U.S. lawmakers try again to end 'forever war' authorizations
- Wall Street jumps with rosy outlooks from companies
- Lululemon surges 15% on earnings, guidance beat; Stifel says shares still 'undervalued'
- Pick up 'resilient regional banks' post SVB and Signature Bank collapses - CFRA
- RH delivers gloomy guidance after Q4 results miss as housing market weakness bites
- Meta best-positioned to benefit from potential TikTok ban - Morgan Stanley
FILE PHOTO: U.S. Senator Tim Kaine (D-VA) listens to an introduction of Julie Rikelman, an abortion rights lawyer who represented the Mississippi clinic at the heart of the U.S. Supreme Court's decision to overturn it's landmark 1973 Roe v. Wade decision,
News and research before you hear about it on CNBC and others. Claim your 1-week free trial to StreetInsider Premium here.
By Patricia Zengerle
WASHINGTON (Reuters) -Democratic and Republican U.S. lawmakers introduced legislation on Thursday seeking to repeal two longstanding authorizations for past wars in Iraq, renewing an ongoing effort to reassert Congress' role in deciding whether to send troops into combat.
Democratic Senator Tim Kaine, Republican Senator Todd Young, Republican Representatives Tom Cole and Chip Roy and Democratic Representatives Barbara Lee and Abigail Spanberger led the effort to repeal the 1991 and 2002 Authorizations for the Use of Military Force, or AUMFs.
"The 1991 and 2002 AUMFs are no longer necessary, serve no operational purpose, and run the risk of potential misuse. Congress owes it to our servicemembers, veterans, and families to pass our bill repealing these outdated AUMFs and formally ending the Gulf and Iraq wars," Kaine, who has championed years of efforts to repeal old AUMFs, said in a statement.
Republican and Democratic members of Congress have been arguing for years that Congress has ceded too much authority to the White House over whether troops should be sent into combat, by passing and then failing to repeal open-ended war authorizations.
But members of Congress have been divided over whether it is better for national security to let the AUMFs stand, leaving it to military commanders to decide how best to fight America's enemies. As a result, no AUMF repeal efforts have succeeded, although some have made it through committees or been passed by one chamber of Congress.
"Three presidents have come and gone since Congress last voted to authorize a U.S. invasion of Iraq over twenty years ago; a fourth is now in office. Yet the legacy of these horrific forever wars lives on in the form of the now-obsolete 2002 and 1991 AUMFs," Lee said in a statement.
Under the Constitution, Congress, not the president, has the right to declare war.
In a statement, Senate Democratic Majority Leader Chuck Schumer said he would work with Kaine and Young to move the legislation to the Senate floor, so it can pass quickly.
There was no immediate indication of whether the Republican leaders of the House of Representatives would do the same.
(Reporting by Patricia Zengerle; Editing by Stephen Coates and David Gregorio)
Serious News for Serious Traders! Try StreetInsider.com Premium Free!
You May Also Be Interested In
- Toyota's global sales notch up a February record as parts shortage eases
- China's economy improves in March, will consolidate recovery, says Premier Li
- How to talk to your aging parents about safe driving
Create E-mail Alert Related CategoriesReuters
Sign up for StreetInsider Free!
Receive full access to all new and archived articles, unlimited portfolio tracking, e-mail alerts, custom newswires and RSS feeds - and more!