Republic Airways (RJET) 4-Yr Pilot Contract Rejected by IBT Local 357

April 4, 2014 1:26 PM EDT

Republic Airways Holdings (NASDAQ: RJET) announced today that members of the International Brotherhood of Teamsters (IBT) Local 357 failed to ratify a proposed four-year pilot labor agreement.

IBT Local 357 represents more than 2,200 pilots for Republic’s sister companies Chautauqua Airlines, Republic Airlines and Shuttle America.

“We are extremely disappointed that the union’s membership failed to ratify the tentative agreement that was reached in mid-February. At a time when other regional airlines have been negotiating concessionary agreements for their pilots, we were able to reach an industry-leading contract that significantly improved pay and work rules for our pilots to vote upon,” said Republic Airways Executive Vice President and Chief Operating Officer Wayne Heller. “Despite the outcome of this vote, Republic remains committed to providing the safest, most reliable flight service for our legacy airline partners.”

The proposed contract included increases in pay that would have placed Republic pilots at or near the top of its regional airline peers. It also included improvements in quality of life enhancements and more flexibility in scheduling, as well as a significant signing bonus if it had been ratified.

Republic Airways Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer Bryan Bedford said, “I am disappointed with the results of today’s IBT Pilot vote as I believe that the Tentative Agreement we reached with the IBT was in the best interest of our Pilots and an important step forward for our Company. We will work with the IBT to determine our next steps.”

Serious News for Serious Traders! Try Premium Free!

You May Also Be Interested In

Related Categories

Corporate News, Management Comments


Pay Increases
Pilot on 2014-04-04 15:51:47
Mark as Spam | Reply to this comment

I am a Republic pilot. I fail to see how this TA was industry leading or much less a pay raise. We are working on 2007 pay rates. My pay rate on the TA was to the penny the exact same as our current amendable pay rate.

How can one claim I would be getting a pay increase when I wouldn't get one penny more per hour???

Significant signing bonus? It was penny's compared to the signing bonus we received in 2003.

With No raise since 2007, No raise on the proposed pay rates, No "sigificant" signing bonus to make up for no raise, managment shouldn't be surprised that this failed and by a huge margin.

Thats just pay. They haven't even started talking about the concessions this TA would have given us in terms of Quality of Life.

Add Your Comment