Austrian far right to sue judge for saying vote challenge was planned
- Donald Trump Sworn in as 45th U.S. President
- Wall Street ends higher as Trump becomes president
- Walgreens Boots Alliance (WBA) Said to Face Antitrust Concern for Rite Aid (RAD) Fix - Bloomberg
- Bristol-Myers Squibb (BMY) Says It Won't Pursue Accelerated U.S. Regulatory Pathway for Opdivo Plus Yervoy in Lung Cancer
- Apple (AAPL) Sues Qualcomm (QCOM) Over Patent Royalties in Antitrust Case - Bloomberg
Get access to the best calls on Wall Street with StreetInsider.com's Ratings Insider Elite. Get your Free Trial here.
VIENNA (Reuters) - Austria's far-right Freedom Party said on Wednesday it is suing one of the judges who ordered a re-run of the country's presidential election for saying the party started preparing its challenge against the result before the vote took place.
Johannes Schnizer sits on the 14-member Constitutional Court, which found widespread infringements of rules on how postal ballots were counted in the May presidential run-off that Freedom Party candidate Norbert Hofer narrowly lost.
In examining the Freedom Party's challenge in June, the court found no proof of foul play in the ballot count but several cases of election officials cutting corners to ensure votes were processed quickly. The re-run will be held on Dec. 4.
Last month, Schnizer said in interviews with Austrian media that Freedom Party election observers knew their party would challenge the outcome and did not tell election authorities of any infringements they should correct.
"It is a grave accusation. It is false," said Freedom Party lawyer Michael Rami, adding that he was preparing a civil case for slander and a criminal defamation case. The maximum prison sentence on the criminal charge is one year, he said.
The Freedom Party (FPO) issued a statement saying it felt it had no choice but to take legal action.
"We cannot let the accusations made publicly by Mr Schnizer against the FPO and Norbert Hofer stand," it said.
Schnizer's lawyer Michael Pilz said: "I cannot understand why the FPO is reacting in such a sensitive way. If the FPO is of the opinion that it must settle this in court, we will deal with it."
(Reporting by Francois Murphy and Kirsti Knolle Editing by Jeremy Gaunt)
Serious News for Serious Traders! Try StreetInsider.com Premium Free!
You May Also Be Interested In
- Unidentified gunman attacks Turkish police in Istanbul, no casualties: DHA
- Trump backers' disparate hopes coalesce around promise of change
- Far-right leaders meet to discuss 'free Europe' vision
Create E-mail Alert Related CategoriesReuters
Sign up for StreetInsider Free!
Receive full access to all new and archived articles, unlimited portfolio tracking, e-mail alerts, custom newswires and RSS feeds - and more!