Seven big banks settle U.S. rate-rigging lawsuit for $324 million
The Bank of America logo is seen at their offices at Canary Wharf financial district in London,Britain, March 3, 2016. REUTERS/Reinhard Krause
Get Alerts BAC Hot Sheet
Overall Analyst Rating:
NEUTRAL (= Flat)
Dividend Yield: 2.8%
Revenue Growth %: -1.9%
Join SI Premium – FREE
By Jonathan Stempel
NEW YORK (Reuters) - Seven of the world's biggest banks have agreed to pay $324 million to settle a private U.S. lawsuit accusing them of rigging an interest rate benchmark used in the $553 trillion derivatives market.
The settlement made public on Tuesday, which requires court approval, resolves antitrust claims against Bank of America Corp (NYSE: BAC), Barclays Plc
Several pension funds and municipalities accused 14 banks, including those that settled, of conspiring to rig the "ISDAfix" benchmark for their own gain from at least 2009 to 2012.
Companies and investors use ISDAfix to price swaps transactions, commercial real estate mortgages and structured debt securities.
The alleged illegal activity included the execution of rapid trades just before the rate was set each day, called "banging the close," causing the British brokerage ICAP Plc (NASDAQ: IAP) to delay trades until they moved ISDAfix where they wanted, and posting rates that did not reflect market activity.
Under the settlement, payments would include $52 million from JPMorgan; $50 million each from Bank of America, Credit Suisse, Deutsche Bank and RBS; $42 million from Citigroup and $30 million from Barclays.
The remaining defendants are BNP Paribas SA
Spokespeople for BNP Paribas, HSBC, Morgan Stanley and UBS declined to comment. The other non-settling defendants did not immediately respond to requests for comment.
Tuesday's accord came five weeks after U.S. District Judge Jesse Furman in Manhattan refused to dismiss the lawsuit.
U.S. and European regulators have also examined whether ISDAfix was set properly, and Barclays agreed last May to pay a $115 million fine to settle a U.S. Commodity Futures Trading Commission probe.
The private lawsuit is one of many pending in Manhattan federal court accusing banks of conspiring to rig rate benchmarks, securities prices or commodities prices.
The case is Alaska Electrical Pension Fund et al v. Bank of America Corp et al, U.S. District Court, Southern District of New York, No. 14-07126.
(Reporting by Jonathan Stempel in New York; Editing by David Gregorio and Bill Rigby)
Serious News for Serious Traders! Try StreetInsider.com Premium Free!
You May Also Be Interested In
- Rubrik IPO: 5 key things to know
- Ex-Karabakh official held by Azerbaijan is on hunger strike
- Deutsche Bank Upgrades Medical Properties Trust (MPW) to Hold, 'Debt Maturity Likely Resolved Until At Least 2025'
Create E-mail Alert Related Categories
ReutersRelated Entities
Credit Suisse, Deutsche Bank, UBS, JPMorgan, Goldman Sachs, Citi, Morgan Stanley, Barclays, Nomura, HSBC, Wells FargoSign up for StreetInsider Free!
Receive full access to all new and archived articles, unlimited portfolio tracking, e-mail alerts, custom newswires and RSS feeds - and more!