Colorado's civil litigation over movie theater massacre ends
- Wall Street surges to new highs; transports set record
- lululemon athletica (LULU) Tops Q3 EPS by 4c; Adj.-Comps Outpaced Views
- Abbott (ABT) Files Complaint to Terminate Alere (ALR) Acquisition
- Costco Wholesale (COST) Tops Q1 EPS by 5c; Comps Up 1%, 2% Ex-Gas
- After-Hours Stock Movers 12/07: (VYGR) (LULU) (HRB( Higher; (OHRP) (VRNT) (CMTL) Lower (more...)
Century Aurora 16 movie theater is pictured in Colorado April 27, 2015. REUTERS/Evan Semon/File Photo
Get daily under-the-radar research with StreetInsider.com's Stealth Growth Insider Get your 2-Wk Free Trial here.
By Keith Coffman
DENVER (Reuters) - The movie theater chain that owns a Colorado cinema where 12 people were killed in a 2012 shooting spree will not pursue $700,000 in legal costs the company incurred fighting an unsuccessful lawsuit, court records showed on Tuesday.
More than two dozen surviving victims and relatives of those killed sued Cinemark USA Inc in state court, accusing the company of lax security measures that made the theater chain partially responsible for the bloodshed.
In May, a jury found Cinemark was not liable for the July 20, 2012, rampage, agreeing with Cinemark lawyers who had argued that the mass shooting was an unforeseeable tragedy carried out by "a madman."
Gunman James Holmes pleaded not guilty by reason of insanity to criminal charges stemming from the shooting.
He was convicted last year of murdering 12 people and wounding 70 others when he opened fire during a screening of the Batman film "The Dark Knight Rises" inside the Century 16 Theater multiplex in Aurora, Colorado.
Jurors spared Holmes the death penalty sought by prosecutors. He was sentenced to multiple life sentences without the possibility of parole.
Under Colorado law, Cinemark was entitled to recover "litigation costs," which are separate from attorney’s fees, since the chain prevailed in the civil lawsuit.
The company said in making the request it had spent nearly $700,000 for expert witnesses and on other costs associated with defending itself at trial.
However, Cinemark said in subsequent court filings it would drop its request if the victims agreed not to appeal against the jury’s verdict. Both sides agreed on Tuesday, according to a stipulated agreement filed in Arapahoe District Court.
Cinemark said in the agreement that its “goal has always been to resolve this matter fully and completely without an award of costs of any kind to any party.”
The "case can now be deemed completely over,” lawyers for Texas-based Cinemark wrote. A judge must still sign off on the deal, but that is expected to be a formality.
If the agreement is approved, it would bring to a close all the state court claims against Cinemark over the shooting.
A federal lawsuit filed against Cinemark by a separate set of victims was dismissed by a judge following the verdict in the state case, although appeals of that ruling have not been completely resolved.
(Editing by Steve Gorman; Editing by Paul Tait)
Serious News for Serious Traders! Try StreetInsider.com Premium Free!
You May Also Be Interested In
- ThyssenKrupp secrets stolen in 'massive' cyber attack this year
- Philippines' Duterte says no plot to unseat vice president
- South Korea worries about growing economic risks, amid impeachment push for President Park
Create E-mail Alert Related CategoriesReuters
Sign up for StreetInsider Free!
Receive full access to all new and archived articles, unlimited portfolio tracking, e-mail alerts, custom newswires and RSS feeds - and more!