Form 10-Q YAHOO INC For: Jun 30

Form 10-Q YAHOO INC For: Jun 30

Sign up for StreetInsider Free!

Sign up for StreetInsider Free!

Create E-mail Alert Related Categories

You May Also Be Interested In

Create E-mail Alert Related Categories

Free News Feed

Article Stock Quotes (1)

FREE Breaking News Alerts from StreetInsider.com!

StreetInsider.com Top Tickers, 4/19/2024

1. NFLX
2. TSM
3. ISRG
4. INFY
5. SNV

6. TSLA
7. SMCI
8. SPY
9. SLB
10. PPG

Top News Most Read Special Reports

August 7, 2015 6:26 PM EDT

E-mail

UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D.C. 20549

Form 10-Q

x	QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the quarterly period ended June 30, 2015

¨	TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the transition period from to

Commission File Number 000-28018

Yahoo! Inc.

(Exact name of Registrant as specified in its charter)


Delaware		77-0398689
(State or other jurisdiction of incorporation or organization)		(I.R.S. Employer Identification No.)

701 First Avenue

Sunnyvale, California 94089

(Address of principal executive offices, including zip code)

Registrant’s telephone number, including area code: (408) 349-3300

Indicate by check mark whether the Registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the Registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes x No ¨

Indicate by check mark whether the Registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the Registrant was required to submit and post such files). Yes x No ¨

Indicate by check mark whether the Registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer” and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.


Large accelerated filer	x	Accelerated filer	¨
Non-accelerated filer	¨ (Do not check if a smaller reporting company)	Smaller reporting company	¨

Indicate by check mark whether the Registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act). Yes ¨ No x

Indicate the number of shares outstanding of each of the issuer’s classes of common stock, as of the latest practicable date.


Class		Outstanding at July 31, 2015
Common Stock, $0.001 par value		941,390,842

YAHOO! INC.

TABLE OF CONTENTS


PART I	FINANCIAL INFORMATION	3
Item 1.	Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements (unaudited)	3
	Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets as of December 31, 2014 and June 30, 2015 (unaudited)	3
	Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations for the three and six months ended June 30, 2014 and 2015 (unaudited)	4
	Condensed Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income for the three and six months ended June 30, 2014 and 2015 (unaudited)	5
	Condensed Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for the six months ended June 30, 2014 and 2015 (unaudited)	6
	Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements (unaudited)	7
Item 2.	Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations	32
Item 3.	Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk	51
Item 4.	Controls and Procedures	53
PART II	OTHER INFORMATION	54
Item 1.	Legal Proceedings	54
Item 1A.	Risk Factors	54
Item 2.	Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds	69
Item 3.	Defaults Upon Senior Securities	69
Item 4.	Mine Safety Disclosures	69
Item 5.	Other Information	69
Item 6.	Exhibits	69
	Signatures	70

PART I — FINANCIAL INFORMATION

Item 1. Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements

(unaudited)

YAHOO! INC.

Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets


	December 31,			June 30,
	2014			2015
	(Unaudited, in thousands
	except par values)
ASSETS
Current assets:
Cash and cash equivalents		$ 2,664,098			$ 1,188,169
Short-term marketable securities		5,327,412			4,636,152
Accounts receivable, net		1,032,704			985,105
Prepaid expenses and other current assets		673,504			771,506

Total current assets		9,697,718			7,580,932
Long-term marketable securities		2,230,892			1,169,671
Property and equipment, net		1,487,684			1,524,539
Goodwill		5,152,570			5,146,579
Intangible assets, net		470,842			412,235
Other long-term assets and investments		554,616			475,497
Investment in Alibaba Group		39,867,789			31,555,927
Investments in equity interests		2,489,578			2,326,436

Total assets		$ 61,951,689			$ 50,191,816

LIABILITIES AND EQUITY
Current liabilities:
Accounts payable		$ 238,018			$ 301,433
Income taxes payable related to sale of Alibaba Group ADSs		3,282,293			-
Other accrued expenses and current liabilities		665,828			903,005
Deferred revenue		336,963			202,246

Total current liabilities		4,523,102			1,406,684
Convertible notes		1,170,423			1,201,540
Long-term deferred revenue		20,774			23,442
Other long-term liabilities		143,095			126,138
Deferred tax liabilities related to investment in Alibaba Group		16,154,906			12,768,155
Deferred and other long-term tax liabilities		1,153,797			1,102,007

Total liabilities		23,166,097			16,627,966

Commitments and contingencies (Note 12)
Yahoo! Inc. stockholders’ equity:
Common stock, $0.001 par value; 5,000,000 shares authorized; 949,771 shares issued and 936,838 shares outstanding as of December 31, 2014 and 956,999 shares issued and 939,850 shares outstanding as of June 30, 2015		945			953
Additional paid-in capital		8,496,683			8,633,143
Treasury stock at cost, 12,933 shares as of December 31, 2014 and 17,149 shares as of June 30, 2015		(712,455	)		(913,515	)
Retained earnings		8,937,036			8,936,682
Accumulated other comprehensive income		22,019,628			16,875,339

Total Yahoo! Inc. stockholders’ equity		38,741,837			33,532,602
Noncontrolling interests		43,755			31,248

Total equity		38,785,592			33,563,850

Total liabilities and equity		$ 61,951,689			$ 50,191,816

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these condensed consolidated financial statements.

YAHOO! INC.

Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations


	Three Months Ended						Six Months Ended
	June 30,			June 30,			June 30,			June 30,
	2014			2015			2014			2015
	(Unaudited, in thousands
	except per share amounts)
Revenue		$ 1,084,191			$ 1,243,265			$ 2,216,921			$ 2,469,235

Operating expenses:
Cost of revenue — traffic acquisition costs		43,826			200,230			89,735			383,369
Cost of revenue — other		295,786			295,932			589,389			581,195
Sales and marketing		253,198			274,304			555,523			549,661
Product development		291,778			306,428			560,042			633,175
General and administrative		154,881			180,595			319,504			354,108
Amortization of intangibles		15,164			19,982			33,504			40,055
Gains on sales of patents		(61,500	)		(9,100	)		(61,500	)		(11,100	)
Restructuring charges, net		52,621			19,688			62,108			70,920

Total operating expenses		1,045,754			1,288,059			2,148,305			2,601,383

Income (loss) from operations		38,437			(44,794	)		68,616			(132,148	)
Other expense, net		(13,589	)		(11,741	)		(27,042	)		(42,804	)

Income (loss) before income taxes and earnings in equity interests		24,848			(56,535	)		41,574			(174,952	)
Provision for income taxes		(8,143	)		(58,495	)		(12,360	)		(17,595	)
Earnings in equity interests, net of tax		255,852			95,841			557,254			195,531

Net income (loss)		272,557			(19,189	)		586,468			2,984
Net income attributable to noncontrolling interests		(2,850	)		(2,365	)		(5,183	)		(3,340	)

Net income (loss) attributable to Yahoo! Inc.		$ 269,707			$ (21,554	)		$ 581,285			$ (356	)

Net income (loss) attributable to Yahoo! Inc. common stockholders per share — basic		$ 0.27			$ (0.02	)		$ 0.58			$ (0.00	)

Net income (loss) attributable to Yahoo! Inc. common stockholders per share — diluted		$ 0.26			$ (0.02	)		$ 0.55			$ (0.00	)

Shares used in per share calculation — basic		999,765			937,569			1,004,828			936,159

Shares used in per share calculation — diluted		1,014,692			937,569			1,023,056			936,159

Stock-based compensation expense by function:
Cost of revenue — other		$ 5,356			$ 7,200			$ 30,007			$ 13,209
Sales and marketing		31,233			39,978			81,907			78,099
Product development		39,507			50,762			53,434			98,983
General and administrative		26,349			27,190			46,278			50,535
Restructuring charges, net		-			-			-			2,705

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these condensed consolidated financial statements.

YAHOO! INC.

Condensed Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income (Loss)


	Three Months Ended						Six Months Ended
	June 30,			June 30,			June 30,			June 30,
	2014			2015			2014			2015
	(Unaudited, in thousands)
Net income (loss)		$ 272,557			$ (19,189	)		$ 586,468			$ 2,984

Available-for-sale securities:
Unrealized gains (losses) on available-for-sale securities, net of taxes of $(3,238) and $149,980 for the three months ended June 30, 2014 and 2015, respectively, and $(4,136) and $3,388,114 for the six months ended June 30, 2014 and 2015, respectively		9,788			(212,465	)		16,516			(4,926,084	)
Reclassification adjustment for realized (gains) losses on available-for-sale securities included in net income, net of taxes of $65 and $49 for the three months ended June 30, 2014 and 2015, respectively, and $73 and $(2) for the six months ended June 30, 2014 and 2015, respectively		(109	)		(81	)		(121	)		2

Net change in unrealized gains on available-for-sale securities, net of tax		9,679			(212,546	)		16,395			(4,926,082	)

Foreign currency translation adjustments (“CTA”):
Foreign CTA gains (losses), net of taxes of $9,608 and $(128) for the three months ended June 30, 2014 and 2015, respectively, and $2,422 and $454 for the six months ended June 30, 2014 and 2015, respectively		63,939			38,140			(82,918	)		(233,102	)
Net investment hedge CTA gains (losses), net of taxes of $7,130 and $(9,153) for the three months ended June 30, 2014 and 2015, respectively, and $15,562 and $(10,744) for the six months ended June 30, 2014 and 2015, respectively		(11,862	)		15,404			(25,911	)		18,038

Net foreign CTA losses, net of tax		52,077			53,544			(108,829	)		(215,064	)

Cash flow hedges:
Unrealized gains (losses) on cash flow hedges, net of taxes of $127 and $(1,065) for the three months ended June 30, 2014 and 2015, respectively, and $431 and $(689) for the six months ended June 30, 2014 and 2015, respectively		(1,383	)		5,875			(1,889	)		(5,281	)
Reclassification adjustment for realized (gains) losses on cash flow hedges included in net income, net of taxes of $231 and $529 for the three months ended June 30, 2014 and 2015, respectively, and $504 and $718 for the six months ended June 30, 2014 and 2015, respectively		(285	)		478			(739	)		2,138

Net change in unrealized losses on cash flow hedges, net of tax		(1,668	)		6,353			(2,628	)		(3,143	)

Other comprehensive income (loss)		60,088			(152,649	)		(95,062	)		(5,144,289	)

Comprehensive income (loss)		332,645			(171,838	)		491,406			(5,141,305	)
Less: comprehensive income attributable to noncontrolling interests		(2,850	)		(2,365	)		(5,183	)		(3,340	)

Comprehensive income (loss) attributable to Yahoo! Inc.		$ 329,795			$ (174,203	)		$ 486,223			$ (5,144,645	)

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these condensed consolidated financial statements.

YAHOO! INC.

Condensed Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows


	Six Months Ended
	June 30,			June 30,
	2014			2015
	(Unaudited, in thousands)
CASH FLOWS FROM OPERATING ACTIVITIES:
Net income		$ 586,468			$ 2,984
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by (used in) operating activities:
Depreciation		239,631			236,694
Amortization of intangible assets		64,763			68,524
Accretion of convertible notes discount		29,526			31,117
Stock-based compensation expense		211,626			243,531
Non-cash restructuring reversals		(7,031	)		(933	)
Loss from sales of investments, assets, and other, net		18,667			44,847
Gains on sales of patents		(61,500	)		(11,100	)
Loss on Hortonworks warrants		-			6,460
Earnings in equity interests		(557,254	)		(195,531	)
Tax benefits (detriments) from stock-based awards		76,828			(3,617	)
Excess tax benefits from stock-based awards		(79,100	)		(1,850	)
Deferred income taxes		14,185			(13,218	)
Dividends received from equity investee		83,685			141,670
Changes in assets and liabilities, net of effects of acquisitions:
Accounts receivable		154,129			32,881
Prepaid expenses and other assets		13,592			(90,078	)
Accounts payable		(10,075	)		37,505
Accrued expenses and other liabilities		(202,142	)		255,678
Incomes taxes payable related to sale of Alibaba Group ADSs		-			(3,282,293	)
Deferred revenue		(79,523	)		(132,790	)

Net cash provided by (used in) operating activities		496,475			(2,629,519	)

CASH FLOWS FROM INVESTING ACTIVITIES:
Acquisition of property and equipment, net		(192,013	)		(290,363	)
Purchases of marketable securities		(1,363,836	)		(2,326,886	)
Proceeds from sales of marketable securities		380,954			473,775
Proceeds from maturities of marketable securities		690,018			3,584,596
Acquisitions, net of cash acquired		(21,661	)		(21,291	)
Proceeds from sales of patents		1,500			20,000
Purchases of intangible assets		(2,174	)		(4,611	)
Proceeds from settlement of derivative hedge contracts		173,258			64,767
Payments for settlement of derivative hedge contracts		(4,616	)		(3,882	)
Payments for equity investments in privately held companies		(10,399	)		-
Other investing activities, net		(640	)		(153	)

Net cash (used in) provided by investing activities		(349,609	)		1,495,952

CASH FLOWS FROM FINANCING ACTIVITIES:
Proceeds from issuance of common stock		163,737			46,777
Repurchases of common stock		(1,168,206	)		(203,771	)
Excess tax benefits from stock-based awards		79,100			1,850
Tax withholdings related to net share settlements of restricted stock units		(159,581	)		(149,960	)
Distributions to noncontrolling interests		(22,344	)		(15,847	)
Other financing activities, net		(6,130	)		(9,015	)

Net cash used in financing activities		(1,113,424	)		(329,966	)

Effect of exchange rate changes on cash and cash equivalents		3,554			(12,396	)
Net change in cash and cash equivalents		(963,004	)		(1,475,929	)
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period		2,077,590			2,664,098

Cash and cash equivalents at end of period		$ 1,114,586			$ 1,188,169

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these condensed consolidated financial statements.

YAHOO! INC.

Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements

(unaudited)

Note 1 The Company And Summary Of Significant Accounting Policies

The Company. Yahoo! Inc., together with its consolidated subsidiaries (“Yahoo” or the “Company”), is a guide focused on informing, connecting, and entertaining its users. By creating highly personalized experiences for its users, the Company keeps people connected to what matters most to them, across devices and around the world. In turn, the Company creates value for advertisers by connecting them with the audiences that build their businesses. For advertisers, the opportunity to be a part of users’ digital habits across products and platforms is a powerful tool to engage audiences and build brand loyalty. Advertisers can build their businesses by advertising to targeted audiences on the Company’s online properties and services (“Yahoo Properties”) and through a distribution network of third-party entities (“Affiliates”) who integrate the Company’s advertising offerings into their websites or other offerings (“Affiliate sites”). The Company manages and measures its business geographically, principally in the Americas, EMEA (Europe, Middle East, and Africa) and Asia Pacific.

Basis of Presentation. The condensed consolidated financial statements include the accounts of Yahoo! Inc. and its majority-owned or otherwise controlled subsidiaries. All significant intercompany accounts and transactions have been eliminated. Investments in entities in which the Company can exercise significant influence, but does not own a majority equity interest or otherwise control, are accounted for using the equity method and are included as investments in equity interests on the condensed consolidated balance sheets. The Company has included the results of operations of acquired companies from the date of the acquisition. Beginning in the three months ended March 31, 2015, the Company classifies editorial costs as cost of revenue — other rather than including such costs in sales and marketing expense. To conform to the current period presentation, the Company reclassified $25 million and $37 million, respectively, in certain website editorial costs previously included in sales and marketing expense to cost of revenue — other for the three and six months ended June 30, 2014. Also, beginning in the three months ended March 31, 2015, the Company classifies non-data center facilities-related costs within general and administrative expense. To conform to the current period presentation, the Company reclassified $12 million and $25 million, respectively, in facilities-related costs previously included in product development expense and $15 million and $30 million, respectively, previously included in sales and marketing expense to general and administrative expense for the three and six months ended June 30, 2014. During the six months ended June 30, 2015, the Company identified measurement period adjustments of $11 million to previous purchase accounting estimates for acquisitions, which were primarily related to the finalization of tax and other adjustments. These adjustments were immaterial and applied retrospectively to the acquisition dates. Accordingly, the Company’s consolidated balance sheet as of December 31, 2014 has been updated to reflect the effects of the measurement period adjustments.

The accompanying unaudited condensed consolidated interim financial statements reflect all adjustments, consisting of only normal recurring items, which, in the opinion of management, are necessary for a fair statement of the results of operations for the periods shown. The results of operations for such periods are not necessarily indicative of the results expected for the full year or for any future periods.

The preparation of consolidated financial statements in conformity with generally accepted accounting principles (“GAAP”) in the United States (“U.S.”) requires management to make estimates, judgments, and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets, liabilities, revenue, and expenses and the related disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities. On an ongoing basis, the Company evaluates its estimates, including those related to revenue, the useful lives of long-lived assets including property and equipment and intangible assets, investment fair values, stock-based compensation, goodwill, income taxes, contingencies, and restructuring charges. The Company bases its estimates of the carrying value of certain assets and liabilities on historical experience and on various other assumptions that are believed to be reasonable under the circumstances, when these carrying values are not readily available from other sources. Actual results may differ from these estimates.

These condensed consolidated financial statements should be read in conjunction with the consolidated financial statements and related notes included in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2014. Certain information and footnote disclosures normally included in financial statements prepared in accordance with U.S. GAAP have been condensed or omitted. The condensed consolidated balance sheet as of December 31, 2014 was derived from the Company’s audited financial statements for the year ended December 31, 2014, but does not include all disclosures required by U.S. GAAP. However, the Company believes the disclosures are adequate to make the information presented not misleading.

Cost of revenue — TAC. TAC consists of payments made to Affiliates and payments made to companies that direct consumer and business traffic to Yahoo Properties. TAC is either recorded as a reduction of revenue or as cost of revenue - TAC. TAC related to the Company’s Search and Advertising Sales Agreement (as amended, the “Search Agreement”) with Microsoft Corporation (“Microsoft”) is recorded as a reduction of revenue. See Note 17 — “Search Agreement With Microsoft Corporation” for a description of the Search Agreement and License Agreement with Microsoft. The Company also has an agreement to compensate a third party, Mozilla Corporation (“Mozilla”), to make the Company the default search provider on certain of Mozilla’s products in the United States. The Company records these payments as cost of revenue – TAC.

Recent Accounting Pronouncements. In May 2014, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) issued Accounting Standard Update (“ASU”) 2014-09, “Revenue from Contracts with Customers,” which supersedes the revenue recognition requirements in Topic 605, “Revenue Recognition” and requires entities to recognize revenue in a way that depicts the transfer of promised goods or services to customers in an amount that reflects the consideration to which the entity expects to be entitled in exchange for those goods or services. In July 2015, the FASB voted to defer the effective date of ASU 2014-09. Accordingly, this guidance is effective for interim and annual periods beginning after December 15, 2017 with early adoption permitted for interim and annual periods beginning after December 15, 2016. The Company plans to adopt this guidance on January 1, 2018. The Company is currently evaluating the effects, if any, that the adoption of this guidance will have on the Company’s financial position, results of operations and cash flows.

Note 2 Marketable Securities, Investments And Fair Value Disclosures

The following tables summarize the available-for-sale securities (in thousands):


	December 31, 2014
	Cost Basis		Gross Unrealized Gains		Gross Unrealized Losses			Estimated Fair Value
Government and agency securities		$ 850,712		$ 82		$ (792	)		$ 850,002
Corporate debt securities, commercial paper, time deposits, and bank certificates of deposit		6,711,683		612		(4,653	)		6,707,642
Alibaba Group equity securities		2,713,484		37,154,305		-			39,867,789
Hortonworks equity securities		26,246		77,783		-			104,029
Other corporate equity securities		230		430		-			660

Total available-for-sale marketable securities		$ 10,302,355		$ 37,233,212		$ (5,445	)		$ 47,530,122



	June 30, 2015
	Cost Basis		Gross Unrealized Gains		Gross Unrealized Losses			Estimated Fair Value
Government and agency securities		$ 804,776		$ 378		$ (41	)		$ 805,113
Corporate debt securities, commercial paper, time deposits, and bank certificates of deposit		5,002,096		721		(2,107	)		5,000,710
Alibaba Group equity securities		2,713,484		28,842,443		-			31,555,927
Hortonworks equity securities		26,246		71,130		-			97,376
Other corporate equity securities		230		314		-			544

Total available-for-sale marketable securities		$ 8,546,832		$ 28,914,986		$ (2,148	)		$ 37,459,670


	December 31,		June 30,
	2014		2015
Reported as:
Short-term marketable securities		$ 5,327,412		$ 4,636,152
Long-term marketable securities		2,230,892		1,169,671
Investment in Alibaba Group		39,867,789		31,555,927
Other long-term assets and investments		104,029		97,920

Total		$ 47,530,122		$ 37,459,670

Short-term, highly liquid investments of $2.0 billion and $518 million as of December 31, 2014 and June 30, 2015, respectively, included in cash and cash equivalents on the condensed consolidated balance sheets are not included in the table above as the gross unrealized gains and losses were not material as the carrying value approximates estimated fair value because of the short maturity of those instruments. Realized gains and losses from sales of available-for-sale marketable debt securities were not material for both the three and six months ended June 30, 2014 and 2015.

The remaining contractual maturities of available-for-sale marketable debt securities were as follows (in thousands):


	December 31,		June 30,
	2014		2015
Due within one year		$ 5,327,412		$ 4,636,152
Due after one year through five years		2,230,892		1,169,671

Total available-for-sale marketable debt securities		$ 7,558,304		$ 5,805,823

The following tables show all available-for-sale marketable debt securities in an unrealized loss position for which an other-than-temporary impairment has not been recognized and the related gross unrealized losses and fair value, aggregated by investment category and length of time that individual securities have been in a continuous unrealized loss position (in thousands):


	December 31, 2014
	Less than 12 Months					12 Months or Longer					Total
	Fair		Unrealized			Fair		Unrealized			Fair		Unrealized
	Value		Loss			Value		Loss			Value		Loss
Government and agency securities	$	744,948	$	(792	)	$	-	$	-		$	744,948	$	(792	)
Corporate debt securities, commercial paper, and bank certificates of deposit		2,601,288		(4,646	)		3,234		(7	)		2,604,522		(4,653	)

Total available-for-sale marketable debt securities	$	3,346,236	$	(5,438	)	$	3,234	$	(7	)	$	3,349,470	$	(5,445	)


	June 30, 2015
	Less than 12 Months					12 Months or Longer				Total
	Fair		Unrealized			Fair		Unrealized		Fair		Unrealized
	Value		Loss			Value		Loss		Value		Loss
Government and agency securities	$	133,333	$	(41	)	$	-	$	-	$	133,333	$	(41	)
Corporate debt securities, commercial paper, and bank certificates of deposit		2,045,898		(2,107	)		-		-		2,045,898		(2,107	)

Total available-for-sale marketable debt securities	$	2,179,231	$	(2,148	)	$	-	$	-	$	2,179,231	$	(2,148	)

The Company’s investment portfolio includes equity securities of Alibaba Group Holding Limited (“Alibaba Group”) and Hortonworks, Inc. (“Hortonworks”), as well as liquid high-quality fixed income debt securities including government, agency and corporate debt, money market funds, and time deposits with financial institutions. The fair value of any debt or equity security will vary over time and is subject to a variety of market risks including: macro-economic, regulatory, industry, company performance, and systemic risks of the equity markets overall. Consequently, the carrying value of the Company’s investment portfolio will vary over time as the value of its investment changes. Investments in both fixed rate and floating rate interest earning instruments carry a degree of interest rate risk. Fixed rate securities may have their fair value adversely impacted due to a rise in interest rates, while floating rate securities may produce less income than expected if interest rates fall. Fixed income securities may have their fair value adversely impacted due to a

deterioration of the credit quality of the issuer. The longer the term of the securities, the more susceptible they are to changes in market rates. Investments are reviewed periodically to identify possible other-than-temporary impairment. The Company has no current requirement or intent to sell the securities in an unrealized loss position. The Company expects to recover up to (or beyond) the initial cost of investment for securities held.

The following table sets forth the financial assets and liabilities, measured at fair value, by level within the fair value hierarchy as of December 31, 2014 (in thousands):


	Fair Value Measurements at Reporting Date Using
Assets	Level 1		Level 2			Level 3		Total
Money market funds⁽¹⁾	$	373,822	$	-		$	-	$	373,822
Available-for-sale marketable debt securities:
Government and agency securities⁽¹⁾		-		850,002			-		850,002
Commercial paper and bank certificates of deposit⁽¹⁾		-		3,602,321			-		3,602,321
Corporate debt securities⁽¹⁾		-		3,327,017			-		3,327,017
Time deposits⁽¹⁾		-		1,361,165			-		1,361,165
Available-for-sale equity securities:
Other corporate equity securities⁽²⁾		660		-			-		660
Alibaba Group equity securities		39,867,789		-			-		39,867,789
Hortonworks equity securities⁽²⁾		104,029		-			-		104,029
Hortonworks warrants		-		-			98,062		98,062
Foreign currency derivative contracts⁽³⁾		-		202,928			-		202,928

Financial assets at fair value	$	40,346,300	$	9,343,433		$	98,062	$	49,787,795
Liabilities
Foreign currency derivative contracts⁽³⁾		-		(6,157	)		-		(6,157	)

Total financial assets and liabilities at fair value	$	40,346,300	$	9,337,276		$	98,062	$	49,781,638

The following table sets forth the financial assets and liabilities, measured at fair value, by level within the fair value hierarchy as of June 30, 2015 (in thousands):


	Fair Value Measurements at Reporting Date Using
Assets	Level 1		Level 2			Level 3		Total
Money market funds⁽¹⁾		$ 403,419		$ -			$ -		$ 403,419
Available-for-sale marketable debt securities:
Government and agency securities⁽¹⁾		-		805,113			-		805,113
Commercial paper and bank certificates of deposit⁽¹⁾		-		1,982,018			-		1,982,018
Corporate debt securities⁽¹⁾		-		3,059,041			-		3,059,041
Time deposits⁽¹⁾		-		73,988			-		73,988
Available-for-sale equity securities:
Other corporate equity securities⁽²⁾		544		-			-		544
Alibaba Group equity securities		31,555,927		-			-		31,555,927
Hortonworks equity securities⁽²⁾		97,376		-			-		97,376
Hortonworks warrants		-		-			91,601		91,601
Foreign currency derivative contracts⁽³⁾		-		181,196			-		181,196

Financial assets at fair value		$32,057,266		$ 6,101,356			$ 91,601		$38,250,223
Liabilities
Foreign currency derivative contracts⁽³⁾		-		(9,278	)		-		(9,278	)

Total financial assets and liabilities at fair value		$32,057,266		$ 6,092,078			$ 91,601		$38,240,945

(1) The money market funds, government and agency securities, commercial paper and bank certificates of deposit, corporate debt securities, and time deposits are classified as part of either cash and cash equivalents or short or long-term marketable securities on the condensed consolidated balance sheets.

(2) The Hortonworks equity securities and other corporate equity securities are classified as part of other long-term assets and investments on the condensed consolidated balance sheets.

(3) Foreign currency derivative contracts are classified as part of either other current or noncurrent assets or liabilities on the condensed consolidated balance sheets. The notional amounts of the foreign currency derivative contracts were: $2.1 billion, including contracts designated as net investment hedges of $1.6 billion, as of December 31, 2014; and $2.3 billion, including contracts designated as net investment hedges of $1.8 billion, as of June 30, 2015.

The amount of cash and cash equivalents as of December 31, 2014 and June 30, 2015 included $702 million and $670 million, respectively, in cash.

The fair values of the Company’s Level 1 financial assets and liabilities are based on quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities. The fair values of the Company’s Level 2 financial assets and liabilities are obtained using quoted prices for similar assets or liabilities in active markets; quoted prices for identical or similar assets in markets that are not active; and inputs other than quoted prices (e.g., interest rates and yield curves). The Company utilizes a pricing service to assist in obtaining fair value pricing for the marketable debt securities. The fair value of this Level 3 financial asset was determined using a Black-Scholes model.

Activity between Levels of the Fair Value Hierarchy

During the year ended December 31, 2014 and the six months ended June 30, 2015, the Company did not make any transfers between Level 1, Level 2, and Level 3 assets or liabilities.

Hortonworks Warrants

The estimated fair value of the Hortonworks warrants was $98 million and $92 million as of December 31, 2014 and June 30, 2015, respectively, which is included in other long-term assets and investments on our condensed consolidated balance sheets. During the three and six months ended June 30, 2015, the Company recorded a gain of $5 million and a loss of $6 million, respectively, due to the change in estimated fair value of the Hortonworks warrants during the respective periods, which was included within other expense, net in the Company’s condensed consolidated statements of operations. The fair value of the Company’s Level 3 financial asset was determined using a Black-Scholes model.

Assets and Liabilities at Fair Value on a Nonrecurring Basis

Convertible Senior Notes. In 2013, the Company issued $1.4375 billion aggregate principal amount of 0.00% Convertible Senior Notes due 2018 (the “Notes”). The Notes are carried at their original issuance value, net of unamortized debt discount, and are not marked to market each period. The approximate estimated fair value of the Notes as of both December 31, 2014 and June 30, 2015 was $1.2 billion. The fair value of the Notes was determined on the basis of quoted market prices observable in the market and is considered Level 2 in the fair value hierarchy. See Note 11 — “Convertible Notes” for additional information related to the Notes.

Other Investments. As of December 31, 2014 and June 30, 2015, the Company held approximately $82 million and $83 million, respectively, of investments in equity securities of privately-held companies that are accounted for using the cost method. These investments are included within other long-term assets and investments on the condensed consolidated balance sheets. Such investments are reviewed periodically for impairment using fair value measurements.

Note 3 Consolidated Financial Statement Details

Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income

The components of accumulated other comprehensive income were as follows (in thousands):


	December 31,			June 30,
	2014			2015
Unrealized gains on available-for-sale securities, net of tax		$ 22,084,960			$ 17,158,878
Unrealized gains (losses) on cash flow hedges, net of tax		1,856			(1,287	)
Foreign currency translation, net of tax		(67,188	)		(282,252	)

Accumulated other comprehensive income		$ 22,019,628			$ 16,875,339

Noncontrolling Interests

Noncontrolling interests were as follows (in thousands):


	December 31,			June 30,
	2014			2015
Beginning noncontrolling interests		$ 55,688			$ 43,755
Distributions to noncontrolling interests		(22,344	)		(15,847	)
Net income attributable to noncontrolling interests		10,411			3,340

Ending noncontrolling interests		$ 43,755			$ 31,248

Other Expense, Net

Other expense, net was as follows (in thousands):


	Three Months Ended						Six Months Ended
	June 30,			June 30,			June 30,			June 30,
	2014			2015			2014			2015
Interest, dividend and investment income		$ 5,596			$ 8,034			$ 11,033			$ 16,879
Interest expense		(17,088	)		(17,558	)		(34,169	)		(35,128	)
Gain (loss) on Hortonworks warrants		-			5,449			-			(6,460	)
Other		(2,097	)		(7,666	)		(3,906	)		(18,095	)

Total other expense, net		$ (13,589	)		$ (11,741	)		$ (27,042	)		$ (42,804	)

Interest, dividend and investment income consists of income earned from cash and cash equivalents in bank accounts, and investments made in marketable debt securities.

Interest expense is related to the Notes, interest expense on notes payable related to building and capital lease obligations for data centers.

During the three and six months ended June 30, 2015, the Company recorded a gain of $5 million and a loss of $6 million, respectively, due to the change in estimated fair value of the Hortonworks warrants during the respective periods, which was included within other expense, net in the condensed consolidated statements of operations.

Other consists of gains and losses from sales or impairments of marketable securities and/or investments in privately-held companies, foreign exchange gains and losses due to re-measurement of monetary assets and liabilities denominated in non-functional currencies, and unrealized and realized foreign currency transaction gains and losses, including gains and losses related to balance sheet hedges. Other increased $6 million for the three months ended June 30, 2015, compared to the same period of 2014, primarily due to foreign exchange losses from hedging activities of $11 million offset by unrealized foreign exchange currency transaction gains of $8 million. Other increased $14 million for the six months ended June 30, 2015, compared to the same period of 2014, primarily due to unrealized foreign exchange currency transaction losses of $25 million partially offset by foreign exchange gains from hedging activities of $12 million.

Reclassifications Out of Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income

Reclassifications out of accumulated other comprehensive income for the three months ended June 30, 2014 and 2015 were as follows (in thousands):

Three Months Ended

June 30,

2014

June 30,

2015

Reclassified from

Accumulated

Other

Comprehensive

Affected Line Item in the

Income

Statement of Income

Realized (gains) losses on cash flow hedges, net of tax

$ (285

)

$ 478

Revenue

Realized (gains) losses on available-for-sale securities, net of tax

(109

)

(81

)

Other income, net

Total reclassifications for the period

$ (394

)

$ 397

Reclassifications out of accumulated other comprehensive income for the six months ended June 30, 2014 and 2015 were as follows (in thousands):

Six Months Ended

June 30,

2014

2015

Reclassified from

Accumulated

Other

Comprehensive

Affected Line Item in the

Income

Statement of Income

Realized (gains) losses on cash flow hedges, net of tax

$ (739

)

$ 2,138

Revenue

Realized (gains) losses on available-for-sale securities, net of tax

(121

)

Other income, net

Total reclassifications for the period

$ (860

)

$ 2,140

Note 4 Acquisitions and Dispositions

Transactions Completed in 2014. During the six months ended June 30, 2014, the Company acquired five companies, all of which were accounted for as business combinations. The total purchase price for these acquisitions was $23 million less cash acquired of $1 million, which resulted in a net cash outlay of $22 million. The purchase price for the assets and liabilities assumed was allocated based on their estimated fair values as follows: $9 million to amortizable intangibles; $1 million to net assumed assets; and the remainder of $13 million to goodwill. Goodwill represents the excess of the purchase price over the fair value of the net tangible and intangible assets acquired and is not deductible for tax purposes.

Transactions Completed in 2015. During the six months ended June 30, 2015, the Company acquired one company which was accounted for as a business combination. The total purchase price for this acquisition was $23 million. The preliminary purchase price allocation of the assets acquired and liabilities assumed based on their estimated fair values was as follows: $5 million to amortizable intangibles; $2 million to net liabilities assumed; and the remainder of $20 million to goodwill. Goodwill represents the excess of the purchase price over the fair value of the net tangible and intangible assets acquired and is not deductible for tax purposes.

The Company’s business combinations completed during the six months ended June 30, 2014 and 2015 did not have a material impact on the Company’s condensed consolidated financial statements and therefore actual and proforma disclosures have not been presented.

Patent Sale and License Agreement. During the three months ended June 30, 2014, the Company entered into a patent sale and license agreement for total cash consideration of $460 million. The total consideration was allocated based on the estimated relative fair value of each of the elements of the agreement: $61 million was allocated to the sale of patents (“Sold Patents”), $135 million to the license of existing patents (“Existing Patents”) and $264 million to the license of patents developed or acquired in the next five years (“Capture Period Patents”). The Company recorded $60 million as a gain on the Sold Patents during the three months ended June 30, 2014 and the remaining $1 million gain on the Sold Patents was recorded in the three months ended September 30, 2014 when the payment was due. The amounts allocated to the license of the Existing Patents are being recorded as revenue over the four-year payment period under the license when payments are due. The amounts allocated to the Capture Period Patents are being recorded as revenue over the five-year capture period. During the three and six months ended June 30, 2015, the Company recognized $22 million and $43 million, respectively, associated with the patent sale and license agreement.

During the three and six months ended June 30, 2015, the Company sold certain patents and recorded gains on sales of patents of approximately $9 million and $11 million, respectively, and during the three and six months ended June 30, 2014 the Company sold certain patents and recorded gains on sales of patents of approximately $62 million.

Note 5 Goodwill

The changes in the carrying amount of goodwill for the six months ended June 30, 2015 were as follows (in thousands):


	Americas⁽¹⁾		EMEA⁽²⁾		Asia Pacific⁽³⁾		Total
Net balance as of January 1, 2015		$ 4,322,219		$ 532,469		$ 297,882		$ 5,152,570
Acquisitions		-		20,249		-		20,249
Foreign currency translation adjustments		(1,110)		(22,169)		(2,961)		(26,240)

Net balance as of June 30, 2015		$ 4,321,109		$ 530,549		$ 294,921		$ 5,146,579

(1)	Gross goodwill balance for the Americas segment was $4.3 billion as of June 30, 2015.

(2)	Gross goodwill balance for the EMEA segment was $1.2 billion as of June 30, 2015. The EMEA segment includes accumulated impairment losses of $630 million as of June 30, 2015.

(3)	Gross goodwill balance for the Asia Pacific segment was $454 million as of June 30, 2015. The Asia Pacific segment includes accumulated impairment losses of $159 million as of June 30, 2015.

Note 6 Intangible Assets, Net

The following table summarizes the Company’s intangible assets, net (in thousands):


	December 31, 2014		June 30, 2015
	Net		Gross Carrying Amount		Accumulated *Amortization^()**		Net
Customer, affiliate, and advertiser related relationships		$ 281,596		$ 363,500		$ (111,038)		$ 252,462
Developed technology and patents		122,674		202,354		(103,538)		98,816
Trade names, trademarks, and domain names		66,572		107,939		(46,982)		60,957

Total intangible assets, net		$ 470,842		$ 673,793		$ (261,558)		$ 412,235

(*)	Cumulative foreign currency translation adjustments, reflecting movement in the currencies of the underlying entities, increased total intangible assets by approximately $18 million as of June 30, 2015.

For the three months ended June 30, 2014 and 2015, the Company recognized amortization expense for intangible assets of $30 million and $34 million, respectively, including $15 million and $14 million in cost of revenue — other for the three months ended June 30, 2014 and 2015, respectively. For the six months ended June 30, 2014 and 2015, the Company recognized amortization expense for intangible assets of $65 million and $68 million, respectively, including $31 million and $28 million in cost of revenue — other for the six months ended June 30, 2014 and 2015, respectively. Based on the current amount of intangibles subject to amortization, the estimated amortization expense for the remainder of 2015 and each of the succeeding years is as follows: six months ending December 31, 2015: $65 million; 2016: $108 million; 2017: $99 million; 2018: $80 million; 2019: $43 million; and cumulatively thereafter: $1 million.

Note 7 Basic And Diluted Net Income (Loss) Attributable To Yahoo! Inc. Common Stockholders Per Share

Basic and diluted net income (loss) attributable to Yahoo! Inc. common stockholders per share is computed using the weighted average number of common shares outstanding during the period, excluding net income attributable to participating securities (restricted stock units granted under the Directors’ Stock Plan (the “Directors’ Plan”)). Diluted net income (loss) per share is computed using the weighted average number of common shares and, if dilutive, potential common shares outstanding during the period. Potential common shares are calculated using the treasury stock method and consist of unvested restricted stock and shares underlying unvested restricted stock units, the incremental common shares issuable upon the exercise of stock options, and shares to be purchased under the 1996 Employee Stock Purchase Plan (the “Employee Stock Purchase Plan”). The Company calculates potential tax windfalls and shortfalls by including the impact of pro forma deferred tax assets.

The Company takes into account the effect on consolidated net income (loss) per share of dilutive securities of entities in which the Company holds equity interests that are accounted for using the equity method.

Potentially dilutive securities representing approximately 7 million and 4 million shares of common stock for the three and six months ended June 30, 2014, respectively, and 1 million shares of common stock for both the three and six months ended June 30, 2015, respectively, were excluded from the computation of diluted earnings per share for these periods because their effect would have been anti-dilutive.

The Company has the option to pay cash, issue shares of common stock or any combination thereof for the aggregate amount due upon conversion of the Notes. The Company’s intent is to settle the principal amount of the Notes in cash upon conversion. As a result, upon conversion of the Notes, only the amounts payable in excess of the principal amounts of the Notes are considered in diluted earnings per share under the treasury stock method.

The denominator for diluted net income (loss) per share does not include any effect from the note hedges. In future periods, the denominator for diluted net income (loss) per share will exclude any effect of the note hedges, if their effect would be anti-dilutive. In the event an actual conversion of any or all of the Notes occurs, the shares that would be delivered to the Company under the note hedges are designed to neutralize the dilutive effect of the shares that the Company would issue under the Notes. See Note 11 — “Convertible Notes” for additional information.

The following table sets forth the computation of basic and diluted net income (loss) per share (in thousands, except per share amounts):


	Three Months Ended				Six Months Ended
	June 30, 2014		June 30, 2015		June 30, 2014		June 30, 2015
*Basic:*
Numerator:
Net income (loss) attributable to Yahoo! Inc.		$ 269,707		$ (21,554)		$ 581,285		$ (356)
Less: Net income allocated to participating securities		(2)		-		(5)		-

Net income (loss) attributable to Yahoo! Inc. common stockholders — basic		$ 269,705		$ (21,554)		$ 581,280		$ (356)

Denominator:
Weighted average common shares		999,765		937,569		1,004,828		936,159

Net income (loss) attributable to Yahoo! Inc. common stockholders per share — basic		$ 0.27		$ (0.02)		$ 0.58		$ (0.00)

*Diluted:*
Numerator:
Net income (loss) attributable to Yahoo! Inc.		$ 269,707		$ (21,554)		$ 581,285		$ (356)
Less: Net income allocated to participating securities		(2)		-		(5)		-
Less: Effect of dilutive securities issued by equity investees		(9,421)		(1,125)		(21,786)		(2,319)

Net income (loss) attributable to Yahoo! Inc. common stockholders — diluted		$ 260,284		$ (22,679)		$ 559,494		$ (2,675)

Denominator:
Denominator for basic calculation		999,765		937,569		1,004,828		936,159
Weighted average effect of Yahoo! Inc. dilutive securities:
Restricted stock units		10,855		-		13,262		-
Stock options and employee stock purchase plan		4,072		-		4,966		-

Denominator for diluted calculation		1,014,692		937,569		1,023,056		936,159

Net income (loss) attributable to Yahoo! Inc. common stockholders per share — diluted		$ 0.26		$ (0.02)		$ 0.55		$ (0.00)

Note 8 Investments In Equity Interests Using The Equity Method Of Accounting

The following table summarizes the Company’s investments in equity interests using the equity method of accounting (dollars in thousands):


	December 31, 2014		Percent Ownership			June 30, 2015		Percent Ownership
Yahoo Japan		$ 2,482,660		35.5	%		$ 2,319,586		35.5	%
Other		6,918		20	%		6,850		20	%

Total		$ 2,489,578					$ 2,326,436

Equity Investment in Yahoo Japan

The investment in Yahoo Japan Corporation (“Yahoo Japan”) is accounted for using the equity method and the total investment, including net tangible assets, identifiable intangible assets, and goodwill, is classified as part of the investments in equity interests balance on the Company’s condensed consolidated balance sheets. The Company records its share of the results of Yahoo Japan, and any related amortization expense, one quarter in arrears within earnings in equity interests in the condensed consolidated statements of operations.

The Company makes adjustments to the earnings in equity interests line in the condensed consolidated statements of operations for any differences between U.S. GAAP and International Financial Reporting Standards (“IFRS”) issued by the International Accounting Standards Board, the standards by which Yahoo Japan’s financial statements are prepared.

The fair value of the Company’s ownership interest in the common stock of Yahoo Japan, based on the quoted stock price, was approximately $8 billion as of June 30, 2015.

During the three and six months ended June 30, 2014 and 2015, the Company received cash dividends from Yahoo Japan in the amount of $84 million and $142 million, net of withholding taxes, respectively, which were recorded as reductions to the Company’s investment in Yahoo Japan.

During the six months ended June 30, 2014, the Company sold data center assets and assigned a data center lease to Yahoo Japan for cash proceeds of $11 million and recorded a net gain of approximately $5 million.

The following tables present summarized financial information derived from Yahoo Japan’s consolidated financial statements, which are prepared on the basis of IFRS. The Company has made adjustments to the Yahoo Japan financial information to address differences between IFRS and U.S. GAAP that materially impact the summarized financial information below. Due to these adjustments, the Yahoo Japan summarized financial information presented below is not materially different than such information presented on the basis of U.S. GAAP.


	Three Months Ended				Six Months Ended
	March 31, 2014		March 31, 2015		March 31, 2014		March 31, 2015
	(In thousands)
Operating data:
Revenue		$ 1,055,064		$ 987,417		$ 2,086,720		$ 1,928,658
Gross profit		$ 861,258		$ 790,966		$ 1,705,184		$ 1,541,950
Income from operations		$ 477,945		$ 438,166		$ 967,387		$ 863,219
Net income		$ 314,029		$ 274,721		$ 621,141		$ 561,514
Net income attributable to Yahoo Japan		$ 311,182		$ 274,129		$ 615,527		$ 558,975


	September 30, 2014		March 31, 2015
	(In thousands)
Balance sheet data:
Current assets		$ 6,161,126		$ 6,303,704
Long-term assets		$ 1,908,379		$ 2,203,642
Current liabilities		$ 1,948,540		$ 2,014,409
Long-term liabilities		$ 35,418		$ 228,902
Noncontrolling interests		$ 66,998		$ 171,849

Under technology and trademark license and other commercial arrangements with Yahoo Japan, the Company records revenue from Yahoo Japan based on a percentage of advertising revenue earned by Yahoo Japan. The Company recorded revenue from Yahoo Japan of approximately $64 million and $55 million for the three months ended June 30, 2014 and 2015, respectively, and approximately $132 million and $115 million for the six months ended June 30, 2014 and 2015, respectively. The revenue from Yahoo Japan for the three and six months ended June 30, 2015 was impacted by unfavorable foreign exchange fluctuations. As of December 31, 2014 and June 30, 2015, the Company had net receivable balances from Yahoo Japan of approximately $47 million and $35 million, respectively.

Alibaba Group

Equity Investment in Alibaba Group. Prior to the closing of the initial public offering by Alibaba Group (“Alibaba Group IPO”) of American Depositary Shares (“ADSs”) in September 2014, the Company’s investment in Alibaba Group was accounted for using the equity method, and the total investment, including net tangible assets, identifiable intangible assets and goodwill, was classified as part of investments in equity interests on the Company’s consolidated balance sheets. Prior to the Alibaba Group IPO, the Company recorded its share of the results of Alibaba Group one quarter in arrears, within earnings in equity interests in the consolidated statements of operations, including any related tax impacts related to the earnings in equity interest.

See Note 2 — “Marketable Securities, Investments And Fair Value Disclosures” for additional information.

Technology and Intellectual Property License Agreement (the “TIPLA”). As a result of the Alibaba Group IPO, the TIPLA will terminate on September 18, 2015 and Alibaba Group’s obligation to make royalty payments under the TIPLA ceased on September 24, 2014. The remaining TIPLA deferred revenue of $60 million is now being recognized ratably over the remaining term of the TIPLA through September 18, 2015. For the three months ended June 30, 2014 and 2015, the Company recognized approximately $62 million and $69 million, respectively, and for the six months ended June 30, 2014 and 2015, the Company recognized approximately $132 million and $139 million, respectively, related to the TIPLA.

Spin-Off of Remaining Holdings in Alibaba Group. On January 27, 2015, Yahoo announced a plan for a spin-off of all of the Company’s remaining holdings in Alibaba Group into a newly formed independent registered investment company. The name selected for the new company is Aabaco Holdings, Inc. (“Aabaco”). The stock of Aabaco will be distributed pro rata to Yahoo stockholders, resulting in Aabaco becoming a separate publicly traded registered investment company. On July 17, 2015, Aabaco filed its initial Registration Statement on Form N-2 with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (the “SEC”). Following the completion of the transaction, Aabaco will own all of Yahoo’s remaining 384 million Alibaba Group shares, and a 100 percent ownership interest in Aabaco Small Business, LLC, a newly formed entity which will own Yahoo Small Business, a current operating business of Yahoo that will also be transferred to Aabaco as part of the transaction.

The completion of the transaction is expected to occur in the fourth quarter of 2015. The transaction is subject to certain conditions, including final approval by the Company’s Board of Directors, receipt of a favorable ruling from the Internal Revenue Service regarding certain aspects of the transaction and a legal opinion with respect to the tax-free treatment of the transaction, under U.S. federal tax laws and regulations, the effectiveness of an applicable registration statement with the SEC and compliance with the requirements under the Investment Company Act of 1940, and other customary conditions. Each of the conditions may be waived, in whole or in part (to the extent permitted by law), by the Company in its sole discretion. The Company has reserved the right, in its sole and absolute discretion, to abandon or modify the terms of the transaction at any time prior to the distribution date, even if the conditions to the transaction have been satisfied.

The composition of Aabaco’s independent board of directors and management team, and other details of the transaction, including the distribution ratio, will be determined prior to the completion of the transaction.

Upon completion of the transaction, which is subject to the satisfaction or waiver of the conditions specified above, the Company’s consolidated financial position will be materially impacted as the Alibaba Group shares and related deferred tax liabilities will be removed from the Company’s consolidated balance sheet with a corresponding reduction of its stockholders’ equity balance. The Company would no longer hold any Alibaba Group shares and would no longer record changes in fair value within comprehensive income (loss).

Note 9 Foreign Currency Derivative Financial Instruments

The Company uses derivative financial instruments, primarily forward contracts and option contracts, to mitigate risk associated with adverse movements in foreign currency exchange rates.

The Company records all derivatives in the condensed consolidated balance sheets at fair value, with assets included in prepaid expenses and other current assets or other long-term assets, and liabilities included in accrued expenses and other current liabilities or other long-term liabilities. The Company’s accounting treatment for these instruments is based on whether or not the instruments are designated as a hedging instrument. The effective portions of net investment hedges are recorded in other comprehensive income as a part of the cumulative translation adjustment. The effective portions of cash flow hedges are recorded in accumulated other comprehensive income until the hedged item is recognized in revenue on the condensed consolidated statements of operations when the underlying hedged revenue is recognized. Any ineffective portions of net investment hedges and cash flow hedges are recorded in other income, net on the Company’s condensed consolidated statements of operations. For balance sheet hedges, changes in the fair value are recorded in other income, net on the Company’s condensed consolidated statements of operations.

The Company enters into master netting arrangements, which are designed to reduce credit risk by permitting net settlement of transactions with the same counterparty. The Company presents its derivative assets and liabilities at their gross fair values on the condensed consolidated balance sheets. However, under the master netting arrangements with the respective counterparties of the foreign exchange contracts, subject to applicable requirements, the Company is allowed to net settle transactions. The Company is not required to pledge, and is not entitled to receive, cash collateral related to these derivative transactions.

Designated as Hedging Instruments

Net Investment Hedges. The Company hedges, on an after-tax basis, a portion of its net investment in Yahoo Japan with forward contracts and option contracts to reduce the risk that its investment in Yahoo Japan will be adversely affected by foreign currency exchange rate fluctuations. The total of the after-tax net investment hedge was less than the Yahoo Japan investment balance as of both December 31, 2014 and June 30, 2015. As such, the net investment hedge was considered to be effective.

Cash Flow Hedges. The Company entered into foreign currency forward contracts designated as cash flow hedges of varying maturities through December 31, 2015. All of the forward contracts designated as cash flow hedges that were settled were reclassified to revenue during the three and six months ended June 30, 2014 and 2015, respectively. All current outstanding cash flow hedges are expected to be reclassified into revenue during 2015. For the three and six months ended June 30, 2014 and 2015, the amounts recorded in other income (expense), net as a result of hedge ineffectiveness and the discontinuance of cash flow hedges because the forecasted transactions were no longer probable of occurring was not material.

Not Designated as Hedging Instruments

Balance Sheet Hedges. The Company hedges certain of its net recognized foreign currency assets and liabilities with foreign exchange forward contracts to reduce the risk that its earnings and cash flows will be adversely affected by changes in foreign currency exchange rates. These derivative instruments hedge assets and liabilities, including intercompany transactions, which are denominated in foreign currencies.

Notional amounts of the Company’s outstanding derivative contracts were as follows (in millions):


	December 31, 2014		June 30, 2015
Derivatives designated as hedging instruments:
Net investment hedge forward and option contracts	$	1,647	$	1,802
Cash flow hedge forwards	$	222	$	117
Derivatives not designated as hedging instruments:
Balance sheet hedges	$	243	$	415

Foreign currency derivative activity for the six months ended June 30, 2014 was as follows (in millions):


	Beginning Fair Value		Settlement Payment (Receipt)			Gain (Loss) Recorded in Other Income, Net			Gain (Loss) Recorded in Other Comprehensive Income		Gain (Loss) Recorded in Revenue		Ending Fair Value
Derivatives designated as hedging instruments:
Net investment hedges	$	209	$	(17	0)	$	-		$	(41) ^(*)	$	-	$	(2	)
Cash flow hedges	$	4	$	(	2)	$	(1	)	$	(4)	$	2	$	(1	)
Derivatives not designated as hedging instruments:
Balance sheet hedges	$	-	$		3	$	(1	)	$	-	$	-	$	2

(*) This amount does not reflect the tax impact of $15 million recorded during the six months ended June 30, 2014. The $26 million after tax impact of the loss recorded within other comprehensive income was included in accumulated other comprehensive income on the Company’s condensed consolidated balance sheets.

Foreign currency derivative activity for the six months ended June 30, 2015 was as follows (in millions):


								Gain (Loss)	Gain
					Gain (Loss)			Recorded in	(Loss)
			Settlement		Recorded in			Other	Recorded
	Beginning		Payment		Other Income,			Comprehensive	in			Ending Fair
	Fair Value		(Receipt)		Net			Income	Revenue			Value
Derivatives designated as hedging instruments:
Net investment hedges	$	185	$	(38)	$	(2	)	29 ^(*)	$	-		$	174
Cash flow hedges	$	8	$	(1)	$	(1	)	$ (3)	$		(1)	$	2
Derivatives not designated as hedging instruments:
Balance sheet hedges	$	4	$	(22)	$	14		$ -	$	-		$	(4)

(*) This amount does not reflect the tax impact of $11 million recorded during the six months ended June 30, 2015. The $18 million after tax impact of the gain recorded within other comprehensive income was included in accumulated other comprehensive income on the Company’s condensed consolidated balance sheets.

Foreign currency derivative contracts balance sheet location and ending fair value was as follows (in millions):


	Balance Sheet Location	December 31, 2014			June 30, 2015
Derivatives designated as hedging instruments:
Net investment hedges	Asset⁽¹⁾	$	190		$	176
	Liability⁽²⁾	$	(5	)	$	(2	)
Cash flow hedges	Asset⁽¹⁾	$	8		$	4
	Liability⁽²⁾	$	-		$	(2	)

Derivatives not designated as hedging instruments:
Balance sheet hedges	Asset⁽¹⁾	$	5		$	1
	Liability⁽²⁾	$	(1	)	$	(5	)

(1)	Included in prepaid expenses and other current assets or other long-term assets and investments on the condensed consolidated balance sheets.

(2)	Included in accrued expenses and other current liabilities or other long-term liabilities on the condensed consolidated balance sheets.

Note 10 Credit Agreement

The Company’s credit agreement with Citibank, N.A., as Administrative Agent entered into on October 19, 2012 (as amended on October 10, 2013 and October 9, 2014, the “Credit Agreement”) provides for a $750 million unsecured revolving credit facility, subject to increase of up to $250 million in accordance with its terms. The Credit Agreement terminates on October 8, 2015, unless extended by the parties. As of June 30, 2015, the Company was in compliance with the financial covenants in the Credit Agreement and no amounts were outstanding. See Note 18 — “Subsequent Events” for additional information.

Note 11 Convertible Notes

0.00% Convertible Senior Notes

As of June 30, 2015, the Company had $1.4 billion principal amount of Notes outstanding. The Notes are senior unsecured obligations of Yahoo, the Notes do not bear regular interest, and the principal amount of the Notes does not accrete. The Notes mature on December 1, 2018, unless previously purchased or converted in accordance with their terms prior to such date. The Company may not redeem the Notes prior to maturity. However, holders of the Notes may convert them at certain times and upon the occurrence of certain events in the future, as outlined in the indenture governing the Notes (the “Indenture”). Holders of the Notes who convert in connection with a “make-whole fundamental change,” as defined in the Indenture, may require Yahoo to purchase for cash all or any portion of their Notes at a purchase price equal to 100 percent of the principal amount, plus accrued and unpaid special interest as defined in the Indenture, if any. The Notes are convertible, subject to certain conditions, into shares of Yahoo common stock at an initial conversion rate of 18.7161 shares per $1,000 principal amount of Notes (which is equivalent to an initial conversion price of approximately $53.43 per share), subject to adjustment upon the occurrence of certain events. Upon conversion of the Notes, holders will receive cash, shares of Yahoo’s common stock or a combination thereof, at Yahoo’s election. The Company’s intent is to settle the principal amount of the Notes in cash upon conversion. If the conversion value exceeds the principal amount, the Company would deliver shares of its common stock with respect to the remainder of its conversion obligation in excess of the aggregate principal amount (conversion spread). As of June 30, 2015, none of the conditions allowing holders of the Notes to convert had been met.

The Notes consist of the following (in thousands):


	December 31, 2014		June 30, 2015
Liability component:
Principal	$	1,437,500	$	1,437,500
Less: note discount		(267,077)		(235,960)

Net carrying amount	$	1,170,423	$	1,201,540

Equity component ^(*)	$	305,569	$	305,569

(*)	Recorded on the condensed consolidated balance sheets within additional paid-in capital.

The following table sets forth total interest expense recognized related to the Notes (in thousands):


	Three Months Ended				Six Months Ended
	June 30, 2014		June 30, 2015		June 30, 2014		June 30, 2015
Accretion of convertible note discount	$	14,860	$	15,660	$	29,526	$	31,117
The estimated fair value of the Notes, which was determined based on inputs that are observable in the market (Level 2), and the carrying value of debt instruments (carrying value excludes the equity component of the Notes classified in equity) was as follows (in thousands):
	December 31, 2014				June 30, 2015
	Fair Value		Carrying Value		Fair Value		Carrying Value
Convertible senior notes	$	1,175,240	$	1,170,423	$	1,226,670	$	1,201,540

Note 12 Commitments And Contingencies

Lease Commitments. The Company leases office space and data centers under operating and capital lease agreements with original lease periods of up to 12 years which expire between 2015 and 2025. A summary of gross and net lease commitments as of June 30, 2015 was as follows (in millions):


	Gross
	Operating				Net Operating
	Lease		Sublease		Lease
	Commitments		Income		Commitments
Six months ending December 31, 2015	$	69	$	(8)	$	61
Years ending December 31,
2016	$	110	$	(12)	$	98
2017	$	82	$	(10)	$	72
2018	$	59	$	(7)	$	52
2019	$	48	$	(5)	$	43
2020	$	35	$	(2)	$	33
Due after 5 years	$	109	$	(3)	$	106

Total gross and net lease commitments	$	512	$	(47)	$	465


	Capital Lease
	Commitments
Six months ending December 31, 2015	$	9
Years ending December 31,
2016		15
2017		10
2018		9
2019		5
2020		-
Due after 5 years		-

Gross lease commitments		48
Less: interest		9

Net lease commitments included in other long-term liabilities	$	39

Affiliate Commitments. The Company is obligated to make payments, which represent traffic acquisition costs (“TAC”), to its Affiliates. As of June 30, 2015, these commitments totaled $1,800 million, of which $218 million will be payable in the remainder of 2015, $401 million will be payable in 2016, $400 million will be payable in 2017, $375 million will be payable in 2018, $375 million will be payable in 2019, and $31 million will be payable thereafter.

Non-cancelable Obligations. The Company is obligated to make payments under various non-cancelable arrangements with vendors and other business partners, principally for marketing, bandwidth, co-location, and content arrangements. As of June 30, 2015, these commitments totaled $502 million, of which $115 million will be payable in the remainder of 2015, $183 million will be payable in 2016, $125 million will be payable in 2017, $77 million will be payable in 2018, and $2 million will be payable in 2019.

Intellectual Property Rights. The Company is committed to make certain payments under various intellectual property arrangements of up to $19 million through 2023.

Other Commitments. In the ordinary course of business, the Company may provide indemnifications of varying scope and terms to customers, vendors, lessors, joint ventures and business partners, purchasers of assets or subsidiaries and other parties with respect to certain matters, including, but not limited to, losses arising out of the Company’s breach of agreements or representations and warranties made by the Company, services to be provided by the Company, intellectual property infringement claims made by third parties or, with respect to the sale, lease, or assignment of assets, or the sale of a subsidiary, matters related to the Company’s conduct of the business and tax matters prior to the sale, lease or assignment. In addition, the Company has entered into indemnification agreements with its directors and certain of its officers that will require the Company, among other things, to indemnify them against certain liabilities that may arise by reason of their status or service as directors or officers. The Company has also agreed to indemnify certain former officers, directors, and employees of acquired companies in connection with the acquisition of such companies. The Company maintains director and officer insurance, which may cover certain liabilities arising from its obligation to indemnify its current and former directors and officers, and former directors and officers of acquired companies, in certain circumstances. It is not possible to determine the aggregate maximum potential loss under these indemnification agreements due to the limited history of prior indemnification claims and the unique facts and circumstances involved in each particular agreement. Such indemnification agreements might not be subject to maximum loss clauses. Historically, the Company has not incurred material costs as a result of obligations under these agreements and it has not accrued any material liabilities related to such indemnification obligations in the Company’s condensed consolidated financial statements.

As of June 30, 2015, the Company did not have any relationships with unconsolidated entities or financial partnerships, such as entities often referred to as structured finance or special purpose entities, established for the purpose of facilitating off-balance sheet arrangements or other contractually narrow or limited purposes. Accordingly, the Company is not exposed to any financing, liquidity, market, or credit risk that could arise if the Company had such relationships. In addition, the Company identified no variable interests currently held in entities for which it is the primary beneficiary.

Legal Contingencies

General. The Company is regularly involved in claims, suits, government investigations, and proceedings arising from the ordinary course of the Company’s business, including actions with respect to intellectual property claims, privacy, consumer protection, information security, data protection or law enforcement matters, tax matters, labor and employment claims, commercial claims, as well as actions involving content generated by users, stockholder derivative actions, purported class action lawsuits, and other matters.

Patent Matters. From time to time, third parties assert patent infringement claims against the Company. Currently, the Company is engaged in lawsuits regarding patent issues and has been notified of other potential patent disputes.

Stockholder and Securities Matters. Since May 31, 2011, several related stockholder derivative suits were filed in the Santa Clara County Superior Court (“California Derivative Litigation”) and the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California (“Federal Derivative Litigation”) purportedly on behalf of the Company against certain officers and directors of the Company and third parties. The California Derivative Litigation was filed by plaintiffs Cinotto, Lassoff, Zucker, and Koo, and consolidated under the caption In re Yahoo! Inc. Derivative Shareholder Litigation on June 24, 2011 and September 12, 2011. The Federal Derivative Litigation was filed by plaintiffs Salzman, Tawila, and Iron Workers Mid-South Pension Fund and consolidated under the caption In re Yahoo! Inc. Shareholder Derivative Litigation on October 3, 2011. The plaintiffs allege breaches of fiduciary duties, corporate waste, mismanagement, abuse of control, unjust enrichment, misappropriation of corporate assets, or contribution, and seek damages, equitable relief, disgorgement, and corporate governance changes in connection with Alibaba Group’s restructuring of its subsidiary Alipay.com Co., Ltd. (“Alipay”) and related disclosures. On June 7, 2012, the courts approved stipulations staying the California Derivative Litigation pending resolution of the Federal Derivative Litigation, and deferring the Federal Derivative Litigation pending a ruling on the motion to dismiss filed by the defendants in the related stockholder class actions, which are discussed below. The Federal Derivative Litigation was stayed pending resolution of the appeal filed by the plaintiffs in the related stockholder class actions, which now has concluded as described below. The Company plans to file a motion to dismiss the Federal Derivative Litigation.

Since June 6, 2011, two purported stockholder class actions were filed in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California against the Company and certain officers and directors of the Company by plaintiffs Bonato and the Twin Cities Pipe Trades Pension Trust. In October 2011, the District Court consolidated the two actions under the caption In re Yahoo! Inc. Securities Litigation and appointed the Pension Trust Fund for Operating Engineers as lead plaintiff. In a consolidated amended complaint filed December 15, 2011, the lead plaintiff purported to represent a class of investors who purchased the Company’s common stock between April 19, 2011 and July 29, 2011, and alleged that during that class period, defendants issued statements that were materially false or misleading because they did not disclose information relating to Alibaba Group’s restructuring of Alipay. The complaint purported to assert claims for relief for violation of Section 10(b) and 20(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and for violation of Rule 10b-5 thereunder, and sought unspecified damages, injunctive and equitable relief, fees, and costs. On August 10, 2012, the District Court granted defendants’ motion to dismiss the consolidated amended complaint. Plaintiffs appealed. On May 15, 2015, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit affirmed the dismissal.

On April 22, 2015, a stockholder action captioned Cathy Buch v. David Filo, et al., was filed in the Delaware Court of Chancery against Yahoo and all current members of the Board of Directors. The complaint asserts both derivative claims, purportedly on behalf of Yahoo, and class action claims, purportedly on behalf of the plaintiff and all similarly situated stockholders, relating to the termination of, and severance payments made to, our former chief operating officer, Henrique de Castro. The plaintiff alleges that the board members breached their fiduciary duties by enabling or acquiescing in the payment of severance to Mr. de Castro, and by allowing Yahoo to make allegedly false and misleading statements regarding the value of his severance. The plaintiff has also asserted claims against Mr. de Castro. The plaintiff seeks to recoup the severance paid to Mr. de Castro, an equitable accounting, disgorgement in favor of Yahoo, monetary damages, declaratory relief, injunctive relief, and an award of attorneys’ fees and costs. The Company has filed a motion to dismiss the action.

Mexico Matters. On November 16, 2011, plaintiffs Worldwide Directories, S.A. de C.V. (“WWD”), and Ideas Interactivas, S.A. de C.V. (“Ideas”) filed an action in the 49th Civil Court of Mexico against the Company, Yahoo! de Mexico, S.A. de C.V. (“Yahoo! Mexico”), Yahoo International Subsidiary Holdings, Inc., and Yahoo Hispanic Americas LLC. The complaint alleged claims of breach of contract, breach of promise, and lost profits in connection with various commercial contracts entered into among the parties between 2002 and 2004, relating to a business listings service, and alleged total damages of approximately $2.75 billion. On December 7, 2011, Yahoo! Mexico filed a counterclaim against WWD for payments of approximately $2.6 million owed to Yahoo! Mexico for services rendered. On April 10, 2012, plaintiffs withdrew their claim filed against Yahoo International Subsidiary Holdings, Inc. and Yahoo Hispanic Americas LLC.

On November 28, 2012, the 49th Civil Court of Mexico entered a non-final judgment against the Company and Yahoo! Mexico in the amount of USD $2.75 billion and a non-final judgment in favor of Yahoo! Mexico on its counterclaim against WWD in the amount of $2.6 million. The judgment against the Company and Yahoo! Mexico purported to leave open for determination in future proceedings certain other alleged damages that were not quantified in the judgment.

On December 12, 2012 and December 13, 2012, respectively, Yahoo! Mexico and the Company appealed the judgment to a three-magistrate panel of the Superior Court of Justice for the Federal District (the “Superior Court”). On May 15, 2013, the Superior Court reversed the judgment, overturned all monetary awards against the Company and reduced the monetary award against Yahoo! Mexico to $172,500. The Superior Court affirmed the award of $2.6 million in favor of Yahoo! Mexico on its counterclaim.

Plaintiffs appealed the Superior Court’s decision to the Mexican Federal Civil Collegiate Court for the First Circuit (“Civil Collegiate Court”). The Company appealed the Superior Court’s decision not to award it statutory costs in the underlying proceeding. Yahoo! Mexico appealed the Superior Court’s award of $172,500, the Superior Court’s decision not to award it additional moneys beyond the $2.6 million award on its counterclaims, and the Superior Court’s decision not to award it statutory costs. On January 14, 2015, the Civil Collegiate Court denied all of the appeals.

On February 16, 2015, plaintiffs filed a petition for review by the Supreme Court of Mexico, where review is limited to constitutional questions under Mexican law. The plaintiff’s petition was denied. Plaintiffs are seeking to reverse the denial through further review by the Supreme Court of Mexico. The Company believes there is no basis to reverse the denial in the matter; however, we cannot assure the ultimate outcome of the matter.

On September 10, 2014, the same plaintiffs in the Mexico litigation described above filed an action in U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York against Yahoo! Inc., Yahoo! Mexico, Baker & McKenzie, and Baker & McKenzie, S.C. Plaintiffs allege that defendants conspired to influence the Mexican courts and “illegally obtain a favorable judgment” in the above litigation. Plaintiffs advance claims for relief under the Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act of 1970 (“RICO”), which provides for treble damages in certain cases, conspiracy to violate RICO, common-law fraud, and civil conspiracy. Their operative amended complaint seeks unspecified damages. The Company and Yahoo! Mexico have filed a motion to dismiss the amended complaint. The Company believes the plaintiffs’ claims in this action are without merit.

The Company has determined, based on current knowledge, that the amount or range of reasonably possible losses, including reasonably possible losses in excess of amounts already accrued, is not reasonably estimable with respect to certain matters described above. The Company has also determined, based on current knowledge, that the aggregate amount or range of losses that are estimable with respect to the Company’s legal proceedings, including the matters described above other than the Mexico matters, would not have a material adverse effect on the Company’s consolidated financial position, results of operations or cash flows. Amounts accrued as of June 30, 2015 were not material. The Company did not accrue for the judgment in Mexico, which was reversed as explained above. The ultimate outcome of legal proceedings involves judgments, estimates and inherent uncertainties, and cannot be predicted with certainty. In the event of a determination adverse to Yahoo, its subsidiaries, directors, or officers in these matters, the Company may incur substantial monetary liability, and be required to change its business practices. Either of these events could have a material adverse effect on the Company’s financial position, results of operations, or cash flows. The Company may also incur substantial legal fees, which are expensed as incurred, in defending against these claims.

Note 13 Stockholders’ Equity And Employee Benefits

Stock Options. The Company’s Stock Plan, the Directors’ Plan, and stock-based awards assumed through acquisitions (including stock-based commitments related to continued service of acquired employees, such as the holdback by Yahoo of shares of Yahoo common stock issued to Tumblr’s founder in connection with the Company’s acquisition of Tumblr in June 2013) are collectively referred to as the “Plans.” Stock option activity under the Company’s Plans for the six months ended June 30, 2015 is summarized as follows (in thousands, except per share amounts):


			Weighted Average
			Exercise Price Per
	Shares		Share
Outstanding at December 31, 2014⁽¹⁾		9,225	$	18.57
Options granted		-	$	-
Options assumed in acquisitions		-	$	-
Options exercised⁽²⁾		(1,328)	$	17.19
Options expired		(562)	$	19.18
Options cancelled/forfeited		(105)	$	15.55

Outstanding at June 30, 2015⁽¹⁾		7,230	$	18.82

⁽¹⁾	Includes shares subject to performance-based stock options for which performance goals had not been set as of the date shown.

⁽²⁾	The Company generally issues new shares to satisfy stock option exercises.

As of June 30, 2015, there was $36 million of unamortized stock-based compensation expense related to unvested stock options, which is expected to be recognized over a weighted average period of 1.6 years.

Restricted Stock Units

Restricted stock unit (“RSU”) activity under the Plans for the six months ended June 30, 2015 is summarized as follows (in thousands, except per share amounts):


			Weighted Average
			Grant Date
			Fair Value
	Shares		Per Share
Awarded and unvested at December 31, 2014⁽¹⁾		40,677	$	32.38
Granted⁽²⁾		12,767	$	43.82
Assumed in acquisitions		-	$	-
Vested		(9,100)	$	27.88
Forfeited		(7,243)	$	32.67

Awarded and unvested at June 30, 2015⁽¹⁾		37,101	$	37.37

⁽¹⁾	Includes the maximum number of shares issuable under the Company’s performance-based restricted stock unit awards (including future-year tranches for which performance goals had not been set) as of the date shown.

⁽²⁾

Includes the maximum number of shares issuable under the performance-based restricted stock unit awards granted during the six months ended June 30, 2015 (including future-year tranches for which performance goals had not been set during the period); excludes tranches of previously granted performance-based restricted stock units for which performance goals were set during the six months ended June 30, 2015.

As of June 30, 2015, there was $847 million of unamortized stock-based compensation expense related to unvested restricted stock units and restricted stock, which is expected to be recognized over a weighted average period of 2.5 years.

During the six months ended June 30, 2014 and 2015, 11.4 million shares and 9.1 million shares, respectively, that were subject to previously granted restricted stock units, vested. These vested restricted stock units were net share settled. During the six months ended June 30, 2014 and 2015, the Company withheld 4.2 million shares and 3.4 million shares, respectively, based upon the Company’s closing stock price on the vesting date, to satisfy the Company’s tax withholding obligation relating to the employees’ minimum statutory obligation for the applicable income and other employment taxes. The Company then remitted cash to the appropriate taxing authorities.

Total payments for the employees’ tax obligations to the relevant taxing authorities were $160 million and $150 million, respectively, for the six months ended June 30, 2014 and 2015 and are reflected as a financing activity within the condensed consolidated statements of cash flows. The payments were used for tax withholdings related to the net share settlements of restricted stock units. The payments had the effect of share repurchases by the Company as they reduced the number of shares that would have otherwise been issued on the vesting date and were recorded as a reduction of additional paid-in capital.

Performance Options. The financial performance stock options awarded by the Company in November 2012 to Ms. Mayer and Mr. Goldman include multiple performance periods. The number of stock options that ultimately vest for each performance period will range from 0 percent to 100 percent of the target amount for such period stated in each executive’s award agreement based on the Company’s performance relative to goals. The financial performance goals are established at the beginning of each performance period and the portion (or “tranche”) of the award related to each performance period is treated as a separate grant for accounting purposes. In March 2015, the Compensation Committee established performance goals under these stock options for the 2015 performance year. The 2015 financial performance metrics (and their weightings) under the performance stock options are GAAP revenue (one-third), revenue ex-TAC (one-third), and adjusted EBITDA (one-third). The grant date fair value of the 2015 tranche of the November 2012 financial performance stock options was $31 million, and is being recognized over the twelve-month service period. The Company began recording stock-based compensation expense for this tranche in March 2015, when the financial performance goals were established.

Performance RSUs. In March 2015, the Compensation Committee approved additional annual financial performance-based RSU awards to Ms. Mayer and other senior officers, and established the 2015 annual performance goals for these awards as well as for the similar performance-based RSUs granted in February 2013 and February 2014. The 2013, 2014, and 2015 performance-based RSU awards are generally eligible to vest in equal annual target amounts over four years (three years for Ms. Mayer) based on the Company’s attainment of annual financial performance goals as well as the executive’s continued employment through each vesting date. The number of shares that ultimately vest each year will range from 0 percent to 200 percent of the annual target amount, based on the Company’s performance. Annual financial performance metrics and goals are established for these RSU awards at the beginning of each year and the tranche of each RSU award related to that year’s performance goal is treated as a separate annual grant for accounting purposes. The 2015 financial performance metrics (and their weightings) established for the performance RSUs are: GAAP revenue (one-third), revenue ex-TAC (one-third), and adjusted EBITDA (one-third). The grant date fair value of the first tranche of the March 2015 performance RSUs was $9 million, the grant date fair value of the second tranche of the February 2014 performance RSUs was $11 million, and the grant date fair value of the third tranche of the February 2013 performance RSUs was $19 million. These values are being recognized over the tranches’ twelve-month service periods. The Company began recording stock-based compensation expense for these tranches in March 2015, when the financial performance goals were established.

Stock Repurchases. In November 2013, the Board authorized a stock repurchase program with an authorized level of $5 billion. The November 2013 program, according to its terms, will expire in December 2016. The aggregate amount available under the November 2013 repurchase program was approximately $726 million at June 30, 2015. In March 2015, the Board authorized an additional stock repurchase program with an authorized level of $2 billion. The March 2015 program, according to its terms, will expire in March 2018. The aggregate amount available under the March 2015 repurchase program was $2 billion at June 30, 2015. Repurchases under the repurchase programs may take place in the open market or in privately negotiated transactions, including structured and derivative transactions such as accelerated share repurchase transactions, and may be made under a Rule 10b5-1 plan. During the six months ended June 30, 2015, the Company repurchased approximately 4 million shares of its common stock under its November 2013 program at an average price of $47.65 per share for a total of $204 million.

Note 14 Restructuring Charges, Net

Restructuring charges, net was comprised of the following (in thousands):


	Three Months Ended						Six Months Ended
	June 30, 2014			June 30, 2015			June 30, 2014			June 30, 2015
Employee severance pay and related costs	$	82		$	7,149		$	3,673		$	51,149
Non-cancelable lease, contract termination, and other charges		61,906			13,403			68,438			22,020
Reversals of previous charges		(2,336	)		(790	)		(2,972	)		(4,021	)
Non-cash accelerations of stock-based compensation expense		-			-			-			2,705
Other non-cash credits		(7,031	)		(74	)		(7,031	)		(933	)

Restructuring charges, net	$	52,621		$	19,688		$	62,108		$	70,920

The Company has implemented various restructuring plans to reduce its cost structure, align resources with its product strategy and improve efficiency, which have resulted in workforce reductions and the consolidation of certain real estate facilities and data centers. For the three months ended June 30, 2014, the Company recorded expense of $50 million and $3 million related to the Americas and EMEA segments, respectively. For the six months ended June 30, 2014, the Company recorded expense of $55 million and $7 million related to the Americas and EMEA segments, respectively. For the three months ended June 30, 2015, the Company recorded expense of $12 million, $7 million, and $1 million related to the Americas, EMEA, and Asia Pacific segments, respectively. For the six months ended June 30, 2015, the Company recorded expense of $53 million, $14 million, and $4 million related to the Americas, EMEA, and Asia Pacific segments, respectively. The amounts recorded during the six months ended June 30, 2015 were primarily related to severance, facility and other related costs pursuant to restructuring plans initiated by the Company in the fourth quarter of 2014 and the first quarter of 2015.

The Company’s restructuring accrual activity for the six months ended June 30, 2015 is summarized as follows (in thousands):


Accrual balance as of December 31, 2014	$	83,608
Restructuring charges		70,920
Cash paid		(82,766	)
Non-cash accelerations of stock-based compensation expense		(2,705	)
Foreign currency translation and other adjustments		292

Accrual balance as of June 30, 2015	$	69,349

The $69 million restructuring liability as of June 30, 2015 consisted of $8 million for employee severance pay expenses, which the Company expects to pay out by the end of the second quarter of 2016, and $61 million relating to non-cancelable lease costs, which the Company expects to pay over the terms of the related obligations through the third quarter of 2022, less estimated sublease income.

The restructuring accrual by reportable segment consisted of the following (in thousands):


	December 31, 2014		June 30, 2015
Americas	$	65,949	$	58,210
EMEA		16,797		11,058
Asia Pacific		862		81

Total restructuring accruals	$	83,608	$	69,349

Note 15 Income Taxes

The Company’s effective tax rate is the result of the mix of income earned in various tax jurisdictions that apply a broad range of income tax rates. Historically, the Company’s provision for income taxes has differed from the tax computed at the U.S. federal statutory income tax rate due to state taxes, the effect of non-U.S. operations, non-deductible stock-based compensation expense, non-deductible acquisition-related costs, and adjustments to unrecognized tax benefits.

The Company recorded income tax expense of $8 million and $58 million for the three months ended June 30, 2014 and 2015, respectively. The Company recorded income tax expense of $12 million and $18 million for the six months ended June 30, 2014 and 2015, respectively. Despite the pre-tax loss, the Company recorded income tax expense for the three and six months ended June 30, 2015, based on forecasted tax expense for fiscal year 2015 as a result of tax expense in profitable jurisdictions being higher than tax benefits anticipated in loss jurisdictions. The tax provision increased in the three and six months ended June 30, 2015 compared to the same period last year primarily due to non-deductible acquisition costs plus limited tax benefits in loss jurisdictions combined with tax expense in profitable jurisdictions.

As of June 30, 2015, the Company does not anticipate repatriating its undistributed foreign earnings of approximately $3.0 billion. Those earnings are principally related to its equity method investment in Yahoo Japan. If those earnings were to be repatriated in the future, the Company may be subject to additional U.S. income taxes (subject to an adjustment for foreign tax credits). It is not practicable to determine the income tax liability that might be incurred if these earnings were to be repatriated.

The Company’s gross amount of unrecognized tax benefits as of June 30, 2015 was $1,041 million, of which $987 million is recorded on the condensed consolidated balance sheets. The gross unrecognized tax benefits as of June 30, 2015 increased by $17 million from the recorded balance as of December 31, 2014.

The Company is in various stages of examination and appeal in connection with its taxes both in the U.S. and in foreign jurisdictions. Those audits generally span tax years 2005 through 2013. As of June 30, 2015, the Company’s 2011 through 2013 U.S. federal income tax returns are currently under examination. The Company has protested the proposed California Franchise Tax Board’s adjustments to the 2005 through 2008 returns, but no conclusions have been reached to date. While it is difficult to determine when the examinations will be settled or their final outcomes, certain audits in various jurisdictions are expected to be resolved in the foreseeable future. As a result, it is reasonably possible that the Company’s unrecognized tax benefits could be reduced by up to approximately $153 million in the next twelve months. The Company believes that it has adequately provided for any reasonably foreseeable adjustment and that any settlement will not have a material adverse effect on its consolidated financial position, results of operations, or cash flows.

The Company may have additional tax liabilities in China related to the sale to Alibaba Group of 523 million Alibaba Group shares that took place during the year ended December 31, 2012 and related to the sale of the 140 million Alibaba Group ADSs sold in the Alibaba Group IPO that took place during the year ended December 31, 2014. Any taxes assessed and paid in China are expected to be ultimately offset and recovered in the U.S. through the use of foreign tax credits.

Tax authorities from the Brazilian State of Sao Paulo have assessed certain indirect taxes against the Company’s Brazilian subsidiary, Yahoo! do Brasil Internet Ltda., related to online advertising services. The assessment is for calendar years 2008 through 2011 and, translated into U.S. dollars as of June 30, 2015, totals approximately $110 million. The Company currently believes the assessment is without merit. The Company believes the risk of loss is remote and has not recorded an accrual for the assessment.

Note 16 Segments

The Company continues to manage its business geographically. The primary areas of measurement and decision-making are Americas, EMEA (Europe, Middle East, and Africa), and Asia Pacific. Management relies on an internal reporting process that provides revenue, revenue ex-TAC (which is defined as revenue less cost of revenue – TAC), direct costs excluding TAC by segment, and consolidated income from operations for making decisions related to the evaluation of the financial performance of, and allocating resources to, the Company’s segments.

The following tables present summarized information by segment (in thousands):


	Three Months Ended						Six Months Ended
	June 30, 2014			June 30, 2015			June 30, 2014			June 30, 2015
Revenue by segment:
Americas	$	805,535		$	992,210		$	1,672,463		$ 1,976,931
EMEA		97,847			85,830			189,417		166,916
Asia Pacific		180,809			165,225			355,041		325,388

Total Revenue	$	1,084,191		$	1,243,265		$	2,216,921		$ 2,469,235

TAC by segment:
Americas	$	30,296		$	180,822		$	64,390		$ 347,477
EMEA		10,212			12,950			19,405		24,654
Asia Pacific		3,318			6,458			5,940		11,238

Total TAC	$	43,826		$	200,230		$	89,735		$ 383,369

Revenue ex-TAC by segment:
Americas	$	775,239		$	811,388		$	1,608,073		$ 1,629,454
EMEA		87,635			72,880			170,012		142,262
Asia Pacific		177,491			158,767			349,101		314,150

Total Revenue ex-TAC		1,040,365			1,043,035			2,127,186		2,085,866

Direct costs by segment⁽¹⁾:
Americas		60,167			76,148			120,977		134,892
EMEA		21,395			20,551			43,339		40,702
Asia Pacific		48,139			51,818			94,967		102,550
Global operating costs⁽²⁾		631,801			649,915			1,282,659		1,334,006
Gain on sale of patents		(61,500	)		(9,100	)		(61,500	)	(11,100)
Depreciation and amortization		146,860			153,679			304,394		305,218
Stock-based compensation expense		102,445			125,130			211,626		240,826
Restructuring charges, net		52,621			19,688			62,108		70,920

Income from (loss) operations	$	38,437		$	(44,794	)	$	68,616		$ (132,148)


(1) Direct costs for each segment include costs associated with the local sales teams and other cost of revenue. Prior to the fourth quarter of 2014, marketing, media, costs associated with Yahoo Properties and ad operation costs were managed locally and included as direct costs for each segment. Such costs are now included in global operating costs. Prior period amounts have been revised to conform to the current presentation. (2) Global operating costs include product development, marketing, real estate workplace, general and administrative, and other corporate expenses that are managed on a global basis and that are not directly attributable to any particular segment. Beginning in the fourth quarter of 2014, marketing, media, costs associated with Yahoo Properties and other ad operation costs are managed globally and included as global costs. Prior period amounts have been revised to conform to the current presentation.
	Three Months Ended						Six Months Ended
	June 30, 2014			June 30, 2015			June 30, 2014			June 30, 2015
Capital expenditures, net:
Americas	$	100,340		$	139,935		$	164,317		$ 262,188
EMEA		3,274			6,978			19,036		14,648
Asia Pacific		3,744			8,529			8,660		13,527

Total capital expenditures, net	$	107,358		$	155,442		$	192,013		$ 290,363


	December 31, 2014		June 30, 2015
Property and equipment, net:
Americas:
U.S.	$	1,382,597	$	1,416,724
Other		787		590

Total Americas	$	1,383,384	$	1,417,314

EMEA		34,649		39,841
Asia Pacific		69,651		67,384

Total property and equipment, net	$	1,487,684	$	1,524,539

See Note 5 — “Goodwill” and Note 14 — “Restructuring Charges, Net” for additional information regarding segments.

Enterprise Wide Disclosures

The following table presents revenue for groups of similar services (in thousands):


	Three Months Ended				Six Months Ended
	June 30, 2014		June 30, 2015		June 30, 2014		June 30, 2015
Search	$	428,418	$	521,126	$	873,185	$	1,052,792
Display		436,053		500,376		889,277		964,109
Other		219,720		221,763		454,459		452,334

Total revenue	$	1,084,191	$	1,243,265	$	2,216,921	$	2,469,235



	Three Months Ended				Six Months Ended
	June 30, 2014		June 30, 2015		June 30, 2014		June 30, 2015
Revenue:
U.S.	$	771,959	$	965,228	$	1,605,616	$	1,928,739
International		312,232		278,037		611,305		540,496

Total revenue	$	1,084,191	$	1,243,265	$	2,216,921	$	2,469,235

Revenue is attributed to individual countries according to the online property that generated the revenue. No single foreign country was material to revenue for the three or six months ended June 30, 2014 and 2015.

Note 17 Search Agreement With Microsoft Corporation

On December 4, 2009, the Company entered into the Search Agreement with Microsoft. On February 18, 2010, the Company received regulatory clearance from both the U.S. Department of Justice and the European Commission and on February 23, 2010 the Company commenced implementation of the Search Agreement on a market-by-market basis.

On April 15, 2015, the Company and Microsoft entered into the Eleventh Amendment to the Search Agreement (the “Eleventh Amendment”) pursuant to which the terms of the Search Agreement were amended. Previously under the Search Agreement, Microsoft was the exclusive algorithmic and paid search services provider to Yahoo on personal computers for Yahoo Properties and for search services provided by Yahoo to Affiliate sites. Microsoft was the non-exclusive provider on mobile devices. Pursuant to the Eleventh Amendment, Microsoft will provide such services on a non-exclusive basis for Yahoo Properties and Affiliate sites on all devices. Commencing on May 1, 2015, Yahoo agrees to request paid search results from Microsoft for 51 percent of its search queries originating from personal computers accessing Yahoo Properties and its Affiliate sites (the “Volume Commitment”) and will display only Microsoft’s paid search results on such search result pages.

Previously under the Search Agreement, the Company was entitled to receive a percentage of the revenue (the “Revenue Share Rate”) generated from Microsoft’s services on Yahoo Properties and on Affiliate sites after deduction of the Affiliate sites’ share of revenue and certain Microsoft costs. The Revenue Share Rate was 88 percent for the first five years of the Search Agreement and then increased to 90 percent on February 23, 2015. Pursuant to the Eleventh Amendment, the Revenue Share Rate increased to 93 percent, but Microsoft now receives its 7 percent revenue share before deduction of the Affiliate site’s share of revenue. The Affiliate site’s share of revenue is deducted from the Company’s 93 percent Revenue Share Rate.

Additionally, pursuant to the Eleventh Amendment, the Company will now have the ability in response to queries on both personal computers and mobile devices to request algorithmic listings only, paid listings only or both algorithmic and paid listings from Microsoft. To the extent the Company requests algorithmic listings only or requests paid listings but elects not to display such paid listings, the Company will pay Microsoft serving costs but not a revenue share. In other cases and with respect to the Volume Commitment, the Revenue Share Rate will apply.

Previously under the Search Agreement, Yahoo had sales exclusivity for both the Company’s and Microsoft’s premium advertisers. Pursuant to the Eleventh Amendment, this sales exclusivity terminated on July 1, 2015. The Company and Microsoft have commenced transitioning premium advertisers for Microsoft’s paid search services to Microsoft. The Eleventh Amendment requires this transition to be completed by January 31, 2016.

The term of the Search Agreement remains 10 years from its commencement date, February 23, 2010, subject to earlier termination as provided in the Search Agreement. Pursuant to the Eleventh Amendment, on or after October 1, 2015, either the Company or Microsoft may terminate the Search Agreement by delivering a written notice of termination to the other party. The Search Agreement will remain in effect for four months from the date of the termination notice to provide for a transition period; however, the Company’s Volume Commitment will not apply in the third and fourth months of this transition period.

The Company reports as revenue the revenue share it receives from Microsoft under the Search Agreement as the Company is not the primary obligor in the arrangement with the advertisers and publishers. The underlying search advertising services are provided by Microsoft. Approximately 36 percent and 37 percent of the Company’s revenue for the three months ended June 30, 2014 and 2015, respectively, was attributable to the Search Agreement, and approximately 36 percent and 38 percent of the Company’s revenue for the six months ended June 30, 2014 and 2015, respectively, was attributable to the Search Agreement.

As of December 31, 2014 and June 30, 2015, the Company had collected total amounts of $52 million and less than $1 million, respectively, on behalf of Microsoft and Microsoft’s affiliates, which was included in cash and cash equivalents with a corresponding liability in accrued expenses and other current liabilities. The Company’s uncollected revenue share in connection with the Search Agreement was $330 million and $328 million, which is included in accounts receivable, net, as of December 31, 2014 and June 30, 2015, respectively.

On December 9, 2010, in connection with entering into the Search Agreement, the Company also entered into a License Agreement with Microsoft (as amended, the “License Agreement”). Under the License Agreement, Microsoft acquired an exclusive 10-year license to the Company’s core search technology and has the ability to integrate this technology into its existing Web search platforms. Pursuant to the Eleventh Amendment, the exclusive licenses granted to Microsoft under the License Agreement became non-exclusive. The Company also agreed pursuant to the Eleventh Amendment to license certain sales tools to Microsoft to use solely in connection with Microsoft’s paid search services pursuant to the terms of the License Agreement.

Note 18 Subsequent Events

Credit Agreement. On July 24, 2015, the Company entered into Amendment No. 3 to the Credit Agreement to extend the termination date of the Credit Agreement from October 8, 2015 to July 22, 2016.

Item 2. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations

Forward-Looking Statements

In addition to current and historical information, this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q (“Report”) contains forward-looking statements within the meaning of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. These statements relate to our future operations, prospects, potential products, services, developments, and business strategies. These statements can, in some cases, be identified by the use of terms such as “may,” “will,” “should,” “could,” “would,” “intend,” “expect,” “plan,” “anticipate,” “believe,” “estimate,” “predict,” “project,” “potential,” or “continue,” the negative of such terms, or other comparable terminology. This Report includes, among others, forward-looking statements regarding our:

•

expectations regarding our proposed spin-off of our remaining holdings in Alibaba Group Holding Limited (“Alibaba Group”);

•

expectations about revenue, including search, display, and other revenue;

•

expectations about growth in users;

•

expectations about changes in our earnings in equity interests and net income;

•

expectations about changes in operating expenses;

•

anticipated capital expenditures;

•

expectations about our share repurchase activity;

•

expectations about the financial and operational impacts of our Search and Advertising Services and Sales Agreement (the “Search Agreement”) with Microsoft Corporation (“Microsoft”);

•

impact of recent acquisitions on our business and evaluation of, and expectations for, possible acquisitions of, or investments in, businesses, products, intangible assets and technologies;

•

expectations about the growth of, the opportunities for monetization in and revenue from, the mobile industry and mobile devices;

•

expectations about the growth of, the opportunities for monetization in and revenue from, our offerings in mobile, video, native, and social (“Mavens”);

•

projections and estimates with respect to our restructuring activities and changes to our organizational structure;

•

expectations about the amount of unrecognized tax benefits, the outcome of tax assessment appeals, the adequacy of our existing tax reserves, future tax expenditures, and tax rates;

•

expectations about positive cash flow generation and existing cash, cash equivalents, and investments being sufficient to meet normal operating requirements; and

•

expectations regarding the future outcome of legal proceedings in which we are involved, including the outcome of our efforts to sustain the reversal of a judgment entered against us and one of our subsidiaries in a proceeding in Mexico.

These statements involve certain known and unknown risks and uncertainties that could cause our actual results to differ materially from those expressed or implied in our forward-looking statements. You are urged to carefully review the disclosures made concerning risks and uncertainties that may affect our business or operating results, which include, among others, those listed in Part II, Item 1A. “Risk Factors” of this Report. We do not intend, and undertake no obligation, to update or revise any of our forward-looking statements after the date of this Report to reflect new information, actual results or future events or circumstances.

Overview

Yahoo! Inc., together with its consolidated subsidiaries (“Yahoo,” the “Company,” “we,” or “us”) is a guide focused on informing, connecting, and entertaining our users. By creating highly personalized experiences for our users, we keep people connected to what matters most to them, across devices and around the world. In turn, we create value for advertisers by connecting them with the audiences that build their businesses. For advertisers, the opportunity to be a part of users’ digital habits across products and platforms is a powerful tool to engage audiences and build brand loyalty. Advertisers can build their businesses through advertising to targeted audiences on our online properties and services (“Yahoo Properties”) or through a distribution network of third party entities (“Affiliates”) who integrate our advertising offerings into their websites or other offerings (“Affiliate sites”). Our revenue is generated principally from search and display advertising.

We continue to manage and measure our business geographically, principally in the Americas, EMEA (Europe, Middle East, and Africa) and Asia Pacific.

In the following Management’s Discussion and Analysis, we provide information regarding the following areas:

•

Key Financial Metrics;

•

Non-GAAP Financial Measures;

•

Significant Transactions;

•

Results of Operations;

•

Liquidity and Capital Resources;

•

Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates; and

•

Recent Accounting Pronouncements.

Key Financial Metrics

The key financial metrics we use are as follows: revenue; revenue less traffic acquisition costs (“TAC”), or revenue ex-TAC; income (loss) from operations; adjusted EBITDA; net income (loss) attributable to Yahoo! Inc.; net cash provided by (used in) operating activities; and free cash flow. Revenue ex-TAC, adjusted EBITDA, and free cash flow are financial measures that are not defined in accordance with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles (“GAAP”). We use these non-GAAP financial measures for internal managerial purposes and to facilitate period-to-period comparisons. See “Non-GAAP Financial Measures” below for a description of each of these non-GAAP financial measures.


	Three Months Ended June 30,					Six Months Ended June 30,
	2014		2015			2014		2015
	(in thousands)

Revenue	$	1,084,191	$	1,243,265		$	2,216,921	$	2,469,235
Revenue ex-TAC	$	1,040,365	$	1,043,035		$	2,127,186	$	2,085,866
Income (loss) from operations⁽¹⁾	$	38,437	$	(44,794	)	$	68,616	$	(132,148	)
Adjusted EBITDA	$	340,363	$	261,703		$	646,744	$	492,816
Net income (loss) attributable to Yahoo! Inc.	$	269,707	$	(21,554	)	$	581,285	$	(356	)
Net cash provided by (used in) operating activities	$	357,414	$	307,952		$	496,475	$	(2,629,519	)
Free cash flow⁽²⁾	$	185,915	$	(24,780	)	$	299,877	$	(3,059,702	)
⁽¹⁾Includes:
Stock-based compensation expense	$	102,445	$	125,130		$	211,626	$	240,826
Restructuring charges, net	$	52,621	$	19,688		$	62,108	$	70,920

⁽²⁾	During the six months ended June 30, 2015, we satisfied the $3.3 billion income tax liability related to the sale of Alibaba Group American Depositary Shares (“ADSs”) in September 2014.

Revenue


	Three Months Ended June 30,						Six Months Ended June 30,
	2014		2015		% Change		2014		2015		% Change
	(dollars in thousands)

Revenue		$ 1,084,191		$ 1,243,265		15%		$ 2,216,921		$ 2,469,235		11%
Less: TAC		43,826		200,230		357%		89,735		383,369		327%

Revenue ex-TAC		$ 1,040,365		$ 1,043,035		0%		$ 2,127,186		$ 2,085,866		(2)%

For the three and six months ended June 30, 2015, revenue increased $159 million, or 15 percent, and $252 million, or 11 percent, respectively, compared to the same periods of 2014. For the three and six months ended June 30, 2015, TAC increased $156 million, or 357 percent, and $294 million, or 327 percent, respectively, compared to the same periods of 2014. For the three and six months ended June 30, 2015, revenue ex-TAC (a non-GAAP financial measure) increased $3 million, or roughly flat, and decreased $41 million, or 2 percent, respectively, compared to the same periods of 2014. The increase in revenue for the three and six months ended June 30, 2015 was primarily attributable to an increase in search and display revenue resulting from an increase in revenue from distribution partners, including Mozilla Corporation (“Mozilla”), revenue from mobile devices, and incremental revenue from the Flurry and BrightRoll acquisitions. The increase in TAC for the three and six months ended June 30, 2015 was primarily driven by higher payments to distribution partners, including Mozilla, and incremental TAC related to the Flurry and BrightRoll acquisitions. Of the $159 million increase in revenue and $156 million increase in TAC for the three months ended June 30, 2015, $99 million and $94 million, respectively, were attributable to the agreement (“Mozilla Agreement”) we entered into in November 2014 to compensate Mozilla for making us the default search provider on certain of Mozilla’s products in the United States. Of the $252 million increase in revenue and $294 million increase in TAC for the six months ended June 30, 2015, $203 million and $188 million, respectively, were attributable to the Mozilla Agreement.

During the remainder of fiscal year 2015, we expect revenue to grow faster than revenue ex-TAC, particularly in our search business, as we optimize our partner deals and innovate our search offering for our users and advertisers. We expect other revenue to be impacted in the six months ending December 31, 2015 as the royalty revenue associated with the Technology and Intellectual Property License Agreement (the “TIPLA”) with Alibaba Group will cease in the three months ending September 30, 2015. We expect to recognize $60 million in royalty revenue from the TIPLA in the three months ending September 30, 2015. No royalty revenue from the TIPLA will be recognized during the three months ending December 31, 2015, or in any periods thereafter.

Mavens Revenue

One of our primary strategies is to invest in and grow our Mavens offerings. Revenue from our Mavens offerings is generated from, without duplication, (i) mobile (as defined below), (ii) video ads and video ad packages, (iii) native ads, and (iv) Tumblr ads and fees. Mavens revenue for the three months ended June 30, 2015 increased 60 percent to $399 million, compared to $249 million for the three months ended June 30, 2014. Mavens revenue for the six months ended June 30, 2015 increased 59 percent to $762 million, compared to $478 million for the six months ended June 30, 2014. The increase in Mavens revenue for the three and six months ended June 30, 2015 was primarily related to growth in mobile advertising, and to a lesser extent, growth in native and video advertising.

We expect our Mavens revenue will continue to increase in 2015. The increase in Mavens revenue has been counteracting a decline in our legacy display offerings that include targeted display advertising, which we refer to as “audience advertising”, and premium advertising.

Mobile Revenue

With the significant platform shift to mobile devices, including smartphones and tablets, we continue to focus on mobile products and mobile ad formats. We have refreshed the user experience on mobile across a number of Yahoo Properties, including the Aviate app, Fantasy Sports, Flickr, and the Yahoo app. Mobile revenue is generated in connection with user activity on mobile devices, including smartphones and tablets (a “device-based” approach), regardless of whether the device is accessing a mobile-optimized service. Mobile revenue is primarily generated by search and display advertising. Mobile revenue also includes leads, listings and fees revenue and ecommerce revenue allocated to user activity on mobile devices.

Mobile revenue for the three months ended June 30, 2015 increased 55 percent to $252 million, compared to $163 million for the three months ended June 30, 2014. Mobile revenue for the six months ended June 30, 2015 increased 58 percent to $485 million, compared to $308 million for the six months ended June 30, 2014. The increase in mobile revenue for the three and six months ended June 30, 2015 was primarily attributable to growth in display revenue on mobile devices driven by native advertising. Mobile revenue is included within Search, Display, and Other revenue that we have reported. As of June 30, 2015, we had more than 600 million monthly mobile users (including Tumblr).

In the latter half of 2014 and in the first half of 2015, we saw a significant increase in the contribution of mobile revenue to our total revenue. We expect the contribution of mobile to continue to increase for the remainder of 2015.

Adjusted EBITDA (a Non-GAAP Financial Measure)


	Three Months Ended June 30,				Six Months Ended June 30,

	2014	2015	% Change		2014	2015		% Change
	(dollars in thousands)
Net income (loss) attributable to Yahoo! Inc.	$ 269,707	$ (21,554)		(108)%	$ 581,285	$	(356)		(100)%
Advisory fees	-	8,000		N/M	-		8,000		N/M
Depreciation and amortization	146,860	153,679		5%	304,394		305,218		0%
Stock-based compensation expense	102,445	125,130		22%	211,626		240,826		14%
Restructuring charges, net	52,621	19,688		(63)%	62,108		70,920		14%
Other (expense) income, net	13,589	11,741		(14)%	27,042		42,804		58%
Provision for income taxes	8,143	58,495		618%	12,360		17,595		42%
Earnings in equity interests, net of tax	(255,852)	(95,841)		(63)%	(557,254)		(195,531)		(65)%
Net income attributable to noncontrolling interests	2,850	2,365		(17)%	5,183		3,340		(36)%

Adjusted EBITDA	$ 340,363	$ 261,703		(23)%	$ 646,744	$	492,816		(24)%


Percentage of Revenue ex-TAC⁽¹⁾⁽²⁾	33%	25%			30%		24%

N/M = Not Meaningful

(1)	Revenue ex-TAC is calculated as GAAP revenue less cost of revenue - TAC.

(2)

Net loss attributable to Yahoo! Inc. as a percentage of GAAP revenue for the three and six months ended June 30, 2015 was 2 percent and 0 percent, respectively. Net income attributable to Yahoo! Inc. as a percentage of GAAP revenue for the three and six months ended June 30, 2014 was 25 percent and 26 percent, respectively.

For the three months ended June 30, 2015, adjusted EBITDA decreased $79 million, or 23 percent, compared to 2014, mainly due to a lower benefit from patent sales year-over-year, an increase in direct costs in the Americas region, and an increase in global operating costs.

For the six months ended June 30, 2015, adjusted EBITDA decreased $154 million, or 24 percent, compared to 2014, mainly due to higher TAC that was not fully offset by higher revenue as well as a lower benefit from patent sales year-over-year, an increase in global operating costs, and an increase in direct costs in the Americas region.

Adjusted EBITDA will be impacted during the three months ending December 31, 2015 if the separation of Yahoo Small Business is completed as planned and may be impacted during the three months ending September 30, 2015 and the three months ending December 31, 2015 if our patent sales in those periods are less than our patent sales in the same periods of 2014. Further, we expect adjusted EBITDA to be impacted in the six months ending December 31, 2015 as the royalty revenue associated with the TIPLA will cease in the three months ending September 30, 2015. We expect to recognize $60 million in royalty revenue in the three months ending September 30, 2015. No royalty revenue from the TIPLA will be recognized during the three months ending December 31, 2015, or in any periods thereafter.

Free Cash Flow (a Non-GAAP Financial Measure)


	Three Months Ended June 30,				Six Months Ended June 30,
	2014		2015		2014		2015
	(dollars in thousands)
Net cash provided by (used in) operating activities	$	357,414	$	307,952	$	496,475	$	(2,629,519)
Acquisition of property and equipment, net		(107,358)		(155,442)		(192,013)		(290,363)
Excess tax benefits from stock-based awards		19,544		(35,620)		79,100		1,850
Dividends received from equity investee		(83,685)		(141,670)		(83,685)		(141,670)

Free cash flow	$	185,915	$	(24,780)	$	299,877	$	(3,059,702)

For the three months ended June 30, 2015, free cash flow decreased $211 million, or 113 percent, primarily due to a decline in net income attributable to Yahoo! Inc., cash paid related to restructuring activities, and an increase in capital expenditures year-over-year.

For the six months ended June 30, 2015, free cash flow decreased $3.4 billion. In the three months ended March 31, 2015, we satisfied the $3.3 billion income tax liability related to the sale of Alibaba Group ADSs in September 2014.

Non-GAAP Financial Measures

Revenue ex-TAC. Revenue ex-TAC is a non-GAAP financial measure defined as GAAP revenue less cost of revenue - TAC. TAC consists of payments made to Affiliates and payments made to companies that direct consumer and business traffic to Yahoo Properties.

Adjusted EBITDA. Adjusted EBITDA is a non-GAAP financial measure defined as net income (loss) attributable to Yahoo! Inc. before taxes, depreciation, amortization of intangible assets, stock-based compensation expense, other income (expense), net (which includes interest), earnings in equity interests, net income attributable to noncontrolling interests, and certain gains, losses, and expenses that we do not believe are indicative of our ongoing results.

Free Cash Flow. Free cash flow is a non-GAAP financial measure defined as net cash provided by (used in) operating activities (adjusted to include excess tax benefits from stock-based awards), less (i) acquisition of property and equipment, net, and (ii) dividends received from equity investees.

For additional information about these non-GAAP financial measures, see “Non-GAAP Financial Measures” included in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2014 under the caption “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations.”

Significant Transactions

Search Agreement with Microsoft Corporation

The term of the Search Agreement is 10 years from its commencement date, February 23, 2010, subject to earlier termination as provided in the Search Agreement. Previously under the Search Agreement, we were entitled to receive a percentage of the revenue (the “Revenue Share Rate”) generated from Microsoft’s services on Yahoo Properties and on Affiliate sites after deduction of the Affiliate sites’ share of revenue and certain Microsoft costs. The Revenue Share Rate was 88 percent for the first five years and then increased to 90 percent on February 23, 2015. Pursuant to the Eleventh Amendment of the Search Agreement effective as of April 15, 2015, the Revenue Share Rate increased to 93 percent, but Microsoft receives its 7 percent revenue share before deduction of the Affiliate site’s share of revenue. The Affiliate site’s share of revenue is deducted from our 93 percent Revenue Share Rate.

For search revenue generated from Microsoft’s services on Yahoo Properties and Affiliate sites, we report as revenue our revenue share, as we are not the primary obligor in the arrangement with the advertisers and publishers, and the amounts paid to Affiliates are recorded on a net basis as a reduction of revenue. The underlying search advertising services are provided by Microsoft. Revenue under the Search Agreement represented approximately 36 percent and 37 percent of our revenue for the three months ended June 30, 2014 and 2015, respectively, and approximately 36 percent and 38 percent of our revenue for the six months ended June 30, 2014 and 2015, respectively.

See Note 17 — “Search Agreement With Microsoft Corporation” in the Notes to our condensed consolidated financial statements for additional information.

Spin-Off of Remaining Holdings in Alibaba Group

On January 27, 2015, we announced a plan for a spin-off of all of our remaining holdings in Alibaba Group into a newly formed independent registered investment company. The name selected for the new company is Aabaco Holdings, Inc. (“Aabaco”). The stock of Aabaco will be distributed pro rata to our stockholders, resulting in Aabaco becoming a separate publicly traded registered investment company. On July 17, 2015, Aabaco filed its initial Registration Statement on Form N-2 with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”). Following the completion of the transaction, Aabaco will own all of Yahoo’s remaining 384 million Alibaba Group shares and a 100 percent ownership interest in Aabaco Small Business, LLC, a newly formed entity which will own Yahoo Small Business, a current operating business of Yahoo that will also be transferred to Aabaco as part of the transaction.

The completion of the transaction is expected to occur in the fourth quarter of 2015. The transaction is subject to certain conditions, including final approval by our Board, receipt of a favorable ruling from the Internal Revenue Service regarding certain aspects of the transaction and a legal opinion with respect to the tax-free treatment of the transaction under U.S. federal tax laws and regulations, the effectiveness of an applicable registration statement with the SEC and compliance with the requirements under the Investment Company Act of 1940, and other customary conditions. Each of the conditions may be waived, in whole or in part (to the extent permitted by law), by us in our sole discretion. We have reserved the right, in our sole and absolute discretion, to abandon or modify the terms of the transaction at any time prior to the distribution date, even if the conditions to the transaction have been satisfied.

Upon completion of the transaction, which is subject to the satisfaction or waiver of the conditions specified above, our consolidated financial position will be materially impacted as the Alibaba Group shares and related deferred tax liabilities will be removed from our consolidated balance sheet with a corresponding reduction of our stockholders’ equity balance. We would no longer hold any Alibaba Group shares and would no longer record changes in fair value within comprehensive income (loss).

Results of Operations


	Three Months Ended June 30,				Percent Change		Six Months Ended June 30,				Percent Change
	2014		2015		Percent Change		2014		2015		Percent Change
	(dollars in thousands)
Revenue for groups of similar services:
Search
Yahoo Properties	$	360,041	$	462,973		29%	$	731,785	$	938,467		28%
Affiliate sites		68,377		58,153		(15)%		141,400		114,325		(19)%

Total Search revenue	$	428,418	$	521,126		22%	$	873,185	$	1,052,792		21%

Display
Yahoo Properties	$	387,965	$	347,722		(10)%	$	796,158	$	688,265		(14)%
Affiliate sites		48,088		152,654		217%		93,119		275,844		196%

Total Display revenue	$	436,053	$	500,376		15%	$	889,277	$	964,109		8%

Other	$	219,720	$	221,763		1%	$	454,459	$	452,334		0%

Total revenue	$	1,084,191	$	1,243,265		15%	$	2,216,921	$	2,469,235		11%

Cost of revenue — TAC	$	43,826	$	200,230		357%	$	89,735	$	383,369		327%
Cost of revenue — other		295,786		295,932		0%		589,389		581,195		(1)%
Sales and marketing		253,198		274,304		8%		555,523		549,661		(1)%
Product development		291,778		306,428		5%		560,042		633,175		13%
General and administrative		154,881		180,595		17%		319,504		354,108		11%
Amortization of intangibles		15,164		19,982		32%		33,504		40,055		20%
Gain on sale of patents		(61,500)		(9,100)		(85)%		(61,500)		(11,100)		(82)%
Restructuring charges, net		52,621		19,688		(63)%		62,108		70,920		14%

Total operating expenses	$	1,045,754	$	1,288,059		23%	$	2,148,305	$	2,601,383		21%

Income (loss) from operations	$	38,437	$	(44,794)		(217)%	$	68,616	$	(132,148)		(293)%

Includes:
Stock-based compensation expense	$	102,445	$	125,130		22%	$	211,626	$	240,826		14%

The following table sets forth selected information concerning our results of operations as a percentage of revenue for the period indicated:


	Three Months Ended June 30,				Six Months Ended June 30,
	2014		2015		2014		2015
Revenue for groups of similar services:
Search
Yahoo Properties		33%		37%		33%		38%
Affiliate sites		7%		5%		6%		5%

Total Search revenue		40%		42%		39%		43%

Display
Yahoo Properties		36%		28%		36%		28%
Affiliate sites		4%		12%		4%		11%

Total Display revenue		40%		40%		40%		39%

Other		20%		18%		21%		18%

Total revenue		100%		100%		100%		100%

Cost of revenue — TAC		4%		16%		4%		15%
Cost of revenue — other		27%		24%		27%		24%
Sales and marketing		24%		22%		25%		22%
Product development		27%		25%		25%		26%
General and administrative		14%		15%		14%		14%
Amortization of intangibles		1%		1%		2%		2%
Gain on sale of patents		(6)%		(1)%		(3)%		(1)%
Restructuring charges, net		5%		2%		3%		3%

Total operating expenses		96%		104%		97%		105%

Income (loss) from operations		4%		(4)%		3%		(5)%

Includes:
Stock-based compensation expense		9%		10%		10%		10%

Management Reporting

We continue to manage our business geographically. The primary areas of measurement and decision-making are currently the Americas, EMEA, and Asia Pacific. Management relies on an internal reporting process that provides revenue, revenue ex-TAC, direct costs excluding TAC by segment, and consolidated income from operations for making decisions related to the evaluation of the financial performance of, and allocating resources to, our segments.


	Three Months Ended June 30,				Percent Change		Six Months Ended June 30,				Percent Change
	2014		2015		Percent Change		2014		2015		Percent Change
	(dollars in thousands)
Revenue by segment:
Americas	$	805,535	$	992,210		23%	$	1,672,463	$	1,976,931		18%
EMEA		97,847		85,830		(12)%		189,417		166,916		(12)%
Asia Pacific		180,809		165,225		(9)%		355,041		325,388		(8)%

Total revenue	$	1,084,191	$	1,243,265		15%	$	2,216,921	$	2,469,235		11%

TAC by segment:
Americas	$	30,296	$	180,822		497%	$	64,390	$	347,477		440%
EMEA		10,212		12,950		27%		19,405		24,654		27%
Asia Pacific		3,318		6,458		95%		5,940		11,238		89%

Total TAC	$	43,826	$	200,230		357%	$	89,735	$	383,369		327%

Revenue ex-TAC by segment:
Americas	$	775,239	$	811,388		5%	$	1,608,073	$	1,629,454		1%
EMEA		87,635		72,880		(17)%		170,012		142,262		(16)%
Asia Pacific		177,491		158,767		(11)%		349,101		314,150		(10)%

Total revenue ex-TAC		1,040,365		1,043,035		0%		2,127,186		2,085,866		(2)%

Direct costs by segment⁽¹⁾:
Americas		60,167		76,148		27%		120,977		134,892		12%
EMEA		21,395		20,551		(4)%		43,339		40,702		(6)%
Asia Pacific		48,139		51,818		8%		94,967		102,550		8%
Global operating costs⁽²⁾		631,801		649,915		3%		1,282,659		1,334,006		4%
Depreciation and amortization		146,860		153,679		5%		304,394		305,218		0%
Stock-based compensation expense		102,445		125,130		22%		211,626		240,826		14%
Gain on sale of patents		(61,500)		(9,100)		(85)%		(61,500)		(11,100)		(82)%
Restructuring charges, net		52,621		19,688		(63)%		62,108		70,920		14%

Income (loss) from operations	$	38,437	$	(44,794)		(217)%	$	68,616	$	(132,148)		(293)%

(1)

Direct costs for each segment include costs associated with the local sales teams and other cost of revenue. Prior to the fourth quarter of 2014, marketing, media, costs associated with Yahoo Properties and ad operation costs were managed locally and included as direct costs for each segment. Prior period amounts have been revised to conform to the current presentation.

(2)

Global operating costs include product development, marketing, real estate workplace, general and administrative, and other corporate expenses that are managed on a global basis and that are not directly attributable to any particular segment. Beginning in the fourth quarter of 2014, marketing, media, costs associated with Yahoo Properties and other ad operation costs are managed globally and included as global costs. Prior period amounts have been revised to conform to the current presentation.

Revenue

We generate revenue principally from search and display advertising on Yahoo Properties and Affiliate sites, with the majority of our revenue coming from advertising on Yahoo Properties. Our margins on revenue from advertising on Yahoo Properties are generally higher than our margins on revenue from advertising on Affiliate sites, as we pay TAC to our Affiliates. Additionally, we generate revenue from other sources including listings-based services, facilitating commercial transactions, royalties, patent licenses, and consumer and business fee-based services. For additional information about how we generate and recognize revenue, see “Results of Operations — Revenue — Mobile Revenue, — Search Revenue, — Display Revenue, and —Other Revenue” included in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2014 under the caption “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations.”

Search Revenue

Search revenue for the three and six months ended June 30, 2015 increased by 22 percent and 21 percent, respectively, compared to the same periods of 2014. This increase in search revenue was attributable to increased revenue on Yahoo Properties of $103 million and $207 million for the three and six months ended June 30, 2015, respectively, primarily in the Americas region, resulting from higher search volume on PCs due primarily to the Mozilla Agreement, which contributed $99 million and $202 million for the respective periods, as well as higher search volume on mobile devices. This increase was partially offset by a decline in Affiliate search revenue of $10 million and $27 million for the three and six months ended June 30, 2015, respectively, primarily in the Asia Pacific and EMEA regions.

The search revenue declines in the EMEA and Asia Pacific regions for the three and six months ended June 30, 2015 were primarily due to the impact of unfavorable foreign exchange fluctuations of $11 million and $21 million, respectively, for the three and six months ended June 30, 2015, using the foreign currency exchange rates from the three and six months ended June 30, 2014.

Display Revenue

Display revenue for the three months ended June 30, 2015 increased by 15 percent, compared to the same period of 2014. The increase in display revenue was driven by increased Affiliate revenue of $105 million, primarily in the Americas region resulting primarily from an increase in video and native advertising, including incremental revenue from the BrightRoll acquisition, as well as an increase in revenue from advertising on mobile devices and improved stabilization of our legacy PC business during the three months ended June 30, 2015. Display advertising on Yahoo Properties declined $40 million, primarily due to a lower volume of premium and audience advertising, which was partially offset by the increase in native advertising revenue.

Display revenue for the six months ended June 30, 2015 increased by 8 percent, compared to the same period of 2014. The increase in display revenue was driven by increased Affiliate revenue of $183 million, primarily in the Americas region resulting primarily from an increase in video and native advertising, including incremental revenue from the BrightRoll acquisition, as well as an increase in revenue from advertising on mobile devices. Display advertising on Yahoo Properties declined $108 million, primarily due to a lower volume of premium and audience advertising, as well as lower Price-per-Ad (as defined below) on audience advertising. This decline was partially offset by the increase in native advertising revenue.

Additionally, the increase in display revenue for the three and six months ended June 30, 2015 was partially offset by the impact of unfavorable foreign exchange fluctuations of $18 million and $28 million, respectively, for the three and six months ended June 30, 2015, using the foreign currency exchange rates from the three and six months ended June 30, 2014.

Other Revenue

Other revenue for the three months ended June 30, 2015 increased by 1 percent compared to the same period of 2014. The year-over-year increase was primarily due to an increase in fees revenue of $21 million, partially offset by a decline in listings-based revenue of $19 million.

Other revenue for the six months ended June 30, 2015 was roughly flat compared to the same period of 2014. The year-over-year decrease was primarily due to a decline in listings-based revenue of $35 million, partially offset by an increase in fees revenue of $33 million.

We expect other revenue to be impacted in the six months ending December 31, 2015 as the royalty revenue associated with the TIPLA will cease in the three months ending September 30, 2015. We expect to recognize $60 million in royalty revenue from the TIPLA in the three months ending September 30, 2015. No royalty revenue from the TIPLA will be recognized during the three months ending December 31, 2015, or in any periods thereafter.

Search and Display Metrics

We present information below regarding the number of “Paid Clicks” and “Price-per-Click” for search and the number of “Ads Sold” and “Price-per-Ad” for display. This information is derived from internal data.

“Paid Clicks” are defined as clicks by end-users on sponsored search listings (excluding native ad units, which are defined as display ads that appear in the content streams viewed by users) on Yahoo Properties and Affiliate sites. Advertisers generally pay for sponsored search listings on a per-click basis. “Search click-driven revenue” is gross search revenue (GAAP search revenue plus the related revenue share with third parties), excluding the Microsoft RPS Guarantee and search revenue from Yahoo Japan. “Price-per-Click” is defined as search click-driven revenue divided by our total number of Paid Clicks.

“Ads Sold” consist of display ad impressions for paying advertisers on Yahoo Properties (including mobile) and Affiliate sites (including Flurry and BrightRoll). “Price-per-Ad” is defined as display revenue from Yahoo Properties (including mobile) and Affiliate sites (including Flurry and BrightRoll) divided by our total number of Ads Sold. Our price and volume metrics for display are based on display revenue which we report on a gross basis (before TAC), and include data for graphical, sponsorship, and native ad units on Yahoo Properties (including mobile) and Affiliate sites (including Flurry and BrightRoll).

We periodically review, refine and update our methodologies for monitoring, gathering, and counting number of Paid Clicks and Ads Sold and for calculating search click-driven revenue, Price-per-Click, and Price-per-Ad. Commencing in the three months ended March 31, 2015, our display volume and price metrics (Ads Sold and Price-per-Ad) include (a) results from Yahoo Properties worldwide (other than Japan, where Yahoo branded sites are operated by third-party licensees), whereas previously those metrics excluded countries and regions where historical data was not previously retained in a manner that would support period-to-period comparisons; (b) results from Affiliate sites (including Affiliates of Flurry and BrightRoll) and (c) historical Tumblr data commencing in the three months ended June 30, 2013, whereas previously Tumblr data was limited to (i) native ad results commencing in the three months ended March 31, 2014 and (ii) other display ad results commencing in the three months ended September 30, 2014. Prior period amounts have been updated to conform to the current presentation.

Search Metrics

For the three and six months ended June 30, 2015, Paid Clicks and Price-per-Click increased 13 percent and 4 percent, and increased 17 percent and 3 percent, respectively, compared to the same periods of 2014. The increase in Paid Clicks for both the three and six months ended June 30, 2015 was primarily attributable to an increase in Paid Clicks on Yahoo Properties in the Americas region, attributable to our agreements with Mozilla and other partners. This increase was partially offset by a decline in Paid Clicks from Affiliate traffic due to traffic quality improvement initiatives conducted by us in 2014. The increase in Price-per-Click for both the three and six months ended June 30, 2015 was attributable to favorable mix shifts towards higher monetizing partners and from Affiliate traffic quality improvement initiatives conducted by us. Improvements in the search metrics resulted in year-over-year growth of 17 percent and 21 percent in search click-driven revenue for the three and six months ended June 30, 2015, respectively.

Display Metrics

For the three months ended June 30, 2015, the number of Ads Sold and Price-per-Ad increased 9 percent and 10 percent, respectively, compared to the same period of 2014. The increase in Ads Sold year-over-year was attributable to an increase in video and native ad units sold which was partially offset by a decline in premium ad units sold. Native ad units represented approximately 41 percent of total Ads Sold for the three months ended June 30, 2015, as compared to 31 percent of total Ads Sold for the three months ended June 30, 2014. The increase in Price-per-Ad was due to improved pricing for native and premium advertising and an improved mix of video inventory, partially offset by a shift in the mix of Ads Sold from premium advertising to native advertising, which is lower monetizing.

For the six months ended June 30, 2015, the number of Ads Sold increased 17 percent and Price-per-Ad decreased 3 percent, compared to the same period of 2014. The increase in Ads Sold year-over-year was primarily attributable to an increase in video and native ad units sold which was partially offset by a decline in premium ad units sold. Native ad units represented approximately 41 percent of total Ads Sold for the six months ended June 30, 2015, as compared to 24 percent of total Ads Sold for the six months ended June 30, 2014. The decrease in Price-per-Ad was due to a shift in the mix of Ads Sold from premium advertising to native advertising offset by an improved mix of video inventory, and a decline in pricing for audience advertising. This decrease was partially offset by improved pricing in native advertising.

Revenue and Revenue ex-TAC by Segment

Americas

Americas revenue for the three and six months ended June 30, 2015 increased $187 million, or 23 percent, and $304 million, or 18 percent, respectively, compared to the same periods of 2014. The increase in Americas revenue for the three months ended June 30, 2015 was primarily attributable to increases in search and display revenue of $101 million and $77 million, respectively. The increase in Americas revenue for the six months ended June 30, 2015 was primarily attributable to increases in Americas search and display revenue of $195 million and $99 million, respectively. The increase in Americas search revenue for the three and six months ended June 30, 2015 included $98 million and $201 million, respectively, attributable to the Mozilla Agreement. The increase in Americas display revenue for the three and six months ended June 30, 2015 was primarily associated with incremental revenue from the BrightRoll acquisition and an increase in revenue from mobile devices.

Revenue in the Americas accounted for approximately 80 percent of total revenue for both the three and six months ended June 30, 2015 compared to 74 percent and 75 percent for the three and six months ended June 30, 2014, respectively.

Americas revenue ex-TAC for the three and six months ended June 30, 2015 increased $36 million, or 5 percent, and $21 million, or 1 percent, compared to the same periods of 2014. The increase in Americas revenue ex-TAC for the three months ended June 30, 2015 was primarily attributable to an increase in display revenue ex-TAC of $31 million and other revenue ex-TAC of $9 million, partially offset by a decline in search revenue ex-TAC of $3 million. The increase in Americas revenue ex-TAC for the six months ended June 30, 2015 was primarily attributable to an increase in display revenue ex-TAC of $18 million and other revenue ex-TAC of $11 million, partially offset by a decline in search revenue ex-TAC of $8 million. The increase in Americas display revenue ex-TAC for the three and six months ended June 30, 2015 was primarily attributable to an increase in Affiliate revenue ex-TAC associated with incremental revenue from the BrightRoll acquisition, as well as an increase in display revenue ex-TAC from mobile devices. This increase is partially offset by declines in display revenue ex-TAC on Yahoo Properties related to premium and audience advertising. The increase in other revenue ex-TAC in the Americas for the three and six months ended June 30, 2015 is attributable to an increase in fees revenue partially offset by a decline in listings revenue. The decline in Americas search revenue ex-TAC for the three and six months ended June 30, 2015 was primarily due to TAC growth associated with payments to distribution partners outpacing search click-driven revenue, partially offset by an increase in search revenue ex-TAC from mobile devices. TAC associated with the Mozilla Agreement was $93 million and $186 million for the three and six months ended June 30, 2015, respectively.

Revenue ex-TAC in the Americas accounted for approximately 78 percent of total revenue ex-TAC for both the three and six months ended June 30, 2015 compared to 75 percent and 76 percent for the three and six months ended June 30, 2014, respectively.

EMEA

EMEA revenue for the three and six months ended June 30, 2015 decreased $12 million, or 12 percent, and $23 million, or 12 percent, respectively, compared to the same periods of 2014, due to the impact of unfavorable foreign exchange fluctuations of $15 million and $24 million for the three and six months ended June 30, 2015, respectively, using the foreign currency exchange rates from the three and six months ended June 30, 2014. The impact of the unfavorable foreign exchange fluctuations was also the primary reason for the decrease in EMEA display and search revenue of $6 million and $3 million, respectively, for the three months ended June 30, 2015, and $12 million and $5 million, respectively, for the six months ended June 30, 2015. In addition, other revenue in EMEA declined $3 million and $6 million, respectively, for the three and six months ended June 30, 2015 primarily due to a decline in listings-based revenue.

Revenue in EMEA accounted for approximately 7 percent of total revenue for both the three and six months ended June 30, 2015, respectively, compared to 9 percent for both the three and six months ended June 30, 2014.

EMEA revenue ex-TAC for the three and six months ended June 30, 2015 decreased $15 million, or 17 percent, and $28 million, or 16 percent, respectively, compared to the same periods of 2014, primarily due to unfavorable foreign exchange fluctuations of $13 million and $20 million for the three and six months ended June 30, 2015, respectively, using the foreign currency exchange rates from the three and six months ended June 30, 2014. The impact of the unfavorable foreign exchange fluctuations contributed to the decrease in EMEA display and search revenue ex-TAC of $8 million and $4 million, respectively, for the three months ended June 30, 2015 and $16 million and $6 million, respectively, for the six months ended June 30, 2015. The declines in EMEA display revenue ex-TAC were also attributable to declines in premium and audience advertising. The declines in EMEA search revenue ex-TAC were also attributable to a decline in Affiliate revenue in the region due to lower volume of Paid Clicks and a decline in Price-per-Click. In addition, other revenue ex-TAC in EMEA decreased $3 million and $6 million, respectively, for the three and six months ended June 30, 2015 primarily due to a decline in listings-based revenue.

Revenue ex-TAC in EMEA accounted for approximately 7 percent of total revenue ex-TAC for both the three and six months ended June 30, 2015, respectively, compared to 8 percent for both the three and six months ended June 30, 2014.

Asia Pacific

Asia Pacific revenue for the three and six months ended June 30, 2015 decreased $16 million, or 9 percent, and $30 million, or 8 percent, respectively, compared to the same periods of 2014, primarily due to the impact of unfavorable foreign exchange fluctuations of $12 million and $22 million for the three and six months ended June 30, 2015, respectively, using the foreign currency exchange rates from the three and six months ended June 30, 2014. The impact of the unfavorable foreign exchange fluctuations was also the primary reason for the decrease in Asia Pacific display, search and other revenue of $8 million, $5 million and $3 million, respectively, for the three months ended June 30, 2015 and $13 million, $11 million and $6 million, respectively, for the six months ended June 30, 2015. Additionally, the decrease in Asia Pacific display revenue was attributable to declines in premium and audience advertising, while the decrease in Asia Pacific search revenue was attributable to a decline in Affiliate revenue in the region due to lower volume of Paid Clicks.

Revenue in Asia Pacific accounted for approximately 13 percent of total revenue for both the three and six months ended June 30, 2015, respectively, compared to 17 percent and 16 percent for the three and six months ended June 30, 2014, respectively.

Asia Pacific revenue ex-TAC for the three and six months ended June 30, 2015 decreased $19 million, or 11 percent, and $35 million, or 10 percent, respectively, compared to the same periods of 2014, primarily due to the impact of unfavorable foreign exchange fluctuations of $11 million and $22 million for the three and six months ended June 30, 2015, respectively, using the foreign currency exchange rates from the three and six months ended June 30, 2014. The impact of the unfavorable foreign exchange fluctuations contributed to the decrease in Asia Pacific display, search and other revenue ex-TAC of $11 million, $5 million and $3 million, respectively, for the three months ended June 30, 2015, and $18 million, $11 million and $6 million, respectively, for the six months ended June 30, 2015. Additionally, the decrease in Asia Pacific display revenue ex-TAC was attributable to declines in premium and audience advertising, while the decrease in Asia Pacific search revenue ex-TAC was attributable to a decline in Affiliate revenue in the region due to lower volume of Paid Clicks.

Revenue ex-TAC in Asia Pacific accounted for approximately 15 percent of total revenue ex-TAC for both the three and six months ended June 30, 2015, respectively, compared to 17 percent and 16 percent for the three and six months ended June 30, 2014, respectively.

Direct Costs by Segment

Starting in the fourth quarter of 2014, direct costs for each segment include costs associated with the local sales teams and other cost of revenue. Prior to the fourth quarter of 2014, marketing, media, costs associated with Yahoo Properties and ad operation costs were managed locally and included as direct costs for each segment. Prior period amounts have been revised to conform to the current presentation.

Americas

For the three and six months ended June 30, 2015, direct costs attributable to the Americas segment increased $16 million, or 27 percent, and $14 million, or 12 percent, respectively, compared to the same periods of 2014, primarily due to higher compensation costs of $15 million and $13 million, respectively, and marketing and public relations expense of $2 million and $3 million, respectively, partially offset by lower content costs of $2 million and $5 million, respectively.

Direct costs attributable to the Americas segment represented approximately 9 percent and 8 percent of Americas revenue ex-TAC for the three and six months ended June 30, 2015, respectively, compared to 8 percent for both the three and six months ended June 30, 2014, respectively.

EMEA

For the three and six months ended June 30, 2015, direct costs attributable to the EMEA segment decreased $1 million, or 4 percent, and $3 million, or 6 percent, respectively, compared to the same periods of 2014 due to lower compensation costs.

Direct costs attributable to the EMEA segment represented approximately 28 percent and 29 percent of EMEA revenue ex-TAC for the three and six months ended June 30, 2015, respectively, compared to 24 percent and 25 percent for the three and six months ended June 30, 2014, respectively.

Asia Pacific

For the three and six months ended June 30, 2015, direct costs attributable to the Asia Pacific segment increased $4 million, or 8 percent, and $8 million, or 8 percent, respectively, compared to the same periods of 2014, primarily attributable to an increase in other cost of revenue of $7 million and $12 million, respectively, related to our ecommerce business in the region, partially offset by a decline in compensation costs of $3 million and $4 million, respectively.

Direct costs attributable to the Asia Pacific segment represented approximately 33 percent of Asia Pacific revenue ex-TAC for both the three and six months ended June 30, 2015, respectively, compared to 27 percent for both the three and six months ended June 30, 2014.

Operating Costs and Expenses

Cost of Revenue — TAC

Cost of revenue - TAC consists of payments made to Affiliates and payments made to companies that direct consumer and business traffic to Yahoo Properties. We also have an agreement to compensate Mozilla for being the default search provider on certain of Mozilla’s products in the United States. We record those payments as cost of revenue — TAC.

Cost of revenue - TAC for the three and six months ended June 30, 2015 increased $156 million, or 357 percent, and $294 million, or 327 percent, respectively, compared to the same periods of 2014, primarily due to increased search TAC in the Americas region associated with payments to Mozilla of $94 million and $188 million, respectively, as well as increased display TAC in the Americas region associated with incremental TAC from the Flurry and BrightRoll acquisitions.

We expect cost of revenue — TAC to continue to grow in 2015 as we invest in scaling and optimizing our businesses and partnerships, including Gemini syndication, BrightRoll, Mozilla, and other syndication partners.

Cost of revenue - TAC represented approximately 16 percent and 15 percent of GAAP revenue for the three and six months ended June 30, 2015, respectively, compared to 4 percent for both the three and six months ended June 30, 2014.

Cost of Revenue — Other

Cost of revenue — other consists of bandwidth costs, and other expenses associated with the production and usage of Yahoo Properties, including content expense and amortization of developed technology and patents. Cost of revenue — other also includes costs for Yahoo’s technology platforms and infrastructure, including depreciation expense and other operating costs, directly related to revenue generating activities.

Cost of revenue — other was roughly flat for the three months ended June 30, 2015 compared to the same period of 2014. There were declines in bandwidth costs of $8 million and compensation costs of $6 million that were offset by higher cost of revenue of $15 million primarily related to algorithmic serving costs, our ecommerce business in the Asia Pacific region, and BrightRoll video advertising fees.

Cost of revenue — other decreased $8 million, or 1 percent, for the six months ended June 30, 2015 compared to the same period of 2014. The decrease for the six months ended June 30, 2015, compared to 2014, was primarily due to a decrease in bandwidth costs of $18 million, and stock-based compensation expense of $17 million. This decrease was partially offset by higher cost of revenue of $23 million primarily related to algorithmic serving costs, our ecommerce business in the Asia Pacific region, BrightRoll video advertising fees, and rich media serving costs.

Cost of revenue — other represented approximately 24 percent of GAAP revenue for both the three and six months ended June 30, 2015 compared to 27 percent for both the three and six months ended June 30, 2014.

Sales and Marketing

Sales and marketing expenses consist primarily of advertising and other marketing-related expenses, compensation-related expenses (including stock-based compensation expense), sales commissions, and travel costs.

Sales and marketing expenses for the three months ended June 30, 2015 increased $21 million, or 8 percent, compared to the same period of 2014, primarily attributable to increases of $9 million in stock-based compensation expense and $10 million in marketing expense. The increase in marketing expense was primarily due to brand marketing campaigns in 2015 for which there were no similar campaigns in 2014.

Sales and marketing expenses for the six months ended June 30, 2015 decreased $6 million, or 1 percent, compared to the same period of 2014, primarily attributable to decreases of $4 million in stock-based compensation expense and $18 million in other compensation costs, partially offset by an increase in marketing expenses of $16 million. The decline in other compensation costs was primarily attributable to a 9 percent decrease in headcount year-over-year, as well as a decline in transition and relocation costs. The increase in marketing expense was primarily due to brand marketing campaigns in 2015 for which there were no similar campaigns in 2014.

Sales and marketing expenses represented approximately 22 percent of GAAP revenue for both the three and six months ended June 30, 2015 compared to 24 percent and 25 percent for the three and six months ended June 30, 2014, respectively.

We expect sales and marketing expense to increase in the three months ending September 30, 2015 to support our search initiatives.

Product Development

Product development expenses consist primarily of compensation-related expenses (including stock-based compensation expense) incurred for the development of, enhancements to and maintenance of Yahoo Properties, classification and organization of listings within Yahoo Properties, research and development, and Yahoo’s technology platforms and infrastructure. Depreciation expense and other operating costs are also included in product development.

Product development expenses for the three months ended June 30, 2015 increased $15 million, or 5 percent, compared to the same period of 2014, primarily attributable to increases of $11 million in stock-based compensation expense and $9 million in compensation costs, partially offset by a decline in depreciation and amortization expense of $3 million and facilities and equipment expense of $3 million. The increase in stock-based compensation expense was due to an increase in the number of awards granted at a higher fair value.

Product development expenses for the six months ended June 30, 2015 increased $73 million, or 13 percent, compared to the same period of 2014, primarily attributable to increases of $46 million in stock-based compensation expense, $30 million in compensation costs, as well as a decline in capitalizable projects of $15 million. This increase was partially offset by a decline in facilities and equipment expense of $9 million and a decline in depreciation and amortization expense of $8 million. The increase in stock-based compensation expense was due to an increase in the number of awards granted at a higher fair value. The increase in compensation costs was primarily attributable to investments in our Mavens offerings, headcount increases from the BrightRoll and Flurry acquisitions, and increased compensation costs due to changes in the location of employees, slightly offset by decreases in our contractor workforce expenses and relocation costs.

Product development expenses represented approximately 25 percent and 26 percent of GAAP revenue for the three and six months ended June 30, 2015, respectively, compared to 27 percent and 25 percent for the three and six months ended June 30, 2014, respectively.

General and Administrative

General and administrative expenses consist primarily of compensation-related expenses (including stock-based compensation expense) related to corporate departments and fees for professional services and includes costs related to our non-data center facilities.

General and administrative expenses for the three months ended June 30, 2015 increased $26 million, or 17 percent, compared to the same period of 2014, primarily attributable to an increase of $12 million due to net gains on disposal of assets and business tax refunds received in 2014 for which there are no similar benefits in 2015, as well as an increase in depreciation and amortization expense of $4 million and advisory costs and other outside service provider expenses of $10 million.

General and administrative expenses for the six months ended June 30, 2015 increased $35 million, or 11 percent, compared to the same period of 2014, primarily attributable to increases of $12 million due to net gains on disposal of assets and business tax refunds received in 2014 for which there are no similar benefits in 2015, $6 million in outside service provider expense, $4 million in stock-based compensation expense, $3 million in depreciation and amortization expense, $3 million in travel and entertainment expense, and $2 million in compensation costs.

General and administrative expenses represented approximately 15 percent and 14 percent of GAAP revenue for the three and six months ended June 30, 2015, respectively, compared to 14 percent for both the three and six months ended June 30, 2014.

Gains on Sales of Patents

During the three and six months ended June 30, 2015, we sold certain patents and recorded gains on sales of patents of approximately $9 million and $11 million, respectively, and during the three and six months ended June 30, 2014 we sold certain patents and recorded gains on sales of patents of approximately $62 million.

Gains on sales of patents in the three months ending September 30, 2015 and the three months ending December 31, 2015 may be less than our gains on sales of patents in the same periods of 2014.

Amortization of Intangibles

We have purchased, and expect to continue purchasing, assets and/or businesses, which may include the purchase of intangible assets. Intangible assets include customer, affiliate, and advertiser-related relationships and tradenames, trademarks and domain names. Amortization of developed technology and patents is included in the cost of revenue — other and not in amortization of intangibles.

Amortization of intangibles for the three and six months ended June 30, 2015 increased $5 million, or 32 percent, and $7 million, or 20 percent, respectively, compared to the same periods of 2014. For the three and six months ended June 30, 2015, the increase in amortization of intangibles was primarily driven by incremental amortization of intangible assets related to BrightRoll, which we acquired in the fourth quarter of 2014, partially offset by a decline in expense for fully amortized assets.

Amortization of intangibles represented approximately 1 percent and 2 percent of GAAP revenue for the three and six months ended June 30, 2015, respectively, compared to 1 percent and 2 percent for the three and six months ended June 30, 2014, respectively.

Restructuring Charges, Net

Restructuring charges, net was comprised of the following (in thousands):


	Three Months Ended June 30,				Six Months Ended June 30,
	2014		2015		2014		2015
Employee severance pay and related costs	$	82	$	7,149	$	3,673	$	51,149
Non-cancelable lease, contract termination, and other charges		61,906		13,403		68,438		22,020
Reversals of previous charges		(2,336)		(790)		(2,972)		(4,021)
Non-cash accelerations of stock-based compensation expense		-		-		-		2,705
Other non-cash credits		(7,031)		(74)		(7,031)		(933)

Restructuring charges, net	$	52,621	$	19,688	$	62,108	$	70,920

We have implemented various restructuring plans to reduce our cost structure, align resources with our product strategy and improve efficiency, which have resulted in workforce reductions and the consolidation of certain real estate facilities and data centers. For the three months ended June 30, 2014, we recorded expense of $50 million related to the Americas segment and $3 million related to the EMEA segment. For the three months ended June 30, 2015, we recorded expense of $12 million, $7 million, and $1 million related to the Americas, EMEA, and Asia Pacific segments, respectively. For the six months ended June 30, 2014, we recorded expense of $55 million related to the Americas segment and $7 million related to the EMEA segment. For the six months ended June 30, 2015, we recorded expense of $53 million, $14 million, and $4 million related to the Americas, EMEA, and Asia Pacific segments, respectively. The amounts recorded during the three and six months ended June 30, 2014 were primarily related to the consolidation of a data center as we ceased use of that facility pursuant to a restructuring plan we initiated in 2011. The amounts recorded during the three and six months ended June 30, 2015 were primarily related to severance, facility and other related costs pursuant to a restructuring plan that we initiated in 2015.

The $69 million restructuring liability as of June 30, 2015 consisted of $8 million for employee severance pay expenses, which we expect to pay out by the end of the second quarter of 2016, and $61 million relating to non-cancelable lease costs, which we expect to pay over the terms of the related obligations through the third quarter of 2022, less estimated sublease income.

See Note 14 — “Restructuring Charges, Net” in the Notes to our condensed consolidated financial statements for additional information.

Other Expense, Net

Other expense, net was as follows (in thousands):


	Three Months Ended June 30,				Six Months Ended June 30,
	2014		2015		2014		2015
Interest, dividend and investment income	$	5,596	$	8,034	$	11,033	$	16,879
Interest expense		(17,088)		(17,558)		(34,169)		(35,128)
Gain (loss) on Hortonworks warrants		-		5,449		-		(6,460)
Other		(2,097)		(7,666)		(3,906)		(18,095)

Total other expense, net	$	(13,589)	$	(11,741)	$	(27,042)	$	(42,804)

Interest, dividend and investment income consists of income earned from cash and cash equivalents in bank accounts, and investments made in marketable debt securities. Interest, dividend and investment income increased $2 million and $6 million for the three and six months ended June 30, 2015, respectively, compared to the same periods of 2014, primarily due to an increase in interest income.

Interest expense was flat for the three months ended June 30, 2015 and increased $1 million for the six months ended June 30, 2015, respectively, compared to the same periods of 2014. Interest expense is primarily related to the accreted non-cash interest expense related to the 0.00% Convertible Senior Notes due 2018 (“Notes”) we issued in November 2013.

During the three and six months ended June 30, 2015, we recorded a gain of $5 million and a loss of $6 million, respectively, due to the change in estimated fair value of the Hortonworks warrants during the respective periods, which was included within other expense, net in the condensed consolidated statements of operations.

Other increased $6 million for the three months ended June 30, 2015, compared to the same period of 2014, primarily due to foreign exchange losses from hedging activities of $11 million offset by unrealized foreign exchange currency transaction gains of $8 million. Other increased $14 million for the six months ended June 30, 2015, compared to the same period of 2014, primarily due to unrealized foreign exchange currency transaction losses of $25 million partially offset by foreign exchange gains from hedging activities of $12 million.

Income Taxes

Our effective tax rate is the result of the mix of income earned in various tax jurisdictions that apply a broad range of income tax rates. Historically, our provision for income taxes has differed from the tax computed at the U.S. federal statutory income tax rate due to state taxes, the effect of non-U.S. operations, non-deductible stock-based compensation expense and adjustments to unrecognized tax benefits.

We recorded income tax expense of $8 million and $58 million for the three months ended June 30, 2014 and 2015, respectively. We recorded income tax expense of $12 million and $18 million for the six months ended June 30, 2014 and 2015, respectively. Despite the pre-tax loss, we recorded income tax expense for the three and six months ended June 30, 2015, based on forecasted tax expense for fiscal year 2015 as a result of tax expense in profitable jurisdictions being higher than tax benefits anticipated in loss jurisdictions. The tax provision increased in the three and six months ended June 30, 2015 compared to the same period last year primarily due to non-deductible acquisition costs plus limited tax benefits in loss jurisdictions combined with tax expense in profitable jurisdictions.

As of June 30, 2015, we do not anticipate repatriating our undistributed foreign earnings of approximately $3.0 billion. Those earnings are principally related to our equity method investment in Yahoo Japan. If those earnings were to be repatriated in the future, we may be subject to additional U.S. income taxes (subject to an adjustment for foreign tax credits). It is not practicable to determine the income tax liability that might be incurred if these earnings were to be repatriated.

Our gross amount of unrecognized tax benefits as of June 30, 2015 was $1,041 million, of which $987 million is recorded on our condensed consolidated balance sheets. The gross unrecognized tax benefits as of June 30, 2015 increased by $17 million from the recorded balance as of December 31, 2014.

We are in various stages of examination and appeal in connection with our taxes both in the U.S. and in foreign jurisdictions. Those audits generally span tax years 2005 through 2013. As of June 30, 2015, our 2011 through 2013 U.S. federal income tax returns are currently under examination. We have protested the proposed California Franchise Tax Board’s adjustments to the 2005 through 2008 returns, but no conclusions have been reached to date. While it is difficult to determine when the examinations will be settled or their final outcomes, certain audits in various jurisdictions are expected to be resolved in the foreseeable future. As a result, it is reasonably possible that our unrecognized tax benefits could be reduced by up to approximately $153 million in the next twelve months. We believe that we have adequately provided for any reasonably foreseeable adjustment and that any settlement will not have a material adverse effect on our consolidated financial position, results of operations, or cash flows.

In the three months ended March 31, 2015, we satisfied the $3.3 billion income tax liability related to the sale by Yahoo! Hong Kong Holdings Limited, our wholly-owned subsidiary, of Alibaba Group ADSs in the Alibaba Group IPO on September 24, 2014. As of June 30, 2015, we accrued deferred tax liabilities of $12.8 billion associated with the Alibaba Group shares that we retained. Such deferred tax liabilities will be subject to periodic adjustments due to changes in the fair value of the Alibaba Group shares. These deferred tax liabilities will become obligations of Aabaco upon completion of the spin-off.

We may have additional tax liabilities in China related to the sale to Alibaba Group of 523 million Alibaba Group shares that took place during the year ended December 31, 2012 and related to the sale of 140 million Alibaba Group ADSs sold in the Alibaba Group IPO that took place during the year ended December 31, 2014. Any taxes assessed and paid in China are expected to be ultimately offset and recovered in the U.S. through the use of foreign tax credits.

Tax authorities from the Brazilian State of Sao Paulo have assessed certain indirect taxes against our Brazilian subsidiary, Yahoo! do Brasil Internet Ltda., related to online advertising services. The assessment is for calendar years 2008 through 2011 and, translated into U.S. dollars as of June 30, 2015, totals approximately $110 million. We currently believe the assessment is without merit. We believe the risk of loss is remote and have not recorded an accrual for the assessment.

Earnings in Equity Interests

Earnings in equity interests for the three and six months ended June 30, 2015 was $96 million and $196 million, respectively, compared to $256 million and $557 million, respectively, for the same periods in 2014. The decrease for the three and six months ended June 30, 2015 was due primarily to Alibaba Group. Following the Alibaba Group IPO in September 2014, we no longer use the equity method to record our proportionate share of Alibaba Group’s financial results in our condensed consolidated financial statements. Since we no longer use the equity method to account for our interest in Alibaba Group, our earnings in equity interests and net income will also be materially lower in periods following the Alibaba Group IPO. See Note 8 — “Investments in Equity Interests Using the Equity Method of Accounting” in the Notes to our condensed consolidated financial statements for additional information. Earnings in equity interests primarily consist of our proportionate share of Yahoo Japan’s financial results, which we record one quarter in arrears.

Noncontrolling Interests

Noncontrolling interests represent the noncontrolling holders’ percentage share of income or losses from the subsidiaries in which we hold a majority, but less than 100 percent, ownership interest and the results of which are consolidated in our condensed consolidated financial statements. Noncontrolling interests recorded in the three and six months ended June 30, 2014 and 2015 were related to the Yahoo!7 venture in Australia and New Zealand.

Liquidity and Capital Resources


	December 31, 2014		June 30, 2015
	(dollars in thousands)

Cash and cash equivalents	$	2,664,098	$	1,188,169
Short-term marketable securities		5,327,412		4,636,152
Long-term marketable securities		2,230,892		1,169,671

Total cash, cash equivalents, and marketable securities	$	10,222,402	$	6,993,992

Percentage of total assets		17%		14%


	Six Months Ended June 30,
Cash Flow Highlights	2014		2015
	(in thousands)

Net cash provided by (used in) operating activities	$	496,475	$	(2,629,519)
Net cash (used in) provided by investing activities	$	(349,609)	$	1,495,952
Net cash used in financing activities	$	(1,113,424)	$	(329,966)

Our operating activities for the six months ended June 30, 2015 did not generate positive cash flow as we satisfied the $3.3 billion income tax liability related to the sale of Alibaba Group ADSs in September 2014.

As of June 30, 2015, we had cash, cash equivalents, and marketable securities (excluding Alibaba Group and Hortonworks equity securities) totaling $7 billion compared to $10.2 billion at December 31, 2014. During the six months ended June 30, 2015, we repurchased 4 million shares of our outstanding common stock for $204 million and we settled the $3.3 billion income tax liability related to the sale of Alibaba Group ADSs in September 2014.

Our foreign subsidiaries held $527 million of our total $7 billion of cash and cash equivalents and marketable securities (excluding Alibaba Group and Hortonworks equity securities) as of June 30, 2015. The cumulative earnings remaining in our consolidated foreign subsidiaries, if repatriated to the U.S., under current law, would be subject to U.S. income taxes with an adjustment for foreign tax credits. For the earnings that are considered indefinitely reinvested outside the U.S., principally related to our equity method investment in Yahoo Japan, we do not anticipate a need to repatriate these earnings for use in our U.S. operations.

On October 19, 2012, we entered into a credit agreement with Citibank, N.A., as Administrative Agent (as amended “Credit Agreement”) that provides for a $750 million unsecured revolving credit facility, subject to increase by up to $250 million in accordance with its terms, which is scheduled to terminate on July 22, 2016. As of June 30, 2015, we were in compliance with the financial covenants in the Credit Agreement and no amounts were outstanding.

We currently hedge a portion of our net investment in Yahoo Japan with forward and option contracts to reduce the risk that our investment in Yahoo Japan will be adversely affected by foreign currency translation exchange rate fluctuations. The forward contracts are required to be settled in cash and the amount of cash payment we receive or could be required to pay upon settlement could be material. The amount of cash paid or received on the option contracts would only be required if the exchange rate is outside a predetermined range.

We expect to continue to evaluate possible acquisitions of, or strategic investments in, businesses, products, and technologies that are complementary to our business, which acquisitions and investments may require the use of cash.

We use cash generated by operations as our primary source of liquidity and believe that existing cash, cash equivalents, and investments in marketable securities, together with any cash generated from operations, and borrowings under the Credit Agreement, will be sufficient to meet normal operating requirements and capital expenditures for the next twelve months.

Cash Flow Changes

Net cash provided by (used in) operating activities. For the six months ended June 30, 2015, operating activities used $2,630 million in cash primarily due to satisfying the $3.3 billion income tax liability related to the sales of Alibaba Group ADSs in September 2014. Net income for the six months ended June 30, 2015 was $3 million, which was adjusted for the following increases related to non-cash items: depreciation, amortization of intangibles and accretion of Notes discount of $336 million, stock-based compensation expense of $244 million, loss from sales of investments, assets, and other, net of $45 million, and loss from Hortonworks warrants of $6 million, partially offset by reductions for non-cash items including: earnings in equity interests of $196 million, excess tax benefits from stock-based awards of $2 million, gains on sale of patents of $11 million, deferred income taxes of $13 million, and tax detriments from stock-based awards of $4 million. Additionally, we received dividends from equity investees of $142 million, had sources of cash from working capital of $326 million, offset by uses of cash from working capital of $3,505 million, which included the reduction of the income tax liability related to the sale of Alibaba Group shares in September 2014, as noted above.

For the six months ended June 30, 2014, operating activities provided $496 million in cash. Net income for the six months ended June 30, 2014 was $586 million, which was adjusted for the following increases related to non-cash items: depreciation, amortization of intangibles and accretion of Notes discount of $334 million, stock-based compensation expense of $212 million, tax benefits from stock-based awards of $77 million, deferred income taxes of $14 million, and loss from sales of investments, assets, and other, net of $19 million, offset by reductions for non-cash items including: earnings in equity interests of $557 million, excess tax benefits from stock-based awards of $79 million, gains on sale of patents of $62 million and non-cash restructuring reversals of $7 million. Additionally, we received dividends from equity investees of $84 million, had sources of cash from working capital of $168 million, offset by uses of cash from working capital of $292 million.

Net cash (used in) provided by investing activities. In the six months ended June 30, 2015, the $1,496 million provided by investing activities was due to proceeds from sales and maturities of marketable securities, net of purchases, of $1,731 million, $20 million proceeds from the sale of patents, and $61 million in net proceeds from settlement of derivative hedge contracts, partially offset by $290 million used for capital expenditures, $21 million used for acquisitions, and $5 million used for the purchase of intangibles and other activities.

In the six months ended June 30, 2014, the $350 million used in investing activities was due to net purchases of marketable securities of $293 million, $192 million used for capital expenditures, $22 million used for acquisitions, $10 million used for additional equity investments, $5 million used to settle derivative hedge contracts, and $3 million used for the purchase of intangibles and other activities, partially offset by $173 million in proceeds received from settlement of derivative hedge contracts and $2 million in proceeds from sales of patents.

Net cash used in financing activities. In the six months ended June 30, 2015, the $330 million used in financing activities was due to $204 million used for the repurchase of 4 million shares of common stock at an average price of $47.65 per share, $16 million used for distributions to non-controlling interests, and $159 million used for tax withholding payments related to net share settlements of restricted stock units and other financing activities. This use of cash was partially offset by $47 million in cash proceeds received from employee stock option exercises and employee stock purchases made through our employee stock purchase plan, and an excess tax benefit from stock-based awards of $2 million.

In the six months ended June 30, 2014, the $1,113 million used in financing activities was due to $1,168 million used for the repurchase of 33 million shares of common stock at an average price of $35.93 per share, $22 million used for distributions to noncontrolling interests, and $166 million used for tax withholding payments related to net share settlements of restricted stock units and other financing activities. This use of cash was partially offset by $164 million in cash proceeds received from employee stock option exercises and employee stock purchases made through our employee stock purchase plan, and an excess tax benefit from stock-based awards of $79 million.

Stock Repurchases

In March 2015, the Board approved an additional share repurchase program of $2 billion (the “March 2015 Program”), which will expire in March 2018. The amount of shares of common stock authorized to be repurchased under the March 2015 Program is in addition to the amount of shares of common stock remaining available for repurchase under the November 2013 program. Repurchases under the March 2015 and the November 2013 Programs may take place in the open market or in privately negotiated transactions, including structured and derivative transactions such as accelerated share repurchase transactions, and may be made under a Rule 10b5-1 plan.

During the six months ended June 30, 2015, we repurchased approximately 4 million shares of our common stock at an average price of $47.65 per share for a total of $204 million. The following table provides the remaining authorization and repurchases by program:


	November 2013 Program		March 2015 Program		Total
	(in millions)
January 1, 2015	$	930	$	-	$	930
Authorized Share Repurchase amount under March 2015 Program		-		2,000		2,000
Total repurchases in the first quarter		(204)		-		(204)
Total repurchases in the second quarter		-		-		-

June 30, 2015	$	726	$	2,000	$	2,726

Capital Expenditures, Net

Capital expenditures are generally comprised of purchases of computer hardware, software, server equipment, furniture and fixtures, real estate, and capitalized software and labor for internal use software projects. Capital expenditures, net, were $290 million for the six months ended June 30, 2015 compared to $192 million in the same period of 2014. The increase in capital expenditures was primarily due to incremental investment in hardware to support Company initiatives, facilities expansions and improvements, partially offset by a decline in capitalizable software projects.

We expect capital expenditures, net to increase in 2015 from the amount recorded in 2014 as a result of increased investment activities supporting our search, communications and multiple product initiatives.

Contractual Obligations and Commitments

The following table presents certain payments due under contractual obligations with minimum commitments as of June 30, 2015 (in millions):


	Payments Due by Period
	Total		Due in 2015		Due in 2016-2017		Due in 2018-2019		Thereafter
Convertible notes⁽¹⁾	$	1,438	$	-	$	-	$	1,438	$	-
Operating lease obligations⁽²⁾		512		69		192		107		144
Capital lease obligations		48		9		25		14		-
Affiliate commitments⁽³⁾		1,800		218		801		750		31
Non-cancelable obligations⁽⁴⁾		502		115		308		79		-
Intellectual property rights⁽⁵⁾		19		4		9		2		4
Uncertain tax positions, including interest and penalties⁽⁶⁾		1,144		2		-		-		1,142

Total contractual obligations	$	5,463	$	417	$	1,335	$	2,390	$	1,321

(1)	During the year end December 31, 2013, we completed an offering of the Notes, which are due in 2018. The amount above represents the principal balance to be repaid. See Note 11—“Convertible Notes” in the Notes to our condensed consolidated financial statements for additional information.

(2)

We have entered into various non-cancelable operating lease agreements for our offices throughout the Americas, EMEA, and Asia Pacific regions with original lease periods up to 12 years, expiring between 2015 and 2025. See Note 12—“Commitments and Contingencies” in the Notes to our condensed consolidated financial statements for additional information.

(3)	We are obligated to make minimum payments under contracts to provide sponsored search and/or display advertising services to our Affiliates or to be the default search provider, which represent TAC.

(4)	We are obligated to make payments under various arrangements with vendors and other business partners, principally for marketing, bandwidth, and content arrangements.

(5)	We are committed to make certain payments under various intellectual property arrangements.

(6)

As of June 30, 2015, unrecognized tax benefits and potential interest and penalties resulted in accrued liabilities of $1,144 million, classified as other accrued expenses and current liabilities and deferred and other long-term tax liabilities, net on our condensed consolidated balance sheets. It is difficult to determine when the examinations will be settled or their final outcomes. See Note 15 — “Income Taxes” in the Notes to our condensed consolidated financial statements for additional information.

Other Commitments and Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements. In the ordinary course of business, we may provide indemnifications of varying scope and terms to customers, vendors, lessors, joint ventures and business partners, purchasers of assets or subsidiaries and other parties with respect to certain matters, including, but not limited to, losses arising out of our breach of agreements or representations and warranties made by us, services to be provided by us, intellectual property infringement claims made by third parties or, with respect to the sale, lease, or assignment of assets or the sale of a subsidiary, matters related to our conduct of the business and tax matters prior to the sale, lease, or assignment of assets. In addition, we have entered into indemnification agreements with our directors and certain of our officers that will require us, among other things, to indemnify them against certain liabilities that may arise by reason of their status or service as directors or officers. We have also agreed to indemnify certain former officers, directors, and employees of acquired companies in connection with the acquisition of such companies. We maintain director and officer insurance, which may cover certain liabilities arising from our obligation to indemnify our current and former directors and officers, and former directors and officers of acquired companies, in certain circumstances. It is not possible to determine the aggregate maximum potential loss under these indemnification agreements due to the limited history of prior indemnification claims and the unique facts and circumstances involved in each particular agreement. Such indemnification agreements might not be subject to maximum loss clauses. Historically, we have not incurred material costs as a result of obligations under these agreements and we have not accrued any material liabilities related to such indemnification obligations in our condensed consolidated financial statements.

As of June 30, 2015, we did not have any relationships with unconsolidated entities or financial partnerships, such as entities often referred to as structured finance or special purpose entities, established for the purpose of facilitating off-balance sheet arrangements or other contractually narrow or limited purposes. Accordingly we are not exposed to any financing, liquidity, market, or credit risk that could arise if we had such relationships. In addition, we identified no variable interests currently held in entities for which we are the primary beneficiary. In addition, as of June 30, 2015, we had no off-balance sheet arrangements that have, or are reasonably likely to have, a current or future material effect on our consolidated financial condition, results of operations, liquidity, capital expenditures, or capital resources.

Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates

Our discussion and analysis of our financial condition and results of operations is based upon our condensed consolidated financial statements, which have been prepared in accordance with U.S. GAAP. The preparation of these condensed consolidated financial statements requires us to make estimates, judgments, and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets, liabilities, revenue and expenses, and the related disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities. We base our estimates on historical experience and on various other assumptions that we believe are reasonable under the circumstances. Our estimates form the basis for our judgments about the carrying values of assets and liabilities that are not readily apparent from other sources. Actual results may differ from these estimates.

An accounting policy is considered to be critical if it requires an accounting estimate to be made based on assumptions about matters that are highly uncertain at the time the estimate is made, and if different estimates that reasonably could have been used, or changes in the accounting estimate that are reasonably likely to occur, could materially impact the condensed consolidated financial statements. We believe that our critical accounting policies reflect the more significant estimates and assumptions used in the preparation of the condensed consolidated financial statements.

For a discussion of our critical accounting policies and estimates, see “Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates” included in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2014 under the caption “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations.” We have made no significant changes to our critical accounting policies and estimates from those described in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2014.

Recent Accounting Pronouncements

See Note 1 — “The Company and Summary of Significant Accounting Policies” in the Notes to our condensed consolidated financial statements.

Item 3. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk

We are exposed to financial market risks, including changes in currency exchange rates and interest rates and changes in the market values of our investments. We may use derivative financial instruments to mitigate certain risks in accordance with our investment and foreign exchange policies.

We enter into master netting arrangements, which are designed to reduce credit risk by permitting net settlement of transactions with the same counterparty. We present our derivative assets and liabilities at their gross fair values on the condensed consolidated balance sheets.

Interest Rate Exposure

Our exposure to market risk for changes in interest rates impacts our costs associated with hedging, and primarily relates to our cash and marketable securities portfolio. We invest excess cash in money market funds, time deposits, and liquid debt instruments of the U.S. and foreign governments and their agencies, U.S. municipalities, and high-credit corporate issuers which are classified as marketable securities and cash equivalents.

In November 2013, we issued $1.4375 billion of the Notes. We carry the Notes at face value less unamortized discount on our condensed consolidated balance sheets. The fair value of the Notes changes when the market price of our stock fluctuates.

Investments in fixed rate and floating rate interest earning instruments carry a degree of interest rate risk. Fixed rate securities may have their fair market value adversely impacted due to a rise in interest rates, while floating rate securities may produce less income than expected if interest rates fall. Due in part to these factors, our future investment income may fall short of expectations due to changes in interest rates or we may suffer losses in principal if forced to sell securities that have declined in market value due to changes in interest rates. A hypothetical 100 basis point increase in interest rates would result in a $31 million and $30 million decrease in the fair value of our available-for-sale debt securities as of December 31, 2014 and June 30, 2015, respectively.

Foreign Currency Exposure

The objective of our foreign exchange risk management program is to identify material foreign currency exposures and identify methods to manage these exposures to minimize the potential effects of currency fluctuations on our reported condensed consolidated cash flows and results of operations. All counterparties to our derivative contracts are major financial institutions. See Note 9 — “Foreign Currency Derivative Financial Instruments” in the Notes to our condensed consolidated financial statements for additional information on our hedging programs.

We transact business in various foreign currencies and have international revenue, as well as costs denominated in foreign currencies. This exposes us to the risk of fluctuations in foreign currency exchange rates.

We had net realized and unrealized foreign currency transaction losses of $5 million and $7 million for the three and six months ended June 30, 2014, respectively. We had net realized and unrealized foreign currency transaction losses of $8 million and $20 million for the three and six months ended June 30, 2015, respectively. These include the impact of balance sheet hedging and remeasurements of foreign denominated assets and liabilities on the balance sheets of the Company and our subsidiaries.

Translation Exposure. We are also exposed to foreign exchange rate fluctuations as we convert the financial statements of our foreign subsidiaries and our investments in equity interests into U.S. dollars in consolidation. If there is a change in foreign currency exchange rates, the conversion of the foreign subsidiaries’ financial statements into U.S. dollars results in a gain or loss which is recorded as a component of accumulated other comprehensive income which is part of stockholders’ equity.

A Value-at-Risk (“VaR”) sensitivity analysis was performed on all of our foreign currency derivative positions to assess the potential impact of fluctuations in exchange rates. The VaR model uses a Monte Carlo simulation to generate thousands of random price paths assuming normal market conditions. The VaR is the maximum expected one day loss in fair value, for a given statistical confidence level, to our foreign currency derivative positions due to adverse movements in rates. The VaR model is used as a risk management tool and is not intended to represent either actual or forecasted losses. Based on the results of the model using a 99 percent confidence interval, we estimate the maximum one-day loss in the net investment hedge portfolio was $22 million and $19 million, respectively, at December 31, 2014 and June 30, 2015. The maximum one-day loss in the cash flow hedge portfolio was $3 million and $1 million, respectively, at December 31, 2014 and June 30, 2015. The maximum one-day loss in the balance sheet hedge portfolio was $2 million and $4 million, respectively, at December 31, 2014 and June 30, 2015. Actual future gains and losses associated with our derivative positions may differ materially from the sensitivity analysis performed as of June 30, 2015 due to the inherent limitations associated with predicting the timing and amount of changes in foreign currency exchange rates and our actual exposures and positions. In addition, the VaR sensitivity analysis may not reflect the complex market reactions that may arise from the market shifts modeled within this VaR sensitivity analysis.

Revenue ex-TAC and related expenses generated from our international subsidiaries are generally denominated in the currencies of the local countries. Primary currencies include Australian dollars, British pounds, Euros, Japanese yen, and Taiwan dollars. The statements of operations of our international operations are translated into U.S. dollars at exchange rates indicative of market rates during each applicable period. To the extent the U.S. dollar strengthens against foreign currencies, the translation of these foreign currency-denominated transactions results in reduced consolidated revenue and operating expenses. Conversely, our consolidated revenue and operating expenses will increase if the U.S. dollar weakens against foreign currencies. Using the foreign currency exchange rates from the three and six months ended June 30, 2014, revenue ex-TAC for the Americas segment for the three and six months ended June 30, 2015 would have been higher than we reported by $4 million and $6 million, respectively; revenue ex-TAC for the EMEA segment would have been higher than we reported by $13 million and $20 million, respectively; and revenue ex-TAC for the Asia Pacific segment would have been higher than we reported by $11 million and $22 million, respectively. Using the foreign currency exchange rates from the three and six months ended June 30, 2014, direct costs for the Americas segment for the three and six months ended June 30, 2015 would have been higher than we reported by $1 million and $2 million, respectively; direct costs for the EMEA segment would have been higher than we reported by $4 million and $6 million, respectively; and direct costs for the Asia Pacific segment would have been higher than we reported by $3 million and $6 million, respectively.

Investment Exposure

We are exposed to investment risk as it relates to changes in the market value of our investments. We have investments in marketable securities and equity instruments of public and private companies. As of the date of the Alibaba Group IPO, we no longer account for our remaining investment in Alibaba Group using the equity method and no longer record our proportionate share of Alibaba Group’s financial results in the consolidated financial statements. Instead, we now reflect our remaining investment in Alibaba Group as an available-for-sale equity security on the condensed consolidated balance sheet and adjust the investment to fair value each quarterly reporting period with changes in fair value recorded within other comprehensive income (loss), net of tax. The change in the classification of our investment in Alibaba Group from an equity method investment to an available-for-sale marketable security exposes our investment portfolio to increased equity price risk. The fair value of the equity investment in Alibaba Group will vary over time and is subject to a variety of market risks including: company performance, macro-economic, regulatory, industry, and systemic risks of the equity markets overall.

Our cash and marketable securities investment policy and strategy attempts primarily to preserve capital and meet liquidity requirements. A large portion of our cash is managed by external managers within the guidelines of our investment policy. We protect and preserve invested funds by limiting default, market, and reinvestment risk. To achieve this objective, we maintain our portfolio of cash and cash equivalents and short-term and long-term investments in a variety of liquid fixed income securities, including both government and corporate obligations and money market funds. As of December 31, 2014, net unrealized losses on these investments were $5 million. As of June 30, 2015, net unrealized gains on these investments were not material.

A sensitivity analysis was performed on our marketable equity security portfolio to assess the potential impact of fluctuations in stock price. Hypothetical declines in stock price of ten percent, twenty percent, and thirty percent were selected based on potential near-term changes in the stock price that could have an adverse effect on our marketable equity security portfolio. As of December 31, 2014 and June 30, 2015, the fair value of our marketable equity security portfolio was approximately $40 billion and $32 billion, respectively. As of June 30, 2015, declines in stock prices of ten percent, twenty percent and thirty percent would have resulted in a $3 billion, $6 billion and $9 billion decline, respectively, in the total value of our marketable equity security portfolio.

We performed a separate sensitivity analysis on our Hortonworks warrants for which we estimate fair value using the Black-Scholes model. We have held all other inputs constant and determined the impact of hypothetical declines in stock price of ten percent, twenty percent, and thirty percent, based on potential near-term changes in the stock price that could have an adverse effect on the fair value of the warrants and result in a loss recorded to the consolidated statements of operations. As of December 31, 2014 and June 30, 2015, the fair value of the Hortonworks warrants was approximately $98 million and $92 million, respectively. As of June 30, 2015, declines in stock prices of ten percent, twenty percent and thirty percent would have resulted in a $9 million, $19 million and $28 million decline, respectively, in the total value of the Hortonworks warrants.

Item 4. Controls and Procedures

Disclosure Controls and Procedures. The Company’s management, with the participation of the Company’s principal executive officer and principal financial officer, has evaluated the effectiveness of the Company’s disclosure controls and procedures (as such term is defined in Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) under the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”), as of the end of the period covered by this Report. Based on such evaluation, the Company’s principal executive officer and principal financial officer have concluded that, as of the end of such period, the Company’s disclosure controls and procedures were effective.

Internal Control Over Financial Reporting. There have not been any changes in the Company’s internal control over financial reporting (as such term is defined in Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f) under the Exchange Act) during the most recent fiscal quarter that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, the Company’s internal control over financial reporting.

PART II — OTHER INFORMATION

Item 1. Legal Proceedings

For a description of our material legal proceedings, see the section captioned “Legal Contingencies” included in Note 12 — “Commitments and Contingencies” in the Notes to our condensed consolidated financial statements, which is incorporated by reference herein.

Item 1A. Risk Factors

We have updated the risk factors previously disclosed in Part I, Item 1A. of our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2014, which was filed with the SEC on February 27, 2015 (“2014 Annual Report”), as set forth below. Other than the risk factors listed below under “Risks Relating to Proposed Spin-Off of Remaining Holdings in Alibaba Group,” we do not believe any of the changes constitute material changes from the risk factors previously disclosed in our 2014 Annual Report, as updated by our Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2015.

We face significant competition for users, advertisers, publishers, developers, and distributors.

We face significant competition from online search engines, sites offering integrated internet products and services, social media and networking sites, ecommerce sites, and broadcast and print media. In a number of international markets, especially those in Asia, Europe, the Middle East and Latin America, we face substantial competition from local Internet service providers and other entities that offer search, communications, and other commercial services.

Several of our competitors offer an integrated variety of Internet products, advertising services, technologies, online services and content in a manner similar to Yahoo. We compete against these and other companies to attract and retain users, advertisers, developers, and third-party website publishers as participants in our Affiliate network, and to obtain agreements with third parties to promote or distribute our services. We also compete with social media and networking sites which are increasingly used to communicate and share information, and which are attracting a substantial and increasing share of users, users’ online time, and online advertising dollars.

A key element of our strategy is focusing on mobile products and mobile advertising formats, as well as increasing our revenue from mobile. A number of our competitors have devoted significant resources to the development of products, services and apps for mobile devices. Several of our competitors have mobile revenue significantly greater than ours. If we are unable to develop products for mobile devices that users find engaging and that help us grow our mobile revenue, our competitive position, our financial condition and operating results could be harmed.

In addition, a number of competitors offer products, services and apps that directly compete for users with our offerings, including e-mail, search, video, social, sports, news, finance, micro-blogging, and messaging. Similarly, our competitors or other participants in the online advertising marketplace offer advertising exchanges, ad networks, demand side platforms, ad serving technologies, sponsored search offerings, and other services that directly compete for advertisers with our offerings. Additionally, as the use of programmatic advertising continues to increase, we compete with companies that have also invested in programmatic platform offerings. We also compete with traditional print and broadcast media companies to attract domestic and international advertising spending. Some of our existing competitors and possible entrants have greater brand recognition for certain products, services and apps, more expertise in particular market segments, and greater operational, strategic, technological, financial, personnel, or other resources than we do. Many of our competitors have access to considerable financial and technical resources with which to compete aggressively, including by funding future growth and expansion and investing in acquisitions, technologies, and research and development. Further, emerging start-ups may be able to innovate and provide new products, services and apps faster than we can. In addition, competitors may consolidate or collaborate with each other, and new competitors may enter the market. Some of our competitors in international markets have a substantial competitive advantage over us because they have dominant market share in their territories, have greater local brand recognition, are focused on a single market, are more familiar with local tastes and preferences, or have greater regulatory and operational flexibility due to the fact that we may be subject to both U.S. and foreign regulatory requirements.

If our competitors are more successful than we are in developing and deploying compelling products or in attracting and retaining users, advertisers, publishers, developers, or distributors, our revenue and growth rates could decline.

We generate the majority of our revenue from search and display advertising, and the reduction in spending by or loss of current or potential advertisers would cause our revenue and operating results to decline.

For both the three and six months ended June 30, 2015, 82 percent of our total revenue came from search and display advertising. Our ability to retain and grow search and display revenue depends upon:

•

maintaining and growing our user base and popularity as an Internet destination site;

•

maintaining the popularity of our existing products, introducing engaging new products and making our new and existing products popular and distributable on mobile and other alternative devices and platforms;

•

maintaining and expanding our advertiser base on PCs and mobile devices;

•

achieving a better traffic mix from our Yahoo Properties and Affiliates and improving our monetization rates on such traffic;

•

broadening our relationships with advertisers to small- and medium-sized businesses;

•

successfully implementing changes and improvements to our advertising management platforms and formats and obtaining the acceptance of our advertising management platforms by advertisers, website publishers, and online advertising networks;

•

successfully acquiring, investing in, and implementing new technologies and strategic partnerships;

•

successfully implementing changes in our sales force, sales development teams, and sales strategy;

•

continuing to innovate and improve the monetization capabilities of our display and native advertising and our mobile products;

•

effectively monetizing mobile and other search queries;

•

continuing to innovate and improve users’ search experiences;

•

maintaining and expanding our Affiliate program for search and display advertising services; and

•

deriving better demographic and other information about our users to enable us to offer better experiences to both our users and advertisers.

In most cases, our agreements with advertisers have a term of one year or less, and may be terminated at any time by the advertiser or by us. Search marketing agreements often have payments dependent upon usage or click-through levels. Accordingly, it is difficult to forecast search and display revenue accurately. In addition, our expense levels are based in part on expectations of future revenue, including any guaranteed minimum payments to our Affiliates in connection with search and/or display advertising, and in some cases, the expenses could exceed the revenue that we generate. The state of the global economy, growth rate of the online advertising market, and availability of capital impacts the advertising spending patterns of our existing and potential advertisers. Any reduction in spending by, or loss of, existing or potential advertisers would negatively impact our revenue and operating results. Further, we may be unable to adjust our expenses and capital expenditures quickly enough to compensate for any unexpected revenue shortfall.

As more people access our products via mobile devices rather than PCs and mobile advertising continues to evolve, if we do not continue to grow our mobile users and revenue, our financial results will be adversely impacted.

The number of people who access the Internet through mobile devices rather than a PC, including mobile telephones, smartphones and tablets, is increasing and will likely continue to increase dramatically. More than 600 million of our monthly users are now joining us (including Tumblr) on mobile devices. In addition, search queries are increasingly being undertaken through mobile devices. As a result, our ability to grow advertising revenue is increasingly dependent on our ability to generate revenue from ads displayed on mobile devices.

A key element of our strategy is focusing on mobile devices and we expect to continue to devote significant resources to the creation and support of developing new and innovative mobile products, services and apps. However, if our new mobile products, services and apps, including new forms of Internet advertising for mobile devices, do not continue to attract and retain mobile users, advertisers and device manufacturers and to generate and grow mobile revenue, our operating and financial results will be adversely impacted. We are dependent on the interoperability of our products and services with mobile operating systems we do not control and we may not be successful in maintaining relationships with the key participants in the mobile industry that control such mobile operating systems. The manufacturer or access provider might promote a competitor’s or its own products and services, impair users’ access to our services by blocking access through their devices, make it hard for users to readily discover, install, update or access our products on their devices, or charge us for delivery of ads, or limit our ability to deliver ads or measure their effectiveness. If distributors impair access to or refuse to distribute our services or apps, or charge for or limit our ability to deliver ads or measure the effectiveness of our ads, then our user engagement and revenue could decline.

If we do not manage our operating expenses effectively, our profitability could decline.

We plan to continue to manage costs to better and more efficiently manage our business. However, our operating expenses might increase as we expand our operations in areas of desired growth, continue to develop and extend the Yahoo brand, fund product development, build or expand data centers, acquire additional office space, and acquire and integrate complementary businesses and technologies. If our expenses increase at a greater pace than our revenue, or if we fail to effectively manage costs, our profitability will decline.

If we are unable to provide innovative search experiences and other products and services that generate significant traffic to our websites, our business could be harmed, causing our revenue to decline.

Internet search is characterized by rapidly changing technology, significant competition, evolving industry standards, and frequent product and service enhancements. Although we use Microsoft’s paid search platform, we still need to continue to invest and innovate to improve our users’ search experience to continue to attract, retain, and expand our user base and paid search advertiser base. We also need to continue to invest in and innovate on the mobile search experience. Pursuant to the Search Agreement with Microsoft, we are also dependent on Microsoft to continue to invest and innovate to maintain and improve its algorithmic and paid search services.

We generate revenue through other online products, services and apps, and continue to innovate the products, services and apps that we offer. The research and development of new, technologically advanced products is a complex process that requires significant levels of innovation and investment, as well as accurate anticipation of technology, market and consumer trends. If we are unable to provide innovative products and services which gain user acceptance and generate significant traffic to our websites, or if we are unable to effectively monetize the traffic from new products and services, our business could be harmed, causing our revenue to decline.

Risks associated with our Search Agreement with Microsoft may adversely affect our business and operating results.

Under our Search Agreement with Microsoft, Microsoft was the exclusive provider of algorithmic and paid search services for Yahoo Properties and Affiliate sites on personal computers and the non-exclusive provider of such services on mobile devices. As of April 15, 2015, Microsoft became the non-exclusive provider of such services on all devices. Commencing on May 1, 2015, the Company has agreed to request paid search results from Microsoft for 51 percent of its search queries originating from personal computers accessing Yahoo Properties and its Affiliate sites (the “Volume Commitment”) and will display only Microsoft’s paid search results on such search result pages. Approximately 37 percent, 38 percent and 35 percent of our revenue for the three and six months ended June 30, 2015 and the year ended December 31, 2014, respectively, were attributable to the Search Agreement. Our business and operating results would be adversely affected by a significant decline in or loss of this revenue.

Pursuant to the Search Agreement with Microsoft, to maintain and grow a substantial portion of our search revenue, we are dependent on Microsoft continuing to invest and innovate to maintain and improve its algorithmic and paid search services and to be competitive with other search providers. If Microsoft fails to do this, our revenue and profitability could decline and our ability to maintain and expand our relationships with Affiliates for search and paid search advertising could be negatively impacted. Further, our competitors may continue to increase revenue, profitability, and market share at a higher rate than we do.

The term of the Search Agreement is 10 years from its commencement date, February 23, 2010, subject to earlier termination as provided in the Search Agreement. On or after October 1, 2015, either the Company or Microsoft may terminate the Search Agreement by delivering a written notice of termination to the other party. The Search Agreement will remain in effect for four months from the date of a termination notice to provide for a transition period. If Microsoft terminated the Search Agreement and the Company was unable to rely on its own services or to find an alternate provider of algorithmic and paid search services, the termination could have an adverse impact on our business, revenue and operating results.

If we are unable to license or acquire compelling content and services at reasonable cost, develop or commission compelling content of our own or receive compelling content from our users, the number of users of our services may not grow as anticipated, or may decline, or users’ level of engagement with our services may decline, all of which could harm our operating results.

Our future success depends in part on our ability to aggregate compelling content and deliver that content through our online properties. We license from third parties much of the content and services on our online properties, such as news, stock quotes, sports and weather data, video, maps and photos. In addition, our users also contribute content to us. We believe that users will increasingly demand high-quality content and services. We may need to make substantial payments to third parties from whom we license or acquire such content or services. Our ability to maintain and build relationships with such third-party providers is critical to our success. In addition, as users increasingly access the Internet via mobile and other alternative devices, we may need to enter into amended agreements with existing third-party providers to cover new devices. We may be unable to enter into new, or preserve existing, relationships with the third-parties whose content or services we seek to obtain. In addition, as competition for compelling content increases both domestically and internationally, our third-party providers may increase the prices at which they offer their content and services to us, stop offering their content or services to us, or offer their content and services on terms that are not agreeable to us. An increase in the prices charged to us by third-party providers could harm our operating results and financial condition. Further, because many of our licenses for our content and services with third parties are non-exclusive, other media providers may be able to offer similar or identical content. This increases the importance of our ability to deliver compelling editorial content and personalization of this content for users in order to differentiate Yahoo from other businesses. If we are unable to license or acquire compelling content at reasonable cost, if other companies distribute content or services that are similar to or the same as that provided by us, if we do not develop or commission compelling editorial content (including personalized content), or if we do not receive compelling content from our users, the number of users of our services may not grow as anticipated, or may decline, or users’ level of engagement with our services may decline, all or any of which could harm our operating results.

Acquisitions and strategic investments could result in adverse impacts on our operations and in unanticipated liabilities.

We have acquired, and have made strategic investments in, a number of companies (including through joint ventures) in the past, and we expect to make additional acquisitions and strategic investments in the future. Such transactions may result in use of our cash resources, dilutive issuances of our equity securities, or incurrence of debt. Such transactions may also result in amortization expenses related to intangible assets. Our acquisitions and strategic investments to date were accompanied by a number of risks, including:

•

the difficulty of integrating the operations, personnel, systems, and controls of acquired companies as a result of cultural, regulatory, systems, and operational differences;

•

the potential disruption of our ongoing business and distraction of management;

•

the incurrence of additional operating losses and operating expenses of the businesses we acquired or in which we invested;

•

the difficulty of integrating acquired technology and rights into our services and unanticipated expenses related to such integration;

•

the failure to successfully further develop an acquired business or technology and any resulting impairment of amounts currently capitalized as intangible assets;

•

the failure of strategic investments to perform as expected or to meet financial projections;

•

the potential for patent and trademark infringement and data privacy and security claims against the acquired companies, or companies in which we have invested;

•

litigation or other claims in connection with acquisitions, acquired companies, or companies in which we have invested;

•

the impairment or loss of relationships with customers and partners of the companies we acquired or in which we invested or with our customers and partners as a result of the integration of acquired operations;

•

the impairment of relationships with, or failure to retain, employees of acquired companies or our existing employees as a result of integration of new personnel;

•

our lack of, or limitations on our, control over the operations of our joint venture companies;

•

in the case of foreign acquisitions and investments, the impact of particular economic, tax, currency, political, legal and regulatory risks associated with specific countries; and

•

the impact of known potential liabilities or liabilities that may be unknown, including as a result of inadequate internal controls, associated with the companies we acquired or in which we invested.

We are likely to experience similar risks in connection with our future acquisitions and strategic investments. Our failure to be successful in addressing these risks or other problems encountered in connection with our past or future acquisitions and strategic investments could cause us to fail to realize the anticipated benefits of such acquisitions or investments, incur unanticipated liabilities, and harm our business generally.

We may be required to record a significant charge to earnings if our goodwill, amortizable intangible assets, investments in equity interests, or other investments become impaired.

We are required under generally accepted accounting principles to test goodwill for impairment at least annually and to review our amortizable intangible assets, investments in equity interests (including investments held by any equity method investee), and our other investments, for impairment when events or changes in circumstance indicate the carrying value may not be recoverable. Factors that could lead to impairment of goodwill, amortizable intangible assets (including goodwill or assets acquired via acquisitions) and other investments include significant adverse changes in the business climate and actual or projected operating results (affecting our company as a whole or affecting any particular reporting unit) and declines in the financial condition of our business. Factors that could lead to impairment of investments in equity interests include a prolonged period of decline in the stock price or operating performance of, or an announcement of adverse changes or events by, the companies in which we invested or the investments held by those companies. Factors that could lead to an impairment of U.S. government securities, which constitute a significant portion of our current assets, include any downgrade of U.S. government debt or concern about the creditworthiness of the U.S. government. We have recorded and may be required in the future to record additional charges to earnings if our goodwill, amortizable intangible assets, investments in equity interests, including investments held by any equity method investee, or other investments become impaired. Any such charge would adversely impact our financial results.

Our business depends on a strong brand, and failing to maintain or enhance the Yahoo brands in a cost-effective manner could harm our operating results.

Maintaining and enhancing our brands is an important aspect of our efforts to attract and expand our user, advertiser, and Affiliate base. We believe that the importance of brand recognition will increase due to the relatively low barriers to entry in certain portions of the Internet market. Maintaining and enhancing our brands will depend largely on our ability to provide high-quality, innovative products, and services, which we might not do successfully. We have spent and expect to spend considerable money and resources on the establishment and maintenance of our brands, as well as advertising, marketing, and other brand-building efforts to preserve and enhance consumer awareness of our brands. Our brands may be negatively impacted by a number of factors such as service outages, product malfunctions, data protection and security issues, exploitation of our trademarks by others without permission, and poor presentation or integration of our search marketing offerings by Affiliates on their sites or in their software and services.

Further, while we attempt to ensure that the quality of our brands is maintained by our licensees, our licensees might take actions that could impair the value of our brands, our proprietary rights, or the reputation of our products and media properties. If we are unable to maintain or enhance our brands in a cost-effective manner, or if we incur excessive expenses in these efforts, our business, operating results and financial condition could be harmed.

We are regularly involved in claims, suits, government investigations, and other proceedings that may result in adverse outcomes.

We are regularly involved in claims, suits, government investigations, and proceedings arising from the ordinary course of our business, including actions with respect to intellectual property claims, privacy, consumer protection, information security, data protection or law enforcement matters, tax matters, labor and employment claims, commercial claims, as well as actions involving content generated by our users, stockholder derivative actions, purported class action and class action lawsuits, and other matters. Such claims, suits, government investigations, and proceedings are inherently uncertain and their results cannot be predicted with certainty. Regardless of the outcome, such legal proceedings can have an adverse impact on us because of legal costs, diversion of management and other personnel, and other factors. In addition, it is possible that a resolution of one or more such proceedings could result in reputational harm, liability, penalties, or sanctions, as well as judgments, consent decrees, or orders preventing us from offering certain features, functionalities, products, or services, or requiring a change in our business practices, products or technologies, which could in the future materially and adversely affect our business, operating results, and financial condition. See Note 12 — “Commitments and Contingencies” in the Notes to our condensed consolidated financial statements.

On May 15, 2013, the Superior Court of Justice for the Federal District of Mexico reversed a judgment of U.S. $2.75 billion that had been entered against us and our subsidiary, Yahoo! Mexico, in a lawsuit brought by plaintiffs Worldwide Directories S.A. de C.V. and Ideas Interactivas, S.A. de C.V. On January 14, 2015, the plaintiffs’ appeal of that decision was denied. On February 16, 2015, the plaintiffs filed a petition for review by the Supreme Court of Mexico, where review is limited to constitutional questions under Mexican law. The plaintiffs’ petition was denied. Plaintiffs are seeking to reverse the denial through further review by the Supreme Court of Mexico. We believe there is no basis to reverse the denial in the matter; however, we cannot assure the ultimate outcome of the matter. If we are ultimately required to pay all or a significant portion of the judgment, together with any potential additional damages, interests and costs, it would have a material adverse effect on our financial condition, results of operations and cash flows. We will also be required to record an accrual for the judgment if we should determine in the future that it is probable that we will be required to pay the judgment.

Our intellectual property rights are valuable, and any failure or inability to sufficiently protect them could harm our business and our operating results.

We create, own, and maintain a wide array of copyrights, patents, trademarks, trade dress, trade secrets, rights to domain names and other intellectual property assets which we believe are collectively among our most valuable assets. We seek to protect our intellectual property assets through patent, copyright, trade secret, trademark, and other laws of the U.S. and other countries of the world, and through contractual provisions. However, the efforts we have taken to protect our intellectual property and proprietary rights might not be sufficient or effective at stopping unauthorized use of those rights. Protection of the distinctive elements of Yahoo might not always be available under copyright law or trademark law, or we might not discover or determine the full extent of any unauthorized use of our copyrights and trademarks in order to protect our rights. In addition, effective trademark, patent, copyright, and trade secret protection might not be available or cost-effective in every country in which our products and media properties are distributed or made available through the Internet. Changes in patent law, such as changes in the law regarding patentable subject matter, could also impact our ability to obtain patent protection for our innovations. In particular, recent amendments to the U.S. patent law may affect our ability to protect our innovations and defend against claims of patent infringement. Further, given the costs of obtaining patent protection, we might choose not to protect (or not to protect in some jurisdictions) certain innovations that later turn out to be important. There is also a risk that the scope of protection under our patents may not be sufficient in some cases or that existing patents may be deemed invalid or unenforceable. To help maintain our trade secrets, we have entered into confidentiality agreements with most of our employees and contractors, and confidentiality agreements with many of the parties with whom we conduct business, in order to limit access to and disclosure of our proprietary information. If these confidentiality agreements are breached it could compromise our trade secrets and cause us to lose any competitive advantage provided by those trade secrets.

If we are unable to protect our proprietary rights from unauthorized use, the value of our intellectual property assets may be reduced. In addition, protecting our intellectual property and other proprietary rights is expensive and time consuming. Any increase in the unauthorized use of our intellectual property could make it more expensive to do business and consequently harm our operating results.

We are, and may in the future be, subject to intellectual property infringement or other third-party claims, which are costly to defend, could result in significant damage awards, and could limit our ability to provide certain content or use certain technologies in the future.

Internet, technology, media, and patent holding companies often possess a significant number of patents. Further, many of these companies and other parties are actively developing or purchasing search, indexing, electronic commerce, and other Internet-related technologies, as well as a variety of online business models and methods.

We believe that these parties will continue to take steps such as seeking patent protection to protect these technologies. In addition, patent holding companies may continue to seek to monetize patents they have purchased or otherwise obtained. As a result, disputes regarding the ownership of technologies and rights associated with online businesses are likely to continue to arise in the future. From time to time, parties assert patent infringement claims against us. Currently, we are engaged in a number of lawsuits regarding patent issues and have been notified of a number of other potential disputes.

In addition to patent claims, third parties have asserted, and are likely in the future to assert, claims against us alleging infringement of copyrights, trademark rights, trade secret rights or other proprietary rights, or alleging unfair competition, violation of federal or state statutes or other claims, including alleged violation of international statutory and common law. In addition, third parties have made, and may continue to make, infringement and related claims against us over the display of content or search results triggered by search terms, including the display of advertising, that include trademark terms.

As we expand our business and develop new technologies, products and services, we may become increasingly subject to intellectual property infringement and other claims, including those that may arise under international laws. In the event that there is a determination that we have infringed third-party proprietary rights such as patents, copyrights, trademark rights, trade secret rights, or other third-party rights such as publicity and privacy rights, we could incur substantial monetary liability, or be required to enter into costly royalty or licensing agreements or be prevented from using such rights, which could require us to change our business practices in the future, hinder us from offering certain features, functionalities, products or services, require us to develop non-infringing products or technologies, and limit our ability to compete effectively. We may also incur substantial expenses in defending against third-party claims regardless of the merit of such claims. In addition, many of our agreements with our customers or Affiliates require us to indemnify them for some types of third-party intellectual property infringement claims, which could increase our costs in defending such claims and our damages. Furthermore, such customers and Affiliates may discontinue the use of our products, services, and technologies either as a result of injunctions or otherwise. The occurrence of any of these results could harm our brands or have an adverse effect on our business, financial position, operating results, and cash flows.

If our security measures are breached, our products and services may be perceived as not being secure, users and customers may curtail or stop using our products and services, and we may incur significant legal and financial exposure.

Our products and services involve the storage and transmission of Yahoo’s users’ and customers’ personal and proprietary information in our facilities and on our equipment, networks and corporate systems. Security breaches expose us to a risk of loss of this information, litigation, remediation costs, increased costs for security measures, loss of revenue, damage to our reputation, and potential liability. Outside parties may attempt to fraudulently induce employees, users, or customers to disclose sensitive information to gain access to our data or our users’ or customers’ data. In addition, hardware, software or applications we procure from third parties may contain defects in design or manufacture or other problems that could unexpectedly compromise network and data security. Security breaches or unauthorized access have resulted in and may in the future result in a combination of significant legal and financial exposure, increased remediation and other costs, damage to our reputation and a loss of confidence in the security of our products, services and networks that could have an adverse effect on our business. We take steps to prevent unauthorized access to our corporate systems, however, because the techniques used to obtain unauthorized access, disable or degrade service, or sabotage systems change frequently or may be designed to remain dormant until a triggering event, we may be unable to anticipate these techniques or implement adequate preventative measures. If an actual or perceived breach of our security occurs, the market perception of the effectiveness of our security measures could be harmed and we could lose users and customers.

Changes in regulations or user concerns regarding privacy and protection of user data, or any failure to comply with such laws, could adversely affect our business.

Federal, state, and international laws and regulations govern the collection, use, retention, disclosure, sharing and security of data that we receive from and about our users. The use of consumer data by online service providers and advertising networks is a topic of active interest among federal, state, and international regulatory bodies, and the regulatory environment is unsettled. Many states have passed laws requiring notification to users where there is a security breach for personal data, such as California’s Information Practices Act. We face similar risks in international markets where our products, services and apps are offered. Any failure, or perceived failure, by us to comply with or make effective modifications to our policies, or to comply with any federal, state, or international privacy, data-retention or data-protection-related laws, regulations, orders or industry self-regulatory principles could result in proceedings or actions against us by governmental entities or others, a loss of user confidence, damage to the Yahoo brands, and a loss of users, advertising partners, or Affiliates, any of which could potentially have an adverse effect on our business.

In addition, various federal, state and foreign legislative or regulatory bodies may enact new or additional laws and regulations concerning privacy, data-retention and data-protection issues, including laws or regulations mandating disclosure to domestic or international law enforcement bodies, which could adversely impact our business, our brand or our reputation with users. For example, some countries are considering laws mandating that user data regarding users in their country be maintained in their country. Having to maintain local data centers in individual countries could increase our operating costs significantly. The interpretation and application of privacy, data protection and data retention laws and regulations are often uncertain and in flux in the U.S. and internationally. These laws may be interpreted and applied inconsistently from country to country and inconsistently with our current policies and practices, complicating long-range business planning decisions. If privacy, data protection or data retention laws are interpreted and applied in a manner that is inconsistent with our current policies and practices we may be fined or ordered to change our business practices in a manner that adversely impacts our operating results. Complying with these varying international requirements could cause us to incur substantial costs or require us to change our business practices in a manner adverse to our business and operating results.

Interruptions, delays, or failures in the provision of our services could damage our reputation and harm our operating results.

Delays or disruptions to our service, or the loss or compromise of data, could result from a variety of causes, including the following:

•

Our operations are susceptible to outages and interruptions due to fire, flood, earthquake, tsunami, other natural disasters, power loss, equipment or telecommunications failures, cyber attacks, terrorist attacks, political or social unrest, and other events over which we have little or no control. We do not have multiple site capacity for all of our services and some of our systems are not fully redundant in the event of delays or disruptions to service, so some data or systems may not be fully recoverable after such events.

•

The systems through which we provide our products and services are highly technical, complex, and interdependent. Design errors might exist in these systems, or might be introduced when we make modifications, which might cause service malfunctions or require services to be taken offline while corrective responses are developed.

•

Despite our implementation of network security measures, our servers are vulnerable to computer viruses, malware, worms, hacking, physical and electronic break-ins, router disruption, sabotage or espionage, and other disruptions from unauthorized access and tampering, as well as coordinated denial-of-service attacks. We may not be in a position to promptly address attacks or to implement adequate preventative measures if we are unable to immediately detect such attacks. Such events could result in large expenditures to investigate or remediate, to recover data, to repair or replace networks or information systems, including changes to security measures, to deploy additional personnel, to defend litigation or to protect against similar future events, and may cause damage to our reputation or loss of revenue.

•

We rely on third-party providers over which we have little or no control for our principal Internet connections and co-location of a significant portion of our data servers, as well as for our payment processing capabilities and key components or features of certain of our products and services. Any disruption of the services they provide us or any failure of these third-party providers to handle higher volumes of use could, in turn, cause delays or disruptions in our services and loss of revenue. In addition, if our agreements with these third-party providers are terminated for any reason, we might not have a readily available alternative.

Prolonged delays or disruptions to our service could result in a loss of users, damage to our brands, legal costs or liability, and harm to our operating results.

A variety of new and existing U.S. and foreign government laws and regulations could subject us to claims, judgments, monetary liabilities and other remedies, and to limitations on our business practices.

We are subject to numerous U.S. and foreign laws and regulations covering a wide variety of subject matters. New laws and regulations, changes in existing laws and regulations or the interpretation of them, our introduction of new products or forms of advertising (such as native advertising), or an extension of our business into new areas, could increase our future compliance costs, make our products and services less attractive to our users, or cause us to change or limit our business practices. We may incur substantial expenses to comply with laws and regulations or defend against a claim that we have not complied with them. Further, any failure on our part to comply with any relevant laws or regulations may subject us to significant civil or criminal liabilities, penalties, and negative publicity.

The application of existing domestic and international laws and regulations to us relating to issues such as user privacy and data protection, security, defamation, pricing, advertising, taxation, gambling, sweepstakes, promotions, billing, real estate, consumer protection, accessibility, content regulation, quality of services, law enforcement demands, telecommunications, mobile, television, and intellectual property ownership and infringement in many instances is unclear or unsettled. Further, the application to us or our subsidiaries of existing laws regulating or requiring licenses for certain businesses of our advertisers can be unclear. U.S. export control laws and regulations also impose requirements and restrictions on exports to certain nations and persons and on our business. Internationally, we may also be subject to laws regulating our activities in foreign countries and to foreign laws and regulations that are inconsistent from country to country.

The Digital Millennium Copyright Act (“DMCA”) is intended, in part, to limit the liability of eligible online service providers for caching, hosting, listing or linking to, third-party websites or user content that include materials that give rise to copyright infringement. Portions of the Communications Decency Act (“CDA”) are intended to provide statutory protections to online service providers who distribute third-party content. We rely on the protections provided by both the DMCA and the CDA in conducting our business, and may be adversely impacted by future legislation and future judicial decisions altering these safe harbors or if international jurisdictions refuse to apply similar protections.

Various U.S. and international laws restrict the distribution of materials considered harmful to children and impose additional restrictions on the ability of online services to collect information from minors. These laws currently impose restrictions and requirements on our business, and future federal, state or international laws and legislative efforts designed to protect children on the Internet may impose additional requirements on us.

Fluctuations in foreign currency exchange rates may adversely affect our operating results and financial condition.

Revenue generated and expenses incurred by our international subsidiaries and any equity method investee are often denominated in the currencies of the local countries. As a result, our consolidated U.S. dollar financial statements are subject to fluctuations due to changes in exchange rates as the financial results of our international subsidiaries and any equity method investee are translated from local currencies into U.S. dollars. Our financial results are also subject to changes in exchange rates that impact the settlement of transactions in non-local currencies. The carrying values of our equity investments in any equity investee are also subject to fluctuations in the exchange rates of foreign currencies.

We use derivative instruments, such as foreign currency forward contracts and options, to partially offset certain exposures to fluctuations in foreign currency exchange rates. The use of such instruments may not offset any, or more than a portion, of the adverse financial effects of unfavorable movements in foreign currency exchange rates. Any losses on these instruments that we experience may adversely impact our financial results, cash flows and financial condition. Further, we hedge a portion of our net investment in Yahoo Japan Corporation (“Yahoo Japan”) with currency forward contracts and option contracts. If the Japanese yen has appreciated at maturity beyond the contract execution rate, we would be required to settle the contract by making a cash payment which could be material and could adversely impact our cash flows and financial condition. See Part I, Item 3 — “Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk” of this Annual Report.

Our international operations expose us to additional risks that could harm our business, operating results, and financial condition.

In addition to uncertainty about our ability to continue to generate revenue from our foreign operations and expand our international market position, there are additional risks inherent in doing business internationally (including through our international joint ventures), including:

•

tariffs, trade barriers, customs classifications and changes in trade regulations;

•

difficulties in developing, staffing, and simultaneously managing a large number of varying foreign operations as a result of distance, language, and cultural differences;

•

stringent local labor laws and regulations;

•

longer payment cycles;

•

credit risk and higher levels of payment fraud;

•

profit repatriation restrictions and foreign currency exchange restrictions;

•

political or social unrest, economic instability, repression, or human rights issues;

•

geopolitical events, including natural disasters, acts of war and terrorism;

•

import or export regulations;

•

compliance with U.S. laws such as the Foreign Corrupt Practices Act, and local laws prohibiting bribery and corrupt payments to government officials;

•

antitrust and competition regulations;

•

potentially adverse tax developments;

•

seasonal volatility in business activity and local economic conditions;

•

economic uncertainties relating to volatility in emerging markets and global economic uncertainty;

•

laws, regulations, licensing requirements, and business practices that favor local competitors or prohibit foreign ownership or investments;

•

different, uncertain or more stringent user protection, content, data protection, privacy, intellectual property and other laws; and

•

risks related to other government regulation (including the potential for actions restricting access to our products), required compliance with local laws or lack of legal precedent.

We are subject to numerous and sometimes conflicting U.S. and foreign laws and regulations which increase our cost of doing business. Violations of these complex laws and regulations that apply to our international operations could result in damage awards, fines, criminal actions, sanctions, or penalties against us, our officers or our employees, prohibitions on the conduct of our business and our ability to offer products and services, and damage to our reputation. Although we have implemented policies and procedures designed to promote compliance with these laws, there can be no assurance that our employees, contractors, or agents will not violate our policies. These risks inherent in our international operations and expansion increase our costs of doing business internationally and could result in harm to our business, operating results, and financial condition.

We may be subject to legal liability associated with providing online services or content.

We host and provide a wide variety of services and technology products that enable and encourage individuals and businesses to exchange information; upload or otherwise generate photos, videos, text, and other content; advertise products and services; conduct business; and engage in various online activities both domestically and internationally. The law relating to the liability of providers of online services and products for activities of their users is currently unsettled both within the U.S. and internationally. As a publisher and producer of original content, we may be subject to claims such as copyright, libel, defamation or improper use of publicity rights, as well as other infringement claims such as plagiarism. Claims have been threatened and brought against us for defamation, negligence, breaches of contract, plagiarism, copyright and trademark infringement, unfair competition, unlawful activity, tort, including personal injury, fraud, or other theories based on the nature and content of information which we publish or to which we provide links or that may be posted online or generated by us or by third parties, including our users. In addition, we have been and may again in the future be subject to domestic or international actions alleging that certain content we have generated or third-party content that we have made available within our services violates laws in domestic and international jurisdictions. We arrange for the distribution of third-party advertisements to third-party publishers and advertising networks, and we offer third-party products, services, or content, such as stock quotes and trading information, under the Yahoo brand or via distribution on Yahoo Properties. We may be subject to claims concerning these products, services, or content by virtue of our involvement in marketing, branding, broadcasting, or providing access to them, even if we do not ourselves host, operate, provide, or provide access to these products, services, or content. While our agreements with respect to these products, services, and content may provide that we will be indemnified against such liabilities, the ability to receive such indemnification may be disputed, could result in substantial costs to enforce or defend, and depends on the financial resources of the other party to the agreement, and any amounts received might not be adequate to cover our liabilities or the costs associated with defense of such proceedings. Defense of any such actions could be costly and involve significant time and attention of our management and other resources, may result in monetary liabilities or penalties, and may require us to change our business in an adverse manner.

It is also possible that if any information provided directly by us contains errors or is otherwise wrongfully provided to users, third parties could make claims against us. For example, we offer Web-based e-mail services, which expose us to potential risks, such as liabilities or claims, by our users and third parties, resulting from unsolicited e-mail, lost or misdirected messages, illegal or fraudulent use of e-mail, alleged violations of policies, property interests, or privacy protections, including civil or criminal laws, or interruptions or delays in e-mail service. We may also face purported consumer class actions or state actions relating to our online services, including our fee-based services (particularly in connection with any decision to discontinue a fee-based service). In addition, our customers, third parties, or government entities may assert claims or actions against us if our online services or technologies are used to spread or facilitate malicious or harmful code or applications.

Investigating and defending these types of claims are expensive, even if the claims are without merit or do not ultimately result in liability, and could subject us to significant monetary liability or cause a change in business practices that could negatively impact our ability to compete.

If we are unable to recruit, hire, motivate, and retain key personnel, we may not be able to execute our business plan.

Our business is dependent on our ability to recruit, hire, motivate, and retain talented, highly skilled personnel. Achieving this objective may be difficult due to many factors, including the intense competition for such highly skilled personnel in the San Francisco Bay Area and other metropolitan areas where our offices are located; fluctuations in global economic and industry conditions; competitors’ hiring practices; and the effectiveness of our compensation programs. If we do not succeed in retaining and motivating our existing key employees, and in attracting new key personnel, we may be unable to meet our business plan and as a result, our revenue and profitability may decline.

If we are unable to attract, sustain, and renew distribution arrangements on favorable terms, our revenue may decline.

We enter into distribution arrangements with third parties such as operators of third-party websites, online networks, software companies, electronics companies, computer manufacturers, Internet service providers and others to promote or supply our services to their users. For example:

•

We maintain search and display advertising relationships with Affiliate sites, which integrate our advertising offerings into their websites.

•

We enter into distribution alliances with Internet service providers (including providers of cable and broadband Internet access) and software distributors to promote our services to their users.

•

We enter into agreements with mobile phone, tablet, television, and other device manufacturers, electronics companies and carriers to promote our software and services on their devices.

In some markets, we depend on a limited number of distribution arrangements for a significant percentage of our user activity. A failure by our distributors to attract or retain their user bases would negatively impact our user activity and, in turn, reduce our revenue. In some cases, device manufacturers may be unwilling to pay fees to Yahoo in order to distribute Yahoo services or may be unwilling to distribute Yahoo services.

In the future, as new methods for accessing the Internet and our services become available, including through alternative devices, we may need to enter into amended distribution agreements with existing access providers, distributors, and manufacturers to cover the new devices and new arrangements. We face a risk that existing and potential new access providers, distributors, and manufacturers may decide not to offer distribution of our services on reasonable terms, or at all.

Distribution agreements often involve revenue sharing. Competition to enter into distribution arrangements has caused and may in the future cause our traffic acquisition costs to increase. In some cases, we guarantee distributors a minimum level of revenue and, as a result, run a risk that the distributors’ performance (in terms of ad impressions, toolbar installations, etc.) might not be sufficient to otherwise earn their minimum payments, in which case our payments could exceed the revenue that we receive. In other cases, we agree that if the distributor does not realize specified minimum revenue we will adjust the distributor’s revenue-share percentage or provide make-whole arrangements.

Some of our distribution agreements are not exclusive, have a short term, are terminable at will, or are subject to early termination provisions. The loss of distributors, increased distribution costs, or the renewal of distribution agreements on significantly less favorable terms may cause our revenue to decline.

Certain of our metrics are subject to inherent challenges in measurement, and real or perceived inaccuracies in such metrics may harm our reputation and negatively affect our business.

We present key metrics such as unique users, number of Ads Sold, number of Paid Clicks, Search click-driven revenue, Price-per-Click and Price-per-Ad that are calculated using internal company data. We periodically review, refine and update our methodologies for monitoring, gathering, and calculating these metrics.

While our metrics are based on what we believe to be reasonable measurements and methodologies, there are inherent challenges in deriving our metrics across large online and mobile populations around the world. In addition, our user metrics may differ from estimates published by third parties or from similar metrics of our competitors due to differences in methodology.

If advertisers or publishers do not perceive our metrics to be accurate, or if we discover material inaccuracies in our metrics, it could negatively affect our reputation, business and financial results.

Any failure to scale and adapt our existing technology architecture to manage expansion of user-facing services and to respond to rapid technological change could adversely affect our business.

As some of the most visited sites on the Internet, Yahoo Properties deliver a significant number of products, services, page views, and advertising impressions to users around the world. We expect our products and services to continue to expand and change significantly and rapidly in the future to accommodate new technologies, new devices, new Internet advertising solutions, and new means of content delivery.

In addition, widespread adoption of new Internet, networking or telecommunications technologies, or other technological or platform changes, could require substantial expenditures to modify or adapt our services or infrastructure. The technology architectures and platforms utilized for our services are highly complex and may not provide satisfactory security features or support in the future, as usage increases and products and services expand, change, and become more complex. In the future, we may make additional changes to our existing, or move to completely new, architectures, platforms and systems, such as the changes we have made in response to the increased use of mobile devices such as tablets and smartphones. Such changes may be technologically challenging to develop and implement, may take time to test and deploy, may cause us to incur substantial costs or data loss, and may cause changes, delays or interruptions in service. These changes, delays, or interruptions in our service may cause our users, Affiliates and other advertising platform participants to become dissatisfied with our service or to move to competing providers or seek remedial actions or compensation. Further, to the extent that demands for our services increase, we will need to expand our infrastructure, including the capacity of our hardware servers and the sophistication of our software. This expansion is likely to be expensive and complex and require additional technical expertise. As we acquire users who rely upon us for a wide variety of services, it becomes more technologically complex and costly to retrieve, store, and integrate data that will enable us to track each user’s preferences. Any difficulties experienced in adapting our architectures, platforms and infrastructure to accommodate increased traffic, to store user data, and track user preferences, together with the associated costs and potential loss of traffic, could harm our operating results, cash flows from operations, and financial condition.

We rely on third parties to provide the technologies necessary to deliver content, advertising, and services to our users, and any change in the licensing terms, costs, availability, or acceptance of these formats and technologies could adversely affect our business.

We rely on third parties to provide the technologies that we use to deliver the majority of the content, advertising, and services to our users. There can be no assurance that these providers will continue to license their technologies or intellectual property to us on reasonable terms, or at all. Providers may change the fees they charge users or otherwise change their business model in a manner that slows the widespread acceptance of their technologies. In order for our services to be successful, there must be a large base of users of the technologies necessary to deliver our content, advertising, and services. We have limited or no control over the availability or acceptance of those technologies, and any change in the licensing terms, costs, availability, or user acceptance of these technologies could adversely affect our business.

Our business depends on continued and unimpeded access to the Internet by us and our users. Internet access providers may be able to block, degrade, or charge for access to certain of our products and services, which could lead to additional expenses and the loss of users and advertisers.

Our products and services depend on the ability of our users to access the Internet, and certain of our products require significant bandwidth to work effectively. Currently, this access is provided by companies that have significant market power in the broadband and internet access marketplace, including incumbent telephone companies, cable companies, mobile communications companies, and government-owned service providers. Some of these providers may take, or have stated that they may take, measures that could degrade, disrupt, or increase the cost of user access to certain of our products by restricting or prohibiting the use of their infrastructure to support or facilitate our offerings, or by charging increased fees to us or our users to provide our offerings. Such interference could result in a loss of existing users and advertisers, and increased costs, and could impair our ability to attract new users and advertisers, thereby harming our revenues and growth. The adoption of any laws or regulations that limit access to the Internet by blocking, degrading or charging access fees to us or our users for certain services could decrease the demand for, or the usage of, our products, services and apps, increase our cost of doing business and adversely affect our operating results.

Technologies, tools, software, and applications could block our advertisements, impair our ability to deliver interest-based advertising, or shift the location in which advertising appears, which could harm our operating results.

Technologies, tools, software, and applications (including new and enhanced Web browsers) have been developed and are likely to continue to be developed that can block or allow users to opt out of display, search, and interest-based advertising and content, delete or block the cookies used to deliver such advertising, or shift the location in which advertising appears on pages so that our advertisements do not show up in the most monetizable places on our pages or are obscured. Most of our revenue is derived from fees paid by advertisers in connection with the display of graphical and non-graphical advertisements or clicks on search advertisements on Web pages. As a result, the adoption of such technologies, tools, software, and applications could reduce the number of search and display advertisements that we are able to deliver and/or our ability to deliver interest-based advertising and this, in turn, could reduce our advertising revenue and operating results.

Any failure to manage expansion and changes to our business could adversely affect our operating results.

If we are unable to effectively manage a large and geographically dispersed group of employees or to anticipate our future growth, our business may be adversely affected. As we change and expand our business, we must also expand and adapt our operational infrastructure. Our business relies on data systems, billing systems, and financial reporting and control systems, among others. All of these systems have become increasingly complex in the recent past due to the growing complexity of our business, acquisitions of new businesses with different systems, and increased regulation over controls and procedures. To manage our business in a cost-effective manner, we will need to continue to upgrade and improve our data systems, billing systems, and other operational and financial systems, procedures, and controls. In some cases, we are outsourcing administrative functions to lower-cost providers. These upgrades, improvements and outsourcing changes will require a dedication of resources and in some cases are likely to be complex. If we are unable to adapt our systems and put adequate controls in place in a timely manner, our business may be adversely affected. In particular, sustained failures of our billing systems to accommodate increasing numbers of transactions, to accurately bill users and advertisers, or to accurately compensate Affiliates could adversely affect the viability of our business model.

We have dedicated resources to provide a variety of premium enhancements to our products, services and apps, which might not prove to be successful in generating significant revenue for us.

We offer fee-based enhancements for many of our free services. The development cycles for these technologies are long and generally require investment by us. We have invested and will continue to invest in premium products, services and apps. Some of these premium products, services and apps might not generate anticipated revenue or might not meet anticipated user adoption rates. We have previously discontinued some non-profitable premium services and may discontinue others. General economic conditions as well as the rapidly evolving competitive landscape may affect users’ willingness to pay for such premium services. If we cannot generate revenue from our premium services that are greater than the cost of providing such services, our operating results could be harmed.

We may have exposure to additional tax liabilities which could negatively impact our income tax provision, net income, and cash flow.

We are subject to income taxes and other taxes in both the U.S. and the foreign jurisdictions in which we currently operate or have historically operated. The determination of our worldwide provision for income taxes and current and deferred tax assets and liabilities requires judgment and estimation. Our income taxes could be adversely affected by earnings being lower than anticipated in jurisdictions that have lower statutory tax rates and higher than anticipated in jurisdictions that have higher statutory tax rates, by changes in the valuation of our deferred tax assets and liabilities, or by changes in tax laws, regulations, or accounting principles.

In the ordinary course of our business, there are many transactions and calculations where the ultimate tax determination is uncertain. As a U.S. multinational corporation, we are subject to changing tax laws both within and outside of the U.S. We cannot predict the form or timing of potential legislative changes, but any newly enacted tax law could have a material adverse impact on our tax expense and cash flow. For example, several jurisdictions have sought to increase revenues by imposing new taxes on internet advertising or increasing general business taxes.

We earn a material amount of our income from outside the U.S. As of June 30, 2015, we had undistributed foreign earnings of approximately $3 billion, principally related to our equity method investment in Yahoo Japan. While we do not currently anticipate repatriating these earnings, any repatriation of funds in foreign jurisdictions to the U.S. could result in higher effective tax rates for us and subject us to significant additional U.S. income tax liabilities.

We are subject to regular review and audit by both domestic and foreign tax authorities as well as subject to the prospective and retrospective effects of changing tax regulations and legislation. Although we believe our tax estimates are reasonable, the ultimate tax outcome may materially differ from the tax amounts recorded in our condensed consolidated financial statements and may materially affect our income tax provision, net income, or cash flows in the period or periods for which such determination and settlement is made.

Proprietary document formats may limit the effectiveness of our search technology by preventing our technology from accessing the content of documents in such formats, which could limit the effectiveness of our products and services.

A large amount of information on the Internet is provided in proprietary document formats. These proprietary document formats may limit the effectiveness of search technology by preventing the technology from accessing the content of such documents. The providers of the software applications used to create these documents could engineer the document format to prevent or interfere with the process of indexing the document contents with search technology. This would mean that the document contents would not be included in search results even if the contents were directly relevant to a search. The software providers may also seek to require us to pay them royalties in exchange for giving us the ability to search documents in their format. If the search platform technology we employ is unable to index proprietary format Web documents as effectively as our competitors’ technology, usage of our search services might decline, which could cause our revenue to fall.

Adverse macroeconomic conditions could cause decreases or delays in spending by our advertisers and could harm our ability to generate revenue and our results of operations.

Advertising expenditures tend to be cyclical, reflecting overall economic conditions and budgeting and buying patterns. Since we derive most of our revenue from advertising, adverse macroeconomic conditions have caused, and future adverse macroeconomic conditions could cause, decreases or delays in advertising spending and negatively impact our advertising revenue and short-term ability to grow our revenue. Further, any decreased collectability of accounts receivable or early termination of agreements, whether resulting from customer bankruptcies or otherwise due to adverse macroeconomic conditions, could negatively impact our results of operations.

Our stock price has been volatile historically and may continue to be volatile regardless of our operating performance.

The trading price of our common stock has been and may continue to be subject to broad fluctuations. During the three months ended June 30, 2015, the closing sale price of our common stock on the NASDAQ Global Select Market ranged from $38.91 to $45.78 per share and the closing sale price on July 31, 2015 was $36.67 per share. Our stock price may fluctuate in response to a number of events and factors, such as variations in quarterly operating results or announcements of technological innovations, significant transactions, or new features, products or services by us or our competitors; changes in financial estimates and recommendations by securities analysts; the operating and stock price performance of, or other developments involving, other companies that investors may deem comparable to us; trends in our industry; general economic conditions; and the operating performance and market valuation of Alibaba Group and Yahoo Japan in which we have investments. The equity valuation of our investment in Yahoo Japan may be impacted due to fluctuations in foreign currency exchange rates. We present our investment in Alibaba Group on our consolidated balance sheet as an available-for-sale marketable security. Consequently, the carrying value of this investment on our consolidated balance sheet will vary over time and fluctuations in its valuation may cause our stock price to fluctuate.

In addition, the stock market in general, and the market prices for companies in our industry, have experienced volatility that often has been unrelated to operating performance. These broad market and industry fluctuations may adversely affect the price of our stock, regardless of our operating performance. A decrease in the market price of our common stock would likely adversely impact the trading price of the 0.00% Convertible Senior Notes due 2018 that we issued in November 2013 (the “Notes”). Volatility or a lack of positive performance in our stock price may also adversely affect our ability to retain key employees who have been granted stock options or other stock-based awards. A sustained decline in our stock price and market capitalization could lead to an impairment charge to our long-lived assets.

Delaware statutes and certain provisions in our charter documents could make it more difficult for a third-party to acquire us.

Our Board has the authority to issue up to 10 million shares of preferred stock and to determine the price, rights, preferences, privileges and restrictions, including voting rights, of those shares without any further vote or action by the stockholders. The rights of the holders of our common stock may be subject to, and may be adversely affected by, the rights of the holders of any preferred stock that may be issued in the future. The issuance of preferred stock may have the effect of delaying, deterring or preventing a change in control of Yahoo without further action by the stockholders and may adversely affect the voting and other rights of the holders of our common stock.

Some provisions of our charter documents, including provisions eliminating the ability of stockholders to take action by written consent and limiting the ability of stockholders to raise matters at a meeting of stockholders without giving advance notice, may have the effect of delaying or preventing changes in control or changes in our management, which could have an adverse effect on the market price of our stock and the value of the $1.4375 billion aggregate principal amount of the Notes we issued in November 2013. In addition, our charter documents do not permit cumulative voting, which may make it more difficult for a third-party to gain control of our Board. Further, we are subject to the anti-takeover provisions of Section 203 of the Delaware General Corporation Law, which will prohibit us from engaging in a “business combination” with an “interested stockholder” for a period of three years after the date of the transaction in which the person became an interested stockholder, even if such combination is favored by a majority of stockholders, unless the business combination is approved in a prescribed manner. The application of Section 203 also could have the effect of delaying or preventing a change in control of us.

Any of these provisions could, under certain circumstances, depress the market price of our common stock and the Notes.

Risks Relating to the Notes

The conditional conversion feature of the Notes, if triggered, may adversely affect our financial condition and operating results.

In the event the conditional conversion feature of the Notes is triggered, holders of Notes will be entitled to convert the Notes at any time during specified periods at their option. If one or more holders elect to convert their Notes, unless we elect to satisfy our conversion obligation by delivering solely shares of our common stock (other than paying cash in lieu of delivering any fractional share), we would be required to settle a portion or all of our conversion obligation through the payment of cash, which could adversely affect our liquidity. In addition, even if holders do not elect to convert their Notes, we could be required under applicable accounting rules to reclassify all or a portion of the outstanding principal of the Notes as a current rather than long-term liability, which would result in a material reduction of our net working capital.

We may not have the ability to raise the funds necessary to settle conversions of the Notes in cash or to repurchase the Notes upon a fundamental change, and our future debt may contain limitations on our ability to pay cash upon conversion or repurchase of the Notes.

Holders of the Notes will have the right to require us to repurchase all or a portion of their Notes upon the occurrence of a fundamental change at a repurchase price equal to 100% of the principal amount of the Notes to be repurchased, plus accrued and unpaid special interest, if any. We may not have enough available cash or be able to obtain financing at the time we are required to make repurchases of Notes surrendered therefore, or pay cash with respect to Notes being converted if we elect not to issue shares, which could harm our reputation and affect the trading price of our common stock.

The note hedge and warrant transactions may affect the value of the Notes and our common stock.

In connection with the pricing of the Notes, we entered into note hedge transactions with the option counterparties. The note hedge transactions are generally expected to reduce the potential dilution upon conversion of the Notes and/or offset any cash payments we are required to make in excess of the principal amount of converted Notes, as the case may be. We also entered into warrant transactions with the option counterparties. However, the warrant transactions could separately have a dilutive effect to the extent that the market price per share of our common stock exceeds the applicable strike price of the warrants.

In connection with establishing their initial hedge of the note hedge and warrant transactions, the option counterparties or their respective affiliates have purchased shares of our common stock and/or entered into various derivative transactions with respect to our common stock concurrently with or shortly after the pricing of the Notes. In addition, the option counterparties or their respective affiliates may modify their hedge positions by entering into or unwinding various derivatives with respect to our common stock and/or purchasing or selling our common stock or other securities of ours in secondary market transactions prior to the maturity of the Notes (and are likely to do so during any observation period related to a conversion of Notes or following any repurchase of Notes by us on any fundamental repurchase date or otherwise). This activity could cause or avoid an increase or a decrease in the market price of our common stock or the Notes.

Any adverse change in the rating of the Notes or the Company may cause their trading price to decline.

While we did not solicit a credit rating on the Company or on the Notes, one rating service has rated both the Notes and the Company. If that rating service announces its intention to put the Company or the Notes on credit watch or lowers its rating on the Company or the Notes below any rating initially assigned to the Company or the Notes, the trading price of the Notes could decline.

The accounting method for convertible debt securities that may be settled in cash, such as the Notes, could have a material effect on our reported financial results.

In May 2008, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) issued FASB Staff Position No. APB 14-1, Accounting for Convertible Debt Instruments That May Be Settled in Cash Upon Conversion (Including Partial Cash Settlement), which has subsequently been codified as Accounting Standards Codification (“ASC”) 470-20, Debt with Conversion and Other Options, which we refer to as ASC 470-20. Under ASC 470-20, an entity must separately account for the liability and equity components of the convertible debt instruments (such as the Notes) that may be settled entirely or partially in cash upon conversion in a manner that reflects the issuer’s economic interest cost. The effect of ASC 470-20 on the accounting for the Notes is that the equity component is required to be included in the additional paid-in capital section of stockholders’ equity on our consolidated balance sheet, and the value of the equity component would be treated as debt discount for purposes of accounting for the debt component of the Notes. As a result, we will be required to record a greater amount of non-cash interest expense in current periods presented as a result of the amortization of the discounted carrying value of the Notes to their face amount over the term of the Notes. We will report lower net income in our financial results because ASC 470-20 will require interest to include the current period’s amortization of the debt discount, which could adversely affect our reported or future financial results, the trading price of our common stock and the trading price of the Notes.

In addition, under certain circumstances, convertible debt instruments (such as the Notes) that may be settled entirely or partly in cash are currently accounted for utilizing the treasury stock method, the effect of which is that the shares issuable upon conversion of the Notes are not included in the calculation of diluted earnings per share except to the extent that the conversion value of the Notes exceeds their principal amount. Under the treasury stock method, for diluted earnings per share purposes, the transaction is accounted for as if the number of shares of common stock that would be necessary to settle such excess, if we elected to settle such excess in shares, are issued. We cannot be sure that the accounting standards in the future will continue to permit the use of the treasury stock method. If we are unable to use the treasury stock method in accounting for the shares issuable upon conversion of the Notes, then our diluted earnings per share would be adversely affected.

Risks Relating to Proposed Spin-Off of Remaining Holdings in Alibaba Group

Our proposed plan to spin off all of our remaining holdings in Alibaba Group is subject to certain conditions, and there can be no assurance that the spin-off will be completed or that the expected benefits from the proposed spin-off to Yahoo and its stockholders will be realized.

On January 27, 2015, Yahoo announced a plan for a spin-off of all of the Company’s remaining holdings in Alibaba Group into a newly formed independent registered investment company. The name selected for the new company is Aabaco Holdings, Inc. (“Aabaco”). The stock of Aabaco will be distributed pro rata to Yahoo stockholders, resulting in Aabaco becoming a separate publicly traded registered investment company. Following the completion of the transaction, Aabaco will own all of Yahoo’s remaining 384 million Alibaba Group shares, and a 100 percent ownership interest in Aabaco Small Business, LLC, a newly formed entity which will own Yahoo Small Business, a current operating business of Yahoo that will also be transferred to Aabaco as part of the transaction.

The completion of the spin-off is subject to certain conditions, including final approval by our Board, receipt of a favorable ruling (“IRS Ruling”) from the Internal Revenue Service (“IRS”) regarding certain aspects of the transaction and a legal opinion from Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom LLP (“Skadden Arps”) with respect to the tax-free treatment of the transaction under U.S. federal tax laws and regulations, the effectiveness of an applicable registration statement with the SEC, and compliance with the requirements under the Investment Company Act of 1940, and other customary conditions. Each of the conditions may be waived, in whole or in part (to the extent permitted by law), by the Company in its sole discretion. The Company has also reserved the right, in its sole and absolute discretion, to abandon or modify the terms of the transaction at any time prior to the distribution date, even if the conditions to the transaction have been satisfied.

Possible delays or the failure in satisfying the above-described conditions (if not waived by the Company) or other factors, including adverse regulatory developments or determinations or adverse changes in, or interpretations of, U.S. or foreign tax laws, rules or regulations, or required third party consents, could delay or prevent completion of the proposed spin-off or cause the terms of the proposed spin-off to be materially modified. In addition, we expect that the process of completing the proposed spin-off will involve dedication of significant resources and the incurrence of significant costs and expenses.

A failure to complete the proposed spin-off may adversely affect the market price of Yahoo’s common stock. In addition, there can be no assurance that the expected benefits from the proposed spin-off to Yahoo and its stockholders will be realized or that the combined value of the common stock of the two publicly traded companies following the completion of the spin-off, Yahoo and Aabaco, will be equal to or greater than what the value of our common stock would have been had the proposed spin-off not occurred.

The spin-off could result in significant U.S. tax liabilities.

Unless waived by Yahoo, the completion of the proposed spin-off is conditioned upon the receipt by Yahoo of the IRS Ruling regarding certain U.S. federal income tax aspects of the spin-off, and upon the absence of any subsequent withdrawal, invalidation, or modification of such ruling in an adverse manner prior to the effective time of the spin-off. Although the IRS Ruling generally will be binding on the IRS, the continued validity of the IRS Ruling will be based upon and subject to the accuracy of factual statements and representations made to the IRS by Yahoo. In addition, the IRS recently announced that it is reconsidering its ruling policy with respect to certain issues under Section 355 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended (the “Code”), which could potentially impact Yahoo’s ability to obtain the IRS Ruling. Accordingly, there is a risk that the IRS might not issue the IRS Ruling or might determine to promulgate new administrative guidance prior to the spin-off that could adversely impact the tax-free treatment of the spin-off even if Yahoo previously received the IRS Ruling. Further, as a result of the IRS’s general ruling policy with respect to transactions under Section 355 of the Code, the IRS Ruling, if received, will be limited to specified aspects of the spin-off under Section 355 of the Code, and will not represent a determination by the IRS that all of the requirements necessary to obtain tax-free treatment to holders of Yahoo’s common stock and to Yahoo have been satisfied. Moreover, if any statement or representation upon which the IRS Ruling is based is incorrect or untrue in any material respect, or if the facts upon which the IRS Ruling is based are materially different from the facts that prevail at the time of the spin-off, the IRS Ruling could be invalidated.

As a result of this IRS ruling policy, the spin-off is also conditioned upon the receipt by Yahoo of the opinion of Skadden Arps, in form and substance reasonably acceptable to Yahoo, to the effect that, under current U.S. federal income tax law, the spin-off will qualify as a tax-free transaction to Yahoo and its stockholders under Sections 355 and 368(a)(1)(D) of the Code. The opinion may rely on the continued validity of the IRS Ruling, as to the matters covered by the IRS Ruling, and will be based upon specified assumptions, as well as statements, representations, and specified undertakings made by officers of Yahoo and Aabaco. These assumptions, statements, representations, and undertakings are expected to relate to, among other things, Yahoo’s business reasons for engaging in the spin-off, the conduct of specified business activities by Yahoo and Aabaco, and the current plans and intentions of Yahoo and Aabaco to continue conducting those business activities and not to materially modify their ownership or capital structure following the spin-off. If any of those statements, representations, or assumptions is incorrect or untrue in any material respect, or any of those undertakings is not complied with, or if the facts upon which the opinion is based are materially different from the facts that prevail at the time of the spin-off, the conclusions reached in the opinion could be adversely affected. In addition, the legal authorities upon which the opinion of Skadden Arps is based are subject to change or differing interpretations at any time, possibly with retroactive effect. The opinion will not be binding on the IRS or a court, and there is a risk that the IRS may challenge the conclusions reached in the opinion and that a court may sustain such a challenge.

Even if the spin-off otherwise qualifies under Sections 355 and 368(a)(1)(D) of the Code, the spin-off would result in a significant U.S. federal income tax liability to Yahoo (but not to our stockholders) under Section 355(e) of the Code if one or more persons acquire, directly or indirectly, a 50 percent or greater interest (measured by vote or value) in our stock or in the stock of Aabaco (excluding, for this purpose, the acquisition of Aabaco’s common stock by our stockholders in the spin-off) as part of a plan or series of related transactions that includes the spin-off. Current tax law generally creates a presumption that any acquisition of our stock or the stock of Aabaco within two years before or after the spin-off is part of a plan that includes the spin-off, although that presumption is subject to certain safe harbors under the applicable Treasury regulations and may otherwise be rebuttable based on the facts and circumstances. The process for determining whether an acquisition is part of a plan under these rules is complex, inherently factual in nature, and subject to a comprehensive analysis of the facts and circumstances of the particular case. Notwithstanding the opinion of Skadden Arps described above, Yahoo or Aabaco might be unable to prevent, or might inadvertently cause or permit, a disqualifying change in the ownership of Yahoo or Aabaco to occur, thereby triggering a significant tax liability to Yahoo, which could have a material adverse effect. If it is subsequently determined, for whatever reason, that the spin-off does not qualify for tax-free treatment, Yahoo and/or its stockholders could incur significant tax liabilities. In connection with the spin-off, Yahoo and Aabaco will enter into a Tax Matters Agreement (the “Tax Matters Agreement”) pursuant to which Aabaco, subject to limited exceptions, will be required to indemnify Yahoo, our subsidiaries, and specified related persons for taxes and losses resulting from the failure of the spin-off to qualify as a tax-free transaction under Sections 355 and 368(a)(1)(D) of the Code. Aabaco’s indemnification obligations to Yahoo, its subsidiaries, and specified related persons will not be limited in amount or subject to any cap. It is, however, possible that liabilities, if any, arising from Aabaco’s indemnification obligations might occur at a time when Aabaco has insufficient assets and liquidity to honor its tax indemnity obligations to Yahoo.

Yahoo and Aabaco face uncertainties with respect to People’s Republic of China (“PRC”) taxation of indirect transfers of Chinese taxable property in connection with the spin-off.

On February 3, 2015, the PRC State Administration of Taxation (“SAT”) issued the Bulletin Regarding Certain Enterprise Income Tax Matters on Indirect Transfer of Property by Non-Resident Enterprises, SAT Bulletin [2015] No. 7 (“Bulletin 7”). Bulletin 7 governs indirect transfers of Chinese taxable property, which includes equity interests in Chinese resident enterprises, real estate located in China, and the assets of a “place or establishment” in China of a foreign company. An indirect transfer occurs when a foreign company that is not resident in China transfers shares in another foreign company that is not resident in China, and the company whose shares are transferred directly or indirectly holds Chinese taxable property.

Under Bulletin 7, an “indirect transfer” of Chinese taxable property, including equity interests, by a foreign company that is not resident in China may be recharacterized and treated as a direct transfer of Chinese taxable property and subject to PRC tax, if such arrangement does not have a reasonable commercial purpose. An arrangement is deemed to lack a reasonable commercial purpose if the primary purpose of the arrangement is to avoid PRC tax. Bulletin 7 provides three safe harbors under which an indirect transfer will not be taxed. One is for internal reorganizations that meet certain criteria, another is for the transfer of shares that were both acquired and sold on a public exchange, and a third is for transfers that would qualify for tax exemption under a tax treaty between China and the transferor’s country of residence if the transfer of Chinese taxable property had been direct rather than indirect.

As Aabaco’s principal asset will be equity interests in Alibaba Group and Alibaba Group has Chinese taxable property, the direct and indirect transfers of the Alibaba Group shares to Aabaco by Yahoo and the distribution of the shares of Aabaco by Yahoo to its stockholders (collectively the “Spin Related Transfers”) are indirect transfers under Bulletin 7. Consequently, Yahoo and Aabaco face uncertainties with respect to the possible PRC taxation of the Spin Related Transfers under Bulletin 7. If the Spin Related Transfers were subject to a PRC tax under Bulletin 7, the tax would be 10 percent of the gain that the PRC tax authorities deem Yahoo to have derived from the transfers.

If the PRC tax is deemed applicable and is not paid prior to the eighth day after the indirect transfer is completed, interest will accrue until the tax is paid or settled by the transferor. Further, a transferee who has paid consideration for the shares transferred is a withholding agent and can be subject to a penalty for failure to withhold the PRC tax payable by the transferor in an amount up to three times the amount of the tax.

The transferee and transferor can each voluntarily report an indirect transfer of Chinese taxable property to the SAT. Voluntary reporting entitles the transferor to a lower rate of interest on the PRC tax payable and gives the transferee a possible exemption or reduction of the penalty for failure to withhold.

We believe that the Spin Related Transfers should qualify for the treaty safe harbor discussed above. Specifically, Yahoo as a tax resident of the United States should be eligible for a tax exemption under the tax treaty between the United States and China if, hypothetically, it transferred the Chinese subsidiaries of Alibaba Group. Therefore, the treaty safe harbor should apply to the indirect transfer of these Chinese subsidiaries in the Spin Related Transfers.

Further, even if the treaty safe harbor did not apply, we believe that neither the corporate structure of Alibaba Group nor the Spin Related Transfers constitutes an “arrangement lacking in reasonable commercial purpose” because they do not have avoidance of PRC tax as their main purpose. Under Bulletin 7, whether a reasonable commercial purpose exists is based on a facts and circumstances assessment using seven factors plus other factors set forth in Bulletin 7. We believe the Spin Related Transfers should not be found to lack a reasonable commercial purpose and so should not be subject to PRC tax under Bulletin 7.

As Bulletin 7 was just recently released, however, there are no formal interpretations and little practical experience as to how the SAT will interpret and apply Bulletin 7, and its interpretation by the courts in China remains untested. The SAT may interpret and administer Bulletin 7 in a way that results in PRC taxation of the Spin Related Transfers, notwithstanding our belief that this would be incorrect as a matter of law and treaty. In such event, Yahoo may be subject to tax on the Spin Related Transfers, or Aabaco may be subject to a penalty as the withholding agent for such tax. Pursuant to the Tax Matters Agreement, Aabaco would be required to indemnify Yahoo for any PRC tax imposed on Yahoo. It is, however, possible that liabilities, if any, arising from Aabaco’s indemnification obligations might occur at a time when Aabaco has insufficient assets and liquidity to honor its tax indemnity obligations to Yahoo.

Item 2. Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds

None.

Item 3. Defaults Upon Senior Securities

None.

Item 4. Mine Safety Disclosures

Not applicable.

Item 5. Other Information

None.

Item 6. Exhibits

The exhibits listed in the Index to Exhibits (following the signatures page of this Report) are filed with, or incorporated by reference in, this Report.

SIGNATURES

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the Registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.


	YAHOO! INC.

Dated: August 7, 2015	By:	/s/ MARISSA A. MAYER
		Marissa A. Mayer Chief Executive Officer (Principal Executive Officer)

Dated: August 7, 2015	By:	/s/ KEN GOLDMAN
		Ken Goldman Chief Financial Officer (Principal Financial Officer)

YAHOO! INC.

Index to Exhibits


Exhibit Number		Description

3.1(A)		Amended and Restated Certificate of Incorporation of the Registrant (previously filed as Exhibit 3.1 to the Registrant’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q filed July 28, 2000 and incorporated herein by reference).

3.1(B)		Certificate of Designation, Preferences and Rights of Series A Junior Participating Preferred Stock of the Registrant (previously filed as Exhibit 4.8 to the Registrant’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q filed May 4, 2001 and incorporated herein by reference).

3.2		Amended and Restated Bylaws of the Registrant (previously filed as Exhibit 3.2 to the Registrant’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed June 27, 2014 and incorporated herein by reference).

10.7*		Amendment Agreement No. 2 to Joint Venture Agreement, dated June 17, 2015, by and between the Registrant and Softbank Corporation.

10.13(O)†		Eleventh Amendment to Search and Advertising Services and Sales Agreement, effective as of April 15, 2015, by and between the Registrant and Microsoft Corporation (previously filed as Exhibit 10.13(O) to the Registrant’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q filed May 7, 2015 and incorporated herein by reference).

10.15(O)+		Letter Amendment, dated April 17, 2015, to Performance Stock Option Agreement (Retention Grant), between the Registrant and Marissa A. Mayer (previously filed as Exhibit 10.15(O) to the Registrant’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q filed May 7, 2015 and incorporated herein by reference).

10.16(D)+		Letter Amendment, dated April 17, 2015, to Performance Stock Option Agreement, between the Registrant and Ken Goldman (previously filed as Exhibit 10.16(D) to the Registrant’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q filed May 7, 2015 and incorporated herein by reference).

10.18(D)		Amendment No. 3 to Credit Agreement, dated as of July 24, 2015, by and among the Registrant, the lenders referenced herein, and Citibank, N.A. as Administrative Agent (previously filed as Exhibit 10.1 to the Registrant’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed July 30, 2015 and incorporated herein by reference).

31.1*		Certificate of Chief Executive Officer Pursuant to Securities Exchange Act Rules 13a-14(a) and 15d-14(a) as Adopted Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, dated August 7, 2015.

31.2*		Certificate of Chief Financial Officer Pursuant to Securities Exchange Act Rules 13a-14(a) and 15d-14(a) as Adopted Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, dated August 7, 2015.

32**		Certificate of Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer Pursuant to Securities Exchange Act Rules 13a-14(b) and 15d-14(b) and 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, dated August 7, 2015.

101.INS*		XBRL Instance

101.SCH*		XBRL Taxonomy Extension Schema

101.CAL*		XBRL Taxonomy Extension Calculation

101.DEF*		XBRL Taxonomy Extension Definition

101.LAB*		XBRL Taxonomy Extension Labels

101.PRE*		XBRL Taxonomy Extension Presentation

*	Filed herewith.

**	Furnished herewith.

+	Indicates a management contract or compensatory plan or arrangement.

†	Portions of this exhibit have been omitted and filed separately with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission pursuant to a request for confidential treatment.

Exhibit 10.7

Confidential

AMENDMENT AGREEMENT NO. 2

This Amendment Agreement No. 2 (this “Amendment”) is made and entered into as of this 17th day of June 2015, by and between SoftBank Corp., a Japanese corporation (“Softbank”), and Yahoo! Inc., a Delaware corporation (“Yahoo!”) to amend that certain Joint Venture Agreement, dated as of April 1, 1996 (the “Original Joint Venture Agreement”), by and between Softbank and Yahoo!, as amended by that certain Amendment Agreement, dated September 17, 1997 (the “First Amendment”), by and between Softbank and Yahoo! (as amended, the “Joint Venture Agreement”). Capitalized terms not defined herein shall have the meanings given to them in the Joint Venture Agreement.

WHEREAS, Section 1(a) of the First Amendment amended Section 6 of the Original Joint Venture Agreement in its entirety;

WHEREAS, Softbank and Yahoo! now desire further to amend Section 6 of the Joint Venture Agreement to reflect certain agreed changes to the structure and composition of the Board of Directors of Yahoo! Japan Corporation, a Japanese corporation (the “Company or Yahoo! Japan”);

NOW, THEREFORE, in exchange for good and valuable consideration, the adequacy of which is hereby acknowledged, Softbank and Yahoo! hereby agree as follows:

Amendment of Joint Venture Agreement

Section 6 of the Joint Venture Agreement is hereby amended to read in its entirety as follows:

“6.

Board of Directors

The Board of Directors of the Company shall be elected pursuant to the Articles of Incorporation of the Company and applicable laws of Japan. Softbank and Yahoo! agree to vote their shares so as to elect two Softbank representatives and two Yahoo! representatives to the Board of Directors of the Company, so long as the party so represented continues to hold at least 5% of the Company’s issued and outstanding shares. Softbank and Yahoo! further agree that the authorized number of directors will be set at 9, and that they will not vote to increase or decrease the authorized number of directors without each other’s consent.”

Remainder of Joint Venture Agreement

Except as expressly amended hereunder, all of the terms of the Joint Venture Agreement remain in full force and effect.

Governing Law; Counterparts

This Amendment shall be governed and construed in accordance with the laws of Japan. This Agreement may be executed in counterparts, which together shall constitute one document and be binding on both of the parties hereto.

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have caused this Amendment to be executed by their duly authorized representatives as of the date first above written.


YAHOO! INC.		SOFTBANK CORPORATION

By:	/s/ Ronald S. Bell	By:	/s/ Masayoshi Son



Name:	Ronald S. Bell	Name:	Masayoshi Son



Title:	General Counsel and Secretary	Title:	Chairman & CEO

EXHIBIT 31.1

Certification of Chief Executive Officer Pursuant to

Securities Exchange Act Rules 13a-14(a) and 15d-14(a)

as Adopted Pursuant to

Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

I, Marissa A. Mayer, certify that:

1.	I have reviewed this Form 10-Q of Yahoo! Inc.;

2.	Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3.	Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations, and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the registrant and have:

(a)

Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

(b)

Designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internal control over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles;

(c)

Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

(d)

Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and

5.	The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

(a)

All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

(b)

Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.

EXHIBIT 31.2

Certification of Chief Financial Officer Pursuant to

Securities Exchange Act Rules 13a-14(a) and 15d-14(a)

as Adopted Pursuant to

Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

I, Ken Goldman, certify that:

1.	I have reviewed this Form 10-Q of Yahoo! Inc.;

2.	Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3.	Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations, and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

(a)

(b)

(c)

(d)

5.	The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

(a)

(b)

Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.

EXHIBIT 32

Certification of Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer Pursuant to

18 U.S.C. Section 1350,

as Adopted Pursuant to

Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Yahoo! (the “Company”) for the quarter ended June 30, 2015 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), Marissa A. Mayer, as Chief Executive Officer of the Company, and Ken Goldman, as Chief Financial Officer of the Company, each hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to the best of her or his knowledge, that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.


		/s/ MARISSA A. MAYER
Name:		Marissa A. Mayer
Title:		Chief Executive Officer
Dated:		August 7, 2015

		/s/ KEN GOLDMAN
Name:		Ken Goldman
Title:		Chief Financial Officer
Dated:		August 7, 2015

The foregoing certification is being furnished pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350. It is not being filed for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and it is not to be incorporated by reference into any filing of the Company, regardless of any general incorporation language in such filing.

Serious News for Serious Traders! Try StreetInsider.com Premium Free!

SEC Filings

Receive full access to all new and archived articles, unlimited portfolio tracking, e-mail alerts, custom newswires and RSS feeds - and more!

Dated: August 7, 2015

/s/ MARISSA A. MAYER

Marissa A. Mayer

Chief Executive Officer