Obama Administration Vetoes Ban on Apple (AAPL) iPhones, iPads
Get Alerts AAPL Hot Sheet
Price: $166.45 +0.37%
Overall Analyst Rating:
NEUTRAL (= Flat)
Dividend Yield: 0.5%
Revenue Growth %: -4.3%
Overall Analyst Rating:
NEUTRAL (= Flat)
Dividend Yield: 0.5%
Revenue Growth %: -4.3%
Join SI Premium – FREE
Apple (Nasdaq: AAPL) shares are indicated for a higher open Monday following a decision by the White House over the weekend to reverse a potential ban on iPhone and iPad imports into the U.S.
Following reports late last week that the Obama administration was considering the move, it was affirmed on August 3, 2013. The call follows an unfavorable ruling issued last year against Apple in patent litigation with Samsung.
In the letter, U.S. Trade Rep Michael Froman said the decision was made to prevent patent holders from gaining
This is the first time since 1987 that a presidential administration vetoed an import ban ordered by the U.S. International Trade Commission (ITC), the WSJ noted Monday morning.
Pundits on the ITC order questioned whether or not companies should be allowed to block rival patents deemed essential for the development of new products. Apple had argued that the ban wasn't right because Samsung committed to license
One Apple rep commented to the WSJ,
The full letter is below:
Following reports late last week that the Obama administration was considering the move, it was affirmed on August 3, 2013. The call follows an unfavorable ruling issued last year against Apple in patent litigation with Samsung.
In the letter, U.S. Trade Rep Michael Froman said the decision was made to prevent patent holders from gaining
undue leverage,while also keeping check that competition in the U.S. wasn't unfairly balanced.
This is the first time since 1987 that a presidential administration vetoed an import ban ordered by the U.S. International Trade Commission (ITC), the WSJ noted Monday morning.
Pundits on the ITC order questioned whether or not companies should be allowed to block rival patents deemed essential for the development of new products. Apple had argued that the ban wasn't right because Samsung committed to license
standard essentialpatents.
One Apple rep commented to the WSJ,
We applaud the Administration for standing up for innovation in this landmark case ... Samsung was wrong to abuse the patent system in this way.
The full letter is below:
Serious News for Serious Traders! Try StreetInsider.com Premium Free!
You May Also Be Interested In
- Midday movers: Tesla, Li Auto and CNH Industrial fall; Salesforce rises
- Apple's June guidance will miss Street estimates - Barclays
- Apple, PepsiCo, JetBlue fall premarket; Amazon, GM and UPS rise
Create E-mail Alert Related Categories
Hot Corp. News, Insiders' Blog, LitigationRelated Entities
Barack ObamaSign up for StreetInsider Free!
Receive full access to all new and archived articles, unlimited portfolio tracking, e-mail alerts, custom newswires and RSS feeds - and more!