U.S. judges cannot expunge convictions despite job threats: court
- Major stock indexes rise again to new records
- Unusual 11 Mid-Day Movers 12/8: (COOL) (TLRD) (DRAM) Higher; (SHIP) (OHRP) (MLSS) Lower
- Third-Party Said Interested in PrivateBancorp (PVTB) as CIBC (CM) Deal is Delayed
- Insys Therapeutics (INSY) Sinks as Former Employees Arrested in Racketeering Scheme
- Lower for longer, ECB scales back asset buys
Find out which companies are about to raise their dividend well before the news hits the Street with StreetInsider.com's Dividend Insider Elite. Sign-up for a FREE trial here.
By Nate Raymond
NEW YORK (Reuters) - Federal judges cannot expunge convictions from people's criminal records even when it prevents those who have been rehabilitated from getting jobs, and Congress should consider granting the judiciary that power, a U.S. appeals court ruled on Thursday.
The 2nd U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals in New York overturned a May 2015 ruling that expunged the records of a 2001 conviction of a woman who spent years struggling to hold down jobs because of it.
Circuit Judge Raymond Lohier called the situation "unfortunate" for the woman, known in court records as Jane Doe, and noted Congress has occasionally let judges give onetime criminal defendants a clean bill of health.
"It might consider doing so again for certain offenders who, like Doe, want and deserve to have their criminal convictions expunged after a period of successful rehabilitation," he wrote.
The decision reversed a ruling by former U.S. District Judge John Gleeson in Brooklyn. It came amid growing attention to ensuring that people with criminal records are treated fairly when seeking employment and trying to rebuild their lives.
Noam Biale, Doe's lawyer, called the decision "especially unfortunate, given the broad consensus that collateral consequences of criminal convictions are unduly harsh, do not enhance public safety, and keep good people like Jane Doe out of the workforce."
U.S. Attorney General Loretta Lynch, in an April speech, said criminal defendants who have served their punishments too often "continue to be punished for past mistakes" through hurdles to secure student loans, driver's licenses and housing.
The Justice Department, which opposed expunging Doe's record, did not immediately respond to requests for comment.
Jane Doe was a single mother and home health aide who in 1997 was a passenger in a staged car accident in an automobile insurance fraud scheme.
A federal jury in Brooklyn convicted her in 2001, and she was sentenced the next year to five years of probation and 10 months of home detention.
In subsequent years, Doe had trouble maintaining employment in the health care field because of the conviction. After landing some jobs, she was fired after employers conducted background checks, according to court papers.
Gleeson ordered her conviction expunged, saying the public's interest in her contributing to society outweighed its interest in her conviction being a matter of public record.
"I sentenced her to five years of probation supervision, not to a lifetime of unemployment," he wrote.
(Reporting by Nate Raymond in New York; Editing by Dan Grebler)
Serious News for Serious Traders! Try StreetInsider.com Premium Free!
You May Also Be Interested In
- Greece to pay out benefit to low income pensioners - PM
- ICC to discuss South Africa's failure to arrest Sudan's Bashir
- U.S. carriers see 3.5 percent bump in 2016 winter holiday flying
Create E-mail Alert Related CategoriesReuters
Sign up for StreetInsider Free!
Receive full access to all new and archived articles, unlimited portfolio tracking, e-mail alerts, custom newswires and RSS feeds - and more!