization |
3. | Includes three $5mm payments for programming fees from 2022 to 2024 |
4. | Reflects upfront content funding payments that will not be reimbursed through working capital and current payment that Talon owes Pelican for content that will be forgiven as a result of the transaction |
5. | Low end reflects present value of absorbed lease obligations as a result of the transaction, mid and high end reflects illustrative potential to break the lease before 2059 when the current contract expires - discounted at 8.0% |
6. | PF Adj. EBITDA includes impact of PR radio acquisition (radio projections only go out to 2022, assumes 2023 EBITDA is flat from prior year) and is burdened by corporate overhead allocated to Pelican. PF Adj. EBITDA with respect to Sparrow Perspective includes EBITDA associated with Talon PR Radio assets |
[ 9 ]
Strictly Private and Confidential
Share Price Performance (Since 2020)
Hawkeye’s share price is below pre-COVID levels and is down ~67% since it announced and subsequently terminated its proposed capital raise in November 2021, and down ~50% since Sparrow’s confidential proposal
SHARE PRICE PERFORMANCE (SINCE 2020) - HAWKEYE VS. SELECTED MEDIA COMPANIES
Source: | Capital IQ as of 05/06/2022 |
1. | Includes Paramount, Discovery, AMC Networks and Fox |
2. | Includes Nexstar, TEGNA, Sinclair, Gray, Entravision and E.W. Scripps calculated as a weighted average |
3. | Includes Netflix, Sirius XM, Spotify, fubo TV, Chicken Soup for the Soul Entertainment, Roku and CuriosityStream calculated as a simple average |
[ 10 ]
Strictly Private and Confidential
Share Price Performance in Context
■ On November 15, 2021, Hawkeye announced a common stock offering of 6mm shares
— Implies gross proceeds of $68mm ($78mm if overallotment exercised) 1
■ On November 17, the Company announced the termination of its common stock offering due to market conditions, noting:
— The offering was opportunistic and at then-current share price levels the offering was no longer attractive
— Hawkeye had ample liquidity to fund operations and the necessary capital to continue to fund strategic growth initiatives, including content and production for Pelican |
||||||
■ In January 2022, Netflix announced slower than expected
forecast subscriber growth, sending its shares down over — Equity research analysts have noted that Netflix’s performance may highlight that the U.S. SVOD market is reaching saturation ■ On April 20, 2022, Netflix announced 200k of subscriber declines (excluding Russia) and forecasted significant declines for the rest of the year — Stock fell 35% the next trading day ■ Netflix’s recent subscription challenges has led to a rerating of the entire SVOD sector — Since Netflix announced Q1 and Q2 earnings, SVOD companies are down an average of 44% and 19% respectively 3 |
| |||||
Source: | Capital IQ as of 05/06/2022 |
1. | 6mm Class A shares with an option for the underwriters to purchase up to an additional 900k Class A shares. Based on Class A share price of $11.19 as of November 14, 2021 |
2. | Reflects price decline between market close on January 20 vs 21 (Netflix announced earnings on January 20) |
3. | Reflects price decline between market close on January 20 (Netflix Q1 earnings) and April 19 (Netflix Q2 earnings) vs. May 6 |
[ 11 ]
Strictly Private and Confidential
Recent Market Pressures on the SVOD Business Model
KEY RECENT DEVELOPMENTS IN SVOD MARKET
On April 19, 2022, Netflix Announced Q1 Subscriber Loss and Guides to 2 Million Subscriber Loss in Q2 2022 |
● Netflix attributed its slowing growth outlook to several factors, including:
– | Slower growth in rate of adoption of connected TVs |
– | In addition to its 222 million paying households, Netflix is being shared with over 100 million additional households |
– | Robust competition from new streaming services that have launched and invested significantly in content |
– | Sluggish economic growth, inflation, Russian conflict and other macroeconomic factors | |
● | On its latest earnings call, Netflix said that it would reduce content spending growth and is exploring offering an ad-supported model |
Warner Bros Discovery Shuts Down CNN+ |
● | In April 2022, following the completion of the Warner Bros Discovery merger, the new management team of the Company shuttered CNN+, a news streaming service |
● | The service was shut down barely a month after it was launched |
● | On a recent earnings call, CEO David Zaslav stated that they would “not overspend to drive subscriber growth” and CFO Gunnar Wiedenfels stated he was reviewing and seeking to decrease content spend, noting that there were “a lot of chunky investments that are lacking what I would view as a solid financial foundation and meeting the hurdle that I would like to see.” |
KEY ANALYST COMMENTARY
NETFLIX STOCK PRICE CHART (LAST 2 YEARS)
Source: Capital IQ as of 5/06/22, Wall Street research
[ 12 ]
Strictly Private and Confidential
II. | Overview of Projections |
Strictly Private and Confidential
Overview of Projections
Financial Plan Overview & Assumptions
For purposes of its analysis, Moelis relied on Hawkeye’s Management’s guidance and Hawkeye Management’s latest financial projections (the “LRP” and the “Extrapolation”)
OVERVIEW |
▪ Hawkeye Management developed and provided both the LRP and Extrapolation to Moelis ▪ In July 2021, Hawkeye Management prepared and provided a set of projections to Talon; the key drivers of the difference between the LRP and the July 2021 forecast are — Greater visibility for Pelican post-integration (Hawkeye had owned Pelican for only ~3 months at the time of the July 2021 forecast) resulting in slower growth but higher margins — 2021 performance across both business lines — Feedback from market participants following Hawkeye’s attempted equity offering in November 2021 |
NETWORKS |
▪ Networks’ revenue CAGR from 2022E – 2026E of 3% and from 2026E – 2031E of 1% is driven by steady growth in advertising and subscriber revenue across segments ▪ EBITDA projected to remain steady through the projection period — Steady state of EBITDA through projection period is a result of incremental revenue growth across segments, offset by increased operating costs and costs of revenue |
PELICAN |
▪ Pelican’s revenue CAGR from 2022E – 2026E of 23% and from 2026E – 2031E of 6% is driven primarily by the continued subscriber acquisition and growth in ARPU — Subscribers projected to reach ~3.0mm in 2025 in-line with the high-end of public guidance — Subscriber projections are supported by expected efficiencies in subscriber acquisition and increased investment in content — ARPU increases over the projection period, primarily driven by a $1.00 price increase in May 2023 ▪ EBITDA losses are generated in 2021 – 2024, and full-year profitability is projected to be achieved in 2025, with margins reaching ~15% in 2026 and ~24% by 2031 — As the subscriber base scales, operating leverage is established from returns on content and marketing investments
▪ Talon has announced plans to launch their global streaming service in H2 2022; a well-capitalized competitor in Spanish-language streaming content could be a significant competitive threat to Pelican |
Source: Hawkeye Management
[ 14 ]
Strictly Private and Confidential
Near Term Liquidity and Leverage
Assuming the business performs in line with Hawkeye Management projections, Hawkeye available liquidity is projected to drop to $40.0mm in Q2’22; pro forma net leverage is projected to be above the 5.0x threshold for the springing covenant in Q2
($ in mm) | Q4'21A | Q1'22B | Q2'22B | Q3'22B | Q4'22B |
Cash | $49.5 | $37.3 | $29.5 | $26.4 | $37.7 |
Availability Under Revolver | 30.0 | 30.0 | 10.5 | 30.0 | 30.0 |
Total Liquidity | $79.5 | $67.3 | $40.0 | $56.4 | $67.7 |
Debt | $252.3 | $251.6 | $251.0 | $250.3 | $249.6 |
LTM Adj. EBITDA (Core) | $67.2 | $64.8 | $64.9 | $65.9 | $66.4 |
LTM Adj. EBITDA (Pelican) | ($24.1) | ($29.6) | ($30.7) | ($29.8) | ($27.6) |
LTM Adj. EBITDA (Consolidated) | $43.1 | $35.1 | $34.2 | $36.1 | $38.9 |
LTM Adj. EBITDA (Per Financial Covenant) 1 | $53.1 | $44.8 | $43.9 | $46.0 | $48.8 |
Gross Leverage |
5.9x |
7.2x |
7.3x |
6.9x |
6.4x |
Net Leverage | 4.7x | 6.1x | 6.5x | 6.2x | 5.5x |
Pro Forma Net Leverage per Financial Covenant 1 | 3.8x | 4.8x | 5.0x | 4.9x | 4.3x |
Source: Hawkeye Management
1. | The Company’s Revolving Facility has a springing net leverage covenant if the aggregate amount of revolving loans and letter of credit exposure exceeds 35% of the aggregate commitments under the Revolving Facility. Per the covenant, Pro Forma Net Leverage may not exceed 5.0x. The calculation of Pro Forma Net Leverage per the Revolving Facility provides for the add-back of Pelican’s EBITDA losses in an amount up to 15% of Hawkeye’s EBITDA before giving the effect of Pelican’s losses, and permits cash netting of up to $60 million. The calculation above assumes that when Pro Forma Net Leverage exceeds 5.0x, availability under the Revolving Facility is limited to 35% of the aggregate commitments under the Revolving Facility to avoid triggering the covenant. |
[ 15 ]
Strictly Private and Confidential
Overview of Projections
Networks Summary
The below reflects Hawkeye Management’s forecast of Networks segment performance
Actuals | Projections | Hawkeye Extrapolation | '22E - '26E | '26E - '31E | ||||||||||
$ in millions | 2020A | 2021A | 2022E | 2023E | 2024E | 2025E | 2026E | 2027E | 2028E | 2029E | 2030E | 2031E | CAGR | CAGR |
WAPA Puerto Rico | $75 | $82 | $86 | $88 | $96 | $92 | $96 | $97 | $104 | $100 | $101 | $103 | 3% | 1% |
Cable Networks | 76 | 73 | 76 | 75 | 77 | 78 | 80 | 82 | 83 | 84 | 84 | 85 | 1% | 1% |
Total Net Revenue | $151 | $155 | $161 | $164 | $173 | $170 | $176 | $179 | $187 | $183 | $186 | $188 | 2% | 1% |
Y/Y Growth % | 2% | 4% | 1% | 6% | (1%) | 3% | 2% | 5% | (2%) | 1% | 1% | |||
Cost of Revenue | $48 | $49 | $52 | $53 | $57 | $59 | $62 | $64 | $67 | $69 | $71 | $73 | 4% | 3% |
SG&A | 39 | 42 | 47 | 48 | 50 | 51 | 53 | 54 | 56 | 58 | 60 | 62 | 3% | 3% |
Operating Expenses | $88 | $91 | $99 | $101 | $107 | $110 | $114 | $118 | $123 | $127 | $131 | $135 | 4% | 3% |
Memo: | ||||||||||||||
Corporate Overhead Allocation1 | (3) | (4) | (4) | (4) | (5) | (5) | (5) | (5) | (5) | (6) | (6) | |||
Adj. EBITDA 1 | $64 | $67 | $66 | $66 | $70 | $65 | $66 | $66 | $70 | $62 | $60 | $59 | (0%) | (2%) |
Y/Y Growth % | 6% | (1%) | (0%) | 6% | (8%) | 2% | (1%) | 6% | (11%) | (2%) | (2%) | |||
Margin % | 42% | 43% | 41% | 41% | 41% | 38% | 38% | 37% | 37% | 34% | 33% | 31% | ||
SBC | (5) | (5) | (5) | (6) | (6) | (6) | (6) | (7) | (7) | (7) | (8) | 6% | 5% | |
Adj. EBITDA (Post-SBC) 1 | $64 | $63 | $62 | $61 | $65 | $59 | $60 | $59 | $63 | $55 | $53 | $51 | (1%) | (3%) |
Y/Y Growth % | (2%) | (2%) | (1%) | 6% | (9%) | 2% | (2%) | 6% | (13%) | (3%) | (3%) | |||
Margin % | 42% | 40% | 38% | 37% | 38% | 35% | 34% | 33% | 34% | 30% | 29% | 27% | ||
Revenue by Type (%) | ||||||||||||||
Subscriber Fees | 51% | 50% | 48% | 47% | 45% | 45% | 44% | 44% | 42% | 43% | 43% | 43% | ||
Net Advertising | 46% | 47% | 47% | 48% | 50% | 48% | 48% | 48% | 50% | 48% | 48% | 48% | ||
Other | 3% | 3% | 5% | 5% | 5% | 7% | 8% | 8% | 8% | 9% | 9% | 10% | ||
Memo: Capex | $2 | $4 | $4 | $4 | $4 | $4 | $4 | $5 | $5 | $5 | $6 | $6 |
Source: | Hawkeye Management |
1. | Adj. EBITDA adjusted for 25% of corporate overhead expenses allocated to Pelican per Hawkeye Management |
[ 16 ]
Strictly Private and Confidential
Overview of Projections
Pelican Summary
The below reflects Hawkeye Management’s forecast of the Pelican segment performance
Actuals | Projections | Hawkeye Extrapolation | '22E - '26E | '26E - '31E | ||||||||||
$ in millions | 2020A | 2021A | 2022E | 2023E | 2024E | 2025E | 2026E | 2027E | 2028E | 2029E | 2030E | 2031E | CAGR | CAGR |
Total EoP Subscribers (000s) | 850 | 948 | 1,461 | 1,986 | 2,506 | 2,966 | 3,366 | 3,666 | 3,966 | 4,216 | 4,416 | 4,566 | 23% | 6% |
Y/Y Growth % | 30% | 12% | 54% | 36% | 26% | 18% | 13% | 9% | 8% | 6% | 5% | 3% | ||
Subscription | $44 | $51 | $57 | $90 | $125 | $154 | $179 | $219 | $247 | $265 | $280 | $291 | 33% | 10% |
Theatrical | 0 | 0 | 6 | 21 | 28 | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- | n/m | 0% |
Licensing & Other | 2 | 2 | 15 | 27 | 33 | 27 | 24 | 24 | 23 | 24 | 25 | 26 | 12% | 2% |
Total Net Revenue | $47 | $53 | $78 | $138 | $186 | $181 | $202 | $243 | $270 | $289 | $304 | $317 | 27% | 9% |
Y/Y Growth % | 13% | 48% | 76% | 35% | (3%) | 12% | 20% | 11% | 7% | 5% | 4% | |||
Content | $10 | $5 | $19 | $43 | $57 | $50 | $53 | $59 | $66 | $71 | $78 | $84 | 29% | 10% |
Distribution | 5 | 5 | 6 | 8 | 11 | 13 | 15 | 18 | 21 | 22 | 23 | 24 | 26% | 10% |
Technical | 3 | 5 | 6 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 10 | 11 | 12 | 12 | 13 | 14 | 13% | 7% |
Marketing | 32 | 47 | 50 | 62 | 70 | 73 | 70 | 79 | 87 | 87 | 89 | 90 | 9% | 5% |
Other SG&A | 11 | 12 | 21 | 30 | 38 | 19 | 19 | 19 | 20 | 21 | 22 | 23 | (3%) | 4% |
Operating Expenses | $61 | $74 | $102 | $149 | $183 | $163 | $167 | $187 | $205 | $214 | $225 | $235 | 13% | 7% |
Memo: | ||||||||||||||
Corporate Overhead Allocation1 | 3 | 4 | 4 | 4 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 6 | 6 | |||
Adj. EBITDA 1 | ($14) | ($24) | ($28) | ($15) | ($1) | $13 | $31 | $51 | $60 | $69 | $74 | $76 | n/m | 20% |
Y/Y Growth % | n/m | n/m | n/m | n/m | n/m | n/m | 128% | 66% | 17% | 16% | 7% | 3% | ||
Margin % | n/m | n/m | n/m | n/m | n/m | 7% | 15% | 21% | 22% | 24% | 24% | 24% | ||
SBC | (2) | (2) | (2) | (2) | (2) | (2) | (2) | (2) | (2) | (2) | (3) | 6% | 5% | |
Adj. EBITDA (Post-SBC) 1 | ($14) | ($26) | ($29) | ($17) | ($3) | $12 | $29 | $49 | $58 | $67 | $71 | $74 | n/m | 21% |
Y/Y Growth % | n/m | n/m | n/m | n/m | n/m | n/m | 149% | 70% | 18% | 16% | 7% | 3% | ||
Margin % | n/m | n/m | n/m | n/m | n/m | 6% | 14% | 20% | 21% | 23% | 23% | 23% | ||
Select KPIs2 | ||||||||||||||
Monthly Churn | 12% | 8% | 8% | 7% | 7% | 6% | 6% | 6% | 6% | 6% | 6% | 6% | ||
ARPU | $4.88 | $4.76 | $3.96 | $4.35 | $4.65 | $4.69 | $4.70 | $5.20 | $5.40 | $5.40 | $5.40 | $5.40 | ||
SAC | $27.41 | $48.79 | $34.33 | $30.31 | $29.38 | $29.43 | $30.00 | $33.00 | $34.00 | $33.00 | $33.00 | $33.00 | ||
LTV | $39.15 | $59.67 | $51.19 | $61.63 | $69.41 | $74.49 | $75.20 | $83.87 | $87.80 | $88.52 | $89.26 | $90.00 | ||
LTV / SAC | 1.4x | 1.2x | 1.5x | 2.0x | 2.4x | 2.5x | 2.5x | 2.5x | 2.6x | 2.7x | 2.7x | 2.7x | ||
Cash Content Cost ($mm) | $22 | $36 | $32 | $36 | $39 | $43 | $47 | $52 | $57 | $63 | $69 | $76 |
Source: | Hawkeye Management |
1. | Adj. EBITDA adjusted for 25% of corporate overhead expenses allocated to Pelican per Hawkeye Management |
2. | KPI figures for 2021A reflects operating results for the nine months ending December 31, 2021 |
[ 17 ]
Strictly Private and Confidential
Overview of Projections
Consolidated Summary
The below reflects Hawkeye Management’s forecast of the financial performance of the entire Hawkeye business (Networks and Pelican)
Actuals | Projections | Hawkeye Extrapolation | '22E - '26E | '26E - '31E | ||||||||||
$ in millions | 2020A | 2021A | 2022E | 2023E | 2024E | 2025E | 2026E | 2027E | 2028E | 2029E | 2030E | 2031E | CAGR | CAGR |
WAPA Puerto Rico | $75 | $82 | $86 | $88 | $96 | $92 | $96 | $97 | $104 | $100 | $101 | $103 | 3% | 1% |
Cable Networks | 76 | 73 | 76 | 75 | 77 | 78 | 80 | 82 | 83 | 84 | 84 | 85 | 1% | 1% |
Pelican | 47 | 53 | 78 | 138 | 186 | 181 | 202 | 243 | 270 | 289 | 304 | 317 | 27% | 5% |
Total Net Revenue | $198 | $208 | $240 | $302 | $359 | $352 | $378 | $422 | $458 | $472 | $490 | $505 | 12% | 4% |
Y/Y Growth % | 5% | 15% | 26% | 19% | (2%) | 8% | 12% | 9% | 3% | 4% | 3% | |||
Networks | $48 | $49 | $52 | $53 | $57 | $59 | $62 | $64 | $67 | $69 | $71 | $73 | 4% | 3% |
Pelican | 18 | 14 | 31 | 57 | 75 | 72 | 77 | 88 | 98 | 106 | 114 | 123 | 26% | 7% |
Total Cost of Revenue | $66 | $63 | $83 | $111 | $132 | $131 | $139 | $152 | $165 | $175 | $185 | $195 | 14% | 5% |
Networks Pelican |
$39 43 |
$42
59 |
$47 71 |
$48 92 |
$50 108 |
$51 91 |
$53 89 |
$54 99 |
$56 107 |
$58 108 |
$60 111 |
$62 112 |
3% 6% |
3% 3% |
Total SG&A | $82 | $101 | $118 | $140 | $158 | $142 | $142 | $153 | $164 | $167 | $171 | $174 | 5% | 3% |
Total Operating Expenses | $149 | $165 | $201 | $251 | $290 | $273 | $281 | $305 | $328 | $341 | $355 | $370 | 9% | 4% |
Consolidated Adj. EBITDA | $50 | $43 | $39 | $51 | $69 | $78 | $97 | $116 | $129 | $131 | $134 | $135 | 26% | 3% |
Y/Y Growth % | (13%) | (10%) | 32% | 35% | 13% | 23% | 20% | 11% | 1% | 3% | 1% | |||
Margin % | 25% | 21% | 16% | 17% | 19% | 22% | 26% | 28% | 28% | 28% | 27% | 27% | ||
SBC | (5) | (6) | (6) | (7) | (7) | (8) | (8) | (9) | (9) | (9) | (10) | (10) | 6% | 4% |
Adj. EBITDA (Post-SBC) | $44 | $37 | $32 | $44 | $62 | $71 | $89 | $108 | $120 | $121 | $124 | $125 | ||
Y/Y Growth % | (17%) | (12%) | 36% | 40% | 14% | 26% | 22% | 12% | 1% | 2% | 0% | |||
Margin % | 22% | 18% | 14% | 15% | 17% | 20% | 23% | 26% | 26% | 26% | 25% | 25% | ||
Contribution (%) | ||||||||||||||
Revenue - Networks | 76% | 74% | 67% | 54% | 48% | 48% | 47% | 42% | 41% | 39% | 38% | 37% | ||
Revenue - Pelican | 24% | 26% | 33% | 46% | 52% | 52% | 53% | 58% | 59% | 61% | 62% | 63% | ||
EBITDA - Networks | n/m | n/m | n/m | n/m | 102% | 83% | 68% | 56% | 54% | 47% | 45% | 44% | ||
EBITDA - Pelican | n/m | n/m | n/m | n/m | (2%) | 17% | 32% | 44% | 46% | 53% | 55% | 56% |
Source: Hawkeye Management
[ 18 ]
Strictly Private and Confidential
III. | Preliminary Financial Analysis Summary |
Strictly Private and Confidential
Summary of Changes to Financial Analysis
[ 20 ]
Strictly Private and Confidential
Preliminary Financial Analyses and Commentary
Moelis performed its financial analysis on a sum-of-the-parts basis (“SOTP”) because of the different characteristics of Hawkeye’s business lines: (1) Networks, a broadcaster with cable network assets, and (2) Pelican, an SVOD platform
▪ The DCF analysis was performed using the LRP and Extrapolation provided by Hawkeye for 2022E – 2031E ▪ The DCF analysis was discounted to March 31, 2022 and relied upon the mid-year convention – Moelis discounted the cash flows separately for the Networks and Pelican businesses, and then added together the DCF analyses to calculate a consolidated DCF price per share ▪ Moelis used the perpetuity growth method to calculate estimated terminal values ▪ To calculate the normalized impact of election year cash flows on the Networks business, Hawkeye Management directed Moelis to increase 2031E EBITDA to calculate a normalized terminal year EBITDA. See appendix A for additional detail | |
▪ Moelis reviewed and analyzed certain financial information and market trading data related to companies whose operations Moelis believed to be generally relevant for the Networks and Pelican businesses for purposes of this analysis ▪ For Networks, selected publicly traded companies analysis focused on EV / EBITDA multiples based on Wall Street consensus estimates for 2022E and 2023E EBITDA1 ▪ For Pelican, selected publicly traded companies analysis focused on EV / revenue multiples based on Wall Street consensus estimates for 2022E and 2023E | |
▪ Moelis reviewed and analyzed certain selected precedent merger and acquisition transactions involving companies whose operations Moelis believe to be generally relevant for the Networks and Pelican businesses for purposes of this analysis ▪ For Networks, selected precedent transaction analysis focused on EV / EBITDA multiples ▪ For Pelican, selected precedent transaction analysis focused on EV / revenue multiples | |
1. | For publicly traded Broadcasters, 2022E and 2023E EBITDA reflects consensus estimates for the average of 2021/2022 and 2022/2023, reflecting the significant political advertising contributions in even years to those businesses |
[ 21 ]
Strictly Private and Confidential
Preliminary Financial Analysis Summary – Consolidated
Source: | Hawkeye Management, Wall Street research, Capital IQ |
Note: | Market data as of 05/06/2022. Assumes 20.7mm Class A shares, 19.7mm Class B Shares, 4.48mm options with strike prices ranging from $5.44 to $15.00, total debt of $251.6mm, cash of $37.3mm, equity method investments of $22.7mm (which are treated as cash and calculated using Hawkeye Management’s estimate for the value of these assets) and post-tax pension liability of $1.7mm per Hawkeye Management |
[ 22 ]
Strictly Private and Confidential
Appendix
Strictly Private and Confidential
A. Preliminary Discounted Cash Flow Analysis
Strictly Private and Confidential
Discounted Cash Flow Analysis
Networks Methodology & Assumptions
Discounted cash flow (“DCF”) analysis reflects implied enterprise value range based on estimated present value of unlevered after-tax free cash flows projected by Hawkeye Management and estimated present value of terminal value
▪ | Based on Hawkeye Management’s projections for the Networks business |
— | Tax rate based on effective tax rate of 30.5% for Networks per Hawkeye Management; cash tax projections do not take into account potential benefit from interest tax shield or other tax characteristics that the Networks business may benefit from |
— | Assumes transaction date of 03/31/22 and uses projected 03/31/22 balance sheet information per Hawkeye Management |
▪ | Unlevered after-tax free cash flows from 2022E through 2031E and terminal values were discounted to March 31, 2022 using the mid-year convention |
— | Discount rate range of 8.25% to 10.50% derived from the capital asset pricing model (“CAPM”) |
▪ | To calculate the estimated terminal value, Moelis used the perpetuity growth method and assumed a perpetuity growth rate of (3.0)% to 1.0% |
— | Perpetuity growth assumption of (3.0)% to 1.0% reflects declining EBITDA and free cash flow in the extrapolated period |
— | Terminal year cash flows set equal to 2031E except for the below adjustments: |
● | EBITDA increased, per Hawkeye Management, by $1.1mm to reflect a normalized level of contributions from political revenue over a four year election cycle |
– | This adjustment was calculated, per Hawkeye Management, by assuming an incremental $6.3mm of terminal year revenue, less agency commissions and news costs, resulting in an election year EBITDA contribution of $4.35mm. This figure was then multiplied by 25% to reflect a four year election cycle, resulting in $1.1mm of incremental EBITDA added to the terminal year |
● | Terminal year D&A set equal to terminal year capex per Hawkeye Management |
▪ | Networks DCF value calculated on an enterprise value basis; in order to calculate consolidated value implied by the DCF on a per share basis, Moelis utilized the following approach: |
— | First, Networks DCF and Pelican DCF enterprise values were added together |
— | Second, the combined enterprise value was reduced by total Hawkeye net debt (see page 69) to calculate consolidated equity value |
— | Third, the consolidated equity value was divided by the number of fully diluted shares outstanding (see page 69) to calculate per share equity value |
Source: Hawkeye Management
[ 25 ]
Strictly Private and Confidential
Discounted Cash Flow Analysis
Networks
PROJECTED UNLEVERED FREE CASH FLOW
Actuals | Projections | Hawkeye Extrapolation | Terminal | ||||||||||
($ in millions) | 2021A | Q1 '22E | Q2-Q4 '22E | 2023E | 2024E | 2025E | 2026E | 2027E | 2028E | 2029E | 2030E | 2031E | Year |
Adjusted EBITDA | $67.2 | $14.0 | $52.4 | $66.4 | $70.4 | $65.0 | $66.2 | $65.5 | $69.5 | $61.7 | $60.5 | $59.0 | $60.1 1 |
% Growth | 27% | 6% | (8%) | 2% | (1%) | 6% | (11%) | (2%) | (2%) | 2% | |||
Less: SBC | ($1.1) | (3.7) | (5.3) | (5.5) | (5.8) | (6.1) | (6.4) | (6.7) | (7.1) | (7.4) | (7.8) | (7.8) | |
Less: Depreciation & Amortization | ($2.6) | (3.7) | (5.0) | (5.2) | (5.2) | (5.3) | (5.3) | (5.3) | (5.3) | (5.3) | (5.3) | (6.0) | |
Less: Severance | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- | (0.5) | (0.5) | -- | |
Adjusted EBIT | $10.4 | $45.0 | $56.1 | $59.7 | $54.0 | $54.9 | $53.8 | $57.6 | $49.4 | $47.3 | $45.5 | $46.3 | |
Less: Taxes | (3.2) | (13.7) | (17.1) | (18.2) | (16.5) | (16.7) | (16.4) | (17.6) | (15.1) | (14.4) | (13.9) | (14.1) | |
Tax-Affected EBIT | $7.2 | $31.3 | $39.0 | $41.5 | $37.5 | $38.1 | $37.4 | $40.0 | $34.3 | $32.9 | $31.6 | $32.2 | |
Plus: Depreciation & Amortization | 2.6 | 3.7 | 5.0 | 5.2 | 5.2 | 5.3 | 5.3 | 5.3 | 5.3 | 5.3 | 5.3 | 6.0 | |
Plus: Programming Amortization | 3.1 | 11.1 | 12.9 | 13.4 | 13.9 | 14.4 | 15.1 | 15.8 | 16.5 | 17.2 | 18.0 | 18.0 | |
Less: Capital Expenditures | (0.8) | (2.7) | (4.0) | (4.0) | (4.0) | (4.0) | (5.0) | (5.0) | (5.0) | (6.0) | (6.0) | (6.0) | |
Less: Programming Payments | (4.7) | (10.2) | (13.6) | (14.2) | (15.0) | (15.7) | (16.4) | (17.1) | (17.9) | (18.7) | (19.6) | (19.6) | |
Less: Equity Method Investments | (0.1) | (0.9) | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- | |
Plus: Other Adj. | 0.1 | 0.4 | 0.5 | 0.3 | 0.2 | 0.2 | 0.2 | 0.2 | 0.2 | 0.2 | 0.2 | 0.2 | |
Less: (Incr.) / Decr. in NWC | (3.8) | 4.6 | 3.3 | (0.2) | 1.9 | 0.6 | 0.5 | (0.2) | 1.0 | 0.1 | 0.1 | 0.1 | |
Unlevered Free Cash Flow | $3.6 | $37.1 | $43.1 | $41.9 | $39.9 | $38.9 | $37.0 | $38.8 | $34.3 | $30.9 | $29.5 | $30.9 | |
% Growth | 16% | (3%) | (5%) | (3%) | (5%) | 5% | (12%) | (10%) | (4%) | 4% | |||
% Conversion | 71% | 65% | 60% | 61% | 59% | 57% | 56% | 56% | 51% | 50% | 51% |
IMPLIED TOTAL ENTERPRISE VALUE (“TEV”) | IMPLIED TEV / TERMINAL ADJ. EBITDA | |||||||||||||
Perpetuity Growth Rate | Perpetuity Growth Rate | |||||||||||||
(3.0%) | (2.0%) | (1.0%) | 0.0% | 1.0% | (3.0%) | (2.0%) | (1.0%) | 0.0% | 1.0% | |||||
8.3% | $394 | $408 | $425 | $446 | $473 | 8.3% | 4.6x | 5.1x | 5.7x | 6.5x | 7.4x | |||
8.8% | 377 | 389 | 404 | 422 | 444 | 8.8% | 4.4x | 4.9x | 5.4x | 6.1x | 6.9x | |||
WACC | 9.4% | 362 | 372 | 385 | 400 | 419 | WACC | 9.4% | 4.2x | 4.6x | 5.1x | 5.7x | 6.5x | |
9.9% | 347 | 357 | 367 | 380 | 396 | 9.9% | 4.0x | 4.4x | 4.9x | 5.4x | 6.1x | |||
10.5% | 334 | 342 | 352 | 363 | 377 | 10.5% | 3.9x | 4.2x | 4.6x | 5.1x | 5.7x |
Source: | Hawkeye Management |
Note: | Cash flows discounted back to 3/31/2022 |
1. | Per Hawkeye Management, to calculate the normalized impact of election year cash flows on the Networks business, analysis increased 2031E EBITDA to calculate a normalized terminal year EBITDA. This adjustment was calculated by an assuming an incremental $6.3mm of terminal year revenue, less agency commissions and news costs, resulting in an election year EBITDA contribution of $4.35mm. This figure was then multiplied by 25% to reflect a four year election cycle, resulting in $1.1mm of incremental EBITDA added to the terminal year |
[ 26 ]
Strictly Private and Confidential
Discounted Cash Flow Analysis
Pelican Methodology & Assumptions
Discounted cash flow (“DCF”) analysis reflects implied enterprise value range based on estimated present value of unlevered after-tax free cash flows projected by Hawkeye Management and estimated present value of terminal value
▪ | Based on Hawkeye Management’s projections for the Pelican business |
— | Tax rate based on effective tax rate of 24% for Pelican per Hawkeye Management |
— | Assumes transaction date of 03/31/22 and uses estimated 03/31/22 balance sheet information per Hawkeye Management |
▪ | Unlevered after-tax free cash flows from 2022E through 2031E and terminal values were discounted to March 31, 2022 using the mid-year convention |
— | Discount rate range of 15.00% to 23.00% derived from the CAPM and private studies on cost of capital for late stage venture investments1 |
▪ | Tax Savings that Pelican is forecasted to generate on a standalone basis were valued separately, and discounted to March 31, 2022, using the same discount rate range derived from the WACC calculation for the Networks business |
— | NOL balance is zero per Hawkeye Management, as prior Pelican taxable losses were used to offset taxes owed on income generated by the Networks business |
— | Tax savings estimated as Pelican’s negative EBIT (as presented on the DCF), and are expected to be used immediately to offset taxes owed on income generated by the Networks business |
— | Because the income the tax savings are offsetting is generated at the Networks business, Moelis used the Networks discount rate to calculate the value of the Tax Savings |
▪ | To calculate the terminal value, Moelis used the perpetuity growth method and assumed a perpetuity growth rate of 0.5% to 2.0% |
— | Perpetuity growth assumption of 1.0% to 3.0% in-line with forecasted U.S. GDP growth |
— | Terminal year cash flows set equal to 2031E except for the below adjustments: |
● | Terminal year D&A set equal to terminal year capex per Hawkeye Management |
● | Terminal year cash content spend set equal to terminal year content amortization per Hawkeye Management |
▪ | Pelican DCF value calculated on an enterprise value basis; in order to calculate consolidated value implied by the DCF on a per share basis, Moelis utilized the following approach: |
— | First, Networks DCF and Pelican DCF enterprise values were added together |
— | Second, the combined enterprise value was reduced by total Hawkeye net debt (see page 69) to calculate consolidated equity value |
— | Third, the consolidated equity value was divided by the number of fully diluted shares outstanding (see page 69) to calculate per share equity value |
Source: | Hawkeye Management |
1. | 2021 Private Capital Markets Report (Pepperdine University) |
[ 27 ]
Strictly Private and Confidential
Discounted Cash Flow Analysis
Pelican
PROJECTED UNLEVERED FREE CASH FLOW
Actuals | Projections | Hawkeye Extrapolation | Terminal | ||||||||||
($ in millions) | 2021A | Q1 '22E | Q2-Q4 '22E | 2023E | 2024E | 2025E | 2026E | 2027E | 2028E | 2029E | 2030E | 2031E | Year |
Net Revenue | $53.0 | $15.3 | $63.0 | $138.2 | $186.2 | $181.2 | $202.2 | $242.9 | $270.3 | $288.8 | $304.3 | $317.0 | $317.0 |
% Growth | 119% | 35% | (3%) | 12% | 20% | 11% | 7% | 5% | 4% | 0% | |||
Adjusted EBITDA | ($24.1) | ($12.1) | ($15.5) | ($15.2) | ($1.2) | $13.5 | $30.7 | $51.0 | $59.9 | $69.2 | $73.8 | $76.2 | $76.2 |
% Growth | 2% | 92% | n/m | 128% | 66% | 17% | 16% | 7% | 3% | 0% | |||
Less: SBC | (0.4) | (1.2) | (1.8) | (1.8) | (1.9) | (2.0) | (2.1) | (2.2) | (2.4) | (2.5) | (2.6) | (2.6) | |
Less: Depreciation & Amortization | (5.0) | (14.9) | (19.8) | (19.8) | (12.4) | (4.7) | (4.7) | (4.7) | (4.7) | (4.7) | (1.2) | (0.8) | |
Adjusted EBIT | ($17.4) | ($31.6) | ($36.8) | ($22.8) | ($0.9) | $24.0 | $44.2 | $52.9 | $62.1 | $66.6 | $72.4 | $72.8 | |
Less: Taxes | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- | (5.8) | (10.6) | (12.7) | (14.9) | (16.0) | (17.4) | (17.5) | |
Tax-Affected EBIT | ($17.4) | ($31.6) | ($36.8) | ($22.8) | ($0.9) | $18.2 | $33.6 | $40.2 | $47.2 | $50.6 | $55.0 | $55.3 | |
Plus: Depreciation & Amortization | 5.0 | 14.9 | 19.8 | 19.8 | 12.4 | 4.7 | 4.7 | 4.7 | 4.7 | 4.7 | 1.2 | 0.8 | |
Less: Capital Expenditures | (0.3) | (1.2) | (0.8) | (0.8) | (0.8) | (0.8) | (0.8) | (0.8) | (0.8) | (0.8) | (0.8) | (0.8) | |
Plus: Content Amortization | 2.5 | 11.0 | 24.6 | 33.8 | 42.4 | 47.2 | 54.3 | 61.8 | 68.0 | 74.5 | 81.5 | 81.5 | |
Less: Cash Content Spend | (5.3) | (27.0) | (35.5) | (39.1) | (43.0) | (47.3) | (52.0) | (57.2) | (63.0) | (69.3) | (76.2) | (81.5) | |
Less: LatAm Cash Timing Diff. | (0.1) | 0.6 | 0.9 | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- | |
Less: Change in Working Capital | 6.0 | (6.2) | (2.2) | (1.6) | (1.7) | (1.8) | (2.2) | (2.5) | (2.6) | (2.8) | (2.9) | (2.9) | |
Plus: Pantelion 2.0 Cash Flow | (5.7) | (1.3) | (1.3) | (6.1) | 3.6 | (0.6) | (1.3) | (0.8) | 1.0 | 1.5 | 0.9 | 0.9 | |
Unlevered Free Cash Flow | ($15.4) | ($40.8) | ($31.2) | ($16.8) | $12.1 | $19.6 | $36.2 | $45.6 | $54.6 | $58.5 | $58.7 | $53.3 | |
% Growth | 23% | 46% | 172% | 62% | 85% | 26% | 20% | 7% | 0% | (9%) | |||
% Conversion | n/m | n/m | n/m | 90% | 64% | 71% | 76% | 79% | 79% | 77% | 70% |
IMPLIED TOTAL ENTERPRISE VALUE (“TEV”) 1 | IMPLIED TEV / TERMINAL REVENUE | |||||||||||||
Perpetuity Growth Rate | Perpetuity Growth Rate | |||||||||||||
1.0% | 1.5% | 2.0% | 2.5% | 3.0% | 1.0% | 1.5% | 2.0% | 2.5% | 3.0% | |||||
15.0% | $158 | $162 | $167 | $172 | $178 | 15.0% | 1.3x | 1.4x | 1.4x | 1.5x | 1.5x | |||
17.0% | 121 | 123 | 127 | 130 | 134 | 17.0% | 1.1x | 1.2x | 1.2x | 1.3x | 1.3x | |||
WACC | 19.0% | 92 | 94 | 97 | 99 | 101 | WACC | 19.0% | 1.0x | 1.1x | 1.1x | 1.1x | 1.2x | |
21.0% | 71 | 72 | 74 | 75 | 77 | 21.0% | 0.9x | 1.0x | 1.0x | 1.0x | 1.1x | |||
23.0% | 54 | 55 | 56 | 57 | 58 | 23.0% | 0.9x | 0.9x | 0.9x | 0.9x | 1.0x |
Source: | Hawkeye Management |
Note: | Cash flows discounted back to 3/31/2022 |
1. | Includes present value of Tax Savings (see next page for detail) |
[ 28 ]
Strictly Private and Confidential
Discounted Cash Flow (DCF) Analysis
Pelican Tax Savings Analysis
TAX SAVINGS PROJECTIONS
Actuals | Projection | Hawkeye Extrapolation | |||||||||
($ in millions) | 2021A | Q2-Q4 '22E | 2023E | 2024E | 2025E | 2026E | 2027E | 2028E | 2029E | 2030E | 2031E |
Adj. EBIT (Pelican) | ($31.6) | ($36.8) | ($22.8) | ($0.9) | $24.0 | $44.2 | $52.9 | $62.1 | $66.6 | $72.4 | |
Adj. EBIT Losses (Pelican) | ($31.6) | ($36.8) | ($22.8) | ($0.9) | $-- | $-- | $-- | $-- | $-- | $-- | |
(x) Tax Rate (Pelican) | 24.0% | 24.0% | 24.0% | 24.0% | 24.0% | 24.0% | 24.0% | 24.0% | 24.0% | 24.0% | |
Tax Savings Generated | $7.6 | $8.8 | $5.5 | $0.2 | - | - | - | - | - | - | |
Memo | |||||||||||
Adj. EBIT (Networks) | $45.0 | $56.1 | $59.7 | $54.0 | $54.9 | $53.8 | $57.6 | $49.4 | $47.3 | $45.5 | |
(-) Taxes (Networks) | (13.7) | (17.1) | (18.2) | (16.5) | (16.7) | (16.4) | (17.6) | (15.1) | (14.4) | (13.9) | |
Implied Tax Rate | 30.5% | 30.5% | 30.5% | 30.5% | 30.5% | 30.5% | 30.5% | 30.5% | 30.5% | 30.5% | |
Tax Affected EBIT (Networks) | $31.3 | $39.0 | $41.5 | $37.5 | $38.1 | $37.4 | $40.0 | $34.3 | $32.9 | $31.6 |
PRESENT VALUE OF TAX SAVINGS | ||||
WACC | ||||
8.3% | 8.8% | 9.4% | 9.9% | 10.5% |
$20.1 | $20.0 | $19.9 | $19.7 | $19.6 |
Source: | Hawkeye Management |
[ 29 ]
Strictly Private and Confidential
Discounted Cash Flow Analysis
Consolidated (Networks + Pelican)
CONSOLIDATED TEV (INCL. PV OF TAX SAVINGS) | IMPLIED SHARE PRICE (INCL. PV OF TAX SAVINGS) | |||||||||||||
Perpetuity Growth Rate | Perpetuity Growth Rate | |||||||||||||
-3.0% / 1.0% | -2.0% / 1.5% | -1.0% / 2.0% | 0.0% / 2.5% | 1.0% / 3.0% | -3.0% / 1.0% | -2.0% / 1.5% | -1.0% / 2.0% | 0.0% / 2.5% | 1.0% / 3.0% | |||||
8.3% / 15.0% | $552 | $571 | $592 | $619 | $651 | 8.3% / 15.0% | $8.88 | $9.33 | $9.87 | $10.50 | $11.28 | |||
8.8% / 17.0% | 498 | 513 | 530 | 551 | 577 | 8.8% / 17.0% | $7.53 | $7.90 | $8.33 | $8.86 | $9.50 | |||
WACC | 9.4% / 19.0% | 454 | 467 | 481 | 499 | 520 | WACC | 9.4% / 19.0% | $6.45 | $6.76 | $7.12 | $7.55 | $8.07 | |
9.9% / 21.0% | 418 | 429 | 441 | 456 | 473 | 9.9% / 21.0% | $5.57 | $5.83 | $6.13 | $6.49 | $6.93 | |||
10.5% / 23.0% | 388 | 397 | 408 | 420 | 435 | 10.5% / 23.0% | $4.82 | $5.05 | $5.31 | $5.61 | $5.98 | |||
Networks / Pelican | Networks / Pelican |
Source: | Hawkeye Management |
[ 30 ]
Strictly Private and Confidential
B. | Preliminary Selected Publicly Traded Companies Analysis |
Strictly Private and Confidential
Selected Publicly Traded Companies Analysis
Summary – 2022E
Analysis reflects implied enterprise value to Adj. EBITDA multiples and implied enterprise value to Revenue multiples for Networks and Pelican, respectively, based on public market trading multiples of companies deemed generally relevant by Moelis in certain respects to Hawkeye for purposes of this analysis
Multiple Range | Enterprise Value | |||||||||||
Segment | Metric | Value | Low | - | High | Low | - | High | ||||
Networks | 2022E Adj. EBITDA (Post-SBC) |
$61.6 | 5.75x | - | 6.75x | $354 | - | $416 | ||||
Pelican | 2022E Revenue | $78.3 | 0.75x | - | 1.75x | $59 | - | $137 | ||||
Total Enterprise Value | $413 | $553 | ||||||||||
Less: Net Debt (as of 3/31/22) 1 | (214) | (214) | ||||||||||
Add: Other (as of 3/31/22) 1 | 21 | 21 | ||||||||||
Total Equity Value | $220 | $360 | ||||||||||
Fully Diluted Shares Outstanding (as of 3/31/22) 1 | 40.401 | 40.442 | ||||||||||
Implied Equity Value per Share | $5.44 | $8.90 |
Source: | Hawkeye Management |
1. | See page 69 for further detail |
[ 32 ]
Strictly Private and Confidential
Selected Publicly Traded Companies Analysis
Summary – 2023E
Analysis reflects implied enterprise value to Adj. EBITDA multiples and implied enterprise value to Revenue multiples for Networks and Pelican, respectively, based on public market trading multiples of companies deemed generally relevant by Moelis in certain respects to Hawkeye for purposes of this analysis
Multiple Range | Enterprise Value | |||||||||||
Segment | Metric | Value | Low | - | High | Low | - | High | ||||
Networks | 2023E Adj. EBITDA (Post-SBC) |
$61.1 | 5.5x | - | 6.5x | $336 | - | $397 | ||||
Pelican | 2023E Revenue | $138.2 | 0.5x | - | 1.50x | $69 | - | $207 | ||||
Total Enterprise Value | $405 | $605 | ||||||||||
Less: Net Debt (as of 3/31/22) 1 | (214) | (214) | ||||||||||
Add: Other (as of 3/31/22) 1 | 21 | 21 | ||||||||||
Total Equity Value | $212 | $411 | ||||||||||
Fully Diluted Shares Outstanding (as of 3/31/22) 1 | 40.401 | 40.452 | ||||||||||
Implied Equity Value per Share | $5.25 | $10.17 |
Source: | Hawkeye Management |
1. | See page 69 for further detail |
[ 33 ]
Strictly Private and Confidential
Selected Publicly Traded Companies Analysis
Networks: Discussion of Selected Publicly Traded Companies
Selected publicly traded companies analysis provides a valuation range based on public market valuations of businesses with operations and financial characteristics similar in certain respects to Networks for purposes of this analysis
▪ | Moelis selected publicly traded companies which have a significant presence in the diversified media and networks as well as TV broadcasting industries |
— | Network segment’s principal business is producing and distributing news, sports and entertainment content across broadcast in Puerto Rico and cable television in the U.S. primarily targeted to a U.S. Spanish language audience |
▪ | No single company is substantially similar across a range of key criteria including size of the company, geographic focus, EBITDA margin, growth profile, financial leverage and business model (including ownership of broadcast network and affiliate stations, TV market presence and business segments) |
▪ | Moelis selected four publicly traded diversified media and networks companies with operations diversified across broadcast networks, cable channels, digital properties and other media assets that it deemed relevant for purposes of this analysis |
— | Fox Corporation is similar in certain respects to Hawkeye given its broadcast network and cable networks ownership with a focus on TV news, sports and general entertainment programming |
● | Moelis views Fox Corporation as the most relevant corporation for Networks and believes Networks should trade at a discount to Fox because: |
– | Fox earns the majority of its revenue from its broadcast network operations and cable network operations |
– | Fox is a “Big Four” network (includes ABC, NBC, CBS and FOX) broadcaster and has superior distribution footprint |
– | Fox News (cable network) is carried on basic cable, whereas Hawkeyes is primarily included on lesser distributed Spanish language tiers |
– | Fox is expected to achieve significantly higher growth of ~5% revenue CAGR (2021-2023E) compared to Hawkeye Networks at ~3% over the same period |
— | Paramount is comprised of a broadcast network (CBS), owned and operated TV stations, premium and basic cable channels (Comedy Central, Nickelodeon, etc.) and a film studio (Paramount) |
● | Excluding Pelican, the Networks business model is more similar in certain respects to the CBS broadcast networks segment of the legacy CBS business and the cable networks (Nickelodeon, Comedy Central) segment of the legacy Viacom business; the remaining assets (Paramount film studio, Showtime, etc.) of Paramount are less relevant |
— | AMC Networks is similar in certain respects to the cable networks business within Networks as the majority of its revenue is derived from distribution fees from AMC’s MVPD and vMVPD partners that distribute its networks including ABC, BBC AMERICA and other networks |
● | AMC Networks is less relevant to Networks in that it does not operate a traditional broadcast network |
— | Prior to the acquisition of Warner Media, Discovery is similar in certain respects to the cable networks business within Networks as a portion of Discovery's revenue is from distribution fees from Discovery's MVPD and vMVPD partners |
● | Post Warner Media acquisition, Discovery is less relevant given its premium subscription, cable, film studio and other assets |
[ 34 ]
Strictly Private and Confidential
Selected Publicly Traded Companies Analysis
Networks: Discussion of Selected Publicly Traded Companies (Cont’d)
▪ | Moelis also reviewed six publicly traded companies within the TV broadcasting industry that it deemed less relevant for purposes of this analysis |
— | Network’s business model differs from the other selected TV broadcasters given that Networks broadcast business owns its own networks (WAPA PR) whereas the other selected TV broadcasters pay fees to their affiliated Network (CBS, Fox, etc.) in exchange for programming |
— | Nexstar, Sinclair, TEGNA, Gray Television, EW Scripps and Entravision derive the vast majority of their revenue from TV broadcasting operations; each individual television station is affiliated with a third-party network (e.g., Fox, NBC) |
● | The majority of their network affiliations are on ABC, CBS, NBC and Fox TV networks |
● | The Big Four networks have greater distribution, higher ratings, earn higher retransmission fees from distributors and command higher CPMs than Non-Big Four networks such as CW and MyTV |
▪ | Moelis focused on forward EBITDA multiples for diversified media and networks companies |
▪ | Moelis focused on two-year average EBITDA multiples for the TV Broadcasting companies (due to the even calendar year impact of political advertising revenue) |
— | We note this approach is consistent with leading Wall Street research analysts who cover the TV broadcasting industry |
▪ | Moelis selected a range of multiples from the selected publicly traded companies analysis and applied the multiples to the Company’s 2022E and 2023E EBITDA to calculate enterprise value |
— | Moelis primarily utilized the diversified media companies that operate both broadcast and cable networks (primarily Fox, and also Paramount) in the determination of its multiples given they are more relevant since their business model more closely aligns with Hawkeye |
— | Unlike the select publicly traded broadcasters, Hawkeye earns a relatively small portion of its revenue from political (~2.5% in 2020A) and therefore forward EBITDA as opposed to a blend of forward and historical EBITDA was appropriate (as is used for the broadcasters as discussed above) |
▪ | Based on the above and its professional judgement, Moelis selected a reference range of 5.75x – 6.75x 2022E Networks Adj. EBITDA and 5.5x – 6.5x 2023E Networks Adj. EBITDA |
[ 35 ]
Strictly Private and Confidential
Selected Publicly Traded Companies Analysis
Detail – Diversified Media & Networks
(Figures in $ millions) | Hawkeye (Networks) |
||||
Valuation Metrics | |||||
Total Enterprise Value | $93,433 | $30,688 | $20,959 | $3,727 | |
Equity Value | 43,072 | 18,426 | 19,050 | 1,452 | |
TEV / 2022E Metrics | |||||
EBITDA Post-SBC | 8.8x | 8.3x | 6.3x | 6.0x | |
EBITDA Post-SBC (excl. SVOD losses) | 7.6x | 5.9x | 6.3x | 5.8x | |
TEV / 2023E Metrics | |||||
EBITDA Post-SBC | 6.7x | 9.4x | 6.1x | 6.2x | |
EBITDA Post-SBC (excl. SVOD losses) | 6.7x | 6.1x | 6.1x | 5.9x | |
Net Debt / 2022E EBITDA | 4.6x | 3.5x | 1.2x | 3.1x | |
Projected Operating Metrics | |||||
‘21A - ‘23E Revenue CAGR % | 2.8% | 6.3% | 6.2% | 4.9% | 2.6% |
‘21A - ‘23E Post-SBC EBITDA CAGR % | (1.2%) | 15.2% | (14.3%) | 7.2% | (7.8%) |
2022E Post-SBC EBITDA Margin % | 38.1% | 22.2% | 12.2% | 23.4% | 19.6% |
2022E
Post-SBC EBITDA (excl. SVOD losses) Margin % |
38.1% | 25.6% | 17.1% | 23.4% | 20.4% |
Source: | Company filings, Wall Street research, Press releases |
Note: | Market data as of 05/06/2022 |
1. | Pro forma balance sheet figures from most recent public filing reflecting 12/31/2021 |
2. | CY2023E EBITDA and revenue reflects consensus estimates calendarized (average of FY2023E and FY2024E estimates 6/30 fiscal year end) |
[ 36 ]
Strictly Private and Confidential
Selected Publicly Traded Companies Analysis
Comparison of Selected Publicly Traded Diversified Media & Networks Companies
Analysis below compares operating metrics of selected publicly traded media networks companies
2022E EBITDA MARGIN (PRE-SVOD LOSSES)
2022E EBITDA MARGIN (POST-SVOD LOSSES)
2021A-2023E REVENUE CAGR (%)
Source: | Company filings, Wall Street research, Capital IQ |
Note: | Market data as of 05/06/2022 |
[ 37 ]
Strictly Private and Confidential
Selected Publicly Traded Companies Analysis
Detail – Broadcasters
(Figures in $ millions) | Hawkeye (Networks) |
||||||
Valuation Metrics | |||||||
Total Enterprise Value | $13,136 | $8,971 | $7,278 | $5,203 | $398 | $13,749 | |
Equity Value | 6,827 | 1,808 | 3,861 | 1,404 | 398 | 1,719 | |
TEV / 2022E Metrics | |||||||
2021A-2022E Avg. EBITDA Post-SBC | 6.4x | 7.7x | 6.8x | 7.8x | 5.0x | 12.1x | |
TEV / 2023E Metrics | |||||||
2022E-2023E Avg. EBITDA Post-SBC | 6.1x | 7.5x | 6.3x | 7.8x | 4.7x | 13.6x | |
Net Debt / 2022E EBITDA | 3.4x | 4.7x | 2.9x | 4.7x | 0.0x | 11.4x | |
Projected Operating Metrics | |||||||
‘21A - ‘23E Revenue CAGR % | 2.8% | 5.4% | 5.8% | 6.0% | 6.6% | 14.7% | 3.9% |
‘21A - ‘23E Post-SBC EBITDA CAGR % | (1.2%) | 4.1% | 0.6% | 9.9% | 0.4% | 5.3% | (10.4%) |
2022E Post-SBC EBITDA Margin % | 38.1% | 43.1% | 36.6% | 35.5% | 28.1% | 8.6% | 15.9% |
For Reference Only |
Source: | Company filings, Wall Street research, Press releases |
Note: | Market data as of 05/06/2022; Operating metrics represent a 2-period average (average of t and t-1) |
1. | TEGNA reflects unaffected price from the day prior to the news of Standard General’s acquisition (9/14/2021) |
2. | Reflects the book value of Sinclair debt |
[ 38 ]
Strictly Private and Confidential
Selected Publicly Traded Companies Analysis
Streamers: Discussion of Selected Publicly Traded Companies
Selected publicly traded companies analysis provides a valuation range based on public market valuations of businesses with operations and financial characteristics similar in certain respects to the Pelican Business
■ | Moelis selected publicly traded companies which have a significant presence in the subscription streaming entertainment industries |
— | Pelican’s principle business is operating a U.S. Spanish language audience subscription streaming service |
■ | No single company is substantially similar across a range of key criteria including size of the company, EBITDA margin, growth profile, financial leverage, target demographic and business model |
■ | Moelis selected seven publicly traded subscription streaming entertainment companies that it deemed relevant for purposes of this analysis |
— | Curiosity Stream, Netflix, FuboTV, Spotify, Roku, SiriusXM and Chicken Soup for the Soul were chosen for the similarity of their business models to Pelican’s |
— | Curiosity Stream is relevant to our analysis of Pelican given its business model derives substantially all of its revenue from monthly membership fees for services related to streaming video content to its members |
● | Curiosity Stream is also more similar to Pelican than other Streamers in terms of scale, growth profile and profitability |
— | Netflix is relevant to our analysis of Pelican given its business model derives substantially all of its revenue from monthly membership fees for services related to streaming video content to its members; on the other hand, Netflix is significantly larger than Pelican and is highly profitable, whereas Pelican is expected to generate losses for the next few years |
● | Netflix has a superior business and financial profile compared to Pelican given its scale, profitability and global subscriber base |
— | FuboTV is similar in certain respects to Pelican given its business model derives substantially all of its revenue from subscription fees from its subscribers |
● | FuboTV is less relevant to our analysis of Pelican in that its business model operates as a virtual MVPD offering its subscribers access to content from third parties (e.g., ESPN). FuboTV also monetizes its audience through its digital advertising offerings (whereas Pelican primarily generates revenue from subscriber fees) |
[ 39 ]
Strictly Private and Confidential
Selected Publicly Traded Companies Analysis
Streamers: Discussion of Selected Publicly Traded Companies (Cont’d)
— | Chicken Soup for the Soul Entertainment is relevant to Pelican in that it operates streaming video-on-demand networks |
● | Chicken Soup is less relevant in that it owns a variety of ad-supported in addition to subscription based-VOD networks. Chicken Soup is also profitable whereas Pelican is expected to generate losses for the next few years |
— | Spotify is similar in certain respects to Pelican given its business model derives substantially all of its revenue from subscription fees from its subscribers |
● | Spotify’s product offering is different in that it primarily offers streaming audio, as compared to Pelican which is a streaming video product |
— | Roku is similar in certain respects to Pelican given a large part of its business derives revenue from subscription fees from its subscribers |
● | Roku is less relevant to our analysis of Pelican in that it derives a material amount revenue from hardware sales and has a business model that operates as a connected TV and AVOD platform (whereas Pelican primarily generates revenue from subscriber fees) |
— | SiruisXM is similar in certain respects to Pelican given its business model derives substantially all of its revenue from subscription fees from its subscribers |
● | Spotify is less relevant to our analysis of Pelican in that it offers its subscribers primarily streaming audio content as compared to streaming video on Pelican |
■ | Based on the above and its professional judgement, Moelis selected a reference range of 0.75x – 1.75x 2022E Pelican revenue and 0.5x – 1.5x 2023E Pelican revenue |
[ 40 ]
Strictly Private and Confidential
Selected Publicly Traded Companies Analysis
Detail – Streaming Services
(Figures in $ millions) | Pelican | |||||||
Valuation Metrics | ||||||||
Total Enterprise Value | $89,014 | $33,748 | $17,904 | $11,892 | $539 | $226 | $20 | |
Equity Value | 80,400 | 24,515 | 20,392 | 14,038 | 516 | 150 | 111 | |
TEV/2022E Metrics | ||||||||
Revenue | 2.7x | 3.7x | 1.5x | 3.2x | 0.5x | 1.5x | 0.2x | |
EBITDA Post-SBC | 13.4x | 12.6x | n/m | n/m | n/m | 9.1x | n/m | |
TEV/2023E Metrics | ||||||||
Revenue | 2.5x | 3.6x | 1.3x | 2.5x | 0.3x | 1.2x | 0.1x | |
EBITDA Post-SBC | 11.8x | 11.9x | n/m | n/m | n/m | 6.6x | n/m | |
Net Debt / 2022E EBITDA | 1.2x | 3.5x | n/m | n/m | n/m | 0.7x | n/m | |
Projected Operating Metrics | ||||||||
‘21A - ‘23E Revenue CAGR % | 61.5% | 9.4% | 4.5% | 13.8% | 31.7% | 55.6% | 25.4% | 39.2% |
‘21A - ‘23E Post-SBC EBITDA CAGR % | n/m | 12.3% | 5.0% | n/m | n/m | n/m | 34.3% | n/m |
2022E Post-SBC EBITDA Margin % | (37.3%) | 20.5% | 29.6% | (1.2%) | (2.7%) | (42.8%) | 16.8% | (63.4%) |
Source: | Company filings, Wall Street research, Press releases |
Note: | Market data as of 05/06/2022 |
1. | PF for acquisition of 1091 Pictures |
2. | Perpetual preferred equity included at redemption value |
[ 41 ]
Strictly Private and Confidential
Selected Publicly Traded Companies Analysis
Streaming Services Valuation in Context (Time of Pelican Acquisition vs. Today)
Since Hawkeye’s acquisition of the remainder of Pelican in March 2021, publicly traded streaming companies have experienced significant multiple compression
VALUATION AS DATE 3/31/21 (PELICAN ACQUISITION) | CURRENT VALUATION |
EV / NTM Revenue | EV / NTM Revenue | |||||
Trailing | As of | Trailing | As of | |||
3 Months | 3/31/2021 | 3 Months | 5/6/2022 | |||
Netflix, Inc. | 8.5x | 8.0x | Netflix, Inc. | 5.8x | 2.8x | |
Sirius XM | 4.3x | 4.1x | Sirius XM | 4.0x | 3.7x | |
Spotify | 6.4x | 5.3x | Spotify | 2.7x | 1.5x | |
fuboTV | 7.4x | 7.2x | fuboTV | 1.5x | 0.5x | |
Roku | 19.4x | 16.1x | Roku | 5.7x | 2.9x | |
Chicken Soup | 4.2x | 4.7x | Chicken Soup | 1.5x | 1.3x | |
CuriosityStream | 12.1x | 9.6x | CuriosityStream | 1.2x | 0.3x | |
Median | 7.4x | 7.2x | Median | 2.7x | 1.5x | |
Memo: Hawkeye acquisition of Pelican |
3.6x | Delta vs. 3/31/2021 | (4.7x) | (5.7x) | ||
Curiosity Stream | 1.2x | 0.3x | ||||
Delta vs. 3/31/2021 | (10.8x) | (9.3x) |
Source: | Capital IQ as of 05/06/2022 |
[ 42 ]
Strictly Private and Confidential
Selected Publicly Traded Companies Analysis
Comparison of Selected Publicly Traded Streaming Companies
Analysis below compares operating metrics of selected publicly traded streaming companies
2021A-2023E REVENUE CAGR (%)
2022E EBITDA MARGIN
2022E MONTHLY CHURN
Source: | Company filings, Wall Street research, Capital IQ |
Note: | Market data as of 05/06/2022 |
[ 43 ]
Strictly Private and Confidential
C. Preliminary Selected Precedent Transactions Analysis
Strictly Private and Confidential
Selected Precedent Transactions Analysis
Summary
Analysis reflects implied enterprise value to Adj. EBITDA multiples and implied enterprise value to Revenue multiples for Networks and Pelican, respectively, based on precedent transaction trading multiples of companies deemed generally relevant by Moelis in certain respects to Hawkeye for purposes of this analysis
Multiple Range | Enterprise Value | |||||||||||
Segment | Metric | Value | Low | - | High | Low | - | High | ||||
Networks | LTM EBITDA (Post-SBC) as of 3/31/2022 |
$60.1 | 6.0x | - | 8.0x | $361 | - | $481 | ||||
Pelican |
LTM Revenue |
$56.3 | 3.0x | - | 4.0x | $169 | - | $225 | ||||
Total Enterprise Value | $529 | $706 | ||||||||||
Less: Net Debt (as of 3/31/22) 1 | (214) | (214) | ||||||||||
Add: Other (as of 3/31/22) 1 | 21 | 21 | ||||||||||
Total Equity Value | $336 | $512 | ||||||||||
Fully Diluted Shares Outstanding (as of 3/31/22) 1 | 40.437 | 40.825 | ||||||||||
Implied Equity Value per Share | $8.31 | $12.55 |
Source: | Hawkeye Management |
1. | See page 69 for further detail |
[ 45 ]
Strictly Private and Confidential
Selected Precedent Transactions Analysis
Networks: Methodology & Assumptions
Analysis reflects implied enterprise value to EBITDA multiples paid in selected precedent transactions deemed generally relevant by Moelis in certain respects to Hawkeye for purposes of this analysis
■ | Moelis selected precedent transactions in the networks and TV broadcasting industry |
■ | However, no single transaction is similar across a range of key criteria including |
— | Transaction value / relative size |
— | EBITDA margin |
— | Growth profile |
— | Business model (including revenue mix from broadcast network operations, cable networks and other media assets) |
■ | Moelis selected 10 transactions in the diversified media and networks industry and 13 transactions in the TV Broadcasting industry since 2016 and focused primarily on the transactions with an enterprise value less than $1 billion given the scale of Hawkeye’s Networks business |
■ | Moelis selected a range of multiples from the selected precedent transactions analysis and applied the multiples to the Networks LTM Adj. EBITDA to calculate enterprise value |
— | Moelis selected a multiple range of 6.0x to 8.0x based on the selected precedent transactions and was applied to Networks LTM Adj. EBITDA as of 3/31/22 |
— | Unlike the publicly traded broadcasters, Networks earns a relatively small portion of its revenue from political (~2.5% in 2020A) and therefore LTM EBITDA as opposed to blended two-year average EBITDA was appropriate |
— | The transactions in the networks industry are relevant to our analysis given the similarity to the cable networks business within Hawkeye Networks |
● | MSGN’s acquisition by MSGE is relevant to our analysis as MSGN was a targeted cable network (New York sports) in the U.S. with a similar growth profile to the Hawkeye cable networks |
— | The broadcaster transactions are relevant to our analysis given the similarity to the broadcast assets within Hawkeye Networks |
● | Moelis notes that all of the broadcaster transactions involved strategic acquirers that expected to achieve significant levels of synergies which are unlikely to be present in an acquisition of Hawkeye |
[ 46 ]
Strictly Private and Confidential
Selected Precedent Transactions Analysis
Select Networks Precedent Transactions
NETWORKS
Announced | Target | Acquiror | TEV ($mm) | TEV
/ LTM EBITDA |
Apr-21 | Grupo Televisa (Content Assets) | Univision | $4,800 | 7.8x1 |
Mar-21 | MSGN | MSGE | 1,7652 | 5.9x |
Dec-20 | Oprah Winfrey Network | Discovery Communications | 4783 | 5.7x |
Aug-19 | Viacom | CBS Corporation | 19,552 | 6.6x |
Mar-18 | The Weather Channel | Allen Media | 977 | 6.9x4 |
Jul-17 | Scripps Networks | Discovery Communications | 14,260 | 9.9x |
Jul-17 | Home Shopping Network | QVC | 2,594 | 9.8x |
Jun-16 | Starz | Lions Gate | 4,400 | 10.9x |
Mar-16 | Crown Media Holdings | Hallmark Cards, Inc. | 2,088 | 10.1x |
Jan-16 | Tennis Channel | Sinclair | 3505 | 16.2x |
Overall Mean | $5,126 | 9.0x | ||
Overall Median | $2,341 | 8.8x |
Source: | Company filings, Wall Street research, Press releases |
1. | Reflects operating income from content assets; USD to MXN FX rate as of transaction announcement date (20.061x) |
2. | Assumes implied transaction value based on the MSGE closing price the day prior to the transaction (0.172x exchange ratio) |
3. | Grossed-up amount shown based on $100mm in total consideration for an incremental 21.0% equity stake in the Oprah Winfrey Network LLC from Harpo that Discovery did not already own |
4. | Estimated EBITDA per SNL Kagan |
5. | Does not include ~$65mm adjustment for savings from present value of Tennis Channel net operating losses |
[ 47 ]
Strictly Private and Confidential
Selected Precedent Transactions Analysis
Broadcasting Precedent Transactions
BROADCASTERS
TEV / | ||||
Announced | Target | Acquiror | TEV ($mm) | L8Q AVG. EBITDA |
Feb-22 | TEGNA | Standard General | $8,605 | 8.8x |
Jun-21 1 | Meredith | Gray Television, Inc. | 2,825 | 9.9x |
Sep-20 | ION Media | E.W. Scripps Company | 2,650 | 8.6x2 |
Jun-19 | Dispatch (2 Stations) | TEGNA | 535 | 7.9x3 |
Mar-19 | Nextsar (8 Stations)4 | E.W. Scripps Company | 580 | 10.4x |
Mar-19 | Nextsar (11 Stations) 4 | TEGNA | 740 | 12.0x |
Dec-18 | Tribune Media | Nexstar Broadcast Group | 6,400 | 9.2x |
Oct-18 | Cordillera (15 Stations) 4 | E.W. Scripps Company | 521 | 9.8x |
Aug-18 | Gray (2 Stations) 4 | TEGNA | 105 | 5.9x3 |
Jun-18 | Raycom Media, Inc. | Gray Television, Inc. | 3,660 | 9.5x |
Dec-17 | Midwest Television Inc.4 | TEGNA | 325 | 6.6x3 |
Apr-17 | Bonten Media Group | Sinclair Broadcast Group | 240 | 6.7x3 |
Jan-16 | Media General | Nexstar Broadcast Group | 4,115 | 9.1x |
Overall Mean | $2,408 | 8.8x | ||
Overall Median | $740 | 9.1x |
Source: | Company filings, Wall Street research, Press releases |
1. | Revised bid date, initial announcement was on 5/3/2021 |
2. | Reflects average of LTM 6/30/2020 and 2019A EBITDA |
3. | Includes pro forma synergies |
4. | Asset deal |
[ 48 ]
Strictly Private and Confidential
Selected Precedent Transactions Analysis
Pelican: Methodology & Assumptions
Analysis reflects implied enterprise value to revenue multiples paid in selected precedent transactions deemed generally relevant by Moelis in certain respects to Pelican for purposes of this analysis
■ | Moelis selected precedent transactions in the streaming subscription video |
■ | With the exception of Hawkeye’s April 2021 acquisition of the 75% of Pelican it did not previously own, no single transaction is similar across a range of key criteria including |
— | Transaction value / relative size |
— | EBITDA margin |
— | Growth profile |
— | Business model |
■ | Moelis selected 4 transactions in the streaming video industry since 2016 with a focus on transactions under $350mm given Pelican’s scale |
■ | Moelis selected a range of multiples from the selected precedent transactions analysis and applied the multiples to Pelican’s LTM revenue to calculate enterprise value |
■ | In its analysis of Pelican, Moelis placed less weight on the selected precedent transactions analysis for Pelican’s valuation, given limited relevant benchmarks and the recent significant change in market sentiment towards SVOD platforms (see slide 40) |
■ | Moelis selected a multiple range of 3.0x to 4.0x based on the selected precedent transactions and was applied to Pelican’s LTM Revenue as of 3/31/22 |
— | Moelis notes the most relevant transaction to Pelican is the March 2021 acquisition by Hawkeye of the 75% of Pelican that it did not own |
[ 49 ]
Strictly Private and Confidential
Selected Precedent Transactions Analysis
Select Streaming Precedent Transactions
STREAMERS
Announced | Target | Acquiror | TEV ($mm) | TEV / LTM Revenue |
Apr-21 | Pantaya | Hemisphere Media Group | $165 | 3.6x |
Jan-19 | PlutoTV | Viacom | 340 | 3.4x1 |
Jul-18 | Acorn (RLJ) | AMC Networks | 274 | 2.9x |
Jul-17 | Funimation | Sony | 151 | 1.5x1 |
Overall Mean | $232 | 2.9x | ||
Overall Median | $220 | 3.2x |
Source: | Company filings, Wall Street research, Press releases |
1. | Approximate revenue figure reported in the press |
[ 50 ]
Strictly Private and Confidential
D. | WACC Analysis |
Strictly Private and Confidential
WACC Analysis - Networks
Overview of Preliminary Networks WACC Analysis
Reference range of 8.25% - 10.50% discount rate derived from WACC calculation as described below
■ | Networks WACC calculation based on range of: |
— | Risk-free rate based on the 20-year U.S. Treasuries yield of 3.43% as of 05/06/2022 |
— | Equity risk premium of 6.22% represents the supply-side long-horizon expected equity risk premium1 |
— | Unlevered beta range of 0.525 to 0.725 based on Diversified Media & Networks and Broadcasters companies’ unlevered 2-year weekly and 5-year monthly Bloomberg adjusted betas |
● | ViacomCBS and Fox Corporation’s 5 year betas were excluded because of significant M&A activity within the last 5 years; specifically Viacom and CBS’s merger in 2019 and Fox Corporation’s spin-off from 21st Century Fox in 2019 |
● | Sinclair’s beta is less relevant given its highly levered capital structure and the impact of debt overhang from its Diamond Sports subsidiary on its equity trading |
● | Gray’s unlevered beta is calculated using trading information and capital structure as of May 2021, prior to the announcement their acquisition of Meredith’s Local Media Group, which significantly transformed their business and capital structure |
● | Tegna’s unlevered beta is calculated using trading information as of February 22, 2022, 1 day prior to the announcement of its sale to Standard General |
— | Target debt-to-total capitalization ratio of 25% to 65% based on capitalization of select publicly traded companies |
— | Cost of debt estimated to be 7.25% before tax informed by the following reference ranges: |
● | 20-year risk-free rate, plus the: |
− | Spread of 3.99%, calculated based on the ICE BofA US High Yield Index Effective Yield of 7.02% and the 7-year risk-free rate of 3.13% as of 05/06/2022 |
● | Yield-to-worst on Hawkeye’s existing debt |
− | $213mm Senior Secured Term Loan B due February 2024 YTW @ 6.03% |
− | $50mm Senior Secured Term Loan B Add-On due February 2024 YTW @ 4.56% |
— | Cash tax rate of 30.5% consistent with Hawkeye Management assumptions in the projections for the Networks business |
— | Size premium of 3.31% based on 10a decile as provided by Kroll1, based on companies with equity values of $190.49 million to $289.1 million |
Source: | Bloomberg, Capital IQ, U.S. Department of the Treasury, company filings, Kroll (formerly known as Duff & Phelps) and S&P. Market data as of 05/06/2022 |
1. | Kroll (formerly known as Duff & Phelps) 2021 Year End Cost of Capital Navigator |
[ 52 ]
Strictly Private and Confidential
WACC Analysis - Networks
Levered Beta ¹ | Total | Debt / | Unlevered Beta ² | |||||||||||
($ in millions, except per share data) | 2-Year | 5-Year | Equity | Debt | Cap | 2-Year | 5-Year | |||||||
Diversified Media & Networks | ||||||||||||||
Paramount 3 | 1.083 | NM | $18,426 | $18,945 | 50.7% | 0.631 | NA | |||||||
Fox Corporation 4 | 0.738 | NM | 19,050 | 7,673 | 28.7% | 0.577 | NA | |||||||
Discovery 5 | 0.998 | 1.248 | 22,061 | 15,026 | 40.5% | 0.677 | 0.847 | |||||||
AMC Networks | 1.189 | 0.977 | 1,452 | 2,893 | 66.6% | 0.498 | 0.409 | |||||||
Diversified Media Mean | 1.002 | 1.112 | 46.6% | 0.596 | 0.628 | |||||||||
Diversified Media Median | 1.040 | 1.112 | 45.6% | 0.604 | 0.628 | |||||||||
Broadcasters | ||||||||||||||
Sinclair | 1.304 | 1.215 | $1,719 | $13,102 | 88.4% | 0.207 | 0.193 | |||||||
Nexstar | 1.226 | 1.355 | 6,827 | 7,598 | 52.7% | 0.691 | 0.764 | |||||||
Tegna 6 | 1.107 | 1.014 | 3,861 | 3,557 | 48.0% | 0.675 | 0.618 | |||||||
Gray 7 | 1.443 | 1.705 | 1,912 | 4,035 | 67.9% | 0.585 | 0.691 | |||||||
Entravision | 1.656 | 0.899 | 398 | 213 | 34.9% | 1.206 | 0.655 | |||||||
E.W. Scripps | 1.643 | 1.499 | 1,404 | 3,240 | 69.8% | 0.631 | 0.576 | |||||||
Broadcasters Mean | 1.397 | 1.281 | 60.3% | 0.666 | 0.583 | |||||||||
Broadcasters Median | 1.374 | 1.285 | 60.3% | 0.653 | 0.637 | |||||||||
Aggregate Mean | 1.239 | 1.239 | 54.8% | 0.638 | 0.594 | |||||||||
Aggregate Median | 1.208 | 1.231 | 51.7% | 0.631 | 0.637 | |||||||||
Hawkeye | 1.323 | 1.110 | $152 | $251 | 62.3% | 0.616 | 0.517 |
KEY ASSUMPTIONS
■ | Historical long-horizon equity risk premium (supply-side) of 6.22% (Source: Kroll 2021 Year End Cost of Capital Navigator) |
■ | Yield of 20-year U.S. Treasuries of 3.43% (as of 05/06/2022) |
■ | Size premium of 3.31% based on 10a decile as provided by Kroll, based on companies with equity values of $190.49 million to $289.1 million |
■ | Target debt-to-total capitalization ratio of 25% to 65% based on capitalization of select publicly traded companies |
WACC SENSITIVITY
Source: | Bloomberg, Capital IQ, U.S. Department of the Treasury, company filings, Kroll (formerly known as Duff & Phelps) and S&P. Market data as of 05/06/2022 | |
1. | Median unlevered adjusted beta of Selected Public Companies used to calculate relevered beta using the formula B = Bu(1+(1-t)(D/E)); 2-year and 5-year betas unlevered using 2-year and 5-year average effective tax rates, respectively | |
2. | Assumes 30.5% effective tax rate based on Hawkeye Management guidance | |
3. | Represents beta for Paramount Class B Common Stock for period beginning 12/4/2019 (date of CBS merger completion) | |
4. | Represents beta for Fox Corporation Class A Common Stock for period beginning 3/19/2019 (date of Disney acquisition close); capital structure is PF for transaction | |
5. | Represents beta and capital structure for Discovery Communications Class A Common Stock for period ending 5/14/2021 (1 day prior to WarnerMedia merger announcement) | |
6. | Represents beta for Tegna Class A Common Stock for period ending 2/22/2022 (1 day prior to Standard General merger announcement) | |
7. | Represents beta and capital structure for Gray Television Common Stock for period ending 5/2/2021 (1 day prior to Meredith acquisition announcement) |
[ 53 ]
Strictly Private and Confidential
WACC Analysis - Pelican
Overview of Preliminary Pelican WACC Analysis
Reference range of 15.00% - 23.00% discount rate derived from WACC calculation as described below
■ | To estimate Pelican’s cost of capital, we reviewed research on cost of equity capital for privately-held businesses per a Pepperdine University report, and prepared a cost of capital analysis using the CAPM |
— | Our range of 15.00% - 23.00% is informed by the high end of our CAPM analysis (at the low end of our range) and by research on the cost of equity for privately-held businesses (at the high end of our range) 1 |
■ | Forecast negative cash flows through 2026, uncertainty on the amount of content investment required to attract new subs, and the unproven, nascent nature of the streaming business model to generate long-term profits all create significant risk to the Pelican achieving its forecast, which supports utilizing venture capital rates of return in our discount rate range |
■ | The median rate of return for Late Stage Venture Capital investments is 23.0%1 |
— | Given Pelican’s existing subscriber base and the revenue it generates currently, we believe the return for a late stage venture capital investment to be relevant to our WACC analysis |
■ | Pelican’s WACC calculation based on a range of: |
— | Risk-free rate based on the 20-year U.S. Treasuries yield of 3.43% as of 05/06/22 |
— | Unlevered beta range of 0.900 to 1.400 based on the SVOD / Streaming Companies’ 2-year (weekly adjusted) and 5-year (monthly adjusted) betas: |
● | fuboTV and CuriosityStream’s 5 year beta were excluded from the analysis because both companies began trading in October 2020 |
— | Cash tax rate of 24.0% during projection period and terminal year consistent with Hawkeye Management assumptions |
— | Total debt / total capitalization of 0% is informed by the SVOD / Streaming Companies and Pelican’s expected cash flow profile |
— | Equity risk premium of 6.22% represents the supply-side long-horizon expected equity risk premium2 |
— | Size premium of 3.31% based on 10a decile as provided by Kroll1, based on companies with equity values of $190.49 million to $289.01 million |
Source: | Bloomberg, Capital IQ, U.S. Department of the Treasury, company filings, Kroll (formerly known as Duff & Phelps) and S&P. Market data as of 05/06/2022 | |
1. | 2021 Private Capital Markets Report (Pepperdine University) | |
2. | Kroll (formerly known as Duff & Phelps) 2021 Year End Cost of Capital Navigator |
[ 54 ]
Strictly Private and Confidential
WACC Analysis - Pelican
Levered Beta ¹ | Total | Debt / | Unlevered Beta ² | |||||||||||
($ in millions, except per share price) | 2-Year | 5-Year | Equity | Debt | Cap | 2-Year | 5-Year | |||||||
SVOD / Streaming | ||||||||||||||
Netflix | 1.311 | 1.186 | $80,400 | $14,623 | 15.4% | 1.152 | 1.042 | |||||||
Spotify | 1.457 | 1.535 | 20,392 | 1,259 | 5.8% | 1.392 | 1.466 | |||||||
Sirius XM | 0.913 | 0.971 | 24,515 | 9,844 | 28.7% | 0.699 | 0.744 | |||||||
fuboTV | 1.250 | NA | 516 | 409 | 44.2% | 0.780 | NA | |||||||
Chicken Soup for The Soul | 1.265 | 1.252 | 150 | 67 | 31.0% | 0.943 | 0.934 | |||||||
Roku | 1.769 | 1.620 | 14,038 | 89 | 0.6% | 1.761 | 1.612 | |||||||
CuriosityStream | 1.430 | NA | 111 | -- | 0.0% | 1.430 | NA | |||||||
SVOD / Streaming Mean | 1.342 | 1.313 | 17.9% | 1.165 | 1.160 | |||||||||
SVOD / Streaming Median | 1.311 | 1.252 | 15.4% | 1.152 | 1.042 |
KEY ASSUMPTIONS
■ | Historical long-horizon equity risk premium (supply-side) of 6.22% (Source: Kroll 2021 Year End Cost of Capital Navigator) |
■ | Yield of 20-year U.S. Treasuries of 3.43% (as of 05/06/2022) |
■ | Size premium of 3.31% based on 10a decile as provided by Kroll, based on companies with equity values of $190.49 million to $289.1 million |
■ | Total debt / total capitalization of 0% is informed by the SVOD / Streaming Companies and Pelican’s expected cash flow profile |
WACC SENSITIVITY @ DEBT / TOTAL CAP OF 0%
Unlevered Beta | |||||||
0.900 | 1.067 | 1.233 | 1.400 | ||||
12.34% | 13.37% | 14.41% | 15.45% |
Source: | Bloomberg, Capital IQ, U.S. Department of the Treasury, company filings, Kroll (formerly known as Duff & Phelps) and S&P. Market data as of 05/06/2022 |
1. | Median unlevered adjusted beta of Selected Public Companies used to calculate relevered beta using the formula B = Bu(1+(1-t)(D/E)); 2-year and 5-year betas unlevered using 2-year and 5-year average effective tax rates, respectively |
2. | Assumes 24.0% effective tax rate based on Hawkeye Management guidance |
[ 55 ]
Strictly Private and Confidential
WACC Analysis
Cost of Capital for Privately-held Businesses
Later stage venture capital investments typically require rates of return from 18% (1st quartile) to 38% (3rd quartile) with a median of 23%; given Pelican’s existing subscriber base and the revenue it generates currently, we believe the return for a late stage venture capital investment to be relevant to our WACC analysis
PRIVATE CAPITAL MARKET REQUIRED RATES OF RETURN
Capital Type | Size | 1st Quartile | Median | 3rd Quartile | Capital Type | Size | 1st Quartile | Median | 3rd Quartile | ||||||||
Bank | $1mm Loan | 5.0% | 5.5% | 6.0% | Private Equity | $1mm EBITDA | - | - | - | ||||||||
$5mm Loan | 3.9% | 4.3% | 4.8% | $5mm EBITDA | 25.5% | 30.0% | 31.5% | ||||||||||
$10mm Loan | 3.9% | 4.0% | 4.5% | $10mm EBITDA | 22.5% | 25.0% | 27.5% | ||||||||||
$25mm Loan | 3.8% | 4.0% | 4.3% | $25mm EBITDA | 21.0% | 25.0% | 27.0% | ||||||||||
$50mm Loan | 3.0% | 3.3% | 3.5% | $50mm EBITDA | 20.0% | 25.0% | 25.5% | ||||||||||
Asset-Based Lending |
$1mm Loan | 15.5% | 16.0% | 18.5% | Venture Capital |
Seed | 33.0% | 38.0% | 40.0% | ||||||||
$5mm Loan | 14.8% | 15.5% | 16.3% | Startup | 30.0% | 33.0% | 40.0% | ||||||||||
$10mm Loan | 4.4% | 8.5% | 15.0% | Early Stage | 23.0% | 30.0% | 38.0% | ||||||||||
$25mm Loan | 3.5% | 5.0% | 8.0% | Expansion | 19.0% | 25.0% | 32.0% | ||||||||||
$50mm Loan | 3.1% | 3.8% | 4.4% | Later Stage | 18.0% | 23.0% | 38.0% | ||||||||||
Mezzanine | $1mm Loan | 11.5% | 14.0% | 21.0% | Angel | Seed | 33.0% | 43.0% | 65.0% | ||||||||
$5mm Loan | 11.0% | 14.0% | 17.5% | Startup | 23.0% | 33.0% | 50.0% | ||||||||||
$10mm Loan | 9.5% | 12.0% | 17.0% | Early Stage | 23.0% | 28.0% | 48.0% | ||||||||||
$25mm Loan | 8.5% | 12.0% | 13.0% | Expansion | 23.0% | 25.0% | 48.0% | ||||||||||
$50mm Loan | 8.5% | 10.0% | 12.0% | Later Stage | 18.0% | 23.0% | 38.0% |
Source: | 2021 Private Capital Markets Report (Pepperdine University) |
[ 56 ]
Strictly Private and Confidential
E. | Pelican Sale Supplemental Materials |
Strictly Private and Confidential
Overview of Pelican Sale Transaction / Consideration
● | As part of Sparrow’s Acquisition Proposal of Hawkeye, Sparrow has entered into an agreement to sell Pelican to Talon for a package of consideration consisting of cash, tax attributes and a seller note mandatorily exchangeable for either (a) all of Talon’s existing radio assets (the “Radio Assets”) or (b) 75% of the EBITDA generated by the Radio Assets plus the Radio Programming Agreement would be terminated and therefore Hawkeye would not be required to make any of the three $5mm annual payments to Talon pursuant to that agreement |
– | Cash consideration: $115mm payable at Closing |
– | Tax attributes: Hawkeye advisors forecast that $82mm of net operating losses in Puerto Rico will be transferred at closing (9/30/2022) with an expected net present value estimated to be between $0.0 – $24.1mm to Hawkeye, net of foreign tax credits |
– | The transaction will result in Hawkeye paying Talon a $15mm programing fee split evenly over three years assuming the sale of the Radio Assets closes 1 |
– | Additionally, Hawkeye will not be reimbursed for $7.3mm of content payments that Talon was expected to repay and Hawkeye will absorb a lease obligation that will run through 2059 and has a PV of between $15.0mm and $22.8mm |
– | Seller Note with a face value of $10mm containing the below provisions: |
■ | If FCC approval is granted for the radio stations, the seller note will be exchanged for the radio assets, and no cash will be exchanged |
■ | If FCC approval is not granted for the radio stations, Talon and the Pelican seller will enter into a JSA for 75% of the EBITDA of the radio assets and the Radio Programming Agreement would be terminated and no payments would be due from Hawkeye to Talon thereunder |
● | Any go-shop buyer will be required to assume the above transaction (i.e., step into Sparrow’s position) as par of its proposal |
$ in millions | Illustrative Pelican Consideration | ||
Low | Mid | High | |
(+) Cash Consideration | $115.0 | $115.0 | $115.0 |
(+) Radio Assets @5.0x - 7.0x 2022E Adj. EBITDA of $6.8mm | 34.1 | 40.9 | 47.7 |
(+) Net Benefit from PR NOLs (PV)2 | - | 12.3 | 24.1 |
(-) 3 Years of Programming Fee (PV)3 | (13.6) | (13.6) | (13.6) |
(-) Unreimbursed Content Payments / License Fee Forgiveness 4 | (7.3) | (7.3) | (7.3) |
(-) Incremental Puerto Rico Lease Obligations (PV) 5 | (22.8) | (20.0) | (15.0) |
Ilustrative Pelican Consideration | $105.4 | $127.3 | $151.0 |
Source: | Hawkeye Management, Talon, 3rd party tax advisors |
1. | Assuming FCC approval is granted |
2. | High end reflects present value of net benefit of Puerto Rican NOLs received less the decrease in foreign tax credits utilized given the decrease in forecasted taxes paid in Puerto Rico – discounted at 8.25%; mid-point assumes 51% probability of utilization |
3. | Includes three $5mm payments for programming fees from 2022 to 2024 |
4. | Reflects upfront content funding payments that will not be reimbursed through working capital and current payment that Talon owes Pelican for content that will be forgiven as a result of the transaction |
5. | Low end reflects present value of absorbed lease obligations as a result of the transaction, mid and high end reflects illustrative potential to break the lease before 2059 when the current contract expires – discounted at 8.25% |
[ 58 ]
Strictly Private and Confidential
Overview of the Talon Radio Assets
ASSET OVERVIEW
● | Talon is currently the owner of a station group in Puerto Rico with reach that extends across the entire island 1 |
● | WKAQ and WUKQ are two of the top ranked radio stations on the Island 2 |
– | The AM and FM stations were the first and second stations, respectively, to broadcast on the Island |
– | The AM station is currently ranked #1 in the 6AM to 3PM weekday slot for listeners aged 12+, while the FM station is ranked #2 from 10AM to 3PM |
● | The stations have strong EBITDA margins and in 2021 generated $14.2mm of revenue and $6.5mm of Adj. EBITDA |
● | Hawkeye Management believes the assets will be complementary with WAPA PR and could present cross-selling opportunities and potential synergies with the broadcast network |
● | Hawkeye’s advisors have forecasted that $82mm of NOLs will be available after utilization assuming the transaction closes by 9/30/2022 |
SUMMARY RADIO P&L
$ in millions
RATINGS BY DAYPART FOR PERSONS 12+ 1
Station | DayPart | Ranking |
6A - 10A | 1 | |
WKAQ580 | 10A - 3P | 1 |
3P - 7P | 2 | |
6A - 10A | 8 | |
KQ105 | 10A - 3P | 2 |
3P - 7P | 4 |
Source: | Talon, Nielsen | |
Note: | ||
1. | The stations cover the entire Island, WKAQ (FM) covers the eastern half of the island, while WUKQ (FM) covers the western half; for the AM stations, WKAQ covers the northern part of the island and WUKQ covers the southern part | |
2. | Nielsen ratings as of January 2022 |
[ 59 ]
Strictly Private and Confidential
Puerto Rico Radio Detailed Financial Overview
COMMENTARY
● | AM stations accounted for 66% of net revenue in 2021 |
● | Local sales account for over 98% of gross revenue |
● | 2022 revenue is expected to grow ~2% driven by increased national and local spend |
● | Adj. EBITDA margins have consistently ranged from 40-50% (2017-2021) |
● | Other adjustments include the allocation of costs that are currently being recognized at another Talon entity, as well as non-recurring costs and insurance normalization |
● | Minimal Capex forecasted |
DETAILED P&L
Actuals | Projected | |||||||||||||||||
$ in millions | 2017A | 2018A | 2019A | 2020A | 2021A | 2022B | ||||||||||||
AM Revenue | 8.4 | 9.3 | 8.8 | 9.1 | 9.5 | 8.7 | ||||||||||||
FM Revenue | 5.7 | 6.8 | 5.8 | 3.6 | 4.7 | 5.9 | ||||||||||||
Total Net Revenue | $14.1 | $16.0 | $14.6 | $12.8 | $14.2 | $14.6 | ||||||||||||
% Growth | n/a | 13.7% | (9.0% | ) | (12.7% | ) | 11.4% | 2.6% | ||||||||||
Payroll | $5.4 | $5.2 | $5.1 | $5.3 | $5.2 | $5.1 | ||||||||||||
Other Opex | 2.7 | 2.4 | 3.0 | 2.4 | 2.1 | 2.3 | ||||||||||||
Total Opex | $8.1 | $7.6 | $8.1 | $7.6 | $7.3 | $7.5 | ||||||||||||
Other Adjustments | - | - | - | ($0.1 | ) | ($0.4 | ) | ($0.3 | ) | |||||||||
Adjusted EBITDA | $6.0 | $8.4 | $6.5 | $5.0 | $6.5 | $6.8 | ||||||||||||
Margin % | 42.4% | 52.6% | 44.3% | 39.4% | 45.9% | 46.8% | ||||||||||||
Memo: Capex | n/a | $0.1 | $0.2 | $0.1 | $0.4 | $0.2 |
Source: | Talon |
[ 60 ]
Strictly Private and Confidential
Pelican Consideration in Context – Preliminary Valuation Summary
Source: | Hawkeye Management, Wall Street research, Capital IQ |
Note: | Market data as of 05/06/2022; Includes value attributable to NOLs generated by Pelican |
1. | Discount rate range derived from Networks capital asset pricing model (“CAPM”) |
[ 61 ]
Strictly Private and Confidential
Selected Publicly Traded Companies Analysis
Radio: Discussion of Selected Publicly Traded Companies
Selected publicly traded companies analysis provides a valuation range based on public market valuations of businesses with operations and financial characteristics similar in certain respects to the Talon Radio Business for the purposes of this analysis
■ | Moelis selected publicly traded companies which have a significant presence in the radio and audio media service sector |
— | Talon’s Radio Business operates stations in Puerto Rico |
■ | No single company is substantially similar across a range of key criteria including size of the company, geographic footprint, diversification across markets and product offerings, EBITDA margin, growth profile, target demographic and business model |
■ | Moelis selected eight publicly traded radio and audio media services companies that it deemed relevant for purposes of this analysis |
— | iHeartMedia and Audacy are relevant to our analysis of Talon’s Radio Business given they both operates radio stations |
● | iHeartMedia and Audacy are less relevant to our analysis given their much larger size and scale relative to Talon’s Radio Business, both companies are also diversified across several operating segments, including a significant footprint in digital audio media and both companies have much larger financial profiles |
— | Cumulus is relevant to our analysis of Talon’s Radio Business given its primary operations involve the ownership of radio stations |
● | Cumulus is less relevant to our analysis given the size of its geographic footprint, diversification across program offerings, larger financial profile and its digital marketing services segment |
— | Urban One and Salem Media Group are relevant to our analysis given that they operates radio stations focused on a targeted demographic |
● | Urban One and Salem Media Group are less relevant to our analysis given that they operates through several segments outside of radio, including digital, television and publishing, the size and scope of its radio stations and larger financial profile |
— | Townsquare Media is relevant to our analysis given that it owns and operates radio stations |
● | Townsquare Media is less relevant to our analysis given that it has substantial exposure to digital audio media, subscription services and live events, its radio business encompasses several hundred markets and has a vastly different financial profile than Talon’s Radio Business |
— | Beasley Broadcast Group is relevant to our analysis given that its primary business is operating radio stations |
● | Beasley Broadcast Group is less relevant to our analysis given that it operates across several markets, owns significantly more stations and is diversified beyond radio in the digital marketing and esports space |
— | Saga Communications is relevant to our analysis given its business is solely focused on local radio stations |
● | Saga Communications is less relevant to our analysis given that it owns and operates significantly more radio stations that are diversified across several markets |
[ 62 ]
Strictly Private and Confidential
Selected Publicly Traded Companies Analysis - Radio
Publicly Traded Companies Analysis
TEV / Post SBC EBITDA | 21-23E CAGR | CY22E EBITDA MARGIN | ||||||||||||||||||
($ in millions, except per share data) | % of 52 Week High | Market Cap | Enterprise Value | CY22 | CY23 | Revenue | EBITDA | |||||||||||||
49.6% | $2,097 | $7,475 | 7.0x | 6.5x | 9.2% | 20.7% | 26.2% | |||||||||||||
46.9% | 318 | 2,085 | 6.7x | 6.1x | 11.6% | 43.5% | 21.4% | |||||||||||||
98.5% | 333 | 1,163 | 6.7x | 6.3x | 6.4% | 19.4% | 17.4% | |||||||||||||
40.2% | 414 | 1,132 | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | |||||||||||||
72.1% | 216 | 719 | 6.3x | 6.1x | 8.8% | 7.8% | 24.2% | |||||||||||||
49.0% | 50 | 305 | 8.1x | 8.0x | 7.9% | 21.5% | 14.0% | |||||||||||||
43.3% | 80 | 252 | 6.7x | 6.3x | 1.9% | 2.8% | 14.0% | |||||||||||||
80.1% | 139 | 83 | 3.9x | 1 | NA | NA | NA | 19.3% | 1 |
Average | 6.5 | x | 6.5 | x | 7.6 | % | 19.3 | % | 19.5 | % | ||||||||||
Median | 6.7 | x | 6.3 | x | 8.4 | % | 20.0 | % | 19.3 | % | ||||||||||
Memo: | ||||||||||||||||||||
Puerto Rico Radio 2 | (0.1 | %) | 1.8% | 46.8% |
Source: | Company filings, Wall Street research, Press releases |
Note: | Market data as of 05/06/2022 |
1. | Reflects LTM EBITDA metrics |
2. | CAGRs represent ’19A - ’22E |
[ 63 ]
Strictly Private and Confidential
Selected Precedent Transactions Analysis
Radio: Methodology & Assumptions
Analysis reflects implied enterprise value to EBITDA multiples paid in selected precedent transactions deemed generally relevant by Moelis in certain respects to Talon’s Radio Business for the purposes of this analysis
■ | Moelis selected precedent transactions in the radio and audio media services sector |
■ | However, no single transaction is similar across a range of key criteria including |
— | Transaction value / relative size |
— | EBITDA margin |
— | Growth profile |
— | Business model (market attractiveness, station clusters and geographic diversification) |
— | Further, all of the selected transactions occurred prior to the COVID-19 pandemic |
■ | Moelis selected seven transactions in the radio and audio media services sector since 2016 and focused primarily on the transactions with an enterprise value less than $3 billion given the size of Talon’s Radio Business |
■ | Moelis selected a range of multiples from the selected precedent transactions analysis and applied the multiples to the Company’s EBITDA to calculate enterprise value |
— | Moelis selected a multiple range of 5.0x to 7.0x based on the selected precedent transactions and was applied to Talon’s Radio Business’ LTM Adj. EBITDA as of 12/31/2021 |
— | The transactions in the radio sector are relevant to our analysis given the each target operated radio stations |
— | None of the transactions are exact matches for Talon’s Radio Business given that all of the transactions involving single stations were in top 40 MSAs including three in top two MSAs, and the larger transactions involved the sale of several stations across multiple media markets |
[ 64 ]
Strictly Private and Confidential
Selected Precedent Transactions Analysis - Radio
Radio Precedent Transactions
RADIO
Ann. | Target | Acquiror | Markets | TEV ($mm) | TEV / LTM EBITDA |
Jul-19 | Emmis Communications Corp. | Standard General L.P. | #1 New York | $106 | 10.0x |
Jun-19 | Emmis Communications Corp. | Sinclair Telecable | #40 Austin | 78 | 7.5x |
Apr-19 | Cumulus Media Inc. | Meruelo Group LLC | #2 Los Angeles | 43 | 8.6x |
Feb-18 | Emmis Communications Corp. | Hubbard Broadcasting / Entercom Communications | #23 St. Louis | 60 | 12.0x |
May-17 | Emmis Communications Corp. | Meruelo Group | #2 Los Angeles | 83 | 11.1x |
Feb-17 | CBS Broadcasting, Inc. | Entercom Communications Corp. |
19 Total, Including: #1 New York, #2 Los Angeles, #3 Chicago |
2,861 | 8.1x |
Jul-16 | Greater Media, Inc. | Beasley Broadcast Group, Inc. |
19 Total, Including: #7 Philadelphia, #11 Boston, #14 Detroit, #22 Charlotte |
207 | 7.0x |
Overall Mean | $491 | 9.2x | |||
Overall Median | $83 | 8.6x |
Source: | Company filings, Wall Street research, Press releases |
[ 65 ]
Strictly Private and Confidential
Puerto Rico Radio Assets: NOL Utilization & Illustrative Valuation
The below reflects a summary of Hawkeye Management’s views of potential future Puerto Rico NOL utilization combined with the loss of foreign tax credits
STANDALONE WAPA PRE-TAX INCOME 1
Projections | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
$ in millions | Q4 2022E | 2023E | 2024E | 2025E | 2026E | 2027E | 2028E | 2029E | 2030E | 2031E | 2032E | 2033E | 2034E | 2035E | 2036E | 2037E | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
WAPA Pre-tax Income 2 | $3.9 | $16.0 | $16.3 | $16.6 | $16.9 | $17.3 | $17.6 | $18.0 | $18.3 | $18.7 | $19.1 | $19.5 | $19.8 | $20.2 | $20.6 | $21.1 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Subject to Tax Grants | - | - | - | - | 10.0 | 10.2 | 10.4 | 10.6 | 10.8 | 11.0 | 11.2 | 11.4 | 11.7 | 11.9 | 12.1 | 12.4 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Total WAPA Pretax Income | $3.9 | $16.0 | $16.3 | $16.6 | $26.9 | $27.4 | $28.0 | $28.5 | $29.1 | $29.7 | $30.3 | $30.9 | $31.5 | $32.1 | $32.8 | $33.4 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
PR Taxes @37.4% | $1.5 | $6.0 | $6.1 | $6.2 | $10.1 | $10.3 | $10.5 | $10.7 | $10.9 | $11.1 | $11.3 | $11.6 | $11.8 | $12.0 | $12.3 | $12.5 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Add: Taxes (Act 135) | 0.2 | 0.9 | 1.0 | 1.0 | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Tax Credit | - | (2.0 | ) | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Cash Taxes Paid in PR | $1.7 | $5.0 | $7.1 | $7.2 | $10.1 | $10.3 | $10.5 | $10.7 | $10.9 | $11.1 | $11.3 | $11.6 | $11.8 | $12.0 | $12.3 | $12.5 |
PRO FORMA FOR ABILITY TO UTILIZE PUERTO RICO RADIO TAX ATTRIBUTES AND IMPACT OF LOST FOREIGN TAX CREDITS
PRO FORMA TAXES | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Pro Forma PreTax Income for AMT | $3.3 | $13.3 | $13.6 | $13.9 | $25.9 | $26.4 | $26.9 | $27.5 | $28.0 | $28.6 | $29.2 | $29.7 | $30.3 | $30.9 | $31.6 | $32.2 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
NOL Limitation 3 | 2.3 | 9.3 | 9.5 | 9.7 | 18.1 | 18.5 | 18.9 | 19.2 | 19.6 | 20.0 | 20.4 | 20.8 | 21.2 | 21.7 | 22.1 | 22.5 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
NOLs Available Balance | 81.5 | 79.2 | 62.5 | 53.0 | 43.3 | 25.2 | 6.7 | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
NOLs Utilized | $2.3 | $9.3 | $9.5 | $9.7 | $18.1 | $18.5 | $6.7 | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Taxable Income | $1.0 | $4.0 | $4.1 | $4.2 | $7.8 | $7.9 | $20.3 | $27.5 | $28.0 | $28.6 | $29.2 | $29.7 | $30.3 | $30.9 | $31.6 | $32.2 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
PR Taxes AMT | 0.2 | 0.9 | 0.9 | 1.0 | 1.8 | 1.8 | 4.7 | 6.3 | 6.4 | 6.6 | 6.7 | 6.8 | 7.0 | 7.1 | 7.3 | 7.4 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
PR Taxes Regular | 0.1 | 0.6 | 0.6 | 0.6 | 1.0 | 1.0 | 9.5 | 10.7 | 10.9 | 11.1 | 11.3 | 11.6 | 11.8 | 12.0 | 12.3 | 12.5 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Taxes Paid 4 | $0.2 | $0.9 | $0.9 | $1.0 | $1.8 | $1.8 | $9.5 | $10.7 | $10.9 | $11.1 | $11.3 | $11.6 | $11.8 | $12.0 | $12.3 | $12.5 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Add: Taxes (Act 135) | 0.2 | 0.9 | 1.0 | 1.0 | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Tax Credit | - | (1.9 | ) | (0.1 | ) | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
AMT Tax Credit | - | - | - | - | - | - | (1.2 | ) | (1.1 | ) | (0.3 | ) | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Cash Taxes Paid in PR | $0.5 | - | $1.8 | $1.9 | $1.8 | $1.8 | $8.3 | $9.6 | $10.6 | $11.1 | $11.3 | $11.6 | $11.8 | $12.0 | $12.3 | $12.5 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Add: Cash Taxes Paid in US With NOL | 0.3 | 7.2 | 8.3 | 8.3 | 10.6 | 12.5 | 6.4 | 10.1 | 9.3 | 9.5 | 9.6 | 9.8 | 9.9 | 10.1 | 10.3 | 10.5 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Net Cash Taxes Paid With NOL | $0.7 | $7.2 | $10.1 | $10.2 | $12.4 | $14.4 | $14.6 | $19.7 | $19.9 | $20.6 | $21.0 | $21.4 | $21.7 | $22.1 | $22.6 | $23.0 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Cash Taxes Paid in US Without NOL | 2.0 | 12.2 | 15.4 | 15.6 | 18.6 | 18.9 | 19.3 | 20.9 | 20.3 | 20.7 | 21.0 | 21.4 | 21.8 | 22.2 | 22.6 | 23.0 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Net Benefit from NOLs | $1.3 | $5.0 | $5.3 | $5.3 | $6.1 | $4.6 | $4.7 | $1.2 | $0.4 | $0.1 | $0.1 | $0.1 | $0.1 | $0.1 | $0.1 | $0.0 |
NPV
Net Benefit Provided from | $24.1 |
SENSITIVITY ANALYSIS – NPV OF NET REDUCTION IN TAXES | ||||
Discount Rate | ||||
8.25% | 8.81% | 9.38% | 9.94% | 10.50% |
$24.1 | $23.6 | $23.1 | $22.6 | $22.1 |
Source: | Hawkeye Management, Talon, 3rd party tax advisors |
Note: | Discount rate range derived from Networks capital asset pricing model (“CAPM”); assumes NOL balance as of 12/31/2021; reflects fully levered WAPA pre-tax income for illustrative purposes |
1. | Assumes growth rate in WAPA pre-tax income of 2.0% |
2. | Assumes none of the income is subject to tax grants per Hawkeye Management |
3. | Assumes 70% NOL limitation with an AMT structure |
4. | Assumes taxes paid are the higher of regular tax and the alternative minimum tax (“AMT”) |
[ 66 ]
Strictly Private and Confidential
F. | Other Information |
Strictly Private and Confidential
Other Information
Leveraged Buyout (LBO) Assumptions and Illustrative Analysis
KEY ASSUMPTIONS
■ | Uses LRP through 2026 for the consolidated Hawkeye business (Networks and Pelican) |
■ | Assumes $180mm of new debt (~5.00x LTM EBITDA of $35.1mm) |
— | Assumes refinancing of existing debt with new Unitranche Facility at L + 650bps, subject to a 1.00% LIBOR floor and 2% OID |
■ | Remaining purchase price provided by equity from Sponsor |
■ | Assumes transaction date of 03/31/22 and exit on 12/31/2026 |
— | Assumes minimum cash balance of $30mm |
— | Assumes $20mm of illustrative other transaction expenses |
■ | Exit multiple calculated on a sum-of-the-parts basis based on 2026E revenue and EBITDA for the Pelican and Networks businesses, respectively |
SENSITIVITY ANALYSIS
Implied Purchase Price (@ 4.75x Max Leverage) | |||||
Exit | Required IRR | ||||
Multiple | 17.5% | 18.8% | 20.0% | 21.3% | 22.5% |
6.0x / 1.5x | $6.80 | $6.39 | $5.99 | $5.62 | $5.28 |
6.5x / 1.9x | 8.46 | 7.96 | 7.49 | 7.05 | 6.64 |
7.0x / 2.3x | 10.12 | 9.54 | 8.99 | 8.48 | 8.00 |
7.5x / 2.6x | 11.72 | 11.09 | 10.49 | 9.91 | 9.36 |
8.0x / 3.0x | 13.25 | 12.58 | 11.93 | 11.30 | 10.70 |
Networks / Pelican |
PF FREE CASH FLOW BUILD
Fiscal Year Ending December 31, | ||||||||||||||
($ in millions) | 9M 2022E | 2023E | 2024E | 2025E | 2026E | |||||||||
Adjusted EBITDA (Post-SBC) | $32 | $44 | $62 | $71 | $89 | |||||||||
% Growth | 40.1% | 14.3% | 25.5% | |||||||||||
(-) Taxes | (3 | ) | (4 | ) | (8 | ) | (12 | ) | (19 | ) | ||||
(+) Other Adjustments | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |||||||||
(-) LatAm Cash Timing Difference | 1 | 1 | -- | -- | -- | |||||||||
(-) Equity Method Investments | (1 | ) | -- | -- | -- | -- | ||||||||
(-) Capex | (4 | ) | (5 | ) | (5 | ) | (5 | ) | (5 | ) | ||||
(+) Programming / Content Amortization | 22 | 37 | 47 | 56 | 62 | |||||||||
(-) Cash Content Spend | (37 | ) | (49 | ) | (53 | ) | (58 | ) | (63 | ) | ||||
(-) Change in Working Capital | (2 | ) | 1 | (2 | ) | 0 | (1 | ) | ||||||
(+) Pantelion 2.0 Cash Flow | (1 | ) | (1 | ) | (6 | ) | 4 | (1 | ) | |||||
(-) Interest Expense | (17 | ) | (19 | ) | (18 | ) | (15 | ) | (11 | ) | ||||
Levered Free Cash Flow | ($9 | ) | $6 | $18 | $42 | $51 |
Source: | Hawkeye Management |
Note: | Market data as of 05/06/2022. Assumes 20.7mm Class A shares, 19.7mm Class B Shares, 4.48mm options with strike prices ranging from $5.44 to $15, total debt of $251.6mm, cash of $37.3mm, equity method investments of $22.7mm (which are treated as cash and calculated using Hawkeye Management’s estimate for the value of these assets) and post-tax pension liability of $1.7mm per Hawkeye Management |
[ 68 ]
Strictly Private and Confidential
Other Information
Hawkeye Current Capitalization
TEV BUILD |
(figures in $ millions, except per share data) |
Capitalization
Capitalization | |
Share Price Class A Shares (as of 05/06/2022) | $3.77 |
(x) Common shares outstanding | 20.680 |
Share Price Class B Shares (as of 05/06/2022) | $3.77 |
(x) Common shares outstanding | 19.720 |
Equity Value | $152.3 |
(+) Total Debt 1 | 251.6 |
(–) Cash 1 | (37.3) |
Net Debt | $214.3 |
(+) Noncontrolling Interests | -- |
(+) Pension Obligation | 1.7 |
(–) Non-Core Assets 1 | (22.7) |
TEV | $345.6 |
FDSO | |
Common Shares (A Shares + B Shares) | 40.401 |
(+) Options | |
FDSO | 40.401 |
OPTIONS SCHEDULE |
(figures in $ millions, except per share data) |
Options Schedule | |||
Item | # of Units | Strike Price | Dilution |
Tranche 1 | 0.105 | $5.44 | -- |
Tranche 2 | 0.025 | $9.29 | -- |
Tranche 3 | 1.200 | $10.20 | -- |
Tranche 4 | 0.020 | $10.35 | -- |
Tranche 5 | 0.030 | $10.39 | -- |
Tranche 6 | 0.040 | $10.60 | -- |
Tranche 7 | 0.055 | $11.35 | -- |
Tranche 8 | 0.025 | $11.35 | -- |
Tranche 9 | 0.040 | $11.51 | -- |
Tranche 10 | 0.300 | $11.65 | -- |
Tranche 11 | 0.010 | $11.70 | -- |
Tranche 12 | 0.650 | $11.90 | -- |
Tranche 13 | 0.210 | $11.95 | -- |
Tranche 14 | 1.025 | $12.06 | -- |
Tranche 15 | 0.060 | $12.43 | -- |
Tranche 16 | 0.095 | $12.56 | -- |
Tranche 17 | 0.065 | $13.49 | -- |
Tranche 18 | 0.045 | $13.53 | -- |
Tranche 19 | 0.035 | $14.00 | -- |
Tranche 20 | 0.325 | $15.00 | -- |
Total | 4.360 |
Source: | Company filings, Hawkeye Management |
Note: | Market data as of 05/06/2022. Assumes 20.7mm Class A shares, 19.7mm Class B Shares, 4.48mm options with strike prices ranging from $5.44 to $15.00, total debt of $251.6mm, cash of $37.3mm, equity method investments of $22.7mm (which are treated as cash and calculated using Hawkeye Management’s estimate for the value of these assets) and post-tax pension liability of $1.7mm |
1. | 3/31/22 estimates per Hawkeye Management |
[ 69 ]
Strictly Private and Confidential
Other Information
Hawkeye Equity Research Overview
ANALYST / DATE / RATING | PRICE TARGET |
BROKER VALUATION PERSPECTIVES
Valuation Method | 2022E Revenue | 2022E EBITDA | |
■ |
Based on Guggenheim’s DCF valuation using a 2% long-term growth rate and a 9.5% WACC (up from 9.1% prior) |
$220mm | $40mm |
■ |
Valuation is based solely on Guggenheim’s DCF due to the company’s Pelican acquisition |
||
■ | Lowered EV/Sub multiple from 250x to 125x, using YE23 Pelican subs of 1.7mm | ||
■ |
Models the company returning to EBITDA growth in FY23 as revenue/profitability growth lags the increased investment
|
$229mm
|
$41mm
|
MOELIS OBSERVATIONS
■ | Given Guggenheim’s near-term cash flow forecast, WACC and terminal year growth rate assumptions, it would require long term projections materially higher than Hawkeye Management’s forecast to achieve a valuation of $12.00 per share |
■ | Wells Fargo’s SOTP valuation implies the following: |
— | Blended Networks / Broadcasting multiple of 6.6x management 2022E EBITDA, as compared to Fox multiple of 6.3x 2022E EBITDA |
— | Pelican multiple of 2.8x management 2022E revenue, as compared to Netflix and Curiosity Stream 2022E revenue multiples of 2.7x and 0.2x, respectively |
— | $101mm of value for equity method investments, which Hawkeye Management estimates is worth $22.7mm (implied impact per share of $1.94) |
■ | Wells Fargo has informed the Company that they are discontinuing coverage |
Source: Hawkeye Management, Wall Street research, Capital IQ as of 05/06/2022
[ 70 ]
Exhibit (c)(v)
Privileged & Confidential | ||
Project Hawkeye | |
PRESENTATION TO THE SPECIAL COMMITTEE OF HMTV | |
May 7, 2022 |
Confidential
Confidential | |
Summary of the Merger Agreement |
> | Searchlight to acquire all outstanding common shares of HMTV for $7.00 per share, other than the shares held by Gato which will be cancelled(1) |
‒ | Gato owns 41.1% economic and 75.3% voting stake in HMTV(2) |
> | Closing of the sale of Pantaya to Univision is a Searchlight condition to closing the HMTV transaction |
> | Closing conditions for the HMTV transaction also include that a majority of HMTV shares not held by Gato have voted in favor of the transaction, FCC approval, HSR clearance (if applicable) and other customary closing conditions |
> | Each of Searchlight and HMTV can terminate the Merger Agreement if, among other things, (a) the Pantaya Transaction Agreement is terminated or (b) the HMTV transaction has not closed 6 months after signing, which may be extended by either HMTV or Searchlight to 9 months after signing if, among other things, the Pantaya transaction has not closed |
> | 30-day post-signing Go-Shop period during which HMTV may solicit additional acquisition proposals |
‒ | Searchlight will have matching rights with respect to a superior proposal |
‒ | HMTV termination fee of (a) 2% of equity value if the Merger Agreement is terminated in connection with the Go-Shop provision; or (b) 3.75% of equity value otherwise |
> | Searchlight termination fee of 5.5% of equity value |
> | Fully committed debt and equity financing has been secured by Searchlight with the amount of equity financing to be sufficient to cover (if applicable) the cash purchase price for the Pantaya transaction |
(1) | In the money stock options will be cashed out for the difference between the strike price and $7.00 per share. |
(2) | Gato and Peter Kern own a total of ~16.6mm shares (Peter Kern personally owns ~0.2mm Class A shares and ~0.7mm Class B shares); Gato Investments LP (“Gato”) is a Delaware limited partnership, Gemini Latin Holdings, LLC is the general partner of Gato and Peter Kern is the controlling person of Gemini; a Searchlight fund, as the sole limited partner in Gato, holds all of the economic interests in Gato (subject to Peter Kern‘s carried interest, which entitles him to payments in certain scenarios). |
1
Confidential | |
Summary of Other Key Transaction Agreements |
> | Pantaya Transaction Agreement and Radio Stations Transaction Agreement |
‒ | Pantaya to be sold to Univision for a combination of $115mm of cash (subject to working capital and net debt adjustments), a $10mm promissory note and HMTV has agreed to forgo $7.3mm of content payments / license fee due from Univision |
○ | Pantaya sale to close (i) concurrently with the HMTV transaction if it closes on or before a to-be-determined date, (ii) a to-be-determined number of business days following receipt of the Required Company Stockholder Approval, if the HMTV transaction does not close by a to-be-determined date or (iii) as soon as practicable following termination of the HMTV transaction by HTMV for a superior proposal |
○ | Pantaya sale subject to customary closing conditions, including receipt of HSR clearance |
○ | Pantaya Transaction Agreement to automatically terminate if the Merger Agreement is terminated, other than by HMTV for a superior proposal |
‒ | Under the Radio Stations Transaction Agreement, in exchange for cancellation of the promissory note received pursuant to the Pantaya Transaction Agreement, HMTV to receive Univision of Puerto Rico, Inc. (which holds certain Puerto Rico radio station assets and certain NOLs) |
○ | Univision of Puerto Rico, Inc. is a party to a real estate lease in Puerto Rico expiring in 2059, which may result in costs to it of between $5.8 and $20.9 million |
○ | Radio Stations Transaction Agreement to automatically terminate if the Pantaya Transaction Agreement is terminated |
‒ | Pursuant to the Programming Agreement, HMTV to pay to Univision a fee of $15mm ratably over 3 years |
‒ | HMTV to provide certain services to Univision in connection with Pantaya pursuant to a transition services agreement and Univision and HMTV to provided certain services to each other pursuant to a shared services agreement in connection with the radio station assets |
> | Voting and Support Agreement |
‒ | If a superior proposal is accepted as part of the go-shop process, shares owned by Gato will be voted in the same manner and proportion as the remaining stockholders |
‒ | Searchlight to execute a separate letter agreement in which it agrees not to transfer its interests in Gato, with such restriction terminating on the earlier of (a) termination of the HMTV transaction (other than by HMTV for a superior proposal), (b) if the HMTV transaction is terminated by HMTV for a superior proposal, the earlier of the consummation of such superior proposal transaction or the termination of the agreement for such superior proposal transaction and (c) closing of the HMTV transaction |
2
Confidential | |
Consideration Received in Connection with Pantaya Sale |
($mm) | Low | High | ||||
Cash Proceeds | $115.0 | $115.0 | ||||
Illustrative Valuation of Puerto Rican Radio Assets @ ~5.0-8.0x 2022E EBITDA | 35.0 | 55.0 | ||||
PV of Tax NOLs per HMTV Management Guidance(1) | 0.0 | 23.0 | ||||
PV of Assumed Lease Liability per HMTV Management Guidance(2) | (19.8 | ) | (5.7 | ) | ||
PV of Programming Agreement Payments(3) | (12.5 | ) | (12.5 | ) | ||
Unreimbursed Content Payments / License Fee Forgiveness | (7.3 | ) | (7.3 | ) | ||
Net Value of Consideration | $110.3 | $167.4 | ||||
Implied Multiple of 2021A Revenue ($53.0mm) | 1.4 | x | 2.1 | x | ||
Implied Multiple of 2022E Revenue ($78.3mm) | 1.0 | x | 1.4 | x | ||
Midpoint Value of Consideration | $138.9 | |||||
Net Value of Non-Radio Consideration | $75.3 | $112.4 | ||||
Midpoint Value of Non-Radio Consideration | $93.9 |
In April 2021, HMTV acquired Lionsgate‘s 75% stake in Pantaya that HMTV did not already own at a $165mm valuation (on a 100% basis). |
Note: Analysis assumes transactions contemplated by the Radio Stations Purchase Agreement will be consummated in accordance with their terms.
(1) | Illustratively assumes a discount rate of 9.5% based on the midpoint of the WACC range for Networks; range represents 0% to 100% range of utilization of the PV of the NOLs based on consent from HMTV management. |
(2) | Illustratively assumes a discount rate of 9.5% based on the midpoint of the WACC range for Networks; low end of range reflects PV of lease costs with LMG payments throughout the lease and high end of range reflects PV of lease costs without LMG payments after December 2025 based on consent from HMTV management. |
(3) | Illustratively assumes a discount rate of 9.5% based on the midpoint of the WACC range for Networks on the $5mm payable by HMTV in each of the first three years of the Programming Agreement. |
3
Confidential | |
Proposed Transaction Sources & Uses |
Sources | $mm | Uses | $mm | |
New Debt Financing(1) | $360 | Purchase ~23.8mm Common Shares of HMTV(3) | $168 | |
Rolled Searchlight Equity(2) | 115 | Rolled Searchlight Equity(2) | 115 | |
Cash Proceeds from Sale of Pantaya | 115 | Refinancing of Existing Indebtedness | 252 | |
HMTV Cash on Hand (6/30/22E) | 27 | Estimated Transaction Fees & Expenses | 25 | |
Estimated Debt Arrangement Fees & OID | 25 | |||
Assumed Opening Cash on Balance Sheet | 25 | |||
Unreimbursed Content Payments / License Fee Forgiveness(5) | 7 | |||
Total Sources | $617 | Total Uses | $617 |
Gato‘s rolled equity represents 24.2%(4) of total sources; new debt financing represents approximately 4.6x the Closing Date EBITDA of $77.9mm as referenced in the Searchlight Debt Commitment Letter. |
Note: Analysis assumes transactions contemplated by the Radio Stations Purchase Agreement will be consummated in accordance with their terms.
(1) | Assumes $35mm revolving credit facility to be undrawn at closing. |
(2) | Gato and Peter Kern own a total of ~16.6mm shares (Peter Kern personally owns ~0.2mm Class A shares and ~0.7mm Class B shares); Gato Investments LP (“Gato”) is a Delaware limited partnership, Gemini Latin Holdings, LLC is the general partner of Gato and Peter Kern is the controlling person of Gemini; A Searchlight fund, as the sole limited partner in Gato, holds all of the economic interests in Gato (subject to Peter Kern‘s carried interest, which entitles him to payments in certain scenarios). |
(3) | Reflects 40.4mm total common shares (i.e., ~20.7mm Class A shares and ~19.7mm Class B shares) and ~4.4mm options at weighted-average strike price of $11.55 (0.02mm on a treasury stock basis) less a total of ~16.6mm shares owned by Gato and Peter Kern. |
(4) | Reflects total Rolled Searchlight Equity of $115mm divided by the sum of total Rolled Searchlight Equity plus New Debt Financing of $360mm. |
(5) | Illustratively assumed to impact cash concurrently with closing. |
4
Confidential | |
Summary Financial Performance Metrics |
Historical | LTM | Projected | ||||||||||
($mm) | 2021 | 3/31/2022 | 2022 | 2023 | ||||||||
Revenue | ||||||||||||
Networks | $154.7 | $153.6 | $161.4 | $163.5 | ||||||||
Pantaya | 53.0 | 56.3 | 78.3 | 138.2 | ||||||||
Consolidated | $207.7 | $209.8 | $239.7 | $301.7 | ||||||||
(-) Pantaya | (53.0 | ) | (56.3 | ) | (78.3 | ) | (138.2 | ) | ||||
(+) Radio Assets | 14.2 | (2) | 14.8 | (1) | 14.6 | 14.6 | ||||||
Pro Forma for Pantaya Divestiture | $168.9 | $168.4 | $175.9 | $178.1 | ||||||||
Adj. EBITDA (Post-SBC) incl. Pantaya losses | ||||||||||||
Networks | $62.6 | $60.1 | $61.6 | $61.1 | ||||||||
Pantaya | (25.7 | ) | (31.2 | ) | (29.2 | ) | (17.0 | ) | ||||
Consolidated | $36.9 | $28.9 | $32.5 | $44.2 | ||||||||
(-) Pantaya | 25.7 | 31.2 | 29.2 | 17.0 | ||||||||
(-) Stranded Corporate Costs Post Pantaya Divestiture | (3.4 | ) | (3.6 | ) | (4.1 | ) | (4.3 | ) | ||||
(+) Radio Assets | 6.5 | (2) | 6.6 | (3) | 6.8 | (4) | 6.8 | (4) | ||||
Pro Forma for Pantaya Divestiture | $65.7 | $63.0 | $64.3 | $63.7 | ||||||||
(+) Assumed Searchlight Synergies(5) | 8.6 | 8.6 | 8.6 | 8.6 | ||||||||
Assumed Searchlight View | $74.4 | $71.7 | $73.0 | $72.3 | ||||||||
Adj. EBITDA (Post-SBC) excl. Pantaya losses | ||||||||||||
Networks | $62.6 | $60.1 | $61.6 | $61.1 | ||||||||
Pantaya | - | - | - | - | ||||||||
Consolidated | $62.6 | $60.1 | $61.6 | $61.1 | ||||||||
(-) Pantaya | - | - | - | - | ||||||||
(-) Stranded Corporate Costs Post Pantaya Divestiture | (3.4 | ) | (3.6 | ) | (4.1 | ) | (4.3 | ) | ||||
(+) Radio Assets | 6.5 | (2) | 6.6 | (3) | 6.8 | (4) | 6.8 | (4) | ||||
Pro Forma for Pantaya Divestiture | $65.7 | $63.0 | $64.3 | $63.7 | ||||||||
(+) Assumed Searchlight Synergies(5) | 8.6 | 8.6 | 8.6 | 8.6 | ||||||||
Assumed Searchlight View | $74.4 | $71.7 | $73.0 | $72.3 |
Source: HMTV management.
Note: Analysis assumes transactions contemplated by the Radio Stations Purchase Agreement will be consummated in accordance with their terms.
(1) | Assumes Q1 2022 LTM revenue calculated as Q2-Q4 2021 revenue plus Q1 2022 revenue estimated as 25% of 2022E revenue as provided by Univision management. |
(2) | Diligence adjusted per PwC QoE. |
(3) | LTM EBITDA calculated as weighted average of 2021A and 2022E. |
(4) | 2022 illustratively reflects 2021 QoE adjustments for accounting team ($0.177mm) and allocated lease costs ($0.125mm); 2023 assumes same EBITDA as 2022. |
(5) | Amount of synergies assumed to be aligned to the $77.9mm Closing Date EBITDA as per the Searchlight Debt Commitment Letter less 3/31/2022 LTM PF EBITDA of $63.0 less 3/31/2022 LTM SBC of $6.2mm. |
5
Confidential | |
Implied Valuation Multiples Analysis |
Offer @ $7.00 | ||||||||||||
(Figures in millions, except per share figures) | Status
Quo @ $3.77 Market Price | Status Quo | Adjusted
for Pantaya Divestiture | Assumed Searchlight View | ||||||||
Share Price | $3.77 | $7.00 | $7.00 | $7.00 | ||||||||
(x) FDSO(1) | 40.4 | 40.4 | 40.4 | 40.4 | ||||||||
Implied Equity Value | $152.3 | $283.0 | $283.0 | $283.0 | ||||||||
(+) Debt(2) | 251.6 | 251.6 | 251.0 | 251.0 | ||||||||
(-) Cash(2) | (37.3 | (37.3 | (26.6 | (26.6 | ||||||||
(+) Post-Tax Pension(3) | 1.7 | 1.7 | 1.7 | 1.7 | ||||||||
(-) Equity Method Investments(4) | (22.7 | (22.7 | (22.7 | (22.7 | ||||||||
(-) Midpoint Non-Radio Value of Consideration Received for Pantaya | - | - | (93.9 | (93.9 | ||||||||
(+) Transaction Fees & Expenses | - | - | - | 50.0 | ||||||||
Adj. Implied Total Enterprise Value | $345.6 | $476.2 | $392.5 | $442.5 | ||||||||
TEV / Adj. EBITDA (Post-SBC) incl. Pantaya Losses Multiples | ||||||||||||
2021A | 9.4x | 12.9x | — | — | ||||||||
LTM 3/31/22A | 12.0x | 16.5x | — | — | ||||||||
2022E | 10.6x | 14.7x | — | — | ||||||||
2023E | 7.8x | 10.8x | — | — | ||||||||
Adj. TEV / Adj. EBITDA (Post-SBC) excl. Pantaya Losses Multiples | ||||||||||||
2021A | 5.5x | 7.6x | 6.0x | 5.9x | ||||||||
LTM 3/31/22A | 5.8x | 7.9x | 6.2x | 6.2x | ||||||||
2022E | 5.6x | 7.7x | 6.1x | 6.1x | ||||||||
2023E | 5.7x | 7.8x | 6.2x | 6.1x |
Source: HMTV management.
Note: Market data as of 5/6/2022. Analysis assumes transactions contemplated by the Radio Stations Purchase Agreement will be consummated in accordance with their terms.
(1) | Reflects 40.4mm total common shares (i.e., ~20.7mm Class A shares, ~19.7mm Class B shares) and ~4.4mm options at weighted-average strike price of $11.55 (0.02mm on a treasury stock basis). |
(2) | Adjusted for Pantaya Divestiture and Assumed Searchlight View columns as of 6/30/2022; status quo columns as of 3/31/2021. |
(3) | Based on 12/31/21 balance of $2.3mm as per HMTV management guidance; tax-affected at a 28% tax rate. |
(4) | Reflects $19.7mm stake in Canal 1 and $3mm stake in Remezcla as per HMTV management guidance. |
6
Confidential | |
HMTV Share Price Performance Since January 1, 2021 |
Source: HMTV press releases; Capital IQ. |
Note: Market data as of 5/6/2022. |
7
Confidential | |
Implied Premiums / Discounts at Offer Price of $7.00 per Share |
Source: Capital IQ; Wall Street research. | ||
Note: Market data as of 5/6/2022. Based on share prices at market close. | ||
(1) VWAPs based on trading days. |
8
Confidential | |
Standalone HMTV Value Per Share By Methodology |
Source: HMTV management; company filings; Capital IQ; Wall Street research. |
Note: Market data as of 5/6/2022; per share calculations based on Q1 2022 balances of $251.6mm of debt, $1.7mm of post-tax pension liabilities, $37.3mm of cash and $22.7mm of equity-method investments. FDSO assumes ~20.7mm of Class A shares and ~19.7mm of Class B shares and potential dilution from ~4.4mm options at weighted-average strike price of $11.55. |
(1) Implied terminal LTM EBITDA multiples shown on a post-SBC basis. |
9
Confidential | |
Networks and Pantaya Peer Group Operating Metrics Benchmarking Analysis |
Although both Networks and Pantaya have growth rates in-line with the relevant peer groups, their scale is significantly below most of their comparables. |
Source: HMTV management; company filings; Capital IQ; Wall Street research.
Note: Market data as of 5/6/2022.
10
Confidential | |
Networks and Pantaya Peer Group Select Trading Multiples |
Public comparables support a ‘22E EBITDA range of 6.0x-7.0x for Networks and a ‘22E EBITDA range of 0.5x-2.0x for Pantaya. |
Source: HMTV management; company filings; Capital IQ; Wall Street research. | |
Note: Market data as of 5/6/2022. | |
(1) | Valuation multiples for Broadcast companies reflect 2021/2022 averages for 2022 and 2022/2023 averages for 2023. |
(2) | Reflects debt at market value. |
(3) | Reflects WholeCo multiple, which includes Pantaya losses. |
11
Confidential | |
Networks and Pantaya Private Market Precedent Transactions |
Precedent transactions support a 12/31/21 LTM EBITDA (Post-SBC) range of 6.0x-8.0x for Networks and a 12/31/21 LTM Revenue range of 1.5x-4.0x for Pantaya(3). |
Source: Capital IQ; press releases; Wall Street research. | |
(1) | Excludes RSN transactions. |
(2) | Represents last 8 quarters average. |
(3) | Pantaya precedent transactions primarily occurred during a period with significantly higher growth expectations and valuations for the sector. |
12
Confidential | |
9.75-Year SOTP DCF Analysis |
(Figures in millions, except prices per share, percentages and multiples) | Low | High | ||
Networks | ||||
Free Cash Flow PGR | (3.0%) | 1.0% | ||
WACC | 10.5% | 8.5% | ||
Implied Terminal 2031E EBITDA Multiple (Post-SBC) | 4.5x | 8.3x | ||
Networks Enterprise Value | $334.3 | $459.5 | ||
Implied ‘21 EBITDA Multiple (Post-SBC) | 5.3x | 7.3x | ||
Implied ‘22 EBITDA Multiple (Post-SBC) | 5.4x | 7.5x | ||
Pantaya | ||||
Free Cash Flow PGR | 1.0% | 4.0% | ||
WACC | 20.0% | 15.0% | ||
Implied Terminal 2031E Revenue Multiple | 1.0x | 1.7x | ||
Implied Terminal 2031E EBITDA Multiple (Post-SBC) | 4.2x | 7.3x | ||
Pantaya Enterprise Value | $61.1 | $170.7 | ||
(+) Tax Synergy Adjustment(1) | 19.5 | 19.5 | ||
Pantaya Enterprise Value (incl. Tax Synergy) | $80.7 | $190.2 | ||
Implied ‘21 Revenue Multiple (excl. Tax Synergy) | 1.2x | 3.2x | ||
Implied ‘22 Revenue Multiple (excl. Tax Synergy) | 0.8x | 2.2x | ||
Total Consolidated Enterprise Value (incl. Pantaya Tax Synergy) | $415.0 | $649.7 | ||
(-) Debt (3/31/2022) | (251.6) | (251.6) | ||
(-) Post-Tax Pension(2) | (1.7) | (1.7) | ||
(+) Cash (3/31/2022) | 37.3 | 37.3 | ||
(+) Equity Method Investments(3) | 22.7 | 22.7 | ||
Equity Value | $221.7 | $456.4 | ||
(/) FDSO | 40.4 | 40.6 | ||
Equity Value per Share | $5.49 | $11.25 |
Source: HMTV filings; HMTV management. | |
Note: Assumes 3/31/2022 valuation date. FDSO includes ~20.7mm of Class A shares and ~19.7mm of Class B shares and potential dilution from ~4.4mm options at weighted-average strike price of $11.55. Analysis assumes a 30.5% Networks tax rate and a 24.0% Pantaya tax rate for the purposes of calculating unlevered cash taxes. | |
(1) | Reflects tax savings on account of Pantaya losses at the consolidated level; assumes a 10% discount rate (approximated based on the weighted average of the midpoints of the Networks and Pantaya WACC ranges). |
(2) | Based on 12/31/21 balance of $2.3mm as per HMTV management guidance; tax-affected at a 28% tax rate. |
(3) | Reflects $19.7mm stake in Canal 1 and $3mm stake in Remezcla as per HMTV management guidance. |
13
Confidential | |
HMTV Research Analyst Perspectives | FOR REFERENCE ONLY |
($mm, except prices per share) | ||||||||||||||||
Broker | Price | Discounted | Reported (Pre-SBC) Adj. EBITDA | |||||||||||||
(date) | Target(1) | Price Target(2) | Rating | 2022E | 2023E | 2024E | 2025E | Valuation Methodology | ||||||||
$13.00 | $11.69 | Overweight | $41 | $46 | --- | --- | ► SOTP analysis assumes 8x NTM EBITDA for WAPA Puerto Rico ($213mm), 7x for Cable Networks ($195mm), 125x TEV/Subs for Pantaya ($217mm) and $101mm valuation for HMTV‘s investments in Canal Uno, Remezcla & Mar Vista | |||||||||
(3/8/2022) | ► On a consolidated basis, SOTP represents a multiple of ~43x NTM EBITDA | |||||||||||||||
► DCF analysis using a 9.5% WACC and a 2% PGR | ||||||||||||||||
$12.00 | $10.79 | Buy | $40 | $49 | $64 | $76 | ||||||||||
► Valuation is based solely on DCF due to Pantaya acquisition | ||||||||||||||||
(3/8/2022) | ||||||||||||||||
Source: Wall Street research. | |
Note: For reference only. | |
(1) | Represents 12 month price targets from the date of the report. |
(2) | Discounted at 12% cost of equity to 3/31/2022. |
14
Appendix |
Confidential
Confidential |
HMTV Shareholder Profile |
Class A | Class B | Options @ $7.00 | Total Treasury-Method | Ownership (%) | ||||||||
($ and shares in millions) | (1 Vote) | (10 Votes) | Per Share (Treasury) | Shares Outstanding(1) | Economic | Voting | ||||||
Insiders | ||||||||||||
Gato Investments(2) | 0.2 | 16.4 | - | 16.6 | 41.1% | 75.3% | ||||||
Grupo MVS S.A. de C.V. | - | 2.7 | - | 2.7 | 6.7% | 12.5% | ||||||
Employees, Mgmt & Directors | 3.0 | 0.6 | 0.02 | 3.6 | 8.9% | 4.1% | ||||||
Total Insiders | 3.2 | 19.7 | 0.02 | 22.9 | 56.7% | 92.0% | ||||||
Top 10 Institutions | ||||||||||||
Fine Capital Partners | 3.3 | - | - | 3.3 | 8.1% | 1.5% | ||||||
Edenbrook Capital | 3.1 | - | - | 3.1 | 7.6% | 1.4% | ||||||
BlackRock | 1.1 | - | - | 1.1 | 2.7% | 0.5% | ||||||
AIG Asset Management | 1.0 | - | - | 1.0 | 2.4% | 0.4% | ||||||
The Vanguard Group | 0.9 | - | - | 0.9 | 2.1% | 0.4% | ||||||
Renaissance Technologies | 0.8 | - | - | 0.8 | 2.0% | 0.4% | ||||||
Columbia Management | 0.7 | - | - | 0.7 | 1.7% | 0.3% | ||||||
Dimensional Fund Advisors | 0.7 | - | - | 0.7 | 1.7% | 0.3% | ||||||
Wells Fargo Advisors | 0.4 | - | - | 0.4 | 0.9% | 0.2% | ||||||
State Street Global Advisors | 0.4 | - | - | 0.4 | 0.9% | 0.2% | ||||||
Total Top 10 Institutions | 12.2 | - | - | 12.2 | 30.3% | 5.6% | ||||||
All Others | 5.3 | - | - | 5.3 | 13.0% | 2.4% | ||||||
Total | 20.7 | 19.7 | - | 40.4 | 100.0% | 100.0% |
Gato owns a total of ~15.7mm Class B shares and Peter Kern personally owns ~0.2mm Class A shares and ~0.7mm Class B shares; Gato and Peter Kern own a total of ~16.6mm shares (Peter Kern personally owns ~0.2mm Class A shares and ~0.7mm Class B shares); Gato Investments LP (“Gato”) is a Delaware limited partnership, Gemini Latin Holdings, LLC is the general partner of Gato and Peter Kern is the controlling person of Gemini; A Searchlight fund, as the sole limited partner in Gato, holds all of the economic interests in Gato (subject to Peter Kern‘s carried interest, which entitles him to payments in certain scenarios). |
Source: HMTV management; HMTV filings. | |
Note: RSUs are included in the Class A basis share counts. Total share count based on shares outstanding as of 5/6/22; institutions and insiders as of latest available. | |
(1) | Options dilution assumes Treasury Stock Method based on offer price of $7.00. |
(2) | Gato Investments total share count includes shares personally owned by Peter Kern (~0.2mm Class A and ~0.7mm Class B shares). |
16
Public Market Trading Analysis: | Confidential |
Bridge from Assumed Valuation Multiple to Value Per Share |
($mm) | Low | High | ||||
Networks | ||||||
2022E EBITDA (Post-SBC) | $61.6 | $61.6 | ||||
(x) Multiple | 6.0x | 7.0x | ||||
Networks Enterprise Value | $369.9 | $431.5 | ||||
Pantaya | ||||||
2022E Revenue | $78.3 | $78.3 | ||||
(x) Multiple | 0.5x | 2.0x | ||||
Pantaya Enterprise Value | $39.2 | $156.6 | ||||
Total Enterprise Value | $409.0 | $588.1 | ||||
(-) Debt (3/31/2022) | (251.6 | ) | (251.6 | ) | ||
(-) Post-Tax Pension(1) | (1.7 | ) | (1.7 | ) | ||
(+) Cash (3/31/2022) | 37.3 | 37.3 | ||||
(+) Equity Method Investments(2) | 22.7 | 22.7 | ||||
Equity Value | $215.8 | $394.9 | ||||
(/) FDSO | 40.4 | 40.4 | ||||
Equity Value per Share | $5.34 | $9.76 |
Source: HMTV filings; HMTV management. | |
Note: Assumes 3/31/2022 valuation date. FDSO includes ~20.7mm of Class A shares and ~19.7mm of Class B shares and potential dilution from ~4.4mm options at weighted-average strike price of $11.55. | |
(1) | Based on 12/31/21 balance of $2.3mm as per HMTV management guidance; tax-affected at a 28% tax rate. |
(2) | Reflects $19.7mm stake in Canal 1 and $3mm stake in Remezcla as per HMTV management guidance. |
17
Private Market Transaction Analysis: | Confidential |
Bridge from Assumed Valuation Multiple to Value Per Share |
($mm) | Low | High | ||||
Networks | ||||||
12/31/2021 LTM EBITDA (Post-SBC) | $62.6 | $62.6 | ||||
(x) Multiple | 6.0x | 8.0x | ||||
Networks Enterprise Value | $375.6 | $500.8 | ||||
Pantaya | ||||||
12/31/2021 LTM Revenue | $53.0 | $53.0 | ||||
(x) Multiple | 1.5x | 4.0x | ||||
Pantaya Enterprise Value | $79.5 | $211.9 | ||||
Total Enterprise Value | $455.0 | $712.7 | ||||
(-) Debt (3/31/2022) | (251.6 | ) | (251.6 | ) | ||
(-) Post-Tax Pension(1) | (1.7 | ) | (1.7 | ) | ||
(+) Cash (3/31/2022) | 37.3 | 37.3 | ||||
(+) Equity Method Investments(2) | 22.7 | 22.7 | ||||
Equity Value | $261.8 | $519.4 | ||||
(/) FDSO | 40.4 | 40.9 | ||||
Equity Value per Share | $6.48 | $12.71 |
Source: HMTV filings; HMTV management. | |
Note: Assumes 3/31/2022 valuation date. FDSO includes ~20.7mm of Class A shares and ~19.7mm of Class B shares and potential dilution from ~4.4mm options at weighted-average strike price of $11.55. | |
(1) | Based on 12/31/21 balance of $2.3mm as per HMTV management guidance; tax-affected at a 28% tax rate. |
(2) | Reflects $19.7mm stake in Canal 1 and $3mm stake in Remezcla as per HMTV management guidance. |
18
Confidential | |
Networks 9.75-Year DCF Analysis |
FREE CASH FLOW BUILD
($mm) | Q2-Q4 ‘22E | 2023E | 2024E | 2025E | 2026E | 2027E | 2028E | 2029E | 2030E | 2031E | Normalized | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Revenue | $124.2 | $163.5 | $172.7 | $170.4 | $175.8 | $178.9 | $187.4 | $183.3 | $185.5 | $187.8 | $189.4 | (4) | |||||||||||||||||||||
% Growth | 31.7 | % | 5.6 | % | (1.4 | %) | 3.2 | % | 1.8 | % | 4.8 | % | (2.2 | %) | 1.2 | % | 1.3 | % | |||||||||||||||
Adjusted EBITDA (Pre-SBC) | $52.4 | $66.4 | $70.4 | $65.0 | $66.2 | $65.5 | $69.5 | $61.7 | $60.5 | $59.0 | $60.1 | (4) | |||||||||||||||||||||
% Margin | 42.2 | % | 40.6 | % | 40.8 | % | 38.2 | % | 37.7 | % | 36.6 | % | 37.1 | % | 33.7 | % | 32.6 | % | 31.4 | % | 31.7 | % | |||||||||||
% Growth | 26.7 | % | 6.1 | % | (7.7 | %) | 1.8 | % | (1.1 | %) | 6.2 | % | (11.3 | %) | (2.0 | %) | (2.5 | %) | |||||||||||||||
(-) SBC | (3.7 | ) | (5.3 | ) | (5.5 | ) | (5.8 | ) | (6.1 | ) | (6.4 | ) | (6.7 | ) | (7.1 | ) | (7.4 | ) | (7.8 | ) | (7.8 | ) | |||||||||||
(-) Severance | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | (0.5 | ) | (0.5 | ) | – | ||||||||||||||||||||
(+) Programming Amortization | 11.1 | 12.9 | 13.4 | 13.9 | 14.4 | 15.1 | 15.8 | 16.5 | 17.2 | 18.0 | 18.0 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
(+) Other Adjustments(1) | 0.4 | 0.5 | 0.3 | 0.2 | 0.2 | 0.2 | 0.2 | 0.2 | 0.2 | 0.2 | 0.2 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
(-) Capital Expenditures | (2.7 | ) | (4.0 | ) | (4.0 | ) | (4.0 | ) | (4.0 | ) | (5.0 | ) | (5.0 | ) | (5.0 | ) | (6.0 | ) | (6.0 | ) | (6.0 | ) | |||||||||||
(-) Cash Content Spend(2) | (10.2 | ) | (13.6 | ) | (14.2 | ) | (15.0 | ) | (15.7 | ) | (16.4 | ) | (17.1 | ) | (17.9 | ) | (18.7 | ) | (19.6 | ) | (19.6 | ) | |||||||||||
(-) Equity Method Investments | (0.9 | ) | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | |||||||||||||||||||||
(+) Decrease / (Increase) in NWC | 4.6 | 3.3 | (0.2 | ) | 1.9 | 0.6 | 0.5 | (0.2 | ) | 1.0 | 0.1 | 0.1 | 0.1 | ||||||||||||||||||||
(-) Unlevered Cash Taxes(3) | (13.7 | ) | (17.1 | ) | (18.2 | ) | (16.5 | ) | (16.7 | ) | (16.4 | ) | (17.6 | ) | (15.1 | ) | (14.4 | ) | (13.9 | ) | (14.1 | ) | |||||||||||
Unlevered Free Cash Flow | $37.1 | $43.1 | $41.9 | $39.9 | $38.9 | $37.0 | $38.8 | $34.3 | $30.9 | $29.5 | $30.9 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
% Growth | 16.1 | % | (2.7 | %) | (5.0 | %) | (2.5 | %) | (4.8 | %) | 4.9 | % | (11.7 | %) | (9.9 | %) | (4.4 | %) | |||||||||||||||
Discount Period | 0.375 | 1.250 | 2.250 | 3.250 | 4.250 | 5.250 | 6.250 | 7.250 | 8.250 | 9.250 | 9.250 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Discount Factor | 0.97 | 0.89 | 0.82 | 0.74 | 0.68 | 0.62 | 0.57 | 0.52 | 0.47 | 0.43 | 0.43 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
PV of Unlevered Free Cash Flow | $35.9 | $38.5 | $34.2 | $29.7 | $26.4 | $23.0 | $22.0 | $17.8 | $14.6 | $12.8 | $13.3 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Memo: D&A | $3.7 | $5.0 | $5.2 | $5.2 | $5.3 | $5.3 | $5.3 | $5.3 | $5.3 | $5.3 | $6.0 |
ENTERPRISE VALUATION SUMMARY
WACC | 9.5 | % | |
PGR | (1.0 | %) | |
Terminal UFCF | $30.9 | ||
Terminal Value | $291.1 | ||
Implied Terminal Multiple (Post-SBC) | 5.8x | ||
PV of UFCF (‘22-‘31) | $254.9 | ||
PV of Terminal Value | $125.7 | ||
Terminal Value % of TEV | 33.0 | % | |
Implied Enterprise Value | $380.6 |
ENTERPRISE VALUATION SENSITIVITY ANALYSIS ($MM)
Source: HMTV filings; Wall Street research; HMTV management.
Note: Assumes 3/31/2022 valuation date; base case assumes 9.5% WACC and (1.0)% PGR.
(1) | Other adjustments includes Provision for Bad Debts, Amortization of Operating Lease Right-of-Use Assets and Proceeds from FCC Spectrum Repack. |
(2) | Includes Change in Programming Rights, Programming Rights Payable, Original Production Rights and Caribbean / Other Production Acquisitions. |
(3) | Unlevered cash taxes calculated based on Adjusted EBITDA less D&A, SBC and Severance; assumes 30.5% tax rate. |
(4) | Normalized terminal year includes $1.575mm of political ad revenue, $0.275mm of agency costs and $0.2125mm of news coverage costs. |
19
Confidential | |
Pantaya 9.75-Year DCF Analysis |
FREE CASH FLOW BUILD
($mm) | Q2-Q4 ‘22E | 2023E | 2024E | 2025E | 2026E | 2027E | 2028E | 2029E | 2030E | 2031E | Normalized | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Revenue | $63.0 | $138.2 | $186.2 | $181.2 | $202.2 | $242.9 | $270.3 | $288.8 | $304.3 | $317.0 | $317.0 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
% Growth | 119.4 | % | 34.7 | % | (2.7 | %) | 11.6 | % | 20.1 | % | 11.3 | % | 6.8 | % | 5.4 | % | 4.2 | % | |||||||||||||||
Adjusted EBITDA (Pre-SBC) | ($15.5 | ) | ($15.2 | ) | ($1.2 | ) | $13.5 | $30.7 | $51.0 | $59.9 | $69.2 | $73.8 | $76.2 | $76.2 | |||||||||||||||||||
% Margin | (24.6 | %) | (11.0 | %) | (0.6 | %) | 7.4 | % | 15.2 | % | 21.0 | % | 22.2 | % | 23.9 | % | 24.3 | % | 24.0 | % | 24.0 | % | |||||||||||
% Growth | (1.7 | %) | (92.3 | %) | NM | 128.2 | % | 66.0 | % | 17.4 | % | 15.5 | % | 6.7 | % | 3.2 | % | ||||||||||||||||
(-) SBC | (1.2 | ) | (1.8 | ) | (1.8 | ) | (1.9 | ) | (2.0 | ) | (2.1 | ) | (2.2 | ) | (2.4 | ) | (2.5 | ) | (2.6 | ) | (2.6 | ) | |||||||||||
(-) Capital Expenditures | (1.2 | ) | (0.8 | ) | (0.8 | ) | (0.8 | ) | (0.8 | ) | (0.8 | ) | (0.8 | ) | (0.8 | ) | (0.8 | ) | (0.8 | ) | (0.8 | ) | |||||||||||
(-) Cash Content Spend | (27.0 | ) | (35.5 | ) | (39.1 | ) | (43.0 | ) | (47.3 | ) | (52.0 | ) | (57.2 | ) | (63.0 | ) | (69.3 | ) | (76.2 | ) | (81.5 | ) | |||||||||||
(+) Content Amortization | 11.0 | 24.6 | 33.8 | 42.4 | 47.2 | 54.3 | 61.8 | 68.0 | 74.5 | 81.5 | 81.5 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
(+) Decrease / (Increase) in NWC | (8.7 | ) | (2.6 | ) | (7.7 | ) | 1.9 | (2.5 | ) | (3.6 | ) | (3.2 | ) | (1.6 | ) | (1.2 | ) | (2.0 | ) | (2.0 | ) | ||||||||||||
(-) Unlevered Cash Taxes(1) | – | – | – | – | (5.8 | ) | (10.6 | ) | (12.7 | ) | (14.9 | ) | (16.0 | ) | (17.4 | ) | (17.5 | ) | |||||||||||||||
Unlevered Free Cash Flow | ($42.6 | ) | ($31.2 | ) | ($16.8 | ) | $12.1 | $19.6 | $36.2 | $45.6 | $54.6 | $58.5 | $58.7 | $53.3 | |||||||||||||||||||
% Growth | (26.7 | %) | (46.3 | %) | (172.3 | %) | 62.1 | % | 84.5 | % | 25.8 | % | 19.9 | % | 7.2 | % | 0.3 | % | |||||||||||||||
Discount Period | 0.375 | 1.250 | 2.250 | 3.250 | 4.250 | 5.250 | 6.250 | 7.250 | 8.250 | 9.250 | 9.250 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Discount Factor | 0.94 | 0.82 | 0.70 | 0.59 | 0.50 | 0.43 | 0.36 | 0.31 | 0.26 | 0.22 | 0.22 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
PV of Unlevered Free Cash Flow | ($40.1 | ) | ($25.5 | ) | ($11.7 | ) | $7.2 | $9.9 | $15.5 | $16.6 | $17.0 | $15.5 | $13.2 | $12.0 | |||||||||||||||||||
Memo: D&A | $14.9 | $19.8 | $19.8 | $12.4 | $4.7 | $4.7 | $4.7 | $4.7 | $4.7 | $1.2 | $0.8 |
ENTERPRISE VALUATION SUMMARY | |||
WACC | 17.5 | % | |
PGR | 2.5 | % | |
Terminal UFCF | $53.3 | ||
Terminal Value | $364.4 | ||
Implied Terminal Multiple (Post-SBC) | 5.4x | ||
PV of UFCF (‘22-‘31) | $19.4 | ||
PV of Terminal Value | $82.0 | ||
Terminal Value % of TEV | 80.9 | % | |
Implied Enterprise Value | $101.3 |
ENTERPRISE VALUATION SENSITIVITY ANALYSIS ($MM)
Source: HMTV filings; Wall Street research; HMTV management.
Note: Assumes 3/31/2022 valuation date; base case assumes 17.5% WACC and 2.5% PGR.
(1) | Unlevered cash taxes calculated based on Adjusted EBITDA less D&A and SBC; assumes 24% tax rate. |
20
Confidential | |
Standalone HMTV Unlevered Tax Synergy Calculation |
($mm) | Q2-Q4 '22E | 2023E | 2024E | 2025E | 2026E | 2027E | 2028E | 2029E | 2030E | 2031E | ||||||||||||||||||||
Pantaya Standalone DCF Taxes | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Allocated EBIT | ($31.6 | ) | ($36.8 | ) | ($22.8 | ) | ($0.9 | ) | $24.0 | $44.2 | $52.9 | $62.1 | $66.6 | $72.4 | ||||||||||||||||
Allocated Tax Rate | -- | -- | -- | -- | 24.0 | % | 24.0 | % | 24.0 | % | 24.0 | % | 24.0 | % | 24.0 | % | ||||||||||||||
Allocated Tax (Shield) / Expense | - | - | - | - | $5.8 | $10.6 | $12.7 | $14.9 | $16.0 | $17.4 | ||||||||||||||||||||
Pantaya Consolidated DCF Impact | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Allocated EBIT | ($31.6 | ) | ($36.8 | ) | ($22.8 | ) | ($0.9 | ) | $24.0 | $44.2 | $52.9 | $62.1 | $66.6 | $72.4 | ||||||||||||||||
Allocated Tax Rate | 24.0 | % | 24.0 | % | 24.0 | % | 24.0 | % | 24.0 | % | 24.0 | % | 24.0 | % | 24.0 | % | 24.0 | % | 24.0 | % | ||||||||||
Allocated Tax (Shield) / Expense | ($7.6 | ) | ($8.8 | ) | ($5.5 | ) | ($0.2 | ) | $5.8 | $10.6 | $12.7 | $14.9 | $16.0 | $17.4 | ||||||||||||||||
Implied Tax Synergy - | $7.6 | $8.8 | $5.5 | $0.2 | - | - | - | - | - | - | ||||||||||||||||||||
Discount Period | 0.375 | 1.250 | 2.250 | 3.250 | 4.250 | 5.250 | 6.250 | 7.250 | 8.250 | 9.250 | ||||||||||||||||||||
Discount Factor | 0.96 | 0.88 | 0.79 | 0.71 | 0.64 | 0.58 | 0.52 | 0.47 | 0.42 | 0.38 | ||||||||||||||||||||
PV of Implied Tax Synergy | $7.3 | $7.7 | $4.3 | $0.2 | - | - | - | - | - | - | ||||||||||||||||||||
NPV of Unlevered Tax Synergies | $19.5 |
Source: HMTV management.
Note: Assumes a 11% discount rate (approximated based on the weighted average of the midpoints of the Networks and Pantaya WACC ranges).
21
Confidential | |
Diversified Media Public Market Trading Analysis |
(Figures in millions, except per share figures) | |||||||||||||||
Share Price | $3.77 | $32.45 | $33.50 | $28.05 | $17.75 | ||||||||||
(x) FDSO | 40 | 45 | 569 | 657 | 2,427 | ||||||||||
Market Capitalization | $152 | $1,452 | $19,050 | $18,426 | $43,072 | ||||||||||
(+) Debt | 252 | 2,893 | 7,204 | 17,370 | 56,634 | ||||||||||
(+) Preferred Stock | - | - | - | - | - | ||||||||||
(-) Cash | (37 | ) | (822 | ) | (3,505 | ) | (6,713 | ) | (5,599 | ) | |||||
(+) Non-Controlling Interest(3) | - | 339 | 763 | 598 | 1,434 | ||||||||||
(+) Pension Obligations(4) | 2 | - | 469 | 1,575 | - | ||||||||||
(-) Equity Method Investments(5) | (23 | ) | (135 | ) | (3,022 | ) | (568 | ) | (2,108 | ) | |||||
TEV | $346 | $3,727 | $20,959 | $30,688 | $93,433 | ||||||||||
'22-'24 Revenue Growth & Margin Metrics | |||||||||||||||
'22E-'24E Revenue CAGR | 22.4 | % | 1.5 | % | 2.9 | % | 6.1 | % | 6.6 | % | |||||
'21A EBITDA (Post-SBC) Margin | 17.8 | % | 22.8 | % | 22.9 | % | 15.4 | % | 23.0 | % | |||||
'22E EBITDA (Post-SBC) Margin | 13.5 | % | 19.8 | % | 22.5 | % | 12.2 | % | 22.2 | % | |||||
Valuation Multiples | |||||||||||||||
TEV / ‘22E EBITDA (Post-SBC) | 10.6 | x | 5.9 | x | 6.4 | x | 8.3 | x | 8.8 | x | |||||
TEV / ‘23E EBITDA (Post-SBC) | 7.8 | x | 6.2 | x | 6.1 | x | 9.4 | x | 6.7 | x | |||||
TEV / ‘24E EBITDA (Post-SBC) | 5.6 | x | 6.2 | x | 6.3 | x | 8.1 | x | 6.7 | x |
Source: Capital IQ; company filings.
Note: Market data as of 5/6/2022; balance sheet figures for Warner Bros.Discovery and Fox as of 12/31/2021; HMTV, AMC Networks and Paramount as of 3/31/2022.
(1) | HMTV balance sheet as of 3/31/2022. |
(2) | Pro forma for WarnerMedia transaction announced on May 17, 2021 and closed on April 8, 2022. |
(3) | Non-controlling interest figures based on disclosure in company filings; AMC Networks includes RLJE and BBC America; Fox includes Big Ten Network and Credible; Paramount includes redeemable put option to an international subsidiary; Warner Bros.Discovery includes Discovery Family, MotorTrend Group, OWN, Food Network and Cooking Channel. |
(4) | Reflects post-tax pension obligations. |
(5) | HMTV reflects $19.7mm stake in Canal 1 and $3mm stake in Remezcla; Equity Method Investments figures based on disclosure in company filings; AMC Networks includes stakes in ACL and a Toronto-based production company and studio; Fox includes Caffeine Studios; Paramount includes The CW and Viacom18; Warner Bros.Discovery includes stakes in nC+, Discovery Solar Ventures, All3Media, Group Nine Media, Formula E and Philo. |
22
Confidential | |
Broadcast Station Public Market Trading Analysis |
(Figures in millions, except per share figures) | Debt @ Face Value |
Debt @ Market Value | ||||||||||||||||
Share Price | $4.44 | $18.84 | $158.41 | $16.39 | $23.98 | $23.98 | ||||||||||||
(x) FDSO | 90 | 96 | 43 | 86 | 72 | 72 | ||||||||||||
Market Capitalization | $398 | $1,808 | $6,827 | $1,404 | $1,719 | $1,719 | ||||||||||||
(+) Debt | 213 | 6,831 | 7,494 | 3,158 | 13,125 | 7,258 | ||||||||||||
(+) Preferred Stock | - | 650 | - | 600 | 175 | 175 | ||||||||||||
(-) Cash | (214 | ) | (217 | ) | (78 | ) | (35 | ) | (816 | ) | (816 | ) | ||||||
(+) Non-Controlling Interest(1) | - | - | 7 | - | 64 | 64 | ||||||||||||
(+) Pension Obligations(2) | - | 17 | 104 | 82 | - | - | ||||||||||||
(-) Equity Method Investments(3) | - | (117 | ) | (1,219 | ) | (6 | ) | (517 | ) | (517 | ) | |||||||
TEV | $398 | $8,971 | $13,136 | $5,203 | $13,750 | $7,883 | ||||||||||||
'22-'24 Revenue Growth & Margin Metrics | ||||||||||||||||||
'22E-'24E Revenue CAGR | NA | 5.2 | % | 6.0 | % | 7.1 | % | 0.7 | % | 0.7 | % | |||||||
'21A EBITDA (Post-SBC) Margin | 10.3 | % | 30.0 | % | 40.8 | % | 25.5 | % | 20.1 | % | 20.1 | % | ||||||
'22E EBITDA (Post-SBC) Margin | 8.6 | % | 38.4 | % | 42.6 | % | 28.0 | % | 15.7 | % | 15.7 | % | ||||||
Valuation Multiples | ||||||||||||||||||
TEV / '21A EBITDA (Post-SBC) | 5.1 | x | 9.5 | x | 6.9 | x | 8.9 | x | 11.1 | x | 6.4 | x | ||||||
TEV / '22E EBITDA (Post-SBC) | 4.9 | x | 6.2 | x | 5.9 | x | 7.0 | x | 13.5 | x | 7.7 | x | ||||||
TEV / '23E EBITDA (Post-SBC) | 4.6 | x | 9.0 | x | 6.4 | x | 8.8 | x | 13.9 | x | 8.0 | x | ||||||
TEV / '24E EBITDA (Post-SBC) | NA | 5.7 | x | 5.4 | x | 5.9 | x | 13.2 | x | 7.6 | x | |||||||
TEV / '21A-'22E Avg. EBITDA (Post-SBC) | 5.0 | x | 7.5 | x | 6.4 | x | 7.9 | x | 12.2 | x | 7.0 | x | ||||||
TEV / '22E-'23E Avg. EBITDA (Post-SBC) | 4.7 | x | 7.4 | x | 6.2 | x | 7.8 | x | 13.7 | x | 7.8 | x | ||||||
TEV / '23E-'24E Avg. EBITDA (Post-SBC) | NA | 7.0 | x | 5.9 | x | 7.1 | x | 13.5 | x | 7.8 | x |
Source: Capital IQ; IHS Markit; Bloomberg; company filings.
Note: Market data as of 5/6/2022; balance sheet figures for Nexstar and Sinclair as of 12/31/2021; Entravision, Gray and Scripps as of 3/31/2022.
(1) | Non-controlling interest figures based on disclosure in company filings; Nexstar includes stakes in VIEs; TEGNA includes stake in Premion; Sinclair includes stakes in RSNs and VIEs. |
(2) | Reflects post-tax pension obligations. |
(3) | Equity Method Investments figures based on disclosure in company filings; Gray includes investments in several television, production and technology companies; Nexstar includes stake in TV Food Network; Scripps includes investments in private companies; Sinclair includes investment in YES Network and entities that are primarily focused on the development of real estate, sustainability initiatives, and other non-media businesses. |
(4) | Entravision figures denoted by “NA” are not available due to lack of research coverage. |
23
Confidential | |
OTT Platform Public Market Trading Analysis |
(Figures in millions, except per share figures) | ||||||||||||||||||
Share Price | $9.59 | $2.07 | $3.25 | $180.97 | $96.83 | $104.68 | ||||||||||||
(x) FDSO | 16 | 54 | 159 | 444 | 145 | 195 | ||||||||||||
Market Capitalization | $150 | $111 | $516 | $80,400 | $14,039 | $20,392 | ||||||||||||
(+) Debt | 67 | - | 409 | 14,623 | 89 | 1,259 | ||||||||||||
(+) Preferred Stock | 54 | - | - | - | - | - | ||||||||||||
(-) Cash | (45 | ) | (81 | ) | (374 | ) | (6,009 | ) | (2,235 | ) | (3,747 | ) | ||||||
(+) Non-Controlling Interest(2) | 1 | - | (11 | ) | - | - | - | |||||||||||
(+) Pension Obligations(3) | - | - | - | - | - | - | ||||||||||||
(-) Equity Method Investments and Other(4) | - | (10 | ) | - | - | - | - | |||||||||||
TEV | $226 | $20 | $540 | $89,014 | $11,892 | $17,904 | ||||||||||||
Growth & Margin Metrics | ||||||||||||||||||
'22E-'24E Revenue (Post-SBC) CAGR | 23.6% | 38.6% | 41.8% | 10.8% | 26.0% | 15.5% | ||||||||||||
'21A-'23E EBITDA (Post-SBC) CAGR | NM | NM | NM | 12.3% | (58.0% | ) | (4.6% | ) | ||||||||||
'22E EBITDA (Post-SBC) Margin | NM | NM | NM | 20.5% | NM | NM | ||||||||||||
Revenue Multiples | ||||||||||||||||||
TEV / '22E Revenue | 1.5x | 0.2x | 0.5x | 2.7x | 3.2x | 1.5x | ||||||||||||
TEV / '23E Revenue | 1.2x | 0.1x | 0.4x | 2.5x | 2.5x | 1.3x | ||||||||||||
TEV / '24E Revenue | 1.0x | 0.1x | 0.3x | 2.2x | 2.0x | 1.1x | ||||||||||||
Valuation Multiples(1) | ||||||||||||||||||
TEV / '22E EBITDA (Post-SBC) | NM | NM | NM | 13.4 | x | NM | NM | |||||||||||
TEV / '23E EBITDA (Post-SBC) | NM | NM | NM | 11.8 | x | NM | NM | |||||||||||
TEV / '24E EBITDA (Post-SBC) | NM | NM | NM | 9.8 | x | NM | 39.7x |
Source: Capital IQ; company filings.
Note: Market data as of 5/6/2022; balance sheet figures for Chicken Soup, CuriosityStream and fuboTV as of 12/31/2021; Netflix, Roku and Spotify as of 3/31/2022.
(1) | NM denotes multiples in excess of 50.0x or instances in which forecasted EBITDA is expected to be negative. |
(2) | Non-controlling interest figures based on disclosure in company filings; Chicken Soup for the Soul Entertainment includes stakes in CSS AVOD, Locomotive Global and Landmark Studio Group; fuboTV includes stake in Evolution AI Corporation. |
(3) | Reflects post-tax pension obligations. |
(4) | Equity Method Investments figures based on disclosure in company filings; includes CuriosityStream‘s stakes in Spiegel Venture and Nebula. |
24
Confidential | |
Radio Public Market Trading Analysis |
(Figures in millions, except per share figures) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Share Price | $2.21 | $1.66 | $15.44 | $14.01 | $22.90 | $2.95 | $11.06 | $7.64 | ||||||||||||||||
(x) FDSO | 144 | 30 | 22 | 150 | 6 | 27 | 20 | 54 | ||||||||||||||||
Market Capitalization | $318 | $50 | $333 | $2,097 | $139 | $80 | $216 | $414 | ||||||||||||||||
(+) Debt | 1,827 | 300 | 1,011 | 5,771 | - | 175 | 550 | 833 | ||||||||||||||||
(+) Preferred Stock | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | ||||||||||||||||
(-) Cash | (60 | ) | (51 | ) | (181 | ) | (390 | ) | (55 | ) | (3 | ) | (51 | ) | (132 | ) | ||||||||
(+) Minority Interest | - | - | - | 8 | - | - | 3 | 17 | ||||||||||||||||
(+) Pension Obligations(1) | - | 8 | - | - | - | - | - | - | ||||||||||||||||
(-) Equity Method Investments and Other | - | (2 | ) | - | (11 | ) | - | - | - | - | ||||||||||||||
TEV | $2,085 | $305 | $1,163 | $7,475 | $83 | $252 | $719 | $1,132 | ||||||||||||||||
Growth & Margin Metrics | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
'21A-'22E Revenue Growth | 18.9 | % | 11.3 | % | 9.8 | % | 15.2 | % | NA | 4.6 | % | 12.5 | % | NA | ||||||||||
'21A-'22E EBITDA (Post-SBC) Growth | 87.2 | % | 45.3 | % | 34.8 | % | 36.3 | % | NA | (0.8 | %) | 12.0 | % | NA | ||||||||||
'21A EBITDA (Post-SBC) Margin | 13.6 | % | 10.8 | % | 14.1 | % | 22.1 | % | 19.2 | % | 14.7 | % | 24.3 | % | 33.9 | % | ||||||||
'22E EBITDA (Post-SBC) Margin | 21.4 | % | 14.0 | % | 17.4 | % | 26.2 | % | NA | 14.0 | % | 24.2 | % | NA | ||||||||||
Valuation Multiples | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
TEV / '21A EBITDA (Post-SBC) | 12.6 | x | 11.7 | x | 9.0 | x | 9.5 | x | 4.0 | x | 6.6 | x | 7.1 | x | 7.6 | x | ||||||||
TEV / '22E EBITDA (Post-SBC) | 6.7 | x | 8.1 | x | 6.7 | x | 7.0 | x | NA | 6.7 | x | 6.3 | x | NA | ||||||||||
TEV / '23E EBITDA (Post-SBC) | 6.1 | x | 8.0 | x | 6.3 | x | 6.5 | x | NA | 6.3 | x | 6.1 | x | NA | ||||||||||
TEV / '21A-'22E Avg. EBITDA (Post-SBC) | 8.8 | x | 9.6 | x | 7.6 | x | 8.0 | x | NA | 6.6 | x | 6.7 | x | NA |
Source: Capital IQ; company filings.
Note: Market data as of 5/6/2022; balance sheet figures for Audacy, Beasley, iHeart, Salem, Townsquare and Urban One as of 12/31/2021; Cumulus and Saga as of 3/31/2022.
(1) | Reflects post-tax pension obligations. |
25
Confidential | |
Radio Assets Peer Group Operating Benchmarking and Valuation Multiples |
Source: Capital IQ; company filings; press releases.
Note: Market data as of 5/6/2022.
(1) TEV / 2021A EBITDA (Post-SBC) multiples utilized for Saga Communications and Urban One due to lack of available broker projections for 2022E EBITDA.
26
Confidential | |
Broadcast Stations Private Market Transaction Analysis |
($ in millions)
Announced | Revenue Growth | ||||
Date | Target | Acquiror | 1 Year Forward | TEV | L8Q(1) |
2/22/2022 | Tegna | Standard General | NA | $8,600 | 8.7x |
5/3/2021 | Meredith Local Media Group | Gray | NA | 2,825 | 9.9x |
9/25/2020 | Ion Media | Scripps Networks | NA | 2,650 | 8.6x |
6/11/2019 | Dispatch Broadcast Group (2 Stations) | Tegna | NA | 535 | 7.9x |
3/20/2019 | Nexstar (8 Stations) | Scripps Networks | NA | 580 | 10.4x |
3/20/2019 | Nexstar (11 Stations) | Tegna | NA | 740 | 12.0x |
12/3/2018 | Tribune | Nexstar | 4% | 6,400 | 9.2x |
10/31/2018 | Cordillera Communications (15 stations) | Scripps Networks | NA | 521 | 9.8x |
8/20/2018 | Gray (2 Stations) | Tegna | NA | 105 | 5.9x |
6/25/2018 | Raycom | Gray | NA | 3,660 | 9.5x |
12/18/2017 | Midwest Television (4 Stations) | Tegna | NA | 325 | 6.6x |
4/21/2017 | Bonten Media Group | Sinclair Broadcasting | NA | 240 | 6.7x |
1/27/2016 | Media General | Nexstar | 20% | 4,115 | 9.1x |
Mean | 8.8x | ||||
Median | 9.1x |
Source: Capital IQ; press releases; Wall Street research.
(1) | Represents last 8 quarters average unless otherwise note; For Tegna, reflects 2020/2021; for Meredith Local Media Group, reflects 2019/2020; for Ion Media, reflects 9/30/2020E LTM; for Dispatch, reflects 2018/2019E and includes run-rate synergies; for Nexstar (8 stations), reflects 2017/2018; for Nexstar (11 stations), reflects 2018/2019E based on equity research; for Tribune, announced purchase multiple did not specify applicable date ranges; for Cordillera Communications (15 stations), reflects 2017/2018 (Sept. year end); for Gray (2 stations), reflects 2017/2018E and includes run-rate synergies but not NPV of tax savings; for Raycom, reflects 2017/2018E (June year end); for Midwest Television (4 stations), reflects 2017E/2018E average and includes run-rate synergies and NPV of tax savings; for Bonten Media Group, announced 6.7x purchase multiple did not specify applicable date ranges; for Media General, reflects 2015E/2016E average. |
27
Confidential | |
Diversified Media Private Market Transaction Analysis |
($ in millions)
Announced | Revenue Growth | EBITDA Multiple | ||||
Date | Target | Acquiror | 1 Year Forward | TEV | LTM | NTM |
4/13/2021 | Televisa | Univision | 7% | $4,800 | 7.8x | 7.8x |
3/26/2021 | MSGN | MSGSE | (6%) | 1,765 | 5.9x | 7.7x |
12/22/2020 | OWN | Discovery | NA | 490 | 5.8x | NA |
8/13/2019 | Viacom | CBS | 2% | 19,557 | 6.6x | 6.8x |
3/22/2018 | Weather Group | Allen Media | NA | 977 | 6.9x | NA |
12/14/2017 | Fox | Disney | NA | 72,010 | 15.7x | 14.4x |
7/31/2017 | Scripps | Discovery | 4% | 14,259 | 9.9x | 9.6x |
7/6/2017 | HSN | QVC | 1% | 2,600 | 9.8x | 9.1x |
10/22/2016 | Time Warner | AT&T | 7% | 104,647 | 13.0x | 12.0x |
6/30/2016 | Starz | Lions Gate | (0%) | 4,400 | 10.9x | 9.8x |
3/9/2016 | Crown Media | Hallmark | NA | 2,088 | 10.1x | NA |
1/27/2016 | Tennis Channel | Sinclair Broadcasting | NA | 350 | 16.2x | NA |
Mean | 9.9x | 9.6x | ||||
Median | 9.9x | 9.4x |
Source: Capital IQ; press releases; Wall Street research.
28
Confidential | |
OTT Private Market Transaction Analysis |
($ in millions)
Announced | ||||||||
Date | Target | Acquirer | Service Type | % Acquired | TEV | EV / LTM Revenu | TEV / LTM EBITDA |
TEV / Subscribers |
7/30/18 | RLJ Entertainment | AMC Networks | SVOD | 30.4% | $274 | 2.9x | 14.8x | $334.1 |
3/31/21 | Pantaya | Hemisphere Media | SVOD | 75.0% | 165 | 3.6x | - | 183.1 |
12/9/20 | Crunchyroll | Sony Pictures Entertainment | SVOD | 100.0% | 1,175 | - | - | 391.7 |
1/22/19 | Pluto TV | Viacom | AVOD | 100.0% | 340 | 3.4x | - | 28.3 |
3/17/20 | Tubi | Fox Corporation | AVOD | 100.0% | 445 | - | - | 17.8 |
7/31/17 | Funimation | Sony Pictures Entertainment | SVOD | 95.0% | 151 | 1.5x (1) | - | - |
8/3/16 | Hulu | Time Warner (investment) | Hybrid | 10.0% | 5,830 | - | - | - |
7/20/18 | Hulu (Fox Interest) | Walt Disney | Hybrid | 30.0% | 9,329 | - | - | - |
4/15/19 | Hulu (Time Warner stake) | Hulu (redemption) | Hybrid | 9.5% | 15,053 | - | - | - |
5/13/19 | Hulu (Comcast Interest) | Walt Disney (Put/ Call Min.) | Hybrid | 33.0% | 27,500 | - | - | - |
Mean | 3.3x | 14.8x | $191.0 | |||||
Median | 3.4x | 14.8x | $183.1 |
Source: Capital IQ; press releases; Wall Street research. |
(1) Based on $100mm+ annual revenue figure as reported in press releases. |
29
Confidential | ||
Radio Private Market Transaction Analysis |
Announced | ||||
Date | Target | Acquiror | TEV | TEV / LTM EBITDA |
8/31/2020 | Potomac Radio Group (1 Station) | iHeartMedia | $1 | NA |
3/17/2020 | Local Media San Diego (1 Station) | iHeartMedia | $1 | NA |
2/18/2020 | Entercom (1 Station) | Educational Media Foundation | $11 | NA |
12/30/2019 | Tegna (2 Stations) | Local Media San Diego | $5 | NA |
8/15/2019 | Salem Media (9 Stations in 8 Markets) | Immaculate Heart Media | $9 | NA |
8/8/2019 | Salem Media (4 Stations in Florida) | Immaculate Heart Media | $8 | NA |
7/1/2019 | Emmis (2 Stations) | Standard General | $106 | 10.0x |
6/27/2019 | Cumulus (1 Station) | Red Apple Media | $13 | NA |
6/10/2019 | Emmis (6 Stations) | Sinclair Telecable | $78 | 7.5x |
4/15/2019 | Cumulus (1 Station) | Meruelo Group | $43 | 8.6x |
2/13/2019 | Cumulus (6 Stations) | Entercom | $104 | NA |
2/4/2019 | Alpha Media (6 Stations) | Midwest Communications | $22 | NA |
9/27/2018 | Alpha Media (6 Stations) | Hubbard Radio | $88 | NA |
2/22/2018 | Emmis (4 Stations) | Hubbard Radio, Entercom | $60 | 12.0x |
5/9/2017 | Emmis (1 Station) | Meruelo Group | $83 | 11.1x |
11/1/2017 | Entercom (10 Stations) | iHeartMedia | NA | NA |
2/2/2017 | CBS Radio | Entercom | $2,861 | 8.1x |
7/19/2016 | Greater Media | Beasley | $207 | 7.0x |
Mean | 9.2x | |||
Median | 8.6x | |||
Source: Capital IQ; press releases; Wall Street research.
30
Confidential | ||
Radio Assets Key Financials |
($mm) | 2017A | 2018A | 2019A | 2020A | 2021A | 2022E | '17-'19 CAGR | 19-'22 CAGR | |||||||||||||||||
Total Gross Ad Sales (excl. Political) | $16.7 | $19.8 | $17.0 | $14.4 | $17.0 | $17.3 | 0.8% | 0.5% | |||||||||||||||||
(+) Political Ad Revenue | 0.1 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.8 | 0.0 | – | (67.0%) | (100.0%) | |||||||||||||||||
Total Gross Ad Sales | $16.9 | $19.8 | $17.0 | $15.1 | $17.0 | $17.3 | 0.4% | 0.5% | |||||||||||||||||
(-) Direct Expenses | (3.7 | ) | (4.8 | ) | (3.7 | ) | (3.3 | ) | (3.4 | ) | (3.4 | ) | (0.1%) | (3.0%) | |||||||||||
Total Net Ad Sales | $13.2 | $15.0 | $13.3 | $11.9 | $13.5 | $13.9 | 0.6% | 1.4% | |||||||||||||||||
(+) Other Revenue | 0.9 | 1.1 | 1.1 | 0.7 | 0.7 | 0.7 | 8.6% | (14.3%) | |||||||||||||||||
(+) Subscription Revenue | - | - | 0.2 | 0.2 | - | - | NA | (100.0%) | |||||||||||||||||
Total Net Revenue | $14.1 | $16.0 | $14.6 | $12.8 | $14.2 | $14.6 | 1.8% | (0.1%) | |||||||||||||||||
(-) Operating Expenses | (8.1 | ) | (7.6 | ) | (8.1 | ) | (7.6 | ) | (7.3 | ) | (7.5 | ) | 0.0% | (2.9%) | |||||||||||
(-) QoE Adjustments(1) | - | - | - | (0.1) | (1) | (0.4 | )(1) | (0.3 | )(2) | ||||||||||||||||
EBITDA | $6.0 | $8.4 | $6.5 | $5.0 | (1) | $6.5 | (1) | $6.8 | 4.1% | 1.8% | |||||||||||||||
Net Revenues Growth | 13.7 | % | (9.0 | %) | (12.7 | %) | 11.4 | % | 2.6 | % | |||||||||||||||
EBITDA Growth | 41.3 | % | (23.4 | %) | (22.4 | %) | 29.5 | % | 4.8 | % | |||||||||||||||
EBITDA Margin | 42.4 | % | 52.6 | % | 44.3 | % | 39.4 | % | 45.8 | % | 46.8 | % |
Source: HMTV management (Univision provided to HMTV; PwC QoE provided by Searchlight to HMTV).
Note: 2020A and 2021A EBITDA figures based on PwC QoE analysis; all other figures as provided by Univision management.
(1) | Based on PwC QoE analysis. |
(2) | Illustratively reflects 2021 PwC QoE adjustments for accounting team ($0.177mm) and allocated lease costs ($0.125mm). |
31
Confidential | ||
Radio Assets NOL Tax Calculation | ||
Assumes a Discount Rate of 9.5% |
Per the information provided by HMTV, the utilization of the NOLs being acquired as part of the Radio Stations Transaction Agreement is subject to a number of uncertainties. With the consent of HMTV, the PJT analysis contemplate a range of values for the NOLs that assume either full or no utilization of the NOLs; PJT is illustratively showing the midpoint of ~$11.5mm on prior slides. |
Source: HMTV management (Univision provided to Searchlight; Searchlight provided to HMTV). | |
Note: Assumes a discount rate of 9.5%, approximated based on the midpoint WACC range for Networks. | |
(1) HMTV management projected cash taxes paid with and without NOLs, assuming the NOLs are fully utilizable without limitation. |
32
Confidential | ||
Lease Liability PV Calculation | ||
Assumes a Discount Rate of 9.5%(1) |
Per the information provided by HMTV, the value of lease depends on a number of currently unknowable factors and the Liberman lease provides for a termination right in 2025. With the consent of HMTV, in order to calculate the present value of the lease, Moelis and PJT are assuming a range that contemplates Liberman terminating the lease in 2025 and no replacement tenant steps into the Liberman lease or that Liberman does not terminate its lease in 2025. |
Source: HMTV management (Univision provided to Searchlight; Searchlight provided to HMTV). | |
(1) Approximated based on the midpoint of the WACC range for Networks. |
33
Confidential | ||
Unreimbursed Content Payments / License Fee Forgiveness |
> | Televisa does not plan to reimburse ~$4.7mm of funding payments through working capital within the next 90 days on the titles listed below |
> | Separately, Televisa is asking that Pantaya forgive a ~$2.6mm license fee payable on Pena Ajena that would otherwise be due in installments to the end of calendar year 2022 |
Overview of Unreimbursed Content Payments / License Fee Forgiveness | |||
Title | Amount
to be paid by Pantaya within the next 90 days |
License
Fee Receivable |
Commentary |
A Beautiful Life | $4.4 | n.a. | Amounts paid between signing and closing will not be reimbursed via working capital |
Pena Ajena | n.a. | $2.6 | Televisa is requesting that Pantaya forgive ~$2.6mm in license fees payable (by Televisa to Pantaya) |
Montecristo | $0.3 | n.a. | Amounts paid between signing and closing will not be reimbursed via working capital |
Rebelión | $0.1 | n.a. | Amounts paid between signing and closing will not be reimbursed via working capital |
Total | $4.7 | $2.6 |
Grand Total | $7.3 |
Source: HMTV management (Univision provided to Searchlight; Searchlight provided to HMTV).
34
Confidential | ||
Networks Preliminary WACC Analysis Based on Peer Beta |
Source: Bloomberg; Capital IQ; company filings.
Note: Market data as of 5/6/2022.
(1) | For peers, represents weighted average of pre and post tax reform rates of 38% and 24%, respectively; for HMTV, represents tax rate of 30.5% based on HMTV management guidance for Network‘s blended tax rate. |
(2) | Historical monthly beta since 5/6/2017, where available. |
(3) | Based on 31% ownership of TV Food Network. |
(4) | Reflects the market value of Sinclair‘s debt. |
(5) | Peer group summary data excludes Gray Television and Sinclair due to elevated leverage levels. |
35
Confidential | ||
Networks Preliminary WACC Analysis Based on Peer Beta (Cont‘d) |
Cost of Equity Calculation | Levered Beta Calculation | |||||
Risk Free Rate(1) | 3.43% | Unlevered Beta(5) | 0.654 | 0.755 | ||
Equity Risk Premium(2) | 6.22% | Debt / Equity | 66.7% | 66.7% | ||
Levered Beta | 0.958 | Levered Beta | 0.958 | 1.105 | ||
Beta-Adj. Premium | 5.96% | |||||
Size Premium(3) | 4.54% | WACC Calculation | ||||
Cost of Equity(4) | 13.93% | After-Tax Cost of Debt(6) | 4.87% | 4.87% | ||
WACC | 10.30% | 10.85% |
Cost of Equity Sensitivity | WACC Sensitivity | ||||||||||
Unlevered | Debt / Equity | Unlevered | Debt / Equity | ||||||||
Beta | 33.3% | 66.7% | 100.0% | Beta | 33.3% | 66.7% | 100.0% | ||||
0.654 | 10.54% | 11.49% | 12.43% | 2.10% size premium |
0.654 | 9.12% | 8.84% | 8.65% | 2.10% size premium | ||
12.98% | 13.93% | 14.87% | 4.54% size premium |
10.95% | 10.30% | 9.87% | 4.54% size premium | ||||
0.755 | 11.32% | 12.41% | 13.49% | 0.755 | 9.70% | 9.39% | 9.18% | ||||
13.76% | 14.85% | 15.93% | 11.53% | 10.85% | 10.40% |
Source: Duff & Phelps 2022 Valuation Handbook; Capital IQ; Bloomberg; IHS Markit.
Note: Market data as of 5/6/2022.
(1) | 20-year US Treasury as of 5/6/2022. |
(2) | Historical supply-side equity risk premium (historical equity risk premium minus price-to-earnings ratio calculated using three-year average). |
(3) | CSRP 9th decile size premium. |
(4) | Calculated as risk free rate + beta-adjusted equity risk premium + size premium. |
(5) | Median of peer monthly beta since 5/6/2017. |
(6) | Illustratively assumes pre-tax cost of debt of 7% in-line with ICE BofA Single-B index yield of ~7.3% (compared to ~6.4% yield on the current HMTV 7-year term L+502.4 term loan due February 2024). |
36
Confidential | ||
Pantaya Preliminary WACC Analysis Based on Peer Beta |
Unlevered Beta Calculation | ||||||
Company | Tax Rate(1) |
Levered Beta(2) |
Debt | Market Cap |
Current Debt / Equity |
Unlevered Beta |
Chicken Soup for the Soul Entertainment | 25.8% | 1.248 | 67 | 150 | 44.8% | 0.936 |
CuriosityStream | 25.8% | 1.679 | - | 111 | - | 1.679 |
FuboTV | 25.8% | 3.206 | 409 | 516 | 79.2% | 2.019 |
Netflix | 25.8% | 1.186 | 14,623 | 80,400 | 18.2% | 1.045 |
Roku | 25.8% | 1.620 | 89 | 14,039 | 0.6% | 1.612 |
Spotify | 25.8% | 1.535 | 1,259 | 20,392 | 6.2% | 1.468 |
Reference Only | ||||||
Hemisphere Media | 24.0% | 1.110 | 252 | 152 | 165.2% | 0.492 |
Peer Group Average | 1.745 | 1.460 | ||||
Peer Group Median | 1.577 | 1.540 |
Source: Bloomberg; Capital IQ.
Note: Market data as of 5/6/2022.
(1) | For peers, represents weighted average of pre and post tax reform rates of 38% and 24%, respectively; for HMTV (Pantaya), represents post-tax reform rate of 24% based on HMTV management guidance for Pantaya‘s blended tax rate. |
(2) | Monthly beta since 5/6/2017, where available; levered beta since 8/18/17 used for Chicken Soup for the Soul Entertainment; levered beta since 10/15/20 (completion date of merger with SPAC Software Acquisition Group) used for CuriosityStream; levered beta since 10/7/20 used for FuboTV; levered beta since 9/28/17 used for Roku; levered beta since 4/3/18 used for Spotify. |
37
Confidential | ||
Pantaya Preliminary WACC Analysis Based on Peer Beta (Cont‘d) |
Cost of Equity Calculation | Levered Beta Calculation | |||
Risk Free Rate(1) | 3.43% | Unlevered Beta(5) | 1.540 | |
Equity Risk Premium(2) | 6.22% | Debt / Equity | - | |
Levered Beta | 1.540 | Levered Beta | 1.540 | |
Beta-Adj. Premium | 9.58% | |||
Size Premium(3) | 6.34% | WACC Calculation | ||
Cost of Equity(4) | 19.35% | After-Tax Cost of Debt(6) | NA | |
WACC | 19.35% |
Cost of Equity Sensitivity | WACC Sensitivity | |||||||||
Unlevered | Size Premium | Unlevered | Size Premium | |||||||
Beta | 11.17% | 6.34% | 4.54% | 2.34% | Beta | 11.17% | 6.34% | 4.54% | 2.34% | |
1.340 | 22.93% | 18.10% | 16.30% | 14.10% | 1.340 | 22.93% | 18.10% | 16.30% | 14.10% | |
1.440 | 23.56% | 18.73% | 16.93% | 14.73% | 1.440 | 23.56% | 18.73% | 16.93% | 14.73% | |
1.540 | 24.18% | 19.35% | 17.55% | 15.35% | 1.540 | 24.18% | 19.35% | 17.55% | 15.35% | |
1.640 | 24.80% | 19.97% | 18.17% | 15.97% | 1.640 | 24.80% | 19.97% | 18.17% | 15.97% | |
1.740 | 25.42% | 20.59% | 18.79% | 16.59% | 1.740 | 25.42% | 20.59% | 18.79% | 16.59% | |
Based
on Value Implied by Low-End of DCF Analysis |
Based
on Value Implied by High-End Of DCF Analysis |
Next Decile (10x) |
Second
Next Decile (10w) |
Based
on Value Implied by Low-End Of DCF Analysis |
Based
on Value Implied by High-End Of DCF Analysis |
Next Decile (10x) |
Second
Next Decile (10w) |
Source: Duff & Phelps 2022 Valuation Handbook; Capital IQ; Bloomberg.
Note: Market data as of 5/6/2022.
(1) | 20-year US Treasury as of 5/6/2022. |
(2) | Historical supply-side equity risk premium (historical equity risk premium minus price-to-earnings ratio calculated using three-year average). |
(3) | CSRP 10th (i.e., 10y) decile size premium. |
(4) | Calculated as risk free rate + beta-adjusted equity risk premium + size premium. |
(5) | Median of peer monthly beta since 5/6/2017, where possible. |
38
Confidential | |
Capital Asset Pricing Model Size Risk Premia |
($mm)
Source: Duff & Phelps 2022 Valuation Handbook. | |
(1) | Pantaya WACC assumes 10th (i.e., 10y) decile size premium; Pantaya‘s DCF TEV range from $61mm on the low-end and $171mm on the high-end. |
(2) | Assumes midpoint DCF TEV of $380.6mm for Networks; assumes $193mm of net debt and other adjustments between Enterprise Value and Equity Value. |
39
Confidential | |
Pantaya Peer Group Levered Beta Analysis |
Weekly | Monthly | Weekly | Monthly | Weekly | Monthly | Weekly | Monthly | Weekly | Monthly | Weekly | Monthly | Weekly | Monthly | |
1-Year | 1.025 | (0.028) | 2.362 | 1.440 | 2.445 | 2.504 | 1.892 | 2.192 | 2.044 | 1.580 | 1.735 | 2.146 | 1.206 | 0.706 |
2-Year | 1.265 | 1.375 | 1.852 | 1.679 | 1.628 | 3.206 | 1.311 | 1.644 | 1.769 | 1.880 | 1.457 | 1.802 | 1.323 | 1.288 |
3-Year | 1.117 | 1.230 | - | - | - | - | 0.938 | 1.073 | 1.390 | 1.577 | 1.034 | 1.549 | 0.961 | 1.263 |
4-Year | 1.019 | 1.210 | - | - | - | - | 1.009 | 1.133 | 1.370 | 1.591 | 1.060 | 1.538 | 0.957 | 1.187 |
5-Year | 0.993 | 1.248 | - | - | - | - | 1.063 | 1.186 | 1.329 | 1.620 | 1.059 | 1.535 | 0.905 | 1.110 |
Data | ||||||||||||||
Available | 8/18/17 | 10/15/20 | 10/7/20 | 5/23/02 | 9/28/17 | 4/3/18 | 4/5/13 | |||||||
Since |
Source: Bloomberg.
Note: Market data as of 5/6/2022.
(1) CuriosityStream merger with SPAC Software Acquisition Group was not completed until October 15, 2020.
40
Confidential | |
Disclaimer |
These materials were prepared by PJT Partners LP (“PJT Partners”, “we” or “us”) solely for the information and assistance of the Special Committee (“Special Committee”) of the Board of Directors (the “Board”) of HMTV (the “Company”) in order to assist the Special Committee in connection with its consideration of the matters referred to herein. These materials are incomplete without reference to, and should be viewed solely in conjunction with, any oral information provided by PJT Partners in connection with these materials.
These materials and any oral information provided by PJT Partners in connection with these materials (collectively, the “Confidential Information”), as well as any information derived from the Confidential Information, may not be communicated, reproduced, disclosed (in whole or in part) to, or relied upon by, any other person, referred to, or used for any purpose, other than with PJT Partners‘ prior written consent.
The Confidential Information is based on information publicly available, provided by or on behalf of the Company or obtained from other sources. We assume no responsibility for independent verification of any such information, and we have assumed and relied upon the accuracy and completeness of such information for purposes of preparing the Confidential Information. Neither we nor any of our affiliates or agents, make any representation or warranty, express or implied, in relation to the accuracy or completeness of the Confidential Information, or any data it generates and expressly disclaim any and all liability in relation to any such Confidential Information. The Confidential Information is based on financial, economic, market and other conditions prevailing as of the date of such Confidential Information and is subject to change. We undertake no obligation or responsibility to update or revise any of the Confidential Information. Any valuation, appraisal or conclusion of a financial nature contained in these materials results from the application by PJT Partners of techniques and principles generally adopted in the context of the preparation of financial presentations of this nature, and PJT Partners cannot and does not warrant that the use of different techniques and principles would not lead to a different result.
Our analyses do not purport to be an appraisal of any assets or liabilities of the Company or any other party, nor have we evaluated the solvency of the Company or any other party under any laws relating to bankruptcy, insolvency or similar matters.
We are not legal, regulatory, accounting or tax advisors and these materials do not constitute legal, regulatory, accounting, tax or other specialist advice. These materials do not constitute and should not be considered any form of financial opinion, advice or recommendation by us or any of our affiliates to any party, with respect to any proposed transaction or otherwise. You should not rely upon or use these materials to form the definitive basis for any decision or action whatsoever, with respect to any proposed transaction or otherwise. Each of the Special Committee and the Company must make its own independent assessment and such investigation as it deems necessary to determine its interest in participating in any transaction.
These materials do not constitute an offer to sell or the solicitation of an offer to buy any security, nor do they constitute an offer or commitment to lend, syndicate or arrange a financing, underwrite or purchase any securities or act as an agent or advisor or in any other capacity with respect to any transaction, or commit capital to, or participate in, any trading strategies. This document is not a research report and should not be considered as such.
This document may include information from the S&P Capital IQ Platform Service. Such information is subject to the following: “Copyright © 2022, S&P Capital IQ (and its affiliates, as applicable). This may contain information obtained from third parties, including ratings from credit ratings agencies such as Standard & Poor‘s. Reproduction and distribution of third party content in any form is prohibited except with the prior written permission of the related third party. Third party content providers do not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, timeliness or availability of any information, including ratings, and are not responsible for any errors or omissions (negligent or otherwise), regardless of the cause, or for the results obtained from the use of such content. THIRD PARTY CONTENT PROVIDERS GIVE NO EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING, BUT NOT LIMITED TO, ANY WARRANTIES OF MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE OR USE. THIRD PARTY CONTENT PROVIDERS SHALL NOT BE LIABLE FOR ANY DIRECT, INDIRECT, INCIDENTAL, EXEMPLARY, COMPENSATORY, PUNITIVE, SPECIAL OR CONSEQUENTIAL DAMAGES, COSTS, EXPENSES, LEGAL FEES, OR LOSSES (INCLUDING LOST INCOME OR PROFITS AND OPPORTUNITY COSTS OR LOSSES CAUSED BY NEGLIGENCE) IN CONNECTION WITH ANY USE OF THEIR CONTENT, INCLUDING RATINGS. Credit ratings are statements of opinions and are not statements of fact or recommendations to purchase, hold or sell securities. They do not address the suitability of securities or the suitability of securities for investment purposes, and should not be relied on as investment advice.
This document may include information from SNL Financial LC. Such information is subject to the following: “CONTAINS COPYRIGHTED AND TRADE SECRET MATERIAL DISTRIBUTED UNDER LICENSE FROM SNL. FOR RECIPIENT‘S INTERNAL USE ONLY.”
PJT Partners is an SEC registered broker-dealer and is a member of FINRA and SIPC. PJT Partners is represented in the United Kingdom by PJT Partners (UK) Limited. PJT Partners (UK) Limited is authorised and regulated by the Financial Conduct Authority (Ref No. 678983) and is a company registered in England and Wales (No. 9424559). PJT Partners is represented in Spain by PJT Partners Park Hill (Spain) A.V., S.A.U., a firm authorized and regulated by the Comision Nacional del Mercado de Valores (“CNMV”). PJT Partners is represented in Hong Kong by PJT Partners (HK) Limited, authorised and regulated by the Securities and Futures Commission, and in Australia, by PJT Partners (HK) Limited, by relying on a passport license approved by the Australia Securities and Investment Commission. In connection with our capital raising services in Canada, PJT Partners relies on the international dealer exemption pursuant to subsection 8.18(2) of National Instrument 31-103 Registration Requirements. Please see https://pjtpartners.com/regulatory-disclosure for more information.
Copyright © 2022, PJT Partners LP (and its affiliates, as applicable).
41
Exhibit 107
Calculation of Filing Fee Tables
Schedule 13E-3
(Form Type)
Hemisphere Media Group, Inc.
(Exact Name of Registrant as Specified in its Charter)
Table 1: Transaction Valuation
Transaction valuation | Fee Rate | Amount of Filing Fee | ||||||||||
Total Transaction Valuation | $ | 284,001,497.43 | (1) | 0.0000927 | $ | 26,326.94 | (2) | |||||
Fees Previously Paid | $ | 0 | $ | 0 | (3) | |||||||
Total Transaction Valuation | $ | 284,001,497.43 | ||||||||||
Total Fees Due for Filing | $ | 0 | ||||||||||
Total Fees Previously Paid | $ | 0 | ||||||||||
Total Fee Offsets | $ | 26,326.94 | ||||||||||
Net Fee Due | $ | 0 |
Table 2: Fee Offset Claims and Sources
Registrant or Filer Name | Form or Filing Type | File Number | Initial Filing Date | Filing Date | Fee Offset Claimed | Fee Paid with Fee Offset Source |
||||||||||||
Fee Offset Claims | PREM 14A | 001-35886 | June 27, 2022 | $ | 26,326.94 | |||||||||||||
Fee Offset Sources | Hemisphere Media Group, Inc. | PREM 14A | 001-35886 | June 27, 2022 | $ | 26,326.94 | (3) |
(1) | For purposes of calculating the fee only, this amount is based upon the sum of (a) 20,827,861 shares of Class A common stock of Hemisphere Media Group, Inc. (the “Company”), par value $0.0001 per share (the “Class A Shares”), and 19,720,381 shares of the Class B common stock of the Company, par value $0.0001 (together with the Class A Shares, the “Shares”), multiplied by $7.00 per Class A Share and (b) stock options to purchase 105,000 Class A Shares multiplied by $1.56 per Class A Share (which is the difference between $7.00 and the weighted average exercise price of $5.44 for such Class A Shares). |
(2) | The amount of the filing fee, calculated in accordance with Exchange Act Rule 0-11(b)(1) and the Securities and Exchange Commission Fee Rate Advisory #1 for Fiscal Year 2022, was calculated by multiplying $284,001,497.43 by 0.0000927. |
(3) | The Company previously paid $26,326.94 upon the filing of its Preliminary Proxy Statement on Schedule 14A on June 27, 2022 in connection with the transaction reported hereby. |
Serious News for Serious Traders! Try StreetInsider.com Premium Free!
You May Also Be Interested In
- Mako Mining Completes Settlement with GR Silver and Wexford Loan Extension
- Capitan Silver Announces Upsize of Non-Brokered Private Placement to C$2.0 Million
- Designated person notification
Create E-mail Alert Related Categories
SEC FilingsSign up for StreetInsider Free!
Receive full access to all new and archived articles, unlimited portfolio tracking, e-mail alerts, custom newswires and RSS feeds - and more!