MARVEL ENTERTAINMENT, Inc. (NY:MVL)

View All ReportsStreetInsider.com Reports on MVL

Dec 31, 2009 04:43 PM Walt Disney (DIS) Completes Acquisition of Marvel Entertainment

Dec 31, 2009 09:27 AM Marvel Entertainment (MVL) Shareholders Approve Merger with Disney (DIS)

Dec 23, 2009 05:30 PM After-Hours Movers 12/23: MRM, BQI, SLGN Higher; ARNA Lower

Dec 23, 2009 05:19 PM S&P Announces Changes to US Index: SLGN for MVL

Nov 3, 2009 07:14 AM Marvel Entertainment (MVL) Tops Q3 Views

View All Press ReleasesCompany Press Releases on MVL

Dec 31, 2009 04:32PM Disney Completes Marvel Acquisition

Dec 31, 2009 09:25AM Marvel Stockholders Approve Disney Merger

Dec 23, 2009 06:11PM Standard & Poor's Announces Change to U.S. Index

StreetInsider Reports on MVL by Category

• Analyst Ratings
• Mergers and Acquisitions
• Earnings
• Guidance
• Stock Buybacks
• Dividends
• Retail Sales
• Management Changes
• Insider Trades
• View More Categories

View All BlogsBlogs on MVL

Jan 16, 2010 02:25 PM Relaunch of Spider-Man Franchise Could Be Shareholder Friendly

Jan 2, 2010 10:05 PM Farallon Ratchets Up With Aetna and Visa

Dec 30, 2009 04:20 PM Closing Bell: Stocks moving around government and year-end (MVL, DIS, SLGN, AAPL, OSIS, KFRC, FNM, CIEN)

Dec 11, 2009 04:00 PM Disney receives new price target -- should I be impressed?

Dec 9, 2009 06:15 PM Consolidation in the video game sector: Too soon to think about?

View All FilingsSEC Filings on MVL

Dec 21, 2009 01:40PM Form 8-K Marvel Entertainment, For: Dec 16

View All Comments Comments on recent MVL articles

ghdhairirons
on Dec 23, 2009
at 08:58 PM ghdhairirons http://www.ghdhairirons.com/ ghd hair straighteners are in best design. http://www.discountukghd.com/ghd-pure-white-limited-edition-hair-straightenersiv-styler-mk4-p-41.html ghd pure white is 63% off, http://www.discountukghd.com/ghd-purple-limited-edition-hair-straighteners-iv-styler-mk4-p-42.html ghd purple is only $90.http://www.ghdhairirons.com/ ghd hair straighteners are in best design. http://www.discountukghd.com/ghd-pure-white-limited-edition-hair-straightenersiv-styler-mk4-p-41.html ghd pure white is 63% off, http://www.discountukghd.com/ghd-purple-limited-edition-hair-straighteners-iv-styler-mk4-p-42.html ghd purple is only $90.
Article: After-Hours Movers 12/23: MRM, BQI, SLGN Higher; ARNA Lower

ANDREW OLIVER SATCHELL
on Nov 13, 2009
at 03:55 PM ANDREW OLIVER SATCHELL EXCELLENT
Article: Trading Radar for 11/03: UBS (UBS), Yamana Gold (AUY), Archer-Daniels (ADM), Royal Caribbean (RCL), Marathon (MRO) Report

bill galloway
on Jul 10, 2008
at 11:53 AM Marvel's Latest 10(b)5 Violations?? Comment by Richard Land, Spokesman, Marvel google news comment Marvel Response to Barron’s Article - Jul 1, 2008 A cursory review of Marvel's "Spokesman's" response to the Barron's article reveals an ongoing policy by Marvel to publish material misstatements and omit to make material statements that accurately represents the facts as Marvel knows it regarding Stan Lee's creator's rights as assigned to Stan Lee Media in Oct 1998. Mr Land, one of the dimmer lights in the investor relations "flak" field, has a mantra that Stan Lee never claimed any rights to his characters- ever- because he has always confirmed his character creations were work for hire for Marvel from 1961-1968- before he ever signed his first contract with Marvel. Marvel and Mr Land know this is a material false statement because Stan sued Marvel in 2002 and stated clearly in his complaint that he made a conditional assignment of his rights to his world famous characters to Marvel and therefore expected to share in the profits derived from his characters- aside from that claim in a federal court that resulted in Marvel paying Stan more than $10 mm in a "sealed" settlement, Marvel's own Exec VP in charge of legal in 1998 swore in a deposition that Stan and his lawyer demanded the new contract Marvel gave him in Nov 1998 or else he would sue Marvel for his ci-creator's rights! This explains why Marvel replaced an ironclad lifetime assignment/employment agreement voided in August 1998 with a non-exclusive lifetime employment rights assignment in November that let Stan compete with Marvel using Marvel's key assets to do so! When will the SEC take action on these false statements and the continued payments to Lee under the fraudulent contract he induced Marvel to enter into in Nov 1998 30 days after assigning everything he owned to SLM?
Article: Could Lawsuits Spell Trouble For Marvel Entertainment (MVL)

danmason
on Jul 2, 2008
at 12:26 PM Stan Lee Media v Marvel for the real story- accepted by the SEC in an "unusual 13D filing" by Jim Nesfield against Marvel management-as referred to in the Baron's article, read what Jim Nesfield, new Chairman of Stan lee Media describes as a collusion between Stan Lee and Marvel 45% shareholder and Chairman Ike perlmutter to defraud shareholders, bankruptcy court of SLM and lenders to Marvel by hiding Styan Lee's assignment of his co-creator's rights, and all other rights he owned in October 1998 to Stan Lee Media
Article: Could Lawsuits Spell Trouble For Marvel Entertainment (MVL)

DouglasC
on Jul 2, 2008
at 10:59 AM trouble for Marvel How can Lee now make public proclamations that what he did was a work for hire? When he sued Marvel, here is what he said: 14. Under the Agreement the Defendants were given the right and assumed the obligation to commercially exploit Mr. Lee's characters, as well as his name. In order to facilitate these rights and obligations, Defendants received a conditional assignment of Mr. Lee's rights in his many world famous and hugely popular characters, and Mr. Lee was entitled to share in the profits from any live action or animation television or movie production based on these characters and other Marvel characters, as well as profits from the exploitation of any ancillary rights associated with such film or television productions, including toys. 15. Throughout his relationship of more than sixty years with Defendants, during which Mr. Lee permitted Defendants to exploit his superhero characters on the understanding that they would share in the profits derived therefrom, Mr. Lee reposed trust and confidence in Defendants to, among other things, deal with him fairly and in good faith, and to pay over to him a portion of the profits derived from such commercial exploitation. ======= As you see, Lee made a conditional assignment of his rights. He asserted then what he denies now after getting paid off by Marvel. Spider Man got his. He got over $10 mil and share of profits. What about the SLM investors, Stan? What about your Oct. 1998 contract with SLM?
Article: Could Lawsuits Spell Trouble For Marvel Entertainment (MVL)

Comments on MVL

外汇
at Jan 11, 2010 01:22 AM wef for the real story- accepted by the SEC in an "unusual 13D filing" by Jim Nesfield against Marvel management-as referred to in the Baron's article, read what Jim Nesfield,外汇交易

Name

Subject

Body

Verification can't see the text?
click here to refresh the image.
what's this?