Tonix Pharma (TNXP) Says TNX-102 SL Phase 3 Did Not Meet Primary Endpoint in Fibromyalgia
- Wall Street gains evaporate, S&P 500 ends lower on Fed tightening timeline
- Tesla (TSLA) Reports Strong Q4 Beat, Achieves Record Vehicle Deliveries in 2021
- Intel (INTC) Reports Q4 Beat, Shares Down 2% on Guidance Miss
- Fed maintains federal funds rate at 0 to 1/4 percent, reduces assets purchases by another $30 billion/month and sees ending them in March
- Ackman Says Pershing Square Bought Over 3.1M Shares of Netflix (NFLX)
News and research before you hear about it on CNBC and others. Claim your 1-week free trial to StreetInsider Premium here.
Tonix Pharmaceuticals Holding Corp. (Nasdaq: TNXP) (Tonix) announced preliminary topline results from its Phase 3 clinical study, AFFIRM, designed to evaluate the safety and efficacy of TNX-102 SL (cyclobenzaprine HCl sublingual tablets), 2.8 mg, in patients with fibromyalgia. AFFIRM was a 12-week randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial of TNX-102 SL taken daily at bedtime, in which 519 participants were enrolled at 35 centers in the U.S. Fibromyalgia is a multi-symptom disorder that originates in the central nervous system and is characterized by widespread pain, non-restorative sleep, fatigue, and disability.
The AFFIRM data did not achieve statistical significance in the primary efficacy endpoint: the proportion of patients who reported a 30 percent or greater reduction in pain from baseline to the end of the 12-week treatment period based on the pre-specified primary analysis (p=0.095, Table 1). However, TNX-102 SL did show statistically significant effects on pain when analyzed by other standard statistical approaches (Table 1). TNX-102 SL activity in fibromyalgia was cross-validated by two additional endpoints, Patient Global Impression of Change (PGIC) and Fibromyalgia Impact Questionnaire-Revised (FIQ-R) (Table 2). These endpoints assess global improvement and a range of fibromyalgia symptoms and function. TNX-102 SL showed strong effects on improving sleep quality by the daily diary and the PROMIS sleep disturbance scale (Table 2). The internal consistency of these results provides clear evidence of beneficial effect of TNX-102 SL for the treatment of fibromyalgia.
Seth Lederman, M.D., president and chief executive officer of Tonix, commented, "TNX-102 SL showed broad beneficial effects across key fibromyalgia symptoms and was well-tolerated in the AFFIRM study. Despite achieving clinically meaningful results from AFFIRM, we have greater clarity on the regulatory path forward in our PTSD program. We will therefore discontinue the fibromyalgia program in order to fully focus Tonix’s resources on advancing our potential breakthrough PTSD program to Phase 3. We owe it to our investors, and to patients who are waiting for meaningful clinical innovation, to steward our resources effectively.” Dr. Lederman continued, “We thank those who contributed to the AFFIRM trial, from the clinical teams to the patients and their families. They helped us evaluate this potential new therapy and their involvement provided valuable clinical and scientific information.”
An unexpected imbalance in patient discontinuations for reasons unrelated to efficacy or tolerability (for example, a patient relocating away from the clinical site) (Table 3), created a negative bias in the primary responder analysis because any patient who left the study, for any reason prior to completion, was labeled a non-responder despite their results up to that point. Another standard statistical method for assessing the 30 percent responder analysis that considers the reason for discontinuation showed statistical significance in the primary pain data (Table 1, P=0.012).
Overall, TNX-102 SL was well-tolerated in the AFFIRM study and the adverse events reported were similar to those seen in other TNX-102 SL clinical studies (Table 4). There were seven serious adverse events (SAEs) reported during the study: four in the placebo group and three in the active group. No new safety signals were observed; multiple causal factors were involved in each SAE, and all were resolved quickly and without sequelae.
Table 1. Primary and Other Standard Analyses of Pain
|30% Responder Analysis Pre-specified||BOCF all discontinuations||P=0.095|
|30% Responder Analysis||BOCF for LOE and AE; LOCF for others||P=0.012|
|ANCOVA; MCFB||Multiple imputation; LOE, AE and ID considered MNAR||P=0.009|
|ANCOVA; MCFB||Multiple imputation; all MNAR except LTF||P=0.042|
|MMRM of MCFB||None||P<0.001|
|50% Responder Analysis||BOCF all discontinuations||P=0.035|
AE- Adverse Event; ANCOVA- Analysis of Covariance; BOCF- Baseline Observation Carried Forward; ID- Investigator Decision; LOCF- Last Observation Carried Forward; LOE- Lack of Efficacy; LTF- Lost to Follow-up; MCFB- Mean Change from Baseline; MMRM- Mixed Models Repeated Measures; MNAR- Missing Not at Random
Table 2. Key Secondary Efficacy Data
|FIQ-R Total Score||MMRM of MCFB||None||<0.001|
|FIQ-R Symptom Domain||MMRM of MCFB||None||<0.001|
|FIQ-R Function Domain||MMRM of MCFB||None||<0.001|
|Clinic 7-day pain recall||MMRM of MCFB||None||0.003|
|FIQ-R Pain Item||MMRM of MCFB||None||<0.001|
|PROMIS Fatigue||MMRM of MCFB||None||<0.001|
|Daily Sleep Quality Diary||MMRM of MCFB||None||<0.001|
|PROMIS Sleep Disturbance||MMRM of MCFB||None||<0.001|
|FIQ-R Sleep Quality Item||MMRM of MCFB||None||<0.001|
Table 3. Reasons for Patient Dropouts/Discontinuations
|Occurrence of an Adverse Event||20 (7.6%)||11 (4.3%)|
|Withdrawal of Consent||15 (5.7%)||3 (1.2%)|
|Investigator Decision||6 (2.3%)||0 (0%)|
|Lack of Efficacy||6 (2.3%)||5 (1.9%)|
|Lost to Follow-up||11 (4.2%)||15 (5.8%)|
|Other||1 (0.4%)||1 (0.4%)|
|Total||59 (22.5%)||35 (13.6%)|
Among subjects randomized to the TNX-102 SL and control arms, 77.5 percent and 86.4 percent, respectively, completed the 12-week dosing period. As observed in other TNX-102 SL clinical studies, the rate of tongue numbness was higher in the active treatment group (40.2 percent vs. 0.8 percent). Transient tongue numbness, the most frequent adverse reaction, is a local effect related to TNX-102 SL sublingual administration and it did not appear to bias efficacy results. The most common systemic adverse reactions occurring in greater than or equal to 3 percent of patients in TNX-102 SL group and greater than placebo, are listed in Table 4.
Table 4. Most Common Systemic Adverse Reactions Occurring in > 3% of Patients in the TNX-102 SL Group and Greater than Placebo
|Preferred term||TNX-102 SL (N = 261)*||Placebo (N=257)*|
|Fatigue||15 (5.7%)||6 (2.3%)|
|Somnolence||8 (3.1%)||4 (1.6%)|
*Safety Population = 518 patients
Serious News for Serious Traders! Try StreetInsider.com Premium Free!
You May Also Be Interested In
- Simpson Manufacturing (SSD) Announces Mike Olosky Promoted to President and Chief Operating Officer
- Blink Charging (BLNK) Announces Agreement with Bridgestone Retail Operations to Bring Electric Vehicle Charging Stations to Tire and Vehicle Service Centers
- Casa Systems (CASA) Announces CFO Departure
Create E-mail Alert Related CategoriesCorporate News, FDA, Management Comments
Sign up for StreetInsider Free!
Receive full access to all new and archived articles, unlimited portfolio tracking, e-mail alerts, custom newswires and RSS feeds - and more!