Court clears Icahn's CVR to sue Wachtell law firm for malpractice
- Top 10 News for 12/2: Crude Rips on OPEC Cut; Starbucks' Schultz Steps Down; Nonfarm Payrolls Flat in Nov.
- Unemployment Rate Drops to 4.6%
- Bond yields slip on U.S. jobs data, euro steady before Italy vote
- Alibaba (BABA) Founder Jack Ma Discuss Plans to Retire; 'I Don't Want to Die at the Office'
- Starbucks Coffee (SBUX) CEO Howard Schultz to Step Down, Appointed Executive Chairman; Kevin Johnson New CEO
Billionaire activist-investor Carl Icahn gives an interview on FOX Business Network's Neil Cavuto show in New York February 11, 2014. REUTERS/Brendan McDermid
Get the Pulse of the Market with StreetInsider.com's Pulse Picks. Get your Free Trial here.
By Jonathan Stempel
NEW YORK (Reuters) - A New York state appeals court on Thursday cleared the way for billionaire investor Carl Icahn to pursue an unusual malpractice lawsuit against the powerful law firm Wachtell, Lipton, Rosen & Katz over his 2012 hostile takeover of CVR Energy Inc (NYSE: CVI).
The 5-0 decision by the Appellate Division in Manhattan frees CVR to contest whether Wachtell should have revealed how Goldman Sachs Group Inc (NYSE: GS) and Deutsche Bank AG
In effect, CVR, and thus Icahn, claimed to have overpaid for the process that left the activist investor with a now 82 percent stake in the Sugar Land, Texas-based petroleum refiner and nitrogen fertilizer manufacturer.
The tender offer had valued CVR at about $2.6 billion at the time. Icahn is now worth $15.6 billion, Forbes magazine said.
Wachtell did not immediately respond to requests for comment.
In dismissing the malpractice claim, Justice O. Peter Sherwood of the state supreme court in Manhattan affirmed in February 2015 that CVR was contractually bound to pay the banks more than $36 million because it failed to object fast enough.
U.S. District Judge Richard Sullivan in Manhattan dismissed a similar federal case in March of this year, saying he was bound by Sherwood's ruling on the case's merits.
But the appeals court said Sherwood's ruling did not bar CVR from pursuing a malpractice claim for "conduct that allegedly caused and/or contributed" to CVR's acceptance of the contracts, and its inability to extricate itself from them.
Herbert Beigel, a lawyer for CVR and Icahn, said Thursday's decision means Sullivan is no longer bound by Sherwood's ruling.
"CVR is gratified by the court's decision," Beigel said in a phone interview. "We expect our federal case on the malpractice claim to proceed."
Goldman and Deutsche Bank had separately sued CVR to recoup unpaid fees. That litigation was settled last October.
The case is Wachtell, Lipton, Rosen & Katz et al vs CVR Energy Inc et al, New York State Supreme Court, Appellate Division, 1st Department, No. 654343/2013.
(Reporting by Jonathan Stempel in New York; Editing by David Gregorio)
Serious News for Serious Traders! Try StreetInsider.com Premium Free!
You May Also Be Interested In
- Pence downplays significance of Trump's call with Taiwan president
- Trump to intervene to keep U.S. jobs at home on 'day-by-day' basis, Pence says
- Euro zone seeks compromise on Greek debt ahead of IMF deadline
Create E-mail Alert Related CategoriesReuters
Related EntitiesCarl Icahn, Deutsche Bank, Goldman Sachs
Sign up for StreetInsider Free!
Receive full access to all new and archived articles, unlimited portfolio tracking, e-mail alerts, custom newswires and RSS feeds - and more!