Close

Fitch Affirms Fresno, CA's Sewer Revs at 'AA-'; Outlook Stable

October 21, 2016 5:16 PM EDT

SAN FRANCISCO--(BUSINESS WIRE)-- Fitch Ratings has affirmed the following city of Fresno, CA ratings:

--$35.8 million subordinate lien sewer revenue bonds at 'AA-';

--$148.3 million senior lien sewer revenue bonds at 'AA'.

The Rating Outlook is Stable.

SECURITY

The bonds are secured by respective senior and subordinate liens on net revenues of the sewer system, including transfers from the rate stabilization fund and connection fees.

KEY RATING DRIVERS

STRONG FINANCIAL PERFORMANCE: Financial performance has been very strong with debt service coverage and liquidity levels at or above 'AAA' medians, but Fitch expects coverage and liquidity to decline to levels that are more typical for the rating level as the city issues additional debt to fund the expansion of its recycled water system.

AFFORDABLE RATES: The city council implemented the significant rate increases planned at the time of the 2008 bond issue but maintains some rate flexibility due to relatively low sewer rates that have not been raised since 2011.

MODERATE DEBT BURDEN: Debt levels are currently low and will remain below average with $69.1 million of additional borrowing planned over the next five years. This is a shift from the previous capital forecast that had anticipated greater debt funding of future capital needs.

MANAGEABLE CAPITAL NEEDS: The sewer system has significant long-term capital needs due to construction of a recycled water distribution system, but the city has considerable flexibility as to the timing of capital plans and has shown a willingness to delay projects as necessary to maintain financial performance.

REGIONAL SERVICE PROVIDER: The system provides essential retail sewer services to the city of Fresno and wholesale services to nearby communities. The city is the economic hub of the San Joaquin Valley, one of the nation's most productive agricultural regions. Its economy is growing at a healthy pace but suffers from chronically elevated unemployment and low incomes.

RATING SENSITIVITIES

PRESSURED BY ADDITIONAL LEVERAGE: The rating could come under downward pressure if debt service coverage falls below 1.5x for a sustained period due to additional leveraging.

CREDIT PROFILE

The utility provides retail sewer services to California's fifth most populous city with about 520,000 residents. It also provides wholesale treatment services to the more affluent neighboring community of Clovis with a population close to 100,000. Fresno is located about 250 miles north of Los Angeles in the heart of the agricultural San Joaquin Valley. The unemployment rate was 9.5% in August 2016. Median household income is low at 77% of the national level.

STRONG SEWER FINANCIAL PERFORMANCE

The sewer system's financial performance has been strong and is expected to remain very healthy. Senior lien debt service coverage averaged 4.4 times (x) over the three fiscal years ended June 30, 2015, while all-in coverage averaged a strong 2.5x. Unaudited results for 2016 show 4.3x senior coverage and 2.5x all-in coverage.

The enterprise's financial forecast shows all-in coverage decreasing to an average of about 2.0x over the next five years as debt service increases for new state revolving fund loans taken to fund expansion of the city's growing recycled water system. The forecast appears reasonably conservative with revenue gains driven by very gradual growth in the customer base and stable rates over the next four years. Management aims to keep coverage at or above 1.4x and tends to beat its conservative forecasts. While the utility's very stable revenues could support the current rating even with a decline in coverage, the rating could come under downward pressure if coverage approached management's 1.4x target on a sustained basis.

Liquidity grew rapidly in recent years, as the utility prepared for the upcoming major capital projects. Days cash was well above the 'AAA' median at 1,103 days at the end of fiscal 2015. Cash levels will decline as the city uses funds for capital improvements but are expected to remain adequate with at least six months of operating cash on hand across the forecast horizon.

Sewer rates are very low, but rate flexibility appears to be limited. Residential bills are quite affordable at $25.75, or 0.7% of median household income, and the Fresno City Council has raised rates as needed to support investments in the system's capital assets. However, the city is imposing very large water rate increases over the next few years that could make it difficult to raise sewer charges, which are on the same bill. The city does not currently plan to raise sewer rates until 2021 after absorbing large water rate increases.

DEBT TO REMAIN BELOW AVERAGE

The sewer utility's $207.3 million debt burden was low at $882 per customer at the end of fiscal 2015. The utility borrowed $24.7 million in state revolving fund loans in 2016 and plans to borrow another $61.9 million over the next five years. Even with the additional borrowing, debt will remain low at about half of the median projected debt for rated water and sewer enterprises at slightly less than $1,000 per customer in 2020. The utility's $315 million fiscal 2017 to 2021 CIP is driven by the city's need to expand its recycled water distribution system, which will help the city reduce over-reliance on ground water.

Additional information is available at 'www.fitchratings.com'.

In addition to the sources of information identified in Fitch's Revenue-Supported Rating Criteria, this action was additionally informed by information from Lumesis.

Applicable Criteria

Revenue-Supported Rating Criteria (pub. 16 Jun 2014)https://www.fitchratings.com/site/re/750012

U.S. Water and Sewer Revenue Bond Rating Criteria (pub. 03 Sep 2015)https://www.fitchratings.com/site/re/869223

Additional Disclosures

Dodd-Frank Rating Information Disclosure Formhttps://www.fitchratings.com/creditdesk/press_releases/content/ridf_frame.cfm?pr_id=1013548

Solicitation Statushttps://www.fitchratings.com/gws/en/disclosure/solicitation?pr_id=1013548

Endorsement Policyhttps://www.fitchratings.com/regulatory

ALL FITCH CREDIT RATINGS ARE SUBJECT TO CERTAIN LIMITATIONS AND DISCLAIMERS. PLEASE READ THESE LIMITATIONS AND DISCLAIMERS BY FOLLOWING THIS LINK: HTTPS://WWW.FITCHRATINGS.COM/UNDERSTANDINGCREDITRATINGS. IN ADDITION, RATING DEFINITIONS AND THE TERMS OF USE OF SUCH RATINGS ARE AVAILABLE ON THE AGENCY'S PUBLIC WEB SITE AT WWW.FITCHRATINGS.COM. PUBLISHED RATINGS, CRITERIA, AND METHODOLOGIES ARE AVAILABLE FROM THIS SITE AT ALL TIMES. FITCH'S CODE OF CONDUCT, CONFIDENTIALITY, CONFLICTS OF INTEREST, AFFILIATE FIREWALL, COMPLIANCE, AND OTHER RELEVANT POLICIES AND PROCEDURES ARE ALSO AVAILABLE FROM THE CODE OF CONDUCT SECTION OF THIS SITE. FITCH MAY HAVE PROVIDED ANOTHER PERMISSIBLE SERVICE TO THE RATED ENTITY OR ITS RELATED THIRD PARTIES. DETAILS OF THIS SERVICE FOR RATINGS FOR WHICH THE LEAD ANALYST IS BASED IN AN EU-REGISTERED ENTITY CAN BE FOUND ON THE ENTITY SUMMARY PAGE FOR THIS ISSUER ON THE FITCH WEBSITE.

Copyright © 2016 by Fitch Ratings, Inc., Fitch Ratings Ltd. and its subsidiaries. 33 Whitehall Street, NY, NY 10004. Telephone: 1-800-753-4824, (212) 908-0500. Fax: (212) 480-4435. Reproduction or retransmission in whole or in part is prohibited except by permission. All rights reserved. In issuing and maintaining its ratings and in making other reports (including forecast information), Fitch relies on factual information it receives from issuers and underwriters and from other sources Fitch believes to be credible. Fitch conducts a reasonable investigation of the factual information relied upon by it in accordance with its ratings methodology, and obtains reasonable verification of that information from independent sources, to the extent such sources are available for a given security or in a given jurisdiction. The manner of Fitch’s factual investigation and the scope of the third-party verification it obtains will vary depending on the nature of the rated security and its issuer, the requirements and practices in the jurisdiction in which the rated security is offered and sold and/or the issuer is located, the availability and nature of relevant public information, access to the management of the issuer and its advisers, the availability of pre-existing third-party verifications such as audit reports, agreed-upon procedures letters, appraisals, actuarial reports, engineering reports, legal opinions and other reports provided by third parties, the availability of independent and competent third- party verification sources with respect to the particular security or in the particular jurisdiction of the issuer, and a variety of other factors. Users of Fitch’s ratings and reports should understand that neither an enhanced factual investigation nor any third-party verification can ensure that all of the information Fitch relies on in connection with a rating or a report will be accurate and complete. Ultimately, the issuer and its advisers are responsible for the accuracy of the information they provide to Fitch and to the market in offering documents and other reports. In issuing its ratings and its reports, Fitch must rely on the work of experts, including independent auditors with respect to financial statements and attorneys with respect to legal and tax matters. Further, ratings and forecasts of financial and other information are inherently forward-looking and embody assumptions and predictions about future events that by their nature cannot be verified as facts. As a result, despite any verification of current facts, ratings and forecasts can be affected by future events or conditions that were not anticipated at the time a rating or forecast was issued or affirmed.

The information in this report is provided “as is” without any representation or warranty of any kind, and Fitch does not represent or warrant that the report or any of its contents will meet any of the requirements of a recipient of the report. A Fitch rating is an opinion as to the creditworthiness of a security. This opinion and reports made by Fitch are based on established criteria and methodologies that Fitch is continuously evaluating and updating. Therefore, ratings and reports are the collective work product of Fitch and no individual, or group of individuals, is solely responsible for a rating or a report. The rating does not address the risk of loss due to risks other than credit risk, unless such risk is specifically mentioned. Fitch is not engaged in the offer or sale of any security. All Fitch reports have shared authorship. Individuals identified in a Fitch report were involved in, but are not solely responsible for, the opinions stated therein. The individuals are named for contact purposes only. A report providing a Fitch rating is neither a prospectus nor a substitute for the information assembled, verified and presented to investors by the issuer and its agents in connection with the sale of the securities. Ratings may be changed or withdrawn at any time for any reason in the sole discretion of Fitch. Fitch does not provide investment advice of any sort. Ratings are not a recommendation to buy, sell, or hold any security. Ratings do not comment on the adequacy of market price, the suitability of any security for a particular investor, or the tax-exempt nature or taxability of payments made in respect to any security. Fitch receives fees from issuers, insurers, guarantors, other obligors, and underwriters for rating securities. Such fees generally vary from US$1,000 to US$750,000 (or the applicable currency equivalent) per issue. In certain cases, Fitch will rate all or a number of issues issued by a particular issuer, or insured or guaranteed by a particular insurer or guarantor, for a single annual fee. Such fees are expected to vary from US$10,000 to US$1,500,000 (or the applicable currency equivalent). The assignment, publication, or dissemination of a rating by Fitch shall not constitute a consent by Fitch to use its name as an expert in connection with any registration statement filed under the United States securities laws, the Financial Services and Markets Act of 2000 of the United Kingdom, or the securities laws of any particular jurisdiction. Due to the relative efficiency of electronic publishing and distribution, Fitch research may be available to electronic subscribers up to three days earlier than to print subscribers.

For Australia, New Zealand, Taiwan and South Korea only: Fitch Australia Pty Ltd holds an Australian financial services license (AFS license no. 337123) which authorizes it to provide credit ratings to wholesale clients only. Credit ratings information published by Fitch is not intended to be used by persons who are retail clients within the meaning of the Corporations Act 2001

Fitch Ratings
Primary Analyst
Andrew Ward, +1-415-732-5617
Director
Fitch Ratings, Inc.
650 California Street
San Francisco, CA 94103
or
Secondary Analyst
Karen Ribble, +1-415-732-5611
Senior Director
or
Committee Chairperson
Kathryn Masterson, +1-512-215-3730
Senior Director
or
Media Relations, New York
Elizabeth Fogerty, +1-212-908-0526
[email protected]

Source: Fitch Ratings



Serious News for Serious Traders! Try StreetInsider.com Premium Free!

You May Also Be Interested In





Related Categories

Press Releases

Related Entities

Fitch Ratings