Form DEF 14A NEWMARK GROUP, INC. For: Sep 28

UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20549

SCHEDULE 14A

Proxy Statement Pursuant to Section 14(a) of the

Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (Amendment No.    )

(Check the appropriate box):

☐    Preliminary Proxy Statement

☐    Confidential, For Use Of The  Commission Only (As Permitted By Rule 14a-6(e)(2))

☒    Definitive Proxy Statement

☐    Definitive Additional Materials

☐    Soliciting Material Pursuant to §240.14a-11(c) or §240.14a-12

Newmark Group, Inc.

(Name of Registrant as Specified In Its Charter)

(Name of Person(s) Filing Proxy Statement, if other than the Registrant)

Payment of Filing Fee (Check all boxes that apply):

August 15, 2022

Dear Stockholder:

It is my pleasure to inform you that our 2022 Annual Meeting of Stockholders (the “Annual Meeting”) will be conducted online on Wednesday, September 28, 2022, commencing at 10:00 a.m. (Eastern Time).

Our Board of Directors will once again conduct the Annual Meeting as a virtual meeting because it believes that a virtual meeting will enable increased stockholder accessibility, while improving meeting efficiency and reducing costs. Stockholders will be able to listen, vote, and submit questions from their home or any remote location with Internet connectivity. Information on how to participate in the Annual Meeting can be found on page 3 of the Proxy Statement.

This year, we are once again taking advantage of the Securities and Exchange Commission rule that allows companies to provide their stockholders with access to proxy materials on the Internet. On or about August 15, 2022, we will begin mailing a Notice of Internet Availability of Proxy Materials (the “Notice”) to our stockholders informing them that our Proxy Statement, Annual Report for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2021 and voting instructions are available online. As more fully described in that Notice, all stockholders may choose to access our proxy materials on the Internet or may request to receive paper copies of the proxy materials. This allows us to conserve natural resources and reduces the costs of printing and distributing the proxy materials, while providing our stockholders with access to the proxy materials in a fast and efficient manner.

During the Annual Meeting, you will be asked to consider and vote upon (i) the election of four directors; (ii) a vote on the ratification of the appointment of Ernst & Young LLP as the Company’s independent registered public accounting firm for the fiscal year ending December 31, 2022; (iii) an advisory vote on executive compensation; and (iv) such other business as may properly come before the Annual Meeting and any adjournment or postponement thereof.

Whether or not you are able to participate in the Annual Meeting, it is important that your shares be represented. Please vote your shares using the Internet or the designated toll-free telephone number, or by requesting a printed copy of the proxy materials and completing and returning by mail the proxy or voting instruction card you will receive in response to your request. Please refer to the section entitled “Voting Via the Internet, by Telephone, or by Mail” on page 2 of the Proxy Statement for a description of these voting methods.

Sincerely,

Howard W. Lutnick

Chairman of the Board of Directors

Newmark Group, Inc.

125 Park Avenue

New York, New York 10017

Notice of 2022 Annual Meeting of Stockholders

NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that our 2022 Annual Meeting of Stockholders will be held on Wednesday, September 28, 2022, commencing at 10:00 a.m. (Eastern Time), for the following purposes:

Only holders of record of our Class A common stock or our Class B common stock at the close of business on August 1, 2022 are entitled to notice of and to vote at the Annual Meeting and any adjournment or postponement thereof. If you plan to participate in the Annual Meeting, please see the instructions under “Participating in the Annual Meeting” beginning on page 3 of the accompanying Proxy Statement. Stockholders will be able to listen, vote, and submit questions from their home or from any remote location that has Internet connectivity. Please see the instructions for voting under “Voting Via the Internet, by Telephone, or by Mail” beginning on page 2 of the accompanying Proxy Statement. There will be no physical location for stockholders to attend. Stockholders may only participate online by logging in at www.virtualshareholdermeeting.com/NMRK2022.

By Order of the Board of Directors,

CAROLINE A. KOSTER

Corporate Secretary

August 15, 2022

YOUR VOTE IS IMPORTANT. WHETHER OR NOT YOU PLAN TO PARTICIPATE IN

THE ANNUAL MEETING, PLEASE VOTE AS PROMPTLY AS POSSIBLE USING THE

INTERNET OR THE DESIGNATED TOLL-FREE TELEPHONE NUMBER

OR BY REQUESTING A PAPER OR E-MAIL COPY OF THE PROXY MATERIALS AND

COMPLETING AND RETURNING BY MAIL THE PROXY OR VOTING INSTRUCTION CARD

YOU WILL RECEIVE IN RESPONSE TO YOUR REQUEST.

Table of Contents

Newmark Group, Inc.

125 Park Avenue

New York, New York 10017

PROXY STATEMENT

This Proxy Statement is being furnished in connection with the solicitation of proxies by and on behalf of our Board of Directors for use at the 2022 Annual Meeting of Stockholders (the “Annual Meeting”) of Newmark Group, Inc. (the “Company,” “Newmark,” “we,” “us,” or “our”) to be held on September 28, 2022, and at any adjournment or postponement thereof, for the purposes set forth in the accompanying Notice of 2022 Annual Meeting of Stockholders. There will be no physical location for stockholders to attend. Stockholders may only participate online by logging in at www.virtualshareholdermeeting.com/NMRK2022. Our Annual Report for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2021 (the “2021 Annual Report”), accompanies this Proxy Statement. The Notice of Internet Availability of Proxy Materials is expected to be mailed to stockholders on or about August 15, 2022.

IMPORTANT NOTICE REGARDING THE AVAILABILITY OF PROXY MATERIALS FOR THE ANNUAL MEETING OF STOCKHOLDERS TO BE HELD ON SEPTEMBER 28, 2022:

On or about August 15, 2022, we will begin mailing a notice, called the Notice of Internet Availability of Proxy Materials (the “Notice”), to our stockholders advising them that this Proxy Statement, the 2021 Annual Report and voting instructions can be accessed over the Internet at www.proxyvote.com. You may then access these proxy materials over the Internet, or you may request that a printed copy of the proxy materials be sent to you. If you want to receive a paper or e-mail copy of these proxy materials, you must request one over the Internet at www.proxyvote.com, by calling toll free 1-800-579-1639, or by sending an e-mail to [email protected]. There is no charge to you for requesting a copy. Please make your request for a copy on or before September 14, 2022 to facilitate timely delivery. If you previously elected to receive our proxy materials electronically, these materials will continue to be sent via e-mail unless you change your election.

If you have not done so already, please help us protect the environment by signing up for electronic delivery for all future proxies and related materials. It takes just five easy steps:

INFORMATION ABOUT VOTING

Who Can Vote

The close of business on August 1, 2022 has been fixed as the record date (the “Record Date”) for the determination of the stockholders entitled to notice of and to vote at the Annual Meeting and any adjournment or postponement thereof. Only holders of record as of that date of shares of our Class A common stock, $0.01 par value per share (the “Class A common stock”), or of our Class B common stock, $0.01 par value per share (the “Class B common stock”), are entitled to notice of and to vote at the Annual Meeting. Our Class A common stock and our Class B common stock will vote together as a single class on all matters to come before the Annual Meeting and are sometimes collectively referred to herein as our “Common Equity.”

Each share of our Class A common stock entitles the holder thereof to one vote per share on each matter presented to stockholders for approval at the Annual Meeting. Each share of our Class B common stock entitles the holder thereof to 10 votes per share on each matter presented to stockholders for approval at the Annual Meeting. The collective voting power represented by the shares of our Class A common stock and our Class B common stock issued and outstanding on the Record Date is referred to as the “Total Voting Power.” On the Record Date, there were 157,809,874 shares of our Class A common stock and 21,285,533 shares of our Class B common stock, for a total of 179,095,407 Class A and Class B shares of our Common Equity, outstanding and entitled to vote, with a Total Voting Power of 370,665,200 votes.

Voting Via the Internet, by Telephone, or by Mail

Stockholders of Record

If your shares are registered directly in your name with the Company’s transfer agent, American Stock Transfer & Trust Company, LLC, you are considered the “stockholder of record” of those shares, and the Notice of Internet Availability of Proxy Materials is being sent directly to you by the Company. If you are a stockholder of record, you can vote your shares in one of two ways: either by proxy or online during the Annual Meeting. If you choose to vote by proxy, you may do so by using the Internet (please visit www.proxyvote.com and follow the instructions), or by calling the designated toll-free number (1-800-690-6903), or by requesting a printed copy of our proxy materials and completing and returning by mail the proxy or voting instruction card you will receive in response to your request. Whichever method you use, each valid proxy received in time will be voted during the Annual Meeting in accordance with your instructions.

Beneficial Owners of Shares Held in Street Name

If your shares are held in a securities brokerage account or by a bank or other nominee, you are considered the “beneficial owner” of shares held in street name, and the Notice is being forwarded to you by your broker, bank or nominee, who is considered the stockholder of record of those shares. As a beneficial owner, you have the right to direct your broker, bank or nominee on how to vote the shares held in your account. You may also vote using the Internet. Please visit www.proxyvote.com and follow the instructions, or, if you request printed proxy materials, you will receive voting instructions from your broker, bank or nominee describing the available processes for voting your stock.

Revocation of Proxies

A stockholder’s voting on the Internet or by telephone or by completing and returning a proxy or voting instruction card will not affect such stockholder’s right to participate in the Annual Meeting and to vote during such time. Any stockholder who votes on the Internet or by telephone or submits an executed proxy or voting instruction card has a right to revoke the proxy at any time before it is voted by taking any of the following actions:

Participation in the Annual Meeting will not in and of itself constitute revocation of a proxy.

Quorum

The required quorum for the transaction of business at the Annual Meeting is a majority of the Total Voting Power, which shares must be present online or represented by proxy during the Annual Meeting.

Broker Non-Votes

If you are a beneficial owner whose shares are held by a broker, bank or other nominee, you must instruct the broker, bank or nominee how to vote your shares. If you do not provide voting instructions, your shares will not be voted on proposals on which brokers do not have discretionary authority. This is called a “broker non-vote.”

Required Vote

With respect to Proposal 1, directors are elected by a plurality of the votes cast. With respect to Proposals 2 and 3, the affirmative vote of the holders of a majority of the Total Voting Power present online or represented by proxy at the Annual Meeting and entitled to vote on the proposals is required. Withheld votes will have no effect on the vote on Proposal 1, and abstentions will have the same effect on the votes as votes against on Proposals 2 and 3. Broker non-votes will have no effect on the votes on Proposals 1 and 3. Additionally, there will not be broker non-votes with regard to Proposal No. 2 as it is a routine matter pursuant to which brokers may exercise discretionary voting authority. Thus, your broker or nominee may vote on your behalf with regard to Proposal No. 2, whether or not you provide voting instructions. Shares not voted in the discretion of your broker or nominee will have the same effect as votes against this proposal.

Participating in the Annual Meeting

You are entitled to participate in the Annual Meeting only if you were a Newmark stockholder of record or a beneficial owner of shares of our Class A common stock or our Class B common stock as of the close of business on the Record Date, August 1, 2022, or you hold a valid proxy for the Annual Meeting. Our Annual Meeting will be a completely virtual meeting. There will be no physical meeting location. The meeting will be conducted only via live webcast.

To participate in the Annual Meeting, visit www.virtualshareholdermeeting.com/NMRK2022 and enter the 16-digit control number included on your Notice of Internet Availability of Proxy Materials, on your proxy card or on the voting instruction card that accompanied your proxy materials. You may begin to log into the meeting platform beginning at 9:45 a.m. (Eastern Time) on September 28, 2022. The meeting will begin promptly at 10:00 a.m. (Eastern Time) on September 28, 2022.

The virtual meeting platform is fully supported across browsers (Edge, Firefox, Chrome, and Safari) and devices (desktops, laptops, tablets, and cell phones) running the most updated version of applicable software and plugins. Participants should ensure that they have a strong WiFi connection wherever they intend to participate in the meeting. Participants should also give themselves plenty of time to log in and ensure that they can hear streaming audio prior to the start of the meeting.

If you want to submit your question during the meeting, log into the virtual meeting platform at www.virtualshareholdermeeting.com/NMRK2022, type your question into the “Ask a Question” field, and click “Submit.” Questions pertinent to meeting matters will be answered during the meeting, subject to time constraints. Questions regarding personal matters, including those related to employment, individual transactions, product or service issues, or other matters not relevant to investors generally, are not pertinent to meeting matters and therefore will not be answered.

Voting Procedures for Newmark 401(k) Plan Participants

Pursuant to the trust agreement governing our Newmark 401(k) Plan (the “401(k) Plan”), the trustee of our 401(k) Plan will not, except as otherwise required by law, vote shares of our Class A common stock held in the trust as to which the trustee has not received voting instructions from 401(k) Plan participants.

Other Information

Unless specified otherwise, the proxies will be voted FOR the election of all the nominees to serve as our directors, FOR the ratification of the appointment of Ernst & Young LLP as the Company’s independent registered public accounting firm for the fiscal year ending December 31, 2022, and FOR the approval, on an advisory basis, of the resolution on executive compensation. In the discretion of the proxy holders, the proxies will also be voted for or against such other matters as may properly come before the Annual Meeting. Management is not aware of any other matters to be presented for action at the Annual Meeting.

Our principal executive offices are located at 125 Park Avenue New York, New York 10017, and our telephone number is (212) 372-2000.

This Proxy Statement is accompanied by the 2021 Annual Report, which includes the Company’s Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2021 (the “2021 10-K”), that we have previously filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “SEC”) and that includes our audited financial statements. We file reports, proxy statements and other information with the SEC. These filings are available to the public on the SEC website at www.sec.gov. In addition, our website at https://ir.nmrk.com/investors/investors-home/ provides ongoing information about the Company, including documents filed by us with the SEC. To obtain documents from us, please direct requests in writing or by telephone to Newmark Group, Inc., 125 Park Avenue New York, New York 10017, phone: (212) 372-2000, Attention: Corporate Secretary. We will send you the requested documents without charge; however, a reasonable fee will be charged for exhibits that you request. The information contained on, or that may be accessed through, our website is not part of, and is not incorporated into, this Proxy Statement.

PROPOSAL 1—ELECTION OF DIRECTORS

Our Board of Directors (the “Board”) is currently composed of five members. Michael Snow, a member of our Board since 2017, has determined not to stand for re-election at the Annual Meeting. Our Board, upon recommendation of our independent directors, has nominated four persons for election as directors at the Annual Meeting. All of the nominees are currently members of our Board. Information with respect to the four nominees for election as directors is set forth below. All of the nominees are to be elected at the Annual Meeting and to serve until their successors are duly elected and qualified. All of the nominees listed below are expected to serve as directors if they are elected. If any nominee should decline or be unable to accept such nomination or to serve as a director (an event which our Board does not now expect), our Board reserves the right to nominate another person or to vote to reduce the size of our Board. In the event another person is nominated, the proxy holders intend to vote the shares to which the proxy relates for the election of the person nominated by our Board. There is no cumulative voting for directors.

Information About Our Directors

VOTE REQUIRED FOR APPROVAL

The four nominees receiving a plurality of the votes cast via the internet, by telephone or by mail or represented by proxy at the Annual Meeting and entitled to vote on the election of directors will be elected as directors. Withheld votes and broker non-votes will have no effect on the election of directors.

RECOMMENDATION OF OUR BOARD OF DIRECTORS

OUR BOARD OF DIRECTORS RECOMMENDS THAT ALL STOCKHOLDERS VOTE “FOR” THE ELECTION OF EACH OF THE FOUR NOMINEES FOR DIRECTOR.

Independence of Directors

Our Board has determined that each of Ms. Bauer and Messrs. Snow, McIntyre and Itzkowitz qualifies as an “independent director” in accordance with the published listing requirements of the Nasdaq Stock Market, Inc. (“Nasdaq”). The Nasdaq independence definition consists of a series of objective tests, including that the director is not an officer or employee of ours and has not engaged in various types of business dealings with us. In addition, as further required by Nasdaq rules, our Board has made a subjective determination with respect to each independent director that no relationships exist which, in the opinion of our Board, would interfere with the exercise of independent judgment by each such director in carrying out the responsibilities of a director. In making these determinations, our Board has reviewed and discussed information provided by the individual directors and us with regard to each director’s business and personal activities as they may relate to us and our management, including participation on any boards of other organizations in which other members of our Board are members. In evaluating Ms. Bauer’s independence, the Board took into consideration her service on the Board of Directors of the National September 11 Memorial & Museum since 2008, an organization where Mr. Lutnick also is a member of the Board of Directors, as well as the fact that Ms. Bauer’s husband was employed by an affiliate of Cantor and subsequent to his death on September 11, 2001, her family received the payments and health care coverage distributed to all affected victims from the Cantor Fitzgerald Relief Fund. In evaluating Mr. McIntyre’s independence, the Board took into consideration his service as an independent director at a public company for which the Company provides an immaterial amount of ordinary course real estate services. In evaluating Mr. Itzkowitz’s independence, the Board took into consideration his prior employment by a Cantor affiliate and his prior partnership interest in Cantor, which ended in 2014.

Meetings and Committees of Our Board of Directors

Our Board held 12 meetings during the year ended December 31, 2021. In addition to meetings, our Board and its committees reviewed and acted upon matters by unanimous written consent from time to time. During 2021, no director attended fewer than 90% of the total number of meetings of the Board and the committees of which he or she was a member. Each independent director attended 100% of the total number of meetings of the Board and the committees of which he or she was a member, except one member missed one meeting during the year.

Audit Committee

Our Audit Committee consists of Ms. Bauer, and Messrs. Snow, McIntyre and Itzkowitz. Our Audit Committee previously consisted of Ms. Bauer and Messrs. Peter F. Cervinka, Snow, and McIntyre with Mr. Cervinka serving as Chair of the Committee during the year ended December 31, 2020 and until April 29, 2021. Effective as of the close of business on April 29, 2021, Mr. Cervinka resigned from the Board and Mr. Snow became Chair of the Committee as of that date. Mr. Itzkowitz joined the Audit Committee in August 2022. Mr. Snow has determined not to stand for re-election at the Annual Meeting.

Each member of the Committee qualifies as “independent” in accordance with the published listing requirements of Nasdaq and under special standards established by the SEC for members of audit committees, and the Committee includes at least one member who is determined by our Board to meet the qualifications of an “audit committee financial expert” in accordance with the SEC rules. Our Board has determined that each of Ms. Bauer and Messrs. Snow, McIntyre and Itzkowitz meets the qualifications of an “audit committee financial expert.” The Committee operates pursuant to an Audit Committee Charter, which is available at https://ir.nmrk.com/disclaimer-and-legal-information under the heading “Charter of the Audit Committee of the Board of Directors,” or upon written request from us free of charge.

Our Audit Committee selects our independent registered public accounting firm, consults with our auditors and with management with regard to the adequacy of our financial reporting, internal control over financial reporting and the audit process and considers any permitted non-audit services to be performed by our auditors. The Committee also approves all related party transactions, oversees the management of our enterprise risk management program, oversees compliance with our Code of Business Conduct and Ethics and administers our

whistleblower policy, including the establishment of procedures with respect to the receipt, retention and treatment of complaints received by us regarding accounting, internal controls and auditing matters, and the anonymous submission by employees of complaints involving questionable accounting or auditing matters. The Committee pre-approves all audit services, audit-related services and permitted non-audit services to be performed for us by our auditors, subject to certain minimum exceptions set forth in our Audit Committee Charter. The Committee held 15 meetings during the year ended December 31, 2021.

During 2022, our Audit Committee approved the appointment of Ernst & Young LLP (“Ernst & Young”) to be our auditors for the year ending December 31, 2022. Ernst & Young was also approved to perform reviews of each of our quarterly financial reports for the year ending December 31, 2022, and certain other audit-related services such as accounting consultations. Pursuant to our Audit Committee Charter, the Committee will pre-approve audit services, internal control-related services and permitted non-audit services to be performed for us by Ernst & Young, as set forth in the Audit Committee Charter. We are submitting such engagement to our stockholders for ratification at the Annual Meeting in Proposal 2.

Compensation Committee

Our Board of Directors has a Compensation Committee. The Committee consists of Ms. Bauer and Messrs. Snow, McIntyre and Itzkowitz. The Committee previously consisted of Ms. Bauer and Messrs. Cervinka, Snow, and McIntyre with Mr. Snow serving as Chair of the Committee, during the year ended December 31, 2020 and until April 29, 2021 when Mr. Cervinka resigned from the Board and Ms. Bauer became Chair of the Committee as of that date. Mr. Itzkowitz joined the Compensation Committee in August 2022. Mr. Snow has determined not to stand for re-election at the Annual Meeting.

Each member of the Committee qualifies as “independent” in accordance with the published listing requirements of Nasdaq. The Committee is responsible for reviewing and approving all compensation arrangements for our executive officers and for administering the Newmark Holdings, L.P. Participation Plan, which we refer to as the “Participation Plan,” our Long-Term Incentive Plan, which we refer to as the “Equity Plan” and our Incentive Bonus Compensation Plan, which we refer to as our “Incentive Plan.” The Committee operates pursuant to a Compensation Committee Charter, which is available at https://ir.nmrk.com/disclaimer-and-legal-information under the heading “Charter of the Compensation Committee of the Board of Directors,” or upon written request from us free of charge. The Committee held 25 meetings during the year ended December 31, 2021, which included meetings with independent advisors for the Compensation Committee in contemplation of the December 2021 one-time bonus award to Mr.  Lutnick described below under the heading “2021 Lutnick Award.”

ESG Committee

Our Board of Directors also has an Environmental, Social and Governance (“ESG”) Committee which was formed in November 2020. The ESG Committee consists of Ms. Bauer and Mr. McIntyre, both of whom are independent directors. Mr. McIntyre is the Chair of the ESG Committee. The Committee is responsible for working with management to review ESG initiatives and procedures appropriate to the Company, to provide periodic review of ESG practices and policies and to review management’s current ESG strategy to ensure the Company engages in appropriate practices and technologies and otherwise make recommendations on these matters to the full Board. The Committee operates pursuant to an Environmental, Social and Governance Committee Charter, which is available at https://ir.nmrk.com/disclaimer-and-legal-information under the heading “ESG Committee Charter,” or upon written request from us free of charge. The Committee held 5 meetings during the year ended December 31, 2021.

Nominating Process

All directors participate in the consideration of director nominees recommended for selection by a majority of the independent directors as defined by the published listing requirements of Nasdaq. Accordingly, our Board does not have a separate nominating committee or committee performing similar functions and does not have a nominating committee charter. The Board believes that such participation of all directors is appropriate given the

size of our Board and the level of participation of all of our independent directors in the nomination process. The Board will also consider qualified director candidates identified by a member of senior management or by a stockholder. However, it is our general policy to re-nominate qualified incumbent directors and, absent special circumstances, the Board will not consider other candidates when a qualified incumbent consents to stand for re-election. A stockholder wishing to submit a recommendation for a director candidate should follow the instructions set forth in this Proxy Statement under the section below entitled “Communications with Our Board of Directors.”

Qualification Criteria and Diversity

Our Board considers the following minimum criteria when reviewing a director nominee: director candidates must (1) have the highest character and integrity, (2) be free of any conflict of interest which would violate applicable laws or regulations or interfere with the proper performance of the responsibilities of a director, (3) possess substantial and significant experience which would be of particular importance in the performance of the duties of a director, (4) have sufficient time available to devote to our affairs in order to carry out the responsibilities of a director and (5) have the capacity and desire to represent the best interests of our stockholders. In addition, the Board considers as one factor among many the diversity of Board candidates, which may include diversity of gender, age and ethnicity. See “Environmental, Social and Governance Policies and Practices (ESG/Sustainability)—Board Diversity.” The Board also considers diversity of skills and experience as well as geographic background. Our Board screens candidates, does reference checks and conducts interviews, as appropriate. Our Board does not evaluate nominees for director any differently because the nominee is or is not recommended by a stockholder.

With respect to qualifications of the members of the Board, the Board generally values broad business experience and independent business judgment in the financial, real estate or in other fields of each member. Specifically, Mr. Snow is qualified based on his experience in the financial services industry and his general business experience. Ms. Bauer is qualified based on her depth of experience in both the technology and government sectors. Mr. McIntyre is qualified as a result of his extensive experience in the commercial real estate industry and general business experience. Mr. Itzkowitz is qualified based on his experience as a mergers and acquisitions attorney in the real estate and media industries and his general business experience. Each of Ms. Bauer and Messrs. Snow, McIntyre and Itzkowitz is additionally qualified as a result of his or her status as an “audit committee financial expert.”

The following matrix provides information regarding the members of our Board, including certain types of knowledge, skills, experiences and attributes possessed by one or more of our directors which our Board believes are relevant to our business and industry. The matrix does not encompass all of the knowledge, skills, experiences or attributes of our directors, and the fact that a particular knowledge, skill, experience or attribute is not listed does not mean that a director does not possess it. In addition, the absence of a particular knowledge, skill, experience or attribute with respect to any of our directors does not mean the director in question is unable to contribute to the decision-making process in that area. The type and degree of knowledge, skill and experience listed below may vary among the members of the Board.

Chairman of the Board

The Board has determined that, in light of Mr. Lutnick’s control of the stockholder vote of the Company through his control of Cantor, having a separate Chairman of the Board and principal executive officer is not efficient or appropriate for us. Additionally, our Board does not have a lead independent director for the same reason.

We believe that we and our stockholders are best served by having Mr. Lutnick serve as Chairman of the Board and as our principal executive officer. Mr. Lutnick’s role as Chairman, which combines the roles of Chairman of the Board and principal executive officer, promotes unified leadership and direction for our Board of Directors and executive management, and it allows for a single, clear focus for the chain of command to execute our strategic initiatives and business plans. Mr. Gosin, who serves as our CEO, and who is not a director, provides strong leadership in strategic initiatives, acquisitions and day-to-day management of the business and industry-leading experience in our markets. Our strong and independent Board effectively oversees our management and provides vigorous oversight of our business and affairs and any proposed related party transactions. Our Board is composed of independent, active and effective directors. Four of our five directors meet the independence qualifications in accordance with the published listing requirements of Nasdaq and the SEC and our Board’s standards for determining director independence. Mr. Lutnick is the only member of executive management who is also a director. Requiring that the Chairman of the Board be an independent director is not necessary to ensure that our Board provides independent and effective oversight of our business and affairs. Such oversight is maintained through the composition of our Board, the strong leadership of our independent directors and Board committees and our highly effective corporate governance structures and processes.

Corporate Governance Guidelines

The Board has adopted Corporate Governance Guidelines that provide the framework for the governance of the Company. The Guidelines address, among other things, the composition and structure of the Board, including membership criteria, independence standards and limits on other directorships, duties and responsibilities of directors, meeting procedures, committees of the Board, executive officer leadership development and stockholder engagement, including with respect to ESG matters. The Board reviews these principles and other aspects of governance annually. The Guidelines are available at https://www.nmrk.com/esg/governance under the heading “Corporate Governance Guidelines” or upon written request from the Company free of charge.

Executive Sessions

In order to comply with Nasdaq rules, the Board has resolved that it will continue to schedule and/or provide opportunities during at least two meetings per year in which the independent directors will meet without the presence of Mr. Lutnick.

Annual Meetings

The Corporate Governance Guidelines provide that each member of the Board is expected to attend Annual Meetings of Stockholders of the Company. At the 2021 Annual Meeting of Stockholders, held on December  17, 2021, all of the Company’s directors were in attendance.

Communications with Our Board of Directors

Stockholders may contact any member of our Board, including to recommend a candidate for director, by addressing their correspondence to the director, c/o Newmark Group, Inc., 125 Park Avenue, New York, NY 10017, Attention: Corporate Secretary. Our Corporate Secretary will forward all such correspondence to the named director. If you wish to submit any proposal to be considered at our 2023 annual meeting of stockholders, please follow the instructions set forth in the section below entitled “Stockholder Proposals.”

The Board’s Role in Risk Oversight

Risk oversight is an integral part of Board and Committee deliberations throughout the year. The Audit Committee oversees the management of our enterprise risk management program, and it annually reviews an assessment prepared by management of the critical risks facing us, their relative magnitude and management’s actions to monitor and mitigate these risks.

Our management implemented an enterprise risk management program to enhance our existing processes through an integrated effort to identify, evaluate and manage risks that may affect our ability to execute our corporate strategy and fulfill our business objectives. The activities of the enterprise risk management program entail the identification, prioritization and assessment of a broad range of risks (e.g., strategic, operational, cybersecurity and information security, financial, legal/regulatory, reputational and market) and the formulation of plans to mitigate their effects.

Our Board generally discusses cybersecurity and information security risks annually with the Chief Technology Officer and other relevant technology and security personnel.

Similarly, in designing and implementing our executive compensation program, the Compensation Committee takes into consideration our operating and financial objectives, including our risk profile, and considers executive compensation decisions based in part on incentivizing our executive officers to take appropriate business risk consistent with our overall goals and risk tolerance.

Non-executive brokers, managers and other professionals are generally compensated based upon production or commissions, which may involve committing to certain transactions in certain of our businesses. These transactions may expose the Company to risks by individual employees, who are motivated to increase production. While we have in place management oversight and risk management policies, there is an inevitable conflict of interest between our compensation structure and certain brokerage, transactional, or similar risks on various portions of our businesses.

Succession Planning

From time to time, the Board discusses succession planning, including our consideration of succession strategy, the impact of any potential absence due to illness or leave of certain key executive officers or

employees, as well as competing demands on the time of certain of our executive officers who also provide services to Cantor, BGC, and various other ventures and investments sponsored by Cantor. Our Board also discusses from time to time, as part of its succession planning, engagement and encouragement of future business leaders and the process of introducing directors to leaders in our business lines. The Board also considers hiring and retention of leaders required for the changing business landscape and to lead future business lines. Such individuals could include internal and external candidates. Additionally, we have implemented identification and tracking of diverse candidates as part of our succession planning efforts and plan to implement development plans for all high-potential successors this year.

ENVIRONMENTAL, SOCIAL AND GOVERNANCE POLICIES AND PRACTICES

(ESG / SUSTAINABILITY)

Environmental, Social and Governance (“ESG”) / Sustainability Information

We believe that our environmental, social and governance (“ESG”) policies and practices will create sustainable long-term value for Newmark, our stockholders and other stakeholders, our clients and our employees while also helping us mitigate risks, reduce costs, protect brand value, and identify market opportunities. We are embedding social and human capital, employment, environmental, sustainability, charitable and corporate governance policies and practices into our corporate strategy, compensation, disclosure, and goals to maintain and advance long-term stockholder value.

In November 2020, we established a Board-level ESG Committee to provide oversight with respect to our ESG policies and practices. The ESG Committee charter may be found on our website at https://ir.nmrk.com/disclaimer-and-legal-information under the heading “ESG Committee Charter.” With the Board’s and the ESG Committee’s oversight, we are embedding social and human capital, employment, environmental, sustainability, charitable and corporate governance policies and practices into our corporate strategy, compensation, disclosure, and goals to maintain and advance long-term stockholder value. In 2022, we established an Executive ESG Council, comprised of key Company executives, to provide direction for Newmark’s ESG progress and initiatives.

For more information about these topics, new and evolving initiatives and specific examples of policies and practices, see our website at https://www.nmrk.com/esg and “Additional ESG/Sustainability Information” below. Unless the context indicates otherwise, references in this ESG section to our “employees” includes our professionals who are independent contractors.

Our Fundamental Values

Newmark is an organization built on strong values, employee engagement and ownership. We value hard work, innovation, superior client service, strong ethics and governance, and equal opportunities. And, philanthropy is woven into our corporate culture. We believe these values foster sustainable, profitable growth. We strive to be exemplary corporate citizens and honor high ethical principles in our interactions with other businesses, our employees and the communities in which we live and work. We take corporate social responsibility and sustainability seriously: we want to contribute to the common good.

Set forth below is a discussion of many of our ESG and sustainability policies and practices. These are our values in action.

Human Capital and Social Policies and Practices

We are committed to our people, our stakeholders and the community as a whole. We have a variety of programs to incentivize and support our employees, from employee ownership to comprehensive benefits and training. We are also committed to equal opportunity, diversity and other policies and practices designed to fulfill our commitment to social and human capital development.

Attracting and Retaining the Best Talent

Our success depends on our ability to attract and retain talented, productive and skilled brokers, professionals, managers, other employees and independent contractors to transact with our clients in a challenging and regulated environment that is experiencing ever-increasing competition for talent. We are investing in creating a diverse, inclusive and incentivized work environment where our people can deliver their best work every day. In 2021, we were named by GlobeSt.com as one of commercial real estate’s “Best Places to Work.” Newmark is ranked #1 on LinkedIn’s 2022 “Top Companies in Real Estate” list, which ranks the top 25 companies at which to grow a career in the industry. We were also named by GlobeSt.com as one of commercial real estate’s “Best Places to Work” in 2021.

Flexible, Safe and Empowering Work Environment

In order to retain and hire additional workforce, we have increased our flexible work arrangements, where appropriate, and made compensation adjustments, established additional corporate opportunities and provided additional benefits, including 401(k) match.

We have taken significant measures to develop a safe work environment for all employees, which is conducive to work in our office locations, particularly for front-office brokers and revenue generating employees, subject to applicable state and local regulatory requirements. We have established a more flexible hybrid approach in many instances for non-revenue generating roles or for roles which are not office dependent, where appropriate. We have established vaccination requirements in accordance with applicable laws, including time-off for vaccines, coverage for COVID-19 testing and enhanced sick leave.

We have implemented measures to ensure the mental health and well-being of our employees during the pandemic, including increased access to Behavioral Health and Mental Health telemedicine, expanding access to Employee Assistance Program Services and providing employees with access to preventative mental health solutions.

We continue to take significant steps to protect our employees and encourage them all to be vaccinated.

Performance-Based and Highly Retentive Compensation Structure

Virtually all our key executives and producers have equity or partnership stakes in the Company and its subsidiaries. Generally, they receive deferred equity, limited partnership units or restricted stock units as part of their compensation. As of June 30, 2022, our employees and independent contractors, partners, executive officers and directors owned approximately 26% of our equity on a fully diluted basis.

We issue limited partnership units and other forms of equity-based compensation, such as restricted stock units, which:

The non-exchangeable partnership units held by our partners are subject to forfeiture (such as if the non-compete, confidentiality or non-solicit provisions of the Newmark Holdings limited partnership agreement are violated), and unvested restricted stock units are subject to service conditions that must be met in order for them to vest into shares of Newmark common stock. In addition, any partnership amounts paid following

termination of service generally are paid over a number of years to ensure compliance with post-termination partner obligations. This compensation structure has proven to be highly retentive.

We also enter into various agreements with certain of our employees, independent contractors and partners. Many of these individuals receive loans which may be either wholly or in part repaid from the earnings distributions that the individual receives on some or all of their LPUs or may be forgiven over time. These loans provide incentives and promote entrepreneurship and long-term engagement.

Clawbacks and Incentives

The partnership units issued to our executive officers, certain of which, such as PSUs or NPSUs, may be redeemed for zero at any time by the Compensation Committee, as well as partnership obligations under the Newmark Holdings Partnership Agreement, are retentive and provide broad discretion and significant clawback power to the Compensation Committee. Accordingly, we do not have a separate general compensation recovery or “clawback” policy for our executive officers or others. See “Compensation, Discussion and Analysis—Clawback, Forfeiture and Recoupment.”

To provide incentives and promote entrepreneurship and long-term engagement, we also enter into various agreements with certain of our employees, independent contractors and partners. Many of these individuals receive loans which may be either wholly or in part repaid from the earnings distributions that the individual receives on some or all of their LPUs or may be forgiven over time.

Employee Diversity, Inclusion and Equal Opportunity

We believe that by cultivating a dynamic mix of people and ideas, we enrich the performance of our businesses, the experience of our increasingly diverse employee base, and our unique communities. We are committed to equal opportunity, diversity and other policies and practices that seek to further our development of a diverse and inclusive workplace. We consider all qualified applicants for job openings and promotions without regard to race, color, religion, gender, sexual orientation, gender identity, national origin or ancestry, age, disability, service in the armed forces, or any other characteristic that has no bearing on the ability of employees to do their jobs well. We continue to develop initiatives to support these values and have implemented a policy that requires the inclusion of qualified, diverse candidates in the final round of interviews for leadership roles.

We are dedicated to our efforts to achieve pay equity. Our promotion and compensation processes are designed to enable us to treat employees fairly, and our compensation decisions are differentiated based on performance.

Newmark participates in the Corporate Equality Index, a national benchmarking tool measuring policies, practices and benefits pertinent to lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender and queer (LGBTQ+) employees and was recently named to GlobeSt.’s 2021 Women of Influence ‘Diversity Champion’ list.

Talent remains at the core of who we are as a company, and we remain committed to having a culture built around inclusion, equality and developing a diverse workforce. In 2020, we launched IDEA (Inclusion, Diversity, Equality and Access), a program designed to enhance our ability to attract, develop and retain top talent with an emphasis on increasing representation of traditionally underrepresented groups at all levels of the organization. Our goal is to build an even more successful organization that more closely reflects the population at large.

Our employee resource groups (“ERGs”) support the recruitment, development and retention of diverse professionals across our organization to advance our businesses and reputation. Our current ERGs are the Asian Pacific American Community, the Black Employee Network, the Latin American/Hispanic ERG, the Military Veterans ERG, Newmark Pride and the Network of Women. Our ERGs strive to offer a variety of opportunities and tools to help our employees make new professional contacts, find mentors and develop their careers. These events and activities also allow our employees to support one another through a valuable exchange of experiences, advice, and best practices for career success.

We are helping to shape future leaders from a wide variety of backgrounds. We actively participate in various initiatives, including the following:

We further participate in job fairs and job boards that are focused on reaching a diverse applicant pool. We are also an investor in a commercial real estate services firm that operates as E Smith Advisors, which is a certified minority-owned business enterprise offering a wide variety of real estate services in the U.S.

Employee Engagement, Communication, Management and Leadership Training and Development

We are investing in our employees’ long-term development and engagement by delivering training and development programs and a culture where our people can thrive and maximize their potential. We require annual training in workplace respect and inclusion, anti-money laundering and anti-crime and cyber-security among other topics. We also provide or support periodic job-specific and other developmental training and support for our employees so they can maximize their potential, as well as tuition reimbursement program to eligible employees.

We provide leadership training to managers on topics, including management effectiveness, writing and delivering effective performance evaluations, unconscious bias and various other topics. This training is supplemented by a comprehensive library of on-line training courses that managers and employees may access. Finally, our individual business lines offer ongoing learning and development opportunities tied to deepening the subject matter expertise of their professionals.

Our success depends on employees understanding how their work and engagement contribute to our strategy, culture, values and regulatory environment. We use various channels to facilitate open and direct communication, including internal calls and meetings with employees, training and policy updates, our ERGs, our IDEA program and our social and family outings and events.

Our Environmental Focus, Workplace Strategies and Sustainable Business Practices

We are focused on the environment and recognize the importance of treating our natural resources with the greatest respect, so that they are available to future generations. As a responsible business, we are acutely aware of climate change and other major issues affecting the environment. We also understand the impact commercial real estate can have on the health of the environment. That is why we encourage sustainable building practices, and in our Global Corporate Services business and Property Management assignments, recommend strategies to clients to maximize energy efficiency, recycle materials and limit waste. These goals apply to Newmark’s offices as well as to the work we do for our clients, whether in selecting a location, building out space or managing an asset.

In our workplaces, we are studying how to make our own contribution to state, national and global environmental initiatives and to expect the same of our vendors and suppliers when doing business with us. As part of this, we are considering how to minimize our future carbon footprint when planning office renovations and will continue to focus our attention in the near term on methods of reducing our greenhouse gas emissions, increasing use of renewable energy, conserving water, and reducing waste generation. Newmark is working with the landlords and property management teams that oversee the buildings we occupy to collect accurate and

actionable energy data. As this data becomes more available, Newmark plans to implement energy efficiency initiatives where possible that will help lower our overall carbon footprint. We are also investigating the purchase of renewable energy supply where possible in deregulated energy markets. For all new leased space for Newmark we generally consider green lease options and make sure the workplace is as sustainable as possible.

Newmark’s property, facilities and energy/sustainability management teams work internally and with clients to reduce energy demand and carbon emissions. Newmark is increasingly collecting and measuring environmental data and this data is used to build client strategies around energy efficiency and renewable energy supply initiatives.

Newmark supports sustainable business practices and is focused on the steps necessary to establish a sustainability program both internally and for our clients, and we have retained a nationally certified women-owned firm to assist our leadership in this endeavor. Building operations have a significant impact on the environment, and as technology continues to place greater demands on building systems for power and cooling, energy consumption is expected to continue to rise at an unsustainable rate. As one of the nation’s largest real estate service providers, we believe it is our responsibility to improve energy efficiency and reduce energy consumption to protect the environment through continuous improvement of building practices. We understand that sustainable buildings provide a better work environment, increase building efficiency and reduce the environmental impact of building operations. We continue to work on these initiatives.

Environmental Policy and Energy and Sustainable Service Reference Guide

We have a policy with respect to the responsible environmental management of our operations. We are creating a baseline to understand and minimize the impact that our business has on the environment and have begun to actively search for ways to reduce our footprint. We are pursuing traditional, as well as new and innovative, methods to achieve our goals. We are seeking to create a culture where environmental focus is a way of being rather than a secondary consideration.

Further information on our policy can be found on our website at the following link: https://www.nmrk.com/esg under the heading “Environmental Policy.”

Newmark has also developed an Energy and Sustainability Services Reference Guide which is available at https://www.nmrk.com/storage-nmrk/uploads/documents/Newmark-Energy-and-Sustainability-Services-Guide_2021-11-16-201727.pdf which assists clients and property teams in reducing the environmental impact of property operations, maintenance and construction associated with real estate assets.

For more information about these initiatives and services provided to clients and within our own facilities as they evolve, please refer to our website at https://www.nmrk.com/esg.

Business Continuity and Resiliency

We are implementing additional sustainability policies and practices to protect the continuity of our business and operations to maintain and advance long-term stockholder value. These policies and practices include disaster recovery and crisis management protocols to minimize the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic and other health emergencies and natural or other disasters on our operations. We maintain concurrent data centers in the United States, providing backup of our computer systems and capacity for our employees to work remotely during crises. These policies and practices enable our employees to maintain a high level of performance while working in offices or remotely during the COVID-19 pandemic in compliance with relevant rules and regulations in applicable jurisdictions, and in preservation of the health, safety and welfare of our workforce.

Charitable Policies and Practices

Never has our commitment to our people and others been so evident as in our corporate giving and charitable work. Honoring the events of September 11, 2001, the Company currently matches 100% of individual employee donations to The Cantor Fitzgerald Relief Fund made in September of each year up to $5,000 per individual employee. Employees have the option of designating a bona-fide charity as the beneficiary of the donation and the match. Additional charitable initiatives are in effect from time to time.

In 2022, Newmark announced a Ukraine relief program with the Company matching 100% of employee, broker and client donations up to $1 million to the Cantor Fitzgerald Relief Fund to support direct relief efforts through charity partners in neighboring countries.

Newmark actively encourages our brokers, managers and other employees to support the communities in which we live and operate through volunteerism and philanthropy. In 2021, we supported hospitals, universities, food banks and community-based organizations focused on childhood development and education and programs for the disabled, families and the financially disadvantaged. Some of the charities include: American Cancer Society, Big Brothers, Big Sisters, Boston Children’s Hospital, Boys & Girls Clubs, Breaking Ground, Community Builders, Creative Art Works, Food First, Homes Fit for Heroes, LA Regional Food Bank, Junior Achievement, Medal of Honor Museum, National Kidney Foundation, Northern Virginia Family Services, Pace University and United Jewish Appeal.

We actively encourage volunteerism from our people and we proudly support our clients in their charitable efforts. To encourage our professionals to engage in civic and charitable efforts, we have a matching program for charities that fit within Newmark’s overall charitable mission.

As part of these values in action, we offer a Volunteer Time Off program to support individual employee volunteerism in the communities in which they work and live. All full and part-time regular employees are eligible to utilize one paid workday (whole day or two half-days) each calendar year to volunteer with bona fide charitable organizations of their choice. Participation is growing and as office life normalizes and pandemic measures begin to recede, we will encourage broader use of this benefit and participation by employees in charitable and community service activities within all of our office communities.

We also support victims of disasters and sometimes our volunteers travel to those in need. For example, a group of more than 200 volunteers drawn from The Cantor Fitzgerald Relief Fund, employee volunteers from Newmark and its affiliates and many friends from the New York community and clients from Banco Santander and Scotiabank, traveled to Puerto Rico to aid in its recovery from Hurricanes Irma and Maria. This operation distributed $4 million in $1,000 prepaid cards to thousands of families still suffering from the devastation.

Additional information about all of our charitable efforts is available at https://www.nmrk.com/esg/social.

Corporate Governance Policies and Practices

Our commitment to good corporate governance policies and practices is demonstrated by our Corporate Governance Guidelines, our rigorous Code of Business Conduct and Ethics (the “Code of Ethics”), the charters of the Audit, Compensation and ESG Committees of our Board, our Hedging Policy and our other corporate governance policies and practices. Some highlights of our corporate governance policies and practices include the following:

Board Diversity Matrix

The table below provides certain highlights of the composition of our Board members as of August 15, 2022. Each of the categories listed in the below table has the meaning as it is used in Nasdaq Rule 5605(f).

Whistleblower Complaint and Investigation Procedures for Accounting, Internal Controls, Auditing Matters and Employment and Labor Practices

We have a policy regarding reporting of complaints about accounting, internal controls, employment and labor practices, auditing matters, or questionable financial practices. The policy is designed to provide a channel of communication for employees and others who have concerns about our conduct or any of our directors or employees. Complaints are treated seriously and handled expeditiously. Any person may submit a complaint to our independent outside law firm to a dedicated hotline and email account available 24 hours a day, 7 days a week. Complaints that are accounting or financial in nature (“Accounting Complaints”) will be handled by the Chair of our Audit Committee and by our Chief Legal Officer, Corporate Secretary or designee.

Employees submitting an Accounting Complaint need not provide their names or other personal information and reasonable efforts will be used to conduct the investigation that follows from an Accounting Complaint from an employee in a manner that protects the confidentiality and anonymity of the employees submitting the Complaint.

Employees are reminded of the Whistleblower Policy at least annually and information is provided in local languages. We honor a culture of investigation, confidentiality and non-retaliation. Persons submitting complaints in good faith will not be subject to retaliation and the policy does not prohibit other actions protected under applicable law. Our whistleblower policy is publicly available on our website at https://www.nmrk.com/esg/governance under the heading “Whistleblower Complaint and Investigation Procedures for Accounting, Internal Controls, Auditing Matters and Employment and Labor Practices.”

Code of Business Conduct and Ethics and Professional Integrity

Our corporate values and strong policies and procedures regarding ethics, conflicts of interests, related party transactions and similar matters are contained in our Code of Ethics. This commitment applies to members of our Board, executive officers, other officers and our other covered employees globally. The Code of Ethics and its training modules are circulated in local languages and training and certifications are conducted annually for all employees. Annual written certifications are required. Potential violations and disclosures globally are reviewed annually by executive management and escalated to the Audit Committee. Director and executive officer

disclosures are reviewed by the Audit Committee on an annual basis. The Code of Ethics is available on our website at https://www.nmrk.com/esg/governance under the heading “Code of Business Conduct and Ethics and Professional Integrity.” In 2021, we adopted a global anti-bribery and corruption policy. See “Compliance and Anti-Financial Crime Policy and Bribery and Corruption” below.

Compliance and Anti-Financial Crime Policy and Bribery and Corruption

We are committed globally to our policy regarding anti-money laundering and anti-financial crime, including anti-bribery and corruption, counter-terrorism financing and anti-fraud. We are committed to compliance and training regarding all relevant laws, rules, and regulations designed to combat bribery and corruption, including, but not limited to, the UK Bribery Act of 2010 and the U.S. Foreign Corrupt Practices Act of 1977 as amended. Further information on this policy can be found on our website at the following link: https://www.nmrk.com/esg/governance under the heading “Compliance & Anti-Financial Crime Policy” and “Compliance and Anti-Financial Crime Policy and Bribery and Corruption.”

In addition, our Code of Ethics provides that we will not enter into a business relationship or engage in an activity if we know or have reasonable grounds to suspect that a business relationship or activity is connected with or facilitates bribery or corruption. It is the responsibility of each person covered under the Code of Ethics to comply with applicable anti-bribery and corruption laws. Persons covered under the Code of Ethics are required to report any suspicions of bribery or corruption to the Compliance Officer or, as appropriate, to the Audit Committee or the Board, or in accordance with our Whistleblower Policy. For more information on our Code of Ethics and Whistleblower Policy, see the section entitled “Code of Ethics and Whistleblower Procedures.”

2021 Global Anti-Bribery and Corruption Policy

In 2021, we implemented a global policy to combat bribery and corruption through a clear set of policies and procedures outlining anti-bribery and corruption standards, procedures and annual employee training. The policy specifically defines Bribery and Corruption and provides for management and Board oversight. Further information on this policy can be found on our website at the following link: https://www.nmrk.com/esg/governance under the heading “2021 Global Anti-Bribery and Corruption Policy.”

Compliance & Anti-Financial Crime Policy

We are committed on a Company-wide basis to our policy regarding anti-money laundering and anti-financial crime, including anti-bribery and corruption, counter-terrorism financing and anti-fraud. Further information on this policy can be found on our website at the following link: https://www.nmrk.com/esg/governance under the heading “Compliance & Anti-Financial Crime Policy.”

Annual Risk Evaluation and Board-Level Risk Oversight

The Board of Directors meets at least annually with our senior risk officer to review and evaluate our enterprise risk framework, risk management policies and practices, credit and risk mitigation policies and practices, and other related issues.

Focus on our Internal Control Environment

As described more fully in its Charter, the primary function of the Audit Committee is to assist the Board of Directors in its general oversight of the Company’s financial reporting, internal control over financial reporting and audit process. Management is responsible for the preparation, presentation and integrity of the Company’s financial statements; accounting and financial reporting principles; internal control over financial reporting; disclosure controls; and procedures designed to ensure compliance with accounting standards, applicable laws and regulations.

In particular, our overall control environment is a focal point for our management, the Audit Committee and the Board. With this focus and with the oversight of the Audit Committee and the Board, management has taken steps to further enhance our overall control environment.

Cyber-Security and Information Security Program

We are committed on a Company-wide basis to combating the global threat of cyber-attacks and to securing our business through our information security programs to operate with confidence, through a deep understanding of cyber-security risks, vulnerabilities, mitigations, and threats. We have a global cyber-security program applicable to all subsidiaries and business lines. We conduct periodic internal and external vulnerability audits and assessments and penetration testing and provide periodic training to employees and independent contractors. Further information on this program can be found on our website at the following link: https://www.nmrk.com/esg/governance under the heading “Cyber-Security and Information Security Program.”

Data Privacy Program

We have a global data privacy program applicable to all subsidiaries and business lines. We are committed to conducting our business in line with the right to privacy set forth in the Universal Declaration of Human Rights (Article 12). As such, we are committed to handling personal data responsibly and recognize the privacy rights of persons involved in our business dealings. Our policy provides a mechanism for data subjects to raise concerns about personal data and privacy as well as a right of access to personal information, rights to correct or amend such information and the right to request deletion of such personal information. Further information on this program can be found on our website at the following link: https://www.nmrk.com/esg/governance under the heading “Data Privacy Program.”

Hedging Policy

We have a policy with respect to hedging of equity securities issued by Newmark (collectively, “Company Equity Securities”). In this regard, we prohibit our directors and employees, including our officers, from purchasing financial instruments (including prepaid variable forward contracts, equity swaps, collars, and exchange funds), or otherwise engaging in transactions that are designed to or have the effect of hedging or offsetting any decrease in the market value of Company Equity Securities held by such persons, except with the explicit approval of our Audit Committee or its designees. For avoidance of doubt, Cantor and its affiliated entities or any securities issued by such entities other than Newmark are not covered under this Hedging Policy.

Additional ESG / Sustainability Information

To learn more about these policies and practices and our continuing efforts related to ESG and sustainability matters, please refer to the ESG / sustainability section of our website at https://www.nmrk.com/esg and to our periodic reports filed under the Exchange Act for further information. You may also find our Corporate Governance Guidelines, Code of Ethics, the charters of the committees of our Board of Directors, Hedging Policy, Environmental Policy, information about our charitable initiatives and other sustainability and ESG policies and practices on our website. The information contained on, or that may be accessed through, our website, is not part of, and not incorporated into this Proxy Statement.

STOCKHOLDER ENGAGEMENT

Our Board of Directors and management value the opportunity to engage with our stockholders and gain insight year-round on their views on a broad range of topics, including our strategy, financial performance, executive compensation, corporate governance, human capital management, including diversity and inclusion, and environmental and social goals. Our Board of Directors receives reporting on feedback from investors and stockholder voting results. In addition, our management routinely engages with investors at conferences and other forums. We also speak with proxy advisors to discuss, and receive feedback on, our governance practices and executive compensation programs. Feedback from investors informs the Board’s ongoing review of governance and compensation matters.

In recent years, we have also enhanced our engagement strategy through:

Over the 18-month period ended June 30, 2022, we reached out to institutions who collectively represented the majority of Newmark shares held by active investors. These interactions covered topics including industry trends, business trends and strategy, capital allocation, geographic and business line expansion, our recruitment and retention policies, key drivers of our growth, ESG, corporate governance matters, board composition and diversity, our executive compensation program, and ways to enhance our disclosures. We also periodically engage a third-party research firm to conduct anonymous surveys of our top institutional owners and the broader investment community to solicit candid feedback on these and other issues.

We look forward to further expanding our communication with stockholders and will continue to consider their views and perspectives, as appropriate, in making governance decisions and establishing strategic direction for the Company going forward.

INFORMATION ABOUT OUR EXECUTIVE OFFICERS

Our executive officers are appointed annually by and serve at the discretion of our Board. In addition to Mr. Lutnick, who serves as Chairman of our Board and our principal executive officer, our executive officers, their respective ages and positions, and certain other information with respect to each of them are as follows:

Barry M. Gosin, 71, has served as our Chief Executive Officer since 1979 and a principal since 1978. Mr. Gosin guides our national and global expansion initiatives and oversees all facets of our day-to-day operations. Mr. Gosin spearheaded our merger with BGC and has since led our acquisition and hiring efforts and increased our annual revenues by over 10 times. An active industry and community leader, Mr. Gosin serves as a member of the Board of Directors of the Partnership for New York City, Trustee of the Citizens Budget Commission, and Trustee of Pace University.

Michael J. Rispoli, 50, has served as our Chief Financial Officer since 2012. As head of the finance and accounting departments, Mr. Rispoli steers our financial activities, with a focus on managing risk and monitoring cash flow. His responsibilities include financial planning and forecasting, accounting, financial reporting, financial due diligence, and analysis and integration of acquisitions. Mr. Rispoli also provides services to our operating partnership and subsidiaries. Prior to joining Newmark, Mr. Rispoli was the Chief Financial Officer of Grubb & Ellis from August 2010 to April 2012 and had served in various capacities with such firm since May 2007. Mr. Rispoli served as executive director and corporate controller at Conexant Systems, Inc. from 2000 to 2007. Mr. Rispoli began his career at PricewaterhouseCoopers as manager of business assurance. Mr. Rispoli is a licensed CPA in the State of New Jersey (inactive).

Stephen M. Merkel, 64, has been our Executive Vice President, Chief Legal Officer and Assistant Corporate Secretary since January 2019 and was our Corporate Secretary from December 2017 to January 2019. Mr. Merkel has been Executive Managing Director, General Counsel and Secretary of Cantor since December 2000 and was Senior Vice President, General Counsel and Secretary of Cantor from May 1993 to December 2000. He joined Cantor in 1993 and oversees all legal and compliance functions. Mr. Merkel has been Executive Vice President and General Counsel of BGC since September 2001 and was its Senior Vice President, General Counsel and Secretary from June 1999 to September 2001. Mr. Merkel was BGC’s Secretary from June 1999 to January 2019. Prior to joining Cantor, Mr. Merkel was Vice President and Assistant General Counsel at Goldman Sachs & Co. from February 1990 to May 1993. From September 1985 to January 1990, Mr. Merkel was an associate with the law firm of Paul, Weiss, Rifkind, Wharton & Garrison. Mr. Merkel is a founding member of the Board of Directors of the Wholesale Markets Brokers’ Association, Americas. Mr. Merkel graduated with a B.A. magna cum laude from the University of Pennsylvania and received his law degree from the University of Michigan School of Law.

EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION INFORMATION

Introduction

Separation and Spin-Off of the Company

On December 19, 2017, the Company, which had previously been a wholly owned subsidiary of BGC Partners, completed its initial public offering (“IPO”). Through the following series of transactions prior to and following the completion of the Separation (as defined below) and the IPO, Newmark became a separate publicly traded company. Prior to the closing of the IPO, on December 13, 2017, BGC Partners, BGC Holdings, BGC U.S. OpCo, the Company, Newmark Holdings, Newmark OpCo and, solely for the provisions listed therein, Cantor and BGC Global OpCo entered into the separation and distribution agreement (as amended on November 8, 2018 and amended and restated on November 23, 2018, the “Separation and Distribution Agreement”). Pursuant to the Separation and Distribution Agreement, BGC, BGC Holdings and BGC U.S. OpCo and their respective subsidiaries (other than the Newmark group (defined below), the “BGC group”) transferred to the Company, Newmark Holdings and Newmark OpCo and their respective subsidiaries (the “Newmark group”) the assets and liabilities of the BGC group relating to BGC’s Real Estate Services business (such series of transactions that resulted in the transfer are herein referred to as the “Separation”). For more information on our IPO and transactions and agreements related to the Separation and the IPO, see “Certain Relationships and Related Transactions, and Director Independence—Separation, Initial Public Offering, and Spin-Off.”

On November 30, 2018, BGC Partners completed its previously announced pro-rata distribution (the “Spin- Off”) to its stockholders of all of the shares of our common stock owned by BGC Partners as of immediately prior to the effective time of the Spin-Off. In addition, BGC Partners also caused its subsidiary, BGC Holdings, to distribute pro rata (the “BGC Holdings distribution”) all of the exchangeable limited partnership units of Newmark Holdings held by BGC Holdings immediately prior to the effective time of the BGC Holdings distribution to its limited partners entitled to receive distributions on their BGC Holdings units. Following the Spin-Off and the BGC Holdings distribution, BGC Partners ceased to be our controlling stockholder, and BGC Partners and its subsidiaries no longer held any shares of our common stock or other equity interests in us or our subsidiaries. For more information on the Spin-Off, see “Certain Relationships and Related Transactions, and Director Independence—Separation, Initial Public Offering, and Spin-Off—the Spin-Off.”

In connection with our IPO in December 2017, we established the Equity Plan and the Incentive Plan, under which the Compensation Committee of our Board of Directors may pay compensation in the form of cash, shares of our common stock or other equity awards, to our directors, executive officers or other officers or employees. We also maintain the Participation Plan, under which the Committee may award Newmark Holdings units to our directors, executive officers or other officers or employees. Prior to the IPO, our executive officers received awards under the BGC compensation plans.

Effect of the Separation and Spin-Off on Executive Compensation

Prior to our IPO, we did not have a Board of Directors or a Compensation Committee. As such, compensation decisions prior to December 2017 were made by the BGC Board of Directors and the Compensation Committee, in the case of Mr. Lutnick, who is also an executive officer of BGC, and by Mr. Lutnick, in the case of Messrs. Gosin and Rispoli, who were not executive officers of BGC. Following our IPO, our executive compensation program was designed and implemented by the Compensation Committee of our Board of Directors and is described below. For 2019, 2020 and 2021, year-end compensation for each of our executive officers, including compensation awarded under our Participation Plan, Equity Plan and Incentive Plan (collectively, the “Newmark Compensation Plans”), was determined by our Compensation Committee.

In connection with the Separation, interests in Newmark Holdings were distributed to holders of interests in BGC Holdings in proportion to such interests of BGC Holdings held by such holders immediately prior to the Separation. Due to such distribution, any BGC Holdings-related interest that existed as of December 13, 2017 also included 0.454545 of a Newmark Holdings-related interest, and any redemption or exchange of a BGC

Holdings-related interest prior to the Spin-Off must also have included the redemption or exchange of the associated ratable portion of a Newmark Holdings-related interest. This 0.454545 figure was based on what the distribution ratio would have been had the Spin-Off occurred immediately following the IPO.

As a result of the Separation, and due to the fact that (i) certain BGC awards granted pursuant to the BGC compensation plans prior to the Separation became, upon the Separation, awards of interests in both BGC Holdings and Newmark Holdings, when we refer generally to partnership units that may be awarded as part of compensation (i.e., NPSUs, PSUs, PPSUs, LPUs and PLPUs), we are referring to such units as may be awarded under both the BGC compensation plans and the Newmark Compensation Plans, and when we refer to specific awards, we are referring to awards under the Newmark Compensation Plans, unless otherwise indicated.

In connection with the Spin-Off, holders of BGC Partners restricted stock awards participated in the distribution as if such holders held unrestricted shares of BGC Partners common stock, and following the Spin-Off, any shares of Newmark common stock issued in respect of restricted BGC Partners common stock remained subject to any vesting, lapse or forfeiture restrictions applicable to the restricted BGC Partners shares prior to the Spin-Off. Restricted stock unit (“RSU”) awards outstanding at the time under the Seventh Amended and Restated BGC Partners, Inc. Long Term Incentive Plan (the “BGC Equity Plan”) at the time of the Spin-Off were adjusted so that each holder of a BGC Partners RSU award continued to hold a BGC RSU award covering BGC Partners Class A common shares, but also received a Newmark RSU award covering Newmark Class A common shares on an “as distributed basis” in order to reflect the impact of the Spin-Off on the pre-Spin-Off BGC Partners RSU awards. Such RSUs generally have the same terms, including vesting terms, as the pre-Spin-Off BGC Partners RSU awards, subject to any adjustments made by the Compensation Committee of the BGC Partners Board of Directors.

COMPENSATION DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS

Background

Our principal executive officer for 2021 was our Chairman, Howard W. Lutnick. Our other three most highly compensated executive officers for 2021 were Barry M. Gosin, Stephen M. Merkel and Michael J. Rispoli. For 2019, 2020 and 2021, executive compensation was determined and approved by our Compensation Committee for all executive officers.

For 2019, 2020 and 2021, the compensation determined and approved by our Compensation Committee for Newmark matters for Messrs. Lutnick, Gosin, Rispoli and Merkel is reflected in full below. In each case compensation includes salary, other cash compensation and non-cash compensation.

The following compensation discussion and analysis describes the material elements of our executive compensation program for 2021, including aspects of our executive compensation program which were designed and implemented by the Compensation Committee of our Board of Directors in December 2021, at which time 2021 year-end compensation decisions with respect to each of our executive officers were reviewed and approved.

The one-time December 2021 bonus award to Mr. Lutnick approved by the Compensation Committee on December 27, 2021 is separately discussed below under the heading “2021 Lutnick Award.”

Compensation Philosophy

Our executive compensation program, which is under the direction and control of our Compensation Committee, is designed to integrate compensation with the achievement of our short- and long-term business objectives and to assist it in attracting, motivating and retaining the highest quality executive officers and rewarding them for superior performance. Different components of our executive compensation program are geared to short- and longer-term performance, with the goal of increasing stockholder value over the long-term.

We believe that the compensation of our executive officers should reflect their success in attaining key corporate objectives, such as growth or maintenance of market position, success in attracting and retaining qualified brokers and other professionals, increasing or maintaining revenues and/or profitability, developing new products and marketplaces, completing acquisitions, dispositions, restructurings, and other value-enhancing transactions and integrating any such transactions, as applicable, meeting established goals for operating earnings, earnings per share and increasing the total return for stockholders, including stock price and/or dividend increases, and maintaining and developing customer relationships and long-term competitive advantage. Such objectives may also include the ability to respond to extraordinary events and manage the business under changing health, environmental, microeconomic and financial circumstances.

We also believe that executive compensation should also reflect achievement of individual managerial objectives established for specific executive officers at the beginning of the fiscal year as well as reflect specific achievements by such individuals over the course of the year, such as development of specific products or customer relationships or executing or integrating specific acquisitions, dispositions and other strategic arrangements. We further believe that specific significant events led by executives, including acquisitions, dispositions, management activities that create significant value and other significant transactions, should also be given significant weight. We believe that the performance of our executives in managing our Company, and in the provision of services to our operating partnerships and subsidiaries, considered in light of general economic and specific company, industry and competitive conditions, should be the basis for determining their overall compensation.

Although reviewed by the Committee, our policy is generally that the compensation of our executive officers should not be based on the short-term performance of our Class A common stock, whether favorable or unfavorable, since we believe that the price of our Class A common stock will, in the long-term, reflect our

overall performance and, ultimately, our management by our executives. Long-term stock performance is reflected in executive compensation through the grant of various equity and partnership awards as described below.

Our Compensation Committee is aware that certain of our executive officers, including Messrs. Lutnick and Merkel, also receive compensation from our affiliates, including Cantor and BGC Partners, for services rendered to each of them, but it generally does not specifically review the nature or amount of such compensation. Messrs. Lutnick’s and Merkel’s overall compensation from BGC Partners is reviewed and approved by the compensation committee of the BGC Partners board of directors and not by our Compensation Committee.

None of our executive officers has received any compensation for serving on our Board of Directors or on the board of directors of BGC Partners.

Overview of Compensation and Processes

For 2021, executive compensation was composed of the following principal components: (i) a base salary, which is designed to retain talented executive officers and contribute to motivating, retaining and rewarding individual performance; (ii) an incentive bonus award that is intended to tie financial rewards to the achievement of the Company’s short- or longer-term performance objectives; and (iii) an incentive program that is designed to promote the achievement of short- and long-term performance goals and to align the long-term interests of executive officers with those of stockholders through the grant of awards. In all cases, performance objectives and goals relate to the performance of our executives at the Company and in the provision of services to our operating partnerships and subsidiaries.

From time to time, we may also restructure the existing partnership, equity and compensation arrangements of our executive officers as described below. We may also adopt various policies related to or in addition to such restructurings, including with respect to the grant of exchange rights, other monetization of awards, and the acceleration of the lapse of restrictions on restricted stock. We may also issue potential extraordinary grants to executive officers which may or may not be based on prior results or other performance measures, including stock price increase or other measures to be specified.

From time to time, we have also used employment agreements, change of control agreements, retention agreements, and other arrangements, including some with specified target or guaranteed bonus components, and extraordinary bonuses to attract, motivate and retain talented executives. Any such arrangements with the executive officers are summarized below.

Our Compensation Committee, with the assistance where appropriate of special project committees and advisors, approves, and recommends to our Board of Directors, that it approve the salaries, bonuses and other compensation of our executive officers. In addition, the Committee approves grants to executive officers under and otherwise administers our Incentive Plan, our Equity Plan and our Participation Plan.

From time to time, the Compensation Committee has engaged a compensation consultant in connection with its compensation decisions. With respect to 2021, Korn Ferry advised the Committee with respect to ordinary year-end compensation and Aon Human Capital Solutions practice (“Aon”) advised the Committee with respect to the 2021 one-time bonus award to Mr. Lutnick described below under the heading “2021 Lutnick Award.” Aon and Korn Ferry are together referred to as the “Compensation Advisors.” The Committee retained Korn Ferry to provide surveys, information, and other assistance with respect to pay practices and compensation levels at the Company’s peer group and other companies, and the Committee discussed with Korn Ferry all ordinary year-end compensation arrangements for 2021. While the Committee does take into consideration such peer data, the Committee does not attempt to benchmark executive compensation against any level, range, or percentile of compensation paid at any other companies, does not apply any specific measures of internal or external pay equity in reaching its conclusions, and does not employ tally sheets, wealth accumulation, or similar tools in its analysis. The Committee considered whether the Compensation Advisors had any conflicts of interest in advising

the Committee. The Committee considered whether the Compensation Advisors had been providing services of any other nature to the Company; the amount of fees received from the Company by the Compensation Advisors; the policies and procedures adopted by the Compensation Advisors that have been designed to prevent conflicts of interest; whether any business or personal relationships existed between the consultants employed by the Compensation Advisors who worked on Company matters and any member of the Committee; whether any business or personal relationship existed between such consultants and any of our executive officers; and whether the Compensation Advisors or such consultants hold any of our Class A common stock. The Compensation Advisors also provide services to the compensation committee of the board of directors of BGC Partners from time to time. Upon evaluating such considerations, the Committee found no conflicts of interest in either of the Compensation Advisors advising the Committee.

Our policy for allocating between currently paid short- and long-term compensation is designed to ensure adequate base compensation to attract and retain talented executive officers, while providing incentives to maximize long-term value for our Company and our stockholders. Cash compensation is provided in the form of base salary to meet competitive salary norms and reward superior performance on an annual basis, and in the form of bonuses and awards for achievement of specific short-term goals or in the discretion of the Compensation Committee. Equity and partnership awards reward superior performance against specific objectives and long-term strategic goals and assist in retaining executive officers and aligning their interests with those of our Company and our stockholders. From time to time, we may provide additional equity or partnership awards on a periodic basis to reward superior performance, which awards may provide further long-term retention opportunities.

Base salaries for the following year are generally set for our executive officers at the year-end meetings of the Compensation Committee or in the early part of the applicable year. At these meetings, the Committee also approves incentive bonuses under the Incentive Plan and any discretionary bonuses and grants of equity and partnership awards under our Equity Plan and the Participation Plan to our executive officers.

At or around the year-end Compensation Committee meetings, our Chairman, Mr. Lutnick, makes compensation recommendations to the Committee with respect to the other executive officers. Such executive officers are not present at the time of these deliberations. With respect to its determination of the Chairman’s compensation, the Committee shall consider such information received from the Chairman as it deems necessary or appropriate. The Committee deliberates separately in executive sessions with Korn Ferry as to all executive officers other than Mr. Lutnick in the presence of Mr. Lutnick, and separately in executive sessions with Korn Ferry as to all executive officers, including Mr. Lutnick. The Committee may accept or adjust Mr. Lutnick’s recommendations and makes the sole determination of the compensation of all of our executive officers. In accordance with our Corporate Governance Guidelines, the Committee shall review and evaluate, at least annually, the performance and leadership of Mr. Lutnick as Chairman and Mr. Gosin as CEO. Based upon the results of this evaluation, and input from Korn Ferry, the Committee reviews and approves Mr. Lutnick’s and Mr. Gosin’s compensation.

During the first quarter of each fiscal year, the practice of our Compensation Committee is to establish annual incentive performance goals and guidelines for all executive officers under the Incentive Plan, with the Committee retaining negative discretion to reduce or withhold any bonuses earned at the end of the year. All executive officers in office at that time are eligible to participate in the Incentive Plan. In all cases, such performance goals relate to the performance of our executive officers at the Company and in the provision of services to our operating partnership and subsidiaries.

We provide long-term incentives to our executive officers through the grants of limited partnership units under the Participation Plan and exchange rights or cash settlement awards in connection with such partnership units and restricted stock and other equity grants under the Equity Plan. In addition, executive officers may receive a portion of their Incentive Plan bonuses in equity or partnership awards, rather than cash, with the number of awards determined by reference to the market price of a share of our Class A common stock on the date that the award is granted or such other date that awards to executive officers are made generally. Grants

under our Equity Plan and our Participation Plan have vesting provisions that are time-based, rather than performance-based, vesting schedules, although both plans are flexible enough to provide for performance-based awards.

In designing and implementing our executive compensation program, our Compensation Committee considers our operating and financial objectives, including our risk profile, and the effect that our executive compensation decisions will have on encouraging our executive officers to take an appropriate level of business, operational and market risk consistent with our overall goal of enhancing long-term stockholder value. In particular, the Committee considers those risks identified in our risk factors and the known trends and uncertainties identified in our management discussion and analysis, and considers how our executive compensation program serves to achieve its operating, financial and other strategic objectives while at the same time mitigating any incentives for executive officers to engage in excessive risk-taking to achieve short-term results that may not be sustainable in the long-term. Our Committee may also consider specific performance measures or grants based on specific events or particular strategic efforts or transactions.

In attempting to strike this balance, our Compensation Committee seeks to provide executive officers with an appropriately diversified mix of fixed and variable cash and non-cash compensation opportunities, time-based and performance-based awards, and short- and long-term incentives. In particular, our performance-based bonuses under our Incentive Plan focus on a mix of Company-wide and product-specific operating and financial metrics, in some cases based upon our absolute performance and in other cases based upon our performance relative to our peer group or other companies. In addition, the Incentive Plan award opportunities provide for the exercise of considerable negative discretion by the Committee to reduce, but not increase, amounts granted to executive officers under the Incentive Plan, and to take individual as well as corporate performance into account in exercising that discretion. Further, the Committee retains the discretion to pay out any amounts finally awarded under the Incentive Plan in equity or partnership awards, rather than cash, and to include restrictions on vesting, resale and forfeiture in any such equity or partnership awards.

Discretionary and Retentive Partnership Opportunities

To incentivize executive officers and hold them accountable to stockholders, our Compensation Committee uses a variety of highly retentive partnership units under the Participation Plan. These partnership awards are granted as a tax-efficient, strongly retentive, and risk-appropriate means to align the interests of the executive officers with those of our long-term stockholders. For executive officers, these grants may include NPSUs, along with PSUs and PPSUs, and the Committee believes that the features of the units, coupled with the discretion of the Committee to grant the right of partnership distributions, exchangeability into shares of Class A common stock of Newmark, and various liquidity opportunities, create a best-in-class form of incentive award for our executives. Until such units are made exchangeable into a share of Class A common stock or exchanged for cash or, in some cases, made exchangeable into another partnership unit with a capital account such as a HDU, at the discretion of the Committee, these units are generally forfeitable for any reason, subject to certain exceptions. We believe this incentivizes performance. These partnership units may be redeemed for zero by the Committee at its discretion. Traditionally, the Committee generally has not granted options and equity-based awards such as RSUs to executives and emphasized instead these flexible and retentive limited partnership units. The Committee has recently granted NPSUs, along with PSUs/PPSUs, and HDUs, provided as long-term incentives to executive officers, which awards are generally coupled with performance-based grants of exchange rights and cash settlement awards. Certain of our executive officers have previously received BGC Holdings NPSUs and received Newmark Holdings NPSUs in connection with the Separation. The Committee may consider RSUs and options, as well as partnership units and other forms of compensation, in future grants.

NPSUs have no value for accounting or other purposes at the time of grant, do not participate in quarterly partnership distributions, are not allocated any items of profit or loss and may not be made exchangeable into shares of Class A common stock. NPSU awards are highly discretionary and provide additional flexibility for the Compensation Committee to determine the timing and circumstances of replacing such units with units that earn partnership distributions and any rights to exchange such units for shares of Class A common stock or cash.

NPSUs have generally been granted to our executives as mid-year grants or in connection with execution of long- term employment arrangements.

From time to time, our Compensation Committee may choose to replace a NPSU with a non-exchangeable PSU or HDU. A non-exchangeable PSU may also be replaced with a non-exchangeable HDU. A non-exchangeable PSU that has been granted the right to convert into a non-exchangeable HDU is referred to as a “PSU-H,” and a non-exchangeable PPSU that has been granted the right to be converted into cash upon conversion of the underlying PSU-H into an HDU is referred to as a “PPSU-H.” PSUs participate in quarterly partnership distributions, but otherwise generally have no value for accounting purposes and are not exchangeable into shares of Class A common stock until such exchange rights are granted by the Committee. HDUs have a stated capital account and are valued based upon such capital account which is initially based on the closing trading price of Class A common stock at the time the HDU right is granted. HDUs participate in quarterly partnership distributions and are not exchangeable into shares of Class A common stock unless such exchange rights are granted by the Committee.

Executive officers may also receive PPSUs. These units are preferred limited partnership units that may be awarded to holders of, or contemporaneously with, the grant of PSUs. PPSUs are entitled to a preferred distribution of net profits of Newmark Holdings and/or BGC Holdings, as applicable, but otherwise are not entitled to participate in quarterly distributions. PPSUs cannot be made exchangeable into shares of Class A common stock, can only be exchanged for cash, at the determination price on the date of grant, in connection with an exchange of the related PSUs or HDUs, and therefore are not included in our fully diluted share count. PPSUs are expected to provide a mechanism for issuing fewer aggregate share equivalents than traditionally issued in connection with our compensation and to have a lesser overall impact on our fully diluted share count. The ratio of the grant of PPSUs to traditional units (e.g., PSUs) is expected to approximate the compensatory tax rate applicable in the relevant country jurisdiction of the partner recipient. The determination price used to exchange PPSUs for cash is determined by the Compensation Committee on the date the grant of such unit and is based on a closing trading price of Class A common stock identified by the Committee on such date.

Over time, as compensation goals are met and other incentives are reached by the executives, the Compensation Committee may choose, in its sole discretion, to grant an exchange right with respect to a PSU, thereby creating a potential liquidity event for the executive and creating a value for accounting purposes. The life cycle of these units, as they may evolve from NPSUs to shares of Class A common stock, provides the Committee and the Board of Directors with superior opportunities to retain and incentivize executives and employees in a tax-efficient and discretionary manner.

Until non-exchangeable units are made exchangeable into a share of Class A common stock or exchanged for cash at the discretion of the Committee, they are generally forfeitable for any reason, subject to certain exceptions. We believe this incentivizes performance.

Our executive officers have much of their personal net worth in a combination of our equity-based awards and non-exchangeable and exchangeable limited partnership units. Messrs. Lutnick, Gosin, Merkel and Rispoli hold limited partnership units in Newmark Holdings. Mr. Lutnick holds additional partnership interests in Cantor, which, through its and CFGM’s ownership of shares of our Class B common stock, controls approximately 57.1% of the total voting power of the outstanding Newmark common stock as of June 30, 2022. Mr. Merkel also holds additional partnership interests in Cantor.

Section 162(m) of the U.S. Internal Revenue Code of 1986, which we refer to as the “Code,” eliminates a corporation’s tax deduction in a given year for payments to certain executive officers in excess of $1,000,000. We do not currently expect that decisions relating to compensation will be significantly impacted by Section 162(m) matters on a going forward basis. The Committee retains negative discretion to reduce or withhold performance-based compensation to our executive officers, including after taking into consideration changing business conditions or the executive officer’s individual performance.

Our management and our Compensation Committee recognize that we are subject to certain Financial Accounting Standards Board and SEC guidance on share-based awards and other accounting charges with respect to the compensation of the executive officers and other employees. However, management and the Committee do not believe that these accounting charges should necessarily determine the appropriate types and levels of compensation to be made available. Where material to the Committee’s decisions, these accounting charges will be described in our compensation discussion and analysis, compensation tables and related narratives.

Our Compensation Committee may grant equity and partnership awards to executive officers in a variety of ways under the Equity Plan and the Participation Plan, including restricted stock, RSUs, exchange rights, cash settlement awards and other equity grants under the Equity Plan and non-exchangeable limited partnership unit awards under the Participation Plan. Grants of such awards may have different accounting treatment and may be reported differently in the compensation tables and related narratives depending upon the type of award granted and how and when it is granted.

For U.S. generally accepted accounting principles (“GAAP”) purposes, a compensation charge is recorded on PSUs and similar limited partnership units if and when an exchange right is granted to such units to acquire shares of Class A common stock, and the charge is based on the market price of Class A common stock on the date on which the exchange right is granted, regardless of when such exchange occurs. Additionally, when the exchange actually occurs, a U.S. federal income tax deduction is generally allowed equal to the fair market value of a share of Class A common stock on the date of exchange.

For GAAP purposes, if shares of restricted stock granted are not subject to continued employment or service with us or any of our affiliates or subsidiaries, even if they are subject to compliance with our customary non-compete obligations, the grant-date fair value of the restricted stock will be expensed on the date of grant.

The BGC compensation committee may also award grants of exchangeability of BGC Holdings units to certain of our directors, executive officers or other officers or employees. Grants of exchangeability relating to Newmark Holdings units and BGC Holdings units may be made at any time in the discretion of the relevant Compensation Committee, and future grant practices may differ from prior practices, including without limitation in connection with performance achievement, changes in incentive arrangements, accounting principles, and tax laws (including deductibility of compensation) and other applicable laws.

Clawback, Forfeiture and Recoupment

The highly retentive nature of the NPSUs, PSUs and similar partnership units, which may be redeemed for zero at any time by the Compensation Committee, as well as the non-compete, non-disparagement and other obligations under the Newmark Holdings Partnership Agreement, provides extraordinary discretion and superior clawback power to the Committee. Accordingly, we do not have a separate general compensation recovery or “clawback” policy. Further, our annual policy is to provide the majority of our compensation through retentive partnership units or other equity with strong vesting mechanisms. Accordingly, we do not require additional share ownership or hold-through retirement thresholds.

Base Salary

Our executive officers receive base salaries or similar cash payments intended to reflect their skills, expertise and responsibilities. Subject to any applicable employment or other agreements, such payments and subsequent adjustments, if any, are reviewed and approved by the Compensation Committee annually, based on a variety of factors, which may include, from time to time, a review of relevant salaries of executives at our peer group of companies and others, and each executive officer’s individual performance for the prior year, including such executive officer’s experience and responsibilities.

We generally establish base pay at levels comparable to our peer group and other companies which employ similarly skilled personnel, including CBRE Group, Inc., Colliers International Group, Inc., Compass, Inc.,

Cushman & Wakefield plc, FirstService Corporation, Jones Lang LaSalle Inc., Marcus & Millichap Inc., Opendoor Technologies Inc., RE/MAX Holdings, Inc., Savills plc, WeWork Inc., and Zillow Group, Inc. While we determine these levels by reviewing publicly available information with respect to our peer group of companies and others, we generally do not expect to engage in benchmarking.

Currently, Mr. Lutnick expects to spend approximately 33% of his time on our matters and Mr. Merkel expects to spend approximately 25% of his time on our matters. These percentages may vary depending on business developments at Newmark or Cantor, BGC Partners or any of our or their respective affiliates. As a result, these key employees (and others in key executive or management roles who we may hire from time to time) dedicate only a portion of their professional efforts to our business and operations, and there is no contractual obligation for them to spend a specific amount of their time with us and/or BGC Partners or Cantor. Messrs. Gosin and Rispoli spend all of their full business time on our matters, including on investments or ventures.

Base Salaries for 2021

Base salary and similar cash payment rates for 2021 were established in March 2021 by our Compensation Committee with respect to each of our executive officers, based on their continuing qualifications, experience and responsibilities. The base rate for 2021 was continued at $1,000,000 for Messrs. Lutnick and Gosin. The base rate for Mr. Rispoli for 2021 was increased to $750,000 effective April 1, 2021, and the base rate for Mr. Merkel for 2021 was continued at $500,000. Mr. Rispoli’s $50,000 base salary increase was awarded due to his increased responsibilities in connection with strategic transactions and his leadership during the COVID-19 pandemic.

Base Salaries for 2022

Base salary and similar cash payment rates for 2022 were established in December 2021 by our Compensation Committee with respect to each of our executive officers, based on their continuing qualifications, experience and responsibilities. The base rate for 2022 was continued at $1,000,000 for Messrs. Lutnick and Gosin. The base rate for Mr. Rispoli for 2022 was increased to $850,000 from $750,000 effective January 1, 2022, and the base rate for Mr. Merkel for 2022 was continued at $500,000. Mr. Rispoli’s $100,000 base salary increase was awarded due to his increased responsibilities in connection with strategic transactions and his leadership during the COVID-19 pandemic.

Bonus Compensation

Notwithstanding the elimination of the exception to the $1,000,000 limit on deductibility for qualified performance-based compensation under Section 162(m) of the Code pursuant to the Tax Act, we intend to award performance-based compensation in the form of bonuses to our executive officers, including pursuant to the Incentive Plan. The Compensation Committee believes that such performance-based compensation appropriately aligns the interests of our executive officers with the interests of our stockholders.

With respect to each performance period, our Compensation Committee specifies the applicable performance criteria and targets to be used under the Incentive Plan for that performance period. These performance criteria, which may vary from participant to participant, will be determined by the Committee and may be based upon one or more of the following financial performance measures:

The actual Incentive Plan bonus paid to any given participant at the end of a performance period is based upon the extent to which the applicable performance goals for such performance period are achieved, subject to the exercise of negative discretion by the Compensation Committee, and may be paid in cash or in equity or partnership awards. These awards also serve as incentives for future performance and retention.

In addition, from time to time, our Compensation Committee may provide for target or guaranteed bonuses in employment or other agreements in order to attract and retain talented executives, or may grant ad hoc discretionary bonuses when an executive officer is not eligible to participate in the Incentive Plan award opportunities for that performance period or when it otherwise considers such bonuses to be appropriate. Such bonuses may also be paid in cash or in equity or partnership awards.

Incentive Plan Bonus Goals for 2021

In the first quarter of 2021, our Compensation Committee determined that Messrs. Lutnick, Gosin, Rispoli and Merkel, our executive officers for 2021, would be participating executives for 2021 in our Incentive Plan.

For 2021, our Compensation Committee used the same performance criteria for all the executive officers and set individual bonus opportunities for 2021 equal to the maximum value allowed for each individual pursuant to the terms of the Incentive Plan (i.e., $25 million), provided that (i) the Company achieved operating profits or Adjusted Earnings annually for 2021, as calculated on substantially the same basis as in the Company’s 2020 year-end earnings release, or (ii) the Company achieved improvement or percentage growth in gross revenue or total transaction volumes for any product annually for 2021 as compared annually to 2020 over any of its peer group members or industry measures, as reported in the Company’s 2021 earnings release, in each case calculated on substantially the same basis as in the Company’s 2020 earnings release, and compared to the most recently available peer group information or industry measures, (each of which we refer to as a “Performance Goal”) in each case subject to any appropriate corporate adjustment to reflect stock splits, reverse stock splits, mergers, spin-offs or any other extraordinary corporate transactions in accordance with the Bonus Plan, the Incentive Plan and the Participation Plan, as applicable.

The Compensation Committee determined that the payment of any such amount may be in the form of cash, shares of Class A common stock, limited partnership units, or other equity or partnership awards permitted under the Equity Plan, the Participation Plan or otherwise. The Compensation Committee, in its sole and absolute discretion, retained the right to reduce the amount of any Incentive Plan bonus payment based upon any factors it determines, including whether and the extent to which the Performance Goals or any other corporate, as well as individual, performance objectives have been achieved.

Incentive Plan Bonuses Awarded for 2021

On December 21, 2021, having determined that the Performance Goals established in the first quarter of 2021 had been met for 2021, our Compensation Committee made awards, effective as of January 1, 2022, to the participating executive officers for 2021 under our Incentive Plan. The awards were granted using a stock price of $16.47 on December 21, 2021, as adjusted by the 0.9339 exchange ratio (as defined herein) in effect as of such

date, and provided a combination of short- and long-term incentives that align the Company’s financial performance with its executive compensation. In addition to short-term cash compensation awarded to certain executives, the Committee awarded significant portions of its 2021 compensation to all executives in the form of long-term partnership units. These units are eligible for partnership distributions, if any, in the current period, which are tied to the Company’s current and future earnings and may rise and fall with the Company’s results and market conditions in a given period. The units awards, however, are issued as non-exchangeable and the non- Preferred Unit awards may be made exchangeable into the Company’s Class A common stock at a future time at the Committee’s discretion, thus incentivizing future performance by aligning it with the Company’s stock price.

In making its year-end bonus determinations for 2021, our Compensation Committee considered the pay practices of our peer group and other companies, including a compensation survey prepared by, and advice from, Korn Ferry. As part of its compensation process, the Committee considered the year-on-year growth of various financial metrics for the nine months ended September 30, 2021, which represented the latest public financial information available at the time, as compared with the disclosed growth rates for these same metrics at our full-service U.S. listed peers. These peers were CBRE Group, Inc., Colliers International Group Inc., Jones Lang LaSalle Incorporated, and Cushman & Wakefield plc. The metrics included consolidated global total revenues, Americas total revenues, Americas fee or net revenues, global consolidated Adjusted EBITDA, and global consolidated pre-tax Adjusted Earnings. The data indicated that Newmark’s growth in each of these metrics meaningfully exceeded the average year-on-year growth rates for these peers over this period. The Committee also reviewed our relative performance versus these peers in individual Americas business lines including leasing, capital markets and mortgage banking, valuation and advisory, and other areas of management services, as well as our market share in investment sales. Performance data are provided to the Committee by management and Korn Ferry.

In making awards for 2021, the Compensation Committee also considered the strong improvement in the Company’s earnings as compared to peers and prior periods, rebounds in business metrics and stock performance as compared to the prior year. The Committee also considered the pay reductions in the prior year and the related impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on various businesses and the Company’s results as a whole, management’s response to the COVID-19 pandemic and adjustments in business plans during the period and pivots in various markets and services in response to changes in the market. The Committee also considered individual contributions toward achievement of strategic goals and financial operating results. The impact of any of these measures during 2022 or beyond may materially impact the value of current and previous partnership awards, thus aligning the interests of the executives with those of our stockholders. Further, all of such 2021 partnership awards are forfeitable in the event that an executive were to leave the Company and compete or otherwise violate applicable partnership obligations. These awards were also expected to incentivize our executive officers with respect to future performance and encourage ongoing contributions to our businesses.

The specific awards to our executive officers for 2021 were as follows:

Mr. Lutnick’s aggregate bonus of $9,000,000 for 2021 was paid $4,000,000 in current cash compensation and $5,000,000 in a long-term partnership award represented by 162,549 non-exchangeable Newmark Holdings PSUs and 162,549 non-exchangeable Newmark Holdings PPSUs with a determination price of $15.38 per unit. The Compensation Committee noted leadership during the COVID-19 pandemic and pay reduction decisions for 2020, 2021 business and stock performance and other market factors in determining Mr. Lutnick’s 2021 year-end bonus award. See also the Section below entitled “2021 Lutnick Award” for Mr. Lutnick’s additional one-time bonus award.

Mr. Gosin’s 2021 aggregate bonus of $11,500,000 for 2021 was paid $5,250,000 in current cash compensation and $6,250,000 in a long-term incentive partnership award represented by 203,186 non-exchangeable Newmark Holdings PSUs and 203,186 non-exchangeable Newmark Holdings PPSUs with a determination price of $15.38 per unit. The Compensation Committee noted in particular Mr. Gosin’s management and leadership during the COVID-19 pandemic, acquisition and entry into new sectors and locations in determining his 2021 bonus award.

Mr. Rispoli’s aggregate bonus of $1,000,000 for 2021 was paid $416,667 in current cash compensation and $583,333 in a long-term partnership award represented by 18,964 non-exchangeable Newmark Holdings PSUs and 18,964 non-exchangeable Newmark Holdings PPSUs with a determination price of $15.38 per unit. The Compensation Committee noted his leadership and efforts with respect to finance, acquisitions and treasury matters in awarding his bonus for the year.

Mr. Merkel’s aggregate bonus of $1,000,000 was paid $500,000 in current cash compensation and $500,000 in a long-term partnership award represented by 16,255 non-exchangeable Newmark Holdings PSUs and 16,255 non-exchangeable Newmark Holdings PPSUs with a determination price of $15.38 per unit. The Compensation Committee noted his legal and regulatory guidance during the year.

Incentive Plan Bonus Goals for 2022

On December 17, 2021, the Compensation Committee determined that Messrs. Lutnick, Gosin, Merkel and Rispoli, our current executive officers, would be participating executives for 2022 in the Incentive Plan. For 2022, the Committee established performance criteria for all executive officers and set a bonus for 2022 equal to the maximum value allowed for each individual pursuant to the terms of the Incentive Plan (i.e., $25 million), provided that (i) the Company achieves operating profits or Adjusted Earnings annually for 2022, as calculated on substantially the same basis as in the Company’s 2021 year-end earnings release, or (ii) the Company achieves improvement or percentage growth in gross revenue or total transaction volumes for any product annually for 2022 as compared to 2021 over any of our peer group members or industry measures, as reported in its 2022 earnings release, in each case calculated on substantially the same basis as in its 2021 earnings release, and compared to the most recently available peer group information or industry measures, in each case, subject to any appropriate corporate adjustment to reflect stock splits, reverse stock splits, mergers, spin-offs or any other extraordinary corporate transactions in accordance with the Incentive Plan, Equity Plan and the Participation Plan, as applicable. As each of the Company’s executive officers also provides services to certain of our operating partnerships and subsidiaries, potential bonuses for 2022 are also on behalf of all such operating partnerships and subsidiaries, as may be applicable.

The Compensation Committee determined that the payment of any such amount may be in the form of cash, shares of Class A common stock, limited partnership units or other equity or partnership awards permitted under the Equity Plan, the Participation Plan or otherwise. The extent determined to reflect the portion of an executive officer’s compensation related to services performed for a particular subsidiary or affiliate as noted above, the cost of compensation awarded under any of the Compensation Plans shall be borne by such subsidiary or affiliate. The Committee, in its sole and absolute discretion, retained the right to reduce the amount of any Incentive Plan bonus payment based upon any factors it determines, including whether and the extent to which Performance Goals or any other corporate, as well as individual, performance objectives have been achieved. The Committee further retains discretion to authorize bonuses and other awards to the participating executives regardless of whether or not such bonuses and awards are tax deductible under tax law in effect at the time of such bonuses and awards.

Equity Plan and Participation Plan Awards

It is the Compensation Committee’s general policy to award restricted stock, exchange rights, awards that are repurchased for cash, which we refer to as “cash settlement awards,” and other equity or partnership awards to executive officers in order to align their interests with those of our long-term investors and to help attract and retain qualified individuals. Our Equity Plan permits the Committee to grant restricted stock, stock options, stock appreciation rights, deferred stock such as RSUs, bonus stock, performance awards, dividend equivalents and other stock-based awards, including to provide exchange rights for shares of our Class A common stock and cash settlement awards relating to Newmark Holdings limited partnership units. Our Participation Plan provides for the grant or sale of Newmark Holdings limited partnership units. The total number of Newmark Holdings limited partnership units issuable under the Participation Plan will be determined from time to time by our Board of Directors, provided that exchange rights or cash settlement awards relating to units may only be granted pursuant

to other stock-based awards granted under our Equity Plan. Partnership units in Newmark Holdings (other than NPSUs) are entitled to participate in preferred or quarterly partnership distributions from Newmark Holdings and (other than Preferred Units and NPSUs) are eligible to be made exchangeable for shares of our Class A common stock. We view these incentives as an effective tool in motivating, rewarding and retaining our executive officers.

Our Compensation Committee retains the right to grant a combination of forms of such awards under our Equity Plan and our Participation Plan to executive officers as it considers appropriate or to differentiate among executive officers with respect to different types of awards. The Committee has also granted authority to Mr. Lutnick, our Chairman, to grant awards to non-executive officer employees of the Company under the Equity Plan and Participation Plan and to establish sub-plans for such persons.

In addition, our executive officers and other employees may also be offered the opportunity to purchase limited partnership units. The Compensation Committee and Mr. Lutnick will have the discretion to determine the price of any purchase right for partnership units, which may be set at preferential or historical prices that are less than the prevailing market price of our Class A common stock.

Timing of Awards

Equity and partnership awards to executive officers that are in payment of the Incentive Plan or discretionary bonuses are typically granted annually in conjunction with the Compensation Committee’s review of company and individual performance of executive officers, although interim grants may be considered and approved from time to time. The Committee’s annual review generally takes place at year-end meetings, which are generally held in the first quarter of each year, although the reviews may be held at any time and from time to time throughout the year. From time to time, grants to executive officers may be made on a mid-year or other basis in the event of business developments, changing compensation requirements or other factors, in the discretion of the Committee.

Our policy is generally to award year-end grants to executive officer recipients by the end of the calendar year or shortly thereafter, with grants to non-executive employees occurring closer to the end of the first quarter of the following year. Grants, if any, to newly hired employees are effective on the first day of the quarter following the employee’s first day of employment. In addition, from time to time the Company may offer compensation enhancements or modifications to employees that it does not offer to its executive officers.

The exercise price of all stock options is set at the closing price of our Class A common stock on the Nasdaq Global Select Market on the date of grant. As discussed above, with respect to limited partnership units and other equity or partnership awards, grants may be made based on a dollar value, with the number of units or shares determined by reference to the market price of our Class A common stock on the date of grant, or based on a specified number of awards.

Replacement and Exchange Right Grants in Respect of 2021

From time to time, the Compensation Committee generally approves monetization of previously issued and outstanding units and shares in order to provide liquidity to the executives in accordance with applicable tax and accounting rules, taking into consideration the retentive impact of the remaining units held by the executives. The 2021 monetizations described below were approved by the Compensation Committee in order to provide liquidity to the executives in accordance with applicable tax and accounting rules, taking into consideration the retentive impact of the remaining units held by the executives.

Mr. Lutnick

Mr. Lutnick received no standalone monetization with respect to 2021. See below under “Standing Policy for Mr. Lutnick” for a description of the exchange rights and/or other monetizations rights granted to him with respect to 2021, and under “Replacement and Exchange Right Grants Related to the 2021 Equity Event” for a description of the exchange rights and/or other monetizations rights granted to him with respect to this event.

Mr. Gosin

On December 21, 2021, the Compensation Committee approved: (i) the redemption of all of Mr. Gosin’s remaining 838,996 non-exchangeable Newmark PPSUs for $8,339,980 in cash and (ii) compensation of approximately $7,357,329 by way of the Company causing 478,328 of Mr. Gosin’s non-exchangeable Newmark PSUs to be redeemed for zero and issuing 446,711 shares of our Class A common stock, based upon the closing price on our Class A common stock the date the Committee approved the transaction (which was $16.47) and an exchange ratio of 0.9339.

In addition to the above, on September 21, 2021, 2,114,546 non-exchangeable BGC Holdings PSUs held by Mr. Gosin were redeemed, and an aggregate of 1,176,745 net shares of Class A common stock of BGC were issued at $4.86 price (which was the closing price of BGC Partners Class A common stock on September 21, 2021). Effective as of April 14, 2022, Mr. Gosin’s 905,371 BGC Holdings HDUs were redeemed for a cash payment of $3,521,893 based upon a price of $3.89 per unit, which was the closing price of BGC’s Class A common stock on April 14, 2022.

See below under “Replacement and Exchange Right Grants Related to the 2021 Equity Event” for a description of the exchange rights and/or other monetizations rights granted to him with respect to this event.

Mr. Merkel

On April 27, 2021, (a) 73,387 of Mr. Merkel’s 145,384 non-exchangeable Newmark Holdings PSUs held by Mr. Merkel were redeemed for zero and 68,727 shares of Class A common stock of Newmark, as adjusted by the then applicable exchange ratio of 0.9365, held by Mr. Merkel, were repurchased by the Company for $10.67 per unit (the April 27, 2021 closing price of our Class A common stock), and (b) $82,560.50 associated with Mr. Merkel’s non-exchangeable Newmark Holdings PPSUs was redeemed and used for tax purposes. The total payment delivered to Mr. Merkel was $815,878, less applicable taxes and withholdings.

On June 28, 2021, (a) 51,124.28 non-exchangeable Newmark Holdings PSUs held by Mr. Merkel were redeemed and an aggregate of 48,072 shares of Class A common stock of Newmark were issued, as adjusted by the then applicable exchange ratio of 0.9403, and (b) $329,155 associated with Mr. Merkel’s non-exchangeable Newmark Holdings PPSUs was redeemed and used for tax purposes.

Mr. Rispoli

See below under “Replacement and Exchange Right Grants Related to the 2021 Equity Event” for a description of the exchange rights and/or other monetizations rights granted to him with respect to this event.

2019 Newmark NPSU Awards

In connection with the 2018 year-end compensation cycle, the Compensation Committee previously approved the issuance of 500,000 Newmark Holdings NPSUs and 500,000 Newmark Holdings NPPSUs with a determination price of $10.05 per unit to Mr. Lutnick, effective April 1, 2019. The terms of those awards provided that on or about each April 1 of 2020, 2021, 2022, and 2023, the Partnership shall grant an aggregate award of 125,000 non-exchangeable Newmark Holdings PSUs and 125,000 non-exchangeable NHLP PPSUs in replacement of 125,000 Newmark Holdings NPSUs and 125,000 Newmark Holdings NPPSUs (which, upon replacement, shall be cancelled and no longer exist), provided that (i) Newmark, inclusive of its affiliates thereof, earns, in aggregate, at least USD 5 million in gross revenues in the calendar quarter in which the applicable

award of Newmark Holdings PSUs or PPSUs is to be granted and (ii) except in the event of death prior to the applicable grant date, Mr. Lutnick remains an employee of Newmark or an affiliate thereof and has at all times remained in compliance with the Newmark Holdings partnership agreement. Mr. Lutnick exercised his rights on December 21, 2021 pursuant to the standing policy for Mr. Lutnick to redeem his remaining 250,000 Newmark Holdings NPPSUs issued effective April 1, 2019. Pursuant to this grant, on April 1, 2022, the Company granted Mr. Lutnick an aggregate award of 125,000 non-exchangeable PSUs in replacement of 125,000 NPSUs.

Replacement and Exchange Right Grants Related to the 2021 Equity Event

On June 28, 2021, in connection with our accelerated receipt of common shares of Nasdaq, Inc. (“Nasdaq Shares”) (see Item 7 of the Company’s 2021 10-K under the headings “Nasdaq Monetization Transactions” and “Acceleration of Nasdaq Earn-out”), the Compensation Committee approved a plan to expedite the tax deductible exchange and redemption of a substantial number of limited partnership units held by partners of the Company (the “2021 Equity Event”). The 2021 Equity Event also accelerated certain compensation expenses, resulting in $428.6 million of compensation charges. These partnership units were settled using a $12.50 share price. In July 2021, the Compensation Committee approved increasing the price to $13.01 to settle certain units.

Some of the key components of the approved plan were as follows:

The specific transactions approved by the Compensation Committee, in connection with the 2021 Equity Event, with respect to Newmark’s executive officers are set forth below. All of the transactions included in the 2021 Equity Event with respect to Messrs. Lutnick, Gosin and Rispoli, were based on (i) the price for Newmark Class A common stock of $12.50 per share, as approved by the Compensation Committee; (ii) the price of BGC Partners Class A common stock of $5.86; and (iii) the price of Nasdaq common stock of $177.11.

Mr. Lutnick

On June 28, 2021, in connection with the 2021 Equity Event, the Newmark Compensation Committee approved the following for Mr. Lutnick:

In accordance with Mr. Lutnick’s right under his existing standing policy, and in connection with the 2021 Equity Event, upon the approval of the Newmark Compensation Committee: (i) 2,909,819 non-exchangeable Newmark Holdings PSUs, pursuant to Mr. Lutnick’s rights under his existing standing policy, were redeemed and 2,736,103 shares of Class A common stock of Newmark, based upon the then applicable exchange ratio of 0.9403, were granted to Mr. Lutnick; and (ii) $8,798,546 associated with Mr. Lutnick’s rights under his existing standing policy was redeemed and used for tax purposes.

Mr. Gosin

The Newmark Compensation Committee approved the following for Mr. Gosin:

Mr. Rispoli

On June 28, 2021, the Compensation Committee approved the following for Mr. Rispoli:

Gosin Commissions

Compensation for Mr. Gosin is generally determined in accordance with the employment agreement, as amended from time to time, which he entered into in connection with our IPO, effective as of December 1, 2017 (the “Gosin Employment Agreement”). Mr. Gosin received commissions in 2020 in the amount of $16,109 payable in connection with brokerage transactions. This amount was paid in the form of $1,611 in cash and 1,519 non-exchangeable Newmark Holdings NPSUs. Mr. Gosin did not receive any commissions with respect to 2021.

2021 Lutnick Award

Introduction

On December 27, 2021, the Compensation Committee approved a one-time bonus award to Mr. Lutnick (the “Award”), which was evidenced by the execution and delivery of a Retention Bonus Agreement dated December 28, 2021 (the “Effective Date”) and described below (the “Award Agreement”), in consideration of his success in managing certain aspects of the Company’s performance as its principal executive officer and Chairman. The Award rewarded Mr. Lutnick for his efforts in delivering superior financial results for the Company and its stockholders, including in particular his success in creating substantial value for the Company and its stockholders in connection with creating, structuring, hedging and monetizing the forward share contract to receive over time shares of common stock of Nasdaq, Inc. (the “Nasdaq Derivative”) held by the Company (together, the “Nasdaq Shares”) and the strong balance sheet and significant amount of income created from the Nasdaq Derivative. A principal reason for structuring the Award with a substantial portion to be paid out over three years was also to further incentivize Mr. Lutnick to continue to serve as both the Company’s principal executive officer and its Chairman for the benefit of the Company’s stockholders.

The Award Agreement provides for an aggregate cash payment of $50 million, payable as follows: $20 million within three days of the Effective Date (which payment was made on December 31, 2021), and $10 million within thirty days following vesting on each of the first, second and third anniversaries of the Effective Date. Any entitlement to future amounts not vested will be forfeited immediately if, prior to the applicable anniversary date, Mr. Lutnick ceases to serve as both the Company’s Chairman and its principal executive officer, unless Mr. Lutnick ceasing to serve in either such capacity occurs pursuant to a “Vesting

Termination,” as that term is defined in the Award Agreement. Mr. Lutnick has purchased Newmark Class A Common Stock with the after-tax proceeds of the initial tranche of the Award. The Award Agreement describes a “Vesting Termination” as (i) a termination of Mr. Lutnick’s employment by the Company without “Cause” (as that term is defined in the Award Agreement) or (ii) an involuntary removal of the Executive from the position of Chairman of the Board on or after the occurrence of a Change in Control (as that term is defined in the Change of Control Agreement dated as of December 13, 2017 by and between Mr. Lutnick and the Company (the “Control Agreement”). In the event that Mr. Lutnick ceases to serve as both the Company’s Chairman and its principal executive officer pursuant to a Vesting Termination, any amounts not vested will immediately become fully vested. The Award Agreement provides that Mr. Lutnick ceasing to serve as the Company’s Chairman and principal executive officer pursuant to his death or disability does not constitute a Vesting Termination. The provisions of the Control Agreement do not apply to the Award. A copy of the Award Agreement was attached as Exhibit 10.1 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on December 29, 2021.

The Compensation Committee’s Consideration of the Award and Award Agreement

The Award and the Award Agreement were approved by the Compensation Committee of Newmark’s board of directors on December 27, 2021 after careful consideration of Mr. Lutnick’s contributions to the Company’s financial growth and success, and Mr. Lutnick’s specific contributions to that success as the Company’s principal executive officer. The terms were determined and agreed by the Committee following an extensive process that included numerous meetings of the Committee dedicated to discussing the Award through the last four months of 2021, during which the Committee evaluated reports and analyses prepared by Aon. In order to assist it with its deliberations, the Committee retained Aon to be its independent compensation consultant and Mayer Brown LLP to be its independent counsel, in each case for the sole purpose of assisting the Committee in its consideration of the Award. The Committee evaluated and discussed reports and analyses prepared by Aon throughout its deliberations. Mr. Lutnick did not participate in any meetings of the Committee where the Award was discussed.

The Nasdaq Share Transactions

Among the principal factors considered by the Compensation Committee in deciding to grant Mr. Lutnick the Award was Mr. Lutnick’s critical role in the value created for Newmark and its stockholders in connection with the Nasdaq Derivative transactions described in the Company’s periodic reports, including in Item 7 of the 2021 10-K under the headings “Nasdaq Monetization Transactions” and “Acceleration of Nasdaq Earn-out.” As detailed in that description of the Nasdaq Derivative, on September 28, 2017, the Company received the remaining rights to receive Nasdaq Shares under the Nasdaq Earn-out that were first received by BGC in June 2013, which at that time consisted of a total of 14,883,705 shares of Nasdaq, to be paid ratably over 15 years (subject to an earn-out, acceleration and present value discount as described in detail in the above-referenced description), meaning that in 2017, the Company received the rights to receive approximately 10,900,000 shares of Nasdaq over the remaining 11 years of the contract provided the Nasdaq Earn-out terms were achieved. At that time, the Company considered the sale of the Nasdaq Derivative as recommended by certain of the Company’s advisors with proceeds in the range of $375-$425 million. Mr. Lutnick chose an alternative route for the Company. In choosing to purchase the long-dated Nasdaq Derivative from a highly rated bank and borrow the potential proceeds of the puts at the bank’s comparatively low cost of funds, Newmark was able to use a portion of the Nasdaq Derivative to repay debt, including debt related to the Berkeley Point acquisition without relinquishing the upside of the Nasdaq Earn-out, and while protecting the downside of a portion of the Nasdaq Derivative.

In 2021, the then-remaining tranches of Nasdaq Shares receivable by the Company pursuant to the Nasdaq Derivative were accelerated on a discounted basis under the terms of the Nasdaq Earn-out, resulting in the Company receiving approximately 6.2 million Nasdaq Shares worth approximately $1.093 billion as the final installment of the Nasdaq Earn-out. The total proceeds received by the Company were significantly in excess of the initial recommendation of value for the Nasdaq Derivative and totaled approximately $1.5 billion, after the cost of hedging and other transaction-related expenses.

In its consideration of the Award, the Compensation Committee carefully reviewed the history of the Company’s transactions in the Nasdaq Shares for the purpose of quantifying the benefit to the Company and its stockholders of the transactions in the Nasdaq Shares described above that were undertaken by Mr. Lutnick for the benefit of the Company and its shareholders, as distinguished from the fact of the Company having received rights to receive the Nasdaq Shares annually over time and the value attributed to the Nasdaq Derivative by the Company’s advisors at the time of the Company’s initial public offering. The Committee determined that Mr. Lutnick’s acumen in personally directing the Company’s transactions in the Nasdaq Shares, including those described above and in the 2021 10-K under the heading “Exchangeable Preferred Partnership Units and Forward Contracts,” played a significant role in maximizing the value of the Nasdaq Shares for the period from 2018 through 2021.

The Compensation Committee determined that the Company’s holdings of the Nasdaq Shares, including the transactions involving such shares as directed by Mr. Lutnick, have played a very significant role in the Company’s financial success, creating a strong balance sheet, producing considerable income and positioning the Company for strategic success. The Committee determined that as a direct result, the Company has:

The Compensation Committee further believes that the Nasdaq Share transactions directed by Mr. Lutnick have been a substantial part of positioning the Company for continued future success and will enable it to continue to execute its business plan at a level that would not be achievable in the absence of Mr. Lutnick’s strategic direction concerning its holdings of, and transactions in, the Nasdaq Shares.

The Retention of Mr. Lutnick as the Company’s Principal Executive Officer

The Compensation Committee believes that the Company and its stockholders benefit from having had, and continuing to have, a strong executive management team. The Committee’s deliberations regarding the Award included extensive discussions regarding the near-term and medium-term future of the executive management team, and determined that it was in the best interests of the Company and its stockholders that the Award be structured in order to incentivize Mr. Lutnick to remain a part of the executive management team and as the Company’s principal executive officer in addition to serving as the Company’s Chairman. As a result, the Committee determined that any one-time bonus for Mr. Lutnick be structured with a considerable retentive element that was dependent on Mr. Lutnick continuing to serve as both the Company’s principal executive officer and its Chairman in order for future installments of the bonus to be payable. The Committee viewed this retentive element as being an essential component of the Award.

Form of Payment of the Award

The Compensation Committee conducted extensive deliberations relating to the form of payment of the Award. Among the options considered by the Committee, assisted by its independent compensation consultant and independent counsel, were to pay the Award in the form of (i) cash, (ii) newly issued Company stock, (iii) Nasdaq Shares, (iv) RSUs or (v) a combination thereof.

The Compensation Committee carefully determined that providing for the payment of the Award in cash was in the best interest of the Company and its shareholders, particularly in light of the Company’s ongoing stock repurchase program and the significant cash earnings of the Company including the additional $1,093,000,000 the Company received in respect of the Nasdaq Shares in June 2021. The Committee also considered Mr. Lutnick’s already-substantial holdings of the Company’s Common Stock and deepening alignment of his interests with those of the Company’s stockholders, the effect of the various forms of payment on the Company’s earnings and the Company’s strong cash position. The Company’s Chief Financial Officer and Aon were consulted in connection with the Committee’s deliberations as to the optimal form of payment from the perspective of the Company and its stockholders.

Subsequent Events

Following the payment of the first installment of the Award, Mr. Lutnick purchased an aggregate 503,500 shares of Class A Common Stock on the open market with his net after-tax proceeds with respect to this payment in 2021. The Award is the subject of legal challenge. See “Certain Relationships and Related Transactions, and Director Independence—Derivative Suit” below.

Standing Policy for Mr. Lutnick

In March 2018, our Compensation Committee and Audit Committee approved a standing policy that gives Mr. Lutnick the same right, subject to certain conditions, to accept or waive opportunities that have previously been offered, or that may be offered in the future, to other executive officers to (i) participate in any opportunity to monetize or otherwise provide liquidity with respect to some or all of their non-exchangeable limited partnership units; (ii) to accelerate the lapse of or eliminate any restrictions on transferability with respect to shares of restricted stock; or (iii) to participate in transactions that monetize and/or provide liquidity of equity or partnership awards granted to other executive officers, including the right to exchange non-distribution earning units such as NPSUs into distribution-earning units such as PSUs, or convert Preferred Units such as PPSUs into regular, non-Preferred Units, such as PSUs, based upon the highest percentage of distribution earning awards and in the same proportion of regular to Preferred Units held by another executive.

The policy provides generally that Mr. Lutnick shall be treated no less favorably than, and in proportion to, any other executive officer with respect to the change, right or modification of equity or partnership awards, which include, but are not limited, to opportunities (i) to have non-exchangeable units redeemed or replaced by other non-exchangeable units; (ii) to have non-exchangeable units received upon such replacement redeemed by Newmark Holdings for cash, or, with the concurrence of Cantor, granted exchange rights for shares of Newmark’s Class A common stock; (iii) to accelerate the lapse of or eliminate any restrictions on transferability with respect to restricted shares of Class A common stock; and (iv) to replace non-distributing units with distributing units and replace Preferred Units with non-Preferred Units. The policy may also include exchange of units into HDUs or other units with a capital account and the cancellation or redemption of non-exchangeable units and the issuance of new shares or units.

Under the policy, Mr. Lutnick shall have the right to accept or waive in advance some or all of the foregoing offers of opportunities that we may offer to any other executive officer. In each case, Mr. Lutnick’s right to accept or waive any opportunity offered to him to participate in any such opportunity shall be cumulative (and, accordingly, Mr. Lutnick would again have the right to accept or waive the opportunity to participate with respect to such portion previously waived if and when any additional opportunity is offered to any executive officer) and shall be equal to the greatest proportion of outstanding units and the greatest percentage of shares of restricted stock with respect to which any other executive officer has been or is offered with respect to all of such opportunities. This policy may result in grants to him of exchange rights/cash settlement awards, grants of HDUs or other units with a capital account, the cancellation or redemption of non-exchangeable units and the issuance of new shares or units, or the acceleration of the lapse of restrictions on transferability of shares restricted stock owned by him if a future triggering event under the policy occurs.

On March 16, 2021, pursuant to the Newmark standing policy for Mr. Lutnick, the Compensation Committee granted exchange rights and/or monetization rights with respect to rights available to Mr. Lutnick. Mr. Lutnick elected to waive such rights one-time with such future opportunities to be cumulative. The aggregate number of Mr. Lutnick’s units for which he waived exchange rights or other monetization rights was 4,015,168 non-exchangeable Newmark Holdings PSUs/NPSUs, inclusive of the PSUs receiving an HDU conversion right and 1,443,850 non-exchangeable Newmark Holdings PPSUs with an aggregate determination amount of $18,369,722 at that time, inclusive of the PPSUs receiving an HDU conversion right.

On April 27, 2021 and June 28, 2021, Mr. Lutnick received monetization rights under the standing policy in connection the Compensation Committee’s approval of certain monetization rights for Mr. Merkel. The cumulative number of Mr. Lutnick’s units for which he waived exchangeability, with such future opportunities to be cumulative, was 4,658,804 non-exchangeable Newmark Holdings PSUs/PSU-Hs and 1,608,328 non-exchangeable Newmark Holdings PPSUs/PPSU-Hs with an aggregate determination amount of $20,009,722.

In connection with the 2021 Equity Event discussed above, Mr. Lutnick again received monetization rights under the Newmark standing policy. Pursuant to Mr. Lutnick’s acceptance and exercise of certain of his rights under the standing policy at that time, on June 28, 2021, (i) 2,909,819 of Mr. Lutnick’s non-exchangeable Newmark Holdings PSUs were redeemed for zero in connection with the issuance of 2,736,103 shares of our Class A common stock to Mr. Lutnick based upon the exchange ratio of 0.9403, and (ii) 689,183 of Mr. Lutnick’s non-exchangeable Newmark Holdings PPSUs were redeemed for a tax payment of $8,798,546. In addition, pursuant to Mr. Lutnick’s exercise of his HDU conversion rights on June 28, 2021, (i) his 552,482 Newmark Holdings PSU-Hs were converted into 552,482 Newmark Holdings HDUs, and (ii) his 602,462 non-exchangeable Newmark Holdings PPSU-Hs were redeemed for a tax payment of $7,983,000.

On December 21, 2021, Mr. Lutnick elected to redeem all of his 193,530 then exchangeable (for cash) Newmark Holdings PPSUs for a cash payment of $1,465,873. In addition, upon the Compensation Committee’s approval on December 21, 2021 of the monetization of Mr. Gosin’s remaining non-exchangeable Newmark Holdings PPSUs and a number of Mr. Gosin’s non-exchangeable Newmark Holdings PSUs, Mr. Lutnick (i) elected to redeem 188,883 non-exchangeable Newmark Holdings PPSUs for a cash payment of $1,954,728, and 127,799 non-exchangeable Newmark Holdings NPPSUs for a cash payment of $1,284,376, both for which he previously waived, but then accepted, his right under the Company’s standing policy for Mr. Lutnick; and (ii) received the right to monetize, and accepted the monetization of, his remaining 122,201 non-exchangeable Newmark Holdings NPPSUs for a cash payment of $1,228,124, under such standing policy. In connection with the foregoing, Mr. Lutnick accepted the right to monetize approximately $4,406,915 by way of the Company causing 286,511 of Mr. Lutnick’s non-exchangeable Newmark Holdings PSUs to be redeemed for zero and issuing 267,572 shares of Newmark Class A common stock, based upon the closing price of our Class A common stock on the date the Committee approved the transaction (which was $16.47) and a 0.9339 exchange ratio, under the Company’s standing policy applying to Mr. Lutnick, with such acceptance of rights granted in reference to Mr. Gosin’s December 2021 transactions to the extent necessary to effectuate the foregoing (and otherwise Mr. Lutnick waived all remaining rights one-time, with all opportunities to be cumulative).

As of August 1, 2022, the number of Mr. Lutnick’s remaining Newmark Holdings units for which he waived monetization under the Newmark standing policy, with such future opportunities to be cumulative, included 1,044,150 non-exchangeable Newmark Holdings PSUs.

Partnership Enhancement Programs

We have from time to time undertaken partnership redemption and compensation restructuring programs to enhance our employment arrangements by leveraging our unique partnership structure. Under these programs, participating partners generally may agree to extend the lengths of their employment or service agreements, to accept a larger portion of their compensation in partnership units and to other contractual modifications sought by us. As part of these programs, we may also redeem limited partnership interests for cash and/or other units and grant exchangeability to certain units.

Perquisites

From time to time, we may provide certain of our executive officers with perquisites and other personal benefits that we believe are reasonable. While we do not view perquisites as a significant element of our executive compensation program, we believe that they can be useful in attracting, motivating, and retaining the executive talent for which we compete. From time to time, these perquisites might include travel, transportation, and housing benefits. We believe that these additional benefits may assist our executive officers in performing their duties and provide time efficiencies for them in appropriate circumstances, and it may consider their use in the future. All present or future practices regarding executive officer perquisites will be subject to periodic review and approval by our Compensation Committee.

Mr. Gosin receives the use of a car and driver in connection with Mr. Gosin’s duties as an executive officer. In 2021, such personal benefits had an aggregate incremental cost of approximately $113,061.

We offer medical, dental, life insurance and short and long-term disability insurance and a 401(k) plan to all employees on a non-discriminatory basis. Medical insurance premiums are charged to employees at varying levels based on total cash compensation.

Post-Employment Compensation

Pension Benefits

We do not currently provide pension arrangements or post-retirement health coverage for our employees, although we may consider such benefits in the future.

Retirement Benefits

Our executive officers are generally eligible to participate in a 401(k) contributory defined contribution plan, which we refer to as the “Deferral Plan.” Pursuant to the Deferral Plan, all U.S. eligible employees, including our executive officers, are provided with a means of saving for their retirement. While we have a 401(k) match for some of our employees, we currently do not match any of our executive officers’ contributions to our Deferral Plan.

Nonqualified Deferred Compensation

We do not provide any nonqualified deferred compensation plans to its employees, although we may consider such benefits in the future.

COMPENSATION COMMITTEE REPORT

The Compensation Committee has reviewed and discussed the Compensation Discussion and Analysis, which we refer to as the “CD&A,” set forth in this Proxy Statement with management of the Company and, based on such review and discussions, the Compensation Committee recommended to the Company’s Board of Directors that the CD&A be included in this Proxy Statement.

Dated: August 15, 2022

EXECUTIVE

COMPENSATION

Summary Compensation Table

The amount in column (c) for 2021 for Mr. Rispoli reflects a salary rate of $700,000 from January through March 2021, and a salary rate of $750,000 for March through December 2021. The amount in column (c) for 2019 for Mr. Rispoli reflects a salary rate of $500,000 for the months of January and February 2019, and a salary rate of $650,000 for the months March through December 2019.

Column (e) does not include certain compensatory grants of Newmark Holdings units described below because such grants did not represent a right to acquire shares of Newmark Class A common stock and had no grant date fair value for accounting purposes. Column (e) also does not include certain monetizations of Newmark Holdings units described below that would otherwise be included in column (e) because the Newmark Holdings units involved were the subject of previous dollar-denominated awards under the Incentive Plan reported in column (g) of the Summary Compensation Table at full notional value.

Column (e) does not include the 500,000 Newmark NPSUs granted to Mr. Lutnick in 2019 because NPSUs do not represent a right to acquire shares of Newmark Class A common stock and they had no grant date fair value for accounting purposes.

On December 19, 2019, the Compensation Committee granted Mr. Lutnick (i) exchange rights into HDUs with respect to 552,483 non-exchangeable Newmark Holdings PSUs held by Mr. Lutnick (which, based on the closing price of Newmark Class A common stock of $13.61 per share on such date and using the exchange ratio of 0.9332, had a value of $7,017,000); and (ii) exchange rights into cash with respect to 602,463 Newmark Holdings non-exchangeable PPSUs held by Mr. Lutnick (which had an average determination price of $13.25 per unit) for payment of $7,983,000 for taxes when (i) is exchanged. Mr. Lutnick exercised his right to exchange these HDUs in connection with the 2021 Equity Event. Column (e) does not include any of the foregoing units because they had been previously granted in partial payment of prior years’ Incentive Plan bonuses at full notional value.

Column (e) does not include the exchanges/monetization that Mr. Lutnick exercised in connection with his rights pursuant to the Newmark standing policy and/or pursuant to the 2021 Equity Event because these units had been previously granted in partial payment of prior years’ Incentive Plan bonuses at full notional value.

On December 19, 2019, the Compensation Committee granted Mr. Gosin (i) exchange rights into HDUs with respect to 443,872 non-exchangeable Newmark Holdings PSUs held by Mr. Gosin (which, based on the closing price of the Class A common stock of $13.61 per share on such date and using the exchange ratio of 0.9332, had a value of $5,637,548); and (ii) exchange rights into cash with respect to 539,080 Newmark Holdings non-exchangeable PPSUs held by Mr. Gosin (which had an average determination price of $9.947 per unit) for a payment upon such exchange of $5,362,452 for taxes when (i) is exchanged. Column (e) does not include any of the foregoing units because they had been previously granted in partial payment of prior years’ Incentive Plan bonuses at full notional value.

On March 16, 2021, the Compensation Committee granted Mr. Gosin exchange rights into shares of our Class A common stock with respect to 526,828 previously awarded non-exchangeable Newmark Holdings PSUs and 30,871 non-exchangeable Newmark Holdings APSUs held by Mr. Gosin (which, based on the closing price of the Class A common stock of $11.09 per share on such date and using the exchange ratio of 0.9365, had a value of $5,792,139 in the aggregate). In addition, on March 16, 2021, the Compensation Committee approved removing the sale restrictions on Mr. Gosin’s remaining 178,232 restricted shares of Class A common stock in BGC (which were originally issued in 2013) and associated 82,680 remaining restricted shares of Newmark Class A common stock (issued as a result of the Company spin-off in November 2018). Column (e) does not include any of the foregoing units because they had been previously granted in partial payment of prior years’ Incentive Plan bonuses at full notional value.

For Mr. Gosin, column (e) does not include the monetizations approved by the Compensation Committee on December 21, 2021 in connection with: (i) the redemption of all of Mr. Gosin’s remaining 838,996 non-exchangeable Newmark PPSUs for $8,339,980 in cash and (ii) compensation of approximately $7,357,329 by way of Newmark causing 478,328 of Mr. Gosin’s non-exchangeable Newmark PSUs to be redeemed for zero and issuing 446,711 Class A common shares of Newmark based upon the closing price of our Class A common stock on the date the Committee approved the transaction (which was $16.47) and an exchange ratio of 0.9339. In addition, 2,114,546 BGC Holdings PSUs held by Mr. Gosin were redeemed, and an aggregate of 1,176,745 net shares of BGC Class A common stock were issued at $4.86 price (which

was the closing price of BGC Class A common stock on September 21, 2021). Column (e) does not include any of the foregoing units because they had been previously granted in partial payment of prior years’ Incentive Plan bonuses at full notional value.

Column (e) does not include the exchanges/monetization for Mr. Gosin in connection with the 2021 Equity Event because these units had been previously granted in partial payment of prior years’ Incentive Plan bonuses at full notional value.

For Mr. Rispoli, column (e) does not include any of the following units, because these units had previously been granted in partial payment of prior years’ Incentive Plan annual bonuses at full notional value: (i) on April 2, 2018, 17,211 non-exchangeable BGC Holdings PSUs, and 14,082 non-exchangeable BGC Holdings PPSUs, of which 9,381 BGC Holdings PPSUs have a determination price of $9.07 per unit and 4,701 BGC Holdings PPSUs have a determination price of $11.40 per unit, were made exchangeable, (ii) On April 17, 2015, 2,094 BGC Holdings PSUs and 1,606 BGC Holdings PPSUs were made exchangeable, on December 1, 2015, 196 BGC Holdings PSUs and 160 BGC Holdings PPSUs were made exchangeable, on May 2, 2016, 4,755 BGC Holdings PSUs and 2,540 BGC Holdings PPSUs were made exchangeable, and on April 17, 2017, 17,040 BGC Holdings PSUs and 13,942 BGC Holdings PPSUs were made exchangeable. On June 9, 2016, 4,755 BGC Holdings PSUs were exchanged for a value of $42,528 and 2,540 BGC Holdings PPSUs for a value of $16,993.

For Mr. Rispoli, column (e) also does not include the fair value of the cancellation of 13,552 non-exchangeable PSUs in BGC Holdings held by Mr. Rispoli and the cancelation of 11,089 BGC Holdings PPSUs (which had an average determination price of $5.814 per unit) on December 31, 2018 that were awarded at full notional value of $131,574 in connection with such year-end Incentive Plan bonuses. In connection with the transaction, BGC issued $134,535 in shares of Class A common stock, less applicable taxes and withholdings, resulting in 13,552 net shares of BGC Class A common stock at a price of $5.17 per share and the payment of $64,471 in cash for taxes. On February 22, 2019, the Compensation Committee removed the sale restrictions on 4,229 shares of BGC Class A common stock and 1,961 shares of Newmark Class A common stock held by Mr. Rispoli.

On December 19, 2019, the Compensation Committee granted Mr. Rispoli (i) exchange rights into HDUs with respect to 5,846 non-exchangeable Newmark Holdings PSUs held by Mr. Rispoli (which, based on the closing price of the Class A common stock of $13.61 per share on such date and using the exchange ratio of 0.9332, had a value of $74,250); and (ii) exchange rights into cash with respect to 4,917 Newmark Holdings non-exchangeable PPSUs held by Mr. Rispoli (which had an average determination price of $12.355 per unit) for a payment of $60,750 for taxes when (i) is exchanged. Column (e) does not include any of the foregoing units because they had been previously granted in partial payment of prior years’ Incentive Plan bonuses at full notional value.

On March 16, 2021, the Compensation Committee granted Mr. Rispoli (i) exchange rights into shares of Class A common stock with respect to 6,043 previously awarded non-exchangeable Newmark Holdings PSUs held by Mr. Rispoli (which, based on the closing price of the Class A common stock of $11.09 per share on such date and using the exchange ratio of 0.9365, had a value of $62,758); and (ii) exchange rights into cash with respect to 4,907 previously awarded non-exchangeable Newmark Holdings PPSUs held by Mr. Rispoli (which had an average determination price of $15.57 per unit, for a total of $76,407 in the aggregate to be paid for taxes when (i) is exchanged). Column (e) does not include any of the foregoing units because they had been previously granted in partial payment of prior years’ Incentive Plan bonuses at full notional value.

Column (e) does not include the exchanges/monetization for Mr. Rispoli in connection with the 2021 Equity Event because these units had been previously granted in partial payment of prior years’ Incentive Plan bonuses at full notional value.

The 2019 amount under column (e) for Mr. Merkel represents $976,224, which is the aggregate fair value of: (i) the redemption of 40,909 Newmark Holdings PPSUs at the determination price of $8.34 per PPSU (totaling $341,181) and redemption of 50,000 Newmark Holdings PSUs for zero and (ii) issuance of 46,660

shares of Newmark Class A common stock at $13.61 per share (totaling $635,043), as part of a larger redemption and shares issuance exercise approved by the Newmark Compensation Committee for Mr. Merkel on December 19, 2019. Such redeemed PSUs and PPSUs were originally issued in 2019 in connection with the issuance of underlying BGC Holdings PSUs and PPSUs pursuant to the prior approval of the BGC Compensation Committee in 2016. In addition, the 2019 amount under column (e) for Mr. Merkel represents $1,096,054, which represents 50% of $2,192,108, which is Newmark’s allocation of (i) the redemption of 90,000 BGC Holdings PPSUs at the determination price of $6.26 per PPSU and redemption of 110,000 BGC Holdings PSUs for zero; (ii) the issuance of 93,560 shares of BGC Class A common stock at $6.26 per share, which is less applicable taxes and withholdings; (iii) the redemption of 40,909 Newmark Holdings PPSUs at the determination price of $10.70 per PPSU and the redemption of 50,000 Newmark Holdings PSUs for zero; and (iv) the issuance of 42,864 shares of Newmark Class A common stock at $10.26 per share, which is less applicable taxes and withholdings, as approved by the BGC Compensation Committee for Mr. Merkel on February 22, 2019. The foregoing amount of $2,192,108 was allocated 50% to BGC and 50% to Newmark based on the allocation methodology for Mr. Merkel. Such redeemed BGC Holdings PSUs and PPSUs were originally issued in 2018 pursuant to the prior approval of the BGC Compensation Committee in 2016, and such redeemed Newmark Holdings PSUs and PPSUs were originally issued in 2018 in connection with the issuance of such BGC Holdings PSUs and PPSUs.

For Mr. Merkel, column (e) does not include the fair value of the cancellation on December 19, 2019 of 145,464 non-exchangeable Newmark Holdings PSUs held by Mr. Merkel, and the cancellation of 178,179 non-exchangeable Newmark Holdings PPSUs (which had an average determination price of $10.61 per unit) because the foregoing units had been previously granted in partial payment of prior years’ Incentive Plan bonuses at full notional value. Additionally, on December 19, 2019, Mr. Merkel exchanged 4,222 already exchangeable Newmark Holdings PSUs, which were units distributed to him in the Separation, in exchange for 3,940 shares of Class A common stock. These transactions resulted in Mr. Merkel being issued a total of 132,429 shares of Class A common stock. On that same day, the Company purchased Mr. Merkel’s 132,429 shares issued pursuant to the above at the closing price of our Class A common stock on the date of approval, which was $13.61, for total net proceeds of approximately $1,802,359.

On March 16, 2021, the Compensation Committee approved the right of Mr. Merkel to convert 30,926 non-exchangeable Newmark Holdings PSUs held by Mr. Merkel into 28,962 shares of Class A common stock (which, based on the closing price of the Class A common stock of $11.09 per share on such date and using the exchange ratio of 0.9365, had a value of $321,189). On March 16, 2021, Mr. Merkel converted these 30,926 non-exchangeable Newmark Holdings PSUs into 28,962 shares of Newmark Class A common stock which the Company repurchased on the same day for $321,189 in total consideration, less applicable taxes and withholding, under its then-current buyback program. Column (e) does not include any of the foregoing units because they had been previously granted in partial payment of prior years’ Incentive Plan bonuses at full notional value.

Column (e) for Mr. Merkel also does not include the following rights granted by the Compensation Committee to Mr. Merkel: (a) on April 27, 2021, (i) the redemption of (i) 73,387 non-exchangeable Newmark Holdings PSUs held by Mr. Merkel, which, as adjusted by the then applicable exchange ratio of 0.9365, were converted into 68,727 shares of our Class A common stock and then repurchased by the Company for $10.67 per unit (the April 27, 2021 closing price of our Class A common stock), and (ii) the redemption of certain of Mr. Merkel’s non-exchangeable Newmark Holdings PPSUs for a tax payment of $82,560; and (b) on June 28, 2021, (i) the redemption of 51,124.28 non-exchangeable Newmark PSUs held by Mr. Merkel, which, as adjusted by the then applicable exchange ratio of 0.9403, were converted into 48,072 shares of our Class A common stock, and (ii) the redemption of certain of Mr. Merkel’s non-exchangeable PPSUs for a tax payment of $329,155. The foregoing units were previously granted in partial payment of prior years’ Incentive Plan bonuses at full notional value.

For 2020, Mr. Lutnick’s Incentive Plan bonus was paid $3,450,000 in the form of 166,025 non-exchangeable Newmark Holdings PSUs and 166,025 non-exchangeable Newmark Holdings PPSUs; Mr. Gosin’s Incentive Plan bonus was paid $7,933,891 in the form of 381,804 non-exchangeable Newmark Holdings PSUs and 381,804 non-exchangeable Newmark Holdings PPSUs; Mr. Rispoli’s bonus was paid $392,288 the form of 18,878 non-exchangeable Newmark Holdings PSUs and 18,878 non-exchangeable Newmark Holdings PPSUs and Mr. Merkel’s bonus was paid $579,000 in the form of 27,864 non- exchangeable Newmark Holdings PSUs and 27,864 non-exchangeable Newmark Holdings PPSUs.

For 2019, Mr. Lutnick’s Incentive Plan bonus was paid $2,000,000 in cash and $2,500,000 in the form of 130,685 non-exchangeable Newmark Holdings PSUs and 130,685 non-exchangeable Newmark Holdings PPSUs; Mr. Gosin’s Incentive Plan bonus was paid $1,000,000 in cash and $9,500,000 in the form of 496,602 non-exchangeable Newmark Holdings PSUs and 496,602 non-exchangeable Newmark Holdings PPSUs; Mr. Rispoli’s bonus was paid $227,500 in cash and $472,500 the form of 24,699 non-exchangeable Newmark Holdings PSUs and 24,699 non-exchangeable Newmark Holdings PPSUs and Mr. Merkel’s bonus was paid $875,000 in the form of 45,740 non-exchangeable Newmark Holdings PSUs and 45,740 non-exchangeable Newmark Holdings PPSUs.

Grants of Plan-Based

Awards

The following table shows all grants of plan-based awards to the named executive officers in 2021:

Outstanding Equity Awards at Fiscal Year End

None of the named executive officers held any unexercised options as of December 31, 2021. The following table shows all exchangeable units representing a right to acquire shares of our Class A common stock held by each of the named executive officers as of December 31, 2021:

For Mr. Gosin, column (b) represents 434,363 exchangeable Newmark Holdings PSUs, 123,336 exchangeable Newmark Holdings APSUs, 60,873 exchangeable Newmark Holdings PSUs granted in connection with the Spin-Off and 92,464 exchangeable Newmark Holdings APSUs held as of December 31, 2021.

For Mr. Rispoli, column (b) represents 436 exchangeable Newmark Holdings PSUs granted in connection with the Spin-Off held as of December 31, 2021.

These exchangeable Newmark Holdings PSUs and Newmark Holdings APSUs were issued in connection with the Separation and Distribution Agreement and may be exchanged at any time at a 0.9393 exchange ratio as of June 30, 2022 for shares of Newmark’s Class A common stock, subject to adjustment and the terms of the Separation and Distribution Agreement. As of December 31, 2021, the closing market price of a share of Class A common stock was $18.70.

As of December 31, 2021, the named executive officers held the following non-exchangeable Newmark Holdings PSUs, NPSUs or APSUs that are eligible to be granted exchange rights into Newmark Class A common stock: Mr. Lutnick: 1,144,365 units; Mr. Gosin: 885,081 units; Mr. Rispoli: 69,115 units; and Mr. Merkel: 48,738 units. These non-exchangeable Newmark Holdings PSUs/NPSUs/APSUs were issued in connection with the Separation and Distribution Agreement.

As of December 31, 2021, Messrs. Gosin, Rispoli and Mr. Merkel did not hold any non-exchangeable Newmark Holdings NPSUs that are eligible to be replaced by non-exchangeable Newmark Holdings PSUs/PPSUs, which in turn would be eligible to be granted exchange rights for shares of Newmark Class A common stock or cash.

Option Exercises and Stock Vested

During 2021, Newmark had no outstanding stock options, no options were exercised by any of the named executive officers and no stock vested for any of the named executive officers.

Potential Payments upon Termination and Change in Control

The following table provides information regarding the estimated amounts payable to the named executive officers listed below, upon either termination or continued employment if such change in control had occurred on December 31, 2021 under their change in control and other agreements, described below, in effect on December 31, 2021. For Mr. Gosin, we have reflected 100% of the amounts he would be paid on a termination of his employment without “cause,” because the payments would have been the same whether or not a change in control of BGC Partners or Newmark had occurred. Messrs. Merkel and Rispoli are not eligible for additional benefits upon termination or a change in control. All amounts are determined, where applicable, using the $18.70 closing market price of our Class A common stock as of December 31, 2021, and the exchange ratio of 0.9444 as of December 31, 2021 to the extent applicable in accordance with SEC rules. All amounts, including estimated vesting of equity compensation and tax gross-up payments, are subject to the specific terms and conditions set forth in the applicable change in control or other agreements and applicable law:

At December 31, 2021, Mr. Lutnick held 1,144,365 of such non-exchangeable, non-preferred Newmark Holdings limited partnership units including PSUs and NPSUs. Based on the closing price of Newmark Class A common stock of $18.70 on December 31, 2021 and the exchange ratio of 0.9444 as of December 31, 2021 with respect to the distribution earning units (i.e., the exchange ratio is not applicable to the NPSUs), the aggregate fair value of the shares and cash underlying such grants would have been $20,469,731.

As of December 31, 2020, Mr. Lutnick did not hold any non-exchangeable Newmark Holdings PPSUs, PPSU-Hs and PNPSUs.

As of December 31, 2020, Mr. Lutnick did not hold any shares of our restricted stock. In each case, the units exclude any units subject to redemption for zero or for cash in accordance with applicable agreements. See “—Change of Control Agreements”.

See “—Change of Control Agreements”. Newmark would have borne the expense of each of the above transactions if they had occurred, including with respect to the non-exchangeable BGC Holdings PSUs held by Mr. Gosin.

At December 31, 2021, Mr. Gosin held 885,081 of such non-exchangeable Newmark Holdings PSU and APSU units. Based on the closing price of our Class A common stock of $18.70 on December 31, 2021 and the exchange ratio of 0.9444 as of December 31, 2021, the value of the shares underlying such grants of exchange rights would have been $15,630,778.

At December 31, 2021, Mr. Gosin held 905,371 HDU units. Based on the closing price of BGC Class A common stock of $4.65 on December 31, 2021, the value of the shares underlying such grants of exchange rights would have been $4,209,975.

At December 31, 2021, Mr. Gosin did not hold any shares of Newmark restricted stock.

Change in Control Agreements

On December 13, 2017, Mr. Lutnick entered into a Change of Control Agreement with us (which we refer to as the “Change of Control Agreement”) providing that, upon a change in control, all stock options, RSUs, restricted stock, and other awards based on shares of our Class A common stock held by him immediately prior to such change in control shall vest in full and become immediately exercisable, and all limited partnership units in Newmark Holdings shall, if applicable, vest in full and be granted immediately exchangeable exchange rights for shares of our Class A common stock. The Change of Control Agreement also contains provisions relating to the continuation of medical and life insurance benefits for two years following termination or extension of employment, as applicable.

Under the Change of Control Agreement, if a change in control of the Company occurs (which will occur in the event that none of Cantor or any of its affiliates has a controlling interest in us) and Mr. Lutnick elects to terminate his employment with us upon the change in control pursuant to a written notice of his resignation provided at any time prior to the change in control, he will receive in a lump sum in cash an amount equal to two times the sum of his annual base salary and his prior year’s annual bonus, and receive medical benefits for two years after the termination of his employment (provided that, if Mr. Lutnick becomes re-employed and is eligible to receive medical benefits under another employer-provided plan, the former medical benefits will be secondary to the latter). If a change in control occurs and Mr. Lutnick does not so elect to terminate his employment with us, he will receive in a lump sum in cash an amount equal to his annual base salary and his prior year’s annual bonus, and receive medical benefits, provided that in the event that, during the three-year period following the change in control, his employment is terminated by us (other than by reason of his death or disability), he will receive in a lump sum in cash an amount equal to his annual base salary and his prior year’s annual bonus. The Change of Control Agreement further provides for certain tax gross-up payments, provide for no duty of Mr. Lutnick to mitigate amounts due by seeking other employment and provide for payment of legal fees and expenses as a result of any dispute with respect to the Change of Control Agreement. The Change of Control Agreement further provides for indemnification of Mr. Lutnick in connection with a challenge thereof. In the event of death or disability, or termination in the absence of a change in control, Mr. Lutnick will be paid only his accrued salary to the date of death, disability, or termination. The Change of Control Agreement is terminable by the Company upon two years’ advance notice on or after the 10-year anniversary of the closing of the IPO.

As of the date hereof, Mr. Lutnick is party to a substantially similar change of control agreement with BGC Partners.

Additionally, in connection with our IPO, in December 2017 Mr. Gosin entered into letter agreements with each of BGC Holdings and Newmark Holdings providing that in the event that BGC Partners or Newmark are no longer controlled by Cantor, Mr. Lutnick or one of their affiliates, any PSUs relating to BGC Holdings or Newmark Holdings, as applicable, then held by Mr. Gosin at the time of the change in control shall be exchanged into restricted shares of the applicable BGC or Newmark Class A common stock (subject to reduction for taxes and withholdings). Such shares shall be transferable ratably over the first through third anniversaries of such change in control, provided that Mr. Gosin continues to satisfy the non-compete, non-solicitation and non-disparagement conditions set forth in the share documentation through the applicable transfer date.

2021 Lutnick Award Agreement

On December 27, 2021, the Compensation Committee approved a one-time bonus award to Mr. Lutnick (the “Award”), which was evidenced by the execution and delivery of a Retention Bonus Agreement, dated December 28, 2021, and described in detail above under the heading “2021 Lutnick Award.” The provisions of the Change of Control Agreement do not apply to the Award.

Employment Agreements

In connection with the completion of the IPO, Newmark OpCo and Barry M. Gosin entered into the Gosin Employment Agreement, pursuant to which Mr. Gosin serves as Chief Executive Officer of Newmark, reporting directly to Mr. Lutnick. The Gosin Employment Agreement provides for a term commencing as of December 1, 2017 and ending on the earlier of (i) the twelve-month anniversary of the date on which either party notifies the other party in writing of its intention to terminate the agreement and (ii) the date the agreement is otherwise terminated in accordance with its terms.

The Gosin Employment Agreement provides that Mr. Gosin is entitled to receive (i) an annual base salary of $1,000,000, all of which shall be paid in cash, (ii) commissions under the terms and conditions applicable to Mr. Gosin and in accordance with Newmark’s then-current policies, provided that the payment of any such Commissions must be approved by our Compensation Committee, and (iii) a discretionary annual bonus, subject to the approval of and achievement by Mr. Gosin of any performance goals or targets as may be established by our Compensation Committee.

During the term of employment, Newmark OpCo may terminate the Gosin Employment Agreement for “Cause,” as defined therein, without further obligation, upon death or disability, or without Cause. Amounts payable upon termination for death or disability shall be determined in accordance with Newmark’s then-current policies. If Mr. Gosin is terminated without Cause, he shall be entitled to receive, subject to his execution of a customary release, (i) his salary through the remainder of the term of employment and (ii) if applicable, Mr. Gosin’s non-exchangeable BGC Holdings and Newmark Holdings units will, as determined by the applicable General Partner, be (y) redeemed for cash or stock ratably over the first four anniversaries of such termination or (z) exchanged into restricted shares of stock and become transferable ratably over the first through fourth anniversaries of such termination (provided that, with respect to clauses (x) and (y), Mr. Gosin continues to satisfy the non-compete, non-solicitation and non-disparagement conditions set forth in the share documentation through the applicable transfer date).

In addition, pursuant to the letter agreements between Mr. Gosin and each of BGC Holdings and Newmark Holdings, in the event of Mr. Gosin’s permanent retirement from Newmark and the real estate brokerage industry, it is the current intention of the General Partner of BGC Holdings and the General Partner of Newmark Holdings that Mr. Gosin’s PSUs then held at the time of retirement shall, at Mr. Gosin’s election, either be (i) redeemed for cash or BGC or Newmark Class A common stock, as applicable, ratably over the first through fourth anniversaries of such retirement or (ii) exchanged into BGC or Newmark restricted shares of Class A common stock, as applicable, upon such retirement and become transferable ratably over the first through fourth anniversaries of such retirement; provided that Mr. Gosin continues to satisfy the non-compete, non-solicitation and non-disparagement conditions set forth in the share documentation through the applicable transfer date. Mr. Gosin may also request to remain a partner in BGC Holdings.

Mr. Gosin is subject to confidentiality, non-competition, non-solicitation and non-disparagement obligations. For as long as Mr. Gosin does not compete with Newmark, subject to customary exceptions including ownership of less than 1% of the securities of a publicly traded competitor and certain investments in ownership of real property, during the 24 months after any termination, and, provided that he executes and delivers a customary release, among other requirements, Mr. Gosin is entitled to receive $83,333.33 per month during the non-compete period (unless Newmark OpCo elects not to continue to enforce the non-compete, at

which time payments will cease). He also agreed not to solicit or perform services for any clients or prospective clients of Newmark for such 24-month period and not to solicit any employees, consultants or independent contractors of Newmark for a five-year period following termination of his employment.

Mr. Gosin is also entitled to certain rights in the event of a Change in Control. See “—Change of Control Agreements” above.

2021 Principal Executive Officer Pay Ratio

The following information contains the relationship of the median annual total compensation of employees and independent contractors and brokers of Newmark and its subsidiaries to the annual total compensation of Mr. Lutnick, our Chairman and principal executive officer.

For 2021, we determined a new median employee in accordance with SEC rules. Our median employee was an Administrative Assistant in the United States.

We selected December 31, 2021 as the date used to identify our “median employee” whose annual total compensation was the median of the annual total compensation of all our applicable employees and independent contractors and brokers (other than our Chairman) for 2021. Based on our internal records, our global employee and independent contractor/broker population as of December 31, 2021 consisted of approximately 5,851 individuals, including full-time, part-time, temporary and seasonal employees, with approximately 84% of these employees working in the United States and approximately 16% working in various non-U.S. locations consisting of Australia, Belgium, Canada, Columbia, Costa Rica, France, Germany, Hong Kong, India, Italy, Japan, the Netherlands, Panama, People’s Republic of China, Poland, Republic of Mexico, Singapore, Switzerland, and the United Kingdom.

To identify the “median employee,” we aggregated actual base salary earnings or commission draw in 2021, overtime earnings paid in 2021 for employees eligible to earn overtime, bonus awards earned in 2021 and paid in the first quarter of 2022 and the grant date value of any equity awards granted in 2021. Bonus awards can consist of discretionary bonuses, forgivable loans, cash advance distribution agreements and promissory notes. We annualized the compensation of employees and independent contractors and brokers who began employment during the fiscal year. In addition, for any persons who provide services to Cantor and its affiliates (other than BGC Partners and its consolidated subsidiaries), the total compensation of such persons for purposes of calculating the pay ratio was consistent with the allocations used by the Company for financial accounting purposes in its 2021 consolidated financial statements. We then converted any compensation paid in foreign currency to U.S. dollars using the published rate for December 31, 2021 on https://www.oanda.com. The sum of these amounts served as our “consistently applied compensation measure,” we used in identifying the median employee. We did not apply a cost of living adjustment to the data.

Once the median employee was identified, the pay ratio for the annual total compensation of the median employee to the principal executive officer was calculated for the 2021 fiscal year in accordance with the requirements of Item 402(c)(2)(x) of Regulation S-K and the pay ratio was determined to be as follows:

The foregoing comparison includes the payment to Mr. Lutnick of his 2021 one-time Award in the amount of $20,000,000 for 2021. If the Lutnick Award is excluded for the year, his annual total compensation would have

been $15,025,000 and the ratio of the annual total compensation of the Chairman to the median employee of the Company would have been approximately 174 to 1.

As an additional comparison, the pay ratio for the annual total compensation of the median employee to Mr. Gosin, our Chief Executive Officer, as calculated on the same basis was approximately 146 to 1.

Compensation of Directors

Directors who are also our employees do not receive additional compensation for serving as director. The compensation schedule for our non-employee directors is as follows:

On April 27, 2020, our independent directors volunteered to forego 15% of their annual cash retainer effective immediately until December 31, 2020.

We also pay each non-employee director $2,000 for each meeting of our Board of Directors and $1,000 for each meeting of a committee of our Board actually attended, whether in person or by telephone. Under our policy, none of our non-employee directors is to be paid more than $3,000 in the aggregate for attendance at meetings held on the same date. Non-employee directors may also receive additional per diem fees for services as a director at the rate of $1,000 per day, with a limit of $5,000 per matter, for additional time spent on Board or Committee matters as directed from time to time by our Board. Non-employee directors also are reimbursed for all out-of-pocket expenses incurred in attending meetings of our Board or its Committees on which they serve.

In addition to the cash compensation described above, under our current policy, upon the appointment or initial election of a non-employee director, we grant to such non-employee director RSUs equal to the value of shares of our Class A common stock that could be purchased for $70,000 at the closing price of our Class A common stock on the trading date of the appointment or initial election of the non-employee director (rounded down to the next whole share). These RSUs vest equally on each of the first two anniversaries of the grant date, provided that the non-employee director is a member of our Board at the opening of business on such dates.

Thereafter, we expect to annually grant to each non-employee director RSUs equal to the value of shares of our Class A common stock that could be purchased for $50,000 on the date of his or her re-election in consideration for services provided. These RSUs will vest equally on each of the first two anniversaries of the grant date, provided that the non-employee director is a member of our Board at the opening of business on such dates.

2021 Director Compensation Payments

The table below summarizes the compensation paid to our non-employee directors for the year ended December 31, 2021.

Compensation Committee Interlocks and Insider Participation

The Compensation Committee currently consists of Ms. Bauer and Messrs. Snow, McIntyre and Itzkowitz, who joined in August 2022. Ms. Bauer has served as Chair since April 29, 2021, succeeding Mr. Snow who also served as Chair during 2020. All of the members who served on the Committee during 2021 were independent directors. No member of the Committee had any relationship with the Company during 2021 pursuant to which disclosure would be required under applicable SEC rules. With the exception of Mr. Lutnick, during 2021, none of our executive officers served as a member of the board of directors or the compensation committee, or similar body, of a corporation where any of its executive officers served on our Committee or on our Board. Mr. Lutnick serves on the board of directors of BGC Partners.

SECURITY OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS AND MANAGEMENT

The following table sets forth certain information, as of July 31, 2022, with respect to the beneficial ownership of our Class A common stock and Class B common stock by: (1) each stockholder, or group of affiliated stockholders, that owns more than 5% of any class of our outstanding capital stock; (2) each of the named executive officers; (3) each director; and (4) the executive officers and directors as a group. Unless otherwise indicated in the footnotes, the principal address of each of the stockholders, executive officers and directors identified below is located at 125 Park Avenue, New York, New York 10017. Shares of our Class B common stock are convertible into shares of our Class A common stock at any time in the discretion of the holder on a one-for-one basis. Accordingly, a holder of Class B common stock is deemed to be the beneficial owner of an equal number of shares of our Class A common stock for purposes of this table. In addition, certain of the limited partnership interests of Newmark Holdings will be exchangeable with us for shares of our Class A common stock or shares of our Class B common stock equal to the exchange ratio (which, as of June 30, 2022 was and is currently 0.9393, but is subject to adjustment as set forth in the Separation and Distribution Agreement.) The table and footnotes below are based on a one-to-0.9393 exchange ratio. See “Certain Relationships and Related Transactions, and Director Independence —Amended and Restated Newmark Holdings Limited Partnership Agreement—Exchanges.”

As of July 31, 2022, Cantor is obligated to distribute an aggregate of 7,284,935 shares of our Class A common stock consisting of (i) 6,469,630 shares to certain partners of Cantor to satisfy certain of Cantor’s deferred stock distribution obligations provided to such partners on April 1, 2008 (the “April 2008 distribution rights shares”), and (ii) 815,305 shares to certain partners of Cantor to satisfy certain of Cantor’s deferred stock distribution obligations provided to such partners on February 14, 2012 in connection with Cantor’s payment of previous quarterly partnership distributions (the “February 2012 distribution rights shares” and, together with the April 2008 distribution rights shares, the “distribution rights shares”), all of which can be distributed within 60 days of July 31, 2022. Certain partners elected to receive their shares and others elected to defer receipt of their shares until a future date. As a result, certain of these distribution rights shares are included both in the number of shares beneficially owned directly by Cantor, and indirectly by CF Group Management, Inc. (“CFGM”) and Mr. Lutnick as a result of their control of Cantor, and in the number of shares beneficially owned directly by CFGM, Mr. Lutnick and the other recipients of distribution rights shares, resulting in substantial duplications in the number of shares set forth in the table below. Once Cantor delivers these 7,284,935 distribution rights shares, these shares will no longer be reflected as beneficially owned directly by Cantor and indirectly by CFGM and Mr. Lutnick as a result of their control of Cantor. Instead, beneficial ownership of the shares will only be reported by CFGM and Mr. Lutnick to the extent of their direct holdings of the shares, and Mr. Lutnick’s indirect holdings as a result of his control of KBCR Management Partners, LLC (“KBCR”) and LFA LLC (“LFA”), and by the other recipients of the distribution rights shares.

These amounts include an aggregate of 7,284,935 distribution rights shares consisting of (a) 6,469,630 April 2008 distribution rights shares and (b) 815,305 February 2012 distribution rights shares, which may generally be issued to such partners upon request.

Equity Compensation Plan Information as of December 31, 2021

INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM FEES

The following table sets forth the aggregate fees incurred by us for audit and other services rendered by Ernst & Young, during the years ended December 31, 2021 and 2020:

“Audit-related fees” are fees for assurance and related services that are reasonably related to the performance of the audit or review of the financial statements and internal control over financial reporting, including audit fees for the Company’s employee benefit plan. Audit related fees includes fees for registration statements. “Tax fees” are fees for tax compliance, tax advice and tax planning, and “all other fees” are fees for any services not included in the other categories.

AUDIT COMMITTEE’S PRE-APPROVAL POLICIES AND PROCEDURES

During 2021, our Audit Committee specifically approved the appointment of Ernst & Young to be our independent auditors for the year ended December 31, 2021. Ernst & Young was also approved to perform reviews of our quarterly financial reports within the year ended December 31, 2021 and certain other audit- related services such as accounting consultations. Pursuant to our Audit Committee Charter, the Committee will pre-approve audit services, internal control-related services and permitted non-audit services to be performed for us by Ernst & Young.

REPORT OF THE AUDIT COMMITTEE OF OUR BOARD OF DIRECTORS

The Audit Committee (the “Committee”) of the Board of Directors (the “Board”) is made up solely of independent directors, as defined under applicable Nasdaq Global Select Stock Market and Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”) rules, and it operates under a written Charter adopted by the Board and the Committee. The composition of the Committee, the attributes of its members and its responsibilities, as reflected in its Charter, are intended to be in accordance with applicable requirements for corporate audit committees. The Committee reviews and assesses the adequacy of its Charter and its performance on an annual basis. A copy of the Audit Committee Charter is available on the Company’s website at https://ir.nmrk.com/disclaimer-and-legal-information under the heading “Charter of the Audit Committee of the Board of Directors,” or upon written request from the Company free of charge.

As described more fully in its Charter, the primary function of the Committee is to assist the Board in its general oversight of the Company’s financial reporting, internal control over financial reporting and audit process. Management is responsible for the preparation, presentation and integrity of the Company’s financial statements; accounting and financial reporting principles; internal control over financial reporting; and procedures designed to ensure compliance with accounting standards, and applicable laws and regulations. The Company’s independent registered public accounting firm (the “Auditors”) is responsible for performing an independent audit of the Company’s annual consolidated financial statements, and a review of its quarterly consolidated financial statements, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (the “PCAOB”), and an independent audit of the Company’s internal control over financial reporting and on the effectiveness of such control.

The Committee has the sole authority to appoint or replace the Auditors and is directly responsible for the oversight of the scope of the Auditors’ role and the determination of its compensation. We are submitting the appointment of Ernst & Young for the year ending December 31, 2022 to the stockholders for ratification as a matter of good corporate practice. If the stockholders do not ratify the appointment, the Board and the Committee will reconsider the appointment. Even if the appointment of Ernst & Young is ratified, the Committee retains the discretion to appoint a different independent auditor at any time if it determines that such a change is in the best interests of the Company and its stockholders.

Although each of the members of the Committee has experience that qualifies him or her as an audit committee financial expert, none of the Committee members is currently a professional accountant or auditor, and the Committee’s functions are not intended to duplicate or to certify the activities of management and the Auditors, nor can the Committee certify that the Auditors are “independent” under applicable rules. The Committee serves a board-level oversight role, in which it provides advice, counsel and direction to management and the Auditors on the basis of the information it receives, discussions with management and the Auditors, and the experience of the Committee’s members in business, financial and accounting matters.

The Committee has an annual agenda that includes reviewing the Company’s financial statements, internal control, and audit matters, as well as related party transactions. The Committee meets each quarter with management and the Auditors to review the Company’s interim financial results before the publication of the Company’s quarterly and annual financial results press releases, and periodically in executive sessions. Management’s and the Auditors’ presentations to and discussions with the Committee cover various topics and events that may have significant financial impact and/or are the subject of discussions between management and the Auditors.

In accordance with Committee policy and the requirements of law, all services to be provided by the Auditors and their affiliates are subject to pre-approval by the Committee. This includes audit services, audit- related services, and any permitted non-audit tax and other services. In addition, the Committee regularly evaluates the performance and independence of the Auditors. Accordingly, the Committee has reviewed and pre-approved all services provided by Ernst & Young subsequent to the firm’s engagement in connection with our IPO in December 2017.

In fulfilling its responsibilities, the Committee has met and held discussions with management and Ernst & Young regarding the fair and complete presentation of the Company’s financial results. The Committee has discussed significant accounting policies applied by the Company in its financial statements, as well as alternative treatments. The Committee has met to review and discuss the Company’s annual audited and quarterly consolidated financial statements for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2021 (including the disclosures contained in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K with the SEC under the heading “Item 8 – Financial Statements and Supplementary Data” and Quarterly Reports on Form 10-Q filed with the SEC under the heading “Item 1 – Financial Statements (unaudited)” with management and Ernst & Young. The Committee also reviewed and discussed with management, the internal auditors, and Ernst & Young the Company’s compliance with Section 404 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act, namely, management’s annual report on the Company’s internal control over financial reporting.

The Committee has discussed with Ernst & Young the matters required to be discussed by PCAOB Auditing Standard No. 16, “Communications with Audit Committees” (AS 16). In addition, the Committee has received and reviewed the written disclosures and the letter from Ernst & Young required by applicable requirements of the PCAOB regarding the communications of Ernst & Young with the Committee concerning independence, and has discussed with Ernst & Young the firm’s independence from the Company and management, including all relationships between the firm and the Company or its management. The Committee also has considered whether the provision of permitted non-audit services by Ernst & Young is compatible with maintaining the firm’s independence.

In reliance on the reviews and discussions referred to above, the Committee recommended to the Board of Directors, and the Board approved, the inclusion of the audited financial statements of the Company in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2021, filed with the SEC on March 1, 2022.

Dated: August 15, 2022

THE AUDIT COMMITTEE

Michael Snow, Chair

Virginia S. Bauer

Kenneth A. McIntyre

Jay Itzkowitz

PROPOSAL 2— RATIFICATION OF APPOINTMENT OF OUR INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

The Audit Committee has appointed Ernst & Young as our independent registered public accounting firm for fiscal year ending December 31, 2022. We are asking stockholders to ratify the appointment of Ernst & Young as our independent registered public accounting firm at the Annual Meeting. Representatives of Ernst & Young are expected to participate in the Annual Meeting. They will have the opportunity to make a statement if they desire to do so and are expected to be available to respond to appropriate questions.

Our Amended and Restated Bylaws (“Bylaws”) do not require that the stockholders ratify the appointment of Ernst & Young as our independent auditors for fiscal year 2022. However, we are submitting the appointment of Ernst & Young to the stockholders for ratification as a matter of good corporate practice. If the stockholders do not ratify the appointment, the Board and the Audit Committee will re-consider the appointment. Even if the appointment of Ernst & Young is ratified, the Audit Committee retains the discretion to appoint a different independent auditor at any time if it determines that such a change is in the best interests of the Company and its stockholders. At this time, the Board and the Audit Committee believe that the continued retention of Ernst & Young to serve as our independent auditors is in the best interest of the Company and its stockholders.

VOTE REQUIRED FOR APPROVAL

The affirmative vote of the holders of a majority of the Total Voting Power present in person or represented by proxy at the Annual Meeting and entitled to vote is required to approve this proposal to ratify the appointment of Ernst & Young. Abstentions will have the same effect as a vote against the proposal.

RECOMMENDATION OF OUR BOARD OF DIRECTORS AND AUDIT COMMITTEE

OUR BOARD OF DIRECTORS AND AUDIT COMMITTEE RECOMMEND THAT ALL

STOCKHOLDERS VOTE “FOR” THE RATIFICATION OF ERNST & YOUNG AS OUR INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM FOR FISCAL YEAR 2022.

PROPOSAL 3—APPROVAL OF AN ADVISORY VOTE ON EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION

The Board is committed to sound compensation governance and recognizes the interest of stockholders in executive compensation matters. On an annual basis, we provide our stockholders with an opportunity to cast an advisory vote to approve the compensation of our named executive officers, as disclosed in the Compensation Discussion and Analysis, compensation tables and narratives of this Proxy Statement.

This stockholder advisory vote will not be binding on the Company, the Board, or the Compensation Committee. Nevertheless, the Board and the Compensation Committee will take into account the outcome of the stockholder advisory vote when making future executive compensation decisions.

As discussed in our Compensation Discussion and Analysis, our executive compensation program, which is under the direction and control of our Compensation Committee, is designed to integrate our executive compensation with the achievement of our short-term and long-term business objectives and to assist us in attracting, motivating and retaining the highest quality executive officers and rewarding them for superior performance. Different components of our executive compensation program are geared to short-term and longer- term performance, with the goal of increasing stockholder value over the long term.

We believe that the compensation of our executive officers should reflect their success in attaining key corporate objectives, such as growth or maintenance of market position, success in attracting and retaining qualified brokers and other professionals, increasing or maintaining revenues and/or profitability, developing new products and marketplaces, completing acquisitions, dispositions, restructurings, and other value-enhancing transactions and integrating any such transactions, as applicable, meeting established goals for operating earnings, earnings per share and increasing the total return for stockholders, including stock price and dividend increases, and maintaining and developing customer relationships and long-term competitive advantage. We also believe that executive compensation should reflect achievement of individual managerial objectives established for specific executive officers at the beginning of the fiscal year as well as reflect specific achievements by such individuals over the course of the year. We further believe that specific significant events led by executives, including acquisitions, dispositions and other significant transactions, should be given significant weight. We believe that the performance of our executives in managing our Company, considered in light of general economic and specific Company, industry and competitive conditions, should be the basis for determining their overall compensation.

From time to time, our Compensation Committee also makes one-time awards in consideration of specific events and achievements, including, for example, the December 2021 Award to Mr. Lutnick in consideration of his delivering superior financial results and creating substantial value as described above under “2021 Lutnick Award.” The 2021 Lutnick Award is the subject of legal challenge. See “Certain Relationships and Related Transactions, and Director Independence—Derivative Suit.”

We also believe that the compensation of our executive officers should not generally be based on the short- term performance of our Class A common stock, whether favorable or unfavorable, but rather that the price of our stock will, in the long term, reflect our overall performance and, ultimately, the management of our Company by our executives. We believe that the long-term performance of our stock is reflected in executive compensation through the grant of awards, including limited partnership units and related exchange rights and cash settlement awards, restricted stock, RSUs, and other equity and partnership awards.

Stockholders are encouraged to read our Compensation Discussion and Analysis in this Proxy Statement for more detailed information about our executive compensation program and how it reflects our philosophy and is linked to our performance. The non-binding stockholder advisory vote on executive compensation is not intended to address any specific component of our executive compensation program; rather, the vote relates to the overall compensation of our named executive officers, as described in this Proxy Statement in accordance with the compensation disclosure rules of the SEC.

We will ask our stockholders to approve the following resolution at the Annual Meeting:

RESOLVED, that the Company’s stockholders approve, on an advisory basis, the compensation paid to the Company’s named executive officers, as disclosed in the Company’s Proxy Statement for the 2022 Annual Meeting of Stockholders pursuant to Item 402 of Regulation S-K, including the Compensation Discussion and Analysis, compensation tables and narratives.

VOTE REQUIRED FOR APPROVAL

The affirmative vote of the holders of a majority of the Total Voting Power present in person or represented by proxy at the Annual Meeting and entitled to vote is required to approve the resolution. Abstentions will have the same effect as a vote against the proposal, but broker non-votes will have no effect on the vote. However, the stockholder vote on executive compensation is advisory and, therefore, not binding on the Company, the Board of Directors, or the Compensation Committee. Nevertheless, the Board and the Committee will take into account the outcome of the stockholder advisory vote when making future executive compensation decisions.

RECOMMENDATION OF OUR BOARD OF DIRECTORS AND COMPENSATION COMMITTEE

OUR BOARD OF DIRECTORS AND COMPENSATION COMMITTEE RECOMMEND THAT ALL

STOCKHOLDERS VOTE “FOR” THE APPROVAL OF THE RESOLUTION.

CERTAIN RELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED TRANSACTIONS, AND DIRECTOR INDEPENDENCE

Review, Approval and Ratification of Transactions with Related Persons

The general policy of the Company and our Audit Committee is that all material transactions with a related party, including transactions with BGC Partners and Cantor, the relationships between us and BGC Partners and Cantor and agreements with related parties, as well as all material transactions in which there is an actual, or in some cases, perceived, conflict of interest, including repurchases of Class A common stock or purchases of Newmark Holdings limited partnership interests or other equity interests in our subsidiaries, including from Cantor or our executive officers (see “Repurchases and Purchases”), are subject to prior review and approval by the Committee and its independent members, which will determine whether such transactions or proposals are fair and reasonable to the Company and its stockholders. In general, potential related-party transactions will be identified by our management and discussed with the Audit Committee at their meetings. Detailed proposals, including, where applicable, financial and legal analyses, alternatives and management recommendations, will be provided to the Audit Committee with respect to each issue under consideration and decisions will be made by the Audit Committee with respect to the foregoing related-party transactions after opportunity for discussion and review of materials. When applicable, the Audit Committee will request further information and, from time to time, will request guidance or confirmation from internal or external counsel or auditors. Our policies and procedures regarding related-party transactions are set forth in our Audit Committee Charter and Code of Business Conduct and Ethics, both of which are publicly available on our website at https://ir.nmrk.com/disclaimer-and-legal-information under the headings “Charter of the Audit Committee of the Board of Directors” and “Code of Business Conduct and Ethics,” respectively.

In December 2017, prior to our Separation and IPO, all intercompany arrangements and agreements that were previously approved by the Audit Committee of BGC Partners with respect to BGC Partners and its subsidiaries and Cantor and its subsidiaries were also approved by our Board of Directors with respect to the relationships between us and our subsidiaries and Cantor and its subsidiaries following our IPO on the terms and conditions approved by the BGC Audit Committee during such time that our business was owned by BGC Partners. These arrangements include, but are not limited to, the following: (i) an authorization to provide Cantor real estate and related services, including real estate advice, brokerage, property or facilities management, valuation and advisory and other services; (ii) an authorization to enter into brokerage and similar agreements with respect to the provision of ordinary course brokerage services in circumstances in which such entities customarily provide brokerage services to third-party customers; (iii) an authorization to enter into agreements with Cantor and/or its affiliates, to provide services, including finding and reviewing suitable acquisition or partner candidates, structuring transactions and negotiating and due diligence services in connection with acquisitions and other business strategies in commercial real estate and other businesses from time to time; and (iv) an arrangement to jointly manage exposure to changes in foreign exchange rates.

The following is a description of certain relationships and transactions that have existed or that we have entered into with our directors, executive officers, or stockholders who are known to us to beneficially own more than five percent of our Class A common stock or Class B common stock, including Cantor, and their immediate family members as well as certain other transactions. The following summary does not purport to describe all the terms of such agreements or transactions and is qualified in its entirety by reference to the complete text of these agreements, to the extent filed as exhibits to our most recent Annual Report on Form 10-K, our Amendment No. 1 to such Annual Report filed on Form 10-K/A, and our other filings with the SEC. We urge you to read the full text of these agreements.

Separation, Initial Public Offering, and Spin-Off

Separation and Distribution Agreement

On December 13, 2017, prior to the closing of the IPO, BGC, BGC Holdings, BGC U.S. OpCo, Newmark, Newmark Holdings, Newmark OpCo and, solely for the provisions listed therein, Cantor and BGC Global OpCo

entered into the Separation and Distribution Agreement. The Separation and Distribution Agreement sets forth the agreements among BGC, Cantor, Newmark and their respective subsidiaries regarding, among other things:

Initial Public Offering

In December 2017, we completed our IPO of 23,000,000 shares of Class A common stock. Prior to the IPO, we were a wholly owned subsidiary of BGC Partners. We received approximately $295.4 million in aggregate net proceeds from the IPO, all of which we used to partially repay indebtedness under a certain term loan that we assumed from BGC Partners prior to the closing of our IPO.

New Newmark

To facilitate tax-free exchanges of the Newmark Holdings exchangeable limited partnership interests, Cantor has a one-time right, exercisable at any time after the second anniversary of the Spin-Off and otherwise subject to preserving the tax-free treatment of the Spin-Off to BGC Partners, at Newmark Holdings’ expense to (1) incorporate, or cause the incorporation of, a newly formed, wholly owned subsidiary of ours (which we refer to as “New Newmark”), (2) incorporate, or cause the incorporation of, a newly formed, wholly owned subsidiary of New Newmark (which we refer to as “New Newmark Sub”) and (3) cause the merger of New Newmark Sub with us, with the surviving corporation being a wholly owned subsidiary of New Newmark. In connection with such a merger, our Class A common stock and Class B common stock will each hold equivalent common stock in New Newmark, with identical rights to the applicable class of shares held prior to such merger. As a condition to such merger, we will have received an opinion of counsel, reasonably satisfactory to our Audit Committee, to the effect that such merger will qualify as a “reorganization” within the meaning of Section 368(a) of the Code. Cantor will indemnify us to the extent that we incur any material income taxes as a result of the transactions related to such merger.

Indemnification

Newmark OpCo agreed to indemnify, defend and hold harmless the Cantor group, the BGC Partners group and the Newmark group (other than Newmark OpCo and its subsidiaries) and each of their respective directors, officers, general partners, managers and employees, from and against all liabilities to the extent relating to, arising out of or resulting from: